1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \shorttitle{SN 2006aj and low-luminosity GRBs}
4: \shortauthors{Cobb et al.}
5:
6: \begin{document}
7:
8: \title{SN 2006aj and the nature of low-luminosity gamma-ray bursts
9: }
10:
11: \author{B.~E. Cobb\altaffilmark{1}, C.~D. Bailyn\altaffilmark{1}, P.~G. van Dokkum\altaffilmark{1}, and
12: P. Natarajan\altaffilmark{1}}
13: \email{cobb@astro.yale.edu}
14:
15: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Astronomy, Yale University, P.O. Box 208101, New Haven, CT 06520}
16:
17: \begin{abstract}
18: We present SMARTS consortium optical/IR light curves of SN 2006aj associated with GRB 060218. We find that this event is
19: broadly similar to two previously observed events SN 1998bw/GRB 980425 and SN 2003lw/GRB 031203. In
20: particular, all of these events are greatly under-luminous in gamma-rays compared
21: to typical long-duration GRBs. We find that the observation by \textit{Swift}
22: of even one such event implies a large enough true event rate to create difficulties
23: in interpreting these events as typical GRBs observed off-axis. Thus these
24: events appear to be intrinsically different from and much more common than high-luminosity
25: GRBs, which have been observed in large numbers out to a redshift
26: of at least 6.3.
27: The existence of a range of intrinsic energies of GRBs may present challenges
28: to using GRBs as standard candles.
29: \end{abstract}
30:
31: \keywords{gamma rays: bursts --- supernovae: general --- supernovae: individual (SN 2006aj)}
32:
33: \section{Introduction}
34: While some long-duration gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are clearly associated with supernovae (SNe),
35: a deeper understanding of the GRB/SN connection remains elusive. The GRB/SN link
36: was first confirmed observationally with the detection of the
37: low-reshift GRB 980425/SN 1998bw ($z=0.0085$) \citep{Galama+98}.
38: GRB 980425, however, was not a typical GRB; it was
39: under-luminous in gamma-rays and had no detected optical afterglow (OAG).
40: SNe were later associated with typical GRBs at cosmological redshifts \citep[e.g.][]{Bloom+99,DellaValle+03}.
41: However, another low gamma-ray luminosity event similar to GRB 980425/SN 1998bw was not observed until GRB 031203.
42: This burst was also orders of magnitude under-energetic and, despite its low redshift ($z=0.1055$) \citep{Prochaska+04},
43: was followed by only a dim OAG \citep{Malesani+04}.
44: Follow-up observations of this burst detected a SN-like brightening \citep{Cobb+04,Gal-Yam+04,Thomsen+04}
45: and SN 2003lw was confirmed spectroscopically by \cite{Tagliaferri+04}.
46: The spectra of SN 2003lw were reminiscent of those of SN 1998bw \citep{Malesani+04}. The
47: The two SN also had similiar peak magnitudes, although SN 2003lw was somewhat brighter
48: and evolved more slowly. Their light curve shapes were also qualitatively
49: different, with SN 1998bw climbing smoothly to peak while SN 2003lw experienced
50: a broad plateau.
51:
52: The low gamma-ray luminosity of GRB 980425 and 031203 suggested that they might represent a new GRB category.
53: Alternatively, they could be normal GRBs that appear under-luminous because their
54: jetted emission is observed off-axis \citep[e.g.][]{YYN03,Ramirez+05}.
55: A comparison of the event rate of low- to typical-luminosity GRBs was warranted
56: but only a small and inhomogeneous sample of
57: well-localized GRBs existed before \textit{Swift}, as pre-\textit{Swift} GRBs were detected
58: using multiple instruments, each with unique sensitivity and sky coverage.
59: \textit{Swift} provides a large and homogeneous GRB sample that is well-suited for rate calculations.
60:
61: On 2006 February 18 at 03:34:30 UT \textit{Swift} detected a new low-luminosity event: GRB 060218 \citep{Cusumano+06}.
62: This was an unusual GRB with weak gamma-ray emission lasting over 2000 seconds
63: \citep{Barthelmy+06}. This burst was followed by an unusual OAG
64: that brightened for 10 hours before decaying like a typical OAG \citep[e.g.][]{Marshall+06}.
65: This was the first \textit{Swift} GRB to be associated with a SN: SN 2006aj.
66: The SN was initially noted in spectral observations \citep{Masetti+06}
67: and then detected as an optical re-brightening \citep[e.g.][etc.]{D'Avanzo+06,Ovaldsen+06}.
68: At $z=0.033$, GRB 060218 is now the second closest GRB with a measured redshift \citep{MH06}.
69: This is the third example of a GRB-related SN
70: in which the gamma-rays are highly under-luminous and
71: the SN light curve is clearly distinct from the GRB's OAG.
72: Hereafter, we will refer to these Long-duration, Low-Luminosity events as L$_3$--GRBs.
73:
74: SMARTS observations of SN 2006aj began on 2006 Feb 22 at 00:35 UT \citep{CB06}. We present optical/IR
75: data obtained between 5 and 30 days following GRB 060218.
76: Our homogeneous data demonstrate that the light curve of SN 2006aj is
77: qualitatively similar to that of the pre-\textit{Swift} L$_3$-GRB SNe 1998bw/2003lw.
78: We argue in \S\,4 that the detection of this
79: single event in the \textit{Swift} era already places strong constraints on
80: the nature of L$_3$-GRBs.
81:
82: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
83: Our data was obtained using the ANDICAM
84: instrument mounted on the 1.3m telescope at Cerro Tololo Inter-American
85: Observatory.\footnote{http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/ANDICAM}
86: This telescope is operated as part of the Small and Moderate Aperture Research
87: Telescope System (SMARTS) consortium.\footnote{http://www.astro.yale.edu/smarts}
88: Nightly imaging was obtained over 26 days with occasional interruptions
89: for weather and equipment problems.
90: The GRB/SN was only observable for a limited period of time immediately after twilight ($\lesssim1$hr).
91: Consequently, all observations were obtained at high airmass ($\sec{(z)}\gtrsim 2$).
92:
93: Each nightly data set consisted of 6 individual 360-second I-band observations
94: obtained simultaneously with 30 dithered 60-second J-band images. The data were reduced
95: in the same way as in \cite{Cobb+04}. A few additional steps were added, including
96: cosmic ray removal in the I-band images using the L.A.
97: Cosmic program\footnote{http://www.astro.yale.edu/dokkum/lacosmic/} \citep{vanDokkum01}
98: and I-band fringe correction using an iterative masking technique.
99: Some images were not included in the final frames because of
100: excessive background due to twilight or because of telescope
101: drift. Typically, the
102: final frames were equivalent to 30 minutes of I/J-band
103: exposure time.
104:
105: The relative magnitude of the SN + host galaxy was determined by comparison with 11 (3) on-chip, non-variable
106: objects in I (J) using seeing matched aperture photometry. Differential magnitudes were converted to apparent
107: magnitudes by comparison, on photometric nights, with Landolt
108: standard stars in the fields of RU149 and PG1047 \citep{Landolt92} for the I-band
109: images, and with 3 on-chip 2MASS stars \citep{Skrutskie+06} for the J-band images.
110: The difference in airmass value between the Landolt standard frames and science frames
111: was corrected for using an extinction coefficient of 0.066 magnitudes per airmass.
112:
113: The light curves are shown in Figure 1 and the photometric data are summarized in Table 1.
114: The error bars represent the photometric measurement error, which accurately reflects nightly
115: variations in image quality but does not account for systematic measurement errors.
116: In addition to the relative night-to-night uncertainty, there is a systematic
117: error of 0.05 magnitudes in I and J resulting from uncertainties in
118: the photometric calibration.
119:
120: \section{Results}
121: Figure 1 shows that GRB 060218's optical and IR counterpart brightened for the first two weeks and then
122: proceeded to gradually decay. This behavior is not consistent with that of a standard GRB OAG \citep[e.g.][]{Tagliaferri+05}
123: but is reminiscent of the low redshift events SNe 1998bw/2003lw. Identification of this
124: optical emission as a SN is possible from our data alone due to our dense observations and
125: the object's particular transient behavior; spectral evidence obtained by
126: other groups clearly supports our claim \citep{Modjaz+06,Sollerman+06,Mirabal+06}.
127: The well-sampled nature of our observations
128: allows us to determine an unambiguous time of peak brightness in I and J.
129: This parameter will be important for determining the
130: amount of mass ejected in the supernova explosion, thought this modeling
131: is beyond the scope of this paper.
132: The position of peak brightness was determined by fitting second order cubic
133: splines to the data points, with errors derived from the formal chi-squared error on
134: the fits in combination with the error on the measured magnitudes.
135: The combination of the host galaxy and
136: SN reaches a peak apparent magnitude in I of $16.91\pm0.05$ mag after $13.1_{-1.9}^{+2.1}$ days
137: and in J of $16.65\pm0.06$ mag after $17.6_{-3.2}^{+3.5}$ days.
138: The rest-frame time to peak is, therefore, approximately 12.7 days in I and 17.0 days in J.
139:
140: The Galactic extinction correction along the line of sight to the host galaxy
141: is taken to be $A_I=0.23$ mag and $A_J=0.11$ mag, assuming the Galactic extinction curves of \cite{CCM89}
142: and a measured reddening value of E(B-V)=0.127 mag \citep{Guenther+06}.
143: The pre-burst SDSS model magnitude of
144: the host galaxy is $i=19.805\pm0.041$ mag, not corrected for Galactic extinction \citep{Adelman+06}.
145: Using the transformation equations derived by \cite{Lupton05}, this corresponds to
146: $I=19.368\pm0.047$ mag.
147: The peak absolute magnitude of the supernova is, therefore, $M_I=-19.02\pm0.09$ mag.
148: No k-correction has been applied, but this should result in minimal error due
149: to the low redshift of the burst. A correction of -0.04 magnitudes was applied to account for
150: spectral stretching.
151: The exact pre-burst J magnitude of the host is unknown as the host galaxy is too dim
152: to appear in the 2MASS catalog. Our observations indicate the host galaxy must have a J magnitude
153: $>18$. Assuming a range of host magnitudes from
154: 18 mag to 20 mag, the peak absolute magnitude of the supernova in J is approximately
155: $M_J =-19.1\pm0.2$ mag.
156:
157: Note that 2006aj clearly
158: peaks later in J than in I. This later peak at redder wavelengths
159: follows the trend seen in SN 1998bw, which, in the rest-frame, peaked 1.6 days earlier in V than in I.
160: The rest-frame V-band peak of SN 2006aj occurred at approximately 9.7 days \citep{Modjaz+06},
161: which is 2.9 days prior to the I-band peak. Likewise,
162: SN 2003lw peaked in V at ~$\sim18$ days \citep{Malesani+04} and in I at $\sim23$ days \citep{Cobb+04,Malesani+04}.
163: The combined light of the galaxy and the SN reddens from I-J = 0.0 mag during the first week to I-J = 0.6 mag
164: for the last few observations.
165: This is a stronger evolution in I-J color than experienced by
166: either SN 1998bw or SN 2003lw, whose I-J colors in the
167: first month only change by about 0.3 magnitudes \citep{Gal-Yam+04}. This comparison
168: is complicated, however, by the unknown intrinsic I-J color of the host galaxy
169: of SN 2006aj.
170:
171: \section{Discussion}
172: Our data, together with those of \cite{Modjaz+06}, \cite{Sollerman+06} and \cite{Mirabal+06},
173: show that GRB 060218 is the third detected GRB to be followed by a dominant SN.
174: With such a small sample being used to extrapolate the characteristics
175: for an entire category, it is important to collect
176: homogeneous and detailed observations over a wide range of wavelengths.
177: Our data provides dense IR coverage, which
178: extends the total SN 2006aj dataset out to redder bands than reported thus far.
179: It is instructive to compare all three cases in
180: which L$_3$--GRBs have been detected, each
181: of which was followed by a Type Ic SN: 1998bw, 2003lw and 2006aj (see Figure 2).
182: We note that the limit on observing L$_3$--GRB events are more
183: stringent than those on observing the associated SNe,
184: so it is unlikely that GRBs for which no optical
185: counterpart are observed are of this character.
186: The properties of these three events are shown in Table 2.
187: All three SNe are very similar in peak brightness, though 2003lw may
188: be half a magnitude brighter than the others.
189: The biggest difference
190: between the bursts is their rise times, with 2006aj peaking the fastest
191: and 2003lw taking the longest time to peak.
192: The rest-frame photon energy at which the GRB spectrum peaks ($E_{p,i}$) appears to increase
193: with increasing SN rise time.
194:
195: As discussed in the introduction, it would be instructive to compare
196: the frequency of these L$_3$ bursts with that of high-luminosity bursts
197: using the homogeneous \textit{Swift} dataset. Such a comparison
198: is now possible since GRB 060218 is the first \textit{Swift}-detected burst that falls
199: in the category of low-luminosity GRBs associated with Type Ic SNe.
200: The low observed fluxes and redshifts of L$_3$--GRBs suggest
201: that the underlying rate of L$_3$--GRB events may be quite high \citep[see also][]{Pian+06,Soderberg+04}, since the
202: volume in which these sources can be observed is much smaller
203: than that of typical GRBs. The ratio of the event rate of
204: L$_3$--GRBs to ordinary long-duration GRBs is expected to be
205: \[\frac{R_{int,~L_3}}{R_{int,~GRB}} = \frac{R_{obs,~L_3}}{R_{obs,~GRB}} \times \left(\frac{D_{c,~GRB}}{D_{c,~L_3}}\right)^3\]
206: where $R_{int}$ denotes the true rate per comoving volume of the
207: two kinds of events, $R_{obs}$ is the observed event rate seen by
208: a given experiment, and $D_c$ is the comoving radial distance out to which the events could
209: be observed by that experiment. In the case of \textit{Swift}, the
210: limiting volume in which L$_3$--GRBs are observable is so small that the
211: observation of even one of these events implies an extremely high
212: ratio of true rates.
213:
214: Specifically, GRB 060218 would not have triggered the BAT event
215: monitor if it had been $\sim2$ times fainter, which corresponds to a
216: maximum redshift of $z=0.046$. By contrast, the 31 high-luminosity, long-duration \textit{Swift} GRBs
217: that have measured redshifts have an average redshift of $z=2.6$.
218: Many of these bursts would have been detected even
219: if they had occurred at $z\gtrsim6$.
220: We will take a conservative approach, however, and assume that most of these bursts would not have been
221: detected had they been at extreme redshifts and adopt $z=2.6$
222: as the redshift below which the high-luminosity GRB samples are complete.
223: Assuming the concordance cosmology
224: of $\Omega_\Lambda = 0.73$, $\Omega_M = 0.27$ and a Hubble constant of
225: 71 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, the ratio of the comoving radial distance cubed for these two events is $3.1 \times 10^4$.
226: Assuming that the
227: ratio of rates is equal to the number of long-duration GRB events observed to date
228: (1 L$_3$--GRB per about 100 GRBs), we find a true event ratio of $3\times10^2$.
229: In the near future, thanks to \textit{Swift}, the cosmological GRB
230: sample may be complete out to at least a redshift of $z\sim5$. For this volume,
231: the true event ratio increases by a factor of $\sim2$.
232: If the current highest GRB redshift measurement, $z=6.3$, is representative of
233: the redshift out to which we have a complete sample, then the
234: true event ratio is $\sim10^3$. We also note that we are assuming a constant
235: GRB rate per unit time. If, instead, the rate scales with the star
236: formation rate \citep[e.g.][]{Natarajan+05}, then the relevant ratio would be higher still.
237:
238: These event ratios provide a constraint on the
239: origins of L$_3$--GRBs. One explanation of these
240: events is that they are standard GRBs observed off-axis
241: \citep[e.g.][]{YYN03,Ramirez+05}. This is an attractive option as it
242: accounts for all long-duration GRBs using a ``unified model'',
243: with observed differences attributed only to viewing angle.
244: However, this scenario implies a maximum true
245: rate ratio, which would be generated if the L$_3$--GRBs could
246: be observed from any angle. This upper limit is
247: $2\pi / \theta_j^2$, where $\theta_j^2$ is the jet opening solid angle of
248: a typical GRB (in steradians). Jet breaks observed in
249: X-ray/optical AG light curves constrain the jet opening angle to $\sim 10^\circ$ \citep[e.g.][]{Frail+01},
250: so we infer a maximum true rate ratio of 65 in this model. This ratio
251: is a factor of five lower than the ratio of $3\times10^2$, which
252: we inferred for $z=2.6$, and lower by $\sim20$ than
253: for $z=6.3$.
254:
255: Since \textit{Swift} has observed only one L$_3$--GRB,
256: the underlying event rate remains uncertain; GRB 060128/SN 2006aj could
257: have been a serendipitous event. From Poisson statistics, the 90\% lower confidence limit of
258: the true event rate is an order of magnitude lower
259: than assumed above, which implies that the off-axis scenario is still acceptable,
260: provided one assumes a limit of $z=2.6$ and a constant GRB rate.
261: If \textit{Swift} detected a second L$_3$--GRB, the off-axis scenario would
262: become significantly less probable. Such a Poissonian analysis addresses
263: the question ``given an event rate, what is the probability of seeing
264: an event'', whereas in this case one might more appropriately
265: ask the Bayesian question ``having seen an event, what
266: is the probability of a given event rate''. Assuming
267: a uniform prior on the distribution of event rates (an assumption for which there
268: is no real basis), we find that the off-axis scenario is implausible
269: at the 98\% level. Of course, the undetermined luminosity function of GRBs could
270: complicate this calculation, as could cosmic evolution of the GRB
271: source population.
272:
273: At face value, however, the above calculation of the event rate
274: suggests that there is a category of GRB events that is intrinsically
275: different from that of typical GRBs.
276: Several suggestions have been made
277: for how these differences can be accounted for including
278: the possibility that the gamma-rays are produced in
279: supernova shock breakout \citep{MM99,TMM01}
280: or ``failed collapsars'' in which highly relativistic
281: jets fail to develop due to baryon loading \citep{WM99}.
282: The orientation-corrected energies of GRBs have been claimed
283: to be constant at $\sim10^{51}$ ergs \citep{Frail+01}. However,
284: if intrinsically low-energy GRBs exist as a separate
285: population, efforts
286: to use GRBs as standard candles \cite[e.g.][]{Lazzati+06,Ghirlanda+04} may be compromised.
287:
288: \acknowledgments
289: We thank SMARTS observers D. Gonzalez and J. Espinoza for their dedication
290: and S. Tourtellotte for assistance with
291: optical data reduction. We greatly appreciate discussions
292: with A. Cantrell and J. Emerson. This work is supported by NSF
293: Graduate Fellowship DGE0202738 to BEC and NSF/AST grant 0407063 and \textit{Swift}
294: grant NNG05GM63G to CDB.
295:
296: \begin{thebibliography}{}
297: \bibitem[Adelman-McCarthy et al.(2006)]{Adelman+06} Adelman-McCarthy, J.~K. et al.\ 2006, \apj, in press
298: \bibitem[Amati(2006)]{Amati06} Amati, L.\ 2006, (astro-ph/0601553)
299: \bibitem[Amati et al.(2006)]{Amati+06} Amati, L. et al.\ 2006, GRB Circular Network, 4846
300: \bibitem[Barthelmy et al.(2006)]{Barthelmy+06} Barthelmy, S. et al. \ 2006, GRB Circular Network, 4806
301: \bibitem[Bloom et al.(1999)]{Bloom+99} Bloom, J.~S., et al.\ 1999, \nat, 401, 453
302: \bibitem[Cardelli, Clayton, \& Mathis(1989)]{CCM89} Cardelli, J.~A., Clayton, G.~C., \& Mathis, J.~S.\ 1989, \apj, 345, 245
303: \bibitem[Cobb et al.(2004)]{Cobb+04} Cobb, B.~E. et al.\ 2004, \apjl, 608, L93
304: \bibitem[Cobb \& Bailyn(2006)]{CB06} Cobb, B.~E., Bailyn, C.~D.\ 2006, GRB Circular Network, 4837
305: \bibitem[Cusumano et al.(2006)]{Cusumano+06} Cusumano, G. et al. \ 2006, GRB Circular Network, 4775
306: \bibitem[D'Avanzo et al.(2006)]{D'Avanzo+06} D'Avanzo, P. et al. \ 2006, GRB Circular Network, 4810
307: \bibitem[Della Valle et al.(2003)]{DellaValle+03} Della Valle, M., et al.\ 2003, \aap, 406, L33
308: \bibitem[Frail et al.(2001)]{Frail+01} Frail, D.~A., et al.\ 2001, \apjl, 562, L55
309: \bibitem[Galama et al.(1998)]{Galama+98} Galama, T.~J., et al.\ 1998, \nat, 395, 670
310: \bibitem[Gal-Yam et al.(2004)]{Gal-Yam+04} Gal-Yam, A., et al.\ 2004, \apjl, 609, L59
311: \bibitem[Ghirlanda et al.(2004)]{Ghirlanda+04} Ghirlanda, G., et al.\ 2004, \apjl, 613, L13
312: \bibitem[Guenther et al.(2006)]{Guenther+06} Guenther, E.~W. et al.\ 2006, GRB Circular Network, 4863
313: \bibitem[Landolt(1992)]{Landolt92} Landolt, A.~U.\ 1992, \aj, 104, 340
314: \bibitem[Lupton(2005)]{Lupton05} Lupton, R.\ 2005, http://www.sdss.org/dr4/
315: \bibitem[Lazzati et al.(2006)]{Lazzati+06} Lazzati, D. et al.\ 2006, (astro-ph/0602216)
316: \bibitem[Malesani et al.(2004)]{Malesani+04} Malesani, D., et al.\ 2004, \apjl, 609, L5
317: \bibitem[Marshall et al.(2006)]{Marshall+06} Marshall, F., et al.\ 2006, GRB Circular Network, 4800
318: \bibitem[Masetti et al.(2006)]{Masetti+06} Masetti, N. et al. \ 2006, GRB Circular Network, 4803
319: \bibitem[Matzner \& McKee(1999)]{MM99} Matzner, C.~D., \& McKee, C.~F.\ 1999, \apj, 510, 379
320: \bibitem[Mirabal et al.(2006)]{Mirabal+06} Mirabal, N. et al. \ 2006, (astro-ph/0603686)
321: \bibitem[Mirabal \& Halpern(2006)]{MH06} Mirabal, N.,~\& Halpern, J.~P. \ 2006, GRB Circular Network, 4792
322: \bibitem[Modjaz et al.(2006)]{Modjaz+06} Modjaz, M. et al.\ 2006, (astro-ph/0603377)
323: \bibitem[Natarajan et al.(2005)]{Natarajan+05} Natarajan, P. et al. \ 2005, \mnras, 364, L8
324: \bibitem[Ovaldsen et al.(2006)]{Ovaldsen+06} Ovaldsen, J. et al.\ 2006, GRB Circular Network, 4816
325: \bibitem[Patat et al.(2001)]{Patat+01} Patat, F., et al.\ 2001, \apj, 555, 900
326: \bibitem[Pian et al.(2000)]{Pian+00} Pian, E., et al.\ 2000, \apj, 536, 778
327: \bibitem[Pian et al.(2006)]{Pian+06} Pian, E., et al.\ 2006, (astro-ph/0603530)
328: \bibitem[Prochaska et al.(2004)]{Prochaska+04} Prochaska, J.~X., et al.\ 2004, \apj, 611, 200
329: \bibitem[Ramirez-Ruiz et al.(2005)]{Ramirez+05} Ramirez-Ruiz, E. et al.\ 2005 \apjl, 625, L91
330: \bibitem[Sakamoto et al.(2006)]{Sakamoto+06} Sakamoto, T. et al.\ 2006, GRB Circular Network, 4822
331: \bibitem[Sazonov et al.(2004)]{SLS04} Sazonov, S.~Y., Lutovinov, A.~A., \& Sunyaev, R.~A.\ 2004, \nat, 430, 646
332: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(2006)]{Skrutskie+06} Skrutskie, M.~F., et al.\ 2006, \aj, 131, 1163
333: \bibitem[Sollerman et al.(2006)]{Sollerman+06} Sollerman, J. et al.\ 2006, (astro-ph/0603495)
334: \bibitem[Soderberg et al.(2004)]{Soderberg+04} Soderberg, A.~M., et al.\ 2004, \nat, 430, 648
335: \bibitem[Stanek et al.(2003)]{Stanek+03} Stanek, K.~Z., et al.\ 2003, \apjl, 591, L17
336: \bibitem[Tagliaferri et al.(2004)]{Tagliaferri+04} Tagliaferri, G., et al. \ 2004, GRB Circular Network, 2545
337: \bibitem[Tagliaferri et al.(2005)]{Tagliaferri+05} Tagliaferri, G., et al.\ 2005, \aap, 443, L1
338: \bibitem[Tan et al.(2001)]{TMM01} Tan, J.~C., Matzner, C.~D., \& McKee, C.~F.\ 2001, \apj, 551, 946
339: \bibitem[Thomsen et al.(2004)]{Thomsen+04} Thomsen, B., et al.\ 2004, \aap, 419, L21
340: \bibitem[van Dokkum(2001)]{vanDokkum01} van Dokkum, P.~G.\ 2001, \pasp, 113, 1420
341: \bibitem[Woosley \& MacFadyen(1999)]{WM99} Woosley, S.~E., \& MacFadyen, A.~I.\ 1999, \aaps, 138, 499
342: \bibitem[Yamazaki et al.(2003)]{YYN03} Yamazaki, R., Yonetoku, D., \& Nakamura, T.\ 2003, \apjl, 594, L79
343: \end{thebibliography}
344:
345: \clearpage
346: \begin{deluxetable}{rrrr}
347: \tablecolumns{3}
348: \tablewidth{0pc}
349: \tablecaption{Photometry of SN 2006aj in the Host Galaxy of GRB 060218}
350: \tablehead{
351: \colhead{Days after GRB\tablenotemark{a}} & \colhead{I magnitude\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{J magnitude\tablenotemark{b}}}
352: \startdata
353: 4.88 & $17.51\pm0.01$ & $17.26\pm0.03$ \\
354: 5.87 & $17.34\pm0.01$ & $17.20\pm0.03$ \\
355: 6.87 & $17.22\pm0.01$ & $17.08\pm0.03$ \\
356: \enddata
357: \tablenotetext{a}{Days after burst trigger at 2006 Feb 18, 03:34:30 UT.}
358: \tablenotetext{b}{These values have not been corrected for Galactic extinction.
359: There is an additional uncertainty of 0.05 mag in the
360: transformation of relative to apparent magnitudes.}
361: \tablecomments{The complete version of this table is in the electronic edition of
362: the Journal. The printed edition contains only a sample.}
363: \end{deluxetable}
364:
365: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
366: \tablecolumns{4}
367: \tablewidth{0pc}
368: \tablecaption{GRB/SN Properties}
369: \tablehead{\colhead{} &
370: \multicolumn{1}{c}{GRB 980425} &
371: \multicolumn{1}{c}{GRB 031203} &
372: \multicolumn{1}{c}{GRB 060218} &
373: \colhead{} \\
374: \colhead{} &
375: \colhead{SN 1998bw} &
376: \colhead{SN 2003lw} &
377: \colhead{SN 2006aj} }
378: \startdata
379: redshift & 0.0085 & 0.1055 & 0.033 \\
380: fluence ($10^{-6}$ erg cm$^{-1}$) & $2.8\pm0.5$\tablenotemark{a} & $2.0\pm0.4$\tablenotemark{b} & $6.8\pm0.4$\tablenotemark{c} \\
381: total duration (s) & $\sim40$ & $\sim40$ & $>2000$ \\
382: $E_{p,i}$ (keV) & $55\pm15$\tablenotemark{d} & $158\pm51$\tablenotemark{d} & $<10$\tablenotemark{e} \\
383: $E_{iso}$ ($1\times10^{50}$ erg)\tablenotemark{f} & $0.010\pm0.002$\tablenotemark{d} & $1.0\pm0.4$\tablenotemark{d} & $0.65\pm0.15$\tablenotemark{e}\\
384: I-band T$_{peak}$ (days)\tablenotemark{g} & $17.7\pm0.3$\tablenotemark{h} & $18 - 28$\tablenotemark{i} & $12.7_{-1.8}^{+2.0}$ \\
385: peak $M_I$ (mag) & $-19.27\pm0.05$\tablenotemark{h} & $-19.0$ to $-19.7$\tablenotemark{i} & $-19.02\pm0.09$ \\
386: I-J SN color, $\sim$T$_{peak,~I}$ & 0.5\tablenotemark{l} & $\sim0.4$\tablenotemark{i} & $\sim0.0$\tablenotemark{m} \\
387: \enddata
388: \tablenotetext{a}{(40 - 700 keV) \cite{Pian+00}}
389: \tablenotetext{b}{(20 - 200 keV) \cite{SLS04}}
390: \tablenotetext{c}{(15 - 150 keV) \cite{Sakamoto+06}}
391: \tablenotetext{d}{\cite{Amati06}}
392: \tablenotetext{e}{\cite{Amati+06}}
393: \tablenotetext{f}{rest-frame 1 - 10,000 keV, assuming $H_0=70$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_\Lambda=0.7$, $\Omega_M=0.3$}
394: \tablenotetext{g}{in the rest-frame}
395: \tablenotetext{h}{\cite{Galama+98}}
396: \tablenotetext{i}{exact value depends strongly on extinction assumptions, \cite{Cobb+04,Gal-Yam+04,Malesani+04,Thomsen+04}}
397: \tablenotetext{l}{at $\sim22$ days post-burst, \cite{Patat+01}}
398: \tablenotetext{m}{assuming a J-band host magnitude of 19}
399: \end{deluxetable}
400:
401: \begin{figure}
402: \includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{f1.eps}
403: \caption{\textit{Top panel:} The I-band (\textit{circles}) and J-band (\textit{squares})
404: aperture photometry light curve of the host+SN of GRB 060218. Values have been
405: corrected for a Galactic foreground extinction of $A_V$=0.39 mag. For clarity,
406: the I-band points have been shifted by +0.1 magnitudes. Error bars are photometric
407: measurement errors and do not include possible systematic effects.
408: The curves are fit with second order cubic splines.
409: \textit{Bottom panel:} I-J color evolution, the combined light is observed to redden with time.}
410: \end{figure}
411:
412: \begin{figure}
413: \includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{f2.eps}
414: \caption{Absolute magnitude light curves of SN 1998bw (\textit{circles}),
415: SN 2003lw (\textit{sqaures}) and SN 2006aj (\textit{triangles}) in
416: I (\textit{top panel}) and J (\textit{bottom panel}). The SN 2003lw
417: data has been binned in intervals of 5 days.
418: The apparent J-band host
419: galaxy magnitude of SN 2006aj is assumed to be 19 mag. SN 2003lw
420: may be shifted by $\sim-0.5$ magnitudes if a stronger line-of-sight
421: extinction is assumed.}
422: \end{figure}
423:
424:
425:
426: \end{document}
427: ~
428: