1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%  TWO SUNS IN THE SKY  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% LEVEL 2 DRAFT %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

6: 

7: \newcommand\arcpt{${{\lower3pt\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$}}\atop{\raise4pt\hbox{.}}}$}

8: \newcommand\msun{$M_\odot$}

9: \newcommand\mjup{$M_{Jup}$}

10: \newcommand\sdeg{$^\circ$}

11: 

12: %\received{}

13: %\accepted{}

14: %\journalid{}{}

15: %\articleid{}{}

16: 

17: \slugcomment{to appear in the {\it Astrophysical Journal}}

18: 

19: \shorttitle{Two Suns in The Sky}

20: \shortauthors{Raghavan et al.}

21: 

22: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

23: 

24: \begin{document}

25: 

26: \title{Two Suns in The Sky: \\ Stellar Multiplicity in Exoplanet

27: Systems}

28: 

29: \author{Deepak Raghavan, Todd J. Henry}

30: 

31: \affil{Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302-4106}

32: 

33: \author{Brian D. Mason}

34: 

35: \affil{US Naval Observatory, 3450 Massachusetts Avenue NW, 

36: Washington DC 20392-5420}

37: 

38: \author{John P. Subasavage, Wei-Chun Jao, Thom D. Beaulieu}

39: 

40: \affil{Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302-4106}

41: 

42: \author{Nigel C. Hambly}

43: 

44: \affil{Institute for Astronomy, School of Physics, University of Edinburgh, 

45: Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, Scotland, UK}

46: 

47: \email{raghavan@chara.gsu.edu}

48: 

49: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

50: \begin{abstract}

51: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

52: 

53: We present results of a reconnaissance for stellar companions to all

54: 131 radial-velocity-detected candidate extrasolar planetary systems

55: known as of July 1, 2005.  Common proper motion companions were

56: investigated using the multi-epoch STScI Digitized Sky Surveys, and

57: confirmed by matching the trigonometric parallax distances of the

58: primaries to companion distances estimated photometrically.  We also

59: attempt to confirm or refute companions listed in the Washington

60: Double Star Catalog, the Catalogs of Nearby Stars Series by Gliese

61: and Jahrei{\ss}, in Hipparcos results, and in \citet{Duq1991}.

62: 

63: Our findings indicate that a lower limit of 30 (23\%) of the 131

64: exoplanet systems have stellar companions.  We report new stellar

65: companions to HD 38529 and HD 188015, and a new candidate companion to

66: HD 169830.  We confirm many previously reported stellar companions,

67: including six stars in five systems, that are recognized for the first

68: time as companions to exoplanet hosts.  We have found evidence that 20

69: entries in the Washington Double Star Catalog are not gravitationally

70: bound companions.  At least three (HD 178911, 16 Cyg B, and HD

71: 219449), and possibly five (including HD 41004 and HD 38529), of the

72: exoplanet systems reside in triple star systems.  Three exoplanet

73: systems (GJ 86, HD 41004, and $\gamma$ Cep) have potentially close-in

74: stellar companions, with planets at $\sim$ Mercury to Mars distances

75: from the host star and stellar companions at projected separations of

76: $\sim$ 20 AU, similar to the Sun--Uranus distance.  Finally, two of

77: the exoplanet systems contain white dwarf companions.  This

78: comprehensive assessment of exoplanet systems indicates that solar

79: systems are found in a variety of stellar multiplicity environments --

80: singles, binaries, and triples; and that planets survive the

81: post-main-sequence evolution of companion stars.

82: 

83: \end{abstract}

84: 

85: \keywords{extrasolar planets - exoplanet systems - multiple systems - 

86: survey - statistics}

87: 

88: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

89: \section{Introduction}

90: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

91: 

92: The hunt for planets outside our solar system has revealed 161

93: candidate planets in 137 stellar systems as of July 1, 2005, with 18

94: of these systems containing multiple planets.  After the initial

95: flurry of ``Hot Jupiter'' discoveries --- primarily a selection effect

96: due to two factors: (1) the nascent effort was biased toward discovery

97: of short period systems, and (2) massive planets induce more readily

98: detected radial velocity variations --- it is now believed that the

99: more massive planets preferentially lie farther away from the primary

100: \citep{Udry2004,Mar2005b}, perhaps leaving the space closer to the

101: star for the harder to detect terrestrial planets.  Through these

102: discoveries, we are now poised to gain a better understanding of the

103: environments of exoplanet systems and compare them to our Solar

104: System.

105: 

106: Our effort in this paper is focused on a key parameter of planetary

107: systems --- the stellar multiplicity status of exoplanet hosts.  We

108: address questions such as: (1) Do planets preferentially occur in

109: single star systems (like ours), or do they commonly occur in multiple

110: star systems as well?  (2) For planets residing in multiple star

111: systems, how are the planetary orbits related to stellar separations?  (3)

112: What observational limits can we place on disk or orbit disruptions in

113: multi-star planetary systems?  This study contributes to the broader

114: subjects of planetary system formation, evolution and stability

115: through a better understanding of the environments of exoplanet

116: systems.

117: 

118: Stellar multiplicity among exoplanet systems was first studied by

119: \citet{Pat2002}, who looked at the first 11 exoplanet systems

120: discovered and reported two binaries and one triple system.

121: \citet{Luh2002} conducted an adaptive optics survey looking for

122: stellar and sub-stellar companions to 25 exoplanet hosts and reported

123: null results. More recently, \citet{Egg2004} and \citet{Udry2004}

124: reported 15 exoplanet systems with stellar companions in a

125: comprehensive assessment, and additional companions have been reported

126: for several specific systems \citep{Mug2004a,Mug2004b,Mug2005b}.  Our

127: effort confirms many of these previously reported systems, reports two

128: new companions, identifies an additional candidate, and recognizes,

129: for the first time, one triple and four binary exoplanet systems

130: (these are known stellar companions, but previously not noted to

131: reside in exoplanet systems).

132: 

133: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

134: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

135: \section {Sample \& Companion Search Methodology}

136: \label{sec:Sample}

137: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

138: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

139: 

140: Our sample includes all known exoplanet systems detected by radial

141: velocity techniques as of July 1, 2005.  We primarily used the

142: Extrasolar Planets Catalog, maintained by Jean Schneider at the Paris

143: Observatory\footnote{$http://vo.obspm.fr/exoplanetes/encyclo/catalog.php$},

144: to build our sample list for analyses.  To ensure completeness, we

145: cross-checked this list with the California \& Carnegie Planet Search

146: Catalog\footnote{$http://exoplanets.org/$}.  Our sample excludes

147: planets discovered via transits and gravitational lensing, as these

148: systems are very distant, with poor or no parallax and magnitude

149: information for the primaries.  In addition, these systems can not be

150: observed for stellar companions in any meaningful way.  We also

151: exclude a radial velocity detected system, HD 219542, identified by

152: \citet{Egg2004} as an exoplanet system with multiple stars, but since

153: confirmed as a false planet detection by its discoverers

154: \citep{Des2004}. The final sample comprises 155 planets in 131

155: systems. This list is included in Table~\ref{Sample} along with

156: companion detection information, as described below.

157: 

158: Several efforts were carried out to gather information on stellar

159: companions to exoplanet stars.  To identify known or claimed

160: companions, we checked available sources listing stellar companions

161: --- the Washington Double Star Catalog (WDS), the Hipparcos Catalog,

162: the Catalog of Nearby Stars (\citealt{CNS1969,CNS1979,CNS1991},

163: hereafter CNS) and \citet{Duq1991}.  We also visually inspected the

164: STScI Digitized Sky Survey (DSS) multi-epoch frames for the sky around

165: each exoplanet system to investigate reported companions and to

166: identify new common proper motion (CPM) companion candidates.  We then

167: confirmed or refuted many candidates through photometric distance

168: estimates using plate magnitudes from SuperCOSMOS, optical CCD

169: magnitudes from the CTIO 0.9m and 1.0m telescopes, and infrared

170: magnitudes from 2MASS.  The origin and status of each companion is

171: summarized in Table~\ref{results} and described in

172: \S\ref{sec:NotESys}.

173: 

174: Table~\ref{Sample} lists each target star in our sample, sequenced

175: alphabetically by name, and identifies all known and new companions.

176: The first column is the exoplanet host star's name (HD when available,

177: otherwise BD or GJ name).  The second and third columns give the

178: proper motion magnitude (in seconds of arc per year) and direction (in

179: degrees) of the star, mostly from Hipparcos.  The fourth and

180: fifth columns specify the observational epochs of the DSS images

181: blinked to identify CPM companion candidates.  The sixth column lists

182: the total proper motion, in seconds of arc, of the exoplanet host

183: during the time interval between the two observational epochs of the

184: DSS plates.  The seventh column identifies whether the proper motion

185: of the star was detectable in the DSS frames, allowing the

186: identification of CPM candidates.  The entries ``YES'' and ``NO'' are

187: self-explanatory, and ``MAR'' identifies that the proper motion was

188: marginally detectable.  Systems with very little proper motion or a

189: brief separation between plate epochs could not be searched

190: effectively (see \S\ref{sec:DSS}).  The eighth column specifies

191: companions identified via CPM, and the ninth column specifies

192: companions listed in the sources mentioned above or in other refereed

193: papers.  A ``?''  following the companion ID indicates that the source

194: remains a candidate, and could not be confirmed or refuted with

195: confidence.  The absence of a question mark indicates that the

196: companion is confirmed.

197: 

198: Each reference we used for the companion search is described in the 

199: subsections below.

200: 

201: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

202: \subsection {STScI Digitized Sky Survey (DSS)}

203: \label{sec:DSS}

204: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

205: 

206: We downloaded multi-epoch images of the sky around each exoplanet

207: primary from the STScI Digitized Sky

208: Survey\footnote{$http://stdatu.stsci.edu/cgi-bin/dss\_form$}. The

209: images of these surveys are based on photographic data obtained using

210: the Oschin Schmidt Telescope on Palomar Mountain and the UK Schmidt

211: Telescope in Australia. We typically extracted 10$\arcmin$ square

212: images at two epochs centered on an exoplanet host star.  The range of

213: time interval between the epochs for a given target is 3.1 years to

214: 46.2 years.  Figure~\ref{DSS-hist} shows a histogram of the number of

215: systems per time interval bin for our sample.

216: 

217: We identified CPM companion candidates by eye, by blinking the two

218: epoch frames.  In general, primaries with a total proper motion of

219: $\ge$ 3$\arcsec$ were effectively searched, while those with a total

220: proper motion in the range of 2 $-$ 3 $\arcsec$ were marginally

221: searched, and stars with $\le$ 2 $\arcsec$ total proper motion could

222: not be searched for companions using this method.  Exceptions to these

223: ranges exist, and are due to poorly matched astrometric fields caused

224: by specific issues with the plate images, such as saturation around

225: the primary, distribution of background stars in the frames,

226: brightness of the companion and its proximity to the primary, and the

227: relative rotation between the frames.  The 3$\arcsec$ detection limit

228: corresponds to a proper motion range of 0\farcs1 yr$^{-1}$ to 1\farcs0

229: yr$^{-1}$ with a median value of 0\farcs2 yr$^{-1}$ for the time

230: intervals sampled.  Additionally, this method favors the detection of

231: wide companions because bright primaries saturate the surrounding

232: region out to many seconds of arc, and prevent companion detection

233: within a $\sim$ 15$\arcsec$ $-$ 30$\arcsec$ radius, depending on

234: source brightness.  At the median distance of 35.6 pc for our sample,

235: this translates to a minimum projected distance of $\sim$ 500 $-$ 1000

236: AU.  However, some bright companions can be picked up much closer, due

237: to twin diffraction spikes or an anomalous PSF compared to other stars

238: in the field.  For an outer limit, the 10$\arcmin$ image gives us a

239: radius of 5$\arcmin$, which translates to a projected distance of

240: $\sim$ 10000 AU for the median distance of the exoplanet sample.  This

241: is of the order of magnitude of the canonical limit for gravitational

242: binding, although \citet{Pov1994} listed several companions with

243: separations larger than this.

244: 

245: Of the 131 systems, 82 had easily detectable proper motions and hence

246: were searched effectively for CPM companions, 7 had marginal proper

247: motions, and 42 systems had no detectable proper motions.  Of the 82

248: systems searched effectively, 15 definite CPM companions were

249: confirmed (one per system), and 67 had no CPM companions detected

250: within the search region outlined above.  However, in 12 (plus 3

251: candidates) of these 67 systems, close companions were identified by

252: other sources.  In 3 (plus 3 candidates) of the 49 marginal or

253: unsearched systems, companions were reported by other sources.  These

254: additional companions could not be detected by our method due to

255: saturation around the primary, and/or a short time baseline between the

256: DSS image pair.

257: 

258: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

259: \subsection {Washington Double Star Catalog (WDS)}

260: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

261: 

262: The WDS catalog\footnote{$http://ad.usno.navy.mil/wds/$} is the

263: world's most comprehensive database of multiple stars.  However, it is

264: a catalog of doubles, not binaries, so it explicitly contains an

265: unknown number of non-physical chance alignments.  Table~\ref{WDS-no}

266: lists 20 WDS entries that are not gravitationally bound to the

267: exoplanet host, but rather are field stars, listed in WDS ID sequence

268: (column 1).  The second column is the HD identifier of the star.  The

269: third column is the component suffix of the pair, as it appears in the

270: WDS catalog, for which position angle, separation and epoch of the

271: most recent observation are listed in columns four, five and six.  The

272: seventh column is the number of observations listed in the WDS.  Note

273: that a few of these ``companions'' have many observations, but they

274: are not true companions.  The eighth column identifies the specific

275: method used to refute the WDS entry.

276: 

277: Figure~\ref{WDS-CPM} shows an example for HD 9826.  The lines mark two

278: WDS entries that do not share the primary's high proper motion and

279: hence are background stars.  On the other hand, the known CPM

280: companion (marked by an arrow) is easily identifiable in these images.

281: 

282: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

283: \subsection {Hipparcos Catalog}

284: \label{sec:Hip}

285: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

286: 

287: As most of the exoplanet systems are close to the Sun (128 of the 131

288: are within 100 pc), the Hipparcos

289: Catalog\footnote{$http://www.rssd.esa.int/Hipparcos/HIPcatalogueSearch.html$}

290: provides fairly reliable distances and some photometric data for these

291: systems.  The catalog also notes some stellar companions, identified

292: by field H59 as component solutions ('C' flag), accelerated proper

293: motion ('G' flag), or orbital solutions ('O' flag).  In total,

294: Hipparcos identified stellar companions in nine exoplanet systems,

295: four each with 'C' and 'G' flags, and one with the 'O' flag.  Five of

296: the nine Hipparcos companions were independently confirmed, one (HD

297: 38529c) is a close brown dwarf, and two (both 'G' flags) remain as

298: candidates.  The $\rho$ CrB system (HD 143761) has an 'O' flag, and

299: contains a companion that is a planet \citep{Noy1997,Zuc2001} or a

300: star \citep{Gat2001,Pou2001,Hal2003}, but not both.

301: 

302: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

303: \subsection {Catalog of Nearby Stars (CNS)}

304: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

305: 

306: Among our sample of 131 stars, 39 are listed in the CNS.  We reviewed

307: the earlier versions of the catalog \citep{CNS1969,CNS1979,CNS1991},

308: as well as the consolidated information on the

309: web\footnote{$http://www.ari.uni-heidelberg.de/aricns/$}.  The catalog

310: identifies any known companions, and lists separation, position angle

311: and references in the notes section.  Twelve stars from our sample

312: have companions listed in the CNS, and every one of them was confirmed by

313: other sources to be a true companion.

314: 

315: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

316: \subsection {Duquennoy \& Mayor}

317: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

318: 

319: The \citet{Duq1991} G Dwarf Survey specifically looked at multiplicity

320: among solar-type stars in the solar neighborhood using radial velocity

321: techniques.  This is an ideal reference for our sample because

322: searches for exoplanet systems have focused on such systems.

323: \citeauthor{Duq1991} identified target stars as single-line, double-line,

324: or line-width spectroscopic binaries, or spectroscopic binaries with

325: orbits.  Only three stars from our sample have companions listed in

326: this reference, and each of these was confirmed by other sources to be

327: a true companion.

328: 

329: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

330: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

331: \section {Photometric Distance Estimates for Companion Candidates}

332: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

333: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 

334: 

335: In addition to the proper motion investigation, we collected archival

336: 2MASS and SuperCOSMOS photometry as well as new CCD photometry that

337: allowed us to compute distance estimates to companion candidates, as

338: described below.  Table~\ref{Obs} summarizes the photometry data, as

339: well as the distance estimates computed.  The first column is the

340: star's name, and the second column contains the spectral type

341: identified as part of this work (see \S\ref{sec:SpecObs}).  The next

342: three columns are the $BRI$ plate magnitudes from SuperCOSMOS,

343: followed by the $VRI$ CCD magnitudes observed by us at the CTIO 0.9m

344: and 1.0m telescopes. The ninth column gives the number of observations

345: available for the $VRI$ photometry.  This is followed by 2MASS $JHK_S$

346: photometry.  The thirteenth, fourteenth and fifteenth columns are the

347: estimated plate photometric distance, total error of this estimate,

348: and the number of color relations used in computing this estimate.

349: The last three columns similarly list the CCD distance estimate, total

350: error and the number of color relations used.

351: 

352: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

353: \subsection {2MASS Coordinates \& Photometry}

354: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 

355: 

356: We used the 2MASS web database, accessed via the Aladin interactive

357: sky atlas\footnote{$http://aladin.u-strasbg.fr/aladin.gml$}

358: \citep{Aladin} to obtain equinox 2000 coordinates for the companion

359: candidates, the epoch of observation, and $J$, $H$ and $K_S$

360: photometry.  The errors in $JHK_S$ were almost always less than 0.05

361: mag, and were typically 0.02--0.03 mag.  Notable exceptions are three

362: distant and faint refuted candidates listed in Table~\ref{Obs}, HD

363: 33636 \#1 (errors of 0.14, 0.15, null at $JHK_S$ respectively), HD

364: 41004 \#1 (0.05, 0.06, and 0.07 mag), and HD 72659 \#1 (0.05, 0.06 and

365: 0.07 mag).

366: 

367: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

368: \subsection {SuperCOSMOS Plate Photometry and Distance Estimates}

369: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 

370: 

371: We obtained optical plate photometry in $B_J$, $R_{59F}$ and $I_{IVN}$

372: bands (hereafter $BRI$) from the SuperCOSMOS Sky Survey (SSS) scans of

373: Schmidt survey plates \citep{Ham2001a}. The SSS plate photometry is

374: calibrated by means of a network of secondary standard star sequences

375: across the entire sky, with the calibration being propagated into

376: fields without standards by means of the ample overlap regions between

377: adjacent survey fields. The external accuracy of the calibrations is

378: $\pm$ 0.3 mag in individual passbands \citep{Ham2001b}; however the

379: internal accuracy in colors (e.g. $B-R$, $R-I$) is much better, being

380: typically 0.1 mag for well--exposed, uncrowded images. We used point

381: source photometric measures in all cases.

382: 

383: Photometric distance estimates were then derived using these SSS plate

384: magnitudes, combined with 2MASS $JHK_S$ by fitting various colors to

385: $M_{K_S}$--color relations from \citet{Ham2004}.  Results for 11

386: companion candidates are given in Table~\ref{Obs}.  Errors quoted from

387: this procedure include internal and external errors.  Internal errors

388: represent the standard deviation of distance estimates from the suite

389: of $M_{K_S}$--color relations.  External errors represent a measure of

390: the reliability of the relations for stars of known distance, which is

391: estimated to be 26\% in \citet{Ham2004}.

392: 

393: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

394: \subsection {CCD Photometry Observations and Distance Estimates}

395: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 

396: 

397: Because of the relatively large photometric distance errors associated

398: with photographic plate photometry, we obtained optical CCD photometry

399: for one exoplanet host and 13 companion candidates (given in

400: Table~\ref{Obs}) in the $V_JR_{KC}I_{KC}$ bands (hereafter $VRI$)

401: using the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO) 0.9m and 1.0m

402: telescopes during observing runs in December 2003, June, September and

403: December 2004, August and December 2005, and March 2006 as part of the

404: SMARTS (Small and Moderate Aperture Research Telescope System)

405: Consortium.  For the 0.9m telescope, the central quarter of the 2048

406: $\times$ 2046 Tektronix CCD camera was used with the Tek 2 $VRI$

407: filter set.  For the 1.0m telescope, the Y4KCam CCD camera was used

408: with the Harris 1 4mts $VR$ and kc 1 4mts $I$ filter set.  Standard

409: stars from \citet{Gra1982}, \citet{Bes1990} and \citet{Lan1992} were

410: observed through a range of air masses each night to place measured

411: fluxes on the Johnson-Kron-Cousins $VRI$ system and to calculate

412: extinction corrections.

413: 

414: Data were reduced using IRAF via typical bias subtraction and dome

415: flat-fielding, using calibration frames taken at the beginning of each

416: night.  In general, a circular aperture 14$\arcsec$ in diameter was

417: used to determine stellar fluxes in order to match apertures used by

418: \citet{Lan1992} for the standard stars.  In cases of crowded fields,

419: an appropriate aperture 2$\arcsec$--12$\arcsec$ in diameter was used

420: to eliminate stray light from close sources and aperture corrections

421: were applied.  For one target (HD 169830B), we used Gaussian fitting

422: via an IDL program to the PSF tail of a bright nearby source to

423: eliminate its effects, and completed the photometry on the target

424: using IDL APER routine.  The same approach was performed on two of our

425: standard stars to correct for zero point difference between IDL and

426: IRAF magnitudes.  As discussed in \citet{Henry2004}, photometric

427: errors are typically $\pm$ 0.03 mag or less, which includes both

428: internal and external errors.  The only exceptions with larger errors

429: were distant and faint refuted candidates HD 33636 \#1 (errors of

430: 0.06, 0.04, and 0.04 mag at $VRI$ respectively) and HD 72659 \#1

431: (0.10, 0.05, and 0.03 mag), new companion HD 188015B (0.05 and 0.04

432: mag at $R$ and $I$, respectively), and new candidate HD 169830B (0.12,

433: 0.09, and 0.13 mag).  The errors for HD188015B and HD 169830B are high

434: due to the uncertainties introduced by the large aperture corrections

435: and, for HD 169830B, PSF fitting as well.

436: 

437: Photometric distances were obtained using the $VRI$ magnitudes along

438: with 2MASS $JHK_S$, and fitting various colors to $M_{K_S}$--color

439: relations from \citet{Henry2004}.  The results for these companion

440: candidates are given in the final three columns of

441: Table~\ref{Obs}. Errors quoted from this procedure include internal

442: and external errors.  Internal errors represent the standard deviation

443: of distance estimates from the suite of $M_{K_S}$--color relations.

444: External errors represent a measure of the reliability of the

445: relations for stars of known distance, which is estimated to be 15\%

446: in \citet{Henry2004}.

447: 

448: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

449: \section {Spectroscopic Observations}

450: \label{sec:SpecObs}

451: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 

452: 

453: New spectra of nine companion candidates were obtained during

454: observing runs in October and December 2003, March and September 2004,

455: and January 2005 at the CTIO 1.5m telescope as part of the SMARTS

456: Consortium.  The R-C Spectrograph and Loral 1200 X 800 CCD detector

457: were used with grating \#32 in our red setup and \#09 in our blue

458: setup, which provided 8.6\AA~resolution and wavelength coverage from

459: 6000-9500\AA~in the red and 3800-6800\AA~in the blue.  Data reduction

460: consisted of background subtraction, spectrum extraction, and

461: wavelength and flux calibrations in IRAF after standard bias

462: subtraction, flat fielding, and illumination corrections were applied.

463: Standard dome flats were used for flat fielding and calibration frames

464: were taken at the beginning of each night.  Fringing at wavelengths

465: longer than 7000\AA~is common in data from this spectrograph; however

466: it is typically removed fully by flat fielding, and no further steps

467: were needed to remove the fringes.  Spectral types for stars observed

468: in the red wavelength regime, listed in Table~\ref{Obs}, were assigned

469: using the ALLSTAR program as described in \citet{Henry2002}.  RECONS

470: types have been assigned using a set of standard comparison stars from

471: the RECONS database, a library of $\sim$ 500 M0.0V to M9.0V spectra.

472: Only rough spectral types were assigned based on our blue spectra by

473: comparing features in our spectra with standard stars in

474: \citet{Jac1984}.

475: 

476: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

477: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

478: \section {Results}

479: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

480: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 

481: 

482: Table~\ref{results} is a compendium of the 30 exoplanet systems

483: confirmed to have two or more stellar components, listed in coordinate

484: sequence.  At the end of the table, six additional systems are listed

485: that may be stellar multiples, although these have not yet been

486: confirmed.  The first column lists a sequence number of the exoplanet

487: system matching the value plotted in Figure 5, and the second and

488: third columns list the HD name and an alternate name of the exoplanet

489: host and companion stars.  The fourth column lists stellar (A, B,

490: C...), or planetary components (b, c, d, ...).  The fifth column lists

491: the RA \& DEC of stars at epoch 2000, equinox 2000.  For stars listed

492: in Hipparcos (all primaries and a few companions), we used the

493: Hipparcos 1991.25 epoch coordinates and proper motions to compute the

494: coordinates listed. For fainter stars not observed by Hipparcos, we

495: used 2MASS coordinates at the epoch of observation, and converted the

496: coordinates to epoch 2000.0 using proper motions from SuperCOSMOS or

497: NLTT \citep{Luy1979}, if available.  When the proper motion of a

498: companion was not available, we used the primary's Hipparcos proper

499: motion.  In some instances, 2MASS coordinates were not available for

500: the companions, and in these instances, the coordinates of the

501: companions are not listed.  However, in all but three of these cases,

502: the separation and position angle of the companion from the primary

503: are listed in columns 10 and 11.  The three exceptional cases (one

504: confirmed and two candidates), where neither coordinates nor

505: separations from the primaries are known, are all Hipparcos 'G' flags,

506: and hence close astrometric binaries.  The sixth column lists the

507: trigonometric parallax from Hipparcos, in seconds of arc.  The seventh

508: and eighth columns list the distance, in parsecs, based on either

509: trigonometric parallax, if available (coded as 'T'), calculated CCD

510: photometric distance using relations from \citet{Henry2004} (coded as

511: 'C'), or calculated plate magnitude distance from SuperCOSMOS using

512: relations from \citet{Ham2004} (coded as 'P').  If both plate and CCD

513: distance estimates are available, only the more reliable CCD distance

514: is listed.  The ninth column lists the spectral type from

515: \citet{Gra2003}, the planet discovery paper, or other references for

516: the primary, and from our spectroscopic observations or other

517: references for the companion.  The tenth and eleventh columns list the

518: angular separation (in seconds of arc) and position angle (in degrees)

519: of stellar companions with respect to the exoplanet host.  For

520: companions listed in WDS, these are typically the most recent entry in

521: WDS, otherwise they are the values listed in the companion discovery

522: paper.  For new companions, these astrometry values are our measurements

523: from our CTIO or the DSS images.  The twelfth column lists the

524: projected spatial separation (and is therefore a lower limit at the

525: epoch of plate observation) of companion stars with respect to their

526: primaries, in AU.  The thirteenth column gives the $M \sin{i}$ in

527: Jupiter masses for planets.  The fourteenth and fifteenth columns list

528: the a $\sin{i}$ (in AU) and eccentricity of the orbits.  The

529: sixteenth column specifies the sources used to detect the companion

530: stars.  The codes are as follows: 'P' represents a CPM detection using

531: the multi-epoch DSS images; 'W' represents a companion listing in the

532: WDS catalog; 'H' represents a Hipparcos catalog companion

533: identification; 'C' represents a companion identification in the CNS

534: catalog; 'D' represents a companion identification in \citet{Duq1991};

535: 'I' represents confirmation via our recent $VRI$ images taken to

536: verify CPM; and 'O' represents that the companion was not found by any

537: of the above means, but reported in one or more refereed papers.

538: Finally, the seventeenth column lists relevant references relating to

539: stellar companions.  We have chosen not to list the individual planet

540: discovery papers as references, unless they identify a stellar

541: companion.

542: 

543: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

544: \subsection {Notes for Each Multiple System}

545: \label{sec:NotESys}

546: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

547: 

548: \subsubsection{New, Known, or Confirmed Companion Systems}

549: \label{sec:KnoCmp}

550: 

551: {\bf 1. HD 142:} This close binary (separation 5$\farcs$4) is listed

552: in WDS and CNS.  While this pair was first resolved at Harvard College

553: Observatory in 1894 \citep{Bai1900}, the separation and $\Delta$m

554: $\simeq$ 5 make this a difficult object. It was found at approximately

555: the same position six times from 1894 to 1928.  It then remained

556: unmeasured for 72 years until it became evident in 2MASS in 2000 at

557: approximately the same position angle.  Given the primary's $\mu$ =

558: 0$\farcs$58 yr$^{-1}$ due east, and the long time lapse between the

559: 1928 WDS observation and our image of 2004, a background star would

560: easily have been detected, but we found a blank field at its expected

561: position.  This system was mentioned in \citet{Low2002} as a single

562: planet in a multiple star system.

563: 

564: {\bf 2. HD 9826:} This CPM pair is clearly identified in DSS images,

565: but not listed in any of the other sources checked.  \citet{Low2002}

566: identified this as the first system discovered with multiple planets

567: and multiple stars.  It was also mentioned in \citet{Pat2002} and

568: \citet{Egg2004} as an exoplanet primary having a stellar companion.

569: 

570: {\bf 3. HD 11964:} This CPM pair is clearly identified in DSS images,

571: and listed in WDS and CNS.  \citet{All2000} listed this as a wide

572: binary system in a catalog of 122 binaries identified via CPM from a

573: sample of 1,200 high-velocity, metal-poor stars.  The primary's $\mu$

574: = 0\farcs441 yr$^{-1}$ at 236\sdeg~from Hipparcos, and the companion's

575: $\mu$ = 0\farcs444 yr$^{-1}$ at 236\sdeg~\citep{UCAC2}, a good match.

576: Our work is the first identification of this as a stellar companion to

577: a planetary system.

578: 

579: {\bf 4. HD 13445:} \citet{Els2001} reported the discovery of this

580: close companion (1\farcs72 $\pm$ 0\farcs2 separation) via AO imaging,

581: incorrectly identifying the companion as a T-dwarf based on its

582: colors.  The recent publication of \citet{Mug2005a} identified this

583: companion as a cool white dwarf based on its spectrum, claiming the

584: first white dwarf discovery in a planetary system.  However, HD 147513

585: was in fact the first white dwarf discovery in a planetary system,

586: reported by \citet{May2004}.  There are now two known systems with

587: evidence of planets surviving the post-main-sequence evolution of a

588: stellar companion, with this one being the closest known white dwarf

589: companion to an exoplanet host (at a projected separation of just 21

590: AU -- similar to Sun-Uranus distance).

591: 

592: {\bf 5. HD 19994:} WDS lists 14 observations for this companion.

593: This pair was first resolved by Admiral Smyth in 1836 with a 6 inch

594: refractor \citep{Smy1844}. It has been resolved fifteen times since

595: then, most recently by \citet{Hale1994} who also calculated a 1420 yr

596: orbit for this pair. While there is some hint of curvilinear motion in

597: the data, the orbit is certainly preliminary.  This companion is also

598: listed in CNS and \citet{Duq1991}.  Several references have identified

599: this as a stellar companion to a planetary system

600: \citep{Low2002,May2004,Egg2004,Udry2004}.

601: 

602: {\bf 6. HD 27442:} WDS and CNS list this companion at 13\farcs7

603: separation at 34\sdeg. It was first resolved in 1930 by

604: \citet{Jes1955}, and measured again by \citet{Hold1966} almost 35

605: years later at approximately the same position.  Our short-exposure

606: $VRI$ images taken at CTIO in September 2004 identified a source about

607: 13$\arcsec$ away at 34\sdeg, consistent with the observations of

608: almost 75 years ago.  Given the primary's $\mu$ = 0\farcs175

609: yr$^{-1}$, this can be confirmed as a companion.  Our work is the

610: first identification of this as a stellar companion to a planetary

611: system.

612: 

613: {\bf 7. HD 38529:} This CPM pair was discovered by us using DSS

614: images.  The primary's $\mu$ = 0\farcs163 yr$^{-1}$ at 209\sdeg~from

615: Hipparcos, and the companion's $\mu$ = 0\farcs162 yr$^{-1}$ at

616: 204\sdeg~from \citet{Lep2005} and 0\farcs158 yr$^{-1}$ at

617: 208\sdeg~from SuperCOSMOS.  Figure~\ref{new38529} includes two DSS

618: images showing the primary and the companion.  Our CCD photometric

619: distance estimate of 28.7 $\pm$ 4.8 pc is consistent with our spectral

620: identification of M3.0V and matches the primary's distance of 42 pc

621: within 3$\sigma$.  At our request, spectroscopic observations of the

622: companion were obtained by G. Fritz Benedict in February 2004 using

623: the McDonald Observatory 2.1m telescope and Sandiford Cassegrain

624: echelle spectrograph \citep{McC1993}.  The data were reduced and 1-D

625: spectra were extracted using the standard IRAF \textit{echelle}

626: package tools.  The radial velocity was determined by

627: cross-correlating the spectra of the star with that of an M2 dwarf (GJ

628: 623) template using the IRAF task \textit{fxcor}.  The adopted radial

629: velocity for the GJ 623 primary (it is a binary) was $-$29.2 km

630: s$^{-1}$, given the orbital phase at which the template was secured

631: and a systemic velocity of $-$27.5 km s$^{-1}$, from \citet{Mar1989}.

632: HD 38529B's radial velocity was measured to be 26.26 $\pm$ 0.10 km

633: s$^{-1}$.  This is roughly consistent with the primary's radial

634: velocity of 30.21 km s$^{-1}$ \citep{Nid2002}, and the odds of two

635: unassociated stars having such similar velocities are low.  However,

636: discrepancies in radial velocities and photometric distances could

637: indicate that the new companion is a double.  The projected separation

638: of the primary to the new companion(s) is $\sim$ 12000 AU, which is

639: extreme for a gravitationally bound system, although \citet{Pov1994}

640: listed a few wide binaries with even greater separations.  This

641: primary also has a Hipparcos 'G' flag listing, which was recently used

642: by \citet{Ref2006} to conclude that the sub-stellar companion ``c'' is

643: actually a brown dwarf of mass 37$_{-19}^{+36}$ \mjup.

644: 

645: {\bf 8. HD 41004:} A companion is listed in WDS and annotated in

646: Hipparcos with a 'C' flag, indicating a linear relative motion of

647: components, implying either an orbital period that is several times

648: the length of the Hipparcos observing interval (3.3 years), or stars

649: that are not physically linked.  At a separation of 0\farcs5 and a

650: $\Delta$m = 3.67 (from Hipparcos), the identification of a close

651: companion is difficult, but there are other such Hipparcos

652: observations (similar separation and $\Delta$m) that were

653: independently confirmed.  For example, T.J.J. See measured a close

654: large $\Delta$m pair, known as SEE 510 (HIP 86228), with the Lowell 24

655: inch telescope in 1896 \citep{See1896}. This pair, lost for nearly 100

656: years, was recovered by Hipparcos at about the same position

657: (0\farcs2, $\Delta$m = 1.8).  While SEE 510 isn't morphologically

658: identical to HD 41004, we believe that it is comparably difficult, and

659: so we accept the Hipparcos identification of a companion to HD 41004.

660: This system was mentioned in \citet{Egg2004} as a stellar companion in

661: an exoplanet system.  Further, \citet{Zuc2003} listed the radial

662: velocity for the primary as 42.5 $\pm$ 0.01 km s$^{-1}$, and found the

663: companion to be a double, with a velocity range of 34--48 km s$^{-1}$

664: ($\pm$ 0.56 km s$^{-1}$) over 103 observations.  They derived an

665: orbital solution for the BC pair, concluding that the orbit is nearly

666: circular with a $\sin{i}$ = 0.016 AU, and that the low mass companion

667: has a minimum mass of 18.4 \mjup.  \citet{Zuc2004} derived orbital

668: elements of the possible M dwarf--brown dwarf pair and concluded that

669: this is a unique system with each stellar component of a visual binary

670: having a low mass companion in orbit around it --- one a planet, and

671: the other a possible brown dwarf.  Note that the projected separation

672: between A and B is just 22 AU, similar to the separation of the Sun

673: and Uranus.

674: 

675: {\bf 9. HD 40979:} This CPM pair is clearly identified in DSS images.

676: The primary is 33 pc away with $\mu$ = 0\farcs179 yr$^{-1}$ at

677: 148\sdeg~(from Hipparcos).  The companion, BD+44 1351, has a very

678: similar $\mu$ = 0\farcs179 yr$^{-1}$ at 148\sdeg~from \citet{Lep2005}

679: and 0\farcs180 yr$^{-1}$ at 148\sdeg~from \citet{Hog1998}.

680: \citet{Hal1986} identified this CPM pair, listing the companion as a

681: K5 star.  \citet{Egg2004} identified this as a stellar companion to a

682: planetary system, noting that physical association of this pair has

683: been confirmed via radial velocity measurements.  However, our plate

684: photometric distance estimate to the companion is 15.2 $\pm$ 4.0 pc

685: (based on only 3 colors), not a very good match with the primary,

686: although the error is large.  This discrepancy could be due to the

687: poor quality of the photometric distance estimate (due to the blue

688: colors of the companion) or perhaps because the companion is an

689: unresolved double.

690: 

691: {\bf 10. HD 46375:} WDS lists this 9\farcs4 separation companion at

692: 308\sdeg.  We took short exposure frames at CTIO in September 2004,

693: which identified a companion at a separation of 10$\arcsec$ at

694: 310\sdeg, consistent with the WDS observation.  The first published

695: resolution of this pair made by \citet{Sou1985} in 1984 has also been

696: confirmed by 2MASS images.  Re-analysis of Astrographic Catalogue data

697: \citep{Urb1998} has added an observation at about the same secondary

698: position in 1932, thereby confirming that it has the same proper

699: motion.  Our CCD photometric distance estimate of 26.4 $\pm$ 6.0 pc is

700: within 2$\sigma$ of the primary's distance of 33.4 pc from Hipparcos.

701: We therefore conclude that this is a physical pair.  This work is the

702: first identification of this as a stellar companion to a planetary

703: system.

704: 

705: {\bf 11. HD 75289:} This CPM candidate was detected by

706: \citet{Mug2004b} and confirmed by their photometry and spectroscopy.

707: While the companion is seen in the epoch-2 DSS image, CPM could not be

708: established by our method due to saturation of the region around

709: around the primary in the epoch-1 image.

710: 

711: {\bf 12. HD 75732:} This CPM pair is easily identified in DSS images,

712: and matches entries in WDS, CNS and \citet{Duq1991}.  The primary has

713: $\mu$ = 0\farcs539 yr$^{-1}$ at 244\sdeg~and $\pi$ = 0\farcs07980

714: $\pm$ 0\farcs00084, from Hipparcos.  Our CCD photometric distance

715: estimate to the companion is 8.7 $\pm$ 1.4 pc, a match within

716: 3$\sigma$.  The companion's $\mu$ = 0\farcs540 yr$^{-1}$ at

717: 244\sdeg~and $\pi$ = 0\farcs0768 $\pm$ 0\farcs0024 from the Yale

718: Parallax Catalog \citep{vanAlt1995} and 0\farcs0757 $\pm$ 0\farcs0027

719: from \citet{Dahn1988} are all consistent with the primary's.  This

720: system is listed in \citet{Egg2004} as a stellar companion to a

721: planetary system.  The primary star, more commonly known as 55 Cnc,

722: has four reported planets, so this system is the most extensive solar

723: system with a stellar companion, which is at a projected distance of

724: more than 1000 AU. The discrepancy in photometric distance could hint

725: that the companion is an unresolved double.

726: 

727: {\bf 13. HD 80606:} This CPM pair is easily identified in DSS images,

728: and matches entries in WDS and Hipparcos.  The primary's $\mu$ =

729: 0\farcs047 yr$^{-1}$ at 82\sdeg~and $\pi$ = 0\farcs01713 $\pm$

730: 0\farcs00577, from Hipparcos.  The parallax has a large error due to

731: the close companion.  The companion is HD 80607, spectral type G5,

732: $\mu$ = 0\farcs043 yr$^{-1}$ at 79\sdeg, and Hipparcos lists an

733: identical parallax.  This companion was listed by \citet{Egg2004} as a

734: stellar companion to a planetary system.

735: 

736: {\bf 14. HD 89744:} This companion was reported as a candidate by

737: \citet{Wil2001} based on spectroscopic observations, and they

738: identified it as a massive brown dwarf of spectral type L0V.

739: Companionship was subsequently confirmed astrometrically by

740: \citet{Mug2004a}.  This faint companion is not seen in the DSS images.

741: 

742: {\bf 15. HD 99492:} This CPM pair is easily identified in DSS images,

743: and matches entries in WDS, Hipparcos and CNS.  Component B (the

744: exoplanet host) has $\mu$ = 0\farcs755 yr$^{-1}$ at 285\sdeg~and $\pi$

745: = 0\farcs05559 $\pm$ 0\farcs00331, from Hipparcos.  Component A is HD

746: 99491 with spectral type K0IV, $\mu$ = 0\farcs749 yr$^{-1}$ at 284\sdeg,

747: and $\pi$ = 0\farcs05659 $\pm$ 0\farcs00140, from Hipparcos.  These

748: match HD 99492's values well, and confirm the pair as physical.

749: 

750: {\bf 16. HD 114729:} This CPM candidate was detected recently by

751: \citet{Mug2005b} and confirmed by their photometry and spectroscopy.

752: It could not be detected using DSS frames due to saturation of the

753: region around around the primary.  

754: 

755: {\bf 17. HD 114762:} This close companion was discovered using

756: high-resolution imaging \citep{Pat2002}. It was also mentioned by

757: \citet{Egg2004} as a stellar companion to a planetary system.  The

758: ``planet'', with $M \sin{i}$ = 11.0 \mjup~may in fact be a star 

759: in a low inclination orbit \citep{Coc1991,Fis2005}.

760: 

761: {\bf 18. HD 120136:} This close companion is listed in WDS (53

762: observations), CNS and in \citet{Duq1991}.  The primary's $\mu$ =

763: 0\farcs483 yr$^{-1}$ at 276\sdeg~from Hipparcos.  CNS lists the

764: companion as GJ 527B, and SIMBAD gives its $\mu$ = 0\farcs480

765: yr$^{-1}$ at 274\sdeg, a good match to the primary's.  This system has

766: been recognized as a stellar companion to an exoplanet system

767: \citep{Pat2002,Egg2004}.

768: 

769: {\bf 19. HD 142022:} This CPM pair (GJ 606.1AB) is easily identified

770: in DSS images, and matches entries in WDS and CNS.  The companion's

771: spectral type is K7V.  The NLTT catalog lists identical $\mu$ for both

772: components = 0\farcs320 yr$^{-1}$ at 269\sdeg~\citep{Luy1979}.

773: 

774: {\bf 20. HD 147513:} This companion is listed in CNS and was the first

775: white dwarf found in an exoplanet system \citep{May2004}.  The

776: primary's $\mu$ = 0\farcs073 yr$^{-1}$ at 87\sdeg~and $\pi$ =

777: 0\farcs07769 $\pm$ 0\farcs00086, from Hipparcos.  The companion is HIP

778: 80300, type DA2 \citep{Weg1973}, with matching Hipparcos values of

779: $\mu$ = 0\farcs076 yr$^{-1}$ at 90\sdeg~and $\pi$ = 0\farcs07804 $\pm$

780: 0\farcs00240.

781: 

782: {\bf 21. HD 178911:} This is a triple star system with one known

783: planet.  The wide CPM pair (AC-B) is clearly seen in DSS images.  The

784: 6.3 \mjup~planet orbits HD 178911B, while HD 178911AC is a close

785: binary, first resolved by \citet{McAl1987a} with the

786: Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT).  This pair has since been

787: resolved ten more times, most recently with the 6m telescope of the

788: Special Astrophysical Observatory in Zelenchuk in 1999

789: \citep{Bal2004}.  \citet{Hart2000} present an orbital solution with a

790: 3.5 year period based on speckle observations and \citet{Tok2000}

791: present a full orbital solution using spectroscopic and

792: interferometric data.  The multiplicity of this system has been

793: previously identified \citep{Zuc2002,Egg2004}.  From Hipparcos, HD

794: 178911AC's $\mu$ = 0\farcs200 yr$^{-1}$ at 14\sdeg~and $\pi$ =

795: 0\farcs02042 $\pm$ 0\farcs00157 and the companion's $\mu$ = 0\farcs203

796: yr$^{-1}$ at 19\sdeg~and $\pi$ = 0\farcs02140 $\pm$ 0\farcs00495, a

797: match within the errors, confirming a physical association.

798: 

799: {\bf 22. HD 186427:} This is a triple star system with one known

800: planet. The wide CPM pair (AC-B) is clearly seen in DSS images.  The

801: planet orbits 16 Cyg B (HD 186427), while 16 Cyg A (HD 186408) is a

802: close binary, first resolved by \citet{Turn2001} with the AO system on

803: the Hooker 100'' telescope, and independently confirmed by IR imaging

804: by \citet{Pat2002} with the Keck 10m and Lick 3m.  In the five total

805: observations, the position of the secondary has not changed much.

806: However, they span less than two years of time and little motion would

807: be expected at a projected separation of 73 AU.  The multiplicity of

808: this system has been previously identified

809: \citep{Pat2002,Low2002,Egg2004}. From Hipparcos, 16 Cyg A's $\mu$ =

810: 0\farcs217 yr$^{-1}$ at 223\sdeg~and $\pi$ = 0\farcs04625 $\pm$

811: 0\farcs00050 and the planet host's $\mu$ = 0\farcs212 yr$^{-1}$ at

812: 220\sdeg~and $\pi$ = and 0\farcs04670 $\pm$ 0\farcs00052, a match

813: within the errors, confirming a physical association.

814: 

815: {\bf 23. HD 188015:} This new companion was detected by us as a CPM

816: candidate and confirmed via CCD photometry.  The primary's $\pi$ =

817: 0\farcs01900 $\pm$ 0\farcs00095 and $\mu$ = 0\farcs106 yr$^{-1}$ at

818: 149\sdeg, from Hipparcos.  The companion, 13$\arcsec$ away from the

819: primary at 85\sdeg, does not have proper motion listed in SuperCOSMOS

820: or NLTT, but our CCD photometric distance of 46.9 $\pm$ 9.5 pc matches

821: the primary's distance within 1$\sigma$, and hence confirms this as a

822: companion.  Figure~\ref{new188015} includes two DSS images showing the

823: primary and the companion.

824: 

825: {\bf 24. HD 190360:} This CPM pair is easily identified in DSS images,

826: and matches entries in WDS and CNS.  The primary is GJ 777A with

827: spectral type G7IV-V and $\mu$ = 0\farcs861 yr$^{-1}$ at

828: 127\sdeg~from Hipparcos.  The companion is GJ 777B with spectral type

829: M4.5V and $\mu$ = 0\farcs860 yr$^{-1}$ at 127\sdeg~\citep{Lep2005}.

830: Our plate photometric distance estimate of 18.5 $\pm$ 6.2 pc is a good

831: match with the primary's trigonometric parallax distance of 15.9 pc.

832: This system has been recognized as a binary, and as an exoplanet

833: primary with a stellar companion \citep{All2000,Naef2003,Egg2004}.

834: 

835: {\bf 25. HD 195019:} WDS is the only source listing this close binary

836: at a separation of 3\farcs5 at 330\sdeg.  The close pair, first

837: resolved by \citet{Hou1887} with an 18 inch refractor, has moved 7

838: degrees in position angle and closed in from 4\farcs5 to 3\farcs5 in

839: separation in 12 observations over 107 years.  This transition has not

840: been smooth, no doubt due to $\Delta$m = 4, making observations a

841: challenge.  The typical measurement errors of micrometry coupled with

842: slow motion makes characterization difficult.  It was identified as a

843: binary in \citet{All2000}, and recognized as a stellar companion to an

844: exoplanet system in \citet{Egg2004}.

845: 

846: {\bf 26. HD 196050:} This CPM candidate was detected recently by

847: \citet{Mug2005b} and confirmed by their photometry and spectroscopy.

848: It could not be detected using DSS frames due to saturation of the

849: region around around the primary.

850: 

851: {\bf 27. HD 213240:} This CPM pair was identified by us using DSS

852: images.  The primary's $\mu$ = 0\farcs236 yr$^{-1}$ at 215\sdeg~and

853: $\pi$ = 0\farcs02454 $\pm$ 0\farcs00081, from Hipparcos.  The

854: companion's $\mu$ = 0\farcs229 yr$^{-1}$ at 214\sdeg~from SuperCOSMOS

855: is a good match.  Our CCD photometric distance of 41.8 $\pm$ 6.5 pc is

856: consistent with our spectral type identification of M5.0V, and is a

857: good match to the primary's trigonometric parallax distance of 40.8

858: pc.  This new companion identification in an exoplanet system was

859: recently reported by \citet{Mug2005b} during the writing of this

860: paper.

861: 

862: {\bf 28. HD 219449:} A CPM companion is easily detected in the DSS

863: images, and is matched by WDS and CNS entries.  WDS lists the

864: secondary as a tight binary (0\farcs4 separation at 101\sdeg).  The

865: primary's $\mu$ = 0\farcs369 yr$^{-1}$ at 93\sdeg~and $\pi$ =

866: 0\farcs02197 $\pm$ 0\farcs00089, from Hipparcos.  The companion binary

867: has $\mu$ = 0\farcs377 yr$^{-1}$ at 91\sdeg~from NLTT and 0\farcs385

868: yr$^{-1}$ at 96\sdeg~from \citet{UCAC2}, both good matches to the

869: primary.  NLTT also lists the companion's spectral type as K8V.  Our

870: CCD photometric distance of 29.9 $\pm$ 4.7 pc is for the BC pair, and

871: we predict an actual distance of 42.4 pc (assuming identical spectral

872: types), which is a good match to the primary (45.5 pc).  Radial

873: velocities from \citet{Wil1953} are -26.4 $\pm$ 0.9 km s$^{-1}$ for

874: the primary and -25 $\pm$ 5 km s$^{-1}$ for the secondary, also a

875: match within the errors.  Our approximate spectral identification as

876: an early K type is consistent with the photometric distances.  This

877: work recognizes, for the fist time, that this exoplanet system resides

878: in a triple star system.

879: 

880: {\bf 29. HD 222404:} This companion is listed in Hipparcos with a 'G'

881: flag, indicating a close astrometric binary.  While some speckle

882: searches have failed to detect a companion (e.g. \citealt{Msn2001}),

883: the companion has been detected via radial velocity efforts and

884: identified as a stellar companion in an exoplanet system

885: \citep{Cam1988,Gri2002,Egg2004}.  The semi-major axes of the planet

886: and stellar companions with respect to the primary place them at

887: Sun-Mars and Sun-Uranus separations, respectively.

888: 

889: {\bf 30. HD 222582:} This CPM pair is easily seen in DSS images, and

890: is listed in the WDS.  The primary's $\mu$ = 0\farcs183 yr$^{-1}$ at

891: 233\sdeg~and $\pi$ = 0\farcs02384 $\pm$ 0\farcs00111, from Hipparcos.

892: The secondary's $\mu$ = 0\farcs180 yr$^{-1}$ at 231\sdeg~from NLTT,

893: 0\farcs186 yr$^{-1}$ at 230\sdeg~from SuperCOSMOS and 0\farcs187

894: yr$^{-1}$ at 232\sdeg~from \citet{UCAC2} are all good matches to the

895: primary.  Our CCD photometric distance of 32.1 $\pm$ 5.0 pc matches

896: the primary's distance of 42.0 pc within 2$\sigma$.  Our spectral type

897: of M3.5V is consistent with the photometric distance estimates.  This

898: pair, resolved by Luyten in 1960, was noted to have a common proper

899: motion.  This work confirms the gravitational relationship via CPM,

900: photometry, and spectroscopy and is the first identification of this

901: stellar companion to an exoplanet system.

902: 

903: \subsubsection{Candidate Companion Systems}

904: 

905: {\bf 31. HD 8673:} WDS is the only source listing a close companion,

906: at 0\farcs1 separation.  Resolved by Mason et al. (2005) as part of a

907: survey of nearby G Dwarfs for duplicity, this unpublished observation

908: has yet to be confirmed. The projected stellar separation of 3.8 AU is

909: just over twice the planet/brown-dwarf projected separation of 1.6 AU

910: and dynamical instability is likely.  Alternatively, given the large

911: $M \sin{i}$ = 14 \mjup~for the ``planet'', it is possible that it is

912: actually a star in a near face-on orbit (i $\le$ 10 degrees), and that

913: the radial velocity and speckle observations are of the same object.

914: 

915: {\bf 32. HD 16141:} This CPM candidate was recently detected by

916: \citet{Mug2005b} at a separation of 6\farcs2, and they plan follow-up

917: observations to confirm it.  We could not detect the companion using

918: DSS frames due to saturation of the region around around the primary.

919: 

920: {\bf 33. HD 111232:} This companion is mentioned only in Hipparcos,

921: and is listed with a 'G' flag, indicating that the proper motion was

922: best fit with with higher-order terms.  \citet{Msn1998} conducted a

923: specific search for a companion using optical speckle, but did not

924: find any.  Their effort should have picked up companions with

925: $\Delta$V $\sim$ 3 and separations 0\farcs035 -- 1\farcs08.  

926: 

927: {\bf 34. HD 150706:} This companion is mentioned only in Hipparcos,

928: and is listed with a 'G' flag, indicating that the proper motion was

929: best fit with with higher-order terms.  \citet{Hal2003} reported this

930: as a single star based on two CORAVEL radial velocity surveys that

931: yielded statistical properties of main-sequence binaries with spectral

932: types F7 to K and with periods up to 10 years.

933: 

934: {\bf 35. HD 169830:} A candidate companion was detected by Kevin Apps

935: as a close 2MASS source with 11$\arcsec$ separation at

936: 265\sdeg~(private communication).  Our CCD photometric distance

937: estimate for the companion is 29 $\pm$ 23 pc, consistent with the

938: primary's distance of 36 pc, but the large error in our estimate

939: prevents confirmation.  The large error is likely due to the

940: uncertainty in our and 2MASS photometry, caused by the close, bright

941: primary, and the proximity of the companion to the primary's

942: diffraction spike.  While 2MASS lists errors of 0.04 mag for $JHK_S$,

943: it notes that the photometry is contaminated by a nearby bright

944: source. Also, the $J$ magnitude from DENIS is 0.36 magnitudes brighter

945: than the 2MASS value, indicating a larger uncertainty.  The low proper

946: motion (0\farcs015 yr$^{-1}$) of the primary prevents confirmation via

947: CPM.  While we believe that the evidence strongly indicates this as a

948: true companion, we can not confirm it until we obtain a spectrum or

949: other conclusive evidence.

950: 

951: {\bf 36. HD 217107:} Only WDS lists this close companion with 0\farcs3

952: separation at 156\sdeg.  Proper motion of the primary is not

953: detectable in DSS images.  This pair has been resolved only twice

954: \citep{McAl1987b,Msn1999} fifteen years apart, and the lack of

955: additional resolutions of this bright pair seems to indicate that a

956: large magnitude difference may be preventing additional detections.

957: Given the two reported planets with a $\sin{i}$ = 0.1 AU and 4.3 AU,

958: this companion at a projected separation of just 6 AU would likely

959: induce dynamical instability.  Explanations for this include the

960: possibility that this is an unrelated star with a chance

961: alignment, and/or that the wider ``planet'' is actually a stellar

962: companion with a highly inclined orbit.

963: 

964: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

965: \subsection{Refuted Candidates -- CPM alone does not confirm companionship}

966: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 

967: 

968: As CPM is often used to detect gravitationally-bound

969: companions, we list here five exceptions that, upon follow-up

970: analyses, turned out to be unrelated field stars rather than true

971: companions.  In three of these instances (HD 33636, HD 41004 and HD

972: 72659), we found proper motions in DSS plates to be an acceptable

973: match by eye, but photometric distances indicated that each candidate

974: was a distant field star.  In the cases of BD$-$10 3166 and HD 114783,

975: photometric distances did not provide a conclusive answer, but

976: plotting these on a $M_V$ versus $B-V$ curve of a sample of Hipparcos

977: stars allowed us to refute them.

978: 

979: {\bf BD$-$10 3166} is the only exoplanet primary without a Hipparcos

980: parallax.  We derived a CCD photometric distance of 66.8 $\pm$ 10.0

981: pc, but that is based on just one color because the object is on the

982: blue end of the $M_{K_S}$--color relations described in

983: \citet{Henry2004}.  The companion candidate, LP 731-076 is 17$\arcsec$

984: from the primary at 217\sdeg~(in the $DSS1$, epoch 1983.29 image), and

985: appears to have a matching proper motion.  The two stars were

986: identified by \citet{Luy1978} as a CPM pair, and recently recovered in

987: SuperCOSMOS data by Richard Jaworski (private communication).  In

988: SuperCOSMOS, the primary's $\mu$ = 0\farcs189 yr$^{-1}$ at

989: 252\sdeg~and the candidate's $\mu$ = 0\farcs202 yr$^{-1}$ at 242\sdeg.

990: The candidate has a published photometric distance of 11.6 $\pm$ 0.8

991: pc \citep{Reid2002}, which is consistent with our photometric distance

992: estimate of 12.5 $\pm$ 2.0 pc and our spectral type listed in

993: Table~\ref{Obs}.  In order to get a better distance estimate to the

994: primary, we plotted 285 stars from Hipparcos on a $M_V$ versus $B-V$

995: diagram.  The stars were selected based on distance (parallax greater

996: than 0\farcs05), quality of parallax (error less than 10\%),

997: luminosity class (main sequence only), and $B-V$ value of greater than

998: 0.5.  Fitting the primary's $B-V$ of 0.84 from \citet{Ryan1992} to the

999: least-squares-fit curve through the Hipparcos data yields a distance

1000: estimate of 68 pc, consistent with our photometric distance estimate,

1001: and too large to be associated with the candidate companion.  This is

1002: an interesting example of a close (17$\arcsec$ separation) CPM pair

1003: for which distance estimates to both components are of the same order

1004: of magnitude, but the components seem to be unrelated.

1005: 

1006: {\bf HD 33636} has $\mu$ = 0\farcs227 yr$^{-1}$ at 127\sdeg~and $\pi$

1007: = 0\farcs03485 $\pm$ 0\farcs00133 (29 pc) from Hipparcos.  The faint

1008: CPM candidate at a separation of 220$\arcsec$ at 250\sdeg~(in the DSS

1009: $POSS2/UKSTU Red$, epoch 1990.81 image) was refuted by us after

1010: obtaining a CCD photometric distance of 739 $\pm$ 162 pc.  Our

1011: spectrum, although noisy, allows us to estimate the spectral type to

1012: be M1.0V, which indicates a large distance consistent with the

1013: photometric estimate.

1014: 

1015: {\bf HD 41004} has $\mu$ = 0\farcs078 yr$^{-1}$ at 327\sdeg~and $\pi$

1016: = 0\farcs02324 $\pm$ 0\farcs00102 (43 pc), from Hipparcos.  The faint

1017: CPM candidate at a separation of 145$\arcsec$ at 335\sdeg~(in the DSS

1018: $POSS2/UKSTU Red$, epoch 1993.96 image) was refuted by us after

1019: obtaining a CCD photometric distance of 557 $\pm$ 103 pc.  We estimate

1020: the spectral type to be M0.5, although the luminosity class is

1021: uncertain -- it could be a dwarf or a sub-dwarf.  The candidate's

1022: $\mu$ = 0\farcs046 yr$^{-1}$ at 6\sdeg~from SuperCOSMOS is not a good

1023: match to the primary.

1024: 

1025: {\bf HD 72659} has $\mu$ = 0\farcs150 yr$^{-1}$ at 229\sdeg~and $\pi$

1026: = 0\farcs01947 $\pm$ 0\farcs00103 (51 pc), from Hipparcos.  The

1027: candidate, at a separation of 195$\arcsec$ at 165\sdeg~(in the DSS

1028: $POSS2/UKSTU Red$, epoch 1992.03 image), was refuted by us after

1029: obtaining a CCD photometric distance of 369 $\pm$ 99 pc.  Our spectral

1030: identification as M3.0V is consistent with this photometric distance.

1031: SuperCOSMOS lists the CPM candidate's $\mu$ = 0\farcs066 yr$^{-1}$ at

1032: 199\sdeg, showing that proper motion is not a good match.

1033: 

1034: {\bf HD 114783} is another CPM pair that looks like it may be

1035: physical, but is not.  From SuperCOSMOS, the primary has $\mu$ =

1036: 0\farcs179 yr$^{-1}$ at 280\sdeg~and the candidate companion (at a

1037: separation of 240$\arcsec$ at 47\sdeg~in the DSS $POSS2/UKSTU Red$,

1038: epoch 1996.23 image) has $\mu$ = 0\farcs184 yr$^{-1}$ at 281\sdeg.

1039: The primary's distance from the Hipparcos parallax is 20.4 pc.  Our

1040: plate photometric distance estimate for the companion is 20.2 $\pm$

1041: 5.2 pc based on only 3 colors.  However, using CCD photometry, we get

1042: a distance of 54.0 $\pm$ 9.3 pc, based on only 2 colors.  The

1043: candidate companion is CCDM J13129-0213AB, a binary (listed in the WDS

1044: with a separation of 2\farcs0 at 28\sdeg), and hence, its actual

1045: distance is greater than photometrically indicated.  We plotted the

1046: primary on the $M_V$ versus $B-V$ diagram using Hipparcos data as

1047: described above, and it falls close to the main sequence fit,

1048: indicating that it is likely a single star.  The candidate companion,

1049: based on its $B-V$ of 1.10 yields a distance of 36 pc, using the

1050: Hipparcos plot, but its actual distance will be greater because it is

1051: a binary.  Our spectra for the two stars show very similar absorption

1052: lines, although the continuum seems to indicate that the candidate

1053: companion is slightly redder.  Given that the spectral types are

1054: close, and that the candidate companion is a binary while the primary

1055: appears to be single, we can only explain the large $\Delta$V (primary

1056: $V$ = 7.56, and candidate companion $V$ = 9.78) by adopting

1057: significantly different distances to the two stars.  Hence, we

1058: conclude that this is not a gravitationally bound pair, despite the

1059: compelling proper motion match.

1060: 

1061: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1062: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1063: \section {Discussion}

1064: \label{sec:Discussion}

1065: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1066: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 

1067: 

1068: Our findings indicate that 30 (23\%) of the 131 exoplanet systems have

1069: confirmed stellar companions, and 6 more (5\%) have candidate

1070: companions.  Given the constraints of our search -- any new companions

1071: we detected had to be widely-separated from primaries with high proper

1072: motion -- these numbers should be regarded as lower limits.  This

1073: point is confirmed by a recent paper, \citet{Mug2005b}, which reported

1074: four new companions in exoplanet systems, of which we had

1075: independently identified only one (HD 213240B).  Several interesting

1076: properties are revealed by this comprehensive assessment.

1077: 

1078: Three of the exoplanet systems (HD 178911, 16 Cyg B, and HD 219449)

1079: are stellar triples, and are arranged similarly --- a single planet

1080: orbits close to one star and there is a distant, tight binary.  In

1081: each system, the three stars are all of the same spectral class (G for

1082: HD 178911 and 16 Cyg, and K for HD 219449).  We find it curious that

1083: all three triple systems contain stars of comparable mass

1084: (i.e. systems such as a G-dwarf exoplanet host with a M-dwarf binary

1085: are not seen).  Could this be due to a selection effect (i.e. faint

1086: companions are not as well studied for multiplicity) or does this say

1087: something about the angular momentum distribution in star forming

1088: regions?  Only a comprehensive survey of all companions for duplicity

1089: can lead us to an answer.

1090: 

1091: It is interesting to note that recent exoplanet discoveries are

1092: predominantly found in single star systems.  Of the first 102

1093: radial-velocity-detected exoplanet systems, 26 (26\%) have confirmed

1094: stellar companions.  In contrast, only 4 (14\%) of the latest 29

1095: systems have confirmed stellar companions.  Even though we are dealing

1096: with small number statistics, we believe that this change is

1097: significant and worthy of further examination.  Our first inclination

1098: was that recent planet detections are at larger projected semi-major

1099: axes, and hence favor single systems because stellar companions would

1100: have to be even farther out to provide the uncorrupted ``single''

1101: systems sought by radial velocity programs.  However, we found no

1102: correlation between the timing of exoplanet reporting and its

1103: projected semi-major axis.  So, we are not able to explain this

1104: curiosity at this point, and simply identify it for further

1105: examination.

1106: 

1107: Exoplanet hosts are deficient in having stellar companions when

1108: compared to a sample of field stars. Our updated results for stellar

1109: counts in the exoplanet sample yield a single:double:triple:quadruple

1110: percentage of 79:21:2:0 for confirmed systems, and 72:24:4:0

1111: considering candidates.  While these are lower limits for

1112: multiplicity, they are significantly lower than the \citet{Duq1991}

1113: results of 57:38:4:1 for multiples with orbits, and 51:40:7:2

1114: considering candidates.  This is certainly due in part to the fact

1115: that planet searches specifically exclude known close binaries from

1116: their samples (e.g. \citealt{Vogt2000}), and further eliminate any new

1117: binaries detected via radial velocity.  We currently do not have

1118: enough detailed information about the exoplanet search target

1119: selection process to say whether the different multiplicity ratios are

1120: entirely due to selection effects, or is indicative of planetary disk

1121: instability and reduced planet formation in binary star systems.

1122: 

1123: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1124: \subsection {Planetary \& Stellar Orbits in Multiple Star Systems}

1125: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 

1126: 

1127: Figure~\ref{Orbits} shows the a $\sin{i}$ of planetary companions and

1128: projected separations of the stellar companions for the 30 confirmed

1129: exoplanets that reside in multiple star systems.  The Y-axis shows the

1130: sequence number of the exoplanet system as listed in column 1 of

1131: Table~\ref{results}.  The figure clearly indicates the presence of

1132: separate planetary and stellar orbit regimes for the data currently

1133: available.  All planets are within 6 AU, and all stars are at a

1134: projected separation of greater than 20 AU from the exoplanet host.

1135: Note that all points in the figure can potentially move right because

1136: (1) planets are plotted at a separation of a $\sin{i}$, and (2) stars

1137: are plotted based on their projected separations (although a few could

1138: move left if they have been caught near apastron in their orbits).

1139: The continued search for wider orbit planets will answer the question

1140: of whether this is simply due to selection effect or if this says

1141: something significant about planetary disk truncation in multiple star

1142: systems.

1143: 

1144: 55 Cnc (HD 75732), an extensive extrasolar system with four reported

1145: planets, has the widest projected planetary orbit with an a $\sin{i}$

1146: of 5.3 AU.  It is noteworthy that such an extensive exoplanet system

1147: also has a stellar companion, at a projected separation of 1050

1148: AU. This provides direct evidence of the stability of protoplanetary

1149: disks in multiple star systems such as to allow formation and

1150: sustenance of multiple planets, at least as long as the separation

1151: between the stars is sufficiently large.  This system can also provide

1152: an observational constraint for evaluating theoretical models of disk

1153: stability and solar system evolution.

1154: 

1155: The smallest projected separation for a stellar companion is 21 AU for

1156: GJ 86, closely followed by 22 AU for HD 41004 and $\gamma$ Cep.  Each

1157: system has only one reported planet, with a $\sin{i}$ of 0.1 AU, 1.3

1158: AU and 2.0 AU, respectively.  This may be evidence that a sufficiently

1159: close stellar companion will disrupt the protoplanetary disk,

1160: truncating planet formation at a few AU from the primary.

1161: 

1162: Every exoplanet system so far discovered in a multiple star system has

1163: an S-type (Satellite-type) orbit, where the planet orbits one of the

1164: stars.  This is not surprising because current radial velocity

1165: searches for exoplanets exclude close binaries

1166: (e.g. \citealt{Vogt2000}).  While the formation and stability of

1167: planets in P-type (Planet-type) orbits, where a planet orbits the

1168: center-of-mass of a binary or multiple star system in a circumbinary

1169: configuration, has been theoretically demonstrated

1170: \citep{Hol1999,Boss2005,Mus2005}, it has not yet been observationally

1171: supported. However, \citet{Cor2005} have raised the interesting

1172: possibility that the 2.4 \mjup~outer planet around HD 202206 may

1173: in-fact have formed in a circumbinary disk around the primary and the

1174: closer 17 \mjup~minimum mass object.

1175: 

1176: Several studies have investigated the theoretical stability of

1177: planetary orbits in multiple star systems

1178: (e.g. \citealt{Hol1999,Ben2003}), deriving ratios of orbital

1179: semi-major axes of the planet and stellar companions for various

1180: values of mass-ratio and eccentricity of the stellar orbits.  Our work

1181: provides observational constraints based on all known exoplanets in

1182: multiple star systems.  Of the 30 confirmed exoplanets in multiple

1183: star systems, only three have a ratio of stellar to planetary

1184: projected separation of less than 100.  The lowest ratio is 11, for

1185: $\gamma$ Cep (HD 222404).  Although numerical simulations demonstrate

1186: the stability of orbits for much smaller separation ratios (e.g. for

1187: m$_2$/(m$_1$ + m$_2$) = 0.5 and e = 0.1, the minimum ratio of stellar

1188: and planetary orbital semi-major axes is about four from

1189: \citealt{Hol1999}), no planets have yet been observed in this regime.

1190: This could be attributed to the selection effect of close binaries

1191: being excluded from planet searches, as described above.  However,

1192: this could also provide evidence for protoplanetary disk truncation by

1193: a close stellar companion, preventing planet formation in systems with

1194: separation ratios close to the limits permitted by numerical

1195: simulations.

1196: 

1197: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1198: \subsection {Stellar Companions Might Influence Eccentricity of

1199: Planetary Orbits}

1200: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 

1201: 

1202: Eccentricities of exoplanet orbits are significantly higher than those

1203: of planets in our Solar System \citep{Mar2005b}.  \citet{Tak2005}

1204: investigated whether the Kozai mechanism can explain this entirely,

1205: and concluded that other effects are also at play.  We investigated

1206: the potential impact of close stellar companions on the eccentricity

1207: of planetary orbits, as these would have a greater gravitational

1208: influence on the planet's orbit, and potentially reduce the period of

1209: Kozai cycles.  Figure~\ref{eccrat} shows the eccentricity of the

1210: planetary orbits as a function of the ratio of projected stellar

1211: separations to the a $\sin{i}$ of planetary orbits, and does not

1212: conclusively demonstrate any relationship.  However, even though three

1213: data points do not provide conclusive evidence, it is interesting to

1214: note that the systems with ratios under 100 have a minimum

1215: eccentricity of 0.2, while larger ratio systems have lower

1216: eccentricities.

1217: 

1218: We also looked at the relationship between period and eccentricity of

1219: planetary orbits in systems with and without stellar companions.

1220: Figure~\ref{eccper} shows the eccentricity of planetary orbits versus

1221: the orbital period.  Planet orbits in systems with confirmed stellar

1222: companions are represented by filled squares, orbits with candidate

1223: stellar companions are represented by open squares, and orbits in

1224: single star systems are denoted by open circles.  \citet{Udry2004} and

1225: \citet{Egg2004} presented similar plots and concluded that all the

1226: planets with a period P $\lesssim$ 40 days orbiting in multiple-star

1227: systems have an eccentricity smaller than 0.05, whereas longer period

1228: planets found in multiple-star systems can have larger eccentricities.

1229: Our updated results show that this conclusion is no longer strictly

1230: true.  The latest planet reported around 55 Cnc, designated with

1231: suffix e, has a period of 2.81 days and an eccentricity of 0.17.

1232: Also, we report HD 38529 as a multiple star system, which was assumed

1233: to be a single star system in \citet{Udry2004}.  Planet HD 38529b has

1234: a period of 14.31 days and an eccentricity of 0.29.  It appears that

1235: single-star and multiple-star planetary systems have similar

1236: period-eccentricity relationships.

1237: 

1238: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1239: \section {Conclusion}

1240: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1241: 

1242: Our comprehensive investigation of 131 exoplanet systems reveals that

1243: 30 (23\%) of these have stellar companions, an increase from 15

1244: reported in previous such comprehensive efforts

1245: \citep{Egg2004,Udry2004}.  We report new stellar companions to HD

1246: 38529 and HD 188015, and identify a candidate companion to HD 169830.

1247: Our synthesis effort, bringing together disparate databases,

1248: recognizes, for the first time, five additional stellar companions to

1249: exoplanet hosts, including one triple system.  A by-product of our CPM

1250: investigation is the determination that 20 of the WDS entries for

1251: exoplanet hosts are not gravitationally bound to their ``primaries'',

1252: but are chance alignments in the sky.  Some interesting examples in

1253: the inventory of multiple-star exoplanet systems include: (1) At least

1254: 3 and possibly 5 exoplanet systems are stellar triples (see

1255: \S\ref{sec:Discussion}); (2) Three systems (GJ 86, HD 41004, and

1256: $\gamma$ Cep) have planets at $\sim$ Mercury to Mars distances and

1257: potentially close-in stellar companions at projected separations

1258: similar to the distance between the Sun and Uranus ($\sim$ 20 AU); (3)

1259: Two systems (GJ 86 and HD 147513) have white dwarf companions.  These

1260: results show that planets form and survive in a variety of stellar

1261: multiplicity environments.  We hope that this compendium of stellar

1262: multiples in exoplanet systems will provide a valuable benchmark for

1263: future companion searches and exoplanet system analyses.

1264: 

1265: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1266: \section {Acknowledgments}

1267: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1268: 

1269: We wish to thank Charlie Finch and Jennifer Winters for their

1270: supporting work in this effort.  We also thank G. Fritz Benedict and

1271: Jacob Bean for obtaining and reducing the radial velocity data for HD

1272: 38529B.  We are grateful to Geoff Marcy and Kevin Apps for reviewing

1273: our draft and providing useful suggestions, and to the anonymous

1274: referee, who provided detailed comments based on a thorough review.

1275: The photometric and spectroscopic observations reported here were

1276: carried out under the auspices of the SMARTS (Small and Moderate

1277: Aperture Research Telescope System) Consortium, which operates several

1278: small telescopes at CTIO, including the 0.9m, 1.0m, and 1.5m.  TJH's

1279: Space Interferometry Mission grant supported some of the work carried

1280: out here.  This effort used multi-epoch images from the Digitized Sky

1281: Survey, which was produced at the Space Telescope Science Institute

1282: under U.S. Government grant NAG W-2166.  This work also used data

1283: products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project

1284: of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and

1285: Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the

1286: National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science

1287: Foundation.  Additionally, this work used data from the SuperCOSMOS

1288: Sky Survey, the Hipparcos catalog, and SIMBAD databases.

1289: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% REFS %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1290: 

1291: \begin{thebibliography}{}

1292: 

1293: \bibitem[Alexander \& Lourens(1969)]{Ale1969} Alexander, J.~B., \&

1294: Lourens, J.~V.~B.\ 1969, Monthly Notes of the Astronomical Society of

1295: South Africa, 28, 95

1296: 

1297: \bibitem[Allen et al.(2000)]{All2000} Allen, C., Poveda, A., \&

1298: Herrera, M.~A.\ 2000, \aap, 356, 529

1299: 

1300: \bibitem[Bailey(1900)]{Bai1900} Bailey, S.~I.\ 1900, Harvard Ann. 32,

1301: Pt.2, 296

1302: 

1303: \bibitem[Baize(1957)]{Bai1957} Baize, P.\ 1957, Journal des

1304: Observateurs, 40, 165

1305: 

1306: \bibitem[Balega et al.(2004)]{Bal2004} Balega, I., Balega, Y.~Y.,

1307: Maksimov, A.~F., Pluzhnik, E.~A., Schertl, D., Shkhagosheva, Z.~U., \&

1308: Weigelt, G.\ 2004, \aap, 422, 627

1309: 

1310: \bibitem[Benest \& Gonczi(2003)]{Ben2003} Benest, D., \& Gonczi, R.\

1311: 2003, Earth Moon and Planets, 93, 175

1312: 

1313: \bibitem[Bessel(1990)]{Bes1990} Bessel, M.~S.\ 1990, \aaps, 83, 357

1314: 

1315: \bibitem[Blazit et al.(1977)]{Bla1977} Blazit, A., Bonneau, D.,

1316: Koechlin, L., \& Labeyrie, A.\ 1977, \apjl, 214, L79

1317: 

1318: \bibitem[Bonnarel et al.(2000)]{Aladin} Bonnarel, F., et al.\ 2000,

1319: \aaps, 143, 33

1320: 

1321: \bibitem[Boss(2005)]{Boss2005} Boss, A.~P.\ 2005, American 

1322: Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 207

1323: 

1324: \bibitem[Campbell et al.(1988)]{Cam1988} Campbell, B., Walker,

1325: G.~A.~H., \& Yang, S.\ 1988, \apj, 331, 902

1326: 

1327: \bibitem[Cochran et al.(1991)]{Coc1991} Cochran, W.~D., Hatzes, 

1328: A.~P., \& Hancock, T.~J.\ 1991, \apjl, 380, L35

1329: 

1330: \bibitem[Cochran et al.(1997)]{Coc1997} Cochran, W.~D., Hatzes, 

1331: A.~P., Butler, R.~P., \& Marcy, G.~W.\ 1997, \apj, 483, 457 

1332: 

1333: \bibitem[Correia et al.(2005)]{Cor2005} Correia, A.~C.~M., 

1334: Udry, S., Mayor, M., Laskar, J., Naef, D., Pepe, F., Queloz, D., \& Santos, 

1335: N.~C.\ 2005, \aap, 440, 751 

1336: 

1337: \bibitem[Couteau(1953)]{Cou1953} Couteau, P.\ 1953, J. Obs. 37, 37

1338: 

1339: \bibitem[Dahn et al.(1988)]{Dahn1988} Dahn, C.~C., et al.\ 1988, \aj,

1340: 95, 237

1341: 

1342: \bibitem[Desidera et al.(2004)]{Des2004} Desidera, S., Gratton, R.~G.,

1343: Endl, M., Claudi, R.~U., \& Cosentino, R.\ 2004, \aap, 420, L27

1344: 

1345: \bibitem[Duquennoy \& Mayor(1991)]{Duq1991} Duquennoy, A., \& Mayor,

1346: M.\ 1991, \aap, 248, 485

1347: 

1348: \bibitem[Eggenberger et al.(2004)]{Egg2004} Eggenberger, A., Udry, S.,

1349: \& Mayor, M.\ 2004, \aap, 417, 353

1350: 

1351: \bibitem[Eggenberger et al.(2005)]{Egg2005} Eggenberger, A., et al.\

1352: 2005, astro-ph, 0510561

1353: 

1354: \bibitem[Els et al.(2001)]{Els2001} Els, S.~G., Sterzik, M.~F.,

1355: Marchis, F., Pantin, E., Endl, M., K{\" u}rster, M.\ 2001, \aap, 370,

1356: L1

1357: 

1358: \bibitem[ESA(1997)]{HIP} ESA 1997, The {\it Hipparcos} and Tycho

1359: Catalogues, ESA SP-1200 (Noordwijk: ESA)

1360: 

1361: \bibitem[Fischer et al.(1999)]{Fis1999} Fischer, D.~A., Marcy, 

1362: G.~W., Butler, R.~P., Vogt, S.~S., \& Apps, K.\ 1999, \pasp, 111, 50 

1363: 

1364: \bibitem[Fischer \& Valenti(2005)]{Fis2005} Fischer, D.~A., \& 

1365: Valenti, J.\ 2005, \apj, 622, 1102

1366: 

1367: \bibitem[Frink et al.(2002)]{Frink2002} Frink, S., Mitchell, D.~S.,

1368: Quirrenbach, A., Fischer, D.~A., Marcy, G.~W., \& Butler, R.~P.\ 2002,

1369: \apj, 576, 478

1370: 

1371: \bibitem[Gatewood et al.(2001)]{Gat2001} Gatewood, G., Han, I., \&

1372: Black, D.~C.\ 2001, \apjl, 548, L61

1373: 

1374: \bibitem[Gliese(1969)]{CNS1969} Gliese, W.\ 1969, Veroeffentlichungen

1375: des Astronomischen Rechen-Instituts Heidelberg, 22, 1

1376: 

1377: \bibitem[Gliese \& Jahrei{\ss}(1979)]{CNS1979} Gliese, W., \&

1378: Jahrei{\ss}, H.\ 1979, Bulletin d'Information du Centre de Donnees

1379: Stellaires, 16, 92

1380: 

1381: \bibitem[Gliese \& Jahrei{\ss}(1991)]{CNS1991} Gliese, W., \&

1382: Jahrei{\ss}, H.\ 1991, On: The Astronomical Data Center CD-ROM:

1383: Selected Astronomical Catalogs, Vol.~I; L.E.~Brotzmann, S.E.~Gesser

1384: (eds.), NASA/Astronomical Data Center, Goddard Space Flight Center,

1385: Greenbelt, MD

1386: 

1387: \bibitem[Graham(1982)]{Gra1982} Graham, J.~A.\ 1982, \pasp, 94, 244

1388: 

1389: \bibitem[Gray et al.(2003)]{Gra2003} Gray, R.~O., Corbally, 

1390: C.~J., Garrison, R.~F., McFadden, M.~T., \& Robinson, P.~E.\ 2003, \aj, 

1391: 126, 2048

1392: 

1393: \bibitem[Griffin et al.(2002)]{Gri2002} Griffin, R.~F., 

1394: Carquillat, J.-M., \& Ginestet, N.\ 2002, The Observatory, 122, 90 

1395: 

1396: \bibitem[Halbwachs(1986)]{Hal1986} Halbwachs, J.~L.\ 1986, \aaps, 66,

1397: 131

1398: 

1399: \bibitem[Halbwachs et al.(2003)]{Hal2003} Halbwachs, J.~L., Mayor, M.,

1400: Udry, S., \& Arenou, F.\ 2003, \aap, 397, 159

1401: 

1402: \bibitem[Hale(1994)]{Hale1994} Hale, A.\ 1994, \aj, 107, 306

1403: 

1404: \bibitem[Hambly et al.(2001a)]{Ham2001a} Hambly, N.~C., et al.\ 

1405: 2001a, \mnras, 326, 1279

1406: 

1407: \bibitem[Hambly et al.(2001b)]{Ham2001b} Hambly, N.~C., Irwin, 

1408: M.~J., \& MacGillivray, H.~T.\ 2001b, \mnras, 326, 1295

1409: 

1410: \bibitem[Hambly et al.(2004)]{Ham2004} Hambly, N.~C., Henry, T.~J.,

1411: Subasavage, J.~P., Brown, M.~A., \& Jao, W.\ 2004, \aj, 128, 437

1412: 

1413: \bibitem[Hartkopf \& McAlister(1984)]{Hart1984} Hartkopf, W.~I., \&

1414: McAlister, H.~A.\ 1984, \pasp, 96, 105

1415: 

1416: \bibitem[Hartkopf et al.(2000)]{Hart2000} Hartkopf, W.~I., et al.\

1417: 2000, \aj, 119, 3084

1418: 

1419: \bibitem[Hatzes et al.(2003)]{Hat2003} Hatzes, A.~P., Cochran, 

1420: W.~D., Endl, M., McArthur, B., Paulson, D.~B., Walker, G.~A.~H., Campbell, 

1421: B., \& Yang, S.\ 2003, \apj, 599, 1383 

1422: 

1423: \bibitem[Henry et al.(2002)]{Henry2002} Henry, T.~J., Walkowicz,

1424: L.~M., Barto, T.~C., \& Golimowski, D.~A.\ 2002, \aj, 123, 2002

1425: 

1426: \bibitem[Henry et al.(2004)]{Henry2004} Henry, T.~J., Subasavage,

1427: J.~P., Brown, M.~A., Beaulieu, T.~D., Jao, W., \& Hambly, N.~C.\ 2004,

1428: \aj, 128, 2460

1429: 

1430: \bibitem[H{\o}g et al.(1998)]{Hog1998} Hog, E., Kuzmin, A., Bastian, U.,

1431: Fabricius, C., Kuimov, K., Lindegren, L., Makarov, V.~V., \& Roeser,

1432: S.\ 1998, \aap, 335, L65

1433: 

1434: \bibitem[Holden(1966)]{Hold1966} Holden, F.\ 1966, Publications of

1435: Michigan Observatory, 9, 185

1436: 

1437: \bibitem[Holman \& Wiegert(1999)]{Hol1999} Holman, M.~J., \& Wiegert,

1438: P.~A.\ 1999, \aj, 117, 621

1439: 

1440: \bibitem[Hough(1887)]{Hou1887} Hough, G.~W.\ 1887, Astronomische

1441: Nachrichten, 116, 273

1442: 

1443: \bibitem[Jacoby et al.(1984)]{Jac1984} Jacoby, G.~H., Hunter, 

1444: D.~A., \& Christian, C.~A.\ 1984, \apjs, 56, 257 

1445: 

1446: \bibitem[Jessup(1955)]{Jes1955} Jessup, M.~K.\ 1955,

1447: Publ. Univ. Michigan Obs. 11, 1

1448: 

1449: \bibitem[Jonckheere(1911)]{Jon1911} Jonckheere, R.\ 1911, \mnras, 72,

1450: 45

1451: 

1452: \bibitem[Jonckheere(1917)]{Jon1917} Jonckheere, R.\ 1917, MemRAS 61, 1

1453: 

1454: \bibitem[Jonckheere(1944)]{Jon1944} Jonckheere, R.\ 1944, J. Obs. 27,

1455: 11

1456: 

1457: \bibitem[Landolt(1992)]{Lan1992} Landolt, A.~U.\ 1992, \aj, 104, 340

1458: 

1459: \bibitem[Lepine \& Shara(2005)]{Lep2005} Lepine, S., \& Shara, 

1460: M.~M.\ 2005, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 1298, 0

1461: 

1462: \bibitem[Lowrance et al.(2002)]{Low2002} Lowrance, P.~J., Kirkpatrick,

1463: J.~D., \& Beichman, C.~A.\ 2002, \apjl, 572, L79

1464: 

1465: \bibitem[Luhman \& Jayawardhana(2002)]{Luh2002} Luhman, K.~L., 

1466: \& Jayawardhana, R.\ 2002, \apj, 566, 1132

1467: 

1468: \bibitem[Luyten(1978)]{Luy1978} Luyten, W.~J.\ 1978, Univ. Minnesota

1469: Proper Motion Surv. \#50

1470: 

1471: \bibitem[Luyten(1979)]{Luy1979} Luyten, W.~J.\ 1979, New Luyten

1472: Catalogue of stars with proper motions larger than two tenths of an

1473: arcsecond (NLTT) (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota), VizieR

1474: On-line Data Catalog: I/98A

1475: 

1476: \bibitem[Marcy \& Moore(1989)]{Mar1989} Marcy, G.~W., \& Moore, D.\

1477: 1989, \apj, 341, 961

1478: 

1479: \bibitem[Marcy et al.(2002)]{Mar2002} Marcy, G.~W., Butler, 

1480: R.~P., Fischer, D.~A., Laughlin, G., Vogt, S.~S., Henry, G.~W., \& 

1481: Pourbaix, D.\ 2002, \apj, 581, 1375 

1482: 

1483: \bibitem[Marcy et al.(2005a)]{Mar2005a} Marcy, G.~W., Butler, 

1484: R.~P., Vogt, S.~S., Fischer, D.~A., Henry, G.~W., Laughlin, G., Wright, 

1485: J.~T., \& Johnson, J.~A.\ 2005a, \apj, 619, 570

1486: 

1487: \bibitem[Marcy et al.(2005b)]{Mar2005b} Marcy, G., Butler, R.~P., 

1488: Fischer, D., Vogt, S., Wright, J.~T., Tinney, C.~G., \& Jones, H.~R.~A.\ 

1489: 2005b, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, 158, 24 

1490: 

1491: \bibitem[Mason et al.(1998)]{Msn1998} Mason, B.~D., Henry, T.~J.,

1492: Hartkopf, W.~I., Ten Brummelaar, T., \& Soderblom, D.~R.\ 1998, \aj,

1493: 116, 2975

1494: 

1495: \bibitem[Mason et al.(1999)]{Msn1999} Mason, B.~D., et al.\ 1999, \aj,

1496: 117, 1890

1497: 

1498: \bibitem[Mason et al.(2001)]{Msn2001} Mason, B.~D., Hartkopf, W.~I.,

1499: Holdenried, E.~R., \& Rafferty, T.~J.\ 2001, \aj, 121, 3224

1500: 

1501: \bibitem[Mayor et al.(2004)]{May2004} Mayor, M., Udry, S., Naef, D.,

1502: Pepe, F., Queloz, D., Santos, N.~C., \& Burnet, M.\ 2004, \aap, 415,

1503: 391

1504: 

1505: \bibitem[McAlister(1978)]{McAl1978} McAlister, H.~A.\ 1978, \pasp, 90,

1506: 288

1507: 

1508: \bibitem[McAlister et al.(1987a)]{McAl1987a} McAlister, H.~A., Hartkopf,

1509: W.~I., Hutter, D.~J., Shara, M.~M., \& Franz, O.~G.\ 1987a, \aj, 93,

1510: 183

1511: 

1512: \bibitem[McAlister et al.(1987b)]{McAl1987b} McAlister, H.~A.,

1513: Hartkopf, W.~I., Hutter, D.~J., \& Franz, O.~G.\ 1987b, \aj, 93, 688

1514: 

1515: \bibitem[McCarthy et al.(1993)]{McC1993} McCarthy, J.~K., Sandiford, B.~A.,

1516: Boyd, D., \& Booth, J.\ 1993, \pasp, 105, 881

1517: 

1518: \bibitem[Mugrauer et al.(2004a)]{Mug2004a} Mugrauer, M.,

1519: Neuh{\"a}user, R., Mazeh, T., Guenther, E., \& Fern{\'a}ndez, M.\

1520: 2004a, Astronomische Nachrichten, 325, 718

1521: 

1522: \bibitem[Mugrauer et al.(2004b)]{Mug2004b} Mugrauer, M.,

1523: Neuh{\"a}user, R., Mazeh, T., Alves, J., \& Guenther, E.\ 2004b, \aap,

1524: 425, 249

1525: 

1526: \bibitem[Mugrauer \& Neuh{\" a}user(2005a)]{Mug2005a} Mugrauer, M., \&

1527: Neuh{\" a}user, R.\ 2005a, \mnras, L50

1528: 

1529: \bibitem[Mugrauer et al.(2005b)]{Mug2005b} Mugrauer, M., Neuh{\"a}user,

1530: R., Seifahrt, A., Mazeh, T., \& Guenther, E.\ 2005b, \aap, 440, 1051

1531: 

1532: \bibitem[Musielak et al.(2005)]{Mus2005} Musielak, Z.~E., Cuntz, M.,

1533: Marshall, E.~A., \& Stuit, T.~D.\ 2005, \aap, 434, 355

1534: 

1535: \bibitem[Naef et al.(2001)]{Naef2001} Naef, D., et al.\ 2001, 

1536: \aap, 375, L27 

1537: 

1538: \bibitem[Naef et al.(2003)]{Naef2003} Naef, D., et al.\ 2003, \aap,

1539: 410, 1051

1540: 

1541: \bibitem[Nidever et al.(2002)]{Nid2002} Nidever, D.~L., Marcy, G.~W.,

1542: Butler, R.~P., Fischer, D.~A., \& Vogt, S.~S.\ 2002, \apjs, 141, 503

1543: 

1544: \bibitem[Noyes et al.(1997)]{Noy1997} Noyes, R.~W., Jha, S.,

1545: Korzennik, S.~G., Krockenberger, M., Nisenson, P., Brown, T.~M.,

1546: Kennelly, E.~J., \& Horner, S.~D.\ 1997, \apjl, 487, L195

1547: 

1548: \bibitem[Oppenheimer et al.(2001)]{Opp2001} Oppenheimer, B.~R.,

1549: Golimowski, D.~A., Kulkarni, S.~R., Matthews, K., Nakajima, T.,

1550: Creech-Eakman, M., \& Durrance, S.~T.\ 2001, \aj, 121, 2189

1551: 

1552: \bibitem[Patience et al.(2002)]{Pat2002} Patience, J., et al.\ 2002,

1553: \apj, 581, 654

1554: 

1555: \bibitem[Pourbaix \& Arenou(2001)]{Pou2001} Pourbaix, D., \& Arenou,

1556: F.\ 2001, \aap, 372, 935

1557: 

1558: \bibitem[Poveda et al.(1994)]{Pov1994} Poveda, A., Herrera, M.~A.,

1559: Allen, C., Cordero, G., \& Lavalley, C.\ 1994, Revista Mexicana de

1560: Astronomia y Astrofisica, 28, 43

1561: 

1562: \bibitem[Queloz et al.(2000)]{Que2000} Queloz, D., et al.\ 

1563: 2000, \aap, 354, 99 

1564: 

1565: \bibitem[Reffert et al.(2006)]{Ref2006} Reffert, S., \&

1566: Quirrenbach, A.\ 2006, \aap (accepted)

1567: 

1568: \bibitem[Reid et al.(2002)]{Reid2002} Reid, I.~N., Kilkenny, D., 

1569: \& Cruz, K.~L.\ 2002, \aj, 123, 2822

1570: 

1571: \bibitem[Ryan(1992)]{Ryan1992} Ryan, S.~G.\ 1992, \aj, 104, 1144 

1572: 

1573: \bibitem[See(1896)]{See1896} See, T.~J.~J.\ 1896, AN 142, 43

1574: 

1575: \bibitem[Smyth(1844)]{Smy1844} Smyth, W.~H.\ 1844, Cycle of Celestial

1576: Objects 2

1577: 

1578: \bibitem[Soulie(1985)]{Sou1985} Soulie, G.\ 1985, \aaps, 61, 17

1579: 

1580: \bibitem[Takeda \& Rasio(2005)]{Tak2005} Takeda, G., \& Rasio, 

1581: F.~A.\ 2005, \apj, 627, 1001

1582: 

1583: \bibitem[Tokovinin et al.(2000)]{Tok2000} Tokovinin, A.~A., 

1584: Griffin, R.~F., Balega, Y.~Y., Pluzhnik, E.~A., \& Udry, S.\ 2000, 

1585: Astronomy Letters, 26, 116

1586: 

1587: \bibitem[Turner et al.(2001)]{Turn2001} Turner, N.~H., Brummelaar,

1588: T.~A.~t., McAlister, H.~A., Mason, B.~D., Hartkopf, W.~I., \& Roberts,

1589: L.~C.\ 2001, \aj, 121, 3254

1590: 

1591: \bibitem[Udry et al.(2004)]{Udry2004} Udry, S., Eggenberger, A.,

1592: Mayor, M., Mazeh, T., \& Zucker, S.\ 2004, Revista Mexicana de

1593: Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, 21, 207

1594: 

1595: \bibitem[Urban et al.(1998)]{Urb1998} Urban, S.~E., Corbin, T.~E.,

1596: Wycoff, G.~L., Martin, J.~C., Jackson, E.~S., Zacharias, M.~I., \&

1597: Hall, D.~M.\ 1998, \aj, 115, 1212

1598: 

1599: \bibitem[van Altena et al.(1995)]{vanAlt1995} van Altena, W.~F., 

1600: Lee, J.~T., \& Hoffleit, E.~D.\ 1995, New Haven, CT: Yale University 

1601: Observatory, 4th ed., completely revised and enlarged

1602: 

1603: \bibitem[Van Biesbroeck(1960)]{VanB1960} Van Biesbroeck, G.\ 1960,

1604: Publ.  Yerkes Obs. 9, pt. 2, 1960

1605: 

1606: \bibitem[van den Bos(1949)]{vandb1949} van den Bos, W.~H.\ 1949, Union

1607: Obs. Circ. 5, 312

1608: 

1609: \bibitem[van den Bos(1960)]{vandb1960} van den Bos, W.~H.\ 1960,

1610: Publ. Yerkes Obs. 9, Pt.1

1611: 

1612: \bibitem[van den Bos(1963)]{vandb1963} van den Bos, W.~H.\ 1963, \aj,

1613: 68, 582

1614: 

1615: \bibitem[Vanderdonck(1911)]{Van1911} Vanderdonck, J.\ 1911, \mnras 72,

1616: 45

1617: 

1618: \bibitem[Vogt et al.(2000)]{Vogt2000} Vogt, S.~S., Marcy, G.~W.,

1619: Butler, R.~P., \& Apps, K.\ 2000, \apj, 536, 902

1620: 

1621: \bibitem[Wegner(1973)]{Weg1973} Wegner, G.\ 1973, \mnras, 163, 381

1622: 

1623: \bibitem[Wilson(1953)]{Wil1953} Wilson, R.~E.\ 1953, Washington,

1624: [Carnegie Institution of Washington] 1953

1625: 

1626: \bibitem[Wilson et al.(2001)]{Wil2001} Wilson, J.~C., Kirkpatrick,

1627: J.~D., Gizis, J.~E., Skrutskie, M.~F., Monet, D.~G., \& Houck, J.~R.\

1628: 2001, \aj, 122, 1989

1629:  

1630: \bibitem[Zacharias et al.(2004)]{UCAC2} Zacharias, N., Urban, 

1631: S.~E., Zacharias, M.~I., Wycoff, G.~L., Hall, D.~M., Monet, D.~G., \& 

1632: Rafferty, T.~J.\ 2004, \aj, 127, 3043

1633: 

1634: \bibitem[Zucker \& Mazeh(2001)]{Zuc2001} Zucker, S., \& Mazeh, T.\

1635: 2001, \apj, 562, 549

1636: 

1637: \bibitem[Zucker et al.(2002)]{Zuc2002} Zucker, S., et al.\ 2002, \apj,

1638: 568, 363

1639: 

1640: \bibitem[Zucker et al.(2003)]{Zuc2003} Zucker, S., Mazeh, T., Santos,

1641: N.~C., Udry, S., \& Mayor, M.\ 2003, \aap, 404, 775

1642: 

1643: \bibitem[Zucker et al.(2004)]{Zuc2004} Zucker, S., Mazeh, T., Santos,

1644: N.~C., Udry, S., \& Mayor, M.\ 2004, \aap, 426, 695

1645: 

1646: \end{thebibliography}

1647: \clearpage

1648: 

1649: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TABLE: Sample List and Companions Found %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1650: 

1651: %\voffset30pt{}

1652: \begin{deluxetable}{lrrrrrlcc}

1653: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}

1654: \tablecaption{Sample List of Exoplanet Systems Searched for Companions.

1655: \label{Sample}}

1656: \tablewidth{0pt}

1657: 

1658: \tablehead{%\vspace{-25pt} \\

1659:            \colhead{HD Name}&

1660:            \multicolumn{2}{c}{Proper Motion}&

1661:            \multicolumn{2}{c}{DSS Images}&

1662:            \colhead{Total $\mu$}&

1663:            \colhead{$\mu$ obs?}&

1664:            \multicolumn{2}{c}{Companions} \\

1665: 

1666:            \colhead{}&

1667:            \colhead{$\arcsec$ yr$^{-1}$}&

1668:            \colhead{\sdeg}&

1669:            \colhead{Epoch 1}&

1670:            \colhead{Epoch 2}&

1671:            \colhead{$\arcsec$}&

1672:            \colhead{}&

1673:            \colhead{CPM}&

1674:            \colhead{Other} \\

1675: 

1676:            \colhead{(1)}&

1677:            \colhead{(2)}&

1678:            \colhead{(3)}&

1679:            \colhead{(4)}&

1680:            \colhead{(5)}&

1681:            \colhead{(6)}&

1682:            \colhead{(7)}&

1683:            \colhead{(8)}&

1684:            \colhead{(9)}}

1685: 

1686: 

1687: \startdata

1688: 

1689: BD$-$10 3166 & 0.183 &  268.5 & 1983.29 & 1992.04 &  1.602 & YES &      &         \\

1690: GJ 436       & 1.211 &  132.2 & 1955.28 & 1996.38 & 49.770 & YES &      &         \\

1691: GJ 876       & 1.174 &  125.1 & 1983.76 & 1989.83 &  7.116 & YES &      &         \\

1692: HD 000142    & 0.577 &   94.0 & 1982.87 & 1996.62 &  7.933 & YES &      & B       \\

1693: HD 001237    & 0.438 &   97.6 & 1977.77 & 1997.58 &  8.676 & YES &      &         \\

1694: HD 002039    & 0.080 &   79.0 & 1978.82 & 1997.61 &  1.503 & NO  &      &         \\

1695: HD 002638    & 0.248 &  205.5 & 1983.53 & 1993.85 &  2.560 & YES &      &         \\

1696: HD 003651    & 0.592 &  231.2 & 1953.91 & 1987.65 & 19.972 & YES &      &         \\

1697: HD 004203    & 0.176 &  134.7 & 1954.00 & 1987.65 &  5.922 & YES &      &         \\

1698: HD 004208    & 0.348 &   64.4 & 1980.63 & 1989.74 &  3.171 & NO  &      &         \\

1699: HD 006434    & 0.554 &  197.8 & 1976.89 & 1990.73 &  7.666 & YES &      &         \\

1700: HD 008574    & 0.298 &  122.1 & 1949.98 & 1991.76 & 12.453 & YES &      &         \\

1701: HD 008673    & 0.250 &  109.8 & 1954.67 & 1991.76 &  9.273 & YES &      & B?      \\

1702: HD 009826    & 0.418 &  204.4 & 1953.71 & 1989.77 & 15.073 & YES & B    & B       \\

1703: HD 010647    & 0.198 &  122.6 & 1977.92 & 1997.61 &  3.898 & YES &      &         \\

1704: HD 010697    & 0.115 &  203.1 & 1954.89 & 1986.69 &  3.657 & YES &      &         \\

1705: HD 011964    & 0.441 &  236.6 & 1982.63 & 1991.70 &  4.003 & YES & B    & B       \\

1706: HD 011977    & 0.105 &   46.1 & 1976.67 & 1987.72 &  1.160 & NO  &      &         \\

1707: HD 012661    & 0.206 &  211.6 & 1953.87 & 1990.87 &  7.622 & NO  &      &         \\

1708: HD 013189    & 0.006 &   13.3 & 1954.76 & 1989.83 &  0.210 & NO  &      &         \\

1709: HD 013445    & 2.193 &   72.6 & 1975.85 & 1988.91 & 28.646 & YES &      & B       \\

1710: HD 016141    & 0.464 &  199.7 & 1982.79 & 1997.74 &  6.937 & YES &      & B?      \\

1711: HD 017051    & 0.399 &   56.7 & 1977.78 & 1997.81 &  7.995 & YES &      &         \\

1712: HD 019994    & 0.205 &  109.7 & 1951.69 & 1997.84 &  9.463 & YES &      & B       \\

1713: HD 020367    & 0.118 &  241.2 & 1953.77 & 1993.72 &  4.714 & YES &      &         \\

1714: HD 022049    & 0.977 &  277.1 & 1982.79 & 1998.97 & 15.806 & YES &      &         \\

1715: HD 023079    & 0.214 &  244.6 & 1978.82 & 1993.96 &  3.241 & YES &      &         \\

1716: HD 023596    & 0.058 &   68.5 & 1953.03 & 1989.76 &  2.130 & NO  &      &         \\

1717: HD 027442    & 0.175 &  196.0 & 1983.04 & 1997.74 &  2.573 & YES &      & B       \\

1718: HD 027894    & 0.328 &   33.8 & 1983.04 & 1997.74 &  4.823 & YES &      &         \\

1719: HD 028185    & 0.101 &  126.7 & 1982.82 & 1985.96 &  0.317 & NO  &      &         \\

1720: HD 030177    & 0.067 &  100.3 & 1983.04 & 1997.74 &  0.985 & NO  &      &         \\

1721: HD 033636    & 0.227 &  127.2 & 1954.85 & 1990.81 &  8.164 & YES &      &         \\

1722: HD 034445    & 0.149 &  184.4 & 1954.85 & 1990.82 &  5.360 & YES &      &         \\

1723: HD 037124    & 0.427 &  190.8 & 1951.91 & 1991.80 & 17.032 & YES &      &         \\

1724: HD 037605    & 0.252 &  167.5 & 1955.90 & 1992.06 &  9.114 & YES &      &         \\

1725: HD 038529    & 0.163 &  209.4 & 1951.91 & 1990.87 &  6.350 & YES & B    &         \\

1726: HD 039091    & 1.096 &   16.5 & 1978.03 & 1989.99 & 13.116 & YES &      &         \\

1727: HD 040979    & 0.179 &  148.0 & 1953.12 & 1989.83 &  6.570 & YES & B    & B       \\

1728: HD 041004    & 0.078 &  327.0 & 1978.03 & 1993.96 &  1.243 & YES &      & B,C     \\

1729: HD 045350    & 0.069 &  219.3 & 1953.19 & 1986.91 &  2.326 & NO  &      &         \\

1730: HD 046375    & 0.150 &  130.3 & 1953.94 & 1998.88 &  6.740 & YES &      & B       \\

1731: HD 047536    & 0.126 &   59.5 & 1979.00 & 1992.99 &  1.763 & MAR &      &         \\

1732: HD 049674    & 0.128 &  164.1 & 1953.19 & 1989.86 &  4.694 & YES &      &         \\

1733: HD 050499    & 0.097 &  314.8 & 1976.89 & 1994.21 &  1.679 & NO  &      &         \\

1734: HD 050554    & 0.103 &  201.2 & 1956.27 & 1994.03 &  3.889 & YES &      &         \\

1735: HD 052265    & 0.141 &  304.8 & 1983.04 & 1989.18 &  0.864 & NO  &      &         \\

1736: HD 059686    & 0.087 &  150.5 & 1953.02 & 1989.08 &  3.137 & MAR &      &         \\

1737: HD 063454    & 0.045 &  207.5 & 1975.94 & 1992.99 &  0.767 & NO  &      &         \\

1738: HD 065216    & 0.190 &  320.1 & 1976.25 & 1991.13 &  2.827 & NO  &      &         \\

1739: HD 068988    & 0.132 &   76.1 & 1954.01 & 1989.98 &  4.747 & YES &      &         \\

1740: HD 070642    & 0.303 &  318.1 & 1976.97 & 1991.10 &  4.283 & NO  &      &         \\

1741: HD 072659    & 0.150 &  229.2 & 1954.97 & 1992.03 &  5.559 & YES &      &         \\

1742: HD 073256    & 0.192 &  290.0 & 1977.22 & 1991.26 &  2.697 & MAR &      &         \\

1743: HD 073526    & 0.173 &  339.5 & 1977.06 & 1991.27 &  2.459 & MAR &      &         \\

1744: HD 074156    & 0.202 &  17209 & 1953.02 & 1991.10 &  7.692 & YES &      &         \\

1745: HD 075289    & 0.229 &  185.1 & 1977.06 & 1991.27 &  3.255 & YES &      & B       \\

1746: HD 075732    & 0.539 &  244.2 & 1953.94 & 1998.30 & 23.908 & YES & B    & B       \\

1747: HD 076700    & 0.308 &  293.2 & 1976.26 & 1991.05 &  4.558 & YES &      &         \\

1748: HD 080606    & 0.047 &   81.6 & 1953.13 & 1995.25 &  1.979 & YES & B    & B       \\

1749: HD 082943    & 0.174 &  179.2 & 1983.36 & 1987.32 &  0.689 & NO  &      &         \\

1750: HD 083443    & 0.123 &  169.5 & 1980.06 & 1995.09 &  1.849 & NO  &      &         \\

1751: HD 088133    & 0.264 &  182.8 & 1955.23 & 1998.99 & 11.555 & YES &      &         \\

1752: HD 089307    & 0.276 &  261.8 & 1950.29 & 1987.32 & 10.219 & YES &      &         \\

1753: HD 089744    & 0.183 &  220.9 & 1953.21 & 1990.23 &  6.773 & NO  &      & B       \\

1754: HD 092788    & 0.223 &  183.2 & 1982.37 & 1991.21 &  1.971 & YES &      &         \\

1755: HD 093083    & 0.177 &  211.6 & 1980.21 & 1995.10 &  2.636 & YES &      &         \\

1756: HD 095128    & 0.321 &  279.9 & 1955.22 & 1998.38 & 13.855 & YES &      &         \\

1757: HD 099492    & 0.755 &  284.7 & 1955.29 & 1996.28 & 30.944 & YES & A    & A       \\

1758: HD 101930    & 0.348 &    2.5 & 1987.20 & 1992.24 &  1.754 & NO  &      &         \\

1759: HD 102117    & 0.094 &  222.1 & 1987.20 & 1992.24 &  0.474 & NO  &      &         \\

1760: HD 104985    & 0.174 &  122.1 & 1955.17 & 1997.11 &  7.299 & YES &      &         \\

1761: HD 106252    & 0.280 &  175.1 & 1955.29 & 1991.27 & 10.076 & YES &      &         \\

1762: HD 108147    & 0.192 &  251.5 & 1987.26 & 1996.30 &  1.735 & NO  &      &         \\

1763: HD 108874    & 0.157 &  124.7 & 1955.39 & 1991.07 &  5.602 & YES &      &         \\

1764: HD 111232    & 0.116 &   13.9 & 1987.08 & 1996.29 &  1.067 & NO  &      & B?      \\

1765: HD 114386    & 0.353 &  203.0 & 1975.41 & 1992.25 &  5.943 & YES &      &         \\

1766: HD 114729    & 0.369 &  213.2 & 1978.13 & 1991.21 &  4.826 & YES &      & B       \\

1767: HD 114762    & 0.583 &  269.8 & 1950.30 & 1996.30 & 26.822 & YES &      & B       \\

1768: HD 114783    & 0.138 &  274.0 & 1956.27 & 1996.23 &  5.514 & YES &      &         \\

1769: HD 117176    & 0.622 &  202.2 & 1955.38 & 1997.35 & 26.110 & YES &      &         \\

1770: HD 117207    & 0.217 &  250.7 & 1975.27 & 1991.21 &  3.458 & MAR &      &         \\

1771: HD 117618    & 0.127 &  168.6 & 1975.19 & 1991.23 &  2.037 & NO  &      &         \\

1772: HD 120136    & 0.483 &  276.4 & 1954.25 & 1992.20 & 18.328 & YES &      & B       \\

1773: HD 121504    & 0.264 &  251.5 & 1987.26 & 1994.19 &  1.828 & NO  &      &         \\

1774: HD 128311    & 0.323 &  140.5 & 1950.28 & 1989.25 & 12.588 & YES &      &         \\

1775: HD 130322    & 0.191 &  222.6 & 1980.22 & 1996.37 &  3.085 & YES &      &         \\

1776: HD 134987    & 0.400 &   86.1 & 1976.42 & 1991.50 &  6.034 & YES &      &         \\

1777: HD 136118    & 0.126 &  280.7 & 1955.30 & 1992.41 &  4.676 & YES &      &         \\

1778: HD 137759    & 0.019 &  334.5 & 1953.46 & 1995.15 &  0.792 & NO  &      &         \\

1779: HD 141937    & 0.100 &   76.1 & 1976.41 & 1991.61 &  1.520 & NO  &      &         \\

1780: HD 142022    & 0.339 &  264.7 & 1977.63 & 1996.30 &  6.329 & YES & B    & B       \\

1781: HD 142415    & 0.153 &  228.1 & 1988.30 & 1992.58 &  0.654 & NO  &      &         \\

1782: HD 143761 \tablenotemark{1} & 0.798 &  194.3 & 1950.28 & 1994.37 & 35.182 & YES &      &         \\

1783: HD 145675    & 0.326 &  156.1 & 1955.23 & 1991.43 & 11.802 & YES &      &         \\

1784: HD 147513    & 0.073 &   87.3 & 1987.39 & 1993.25 &  0.428 & NO  &      & B       \\

1785: HD 149026    & 0.094 &  304.7 & 1954.49 & 1993.33 &  3.651 & YES &      &         \\

1786: HD 150706    & 0.130 &  132.6 & 1955.39 & 1996.54 &  5.350 & YES &      & B?      \\

1787: HD 154857    & 0.103 &  122.4 & 1987.30 & 1993.32 &  0.621 & NO  &      &         \\

1788: HD 160691    & 0.192 &  184.5 & 1987.70 & 1992.58 &  0.938 & NO  &      &         \\

1789: HD 162020    & 0.033 &  140.2 & 1987.71 & 1991.68 &  0.131 & NO  &      &         \\

1790: HD 168443    & 0.242 &  202.3 & 1978.65 & 1988.59 &  2.406 & NO  &      &         \\

1791: HD 168746    & 0.073 &  197.7 & 1978.65 & 1988.59 &  0.726 & NO  &      &         \\

1792: HD 169830    & 0.015 &  356.8 & 1987.38 & 1992.41 &  0.075 & NO  &      & B?      \\

1793: HD 177830    & 0.066 &  218.1 & 1950.46 & 1992.42 &  2.770 & NO  &      &         \\

1794: HD 178911B   & 0.203 &   18.6 & 1955.39 & 1992.44 &  7.523 & YES & A    & A,C     \\

1795: HD 179949    & 0.153 &  131.6 & 1987.42 & 1991.62 &  0.643 & NO  &      &         \\

1796: HD 183263    & 0.038 &  208.2 & 1950.61 & 1992.59 &  1.595 & NO  &      &         \\

1797: HD 186427    & 0.212 &  219.6 & 1951.53 & 1991.53 &  8.679 & YES & A    & A,C     \\

1798: HD 187123    & 0.189 &  130.7 & 1952.54 & 1992.67 &  7.583 & YES &      &         \\

1799: HD 188015    & 0.106 &  149.4 & 1953.53 & 1992.49 &  4.130 & YES & B    &         \\

1800: HD 190228    & 0.126 &  123.7 & 1953.53 & 1992.49 &  4.910 & YES &      &         \\

1801: HD 190360    & 0.861 &  127.5 & 1953.53 & 1992.49 & 33.549 & YES & B    & B       \\

1802: HD 192263    & 0.270 &  346.4 & 1951.58 & 1988.67 & 10.013 & YES &      &         \\

1803: HD 195019    & 0.354 &   99.2 & 1951.52 & 1990.71 & 13.874 & YES &      & B       \\

1804: HD 196050    & 0.201 &  251.4 & 1977.61 & 1991.75 &  2.842 & MAR &      & B       \\

1805: HD 196885    & 0.096 &   29.7 & 1953.68 & 1987.50 &  3.246 & YES &      &         \\

1806: HD 202206    & 0.126 &  197.7 & 1977.55 & 1991.74 &  1.788 & NO  &      &         \\

1807: HD 208487    & 0.156 &  139.3 & 1980.55 & 1995.63 &  2.353 & MAR &      &         \\

1808: HD 209458    & 0.034 &  122.4 & 1950.54 & 1990.73 &  1.366 & NO  &      &         \\

1809: HD 210277    & 0.458 &  169.2 & 1979.72 & 1987.79 &  3.693 & YES &      &         \\

1810: HD 213240    & 0.236 &  214.9 & 1980.77 & 1995.65 &  3.510 & YES & B    & B       \\

1811: HD 216435    & 0.232 &  110.6 & 1980.54 & 1996.62 &  3.730 & NO  &      &         \\

1812: HD 216437    & 0.085 &  329.5 & 1978.82 & 1996.79 &  1.527 & NO  &      &         \\

1813: HD 216770    & 0.290 &  127.9 & 1980.78 & 1995.79 &  4.354 & YES &      &         \\

1814: HD 217014    & 0.217 &   73.7 & 1954.59 & 1990.79 &  7.856 & YES &      &         \\

1815: HD 217107    & 0.017 &  200.7 & 1982.80 & 1991.68 &  0.151 & NO  &      & B?      \\

1816: HD 219449    & 0.369 &   92.6 & 1983.82 & 1991.76 &  2.931 & YES & B    & B,C     \\

1817: HD 222404    & 0.136 &  339.0 & 1954.73 & 1992.76 &  5.172 & YES &      & B       \\

1818: HD 222582    & 0.183 &  232.6 & 1983.54 & 1989.83 &  1.152 & YES & B    & B       \\

1819: HD 330075    & 0.254 &  248.2 & 1988.45 & 1995.25 &  1.725 & NO  &      &         \\

1820: 

1821: \enddata

1822: 

1823: \tablenotetext{1}{We conclude that this system ($\rho$ CrB) has either

1824: a planetary or a stellar companion, but not both.  See

1825: \S\ref{sec:Hip} for more details.}

1826: 

1827: \end{deluxetable}

1828: 

1829: \clearpage

1830: 

1831: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1832: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TABLE: STAR/PLANET TABLE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1833: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1834: 

1835: %\voffset50pt{

1836: \begin{deluxetable}{rllccrlrrrrrrrcll}

1837: \rotate 

1838: \setlength{\tabcolsep}{0.05in}

1839: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize} 

1840: \tablecaption{Exoplanet Systems with Stellar Companions.

1841: \label{results}}

1842: \tablewidth{0pt}

1843: 

1844: \tablehead{\vspace{-25pt} \\

1845:            \colhead{S}&

1846:            \colhead{HD Name}&

1847:            \colhead{Other Name}&

1848:            \colhead{C}&

1849:            \colhead{RA \hskip25pt DEC}&

1850:            \colhead{$\pi$}&

1851:            \colhead{Dist}&

1852:            \colhead{}&

1853:            \colhead{SpT}&

1854:            \colhead{Ang Sep}&

1855:            \colhead{PA}&

1856:            \colhead{Proj. Sep.}&

1857:            \colhead{$M \sin{i}$}&

1858:            \colhead{a $\sin{i}$}&

1859:            \colhead{e}&

1860:            \colhead{Sources}&

1861:            \colhead{References} \\

1862: 

1863:            \colhead{}&

1864:            \colhead{}&

1865:            \colhead{}&

1866:            \colhead{}&

1867:            \colhead{(J2000)}&

1868:            \colhead{($\arcsec$)}&

1869:            \colhead{(pc)}&

1870:            \colhead{}&

1871:            \colhead{}&

1872:            \colhead{($\arcsec$)}&

1873:            \colhead{(\sdeg)}&

1874:            \colhead{(AU)}&

1875:            \colhead{(\mjup)}&

1876:            \colhead{(AU)}&

1877:            \colhead{}&

1878:            \colhead{}&

1879:            \colhead{} \\

1880: 

1881:            \colhead{(1)}&

1882:            \colhead{(2)}&

1883:            \colhead{(3)}&

1884:            \colhead{(4)}&

1885:            \colhead{(5)}&

1886:            \colhead{(6)}&

1887:            \colhead{(7)}&

1888:            \colhead{(8)}&

1889:            \colhead{(9)}&

1890:            \colhead{(10)}&

1891:            \colhead{(11)}&

1892:            \colhead{(12)}&

1893:            \colhead{(13)}&

1894:            \colhead{(14)}&

1895:            \colhead{(15)}&

1896:            \colhead{(16)}&

1897:            \colhead{(17)}}

1898: \startdata

1899: 

1900: 1  & 000142 & GJ 4.2         & A  & 00 06 19.18 $-$49 04 30.7 & 0.03900 & 25.6 & T & G1IV   &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1901:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 1     & 0.98  & 0.38  &      &         \\

1902:    &        &                & B  &                           &         &      &   &        & 5.4  & 177 & 138   &       &       &       & WC   & 1,2     \\

1903: 2  & 009826 & $\upsilon$ And & A  & 01 36 47.84 +41 24 19.7   & 0.07425 & 13.5 & T & F8.0V  &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1904:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 0.69  & 0.059 & 0.012 &      &         \\

1905:    &        &                & c  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 1.89  & 0.829 & 0.28  &      &         \\

1906:    &        &                & d  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 3.75  & 2.53  & 0.27  &      &         \\

1907:    &        &                & B  & 01 36 50.40 +41 23 32.1   &         &      &   & M4.5V  & 52   & 150 & 702   &       &       &       & P    & 2,3,4   \\

1908: 3  & 011964 & GJ 81.1        & A  & 01 57 09.61 $-$10 14 32.7 & 0.02943 & 34.0 & T & G5     &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1909:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 0.11  & 0.229 & 0.15  &      &         \\

1910:    &        &                & c  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 0.7   & 3.167 & 0.3   &      &         \\

1911:    &        &                & B \tablenotemark{1} & 01 57 11.07 $-$10 14 53.2 &   &  &   & & 29.7 & 133 & 1010  &       &       &       & PWC  & 5,6     \\

1912: 4  & 013445 & GJ 86          & A  & 02 10 25.93 $-$50 49 25.4 & 0.09163 & 10.9 & T & K1V    &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1913:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 4.01  & 0.11  & 0.046 &      &         \\ 

1914:    &        &                & B  &                           &         &      &   & wd     & 1.93 & 119 & 21    &       &       &       & O    & 7,8,9   \\

1915: 5  & 019994 & GJ 128         & A  & 03 12 46.44 $-$01 11 46.0 & 0.04469 & 22.4 & T & F8.5V  &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1916:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 2     & 1.3   & 0.2   &      &         \\

1917:    &        &                & B  &                           &         &      &   & M      & 2.5  & 213 & 56    &       &       &       & WCD  & 10,11,12,13 \\

1918: 6  & 027442 & $\epsilon$ Ret & A  & 04 16 29.03 $-$59 18 07.8 & 0.05484 & 18.2 & T & K2IVa  &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1919:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 1.28  & 1.18  & 0.07  &      &         \\

1920:    &        &                & B \tablenotemark{1} &          &         &      &   &        & 13.8 & 36  & 251   &       &       &       & WCI  & 14,15   \\

1921: 7  & 038529 & HIP 27253      & A  & 05 46 34.91 +01 10 05.5   & 0.02357 & 42.4 & T & G4V    &      &     &       &       &       &       &      & 16      \\

1922:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 0.78  & 0.129 & 0.29  &      &         \\

1923:    &        &                & c  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 12.7  & 3.68  & 0.36  &      &         \\

1924:    &        &                & B \tablenotemark{2}  & 05 46 19.38 +01 12 47.2   &         & 28.7 & C & M3.0V  & 284  & 305 & 12042 &       &       &       & P    &         \\

1925: 8  & 041004 & HIP 28393      & A  & 05 59 49.65 $-$48 14 22.9 & 0.02324 & 43.0 & T & K1V    &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1926:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 2.3   & 1.31  & 0.39  &      &         \\

1927:    &        &                & B  & 05 59 43.81 $-$48 12 11.9 &         &      &   & M2.5V  & 0.5  & 176 & 22    &       &       &       & WH   & 4,17,18,19 \\

1928:    &        &                & C  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 18.4  & 0.016 & 0.08  &      & 18,19    \\

1929: 9  & 040979 &  BD+44 1353    & A  & 06 04 29.95 +44 15 37.6   & 0.03000 & 33.3 & T & F8     &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1930:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 3.32  & 0.811 & 0.23  &      &         \\

1931:    &        &  BD+44 1351    & B  & 06 04 13.02 +44 16 41.1   &         & 15.2 & P & K5     & 192  & 290 & 6394  &       &       &       & P    & 4,16,20,21 \\

1932: 10 & 046375 & HIP 31246      & A  & 06 33 12.62 +05 27 46.5   & 0.02993 & 33.4 & T & K0V    &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1933:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 0.249 & 0.041 & 0.04  &      &         \\

1934:    &        &                & B \tablenotemark{1} & 06 33 12.10 +05 27 53.2 & & 26.4 & C & & 9.4  & 308 & 314   &       &       &       & WI   & 22,23   \\

1935: 11 & 075289 & HIP 43177      & A  & 08 47 40.39 -41 44 12.5   & 0.03455 & 28.9 & T & G0V    &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1936:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 0.42  & 0.046 & 0.054 &      &         \\

1937:    &        &                & B  & 08 47 42.26 -41 44 07.6   &         &      &   &        & 21.5 & 78  & 621   &       &       &       & O    & 24      \\

1938: 12 & 075732 & 55 Cnc         & A  & 08 52 35.81 +28 19 50.9   & 0.07980 & 12.5 & T & K0IV-V &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1939:    &        &                & e  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 0.045 & 0.038 & 0.174 &      &         \\

1940:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 0.784 & 0.115 & 0.020 &      &         \\

1941:    &        &                & c  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 0.217 & 0.24  & 0.44  &      &         \\

1942:    &        &                & d  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 3.92  & 5.257 & 0.327 &      &         \\

1943:    &        &                & B  & 08 52 40.85 +28 18 59.0   &         &  8.7 & C & M4     & 84   & 130 & 1050  &       &       &       & PWCD & 4,12,25,26,27 \\

1944: 13 & 080606 & HIP 45982      & A  & 09 22 37.57 +50 36 13.4   & 0.01713 & 58.4 & T & G5     &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1945:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 3.41  & 0.439 & 0.927 &      &         \\

1946:    & 080607 & HIP 45983      & B  & 09 22 39.73 +50 36 13.9   &         &      &   & G5     & 20.6 & 269 & 1203  &       &       &       & PWH  & 4,28    \\

1947: 14 & 089744 & HIP 50786      & A  & 10 22 10.56 +41 13 46.3   & 0.02565 & 39.0 & T & F8IV   &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1948:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 7.99  & 0.89  & 0.67  &      &         \\

1949:    &        &                & B  & 10 22 14.87 +41 14 26.4   &         &      &   & L0V    & 63.0 & 48  & 2456  &       &       &       & O    & 29,30   \\

1950: 15 & 099492 & GJ 429B        & B  & 11 26 46.28 +03 00 22.8   & 0.05559 & 18.0 & T & K2V    &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1951:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 0.122 & 0.119 & 0.05  &      &         \\

1952:    & 099491 & GJ 429A        & A  & 11 26 45.32 +03 00 47.2   & 0.05659 & 17.7 & T & K0IV   & 28.6 & 150 & 515   &       &       &       & PWHC & 31      \\

1953: 16 & 114729 & HIP 64459      & A  & 13 12 44.26 $-$31 52 24.1 & 0.02857 & 35.0 & T & G3V    &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1954:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 0.82  & 2.08  & 0.31  &      &         \\

1955:    &        &                & B  & 13 12 43.97 $-$31 52 17.0 &         &      &   &        & 8.05 & 333 & 282   &       &       &       & O    & 32      \\

1956: 17 & 114762 & HIP 64426      & A  & 13 12 19.74 +17 31 01.6   & 0.02465 & 40.6 & T & F9V    &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1957:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 11.02 & 0.3   & 0.25  &      &         \\

1958:    &        &                & B  &                           &         &      &   &        & 3.26 & 30  & 132   &       &       &       & O    & 3,4     \\

1959: 18 & 120136 & $\tau$ Boo     & A  & 13 47 15.74 +17 27 24.9   & 0.06412 & 15.6 & T & F6IV   &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1960:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 4.13  & 0.05  & 0.01  &      &         \\

1961:    &        &                & B  &                           &         &      &   &        & 2.87 & 31  & 45    &       &       &       & WCD  & 3,4,12  \\

1962: 19 & 142022 & GJ 606.1       & A  & 16 10 15.02 $-$84 13 53.8 & 0.02788 & 38.9 & T & G8/K0V &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1963:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 4.4   & 2.8   & 0.57  &      &         \\

1964:    &        &                & B  & 16 10 25.34 $-$84 14 06.7 &         &      &   & K7V    & 20.4 & 130 & 794   &       &       &       & PWC  & 33,34   \\

1965: 20 & 147513 & GJ 620.1       & A  & 16 24 01.29 $-$39 11 34.7 & 0.07769 & 12.9 & T & G5V    &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1966:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 1     & 1.26  & 0.52  &      &         \\

1967:    &        &                & B  & 16 23 33.83 $-$39 13 46.1 & 0.07804 & 12.8 & T & wd     & 345  & 245 & 4451  &       &       &       & C    & 13,35   \\

1968: 21 & 178911B & HIP 94076B     & B  & 19 09 03.10 +34 35 59.5   & 0.02140 & 46.7 & T & G5     &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1969:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 6.292 & 0.32  & 0.124 &      &         \\

1970:    & 178911 & HIP 94076      & A  & 19 09 04.38 +34 36 01.6   & 0.02042 & 49.0 & T & G1V J  & 16.1 &  82 & 789   &       &       &       & PWH  & 4,36,37,38,39 \\

1971:    &        &                & C \tablenotemark{3} &                           &         &      &   &        & 0.1  & 21  & 4.9   &       &       &       & W    &         \\

1972: 22 & 186427 & 16 Cyg B       & B  & 19 41 51.97 +50 31 03.1   & 0.04670 &      &   & G3V    &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1973:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 1.69  & 1.67  & 0.67  &      &         \\

1974:    & 186408 & 16 Cyg A       & A  & 19 41 48.95 +50 31 30.2   & 0.04625 & 21.6 & T & G1.5V J & 39.8 & 313 & 860   &       &       &       & PWC  & 2,3,4,40,41 \\

1975:    &        &                & C \tablenotemark{3} &                           &         &      &   &        & 3.4  & 209 & 73    &       &       &       & W    &         \\

1976: 23 & 188015 & HIP 97769      & A  & 19 52 04.54 +28 06 01.4   & 0.01900 & 52.6 & T & G5IV   &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1977:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 1.26  & 1.19  & 0.15  &      &         \\

1978:    &        &                & B \tablenotemark{2} & 19 52 05.51 +28 06 03.7   &         & 46.9 & C &        & 13   &  85 & 684   &       &       &       & P    &         \\

1979: 24 & 190360 & GJ 777         & A  & 20 03 37.41 +29 53 48.5   & 0.06292 & 15.9 & T & G7IV-V &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1980:    &        &                & c  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 0.057 & 0.128 & 0.01  &      &         \\

1981:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 1.502 & 3.92  & 0.36  &      &         \\

1982:    &        &                & B  & 20 03 26.58 +29 51 59.5   &         & 18.5 & P & M4.5V  & 179  & 234 & 2846  &       &       &       & PWC  & 4,5,16,42 \\

1983: 25 & 195019 & HIP 100970     & A  & 20 28 18.64 +18 46 10.2   & 0.02677 & 37.3 & T & G3IV-V &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1984:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 3.43  & 0.14  & 0.05  &      &         \\

1985:    &        &                & B  &                           &         &      &   &        & 3.5  & 330 & 131   &       &       &       & W    & 4,5,43,44 \\

1986: 26 & 196050 & HIP 101806     & A  & 20 37 51.71 $-$60 38 04.1 & 0.02131 & 46.9 & T & G3V    &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1987:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 3     & 2.5   & 0.28  &      &         \\

1988:    &        &                & B  & 20 37 51.85 $-$60 38 14.9 &         &      &   &        & 10.9 & 175 & 510   &       &       &       & O    & 32      \\

1989: 27 & 213240 & HIP 111143     & A  & 22 31 00.37 $-$49 25 59.8 & 0.02454 & 40.8 & T & G0/G1V &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1990:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 4.5   & 2.03  & 0.45  &      &         \\

1991:    &        &                & B  & 22 31 08.26 $-$49 26 56.7 &         & 41.8 & C & M5.0V  & 95.8 & 127 & 3909  &       &       &       & P    & 32      \\

1992: 28 & 219449 & GJ 893.2       & A  & 23 15 53.49 $-$09 05 15.9 & 0.02197 & 45.5 & T & K0III  &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1993:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 2.9   & 0.3   & $-$   &      &         \\

1994:    & 219430 &                & B  \tablenotemark{1} & 23 15 51.00 $-$09 04 42.7 &         & 42.4 \tablenotemark{4} & C & K8V J   & 49.4 & 313 & 2248  &       &       &       & PWC  & 6,45    \\

1995:    &        &                & C  \tablenotemark{1,5} &                         &         & 42.4 \tablenotemark{4} & C &         & 0.4  & 101 &   18  &       &       &       & W    &         \\

1996: 29 & 222404 & $\gamma$ Cephei & A & 23 39 20.85 +77 37 56.2   & 0.07250 & 13.8 & T & K1III  &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

1997:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 1.59  & 2.03  & 0.2   &      &         \\

1998:    &        &                & B  &                           &         &      &   &        & $-$  &     &       &       & 20.3  & 0.39  & H    & 4,46,47,48,49 \\

1999: 30 & 222582 & HIP 116906     & A  & 23 41 51.53 $-$05 59 08.7 & 0.02384 & 42.0 & T & G5     &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

2000:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 5.11  & 1.35  & 0.76  &      &         \\

2001:    &        &                & B \tablenotemark{1} & 23 41 45.14 $-$05 58 14.8 &         & 32.1 & C & M3.5V  & 113  & 302 & 4746  &       &       &       & PW   & 6       \\

2002: 

2003: \tableline %\vspace{-15pt} \\

2004: \multicolumn{16}{c}{Candidate (Unconfirmed) Stellar Companions} \\

2005: \tableline %\vspace{-15pt} \\

2006: 

2007: 31 & 008673 & HIP 6702       & A  & 01 26 08.78 +34 34 46.9   & 0.02614 & 38.3 & T & F7V    &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

2008:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 14    & 1.58  & $-$   &      &         \\

2009:    &        &                & B  &                           &         &      &   &        & 0.1  & 78  & 3.8   &       &       &       & W    &         \\

2010: 32 & 016141 & HIP 12048      & A  & 02 35 19.93 $-$03 33 38.2 & 0.02785 & 35.9 & T & G5IV   &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

2011:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 0.23  & 0.35  & 0.21  &      &         \\

2012:    &        &                & B  & 02 35 19.88 $-$03 33 43.9 &         &      &   &        & 6.2  & 188 & 222   &       &       &       & O    & 32      \\

2013: 33 & 111232 & HIP 62534      & A  & 12 48 51.75 $-$68 25 30.5 & 0.03463 & 28.9 & T & G8V    &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

2014:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 6.8   & 1.97  & 0.2   &      &         \\

2015:    &        &                & B  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       &       &       &       & H    & 13      \\

2016: 34 & 150706 & GJ 632         & A  & 16 31 17.59 +79 47 23.2   & 0.03673 & 27.2 & T & G0     &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

2017:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 1     & 0.82  & 0.38  &      &         \\

2018:    &        &                & B  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       &       &       &       & H    & 50      \\

2019: 35 & 169830 & HIP 90485      & A  & 18 27 49.48 $-$29 49 00.7 & 0.02753 & 36.3 & T & F9V    &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

2020:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 2.88  & 0.81  & 0.31  &      &         \\

2021:    &        &                & c  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 4.04  & 3.6   & 0.33  &      &         \\

2022:    &        &                & B  \tablenotemark{6} & 18 27 48.65 $-$29 49 01.6  &         &      &   &        & 11   & 270 & 399   &       &       &       &      &         \\

2023: 36 & 217107 & HIP 113421     & A  & 22 58 15.54 $-$02 23 43.4 & 0.05071 & 19.7 & T & G8IV-V &      &     &       &       &       &       &      &         \\

2024:    &        &                & b  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 1.37  & 0.074 & 0.13  &      &         \\

2025:    &        &                & c  &                           &         &      &   &        &      &     &       & 2.1   & 4.3   & 0.55  &      &         \\

2026:    &        &                & B  &                           &         &      &   &        & 0.3  & 156 & 6     &       &       &       & W    & 51,52   \\

2027: 

2028: \enddata

2029: 

2030: \tablenotetext{1}{Known companion, but first identification of the

2031: star as a companion to an exoplanet host.}

2032: \tablenotetext{2}{New stellar companion reported by this work.}

2033: \tablenotetext{3}{Separation and position angle are listed with

2034: respect to component A.  A and C have been referred to as Aa and Ab,

2035: respectively in other publications, but we follow a consistent naming

2036: convention, using uppercase letters to represent stars and lowercase

2037: letters to denote planets.}

2038: \tablenotetext{4}{Photometry obtained is for the BC pair.  Distance

2039: estimate assumes identical binary components.}

2040: \tablenotetext{5}{Separation and position angle are listed with

2041: respect to component B.}

2042: \tablenotetext{6}{New candidate companion reported by this work,

2043: via Kevin Apps.}

2044: 

2045: \tablecomments{Planet data is from Exoplanet Encyclopedia web site

2046: $http://vo.obspm.fr/exoplanetes/encyclo/catalog.php$.}

2047: \tablerefs{

2048: (1) \citet{Bai1900}; 

2049: (2) \citet{Low2002}; 

2050: (3) \citet{Pat2002}; 

2051: (4) \citet{Egg2004}; 

2052: (5) \citet{All2000}; 

2053: (6) \citet{UCAC2};

2054: (7) \citet{Els2001}; 

2055: (8) \citet{Mug2005a};

2056: (9) \citet{Que2000}; 

2057: (10) \citet{Smy1844};

2058: (11) \citet{Hale1994};

2059: (12) \citet{Duq1991}; 

2060: (13) \citet{May2004}; 

2061: (14) \citet{Jes1955};

2062: (15) \citet{Hold1966};

2063: (16) \citet{Lep2005};

2064: (17) \citet{See1896};

2065: (18) \citet{Zuc2003};

2066: (19) \citet{Zuc2004};

2067: (20) \citet{Hog1998}; 

2068: (21) \citet{Hal1986}; 

2069: (22) \citet{Sou1985};

2070: (23) \citet{Urb1998};

2071: (24) \citet{Mug2004b};

2072: (25) \citet{vanAlt1995};

2073: (26) \citet{Dahn1988}; 

2074: (27) \citet{Mar2002};

2075: (28) \citet{Naef2001};

2076: (29) \citet{Wil2001};

2077: (30) \citet{Mug2004a};

2078: (31) \citet{Mar2005a};

2079: (32) \citet{Mug2005b};

2080: (33) \citet{Luy1979};

2081: (34) \citet{Egg2005};

2082: (35) \citet{Weg1973};

2083: (36) \citet{McAl1987a};

2084: (37) \citet{Bal2004};

2085: (38) \citet{Hart2000};

2086: (39) \citet{Zuc2002}; 

2087: (40) \citet{Turn2001};

2088: (41) \citet{Coc1997};

2089: (42) \citet{Naef2003}; 

2090: (43) \citet{Hou1887};

2091: (44) \citet{Fis1999};

2092: (45) \citet{Wil1953};

2093: (46) \citet{Msn2001}; 

2094: (47) \citet{Cam1988}; 

2095: (48) \citet{Gri2002}; 

2096: (49) \citet{Hat2003};

2097: (50) \citet{Hal2003}; 

2098: (51) \citet{McAl1987b};

2099: (52) \citet{Msn1999}.

2100: }

2101: 

2102: \end{deluxetable}

2103: %}

2104: \clearpage

2105: 

2106: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TABLE: WDS non-companions %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2107: 

2108: %\voffset30pt{}

2109: \begin{deluxetable}{crcrrcrc}

2110: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}

2111: \tablecaption{WDS Entries that are not Gravitationally Bound Companions. 

2112: \label{WDS-no}}

2113: \tablewidth{0pt}

2114: 

2115: \tablehead{%\vspace{-25pt} \\

2116:            \colhead{WDS ID}&

2117:            \colhead{HD Name}&

2118:            \colhead{Comp}&

2119:            \colhead{$\theta$}&

2120:            \colhead{$\rho$}&

2121:            \colhead{Epoch}&

2122:            \colhead{\#} &

2123:            \colhead{Notes} \\

2124: 

2125:            \colhead{}&

2126:            \colhead{}&

2127:            \colhead{}&

2128:            \colhead{\sdeg}&

2129:            \colhead{$\arcsec$}&

2130:            \colhead{}&

2131:            \colhead{}&

2132:            \colhead{} \\

2133: 

2134:            \colhead{(1)}&

2135:            \colhead{(2)}&

2136:            \colhead{(3)}&

2137:            \colhead{(4)}&

2138:            \colhead{(5)}&

2139:            \colhead{(6)}&

2140:            \colhead{(7)}&

2141:            \colhead{(8)}}

2142: 

2143: \startdata

2144: 

2145: 00394+2115   & 003651 &      &  80 & 167.6 & 1997 &  9 & 1 \\

2146: 01368+4124   & 009826 & AB   & 128 & 114.0 & 1909 &  1 & 1 \\

2147: 01368+4124   & 009826 & AC   & 289 & 273.6 & 1991 &  7 & 1 \\

2148: 03329$-$0927 & 022049 &      & 143 &   0.0 & 1975 &  1 & 2 \\

2149: 11268+0301   & 099492 & AC   & 187 &  90.5 & 1937 &  3 & 1 \\

2150: 13284+1347   & 117176 & AB   & 127 & 268.6 & 2002 & 13 & 1 \\

2151: 13284+1347   & 117176 & AC   & 263 & 325.5 & 1923 &  1 & 1 \\

2152: 13573$-$5602 & 121504 &      &  55 &  36.2 & 1999 & 32 & 3 \\

2153: 15249+5858   & 137759 &      &  50 & 254.8 & 2002 & 12 & 4 \\

2154: 16010+3318   & 143761 &      &  49 & 135.3 & 2002 & 22 & 1 \\

2155: 19091+3436   & 178911 & Aa-C & 130 &  60.0 & 1944 &  1 & 1 \\

2156: 20140$-$0052 & 192263 & A-BC & 102 &  73.1 & 2003 & 19 & 1 \\

2157: 20140$-$0052 & 192263 & AD   & 244 &  71.3 & 1921 &  1 & 1 \\

2158: 20140$-$0052 & 192263 & BC-D &  65 &  23.5 & 1998 &  8 & 1 \\

2159: 20283+1846   & 195019 & AC   &  72 &  70.9 & 1998 & 11 & 1 \\

2160: 20283+1846   & 195019 & AD   &  97 &  84.5 & 1998 &  2 & 1 \\

2161: 20399+1115   & 196885 &      &   6 & 182.9 & 2000 & 13 & 1 \\

2162: 22310$-$4926 & 213240 &      & 359 &  21.9 & 1999 &  7 & 1 \\

2163: 23159$-$0905 & 219449 & AD   & 274 &  80.4 & 1924 &  6 & 1 \\

2164: 23159$-$0905 & 219449 & BC-E & 341 &  19.7 & 1924 &  6 & 1 \\

2165: 

2166: \enddata

2167: 

2168: 

2169: \tablecomments{Columns 1, 3 and 7 are listed here exactly as in WDS

2170: catalog.  Columns 4, 5 and 6 correspond to the most recent

2171: observation.  All data are as of June 20, 2005.  Certain pairs of

2172: multiple systems omitted from this table are confirmed to be

2173: gravitationally bound companions (01368+4124AD, 11268+0301AB,

2174: 19091+3436Aa \& Aa-B, 20283+1846AB, and 23159$-$0905A-BC \& BC).  One

2175: omitted pair (20140$-$0052BC) has several speckle observations

2176: \citep{Jon1911,Jon1917,Jon1944,Van1911,VanB1960}, and several failed

2177: attempts \citep{vandb1949,vandb1960,vandb1963,Cou1953,Bai1957}, and is

2178: hence inconclusive.

2179: Column 8 notes:

2180: (1) {DSS multi-epoch plates do not show CPM for WDS entry.  In fact,

2181:   proper motion of the primary star causes change in separation and

2182:   position angle indicating that the ``companion'' is a background

2183:   star.}

2184: (2) {Primary star is eps Eri, the well studied exoplanet system.  WDS

2185:   listing is based on a single speckle measure by \citet{Bla1977}.

2186:   This system has been observed 13 other times and no companion was

2187:   resolved \citep{McAl1978,Hart1984,Opp2001}.}

2188: (3) {Primary's $\mu$ = 0\farcs264 yr$^{-1}$ at 251\sdeg~from Hipparcos

2189:   is not detectable in DSS plates.  For the WDS ``companion'',

2190:   SuperCOSMOS lists $\mu$ = 0\farcs013 yr$^{-1}$ at 91\sdeg, clearly

2191:   not matching the primary's.}

2192: (4) {Primary does not show detectable proper motion in DSS plates.

2193:   Planet discovery paper, \citet{Frink2002}, refuted the WDS entry

2194:   based on distance estimate to WDS entry and proper motion

2195:   comparisons.}

2196: }

2197: 

2198: \end{deluxetable}

2199: \clearpage

2200: \thispagestyle{empty}

2201: \setlength{\voffset}{15mm}

2202: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% TABLE: Observations %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2203: %\voffset40pt{

2204: \begin{deluxetable}{llrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr}

2205: \rotate

2206: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}

2207: \tablecaption{Observations and Computed Distances.

2208: \label{Obs}}

2209: \tablewidth{0pt}

2210: \tablehead{%\vspace{-25pt} \\

2211:            \colhead{HD Name}&

2212:            \colhead{SpT}&

2213:            \multicolumn{3}{c}{Plate Mags.}&

2214:            \multicolumn{3}{c}{CCD Mags.}&

2215:            \colhead{\#}&

2216:            \multicolumn{3}{c}{Infrared Mags.}&

2217:            \colhead{D$_{plt}$}&

2218:            \colhead{Err}&

2219:            \colhead{\# Rel}&

2220:            \colhead{D$_{CCD}$}&

2221:            \colhead{Err}&

2222:            \colhead{\# Rel} \\

2223: 

2224:            \colhead{}&

2225:            \colhead{}&

2226:            \colhead{$B$}&

2227:            \colhead{$R$}&

2228:            \colhead{$I$}&

2229:            \colhead{$V$}&

2230:            \colhead{$R$}&

2231:            \colhead{$I$}&

2232:            \colhead{}&

2233:            \colhead{$J$}&

2234:            \colhead{$H$}&

2235:            \colhead{$K_S$}&

2236:            \colhead{pc}&

2237:            \colhead{pc}&

2238:            \colhead{}&

2239:            \colhead{pc}&

2240:            \colhead{pc}&

2241:            \colhead{} \\

2242:            \colhead{(1)}&

2243:            \colhead{(2)}&

2244:            \colhead{(3)}&

2245:            \colhead{(4)}&

2246:            \colhead{(5)}&

2247:            \colhead{(6)}&

2248:            \colhead{(7)}&

2249:            \colhead{(8)}&

2250:            \colhead{(9)}&

2251:            \colhead{(10)}&

2252:            \colhead{(11)}&

2253:            \colhead{(12)}&

2254:            \colhead{(13)}&

2255:            \colhead{(14)}&

2256:            \colhead{(15)}&

2257:            \colhead{(16)}&

2258:            \colhead{(17)}&

2259:            \colhead{(18)}}

2260: \startdata

2261: \tableline \vspace{-15pt} \\

2262: \multicolumn{16}{c}{Exoplanet Host Without Parallax} \\

2263: \tableline \vspace{-15pt} \\

2264: BD$-$10 3166     &          &  9.90 &  8.80 &  8.08 & 10.03 &  9.59 &  9.19 & 1 &  8.61 &  8.30 &  8.12 &  33.8 &   8.8 &  1 &  66.8 &  10.0 &  1 \\

2265: \tableline \vspace{-15pt} \\

2266: \multicolumn{16}{c}{Confirmed Companions} \\

2267: \tableline \vspace{-15pt} \\

2268: HD 038529B  & M3.0V   & 13.81 & 11.84 & 10.05 & 13.35 & 12.29 & 10.98 & 3 &  9.72 &  9.04 &  8.80 &  31.8 &   9.0 & 11 &  28.7 &   4.8 & 12 \\

2269: HD 040979B  &         &  9.92 &  8.72 &       &       &       &       &   &  7.27 &  6.79 &  6.69 &  15.2 &   4.0 &  3 &       &       &    \\

2270: HD 046375B  &         &       &       &       & 11.80 & 11.01 &  9.80 & 3 &  8.70 &  8.08 &  7.84 &       &       &    &  26.4 &   6.0 & 12 \\

2271: HD 075732B  &         & 13.14 & 11.53 &       & 13.26 & 11.91 & 10.24 & 2 &  8.56 &  7.93 &  7.67 &  14.5 &   4.6 &  6 &   8.7 &   1.4 & 12 \\

2272: HD 188015B  &         &       &       &       &       & 15.54 & 13.91 & 1 & 12.09 & 11.59 & 11.34 &       &       &    &  46.9 &   9.5 &  7 \\

2273: HD 190360B  &         & 15.30 & 12.35 &       &       &       &       &   &  9.55 &  9.03 &  8.71 &  18.5 &   6.2 &  6 &       &       &    \\

2274: HD 213240B  & M5.0V   &       &       &       & 17.40 & 15.96 & 14.13 & 1 & 12.36 & 11.74 & 11.47 &       &       &    &  41.8 &   6.5 & 12 \\

2275: HD 219449BC & Early K &       &       &       &  9.17 &  8.57 &  8.05 & 1 &  7.31 &  6.84 &  6.69 &       &       &    &  29.9 &   4.7 &  6 \\

2276: HD 222582B  & M3.5V   & 15.25 & 13.16 & 11.41 & 14.49 & 13.33 & 11.83 & 1 & 10.39 &  9.81 &  9.58 &  35.1 &   9.3 & 11 &  32.1 &   5.0 & 12 \\

2277: \tableline \vspace{-15pt} \\

2278: \multicolumn{16}{c}{Candidate Companions} \\

2279: \tableline \vspace{-15pt} \\

2280: HD 169830B  &         &       &       &       & 14.35 & 13.62 & 12.39 & 1 & 10.16 &  9.50 &  9.35 &       &       &    &  29.2 &  23.4 & 12 \\

2281: \tableline \vspace{-15pt} \\

2282: \multicolumn{16}{c}{Refuted Candidate Companions} \\

2283: \tableline \vspace{-15pt} \\

2284: BD$-$10 3166 \#1 & M5.0V    & 14.71 & 13.36 & 11.78 & 14.43 & 13.03 & 11.22 & 1 &  9.51 &  8.97 &  8.64 &  16.4 &  10.1 & 11 &  12.5 &   2.0 & 12 \\

2285: HD 033636 \#1    & M1.0V    & 20.56 & 18.17 &       & 19.31 & 18.43 & 17.37 & 1 & 16.26 & 15.63 & 15.16 & 608.5 & 162.9 &  6 & 738.9 & 162.3 & 12 \\

2286: HD 041004 \#1    & M0.5V-VI & 18.90 & 16.87 & 15.76 & 17.89 & 16.91 & 16.05 & 1 & 15.06 & 14.50 & 14.16 & 414.0 & 119.1 & 11 & 557.4 & 103.3 &  9 \\

2287: HD 072659 \#1    & M3.0V    & 20.21 & 18.05 & 16.43 & 18.91 & 18.02 & 16.53 & 1 & 15.31 & 14.67 & 14.30 & 293.0 &  82.5 & 11 & 368.6 &  99.2 & 12 \\

2288: HD 114783 \#1    & Early K  & 10.60 &  9.32 &  8.92 &  9.78 &  9.31 &  8.90 & 2 &  8.32 &  7.90 &  7.79 &  20.2 &   5.4 &  3 &  54.0 &   9.3 &  2 \\

2289: \enddata

2290: \end{deluxetable}

2291: %}

2292: \clearpage

2293: \setlength{\voffset}{0mm}

2294: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURE CAPTIONS %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2295: \figcaption[f1.eps]{Histogram of time intervals between DSS epochs for

2296: the exoplanet sample.

2297: \label{DSS-hist}}

2298: 

2299: \figcaption[f2.eps]{DSS images from two epochs for HD 9826.  The

2300:   10$\arcmin$ square images have north up and east to the left.  WDS

2301:   lists components B \& C (marked by lines), which are background

2302:   stars.  WDS component D (marked by an arrow), however, is a CPM

2303:   companion.  The primary's $\mu$ = 0\farcs42 yr$^{-1}$ at 204\sdeg.

2304: \label{WDS-CPM}}

2305: 

2306: \figcaption[f3.eps]{New stellar companion to exoplanet host HD 38529.

2307: The 10$\arcmin$ square DSS images have north up and east to the

2308: left. The companion, marked by arrows, is at an angular separation of

2309: 284$\arcsec$ at 305\sdeg~from the primary, which is at the center of

2310: the images.

2311: \label{new38529}}

2312: 

2313: \figcaption[f4.eps]{New stellar companion to exoplanet host HD 188015.

2314: The 10$\arcmin$ square DSS images have north up and east to the

2315: left. The companion, marked by arrows, is at an angular separation of

2316: 13$\arcsec$ at 85\sdeg~from the primary, which is the bright source at 

2317: the center of the images.

2318: \label{new188015}}

2319: 

2320: \figcaption[f5.eps]{Orbits of planets and stars in exoplanet systems

2321: with stellar companions.  The exoplanet host stars are at a position

2322: of zero AU.  Open circles represent planets and stars represent stars.

2323: Points will tend to move right because of orbital inclination and

2324: projection effects.  Separations between the components of the three

2325: binary companions is exaggerated to be able to distinguish the binary

2326: components on the plot.  For comparison, the positions of the eight

2327: planets of our Solar System are shown at the bottom as filled circles.

2328: \label{Orbits}}

2329: 

2330: \figcaption[f6.eps]{Eccentricity of planetary orbits as a function of

2331: proximity of the stellar companion.  The ratio is computed using

2332: projected stellar separation and a $\sin{i}$ of the planetary orbit.

2333: \label{eccrat}}

2334: 

2335: \figcaption[f7.eps]{Period-eccentricity diagram for planets orbiting

2336: single stars (open circles) and planets in systems with more than one

2337: star (open squares for candidate multiplicity, and filled squares for 

2338: confirmed multiplicity).

2339: \label{eccper}}

2340: 

2341: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% FIGURES %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2342: 

2343: \begin{figure}

2344: \epsscale{0.6}\plotone{f1.eps}

2345: \centerline{f1}

2346: \end{figure}

2347: \clearpage

2348: 

2349: \begin{figure}

2350: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=30cm]{f2.eps}

2351: %\epsscale{1.5}\plotone{f2.eps}

2352: \centerline{f2}

2353: \end{figure}

2354: \clearpage

2355: 

2356: \begin{figure}

2357: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=30cm]{f3.eps}

2358: %\epsscale{1.5}\plotone{f3.eps}

2359: \centerline{f3}

2360: \end{figure}

2361: \clearpage

2362: 

2363: \begin{figure}

2364: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=30cm]{f4.eps}

2365: %\epsscale{1.5}\plotone{f4.eps}

2366: \centerline{f4}

2367: \end{figure}

2368: \clearpage

2369: 

2370: \begin{figure}

2371: \epsscale{0.8}\plotone{f5.eps}

2372: \centerline{f5}

2373: \end{figure}

2374: \clearpage

2375: 

2376: \begin{figure}

2377: \epsscale{1.0}\plotone{f6.eps}

2378: \centerline{f6}

2379: \end{figure}

2380: \clearpage

2381: 

2382: \begin{figure}

2383: \epsscale{1.0}\plotone{f7.eps}

2384: \centerline{f7}

2385: \end{figure}

2386: 

2387: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2388: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% THE END %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2389: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2390: \end{document}

2391: