1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: %\documentclass[12pt,manuscript]{aastex}
4: %\usepackage{natbib}
5:
6: \newcommand{\dg}{^{\circ}}
7: \newcommand{\mn}{^{\prime}}
8: \newcommand{\dsec}{.\!\!^{\prime\prime}}
9: \newcommand{\hr}{^{\mathrm h}}
10: \newcommand{\rmin}{^{\mathrm m}}
11: \newcommand{\rsec}{.\!\!^{\mathrm s}}
12: %\bibliographystyle{apj}
13:
14: \begin{document}
15:
16: \title{A Study of Compact Radio Sources in Nearby Face-on Spiral
17: Galaxies. I. Long Term Evolution of M83}
18:
19: \author{L.A. Maddox\altaffilmark{a}, J.J. Cowan\altaffilmark{a},
20: R.E. Kilgard\altaffilmark{b}, C.K. Lacey\altaffilmark{c},
21: A.H. Prestwich\altaffilmark{b}, C.J. Stockdale\altaffilmark{d}, E. Wolfing\altaffilmark{e,f}
22: }
23:
24: %\author{L.A. Maddox\altaffilmark{a}, C.J. Stockdale\altaffilmark{b},
25: %J.J. Cowan\altaffilmark{a}, C.K. Lacey\altaffilmark{c}, and Emily Wolfing\altaffilmark{d}}
26:
27: \altaffiltext{a}{The Homer L. Dodge Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University
28: of Oklahoma, 440 W. Brooks St., Norman, OK 73019}
29:
30: \altaffiltext{b}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,
31: 60 Garden St, Cambridge, MA, 02138}
32:
33:
34: \altaffiltext{c}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of
35: South Carolina, 712 Main St., Columbia, SC 29208}
36:
37: \altaffiltext{d}{Department of Physics, Marquette University, P.O. Box
38: 1881, Milwaukee, WI 53201}
39:
40: \altaffiltext{e}{Department of Physics and Engineering, Washington \&
41: Lee University, Lexington, VA 24450}
42:
43: \altaffiltext{f}{
44: Current Address: Directed Technologies Inc., 3601 Wilson Blvd., Suite 650, Arlington, VA
45: 22201}
46:
47: \begin{abstract}
48:
49:
50: We present analyses of deep radio observations of M83 taken with the
51: Very Large Array spanning fifteen years,
52: including never before published observations from 1990 and 1998.
53: We report
54: on the evolution of 55 individual point sources, which include four of the six known
55: historical supernovae in this galaxy.
56: A total of 10 sources have X-ray counterparts from a {\em Chandra} survey.
57: Each of these sources show non-thermal spectral indices, and most appear to be X-ray supernova
58: remnants.
59: Comparing the radio source list to
60: surveys in optical and X-ray, we identify three optical/X-ray supernova
61: remnants.
62: Nearly half of the detected radio sources in these observations are coincident with known {\sc Hii}
63: regions lying in the spiral arm structures of the galaxy.
64: We also report on changes in emission from the complex nuclear region,
65: which has shown variability at 20cm wavelengths.
66: We confirm that the peak radio emission from the nucleus
67: is not coincident with the known optical center.
68: One lesser nuclear peak is consistent with the optical/IR nucleus.
69: Previous dynamical studies of a ``dark'' nuclear
70: mass indicate a possible match to other radio nuclear emission regions in M83.
71:
72:
73:
74: \end{abstract}
75:
76: \keywords{GALAXIES: INDIVIDUAL: (NGC~5236 = M83)---H II REGIONS---RADIO
77: CONTINUUM: GALAXIES---SUPERNOVA REMNANTS---X-RAYS: GALAXIES
78: }
79:
80: \section{Introduction}
81:
82:
83:
84:
85: M83 (NGC 5236) is a nearby SABc galaxy that is nearly face-on \citep[$i=24^{\circ}$, ][]{tal79}.
86: It is relatively nearby with distance estimates ranging
87: from 3.75 Mpc \citep{dev79} to 8.9 Mpc \citep{san87}.
88: We have opted to use the Cepheid-established distance of 4.5 Mpc \citep{thi03}.
89: The proximity of M83 has made it an ideal candidate for observations at all wavelengths.
90: The presence of large quantities of gas and dust imply observable levels of enhanced
91: star formation.
92: Previous studies have also noted vigorous star formation in the nuclear region of the
93: galaxy \citep[e.g., ][]{elm98}.
94: Similar star formation activity is evidenced by the discovery of six
95: supernovae in modern times: SN 1923A, SN 1945B, SN 1950B, SN 1957D, SN
96: 1968L, and SN 1983N.
97: The results of monitoring of these historical supernovae in the radio have been presented in
98: \citet{cb82,cb85,crb,eck98,eck02} and \citet{stock05}.
99:
100:
101: In addition to the radio surveys, several X-ray studies have been performed on M83.
102: \citet{kil02} and \citet{kil05} included it in a larger survey of nearby galaxies.
103: \citet{soria02,soria03} also
104: presented detailed analyses of {\em Chandra} observations of this galaxy.
105: Optical surveys have also provided evidence of high star formation in the
106: form of {\sc Hii} regions \citep{rk83} and supernova remnants
107: \citep[SNRs][]{blair04}.
108:
109: Comparisons of compact sources at multiple wavelengths provide critical
110: information about late stages of stellar evolution, emission mechanisms,
111: the transition of supernovae to supernova remnants, etc.
112: In this paper we report on the results of analysis of fifteen years of radio observations of
113: M83, including new, never before published data from 1990 and 1998.
114: We will begin by describing the observations dating back to 1981, before the
115: Very Large Array\footnote{The Very Large Array of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National
116: Science Foundation operated in cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.}
117: was completed. A brief description of the analysis techniques will then be presented in
118: Section 3.
119: In the sections that follow, results will be presented for specific sources. The first discussion
120: will be a brief report on the observed historical supernovae. For the remaining unidentified
121: sources, comparisons with optical and X-ray studies will be presented to
122: identify
123: SNRs, {\sc Hii} regions and X-ray binaries (XRBs).
124: Finally, a discussion of the complex nuclear
125: emission will be presented.
126:
127:
128:
129:
130: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
131:
132:
133:
134: We have observed M83 with the VLA several times between 1981 and 1998. Table \ref{obs}
135: summarizes each of the observations. Reports of the 1981, 1983 and 1990 observations
136: have been presented by
137: \citet{cb82,cb85} and \citet{crb}. The new 1998 observations will be presented here.
138: For this paper, some of the older data have been reprocessed and reimaged
139: in order to to allow consistent analyses and comparisons over
140: many years.
141:
142: The first 20cm observation was performed on 10 April 1981 using 22 antennas while the
143: array was being moved from A to B configuration. More 20cm observations were done on
144: 15 and 17 December 1983 in the BnA hybrid configuration. A 6cm observation was taken on
145: 14 March 1984 in the hybrid CnB configuration. These observations were reported in \citet{cb82,cb85}
146: M83 was observed again at 6cm on 14 October 1990 (CnB), and at 20cm on 30 June 1990 (BnA).
147: These were reported in \citet{crb}. Finally, we observed M83 in 1998 at 20cm (June 13 and 15, BnA)
148: and 6cm (October 31 and November 1, CnB). \citet{crb} reported results of a 1992 20 cm
149: observation taken in B configuration. The original 1990 observation was believed to
150: be corrupted at the time due to the dramatic fading of SN 1957D. In reprocessing the
151: this observation, we have determined it to be good, and since the array was in the preferred
152: configuration, we have opted to present the observation here for the first time.
153:
154:
155: All of the data were processed using the Astronomical Image Processing System (AIPS) provided
156: by NRAO. Flux calibration was performed using 3C286 as the primary source calibrator.
157: To correct for atmospheric phase variations, a secondary calibrator, B1354-132 was used for the
158: 1983 and 1984 observations, and J1316-336 was used for the
159: 1990 and 1998 data sets.
160: Due to changes in the AIPS system, we were unable to reproduce adequate maps for the earliest
161: observations. We have opted to use the original maps presented in \citet{cb85}.
162: The remaining data were then imaged using the AIPS task IMAGR using a Briggs robustness parameter of 0.
163: This value has the advantage of minimizing noise while allowing for excellent point source
164: detection in resultant images. During the imaging process, we also employed self-calibration
165: loops using the task CALIB to improve the noise levels on the maps.
166: The data sets were deconvolved using Gaussian restoring beams,
167: the sizes of which are indicated in Table \ref{obs}.
168: The deconvolved beams were
169: determined using the values for the ``dirty'' beam, calculated from the Fourier transform
170: of the {\em u-v} plane coverage. After imaging, the task PBCOR was run on each map to
171: correct for the shape of the primary beam.
172:
173:
174:
175: \section{Data Analysis}
176:
177:
178:
179:
180: An initial source list was obtained using the AIPS task SAD, which searches for points in
181: a radio image that are higher than a specified level. A gaussian fit is the applied to each
182: detected area of emission, and fits that fail are rejected by the algorithm.
183: Many extended and slightly extended
184: sources were listed as multiple sources. The list was compressed to account for this.
185: Nuclear emission was removed from the source list. Finally, a visual inspection of the maps
186: was performed in order to find sources that were rejected by the detection algorithm. The final
187: list of sources along with peak flux densities at all epochs is presented in Table \ref{flux}.
188: Table \ref{spix} lists the spectral indices ($S\propto\nu^{+\alpha}$) of each source.
189:
190: The sources were then fit using the AIPS task IMFIT. The input model was a two-dimensional
191: Gaussian with a linear sloping background as was implemented in \citet{crb}. Fluxes for the
192: sources are listed in Table \ref{flux}. Where no value exists, we assume a 3-$\sigma$ upper
193: limit of 0.59 mJy beam$^{-1}$ (1983 20cm), 0.14 mJy beam$^{-1}$ (1984 6cm), 0.22 mJy beam$^{-1}$ (1990 20cm),
194: 0.11 mJy beam$^{-1}$ (1990 6cm), 0.24 mJy beam$^{-1}$ (1998 20cm), and 0.21 mJy beam$^{-1}$ (1998 6cm).
195: The 20cm map shown in Figure \ref{m83source} shows the positions
196: of the sources in the final list. The 6cm contour map in Figure \ref{galcont} indicates the positions of
197: some of the sources discussed in \citet{crb} and \citet{eck98}.
198:
199:
200: Many of the fluxes of the sources listed in \citet{crb} differ from fluxes listed in
201: Table \ref{flux}. The reprocessing and reimaging of the older data resulted in maps with
202: different deconvolution sizes than those in the older maps. This produced different flux
203: measurements than maps using the older imaging algorithms.
204: The advantage
205: in reprocessing lies in the fact that all of the older data have been treated
206: in the same manner as
207: the new data.
208:
209:
210:
211: \section{Discussion}
212:
213: \subsection{Radio Point Sources}
214:
215: \subsubsection{Historical Supernovae}
216:
217:
218:
219:
220:
221:
222: We detected emission from four of the six historical supernovae (SNe) in M83 (SNe 1923A,
223: 1950B, 1957D and 1983N). Source designations for each of the SNe are provided in Table
224: \ref{flux}. A more detailed discussion of the nature of the historical SNe is presented
225: in \citet{stock05}.
226:
227: SN 1983N is detected only in the $1983-1984$ observations \citep{cb85,crb}, indicating
228: that it faded very quickly after maximum light. This is consistent with the identification of
229: SN 1983N as a Type Ib supernova \citep{weil86,boff99}.
230:
231: \citet{eck98} reported the discovery of SN 1923A in the radio.
232: The 1990 observations showed a
233: very faint radio point source, and the reprocessing of the $1983-1984$ data did hint at the
234: presence of a source at the position of the supernova, though the flux level is too low
235: to call it a detection. In the 1998 data, we again see
236: a faint source that is coincident with the supernova.
237: In the 1990 maps, the emission appears to be non-thermal in nature.
238: \citet{rk83} report the presence of an optical
239: {\scshape Hii} region at the position of source 59, coincident with the reported position
240: of SN 1923A. \citet{boff99} could find no optical emission consistent with a supernova
241: expansion shock in the area around SN 1923A. It is possible that we are detecting emission
242: from both objects, though the radio emission is near the limits of detection for the
243: observations.
244:
245: \cite{crb} and \citet{stock05} noted a continuing decline in the radio emission from
246: SN 1957D. However
247: there has been unusual optical activity at the position of the explosion. \citet{long89}
248: reported the detection of an optical remnant of SN1957D. The remnant then faded below
249: detectable limits within a few years \citep{long92}, suggesting a possible drop in the
250: circumstellar density through which the explosion shock is propagating. Our radio observations
251: also indicate the rapid decline of SN 1957D (see Figure \ref{57dtime}), and the spectrum
252: seems to be flattening.
253: This could indicate that the supernova is approaching the level of the {\scshape Hii}
254: region in the area. The supernova has not faded below this level, but the flattening
255: of the spectrum could mean a greater contribution from the thermal emission of the gas.
256:
257: As reported in \citet{stock05}, the radio spectrum of SN 1950B seems to have
258: flattened and the flux has remained relatively constant across the 1990 to 1998 epochs. This would imply that the
259: supernova has faded below the level of the local {\scshape Hii} regions. SN 1950B occurred
260: in a complex region of emission. Figure \ref{50btime} shows the region and how the emission
261: has changed over the course of the observations.
262:
263:
264:
265:
266:
267:
268:
269: \subsubsection{Supernova Remnants}
270:
271:
272:
273: After studying the historical supernovae, we turned our attention to searching for radio
274: counterparts to the numerous optical SNRs reported by \citet{blair04}.
275: In our search we identified four sources coincident with optical SNRs. Three of these
276: radio sources had corresponding X-ray sources as reported in \citet{soria02,soria03}.
277: The SNR counterparts are listed in Table \ref{snrcount} and the positions are indicated
278: in Figure \ref{m83source}. With the exception of source 39, all
279: sources exhibit continuum spectral indices consistent with those due to synchrotron
280: emission models for radio emitting SNRs \citep{bere04}.
281:
282: Source 19 is located on the edge of the southern spiral arm of M83. It has exhibited inverted
283: spectra throughout the observations, with some flattening in 1998. The source faded at 6 cm
284: from 1983 to 1990, and it has remained constant in flux between 1990 and 1998.
285: It could be again that we are seeing larger contributions from thermal emission in this region.
286: The large uncertainties in the spectral index measurements stem from the faintness
287: of the source. \citet{soria03} note the detection of a faint X-ray source coincident
288: with source 19.
289: Two X-ray colors are obtained: a hard color (HC),
290: defined as $(H-M)/(H+M)$ and a soft color (SC), defined as $(M-S)/(M
291: +S)$; where S, M and H are counts in the soft (0.3-1.0 keV), medium
292: (1.0-2.0 keV) and hard (2.0-8.0 keV) bands, respectively.
293: Our resulting colors ($HC=-0.19\pm0.45,\ SC=-0.68\pm0.17$) are consistent with SNR emission
294: using the classification scheme in \citet{prest03}.
295: Our radio measurements appear to confirm the identification of this
296: source as an SNR.
297:
298:
299: Source 22 has shown a consistent non-thermal spectrum throughout all observational
300: epochs. It lies in the same region of the galaxy as source 19. This is a crowded
301: region of emission along the southern spiral arm, making isolated measurements difficult.
302: Source 22 has steepened due to the greater fading in the 6cm maps. The
303: source has shown fairly steady emission in the 20cm band. Like source 19 there is a
304: coincident X-ray source. Both source 19 and 22 also exhibit high H$\alpha$ luminosities
305: \citep{blair04}. This is consistent with there being a denser interstellar medium
306: in the region of the sources. The lower resolution 20 cm map presented in \citet{crb} indicates
307: a high {\scshape Hi} density in the area of sources 19 and 22. The X-ray colors for source 22 are not typical for
308: an SNR ($HC=0.15\pm0.22$, $SC=-0.51\pm0.14$), though they might indicate the presence of and
309: XRB or an X-ray pulsar.
310:
311: Source 35 has exhibited fairly steady fluxes through all epochs that we are considering.
312: We have determined spectral indices for this source that are consistently non-thermal in
313: nature. Our {\em Chandra} observations \citep{kil05} show that this source has a very soft spectrum
314: ($HC=-0.82\pm0.22$, $SC=-0.53\pm0.11$), indicative of SNR emission.
315:
316:
317:
318: Source 39 differs from the other sources discussed here in that it has exhibited
319: consistently thermal spectral indices over the time of observation. We note that the flux
320: density of the source has remained fairly steady with some slight fading in the 6cm band.
321: This is more consistent with the behavior of an {\sc Hii} region than a SNR.
322: There is also a lack of X-ray emission from this source. \citet{blair04} identified
323: the optical source as an SNR candidate based on enhanced [{\sc Sii}]:H$\alpha$ ratio.
324: Further spectroscopic confirmation was not possible due to the relatively low luminosity
325: of the region.
326:
327:
328:
329: \subsubsection{H II Regions}
330:
331:
332:
333: It should come as no surprise that the largest number of radio sources in M83 should be
334: associated with {\scshape Hii} regions. M83 is known for exhibiting vigorous star formation
335: activity as indicated by the large number of observed SNe and SNRs.
336: By far the largest number of optical counterparts to our radio sources do
337: consist of
338: {\scshape Hii} regions. Nearly half of the reported radio sources have coincident
339: optical sources identified with {\scshape Hii} emission \citep{rk83}. The radio/{\scshape Hii}
340: counterparts are listed in Table \ref{hiicount}.
341: It should be noted that the earlier observations represent some of the first detections
342: of extragalactic {\sc Hii} in the radio at the resolution and flux level that were
343: detected in M83. This is due in part to the depth of each observation. The deep observations
344: also contribute to the ability to see the spiral arm structure of the galaxy as seen in Figures
345: \ref{m83source} and \ref{galcont}. It is in the spiral arms where {\sc Hii} regions would
346: be more abundant.
347:
348: It is clear from Table \ref{hiicount}, that we are preferentially identifying large
349: optical {\scshape H ii} regions.
350: \citet{rk83} establish a threshold excitation parameter $U\ge300 \mathrm{pc}\
351: \mathrm{cm}^{-2}$
352: to classify
353: a region as large. Only $11\%$ of the \citet{rk83} sources are
354: classified as large by
355: this criterion, while 12 of 21 radio detected {\scshape H ii} regions fall in this
356: category. If
357: the cut-off was relaxed to 250 pc cm$^{-2}$, $19\%$ of the \citet{rk83}
358: sources
359: would be included, while 16 of our 21 radio detected {\scshape H ii} regions now fall
360: in this
361: regime. We have restricted our comparisons to optical studies with
362: comparable resolutions to our
363: radio observations.
364:
365: Most of the radio/optical counterpart sources show consistently stable flux densities and
366: flat spectra indicative of thermal emission processes. This type of behavior is what would
367: be expected from the hot gas that composes an {\sc Hii} region.
368: There are notable exceptions.
369: Source 27, although coincident with an optical {\scshape Hii} region, is a radio lobe
370: to a background FR II radio galaxy \citep{poster2,soria03}.
371:
372: The spectrum of source 4 has steepened with time. It has shown a consistent increase in 20cm
373: emission, while steadily fading at 6cm. In addition to the associated {\sc Hii} region, there
374: exists an X-ray counterpart \citep{colb04}. A discussion of the X-ray properties of source 4
375: are given in the next section.
376:
377: Sources 53 and 55 are very faint sources. This leads to large uncertainties in the spectral
378: index measurements for each of the sources. As noted earlier, source 53 is coincident with the
379: reported optical position of SN 1923A \citep{eck98}. The measured flux of this source is
380: dependent on the noise level at that position on the map. Similarly, the faint source 55
381: is greatly dependent on the rms map level at the position. While the emission is likely to
382: be thermal emission from {\sc H ii}, we are unable to confidently identify source 55.
383:
384:
385:
386:
387:
388:
389:
390: \subsubsection{\label{xray} X-ray Counterparts}
391:
392: A comparison of our radio source list with the X-ray lists of \citet
393: {soria03} and \citet{kil05} yield 10 X-ray counterparts. These
394: sources, along with the {\em Chandra} source designation, are listed in
395: Table \ref{xrcount}. Sources 19, 22 and 35 were discussed
396: previously.
397:
398: In order to constrain the nature of the X-ray/radio sources, we
399: examine the X-ray colors using the values published in \citet{kil05}. The X-ray
400: color-color plot is presented in Figure \ref{xrcc}.
401: As can be seen, a clear dichotomy exists between X-ray binary
402: candidates and SNR candidates:
403: sources 3, 4, 7, 19, 22 and 35 are SNR candidates; sources 24, 32 and
404: 36 are XRB candidates; and
405: source 28 is a highly absorbed background source.
406: Individual sources
407: are discussed below. This same dichotomy between SNRs and XRBs was
408: seen by Kilgard et al. (2006, in preparation) in M51 X-ray sources
409: that are coincident with compact H$\alpha$ sources. In M51, many of
410: the SNR-candidates are also coincident with compact radio sources.
411: Thus, these observations
412: help place constraints on X-ray source classification based upon X-
413: ray colors.
414:
415: Sources 3 and 4 show consistently non-thermal radio emission over the
416: three epochs, although
417: for source 3 we cannot calculate a spectral index due to lack of
418: detections for at least
419: one band in each epoch. In the radio source 3 has shown a rise in
420: 20cm flux density from 1983 to
421: 1990. That emission dropped to below detectability in 1998. At the
422: same time the source brightened
423: to a detectable level in 1998 after no detections in the two previous
424: epochs. We do note
425: that there are optical {\scshape Hii} regions \citep{rk83} coincident with both
426: radio sources. Source 3 has HC$=-0.44\pm0.31$ and SC
427: $=-0.50\pm0.15$, placing it in the range of thermal SNRs; source 4
428: falls on the cusp between SNRs and soft X-ray binaries (likely
429: LMXBs), with HC$=-0.57\pm0.25$ and SC$=-0.22\pm0.18$. Both sources
430: exhibit no variability between the two {\em Chandra} observations.
431:
432: Similarly, source 7 has X-ray colors of HC$=-0.17\pm0.27$ and SC
433: $=-0.47\pm0.15$, placing it also on the cusp of LMXBs and SNRs.
434: Consistent non-thermal radio emission over this time strengthens the
435: determination of this source as an SNR. There was an increase in 20cm
436: emission, while at 6cm the flux remained flat. There is no
437: identified optical counterpart to this source so we cannot place
438: other constraints on the source type.
439:
440: Source 24 has X-ray colors indicative of an X-ray binary, with HC
441: $=-0.20\pm0.26$ and SC$=0.11\pm0.25$. However, the location of the
442: source within a dust lane could lead to absorption of the soft X-
443: rays. As such, we cannot rule out an identification of an SNR based
444: upon the X-ray data.
445:
446: Source 28 has been of particular interest since it was associated
447: with sources 27 and 29 \citep{crb}.
448: It was postulated that the sources could be part of a jet from the
449: nucleus of M83. High resolution
450: {\em Chandra} observations show an X-ray source at the position of
451: source 28. X-ray spectral analysis
452: indicate that it is likely a background galaxy \citep{poster1,soria03}.
453: Radio observations show
454: a source that varies slightly at 20cm while fading rapidly at 6cm.
455: Sources 27 and 29 show consistent non-thermal emission. At 20cm source 27 has brightened slightly, while
456: source 29 has remained steady or slightly faded (there is a large overlap in the uncertainty). Both sources faded between 1990 and 1998 at 6cm.
457: The association of sources 27 and 29 indicate
458: that they are the radio lobes of a FR II radio galaxy that lies along
459: the line of sight
460: \citep{poster1,poster2,soria02,soria03}.
461:
462: Source 32 has the faintest X-ray detected counterpart to a radio
463: source in M83 (L$_X < 10^{37} erg\ s^{-1}$). The X-ray colors
464: indicate that the source is a soft X-ray binary (HC$=-0.73\pm0.32$, SC
465: $=0.00\pm0.26$). The soft X-ray color may be artificially
466: ``softened" due to excess soft, diffuse X-ray emission near the
467: source. There is also the suggestion of X-ray variability, with the
468: source not detected at all in the second {\em Chandra} observation.
469: However, given the short observation time (20\% that of the longer
470: observation), the source would be at or slightly below the detection
471: limit. This source lies near the confused nuclear region of the galaxy.
472: This leads to a large background in that area. The measured spectral index
473: for source 32 is quite steep ($-1.7$), but this could be attributed to
474: the uncertainty in the background level. The source could also be
475: exhibiting radio variability similar to the suggested X-ray variability.
476:
477: Source 36 has been a mystery in previous studies. It has no optical
478: counterpart. It is
479: not located in the high surface brightness area of a spiral arm.
480: The presence of the X-ray counterpart
481: was noted first by \citet{poster1}, and \citet{poster2} suggested
482: that it was another
483: background galaxy. Radio measurements show a slight rise in 20cm
484: emission from the earliest epoch.
485: Over the same span of time the 6cm has dramatically dropped.
486: Further analysis of the X-ray indicated that the source is
487: consistent with an X-ray binary (HC$=-0.13\pm0.16$, SC$=0.15\pm0.16
488: $), with evidence for X-ray spectral evolution between the two
489: observations without a change in flux.
490:
491:
492:
493:
494: As illustrated in Figure \ref{m83source} and listed in Tables \ref{flux}, \ref{snrcount},
495: \ref{hiicount}, and
496: \ref{xrcount}, we detect
497: radio
498: emission from 55 point source sources overlapping with 6 X-ray only
499: sources, 20
500: optical only sources, and 4 X-ray/optical sources. $54\%$ of the sources
501: in
502: our radio sample
503: have counterparts in the optical and X-ray, which can be compared to the
504: SNR populations
505: measured by \citet{pan02} for M33, NGC~300, and NGC~7793. For M33, they
506: report radio
507: emission from 53 SNRs with 37 optical and 11 optical/X-ray co-detections;
508: for NGC~300,
509: they report radio emission from 17 SNRs with one optical, one X-ray, and
510: two optical/X-ray
511: co-detections; and for NGC~7793, they report seven radio SNRs with one
512: each optical,
513: X-ray, and optical/X-ray co-detection. It should be noted that the
514: resolution for
515: the observations was $6\arcsec$, that the statistical errors of the SNR
516: spectral
517: index measurements were so large that the spectral indices for most
518: identified
519: radio sources are not clearly identified as SNRs by their own
520: identification
521: ($\alpha < -0.2$), and that a large fraction of their detections would not
522: be classified
523: as detections in this catalog as their flux measurements do not exceed
524: $4\sigma$.
525: Given these limitations, the fact that we have an approximate $50\%$
526: overlap at the
527: other bands is in relative agreement with the range of co-detections of
528: \citet{pan02}.
529:
530:
531:
532:
533:
534:
535:
536:
537: \subsection{Nuclear Emission}
538:
539:
540:
541:
542: The nucleus of M83 is very complex. The bright emission prevents the resolution of individual
543: sources using the VLA configurations for the observation bands here. \citet{crb} noted that
544: the optical/IR nucleus was not coincident with the radio nucleus. We are able to confirm this
545: with the new analysis of the data. The peak of the radio nuclear emission is located at a distance
546: of $\sim 10^{\prime\prime}$ from the optical center. Contour plots of all maps are shown in Figure
547: \ref{nuctime}.
548:
549:
550:
551: There does exist evidence for multiple emission sources within the nuclear complex. From the
552: 1983$-$1984 observations to those in 1992, there was an overall increase in the nuclear emission.
553: Figure \ref{m83profiles} shows a series of three dimensional emission profiles of the nuclear region.
554: The plots for the 20cm band indicate the presence of at least four possible sources. The position
555: of the third brightest ``peak'' is consistent with the optical center. \citet{soria02} report the
556: presence of a hard X-ray source at this position. X-ray spectral analysis \citep{soria02} indicate
557: that the source is consistent with a low accretion-rate black hole with mass $\sim 10^7 M_{\odot}$.
558: This compares favorably with the mass estimates of \citet{that00} ($1.6\times10^7M_{\odot}$) and
559: \citet{mast05} ($1.2\times10^7M_{\odot}$).
560: Although we cannot get accurate measurements of the nuclear peak flux levels in the radio maps, qualitative
561: inspection indicates that the emission is non-thermal in nature which would be consistent
562: with the X-ray results.
563:
564:
565: The second highest ``peak'' seems to be consistent with the obscured ``dark'' nucleus reported
566: by \citet{that00} and subsequently studied in \citet{sak04}. In a later study, however, \citet{mast05}
567: reported a different position for this ``dark'' nucleus. Figure \ref{hidd} shows positions
568: of the optical nucleus and the ``dark'' nucleus on the 1983 20cm contours.
569: As illustrated in Figure \ref{hidd}
570: nucleus appears closer to the peak of the radio emission of the galaxy. The studies of this mass concentration
571: indicate that it is more massive \citep[e.g., ][]{mast05} than the the optical nucleus. \citet{that00}
572: also note that the ``dark'' nucleus is located near
573: the dynamical center of the galaxy.
574: The positions of the nuclear mass concentrations are given in Table
575: \ref{npos}. The positions for the ``dark'' nucleus are offset in
576: Declination by $\sim3.6^{\prime\prime}$, which corresponds to the deconvolution
577: size
578: for our observations. We would need the higher resolution of VLBI
579: observations in order to isolate the radio emission sources.
580:
581:
582: A VLBI observation using the Long Baseline Array of the
583: Australia Telescope has been performed on the nuclear region of M83. The aim of these observations
584: is to resolve the individual sources in this region to get a better idea of the distribution and
585: to find multiple counterparts to the nuclear X-ray sources reported in \citet{soria03}. The results
586: of this study will be presented in a future paper (Maddox et al, in preparation).
587:
588:
589: \section{Conclusions}
590:
591: We have studied the long term radio emission from compact sources in the galaxy M83.
592: The observations included previously unpublished data from 1990 and 1998.
593: We have presented the data over the fifteen years in a consistent manner.
594: Our observations have resulted in the detection of a number of objects
595: in M83:
596:
597: \noindent$\bullet$
598: It was shown that SN 1957D has continued fading, consistent with an expanding shock through
599: a circumstellar material that is decreasing in density. SN 1950B has apparently faded to the
600: level of thermal {\sc Hii} regions that are near the position of the explosion. SN 1923A has
601: faded to near the limits of detection of these observations. We continue to show no detection
602: of SN 1983N after its initial radio detection, consistent with it having been a Type Ib
603: supernova.
604:
605: \noindent$\bullet$
606: About half of the radio sources are thermal {\sc Hii} regions. A result that is not surprising
607: due to the high star formation activity of M83. The {\sc Hii} regions
608: tend to be very large, exhibiting high excitation parameters. The largest
609: regions are not detected due to the high resolution of our
610: observations.
611:
612:
613: \noindent$\bullet$
614: It was found that ten sources were coincident with X-ray sources. The continuum spectral indices
615: of these sources indicated that most were X-ray supernova remnants. We confirm that one of the
616: coincident sources (source 28) is the nucleus of a background radio galaxy with two
617: radio lobes (sources 27 and 29). Three of the X-ray sources are coincident with
618: known optical supernova remnants.
619:
620: \noindent$\bullet$
621: We note that the nuclear region of M83 has shown a slight increase in 20 cm emission in the
622: radio peak. It is possible that there is an increase in accretion onto a supermassive black
623: hole, which would be consistent with X-ray results. The 6 cm emission does not show this
624: increase in flux.
625: We confirmed that the reported optical/IR nuclear peak is not consistent with the radio
626: nucleus, though there is evidence for a radio emission region at the position of the optical
627: nucleus. It was seen that the nuclear radio peak was near the position of a second ``dark''
628: nuclear mass concentration that corresponds to the dynamical nucleus of the galaxy.
629:
630: Our
631: multiwavelength analyses have provided new information about the
632: nature of the many, detected compact sources and the nucleus in the
633: starburst galaxy M83.
634: Studies of the compact sources are providing new information about
635: late-term stellar evolution ({\it e.g.}, mass-loss rates), emission
636: mechanisms, the transition of SNe into SNRs,
637: and the nature of XRBs. The combination of radio, X-ray and optical observations provide an
638: excellent diagnostic for the classification of compact sources in this and other nearby
639: galaxies. This galaxy also appears to have
640: a complicated nuclear structure, including possibly
641: multiple supermassive black holes, and may have minor
642: variability.
643: In the future we will
644: continue to follow the long-term evolution of these sources in this
645: galaxy, as well as to compare the results here
646: with those in other nearby face-on
647: spiral galaxies.
648:
649: We thank the referee, A. Pedlar,
650: for useful comments that have helped us to improve the paper.
651: This work employed extensive use of the NASA Extragalactic Database (NED).
652: This work was supported by NSF Grant AST-03-07279 (JJC). CJS is a
653: Cottrell Scholar of Research Corporation and work on this
654: project has been supported by the NASA Wisconsin Space Grant Consortium.
655:
656:
657:
658: %\bibliography{refs}
659:
660: \begin{thebibliography}{31}
661:
662: \bibitem[{{Berezhko} \& {V{\" o}lk}(2004)}]{bere04}
663: {Berezhko}, E.~G., \& {V{\" o}lk}, H.~J. 2004, \aap, 427, 525
664:
665: \bibitem[{{Blair} \& {Long}(2004)}]{blair04}
666: {Blair}, W.~P., \& {Long}, K.~S. 2004, \apjs, 155, 101
667:
668: \bibitem[{{Boffi} {et~al.}(1999){Boffi}, {Sparks}, \& {Macchetto}}]{boff99}
669: {Boffi}, F.~R., {Sparks}, W.~B., \& {Macchetto}, F.~D. 1999, \aaps, 138, 253
670:
671: \bibitem[{{Colbert} {et~al.}(2004){Colbert}, {Heckman}, {Ptak}, {Strickland},
672: \& {Weaver}}]{colb04}
673: {Colbert}, E.~J.~M., {Heckman}, T.~M., {Ptak}, A.~F., {Strickland}, D.~K., \&
674: {Weaver}, K.~A. 2004, \apj, 602, 231
675:
676: \bibitem[{{Cowan} \& {Branch}(1982)}]{cb82}
677: {Cowan}, J.~J., \& {Branch}, D. 1982, \apj, 258, 31
678:
679: \bibitem[{{Cowan} \& {Branch}(1985)}]{cb85}
680: ---. 1985, \apj, 293, 400
681:
682: \bibitem[{{Cowan} {et~al.}(1994){Cowan}, {Roberts}, \& {Branch}}]{crb}
683: {Cowan}, J.~J., {Roberts}, D.~A., \& {Branch}, D. 1994, \apj, 434, 128
684:
685: \bibitem[{{de Vaucouleurs}(1979)}]{dev79}
686: {de Vaucouleurs}, G. 1979, \aj, 84, 1270
687:
688: \bibitem[{{de Vaucouleurs} {et~al.}(1983){de Vaucouleurs}, {Pence}, \&
689: {Davoust}}]{dev83}
690: {de Vaucouleurs}, G., {Pence}, W.~D., \& {Davoust}, E. 1983, \apjs, 53, 17
691:
692: \bibitem[{{Eck} {et~al.}(2002){Eck}, {Cowan}, \& {Branch}}]{eck02}
693: {Eck}, C.~R., {Cowan}, J.~J., \& {Branch}, D. 2002, \apj, 573, 306
694:
695: \bibitem[{{Eck} {et~al.}(1998){Eck}, {Roberts}, {Cowan}, \& {Branch}}]{eck98}
696: {Eck}, C.~R., {Roberts}, D.~A., {Cowan}, J.~J., \& {Branch}, D. 1998, \apj,
697: 508, 664
698:
699: \bibitem[{{Elmegreen} {et~al.}(1998){Elmegreen}, {Chromey}, \&
700: {Warren}}]{elm98}
701: {Elmegreen}, D.~M., {Chromey}, F.~R., \& {Warren}, A.~R. 1998, \aj, 116, 2834
702:
703: \bibitem[{{Kilgard} {et~al.}(2005){Kilgard}, {Cowan}, {Garcia}, {Kaaret},
704: {Krauss}, {McDowell}, {Prestwich}, {Primini}, {Stockdale}, {Trinchieri},
705: {Ward}, \& {Zezas}}]{kil05}
706: {Kilgard}, R.~E., {et~al.}
707: 2005, \apjs, 159, 214
708:
709: \bibitem[{{Kilgard} {et~al.}(2002){Kilgard}, {Kaaret}, {Krauss}, {Prestwich},
710: {Raley}, \& {Zezas}}]{kil02}
711: {Kilgard}, R.~E., {Kaaret}, P., {Krauss}, M.~I., {Prestwich}, A.~H., {Raley},
712: M.~T., \& {Zezas}, A. 2002, \apj, 573, 138
713:
714: \bibitem[{{Long} {et~al.}(1989){Long}, {Blair}, \& {Krzeminski}}]{long89}
715: {Long}, K.~S., {Blair}, W.~P., \& {Krzeminski}, W. 1989, \apjl, 340, L25
716:
717: \bibitem[{{Long} {et~al.}(1992){Long}, {Winkler}, \& {Blair}}]{long92}
718: {Long}, K.~S., {Winkler}, P.~F., \& {Blair}, W.~P. 1992, \apj, 395, 632
719:
720: \bibitem[{{Maddox} {et~al.}(2003){Maddox}, {Stockdale}, \& {Cowan}}]{poster2}
721: {Maddox}, L.~A., {Stockdale}, C.~J., \& {Cowan}, J.~J. 2003, \baas
722: 35, 1396
723:
724: \bibitem[{{Mast} {et~al.}(2005){Mast}, {D{\'{\i}}az}, \& {Aguero}}]{mast05}
725: {Mast}, D., {D{\'{\i}}az}, R.~J., \& {Aguero}, M.~P. 2005, ArXiv Astrophysics
726: e-prints, arXiv:astro-ph/0505264
727:
728: \bibitem[{{Pannuti} {et~al.}(2002){Pannuti}, {Duric}, {Lacey}, {Ferguson},
729: {Magnor}, \& {Mendelowitz}}]{pan02}
730: {Pannuti}, T.~G., {Duric}, N., {Lacey}, C.~K., {Ferguson}, A.~M.~N., {Magnor},
731: M.~A., \& {Mendelowitz}, C. 2002, \apj, 565, 966
732:
733: \bibitem[{{Prestwich} {et~al.}(2003){Prestwich}, {Irwin}, {Kilgard}, {Krauss},
734: {Zezas}, {Primini}, {Kaaret}, \& {Boroson}}]{prest03}
735: {Prestwich}, A.~H., {Irwin}, J.~A., {Kilgard}, R.~E., {Krauss}, M.~I., {Zezas},
736: A., {Primini}, F., {Kaaret}, P., \& {Boroson}, B. 2003, \apj, 595, 719
737:
738: \bibitem[{{Rumstay} \& {Kaufman}(1983)}]{rk83}
739: {Rumstay}, K.~S., \& {Kaufman}, M. 1983, \apj, 274, 611
740:
741: \bibitem[{{Sakamoto} {et~al.}(2004){Sakamoto}, {Matsushita}, {Peck}, {Wiedner},
742: \& {Iono}}]{sak04}
743: {Sakamoto}, K., {Matsushita}, S., {Peck}, A.~B., {Wiedner}, M.~C., \& {Iono},
744: D. 2004, \apjl, 616, L59
745:
746: \bibitem[{{Sandage} \& {Tammann}(1987)}]{san87}
747: {Sandage}, A., \& {Tammann}, G.~A. 1987, {A revised Shapley-Ames Catalog of
748: bright galaxies} (Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, Washington:
749: Carnegie Institution, 1987 , 2nd ed.)
750:
751: \bibitem[{{Soria} \& {Wu}(2002)}]{soria02}
752: {Soria}, R., \& {Wu}, K. 2002, \aap, 384, 99
753:
754: \bibitem[{{Soria} \& {Wu}(2003)}]{soria03}
755: ---. 2003, \aap, 410, 53
756:
757: \bibitem[{{Stockdale} {et~al.}(2001){Stockdale}, {Cowan}, {Maddox}, {Lacey},
758: {Rupen}, {Prestwich}, {Kilgard}, {Krauss}, \& {Zezas}}]{poster1}
759: {Stockdale}, C.~J., {et~al.}
760: 2001, \baas, 33, 1338
761:
762: \bibitem[{{Stockdale} {et~al.}(2006){Stockdale}, {Maddox}, {Cowan},
763: {Prestwich}, {Kilgard}, \& {Immler}}]{stock05}
764: {Stockdale}, C.~J., {Maddox}, L.~A., {Cowan}, J.~J., {Prestwich}, A.,
765: {Kilgard}, R., \& {Immler}, S. 2006, \aj, 131, 889
766:
767: \bibitem[{{Talbot} {et~al.}(1979){Talbot}, {Jensen}, \& {Dufour}}]{tal79}
768: {Talbot}, R.~J., {Jensen}, E.~B., \& {Dufour}, R.~J. 1979, \apj, 229, 91
769:
770: \bibitem[{{Thatte} {et~al.}(2000){Thatte}, {Tecza}, \& {Genzel}}]{that00}
771: {Thatte}, N., {Tecza}, M., \& {Genzel}, R. 2000, \aap, 364, L47
772:
773: \bibitem[{{Thim} {et~al.}(2003){Thim}, {Tammann}, {Saha}, {Dolphin}, {Sandage},
774: {Tolstoy}, \& {Labhardt}}]{thi03}
775: {Thim}, F., {Tammann}, G.~A., {Saha}, A., {Dolphin}, A., {Sandage}, A.,
776: {Tolstoy}, E., \& {Labhardt}, L. 2003, \apj, 590, 256
777:
778: \bibitem[{{Weiler} {et~al.}(1986){Weiler}, {Sramek}, {Panagia}, {van der
779: Hulst}, \& {Salvati}}]{weil86}
780: {Weiler}, K.~W., {Sramek}, R.~A., {Panagia}, N., {van der Hulst}, J.~M., \&
781: {Salvati}, M. 1986, \apj, 301, 790
782:
783: \end{thebibliography}
784:
785: \clearpage
786:
787: %%%%%%%%% Tables %%%%%%%%%%%%%
788:
789: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccccc}
790: \tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
791: \tablecaption{{\sc \label{obs} VLA Radio Observations of M83}}
792: \tablehead{
793: % & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$1983-1984$ {\sc Observations}} &
794: %\multicolumn{2}{c}{1990 {\sc Observations}} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{1998
795: %{\sc Observations}} \\
796: %\cline{2-7}
797: %{\sc Parameter} & 20cm & 6cm & 20cm & 6cm & 20cm & 6cm \\
798: \colhead{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$1983-1984$ {\sc Observations}} &
799: \multicolumn{2}{c}{1990 {\sc Observations}} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{1998
800: {\sc Observations}} \\
801: \cline{2-7}
802: \colhead{{\sc Parameter}} & \colhead{20cm} & \colhead{6cm} & \colhead{20cm}
803: & \colhead{6cm} & \colhead{20cm} & \colhead{6cm}
804: }
805: \startdata
806: %\hline
807: Frequency (GHz)\dotfill & 1.446 & 4.873 & 1.452 & 4.873 & 1.465 & 4.885\\
808: Observing dates\dotfill& 1983 Dec 15,17 & 1984 Mar 15 & 1990 Jun 30 & 1990 Oct 14 & 1998 Jun 13 & 1998 Oct 31\\
809: Observing time (hr)\dotfill& 3 & 6.5 & 7.5 & 6 & 11.3 & 11.6 \\
810: Configuration\dotfill& BnA & CnB & BnA & CnB & BnA & CnB\\
811: Primary beam HPBW\dotfill& $30^\prime$ & $8^\prime$ &$30^\prime$ & $8^\prime$ & $30^\prime$ & $8^\prime$ \\
812: Clean Beam\dotfill&
813: $3.\!\!^{\prime\prime}50\times3.\!\!^{\prime\prime}50$ &
814: $3.\!\!^{\prime\prime}93\times2.\!\!^{\prime\prime}80$ &
815: $3.\!\!^{\prime\prime}65\times3.\!\!^{\prime\prime}65$ &
816: $3.\!\!^{\prime\prime}65\times3.\!\!^{\prime\prime}65$ &
817: $3.\!\!^{\prime\prime}65\times3.\!\!^{\prime\prime}65$ &
818: $3.\!\!^{\prime\prime}65\times3.\!\!^{\prime\prime}65$ \\
819: rms noise (mJy ${\mathrm{beam}}^{-1}$)\dotfill&
820: 0.197 &
821: 0.045 &
822: 0.074 &
823: 0.037 &
824: 0.079 &
825: 0.070 \\
826: %\hline
827: \enddata
828: \end{deluxetable}
829:
830: \clearpage
831:
832: \begin{deluxetable}{lllcccccc}
833: \tablewidth{0pt}
834: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
835: %\rotate
836: \tablecolumns{9}
837: \tablecaption{
838: \label{flux}
839: Radio Positions and Peak Flux Densities of Sources in M83}
840: \tablehead{\colhead{} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{\raisebox{-1.5ex}[0pt][0pt]{Position\tablenotemark{a}}} &
841: \multicolumn{2}{c}{1983-1984\tablenotemark{b}} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{1990} &
842: \multicolumn{2}{c}{1998} \\
843: \cline{4-9} \\
844: \cline{2-3}
845: \multicolumn{3}{c}{} & \colhead{20 cm} & \colhead{6 cm} &
846: \colhead{20 cm} & \colhead{6 cm} & \colhead{20 cm} &
847: \colhead{6 cm} \\
848: \colhead{Source} & \colhead{R.A.(2000)} & \colhead{Decl.(2000)} &
849: \colhead{(mJy)} & \colhead{(mJy)} & \colhead{(mJy)} &
850: \colhead{(mJy)} & \colhead{(mJy)} & \colhead{(mJy)}
851: }
852:
853:
854: \startdata
855: 1 & $13^{\mathrm{h}}36^{\mathrm{m}}50^{\mathrm{s}}\!\!.00$ & $-29^{\circ}52'43''\!\!.36$ & $\cdots$ & $0.41\pm0.08$ & $0.37\pm0.08$ & $0.35\pm0.04$ & $0.52\pm0.07$ & $0.34\pm0.06$ \\
856: 2 & 13 36 50.83 & $-$29 51 59.56 &$\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $0.38\pm0.08$ & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ \\
857: 3 & 13 36 50.86 & $-$29 52 38.54 & $0.76\pm0.20$ & $0.39\pm0.08$ & $0.38\pm0.08$ & $0.25\pm0.03$ & $0.40\pm0.09$ & $0.20\pm0.06$ \\
858: 4 & 13 36 51.11 & $-$29 50 41.98 & $0.96\pm0.19$ & $\cdots$ & $0.55\pm0.08$ & $0.23\pm0.04$ & $0.58\pm0.07$ & $0.34\pm0.04$ \\
859: 5\tablenotemark{c} & 13 36 51.24 & $-$29 54 02.01 & $4.58\pm0.20$ & $1.30\pm0.12$ & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ \\
860: 6 & 13 36 51.55 & $-$29 53 00.61 & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $0.43\pm0.08$ & $0.41\pm0.05$ & $0.54\pm0.10$ & $0.36\pm0.06$ \\
861: 7 & 13 36 52.78 & $-$29 52 31.58 &$\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $0.52\pm0.08$ & $0.25\pm0.04$ & $0.47\pm0.10$ & $0.29\pm0.05$ \\
862: 8 & 13 36 52.77 & $-$29 51 10.39 & $\cdots$ & $0.45\pm0.07$ & $0.38\pm0.08$ & $0.49\pm0.04$ & $0.42\pm0.09$ & $0.30\pm0.05$ \\
863: 9 & 13 36 52.83 & $-$29 51 37.96 & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $0.62\pm0.08$ & $\cdots$ & $0.90\pm0.08$ & $\cdots$ \\
864: 10 & 13 36 52.91 & $-$29 52 49.07 & $0.73\pm0.19$ & $0.39\pm0.08$ & $0.60\pm0.08$ & $0.28\pm0.05$ & $0.45\pm0.09$ & $0.28\pm0.05$ \\
865: 11\tablenotemark{c} & 13 36 52.92 & $-$29 51 56.50 & $0.70\pm0.17$ & $0.43\pm0.06$ & $0.54\pm0.08$ & $0.54\pm0.05$ & $0.53\pm0.07$ & $0.50\pm0.04$ \\
866: 12 & 13 36 53.14 & $-$29 51 33.12 & $0.98\pm0.19$ & $1.03\pm0.06$ & $0.95\pm0.08$ & $1.16\pm0.05$ & $0.89\pm0.13$ & $1.17\pm0.05$ \\
867: 13 & 13 36 53.27 & $-$29 52 57.44 & $0.47\pm0.19$ & $0.53\pm0.08$ & $0.45\pm0.08$ & $0.40\pm0.06$ & $0.60\pm0.08$ & $0.47\pm0.05$ \\
868: 14 & 13 36 53.25 & $-$29 50 58.62 & $\cdots$ & $0.31\pm0.06$ & $0.42\pm0.08$ & $0.41\pm0.04$ & $0.20\pm0.08$ & $0.35\pm0.04$ \\
869: 15 & 13 36 53.39 & $-$29 51 11.17 & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $0.18\pm0.04$ & $\cdots$ & $0.19\pm0.05$ \\
870: 16 & 13 36 54.20 & $-$29 50 42.22 & $\cdots$ & $0.45\pm0.06$ & $0.37\pm0.08$ & $0.30\pm0.05$ & $0.41\pm0.07$ & $0.33\pm0.04$ \\
871: 17 & 13 36 54.40 & $-$29 53 05.17 & $0.43\pm0.21$ & $0.37\pm0.08$ & $0.36\pm0.08$ & $0.49\pm0.05$ & $0.52\pm0.11$ & $0.58\pm0.06$ \\
872: 18 & 13 36 54.74 & $-$29 52 56.77 & $0.59\pm0.19$ & $0.47\pm0.08$ & $0.60\pm0.08$ & $0.33\pm0.05$ & $0.44\pm0.10$ & $0.29\pm0.06$ \\
873: 19 & 13 36 54.90 & $-$29 53 10.29 & $\cdots$ & $0.58\pm0.08$ & $\cdots$ & $0.40\pm0.04$ & $0.36\pm0.10$ & $0.43\pm0.05$ \\
874: 20 & 13 36 54.95 & $-$29 52 40.21 & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $0.19\pm0.05$ & $0.28\pm0.09$ & $\cdots$ \\
875: 21 & 13 36 55.41 & $-$29 52 56.08 & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $0.26\pm0.08$ & $\cdots$ & $0.26\pm0.09$ & $0.21\pm0.03$ \\
876: 22 & 13 36 55.54 & $-$29 53 03.26 & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $0.22\pm0.08$ & $0.26\pm0.04$ & $0.33\pm0.09$ & $0.32\pm0.05$ \\
877: 23 & 13 36 55.72 & $-$29 49 52.14 & $0.88\pm0.18$ & $0.51\pm0.06$ & $0.70\pm0.08$ & $0.43\pm0.04$ & $0.46\pm0.06$ & $0.53\pm0.05$ \\
878: 24 & 13 36 56.13 & $-$29 52 54.99 & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $0.45\pm0.08$ & $0.31\pm0.04$ & $0.42\pm0.07$ & $\cdots$ \\
879: 25 & 13 36 56.32 & $-$29 49 34.10 & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $0.13\pm0.03$ & $0.30\pm0.05$ & $\cdots$ \\
880: 26 & 13 36 56.84 & $-$29 52 48.36 & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $0.27\pm0.04$ & $0.35\pm0.08$ & $0.25\pm0.04$ \\
881: 27 & 13 36 56.91 & $-$29 50 43.28 & $3.39\pm0.18$ & $0.86\pm0.05$ & $3.23\pm0.08$ & $1.09\pm0.03$ & $3.38\pm0.07$ & $1.02\pm0.04$ \\
882: 28 & 13 36 58.34 & $-$29 51 04.58 & $0.74\pm0.18$ & $1.31\pm0.06$ & $1.06\pm0.08$ & $1.55\pm0.04$ & $0.82\pm0.07$ & $0.87\pm0.05$ \\
883: 29 & 13 36 59.00 & $-$29 51 16.04 & $1.39\pm0.21$ & $0.37\pm0.05$ & $1.45\pm0.07$ & $0.60\pm0.04$ & $1.38\pm0.07$ & $0.49\pm0.04$ \\
884: 30 & 13 36 59.54 & $-$29 51 26.32 & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $0.73\pm0.07$ & $\cdots$ & $1.26\pm0.09$ & $\cdots$ \\
885: 31 & 13 36 59.98 & $-$29 52 16.65 & $2.29\pm0.19$ & $1.35\pm0.06$ & $2.19\pm0.08$ & $1.45\pm0.05$ & $2.11\pm0.09$ & $1.56\pm0.05$ \\
886: 32 & 13 37 00.17 & $-$29 51 40.02 & $1.75\pm0.21$ & $0.42\pm0.06$ & $2.16\pm0.08$ & $0.57\pm0.03$ & $2.85\pm0.12$ & $0.38\pm0.08$ \\
887: 33 & 13 37 00.54 & $-$29 54 18.50 & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $0.20\pm0.08$ & $0.27\pm0.05$ & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ \\
888: 34 & 13 37 01.34 & $-$29 51 26.51 & $1.34\pm0.22$ & $0.95\pm0.05$ & $0.92\pm0.08$ & $0.87\pm0.04$ & $1.14\pm0.09$ & $0.85\pm0.04$ \\
889: 35 & 13 37 02.36 & $-$29 51 25.85 & $0.94\pm0.21$ & $\cdots$ & $0.77\pm0.08$ & $0.48\pm0.04$ & $0.66\pm0.08$ & $0.37\pm0.05$ \\
890: 36 & 13 37 03.24 & $-$29 52 26.56 & $\cdots$ & $1.13\pm0.06$ & $0.50\pm0.08$ & $0.63\pm0.04$ & $0.68\pm0.07$ & $0.32\pm0.04$ \\
891: 37 & 13 37 03.28 & $-$29 51 13.7 & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $0.24\pm0.08$ & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $0.22\pm0.05$ \\
892: 38 & 13 37 03.39 & $-$29 54 02.04 & $1.01\pm0.23$ & $1.07\pm0.07$ & $0.66\pm0.08$ & $1.04\pm0.05$ & $0.80\pm0.06$ & $1.00\pm0.05$ \\
893: 39\tablenotemark{c} & 13 37 03.53 & $-$29 49 40.56 & $2.72\pm0.21$ & $2.18\pm0.06$ & $1.88\pm0.08$ & $1.57\pm0.04$ & $0.82\pm0.09$ & $0.60\pm0.05$ \\
894: 40 & 13 37 04.73 & $-$29 50 57.59 & $\cdots$ & $0.32\pm0.06$ & $0.27\pm0.08$ & $0.36\pm0.04$ & $0.67\pm0.08$ & $0.41\pm0.05$ \\
895: 41 & 13 37 06.61 & $-$29 53 32.32 & $\cdots$ & $0.75\pm0.09$ & $0.59\pm0.08$ & $0.42\pm0.05$ & $0.56\pm0.08$ & $0.31\pm0.05$ \\
896: 42 & 13 37 06.91 & $-$29 49 36.03 & $1.30\pm0.23$ & $1.42\pm0.05$ & $1.51\pm0.08$ & $1.53\pm0.04$ & $1.54\pm0.07$ &$1.50\pm0.05$ \\
897: 43 & 13 37 07.37 & $-$29 51 06.38 & $\cdots$ & $0.32\pm0.06$ & $0.27\pm0.08$ & $0.43\pm0.04$ & $0.38\pm0.06$ & $0.34\pm0.05$ \\
898: 44 & 13 37 07.40 & $-$29 52 06.91 & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $0.23\pm0.08$ & $0.20\pm0.04$ & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ \\
899: 45 & 13 37 07.66 & $-$29 51 13.28 & $0.60\pm0.21$ & $0.31\pm0.06$ & $0.55\pm0.07$ & $0.47\pm0.04$ & $0.49\pm0.07$ & $0.40\pm0.06$ \\
900: 46 & 13 37 07.74 & $-$29 53 13.99 & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $0.26\pm0.08$ & $0.22\pm0.04$ & $\cdots$ & $0.23\pm0.04$ \\
901: 47 & 13 37 07.82 & $-$29 52 41.69 & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $0.28\pm0.08$ & $0.26\pm0.05$ & $0.23\pm0.06$ &$\cdots$ \\
902: 48 & 13 37 07.89 & $-$29 51 17.78 & $0.66\pm0.22$ & $0.65\pm0.07$ & $0.98\pm0.07$ & $0.53\pm0.04$ & $0.65\pm0.07$ & $0.62\pm0.05$ \\
903: 49 & 13 37 08.09 & $-$29 52 55.78 & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $0.34\pm0.09$ & $0.23\pm0.05$ & $0.34\pm0.07$ & $0.29\pm0.05$ \\
904: 50 & 13 37 08.31 & $-$29 52 11.54 & $0.68\pm0.22$ & $0.35\pm0.08$ & $0.46\pm0.09$ & $0.41\pm0.04$ & $0.40\pm0.08$ & $0.38\pm0.05$ \\
905: 51 & 13 37 08.69 & $-$29 51 31.04 & $\cdots$ & $0.39\pm0.06$ & $0.26\pm0.08$ & $0.31\pm0.04$ & $0.48\pm0.08$ & $0.23\pm0.05$ \\
906: 52 & 13 37 09.19 & $-$29 51 33.31 & $0.86\pm0.22$ & $0.38\pm0.07$ & $0.48\pm0.07$ & $0.33\pm0.04$ & $0.70\pm0.07$ & $0.35\pm0.04$ \\
907: 53\tablenotemark{c} & 13 37 09.22 & $-$29 51 00.51 & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $0.28\pm0.04$ & $0.22\pm0.06$ & $0.19\pm0.05$ \\
908: 54 & 13 37 10.01 & $-$29 51 28.24 & $\cdots$ & $0.45\pm0.06$ & $\cdots$ & $0.20\pm0.04$ & $0.29\pm0.09$ & $0.25\pm0.06$ \\
909: 55 & 13 37 11.44 & $-$29 49 52.31 & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ & $0.23\pm0.05$ & $0.21\pm0.06$ & $0.18\pm0.06$\\
910: \enddata
911: \tablenotetext{a}{From 1998 6 cm observations.}
912: \tablenotetext{b}{Flux measurements using original maps discussed in \citet{cb85}. Included here
913: for completeness.}
914: \tablenotetext{c}{In order of appearance: SN 1983N, SN 1950B, SN 1957D, and SN 1923A.}
915: \end{deluxetable}
916:
917: \clearpage
918:
919: \begin{deluxetable}{lr@{$\pm$}rr@{$\pm$}r}
920: \tablewidth{0pt}
921: \tablecaption{
922: {\sc \label{spix} Spectral Indices of Sources in M83}}
923: \tablehead{\colhead{} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{{\sc Spectral Index}} \\
924: \cline{2-5}
925: \colhead{{\sc Source}} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{1990} &
926: \multicolumn{2}{c}{1998} }
927: \startdata
928: 1 & -0.05 & 0.24 & -0.36 & 0.22 \\
929: 2 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$<-1.01$} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$\cdots$} \\
930: 3 & -0.35 & 0.24 & -0.58 & 0.38 \\
931: 4 & -0.73 & 0.23 & -0.45 & 0.17 \\
932: 5 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$\cdots$} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$\cdots$} \\
933: 6 & -0.04 & 0.22 & -0.34 & 0.25 \\
934: 7 & -0.61 & 0.22 & -0.41 & 0.27 \\
935: 8 & 0.21 & 0.23 & -0.28 & 0.27 \\
936: 9 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$<-1.42$ } & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$<-1.20$ } \\
937: 10 & -0.64 & 0.22 & -0.40 & 0.27 \\
938: 11 & 0.00 & 0.17 & -0.05 & 0.15 \\
939: 12 & 0.17 & 0.09 & 0.23 & 0.15 \\
940: 13 & -0.10 & 0.23 & -0.21 & 0.17 \\
941: 14 & -0.02 & 0.21 & 0.47 & 0.42 \\
942: 15 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$>-0.17$ } & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$>-0.18$ } \\
943: 16 & -0.18 & 0.27 & -0.18 & 0.21 \\
944: 17 & 0.26 & 0.24 & 0.09 & 0.24 \\
945: 18 & -0.50 & 0.20 & -0.35 & 0.31 \\
946: 19 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$>0.49$ } & 0.15 & 0.30 \\
947: 20 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{ $>-0.13$ } & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$<-0.23$ } \\
948: 21 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$<-0.70$ } & -0.18 & 0.37 \\
949: 22 & 0.14 & 0.39 & -0.03 & 0.31 \\
950: 23 & -0.41 & 0.15 & 0.12 & 0.16 \\
951: 24 & -0.31 & 0.22 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$<-0.57$ } \\
952: 25 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$>-0.44$ } & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$<-0.29$ } \\
953: 26 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$>0.16$ } & -0.28 & 0.28 \\
954: 27 & -0.91 & 0.04 & -1.01 & 0.04 \\
955: 28 & 0.32 & 0.08 & 0.05 & 0.10 \\
956: 29 & -0.74 & 0.08 & -0.87 & 0.10 \\
957: 30 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$<-1.55$ } & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$<-1.48$ } \\
958: 31 & -0.35 & 0.05 & -0.25 & 0.05 \\
959: 32 & -1.12 & 0.06 & -1.70 & 0.21 \\
960: 33 & 0.25 & 0.44 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$\cdots$} \\
961: 34 & -0.05 & 0.10 & -0.25 & 0.09 \\
962: 35 & -0.40 & 0.13 & -0.49 & 0.18 \\
963: 36 & 0.19 & 0.17 & -0.63 & 0.16 \\
964: 37 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$<-0.64$ } & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$>-0.06$ } \\
965: 38 & 0.38 & 0.13 & 0.19 & 0.09 \\
966: 39 & -0.15 & 0.05 & -0.26 & 0.14 \\
967: 40 & 0.24 & 0.32 & -0.41 & 0.17 \\
968: 41 & -0.28 & 0.18 & -0.50 & 0.22 \\
969: 42 & 0.01 & 0.06 & -0.02 & 0.06 \\
970: 43 & 0.39 & 0.31 & -0.09 & 0.22 \\
971: 44 & -0.12 & 0.40 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$\cdots$} \\
972: 45 & -0.13 & 0.15 & -0.17 & 0.21 \\
973: 46 & -0.14 & 0.36 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$>-0.02$ } \\
974: 47 & -0.06 & 0.34 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$<-0.08$ } \\
975: 48 & -0.52 & 0.10 & -0.04 & 0.13 \\
976: 49 & -0.33 & 0.34 & -0.13 & 0.27 \\
977: 50 & -0.10 & 0.22 & -0.04 & 0.24 \\
978: 51 & 0.15 & 0.33 & -0.62 & 0.27 \\
979: 52 & -0.31 & 0.19 & -0.58 & 0.15 \\
980: 53 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$>0.19$ } & -0.12 & 0.38 \\
981: 54 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$>-0.09$ } & -0.12 & 0.39 \\
982: 55 & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$>0.03$ } & -0.13 & 0.44 \\
983: \enddata
984: \end{deluxetable}
985:
986: \clearpage
987:
988: \begin{table}
989: \caption[Optical Supernova Remnants]{\label{snrcount}
990: Optical Supernova Remnants with Radio Counterparts}
991: \begin{center}
992: \begin{tabular}{lcc}
993: \hline\hline
994: Source & Radio Spectral Index & SNR \\
995: \hline
996: 19\dotfill & $+0.15\pm0.30$ & BL18 \\
997: 22\dotfill & $-0.18\pm0.37$ & BL24 \\
998: 35\dotfill & $-0.49\pm0.18$ & BL41 \\
999: 39\dotfill & $-0.26\pm0.14$ & BL50 \\
1000: \hline
1001: \end{tabular}
1002: \end{center}
1003: \end{table}
1004:
1005: \clearpage
1006:
1007: \begin{table}
1008: \caption[Optical {\scshape Hii} Regions with Radio Counterparts]{\label{hiicount}
1009: Radio Sources with Associated {\scshape Hii} Regions}
1010: \begin{center}
1011: \begin{tabular}{lclc}
1012: \hline
1013: Source & Radio Spectral Index & HII Region & Excitation Parameter\tablenotemark{a} \\
1014: \hline\hline
1015: 2 & $<-1.02$ & RK230 & 241 \\
1016: 3 & $-0.58\pm0.38$ & RK233 & 355 \\
1017: 4 & $-0.45\pm0.17$ & RK223 & 444 \\
1018: 6 & $+0.34\pm0.25$ & RK292/295 & 228/287 \\
1019: 8 & $-0.28\pm0.27$ & RK211 & 393 \\
1020: 12 & $+0.23\pm0.15$ & RK209 & 321 \\
1021: 18\tablenotemark{b} & $-0.35\pm0.31$ & $\cdots$ & $\cdots$ \\
1022: 22 & $-0.03\pm0.31$ & RK185 & 369 \\
1023: 26 & $-0.28\pm0.28$ & RK181 & 201 \\
1024: 33 & $+0.25\pm0.44$ & RK144 & 300 \\
1025: 34 & $-0.25\pm0.09$ & RK137 & 473 \\
1026: 37 & $>-0.06$ & RK119 & 97 \\
1027: 40 & $-0.41\pm0.17$ & RK110 & 470 \\
1028: 42 & $-0.02\pm0.06$ & RK86 & 316 \\
1029: 43 & $-0.09\pm0.22$ & RK79 & 288 \\
1030: 45/48 & $-0.04\pm0.13$ & RK75 & 395 \\
1031: 46 & $-0.14\pm0.36$ & RK78 & 228 \\
1032: 49 & $-0.13\pm0.27$ & RK73 & 301 \\
1033: 50 & $-0.04\pm0.24$ & RK70 & 353 \\
1034: 53 & $-0.12\pm0.38$ & RK59 & 323 \\
1035: 55 & $-0.13\pm0.44$ & RK37 & 294 \\
1036: \hline
1037: \tablenotetext{a}{The excitation parameter $U$ is a measure of the total Lyman continuum flux and is a
1038: useful index of the distribution of O stars. The values are in units of pc cm$^{-2}$, as presented in \citet{rk83}.}
1039: \tablenotetext{b}{This source was detected as an {\scshape Hii} in a survey by \citet{dev83}, listed as source 23.}
1040: \end{tabular}
1041: \end{center}
1042: \end{table}
1043:
1044: \clearpage
1045:
1046: \begin{table}
1047: \caption[X-Ray Counterparts to Radio Sources in M83]{
1048: \label{xrcount}X-Ray Counterparts to Radio Sources in M83}
1049: \begin{center}
1050: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
1051: \hline\hline
1052: Source & Radio Spectral Index & CXOU & Source Type & Reference \\
1053: \hline
1054: 3\dotfill & $-0.58\pm0.38$ & J133650.8-295240 & {\scshape Hii} Region/SNR & 1\\
1055: 4\dotfill & $-0.45\pm0.17$ & J133651.1-295043 & {\scshape Hii} Region/LMXB & 1\\
1056: 7\dotfill & $-0.41\pm0.27$ & J133652.8-295231 & SNR & 1\\
1057: 19\dotfill & $+0.15\pm0.30$ & J133655.0-295239 & SNR & 2\\
1058: 22\dotfill & $-0.02\pm0.31$ & J133655.6-295303 & SNR & 2\\
1059: 24\dotfill & $-0.31\pm0.22$ & J133656.2-295255 & $\cdots$\\
1060: 28\dotfill & $+0.05\pm0.10$ & J133658.3-295105 & Background Galaxy & 3 \\
1061: 32\dotfill & $-1.70\pm0.21$ & J133700.0-295138 & $\cdots$\\
1062: 35\dotfill & $-0.49\pm0.18$ & J133702.4-295126 & SNR & 2\\
1063: 36\dotfill & $-0.63\pm0.16$ & J133703.3-295226 & XRB\\
1064: \hline
1065: \end{tabular}
1066: \end{center}
1067:
1068: (1) \citet{colb04} \\
1069: (2) \citet{blair04} \\
1070: (3) \citet{poster1}
1071:
1072: \end{table}
1073:
1074: \clearpage
1075:
1076: \begin{table}
1077: \caption[{\sc Nuclear Mass Concentrations in M83}]{\label{npos} {\sc Reported Positions of Nuclear Mass Concentrations}}
1078: \begin{center}
1079: \begin{tabular}{lccc}
1080: \hline\hline
1081: & RA (J2000) & Dec (J2000) & Reference \\
1082: \hline
1083: Optical Nucleus & 13 37 00.79 & $-$29 51 58.60 & \citet{crb} \\
1084: Hidden Nucleus & 13 37 00.54 & $-$29 51 53.62 & \citet{mast05} \\
1085: & 14 37 00.72 & $-$29 51 57.20 & \citet{that00} \\
1086: \hline
1087: \end{tabular}
1088: \end{center}
1089: \end{table}
1090:
1091: \clearpage
1092:
1093: \begin{figure}
1094: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{f1.ps}
1095: \caption[{\sc Sources in M83}]{\label{m83source}
1096: A 20cm map of M83 from the 1998 observation. Sources indicated correspond to
1097: those in Table \ref{flux}. Greyscale spans from $-0.1$ mJy to 1.6 mJy.}
1098: \end{figure}
1099:
1100: \clearpage
1101:
1102: \begin{figure}
1103: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{f2.ps}
1104: \caption[{\sc Contours of M83}]{\label{galcont}
1105: 6cm contours of M83. Red symbols indicate radio sources with optical counterparts. Red
1106: circles are {\scshape Hii} regions, while the red diamond indicates an optical SNR.
1107: Blue triangles indicate the presence of X-ray counterparts. Green squares denote sources
1108: that have emission in radio, optical and X-ray.
1109: Contour levels are 0.14, 0.20, 0.28, 0.40, 0.57,
1110: 0.80, 1.13, 1.60, 2.26, 3.20, 4.53, 6.40, 9.05 and 12.80 mJy/beam.
1111: }
1112: \end{figure}
1113:
1114: \clearpage
1115:
1116: \begin{figure}
1117: \begin{center}
1118: \includegraphics[width=5in]{f3a.ps}\\
1119: \includegraphics[width=5in]{f3b.ps}\\
1120: \includegraphics[width=5in]{f3c.ps}
1121: \end{center}
1122: \caption[{\sc Time Evolution of SN 1957D}]{\label{57dtime}
1123: A series of contour plots showing the time evolution of SN 1957D. Black contours are 20cm
1124: emission and thick blue green contours are 6cm emission.
1125: Contour levels for both plots are 0.20, 0.28, 0.40, 0.57, 0.8, 1.13, 1.60 and 2.26 mJy/beam.
1126: SN 1957D is the right hand source. The left hand source is an {\scshape Hii} region. Time
1127: runs from top to bottom.
1128: }
1129: \end{figure}
1130:
1131: \clearpage
1132:
1133: \begin{figure}
1134: \begin{center}
1135: \includegraphics[width=3in]{f4a.ps}
1136: \includegraphics[width=3in]{f4b.ps}
1137: \includegraphics[width=3in]{f4c.ps}
1138: \end{center}
1139: \caption[{\sc Time Evolution of SN 1950B}]{\label{50btime}
1140: Same as Figure \ref{57dtime}, but near the region of SN 1950B. Contour levels are the same.
1141: SN 1950B is the lower of the two major sources. Time progress clockwise form the upper left.
1142: }
1143: \end{figure}
1144:
1145: \clearpage
1146:
1147: \begin{figure}
1148: \begin{center}
1149: \includegraphics[width=4.5in]{f5.ps}
1150: \end{center}
1151: \caption[{\sc X-ray color-color diagram for M83}]{\label{xrcc}
1152: X-ray color-color diagram for the X-ray/Radio counterpart sources in M83.}
1153: \end{figure}
1154:
1155: \clearpage
1156:
1157: \begin{figure}
1158: \begin{center}
1159: \includegraphics[width=6in]{f6.ps}
1160: \end{center}
1161: \caption[{\sc Nuclear 20cm Contours}]{\label{nuctime}
1162: Same as Figure \ref{57dtime}, but for the nuclear region. Contour levels are 0.40, 0.57, 0.8, 1.13, 1.60, 2.26,
1163: 3.20, 4.53, 6.40, 9.05, 12.80, 18.10 and 25.59 mJy/beam.}
1164: \end{figure}
1165:
1166: \clearpage
1167:
1168: \begin{figure}
1169: \begin{center}
1170: \includegraphics[height=7in]{f7.ps}
1171: \end{center}
1172: \caption[{\sc Profile Plot of M83 Nucleus}]{
1173: \label{m83profiles} A series of profile plots of the nuclear region. Flux peaks are scaled to
1174: the 1990 20cm observation to show the
1175: differences between 20cm (left) and 6cm (right). Time progresses from top to bottom.
1176: One notable feature of these plots is the evidence for several lesser ``peaks'' of emission
1177: in the 20cm images.
1178: }
1179: \end{figure}
1180:
1181: \clearpage
1182:
1183: \begin{figure}
1184: \begin{center}
1185: \includegraphics[width=6in]{f8.ps}
1186: \end{center}
1187: \caption[{\sc Optical and Hidden Nucleus}]{\label{hidd}
1188: Contours of 20cm emission from the 1983 observation. Contour levels are same as Figure \ref{nuctime}.
1189: The cross indicates the position of the optical nucleus. The plus sign indicates the
1190: reported position of the hidden nuclear mass as determined by \citet{mast05}. The
1191: ellipse surrounding the plus indicates a probable region in which the hidden mass lies
1192: due to another estimate by \citet{that00}.
1193: }
1194: \end{figure}
1195:
1196:
1197: \end{document}
1198:
1199: