1:
2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3: %
4: % On the Environmental Dependence of Galaxy Properties
5: % Established by the Initial Cosmological Conditions
6: %
7: % Jounghun Lee
8: %
9: %
10: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
12: \begin{document}
13: \title{On the Environmental Dependence of Galaxy Properties
14: Established by the Initial Cosmological Conditions}
15: \author{\sc Jounghun Lee}
16: \affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University,
17: Seoul 151-742, Korea}
18: \email{jounghun@astro.snu.ac.kr}
19:
20: \begin{abstract}
21: We study theoretically how the initial cosmological conditions establish
22: the dependence of galaxy properties on the environment. First, we adopt the
23: linear tidal torque theory according to which the angular momentum of a
24: proto-galaxy is generated at first order by the misalignment between the
25: proto-galaxy inertia tensor and the local tidal tensor. Then, we quantify
26: analytically the degree of the misalignment between the two tensors, and show
27: quantitatively that it increases as the density of the environment decreases.
28: It implies that the proto-galaxies forming in the lower density regions
29: should end up with having higher angular momentum than those in the higher
30: density regions, which is consistent with recent numerical finding that the
31: void and field galaxies have higher spin parameters than the cluster galaxies.
32: Since the galaxy angular momentum plays a role of developing a disk-like
33: structure and hindering the star-formation, our theoretical insight provides
34: an answer to such fundamental observational question as why the large void
35: galaxies have young stellar populations and high specific star formation
36: rate, which was not explained by the previous morphology-density
37: relation.
38: \end{abstract}
39: \keywords{cosmology:theory --- large-scale structure of universe}
40:
41: \section{INTRODUCTION}
42:
43: Recent observations from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey \citep[SDSS,][]
44: {str-etal02} and the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey \citep[2dFGR,][]{col-etal01}
45: have made it possible to study the properties of galaxies from largest
46: spectroscopic samples. Although it has been noted for long that
47: the morphology and the specific star formation rate of galaxies depend on
48: the density of environments \citep{dre80,pos-gel84,whi-etal93}, it is only in
49: recent years that the environmental dependence of galaxy properties have been
50: observationally confirmed as common and studied systematically through
51: statistical analyses of these large samples \citep{lew-etal02,gom-etal03,
52: got-etal03,tan-etal04,roj-etal05}.
53:
54: Now that the environmental dependence of galaxy properties holds a crucial
55: key to the galaxy formation, it is quite important and necessary to understand
56: what physical mechanism establishes it. A fundamental question that naturally
57: arise in the study of the environmental dependence of galaxy properties is
58: whether it is destined from the initial conditions or acquired during the
59: evolutionary process.
60:
61: Previous studies were largely focused on the properties of those galaxies
62: located in the dense environments like cluster cores, highlighting mainly
63: the effect of the subsequent evolutionary process like hierarchical
64: merging, galaxy-galaxy interactions, and so on \citep{dre80,pos-gel84,
65: whi-etal93,lew-etal02,tan-etal04}. Yet, significant as its effect may be,
66: the evolutionary process by itself is incapable of explaining the whole
67: picture. There are many aspects of the environmental variations of galaxy
68: properties that cannot be explained by the effect of the evolutionary process.
69: For example, the analysis of SDSS data has revealed recently that the
70: large void galaxies have very young stellar populations and quite high
71: specific star formation rate \citep{roj-etal05}. Since the rates of galaxy
72: merging and interaction in voids are quite low, it is unlikely due to the
73: effect of the evolutionary process. Although it was claimed by
74: \citet{vog-etal04} that it is consistent with the predictions of the
75: semi-analytic model of the galaxy formation \citep{ben-etal03},
76: it has not been understood yet what caused the galaxies in voids to
77: have such properties.
78:
79: What is generally suspected is that the initial cosmological conditions should
80: be at least partly responsible for establishing the environment-variation of
81: galaxy properties \citep[e.g.,][]{tan-etal04}. However, it is hard to
82: investigate theoretically the effect of the initial cosmological conditions
83: as it is still unknown under what initial conditions the formation of galaxies
84: occurs. A conventional idea is that the galaxies form at the local peaks of
85: the initial density field. If this is really the case, then it is unlikely
86: that the initial conditions establish any strong dependence on the
87: environments since the gravitational collapse of the local density peaks
88: must depend mostly on the mass enclosed rather than the environments around
89: the peaks \citep{she-tor04}.
90:
91: However, there is another effect other than the local gravity that is
92: responsible the formation of galaxies. At the initial stages, proto-galaxies
93: interact with the surrounding matter, which originates the angular momentum.
94: If the efficiency of the angular momentum generation by the external tidal
95: field depends on the density of the environment, then the properties of
96: galaxies like the morphology and the specific star formation rate may end up
97: with having the environmental dependence.
98:
99: In this Letter, we construct a new theoretical model for the efficiency of
100: the generation of the galaxy angular momentum as a function of the density
101: of the environment, and show qualitatively how the environmental dependence
102: of the galaxy properties should be at least partly established by the initial
103: tidal condition.
104:
105: \section{THE INITIAL TIDAL CONDITION}
106:
107: In the tidal-torque scenario \citep{hoy49,pee69}, a proto-galaxy acquires
108: the angular momentum ${\bf L} = (L_i)$ through tidal interaction with the
109: surrounding matter. The linear perturbation theory enables us to compute
110: the angular momentum of a proto-galaxy in terms of Lagrangian quantities.
111: According to this theory, if the shape of a proto-galaxy is not perfectly
112: spherical, its angular momentum can be expressed as
113: \citep{dor70,whi84,cat-the96}
114: \begin{equation}
115: \label{eqn:ang}
116: L_{i} \propto \epsilon_{ijk}T_{jl}I_{lk}.
117: \end{equation}
118: This is the first-order approximation of the proto-galaxy angular momentum.
119: Here, $\epsilon_{ijk}$ is an alternating symbol, and ${\bf I} = (I_{ij})$
120: and ${\bf T} = (T_{ij})$ are the inertia momentum tensor of the proto-galaxy
121: and the tidal shear tensor of the surrounding matter, respectively. The
122: definitions of the two tensors are given, respectively as
123: \begin{equation}
124: \label{eqn:it}
125: I_{ij} \equiv \int_{V_L} q_i q_j d^{3}q, \qquad
126: T_{ij} \equiv \partial_{i}\partial_{j}\phi \bigg{|}_{{\bf q}_{cm}},
127: \end{equation}
128: where $V_L$ is the Lagrangian volume of a proto-galaxy, ${\bf q} = (q_{i})$
129: is the Lagrangian position vector in the center-of-mass frame, ${\bf q}_{cm}$
130: is the Lagrangian center-of-mass of the proto-galaxy, and $\phi$ is the
131: initial velocity potential, related to the linear density contrast
132: $\delta \equiv (\rho-\bar{\rho})/\bar{\rho}$ as
133: $\delta = \nabla^{2}_{\bf q}\phi({\bf q})$
134: ($\bar{\rho}$ : the mean density of the background universe).
135:
136: Since we consider the generation of the angular momentum on the proto-galactic
137: mass scale, the density field $\delta$ is supposed to be averaged over the
138: proto-galactic mass scale $M$. In other words, the linear density $\delta$
139: is not the actual one but the smoothed one by convolution with a filter on the
140: proto-galaxy mass scale. Accordingly, the tidal tensor ${\bf T}$ in equation
141: (\ref{eqn:it}) is a smoothed version of the actual tidal field on the mass
142: scale $M$. In order to show explicitly that the tidal tensor in equation
143: (\ref{eqn:it}) is smoothed on the proto-galaxy mass scale $M$, we use the
144: superscripted notation, ${\bf T}^{M}$, from here on. The same notation rule
145: applies to the inertia tensor ${\bf I}^{M}$ since it represents the
146: geometrical shape of the proto-galaxy, defined on the same mass scale $M$.
147: Thus, equations (\ref{eqn:ang})-(\ref{eqn:it}) imply that the proto-galaxy
148: angular momentum is generated by the tidal field smoothed on the same mass
149: scale as the inertia tensor.
150:
151: Adopting a top-hat spherical filter whose functional form in the Fourier
152: space is given as
153: \begin{equation}
154: W(kR) = \frac{kR\sin(kR)-\cos(kR)}{kR},
155: \end{equation}
156: one can relate the proto-galactic mass $M$ to the filtering radius $R$ as
157: \begin{equation}
158: \label{eqn:mas}
159: M(R) = \frac{4\pi}{3}\bar{\rho}(1 + \delta)R^{3}.
160: \end{equation}
161: Here, the filtering radius $R$ represents the effective spherical radius
162: (i.e., the linear size) of the proto-galaxy $R \propto V^{1/3}_{L}$.
163:
164: The tidal interaction of the proto-galaxy with the surrounding materials
165: continues till the moment of the turn-around when $\delta \sim 1$.
166: After the moment of the turn-around, the tidal influence from the
167: surrounding matter effectively terminates, bringing the growth of the
168: angular momentum to a halt. Thus, it is at the moment of the turn-around
169: when the tidal effect of the surrounding matter is most influential.
170: Although the nonlinear effect like galaxy-galaxy interaction might modify
171: the galaxy angular momentum, it have been verified both numerically and
172: observationally that the angular momentum of galaxies at present epoch still
173: keeps quite well the initial memory of the surrounding matter distribution at
174: the moment of the turn-around \citep{nav-etal04,tru-etal05}.
175:
176: Now, let us express equation (\ref{eqn:ang}) in the principal axis frame
177: of the tidal tensor ${\bf T}$:
178: \begin{equation}
179: \label{eqn:pri}
180: L_{1} \propto (\lambda^{M}_{1} - \lambda^{M}_{2})I^{M}_{12},
181: \qquad
182: L_{2} \propto (\lambda^{M}_{2} - \lambda^{M}_{3})I^{M}_{23},
183: \qquad
184: L_{3} \propto (\lambda^{M}_{3} - \lambda^{M}_{1})I^{M}_{31},
185: \end{equation}
186: where $\lambda^{M}_{1},\lambda^{M}_{2},\lambda^{M}_{3}$ are the three
187: eigenvalues of the tidal tensor ${\bf T}^{M}$ in a decreasing order, and
188: $I^{M}_{12},I^{M}_{23},I^{M}_{31}$ are the three off-diagonal components
189: of the inertia tensor ${\bf I}^{M}$ in the principal axis frame of the tidal
190: tensor ${\bf T}^{M}$.
191:
192: Equation (\ref{eqn:pri}) implies that only in case the principal axes of
193: the inertia tensor ${\bf I}^{M}$ are not aligned with that of the tidal
194: tensor ${\bf T}^{M}$, the angular momentum can be generated at first order.
195: It also implies that the degree of the misalignment between the principal
196: axes of ${\bf T}^{M}$ and ${\bf I}^{M}$ is directly proportional to the
197: magnitude of the angular momentum. Recent N-body simulations demonstrated
198: that the principal axes of the inertia tensor ${\bf I}^{M}$ are almost
199: perfectly aligned with that of the tidal tensor ${\bf T}^{M}$, if the two
200: tensors are smoothed at the same radius \citep{lee-pen00,por-etal02}.
201:
202: This empirical finding may be understood theoretically. In the Zel'dovich
203: approximation \citep{zel70}, a proto-galaxy forms at the moment of
204: shell-crossing when the principal axes of the tidal tensors are perfectly
205: aligned with that of the inertia tensors.
206:
207: But, it is still possible for the galaxy angular momentum to be generated
208: at first order. Although the tidal interaction is a {\it local} effect,
209: the external tidal field has a {\it large-scale coherence} \citep{bon-etal96}.
210: Thus, the tidal tensor smoothed at larger scales may be misaligned with the
211: inertia tensor, and thus it can generate the galaxy angular momentum at first
212: order.
213:
214: Let $\delta_{1}$ and $R_{1}$ be the linear density contrast and the
215: effective spherical radius of the proto-galaxy of mass $M$. To consider
216: the effect of the external tidal field smoothed at larger scales, we assume
217: that the proto-galaxy is located in the environment whose linear density
218: contrast and the scale radius are given as $\delta_{2} < \delta_{1}$
219: and $R_{2} > R_{1}$, respectively, satisfying a condition that the larger
220: scale radius $R_{2}$ should enclose the same amount of mass, $M$.
221: This condition guarantees that even though the external field is smoothed
222: at larger scale $R_{2}$, it represents a local tidal effect acting on the
223: proto-galactic mass $M$. Using the condition $M(R_{1}) = M(R_{2})$, we have
224: \begin{equation}
225: \label{eqn:rad12}
226: R_{2} = R_{1}\left(\frac{1+\delta_{1}}{1+\delta_{2}}\right)^{1/3}.
227: \end{equation}
228: Since the values of $R_{1}$ and $\delta_{1}$ are fixed, equation
229: (\ref{eqn:rad12}) implies that the lower the linear density $\delta_{2}$ is,
230: the larger is the scale radius $R_{2}$.
231:
232: Now that the tidal tensor ${\bf T}^{M}$ is smoothed at larger scale $R_{2}$,
233: it is no longer perfectly aligned with the inertia tensor ${\bf I}^{M}$
234: smoothed at scale $R_{1}$. The misalignment between ${\bf T}^{M(R_{2})}$
235: and ${\bf I}^{M(R_{1})}$ is expected to increase as the difference between
236: $R_{1}$ and $R_{2}$ increases. To quantify the misalignment between
237: ${\bf T}^{M(R_{2})}$ and ${\bf I}^{M(R_{1})}$, we first rescale both the
238: tidal and the inertia tensors to have unit magnitudes and become traceless as
239: \begin{equation}
240: \label{eqn:hat}
241: \hat{\bf T}^{M(R_{2})} \equiv \frac{\tilde{\bf T}^{M(R_{2})}}
242: {\vert\tilde{\bf T}^{M(R_{2})}\vert}, \qquad
243: \hat{\bf I}^{M(R_{1})} \equiv \frac{\tilde{\bf I}^{M(R_{1})}}
244: {\vert\tilde{\bf I}^{M(R_{1})}\vert},
245: \end{equation}
246: where $\vert\tilde{\bf T}^{M(R_{2})}\vert \equiv
247: [\tilde{T}^{M(R_{2})}_{ij}\tilde{T}^{M(R_{2})}_{ij}]^{1/2}$ and
248: $\vert\tilde{\bf I}^{M(R_{1})}\vert \equiv
249: [\tilde{I}^{M(R_{1})}_{ij}\tilde{I}^{M(R_{1})}_{ij}]^{1/2}$, with
250: $\tilde{\bf T} \equiv {\bf T} - {\rm Tr}({\bf T})/3$ and
251: $\tilde{\bf I} \equiv {\bf I} - {\rm Tr}({\bf I})/3$.
252:
253: By equation (\ref{eqn:ang}), the square of the magnitude of the proto-galaxy
254: specific (per mass) angular momentum is proportional to
255: \begin{equation}
256: \label{eqn:l2}
257: \langle L^{2} \rangle \propto \epsilon_{iab}\epsilon_{iuv}
258: \langle \hat{T}^{M(R_{2})}_{ac}\hat{T}^{M(R_{2})}_{cb}\hat{I}^{M(R_{1})}_{uw}
259: \hat{I}^{M(R_{1})}_{wv} \rangle.
260: \end{equation}
261: Since the principal axes of the inertia and the tidal tensors smoothed at
262: the same filtering radius are almost perfectly correlated, we make an
263: approximation $\hat{\bf I}^{M(R_{1})} \approx \hat{\bf T}^{M(R_{1})}$
264: in equation (\ref{eqn:l2}), and we define $\beta$ as
265: \begin{equation}
266: \label{eqn:bet}
267: \beta \equiv \left[\epsilon_{iab}\epsilon_{iuv}\langle\hat{T}^{M(R_{2})}_{ac}
268: \hat{T}^{M(R_{2})}_{cb}\hat{T}^{M(R_{1})}_{uw}\hat{T}^{M(R_{1})}_{wv}
269: \rangle\right]^{1/2}.
270: \end{equation}
271: The value of $\beta$ basically represents the {\it efficiency} of the
272: generation of the galaxy angular momentum at first order. It increases as
273: the degree of the misalignment between the principal axes of the tidal tensor
274: ${\bf T}^{M(R_{2})}$ and ${\bf T}^{M(R_{1})}$ increases. Thus, it is
275: expected that it increases as the density of the environment decreases
276: according to equation (\ref{eqn:rad12}).
277:
278: To see this explicitly, we evaluate the value of $\beta$, using the following
279: approximation whose validity was justified by the Monte-Carlo simulation
280: \citep{lee-pen01}:
281: \begin{equation}
282: \label{eqn:app}
283: \langle\hat{T}^{M(R_{2})}_{ac}\hat{T}^{M(R_{2})}_{cb}\hat{T}^{M(R_{1})}_{uw}
284: \hat{T}^{M(R_{1})}_{wv}\rangle \approx
285: \frac{\langle\tilde{T}^{M(R_{2})}_{ac}\tilde{T}^{M(R_{2})}_{cb}
286: \tilde{T}^{M(R_{1})}_{uw}\tilde{T}^{M(R_{1})}_{wv}\rangle}
287: {\vert\tilde{\bf T}^{M(R_{2})}\vert^{2}\vert\tilde{\bf T}^{M(R_{1})}\vert^{2}}.
288: \end{equation}
289: By the Wick theorem,
290: $\langle\tilde{T}^{M(R_{2})}_{ac}\tilde{T}^{M(R_{2})}_{cb}
291: \tilde{T}^{M(R_{1})}_{uw}\tilde{T}^{M(R_{1})}_{wv}\rangle$, equation
292: (\ref{eqn:app}) is written as
293: \begin{eqnarray}
294: \label{eqn:wic}
295: \langle\tilde{T}^{M(R_{2})}_{ac}\tilde{T}^{M(R_{2})}_{cb}
296: \tilde{T}^{M(R_{1})}_{uw}\tilde{T}^{M(R_{1})}_{wv}\rangle &=&
297: \langle\tilde{T}^{M(R_{2})}_{ac}\tilde{T}^{M(R_{2})}_{cb}\rangle
298: \langle\tilde{T}^{M(R_{1})}_{uw}\tilde{T}^{M(R_{1})}_{wv}\rangle \nonumber \\
299: &+&\langle\tilde{T}^{M(R_{2})}_{ac}\tilde{T}^{M(R_{1})}_{wv}\rangle
300: \langle\tilde{T}^{M(R_{1})}_{uw}\tilde{T}^{M(R_{2})}_{cb}\rangle \nonumber \\
301: &+&\langle\tilde{T}^{M(R_{2})}_{ac}\tilde{T}^{M(R_{1})}_{uw}\rangle
302: \langle\tilde{T}^{M(R_{1})}_{wv}\tilde{T}^{M(R_{2})}_{cb}\rangle.
303: \end{eqnarray}
304: The correlations between the components of the tidal tensors can be
305: written as
306: \begin{equation}
307: \label{eqn:cor}
308: \langle T^{M(R_1)}_{ij}T^{M(R_2)}_{kl}\rangle =
309: \partial_{i}\partial_{j}\partial_{k}\partial_{l}{\bf \nabla}^{-4}
310: \int P(k)W_{TH}(k;R_{1})W_{TH}(k;R_{2})d^{3}k.
311: \end{equation}
312: Through equations (\ref{eqn:bet})-(\ref{eqn:cor}), it is straightforward
313: to derive
314: \begin{equation}
315: \label{eqn:fin}
316: \beta = \left(1 - \frac{\sigma^{4}_{c}}{\sigma^{2}_{1}\sigma^{2}_{2}}
317: \right)^{1/2},
318: \end{equation}
319: where the three mass variances $\sigma^{2}_{1},\sigma^{2}_{2},\sigma^{2}_{c}$
320: are defined as
321: \begin{eqnarray}
322: \label{eqn:sig1}
323: \sigma^{2}_{1} &=& \frac{1}{2\pi^2}\int P(k) W^{2}(kR_{1}) k^{2}dk,
324: \\
325: \label{eqn:sig2}
326: \sigma^{2}_{2} &=& \frac{1}{2\pi^2}\int P(k) W^{2}(kR_{2}) k^{2}dk,
327: \\
328: \label{eqn:sigc}
329: \sigma^{2}_{c} &=& \frac{1}{2\pi^2}\int P(k) W(kR_{1})W(kR_{2})k^{2}dk,
330: \end{eqnarray}
331: with the linear power spectrum $P(k)$.
332:
333: Figure \ref{fig:ang} plots $\beta$ as a function of the linear density
334: contrast of the environment $\delta_{2}$ through equations
335: (\ref{eqn:rad12})-(\ref{eqn:sigc}). For $P(k)$ in equations
336: (\ref{eqn:sig1})-(\ref{eqn:sig2}), we use the approximation given
337: by \citet{bar-etal86} for the concordance cosmology with
338: $\Omega_{m}=0.3,\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.7,h=0.7,\Omega_{b}=0.044$, and
339: $\sigma_{8}=0.9$. For this plot, we use the typical galaxy mass scale
340: $M = 10^{12}h^{-1}M_{\odot}$. As seen clearly, $\beta$ decreases
341: monotonically as $\delta_{2}$ increases, reducing to zero as the value of
342: $\delta_{2}$ approaches $\delta_{1}$. This result shows how the generation
343: of the galaxy angular momentum depend on the environment: high-angular
344: momentum in the low-density region ($\delta_{2} << \delta_{1}$) and
345: low-angular momentum in the high-density region
346: ($\delta_{2} \sim \delta_{1}$). It provides a theoretical explanation
347: to the recent numerical finding that the spin parameters of void galaxies
348: are higher than those of cluster galaxies \citep{avi-etal05}.
349:
350: \section{DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION}
351:
352: In the cold dark matter (CDM) paradigm, the basic mechanism for the star
353: formation in galaxies is described as follows. The hot gas falls into the
354: gravitational potential well of the galactic dark halo, and goes through
355: radiative cooling. A cloud of the cool gas in the halo potential well
356: fragments into many clumps, and those clumps can further collapse via
357: self-gravity to form stars. The angular momentum of a galactic dark halo
358: hinders the formation of stars in it: The high angular momentum causes high
359: rotational speed of the gas clumps, which slows down the collapse of clumps
360: into stars.
361:
362: In $\S 2$, it is shown that the galaxies in the low-density environment will
363: end up with having high angular momentum. Consequently, it will take long time
364: before stars form in the galaxies located in the low-density environment.
365: For example, if a galaxy is located in the lowest-density environment like a
366: void, then stars in the void galaxy must form only very recently. In other
367: words, the void galaxies are predicted to have young stellar populations and
368: show higher specific star formation rate at present epoch.
369: One should note here that it is true only for those void galaxies whose
370: sizes are large enough to hold gas. If a void galaxy is small,
371: then the UV-background will photo-evaporate all gas in the galaxy,
372: suppressing any star-formation activity \citep[e.g.,][]{sus-ume04,hoe-etal05}.
373:
374: This theoretical insight agrees with the recent observational report
375: that the large void galaxies at fixed luminosity and surface brightness
376: profile are disk-like, having bluer colors and higher specific star
377: formation rate than the wall galaxies, which was not explained by
378: the previous morphology-density relation \citep{vog-etal04}.
379:
380: The properties of galaxies located in the high-density environment like
381: galaxy clusters may be explained in the same line. A low angular momentum
382: is expected for a proto-galaxy in a cluster due to the strong alignment
383: between the inertia and the tidal tensors in the high-density.
384: Thus, it will be quite faster to form stars in the cluster galaxies,
385: because there is no hindrance caused by the galaxy angular momentum.
386: However, for the cluster galaxies, it is expected that the evolutionary
387: process like merging and interaction must play more significant role in
388: establishing the environmental dependence.
389:
390: As a final conclusion, we have provided a new insight into the puzzle of
391: galaxy formation by showing that the environmental dependence of galaxy
392: properties has an aspect of destiny, being caused by the initial cosmological
393: conditions.
394:
395: \acknowledgments
396:
397: J.L. acknowledges stimulating discussion with W. T. Kim.
398: This work is supported by the research grant No. R01-2005-000-10610-0 from
399: the Basic Research Program of the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation.
400:
401: \clearpage
402: \begin{thebibliography}{}
403: \bibitem[Avila-Reese et al.(2005)]{avi-etal05}
404: Avila-Reese, V., Colin, P., Gottlober, S., Firmani, C., \& Firmani, C. 2005,
405: \apj, 634, 51
406: \bibitem[Abbas \& Sheth(2005)]{abb-she05}
407: Abbas, U., \& Sheth, R. K. 2005, \mnras, 364, 1327
408: \bibitem[Balogh et al.(2004)]{bal-etal04}
409: Balogh, M. et al. 2004, \mnras, 348, 1355
410: \bibitem[Bardeen et al.(1986)]{bar-etal86}
411: Bardeen, J. M., Bond, J. R., Kaiser, N., \& Szalay, A. S. 1986, \apj, 304, 15
412: \bibitem[Benson et al.(2003)]{ben-etal03}
413: Benson, A. J., Hoyle, F., Torres, F., \& Vogeley, M. S. 2003, \mnras, 340, 160
414: \bibitem[Bond, Kofman, \& Pogosyan(1996)]{bon-etal96}
415: Bond, J., R., Kofman, L., \& Pogosyan, D. 1996, Nature, 380, 603
416: \bibitem[Catelan \& Theuns(1996)]{cat-the96}
417: Catelan, P. \& Theuns, T. 1996, \mnras, 282, 436
418: \bibitem[Colless et al.(2001)]{col-etal01}
419: Colless et al. 2001, \mnras, 328, 1039
420: \bibitem[Doroshkevich(1970)]{dor70}
421: Doroshkevich, A. G. 1970, astrofizika, 6, 581
422: \bibitem[Dressler(1980)]{dre80}
423: Dressler, A. 1980, \apj, 236, 351
424: \bibitem[Gomez et al.(2003)]{gom-etal03}
425: Gomez, P. et al. 2003, \apj, 584, 210
426: \bibitem[Goto et al.(2003)]{got-etal03}
427: Goto, et al. 2003, \mnras, 346, 601
428: \bibitem[Hao et al.(2005)]{hao-etal05}
429: Hao, L., Strauss, M. A., Rojas, R. R., \& Vogeley, M. S. 2004,
430: \bibitem[Hoeft et al.(2005)]{hoe-etal05}
431: Hoeft, M., Yepes, G., Gottloeber, S., \& Springel, V. 2005, preprint
432: [astro-ph/0501304]
433: \bibitem[Hoyle(1949)]{hoy49}
434: Hoyle, F. 1949, in Problems of Cosmical Aerodynamics, ed. J. M. Burgers
435: \& H. C. van de Hulst (Dayton: Central Air Documents Office), 195
436: \bibitem[Peebles(1969)]{pee69}
437: Peebles, P. J. E. 1969, \apj, 155, 393
438: \bibitem[Lee \& Pen(2000)]{lee-pen00}
439: Lee, J. \& Pen, U. L. 2000, \apj, 532, L5
440: \bibitem[Lee \& Pen(2001)]{lee-pen01}
441: Lee, J. \& Pen, U. L. 2001, \apj, 555, 106
442: \bibitem[Lewis et al.(2002)]{lew-etal02}
443: Lewis, I., et al. 2002, \mnras, 334, 673
444: \bibitem[Navarro et. al.(2004)]{nav-etal04}
445: Navarro, J.F., Abadi, M.G., \& Steinmetz, M. 2004, \apj, 613, L41
446: \bibitem[Porciani et al.(2002)]{por-etal02}
447: Porciani, C., Dekel, A., \& Hoffman, Y. 2002, \mnras, 332, 339
448: \bibitem[Postman \& Geller(1984)]{pos-gel84}
449: Postman, M., \& Geller, M. J., 1984, \apj, 281, 95
450: \bibitem[Rines et al.(2005)]{rin-etal05}
451: Rines, K., Geller, M. J., Kurtz, M. J., Diaferio, A. 2005, \aj, 130, 1482
452: \bibitem[Rojas et al.(2005)]{roj-etal05}
453: Rojas, R. R., Vogeley, M. S., Hoyle, F., \& Brinkmann, J. 2005, 624, 571
454: \bibitem[Sheth \& Tormen(2004)]{she-tor04}
455: Sheth, R. K., \& Tormen, G. 2004, \mnras, 349, 1464
456: \bibitem[Strauss et al.(2002)]{str-etal02}
457: Strauss, et al. 2002, \apj, 124, 1810
458: \bibitem[Susa \& Umemura(2004)]{sus-ume04}
459: Susa, H., \& Umemura, M. 2004, 610, L5
460: \bibitem[Tanaka et al.(2004)]{tan-etal04}
461: Tanaka, M., Goto, T., Okamura, S., Shimasaku, K., \& Brinkman, J. 2004,
462: \aj, 128, 2677
463: \bibitem[Trujillo et. al.(2005)]{tru-etal05}
464: Trujillo, I., Carretero, C., \& Patiri, S. 2005, \apj in press
465: \bibitem[Vogeley et al.(2004)]{vog-etal04}
466: Vogeley, M. S. et al. 2004, Outskirts of Galaxy Clusters,
467: Proceedings IAU Colloquium No. 195
468: \bibitem[White(1984)]{whi84}
469: White, S. D. M. 1984, \apj, 286, 38
470: \bibitem[Whitmore et al.(1993)]{whi-etal93}
471: Whitmore, B. C., Gilmore, D. M., \& Jones, C. 1993, \apj, 407, 489
472: \bibitem[Zeldovich(1970)]{zel70}
473: Zel'dovich, Y. B. 1970, A\& A, 5, 84
474: \end{thebibliography}
475:
476: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
477:
478: \clearpage
479: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
480: \begin{figure}
481: \begin{center}
482: \plotone{f1.eps}
483: \caption{Spin-generation efficiency of a galactic dark halo with mass
484: $10^{12}h^{-1}M_{\odot}$ as a function of the linear density contrast
485: of the environment where the galaxy is located.
486: \label{fig:ang}}
487: \end{center}
488: \end{figure}
489: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
490:
491: \end{document}
492: