1: %\documentclass[11pt,preprint2]{aastex52}
2: \documentclass[11pt,preprint2]{aastex} % Uncomment for submission
3: \newcommand\msun{\ensuremath{M_\sun}}
4: \newcommand\teff{\ensuremath{T_{\rm eff}}}
5: \newcommand\logg{\ensuremath{\log g}}
6: \newcommand\ubv{\ensuremath{U\!BV}}
7: \newcommand\ebv{\ensuremath{E(\bv)}}
8:
9: \slugcomment{Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal Letters}
10: \shorttitle{A DQ white dwarf in NGC 2168}
11: \shortauthors{Williams et al.}
12:
13: \begin{document}
14:
15: \title{A Hot DQ White Dwarf in the Open Star Cluster M35}
16:
17: \author{Kurtis A.~Williams\altaffilmark{1}, James Liebert\altaffilmark{1},
18: Michael Bolte\altaffilmark{2}, and Robert B.~Hanson\altaffilmark{2}}
19:
20: \altaffiltext{1}{Steward Observatory, 933 N. Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ 85721}
21: \altaffiltext{2}{UCO/Lick Observatory, University of California, Santa
22: Cruz, CA 95064}
23:
24: \begin{abstract}
25: We report the discovery of a hot DQ white dwarf, \object{NGC
26: 2168:LAWDS 28}, that is a likely member of the 150-Myr old cluster
27: \object{NGC 2168} (Messier 35). The spectrum of the white dwarf is
28: dominated by \ion{C}{2} features. The effective temperature is
29: difficult to estimate but likely $\gtrsim 20\,000\,{\rm K}$ based on
30: the temperatures of hot DQs with similar spectra. NGC2168:LAWDS 28
31: provides further evidence that hot DQs may be the ``missing''
32: high-mass helium-atmosphere white dwarfs. Based on published studies,
33: we find that the DBA WD LP 475-242 is likely a member of the Hyades
34: open cluster, as often assumed. These two white dwarfs are the entire
35: sample of known He-atmosphere white dwarfs in open clusters with
36: turnoff masses $\geq 2\msun$. Based on the number of known cluster DA
37: white dwarfs and a redetermination of the
38: H-atmosphere:He-atmosphere ratio, commonly known as the DA:DB ratio,
39: we re-examine the hypothesis that the H- to He-atmosphere ratio in
40: open clusters is the same as the ratio in the field. Under this
41: hypothesis, we calculate that five He-atmosphere WDs are expected to
42: have been discovered, with a probability of finding fewer than three
43: He-atmosphere white dwarfs of 0.08, or at the $\approx 2\sigma$ level.
44: \end{abstract}
45: \keywords{white dwarfs --- open clusters and associations: individual
46: (NGC 2168)}
47:
48: \section{Introduction}
49: White dwarfs (WDs) have one of two types of atmospheres:
50: those dominated by hydrogen (spectral class DA), and those dominated
51: by helium (the non-DA spectral classes). The ratio of the numbers of
52: DA to non-DA stars is a function of temperature, culminating in the
53: ``DB gap'', ranging from $\approx 45\,000\,{\rm K}$ to
54: $\approx 30\,000\,{\rm K}$ \citep[e.g.,][]{Liebert1986}. Until
55: recently, no He-atmosphere WDs were known to exist in this temperature
56: range, though several have now been discovered in the Sloan Digital
57: Sky Survey \citep{Eisenstein2006}. The temperature dependence of the
58: DA to non-DA ratio suggests that some He-atmosphere WDs must
59: change their atmospheric composition, an effect often ascribed to the
60: diffusion of hydrogen to the surfaces of cooling DO stars and the
61: later mixing of this hydrogen veneer into the thicker He-envelope due
62: to the appearance of an atmospheric convection zone
63: \citep{Fontaine1987}.
64:
65: \citet{Kalirai2005} note that even though a few dozen WDs are known to
66: exist in open star clusters with turnoff masses greater than 2\msun,
67: no DB WDs are known in these clusters. However, this study excludes
68: other WD spectral types with He-dominated atmospheres, such as the
69: DBA WD LP~475-242 (WD 0437+138), a potential member of the
70: Hyades. \citet{Kalirai2005} also give only a brief mention of the
71: impact of the DB gap without calculating the impact of the changing DA
72: to non-DA ratio in this temperature range. Subsequent to their
73: publication, analysis of the SDSS DR4 WD sample \citep{Eisenstein2006}
74: has found that the DA to non-DA ratio is larger than the value of 3.5
75: used in \citet{Kalirai2005}, warranting a re-analysis of the cluster
76: non-DA deficiency.
77:
78: In this Letter, we report the discovery of a hot DQ (He-dominated
79: atmosphere with opacity dominated by atomic carbon) WD in the field of
80: the young open cluster \object{NGC 2168} (Messier 35). Several DA WDs
81: in this cluster have already been identified and characterized
82: \citep{Williams2004}. The identification of this He-atmosphere WD
83: provides insight into both the origin of DQ WDs and the apparent
84: deficiency of He-atmosphere WDs in open clusters.
85:
86: \section{Observations\label{sec.obs}}
87: We obtained \ubv~imaging of the open cluster NGC 2168 on UT 2004
88: January 27 with the Mosaic-1 camera on the Kitt Peak Mayall 4-m
89: telescope. Photometry was derived via point-spread function fitting
90: using the DAOPHOT II program \citep{Stetson1987}. We select objects
91: with blue excess as candidate WDs as discussed in
92: \citet{Williams2004}. The color-magnitude diagram for confirmed
93: cluster WDs is shown in Figure \ref{fig.cmd}. NGC 2168 has an age of
94: $150\pm 60$ Myr \citep{vonHippel2005} and $[{\rm Fe}/{\rm H}]
95: =-0.21\pm 0.10$ \citep{Barrado2001}. The main-sequence turnoff mass
96: is $\sim 4.5\msun$ \citep{Girardi2002}; based on the initial-final
97: mass relation, WDs in NGC 2168 are expected to be massive
98: \citep[e.g.,][]{Weidemann2000,Ferrario2005}.
99:
100: The open diamond in Figure \ref{fig.cmd} is \object{NGC 2168:LAWDS 28}
101: (hereafter LAWDS 28), $\alpha(J2000)=6^{\rm h}08^{\rm m}13\fs 50$,
102: $\delta(J2000)=+24\degr 20\arcmin 32\farcs 5$, and we assign it the
103: \citet{McCook1999}-style designation WD J0608+2420. This object has a
104: $V$-magnitude of $21.63\pm 0.03$, $\bv=0.02\pm 0.04$, and $\ub =
105: -1.10\pm 0.04$. As its photometric properties (open diamond in Figure
106: \ref{fig.cmd}) are similar to those of known WDs in M35, we
107: selected this object for follow-up spectroscopy.
108:
109: The spectroscopic data were obtained on UT 2005 November 26 using the
110: blue camera of the Low-Resolution Imaging Spectrometry on the Keck 1
111: telescope \citep{Oke1995}. We placed a 1\arcsec~slit on the object at
112: the parallactic angle and selected the 400 line mm$^{-1}$,
113: 3400\AA~blaze grism to obtain a spectral resolution of $\approx 6$\AA.
114: Our total exposure time was 4800s, split into four 1200s
115: exposures. The images were combined and the spectrum was extracted and
116: calibrated (wavelength and relative flux) using standard \emph{IRAF}
117: routines.
118:
119: The extracted spectrum is peculiar and markedly different from
120: other spectra obtained in our open cluster WD survey, both for
121: confirmed WDs (DA, DB and DCs) and the non-WD sample contaminants
122: (mostly QSOs, hot subdwarfs, and field horizontal branch
123: stars). The spectral features are consistent with \ion{C}{2} spectral
124: features, leading us to conclude that this object is a DQ WD.
125:
126: The spectrum for LAWDS~28 is shown in Figure \ref{fig.spec} (top),
127: along with the SDSS 2.5-m spectrum for
128: \object{SDSS~J010647.93+151327.9} (bottom), the object most similar
129: from the sample of hot DQ stars showing \ion{C}{1}, \ion{C}{2},
130: \ion{O}{1} and/or \ion{O}{2} multiplets in \citet{Liebert2003}. The
131: tick marks label the approximate positions of multiplets of \ion{C}{2}
132: taken from \citet{Moore1970}. Included are the weaker multiplets
133: omitted from the plots in \citet{Liebert2003}. Both multiplets with
134: strong and weak laboratory intensities appear in LAWDS 28; the 4267\AA
135: ~line, often observed to be strong in hot stars, is present in
136: LAWDS 28 but is not the only dominant feature. While a case could be
137: made that the SDSS object shows additional features, possibly due to
138: \ion{O}{2} in its spectrum, the cluster WD is matched almost perfectly
139: with \ion{C}{2} transitions alone. It is possible that the strong
140: \ion{C}{3} multiplet near 4647--51\AA ~may contribute weakly, but no
141: \ion{C}{1} or oxygen lines are matched except where they would blend
142: with the \ion{C}{2}.
143:
144: Hot DQ WDs are thought to have atmospheres dominated by helium.
145: \citet{Thejll1990} analyze the atmospheric abundances of the hot DQ
146: \object{G35-26} (WD 0203+207) and find a carbon abundance $n_{\rm
147: C}\sim 0.03$ and a hydrogen abundance of $n_{\rm H}\lesssim 0.01$,
148: implying that $n_{\rm He}\sim 0.96$ \citep{Liebert2003}. The hot DQ
149: \object{G227-5} (WD 1727+560) also was found to have only trace
150: abundances of carbon and hydrogen \citep{Wegner1985}. Therefore it is
151: likely that LAWDS 28 has a He-dominated atmosphere despite showing no
152: evidence for helium features in the spectrum. The lack of such
153: features in many hot DQs is thought to be due to the masking of helium
154: features by the dominant carbon opacity \citep{Liebert2003}.
155:
156: \section{Discussion\label{sec.disc}}
157:
158: \subsection{Cluster membership, mass, and temperature}
159: Given the lack of a model fit to the spectrum of LAWDS 28, it is
160: difficult to determine many fundamental parameters of this WD with
161: precision. However, the available observations provide a
162: preponderance of evidence that LAWDS 28 is a hot, massive
163: cluster-member WD. We now outline this evidence.
164:
165: The distance and reddening of NGC 2168 are somewhat uncertain.
166: \citet{Kalirai2003} adopt $\ebv = 0.20$ from \citet{Sarrazine2000} to
167: derive $(m-M)_0 = 9.80\pm 0.16$ from $BV$ photometry, while
168: \citet{Sung1999} calculate $(m-M)_0=9.60\pm 0.1$ and $\ebv = 0.255 \pm
169: 0.024$ from $\ubvr I$ photometry. Either case leads to an apparent
170: distance modulus $(m-M)_V\approx 10.4$. At this distance, the
171: absolute magnitude of LAWDS 28 is $M_V=11.2$; assuming the
172: \citet{Sarrazine2000} reddening value, $(\bv)_0 = -0.22$ and $(\ub)_0
173: = -1.23$. This absolute magnitude is consistent with evolutionary
174: models of DA and DB WDs with $M_{\rm WD}\gtrsim 0.8\msun$ and hotter
175: than $20\,000 {\rm K}$ \citep{Bergeron1995}. However, DQ photometric
176: indices are likely to differ from those of DAs and DBs, and in fact
177: the hot DQs in \citet{Liebert2003} are bluer in $u-g$ than pure-He
178: atmosphere models. As seen in Figure \ref{fig.cmd}, LAWDS 28 is also
179: bluer than the given DB models.
180:
181: The effective temperature, \teff, of LAWDS 28 cannot be determined
182: accurately, as no spectral models for these hot DQs exist. The \bv
183: ~color of this WD is bluer than any DB model from
184: \citet{Bergeron1995}, though these models are not calculated for
185: $\teff>30\,000\,{\rm K}$. By matching the observed \bv ~color to
186: reddened blackbody models calculated using the \emph{synphot} package
187: in STSDAS \citep{Bushouse1994}, we derive a blackbody temperature of
188: $22\,200^{+5200}_{-3500}\,{\rm K}$. For the hot DQs in
189: \citet{Liebert2003}, SDSS colors were converted to a ``pure helium''
190: effective temperature, $T_{\rm He}$, based on colors for pure
191: helium-atmosphere WDs with $\logg=8$. For SDSS J0106+1513, the
192: comparison star shown in Figure \ref{fig.spec}, $T_{\rm He} =
193: 20\,000\,{\rm K}$, while the DQs \object{SDSS J0005-1002} and
194: \object{SDSS J0236-0734} have $T_{\rm He} = 29\,000$ and
195: $30\,000\,{\rm K}$, respectively \citep{Liebert2003}. Both of these
196: stars show \ion{C}{1} in addition to \ion{C}{2} in their spectra; the
197: lack of \ion{C}{1} in the spectrum of LAWDS 28 would argue that this
198: DQ is hotter than the other two. While the continuum slope of SDSS
199: J0106+1513 is bluer than that of LAWDS 28, this does not necessarily
200: mean that LAWDS 28 is cooler, as the spectra have not been corrected
201: for extinction. Since neither the blackbody temperature nor the
202: pure-helium temperatures take the spectral features of the DQs into
203: account, these are only educated guesses as to \teff. Given the very
204: blue colors and the ion ratios, we surmise that LAWDS 28 is a hot
205: ($\teff\gtrsim 20\,000\, {\rm K}$) WD. We also note that the coolest
206: DA WDs in NGC 2168 (similar in \bv ~to LAWDS 28) have $\teff \sim 30\,000\,{\rm K}$.
207:
208: The discovery of a hot DQ white dwarf in this young cluster is
209: consistent with the case reiterated in \citet{Liebert2003} that such
210: WDs may be massive. \citet{Thejll1990} found a high gravity for the
211: hot DQ star \object{G 35-26} from their detailed atmospheric analysis
212: and fit to the spectral lines of carbon, hydrogen and helium. This
213: has been confirmed by a trigonometric parallax measurement
214: \citep{Dahn2006}. A parallax is also available from the same source
215: for the similar field star \object{G 227-5}, the spectrum of which was
216: analyzed by \citet{Wegner1985}, and it also appears to have a mass
217: near 1~\msun. It is expected from theoretical evolutionary
218: calculations of asymptotic giant branch stars that the helium-shell
219: burning consumes a greater fraction of the helium layer with
220: increasing mass \citep{Kawai1988}, with further calculations leading
221: to a similar conclusion in \citet{Thejll1990}. A smaller helium
222: envelope as the star enters the white dwarf cooling phase in turn
223: means that dredge-up of carbon (and perhaps oxygen) from the edge of
224: the core into the convective envelope and atmosphere should occur at a
225: higher temperature -- in the DB temperature range, in which LAWDS~28
226: apparently is. If \emph{all} hot DQ stars are in fact massive, this
227: may account for the absence of massive DB stars in the sample of
228: \citet[][see also \citealt{Beauchamp1996}]{Beauchamp1995}; this is the
229: only large sample of field DB stars for which detailed determinations
230: of the relevant parameters (\teff, \logg, and therefore mass) are
231: available. Nearly all of these DB stars have masses near the
232: canonical peak of 0.6 \msun.
233:
234: Finally, hot DQs are very rare. In the SDSS DR4 WD catalog
235: \citep{Eisenstein2006b}, only 0.3\% (28 out of 9316 white dwarfs) are
236: hot DQs; with a surface density of approximately one for every 180
237: square degrees. We estimate the number of hot white dwarfs in our 0.5
238: sq.~degree imaging of NGC 2168 by integrating the WD luminosity
239: function from the Palomar-Green Survey \citep{Liebert2005} for
240: $M_V\geq 11$ to a volume corresponding to limiting apparent magnitude
241: of $V=21.6$. This estimate therefore allows for the possibility that
242: LAWDS 28 is less massive than 1\msun, and therefore brighter and
243: background to NGC 2168. The estimated number of intrinsically bright
244: WDs in our imaging area is found to be $\approx 10$. If 0.3\% of
245: these are hot DQs, we would expect 0.03 hot DQs in our imaging area.
246: Thus, the likelihood that LAWDS 28 is an interloping field DQ in our
247: 0.5 square degree field of view is extremely low. However, until a
248: distance modulus or proper motion can be determined for LAWDS 28, some
249: uncertainty about its membership will remain.
250:
251: In summary, the photometric and spectroscopic data for LAWDS 28 are
252: consistent with it being a hot ($\teff \gtrsim 20\,000\,{\rm K}$),
253: massive ($M\gtrsim 0.8\msun$) WD located at the distance of NGC 2168.
254: Until an accurate model atmosphere can be fit to the data or until
255: proper motion information is available, it is not possible to
256: state \emph{conclusively} that LAWDS 28 is a member of NGC 2168.
257:
258: \subsection{Other non-DA WDs in open clusters}
259:
260: \emph{LP~475-242. ---} LP 475-242 (WD 0437+138) is a DBA white dwarf
261: about one core radius (3 pc) from the Hyades cluster center.
262: \citet{Beauchamp1995} fits its spectrum to get $\teff =
263: 15\,355\,{\rm K}$ and $\logg = 8.26$, suggesting a modestly
264: above-average mass ($0.751\pm 0.033\msun$) for a DB white dwarf.
265: Hydrogen lines were included to get a trace hydrogen abundance of
266: $\log (n_{\rm H}/n_{\rm He}) = -4.5$, so the atmosphere is clearly
267: He-dominated. This WD has been used in some cluster data compilations
268: to determine the initial-final mass relation, most recently that of
269: \citet{Ferrario2005}.
270:
271: LP 475-242 was listed by \citet{Luyten1971} as a possible white dwarf
272: member of the Hyades on the basis of its proper motion, faint
273: magnitude, and blue color. \citet{Greenstein1976} determined a
274: photometric parallax of 0\farcs 023, in close agreement with the
275: Hyades distance. \citet{Eggen1985} and \citet{Weidemann1992} consider
276: LP 475-242 to be an established Hyades member. Accurate proper motion
277: measurements (Table \ref{tab.pm}) agree almost exactly, in size
278: and direction, with motion expected for a Hyades member. Finally,
279: under the assumption that LP 475-242 is at the systemic velocity of
280: the Hyades, the resulting gravitational redshift leads to a mass of
281: $0.748\pm 0.037\msun$ \citep{Reid1996}, consistent with the
282: spectroscopic mass \citep{Beauchamp1995} and with the masses of DAs in
283: the Hyades \citep{Bergeron1995a}. It therefore seems highly likely
284: that LP 475-242 is a Hyades member.
285:
286: \emph{LB 3600. ---} It is also possible that a third cluster DB is
287: already known, \object{LB 3600} in \object{Messier 67}
288: \citep{Fleming1997}. Based on their spectral fits, this WD is about
289: one magnitude too bright to be a member of M67, though their spectrum
290: is very noisy, and DB spectra are difficult to fit with precision. As
291: the deficiency of open cluster DBs noted by \citet{Kalirai2005} was
292: specifically for clusters with main-sequence turnoff masses $\geq
293: 2\msun$ and the M67 turnoff mass is $\approx 1.4\msun$, we do
294: not consider this object in our analysis below.
295:
296: \subsection{The open cluster DA:non-DA ratio}
297:
298: \citet{Kalirai2005} note the lack of DB WDs in open clusters.
299: Though there are no known ``pure'' DB WDs in open clusters, this
300: overlooks the physical reality that non-DA spectral types in the DB
301: temperature range -- DBs, DBAs, DBZs, and hot DQs -- have atmospheres
302: dominated by He. As He has a very low opacity, trace contaminants in
303: the atmosphere can easily dominate the opacity, masking He
304: features. In order to study whether the ratio of hydrogen-dominated
305: atmosphere WDs to helium-dominated atmosphere WDs differs from star
306: clusters to the field, these other spectral types should be included
307: in any analysis. Given our discovery of LAWDS 28, a likely
308: He-dominated atmosphere WD in an open cluster, given the probable
309: Hyades DBA LP~475-242, and given a new determination of the field
310: DA:DB ratio from Sloan Digital Sky Survey data \citep{Eisenstein2006},
311: we now revisit the issue of the H- to He-atmosphere ratio in open
312: clusters.
313:
314: \emph{A new measurement of the field DA:DB ratio. ---} The large
315: numbers of field WDs discovered during the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
316: has permitted a new determination of the DA:DB ratio (including DBAs)
317: \citep{Eisenstein2006}. For $\teff\lesssim 20\,000\,{\rm K}$,
318: DA:DB$\approx 5$, while for $20\,000\,{\rm K} \lesssim \teff\lesssim
319: 45\,000\,{\rm K}$, DA:DB$\approx 12.5$. Because of the near
320: degeneracy of DB spectra over the temperature range of
321: $20-28\,000\,{\rm K}$, it is difficult to determine the
322: lower \teff~boundary of the deficit, though it is most
323: likely in the $20-22\,000\,{\rm K}$ range. Thus, the
324: ``DB-gap'' is really a deficiency, not a complete lack, of WDs in the
325: temperature range $45\,000\,{\rm K} \lesssim \teff \lesssim
326: 20\,000\,{\rm K}$, somewhat larger than previous estimates of the DB
327: gap range. As this is a large, uniform sample of WDs, and as the
328: DA:DB ratio is provided as a function of temperature, we adopt these
329: ratios for calculating the number of expected He-atmosphere WDs in the
330: open cluster sample.
331:
332: \emph{Expected numbers of He-atmosphere WDs in the open cluster
333: sample. ---} For the sample of open cluster WDs, we use the sample as
334: presented by \citet{Ferrario2005}. This work applies stringent
335: membership criteria, so few non-cluster members should contaminate the
336: sample. We calculate the number of non-DA WDs using the
337: \citet{Eisenstein2006} DA:DB ratio in two temperature bins: $\teff <
338: 20\,000\,{\rm K}$ (DA:DB$=5$; 21 open cluster DAs) and $20\,000\leq
339: \teff \leq 45\,000\,{\rm K}$ (DA:DB$=12.5$; 17 DAs). We thus expect
340: $\approx 5.6$ non-DA WDs in the current open cluster WD sample. This
341: number assumes that the \citet{Eisenstein2006} DA:DB ratio would be
342: unaffected by inclusion of non-DB and non-DBA He-atmosphere WDs in the
343: calculations.
344:
345: Given two probable He-atmosphere cluster WDs (LAWDS 28 and
346: LP~475-242), we use Poisson statistics to calculate the likelihood of
347: finding two or fewer non-DA WDs to be 0.08. If only one of these
348: He-atmosphere WDs is a cluster member, this probability drops to 0.02.
349: This is akin to $1.9\sigma$ and $2.3\sigma$, respectively. Thus,
350: while the ratio of DA to non-DA WDs in open clusters is low, it is not
351: greatly inconsistent with the expected number. With coming larger
352: samples of open cluster WDs, the question of whether the DA to non-DA
353: ratio in open clusters is the same as that in the field can be
354: addressed with much more certainty.
355:
356: \acknowledgements The authors are grateful for financial support from
357: National Science Foundation grants AST 03-07492 and AST 03-07321. The
358: authors also thank the referee, Harvey Richer, for comments improving
359: this paper.
360:
361: \begin{thebibliography}{}
362:
363: \bibitem[Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s, Deliyannis, \&
364: Stauffer(2001)]{Barrado2001} Barrado y Navascu{\'e}s, D., Deliyannis,
365: C.~P., \& Stauffer, J.~R.\ 2001, \apj, 549, 452
366:
367: \bibitem[Beauchamp(1995)]{Beauchamp1995} Beauchamp, A.\ 1995,
368: Ph.D.~Thesis, Universit\'e de Montr\'eal
369:
370: \bibitem[Beauchamp et al.(1996)]{Beauchamp1996} Beauchamp, A., Wesemael,
371: F., Bergeron, P., Liebert, J., \& Saffer, R.~A.\ 1996, ASP Conf.~Ser.~ 96:
372: Hydrogen Deficient Stars, 96, 295
373:
374: \bibitem[Bergeron, Liebert, \& Fulbright(1995)]{Bergeron1995a} Bergeron, P.,
375: Liebert, J., \& Fulbright, M.~S.\ 1995, \apj, 444, 810
376:
377: \bibitem[Bergeron, Wesemael, \& Beauchamp(1995)]{Bergeron1995} Bergeron,
378: P., Wesemael, F., \& Beauchamp, A.\ 1995, \pasp, 107, 1047
379:
380: \bibitem[Bushouse \& Simon(1994)]{Bushouse1994} Bushouse, H., \& Simon, B.\
381: 1994, ASP Conf.~Ser.~ 61: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems
382: III, 61, 339
383:
384: \bibitem[Dahn et al.(2006)]{Dahn2006} Dahn, C.~C., et al.\ 2006, in
385: preparation
386:
387: \bibitem[Eggen(1985)]{Eggen1985} Eggen, O.~J.\ 1985, \pasp, 97, 1029
388:
389: \bibitem[Eisenstein et al.(2006a)]{Eisenstein2006b} Eisenstein, D.~J.,
390: et al.\ 2006a, \apjs, submitted
391:
392: \bibitem[Eisenstein et al.(2006b)]{Eisenstein2006} Eisenstein, D.~J.,
393: et al.\ 2006b, \aj, in press
394:
395: \bibitem[Ferrario et al.(2005)]{Ferrario2005} Ferrario, L., Wickramasinghe,
396: D., Liebert, J., \& Williams, K.~A.\ 2005, \mnras, 361, 1131
397:
398: \bibitem[Fleming et al.(1997)]{Fleming1997} Fleming, T.~A., Liebert, J.,
399: Bergeron, P., \& Beauchamp, A.\ 1997, ASSL Vol.~214: White dwarfs, 91
400:
401: \bibitem[Fontaine \& Wesemael(1987)]{Fontaine1987} Fontaine, G., \&
402: Wesemael, F.\ 1987, IAU Colloq.~95: Second Conference on Faint Blue Stars,
403: 319
404:
405: \bibitem[Girardi et al.(2002)]{Girardi2002} Girardi, L., Bertelli, G.,
406: Bressan, A., Chiosi, C., Groenewegen, M.~A.~T., Marigo, P., Salasnich, B.,
407: \& Weiss, A.\ 2002, \aap, 391, 195
408:
409: \bibitem[Greenstein(1976)]{Greenstein1976} Greenstein, J.~L.\ 1976, \aj,
410: 81, 323
411:
412: \bibitem[Kalirai et al.(2003)]{Kalirai2003} Kalirai, J.~S., Fahlman, G.~G.,
413: Richer, H.~B., \& Ventura, P.\ 2003, \aj, 126, 1402
414:
415: \bibitem[Kalirai et al.(2005)]{Kalirai2005} Kalirai, J.~S., Richer, H.~B.,
416: Hansen, B.~M.~S., Reitzel, D., \& Rich, R.~M.\ 2005, \apjl, 618, L129
417:
418: \bibitem[Kawai, Saio, \& Nomoto(1988)]{Kawai1988} Kawai, Y., Saio, H., \&
419: Nomoto, K.\ 1988, \apj, 328, 207
420:
421: \bibitem[Liebert et al.(1986)]{Liebert1986} Liebert, J., Wesemael, F.,
422: Hansen, C.~J., Fontaine, G., Shipman, H.~L., Sion, E.~M., Winget, D.~E., \&
423: Green, R.~F.\ 1986, \apj, 309, 241
424:
425: \bibitem[Liebert et al.(2003)]{Liebert2003} Liebert, J., et al.\ 2003, \aj,
426: 126, 2521
427:
428: \bibitem[Liebert, Bergeron, \& Holberg(2005)]{Liebert2005} Liebert, J.,
429: Bergeron, P., \& Holberg, J.~B.\ 2005, \apjs, 156, 47
430:
431: \bibitem[Luyten(1971)]{Luyten1971} Luyten, W.~J.\ 1971, The Hyades,
432: Minneapolis: University of Minnesota
433:
434: \bibitem[Luyten, Hill, \& Morris(1981)]{Luyten1981}
435: Luyten, W.~J., Hill, G., \& Morris, S.\ 1981, Proper Motion Surveys with
436: the 48 Inch Schmidt Telescope, Vol. 59, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota
437:
438: \bibitem[McCook \& Sion(1999)]{McCook1999} McCook, G.~P., \& Sion, E.~M.\
439: 1999, \apjs, 121, 1
440:
441: \bibitem[Moore(1972)]{Moore1970} Moore, C.~E.\ 1972, A Multiplet Table
442: of Astrophysical Interest, NSRDS-NBS, Washington: US Department of
443: Commerce, Rev.~edition
444:
445:
446: \bibitem[Oke et al.(1995)]{Oke1995} Oke, J.~B., et al.\ 1995, \pasp, 107,
447: 375
448:
449: \bibitem[Perryman et al.(1998)]{Perryman1998} Perryman, M.~A.~C., et al.\
450: 1998, \aap, 331, 81
451:
452: \bibitem[Reid(1992)]{Reid1992} Reid, N.\ 1992, \mnras, 257, 257
453:
454: \bibitem[Reid(1996)]{Reid1996} Reid, I.~N.\ 1996, \aj, 111, 2000
455:
456: \bibitem[Sarrazine et al.(2000)]{Sarrazine2000} Sarrazine, A.~R.,
457: Steinhauer, A.~J.~B., Deliyannis, C.~P., Sarajedini, A., Bailyn, C.~D.,
458: Kozhurina-Platais, V., von Hippel, T., \& Platais, I.\ 2000, Bulletin of
459: the American Astronomical Society, 32, 742
460:
461: \bibitem[Stetson(1987)]{Stetson1987} Stetson, P.~B.\ 1987, \pasp, 99, 191
462:
463: \bibitem[Sung \& Bessell(1999)]{Sung1999} Sung, H., \& Bessell, M.~S.\
464: 1999, \mnras, 306, 361
465:
466: \bibitem[Thejll et al.(1990)]{Thejll1990} Thejll, P., Shipman, H.~L.,
467: MacDonald, J., \& Macfarland, W.~M.\ 1990, \apj, 361, 197
468:
469: \bibitem[von Hippel(2005)]{vonHippel2005} von Hippel, T.\ 2005, \apj, 622,
470: 565
471:
472: \bibitem[Wegner \& Koester(1985)]{Wegner1985} Wegner, G., \& Koester, D.\
473: 1985, \apj, 288, 746
474:
475: \bibitem[Weidemann et al.(1992)]{Weidemann1992} Weidemann, V., Jordan, S.,
476: Iben, I.~J., \& Casertano, S.\ 1992, \aj, 104, 1876
477:
478: \bibitem[Weidemann(2000)]{Weidemann2000} Weidemann, V.\ 2000, \aap, 363,
479: 647
480:
481: \bibitem[Williams, Bolte, \& Koester(2004)]{Williams2004} Williams, K.~A.,
482: Bolte, M., \& Koester, D.\ 2004, \apjl, 615, L49
483:
484: \bibitem[Zacharias et al.(2004)]{Zacharias2004} Zacharias, N., Monet,
485: D.~G., Levine, S.~E., Urban, S.~E., Gaume, R., \& Wycoff, G.~L.\ 2004,
486: American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 205
487:
488: \end{thebibliography}
489:
490:
491: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccl}
492: \rotate
493: \tablewidth{0pt}
494: \tablecolumns{6}
495: \tablecaption{Proper motion measurements of LP 475-242.\label{tab.pm}}
496: \tablehead{\colhead{$\mu_\alpha$} & \colhead{$\mu_\delta$} &
497: \colhead{$\mu$} & \colhead{PA} & \colhead{Reference} & \colhead{Comments}}
498: \startdata
499: 0.093\tablenotemark{a} & -0.036\tablenotemark{a} & 0.10 & 111 & (1) & \\
500: 0.100 & -0.021 & 0.102\tablenotemark{a} & 102\tablenotemark{a} & (2) & \\
501: 0.097 & -0.023 & 0.100\tablenotemark{a} & 103\tablenotemark{a} & (3) & LP 475-242 = Reid 400 \\
502: 0.094 & -0.018 & 0.096\tablenotemark{a} & 101\tablenotemark{a} & (4) & LP 475-242 = NOMAD 1039-0046673 \\
503: 0.098\tablenotemark{a} & -0.021\tablenotemark{a} & 0.100\tablenotemark{a} & 102\tablenotemark{a} & (5) & Predicted motion for a Hyades member at position of LP 475-242 \\
504: \enddata
505: \tablenotetext{a}{Calculated from data in reference}
506: \tablecomments{Proper motions are in arcseconds per year; position angles
507: are degrees east of north.}
508: \tablerefs{(1) \citealt{Luyten1971}, (2) \citealt{Luyten1981},
509: (3) \citealt{Reid1992}, (4) \citealt{Zacharias2004}, (5) \citealt{Perryman1998}}
510: \end{deluxetable}
511:
512: \begin{figure}
513: \plotone{f1.eps}
514: \caption{Color-magnitude diagram of confirmed white dwarfs in NGC
515: 2168. Curves are evolutionary tracks for pure H- (i.e., DA; solid)
516: and pure He-atmosphere (i.e., DB; dashed) white dwarfs hotter than
517: $10\,000$ K with masses of 0.6\msun, 0.8\msun, 1.0\msun, and
518: 1.2\msun (top to bottom, respectively). Tracks have been moved to
519: the cluster distance and reddening. Filled squares are the
520: confirmed cluster member white dwarfs from \citet{Williams2004}.
521: The open diamond with $1\sigma$ error bars is NGC 2168:LAWDS 28; the
522: error in $V$ is smaller than the point size. This white dwarf has
523: photometry consistent with known cluster white dwarfs and with
524: massive white dwarf evolutionary models.
525: \label{fig.cmd}}
526: \end{figure}
527:
528: \begin{figure}
529: \plotone{f2.eps}
530: \caption{Spectrum of NGC 2168:LAWDS 28 (top) compared to the known hot
531: DQ SDSS J010647.9+151327.9 (bottom). Dashed tick marks indicate the
532: location of \ion{C}{2} features. The qualitative match of the two
533: spectra and the fact that most or all of the features in the top
534: spectrum match the \ion{C}{2} features lead us to conclude that
535: NGC2168:LAWDS 28 is a hot DQ white dwarf.\label{fig.spec}}
536: \end{figure}
537:
538: \end{document}
539: