1: %\documentclass{aastex}
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3:
4: \usepackage{epsfig}
5:
6: \begin{document}
7: \title{Discovery of 14 radio pulsars in a survey of the Magellanic Clouds}
8: \author{R. N. Manchester\altaffilmark{1}, G. Fan\altaffilmark{2,3},
9: A. G. Lyne\altaffilmark{4}, V. M. Kaspi\altaffilmark{3} \and
10: F. Crawford\altaffilmark{5}}
11: \altaffiltext{1}{Australia Telescope National Facility, CSIRO, PO Box 76,
12: Epping NSW 1710, Australia}
13: \altaffiltext{2}{Physics Department, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulham Rd, Hong Kong,
14: China}
15: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Physics, Rutherford Physics Building, McGill University,
16: Montreal, QC H3A 2T8, Canada}
17: \altaffiltext{4}{University of Manchester, Jodrell Bank Observatory, Macclesfield,
18: Cheshire SK11 9DL, UK}
19: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Physics, Haverford College, Haverford, PA 19041-1392}
20: \email{dick.manchester@csiro.au}
21:
22: \begin{abstract}
23: A systematic survey of the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds for radio
24: pulsars using the Parkes radio telescope and the 20-cm multibeam
25: receiver has resulted in the discovery of 14 pulsars and the
26: redetection of five of the eight previously known spin-powered pulsars
27: believed to lie in the Magellanic Clouds. Of the 14 new discoveries,
28: 12 are believed to lie within Clouds, three in the Small Cloud and
29: nine in the Large Cloud, bringing the total number of known
30: spin-powered pulsars in the Clouds to 20. Averaged over all positions
31: within the survey area, the survey had a limiting flux density of
32: about 0.12 mJy. Observed dispersion measures suggest that the mean
33: free electron density in the Magellanic Clouds is similar to that in
34: the disk of our Galaxy. The observed radio luminosities have little or
35: no dependence on pulsar period or characteristic age and the
36: differential luminosity function is consistent with a power-law slope
37: of $-1$ as is observed for Galactic pulsars.
38: \end{abstract}
39:
40: \keywords{Magellanic Clouds --- pulsars: general --- surveys}
41:
42: \section{Introduction}
43: The Large and Small Magellanic Clouds (LMC and SMC) are our
44: nearest-neighbour galaxies and, to date, the only galaxies other than
45: our own which have detectable pulsars. The first systematic survey for
46: radio pulsars in the Magellanic Clouds was by \citet{mhah83} who used
47: a receiver with center frequency 645 MHz and bandwidth 25 MHz on the
48: Parkes 64-m radio telescope to search 7 square degrees of the
49: LMC. This survey uncovered the first known extra-galactic pulsar, PSR
50: B0529$-$66, which has a period of 0.975 s and a dispersion measure
51: (DM) of 103 cm$^{-3}$ pc which clearly places it outside the Galactic
52: free-electron layer. This survey was subsequently extended by
53: \citet{mmh+91} to cover both the LMC and the SMC with higher
54: sensitivity using a receiver with center frequency 610 MHz, a
55: bandwidth 60 MHz in each of two orthogonal polarizations and 5-ms
56: sampling. With an observation time of 5000 s per pointing, the
57: limiting mean flux density at 610 MHz was 0.5 to 0.8 mJy for pulsars
58: with periods greater than about 500 ms and DMs of 100 cm$^{-3}$ pc or
59: less. Four pulsars were discovered, one in the SMC, two in the LMC and
60: one foreground pulsar. The SMC pulsar, now known as PSR J0045$-$7319,
61: was shown by \citet{kjb+94} to be in a 51-day orbit round a massive
62: star, optically identified as a 16th-magnitude B star. The
63: identification was subsequently confirmed by the detection of orbital
64: Doppler shifts in spectral lines from the B-star, showing that the
65: star has a mass of 8 -- 10 M$_\sun$ \citep{bbs+95}.
66:
67: Many young pulsars emit pulsed emission in the X-ray band and
68: sometimes detection is easier in this band than at radio
69: wavelengths. Two such pulsars which are clearly located in the LMC are
70: known. The first, PSR B0540$-$69, was discovered by \citet{shh84}
71: using data from the {\it Einstein X-ray Observatory}.
72: With a pulse period of 50.2 ms and a characteristic age of just 1670
73: years, it has properties very similar to those of the Crab pulsar and is
74: located at the center of the supernova remnant (SNR) 0540$-$693 in the
75: LMC \citep{msk93}. This pulsar was detected in the radio band by
76: \citet{mml+93} at 640 MHz with a very broad pulse and mean flux
77: density of about 0.4 mJy. Giant radio pulses at 1400 MHz were detected
78: from PSR B0540$-$69 by \citet{jr03} and subsequently the 1400-MHz mean
79: pulse emission was observed with a flux density of just 24 $\mu$Jy by
80: \citet{jrmz04}. Another young Magellanic Cloud pulsar, PSR
81: J0537$-$6910, was detected by \citet{mgz+98} using observations with
82: the {\it Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer}. This pulsar lies within the SNR
83: N~157B in the LMC and has the shortest period, 16.1 ms, of any known
84: young (unrecycled) pulsar. Its characteristic age is 5000 years, close
85: to the estimated age of N~157B. Radio searches for pulsed emission
86: from this pulsar have been unsuccessful, with the best limit on the
87: mean flux density, 10 $\mu$Jy at 1400 MHz, being set by
88: \citet{cmj+05}.
89:
90: A decade after the \citet{mmh+91} search, \citet{ckm+01} exploited the
91: high survey efficiency of the 13-beam Parkes 20-cm multibeam receiver
92: \citep{swb+96,mlc+01} to undertake a higher-sensitivity survey of the
93: SMC. A total area of $\sim 6.7$ square degrees was covered in 12
94: pointings of the instrument, with 0.25-ms sampling interval and
95: 8400 s observation time per pointing giving a 1400-MHz limiting flux
96: density of about 0.08 mJy for pulsars with periods greater than 50 ms
97: and DMs less than 200 cm$^{-3}$ pc. For comparison, the 610-MHz
98: limiting flux density of the \citet{mmh+91} survey corresponds to a
99: 1400-MHz limiting flux density of about 0.12 to 0.18 mJy assuming a
100: spectral index of $-1.8$, typical for most pulsars
101: \citep{mkkw00a}. These limiting flux densities apply to a detection at
102: the beam center and do not take into account variations of telescope
103: gain over the surveyed region. The \citet{ckm+01} survey found two
104: previously unknown pulsars, one of which is believed to be associated
105: with the SMC. In a separate search for pulsed emission from PSR
106: J0537$-$6910, a pulsar, PSR J0535$-$6935, was serendipitously
107: discovered.
108:
109: These discoveries brought the total number of known pulsars associated
110: with the Magellanic Clouds to eight, seven of which are radio
111: emitting, two of which are in the SMC and six of which were discovered
112: in radio surveys. In this paper we report on an extensive radio survey
113: of both the LMC and SMC for pulsars. Like the \citet{ckm+01} survey of
114: the SMC, this survey used the multibeam receiver on the Parkes 64-m
115: radio telescope. It has a comparable sensitivity to the \citet{ckm+01}
116: survey but covers a wider area and is sensitive to higher DMs. The
117: survey was very successful with 14 pulsars discovered, 12 of which are
118: believed to be in the Magellanic Clouds. In \S2 we describe the survey
119: and timing observations, \S3 gives details of the new discoveries and
120: the implications of the results are discussed in \S4.
121:
122: \section{Observations and analysis procedures}
123: The survey observations were made using the 13-beam multibeam receiver
124: \citep{swb+96} on the Parkes 64-m radio telescope in several sessions
125: between 2000 May and 2001 November. The 13 beams lie
126: in a double-hexagon pattern around a central beam which allows
127: complete sky coverage (with adjacent beams overlapping at the
128: half-power points) with interleaved pointings. A brief description of
129: the observing system follows; for more details see \citet{mlc+01}. Each
130: beam has cryogenic receivers for two orthogonal polarizations centered at 1374
131: MHz. For each polarization, the received 288-MHz band is split into 96
132: 3-MHz channels. Detected signals from each channel are summed in
133: polarization pairs, high-pass filtered, integrated for 1 ms, one-bit
134: sampled and written to Digital Linear Tape for subsequent
135: analysis. Each pointing was observed for 8400 s, giving $2^{23}$
136: samples per observation. A total of 73 pointings (949 beams) was
137: observed for the SMC and 136 pointings (1768 beams) for the LMC. The
138: distribution of these beams overlaid on images of the neutral hydrogen
139: in the SMC and LMC is shown in Figure~\ref{fg:beams}.
140:
141: \begin{figure}[ht]
142: \plottwo{f1ar.eps}{f1br.eps}
143: \caption{Distribution of survey beams across the SMC (left) and LMC
144: (right) overlaid on a greyscale of the neutral hydrogen distribution
145: from \citet{ssd+99} and \citet{ksd+03} for the SMC and LMC
146: respectively. }\label{fg:beams}
147: \end{figure}
148:
149: In most respects, off-line processing followed the procedures outlined
150: by \citet{ckm+01} and \citet{mlc+01} and was carried out on Sun
151: workstations at the ATNF and at McGill University. Compared to the
152: \citet{ckm+01} survey of the SMC, a larger DM range was searched in
153: the present survey. A total of 102 DMs up to 277 cm$^{-3}$ pc were
154: searched with 1-ms time resolution, a further 42 DMs were then
155: searched for each of 2~ms, 4~ms and 8~ms time resolution, with maximum
156: DMs of approximately 550 cm$^{-3}$ pc, 1100 cm$^{-3}$ pc and 2200
157: cm$^{-3}$ pc, respectively. For most periods and DMs, the sensitivity
158: of this survey was comparable to that of \citet{ckm+01}, with a
159: limiting flux density of about 0.08 mJy for an assumed 5\% duty
160: cycle. Because of the four-times-longer sampling interval, the
161: sensitivity for short-period pulsars ($P\la50$ ms) is reduced compared
162: to the earlier survey. These limiting flux densities apply to a pulsar
163: at the center of the central beam of the multibeam receiver. In
164: general, pulsars will lie some distance from the center of the nearest
165: beam. Furthermore, outer beams have a lower gain than the central
166: beam. Following \citet{mlc+01}, we estimate the limiting mean flux
167: density of the survey averaged over all positions within the tiled
168: region to be approximately 0.12 mJy.
169:
170: The data analysis resulted in a large number of candidate pulsars
171: which were graded according to signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) and absence
172: of interference. The better candidates were reobserved using a grid
173: pattern of observations with the center beam of the multibeam system
174: at the nominal position and $9\arcmin$ north, south, east and west,
175: typically for 3000~s per pointing. The data from these observations
176: were searched over ranges of period and DM about the nominal
177: values. Detection of a pulsar signal in one or more pointings gave
178: confirmation of the candidate and detection in two or more pointings
179: also allowed determination of an improved position for the pulsar.
180:
181: Following confirmation of a pulsar, a program of timing observations
182: commenced in order to improve the position, period and DM, and to
183: determine the period derivative. These timing observations used the
184: center beam of the multibeam receiver and the same recording system as
185: was used for the survey. The resulting data were folded at the
186: topocentric period to form mean pulse profiles which were further
187: analysed using the {\sc psrchive} \citep{hvm04} pulsar data analysis
188: package to produce pulse times of arrival (TOAs) for each observation
189: (where there was a detectable pulse). These were analysed using {\sc
190: tempo}\footnote{See http://www.atnf.csiro.au/research/pulsar/tempo}
191: with the DE200 Solar-System ephemeris \citep{sta90} and a weighted
192: fit. Typically, the timing observations spanned 400 -- 600 days with
193: more than 20 observations per pulsar. In most cases, DMs were
194: determined by splitting the observed 20-cm band into four subbands and
195: measuring TOAs separately for each subband. In a few cases the pulsar
196: was also detected using a 70-cm receiver which has a bandwidth of 32
197: MHz centered at 436 MHz; combination of the 20-cm and 70-cm TOAs
198: resulted in an improved DM for these pulsars. For each pulsar, several
199: observations having high S/N were folded at two and three times the
200: nominal period in order to uncover detection by the survey analysis
201: software of a harmonic of the true pulse frequency --- this procedure
202: revealed two pulsars that had mis-identified periods from the survey
203: analysis.
204:
205: \section{Results}
206: The procedures described above resulted in the detection of 14 previously
207: unknown pulsars, three toward the SMC and 11 toward the
208: LMC. Table~\ref{tb:par} lists the J2000 right ascension and
209: declination obtained from the timing analysis, the DM and its
210: ``z-component'', DM $\sin|b|$, where $b$ is the Galactic latitude,
211: which is useful for determining if the pulsar is within or outside the
212: Galactic electron layer, the mean flux density (averaged over the
213: pulse period) at 1400 MHz and the pulse width at 50\% of the peak
214: amplitude. Table~\ref{tb:ppar} gives other parameters derived from the
215: timing analysis, namely the barycentric pulse period, $P$, its first time
216: derivative, $\dot P$, the epoch of the period in Modified Julian Days,
217: the time-span of the data used in the timing fit, the number of TOAs fitted
218: and the post-fit rms timing residual. Estimated uncertainties given in
219: parentheses after parameter values are twice the {\sc tempo} rms
220: errors and refer to the last quoted digit. Mean flux densities were
221: estimated from the area under grand average profiles formed by summing
222: data from all timing observations (whether or not the pulsar was
223: detectable) using the derived timing model to phase-align the
224: profiles.
225:
226: PSR J0451$-$67 was detected just twice in two years of
227: timing observations and a coherent timing solution was not
228: possible. Grid observations were also unsuccessful, so that the quoted
229: position is that of the discovery beam and the uncertainties are the
230: half-power beam radius. The period given in Table~\ref{tb:ppar} was
231: obtained by splitting the best single observation into five parts of
232: equal duration and obtaining TOAs for each part; the quoted error
233: includes a contribution from the position uncertainty. A limit on the
234: period derivative was obtained by differencing the derived period and
235: that from the discovery observation on MJD 51816. The mean flux
236: density was estimated by taking the value for the best detection (on
237: MJD 52817) and dividing by $N^{1/2}$ where $N$ is the total number of
238: timing observations ($\sim 20$).
239:
240: \begin{deluxetable}{llllcrr}
241: \tablecaption{Parameters for Pulsars Discovered in this Survey\label{tb:par}}
242: \tablehead{
243: \colhead{PSR} & \colhead{RA (J2000)} & \colhead{Dec. (J2000)} & \colhead{DM} &
244: \colhead{DM$\sin|b|$} & \colhead{S$_{1400}$} & \colhead{W$_{50}$} \\
245: & \colhead{(h m s)} & \colhead{($\degr$ $\arcmin$ $\arcsec$)} &
246: \colhead{(cm$^{-3}$ pc)} & \colhead{(cm$^{-3}$ pc)} & \colhead{(mJy)} & \colhead{(ms)}
247: }
248: \startdata
249: J0045$-$7042 & 00:45:25.69(17) & $-$70:42:07.1(13) & 70(3) & 50.7 & 0.11 & 19 \\
250: J0111$-$7131 & 01:11:28.77(9) & $-$71:31:46.8(6) & 76(3) & 54.2 & 0.06 & 13 \\
251: J0131$-$7310 & 01:31:28.51(3) & $-$73:10:09.34(13) & 205.2(7)&141.6 & 0.15 & 4.8 \\
252: J0449$-$7031 & 04:49:05.67(5) & $-$70:31:31.7(3) & 65.83(7)\tablenotemark{*}& 38.2 & 0.14 & 7.9 \\
253: J0451$-$67 & 04:51:50(70) & $-$67:18(7) & 45(1) & 26.6 & $\lesssim 0.05$ & 5.5 \\
254: J0456$-$7031 & 04:56:02.5(3) & $-$70:31:06.6(12) & 100.3(3)\tablenotemark{*}& 57.5 & 0.05 & 8 \\
255: J0457$-$6337 & 04:57:07.79(8) & $-$63:37:30.4(9) & 27.5(10)& 16.4 & 0.18 & 36 \\
256: J0511$-$6508 & 05:11:56.50(2) & $-$65:08:36.5(3) & 25.66(8)\tablenotemark{*}& 14.6 & 0.70 & 12 \\
257: J0519$-$6932 & 05:19:46.917(12)& $-$69:32:23.48(7) & 119.4(5)& 65.5 & 0.32 & 4.1 \\
258: J0522$-$6847 & 05:22:23.06(8) & $-$68:47:02.2(3) &126.45(7)\tablenotemark{*}& 69.2 & 0.19 & 12 \\
259: J0532$-$6639 & 05:32:59.51(6) & $-$66:39:37.3(5) & 69.3(18)& 37.2 & 0.08 & 9 \\
260: J0534$-$6703 & 05:34:36.17(10) & $-$67:03:48.8(8) & 94.7(12)& 50.6 & 0.08 & 25 \\
261: J0543$-$6851 & 05:43:52.71(11) & $-$68:51:25.3(9) & 131(4) & 67.9 & 0.22 & 58 \\
262: J0555$-$7056 & 05:55:01.85(12) & $-$70:56:45.6(6) & 73.4(16)& 36.8 & 0.21 & 27 \\
263: \enddata
264: \tablenotetext{*}{70-cm and 20-cm data used for DM determination.}
265: \end{deluxetable}
266:
267: \begin{deluxetable}{lllllrc}
268: \tablecaption{Period Parameters for Pulsars Discovered in this Survey\label{tb:ppar}}
269: \tablehead{
270: \colhead{PSR} & \colhead{$P$} & \colhead{$\dot P$} & \colhead{Epoch} &
271: \colhead{Data Span} & \colhead{$N_{\rm TOA}$} & \colhead{Residual}\\
272: & \colhead{(s)} & \colhead{($10^{-15}$)} & \colhead{MJD} &
273: \colhead{MJD} & & \colhead{(ms)}
274: }
275: \startdata
276: J0045$-$7042 & 0.63233580002(6) & 2.49(3) & 52407.0 & 52189 -- 52642 & 17 & 1.54 \\
277: J0111$-$7131 & 0.68854151164(5) & 7.092(4) & 52369.0 & 52041 -- 52695 & 15 & 1.14 \\
278: J0131$-$7310 & 0.348124045581(7) & 1.7614(7) & 52335.0 & 52038 -- 52631 & 24 & 0.40 \\
279: J0449$-$7031 & 0.479163971291(14)& 3.371(4) & 52465.0 & 52233 -- 52695 & 20 & 0.51 \\
280: J0451$-$67\tablenotemark{a} & 0.24545429(7) & $<2$ & 52817.0 & 52817
281: -- 52818 & 5 & 0.80 \\
282: J0456$-$7031 & 0.80013207321(10) & 36.70(3) & 52560.0 & 52316 -- 52804 & 15 & 2.25 \\
283: J0457$-$6337 & 2.49701169613(19) & 0.21(3) & 52465.0 & 52189 -- 52739 & 8 & 0.75 \\
284: J0511$-$6508 & 0.322061827468(8) & 0.206(4) & 52409.0 & 52189 -- 52628 & 27 & 0.29 \\
285: J0519$-$6932 & 0.263211634568(3) & 0.6968(5) & 52466.0 & 52237 -- 52695 & 26 & 0.20 \\
286: J0522$-$6847 & 0.67453190906(3) & 17.727(14)& 52503.0& 52311 -- 52695 & 16 & 0.29 \\
287: J0532$-$6639 & 0.64274275093(3) & 5.354(13) & 52462.0 & 52259 -- 52664 & 14 & 0.58 \\
288: J0534$-$6703 & 1.81756503106(17) & 425.05(6) & 52410.0 & 52195 -- 52624 & 16 & 0.65 \\
289: J0543$-$6851 & 0.70895418575(6) & 3.94(3) & 52410.0 & 52195 -- 52624 & 16 & 1.32 \\
290: J0555$-$7056 & 0.82783808575(7) & 5.96(3) & 52408.0 & 52190 -- 52624 & 16 & 0.84 \\
291: \enddata
292: \tablenotetext{a}{See text.}
293: \end{deluxetable}
294:
295: Mean pulse profiles at 1400 MHz for the 14 pulsars are shown in
296: Figure~\ref{fg:prf}; the whole pulse period is shown in each case.
297: These profiles were obtained by summing data from all observations of
298: a given pulsar where there was a detectable pulse and then correcting
299: for the effects of the high-pass filter in the digitization system;
300: see \citet{mlc+01} for details. Profiles were rotated to place the
301: pulse peak at phase 0.3 for display purposes. It is notable that, in
302: most cases, the mean pulse profiles are narrow and relatively simple
303: in form. The median duty cycle ($W_{50}/P$) for these pulsars is just
304: 0.015 (compared to 0.029 for the Galactic population) and the largest
305: (for PSR J0543$-$6851) is only 0.082. Only two pulsars, PSRs
306: J0543$-$6851 and J0555$-$7056, have clear evidence for multiple
307: components in the mean profile.
308:
309: \begin{figure}[ht]
310: \begin{tabular}{cccc}
311: \mbox{\psfig{file=f2a.eps,width=30mm,angle=270}} &
312: \mbox{\psfig{file=f2b.eps,width=30mm,angle=270}} &
313: \mbox{\psfig{file=f2c.eps,width=30mm,angle=270}} &
314: \mbox{\psfig{file=f2d.eps,width=30mm,angle=270}} \\
315: \mbox{\psfig{file=f2e.eps,width=30mm,angle=270}} &
316: \mbox{\psfig{file=f2f.eps,width=30mm,angle=270}} &
317: \mbox{\psfig{file=f2g.eps,width=30mm,angle=270}} &
318: \mbox{\psfig{file=f2h.eps,width=30mm,angle=270}} \\
319: \mbox{\psfig{file=f2i.eps,width=30mm,angle=270}} &
320: \mbox{\psfig{file=f2j.eps,width=30mm,angle=270}} &
321: \mbox{\psfig{file=f2k.eps,width=30mm,angle=270}} &
322: \mbox{\psfig{file=f2l.eps,width=30mm,angle=270}} \\
323: \mbox{\psfig{file=f2m.eps,width=30mm,angle=270}} &
324: \mbox{\psfig{file=f2n.eps,width=30mm,angle=270}}
325: \end{tabular}
326: \caption{Mean total intensity pulse profiles at 1400 MHz for the 14
327: pulsars discovered in this survey. The pulsar period and dispersion
328: measure are given on each plot below the name.}\label{fg:prf}
329: \end{figure}
330:
331: Five of the seven previously known radio pulsars in the Magellanic
332: Clouds were detected in the survey: PSRs J0045$-$7319, J0113$-$7220,
333: J0455$-$6915, J0502$-$6617 and J0529$-$6652. PSR J0540$-$6919 was well
334: below our detection threshold and PSR J0535$-$6935 has an estimated
335: 1400-MHz flux density of 0.05 mJy; neither pulsar was detected in the
336: survey. However, in an attempt to obtain a timing solution for PSR
337: J0535$-$6935, about 50 observations with the beam centered on the
338: nominal position and mostly with a duration of about 3 hours were made
339: between late 1998 and 2004 resulting in about 25 detections. The
340: period and DM giving the highest S/N for the pulse were determined for
341: each observation by searching over a small range in each
342: parameter. The derived periods showed a clear trend over the six
343: years. Although a coherent timing solution could not be found, a fit
344: of a straight line to the seven points having S/N greater than 8.0
345: gave $P$ = 0.20051133(2) s at MJD 52200 and $\dot P = 11.5(3)\times
346: 10^{-15}$ with an assumed position of R.A. 05$^{\rm h}$~35$^{\rm
347: m}$~00$^{\rm s}$, Dec. $-$69\degr~35\arcmin~00\arcsec. These values
348: are consistent with the period parameters quoted by \citet{ckm+01} for
349: this pulsar. Averaging the DM values for the seven high-S/N detections
350: gave a mean value of $93.7\pm0.4$ cm$^{-3}$ pc.
351:
352: \section{Discussion}
353: Of the 14 pulsars listed in Table~\ref{tb:par}, two have values of
354: DM~$\sin |b|$ significantly less than 25 cm$^{-3}$ pc. As discussed by
355: \citet{ckm+01} the distribution of DM~$\sin |b|$ for Galactic pulsars
356: extends to about this value, suggesting that these pulsars, PSRs
357: J0457$-$6337 and J0511$-$6508, probably lie within the disk of our
358: Galaxy. A third pulsar, PSR J0451$-$67, has a DM~$\sin |b|$ value
359: marginally above this limit, so its association is not clear. However,
360: only nine of the roughly 1500 known Galactic-disk pulsars have
361: DM~$\sin |b|$ greater than the value for PSR J0451$-$67.\footnote{Data
362: obtained from the ATNF Pulsar Catalogue, Version 1.24
363: (\url{http://www.atnf.csiro.au/research/pulsar/psrcat}; Manchester et
364: al. 2005).}\nocite{mhth05} Furthermore, of the eight globular
365: clusters containing known pulsars and with Galactic $z$-distances
366: greater than 3 kpc, only two have pulsars with DM~$\sin |b|$ values
367: greater than that for PSR J0451$-$67. We therefore conclude that it is
368: most probable that PSR J0451$-$67 lies in the LMC, most likely on the
369: near side. All other pulsars in Table~\ref{tb:par} have significantly
370: higher values of DM~$\sin |b|$ and are almost certainly associated
371: with the Magellanic Clouds.
372:
373: Figure~\ref{fg:smc_psrs} shows the positions of the three SMC pulsars
374: from Table~\ref{tb:par} together with the two previously known SMC
375: pulsars plotted on a greyscale image of the HI in the SMC. Two of the
376: newly discovered pulsars are within the HI distribution (at least in
377: projection) but the other, PSR J0045$-$7042 is outside the main HI
378: region. PSR J0131$-$7310 lies on the eastern edge of the imaged region
379: but is notable for having the highest DM and DM~$\sin |b|$ of any of
380: the Magellanic Cloud pulsars by a considerable
381: margin. Figure~\ref{fg:beams} shows that a considerable area further
382: to the east of PSR J0131$-$7310 was searched, but no pulsars were
383: detected there.
384:
385: Positions of newly discovered pulsars in the direction of the LMC and
386: previously known pulsars believed to be associated with the LMC are
387: shown in Figure~\ref{fg:lmc_psrs}. All the pulsars believed to be associated with
388: the LMC lie within the HI distribution. The two foreground pulsars lie
389: outside the main HI distribution to the north.
390:
391:
392: \begin{figure}[ht]
393: \plotone{f3r.eps}
394: \caption{Location of pulsars discovered in the SMC survey, marked by a
395: cross, overlaid on an image of the neutral hydrogen in the SMC
396: \citep{ssd+99}. Pulsars believed to be associated with the LMC,
397: including previously known pulsars, are marked by a
398: circle.}\label{fg:smc_psrs}
399: \end{figure}
400:
401: \begin{figure}[ht]
402: \plotone{f4r.eps}
403: \caption{Location of pulsars discovered in the LMC survey, marked by a
404: cross, overlaid on an image of the neutral hydrogen in the LMC
405: \citep{ksd+03}. Pulsars believed to be associated with the LMC,
406: including previously known pulsars, are marked by a
407: circle.}\label{fg:lmc_psrs}
408: \end{figure}
409:
410: No millisecond pulsars were discovered in the survey. This is not
411: surprising given the 1-ms sampling interval employed and the generally
412: lower radio luminosity of millisecond pulsars. However, two very
413: long-period pulsars were discovered (Table~\ref{tb:ppar}). One of
414: these, PSR J0457$-$6337, has a small period derivative and hence a
415: very large age, $\sim 190$ Myr. Although we do not believe this pulsar
416: to be associated with the LMC, it has a significant DM~$\sin |b|$
417: (Table~\ref{tb:par}) and must be located in the Galactic halo. Both of
418: the commonly used models for the Galactic electron density
419: \citep{tc93,cl02} place this (and PSR J0511$-$6508) at
420: or beyond the outer edge of the Galactic electron disk with
421: $z$-distances in excess of 1 kpc. The other long-period pulsar
422: discovered in the survey, PSR J0534$-$6703, is clearly associated with
423: the LMC and is notable for its very large period derivative
424: (Table~\ref{tb:ppar}). This pulsar is relatively young ($\tau_c =
425: P/2\dot P \sim 68$ kyr) and has a very strong implied surface dipole
426: magnetic field, $B_s = 3.2\times 10^{19} (P\dot P)^{1/2} \;{\rm G} \sim
427: 2.8\times 10^{13}$ G. Only ten radio pulsars have a greater surface
428: dipole magnetic field based on their observed period and period
429: derivative.
430:
431: Table~\ref{tb:prop} lists the 20 known spin-powered pulsars believed
432: to be associated with the Magellanic Clouds, 12 of which were
433: discovered in the present survey. The table lists the pulse period
434: $P$, the DM (except for PSR J0537$-$6910 which has not been detected
435: at radio wavelengths), the $\log_{10}$ of the characteristic age
436: $\tau_c$ in years, the mean pulsed flux density at 1400 MHz
437: $S_{1400}$, the monochromatic radio luminosity at 1400 MHz $L_{1400} =
438: S_{1400} d^2$, where $d$ is the pulsar distance, the discovery
439: reference and the reference for the flux density measurement. The
440: distance $d$ is assumed to be 50 kpc in all cases; this is reasonable,
441: since the actual distances are not reliably known. In any case,
442: uncertainties in the luminosities are contributed to, if not dominated
443: by, uncertainties in the mean flux densities.
444:
445: \begin{deluxetable}{llccccccc}
446: \tablecaption{Properties of Magellanic Cloud Pulsars\label{tb:prop}}
447: \tablehead{
448: \colhead{JName} & \colhead{BName} & \colhead{$P$} & \colhead{DM} & \colhead{log($\tau_c$)} &
449: \colhead{$S_{1400}$} & \colhead{$L_{1400}$} & \colhead{Disc.} & \colhead{$S_{1400}$} \\
450: & & \colhead{(s)} & \colhead{(cm$^{-3}$ pc)} & & \colhead{(mJy)} & \colhead{(mJy kpc$^2$)} &
451: \colhead{Ref.} & \colhead{Ref.} }
452: \startdata
453: J0045$-$7042 & \nodata & 0.6323 & 70.0 & 6.60 & 0.11 & 275 & 1 & 1 \\
454: J0045$-$7319 & \nodata & 0.9262 & 105.4 & 6.51 & 0.3 & 750 & 2 & 3 \\
455: J0111$-$7131 & \nodata & 0.6885 & 76.0 & 6.18 & 0.06 & 150 & 1 & 1 \\
456: J0113$-$7220 & \nodata & 0.3258 & 125.4 & 6.02 & 0.4 & 1000& 3 & 3 \\
457: J0131$-$7310 & \nodata & 0.3481 & 205.2 & 6.49 & 0.15 & 375 & 1 & 1 \\
458: J0449$-$7031 & \nodata & 0.4791 & 65.8 & 6.35 & 0.14 & 350 & 1 & 1 \\
459: J0451$-$67 & \nodata & 0.2454 & 45 & $>6.2$ & $\lesssim 0.05$& $\lesssim 125$ & 1 & 1 \\
460: J0455$-$6951 & B0456$-$69 & 0.3204 & 94.8 & 5.69 & 0.25\tablenotemark{*} & 625 & 2 & 2 \\
461: J0456$-$7031 & \nodata & 0.8001 & 100.3 & 5.53 & 0.05 & 125 & 1 & 1 \\
462: J0502$-$6617 & B0502$-$66 & 0.6912 & 68.9 & 5.67 & 0.25\tablenotemark{*} & 625 & 2 & 2 \\
463: J0519$-$6932 & \nodata & 0.2632 & 119.4 & 6.77 & 0.32 & 800 & 1 & 1 \\
464: J0522$-$6847 & \nodata & 0.6745 & 126.4 & 5.78 & 0.19 & 475 & 1 & 1 \\
465: J0529$-$6652 & B0529$-$66 & 0.9757 & 103.2 & 6.00 & 0.3 & 750 & 4 & 3 \\
466: J0532$-$6639 & \nodata & 0.6427 & 69.3 & 6.28 & 0.08 & 200 & 1 & 1 \\
467: J0534$-$6703 & \nodata & 1.8175 & 94.7 & 4.83 & 0.08 & 200 & 1 & 1 \\
468: J0535$-$6935 & \nodata & 0.2005 & 89.4 & 5.44 & 0.05 & 125 & 3 & 3 \\
469: J0537$-$6910 & \nodata & 0.0161 &\nodata& 3.69 &$<0.01$ & $<25$ & 5 & 6 \\
470: J0540$-$6919 & B0540$-$69 & 0.0505 & 146.5 & 3.22 & 0.024 & 60 & 7 & 8 \\
471: J0543$-$6851 & \nodata & 0.7089 & 131.0 & 6.45 & 0.22 & 550 & 1 & 1 \\
472: J0555$-$7056 & \nodata & 0.8278 & 73.4 & 6.34 & 0.21 & 525 & 1 & 1 \\
473: \enddata
474: \tablenotetext{*}{From $S_{610}$ assuming a spectral index of $-1.8$}
475: \tablecomments{References: (1) This paper; (2) \citet{mmh+91}; (3)
476: \citet{ckm+01}; (4) \citet{mhah83}; (5) \citet{mgz+98}; (6)
477: \citet{cmj+05}; (7) \citet{shh84}; (8) \citet{jrmz04}.}
478: \end{deluxetable}
479:
480: Based on the observed pulsar positions and DMs, we can estimate the
481: free-electron content of the two Clouds. For the SMC and LMC
482: separately, we first subtract a Galactic contribution, $25/\sin |b|$
483: cm$^{-3}$ pc from the DM for each pulsar and compute the mean value of
484: the Cloud DMs, obtaining $\langle DM\rangle = 80.9$ cm$^{-3}$ pc for
485: the SMC and 49.5 cm$^{-3}$ pc for the LMC. If we assume pulsars are
486: uniformly distributed through a roughly spherical volume for each
487: Cloud, the total integrated electron content across the Cloud is twice
488: the mean value or approximately 160 cm$^{-3}$ pc ($\sim 5\times
489: 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$) for the SMC and 100 cm$^{-3}$ pc ($\sim 3\times
490: 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$) for the LMC. We also estimate the mean electron
491: density in each cloud by computing the rms dispersion of the Cloud
492: DMs, 48.2 cm$^{-3}$ pc and 26.8 cm$^{-3}$ pc for the SMC and LMC
493: respectively, and dividing this by the (one-dimensional) rms
494: dispersion of the pulsar spatial coordinates in the right ascension
495: and declination directions (assuming a mean distance of 50 kpc and
496: that the offsets in the two directions are independent), 1025 pc and
497: 1480 pc respectively. This procedure gave mean electron densities of
498: 0.047 cm$^{-3}$ for the SMC and 0.018 cm$^{-3}$ for the LMC. We are
499: somewhat limited by small-number statistics in the conclusions that we
500: can draw from these results. For example, the relatively large values
501: for the SMC may simply be a consequence of PSR J0131$-$7310 lying
502: behind a dense HII region. Never-the-less, the results indicate that
503: the mean free electron density in the Magellanic Clouds is similar to
504: that in the disk of our Galaxy, possibly with a somewhat higher value
505: in the SMC and a somewhat lower value in the LMC. These results show
506: that the Magellanic Clouds have a much higher proportion of stars
507: contributing to ionization of the interstellar medium compared to the
508: Galaxy, consistent with the much higher per-unit-mass star-formation
509: rates in the Clouds \citep[e.g.,][]{ggs03}.
510:
511: Despite the lack of an electron density model for the Magellanic
512: Clouds, the relative distance uncertainties are small for the
513: Magellanic Cloud pulsars compared to those in our Galaxy. Therefore
514: Magellanic Cloud pulsars give a more reliable estimation of the
515: luminosity and its dependence on various parameters than can be
516: obtained from Galactic pulsars. Figure~\ref{fg:lum_distr} shows the
517: 1400 MHz radio luminosity for pulsars in the Galactic disk and the
518: Magellanic Cloud plotted against pulsar period (left) and
519: characteristic age (right). The approximately 1000 Galactic pulsars
520: plotted in these figures exclude apparently recycled pulsars,
521: identified by having $B_s < 3\times 10^{10}$~G, as well as pulsars in
522: globular clusters. The Magellanic Cloud pulsars are typically of
523: higher radio luminosity than Galactic pulsars. This is simply a result
524: of the limited sensitivity of radio surveys combined with the greater
525: distance of the Magellanic Cloud pulsars.
526:
527: Although the number of Magellanic Cloud pulsars remains relatively
528: small, they do cover significant ranges of both pulse period and
529: age. The maximum observed period is 1.82~s and more than half the ages
530: are greater than $10^6$ years. Figure~\ref{fg:lum_distr} shows that
531: there is little or no significant dependence of radio luminosity on
532: either pulsar period or age. This remains true even if PSR
533: J0537$-$6910 and PSR J0540$-$6919, neither of which was discovered in
534: radio surveys, are disregarded. Indeed, if anything, there is a weak
535: positive correlation of radio luminosity with characteristic age!
536: This suggests that the emitted radio power is not greatly dependent on
537: pulsar period or age and that other factors dominate the observed
538: luminosity. It is worth noting that, assuming radiation into a beam of
539: angular width equal to the observed pulse width, the radio luminosity
540: is a tiny fraction, typically $10^{-4}$, of the spin-down luminosity.
541:
542: The true radio luminosity may be substantially underestimated if only
543: the outer part of the radio beam sweeps across the
544: Earth. Unfortunately, there is little known about the pulse
545: polarization of the Magellanic Cloud pulsars, so no estimates of
546: offsets of our viewing angle from the beam center are
547: available. However, experience with Galactic pulsars shows that, even
548: when these data are available, our poor understanding of radio beam
549: shapes precludes making reliable corrections for these offsets
550: \citep[cf.][]{tm98}. The narrow and relatively simple pulse profiles
551: observed for most of the pulsars suggests that the observed emission
552: is core-dominated, but this remains to be confirmed by polarization
553: and spectral measurements. As mentioned in \S3, the median duty cycle
554: ($w$) for pulsars detected in this survey, 0.015, is considerably less
555: than the median value for the Galactic population, 0.029 (0.028 if
556: millisecond pulsars are excluded). Since the Magellanic Cloud pulsars
557: are all of high radio luminosity, this might suggest a correlation
558: between luminosity and duty cycle, but no such correlation exists in
559: the known Galactic population. It is more likely that the low median
560: duty cycle is a selection effect resulting from the fact that the
561: limiting flux density is proportional to $w^{1/2}$ for small $w$. It
562: is easier to detect pulsars of a given mean flux density if they have
563: a small duty cycle. This effect is significant when a large fraction
564: of the sample is close to the detection threshold.
565:
566: The two shortest-period and youngest known Magellanic Cloud pulsars
567: were both first detected at X-ray wavelengths. Both have low radio
568: luminosities, with only an upper limit for PSR J0537$-$6910. It is
569: quite possible that the radio beam for both of these pulsars misses or
570: largely misses the Earth, implying that the X-ray beam either covers a
571: wider range of pulsar latitude than the radio beam or is less patchy.
572:
573: \begin{figure}[ht]
574: \plottwo{f5a.eps}{f5b.eps}
575: \caption{Plot of 1400 MHz radio luminosity for non-recycled pulsars in
576: the Galactic disk (dots) and Magellanic Clouds (filled circles) versus
577: pulsar period (left) and characteristic age (right). Parameters for
578: Galactic pulsars were obtained from the ATNF Pulsar
579: Catalogue.}\label{fg:lum_distr}
580: \end{figure}
581:
582: Figure~\ref{fg:lumfn} shows the distribution of observed radio
583: luminosities for Galactic and Magellanic Cloud pulsars. This figure
584: clearly illustrates the effect of selection against low flux densities
585: in radio pulsar surveys. For luminosities above about 30 mJy kpc$^2$
586: for Galactic pulsars and 300 mJy kpc$^2$ for Magellanic Cloud pulsars,
587: the effect of selection is less and the distribution approximates the
588: intrinsic luminosity function of pulsars, which in this plot of $d\log
589: N/d\log L$ has a slope of about $-1$ \citep{lor04}. Although we are
590: still limited by small-number statistics, there is no evidence that
591: the Magellanic Cloud pulsars have a different luminosity function from
592: their Galactic counterparts.
593:
594:
595: \begin{figure}[ht]
596: \plotone{f6.eps}
597: \caption{Observed distribution of 1400 MHz radio luminosities for the
598: Magellanic Cloud pulsars (hatched) and Galactic disk pulsars. The
599: Magellanic Cloud pulsar with the lowest luminosity is PSR
600: J0540$-$6919 (shown with different hatching) which was discovered at
601: X-ray wavelengths and subsequently detected at radio
602: wavelengths.}\label{fg:lumfn}
603: \end{figure}
604:
605: \section{Conclusions}
606: An extensive survey of the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds for radio
607: pulsars using the Parkes radio telescope at 1400 MHz has resulted in
608: the discovery of 14 pulsars, 12 of which are believed to be associated
609: with the Clouds. The average limiting flux density of the survey was
610: about 0.12 mJy. In general, the associated pulsars appear to be
611: located in the more central regions of each Cloud where there is
612: significant HI emission. Two long-period pulsars were discovered, one
613: of which appears to be a very old pulsar located in the Galactic halo;
614: the other is notable for its very strong implied surface dipole
615: magnetic field.
616:
617: This survey brings the number of spin-powered pulsars believed to be
618: associated with the Magellanic Clouds to 20. Mean free electron
619: densities averaged over the volume of the Clouds are similar to those
620: in the disk of our Galaxy. Observed luminosities are at the high end
621: of the luminosity function observed for Galactic pulsars but
622: consistent with it. Despite the observed pulse periods and ages
623: covering relatively wide ranges, there is little or no correlation of
624: radio luminosity with either of these parameters.
625:
626: It will be difficult to significantly improve on this survey with
627: existing instrumentation as the required observation times are too
628: long to be feasible. Although searches for extra-galactic pulsars at
629: relatively low frequencies with large radio telescopes such as Arecibo
630: may have some success, any major increase in the their number will
631: most probably have to wait until the advent of instruments of much
632: larger collecting area, for example, the proposed Square Kilometer
633: Array.
634:
635:
636: \section*{Acknowledgments}
637: We thank our colleagues for assistance, especially with the timing
638: observations. The Parkes telescope is part of the Australia Telescope
639: which is funded by the Commonwealth Government for operation as a
640: National Facility managed by CSIRO.
641:
642:
643: %\bibliographystyle{apj}
644: %\bibliography{journals,modrefs,psrrefs,crossrefs}
645:
646: \begin{thebibliography}{25}
647: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
648:
649: \bibitem[{Bell {et~al.}(1995)Bell, Bessell, Stappers, Bailes, \&
650: Kaspi}]{bbs+95}
651: Bell, J.~F., Bessell, M.~S., Stappers, B.~W., Bailes, M., \& Kaspi, V.~M. 1995,
652: ApJ, 447, L117
653:
654: \bibitem[{{Cordes} \& {Lazio}(2002)}]{cl02}
655: {Cordes}, J.~M. \& {Lazio}, T.~J.~W. 2002, {astro-ph/0207156}
656:
657: \bibitem[{{Crawford} {et~al.}(2001){Crawford}, {Kaspi}, {Manchester}, {Lyne},
658: {Camilo}, \& {D'Amico}}]{ckm+01}
659: {Crawford}, F., {Kaspi}, V.~M., {Manchester}, R.~N., {Lyne}, A.~G., {Camilo},
660: F., \& {D'Amico}, N. 2001, ApJ, 553, 367
661:
662: \bibitem[{{Crawford} {et~al.}(2005){Crawford}, {McLaughlin}, {Johnston},
663: {Romani}, \& {Sorrelgreen}}]{cmj+05}
664: {Crawford}, F., {McLaughlin}, M., {Johnston}, S., {Romani}, R., \&
665: {Sorrelgreen}, E. 2005, Adv. Space Res., 35, 1181
666:
667: \bibitem[{{Grimm} {et~al.}(2003){Grimm}, {Gilfanov}, \& {Sunyaev}}]{ggs03}
668: {Grimm}, H.-J., {Gilfanov}, M., \& {Sunyaev}, R. 2003, MNRAS, 339, 793
669:
670: \bibitem[{{Hotan} {et~al.}(2004){Hotan}, {van Straten}, \&
671: {Manchester}}]{hvm04}
672: {Hotan}, A.~W., {van Straten}, W., \& {Manchester}, R.~N. 2004, PASA, 21, 302
673:
674: \bibitem[{Johnston \& Romani(2003)}]{jr03}
675: Johnston, S. \& Romani, R. 2003, ApJ, 590, L95
676:
677: \bibitem[{{Johnston} {et~al.}(2004){Johnston}, {Romani}, {Marshall}, \&
678: {Zhang}}]{jrmz04}
679: {Johnston}, S., {Romani}, R.~W., {Marshall}, F.~E., \& {Zhang}, W. 2004, MNRAS,
680: 355, 31
681:
682: \bibitem[{Kaspi {et~al.}(1994)Kaspi, Johnston, Bell, Manchester, Bailes,
683: Bessell, Lyne, \& D'Amico}]{kjb+94}
684: Kaspi, V.~M., Johnston, S., Bell, J.~F., Manchester, R.~N., Bailes, M.,
685: Bessell, M., Lyne, A.~G., \& D'Amico, N. 1994, ApJ, 423, L43
686:
687: \bibitem[{Kim {et~al.}(2003)Kim, Staveley-Smith, Dopita, Sault, Freeman, Lee,
688: \& Chu}]{ksd+03}
689: Kim, S., Staveley-Smith, L., Dopita, M.~A., Sault, R.~J., Freeman, K.~C., Lee,
690: Y., \& Chu, Y.-H. 2003, ApJS, 148, 473
691:
692: \bibitem[{{Lorimer}(2004)}]{lor04}
693: {Lorimer}, D.~R. 2004, in Young Neutron Stars and Their Environments, {IAU}
694: Symposium 218, ed. F.~Camilo \& B.~M. Gaensler (San Francisco: Astronomical
695: Society of the Pacific), 105
696:
697: \bibitem[{{Manchester} {et~al.}(2005){Manchester}, {Hobbs}, {Teoh}, \&
698: {Hobbs}}]{mhth05}
699: {Manchester}, R.~N., {Hobbs}, G.~B., {Teoh}, A., \& {Hobbs}, M. 2005, AJ, 129,
700: 1993
701:
702: \bibitem[{Manchester {et~al.}(2001)Manchester, Lyne, Camilo, Bell, Kaspi,
703: D'Amico, McKay, Crawford, Stairs, Possenti, Morris, \& Sheppard}]{mlc+01}
704: Manchester, R.~N., Lyne, A.~G., Camilo, F., Bell, J.~F., Kaspi, V.~M., D'Amico,
705: N., McKay, N. P.~F., Crawford, F., Stairs, I.~H., Possenti, A., Morris,
706: D.~J., \& Sheppard, D.~C. 2001, MNRAS, 328, 17
707:
708: \bibitem[{Manchester {et~al.}(1993{\natexlab{a}})Manchester, Mar, Lyne, Kaspi,
709: \& Johnston}]{mml+93}
710: Manchester, R.~N., Mar, D., Lyne, A.~G., Kaspi, V.~M., \& Johnston, S.
711: 1993{\natexlab{a}}, ApJ, 403, L29
712:
713: \bibitem[{Manchester {et~al.}(1993{\natexlab{b}})Manchester, Staveley-Smith, \&
714: Kesteven}]{msk93}
715: Manchester, R.~N., Staveley-Smith, L., \& Kesteven, M.~J. 1993{\natexlab{b}},
716: ApJ, 411, 756
717:
718: \bibitem[{{Maron} {et~al.}(2000){Maron}, {Kijak}, {Kramer}, \&
719: {Wielebinski}}]{mkkw00a}
720: {Maron}, O., {Kijak}, J., {Kramer}, M., \& {Wielebinski}, R. 2000, A\&AS, 147,
721: 195
722:
723: \bibitem[{Marshall {et~al.}(1998)Marshall, Gotthelf, Zhang, Middleditch, \&
724: Wang}]{mgz+98}
725: Marshall, F.~E., Gotthelf, E.~V., Zhang, W., Middleditch, J., \& Wang, Q.~D.
726: 1998, ApJ, 499, L179
727:
728: \bibitem[{McConnell {et~al.}(1991)McConnell, McCulloch, Hamilton, Ables, Hall,
729: Jacka, \& Hunt}]{mmh+91}
730: McConnell, D., McCulloch, P.~M., Hamilton, P.~A., Ables, J.~G., Hall, P.~J.,
731: Jacka, C.~E., \& Hunt, A.~J. 1991, MNRAS, 249, 654
732:
733: \bibitem[{McCulloch {et~al.}(1983)McCulloch, Hamilton, Ables, \& Hunt}]{mhah83}
734: McCulloch, P.~M., Hamilton, P.~A., Ables, J.~G., \& Hunt, A.~J. 1983, Nature,
735: 303, 307
736:
737: \bibitem[{Seward {et~al.}(1984)Seward, Harnden, \& Helfand}]{shh84}
738: Seward, F.~D., Harnden, F.~R., \& Helfand, D.~J. 1984, ApJ, 287, L19
739:
740: \bibitem[{Standish(1990)}]{sta90}
741: Standish, E.~M. 1990, A\&A, 233, 252
742:
743: \bibitem[{Stanimirovi\'{c} {et~al.}(1999)Stanimirovi\'{c}, Staveley-Smith,
744: Dickey, Sault, \& Snowden}]{ssd+99}
745: Stanimirovi\'{c}, S., Staveley-Smith, L., Dickey, J.~M., Sault, R.~J., \&
746: Snowden, S.~L. 1999, MNRAS, 302, 417
747:
748: \bibitem[{Staveley-Smith {et~al.}(1996)Staveley-Smith, Wilson, Bird, Disney,
749: Ekers, Freeman, Haynes, Sinclair, Vaile, Webster, \& Wright}]{swb+96}
750: Staveley-Smith, L., Wilson, W.~E., Bird, T.~S., Disney, M.~J., Ekers, R.~D.,
751: Freeman, K.~C., Haynes, R.~F., Sinclair, M.~W., Vaile, R.~A., Webster, R.~L.,
752: \& Wright, A.~E. 1996, PASA, 13, 243
753:
754: \bibitem[{Tauris \& Manchester(1998)}]{tm98}
755: Tauris, T.~M. \& Manchester, R.~N. 1998, MNRAS, 298, 625
756:
757: \bibitem[{Taylor \& Cordes(1993)}]{tc93}
758: Taylor, J.~H. \& Cordes, J.~M. 1993, ApJ, 411, 674
759:
760: \end{thebibliography}
761:
762: \end{document}
763:
764: