1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
3:
4:
5: \slugcomment{}
6:
7: \shorttitle{3-D structure and distance of NGC 6781}
8: \shortauthors{Schwarz and Monteiro}
9:
10:
11: \begin{document}
12: \title{3-D Photoionization Structure and Distances of
13: Planetary Nebulae III. NGC 6781}
14:
15: \author{Hugo E. Schwarz$^1$, Hektor Monteiro$^{1,2}$}
16: \affil{1 Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory\altaffilmark{1},
17: Casilla 603, Colina El Pino S/N, La Serena, Chile}
18:
19: \affil{2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University,
20: 1, Park Place South, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA}
21:
22:
23: \altaffiltext{1}{Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, National
24: Optical Astronomy Observatory, operated by the Association of Universities for
25: Research in Astronomy, Inc., under a cooperative agreement with the
26: National Science Foundation.}
27:
28: \begin{abstract}
29:
30: Continuing our series of papers on the three-dimensional (3-D)
31: structures of and accurate distances to Planetary Nebulae (PNe), we
32: present our study of the planetary nebula NGC\,6781. For this object
33: we construct a 3-D photoionization model and, using the constraints
34: provided by observational data from the literature we determine the
35: detailed 3-D structure of the nebula, the physical parameters of the
36: ionizing source and the first precise distance. The procedure consists
37: in simultaneously fitting all the observed emission line morphologies,
38: integrated intensities and the 2-D density map from the [SII] line
39: ratios to the parameters generated by the model, and in an iterative
40: way obtain the best fit for the central star parameters and the
41: distance to NGC\,6781, obtaining values of 950\,$\pm$\,143\,pc and
42: 385\,L$_{\odot}$ for the distance and luminosity of the central star
43: respectively. Using theoretical evolutionary tracks of intermediate
44: and low mass stars, we derive the mass of the central star of
45: NGC\,6781 and its progenitor to be $0.60\,\pm0.03\,M_{\odot}$ and
46: $1.5\,\pm0.5\,M_{\odot}$ respectively.
47:
48: \end{abstract}
49:
50: \keywords{Planetary Nebula -- Interstellar medium -- photoionization
51: modeling}
52:
53: \section{Introduction}
54:
55: Planetary nebulae are the end products of the evolution of stars with
56: masses below about $8 M_{\odot}$ (\cite{P84} and \cite{IR83}). The
57: importance of these objects extends beyond the understanding of how
58: the outer layers of stars end up forming the many observed
59: morphologies. Indeed, PNe have been used for many purposes, from
60: understanding basic atomic and plasma processes (\cite{A87}) to
61: determining chemical evolution of our Galaxy (\cite{MC03}). Recently
62: PNe are also being used to study galaxies other than our own,
63: providing powerful tools to determine distances, kinematics and
64: chemical properties of external galaxies (\cite{C03}) and even to
65: trace inter-cluster material as in \cite{FCJD04}. PNe have the
66: advantage that they are observable out to large distances due to their
67: luminous narrow emission lines, especially [OIII]500.7nm, being
68: useful also as standard candles through the use of the PN luminosity
69: function (for extensive discussion see \cite{JCF99}.
70:
71: One of the most important problems in observational Galactic PNe
72: research is the difficulty in determining their distances and
73: three-dimensional structures. Observations always produce a 2-D
74: projection of their 3-D structure, and recovering the original
75: structure is not trivial. This is also made worse by the fact that
76: only crude distances, usually obtained from statistical methods on
77: large samples, can be determined. Large uncertainties are generated
78: by the need to assume constancy of one parameter such as the nebular
79: size, (ionized) mass, flux etc. so that typical errors in the
80: distances to individual objects are of the order of a factor of 3 or
81: more. Very few nebulae have had individual accurate distances
82: determined.
83:
84: Historically, PNe have been studied with empirical methods and one
85: dimensional photoionization models, leading to the above mentioned
86: problems. In contrast to this, our technique developed and described in
87: \cite{MSGH04} provides precise, self-consistently determined
88: distances, as well as the physical parameters for the central star and
89: gaseous nebula, for objects with sufficient observational
90: constraints. These objects can provide valuable calibration for
91: existing distance scales as well as self-consistently determined
92: physical and chemical quantities. For a detailed description of our
93: novel method see our previously published papers in this series and
94: especially the extensive explanatory appendix in the second paper
95: \cite{MSGGH05}.
96:
97: In this work we focus on the PN NGC\,6781 (RA 19$^h$ 18$^m$ 28$^s$
98: Dec. +06$^o$ 32' 19'' 2000.) shown in Figure\,\ref{imagen6781}. This
99: is a PN whose main structure is observed as a 130'' diameter bright
100: shell of low ellipticity, double in parts and with fainter lobes
101: emanating at the N-S ends where the ring is double and fainter. The
102: ring is brighter in the E-W directions as also shown in Figure\,1 of
103: \cite{MPPS01}. Their image is available as a fits file on the web at
104: http://www.ing.iac.es/~rcorradi and our Figure\,\ref{imagen6781} has been produced
105: using this image.
106:
107: \begin{figure}[ht]
108: \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{f1.ps}
109: \caption{Narrowband image of NGC\,6781 in the light of the [NII]658.4nm
110: line. Image produced from the original of \cite{MPPS01}. \label{imagen6781}}
111: \end{figure}
112:
113:
114: \cite{MPPS01} claim a possible faint halo extending out to about 3' by 4'
115: surrounding NGC\,6781. Note that \cite{CSSP03} list the object in
116: their paper on the search for faint haloes around bright PNe, but do
117: not make any statement about having detected a halo according to their
118: criteria, which include the candidate halo having to be limb
119: brightened and\/or detached. The halo of \cite{MPPS01} is not limb
120: brightened and more likely to be the result of scattered light in the
121: instrument.
122:
123: For a more detailed discussion of the morphology of NGC\,6781 based on
124: a set of narrow band images, as well as density, temperature, and
125: extinction maps see \cite{MPPS01}.
126:
127: An estimate for the luminosity, temperature, and mass of the CS of
128: NGC\,6781 based on statistical analysis is 127\,L$_{\odot}$, 105\,kK,
129: and 0.6\,M$_{\odot}$, respectively, taken from \cite{SVMG02}. The
130: average distance of the 12 literature values we found in \cite{AO92}
131: is 946\,pc with the individual values ranging from 500 to 1600\,pc, a
132: factor of more than three.
133:
134: \begin{figure}[ht]
135:
136: \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{f2.ps}
137:
138: \caption{
139: The graph shows the Spectral Energy Distribution (SED) of NGC\,6781 over more
140: than five decades of wavelength interval. All values were obtained from
141: the literature. The dotted curve is a combined blackbody and continuum
142: radiation fit to the data. \label{sed6781}}
143: \end{figure}
144:
145: The Spectral Energy Distribution (SED) $\lambda$F($\lambda$) of
146: NGC\,6781 shows a broad blackbody-like spectrum between about 1 and
147: 100\,$\mu$m, a radio tail out to 12\,cm, and a rise toward the blue
148: which probably comes from the hot central star. Integrating the F($\lambda$) curve we
149: obtain a luminosity of L = 166\,d$^2$\,(kpc) L$_{\odot}$. The
150: luminosity of NGC\,6781 is therefore 150\,L$_{\odot}$ at its distance
151: of 950\,pc. Applying the usual correction according to \cite{MY87} we
152: obtain L\,=\,225\L$_{\odot}$.
153:
154: Here we present our own modeling results using observational
155: data published in the literature as constraints and derive the 3-D
156: structure, chemical abundances, CS properties, and distance for
157: NGC\,6781 in a self-consistent manner.
158:
159: In \S2 we discuss the observational data used as constraints for the
160: models. In \S3 we present the model results generated by the 3-D
161: photoionization code, and we discuss the derived quantities. In \S4
162: we give our overall conclusions and discuss possible discrepancies
163: with other determinations of parameters for this nebula.
164:
165: \section{Observations}
166:
167: The observational data that we used to constrain our model for
168: NGC\,6781 were taken from the literature. \cite{MPPS01} presents narrow
169: band imaging of the nebula in the most important lines such as
170: H$\alpha$ ,H$\beta$, [OIII] and others. He also provides [SII] narrow
171: band images to obtain a spatially resolved density map, as well as the
172: H$\alpha$\/H$\beta$ extinction map of the nebula. We used their 2-D
173: density map to infer the 3-D density structure to be used as an input
174: for the photoionization model.
175:
176: \cite{LLLB04} present deep optical spectra of medium resolution for
177: NGC 6781 and 11 other planetary nebulae. The observations were carried
178: out with a long-slit spectrograph covering from 360 to 800\,nm and
179: include all important emission lines. Their observations are
180: particularly interesting because the objects were scanned with the
181: long-slit across the nebular surface by driving the telescope
182: differentially in right ascension. These observations then yield
183: average spectra for the whole nebula, which are in principle more
184: precise than single slit observations, and allow us to produce
185: emission line maps of the object. For details of the observations and
186: their reduction procedure as well as the full tables of line fluxes,
187: see \cite{LLLB04}. The most important lines used as constraints for
188: the model are listed in our Table\,\ref{mod-res} together with the
189: corresponding values from our model.
190:
191: We also used the H$\alpha$\,+\,[NII] image from \cite{MPPS01} to
192: determine the size of NGC\,6781 thus using it as one of the
193: constraints for the distance obtained in our model calculations.
194:
195: \section{Photoionization Models for NGC\,6781}
196:
197: The photoionization code we used for the study of NGC\,6781 is the
198: Mocassin code described in full detail in \cite{EBSL03}. This
199: code allows for the same possibilities as the code used previously in
200: \cite{MMGV00} but is more sophisticated in that the diffuse radiation is
201: fully taken into account in an efficient manner. The previous code
202: also had this ability but the associated increase in computational
203: time was prohibitive.
204:
205: The basic procedure adopted to study NGC\,6781 is the same,
206: independent of the code and has been fully described in the two
207: previous papers in this series (\cite{MSGH04} and (especially the
208: appendix of) \cite{MSGGH05}). In short, we gather as much
209: observational material as possible and use it to constrain our model
210: with many data simultaneously. Of particular interest are the total
211: line fluxes and line images corrected for reddening, and the line
212: diagnostic ratio maps. The structure adopted for the nebulae is
213: defined based on the observed density map, when available, or density
214: profiles from single slit observations plus the observed projected
215: morphology in several emission lines.
216:
217: In the case of NGC\,6781 in particular, the initial structure was
218: based on density maps published by \cite{MPPS01}. It is clear from the
219: images and density map (from the [SII] doublet ratio) presented here,
220: that the density is lower in the central region than in the
221: main bright ring. This indicates that the structure must have lower
222: density material in the line of sight of those regions and therefore
223: the best structure to reproduce the observed projected morphology is
224: an open ended structure or hour-glass shape, which we therefore adopt
225: for this object. It is also clear from the images in many narrow band
226: filters that the material is highly clumpy, so to reproduce this we
227: include random density fluctuations in the adopted structure. The
228: final adopted structure in its best fitting orientation on the sky is
229: presented in Figure\,\ref{strut6781}.
230:
231: \begin{figure}[ht]
232: \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{f3.ps}
233: \caption{The image shows an isodensity surface of the structure
234: adopted for NGC\,6781 in its final fitted spatial orientation
235: indicated in the upper left hand corner. \label{strut6781}}
236: \end{figure}
237:
238:
239: \section{Model Results}
240:
241: We present here the main results obtained from the photoionization
242: model constrained by the observational data. The integrated fluxes for
243: 12 emission lines are given in Table\,\ref{mod-res}, as well as the
244: fitted abundances and ionizing star parameters.
245:
246: The model fitting procedure which uses the model image size fitted to
247: the observed one for the line {[}NII{]}658.4nm, as well as the
248: absolute $H\beta$ flux, and the integrated fluxes of all other lines
249: gives a distance of 950$\pm$145\,pc for NGC\,6781. The error on this
250: distance has been computed in the same way as in our previous papers
251: in this series.
252:
253: \begin{table}[ht]
254: \begin{center}
255: \caption{Observed and model line fluxes and model central star
256: parameters for NGC\,6781.\label{mod-res}}
257: \begin{tabular}{lccc}\hline & {Observed} & {Model} & {Rel. Error} \\
258: \hline\hline
259: \\
260: {$T_*$ (K)} & {-} & {123kK} & {-} \\
261: {$L_*/L_{\odot}$} & {-} & {385} & {-} \\
262: {log\,($g_*$)} & {-} & {7.0} & {-} \\
263: {Distance (pc)} & 500\,-\,1600 & 950 & {$\pm$0.143} \\
264: {Density} & {100-1400} & {100-1400} & {-} \\
265: {He/H} & {-} & {$1.25\times 10^{-1}$} & {-} \\
266: {C/H} & {-} & {$5.95\times 10^{-4}$} & {-} \\
267: {N/H} & {-} & {$9.75\times 10^{-5}$} & {-} \\
268: {O/H} & {-} & {$3.50\times 10^{-4}$} & {-} \\
269: {Ne/H} & {-} & {$7.10\times 10^{-5}$} & {-} \\
270: {Ar/H} & {-} & {$2.26\times 10^{-6}$} & {-} \\
271: {S/H} & {-} & {$0.28\times 10^{-5}$} & {-} \\
272: {log($H\beta$)} & {-9.80} & {-9.84} & {-0.09} \\
273: {[NeIII]\,386.8$^{a}$}& {1.09} & {1.06} & {-0.03} \\
274: {[OIII]\,436.3} & {0.05} & {0.07} & {0.28} \\
275: {HeII\,468.6} & {0.09} & {0.09} & {0.02} \\
276: {[OIII]\,500.7} & {8.23} & {7.10} & {-0.14} \\
277: {[NII]\,575.5} & {0.07} & {0.07} & {0.07} \\
278: {HeI\,587.6} & {0.16} & {0.17} & {0.09} \\
279: {[OI]\,630.2} & {0.33} & {0.38} & {0.15} \\
280: {H$\alpha$656.3} & {2.65} & {2.86} & {0.08} \\
281: {[NII]\,658.4} & {3.96} & {3.88} & {-0.02} \\
282: {[SII]\,671.7} & {0.25} & {0.25} & {-0.01} \\
283: {[SII]\,673.1} & {0.21} & {0.21} & {0.00} \\
284:
285: \hline
286:
287: \end{tabular}
288: \end{center}
289: a) Value obtained by \cite{KSB97}
290: \end{table}
291:
292: In Fig. \ref{modims6781} we show the projected images obtained from
293: the fitted model. Notice that all major morphological features of the
294: object are well reproduced as well as the general ionization
295: stratification in the different emission lines. In particular the
296: images for [OIII]\,500.7 and HeII\,468.6 show very good agreement with
297: those obtained by \cite{MPPS01} as well as the more common
298: [NII]\,658.4\,nm and $H\alpha$.
299:
300:
301: \begin{figure*}[ht]
302:
303: %\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{figs_mod.ps}
304: \begin{center}
305: \includegraphics[scale=0.75]{f4.ps}
306:
307: \caption{
308: Images obtained from the projection at the observed angle of the data
309: cubes of emissivities computed by the photoionization code for the most
310: important emission lines. Compare these model images with the observed
311: images in \cite{MPPS01}. \label{modims6781} }
312: \end{center}
313: \end{figure*}
314:
315: Figure\,\ref{n2comp6781} shows the final model image for
316: [NII]\,658.4\,nm plotted in contours over the observed image by
317: \cite{MPPS01}. Again the good agreement of the apparent size, obtained
318: from the size of the fitted model grid and our determined distance, is
319: evident.
320:
321:
322: \begin{figure}[ht]
323: \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{f5.ps}
324: \caption{
325: Image comparing the observed [NII]658.4\,nm narrow band image with the
326: contours of the equivalent image of the fitted model. Note the
327: similarity between the observed and modeled images. \label{n2comp6781}
328: }
329: \end{figure}
330:
331: As with objects studied in previous works, the mass of the ionizing
332: star, as well as its progenitor and age are determined from
333: theoretical cooling tracks. Here we have used the cooling tracks of
334: \cite{VW94} because their grids present a good (=\,close) sampling of
335: progenitor masses in the 1 to 3$M_{\odot}$ range. In Figure
336: \ref{evolallpn} we show the position of NGC\,6781, as well as the
337: other objects that we have studied previously with this method, along
338: with the theoretical cooling tracks. From this we obtain the mass of
339: the central star of and its progenitor to be
340: $0.60\,\pm0.03\,M_{\odot}$ and $1.5\,\pm0.5\,M_{\odot}$
341: respectively. Figure\,\ref{evolallpn} also shows the position of these
342: same objects as determined by different authors by distinct
343: techniques. All PNe central stars are well evolved on their cooling
344: track except NGC\,6369.
345:
346:
347: \begin{figure}[ht]
348: \includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{f6.ps}
349: \caption{HR diagram for NGC\,6781, NGC\,3132 (\cite{MMGV00}),
350: NGC\,6369 (\cite{MSGH04}), MZ\,1 (\cite{MSGGH05}), all PNe that
351: had their central star properties determined by our method. Also
352: plotted are the literature values for comparison. a) \cite{SCS93}; b)
353: \cite{SVMG02}; c) . The evolutionary tracks are from \cite{VW94}; they
354: are similar to the \cite{B95} models but take metalicities etc. into account.
355: . \label{evolallpn} }
356: \end{figure}
357:
358:
359: \section{Discussion and conclusions}
360:
361: As with all our other PNe central star temperatures determined by this
362: 3-D structure method we generally find higher temperatures than those
363: computed from oxygen lines and nearer those from HeII
364: lines. Table\,\ref{param-comp} shows a comparison of parameters from
365: the literature and those determined by us in this and previous papers.
366:
367: \begin{table*}[ht]
368: \begin{center}
369: \caption{Comparison of parameters found in the literature and those
370: determined by our 3-D method. \label{param-comp}}
371: \begin{tabular}{lccccc}\hline {Object} & {Our T} & {HeII/HI} &
372: {[OIII]/[OII]} & {Our L(L$_{\odot}$)} & {Our d(pc)}\\
373: \hline\hline
374: \\
375: {Hb 5 } & 230$^a$ & 131$^b$ & - & 6000$^a$ & 1400$^a$ \\
376: {Mz1 } & 120$^c$ & 139$^d$ & - & 164$^c$ & 1050$^c$ \\
377: {NGC 3132} & 90$^e$ & 80$^c$ & 36$^c$ & 150$^e$ & 930$^e$ \\
378: {NGC 6369} & 91$^f$ & 122$^g$ & 60$^g$ & 8100$^f$ & 1550$^f$ \\
379: {NGC 6781} & 123$^h$ & 126$^g$ & 68$^g$ & 385$^h$ & 950$^h$ \\
380:
381: \hline
382:
383: \end{tabular}
384: \end{center}
385: \small{
386: a) Preliminary results from \cite{RSM04}
387: b) \cite{KJ89}
388: c) \cite{Ph03}
389: d) \cite{MSGGH05}
390: e) \cite{MMGV00}
391: f) \cite{MSGH04}
392: g) \cite{G97}
393: h) This paper.}
394: \end{table*}
395:
396: Note that \cite{Ph03} found that bipolar PNe have average
397: T(HeII)\,=\,138k; ellipticals 92\,k; round 81\,k whole sample
398: 87\,k. This was also found earlier by \cite{CS95} who determined
399: T(bipolars)\,=\,142\,k; irregulars 99\,k; ellipticals 76\,k; and
400: unresolved 63\,k. This general trend is always observed, and our high
401: temperature for bipolar NGC\,6781 is no exception.
402:
403: The central star properties of all PNe that we have applied our method
404: to are shown in the HR diagram of Figure\,\ref{evolallpn}. Also shown
405: are the values determined by other methods, taken from the
406: literature. There are large differences between our values and those
407: previously published for NGC\,6781 and NGC\,6369 and in both cases the
408: central star luminosity determined by our method was higher than the
409: literature value. This is because it was assumed that these nebulae
410: are radiation bound but we have shown them to be matter bound as they
411: lose up to 70\% of their UV radiation to space, resulting in an
412: underestimation of both the luminosity and temperature. The blue rise
413: in the SED for NGC\,6781 also confirms that blue radiation is escaping
414: from the nebula. Note that the central star luminosity from our model,
415: L\,=\,385\,$/L_{\odot}$ is larger than the luminosity derived from the
416: observed SED L\,=\,225\,$/L_{\odot}$ by a factor of 1.7, confirming
417: that the nebula is matter bound and that a significant fraction of
418: the stellar UV flux escapes from the object.
419:
420: We claim that ours are the most accurate luminosities and temperatures
421: that have been determined for these stars to date. Interestingly our
422: values tend to bring the core masses closer to $0.6~M_{\odot}$ which
423: is also the peak value of the narrow mass distribution of white
424: dwarfs.
425:
426: \begin{acknowledgements}
427: We acknowledge the continuing support of NOAO's Science Fund to
428: HM and the generous hospitality of the Nordic Optical Telescope
429: on La Palma.
430: \end{acknowledgements}
431:
432: \begin{thebibliography}
433:
434: \bibitem[Acker et al. (1992)]{AO92} Acker, A., Ochsenbein, F., Stenholm,
435: B., Tylenda, R., Marcout, J., Schohn, C. 1992, Strabourg-ESO Catalogue of
436: Galactic PNe.
437:
438: \bibitem[Aller (1987)]{A87} Aller, L.H. Physics of Thermal Gaseous Nebulae, Reidel.
439:
440: \bibitem[Bl\"{o}cker (1995)]{B95} Bl\"{o}cker, T.\ 1995, \aap, 299, 755
441:
442: \bibitem[Cahn, Kaler \& Stanghelini (1992)]{CKS92} Cahn, J.H., Kaler,
443: J.B.; \& Stanghellini, L. 1992, \aaps, 94, 399
444:
445: \bibitem[Ciardullo (2003)]{C03} Ciardullo, R. 2003, Lecture Notes in Physics, 635, 243
446:
447: \bibitem[Corradi et al. (2003)]{CSSP03} Corradi, R.L.M., Sch\"{o}nberner,
448: D., Steffen, M., Perinotto, M. 2003, MNRAS, 340, 417
449:
450: \bibitem[Corradi \& Schwarz (1995)]{CS95} Corradi, R.L.M., Schwarz,
451: H.E. 1995, \aap, 293, 871
452:
453: \bibitem[Ercolano et al. (2003)]{EBSL03} Ercolano, B., Barlow,
454: M.~J., Storey, P.~J., \& Liu, X.-W.\ 2003, \mnras, 340, 1136
455:
456: \bibitem[Feldmeier et al. (2004)]{FCJD04} Feldmeier, J.J., Ciardullo, R.,
457: Jacoby, G.H., Durrell, P.R. 2004, \apj, 615, 196
458:
459: \bibitem[Filippenko (1982)]{F82} Filippenko, A. V.\ 1982,
460: \pasp, 94, 715
461:
462: \bibitem[Gruenwald, Viegas \& Brogui\`{e}re (1997)]{GVB97}
463: Gruenwald, R., Viegas, S.~M., \& Brogui\`{e}re, D.\ 1997, \apj, 480, 283
464:
465: \bibitem[Gurzadyan (1997)]{G97} Gurzadyan, G.A. 1997 ``The Physics and
466: Dynamics of Planetary Nebulae'', Springer
467:
468: \bibitem[Huggins, Bachiller, Cox \& Forveille (1996)]{HBCF96} Huggins,
469: P.J., Bachiller, R., Cox, P., Forveille, T. 1996, \aap, 315, 284
470:
471: \bibitem[Iben \& Renzini (1983)]{IR83} Iben, I., \& Renzini,
472: A.\ 1983, \araa, 21, 271
473:
474: \bibitem[Jacoby et al. (1999)]{JCF99} Jacoby, G.~H.,
475: Ciardullo, R., \& Feldmeier, J.~J.\ 1999, ASP Conf.~Ser.~167: Harmonizing
476: Cosmic Distance Scales in a Post-HIPPARCOS Era, 167, 175
477:
478: \bibitem[Kaler \& Jacoby (1989)]{KJ89} Kaler, J.B., Jacoby, G.H.
479: 1989 AJ 345, 871
480:
481: \bibitem[Kaler, Shaw \& Browning (1997)]{KSB97} Kaler, J.B., Shaw, R.A.,
482: Browning, L. 1997, \pasp, 109, 289
483:
484: \bibitem[Liu, Liu, Luo \& Barlow (2004)]{LLLB04} Liu, Y., Liu, X.-W.,
485: Luo, S.-G., Barlow, M. J. 2004, MNRAS 353, 1231
486:
487: \bibitem[Maciel \& Costa (2003)]{MC03} Maciel, W.J., Costa, R.D.D.
488: 2003 IAUS 209, 551 Eds. Kwok et al.
489:
490: \bibitem[Marston et al. (1998)]{MB98} Marston, A.P.,
491: Bryce, M., L\'opez, J.A., Palmer, J.W., Meaburn, J. 1998, \aap, 329,
492: 683
493:
494: \bibitem[Mavromatakis et al. (2001)]{MPPS01} Mavromatakis, F.,
495: Papamastorakis, J., Paleogolou, E.V. 2001, \aap, 280, 287
496:
497: \bibitem[McCall (1984)]{M84}McCall, M. L. 1984, MNRAS, 208, 253
498:
499: \bibitem[Monteiro, Morisset, Gruenwald \& Viegas (2000)]{MMGV00} Monteiro,
500: H., Morisset, C., Gruenwald, R., \& Viegas, S.~M.\ 2000, \apj, 537, 853
501:
502: \bibitem[Monteiro, Gruenwald, Morisset \& Viegas (2002)]{MMGV02}
503: Monteiro, H., Gruenwald, R., Morisset, C., \& Viegas, S.~M.\ 2002,
504: Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, 12, 170
505:
506: \bibitem[Monteiro, Schwarz, Gruenwald \& Heathcote (2004)]{MSGH04}
507: Monteiro, H., Schwarz, H.E., Gruenwald, R., \& Heathcote,S.R. 2004,
508: \apj, 609,194
509:
510: \bibitem[Monteiro, Schwarz, Gruenwald, Guenthner \&
511: Heathcote (2005)]{MSGGH05} Monteiro, H., Schwarz, H.E., Gruenwald, R.,
512: Guenthner, K., \& Heathcote,S.R. 2005, \apj, 620,321
513:
514: \bibitem[Myers et al. (1987)]{MY87} Myers, P. C.; Fuller, Gary A.;
515: Mathieu, R. D.; Beichman, C. A.; Benson, P. J.; Schild, R. E.;
516: Emerson, J. P. 1987, \apj, 319, 340
517:
518: \bibitem[Osterbrock (1989)]{OS89} Osterbrock, D. E.\ 1989,
519: Research supported by the University of California, John Simon
520: Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, University of Minnesota, et al.~Mill
521: Valley, CA, University Science Books
522:
523: \bibitem[Perek (1971)]{P71} Perek, L. 1971, Bull.Astr.Inst.Cz., 22, 103
524:
525: \bibitem[Phillips (2003)]{Ph03} Phillips, J.P. 2003, MNRAS 344, 501
526:
527: \bibitem[Pottasch (1984)]{P84} Pottasch, S.R. 1984, Planetary Nebulae, Reidel
528:
529: \bibitem[Rauch, Deetjen, Dreizler \& Werner (2000)]{RDDW00} Rauch, T.,
530: Deetjen, J. L., Dreizler, S. e Werner, K. 2000, Asymmetrical Planetary
531: Nebulae II: From origins to microstructures, ASP Conference Series 199, 337
532:
533: \bibitem[Rice, Schwarz \& Monteiro (2004)]{RSM04} Rice, M.,
534: Schwarz, H.E., Monteiro, H. 2004 AAS Abs. 20513813
535:
536: \bibitem[Schwarz, Corradi \& Melnick (1992)]{SCM92}Schwarz, H. E.,
537: Corradi, R. L. M., \& Melnick, J. 1992, AApS, 96, 23
538:
539: \bibitem[Schwarz, Aspin, Corradi, Reipurth \& (1997)]{S97}Schwarz, H.
540: E., Aspin, C., Corradi, R. L. M., Reipurth, B. 1997, \aap, 319, 267
541:
542: \bibitem[Seaton (1979)]{S79}Seaton, M. J. 1979, MNRAS, 187, 73
543:
544: \bibitem[Stanghellini, Corradi \& Schwarz (1993)]{SCS93} Stanghellini, L.,
545: Corradi, R.L.M., Schwarz, H.E. 1993, \aap, 279,521
546:
547: \bibitem[Stanghellini, Villaver, Manchado \& Guerrero (2002)]{SVMG02}
548: Stanghellini, L., Villaver, E., Manchado, A., \& Guerrero, M. A.
549: 2002, \apj, 576, 285
550:
551: \bibitem[Van de Steene \& Zijlstra (1995)]{VZ95} Van de Steene, G.C.,
552: Zijlstra, A.A., 1995, \aap, 293, 541
553:
554: \bibitem[Vassiliadis \& Wood (1994)]{VW94}Vassiliadis, E., Wood, P.R.
555: 1994, \apjs, 92, 125
556:
557: \bibitem[Webster, Payne, Storey \& Dopita (1988)]{W88} Webster, B. L.;
558: Payne, P. W.; Storey, J. W. V.; Dopita, M. A. 1988, MNRAS, 235, 533
559:
560: \bibitem[Zhang (1995)]{Z95} Zhang, C. Y. 1995, \apjs, 98, 659
561:
562: \end{thebibliography}
563:
564: \end{document}
565:
566:
567:
568: