1: \documentclass{emulateapj}
2:
3: \begin{document}
4:
5: \title{Spatially Resolved \textit{Spitzer} Spectroscopy of the
6: Starburst Nucleus in NGC 5253}
7:
8: \author{P. Beir\~ao\altaffilmark{1},
9: B. R. Brandl\altaffilmark{1},
10: D. Devost\altaffilmark{2},
11: J. D. Smith\altaffilmark{3},
12: L. Hao\altaffilmark{2} \&
13: J. R. Houck\altaffilmark{2}}
14: \altaffiltext{1}{Sterrewacht Leiden, P. O. Box 9513, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands}
15: \altaffiltext{2}{Astronomy Department, Cornell University, Ithaca,
16: NY 14853-6801}
17: \altaffiltext{3}{Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson,
18: AZ 85721}
19:
20:
21: \begin{abstract}
22: %
23: We present new {\sl Spitzer Space Telescope} data on the nearby,
24: low-metallicity starburst galaxy NGC~5253, from the Infrared Array
25: Camera {\sl IRAC} and the Infrared Spectrograph {\sl IRS}\footnote{The {\sl IRS} was a collaborative venture between Cornell University and Ball Aerospace Corporation funded by NASA through the Jet
26: Propulsion Laboratory and the Ames Research Center.}. The mid-IR
27: luminosity profile of NGC~5253 is clearly dominated by an unresolved
28: cluster near the center, which outshines the rest of the galaxy at
29: longer wavelengths. We find that the [Ne\,III]/[Ne\,II] ratio
30: decreases from $\sim8.5$ at the center to $\sim2.5$ at a distance of
31: $\sim250$~pc. The [S\,IV]/[S\,III] follows the [Ne\,III]/[Ne\,II]
32: ratio remarkably well, being about $4-5$ times lower at all distances.
33: Our spectra reveal for the first time PAH emission feature at 11.3$\mu$m and its
34: equivalent width increases significantly with distance from the
35: center. The good anti-correlation between the PAH strength and the
36: product between hardness and luminosity of the UV radiation field
37: suggests photo-destruction of the PAH molecules in the central region.
38: The high-excitation [OIV]25.91$\mu$m line was detected at
39: $0.42\times10^{-20}$W cm$^{-2}$.
40: Our results demonstrate the importance of spatially resolved mid-IR spectroscopy.
41:
42: %
43: \end{abstract}
44:
45: \keywords{ISM: lines and bands - Galaxies: individual (NGC 5253) - Galaxies: ISM - Galaxies: starburst - Infrared: galaxies}
46:
47: \newpage
48:
49: \section{Introduction}
50:
51: NGC~5253 is a nearby, low-metallicity dwarf galaxy with a recent
52: starburst, which is responsible for its infrared luminosity of
53: $L_{IR}\sim1.8\times10^9L_{\odot}$ \citep{Beck96}. Distance estimates
54: vary from $3.3\pm0.3$~Mpc \citep{Gibson00} to $4.0\pm0.3$~Mpc
55: \citep{Thim03}; here we will assume 4.0~Mpc, corresponding to
56: 19.4~pc/$\arcsec$. With its low metallicity of only about $1/6
57: Z_{\odot}$ \citep{Kobul99} NGC~5253 is an excellent target to study
58: starbursts in a low-metallicity environment. The spectral signatures
59: of Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars suggest a very recent starburst
60: (\citet{Beck96,Schaerer97}). \citet{Cresci05} detected 115 star
61: clusters using optical and near-infrared VLT images at an age range of
62: 3-19~Myr. \citet{Turner98} found a compact radio source representing
63: a hidden super star cluster (SSC) in one of the earliest phases of SSC
64: formation ever observed. Its ionizing flux corresponds to several
65: thousand O7\,V star equivalents within the central $2''$
66: \citep{Crowther99,Turner04} and an infrared luminosity of
67: $L_{IR}=7.8\times10^8L_{\odot}$ \citep{Crowther99}. Near-infrared
68: observations with Hubble Space Telescope revealed the presence of a
69: double star cluster in the nuclear region, separated by $6-8$~pc
70: \citep{Alonso04}. There are indications that an interaction with M81 might have provoked the starburst \citep{Kobul95}.
71:
72: NGC~5253 has also been studied in the mid-IR with the \textit{Infrared
73: Space Observatory (ISO)} by several authors, e.g., \citet{Crowther99},
74: \citet{Thornley00} and \citet{Verma03}. With {\sl Spitzer}'s
75: increased sensitivity \citep{Werner04} and the smaller slit apertures,
76: the {\sl IRS} can continue where {\sl ISO} left off. In this letter
77: we report on the spatial variations of the physical conditions in the
78: central region of NGC~5253, based on {\sl IRAC} images and {\sl IRS} \citep{Houck04a}
79: spectral maps.
80:
81:
82:
83: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
84: \begin{figure}
85: \epsscale{.80}
86: \plotone{f1.eps}
87: \caption{Overlay of the SH and LH slits on the {\sl IRAC} 3.6$\mu$m
88: image of NGC~5253. The image is $1.2'\times1.0'$. Highlighted is the SH slit at the most central position.}
89: \end{figure}
90:
91:
92: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
93:
94:
95: The images were obtained on 2005 January 31 using IRAC
96: \citep{Fazio04} at all four bands ($3.6, 4.8, 5.8, 8.0\mu$m). The
97: observations consist of 12 slightly dithered pointings of $3\times
98: 12$s exposures each. The data were pipeline processed by the Spitzer
99: Science Center. Longward of $5\mu$m the IRAC images show only one compact cluster
100: and no structure of the host galaxy. To assess what fraction of the total
101: luminosity of the central region is provided by the central cluster we
102: compare the flux within the central 44~pc (2 pixel) to the total flux
103: within a radius of 330 pc for each channel. The results in
104: Table 1 show the increasing dominance of the starburst
105: nucleus in luminosity with wavelength. We subtracted the {\sl IRAC}
106: instrumental PSFs from the nucleus for all four channels, and the
107: residuals suggest that the central cluster remains unresolved in the
108: {\sl IRAC} images, which is consistent with its very compact
109: size \citep{Turner04}.
110:
111: \begin{deluxetable}{cccc}
112: \tablewidth{0pt}
113: \tablecaption{IRAC Flux Table}
114: \tablehead{\colhead{$\lambda$} & \colhead{central flux} &
115: \colhead{total flux} & \colhead{$F_{44pc}/F_{600pc}$} \\
116: \colhead{($\mu$m)} & \colhead{(MJy/sr)} & \colhead{(MJy/sr)} &
117: \colhead{}}
118: \startdata
119: 3.6 & 2616$\pm$12 & 6578$\pm$86 & 0.39 \\
120: 4.5 & 5069$\pm$16 & 7846$\pm$97 & 0.65 \\
121: 5.8 & 11640$\pm$29 & 17187$\pm$261 & 0.68 \\
122: 8.0 & 26869$\pm$33 & 37846$\pm$99 & 0.71 \\
123: \enddata
124: \end{deluxetable}
125:
126: The mid-IR spectra were obtained on 2004 July 14, using high
127: resolution modules ($R\approx 600$) of the {\sl Infrared Spectrograph
128: (IRS)} in spectral mapping mode. In the SH
129: (short-high) mode, the map consists of 12 different pointings,
130: overlapping by half a slit width and about one third slit length,
131: covering an area of $18.0\arcsec\times 23.6\arcsec$. In LH (long-high) mode the map
132: consists of only 6 different pointings, covering an area of $22.2\arcsec\times33.4\arcsec$. Fig. 1 shows the SH
133: and LH slit positions overlaid on the {\sl IRAC} image of the central
134: region. Both maps are slightly off-center. Additional ``sky''
135: measurements, 6~arcmin from the nucleus were also taken.
136: The basic processing of the data was performed with version~11.0 of
137: the automated {\sl IRS} pipeline at the Spitzer Science Center. The background was subtracted using the sky images.
138: The spectra were extracted in "full-slit" mode from pre-flat-fielded
139: files using the {\sl IRS} data reduction and
140: analysis package SMART, version 5.5 \citep{Higdon04}. The extracted
141: spectra were flux calibrated with an empirically derived RSRF
142: (relative spectral response function) of
143: $\alpha$ Lac. The spectral overlaps between orders were manually clipped,
144: according to the local S/N. Finally, the SH spectra were scaled up by
145: 16\% to match the LH continuum fluxes at 19~$\mu$m. This discrepancy in the
146: fluxes is due to the difference between the SH and LH slit sizes.
147:
148:
149: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
150:
151:
152: \section{Discussion}
153:
154: The complete $10-38\mu$m SH+LH spectrum at the most central position
155: of our map is shown in Fig. 2. With a
156: smooth continuum with no significant absorption features, and turnover
157: in the slope around $20\mu$m, it is dominated by the strong emission
158: lines of [SIV]$10.5\mu$m, [NeII]$12.8\mu$m, [NeIII]$15.5\mu$m,
159: [SIII]$18.7\mu$m, [SIII]$33.5\mu$m and [SiII]$34.8\mu$m. Also detected are the signature of
160: polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) at $11.3\mu$m and Hu$\alpha$ at $12.37\mu$m up to a distance of $\sim120$ pc.
161: Fig. 3 shows eight representative SH spectra at
162: decreasing radial distances, calculated from the
163: central cluster to the center of each slit position. The remaining
164: four spectra of our map are redundant and not shown to save space.
165: The most prominent spectral features are labeled. The line fluxes for
166: each radial position are listed in Table 2.
167:
168:
169: \begin{figure}
170: \plotone{f2.eps}
171: \caption{Complete {\sl IRS} SH+LH spectrum of the cluster region of
172: NGC~5253, which correspond to the highlighted slits in Fig. 1. Beyond 35$\mu$m the spectrum dominated by noise and detector artifacts.}
173: \end{figure}
174:
175: \begin{figure*}
176: \plotone{f3.eps}
177: \caption{IRS SH spectra of NGC~5253 sorted by decreasing distance from
178: the central cluster (from left to right and from top to
179: bottom). The distances are inserted in the lower right of
180: each plot.}
181: \end{figure*}
182:
183:
184: % -------------------------------------------------------------------
185:
186: \subsection{Gradients in the Radiation Field}
187:
188: With ionization potentials of 21.56~eV and 40.95~eV for Ne and
189: Ne$^{+}$, respectively, the [Ne\,III]/[Ne\,II] ratio is a good measure
190: of the hardness of the radiation field, and traces the OB stars. \citet{Crowther99} measured a relatively low [Ne\,III]/[Ne\,II] ratio
191: of $3.5-4.0$. However, the larger {\sl ISO-SWS} slit apertures of
192: $14''\times 20''$ and $14''\times 27''$, centered on the nucleus, may
193: have also picked up significant line flux at lower excitation from the
194: surrounding galactic population. With the smaller {\sl IRS} slit
195: aperture of $4.7''\times 11.3''$ we can probe the influence of
196: spatial resolution on the measured spectral diagnostics. The upper
197: plot of Fig. 4 shows the [Ne\,III]/[Ne\,II] and
198: [S\,IV]/[S\,III] ratios as functions of the distance to the central
199: cluster. Both ratios decrease by a factor of four over 250 parsecs,
200: indicating a significant softening of the UV radiation field with
201: distance from the cluster core, and trace each other remarkably well, with the Ne ratio being
202: about $4-5$ times higher at all distances. Our high [Ne\,III]/[Ne\,II] ratio at the central cluster is comparable
203: to those observed in nearby H\,II regions like 30~Doradus and
204: low-metallicity dwarf galaxies like II~Zw~40 \citep{Thornley00}.
205: \citet{Rigby04} modeled Ne line ratios for star clusters at low
206: metallicity $Z=0.2Z_{\odot}$ and showed that a peak ratio of 7.0 is
207: consistent with an upper mass cutoff of $100 M_{\odot}$, at an age of
208: $3-5$~Myr.
209:
210:
211:
212:
213: % -------------------------------------------------------------------
214:
215: \subsection{Dependence of PAH Strength on the Radiation Field}
216:
217: It has often been asked if PAHs in low-metallicity starbursts appear
218: to be weaker because of low abundance or because they get destroyed by
219: the generally harder radiation fields in these environments (e.g.,
220: \citet{Wu05,Engel05,Halloran05,Houck04b,Madden00}). Our high S/N spectra
221: clearly reveal, for the first time, the presence of the $11.3\mu$m PAH
222: feature in all SH positions on NGC~5253, which shows that PAHs can be
223: present in a low metallicity environment. The center plot of
224: Fig. 4 shows a steady increase of the PAH equivalent
225: width (EW) with distance. We assume constant metallicity
226: throughout the galaxy, as no known dwarf has
227: steep metallicity gradients \citep{Kobul99a}.
228: In Fig. 4 we have investigated the correlation between
229: the measured PAH strength and the ``strength'' of the UV radiation
230: field, defined by the product of the hardness and the intensity of the radiation field, [Ne\,III]/[Ne\,II]$\times$([Ne\,III]+[Ne\,II]). The bottom plot shows the product between the UV field and the
231: PAH strengths as a function of distance. This product stays almost
232: constant out to a radial distance of 200 pc, meaning that the strength
233: of the UV field and the strength of the PAH emission is strongly
234: anti-correlated. The good anti-correlation over such a large distance
235: (encompassing numerous H\,II regions) suggests that the
236: photo-destruction of PAHs could be the dominant mechanism here. We note that PAH emission models \citep{Li2001,Bakes01} show that photoionization of hydrogen in PAHs can also cause a decrease in the relative PAH strength above $10\mu$m. However, we consider this effect unlikely since no ionization effect has been seen in other starburst galaxies \citep{Brandl06}. For comparison, a low metallicity system like SBS 0335-052, where no PAHs have been detected, has a Ne ratio of 4.9 \citep{Houck04b} and some of the low metallicity systems with weak PAHs studied by \citet{Halloran05} have a Ne ratio of $\sim3-4$. As seen in Fig. 4, these ratios correspond to a radial distance inside the PAH destruction zone in NGC 5253.
237:
238:
239: % -------------------------------------------------------------------
240:
241: \subsection{[O\,IV] Line Emission}
242:
243: With an excitation potential of
244: 54.9~eV, the [O\,IV]25.89$\mu$m line fills the wide energetic gap of mid-IR fine-structure lines
245: between lines that can originate from massive stars and lines that likely require an AGN. It has been attributed to various mechanisms, including very hot stars \citep{Schaerer99,Morris04} and energetic shocks for low-excitation starbursts \citep{Lutz98}. Our high S/N spectra reveal a faint [O\,IV] line at two slit positions outside the central cluster,
246: with fluxes of about $0.42\times10^{-20}$W cm$^{-2}$ at a S/N of 7.1. This is higher than the limits given by \citet{Crowther99} ($0.10\times10^{-20}$W), but below
247: the upper limit of \citet{Verma03} ($0.9\times10^{-20}$W cm$^{-2}$), and in reasonable agreement with the
248: flux measured by \citet{Lutz98} ($0.65\times10^{-20}$W cm$^{-2}$). Using the
249: STARBURST99 code (Leitherer et al. 1999) assuming an instantaneous burst
250: of star formation with a Salpeter \citep{Salpeter55} IMF at 1/5 solar
251: metallicity, the observed OIV emission can be produced by roughly 125 WR
252: stars (WC+WN), consistent with the wide range of O7\,V star
253: equivalents \citep{Crowther99,Turner04} within the central $1-2''$. A detailed discussion is
254: given in \citet{Martin05}. However, as the [OIV] emission is only observed in two LH slit positions off the nucleus,
255: it is not obvious that the [OIV] line is predominantly photo-excited by the central WR stars. Other excitation mechanisms, such as shocks, need to be considered.
256:
257: \begin{figure}
258: \epsscale{.80}
259: \plotone{f4.eps}
260: \caption{\textit{Upper:} Variation of the [Ne\,III]/[Ne\,II] (full
261: circles) and [S\,IV]/[S\,III] (diamonds) line ratios with
262: distance to the galactic center. The error bars along the x
263: axis represent the {\sl IRS} slit length, which translates
264: into a range in radial distance; they are the same for
265: [S\,IV]/[S\,III] ratios. The error bars along the y axis
266: represent flux uncertainties. \textit{Center:} PAH $11.2
267: \mu$m equivalent widths (EWs) as a function of distance to
268: the nucleus. The error bars represent EW measurement
269: uncertainties. \textit{Bottom:} Dependence of PAH $11.2\mu$m
270: EW $\times$ ([Ne\,II]+[Ne\,III]) $\times$ [Ne\,III]/[Ne\,II] with
271: distance. For details see text. The bars indicate systematic
272: errors.}
273: \end{figure}
274:
275: \begin{deluxetable*}{cccccccc}
276: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
277: \tablecaption{Fine-Structure Lines and Ratios\label{tablines}}
278: \tablehead{
279: \colhead{distance} & \colhead{[SIV]} & \colhead{Hu$\alpha$} & \colhead{[NeII]} &
280: \colhead{[NeIII]} & \colhead{[SIII]} & \colhead{[NeIII]/[NeII]} &
281: \colhead{[SIV]/[SIII]} \\
282: \colhead{(pc)} & \colhead{$(10^{-20} Wcm^{-2})$} & \colhead{$(10^{-20}
283: Wcm^{-2})$} & \colhead{$(10^{-20} Wcm^{-2})$} & \colhead{$(10^{-20}
284: Wcm^{-2})$} & \colhead{$(10^{-20} Wcm^{-2})$} \\
285: \colhead{} & \colhead{$\lambda_{obs}=10.52\mu$m} &
286: \colhead{$\lambda_{obs}=12.37\mu$m} &
287: \colhead{$\lambda_{obs}=12.83\mu$m} &
288: \colhead{$\lambda_{obs}=15.58\mu$m} &
289: \colhead{$\lambda_{obs}=18.74\mu$m} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} \\
290: \colhead{} & \colhead{EP=34.8 eV} & \colhead{} & \colhead{EP=21.6 eV} &
291: \colhead{EP=41.0 eV} & \colhead{EP=23.3 eV} & \colhead{} & \colhead{}
292: }
293: \startdata
294:
295: 27 & 37.50 $\pm$ 0.21 & 2.11 $\pm$ 0.53 & 5.63 $\pm$ 0.14 & 47.40 $\pm$ 1.21 & 16.79 $\pm$ 0.58 & 8.41 & 2.23 \\
296:
297: 30 & 33.22 $\pm$ 0.84 & 1.57 $\pm$ 0.28 & 5.90 $\pm$ 0.16 & 40.87 $\pm$ 1.90 & 17.24 $\pm$ 0.52 & 6.93 & 1.93 \\
298:
299: 76 & 8.80 $\pm$ 0.21 & 0.43 $\pm$ 0.02 & 3.51 $\pm$ 0.08 & 16.94 $\pm$ 0.50 & 7.91 $\pm$ 0.24 & 4.83 & 1.11 \\
300:
301: 121 & 2.25 $\pm$ 0.32 & 0.32 $\pm$ 0.10 & 2.02 $\pm$ 0.09 & 8.41 $\pm$ 0.31 & 4.54 $\pm$ 0.16 & 4.17 & 0.50 \\
302:
303: 135 & 7.01 $\pm$ 0.45 & \nodata & 2.62 $\pm$ 0.17 & 12.18 $\pm$ 0.33 & 6.30 $\pm$ 0.18 & 4.65 & 1.11 \\
304:
305: 149 & 6.03 $\pm$ 0.51 & \nodata & 2.75 $\pm$ 0.13 & 11.06 $\pm$ 0.25 & 6.00 $\pm$ 0.12 & 4.02 & 1.01 \\
306:
307: 155 & 3.37 $\pm$ 0.24 & \nodata & 2.58 $\pm$ 0.23 & 8.74 $\pm$ 0.14 & 4.98 $\pm$ 0.09 & 3.39 & 0.68 \\
308:
309: 173 & 1.01 $\pm$ 0.08 & \nodata & 1.09 $\pm$ 0.02 & 3.16 $\pm$ 0.11 & 2.38 $\pm$ 0.08 & 2.91 & 0.43 \\
310:
311: 194 & 1.77 $\pm$ 0.04 & \nodata & 2.17 $\pm$ 0.14 & 6.27 $\pm$ 0.09 & 4.03 $\pm$ 0.09 & 2.89 & 0.44 \\
312:
313: 219 & 0.71 $\pm$ 0.01 & \nodata & 0.60 $\pm$ 0.04 & 1.55 $\pm$ 0.06 & 1.10 $\pm$ 0.07 & 2.60 & 0.64 \\
314:
315: 226 & 1.18 $\pm$ 0.18 & \nodata & 1.36 $\pm$ 0.08 & 3.28 $\pm$ 0.11 & 2.35 $\pm$ 0.09 & 2.42 & 0.50 \\
316:
317: 260 & \nodata & \nodata & 0.68 $\pm$ 0.12 & 1.76 $\pm$ 0.07 & 1.12 $\pm$ 0.05 & 2.59 & \nodata
318: \enddata
319:
320: \end{deluxetable*}
321:
322: \acknowledgments
323:
324: This work is based on observations made with the {\em Spitzer} Space
325: Telescope, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
326: California Institute of Technology under NASA contract 1407. Support
327: for this work was provided by NASA through Contract Number 1257184
328: issued by JPL/Caltech.
329: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
330: \newpage
331: \begin{thebibliography}{}
332:
333: \bibitem[Alonso-Herrero et al.(2004)]{Alonso04} Alonso-Herrero, A.,
334: Takagi, T., Baker, A. J., Rieke, G. H., Rieke, M., Imanishi, M., \& Scoville, N. 2004, ApJ, 612, 222
335: \bibitem[Bakes et al.(2001)]{Bakes01} Bakes, E. L. O.,
336: Tielens, A. G. G. M. \& Bauschlicher, Jr., C. W. 2001, ApJ, 556, 501
337: \bibitem[Beck et al.(1996)]{Beck96} Beck, S.C.,
338: Turner, J. L., Ho, P. T. P., Lacy, J. H., \& Kelly, D. M. 1996, ApJ, 457, 610
339: \bibitem[Brandl et al.(2006)]{Brandl06} Brandl, B. R., et al., submitted
340: \bibitem[Cresci et al.(2005)]{Cresci05} Cresci, G.,
341: Vanzi, L., \& Sauvage, M. 2005, A\&A, 433, 447
342: \bibitem[Crowther et al.(1999)]{Crowther99} Crowther, P.A.,
343: Beck, S. C., Willis, A. J., Conti, P. S., Morris, P. W., \& Sutherland, R. S. 1999, MNRAS, 304, 654
344: \bibitem[Engelbracht et al.(2005)]{Engel05} Engelbracht, C.W.,
345: Gordon, K. D., Rieke G. H., Werner, M. W., Dale, D. A., \& Latter W. B. 2005, ApJL, 628, L29
346: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004)]{Fazio04} Fazio, G. G. et al. 2004, ApJS,
347: 154, 10
348: \bibitem[Gibson et al.(2000)]{Gibson00} Gibson, B. K., et al. 2000,
349: ApJ, 529, 723
350: \bibitem[Higdon et al.(2004)]{Higdon04} Higdon, S. J. U., et al. 2004,
351: PASP, 116, 975
352: \bibitem[Houck et al.(2004b)]{Houck04b} Houck, J. R., et al. 2004, ApJS,
353: 154, 211
354: \bibitem[Houck et al.(2004a)]{Houck04a} Houck, J. R., et al. 2004, ApJS,
355: 154, 18
356: \bibitem[Kobulnicky et al.(1999)]{Kobul99a} Kobulnicky, H. A. 1999, in IAU Symp. 193,
357: Wolf-Rayet Phenomena in Massive Stars and Starburst Galaxies, ed. K. van der Hucht,
358: G. Koenigsberger, \& P. Eenens (San Francisco: ASP), 670
359: \bibitem[Kobulnicky et al.(1999)]{Kobul99} Kobulnicky, H. A.,
360: Kennicutt, R. C., Jr., \& Pizagno, J. L. 1999, ApJ, 514, 544
361: \bibitem[Kobulnicky et al.(1995)]{Kobul95} Kobulnicky, H. A.,
362: \& Skillman, E. D. 1995, ApJ 454, L121
363: \bibitem[Li \& Draine(2001)]{Li2001} Li, A. \& Draine, B. T. 2001, ApJ, 554, 778
364: \bibitem[Lutz et al.(1998)]{Lutz98} Lutz, D.,
365: Kunze, D., Spoon, H. W. W., \& Thornley, M. D. 1998, A\&A, 333, L75
366: \bibitem[Madden (2000)]{Madden00} Madden, S. C. 2000, New A Rev, 44, 249
367: \bibitem[Martin-Hernandez et al.(2005)]{Martin05} Martin-Hernandez, N. L.,
368: Schaerer, D., \& Sauvage, M. 2005, A\&A, 429, 449
369: \bibitem[Morris et al.(2004)]{Morris04} Morris, P.W.,
370: Crowther, P. A., \& Houck, J. R. 2004, ApJS, 154, 413
371: \bibitem[O'Halloran et al.(2005)]{Halloran05} O'Halloran, B.,
372: Satyapal, S., \& Dudlik, R. P. 2005, ApJ, accepted
373: \bibitem[Rigby et al.(2004)]{Rigby04} Rigby, J. R., \& Rieke, G. H. 2004, ApJ, 606, 237
374: \bibitem[Salpeter(1955)]{Salpeter55} Salpeter, E.E. 1955, ApJ, 121, 161
375: \bibitem[Schaerer et al.(1997)]{Schaerer97} Schaerer, D. \& de Koter, A. 1997, A\&A, 322, 598
376: \bibitem[Schaerer \& Stasinska(1999)]{Schaerer99} Schaerer, D. \& Stasinska, G. 1999, A\&A, 345, L17
377: \bibitem[Summers et al.(2004)]{Summers04} Summers, L. K.,
378: Stevens, I. R., Strickland, D. K., \& Heckman, T. M. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 1
379: \bibitem[Thim et al.(2003)]{Thim03} Thim, F.,
380: Tammann, G. A., Saha, A., Dolphin, A., Sandage, A., Tolstoy, E., \& Labhardt, L. 2003, ApJ, 590, 256
381: \bibitem[Thornley et al.(2000)]{Thornley00} Thornley, M. D.,
382: Schreiber, N. M. F., Lutz, D., Genzel, R., Spoon, H. W. W., Kunze, D., \& Sternberg, A. 2000, ApJ, 539, 641
383: \bibitem[Turner et al.(1998)]{Turner98} Turner, J. L.,
384: Ho, P. T. P., \& Beck, S. C. 1998, AJ, 116, 121
385: \bibitem[Turner \& Beck (2004)]{Turner04} Turner, J. L. \& Beck,
386: S. C. 2004, ApJL, 602, L85
387: \bibitem[Verma et al.(2003)]{Verma03} Verma, A.,
388: Lutz, D., Sturm, E., Sternberg, A., Genzel, R., \& Vacca, W. 2003, A\&A, 403, 829
389: \bibitem[Wu et al.(2005)]{Wu05} Wu, Y.,
390: Charmandaris, V., Hao, L., Brandl, B. R., Bernard-Salas, J., Spoon, H. W. W., \& Houck, J. R. 2005, in press (astro-ph/0510856)
391: \bibitem[Werner et al.(2004)]{Werner04} Werner, M., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 1
392: \end{thebibliography}
393:
394:
395: \end{document}
396: