1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'ms.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2006 March 29
5: %% Final editing by Alex, 4/23/06
6: %%
7: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
8: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
9:
10: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
11: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
12: %% any data that comes before this command.
13:
14: %% The command below calls the preprint style
15: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
16: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
17: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
18: %%
19: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
20:
21: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
22:
23: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
24:
25: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
26:
27: \documentclass[10pt,preprint2]{aastex}
28:
29: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
30: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
31: %% use the longabstract style option.
32:
33: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
34:
35: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
36: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
37: %% the \begin{document} command.
38: %%
39: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
40: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
41: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
42: %% for information.
43:
44: \newcommand{\Msun}{\hbox{$\hbox{M}_\odot$}}
45: \newcommand{\Rsun}{\hbox{$\hbox{R}_\odot$}}
46: \newcommand{\kms}{\hbox{${\rm km}\:{\rm s}^{-1}$}}
47: \newcommand{\myemail}{Jonay.Gonzalez-Hernandez@obspm.fr}
48:
49: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
50:
51: %%\slugcomment{Gonz\'alez Hern\'andez et al.}
52:
53: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
54: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
55: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
56: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
57: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
58: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
59:
60: %%\shorttitle{Stellar Abundances in \mbox{XTE J1118+480}}
61: %%\shortauthors{J. I. Gonz\'alez Hern\'andez et al.}
62:
63: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
64: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
65:
66: \begin{document}
67:
68: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
69: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
70: %% you desire.
71:
72: \title{XTE J1118+480: A Metal-Rich Black \\ Hole Binary in the Galactic Halo.}
73:
74: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
75: %% author and affiliation information.
76: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
77: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
78: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
79: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
80:
81: \author{Jonay I. Gonz\'alez Hern\'andez\altaffilmark{1,2,3}, Rafael
82: Rebolo\altaffilmark{1,4}, Garik Israelian\altaffilmark{1}, Emilios T.
83: Harlaftis\altaffilmark{5,6}, Alexei V. Filippenko\altaffilmark{7} and
84: Ryan Chornock\altaffilmark{7}}
85:
86: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
87: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
88: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
89: %% affiliation.
90:
91: \altaffiltext{1}{Instituto de Astrof{\'\i }sica de Canarias, E-38205 La Laguna,
92: Tenerife, Spain: jonay@iac.es, rrl@iac.es, gil@iac.es}
93: \altaffiltext{2}{CIFIST Marie Curie Excellence Team}
94: \altaffiltext{3}{Observatoire de Paris-Meudon, GEPI, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon Cedex, France}
95: \altaffiltext{4}{Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cient{\'\i }ficas, Spain}
96: \altaffiltext{5}{Institute of Space Applications and Remote Sensing, National
97: Observatory of Athens, PO Box 20048, Athens 118 10, Greece}
98: \altaffiltext{6}{In memoriam}
99: \altaffiltext{7}{Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA
100: 94720-3411: alex@astro.berkeley.edu, chornock@astro.berkeley.edu}
101:
102: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
103: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
104: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
105: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
106: %% editorial office after submission.
107:
108: \begin{abstract}
109: We present medium-resolution optical spectra of the secondary star
110: in the high Galactic latitude black hole X-ray binary \mbox{XTE
111: J1118+480} and determine the abundance of Mg, Al, Ca, Fe, and
112: Ni in its atmosphere. For all the elements investigated we find
113: supersolar abundances; thus, we reject the hypothesis that the black
114: hole came from the direct collapse of an ancient massive halo star.
115: The compact primary most likely formed in a supernova event of a
116: massive star whose nucleosynthetic products polluted the secondary
117: star. The observed element abundances and their ratios can be
118: explained using a variety of supernova models with a wide range of
119: metallicities. While an explosive origin in the Galactic halo or thick
120: disk cannot be discarded, a metal-rich progenitor is clearly favored
121: by the observed abundance pattern. This suggests that the black hole
122: was produced in the Galactic thin disk with a violent natal kick,
123: propelling the X-ray binary to its current location and orbit.
124: \end{abstract}
125:
126: \keywords{black hole physics --- stars: abundances --- stars: evolution ---
127: stars: individual (\mbox{XTE J1118+480}) --- supernovae: general --- X-rays:
128: binaries}
129:
130: \section{Introduction}
131:
132: The low-mass X-ray binary \mbox{XTE J1118+480} was discovered with the
133: all-sky monitor aboard the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer on UT 2000
134: March 29 (Remillard et al.\ 2000). Throughout its outburst the source
135: remained in the low/hard state, one of the characteristic spectral
136: states of an accreting black hole binary (McClintock et al.\ 2003).
137: The system consists of a black hole with a mass estimated in the range
138: 6$-$8 {\Msun} and a late-type secondary star of 0.1$-$0.5 {\Msun}
139: (Wagner et al.\ 2001).
140:
141: The extraordinarily high Galactic latitude
142: ($b \approx 62.3^{\circ}$), together with its distance of $1.85\pm0.36$ kpc
143: (Wagner et al.\ 2001), places the system at a height of $\sim$1.6 kpc
144: above the Galactic plane. In addition, an accurate
145: measurement of its proper motion coupled with its distance provides
146: space-velocity components $U$, $V$ which seem consistent with
147: those of some old halo globular clusters (Mirabel et al.\ 2001).
148: If the system formed in the Galactic halo, the black hole could be
149: either the remnant of a supernova in the very early Galaxy or the
150: result of a direct collapse of an ancient massive star. However,
151: the galactocentric orbit crossed the Galactic plane many times in the
152: past, and an alternative possibility is that the system formed in the
153: Galactic disk and was launched into its present orbit as
154: a consequence of the ``kick'' acquired in the supernova explosion of a
155: massive star (Gualandris et al.\ 2005). The metallicity of the secondary star may
156: provide a key to distinguish among these two possible birth places,
157: giving important clues to the formation of the black hole and the
158: properties of the supernova explosion, such as symmetry, released
159: energy, and characteristics of the ejected matter (Israelian et al.\
160: 1999; Podsiadlowski et al.\ 2002).
161:
162: \section{Observations}
163:
164: We obtained 74 medium-resolution spectra
165: ($\lambda/\delta\lambda\approx 6,000$) of the secondary star in
166: XTE J1118+480, in quiescence, on UT 14 February 2004,
167: using the 10-m Keck~II telescope, equipped with the Echellette
168: Spectrograph and Imager (ESI; Sheinis et al.\ 2002). The exposure time
169: was fixed at 300~s to minimize the effects of orbital smearing which,
170: for the orbital parameters of XTE J1118+480, is in the range 0.6--26.6
171: {\kms}, smaller than the instrumental resolution of $\sim 50$
172: {\kms}. Each individual spectrum was corrected for the radial velocity
173: of the star, and the spectra were combined in order to improve the
174: signal-to-noise ratio. After binning in wavelength in steps of 0.3
175: {\AA}, the final spectrum had an average signal-to-noise ratio of 80
176: in the continuum. The data cover the spectral range 4000--9000 {\AA}
177: and clearly show the characteristic emission lines of accreting
178: low-mass X-ray binaries (Balmer series and \ion{Ca}{2} near-infrared
179: triplet, \ion{He}{1} 5876 {\AA}, \ion{He}{1} 6678 {\AA}), superimposed
180: on the typical photospheric spectrum of a late-type star.
181:
182: \section{Chemical Analysis}
183:
184: A comparison of the observed spectrum with the spectra of ten template
185: stars (K0V--M2V) obtained with the same instrument
186: allows us to classify the secondary as a mid to late K-type star. In
187: Figure 1 we display two spectral regions containing some relevant lines
188: for our analysis as well as a spectrum of a template star of similar
189: spectral type for comparison with available detailed chemical
190: analysis (Allende Prieto et al.\ 2004). We also show synthetic line
191: profiles for different stellar abundances computed with the local
192: thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) code MOOG (Sneden 1973), adopting the
193: atomic line data from the Vienna Atomic Line Database (VALD; Piskunov
194: 1995) and using a grid of LTE model atmospheres (Kurucz 1993).
195:
196: In order to perform the chemical analysis of the secondary star
197: we used a technique which combines a grid of synthetic
198: spectra and a $\chi2$-minimization procedure that includes Monte-Carlo
199: simulations (Gonz\' alez Hern\'andez et al.\ 2004, 2005). First, we
200: inspected the observed spectrum in order to select the most suitable
201: features for a chemical abundance determination. We identified nine
202: spectral features containing in total 30 lines of \ion{Fe}{1} and 8
203: lines of \ion{Ca}{1} with excitation potentials between 1 eV and 5 eV.
204: The oscillator strengths of the re\-le\-vant spectral lines were
205: checked via spectral synthesis against the solar atlas (Kurucz et al.\
206: 1984). We then generated a grid of about one million synthetic spectra
207: of each of these features, varying as free parameters the star effective
208: tem\-pe\-ra\-tu\-re ($T_{\mathrm{eff}}$), surface gravity ($\log g$),
209: and metallicity ([Fe/H]), together with the veiling from the accretion
210: disk which was assumed to be a linear function of wavelength, and thus
211: described by two additional parameters. Iron abundances were varied in
212: the range $-1.5 < \mathrm{[Fe/H]} < 1$ whereas the Ca abundance was
213: fixed, for each given iron abundance, according to the Galactic trend of
214: Ca (Bensby et al.\ 2005) for $\mathrm{[Fe/H]} < 0$, and fixed to
215: $\mathrm{[Ca/Fe]} = 0$ in the range $0 < \mathrm{[Fe/H]} < 1$. A
216: rotational broadening of 100 {\kms} and a limb darkening $\epsilon =
217: 0.8$ were adopted. The microturbulence ($\xi$) was computed using an
218: experimental expression as a function of effective temperature and
219: surface gravity (Allende Prieto et al.\ 2004).
220:
221: We compared, using a $\chi2$-minimization procedure, this grid with
222: 1000 realizations of the observed spectrum. Using a bootstrap
223: Monte-Carlo method, we found the most likely values $T_{\mathrm{eff}}
224: = 4700 \pm 100$ K, $\log (g/{\rm cm~s}^2) = 4.6 \pm 0.3$,
225: $\mathrm{[Fe/H]} = 0.2 \pm 0.2$, and a disk veiling (defined as
226: $F_{\rm disk}/F_{\rm total}$) of less than 40\% at 5000 {{\AA}} and
227: decreasing toward longer wavelengths. The (1$\sigma$) uncertainty in
228: the iron-abundance determination takes into account the uncertainties
229: in the stellar and veiling parameters. The effective temperature and
230: surface gravity are consistent with previous spectral classifications
231: and similarly the reported veiling values (Torres et al.\ 2004). Using
232: the derived stellar and veiling parameters, we analyzed several
233: spectral regions where we had identified various lines of Fe, Ca, Al,
234: Mg and Ni. Abundances of all the elements are listed in Table 1. The
235: 1$\sigma$ uncertainty in the abundance determination takes into
236: account uncertainties in the stellar and veiling parameters.
237:
238: Remarkably, we find a metallicity higher than solar, which is extremely
239: atypical of halo stars (Allende Prieto et al.\ 2006).
240: In Figure 1 we show the best-fit synthetic
241: spectrum to various features in two different spectral regions, and
242: for comparison, a model with twenty-five times lower metal content. Notice the
243: inadequacy of low-metallicity models to reproduce the observed
244: features, even in the extreme case that no veiling is considered
245: (adding veiling would make the discrepancy much worse). An iron
246: abundance of $\mathrm{[Fe/H]}=-1.2$ is more than 6$\sigma$ away from
247: the best-fit solution ($\mathrm{[Fe/H]}=0.18$), and hence very
248: unlikely. We have also found
249: that abundances of Al, Ca, Mg, and Ni are higher than solar (see Table
250: 1). In Figure 2, we show that the abundance ratios of these elements
251: with respect to iron are consistent with those of stars in the solar
252: neighborhood from Gilli et al. (2006). We have also determined an
253: upper limit to the Li abundance $\log
254: \epsilon(\mathrm{Li})_\mathrm{LTE} = \log
255: [N(\mathrm{Li})/N(\mathrm{H})]_\mathrm{LTE} + 12 \le 1.61 \pm 0.25$
256: using the Li 6708 {\AA} line. This value seems to be lower
257: that typical high Li abundances measured in other late-type secondary
258: stars in soft X-ray transients whose origin is still an open question
259: (Mart{\'\i}n et al. 1994).
260:
261: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}
262:
263: If we include the metallicity distribution of halo and thick-disk
264: stars (Allende Prieto et al.\ 2006) and thin-disk stars (Allende
265: Prieto et al.\ 2004) in the equations based on kinematics for
266: establishing the relative likehoods of belonging to the halo, thick
267: disk, or thin disk (Bensby et al.\ 2003), the probability that a star with
268: the Galactic space velocity components of this system (Mirabel et al.\
269: 2001; $U=-105\pm16$ {\kms}, $V=-98\pm16$ {\kms}, $W=-21\pm10$ {\kms})
270: and metallicity $\mathrm{[Fe/H]} = 0.18$ belongs to the Galactic halo
271: is less than 0.1\%. Moreover, the kinematics alone suggest thick-disk
272: rather than halo membership, although the high metallicity of the
273: secondary star favors thin-disk membership. If, however, the progenitor
274: was a massive star in the halo or thick disk, the high metallicity of
275: the secondary rules out the hypothesis that the black hole
276: was formed by direct collapse of the massive star; instead, a
277: supernova explosion origin is strongly suggested.
278:
279: Given its present orbital distance from the black hole ($a_{\rm c}
280: \approx 3$ {\Rsun}, Wagner et al.\ 2001), it is plausible
281: that the secondary star captured a significant fraction of the matter
282: ejected in a supernova explosion. The chemical composition of the
283: secondary may provide crucial information on nucleosynthesis
284: in the progenitor and the formation mechanism of the black hole.
285: We consider two possible scenarios for the origin of the compact
286: object: either it formed in the Galactic halo or thick disk as a
287: result of the explosion of a metal-poor massive progenitor
288: which enriched the secondary star from the typical abundances of
289: halo/thick-disk stars up to the observed supersolar values, or
290: alternatively, it formed in the Galactic thin disk with a natal kick
291: imparted during the supernova explosion which propelled the binary
292: into its current orbit.
293:
294: In the first case, the similarity with the kinematics of halo and
295: thick-disk stars makes unnecessary a significant kick during the black
296: hole formation process. However, since the typical metallicities of
297: halo stars and thick-disk stars are significantly lower than solar, it
298: is required that the secondary captured enough matter from the ejecta
299: to reach the current abundances. A metal-poor $\sim$1 {\Msun}
300: secondary star, initially placed at an orbital distance of $\sim$6
301: {\Rsun} (after tidal circularization of the orbit), would need to
302: capture roughly 5--10\% of the matter ejected in a spherically
303: symmetric core-collapse supernova explosion of a 16 {\Msun} helium
304: core to achieve the observed iron abundance. We have considered
305: supernova and hypernova models of metal-poor progenitors with
306: different masses, metallicities, mass cuts (i.e., the mass above which
307: the matter is expelled at the time of the supernova explosion),
308: fallback (i.e., amount of mass which is eventually accreted by the
309: compact core), and mixing (Umeda \& Nomoto, 2002, 2005; Tominaga,
310: Umeda \& Nomoto 2006, in preparation), and assumed that all the
311: fallback material is well mixed with the ejecta. We find that a
312: sufficiently large Fe enrichment is possible for mass cuts in the
313: range 2--4 {\Msun} [and explosion energies $(1-30)\times10^{51}$
314: ergs]. The abundance ratios of the other elements are only marginally
315: reproduced by these models. An origin of \mbox{XTE J1118+480} in the
316: Galactic halo or in the Galactic thick disk cannot be discarded by the
317: present observations, nor can it be confirmed. Further higher-quality
318: observations and extensive model calculations are required to fully
319: explore this possibility. Further details of analysis will put
320: together in Gon\'alez Hern\'andez et al. (2006, in preparation).
321:
322: In the second scenario, the system had to acquire a peculiar space
323: velocity of $\sim 180$ {\kms}, to change from a Galactic thin disk
324: orbit to the currently observed orbit (Gualandris et al.\ 2005), requiring
325: an asymmetric kick. Such kicks imparted during the birth of nascent neutron
326: stars, due to asymmetric mass ejection and/or an asymmetry in the
327: neutrino emission (Lai et al.\ 2001), have been proposed to
328: explain the large transverse motions of neutron stars in the plane of
329: the sky (Lyne \& Lorimer 1994). The black hole could have formed
330: in a two-stage process where the initial collapse led to the
331: formation of a neutron star accompanied by a substantial kick and the
332: final mass of the compact remnant was achieved by matter that fell
333: back after the initial collapse as proposed to explain the origin of
334: the black hole in \mbox{Nova Sco 1994} (Podsiadloski et al.\ 2002;
335: Brandt et al.\ 1995).
336:
337: Spherically symmetric explosion models are able to explain the
338: observed metal enrichment. A modest amount of ejecta ($\sim 0.02$)
339: {\Msun} captured by a secondary with initial solar abundance is
340: sufficient if vigorous mixing (Kifonidis et al.\ 2000)
341: between the fallback matter (which is necessarily large given the mass
342: of the black hole) and the ejecta took place. In this scenario the
343: black hole would be formed in a mild explosion with fallback as in
344: collapsar models (MacFadyen et al.\ 2001) associated with rapidly rotating
345: massive stars. However, in the pure spherical supernova explosion
346: scenario for \mbox{XTE J1118+480}, the maximum allowed ejected mass to
347: keep the secondary star gravitationally bound is $\Delta M \approx 8$
348: {\Msun}. This leads to a system velocity of $\sim$60 {\kms} (there
349: could be extreme cases with system velocities as high as $\sim 100$
350: {\kms} requiring very \emph{special} model parameters such as higher
351: secondary and black hole masses just after the explosion; see further
352: details in Sec. 3.2 of Gualandris et al.\ 2005), much lower
353: than the observed value, and a neutrino-induced kick is required
354: if we are to explain the kinematics of the system.
355:
356: The chemical composition of the ejecta in a non-spherically symmetric
357: supernova explosion is strongly dependent on direction. In particular,
358: if we assume that the jet is collimated perpendicular to the orbital
359: plane of the binary, where the secondary star is located, elements
360: such as Ti, Ni, and Fe are mainly ejected in the jet direction, while
361: Al, O, Si, S, and Mg are preferentially ejected near the equatorial
362: plane of the helium star (Maeda et al.\ 2002). Using predictions
363: for an aspherical explosion model of a 16 {\Msun} He core metal-rich
364: progenitor, we can explain the observed abundances in the secondary.
365: Complete lateral mixing (Podsiadlowski et al.\ 2002) is required to account
366: for the similar enhancement of Mg and Ni and the observed abundances
367: can be reproduced for all mass cuts in the range 2--8 {\Msun}.
368:
369: It is therefore plausible that the black hole in \mbox{XTE
370: J1118+480} formed in the Galactic thin disk from a massive
371: metal-rich progenitor and was launched into its current orbit either
372: by mass ejection in an asymmetric supernova/hypernova explosion or by
373: a neutrino-induced kick. In addition, ultraviolet observations of the
374: accretion disk in this system suggest that the material accreted onto the
375: compact object is substantially CNO processed (Haswell et al.\ 2002),
376: indicating that the zero-age mass of the secondary star could have
377: been $\sim 1.5$ {\Msun}. By means of binary evolution calculations
378: this may constrain the age of the system in the range 2--5.5 Gyr
379: (Gualandris et al.\ 2005). Future chemical studies of the secondary
380: star during periods of quiescence may provide accurate abundances of
381: elements (e.g., C, Ti, Si) whose lines either are not available in the
382: observed spectrum or are present in spectral regions where the
383: signal-to-noise ratio is too low for an accurate chemical analysis.
384: These may reveal further details of the formation mechanism of the
385: black hole in this system.
386:
387: \acknowledgments
388:
389: We are grateful to Hideyuki Umeda, Ken'ichi Nomoto, and Nozomu Tominaga
390: for sending us their explosion models for metal-poor and metal-rich
391: progenitors and several programs for our model computations. We also
392: thank Keiichi Maeda for providing us with his aspherical explosion
393: models, and for helpful discussions. We are grateful to Tom Marsh for
394: the use of the MOLLY analysis package, to Jorge Casares for his helpful
395: comments on different aspects of this work, and to Ryan J. Foley for
396: assistance with the observations. We also thank the referee for
397: helpful comments. The W. M. Keck Observatory is
398: operated as a scientific partnership among the California Institute of
399: Technology, the University of California, and NASA; it was made
400: possible by the financial support of the W. M. Keck Foundation. This
401: work has made use of the VALD database and IRAF facilities. It was
402: funded in part by Spanish Ministry project AYA2005-05149 and by
403: US National Science Foundation grant AST-0307894. We dedicate this
404: paper to the memory of our dear friend and collaborator E. T.
405: Harlaftis, whose life was tragically cut short by a snow avalanche on
406: 13 February 2005.
407:
408: \begin{thebibliography}{}
409: \bibitem[Allende Prieto et al., 2004]{all04}
410: Allende Prieto, C., Barklem, P. S., Lambert, D. L., \& Cunha,
411: K. 2004, \aap, 420, 183
412: \bibitem[Allende Prieto et al., 2006]{all06}
413: Allende Prieto, et al. 2006, \apj,
414: 636, 804
415: \bibitem[Bensby et al., 2005]{ben05}
416: Bensby, T., Feltzing, S., Lundstr\"om, I., \& Ilyin, I. 2005, \aap,
417: 433, 185
418: \bibitem[Brandt et al., 1995]{bra95}
419: Brandt, W. N., Podsiadlowski, Ph., \& Sigurdsson, S. 1995, \mnras,
420: 277, L35
421: \bibitem[Gilli et al., 2006]{gua06}
422: Gilli, G., Israelian, G., Ecuvillon, A., Santos, N. C., \&
423: Mayor, M. 2006, \aap, in press
424: \bibitem[Gonz\'alez Hern\'andez et al. 2005]{gon05}
425: Gonz\'alez Hern\'andez, J. I., Rebolo, R., Israelian, G., Casares, J.,
426: Maeda, K., Bonifacio, P., \& Molaro, P. 2005, \apj, 630, 495
427: \bibitem[Gonz\'alez Hern\'andez et al. 2004]{gon04}
428: Gonz\'alez Hern\'andez, J. I., Rebolo, R., Israelian, G., Casares, J.,
429: Maeder, A., \& Meynet, G. 2004, \apj, 609, 988
430: \bibitem[Gualandris et al., 2005]{gua05}
431: Gualandris, A., Colpi, M., Portegies Zwart, S., \& Possenti,
432: A. 2005, \aap, 618, 845
433: \bibitem[Haswell et al., 2002]{has02}
434: Haswell, C. A., Hynes, R. I., King, A. R., \& Schenker, K. 2002, \apj,
435: 332, 928
436: \bibitem[Israelian et al., 1999]{isr99}
437: Israelian, G., Rebolo, R., Basri, G., Casares, J., \&
438: Mart{\'\i}n, E. L. 1999, \nat, 401, 142
439: \bibitem[Kifonidis et al., 2000]{kif00}
440: Kifonidis, K., Plewa, T., Janka, H.-Th., \& Müller, E. 2000, \aap, 531, L123
441: \bibitem[Kurucz et al., 1984]{kur84}
442: Kurucz, R. L. ATLAS9 Stellar Atmospheres Programs and 2 {\kms}
443: Grid. (CD-ROM, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge,
444: 1993).
445: \bibitem[Kurucz et al., 1984]{kur84}
446: Kurucz, R. L., Furenild, I., Brault, J., \& Testerman, L. 1984, Solar Flux Atlas from
447: 296 to 1300 nm, NOAO Atlas 1 (Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press)
448: \bibitem[Lai et al 2001]{lai01}
449: Lai, D., Chernoff, D. F., \& Cordes, J. M. 2001, \apj, 549, 1111
450: \bibitem[Lyne et al 1994]{lyn94}
451: Lyne, A. G., \& Lorimer, D. R. 1994, \nat, 369, 127L
452: \bibitem[MacFadyen et al., 2001]{mwh01}
453: MacFadyen, A. I., Woosley, S. E., \& Heger, A. 2001, \apj, 550, 410
454: \bibitem[Maeda et al. 2002]{mae02}
455: Maeda, K., Nakamura, T., Nomoto, K., Mazzali, P. A., Patat, F., \&
456: Hachisu, I. 2002, \apj, 565, 405
457: \bibitem[Mart{\'\i }n et al., 1994]{mar94}
458: Mart{\'\i }n, E. L., Rebolo, R., Casares, J., \& Charles, P. A. 1994,
459: \apj, 435, 791
460: \bibitem[McClintock et al., 2002]{mck03}
461: McClintock, J. E., et al. 2003, \apj,
462: 593, 435
463: \bibitem[Mirabel et al., 2001]{mir01}
464: Mirabel, I. F., Dawan, V., Mignani, R. P., Rodrigues, I., \&
465: Guglielmetti, F. 2001, \nat, 413, 139
466: \bibitem[Piskunov et al. 1995]{pis95}
467: Piskunov, N. E., Kupka, F., Ryabchikova, T. A., Weiss, W. W., \& Jeffery, C.
468: S. 1995, \aaps, 112, 525
469: \bibitem[Podsiadlowski et al., 2002]{pod02}
470: Podsiadlowski, P., Nomoto, K., Maeda, K., Nakamura, T., Mazzali, P., \&
471: Schmidt, B. 2002, \apj, 567, 491
472: \bibitem[Remillard et al. 2002]{uan02}
473: Remillard, R., Morgan, E., Smith, D., \& Smith, E. 2002, IAU Circ. No. 7389
474: \bibitem[Sheinis 2002]{she02}
475: Sheinis, A. I., et al. 2002, \pasp, 114, 851
476: \bibitem[Sneden 1973]{sne73}
477: Sneden, C. 1973, PhD Dissertation (Univ. of Texas at Austin)
478: \bibitem[Torres et al. 2004]{gon04}
479: Torres, M. A. P., et al. 2004, \apj, 612, 1026
480: \bibitem[Umeda \& Nomoto 2002]{uan02}
481: Umeda, H., \& Nomoto, K. 2002, \apj, 565, 385
482: \bibitem[Umeda \& Nomoto 2005]{uan05}
483: Umeda, H., \& Nomoto, K. 2005, \apj, 619, 427
484: \bibitem[Wagner 2001]{wag01}
485: Wagner, R. M., et al. 2001, \apj, 556,42
486:
487: \end{thebibliography}
488:
489: \clearpage
490:
491: \begin{figure}
492: \epsscale{0.60}
493: \plotone{f1bw.eps}
494: \caption{Best synthetic spectral fits to the ESI
495: spectrum of the secondary star in the \mbox{XTE J1118+480} system
496: (second and bottom panels) and the same for a template star
497: (properly broadened) taken from Allende Prieto et al. (2004)
498: shown for comparison (top and third panels). Synthetic spectra are
499: computed for typical abundances for a halo star ($\mathrm{[Fe/H]}=-1.2$,
500: dashed-dotted blue line), solar abundances ($\mathrm{[Fe/H]}=0$,
501: dashed green line), and best-fit abundances (solid red line). In
502: addition, note that for solar and best-fit abundances we have
503: applied to the synthetic spectra the corresponding values for the
504: veiling according to the solution found with the fitting procedure.
505: However, for the low-metallicity synthetic spectra, we have not
506: assumed any veiling.}
507: \label{fig1}
508: \end{figure}
509:
510: \clearpage
511:
512: \begin{figure}
513: \epsscale{0.80}
514: \plotone{f2bw.eps}
515: \caption{Abundance ratios of the secondary star
516: in XTE J1118+480 (blue wide cross) in comparison with the
517: abundances of G and K metal-rich dwarf stars. Galactic trends were
518: taken from Gilli et al. (2006). The size of the cross
519: indicates the uncertainty. Filled and empty circles correspond to
520: abundances for planet host stars and stars without known planet
521: companions, respectively. The dashed-dotted lines indicate solar
522: abundance values.}
523: \label{fig2}
524: \end{figure}
525:
526: \clearpage
527:
528: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
529: \tablewidth{7cm}
530: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
531: \tablecaption{Abundances in the secondary star}
532: \tablehead{\colhead{Parameter} & \colhead{Al}& \colhead{Ca}&
533: \colhead{Mg}& \colhead{Fe}& \colhead{Ni}}
534: \startdata
535: {$\mathrm{[X/H]}$} & 0.60 & 0.15 & 0.35 & 0.18 & 0.30 \\
536: {$\Delta \mathrm{[X/H]}$} & 0.20 & 0.23 & 0.25 & 0.17 & 0.21 \\
537: \enddata
538: \tablecomments{\scriptsize{Element abundances (calculated assuming LTE) are
539: $\mathrm{[X/H]}= \log [N(\mathrm{X})/N(\mathrm{H})]_{\rm star} - \log
540: [N(\mathrm{X})/N(\mathrm{H})]_{\rm Sun}$, where $N(\mathrm{X})$ is
541: the number density of atoms. Uncertainties, $\Delta \mathrm{[X/H]}$, are
542: 1$\sigma$ and take into account uncertainties in the
543: stellar and veiling parameters.}}
544: \end{deluxetable}
545:
546: \end{document}
547:
548:
549:
550:
551: