1: \documentstyle{pasj00}

2: %\draft

3: \begin{document}

4: 

5: \SetRunningHead{A.Imada et al.}{A new WZ Sge star, TSS J022216.4+412259.9}

6: 

7: \title{Discovery of a new dwarf nova, TSS J022216.4+412259.9: \\

8:  WZ Sge-type dwarf novae \\

9: breaking the shortest superhump period record}

10: 

11: \author{Akira \textsc{Imada},$^1$Kaori \textsc{Kubota},$^1$Taichi

12: \textsc{Kato},$^1$Daisaku \textsc{Nogami},$^2$Hiroyuki

13: \textsc{Maehara},$^3$ \\

14: Kazuhiro \textsc{Nakajima},$^4$Makoto \textsc{Uemura},$^5$ and Ryoko

15: \textsc{Ishioka}$^6$}

16: 

17: \affil{$^1$Department of Astronomy,Faculty of Science, Kyoto University,

18:        Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502}

19: \affil{$^2$Hida Observatory, Kyoto University, Kamitakara, Gifu 506-1314}

20: \affil{$^3$VSOLJ, Namiki 1-13-4, Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0034, Japan}

21: \affil{$^4$VSOLJ, 124 Isatotyo Teradani, Kumano, Mie, Japan}

22: \affil{$^5$Hiroshima Astrophysical Science Center, Hiroshima University,

23:        Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan}

24: \affil{$^6$Subaru Telescope, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan

25:        650 North A'ohoku Place, Hilo, \\ HI 96720, U.S.A.}

26: \email{a\_imada@kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp}

27: 

28: \KeyWords{

29:           accretion, accretion disks

30:           --- stars: dwarf novae

31:           --- stars: individual (TSS J022216.4+412259.9)

32:           --- stars: novae, cataclysmic variables

33:           --- stars: oscillations

34: }

35: 

36: \maketitle

37: 

38: \begin{abstract}

39: We report on the time-resolved CCD photometry of a newly discovered

40:  variable star, TSS J022216.4+412259.9 during the outburst in 2005

41:  November-December brightening. The obtained light curves unambiguously

42:  showed 0.2-0.3 mag modulations, which we confirmed to be the superhump

43:  observed among SU UMa-type dwarf novae. We also performed  a period

44:  search for the data obtained during the outburst plateau phase, and

45:  revealed the existence of the two periodicities: 0.054868(98) days for

46:  the first two nights and 0.055544(26) days for the following plateau

47:  phase. This bi-periodicity is hardly observed in usual SU UMa-type

48:  dwarf novae, but characteristic of WZ Sge-type stars. We undoubtedly

49:  detected a rebrightening in the post-outburst stage, which is typical

50:  of short-period SU UMa-type dwarf novae including WZ Sge-type

51:  stars. These observations suggests that TSS J022216.4+412259.9 may be a

52:  new WZ Sge stars breaking the shortest superhump period of 0.05648 days

53:  for V592 Her among this class with a known superhump period so far.

54: \end{abstract}

55: 

56: \section{Introduction}

57: 

58: Since the advent of the high speed CCD photometry, many studies have

59: been performed concerning the variability of dwarf novae

60: (\cite{war95book}; \cite{kat04vsnet}), which have led a significant

61: progress in understanding many aspects of dwarf novae-outburst.

62: WZ Sge stars, an extreme subclass of SU

63: UMa-type dwarf novae, show many peculiarities both in outburst and

64: quiescence. One of the enigmatic phenomenon is that they exhibit so

65: called ``early superhumps'' on the early stage of the superoutburst of

66: WZ Sge stars (\cite{kat96alcom}; \cite{osa02wzsgehump}; \cite{kat02wzsgeESH};

67: \cite{pat02wzsge}). The period of the humps is almost identical to that

68: of the orbital period of the system. Another peculiarity is that most of

69: WZ Sge stars show rebrightenings (\cite{kuu96TOAD}; \cite{pat98egcnc})

70: after the main outburst. Extensive monitoring of WZ Sge stars, as well

71: as insightful theoretical works, have shed some light on elucidating

72: these origin and revealing the diversity of them, while less than

73: ten objects have been certified as this class. However, interpretation

74: of the aforementioned phenomena is controversial.

75: 

76: Recently, there has arisen a new problem regarding the evolution of

77: dwarf novae. According to a population synthesis, there should

78: be more dwarf novae below the period gap than observed

79: \citep{how97periodminimum}. \citet{how97periodminimum} further suggested

80: that almost all of CVs should have the orbital period below the period

81: gap. However, observations indicate that the number of CVs above the period

82: gap is comparable to that of CVs below the period gap

83: \citep{gan05review}. Another calculation suggests the ``theoretical

84: period minimum`` of dwarf novae will lie as short as 64 min

85: \citep{kol99CVperiodminimum} under the secular

86: evolution. \citet{wil05CVevolution}, on the other hand, has shown that

87: the ``period minimum'' becomes around 80 min by an inclusion of an

88: effect of a circumbinary disk. After reaching the ``period minimum'',

89: the system comprises a degenerate secondary, which gives rise to

90: inversion of the mass-radius relation. Then the orbital period of the

91: system will become longer as the CV evolves. Meanwhile, well accepted is

92: that the ``observational period minimum'' lies around 78

93: min.\footnote{V485 Cen and EI Psc, recently discovered dwarf novae with

94: the periods breaking the minimum, are suggested to have experienced

95: another evolution with an evolved secondary

96: \citep{pod03amcvn}.}\footnote{Theoretical works suggest the value of the

97: period minimum depends on chemical abundance of the secondary star.} As far

98: as the evolutional scenario of dwarf novae is concerned, intensive

99: studies should be awaited especially from the theoretical side (see

100: \citet{how01periodgap} for a review.).

101: 

102: TSS J022216.4+412259.9 was firstly discovered by \citet{qui05atel658} as

103: a candidate of an ongoing supernova on 2005 November 16.1 (UT) with about

104: 15.5 mag. The object maintained almost the same magnitude until 2005

105: November 17.1 (UT), which was confirmed by 45 cm ROTSE-IIIb telescope at

106: the McDonald Observatory. Negative observations were carried out at the

107: same site, giving 16.5 mag as an upper limit on 2005 November 15.1

108: (UT). On 2005 November 18, an optical spectrum was obtained with a 2.2 m

109: telescope located on the University of Hawaii, which revealed the dwarf

110: nova nature of the eruptive object by unambiguous detection of

111: H$\alpha$ and HeII 4686~\AA in emission, as well as a blue

112: continuum \citep{qui05atel658}. There is no optical counterpart in USNO

113: B1.0 and 2MASS catalog within the 5 arcsec circle. This suggests that

114: the quiescent magnitude of the object is fainter than 21 mag.

115: 

116: In this letter, we report on the results of CCD photometric observations

117: during the 2005 November long outburst of TSS 022216.4+412259.9

118: (hereafter, aliased TSS J0222), mainly focusing on detection of two

119: periodicities during the outburst plateau stage. Detailed discussion

120: will be published in the forthcoming paper.

121: 

122: \section{Observations}

123: 

124: \begin{figure}

125: \begin{center}

126: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{fig1.eps}}

127: \end{center}

128: \caption{Finding chart of TSS J0222 from our original data. The field of

129:  view is about 16'${\times}$8'. The north is up and the east is to the

130:  left. The variable and the comparison star are denoted by $V$ and $C$,

131:  respectively.}

132: \end{figure}

133: 

134: \begin{figure}

135: \begin{center}

136: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{fig2.eps}}

137: \end{center}

138: \caption{The daily averaged light curve during the outburst. The vertical

139:  and horizontal axes denote $R$ magnitude and HJD,

140:  respectively. The magnitude of the comparison is $R$ = 12.6. The

141:  error bar denotes standard error. Due to the faintness of TSS J0222,

142:  the accuracy of the magnitude calibration was dependent on the

143:  weather condition so that we excluded a few data. Nevertheless, we

144:  unambiguously detected the rebrightenings around HJD 2453708.}

145: \label{}

146: \end{figure}

147: 

148: Time-resolved CCD photometry was carried out from 2005 November 21 to

149: 2005 December 14 at 4 sites using 25-60 cm telescopes. More information

150: about each site is described in table 1. The total data

151: points exceeded 10000. Typical exposure time was 10-30 sec with no

152: filter. The resultant band pass is close to R$_{\rm c}$-band. The differential

153: magnitude among each sites was adjusted to that of the Kyoto site. We

154: used USNO$-$A2.0 1275$-$01425512 ($B$ = 12.8, $R$ = 12.6) as a

155: comparison star, whose constancy was checked by several stars in the

156: same image. Figure 1 illustrates a finding chart of TSS J0222. Kyoto

157: team used java-based PSF photometry package developed

158: by one of authors (TK). Hida and Saitama used IRAF DAOPHOT and

159: APPHOT. Data of Mie were analysed by

160: FitsPhot4.1.\footnote{http://www.geocities.jp/nagai\_kazuo/dload-1.html}

161: Because of the faintness of TSS J0222, accurate calibration of the

162: magnitude was prevented on some nights. However, such uncertainty would

163: not influence on the following analysis in which we mainly focus on the

164: periodicity of photometric variations. Heliocentric correction is also

165: made for our whole run.

166: 

167: \begin{table}[htb]

168: \caption{Information about each site.}

169: \begin{center}

170: \begin{tabular}{cccc}

171: \hline\hline

172: Site & Telescope & Exp(s)$^\dagger$ & N(days) \\ 

173: \hline

174: \hline

175: Kyoto, Japan & 40cm & 30 & 20 \\

176: Hida, Japan & 60cm & 10 & 1 \\

177: Saitama, Japan & 25cm & 30 & 2 \\

178: Mie, Japan & 25cm & 30 & 1 \\

179: \hline

180: \multicolumn{4}{l}{$^\dagger$ Exposure time.} \\

181: \multicolumn{4}{l}{$^\ddagger$ Number of observed nights.} \\

182: \end{tabular}

183: \end{center}

184: \end{table}

185: 

186: \section{Results and discussion}

187: 

188: \subsection{light curves}

189: 

190: Figure 2 displays the overall light curve of this outburst. At the onset

191: of our observations, TSS J0222 was at the magnitude of 16.4. After that

192: the magnitude linearly faded down with the rate of 0.1

193: mag d$^{-1}$. Some WZ Sge stars show a rapid decline just after the

194: maximum brightness with $\sim$ 0.5 mag d$^{-1}$, presumably due to

195: viscous decay in the accretion disk \citep{kat02v592her}. In the case of

196: TSS J0222, we cannot specify such a rapid declining took place due to

197: the lack of the our run at the early stage of the superoutburst. After

198: the end of the main plateau stage, TSS J0222 faded down as faint as our

199: detection limit ($\sim$ 19.5 mag) on HJD 2453706. However, we

200: detected a rebrightening on HJD 2453708 at the magnitude of

201: 18.8. Judging from figure 2, the rebrightening lasted at least 9

202: days. Because of an intrinsic faintness of TSS J0222, we could not

203: specify the overall feature of the rebrightenings. Phenomenologically,

204: three types of rebrightenings may exist. AL Com and WZ Sge itself kept

205: bright for a week or even more, although about 1 mag-fluctuations were

206: observed with a time scale of a few days in WZ Sge. The overall light

207: curves of rebrightenings are not discrete, but somewhat

208: long-lasting. Here we call this type of rebrighenings ``type-A''. On the

209: other hand, regular rebrightenings were seen in EG Cnc. Here we call

210: this kind of rebrightenings ``type-B''. Finally, not only WZ Sge stars

211: but also some SU UMa stars show a short rebrightening. Such systems

212: include RZ Leo \citep{ish01rzleo}. We call ``type-C'' for the

213: rebrightening. The observed rebrightening of TSS J0222 apparently

214: belongs to the "type-A" category. The reason why different

215: rebrightenings emerge even in the same system, is not known (for a

216: relevant paper, see e.g., \cite{kuu96TOAD};

217: \cite{osa01egcnc}).footnote{For example, WZ Sge shows two types of

218: rebrightenings. In 1978 and 2001 superoutburst, the object exhibited the

219: type-A rebrightening, while no rebrightening was observed in 1946

220: superoutbutst (\cite{pat81wzsge}; \cite{ish02wzsgeletter}}.

221: 

222: \begin{figure}

223: \begin{center}

224: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{fig3.eps}}

225: \end{center}

226: \caption{Light curves on HJD 2453696 and HJD 2453697, second and third

227:  night of our observations. Both light curves were subtracted a linear

228:  declining trend. Note that there are vague features on HJD 2453696,

229:  while there are features of superhumps on HJD 2453697.}

230: \label{}

231: \end{figure}

232: 

233: Figure 3 displays enlarged light curves on HJD

234: 2453696 and HJD 2453697. There is almost no feature on HJD

235: 2453696 at a glance. However, double-peaked features can be seen when

236: the data of HJD 2453695 and HJD 2453696 are folded with 

237: 0.054868 days (discussed later). As for the light curve on HJD 2453697,

238: we can clearly see a rapid-rise and a slow decline feature, which is

239: typical for the superhump profile. We suggest that some kind of

240: transition took place between HJD 2453696 and HJD 2453697, and that the

241: feature we observed on HJD 2453697 was genuine superhumps, as is

242: observed in SU UMa stars during superoutbursts. This kind of

243: transition has been observed in WZ Sge stars amid the plateau

244: stage (e.g., \cite{nog97alcom}; \cite{pat98egcnc};

245: \cite{ish02wzsgeletter}). Therefore, we can reasonably conclude that we

246: did observe early superhumps on HJD 2453695 and HJD 2453696, and genuine

247: superhumps from HJD 2453697 on, respectively.

248: 

249: \subsection{period analysis}

250: 

251: \begin{figure}

252: \begin{center}

253: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{fig4a.eps}}

254: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{fig4b.eps}}

255: \end{center}

256: \caption{Theta diagrams of the period analyses using the PDM method for

257:  the data obtained during the first two days (Top panel) and the

258:  following nights of the plateau stage (Bottom panel). For the first two

259:  days, 0.054868(98) days is the best estimated period, while the

260:  periodicity of 0.055544(26) days is shown since HJD 2453697. We

261:  interpreted the latter as the mean superhump period of TSS J0222.}

262: \label{}

263: \end{figure}

264: 

265: \begin{figure}

266: \begin{center}

267: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{fig5a.eps}}

268: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{fig5b.eps}}

269: \end{center}

270: \caption{Phase-averaged light curves during the two stages folded with

271:  the above mentioned period, 0.054868 days and 0.055544 days,

272:  respectively. One can see double-peaked profiles, as is observed in WZ

273:  Sge-type dwarf novae in the top panel. On the other hand, a rapid

274:  rise and slow decline, characteristic of superhumps, is evident on the

275:  bottom panel.}

276: \label{}

277: \end{figure}

278: 

279: The results of period analyses during the plateau phase are represented in

280: figure 4. After subtracting a linear decline trend for each run, we performed

281: the phase dispersion minimization method (PDM, \citet{ste78pdm}) for the

282: data obtained on HJD 2453695 and HJD 2453696, corresponding to the early

283: superhump phase (upper panel), and for following 7 days, corresponding

284: to the genuine superhump phase (lower panel), respectively. The

285: statistical errors were estimated by using Lafler-Kinman class method

286: \citep{fer89error}. As can be obviously seen in figure 4, two different

287: periodicities were exhibited: 0.054868(98) days for early superhumps,

288: and 0.055544(26) days for genuine superhumps, respectively. The

289: statistical errors were estimated by using Lafler-Kinman class method

290: \citep{fer89error}. The statistical F-tests yielded significance levels

291: of the signals 74$\%$ for early superhumps and 83$\%$ for genuine

292: superhumps, respectively. Note that

293: the resultant superhump period is the shortest record among WZ Sge

294: stars, exceeding 0.05648(2) days of V592 Her

295: \citep{kat02v592her}. Figure 5 shows averaged light curves during these

296: stages folded by the periods obtained above. Note that the profile of

297: the upper panel is not singly peaked, but definitely doubly peaked,

298: similar to that observed in the early phase of WZ Sge and AL Com

299: \citep{ish02wzsgeletter}. On the other hand, the lower panel illustrates

300: a singly peaked profile. The rapid rise and slow decline of the profile

301: are quite typical for superhumps of SU UMa stars.

302: 

303: \subsection{TSS J0222 as a WZ Sge star}

304: 

305: \begin{figure}

306: \begin{center}

307: \resizebox{80mm}{!}{\includegraphics{fig6.eps}}

308: \end{center}

309: \caption{${\epsilon}-$period diagram of SU UMa-type dwarf novae. TSS

310:  J0222 and confirmed WZ Sge stars are also included with the filled

311:  circle and filled triangles, respectively. The figure is drawn based on

312:  table 9 of \citet{pat05suuma}. The vertical dotted line indicates the

313:  observed period minimum of SU UMa stars on the secular evolution path.}

314: \end{figure}

315: 

316: The present superoutburst of TSS J0222 showed two types of humps, a

317: rebrightening, and a large-amplitude of the eruption larger than 6 mag,

318: all of which are characteristic of WZ Sge stars

319: (\cite{how95TOAD}; \cite{ima05gocom}). Judging from the

320: results mentioned before, we can reasonably conclude that TSS J0222 is a

321: new member of WZ Sge stars with the shortest period ever known. We

322: further investigated the mass ratio of the object based on an empirical

323: relation derived by \citet{pat98evolution} as follows:

324: 

325: \begin{equation}

326: \epsilon = \frac{0.23q}{1+0.27q},

327: \end{equation}

328: 

329: where ${\epsilon}$ and $q$ are the fractional superhump excess and mass

330: ratio, respectively. Because the radial velocity study has not been

331: performed for TSS J0222, the orbital period of TSS J0222 cannot be

332: exactly specified. However, taking into account the fact

333: that the period of the early superhump is almost the same as that of the

334: orbital period (\cite{pat98egcnc}; \cite{pat02wzsge};

335: \cite{ish03hvvir}), we can validly use the early superhump period above

336: obtained (0.054868 days) as the orbital period of TSS J0222. Thus the

337: fractional superhump excess is estimated as being 0.0123(23) with a

338: little algebra. Substituting this value into the equation (1), we

339: obtained q = 0.054(10). The value is quite a similar to that listed in

340: \citet{pat05suuma} for some WZ Sge stars. This implies that

341: the mass of the secondary star might be as low as 0.075 $M_{\odot}$ even

342: if the primary white dwarf reaches the Chandrasekhar mass.

343: 

344: Figure 6 shows ${\epsilon}$$-$$P_{\rm orb}$ diagram recently refined by

345: \citet{pat05suuma}, together with the data of TSS J0222 derived

346: above. Note that the location of TSS J0222 is close to that of WZ Sge

347: and AL Com, rather than that of SU UMa-type dwarf novae with short

348: orbital periods, e.g., WX Cet and SW UMa. This suggests that TSS J0222

349: bears some resemblance to WZ Sge and AL Com.

350: 

351: \section{Summary}

352: 

353: In this letter, we reported on the newly discovered dwarf

354: nova, TSS J0222. The obtained light curves provided enough evidence for

355: early superhumps and genuine superhumps, characteristic of WZ Sge-type

356: dwarf novae. We derived the superhump period was 0.055544(26) days, as

357: well as the early superhump period of 0.054868(98) days. The value is

358: the shortest period among WZ Sge stars. Although a faintness

359: of the object prevented an accurate calibration of magnitude after the

360: post-plateau stage, we detected a long rebrightening during this stage,

361: indicative of the WZ Sge nature of the system. The overall

362: rebrightenings was classified into ``type-A'' in the

363: letter, similar to those observed in the 1995 superoutburst of AL Com.

364: Assuming that the early superhump period is exactly the same as the

365: orbital period, we roughly derived the mass ratio of TSS J0222 to be

366: 0.054(10). This may indicate the mass of the secondary star is low, like

367: WZ Sge and AL Com. In the future, further observations with a large

368: telescope should be performed to accurately determine the orbital period

369: and the mass ratio of the system.

370: 

371: \vskip 5mm

372: 

373: We would express our gratitude to VSNET observers. This work is

374: supported by Grants-in-Aid for the 21st Century COE ``Center for

375: Diversity and Universality in Physics'' from the Ministry of Education,

376: Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), and also by

377: Grants-in-Aid from MEXT (No. 13640239, 16340057, 16740121,

378: 17740105).

379: 

380: \begin{thebibliography}{}

381: 

382: \bibitem[Fernie(1989)]{fer89error}

383:   Fernie, J.~D.\ 1989, \pasp, 101, 225

384: 

385: \bibitem[G\"ansicke(2005)]{gan05review}

386:   G\"ansicke, B.~T.\ 2005, in ASP Conf. Ser. 330, The astrophysics of

387:   Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects, ed. J.~M. Hameury, \&

388:   J.~M.

389:   Lasota (San Francisco: ASP), ~3

390: 

391: \bibitem[Howell et~al.(2001)]{how01periodgap}

392:   Howell, S.~B., Nelson, L.~A., \& Rappaport, S.\ 2001, \apj, 550, 897

393: 

394: \bibitem[Howell et~al.(1997)]{how97periodminimum}

395:   Howell, S.~B., Rappaport, S., \& Politano, M.\ 1997, \mnras, 287, 929

396: 

397: \bibitem[Howell et~al.(1995)]{how95TOAD}

398:   Howell, S.~B., Szkody, P., \& Cannizzo, J.~K.\ 1995, \apj, 439, 337

399: 

400: \bibitem[Imada et~al.(2005)]{ima05gocom}

401:   Imada, A., {et~al.}\ 2005, \pasj, 57, 193

402: 

403: \bibitem[Ishioka et~al.(2001)]{ish01rzleo}

404:   Ishioka, R., {et~al.}\ 2001, \pasj, 53, 905

405: 

406: \bibitem[Ishioka et~al.(2003)]{ish03hvvir}

407:   Ishioka, R., {et~al.}\ 2003, \pasj, 55, 683

408: 

409: \bibitem[Ishioka et~al.(2002)]{ish02wzsgeletter}

410:   Ishioka, R., {et~al.}\ 2002, \aap, 381, L41

411: 

412: \bibitem[Kato(2002)]{kat02wzsgeESH}

413:   Kato, T.\ 2002, \pasj, 54, L11

414: 

415: \bibitem[Kato et~al.(1996)]{kat96alcom}

416:   Kato, T., Nogami, D., Baba, H., Matsumoto, K., Arimoto, J., Tanabe, K., \&

417:   Ishikawa, K.\ 1996, \pasj, 48, L21

418: 

419: \bibitem[Kato et~al.(2004)]{kat04vsnet}

420:   Kato, T., Uemura, M., Ishioka, R., Nogami, D., Kunjaya, C., Baba, H., \&

421:   Yamaoka, H.\ 2004, \pasj, 56S, 1

422: 

423: \bibitem[Kato et~al.(2002)]{kat02v592her}

424:   Kato, T., Uemura, M., Matsumoto, K., Kinnunen, T., Garradd, G., Masi, G., \&

425:   Yamaoka, H.\ 2002, \pasj, 54, 999

426: 

427: \bibitem[Kolb, Baraffe(1999)]{kol99CVperiodminimum}

428:   Kolb, U., \& Baraffe, I.\ 1999, \mnras, 309, 1034

429: 

430: \bibitem[Kuulkers et~al.(1996)]{kuu96TOAD}

431:   Kuulkers, E., Howell, S.~B., \& van Paradijs, J.\ 1996, \apjl, 462, L87

432: 

433: \bibitem[Nogami et~al.(1997)]{nog97alcom}

434:   Nogami, D., Kato, T., Baba, H., Matsumoto, K., Arimoto, J., Tanabe, K., \&

435:   Ishikawa, K.\ 1997, \apj, 490, 840

436: 

437: \bibitem[Osaki, Meyer(2002)]{osa02wzsgehump}

438:   Osaki, Y., \& Meyer, F.\ 2002, \aap, 383, 574

439: 

440: \bibitem[Osaki et~al.(2001)]{osa01egcnc}

441:   Osaki, Y., Meyer, F., \& Meyer-Hofmeister, E.\ 2001, \aap, 370, 488

442: 

443: \bibitem[Patterson(1998)]{pat98evolution}

444:   Patterson, J.\ 1998, \pasp, 110, 1132

445: 

446: \bibitem[Patterson et~al.(2005)]{pat05suuma}

447:   Patterson, J., {et~al.}\ 2005, \pasp, 117, 1204

448: 

449: \bibitem[Patterson et~al.(1998)]{pat98egcnc}

450:   Patterson, J., {et~al.}\ 1998, \pasp, 110, 1290

451: 

452: \bibitem[Patterson et~al.(1981)]{pat81wzsge}

453:   Patterson, J., McGraw, J.~T., Coleman, L., \& Africano, J.~L.\ 1981, \apj,

454:   248, 1067

455: 

456: \bibitem[Patterson et~al.(2002)]{pat02wzsge}

457:   Patterson, J., {et~al.}\ 2002, \pasp, 114, 721

458: 

459: \bibitem[Podsiadlowski et~al.(2003)]{pod03amcvn}

460:   Podsiadlowski, Ph., Han, Z., \& Rappaport, S.\ 2003, \mnras, 340, 1214

461: 

462: \bibitem[Quimby et~al.(2005)]{qui05atel658}

463:   Quimby, R., {et~al.}\ 2005, ATEL, 658

464: 

465: \bibitem[Stellingwerf(1978)]{ste78pdm}

466:   Stellingwerf, R.~F.\ 1978, \apj, 224, 953

467: 

468: \bibitem[Warner(1995)]{war95book}

469:   Warner, B.\ 1995, Cataclysmic Variable Stars (Cambridge: Cambridge

470: 	         University Press) 

471: 

472: \bibitem[Willems et~al.(2005)]{wil05CVevolution}

473:   Willems, B., Kolb, U., Sandquist, E.L., Taam, R.~E., \& Dubus, G.\ 2005,

474:   \apj, 635, 1263

475: 

476: \end{thebibliography}

477: 

478: 

479: \end{document}

480: