1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
3: %\usepackage{psfig}
4:
5: \shorttitle{LP 714-37: A triple system}
6: \shortauthors{Phan-Bao et al.}
7:
8: \begin{document}
9:
10: \title{LP 714-37: A wide pair of ultracool dwarfs actually is a
11: triple$^{\star}$}
12:
13: \author{Ngoc Phan-Bao,\altaffilmark{1} Thierry Forveille, \altaffilmark{2,3}
14: Eduardo L. Mart\'{\i}n, \altaffilmark{4,1} Xavier Delfosse \altaffilmark{3}}
15:
16: \altaffiltext{$^{\star}$}{Based on observations made at the
17: Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope,
18: operated by the National Research Council of Canada, the Centre National
19: de la Recherche Scientifique de France and the University of Hawaii.}
20: \altaffiltext{1}{University of Central Florida, Dept. of Physics,
21: PO Box 162385, Orlando, FL 32816-2385, USA; pngoc@physics.ucf.edu}
22: \altaffiltext{2}{Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Corporation, 65-1238
23: Mamalahoa Highway, Kamuela, HI 96743 USA; forveille@cfht.hawaii.edu}
24: \altaffiltext{3}{Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Grenoble, Universit\'e
25: J. Fourier, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble, France; delfosse@obs.ujf-grenoble.fr}
26: \altaffiltext{4}{Instituto de Astrof\'{\i}sica de Canarias,
27: C/ V\'{\i}a L\'actea s/n, E-38200 La Laguna (Tenerife), Spain; ege@iac.es}
28:
29:
30: \begin{abstract}
31:
32: LP~714-37 was identified by Phan-Bao et al. (2005) as one of the very
33: few wide pairs of very low mass (VLM) stars known to date, with a separation
34: of 33~AU. Here we present adaptive optics imaging which resolves the
35: secondary of the wide pair into a tighter binary, with a projected angular
36: separation of 0.36\arcsec, or 7~AU. The estimated spectral types of
37: LP~714-37B and LP~714-37C are M8.0 and M8.5. We discuss the implications
38: of this finding for brown dwarf formation scenarios.
39:
40: \end{abstract}
41:
42: \keywords{stars: low mass, brown dwarfs --- binaries: visual ---
43: stars: individual (LP~714-37, DENIS-P~J0410-1251)}
44:
45: \section{Introduction}
46:
47: Binary systems offer the only practical opportunity to measure accurate
48: stellar masses, and represent a powerful test of evolutionary models and
49: star formation theories. These last aspects are particularly important
50: for stars at the bottom of the main sequence and brown dwarfs (BDs), whose
51: physical parameters and formation mechanism are not well known. Significant
52: attention has recently been concentrated on binaries among ultracool dwarfs
53: (spectral types later than M6) both in the field (\citealt{martin99, reid01};
54: \citealt{close02}, 2003; \citealt{bouy03,burgasser03};
55: \citealt{forveille04}, 2005; \citealt{siegler, liu, law}) and in nearby
56: young open clusters and associations (\citealt{martin98}, 2000, 2003;
57: \citealt{luhman04a}; \citealt{kraus}; \citealt{stassun}; \citealt{bouy06a}).
58: These surveys demonstrate that wide binary systems (semi-major axis $>$
59: 15~AU) are very rare amongst ultracool dwarfs, with a frequency below 1\%,
60: while tighter binaries (semi-major axis $<$ 15~AU) occurs in $>$15\% of
61: them. This well defined cutoff is not caused by disruptions during galactic
62: dynamical encounters, which only become effective at significantly wider
63: separations \citep{weinberg87}. One possible explanation lies in the
64: ejection model \citep{reipurth, bate02} for brown dwarf formation,
65: which describes them as failed stellar embryos, ejected from their parent
66: gas core before they have time to accrete a larger mass. Wide binaries
67: are not expected to survive such an ejection, and the numerical simulations
68: of this process suggest that it only produces close binaries (separation
69: $\leq$ 10~AU; \citealt{bate02}), in rough agreement with the observations.
70: More recently however, a growing number of wide binaries (separation $>$
71: 30~AU) has been detected \citep{luhman04a, phan-bao05, chauvin,
72: luhman05, billeres, bouy06b}, suggesting that at least some VLM stars
73: and BDs form through
74: another process. Some of these apparent binaries, however, could
75: be unresolved higher multiplicity systems, with a correspondingly higher
76: total mass and binding energy. Ascertaining how many of them there are is
77: clearly important.
78:
79: In this Letter, we present adaptive optics observations of one such
80: system, LP~714-37 \citep{phan-bao05}, prompted in part by its apparently
81: overluminous secondary. The new images do resolve that secondary
82: into a tighter pair, and demonstrate that the system contains three
83: VLM stars. Sec.~2 presents the observations and the data reduction, while
84: Sec.~3. discusses the results in the context of the binary properties of
85: wide VLM stars and BDs in general, and of the formation of LP~714-37
86: in particular.
87:
88: \section{Observations and data reduction}
89:
90: We observed LP~714-37 at the 3.6-meter Canada-France-Hawaii
91: Telescope (CFHT) on 2005 October 13$^{th}$, using the CFHT Adaptive
92: Optics Bonnette (AOB) and the KIR infrared camera. The AOB, also called
93: PUEO after the sharp-visioned Hawaiian owl, is a general-purpose adaptive
94: optics (AO) system based on F. Roddier's curvature concept
95: \citep{roddier91}. It is mounted at the telescope F/8 Cassegrain focus,
96: and cameras or other instruments are then attached to it
97: \citep{arsenault94,rigaut94}. The atmospheric
98: turbulence is analysed by a 19-element wavefront curvature sensor and
99: the correction applied by a 19-electrode bimorph mirror. Modal control
100: and continuous mode gain optimization \citep{gendron94,rigaut94}
101: maximize the quality of the AO correction for
102: the current atmospheric turbulence and guide star magnitude, and produced
103: well corrected images for the faint LP~714-37 system ($V=16.5$, $I=13.0$).
104: For our observations a dichroic mirror diverted the visible light to the
105: wavefront sensor while the KIR science camera \citep{doyon98} recorded
106: infrared photons. The KIR plate scale is 0\farcs035 per pixel, for a
107: total field size of $36\arcsec \times 36\arcsec$.
108:
109: We observed LP~714-37 through a K$^{\prime}$ filter, and obtained series
110: of five 30s exposures at each of five dither positions. The raw images
111: were median combined to produce sky frames, which were then subtracted
112: from the raw data. Subsequent reduction steps included flat-fielding,
113: flagging of the bad pixels, and finally shift-and-add combinations of the
114: corrected frames into one final image (Fig.~\ref{AOimage}) with a 12.5~min total exposure time.
115: Analysis of this image with SExtractor \citep{bertin} produced the relative
116: astrometry and relative photometry summarized in Table~\ref{tab_oa}.
117:
118: \section{Discussion}
119:
120: \subsection{Physical parameters of the LP~714-37 triple system}
121:
122: The proper motion of the system is $\mu_{\rm \alpha}$~=~$-$117~mas/yr
123: and $\mu_{\rm \delta}$~=~$-$382~mas/yr \citep{phan-bao03}, and it has
124: moved by 1.95\arcsec~between the epoch of the DENIS image (2000.0) and
125: our CFHT observation. Figure~\ref{fig_pm} shows no background star at
126: the position of the system in the DENIS and 2MASS K images, demonstrating
127: that the system is a physical triple.
128:
129: \citet{phan-bao05} spectroscopically classified component~A as M5.5, with
130: an estimated absolute magnitude of $M_{K} = 9.11$. The relative photometry
131: listed in Table~\ref{tab_oa} therefore provides estimates of $M_{K}~=~10.05$
132: for LP~714-37B and $M_{K}~=~10.35$ for LP~714-37C. We note that the
133: difference between the DENIS-K, 2MASS-K and K$^{\prime}$ photometry is
134: very small \citep{carpenter}, and completely negligible for the purpose
135: of the present paper. Adding the flux of the three components, the absolute
136: K-band magnitude of the system is $M_{\rm K}$~=~8.5, which combines with the
137: DENIS magnitude ($K_{\rm s}=9.89$) to give a photometric distance of
138: 18.9$\pm$2.6~pc.
139: At this updated distance
140: the projected separations between B and C, and A and the BC barycenter,
141: are respectively of 6.8 and 36.1~AU.
142:
143: We estimate approximate spectral types for components B and C from their
144: absolute K-band magnitude (which itself scales back to the spectral type
145: of A). A linear least-square fit to the absolute magnitudes and spectral
146: types relation of 35~single M5.0-M9.5 dwarfs (Fig.~\ref{MkvsSpT}), gives
147: the following relation:
148: %
149: \begin{center}
150: SpT = 2.17 $M_{\rm K}$ - 13.9, $\sigma = 0.68 $
151: \end{center}
152: %
153: where SpT is the spectral subtype, 5.0 for spectral type M5.0 and 9.5
154: for spectral type M9.5. Applying this relation results in estimated
155: spectral types of M8.0$\pm$0.5 and M8.5$\pm$0.5 for component B and C,
156: respectively.
157:
158: The 5~Gyr K-band mass-luminosity relation of \citet{baraffe98} results
159: in a mass 0.08$\pm$0.01~M$_{\odot}$ for component C. All three components
160: have estimated masses close to the hydrogen-burning limit \citep{chabrier},
161: and the total mass of LP~714-37 is $\sim$0.28~M$_{\odot}$. Table~\ref{parameters}
162: presents a summary of the derived physical parameters of the system.
163:
164: \subsection{Could LP 714-37 have formed through the ejection process?}
165:
166: Ejection models \citep{reipurth, bate02} suggest that (most) brown dwarfs
167: form through the premature removal of pre-stellar cores from their parental
168: molecular clouds by dynamical interactions. These models qualitatively
169: predict that the binary brown dwarf systems that do exist must be close
170: (separation $\leq$ 10~AU), since the small binding energy of wide BD
171: binaries leaves them vulnerable to disruption. More recent simulations
172: \citep{bate05} do produce some wide BD binary systems, when two unrelated
173: objects are simultaneously ejected in the same direction. This mechanism
174: however needs high density environments to work. It could thus not possibly
175: form the wide binaries known in TW~Hya, Cha~I, and Upper~Sco
176: \citep{chauvin, luhman04a, luhman05}. A caveat, however, is that some
177: apparent binaries might be unresolved triple or higher order multiple
178: systems, whose additional components could boost the binding energy of the
179: systems enough to allow them to survive ejection.
180:
181: \citet{close03} found that the minimum escape velocity in their sample of
182: 34 VLM binaries is 3.8~km~s$^{-1}$ (Fig.~\ref{Vesc}). The escape
183: velocity of LP~714-37 A and B at a 33~AU semi-major-axis would be
184: $V_{\rm esc} \sim 3.3$~km~s$^{-1}$, significantly under that limit.
185: Accounting for the additional C component however increases the escape
186: velocity of the system to 4.4~km~s$^{-1}$. This is significantly above the
187: 3.8~km~s$^{-1}$ \citep{close03} empirical lower limit, and Figure~\ref{Vesc}
188: actually has a close analog of LP~714-37: GJ~1245ABC.
189: LP~714-37 therefore demonstrates that some wide apparent VLM binaries
190: are actually higher order multiple systems with
191: $V_{\rm esc}~\geq$~$\sim3.8$~km~s$^{-1}$ and no longer contradict the
192: ejection scenario for brown dwarf formation. The wider VLM binaries
193: identified by \citet{martin00}, \citet{billeres}, and \citet{burgasser06}
194: however cannot be brought over $V_{\rm esc}$~$\sim3.8$~km~s$^{-1}$
195: for any realistic number of components. This suggests that other
196: formation channels must exist, but a high resolution search for additional
197: components among wide VLM binaries such as CFHT-Pl-18 \citep{martin00},
198: DENIS 0551-44 \citep{billeres}, and DENIS 2200$-$3038 \citep{burgasser06}
199: is clearly important.
200:
201: \acknowledgments
202: P.B.N. and E.L.M. acknowledge financial support from NSF grant AST 0440520.
203: P.B.N. thanks A.J. Burgasser for his comments on the
204: manuscript. We thank the referee for a fast and useful report.
205: This research has made use of the ALADIN, SIMBAD and VIZIER databases,
206: operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France.
207:
208: \begin{thebibliography}{}
209:
210: \bibitem[Arsenault et al.(1994)]{arsenault94} Arsenault, R., Salmon, D.,
211: Kerr, J., Rigaut, F., et al. 1994, in SPIE Proceedings 2201, Adaptive
212: Optics in Astronomy, ed. M.A. Ealey, \& F. Merkle, 833
213:
214: \bibitem[Baraffe et al.(1998)]{baraffe98}
215: Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., et al. 1998, \aap, 337, 403
216:
217: \bibitem[Bate et al.(2002)]{bate02}
218: Bate, M. R., Bonnell, I. A., \& Bromm, V. 2002, MNRAS, 332, L65
219:
220: \bibitem[Bate \& Bonnell(2005)]{bate05}
221: Bate, M. R., \& Bonnell, I. A. 2005, MNRAS, 356, 1201
222:
223: \bibitem[Bertin \& Arnouts(1996)]{bertin}
224: Bertin, E., \& Arnouts, S. 1996, A\&AS, 117, 393
225:
226: \bibitem[Beuzit et al.(2004)]{beuzit04}
227: Beuzit, J.-L., S\'egransan, D., Forveille, T., et al. 2004, \aap, 425, 997
228:
229: \bibitem[Bill\`eres et al.(2005)]{billeres}
230: Bill\`eres, M., Delfosse, X., Beuzit, J.-L., et al. 2005, \aap, 440, L55
231:
232: \bibitem[Bouy et al.(2003)]{bouy03}
233: Bouy, H., Brandner, W., Mart\'{\i}n, E. L., et al. 2003, AJ, 126, 1526
234:
235: \bibitem[Bouy et al.(2006a)]{bouy06a}
236: Bouy, H., Moraux, E., Bouvier, J., et al. 2006a, \apj, 637, 1056
237:
238: \bibitem[Bouy et al.(2006b)]{bouy06b}
239: Bouy, H., Mart\'{\i}n, E. L., Brandner, W. et al. 2006b, submitted (astro-ph/0512258)
240:
241: \bibitem[Burgasser et al.(2003)]{burgasser03}
242: Burgasser, A. J., Kirkpatrick, J. D., et al. 2003, ApJ, 586, 512
243:
244: \bibitem[Burgasser \& McElwain(2006)]{burgasser06}
245: Burgasser, A. J. \& McElwain, M. W. 2006, \aj, 131, 1007
246:
247: \bibitem[Carpenter(2001)]{carpenter}
248: Carpenter, J. M. 2001, \aj, 121, 2851
249:
250: \bibitem[Chabrier \& Baraffe(1997)]{chabrier}
251: Chabrier, G., \& Baraffe, I. 1997, A\&A, 327, 1039
252:
253: \bibitem[Chauvin et al.(2004)]{chauvin}
254: Chauvin, G., Lagrange, A.-M, Dumas, C., et al. 2004, A\&A, 425, L29
255:
256: \bibitem[Close et al.(2002)]{close02}
257: Close, L. M., Siegler, N., et al. 2002, \apj, 567, L53
258:
259: \bibitem[Close et al.(2003)]{close03}
260: Close, L. M., Siegler, N., et al. 2003, \apj, 587, 407
261:
262: \bibitem[Dahn et al.(2002)]{dahn02}
263: Dahn, C. C., Harris, H. C., Vrba, F. J., et al. 2002, \aj, 124, 1170
264:
265: \bibitem[Doyon et al. (1998)]{doyon98}
266: Doyon R., Nadeau D., Vall\'ee P., et al. 1998, in
267: SPIE Proceedings 3354, Infrared Astronomical Instrumentation,
268: ed. A.M. Fowler, 760
269:
270: \bibitem[Forveille et al.(2004)]{forveille04}
271: Forveille, T., S\'egransan, D., Delorme, P., et al. 2004, \aap, 427, L1
272:
273: \bibitem[Forveille et al.(2005)]{forveille05}
274: Forveille, T., Beuzit, J.-L., Delorme, P., et al. 2005, A\&A, 435, L5
275:
276: \bibitem[Gendron \& Lena(1994)]{gendron94}
277: Gendron, E., \& L\'ena, P. 1994, A\&A, 291, 337
278:
279: \bibitem[Kraus et al.(2005)]{kraus}
280: Kraus, A. L., White, R. J., \& Hillenbrand, L. A. 2005, \apj, 633, 452
281:
282: \bibitem[Law et al.(2006)]{law}
283: Law, N. M., Hodgkin, S. T., \& Mackay, C. D. 2006, MNRAS, in press (astro-ph/0512449)
284:
285: \bibitem[Liu \& Leggett(2005)]{liu}
286: Liu, M. C., \& Leggett, S. K. 2005, \apj, 634, 616
287:
288: \bibitem[Luhman(2004a)]{luhman04a}
289: Luhman, K. L. 2004a, ApJ, 614, 398
290:
291: \bibitem[Luhman(2005)]{luhman05}
292: Luhman, K. L. 2005, ApJ, 633, L41
293:
294: \bibitem[Mart\'{\i}n et al.(1998)]{martin98}
295: Mart\'{\i}n, E. L., Basri, G., Brandner, W., et al. 1998, ApJ, 509, L113
296:
297: \bibitem[Mart\'{\i}n et al.(1999)]{martin99}
298: Mart\'{\i}n, E. L., Brandner, W., \& Basri, G. 1999, Sci, 283, 1718
299:
300: \bibitem[Mart\'{\i}n et al.(2000)]{martin00}
301: Mart\'{\i}n, E. L., Brandner, W., Bouvier, J., et al. 2000, ApJ, 543, 299
302:
303: \bibitem[Mart\'{\i}n et al.(2003)]{martin03}
304: Mart\'{\i}n, E. L., Barrado y Navascu\'es, D., et al. 2003, ApJ, 594, 525
305:
306: \bibitem[Monet et al.(1992)]{monet92}
307: Monet, D. G., Dahn, C. C., Vrba, F. J., et al. 1992, \aj, 103, 638
308:
309: \bibitem[Phan-Bao et al.(2003)]{phan-bao03}
310: Phan-Bao, N., Crifo, F., Delfosse, X., et al. 2003, A\&A, 401, 959
311:
312: \bibitem[Phan-Bao et al.(2005)]{phan-bao05}
313: Phan-Bao, N., Mart\'{\i}n, E. L., Reyl\'e, C., Forveille, T., \& Lim, J. 2005, \aap, 439, L19
314:
315: \bibitem[Reid \& Gizis(1997)]{reid97a}
316: Reid, I. N., \& Gizis, J. E. 1997, AJ, 113, 2246
317:
318: \bibitem[Reid et al.(2001)]{reid01}
319: Reid, I. N., Gizis, J. E., et al. 2001, AJ, 121, 489
320:
321: \bibitem[Reipurth \& Clarke(2001)]{reipurth}
322: Reipurth, B., \& Clarke, C. 2001, AJ, 122, 432
323:
324: \bibitem[Rigaut et al.(1994)]{rigaut94}
325: Rigaut, F., Arsenault, R., Kerr, J., et al. 1994,
326: in SPIE Proceedings 2201, Adaptive Optics in Astronomy, ed. M.A. Ealey, \& F. Merkle, 149
327:
328: \bibitem[Roddier et al.(1991)]{roddier91}
329: Roddier, F., Graves, J. E., McKenna, D., \& Northcott, M. J. 1991, in SPIE Proceedings 1524, 248
330:
331: \bibitem[Siegler et al.(2005)]{siegler}
332: Siegler, N., Close, L. M., et al. 2005, ApJ, 621, 1023
333:
334: \bibitem[Stassun et al.(2006)]{stassun}
335: Stassun, K. G, Mathieu, R. D., \& Valenti, J. A. 2006, \nat, 440, 311
336:
337: \bibitem[van Altena et al.(1995)]{van95}
338: van Altena, W. F., Lee, J. T., \& Hoffleit, E. D. 1995, The General Catalogue
339: of Trigonometric Stellar Parallaxes, Fourth Edition (New Haven, CT: Yale University Observatory)
340:
341: \bibitem[Weinberg et al.(1987)]{weinberg87}
342: Weinberg, M. D., Shapiro, S. L., \& Wasserman, I. 1987, \apj, 312, 367
343:
344: \end{thebibliography}
345:
346: \clearpage
347:
348: \begin{figure}
349: \vskip 1in
350: \hskip -0.25in
351: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in,angle=0]{f1.ps}}
352: \caption{\normalsize
353: An adaptive optics image of LP 714-37 with CFHT in the K$^{\prime}$ filter. The size of
354: the image is 3.5\arcsec $\times$ 3.5\arcsec, and North is up and East to the left.
355: \label{AOimage}}
356: \end{figure}
357:
358: \clearpage
359:
360: \begin{figure}
361: \vskip 1in
362: \hskip -0.25in
363: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in,angle=0]{f2.ps}}
364: \caption{\normalsize
365: Archival images of the LP 714-37 system: 2MASS-K (left, epoch: 1998.690 from ALADIN) and DENIS-K
366: (right, epoch: 2000.896). The cross indicates the position of component C at the
367: 2005.784 epoch of the CFHT image. Component C would clearly be separated from LP~714-37AB
368: in the 2MASS-K and DENIS-K images if it were not physically associated to the system.
369: The size of each image is 15\arcsec $\times$ 15\arcsec, and North is up and East to the left.
370: \label{fig_pm}}
371: \end{figure}
372:
373: \clearpage
374:
375: \begin{figure}
376: \vskip 1in
377: \hskip -0.25in
378: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in,angle=-90]{f3.ps}}
379: \caption{\normalsize
380: K-band absolute magnitude as a function of spectral type; most photometric
381: data from \citet{phan-bao03}, \citet{dahn02}; trigonometric parallaxes from \citet{van95}, \citet{monet92},
382: \citet{dahn02} and references therein.
383: \label{MkvsSpT}}
384: \end{figure}
385:
386:
387: \clearpage
388:
389: \begin{figure}
390: \vskip 1in
391: \hskip -0.25in
392: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4in,angle=-90]{f4.ps}}
393: \caption{\normalsize
394: Escape velocity vs. total mass of the system for VLM systems in the field.
395: The filled circles represent VLM binaries, from \citet{siegler} and references therein;
396: \citet{reid97a, beuzit04, martin00, billeres, burgasser06}.
397: The squares show the VLM triple system GJ~1245;
398: the empty square represents the escape velocity calculated by assuming
399: the system would have only two components A and B meanwhile the filled square
400: shows the escape velocity of the triple system.
401: The LP 714-37 system is noted as different symbols (empty and filled star).
402: Dash-dotted line: $V_{\rm esc} = 3.8$~km/s \citep{close03}.
403: \label{Vesc}}
404: \end{figure}
405:
406: \clearpage
407:
408: \begin{table*}
409: \caption{Relative astrometry and photometry of LP~714-37B and C
410: relative to LP~714-37A.
411: \label{tab_oa}
412: }
413: $$
414: \begin{tabular}{lllll}
415: \hline
416: \hline
417: Component & $\rho$ & $\theta$ & $\Delta$(K$^{\prime}$) \\
418: & (arcsec) & (deg) & \\
419: \hline % \hline
420: LP~714-37B & 1.87 & 124.9$\pm$0.5 & 0.94$\pm$0.05 \\ % H
421: LP~714-37C & 1.96 & 135.4$\pm$0.5 & 1.24$\pm$0.05 \\ % Kp
422: \hline
423: \end{tabular}
424: $$
425: \end{table*}
426:
427:
428: \clearpage
429: %
430: \begin{table*}
431: \caption{Spectral types of the three components of LP~714-37}
432: \label{parameters}
433: $$
434: \begin{tabular}{llll}
435: \hline
436: \hline
437: \noalign{\smallskip}
438: Components & SpT & $M_{\rm K}$ & Mass \\
439: & & & ($M_{\odot}$) \\
440: \noalign{\smallskip}
441: \hline
442: LP 714-37A & M5.5$\pm$0.5$^{1}$ & ~\,9.11$\pm$0.25$^{1}$ & 0.11$\pm$0.01$^{1}$ \\
443: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~\,B & M8.0$\pm$0.5 & 10.05$\pm$0.30 & 0.09$\pm$0.01 \\
444: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~\,C & M8.5$\pm$0.5 & 10.35$\pm$0.30 & 0.08$\pm$0.01 \\
445: \noalign{\smallskip}
446: \hline
447: \end{tabular}
448: $$
449: \begin{list}{}{}
450: \item[$^{1}$]: from \citet{phan-bao05}
451:
452: {\it Column 1}: Component name.
453: {\it Column 2}: Spectral type, estimated from the $M_{\rm K}$ versus spectral type relation.
454: {\it Column 3}: K-band absolute magnitude.
455: {\it Column 4}: Mass determination for 1-5~Gyr from the models of \citet{baraffe98}.
456: \end{list}
457: \end{table*}
458: %
459: \end{document}
460:
461:
462: