1:
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3:
4: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
5:
6: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
7:
8: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
9:
10: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
11:
12: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
13:
14: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
15: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
16: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
17: %% for information.
18:
19: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
20: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
21:
22:
23: \begin{document}
24:
25: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
26: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
27: %% you desire.
28:
29: \title{Detection of a $60\arcdeg$-Long Dwarf Galaxy Debris Stream}
30:
31: \author{C. J. Grillmair}
32: \affil{Spitzer Science Center, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125}
33: \email{carl@ipac.caltech.edu}
34:
35: \begin{abstract}
36:
37: We report on a $60\arcdeg$-long stream of stars, extending from Ursa
38: Major to Sextans, in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. The stream is
39: approximately $2\arcdeg$ wide and is clearly distinct from the
40: northern tidal arm of the Sagittarius dwarf galaxy. The apparent width
41: of the stream indicates a progenitor with a size and mass similar to
42: that of a dwarf galaxy. The stream is about 21 kpc distant and appears
43: to be oriented almost perpendicular to our line of sight. The visible
44: portion of the stream does not pass near any known dwarf galaxies,
45: though we cannot rule out that the stream may form the inner part of a
46: known dwarf galaxy's orbit. The most likely explanation is that the
47: stream constitutes the remains a dwarf galaxy that has been completely
48: disrupted at some point in the past. We also briefly report on the
49: discovery of a diminutive Galactic satellite which lies near the
50: projected path of the new stream, but is unlikely to be related to it.
51:
52:
53:
54:
55: \end{abstract}
56:
57: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
58: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
59: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
60: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
61:
62: \keywords{globular clusters: general --- Galaxy: Structure --- Galaxy: Halo}
63:
64: \section{Introduction}
65: The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) continues to be a remarkable
66: resource for studies of Galactic structure and the Local Group. In
67: addition to the large scale features attributed to past galaxy
68: accretion events \citep{yann03,maje2003,roch04}, SDSS data was used to
69: detect the remarkably strong tidal tails of Palomar 5
70: \citep{oden2001,rock2002, oden2003, grill2006b}. Most recently,
71: \citet{will2005}, \citet{zuck2006}, and \citet{belo2006b} used SDSS
72: data to discover several new dwarf satellites of the Milky Way.
73:
74: Substantial tidal streams have now been found associated with at least
75: two of the eight globular clusters in the SDSS area; Pal 5
76: \citep{oden2003, grill2006b} and NGC 5466 \citep{belo05,
77: grill2006a}. Most recently, \citet{grill2006c} discovered a
78: $63\arcdeg$ cold stellar stream without an obvious progenitor. Though
79: the parent body may be one of the $\approx 140$ globular clusters
80: situated outside the SDSS area, it is equally possible that the stream
81: is all that remains of a globular cluster that was disrupted long ago.
82:
83: In this paper we analyze a broad, $60\arcdeg$ long stream,
84: independently detected in SDSS data by \citet{belo2006b}. We briefly
85: describe our analysis in Section \ref{analysis}. We discuss the
86: detection of the stellar stream in Section \ref{discussion}, make
87: some initial distance estimates in Section \ref{distance}, and attempt
88: to identify a progenitor in Section \ref{progenitor}. We make
89: concluding remarks in Section \ref{conclusions}.
90:
91:
92: \section{Data Analysis \label{analysis}}
93:
94: Data comprising $ugriz$ photometry for $5.3 \times
95: 10^7$ stars in the region $124\arcdeg < \alpha < 251\arcdeg$ and
96: $-1\arcdeg < \delta < 65\arcdeg$ were extracted from the SDSS database
97: using the SDSS CasJobs query system. The data were analyzed using the
98: matched filter technique employed by \citet{grill2006a},
99: \citet{grill2006b}, and \citet{grill2006c}, and described in detail by
100: \citet{rock2002}. This technique is made necessary by the fact that,
101: over the magnitude range and over the region of sky we are
102: considering, the foreground disk stars outnumber the more distant
103: stars in the Galactic halo by three orders of magnitude. Applied in
104: the color-magnitude domain, the matched filter is a means by which we
105: can optimally differentiate between two populations, provided we know
106: the color-magnitude distribution of each.
107:
108: We used the SDSS photometry to create a color-magnitude density or
109: Hess diagram for both stars of interest and for the contaminating
110: foreground population. Dividing the former by the latter, we generated
111: an array of relative weights which constitutes an optimal
112: color-magnitude filter. Using this filter, every star in the survey
113: can be assigned a weight or probability of association with a
114: particular color-magnitude sequence. Having used observed data to
115: generate it, the filter implicitly includes the effects of photometric
116: uncertainties.
117:
118: To generate the filters, we used the SDSS-observed color magnitude
119: distributions for stars in each of the eight globular clusters in the
120: SDSS DR4 area (NGC 2419, Pal 3, NGC 5272, NGC 5466, Pal 5, NGC 6205,
121: NGC 7078, and NGC 7089). A single Hess diagram for field stars was
122: generated using $1.2 \times 10^7$ stars spread over $\sim 2200$
123: deg$^2$ of DR4. We applied each of the eight optimal filters in turn
124: to the entire survey area, and the weighted star counts were summed by
125: location on the sky to produce two dimensional probability maps.
126:
127: We used all stars with $15 < g < 22.5$. We dereddended the SDSS
128: photometry as a function of position on the sky using the DIRBE/IRAS
129: dust maps of \citet{schleg98}. We optimally filtered the $g - u$,
130: $g - r$, $g - i$, and $g - z$ star counts independently and then
131: co-added the resulting weight images. In Figure 1 we show the final,
132: combined, filtered star count distribution, using a filter matched to
133: the color magnitude distribution of stars in M 13. The image has been
134: smoothed with a Gaussian kernel with $\sigma = 0.2\arcdeg$. A
135: low-order, polynomial surface has been subtracted from the image to
136: approximately remove large scale gradients due to the Galactic disk
137: and bulge.
138:
139: \section{Discussion \label{discussion}}
140:
141: Quite obvious in Figure 1 are two broad streams, one running east to
142: west across the center of the field, and the other running more nearly
143: north and south. The stronger, east-west stream is part of the well
144: known northern tidal tail of the Sagittarius dwarf galaxy
145: \citep{maje2003,mart2004}. The north-south stream is clearly distinct
146: from the Sagittarius stream (intersecting at an angle of almost
147: $45\arcdeg$ on the sky), and runs from (R.A., decl) = ($163\arcdeg,
148: -1\arcdeg$) to approximately (R.A., decl.) = ($141\arcdeg,
149: 52\arcdeg$). On the sky, the stream runs in a $60\arcdeg$, nearly
150: great circle path from Ursa Major in the north to Sextans in the
151: south. The stream is distinct from the low latitude halo stream found
152: by Yanny et al. (2003), which lies some $30\arcdeg$ to the east of the
153: present stream. The stream is also visible in Figure 1 of \citet{belo2006b}.
154:
155: The stream was found using a filter that is matched to the color
156: magnitude distribution and luminosity function of stars in the
157: globular cluster M 13, though shifted faintwards by 2.1 magnitudes. We
158: used M 13's color-magnitude locus primarily because, owing to 13's
159: relative proximity, we have a better measure of its luminosity
160: function and the effects of SDSS completeness.
161:
162: The stream is not a product of our dereddening procedure. Figure 2
163: shows the portion of the reddening map of \citet{schleg98} covering
164: the region of interest. There appears to be no correlation between the
165: new stream and the applied reddening corrections. The maximum values
166: of $E(B-V)$ are $\approx 0.05$, with typical values of 0.03 in the
167: southern region of the stream and 0.01 in the northern. There are
168: diminutions here and there in the stream that could perhaps be
169: attributed to regions of higher reddening in Figure 2, but there is
170: certainly no long trough in the reddening map that could be held to
171: account for the entire stream.
172:
173: We have also run our optimum filter against the SDSS DR4 galaxy
174: catalog to investigate whether the stream could be due to confusion
175: with faint galaxies. Though there are occassional concentrations of
176: galaxies along the stream's trajectory, there is no indication of a
177: continuous north-south feature as is apparent in Figure 1. We conclude
178: that faint galaxies also cannot be held to account for the stream.
179:
180: At its southern end the stream is truncated by the limits of the
181: available data. The apparent surface density of the stream is highest
182: at this point, and we are fairly confident that larger surveys will be
183: able to extend the current stream substantially to the south. On the
184: northern end, the stream becomes indiscernible beyond $\delta =
185: 51\arcdeg$. We have attempted to trace the stream in the portion of
186: the SDSS extending from $52\arcdeg < \delta < 65\arcdeg$ by shifting
187: the filter to both brighter and fainter magnitudes, but to no
188: avail.
189:
190: We conclude that we are seeing either $(1)$ a substantial local drop in
191: volume density at the northern end of the stream (due perhaps to an
192: episodic stripping process or a higher velocity portion of an
193: eccentric orbit), $(2)$ a significant change in the color-magnitude
194: distribution of stars along the stream, or $(3)$ the physical end of
195: the stream. We consider the second option to be the least likely of the
196: three possibilities, though it is not inconceivable that distinct
197: stellar populations could have been pulled from the progenitor in
198: sequence. Arguments for or against $(i)$ and ($iii)$ will have to
199: await the acquisition of survey data covering a larger field.
200:
201: Sampling by eye at several representative points, the stream appears
202: to be about $2\arcdeg$ wide on average. This is significantly broader
203: than the globular cluster streams found by \citet{oden2003,
204: grill2006a, grill2006b} and \citet{grill2006c}. On the other hand, it
205: is similar to the western portion of the Sagittarius stream visible in
206: Figure 1. $2\arcdeg$ corresponds to about 700 pc at our estimated
207: distance to the stream (see below). If the stream is circular in cross
208: section, then in a logarithmic potential with $v_c = 220$ km s$^{-1}$,
209: a radial width of this magnitude would correspond to $\Delta E > 20$
210: km s$^{-1}$. This is considerably larger than the expected random
211: velocities of stars weakly stripped from globular clusters and implies
212: a much larger progenitor mass. Of course, with the stream passing high
213: over the outer regions of the disk ($165\arcdeg < {\it l} <
214: 252\arcdeg, 44\arcdeg < b < 50\arcdeg$) we cannot currently say how
215: broad the stream is along a radial from the Galactic center. However,
216: 700 pc remains much larger than the tidal diameters of globular
217: clusters, and we conclude that the progenitor is most likely to be an
218: extant or disrupted dwarf galaxy.
219:
220: Integrating the background subtracted, weighted star counts along the
221: stream over a width of $\approx 2\arcdeg$ we find that the total
222: number of stars in the discernible stream down to $g = 22.5$ is $1250
223: \pm 200$. The surface density of stars in the southern portion of the
224: stream ($-1\arcdeg < \delta < 14\arcdeg$) is roughly twice that of the
225: northernmost section ($39\arcdeg < \delta < 52\arcdeg$). The highest
226: surface densities along the southern portion of the stream are $\sim
227: 40$ stars deg$^{-2}$.
228:
229:
230: \subsection{Distance to the Stream \label{distance}}
231:
232:
233: The power of the matched filter resides primarily at the main sequence
234: turn-off and below, where the stellar luminosity function increases
235: rapidly and the bulk of the foreground contaminants lie well to the
236: red. If our filter is globally matching the color-magnitude
237: distribution of the stream population, then we can use the filter
238: response to estimate distances by main sequence fitting
239: (e.g. \citet{grill2006c}). In Figure 3 we show the color-magnitude
240: distribution for the stream stars, extracted by generating a Hess
241: diagram of stars in a 11 deg.$^2$ area covering the southern portion
242: of the stream, and subtracting a similar field star distribution
243: sampled over 28 deg$^2$ to the east and west of the stream. A clear
244: signature of the sub-giant branch and the main sequence turn-off is
245: evident in the stream population. Moreover, the sub-giant and
246: turn-off region of the distribution match the dereddened, shifted $g,
247: g - i$ RGB/main sequence locus of M 13 very well.
248:
249: Varying the magnitude shift applied to M 13's main sequence locus from
250: 1.5 to 3.0 mags, we measured the foreground-subtracted, mean surface
251: density of stream stars in the regions $-1\arcdeg < \delta <
252: 14\arcdeg$, $29\arcdeg < \delta < 39\arcdeg$, and $39\arcdeg < \delta
253: < 52\arcdeg$. To avoid potential problems related to a difference in
254: age between M 13 and the stream stars, we used only the portion of the
255: filter with $19.5 < g < 22.5$, where the bright cutoff is 0.8
256: magnitudes below M 13's main sequence turn-off. This reduces the
257: stream contrast significantly, but still provides sufficient
258: signal to identify the optimum magnitude shift.
259:
260: Fitting Gaussians to the mean surface densities as a function of
261: magnitude shift (e.g. \citet{grill2006c}, we find the highest
262: contrasts occur for shifts of 2.1, 2.4, and $2.15 \pm 0.1$ mags for
263: the three stream segments identified above. This puts the stream
264: roughly perpendicular to our line of sight at an average distance 2.78
265: times that of M 13. Adopting a distance to M 13 of 7.7 kpc, we arrive
266: at a mean Sun-stream distance of $21.4 \pm 1$ kpc, where the
267: uncertainty reflects only random measurement errors.
268:
269: The measurement of relative distances in this manner rests on the
270: assumption that the color-magnitude distribution of stream stars is
271: uniform, and that different parts of the stream will respond to
272: magnitude shifts in the filter in the same way. Of course, this may
273: not be true if different sub-populations of the parent galaxy were
274: removed at different times. Our relative distance estimates may also
275: be subject to variations in SDSS sensitivity and completeness at faint
276: magnitudes, though over the scales with which we are dealing, it seems
277: reasonable to suppose that the such variations will have largely
278: averaged out.
279:
280: \subsection{The Stream Progenitor \label{progenitor}}
281:
282: The stream does not pass near any of the known dwarf galaxies in the
283: Local Group. While Leo I and Leo A lie close to the stream in
284: projection, their respective distances of $254 \pm 19$ kpc
285: \citep{bell2004} and $800 \pm 40$ kpc \citep{dolph2002} put them well
286: beyond the 21 kpc distance we determined above. The Sextans dwarf is
287: situated about $7\arcdeg$ west of the southern end of the
288: stream. However, at its distance of $86 \pm 6$ kpc \citep{mateo95} it
289: too is too far away to be a likely progenitor. At this
290: distance its main sequence turn-off would be well below the
291: completeness limit of the SDSS data, which is clearly inconsistent
292: with Figure 3.
293:
294: Though we are obviously limited by the lack of velocity information,
295: for a given model of the Galactic potential the progenitor's orbit is
296: actually fairly well constrained by the observed distance and
297: orientation of the stream. Using the model of \citet{allen91} (which
298: includes a disk, bulge, and spherical halo, and which
299: \citet{grill2006a} and \citet{grill2006b} found to work reasonably
300: well for NGC 5466 and Pal 5), we use a least squares method to fit
301: both the orientation on the sky and the distance measurements in
302: Section \ref{distance}. In addition to a number of normal points lying
303: along the centerline of the stream, we chose as a velocity fiducial
304: point a position at the northern tip of the stream at (R.A., decl) =
305: (141.2\arcdeg, 51.2\arcdeg).
306:
307: If we allow the proper motions to be free ranging and uninteresting
308: parameters, we find that the 95\% confidence interval in $\chi^2$
309: predicts $-35 < v_{LSR} < +57$ km s$^{-1}$ at the fiducial point.
310: The corresponding ranges in perigalactic and apogalactic radii are
311: $9.1 < R_p < 9.3$ kpc and $28 < R_a < 32$ kpc. Of course, these ranges
312: do not take into account uncertainties in the absolute distance of the
313: stream (which depends on the uncertainty in M 13's distance) or in the
314: validity of \citet{allen91}'s Galactic model. However, they do suggest
315: a fairly compact orbit with moderate eccentricity.
316:
317: Integrating orbits for parameter sets spanning the range above, we
318: find that there are another five known dwarf galaxies (NGC 185, the
319: Aquarius dwarf galaxy, NGC 6822, and the Sagittarius irregular and
320: dwarf elliptical galaxies) that lie within $10\arcdeg$ of the
321: projected orbits. However, with the exception of the Sagittarius dE,
322: their measured distances are all greater than 500 kpc and would
323: therefor require rather unreasonably high orbital eccentricities
324: ($\epsilon > 0.98$). We attribute the proximity of the Sagittarius dE
325: to the new stream's projected orbit to the expected confluence of
326: orbit projections in the direction of the Galactic center, and not to
327: any physical association between them.
328:
329: In the upper right-hand corner of Figure 1 (R.A., decl.) =
330: ($132.857\arcdeg, +63.136\arcdeg$) is a fairly pronounced
331: concentration of stars about 37 kpc distant which we identify as a new
332: globular cluster or dwarf galaxy \citep{grill2006d}. The object lies
333: within $5\arcdeg$ of the projected orbit of the stream (1.8 kpc at the
334: distance of the stream). However, its diminutive size and its 16 kpc
335: separation from the stream's orbit argue against its being either the
336: progenitor or a part of the debris in the stream.
337:
338:
339:
340:
341: \section{Conclusions \label{conclusions}}
342:
343: Applying optimal contrast filtering techniques to SDSS data, we have
344: detected a broad stream of stars some $60\arcdeg$ long on the sky. We
345: are at present unable to identify a progenitor for this stream, though
346: from its appearance and location on the sky, we believe it to be a
347: either an extant or disrupted dwarf galaxy. The color-magnitude
348: distribution of stars in the stream closely matches that of the
349: globular cluster M 13, indicating that the stars making up the stream
350: are old and metal poor. The stream appears to be about 21 kpc
351: distant, and the portion of the stream contained in the survey data is
352: roughly perpendicular to our line of sight.
353:
354: Refinement of the stream's orbit will require radial velocity
355: measurements of individual stars along its length. Ultimately, the
356: vetted stream stars will become prime targets for the Space
357: Interferometry Mission, whose proper motion measurements will enable
358: very much stronger constraints to be placed on both the orbit of the
359: progenitor and on the potential field of the Galaxy.
360:
361:
362:
363: \acknowledgments
364:
365:
366: Funding for the creation and distribution of the SDSS Archive has been
367: provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating
368: Institutions, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the
369: National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, the
370: Japanese Monbukagakusho, and the Max Planck Society.
371:
372:
373:
374: {\it Facilities:} \facility{Sloan}.
375:
376:
377: \begin{thebibliography}{}
378:
379: \bibitem[Allen \& Santillan (1991)]{allen91} Allen, C., \& Santillan,
380: A. 1991, {\it Rev. Mex. Astron. Astrofis.}, 22, 255
381:
382: \bibitem[Bellazzini et al. (2004)]{bell2004} Bellazzini, M., Gennari,
383: N., Ferraro, F. R., Sollima, A 2004, \mnras, 354, 708
384:
385: \bibitem[Belokurov et al. (2005)]{belo05} Belokurov, V., Evans, N. W.,
386: Irwin, M. J., Hewett, P. C., \& Wilkinson, M. I. 2005, \apjl, 637, L29
387:
388: \bibitem[Belokurov et al. (2006a)]{belo2006a} Belokurov, V. et al. 2006a,
389: \apjl, submitted.
390:
391: \bibitem[Belokurov et al. (2006b)]{belo2006b} Belokurov, V. et al. 2006b,
392: \apjl, 642, L137
393:
394: \bibitem[Dolphin et al. (2002)]{dolph2002} Dolphin, A. E. et al. 2002,
395: \aj, 123, 3154
396:
397: \bibitem[Grillmair (2006)]{grill2006d} Grillmair, C. J. 2006, in
398: preparation.
399:
400: \bibitem[Grillmair \& Johnson (2006)]{grill2006a} Grillmair, C. J., \&
401: Johnson, R. 2006, \apjl, 639, L17
402:
403: \bibitem[Grillmair \& Dionatos (2006a)]{grill2006b} Grillmair,
404: C. J. \& Dionatos, O. 2006a, \apjl, 641, L37
405:
406: \bibitem[Grillmair \& Dionatos (2006b)]{grill2006c} Grillmair, C. J., \&
407: Dionatos, O. 2006b, \apjl, in press
408:
409: \bibitem[Martinez-Delgado et al. (2004)]{mart2004} Martinez-Delgado,
410: D., Gomez-Flechoso, M., Aparicio, A., \& Carrera, R. 2004, \apj, 601,
411: 242
412:
413: \bibitem[Majewski et al. (2003)]{maje2003} Majewski, S. R., Skrutskie,
414: M. F., Weinberg, M. D., \& Ostheimer, J. C. 2003, \apj, 599, 1082
415:
416: \bibitem[Mateo, Fischer, \& Krzeminski (1995)]{mateo95} Mateo, M.,
417: Fischer, P., \& Krzeminski, W. 1995, AJ 110, 2166
418:
419: \bibitem[Odenkirchen et al. (2001)]{oden2001} Odenkirchen, M. et al. 2001,
420: \apjl, 548, 1650
421:
422: \bibitem[Odenkirchen et al. (2003)]{oden2003} Odenkirchen, M. et
423: al. 2003, \aj, 126, 2385
424:
425: \bibitem[Rocha-Pinto et al. (2004)]{roch04} Rocha-Pinto, H. J.,
426: Majewski, S. R., Skrutskie, M. F., Crane, J. D., Patterson,
427: R. J. 2004, \apj, 615, 732
428:
429: \bibitem[Rockosi et al. (2002)]{rock2002} Rockosi, C. M. et al. 2002,
430: \aj, 124, 349
431:
432: \bibitem[Schlegel, Finkbeiner, \& Davis (1998)]{schleg98} Schlegel,
433: D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., \& Davis, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525
434:
435: \bibitem[Willman et al. (2005)]{will2005} Willman, B. et al. 2005,
436: \aj, 129, 2692
437:
438: \bibitem[Yanny et al. (2003)]{yann03} Yanny, B. et al. 2003, \apj,
439: 588, 824
440:
441: \bibitem[Zucker et al. (2006)]{zuck2006} Zucker, D. B. 2006, \apjl, 643, L103
442:
443: \end{thebibliography}
444:
445:
446: \clearpage
447:
448: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
449: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
450: %% To embed the sample graphics in
451: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
452: %% \includegraphics commands
453: %%
454: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
455: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
456: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
457: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
458: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
459: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
460: %%
461: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
462: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
463: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
464: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
465: %% journal to journal.
466:
467: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
468: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
469: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
470: %% available in the electronic journal.
471:
472: \begin{figure}
473: \epsscale{0.8}
474: \plotone{f1.eps}
475: \caption{Smoothed, summed weight image of the SDSS field after
476: subtraction of a low-order polynomial surface fit. Darker areas
477: indicate higher surface densities. The weight image has been smoothed
478: with a Gaussian kernel with $\sigma = 0.2\arcdeg$. The white areas are
479: either data missing from DR4, or clusters or bright stars which have
480: been masked out prior to analysis. The northern tidal arm of the
481: Sagittarius dwarf galaxy runs roughly east-west above and below the
482: gap in DR4. The new stream runs from (R.A., decl) = ($163\arcdeg,
483: -1\arcdeg$) to approximately (R.A., decl.) = ($141\arcdeg,
484: 52\arcdeg$). At the extreme upper right is a new Milky Way satellite
485: which is considered in detail by \citet{grill2006d}. \label{fig1}}
486: \end{figure}
487:
488: \begin{figure}
489: \epsscale{0.8}
490: \plotone{f2.eps}
491: \caption{Distribution of E(B-V) over the field shown in Figure 1.
492: Darker areas indicate higher color excesses. Typical values of the color
493: excess range from 0.01 along the northern part of the new stream to
494: 0.03 along the southern part. \label{fig2}}
495: \end{figure}
496:
497: \begin{figure}
498: \epsscale{0.6}
499: \plotone{f3.eps}
500: \caption{The dereddened, background subtracted, color-magnitude
501: distribution of stream stars. The stream stars include all stars
502: situated in an 11 deg$^2$ area covering the southern portion of the
503: stream in Figure 1. The distribution of field stars was computed from
504: all stars in a 28 deg$^2$ area bracketing the stream to the east and
505: west. A subgiant branch and main sequence turn-off are clearly
506: distinguishable. The solid line shows the dereddened locus of giant
507: branch and main sequence stars as measured in DR4 for M 13,
508: shifted faintwards by 2.1 mags.}
509: \end{figure}
510:
511:
512:
513: \end{document}
514:
515: %%
516:
517: