1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \shorttitle{Kilogauss magnetic fields in white dwarfs}
3: \shortauthors{Valyavin et al.}
4: \begin{document}
5:
6: \title{A search for kilogauss magnetic fields in white dwarfs and
7: hot subdwarf stars}
8:
9: \author{G. Valyavin\altaffilmark{1,2}, S. Bagnulo\altaffilmark{3},
10: S.~Fabrika\altaffilmark{2}, A. Reisenegger\altaffilmark{4},
11: G.A.~Wade\altaffilmark{5}, Inwoo Han\altaffilmark{1},
12: D. Monin\altaffilmark{6}}
13:
14: \altaffiltext{1}{Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, 61-1,
15: Whaam-Dong, Youseong-Gu, Taejeon, Republic of Korea 305-348 }
16: \altaffiltext{2}{Special Astrophysical Observatory, Russian Academy
17: of Sciences, Nizhnii Arkhyz, Karachai Cherkess Republic, 357147,
18: Russia}
19: \altaffiltext{3}{European Southern Observatory, Alonso de
20: C\'ordova 3107, Santiago, Chile}
21: \altaffiltext{4}{Departamento de Astronom{\'\i}a y
22: Astrof{\'\i}sica, Pontificia Universidad Cat\'olica de Chile,
23: Casilla 306, Santiago 22}
24: \altaffiltext{5}{Physics Department, Royal
25: Military College of Canada, Kingston, Ontario, Canada}
26: \altaffiltext{6}{Dominion Astrophysical
27: Observatory, 5071, West Saanich Road, Victoria, British Columbia, V9E 2E7,
28: Canada}
29:
30:
31: \begin{abstract}
32: We present new results of a survey for weak magnetic fields among DA
33: white dwarfs with inclusion of some brighter hot subdwarf stars.
34: We have detected variable circular polarization in the
35: H$\alpha$ line of the hot subdwarf star Feige~34 (SP: sdO).
36: From these data, we estimate that the longitudinal magnetic field of
37: this star varies from $-1.1 \pm 3.2$\,kG to $+9.6 \pm 2.6$\,kG, with a
38: mean of about $+5$\,kG and a period longer than 2~h. In this
39: study, we also confirm the magnetic nature of white dwarf WD1105-048, found
40: earlier in a study by \citet{AZC04}, and present upper limits of
41: kilogauss longitudinal magnetic fields of 5 brightest DA white
42: dwarfs. Our data support the finding of \citet{AZC04} that $\sim$
43: 25\% of white dwarfs have kilogauss magnetic fields. This frequency also
44: confirms results of early estimates obtained using the magnetic field
45: function of white dwarfs \citep{FV99}.
46: \end{abstract}
47:
48:
49: \keywords{stars: individual (\objectname{Feige~34},
50: \objectname{WD1647+591}, \objectname{WD1105-048})---
51: stars: magnetic fields --- stars: white dwarfs}
52:
53: \section{Introduction}
54:
55: The investigation of white dwarf stars (WDs) is of fundamental
56: importance for the understanding of stellar and galactic evolution,
57: as WDs represent the final evolutionary stage of more than 90\% of
58: all stars. Nowadays, we believe that the general properties and
59: evolution of WDs are fairly well understood. However, there are
60: several important problems that still need to be properly addressed,
61: especially those connected with the group of about one hundred
62: isolated magnetic white dwarfs (MWDs)
63: \citep{ABL81,SS95,LBH03,VBFM03,AZC04}. The first problem is related
64: to the origin of the MWDs. Earlier studies \citep{ABL81} suggested
65: that MWDs are descendants of magnetic Ap/Bp stars. More recent
66: studies, however, have suggested that the progenitors are not
67: restricted to this class \citep{LBH03,KW04,WF05}. The second problem
68: is associated with the evolution of a global magnetic field during a
69: WD's life: it has been shown \citep{LS79,FV99,VF99,LBH03} that the
70: magnetic field exhibits some peculiar features during the WD life time.
71: One of them is that WDs with strong fields show a tendency to
72: increase in fractional incidence with age, in contradiction to the
73: hypothesis that WD magnetic fields decay with time \citep{WVS87}.
74:
75: Another group of problems is related to astroseismology of WDs. A
76: model analysis of pulsation modes applied to pulsating WDs
77: \citep[for instance]{WNC94}, theoretical exploration \citep{MTV94},
78: and high-resolution spectroscopy \citep{KDWA98} suggest the general presence
79: of kilogauss magnetic fields in pulsating white dwarfs. In spite of that,
80: attempts to measure magnetic fields in pulsating WDs \citep[for
81: instance]{SG97} have yielded no positive results, suggesting that
82: the theory of WD pulsation may require revision.
83:
84: The implications of these studies are extremely significant.
85: Unfortunately, {\it they are based on a highly biased and limited
86: sample of strongly magnetic WDs}, and therefore they are still
87: controversial and require better statistics \citep{LBH03}. It
88: appears quite likely that the fraction of MWDs (as compared to the
89: total population of known WDs) will increase significantly if
90: high-precision spectropolarimetric surveys are conducted.
91: The required accuracy of magnetic field measurements is
92: about 1~kG or better \citep{LBH03}.
93:
94: In order to better
95: understand the origin of magnetic fields in late type stars,
96: it is also interesting
97: to extend observations to the group of hot subdwarfs,
98: the magnetic nature of which has already been reported \citep{E96,TJFH05},
99: but which is still not well studied. The importance of a study of hot subdwarf
100: stars to the theory of stellar evolution
101: is established by the fact that they exhibit a variety of
102: evolutionary channels to the white dwarf stage
103: \citep{GS74,H86,SBKL94,WMG01,WMMG01,M04}.
104: A search for magnetic
105: fields among these stars should help to understand the magnetic nature
106: of some low- normal-mass magnetic white dwarfs which potentially could be
107: evolutionary
108: products of the subdwarf stars. In particular, the study of a heterogenous
109: group of sdO stars \citep[and references therein]{M04}
110: for which it has been found that about 65\% of them may be unresolved binary systems
111: \citep{WMMG01}, makes it possible to consider
112: dynamo-induced magnetic fields in these systems, suggesting a non-fossil field
113: origin in their magnetic white dwarf decendants.
114:
115:
116: For these reasons, we are
117: carrying out an observational program with the 6\,m and 8\,m Russian
118: and European telescopes. The main goal of the project is the accumulation
119: of observational data on white dwarf magnetism in the kilogauss region
120: and statistical analysis of these data for a study of the evolution
121: of magnetic fields in degenerate stars. Our secondary goals are
122: monitoring studies of some individual weak-field magnetic WDs
123: \citep{VBM05} and some individual brighter hot subdwarf stars.
124: Here, we discuss new results from our survey.
125: We present the positive detection of a kilogauss longitudinal
126: magnetic field on the sdO star Feige~34 and confirm the
127: magnetic nature of white dwarf WD1105-048, detected recently by \citet{AZC04}.
128: We also suspect the presence of a varying weak longitudinal magnetic
129: field on the pulsating white dwarf WD1647+591.
130:
131:
132: \section{Selection of the sample and observational strategy}
133:
134: At the present stage, our study of hot subdwars is restricted to observations
135: of only one of the brightest objects Feige~34. Our observations of white
136: dwarfs are aimed mainly at studying a random sample of WDs in a
137: limited space volume with an accuracy of magnetic field measurements
138: of about 1-2\,kG and better. To answer the question of {\it whether
139: WD magnetic field evolution can be detected in observations}, it is
140: important to extend field measurements with uniform accuracy to the
141: whole range of WD masses and temperatures. All types from the
142: hottest (youngest) WDs to the coolest (oldest) degenerates of DA8-9
143: spectral classes are present in our list, in order to provide the
144: survey with appropriate statistics.
145:
146: With the aid of the 6\,m telescope (BTA), we searched for circular
147: polarization in cores of the hydrogen lines of the brightest ($V <
148: 14$\,mag) northern hot (young) WDs and WDs of intermediate
149: temperatures. The cooler (and older) WDs, however, can not be
150: studied well with this telescope. These stars are intrinsically
151: fainter and have weaker Balmer absorption features that make it
152: difficult to study them polarimetrically with the necessary field
153: measurement accuracy. In order to minimize this observational bias,
154: we have extended our list toward observations with the VLT of a
155: random sample of southern WDs with $T_{\rm eff} < 9000~K$. These
156: observations, when completed, will make it possible to determine the
157: fractional incidence of magnetism in the low-field regime among WDs
158: of different ages. Our full list consists of 40 isolated WDs of
159: different masses and temperatures. As follows from \citet{FV99} and
160: from the discussion presented by \citet{AZC04}, the fractional
161: incidence of magnetism in the region from 1\,kG to 10\,kG is
162: expected to be a few to several tens of percents. \citet{AZC04} give
163: an estimate of 25$\%$. Their conclusion, if true, suggests that weak
164: magnetic fields may be found in about 10 WDs in our list at a
165: detection level around 1\,kG. These data, combined with those
166: obtained for the group of strongly magnetic MWDs, will then be used
167: to determine unbiased relative fractions of young and old MWDs, to
168: be compared for a study of the evolution of WD magnetic fields.
169:
170: In this paper, we report observations of the 6 brightest WDs and
171: one subdwarf star in our
172: target list for the 6\,m telescope. Although the survey is not yet
173: complete, new weak-field magnetic stars are interesting enough to
174: warrant a separate paper concerning the brightest, hot WDs and WDs
175: of intermediate temperatures. These data represent our first scientific
176: observations obtained with a new polarimeter (see next section).
177: White dwarfs presented here may also be considered as a random sample,
178: to be compared with
179: data presented by \citet{AZC04}. The full survey, including the data
180: from the VLT and a final, detailed statistical analysis will be
181: presented later.
182:
183: \section{Observations and data reduction}
184:
185: The observations were carried out at the 6\,m Russian telescope from
186: 2003 to 2005 in the course of about 9 observing nights shared with
187: other observational programs. The observations are now obtained
188: using the updated prime-focus spectrograph-polarimeter UAGS (R~$\sim
189: 2000$, H$\alpha$ region). The instrument and observational technique
190: are described in detail by \citet{ABVD95} and by \citet{NVF02}. The
191: modulation technique we use in observations with this instrument,
192: the strategy of the observations, and the data reduction are very
193: similar to those performed by \citet{BSWLM02} and described by
194: \citet{VBM05}.
195:
196: In polarimetric observations of each star, we obtain series of
197: short, consecutive exposures at two orthogonal orientations of the
198: quarter-wave plate (the sequence of its position angles is
199: $+45^\circ , -45^\circ , -45^\circ , +45^\circ$). Assuming \textit{a
200: priori} that the time-scale of possible variability of the
201: longitudinal magnetic field could be as short as a few minutes, we
202: usually set the integration time of each exposure to 60-300\,s,
203: depending on stellar magnitude and sky conditions.
204:
205: For longitudinal magnetic field measurements, we initially use
206: cross-correlation analysis of the displacement between positions of
207: the H$\alpha$ line in spectra of opposite circular polarizations
208: \citep{MFV02,VBM05}. Applying this method to the series of short
209: time exposures, we then analyze rows of the longitudinal field
210: values to rule out a possible variability of the magnetic field on
211: longer time scales (tens of minutes and longer). After the
212: determination of these scales for each star, we combine spectra of
213: equal orientations of the quarter-wave plate into longer equivalent
214: exposures and build Stokes~$I$ and $V$ profiles as described in
215: \citet{VBM05}.
216:
217: Finally, we obtain the longitudinal field determinations from the
218: Stokes~$I$ and $V$ profiles through the weak-field approximation, as
219: described by \citet{BSWLM02}. Associated error bars are obtained by
220: using the Monte Carlo modeling method demonstrated by \citet{SS94}.
221:
222: \section{Results}
223:
224: Results of longitudinal magnetic field measurements are summarized
225: in Table~1, where column~1 is the name of the WD, column~2 is the
226: spectral class, column~3 is the Julian Date of the midpoint of the
227: observation, column~4 is the exposure time, and columns 5-6 report
228: the measurements and uncertainties of the longitudinal magnetic
229: fields as obtained using the weak-field approximation. The Stokes
230: $I$ and $V$ spectra are illustrated in Figure~1.
231:
232: Six targets of our list (WD0009+501, WD0644+375,
233: WD0713+584, WD1105-048, WD1134+300, WD1647+591) have
234: already been observed by \citet{SS94,SS95,VBFM03,AZC04,VBM05}. In
235: order to minimize the probability to observe a possible zero
236: crossover of the longitudinal magnetic field due to rotation, we
237: repeated the observations of these WDs.
238:
239: In order to clarify our polarimetric measurements, here we also
240: present an example of our observations of the magnetic white dwarf
241: WD0009+501 \citep{VBM05}. The field of WD0009+501 varies with the
242: rotation phase from about -120~kG to about +50~kG \citep{VBM05}.
243: Here, we use its phase-resolved Stokes $I$ and $V$ spectra at the
244: maximum field obtained during JD245300(3-8). As one can see, the
245: comparatively weak magnetic field (~50~kG) of this faint (for
246: spectropolarimetry) WD ($V=14.4$) can easily be resolved and
247: measured in our observations.
248:
249: Two targets in our list WD1105-048 and Feige~34 showed
250: longitudinal magnetic fields by the presence of weak circular polarization
251: in the H$\alpha$ cores of their spectra. We briefly discuss these
252: results.
253:
254:
255: {\bf Feige\,34} or {\bf WD1036+433} \citep{MS99} is one of
256: the brightest ($V = 11.22$) weak-lined subdwarf stars spectroscopically
257: classified as sdO \citep[and references therein]{GS74,MS99}.
258: \citet{TMS91,TUM95} suggested this
259: star to be a close binary system having a companion of spectral type K.
260: In three observations of this star in different nights,
261: the longitudinal magnetic field was detected once at more than the
262: 3$\sigma$ level ( see Table~1 ). S-shaped circular polarization is
263: seen in one of the observations (at JD=2453005.49; see Fig.~1). We
264: therefore conclude that WD1036+433 may be another one candidate to
265: magnetic subdwarf stars \citep{E96,TJFH05} with a weak magnetic field.
266: The peak field is below 10~kG. In
267: our observations, the field varies in the range from -1~kG to
268: +9.6~kG, due to possible rotation with a period longer than 2 hours.
269:
270: {\bf WD1105-048} is, in comparison, a well-studied, ordinary DA3 WD
271: \citep{MS99} discovered recently as magnetic by \citet{AZC04}. The
272: longitudinal magnetic field of this star was found to be variable,
273: varying from about -1 to -4.6~kG. In this study, we confirm the
274: magnetic nature of this degenerate star. In the course of two
275: consequent nights, WD1105-048 showed a variable longitudinal field,
276: from 0 to about -8~kG. From our data, the rotation period is longer
277: than 3~hours.
278:
279:
280: In addition, we have selected 2 white dwarfs.
281:
282: {\bf WD1647+591} is a representative of the group of pulsating WD
283: stars, the magnetic nature of which has been discussed by a number
284: of authors \citep[and references therein]{SG97}. Earlier
285: observations of the longitudinal magnetic field \citep{SG97} yielded
286: null results at a level of about 3~kG. However, the probability to
287: observe a possible zero crossover of the field due to rotation of
288: the star was quite high in those observations. In particular, their
289: results and conclusions are based on only three measurements with
290: associated error bars of 1.1, 1.2 and 5.7~kG. These three
291: observations, obtained in different years, together with the
292: indirectly estimated rotation period of about 9\,hr \citep[and
293: references therein]{SG97} do not exclude a situation that the
294: observations have been obtained close to the crossover. For this
295: reason, we continued observations of WD1647+591. The data showed no
296: detection above the 3$\sigma$ level. Just one of the observations
297: showed a 2.7$\sigma$ detection at JD2453195.46. Unfortunately, poor
298: weather conditions limited our observations of this star, making it
299: necessary to continue the monitoring.
300:
301:
302: {\bf WD\,0501+527} is one of the interesting WDs in our list.
303: In the high-resolution observations of this star
304: \citet{RW88} have found a weak emission line at the H$\alpha$
305: core. \citet{RW88} have argued that the observed emission
306: can not be due to a nearby red dwarf companion, suggesting a photospheric
307: origin. Explaining this emission feature they tested an atmosphere model
308: under the assumption of a chemically stratified atmosphere which can
309: produce the necessary temperature inversion giving rise to emission cores in the Balmer
310: lines \citep[and references therein]{RW88}. The presence of magnetic fields
311: in this object, if detected, could potentially be interesting for
312: alternative, magnetoionic heating models of the observed emission
313: \citep[see their discussion]{GM85}. High-resolution spectra
314: presented by \citet{RW88} make it possible to estimate roughly the surface
315: magnetic field on WD\,0501+527
316: to be less than 100~kG. In our observations we estimate its magnetic field
317: to be weaker than 10~kG.
318:
319: The magnetic field estimates in the spectra of the other observed
320: stars did not yield any detections. Unfortunately, due to
321: weather conditions and technical limitations which require us
322: to carry out the
323: observations only in the H$\alpha$ region, we did not achieve the
324: required accuracy better 2~kG for all the stars. Nevertheless, the
325: possible detection of the longitudinal magnetic field in WD1036+433
326: and the confirmation of the magnetic nature of WD1105-048 make it
327: possible to contribute to the ongoing discussion about the
328: fractional incidence of WD magnetism in the kilogauss region.
329:
330:
331: \section{Discussion and conclusion}
332:
333: We have presented new observations of kilogauss longitudinal
334: magnetic fields in 6 WDs and one hot subdwarf star. We confirm the magnetic
335: nature of WD1105-048 and find a new candidate weak-field sdO star,
336: Feige\,34 (WD1036+433). We did not detect any significant field in the
337: pulsating WD WD1647+591; nevertheless, we find it important to note
338: that the 2.7$\sigma$ result (at JD2453195.46), as well as the
339: systematic negative magnetic field in all of our observations and
340: those of \citet{SG97} may indicate the presence of a weak, varying,
341: or fluctuating non-zero longitudinal magnetic field. It should also
342: be noted that recent high-resolution spectroscopy of WDs
343: \citep{KDWA98} showed significant broadening of H$\alpha$ cores in
344: the spectra of pulsating ZZ~Ceti WDs with typical projected
345: velocities of 30 -- 40 km/s. Such velocities seem to be in conflict
346: with astroseismology \citep{KDWA98} and support independently the
347: probable presence of alternative broadening mechanisms such as a
348: kilogauss magnetic field. For this reason, we hope that polarimetric
349: observations of WD1647+591 will be continued.
350:
351: Together with another subdwarf stars the magnetic nature of which
352: has been recently detected \citep{E96,TJFH05}, the presence of kilogauss
353: magnetic field on Feige\,34, if confirmed by future observations,
354: would be of a great interest for theories of the origin of hot subdwarfs.
355: Despite the fact that Zeeman polarimetric
356: observations of these stars are relatively uncommon in the
357: literature, such a high rate of positive detections
358: suggests that the presence of global magnetic fields may be a typical property
359: of the hot subdwarfs (by analogy with the Ap/Bp stars).
360: At this moment, the origin of magnetic fields in these stars is unclear
361: \citep{TJFH05}. These fields may be fossil remnants of their progenitor fields
362: or dynamo-generated by any unknown mechanism. In this connection,
363: the suggested \citep{TMS91,TUM95} binarity of Feige\,34 gives
364: new interesting possibilities to explain the magnetic nature of
365: this object. Following the accretion model of helium degenerate
366: dwarf formation in a close binary \citep{IT86} we may speculate that
367: the kilogauss magnetic field could be generated by the accretion processes
368: which might take place in Feige\,34. This assumption, if true,
369: could then explain the origin of some kilogauss-strength magnetic fields in
370: low-mass white dwarfs which may potentially be products of
371: the evolution of the sdO stars.
372:
373: Kilogauss upper limits are presented for the other 5 WDs. Here, we
374: formally estimate the fraction of kilogauss MWDs as 17\% (1/6) that
375: is consistent with the estimate of \citet{AZC04} (25\%).
376: Note, that practically the same estimate of the frequency of kilogauss MWDs
377: has been done using the magnetic field function technique \citep{FV99}.
378: Based on these results, one might speculate that the MWDs are not a
379: unique class of degenerate stars, but rather represent the
380: strong-field tail of a continuous distribution of field intensities.
381: The 10\,\% fraction of megagauss MWDs \citep{LBH03}, in comparison
382: to 25\,\% for kilogauss fields, supports this idea.
383: This conclusion, however, could be more definite if framed in terms
384: of surface magnetic fields (mean field modulus, $B_s$) since our
385: study is based on observations of only the longitudinal component
386: $B_l$ of the field, which is smaller than $B_s$ in all cases. In
387: case of a dipolar geometry, the difference may be as much as 3 times and
388: higher, depending on the orientation of the dipole to the line of
389: sight. Furthermore, the large-scale magnetic field structure of the
390: weak-field MWDs may be different from dipolar, giving a very strong
391: observational bias to the underestimation of the incidence of WD
392: magnetism in the polarimetric observations. Therefore, the above
393: conclusion about the incidence of magnetism below 1\,kG can only be
394: considered as a lower limit (see also \citet{AZC04}).
395:
396: Assuming magnetic field conservation during MS star evolution into a
397: WD, we have to conclude that the majority of MWDs (namely those with
398: kilogauss field strengths) descend from MS stars with global
399: magnetic field strengths even weaker than 1~G, much weaker than those of
400: Ap/Bp stars \citep{P99}, for which dipole fields larger than about
401: 300~G \citep{A04} are found. So, we may assume that stars other than
402: Ap/Bp stars evolve into kilogauss MWDs \citep{KW04,AZC04,WF05}.
403: Alternatively, we should conclude that significant flux loss occurs
404: during the post-main sequence evolutionary process, although this is
405: unlikely to be consistent with the newly found, high fraction of
406: MWDs compared to the few percent fraction of Ap/Bp stars on the
407: upper main sequence. Further examination of these two possibilities
408: will be among the goals of our more detailed study upon completion
409: of our survey.
410:
411:
412:
413: \acknowledgments
414:
415: We wish to thank Drs. A.\,Pramsky and A.\,Burenkov for their help
416: during observations. We are also especially grateful to
417: our anonymous referee and Prof. J.\,Liebert for their valuable comments and
418: suggestions. GV is grateful to the Korean MOST (Ministry of
419: Science and Technology, grant M1-022-00-0005) and KOFST (Korean
420: Federation of Science and Technology Societies) for providing him an
421: opportunity to work at KAO through Brain Pool program. AR
422: acknowledges support from FONDECYT Regular Grant 1020840. GAW
423: acknowledges Discovery Grant support from the Natural Sciences and
424: Engineering Research Council of Canada.
425:
426: \begin{thebibliography}{}
427: \bibitem[Afanasiev et al.(1995)]{ABVD95}
428: Afanasiev, V.L., Burenkov, A.N., Vlasyuk, V.V., \& Drabek S.V.
429: 1995, SAO Ras internal rep., 234
430: \bibitem[Angel et al.(1981)]{ABL81}
431: Angel, J.R.P., Borra, E.F., \& Landstreet, J.D. 1981, \apjs, 45, 457
432: \bibitem[Auriere et al.(2004)]{A04}
433: Auriere M., Donati J.-F., F.
434: Lignieres, D. Mouillet et al., 2004, in the proceedings of IAU Symposium
435: 224: The A-Star Puzzle, in press.
436: \bibitem[Aznar Cuadrado et al.(2004)]{AZC04}
437: Aznar Cuadrado, R., Jordan, S., Napiwotzki, R., Schmid, H.M., Solanki, S.K.,
438: \& Mathys, G. 2004, \aap, 423, 1081
439: \bibitem[Bagnulo et al.(2002)]{BSWLM02}
440: Bagnulo, S., Szeifert, T., Wade, G.A., Landstreet, J.D., \& Mathys, G.
441: 2002, \aap, 389, 191
442: \bibitem[Elkin(1996)]{E96}
443: Elkin, V. 1996, \aap, 312L, 5
444: \bibitem[Fabrika \& Valyavin(1999)]{FV99}
445: Fabrika, S., \& Valyavin, G.
446: 1999, In: 11th European Workshop on White Dwarfs,
447: J.-E. Solheim and E.G. Meistas (eds.), ASP Conf. Ser., 169, 214
448: \bibitem[Greenstein \& Sargent(1974)]{GS74}
449: Greenstein Jesse L., \& Sargent Anneila I. 1974, \apjs, 28, 157
450: \bibitem[Greenstein \& McCarthy(1985)]{GM85}
451: Greenstein Jesse L., \& McCarthy James K. 1985, \apj, 289, 732
452: \bibitem[Heber(1986)]{H86}
453: Heber, U. 1986, \aap, 115, 33
454: \bibitem[Iben \& Tutukov(1986)]{IT86}
455: Iben, Icko Jr., \& Tutukov Alexander, V. 1986, \apj, 311, 742
456: \bibitem[Kawka \& Vennes(2004)]{KW04}
457: Kawka, A., \& Vennes, S. 2004,
458: In: The A-Star Puzzle, J. Zverko, J. Ziznovsky, S.J. Adelman,
459: and W.W. Weiss (eds), IAU Symposium, No. 224.
460: Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004., p.879-885
461: \bibitem[Koester et al.(1998)]{KDWA98}
462: Koester, D., Dreizler, S., Weidemann, V., \& Allard, N.F. 1998,
463: \aap, 338, 612
464: \bibitem[Liebert \& Sion(1979)]{LS79}
465: Liebert, J., \& Sion, E.M. 1979, Astrophysical Letters, 20, 53
466: \bibitem[Liebert et al.(2003)]{LBH03}
467: Liebert, J., Bergeron, P., \& Holberg, J.B. 2003, \aj, 125, 348
468: \bibitem[Markiel et al.(1994)]{MTV94}
469: Markiel, J.A., Thomas, J.H., \& Van Horn, H.M. 1994,
470: \apj, 430,834
471: \bibitem[Maxted(2004)]{M04}
472: Maxted, Pierre F.L. 2004, In: Spectroscopically and Spatially Resolving
473: the Components of Close Binary Stars, R. W. Hilditch,
474: H. Hensberge, \& K. Pavlovski (eds.), ASP Conf. Ser., 318, 387
475: \bibitem[McCook \& Sion(1999)]{MS99}
476: McCook, G.P, \& Sion, E.M. 1999, \apjs, 121, 1
477: \bibitem[Monin et al.(2002)]{MFV02}
478: Monin, D.N., Fabrika, S.N., \& Valyavin G.G., 2002, \aap, 396, 131
479: \bibitem[Naydenov et al.(2002)]{NVF02}
480: Naydenov, I.D., Valyavin, G.G., Fabrika, S.N., et al.
481: 2002, Bull. Spec. Astrophys. Obs., 53, 124
482: %\bibitem[Provencial et al.(2002)]{PSKWB02}
483: %Provencial, J.L., Shipman, H.L., Koester, D., Wesemail, F. \& Bergeron, P.
484: %2002, \apj, 568, 324
485: \bibitem[Putney(1999)]{P99}
486: Putney, A. 1999, 11th. European Workhop on White Dwarfs, ASP Conf.
487: Series, 196, 195. J.E., Solheim, E.G., Meistas ed.
488: \bibitem[Reid \& Wegner(1988)]{RW88}
489: Reid, Neill, \& Wegner, Gary 1988, \apj, 335, 953
490: \bibitem[Saffer et al.(1994)]{SBKL94}
491: Saffer Rex A., Bergeron, P., Koester, D. \& Liebert, J. 1994, \apj,
492: 432, 351
493: \bibitem[Schmidt \& Smith(1994)]{SS94}
494: Schmidt, G.D.,\& Smith, P.S. 1994, \apj, 423, L63
495: \bibitem[Schmidt \& Smith(1995)]{SS95}
496: Schmidt, G.D., \& Smith, P.S. 1995, \apj, 448, 305
497: \bibitem[Schmidt \& Grauer(1997)]{SG97}
498: Schmidt, G.D., \& Grauer, A.D. 1997, \apj, 488, 827
499: \bibitem[Thejll et al.(1991)]{TMS91}
500: Thejll, P., MacDonald, J., \& Saffer, R. 1991, \aap, 248, 448
501: \bibitem[Thejll et al.(1995)]{TUM95}
502: Thejll, P., Ulla, A., \& MacDonald, J. 1995, \aap, 303, 773
503: \bibitem[O'Toole et al.(2005)]{TJFH05}
504: O'Toole, S.J., Jordan, S., Friedrich, S., \& Heber, U. 2005,
505: \aap, 437, 227
506: \bibitem[Valyavin \& Fabrika(1999)]{VF99}
507: Valyavin, G., \& Fabrika, S.
508: 1999, In: 11th European Workshop on White Dwarfs,
509: J.-E. Solheim and E.G. Meistas (eds.), ASP Conf. Ser., 169, 206
510: \bibitem[Valyavin et al.(2003)]{VBFM03}
511: Valyavin, G.G., Burlakova, T.E., Fabrika, S.N, \& Monin, D.N.
512: 2003, Astronomy Reports, 47, 589
513: \bibitem[Valyavin et al.(2005)]{VBM05}
514: Valyavin, G., Bagnulo, S., Monin, D., Fabrika, S., Lee, B.-C.,
515: Galazutdinov, G., Wade, G., Burlakova, T. 2005,
516: \aap, 439, 1099
517: \bibitem[Wendell et al.(1987)]{WVS87}
518: Wendell, C.E., Van Horn, H.M., \& Sargent, D. 1987, \apj, 313, 284
519: \bibitem[Wickramasinghe \& Ferrario(2005)]{WF05}
520: Wickramasinghe, D.T., \& Ferrario, Lilia 2005, \mnras, 356, 1576
521: \bibitem[Williams et al.(2001a)]{WMG01}
522: Williams, T., McGrow, J.T., \& Grashuis, R. 2001a,\pasp, 113, 490
523: \bibitem[Williams et al.(2001b)]{WMMG01}
524: Williams, T., McGrow, J.T., Mason, Paul A., \& Grashuis, R.
525: 2001b,\pasp, 113, 944
526: \bibitem[Winget et al.(1994)]{WNC94}
527: Winget, D. E., Nather, R. E., Clemens, J.C. and 29 coauthors 1994,
528: \apj, 430, 839
529: \end{thebibliography}
530: \clearpage
531:
532: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%TABLE%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
533: \begin{deluxetable}{cccccc}
534: \tablecolumns{5} \tablewidth{0pc} \tablecaption{Determination of the
535: mean longitudinal field obtained as explained in \S~3. } \tablehead{
536: Name & SP& JD& Exp& $B_\mathrm{l}$&
537: $\sigma$\\
538: WD & & (-2400000)&(sec)&$(kG)$&$(kG)$ \\
539: }
540: \startdata
541: 0501+527&DA1 &53004.49&3600&-3.9 & 2.8\\
542: \hline
543: 0644+375&DA2 &53004.59&4020&+1.9 & 1.8\\
544: \hline
545: 0713+584&DA4 &53003.53&7100&+0.6 & 0.8\\
546: & &53003.61&7100&+0.8 & 1.0\\
547: & & AVERAGE & &+0.7 & 0.6\\
548: \hline
549: 1036+433&sdO &53005.49&6000&+9.6 & 2.6\\
550: & &53005.63&5000&+5.9 & 2.8\\
551: & &53422.34&5500&-1.1 & 3.2\\
552: & & AVERAGE & &+5.5& 1.6 \\
553: \hline
554: 1105-048&DA3 &53006.54&3600&-7.9 & 2.6\\
555: & &53007.55&7200&-4.8 & 2.3\\
556: & &53007.64&3100&+0.1 & 2.7\\
557: & & AVERAGE & &-4.4 & 1.4\\
558: \hline
559: 1134+300&DA3 &53004.64&1800&+8.9& 4.5\\
560: & &53006.62&3600&+3.5 & 2.7\\
561: & & AVERAGE & &+4.9 & 2.3\\
562: \hline
563: 1647+591&DAv4 &53194.47&3600&$-2.9$ & 3.4\\
564: & &53195.46&3600&-8.7 & 3.2\\
565: & &53422.59&5100&-0.5 & 2.8\\
566: & & AVERAGE & &-3.8 & 1.7\\
567: \enddata
568: \end{deluxetable}
569:
570: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
571: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
572:
573: \begin{figure}
574: \centering
575: \includegraphics[width=4.03cm, height=9.2cm, angle=270]{f1a.eps}
576: \includegraphics[width=4.03cm, height=9.2cm, angle=270]{f1b.eps}
577: \includegraphics[width=4.03cm, height=9.2cm, angle=270]{f1c.eps}
578: \includegraphics[width=4.03cm, height=9.2cm, angle=270]{f1d.eps}
579: \end{figure}
580: \begin{figure}
581: \centering
582: \includegraphics[width=4.03cm, height=9.2cm, angle=270]{f1e.eps}
583: \includegraphics[width=4.03cm, height=9.2cm, angle=270]{f1f.eps}
584: \includegraphics[width=4.03cm, height=9.2cm, angle=270]{f1g.eps}
585: \includegraphics[width=4.03cm, height=9.2cm, angle=270]{f1h.eps}
586: \caption{Stokes $I$ and $V$ spectra of observed WDs at the H$\alpha$
587: core. The weak-field fit of the Stokes $V$ spectra is illustrated by
588: thick lines.}
589: \end{figure}
590: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
591:
592: \end{document}
593:
594: