1: \documentclass[prl,floats,aps,showpacs,twocolumn]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3: \usepackage{natbib}
4: \usepackage[usenames]{color}
5:
6: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
7: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
8: \newcommand{\beqa}{\begin{eqnarray}}
9: \newcommand{\eeqa}{\end{eqnarray}}
10: \newcommand{\p}{\partial}
11: \newcommand{\pr}{^\prime}
12:
13: \def\fnu{{\cal F}_\nu}
14: \def\etal{{et~al. \,}}
15: \def\sun{_\odot}
16: \def\mo{M$_\odot$}
17: \def\lo{L$_\odot\,$}
18: \def\teff{T$_{\rm eff}\,$}
19: \def\teffs{T$_{\rm eff}$s$\ $}
20: \def\Dwa{$\,$\uppercase\expandafter{\romannumeral5}$\,$}
21: \def\mic{$\mu$m$\,$}
22: \def\undertext#1{$\underline{\smash{\hbox{#1}}}$}
23: \def\sless{\lower2pt\hbox{$\buildrel {\scriptstyle <}
24: \over {\scriptstyle\sim}$}}
25: \def\under{\undertext}
26: \def\sgreat{\lower2pt\hbox{$\buildrel {\scriptstyle >}
27: \over {\scriptstyle\sim}$}}
28: \def\sharpnull#1{}
29: \def\aa{Astron. Astrophys.}
30: \def\aap{Astron. Astrophys.}
31: \def\apj{Astrophys. J.}
32: \def\apjl{Astrophys. J. Lett.}
33: \def\apjs{Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. }
34: \def\mnras{Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.}
35:
36:
37: % make the argument stand out visually
38: %\newcommand{\todo}[1]{$\bullet\bullet\bullet$\textbf{[#1]}}
39:
40: \begin{document}
41:
42: \title{A New Mechanism for Gravitational Wave Emission in Core-Collapse Supernovae}
43:
44: \author{Christian D. Ott$^{(1)}$, Adam Burrows$^{(2)}$,
45: Luc Dessart$^{(2)}$, Eli Livne$^{(3)}$}
46:
47: \affiliation{$^{(1)}$Max-Planck-Institut f\"{u}r Gravitationsphysik,
48: Albert-Einstein-Institut, Potsdam, Germany; cott@aei.mpg.de}
49: \affiliation{$^{(2)}$Department of Astronomy and Steward Observatory,
50: The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721;
51: burrows@zenith.as.arizona.edu,luc@as.arizona.edu}
52: \affiliation{$^{(3)}$Racah Institute of Physics, The Hebrew University,
53: Jerusalem, Israel; eli@frodo.fiz.huji.ac.il}
54:
55: \begin{abstract}
56: We present a new theory for the gravitational wave signatures
57: of core-collapse supernovae. Previous studies identified
58: axisymmetric rotating core collapse, core bounce, postbounce convection,
59: and anisotropic neutrino emission as the primary processes
60: and phases for the radiation of gravitational waves.
61: Our results, which are based on axisymmetric, Newtonian
62: radiation-hydrodynamics supernova simulations (Burrows et al.\ 2006),
63: indicate that the dominant emission process of gravitational
64: waves in core-collapse supernovae may be the oscillations of the
65: protoneutron star core. The oscillations are predominantly of
66: g-mode character, are excited hundreds of milliseconds after bounce, and
67: typically last for several hundred milliseconds. Our results
68: suggest that even nonrotating core-collapse supernovae should be visible
69: to current LIGO-class detectors throughout the Galaxy, and depending on progenitor
70: structure, possibly out to Megaparsec distances.
71: \end{abstract}
72:
73: \pacs{
74: 04.30.Db %gravitational wave generation and sources
75: 04.40.Dg %Relativistic stars: structure, stability, and oscillations
76: 97.60.Bw %supernovae
77: 97.60.Jd %neutron stars
78: 97.60.-s %late stages of stellar evolution incl. BHs
79: }
80:
81:
82:
83: \maketitle
84:
85: Ever since physicists began to think about gravitational
86: wave detection, core-collapse supernovae have been regarded
87: as prime sources. Traditionally, model calculations
88: estimating the supernova wave signature have focussed on the
89: gravitational-wave emission from rotating iron core collapse
90: and core bounce (see, e.g., \cite{ott:04}).
91: Recent results from stellar evolutionary
92: calculations \cite{heger:05,hirschi:04} and neutron star birth spin
93: estimates \cite{ott:06} indicate that presupernova
94: stellar iron cores may rotate much more slowly
95: than previously assumed and that the asphericity during collapse
96: and bounce due to rotation is not generally great enough to produce a sizable
97: time-varying, wave-emitting mass-quadrupole moment. In fact, gravitational
98: radiation from large-scale postbounce convection and anisotropic neutrino
99: emission are likely to exceed the bounce signal of such slowly rotating
100: supernova cores \cite{jankamueller:96,bh:96,ott:04,mueller:04}.
101:
102: The first-generation LIGO-class detectors are now operating at design
103: sensitivity and an international network of observatories, including
104: LIGO, GEO600, VIRGO and TAMA, is on-line.
105: Gravitational waves detected from a supernova can provide
106: us with ``live'' dynamical
107: information from the supernova core, complementing the supernova neutrino pulse
108: as the only other immediate carriers of information from deep inside the star.
109: Using signal-processing techniques operating on a large
110: set of theoretical templates, it will be possible to extract
111: supernova physics from a sufficiently strong signal
112: \cite{summerscales:06}.
113:
114:
115: In recent simulations, Burrows et al.~\cite{burrows:06}
116: have observed that protoneutron star (PNS) core
117: g-modes are excited by turbulence and by accretion downstreams
118: through the unstable and highly-deformed stalled supernova shock
119: (undergoing the Standing-Accretion-Shock Instability [SASI]
120: \cite{foglizzo:01,blondin:03,burrows:06,buras:06b})
121: at postbounce times of many hundreds of milliseconds.
122: The oscillations damp by the emission of strong sound waves
123: and do not ebb until accretion subsides. In this way the core
124: g-modes act as transducers for the conversion of accretion
125: gravitational energy into acoustic power that is deposited
126: in the supernova mantle and, as proposed by
127: Burrows et al.~\cite{burrows:06}, may be sufficient to
128: drive an explosion. Most easily excited is the
129: fundamental $\ell$=1 core g-mode, but higher-order eigenmodes
130: and, through nonlinear effects, harmonics of eigenmodes with
131: complicated spatial structures, emerge at later times.
132:
133: In this letter, we consider the intruiging possibility of
134: the emission of strong gravitational waves from the quadrupole
135: spatial components of the PNS core oscillations. We obtain
136: new estimates for the gravitational-wave signature of core-collapse
137: supernovae. With three different presupernova stellar models,
138: we have performed the longest to date 2D Newtonian
139: radiation-hydrodynamics supernova simulations.
140: We find that the gravitational waves from the quadrupole components
141: of the core oscillations dominate the total wave signature
142: in duration, maximum strain, and total energy emission by one to
143: several orders of magnitude.
144: We have also discovered
145: an approximate progenitor dependence: more massive iron
146: cores may experience higher frequency, higher
147: amplitude oscillations, and, hence, more energetic
148: gravitational-wave emission.
149:
150: \emph{Method and Initial Models.}
151: We carry out our axisymmetric calculations
152: with the VULCAN/2D code in the multi-group, flux-limited diffusion
153: approximation \cite{livne:04,walder:05,burrows:06,dessart:06}.
154: The computational grid is comprised of 120 angular
155: zones on a full hemisphere and 160 logarithmically-spaced,
156: centrally-refined radial zones from 30~km out to 5000~km. The
157: innermost 30~km is covered by a Cartesian region that is deformed
158: to smoothly match the polar grid at the transition radius \cite{ott:04}.
159: A resolution test with 50\% more angular and radial zones did not reveal
160: major differences in global integral observables such as the gravitational-wave
161: strain. We employ the Shen equation of state \cite{shen:98}.
162:
163: We explore three models in this study. Model s11WW is the 11-\mo\
164: (Zero-Age Main Sequence [ZAMS]) presupernova model of
165: Woosley~\&~Weaver \cite{ww:95} without rotation.
166: Model s25WW is nonrotating as well, but is the
167: 25-\mo\ progenitor from the same study. Model m15b6 corresponds to the
168: 15-\mo\ progenitor model of Heger et al. \cite{heger:05} which was evolved
169: with a 1D prescription for rotation and magnetic-field-driven
170: angular momentum redistribution. We map this model onto
171: our 2D grid under the assumption of constant rotation on
172: cylinders. It has a precollapse ratio of rotational kinetic energy to
173: gravitational potential energy, $\beta$~=~T/$|$W$|$, of
174: $\sim$1$\times$10$^{-3}$\%. This value is one to two orders of magnitude smaller
175: than in previous models~ (e.g., \cite{harry:02b,ott:04,mueller:04}), but yields
176: a PNS consistent with neutron star birth spin estimates~\cite{ott:06}.
177:
178: We extract gravitational waves from the mass motions via
179: the quadrupole formula as described in \cite{finnevans:90,jm:97,ott:04}.
180: In addition, we estimate the gravitational-wave emission by anisotropic neutrino
181: radiation with the formalism introduced by \cite{epstein:78} and
182: concretized in \cite{bh:96,jm:97}.
183:
184: \begin{figure}
185: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{f1.ps}
186: \caption{Dimensionless gravitational-wave strain h$_+$ along the equator at a
187: distance of 10 kpc. Note that the range of h$_+$ in the lower panel is almost 50
188: times wider than that of the top panel.
189: \label{fig:waveform}}
190: \end{figure}
191:
192:
193: \emph{Results}. Figure~\ref{fig:waveform} depicts the quadrupole gravitational
194: wave strain h$_+$ as emitted by mass motions scaled to a source distance of
195: 10~kiloparsecs (kpc). In the top panel, we superpose the waveforms of
196: models s11WW and m15b6. Despite the presence of some rotation in the latter
197: and its greater ZAMS mass, the two models have very similar precollapse stellar
198: structures~\cite{ww:95,heger:05,ott:06}. This is reflected in the very similar
199: shapes of their waveforms. Even though s11WW is not rotating, a bounce burst
200: strain of $\sim$1.3$\times$10$^{-21}$ (@ 10 kpc) is
201: present in our numerical model. The first one to two milliseconds of this burst
202: are the imprint of the transition in grid geometry from the outer polar to the inner
203: Cartesian grids which generates a time-varying quadrupole moment at core bounce.
204: It also induces initial perturbations for
205: vortical motion in the Ledoux-unstable regions behind the expanding shock that
206: sets in almost immediately and with a perhaps too fast initial growth rate after core
207: bounce. The amount of rotational energy in m15b6's core (at bounce, $\beta$\sless\ 0.02\%
208: and at the end, $\beta$$\sim$0.08\%) is too small to have a large
209: influence on the core dynamics and, thus, on the waveform, except to slightly
210: stabilize the aspherical fluid motion at and shortly after bounce.
211: In both models, until about $\sim$250~ms after bounce the
212: physical waveform is dominated by convective motions in the
213: PNS and in the post-shock region. As the
214: SASI \cite{foglizzo:01,blondin:03,burrows:06,buras:06b}) becomes vigorous
215: and leads to global deformation of the standing shock (see, e.g., \cite{burrows:06})
216: the wave emission from the post-shock flow increases.
217:
218: \begin{figure}
219: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{f2lr.ps}
220: \caption{
221: Frequency-time evolution of model s25WW's gravitational-wave energy spectrum
222: ($dE_{\mathrm{GW}}$/$df$, \cite{jm:97}) computed with a 50 ms sampling interval.
223: \label{fig:timefreq}}
224: \end{figure}
225:
226:
227: As described in Burrows et al.~\cite{burrows:06} the fundamental core g-mode
228: ($\ell$=1,$f$$\sim$330 Hz in s11WW and m15b6) is excited by turbulence and accretion.
229: It grows strong around $\sim$400~ms after bounce and starts
230: transferring energy to the harmonic at 2$f$ through nonlinear effects. This is
231: reflected in the rise of s11WW's gravitational-wave strain around that time.
232: h$_+$ reaches a local maximum, then quickly decays to about one-third that amplitude,
233: only to pick up again after some tens of milliseconds, rising to even higher
234: amplitudes (a maximum of
235: $\sim$7$\times$10$^{-22}$ [@ 10 kpc]), followed by a quasi-exponential
236: decay with a $\sim$100~ms $e$-folding time. We attribute the
237: gravitational-wave emission in these two `humps' to the quadrupole
238: spatial component of the 2$f$ harmonic of the $\ell$=1 core g-mode.
239: s11WW's gravitational-wave energy spectrum exhibits prominent emission
240: in a band around $\sim$650~Hz.
241: A frequency analysis shows that the harmonic appears first at a frequency of $\sim$590~Hz,
242: which increases over 200~ms to a maximum of about 680~Hz, and then continuously
243: decreases to $\sim$500~Hz at the end of the simulation. In this way, the gravitational-wave
244: emitting component exactly mirrors the behavior of the $\ell$=1 g-mode which goes through
245: the same phases \cite{burrows:06,burrows:06b}. This behavior is qualitatively
246: consistent with the g-mode frequency evolution in PNSs presented
247: in \cite{ferrari:03}, who used general relativity and obtained more compact
248: PNSs with higher-frequency modes. Interestingly, we find that the time of the
249: first lull in the wave emission ($\sim$500 ms) coincides with the point in time
250: at which the core-oscillation mode reaches its maximum frequency and its
251: frequency derivative is zero~\cite{burrows:06b}. Even though model s11WW
252: begins to explode around 550~ms, its core oscillation does not subside
253: immediately \cite{burrows:06}.
254:
255: \begin{footnotesize}
256: \begin{center}
257: {\sc Table 1: Model Summary} \\
258: \vspace{0.1cm}
259: \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
260: \hline
261: \hline
262: \vspace{0.1cm}
263:
264: Model & $\Delta$t$^{a}$ &$|$h$_{+,\mathrm{max}}|^b$
265: & h$_{\mathrm{char,max}}^{b,c}$
266: & f(h$_{\mathrm{char,max}}$)
267: & E$_\mathrm{GW}^{d}$\\
268: &(ms)&(10$^{-21}$)&(10$^{-21}$)&(Hz)&(10$^{-7}$ \mo c$^2$)\\
269: \hline
270: s11WW&1045&1.3&22.8&654&0.16\\
271: s25WW&1110&50.0&2514.3&937&824.28\\
272: m15b6&927.2&1.2&19.3&660&0.14\\
273: \hline
274: \end{tabular}
275: \end{center}
276: $^a$\, time between bounce and the end of the simulation\\
277: $^b$\, at 10 kpc \hspace{.2cm} $^c$\, see Eq. (5.3) of \cite{flanhughes:98}.
278: $^d$\, see Eq. (12) of \cite{jm:97}
279: \end{footnotesize}
280: \vskip.1cm
281:
282: The lower panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:waveform} displays model s25WW's waveform.
283: s25WW's precollapse stellar structure is significantly different from
284: those of s11WW and m15b6. Most importantly, its iron core is more massive (1.92\mo\ vs.
285: 1.37\mo\ and 1.47\mo, respectively) and more extended. These differences in progenitor
286: structure lead to different postbounce evolution for model s25WW. Its initial shock
287: radius is significantly smaller and the SASI becomes vigorous some 100~ms later
288: than in the two other models \cite{burrows:06c}. Figure~\ref{fig:timefreq} shows a
289: frequency-time plot of s25WW's gravitational-wave energy spectrum starting at
290: 400~ms after bounce. The first burst of gravitational waves, starting at about
291: 500~ms and slowly fading afterwards (Fig.~\ref{fig:waveform}), is centered about
292: $\sim$800~Hz. In this model, the $\ell$=1 fluid mode, which dominates the dynamics
293: at that time, is centered at $\sim$400~Hz and as for models s11WW and m15b6,
294: we identify the wave-emitting component as part of the harmonic at 2$f$ of the former.
295: At $\sim$900~ms after bounce, much stronger waves begin
296: to be emitted through the excitation of an $\ell$=2 core
297: eigenmode (Fig.~\ref{fig:timefreq}; at
298: that time $f\sim$950~Hz). It reaches a maximum
299: strain of $\sim$5$\times$10$^{-20}$ (@ 10 kpc) and lasts for at least 200~ms,
300: emitting a total of close to $10^{-4}$ \mo\ c$^2$ ($\simeq$1.8$\times$10$^{50}$ erg!)
301: in gravitational waves (Fig.~\ref{fig:egw}).
302:
303: For the three models considered here we find the contributions of anisotropic
304: neutrino emission to be completely negligible compared with those of the core oscillations.
305: Extracting the neutrino-flux anisotropies at an observer radius of 200~km,
306: well outside the neutrinospheres, and extrapolating to 10~kpc distance we find
307: maximum strains of 5.5$\times$10$^{-23}$, 2.6$\times$10$^{-23}$, and
308: 1.3$\times$10$^{-23}$ for s25WW, s11WW, and m15b6, respectively. These numbers
309: are also up to five times smaller than previous estimates obtained with codes that
310: perform neutrino transport along rays, which tends to overemphasize anisotropies
311: \cite{bh:96,jm:97,mueller:04}, while our flux-limited diffusion approach tends to
312: smooth them out slightly. Due to their low-frequency character, gravitational
313: waves from neutrinos may not be observable by
314: Earth-based detectors
315:
316: \begin{figure}
317: \includegraphics[width=6.5cm]{f3lr.ps}
318: \caption{
319: Integrated energy emitted in gravitational waves.
320: \label{fig:egw}}
321: \vskip-.4cm
322: \end{figure}
323:
324:
325: \emph{Summary}.
326: We have derived and analyzed the gravitational-wave emissions in
327: long-term Newtonian 2D radiation-hydrodynamics
328: supernova calculations for three different
329: progenitors, one of which includes angular momentum consistent with
330: the inferred rotation period of young pulsars. We find that the
331: gravitational-wave emissions of all models are dominated by the quadrupolar
332: components of the core g-mode oscillations first discovered by
333: Burrows et al.\ \cite{burrows:06}. If the core oscillations
334: seen in simulations do obtain, their gravitational-wave
335: emission will exceed the emission from all previously
336: considered emission processes, including rotational core bounce,
337: convection, and anisotropic neutrino emission. Importantly, we point
338: out that the excitation of the core g-modes does not depend
339: on the particular explosion mechanism proposed by
340: Burrows et al.\ \cite{burrows:06}, but is likely to be a generic
341: phenomenon induced by turbulence and accretion downstreams in
342: any suitably delayed explosion mechanism.
343:
344: The recent study of
345: M\"uller et al.~\cite{mueller:04} suggests a total energy emission of
346: 3$\times$10$^{-9}$~\mo c$^2$ for a rotating model (initially about 3 times
347: as fast as our m15b6). For our nonrotating, low-mass model s11WW we find
348: about 5 times as much energy emission: 1.6$\times$10$^{-8}$~\mo c$^2$.
349: For the slowly rotating, but otherwise very similar model m15b6, we calculate a
350: total gravitational-wave energy of 1.4$\times$10$^{-8}$~\mo c$^2$
351: (Fig.~\ref{fig:egw} and Table 1). For the initial rotation rate and angular
352: momentum distribution present in m15b6, we do not find significant qualitative or
353: quantitative differences caused by such slow rotation. Model s25WW, due
354: to its more massive iron core, higher postbounce accretion rates, and higher pulsation
355: frequencies and amplitudes, emits an amazing 8.2$\times$10$^{-5}$~\mo c$^2$,
356: almost one tenth of a typical supernova explosion energy. Clearly, radiation-reaction
357: effects, not included in our present
358: work, might be significant for this model.
359: In Fig.~\ref{fig:ligospect}, we show the characteristic gravitational-wave
360: strain spectra of the three models, if located at 10~kpc.
361: $h_{\mathrm{char}}$ is defined by \cite{flanhughes:98} as
362: $h_{\mathrm{char}}(f)$=$D^{-1}\sqrt{2 \pi^{-2} G c^{-3} dE_{\mathrm{GW}}/df}$,
363: where $D$ is the distance to the source. This is a particularly useful measure, since it
364: incorporates the amount of energy radiated in a spectral interval $df$ around $f$.
365: In addition, we show the optimal rms noise strain ($h_{\mathrm{rms}}=\sqrt{f S(f)}$,
366: $S(f)$ being the spectral strain sensitivity) of both LIGO~I
367: and Advanced LIGO \cite{gust:99}. All h$_{\mathrm{char}}$ spectra peak
368: strongly at the frequencies identified with the quadrupole
369: components of the core oscillations (Fig.~\ref{fig:timefreq}, between 600 and 1000 Hz,
370: likely to be higher when general relativity is included), corroborating the narrow-band
371: nature of the emission process. Given our results, we conclude that, if the core
372: oscillations observed in our simulations are generically excited in core-collapse
373: supernovae, even nonrotating supernovae of small to intermediate progenitor mass
374: should be observable by LIGO throughout the Milky Way and beyond. Massive progenitors
375: could be detectable out to $\sim$100 times greater distances and their prolonged and
376: extremely energetic core-oscillation wave signature might be the generic precursor of
377: stellar-mass black-hole formation.
378:
379: \begin{figure}
380: \includegraphics[width=6.8cm]{f4lr.ps}
381: \caption{
382: Characteristic strain spectra contrasted with initial and
383: advanced LIGO (optimal) rms noise curves.\label{fig:ligospect}}
384: \end{figure}
385:
386:
387: We point out that the work presented here is based on
388: simulations in 2D Newtonian gravity and only quadrupole
389: wave emission has been considered.
390: General relativity is likely to increase the frequency of the PNS eigenmodes,
391: but is unlikely to lead to qualitative differences. Fast rotation might
392: lead to the partial stabilization of
393: the post-shock convection, might affect the growth of core oscillations,
394: and will likely lead to nonaxisymmetric rotational instabilities
395: for $\beta$ \sgreat\ 8\% \cite{rotinst:05}. In 3D, the temporal and spatial
396: mode and SASI structures may change.
397:
398:
399:
400: \acknowledgments
401:
402: We acknowledge help from and discussions with C. Meakin, J. Murphy,
403: H. Dimmelmeier, E. M\"uller, J. Pons, N. Stergioulas, L. Rezzolla, and E. Seidel.
404: We acknowledge support from the Scientific Discovery
405: through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) program of the DOE, grant number DE-FC02-01ER41184,
406: and from the NSF, grant number AST-0504947.
407: E. L. acknowledges support from the Israel Science
408: Foundation under grant 805/04.
409: This research used resources of the National
410: Energy Research Scientific Computing Center,
411: which is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of
412: Energy under Contract No. DE-AC03-76SF00098.
413:
414:
415: \begin{thebibliography}{28}
416: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
417: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibnamefont\endcsname\relax
418: \def\bibnamefont#1{#1}\fi
419: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibfnamefont\endcsname\relax
420: \def\bibfnamefont#1{#1}\fi
421: \expandafter\ifx\csname citenamefont\endcsname\relax
422: \def\citenamefont#1{#1}\fi
423: \expandafter\ifx\csname url\endcsname\relax
424: \def\url#1{\texttt{#1}}\fi
425: \expandafter\ifx\csname urlprefix\endcsname\relax\def\urlprefix{URL }\fi
426: \providecommand{\bibinfo}[2]{#2}
427: \providecommand{\eprint}[2][]{\url{#2}}
428:
429: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Ott et~al.}(2004)\citenamefont{Ott, Burrows, Livne, and
430: Walder}}]{ott:04}
431: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.~D.} \bibnamefont{Ott}},
432: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Burrows}},
433: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Livne}}, \bibnamefont{and}
434: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Walder}},
435: \bibinfo{journal}{Astrophys. J.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{600}}, \bibinfo{pages}{834}
436: (\bibinfo{year}{2004}).
437:
438: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Heger} et~al.}(2005)\citenamefont{{Heger}, {Woosley},
439: and {Spruit}}}]{heger:05}
440: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{{Heger}}},
441: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~E.} \bibnamefont{{Woosley}}},
442: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.~C.}
443: \bibnamefont{{Spruit}}}, \bibinfo{journal}{\apj}
444: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{626}}, \bibinfo{pages}{350} (\bibinfo{year}{2005}).
445:
446: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Hirschi} et~al.}(2004)\citenamefont{{Hirschi},
447: {Meynet}, and {Maeder}}}]{hirschi:04}
448: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{{Hirschi}}},
449: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{{Meynet}}}, \bibnamefont{and}
450: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{{Maeder}}},
451: \bibinfo{journal}{Astron. Astrophys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{425}}, \bibinfo{pages}{649}
452: (\bibinfo{year}{2004}).
453:
454: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Ott} et~al.}(2006)\citenamefont{{Ott}, {Burrows},
455: {Thompson}, {Livne}, and {Walder}}}]{ott:06}
456: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.~D.} \bibnamefont{{Ott}}},
457: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{{Burrows}}},
458: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T. A.}~\bibnamefont{{Thompson}}},
459: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{{Livne}}}, \bibnamefont{and}
460: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{{Walder}}},
461: \bibinfo{journal}{Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser., 164, 130} (\bibinfo{year}{2006}).
462:
463: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Janka} and {M\"uller}}(1996)}]{jankamueller:96}
464: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.-T.} \bibnamefont{{Janka}}} \bibnamefont{and}
465: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{{M\"uller}}},
466: \bibinfo{journal}{\aap} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{306}}, \bibinfo{pages}{167}
467: (\bibinfo{year}{1996}).
468:
469: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Burrows and Hayes}(1996)}]{bh:96}
470: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Burrows}} \bibnamefont{and}
471: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Hayes}},
472: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{76}},
473: \bibinfo{pages}{352} (\bibinfo{year}{1996}).
474:
475:
476: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{M{\" u}ller} et~al.}(2004)\citenamefont{{M{\" u}ller},
477: {Rampp}, {Buras}, {Janka}, and {Shoemaker}}}]{mueller:04}
478: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{{M{\" u}ller}}},
479: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{{Rampp}}},
480: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{{Buras}}},
481: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.-T.} \bibnamefont{{Janka}}},
482: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~H.}
483: \bibnamefont{{Shoemaker}}}, \bibinfo{journal}{\apj}
484: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{603}}, \bibinfo{pages}{221} (\bibinfo{year}{2004}).
485:
486: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Summerscales}
487: et~al.}(2006)\citenamefont{{Summerscales}, Burrows, {Finn}, and
488: {Ott}}}]{summerscales:06}
489: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{{Summerscales}}},
490: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Burrows}},
491: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.~S.} \bibnamefont{{Finn}}},
492: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.~D.} \bibnamefont{{Ott}}},
493: \bibinfo{journal}{in preparation} (\bibinfo{year}{2006}).
494:
495: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Burrows}
496: et~al.}(2006{\natexlab{a}})\citenamefont{{Burrows}, {Livne}, {Dessart},
497: {Ott}, and {Murphy}}}]{burrows:06}
498: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{{Burrows}}},
499: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{{Livne}}},
500: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{{Dessart}}},
501: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.~D.} \bibnamefont{{Ott}}}, \bibnamefont{and}
502: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{{Murphy}}},
503: \bibinfo{journal}{\apj, 640, 878,}
504: (\bibinfo{year}{2006}{\natexlab{a}}).
505:
506: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Foglizzo}}(2001)}]{foglizzo:01}
507: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{{Foglizzo}}},
508: \bibinfo{journal}{\aap} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{368}}, \bibinfo{pages}{311}
509: (\bibinfo{year}{2001}).
510:
511: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Blondin} et~al.}(2003)\citenamefont{{Blondin},
512: {Mezzacappa}, and {DeMarino}}}]{blondin:03}
513: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~M.} \bibnamefont{{Blondin}}},
514: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{{Mezzacappa}}},
515: \bibnamefont{and}
516: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{{DeMarino}}},
517: \bibinfo{journal}{\apj} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{584}}, \bibinfo{pages}{971}
518: (\bibinfo{year}{2003}).
519:
520: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Buras et~al.}(2005)\citenamefont{Buras, Janka, Rampp,
521: and Kifonidis}}]{buras:06b}
522: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Buras}},
523: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.-T.} \bibnamefont{Janka}},
524: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Rampp}}, \bibnamefont{and}
525: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Kifonidis}},
526: \bibinfo{journal}{\aa, submitted, astro-ph/0512189} (\bibinfo{year}{2005}).
527:
528: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Livne} et~al.}(2004)\citenamefont{{Livne}, {Burrows},
529: {Walder}, {Lichtenstadt}, and {Thompson}}}]{livne:04}
530: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{{Livne}}},
531: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{{Burrows}}},
532: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{{Walder}}},
533: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{I.}~\bibnamefont{{Lichtenstadt}}},
534: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.~A.}
535: \bibnamefont{{Thompson}}}, \bibinfo{journal}{\apj}
536: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{609}}, \bibinfo{pages}{277} (\bibinfo{year}{2004}).
537:
538: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Walder} et~al.}(2005)\citenamefont{{Walder},
539: {Burrows}, {Ott}, {Livne}, {Lichtenstadt}, and {Jarrah}}}]{walder:05}
540: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{{Walder}}},
541: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{{Burrows}}},
542: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.~D.} \bibnamefont{{Ott}}},
543: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{{Livne}}},
544: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{I.}~\bibnamefont{{Lichtenstadt}}},
545: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{{Jarrah}}},
546: \bibinfo{journal}{\apj} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{626}}, \bibinfo{pages}{317}
547: (\bibinfo{year}{2005}).
548:
549: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Dessart et~al.}(2006)\citenamefont{Dessart, {Burrows},
550: {Livne}, and {Ott}}}]{dessart:06}
551: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Dessart}},
552: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{{Burrows}}},
553: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{{Livne}}}, \bibnamefont{and}
554: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.~D.} \bibnamefont{{Ott}}},
555: \bibinfo{journal}{\apj, accepted, astro-ph/0510229} (\bibinfo{year}{2006}).
556:
557: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Shen} et~al.}(1998)\citenamefont{{Shen}, {Toki},
558: {Oyamatsu}, and {Sumiyoshi}}}]{shen:98}
559: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{{Shen}}},
560: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{{Toki}}},
561: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{{Oyamatsu}}},
562: \bibnamefont{and}
563: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{{Sumiyoshi}}},
564: \bibinfo{journal}{Progress of Theoretical Physics}
565: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{100}}, \bibinfo{pages}{1013} (\bibinfo{year}{1998}).
566:
567: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Woosley} and {Weaver}}(1995)}]{ww:95}
568: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~E.} \bibnamefont{{Woosley}}}
569: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.~A.}
570: \bibnamefont{{Weaver}}}, \bibinfo{journal}{\apjs}
571: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{101}}, \bibinfo{pages}{181} (\bibinfo{year}{1995}).
572:
573: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Dimmelmeier et~al.}(2002)\citenamefont{Dimmelmeier,
574: Font, and M{\"u}ller}}]{harry:02b}
575: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Dimmelmeier}},
576: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Font}}, \bibnamefont{and}
577: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{M{\"u}ller}},
578: \bibinfo{journal}{\aa} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{393}}, \bibinfo{pages}{523}
579: (\bibinfo{year}{2002}).
580:
581: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Finn and Evans}(1990)}]{finnevans:90}
582: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.~S.} \bibnamefont{Finn}} \bibnamefont{and}
583: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.~R.} \bibnamefont{Evans}},
584: \bibinfo{journal}{\apj} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{351}}, \bibinfo{pages}{588}
585: (\bibinfo{year}{1990}).
586:
587: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{M{\"u}ller and Janka}(1997)}]{jm:97}
588: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{M{\"u}ller}} \bibnamefont{and}
589: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.-T.} \bibnamefont{Janka}},
590: \bibinfo{journal}{\aa} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{317}}, \bibinfo{pages}{140}
591: (\bibinfo{year}{1997}).
592:
593: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Epstein}}(1978)}]{epstein:78}
594: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{{Epstein}}},
595: \bibinfo{journal}{\apj} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{223}}, \bibinfo{pages}{1037}
596: (\bibinfo{year}{1978}).
597:
598: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Burrows} et~al.}(2005)\citenamefont{{Burrows},
599: {Livne}, {Dessart}, {Ott}, and {Murphy}}}]{burrows:06b}
600: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{{Burrows}}},
601: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{{Livne}}},
602: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{{Dessart}}},
603: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.~D.} \bibnamefont{{Ott}}}, \bibnamefont{and}
604: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{{Murphy}}},
605: \bibinfo{journal}{in proceedings of, ``Astronomy with Radioactivities V: From Gamma-Rays to
606: Stardust," held at Clemson University, SC, USA} (\bibinfo{year}{2005}).
607:
608: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Ferrari} et~al.}(2003)\citenamefont{{Ferrari},
609: {Miniutti}, and {Pons}}}]{ferrari:03}
610: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{V.}~\bibnamefont{{Ferrari}}},
611: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{{Miniutti}}},
612: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~A.}
613: \bibnamefont{{Pons}}}, \bibinfo{journal}{\mnras}
614: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{342}}, \bibinfo{pages}{629} (\bibinfo{year}{2003}).
615:
616: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Flanagan} and {Hughes}}(1998)}]{flanhughes:98}
617: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{{\'E}.~{\'E}.} \bibnamefont{{Flanagan}}}
618: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~A.}
619: \bibnamefont{{Hughes}}}, \bibinfo{journal}{\prd}
620: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{57}}, \bibinfo{pages}{4535} (\bibinfo{year}{1998}).
621:
622: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Burrows}
623: et~al.}(2006{\natexlab{b}})\citenamefont{{Burrows}, {Livne}, {Dessart},
624: {Ott}, and {Murphy}}}]{burrows:06c}
625: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{{Burrows}}},
626: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{{Livne}}},
627: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{{Dessart}}},
628: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.~D.} \bibnamefont{{Ott}}}, \bibnamefont{and}
629: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{{Murphy}}},
630: \bibinfo{journal}{in preparation} (\bibinfo{year}{2006}{\natexlab{b}}).
631:
632: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Gustafson et~al.}(1999)\citenamefont{Gustafson,
633: Shoemaker, Strain, and Weiss}}]{gust:99}
634: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Gustafson}},
635: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{Shoemaker}},
636: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Strain}}, \bibnamefont{and}
637: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Weiss}},
638: \bibinfo{journal}{LSC white paper on detector research and development,
639: Technical Report, LIGO~T99080-00-D} (\bibinfo{year}{1999}).
640:
641: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{{Ott} et~al.}(2005)\citenamefont{{Ott}, {Ou},
642: {Tohline}, and {Burrows}}}]{rotinst:05}
643: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.~D.} \bibnamefont{{Ott}}},
644: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{{Ou}}},
645: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~E.} \bibnamefont{{Tohline}}},
646: \bibnamefont{and}
647: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{{Burrows}}},
648: \bibinfo{journal}{\apjl} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{625}},
649: \bibinfo{pages}{L119} (\bibinfo{year}{2005}).
650:
651: \end{thebibliography}
652:
653:
654: \end{document}
655:
656: