1: % mn2esample.tex
2: %
3: % v2.1 released 22nd May 2002 (G. Hutton)
4: %
5: % The mnsample.tex file has been amended to highlight
6: % the proper use of LaTeX2e code with the class file
7: % and using natbib cross-referencing. These changes
8: % do not reflect the original paper by A. V. Raveendran.
9: %
10: % Previous versions of this sample document were
11: % compatible with the LaTeX 2.09 style file mn.sty
12: % v1.2 released 5th September 1994 (M. Reed)
13: % v1.1 released 18th July 1994
14: % v1.0 released 28th January 1994
15:
16: \documentclass[useAMS,usenatbib]{mn2e}
17:
18: % If your system does not have the AMS fonts version 2.0 installed, then
19: % remove the useAMS option.
20: %
21: % useAMS allows you to obtain upright Greek characters.
22: % e.g. \umu, \upi etc. See the section on "Upright Greek characters" in
23: % this guide for further information.
24: %
25: % If you are using AMS 2.0 fonts, bold math letters/symbols are available
26: % at a larger range of sizes for NFSS release 1 and 2 (using \boldmath or
27: % preferably \bmath).
28: %
29: % The usenatbib command allows the use of Patrick Daly's natbib.sty for
30: % cross-referencing.
31: %
32: % If you wish to typeset the paper in Times font (if you do not have the
33: % PostScript Type 1 Computer Modern fonts you will need to do this to get
34: % smoother fonts in a PDF file) then uncomment the next line
35: % \usepackage{Times}
36:
37: %%%%% AUTHORS - PLACE YOUR OWN MACROS HERE %%%%%
38:
39:
40: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
41:
42: \title[Timing properties of XB 1254--690]{Timing properties of XB 1254--690}
43: \author[Sudip Bhattacharyya]{Sudip Bhattacharyya$^{1,2}$\thanks{E-mail:
44: sudip@milkyway.gsfc.nasa.gov}\\
45: $^{1}$CRESST and X-ray Astrophysics Laboratory, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA\\
46: $^{2}$Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland,
47: College Park, MD 20742, USA}
48: \begin{document}
49:
50: \date{}
51:
52: %\pagerange{\pageref{firstpage}--\pageref{lastpage}} \pubyear{2002}
53:
54: \maketitle
55:
56: \label{firstpage}
57:
58: \begin{abstract}
59: We analyze archival Rossi X--ray Timing Explorer ({\it RXTE}) Proportional Counter
60: Array (PCA) data of the low mass X--ray binary (LMXB) system XB 1254--690.
61: We calculate colour-colour diagram, hardness-intensity diagram and power spectra
62: of this source, associate its broad low-frequency timing features with the
63: portions of the colour-colour diagram, and establish that XB 1254--690 is an atoll source.
64: This will be important to correlate the timing and spectral features of this
65: dipping LMXB with its various states, which may be useful to understand LMXBs
66: in general. We find the source always in the high intensity
67: banana state, which may explain why $\sim 1$ Hz ``dipper QPOs'' have never been
68: observed from XB 1254--690.
69: We also report a suggestive evidence of millisecond period brightness oscillations at the
70: frequency $\sim 95$ Hz during a thermonuclear X--ray burst for the first
71: time from this source.
72: \end{abstract}
73:
74: \begin{keywords}
75: methods: data analysis --- stars: neutron ---
76: techniques: miscellaneous --- X-rays: binaries ---
77: X-rays: bursts --- X-rays: individual
78: (XB 1254--690)
79: \end{keywords}
80:
81: \section{Introduction}
82:
83: XB 1254--690 is a persistent low mass X--ray binary (LMXB) system (Griffiths et al. 1978),
84: that exhibits energy dependent intensity dips (Courvoisier et al. 1986) with the binary orbital
85: period ($\sim 3.88$ hr). This modulation of soft X-ray intensity is believed to be caused
86: by structures above the accretion disc (White \& Swank 1982). This is
87: possible only if the dippers are high inclination systems, so that the
88: line of sight passes through these structures. Therefore, dippers provide
89: an opportunity to constrain the properties of the upper layers of accretion discs (and the
90: photoionized plasma above them; Jimenez-Garate et al. 2003) in LMXBs.
91: However, in order to understand the nature of these X--ray emitting and absorbing
92: components, it is essential to
93: identify various states of the source, and to correlate the observed timing and spectral
94: features with these states. But, no detailed timing properties of XB 1254--690
95: have previously been reported. Moreover, the nature
96: of this source is not yet established
97: (e.g., Z, atoll, etc.; see, for example, van der Klis 2004;
98: Kuulkers et al. 1997; Wijnands et al. 1998;
99: Homan et al. 2002; Agrawal \& Bhattacharyya 2003).
100: Here we note that, although Gladstone, Done, Gierli\'nski (2006)
101: have recently included XB 1254--690 in the list of atoll sources, these authors have not
102: given a discussion to justify this, have not shown a separate colour-colour diagram (van der Klis
103: 2004; Belloni \& Hasinger 1990; Olive, Barret, Gierli\'nski 2003;
104: Jonker et al. 2000) of this source, and have not done timing
105: analysis using the {\it RXTE} PCA data of XB 1254--690 in order to find the nature of this source.
106:
107: XB 1254--690 also exhibits type-I X--ray bursts (Mason et al. 1980; Courvoisier et al. 1986).
108: These bursts are produced by thermonuclear burning of matter
109: accumulated on the surfaces of accreting neutron stars (Woosley \&
110: Taam 1976; Lamb \& Lamb 1978), which shows that XB 1254--690 contains a neutron
111: star. During many such bursts from some other LMXBs, the combination of rapid stellar rotation and
112: an asymmetric brightness pattern on the neutron star surface gives rise
113: to observable millisecond period brightness oscillations (Strohmayer \& Bildsten 2006).
114: The frequency of these oscillations gives the neutron star spin
115: frequency (Chakrabarty et al. 2003).
116: Moreover, this timing feature may be useful to constrain stellar structure parameters
117: (Bhattacharyya et al. 2005; Nath, Strohmayer, Swank 2002),
118: and to understand thermonuclear flame spreading
119: on neutron stars (Bhattacharyya \& Strohmayer 2005; 2006a; 2006b; 2006c).
120: However, until now,
121: burst oscillations from XB 1254--690 have never been reported, and the spin
122: frequency of the neutron star is not known. Therefore, the detection of
123: these oscillations from this source will be very useful.
124:
125: In this paper, we perform timing and spectral analysis of the {\it RXTE} PCA data of XB 1254--690,
126: calculate the colour-colour diagram (van der Klis 2004), correlate broad timing features with
127: different portions of it, and establish that XB 1254--690 is an atoll source.
128: Moreover, we find a suggestive evidence of oscillations from one type-I (thermonuclear)
129: X--ray burst. In \S~2, we describe
130: our data analysis procedure and results, and in \S~3, we discuss the implications of these
131: results.
132:
133: \section[]{Data Analysis and Results}
134:
135: The LMXB system XB 1254--690 was observed with {\it RXTE} in the years (proposal numbers)
136: 1996 (P10068), 1997 (P20066), 2001 (P60044) and 2004 (P90036). In 2001, the source was
137: observed both in May, and in December. We have used these proportional counter array (PCA)
138: instrument data to calculate the colour-colour diagram (CD; Fig. 1), and
139: hardness-intensity diagram (HID; Fig. 1), and to perform timing studies.
140: For the first two, we have always used PCA Standard 2 mode data, while for the third one
141: we have used PCA Good Xenon data (except for 1996 observations, for which we have used
142: PCA Event mode data with about 16 $\mu$s resolution). The PCUs 0, 2 and 3
143: were reliably on during these observations, and we have used the data from these PCUs (and only
144: from the top Xenon layers to increase signal-to-noise) to calculate the CD and HID.
145: We have defined the soft and hard colours for the CD (the intensity for the HID)
146: as the ratio of the background-subtracted counts (background-subtracted count) in the
147: channel and energy ranges mentioned in Table 1. These definitions for various observations are
148: very close to each other, and also very similar to those used by Muno, Remillard \& Chakrabarty (2002;
149: hereafter MRC). This will facilitate the comparison of our results with those of these authors.
150: However, the gain settings of PCUs change from time to time, and small gain shift happens
151: even in the same gain epoch. As a result, artificial relative differences among CD (and HID) tracks
152: of various observations may occur. We have corrected this effect by using the PCA data of
153: Crab pulsar/nebula, as the Crab colours can be supposed to be constant (Homan et al. 2002;
154: van Straaten et al. 2000; Altamirano et al. 2005).
155: We have scaled the colours of the XB 1254--690 observation sets (except the one during
156: May, 2001) mentioned in Table 1 to correctly compare them with those of the May, 2001
157: observations. We have utilized the Crab data at the closest time (but in the same gain
158: epoch) to each of the five observation sets to do this (see, for example,
159: Homan et al. 2002).
160:
161: In order to explore the nature of XB 1254--690, first we have calculated a typical X--ray flux from this
162: source by fitting spectra with a model. The $2-20$ keV average flux is
163: $\approx 10^{-9}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$.
164: Considering an estimated bolometric correction factor $\sim 2$, and assuming
165: (1) the source distance in the range $8-15$ kpc (Motch et al. 1987), (2) the neutron star mass
166: in the range $M_{\rm x} = 1.4-2.0 M_\odot$, and (3) solar hydrogenic abundance,
167: we have found the source luminosity in the range $\approx 0.05L_{\rm Edd} - 0.25L_{\rm Edd}$,
168: where $L_{\rm Edd}$ is the Eddington luminosity.
169:
170: We have, then, compared our CD (Fig. 1) with that of MRC.
171: Fig. 1 of MRC shows that the flaring branches (FBs) of Z sources have hard colours less than 0.3
172: (except for GX 17+2). As the hard colour of XB 1254--690 is always greater than 0.3,
173: this indicates that if this source is a Z source, it
174: was not in an FB state. Besides, during these observations
175: the source showed frequent flares, which are not usual for the
176: other two states (normal branch and horizontal branch) of Z sources.
177: Therefore, it is not likely that XB 1254--690 is a Z source.
178: Moreover, the typical luminosities
179: of Z sources are close to the Eddington luminosity (van der Klis 2004), and hence much higher
180: than the luminosity of XB 1254--690. Therefore, we conclude that XB 1254--690 is not a Z source.
181:
182: Fig. 1 of MRC shows that the hard colours of atoll sources are always greater than 0.3
183: (except for GX 13+1). This, and especially the observed hard colours of the banana branches of
184: atoll sources (see MRC) strongly indicate that XB 1254--690 is an atoll source, and
185: it was in the banana branch during all the observations (see Fig. 1). The following
186: findings also suggest that XB 1254--690 was in banana branch during these observations:
187: (1) the source covered a large part of its CD track in a few hours, and
188: (2) the source hardened as its intensity increased (i.e., possibly went into upper banana (UB)
189: state from lower banana (LB) state; van der Klis 2004).
190:
191: To confirm the identification of the banana state of XB 1254--690, we have computed and
192: fitted the power spectra of the source during low intensity and high intensity for each
193: of 2001 and 2004 data (Table 2). The chosen 2001 data sets are from the same ObsID, which shows
194: that the source intensity can significantly change with a timescale of hours. Both the power spectra
195: from these low intensity and high intensity data sets can be well fitted with a `constant+powerlaw'
196: model (no. 1 \& 2 of Table 2). The `constant' describes the Poisson noise level,
197: and the `powerlaw' describes the very low frequency noise (VLFN). The detection of the
198: latter noise strongly indicates that the source was in banana state during the
199: 2001 observations (van der Klis 2004). Moreover, the strength of the VLFN increases
200: with the intensity and the hardness of the source. This, and the disappearance of the VLFN
201: during the low intensity state of the 2004 data (Table 2 and Fig. 2) are also consistent
202: with banana state properties of atoll sources (van der Klis 2004). We also note that
203: the power spectrum of the low intensity 2004 data can be well fitted with a `constant+Lorentzian'
204: (Fig. 2). The `Lorentzian' indicates a broad hump, or alternatively a band-limited noise (BLN;
205: van der Klis 2004).
206:
207: We have detected five type-I (thermonuclear)
208: X--ray bursts from XB 1254--690: one from 1996 data and four from
209: 2001 data. All of them are non-photospheric-radius-expansion bursts with the peak count rates
210: in the range $\sim 500-800$ counts s$^{-1}$ PCU$^{-1}$ (for all the detector channels).
211: None of the 2001 bursts shows
212: significant millisecond period brightness oscillations. However, we have found suggestive evidence of
213: burst oscillations during the rising portion of the 1996 burst.
214: In the inset panel of Fig. 3, we show the first power spectrum
215: that we have calculated using 16 $\mu$s event mode data and a 1 s time interval
216: (i.e., 1 Hz frequency resolution). This interval starts at the time
217: when the burst count rate starts rising sharply.
218: We have found a candidate peak at $\sim 95$~Hz with the power of $\approx 24.3$.
219: The probability of obtaining a power
220: this high in a single trial from the expected $\chi^2$ noise distribution (2 dof) is
221: $\approx 5.29 \times 10^{-6}$. Multiplying this with the number of trials ($N_{\rm trial}$)
222: would give the significance of this peak.
223: The Nyquist frequency = 2048 Hz of our power spectrum, and five observed bursts from XB 1254--690
224: give $N_{\rm trial} = 10240$
225: for 1 Hz frequency resolution. This implies that the oscillations (at $\sim 95$ Hz)
226: are detected with $\approx 95$\% confidence.
227: Although, the calculation of oscillation significance separately for each burst
228: (as the presence of oscillations depends on burst properties and accretion history;
229: Galloway et al. 2006) would imply a detection from the 1996 burst with 98.9\% confidence
230: ($N_{\rm trial} = 2048$), the more conservative value (95\%) should be acceptable, because of
231: the lack of our complete understanding of burst oscillations.
232:
233: We have also fitted the phase-folded lightcurve of 1 s of data (the same data used to calculate
234: the power spectrum of Fig. 3) with a combined model of a sinusoid and a constant ($\chi^2/{\rm dof} =
235: 3.2/13$), and found that the oscillation rms amplitude is $0.31\pm0.07$. These values of fractional
236: rms amplitude are consistent with that expected for a hot spot on a spinning neutron star surface
237: (Miller \& Lamb 1998). These values are also consistent with the rms amplitude value (= 0.27)
238: obtained from the formula $(P_{\rm n}/I)^{1/2} (I/(I-B))$ (Muno, {\"O}zel, Chakrabarty 2003).
239: Here $P_{\rm n}$ is the power at the nth bin of the Fourier
240: spectrum, $I$ is the total number of counts in the profile, and $B$ is the estimated
241: number of background counts in the profile. We have not found any significant burst
242: oscillation frequency evolution, as were seen from some other bursting sources
243: (e.g., Strohmayer et al. 1998; Bhattacharyya \& Strohmayer 2006c; Bhattacharyya et al. 2006a).
244:
245: We have searched for kHz QPOs in the whole data set, and found a tentative indication of
246: $\approx$1000 Hz QPOs in the ObsID 20066-01-01-04.
247: The significance of these plausible kHz QPOs is $\approx 2.66 \sigma$.
248: The high centroid frequency, the low $Q$-value $(\sim 2.44)$, and
249: the inferred fractional rms amplitude ($\approx 0.12$) are consistent with those of
250: upper frequency kHz QPOs observed from other sources (see, for example,
251: Barret, Olive, Miller, 2005). This plausible timing feature appeared in the relatively
252: lower portion (that is lower soft colour and lower hard colour) of the
253: banana branch. This is consistent with what has been seen in other atoll
254: sources, because kHz QPOs are normally found in the ``lower left banana" portion
255: of the CD (van der Klis 2004).
256: If confirmed, this timing feature will be the first kHz QPOs observed from this source.
257: However, more significant detection of this feature is essential, as
258: this plausible kHz QPOs appeared only in a small ($\sim 400$ s) data set.
259:
260: \section{Discussion}
261:
262: In this paper, we have estimated the luminosity range (in the unit of Eddington luminosity)
263: of XB 1254--690, calculated the colour-colour diagram, hardness-intensity diagram and
264: persistent emission power spectra
265: of this source, and established that this source is an atoll source.
266: This is an important first step to identify various states of this source.
267: As we have mentioned in \S~1, XB 1254--690 is a dipping LMXB, and hence can be
268: particularly useful to understand the properties of the upper layers of accretion discs, and the
269: photoionized plasma above them in LMXBs. Moreover, spectral lines are normally observed from
270: the dippers, and X--ray absorption lines were actually detected from XB 1254--690 (Boirin et al. 2004).
271: Therefore, this source can be very promising for understanding LMXBs, if its
272: timing and spectral features can be correlated to its various states. In this paper,
273: we have already associated some low-frequency broad timing features with the LB and
274: UB states of XB 1254--690. These, as well as the weak indication of a kHz QPO (see \S~2),
275: will encourage more observations of this source. Moreover, dippers can exhibit
276: $\sim 1$ Hz QPOs, and to the best of our knowledge, such QPOs have been detected from
277: four dippers so far (Jonker, van der Klis, Wijnands 1999; Homan et al. 1999; Jonker et al. 2000;
278: Bhattacharyya et al. 2006c). However, these QPOs are observed at the low intensity states,
279: which might explain why they were never observed from XB 1254--690, as according to our analysis,
280: this source was
281: always in the high intensity banana state during {\it RXTE} observations. This may motivate
282: {\it RXTE} observations of XB 1254--690 at low intensities.
283:
284: We have found a suggestive evidence of burst oscillations from XB 1254--690,
285: and if confirmed (by the detection of more bursts),
286: these will provide the neutron star spin frequency. The plausible
287: oscillations were observed from only one burst out of the five
288: observed from this source, although the other properties of all these bursts seem similar.
289: This is typical of other burst oscillation sources, and
290: may be understood from the the recent work of Spitkovsky et al.
291: (2002). According to these authors, the low-latitude
292: ignition of bursts is much more likely, and oscillations do not occur for such ignitions.
293: This supports the calculation of oscillation significance separately for each burst,
294: although a better understanding of burst oscillations is required to strongly justify such
295: calculation (see \S~2). Finally, if the $95$ Hz burst oscillations
296: from XB 1254--690 are confirmed, the neutron star with low spin frequency (inferred from
297: the oscillations) will be ideal to search for surface atomic spectral absorption lines
298: (see Cottam, Paerels, M\'endez 2002; Bhattacharyya, Miller, Lamb 2006b), which may
299: have sufficient depths for detection.
300:
301: \section*{Acknowledgments}
302:
303: The author thanks Tod E. Strohmayer for detailed discussion, and
304: an anonymous referee for helpful suggestions.
305: This work was supported in part by NASA Guest
306: Investigator grants.
307:
308: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
309:
310: \bibitem[]{} Agrawal V.K., Bhattacharyya S., 2003, A\&A, 398, 223
311:
312: \bibitem[]{} Altamirano, D. et al., 2005, ApJ, 633, 358
313:
314: \bibitem[]{} Barret D., Olive J.-F., Miller M.C., 2005, MNRAS, 361, 855
315:
316: \bibitem[]{} Belloni T., Hasinger G., 1990, A\&A, 230, 103
317:
318: \bibitem[]{} Bhattacharyya S., Miller M.C., Lamb F., 2006b, ApJ, in press
319:
320: \bibitem[]{} Bhattacharyya S., Strohmayer T.E., 2005, ApJ, 634, L157
321:
322: \bibitem[]{} Bhattacharyya S., Strohmayer T.E., 2006a, ApJ, 636, L121
323:
324: \bibitem[]{} Bhattacharyya S., Strohmayer T.E., 2006b, ApJ, 641, L53
325:
326: \bibitem[]{} Bhattacharyya S., Strohmayer T.E., 2006c, ApJ, 642, L161
327:
328: \bibitem[]{} Bhattacharyya S., Strohmayer T.E., Markwardt C.B., Swank J.H., 2006a, ApJ, 639, L31
329:
330: \bibitem[]{} Bhattacharyya S., Strohmayer T.E., Miller M.C., Markwardt C.B., 2005, ApJ, 619, 483
331:
332: \bibitem[]{} Bhattacharyya S., Strohmayer T.E., Swank J.H., Markwardt C.B., 2006c, ApJ, 652, 603
333:
334: \bibitem[]{} Boirin L., Parmar A.N., Barret D., Paltani S., 2004, Nuclear Physics B Proceedings
335: Supplements, 132, 506
336:
337: \bibitem[]{} Chakrabarty D., 2005, American Astronomical Society Meeting, 206, 17.02
338:
339: \bibitem[]{} Chakrabarty D. et al., 2003, Nature, 424, 42
340:
341: %\bibitem[]{} Chang P., Morsink S., Bildsten L., Wasserman I., 2006, ApJ, 636, L117
342:
343: \bibitem[]{} Cottam J., Paerels F., M\'endez M., 2002, Nature, 420, 51
344:
345: \bibitem[]{} Courvoisier T.J.-L., Parmar A.N., Peacock A., Pakull M., 1986, ApJ, 309, 265
346:
347: %\bibitem[]{} Cumming A., Bildsten L., 2000, ApJ, 544, 453
348:
349: %\bibitem[]{} Fryxell B.A., Woosley S.E., 1982, ApJ, 261, 332
350:
351: \bibitem[]{} Galloway D.K. et al., 2006 (astro-ph/0608259)
352:
353: \bibitem[]{} Gladstone J., Done C., Gierli\'nski M., 2006 (astro-ph/0603126)
354:
355: \bibitem[]{} Griffiths R.E. et al., 1978, Nature, 276, 247
356:
357: \bibitem[]{} Homan J. et al., 2002, ApJ, 568, 878
358:
359: \bibitem[]{} Homan J., Jonker P.G., Wijnands R., van der Klis, M.,
360: van Paradijs J., 1999, ApJ, 516, L91
361:
362: %\bibitem[]{} in 't Zand J.J.M., Kuulkers E., Verbunt F., Heise J., Cornelisse R., 2003, A\&A, 411, L487
363:
364: \bibitem[]{} Jimenez-Garate M.A., Schulz N.S., Marshall H.L., 2003, ApJ, 590, 432
365:
366: \bibitem[]{} Jonker P.G. et al., 2000, ApJ, 531, 453
367:
368: \bibitem[]{} Jonker P.G., van der Klis M., Wijnands R., 1999, ApJ, 511, L41
369:
370: \bibitem[]{} Kuulkers E., van der Klis M., Oosterbroek T., van Paradijs J., Lewin W.H.G., 1997,
371: MNRAS, 287, 495
372:
373: \bibitem[]{} Lamb D.Q., Lamb F.K., 1978, ApJ, 220, 291
374:
375: \bibitem[]{} Mason K.O., Middleditch J., Nelson J.E., White N.E., 1980, Nature, 287, 516
376:
377: \bibitem[]{} Miller M.C., Lamb F.K., 1998, ApJ, 499, L37
378:
379: \bibitem[]{} Motch C., Pedersen H., Beuermann K., Pakull M.W., Courvoisier, T. J.-L., 1987, ApJ,
380: 313, 792
381:
382: \bibitem[]{} Muno M.~P., {\"O}zel F., Chakrabarty D., 2003, ApJ, 595, 1066
383:
384: \bibitem[]{} Muno M.P., Remillard R.A., Chakrabarty D., 2002, ApJ, 568, L35 (MRC)
385:
386: \bibitem[]{} Nath N.R., Strohmayer T.E., Swank J.H., 2002, ApJ, 564, 353
387:
388: \bibitem[]{} Olive J.-F., Barret, D., Gierli\'nski M., 2003, ApJ, 583, 416
389:
390: %\bibitem[]{} \"Ozel F., Psaltis D., 2003, ApJ, 582, L31
391:
392: %\bibitem[]{} Shapiro S.L., Teukolsky S.A., 1983, Black Holes,
393: %White Dwarfs, and Neutron Stars (New York: A Wiley-Interscience Publication),
394: %394-396
395:
396: \bibitem[]{} Spitkovsky A., Levin Y., Ushomirsky G., 2002, ApJ, 566, 1018
397:
398: \bibitem[]{} Strohmayer T.E., Bildsten L., 2006, in {\it Compact
399: Stellar X-ray Sources}, Eds. W.H.G. Lewin and M. van der Klis,
400: (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge), (astro-ph/0301544)
401:
402: \bibitem[]{} Strohmayer T.E., Markwardt C.B., 1999, ApJ, 516, L81
403:
404: \bibitem[]{} Strohmayer T.E., Zhang W., Swank J.H., White N.E.,
405: Lapidus I., 1998, ApJ, 498, L135
406:
407: \bibitem[]{} van der Klis M., 2004, in {\it Compact
408: stellar X-ray Sources}, Eds. W.H.G. Lewin and M. van der Klis,
409: (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge), (astro-ph/0410551)
410:
411: \bibitem[]{} van Straaten S., Ford E.C., van der Klis M., M\'endez M., Kaaret, P., 2000,
412: ApJ, 540, 1049
413:
414: %\bibitem[]{} Villarreal A.R., Strohmayer T.E., 2004, ApJ, 614, L121
415:
416: \bibitem[]{} White N.E., Swank J.H., 1982, ApJ, 253, L61
417:
418: \bibitem[]{} Wijnands R. et al., 1998, ApJ, 493, L87
419:
420: \bibitem[]{} Woosley S.E., Taam R.E., 1976, Nature, 263, 101
421:
422: \end{thebibliography}
423:
424: \newpage
425: %\citet{b15}.
426: \begin{table*}
427: \centering
428: \begin{minipage}{140mm}
429: \caption{Channel and energy boundaries of the soft colour, hard colour, and
430: intensity used in Figure 1.
431: }
432: \begin{tabular}{@{}lcccccc@{}}
433: \hline\\
434: Year & Channels\footnote{The channel numbers refer to the absolute
435: PCA channels (0--255).} & keV & Channels$^a$ & keV & Channels$^a$ & keV \\
436: & (Soft colour) & (Soft colour) & (Hard colour) & (Hard colour) & (Intensity) & (Intensity) \\
437: \hline\\
438: 1996 & 10--13/6--9 & 3.71--5.15/2.29--3.71 & 24--49/14--23 & 8.74--18.23/5.15--8.74 & 6--49 &
439: 2.29--18.23 \\
440: 1997 & 10--13/6--9 & 3.68--5.11/2.26--3.68 & 24--49/14--23 & 8.70--18.18/5.11--8.70 & 6--49 &
441: 2.26--18.18 \\
442: 2001 (May) & 9--12/6--8 & 3.58--5.28/2.30--3.58 & 21--42/13--20 & 8.69--18.16/5.28--8.69 & 6--42 &
443: 2.30--18.16 \\
444: 2001 (Dec) & 9--12/6--8 & 3.55--5.25/2.29--3.55 & 21--42/13--20 & 8.65--18.09/5.25--8.65 & 6--42 &
445: 2.29--18.09 \\
446: 2004 & 9--12/6--8 & 3.45--5.12/2.21--3.45 & 21--43/13--20 & 8.46--18.15/5.12--8.46 & 6--43 &
447: 2.21--18.15 \\
448: \hline\\
449: \end{tabular}
450: \end{minipage}
451: \end{table*}
452:
453: \clearpage
454: %\citet{b15}.
455: \begin{table*}
456: \centering
457: \begin{minipage}{140mm}
458: \caption{Best fit parameters
459: %\footnote{Power spectra are fitted either by constant+Lorentzian, or by constant+powerlaw in the energy range $\sim 2.6-30$ keV.}
460: (with $1 \sigma$ error) for the low frequency (up to $\sim 100$ Hz) {\it RXTE} power spectra from XB 1254--690.}
461: \begin{tabular}{@{}ccccccc@{}}
462: \hline
463: No.\footnote{1: ObsID 60044-01-01-01 (lower intensity), 2: ObsID 60044-01-01-01 (higher
464: intensity), 3: ObsID 90036-01-01-02 (low intensity), and 4: ObsID 90036-01-01-03 (high
465: intensity). Power spectra are fitted either by constant+Lorentzian, or by constant+powerlaw in the
466: energy range $\sim 2.6-30$ keV.}
467: & PLN $\nu$\footnote{Index of power law noise ($\propto f^{\nu}$; $f$ is frequency).} &
468: PLN rms\footnote{RMS of power law; lower limit of integration is 0.004 Hz.} & L$_{f_{\rm
469: 0}}$\footnote{Centroid frequency of Lorentzian ($\propto \lambda/[(f-f_{\rm 0})^2+(\lambda/2)^2]$).}
470: & L$_{\lambda}$\footnote{Full width at half maximum (FWHM) of Lorentzian.} &
471: L$_{\rm rms}$\footnote{RMS of Lorentzian.} & $\chi^2/{\rm dof}$ \\
472: & & (\%) & (Hz) & (Hz) & (\%) & \\
473: \hline
474: 1 & $-1.17\pm0.08$ & $3.4\pm0.6$ & -- & -- & -- & $65.88/80$ \\
475: 2 & $-0.92\pm0.06$ & $4.5\pm0.5$ & -- & -- & -- & $82.34/80$ \\
476: 3 & -- & -- & $0.011\pm0.004$ & $0.018\pm0.007$ & $1.8\pm0.3$ & $22.67/18$\\
477: 4 & $-1.44\pm0.13$ & $2.8\pm1.0$ & -- & -- & -- & $44.31/56$\\
478: \hline
479: \end{tabular}
480: \end{minipage}
481: \end{table*}
482:
483: \input psbox.tex
484:
485: \newpage
486: \begin{figure*}
487: \vspace{2.0 cm}
488: \hspace{-4.6 cm}
489: {\mbox{\psboxto(19cm;22cm){f1.eps}}}
490: \vspace{-8.0 cm}
491: \caption{Colour-colour diagram (left panel) and hardness-intensity diagram (right panel)
492: of XB 1254--690 using {\it RXTE} PCA data of the years
493: 1996 (proposal number: 10068; {\it square} signs), 1997 (proposal number: 20066; {\it cross} signs),
494: 2001 (proposal number: 60044; {\it plus} signs), and 2004 (proposal number: 90036;
495: {\it diamond} signs). The definitions of the colours and the energy range of
496: the intensity are given in Table 1. Here we use only the top Xenon layers of the PCUs
497: 0, 2 and 3, and exclude the flaring and dipping data. Each point is for 128 s of data.
498: Typical $1 \sigma$ error bars for soft and hard colours are shown in the left panel.
499: The ranges of soft colour, hard colour and intensity strongly indicate that XB 1254--690
500: is an atoll source.
501: }
502: \end{figure*}
503:
504: \newpage
505: \begin{figure*}
506: %\hspace{1.6 cm}
507: {\mbox{\psboxto(12cm;16cm){f2.eps}}}
508: %\vspace{1 cm}
509: \caption{Low frequency power spectra (for the energy range $\sim 2.6-30$ keV) of XB 1254--690
510: using {\it RXTE} PCA data of 2004. The upper and lower panels are for the power spectrum numbers
511: 3 (low intensity) and 4 (high intensity) of Table 2. Each panel shows the data points and the
512: best fit model (solid line). The data of the upper panel are fitted well with `constant+Lorentzian',
513: while the best fit model for the lower panel data is `constant+powerlaw'. The `constant'
514: describes the Poisson noise level, the `Lorentzian' indicates a broad hump or a band-limited
515: noise (BLN), and the `powerlaw' describes the very low frequency noise
516: (VLFN). These indicate that XB 1254--690 was in banana state during these observations.
517: The horizontal lines around the data points give the frequency bin, and the corresponding
518: vertical lines give the $1 \sigma$ errors of powers.
519: }
520: \end{figure*}
521:
522: \newpage
523: \begin{figure*}
524: %\hspace{1.6 cm}
525: {\mbox{\psboxto(15cm;18cm){f3.eps}}}
526: %\vspace{1 cm}
527: \caption{A thermonuclear X--ray burst from XB 1254--690 (1996 data). The main
528: panel shows the PCA count rate profile and the power contours (of the plausible burst oscillations)
529: using the dynamic power spectra (for 1.0 s duration at 0.1 s intervals; Strohmayer
530: \& Markwardt 1999). Contours at power levels of 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 28.8 are given.
531: The inset panel shows a power spectrum of 1 s interval (the first such interval
532: after the burst count rate starts rising sharply)
533: with 1 Hz frequency resolution. The peak near 95 Hz
534: shows the plausible signal power.
535: }
536: \end{figure*}
537:
538: \label{lastpage}
539:
540: \end{document}
541: