1: %\documentclass[prl,nofootinbib]{revtex4}
2: \documentclass[prl,twocolumn,nofootinbib]{revtex4}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{latexsym}
5: \def\be{\begin{equation}}
6: \def\ee{\end{equation}}
7: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}
8: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}
9:
10: \begin{document}
11: \title{Weighing neutrinos in the presence of a running primordial spectral index}
12: \author{Bo Feng${}^{a}$}
13:
14: \author{Jun-Qing Xia${}^{b}$}
15:
16: \author{Jun'ichi Yokoyama${}^{a}$}
17:
18: \author{Xinmin Zhang${}^{b}$}
19:
20: \author{Gong-Bo Zhao${}^{b}$}
21:
22: \affiliation{ ${}^a$ Research Center for the Early Universe(RESCEU),
23: Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033,
24: Japan}
25:
26: \affiliation{${}^b$Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy
27: of Science, P.O. Box 918-4, Beijing 100049, P. R. China}
28:
29:
30:
31: \begin{abstract}
32:
33: The three-year WMAP(WMAP3), combined with other cosmological
34: observations from galaxy clustering and Type Ia Supernova (SNIa),
35: prefers a non-vanishing running of the primordial spectral index
36: independent of the low CMB multipoles. Motivated by this feature we
37: study cosmological constraint on the neutrino mass, which severely
38: depends on what prior we adopt for the spectral shape of primordial
39: fluctuations,
40: taking possible running into account.
41: As a result we find a more stringent constraint on the sum of the
42: three neutrino masses, $m_\nu < 0.76$eV (2 $\sigma$), compared with
43: $m_\nu < 0.90$eV (2 $\sigma$) for the case where power-law prior is
44: adopted to the primordial spectral shape.
45:
46: \end{abstract}
47:
48: \maketitle
49:
50: \hskip 1.6cm PACS number(s): 98.80.Cq \vskip 0.4cm
51:
52: The three year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe observations
53: (WMAP3) \cite{Spergel:2006hy,Page:2006hz,Hinshaw:2006,Jarosik:2006,WMAP3IE}
54: have marked another milestone on the precision cosmology of
55: the Cosmic Microwave
56: Background (CMB) Radiation. The simplest six-parameter power-law
57: $\Lambda$CDM cosmology is in remarkable agreement with WMAP3
58: together with the large scale structure(LSS) of galaxy clustering
59: as measured by 2dF \cite{Cole:2005sx} and SDSS \cite{Tegmark:2003uf}
60: and with the Type Ia Supernova (SNIa) as measured by the Riess
61: "gold" sample \cite{Riess:2004nr} and the first year SNLS \cite{snls}.
62: This agreement between the above ``canonical'' cosmological model
63: and observations can be used to test a number of possible new physics,
64: such as the equation of state of dark energy, neutrino masses, time
65: variation of fundamental constants, etc.
66:
67: Among them, the constraint on the neutrino or hot dark matter mass
68: can be obtained from the free-streaming modification of the
69: transfer function of the matter power spectrum.
70: We should note, however, that if one allowed any shape
71: of primordial spectrum, the free-streaming effect could easily be
72: compensated by some nontrivial shape of the primordial spectrum,
73: so that one cannot obtain sensible limit on the neutrino mass.
74: That is,
75: we can obtain a nontrivial bound on neutrino mass if and only
76: if we adopt some prior on the shape of primordial power spectrum
77: such as a simple power-law. From the above argument, we
78: expect that as we allow more degrees
79: of freedom on the primordial spectrum beyond a power-law, the
80: constraint on the neutrino mass would be less stringent in general.
81:
82: As for the shape of the primordial power spectrum,
83: it is noteworthy that a significant deviation has been observed
84: by WMAP3 from the simplest
85: Harrison-Zel'dovich spectrum, and that this feature is more
86: eminent with the combination of all the currently available CMB, LSS
87: and SNIa (dubbed the case of "All" in \cite{WMAP3IE}). Moreover, a
88: nontrivial negative running of the scalar spectral index $\alpha_s$,
89: whose existence was studied even before WMAP epoch
90: \cite{Lewis:2002ah,Feng:2003nt}, was
91: favored by the first-year
92: WMAP papers \cite{wmap1a,wmap1b,wmap1c}.
93: But its preference was somehow diminished
94: as corrections to the likelihood
95: functions were made \cite{Slosar:2004fr}.
96: However, the new
97: WMAP3 data prefers again a negative running
98: in the "All" combination \cite{WMAP3IE}.
99:
100: If confirmed, a nonvanishing running of $\alpha_s$ would
101: not only constrain inflationary cosmology significantly
102: \cite{Feng:2003mk,Kawasaki:2003zv,Yamaguchi:2003fp,Yamaguchi:2004tn,Chen:2004nx,
103: Ballesteros:2005eg}, but also affect the cosmological constraint
104: on the neutrino mass. In the LSS power spectrum, the effect of
105: massive neutrino may be compensated by a nonvanishing
106: running of primordial spectrum. On the other hand, if
107: negativeness of the running is established, it will lead to even
108: more stringent constraints on neutrino mass compared with fittings
109: in the constant scalar spectral index($n_s$) cosmology, because
110: both of them lead to a damped power on small scales.
111:
112: The actual problem, however, cannot be solved by the above simple
113: one-to-one correspondence, because the effects of a nonvanishing
114: neutrino mass on CMB is much less dramatic than a nonvanishing
115: running $\alpha_s$.
116: Alternatively,
117: in the scales probed by CMB,
118: especially near the third peak, there is a large degeneracy between
119: $\alpha_s$ and the matter density $\Omega_m$
120: \cite{Dodelson:1995es,Hannestad:2006zg,Lesgourgues:2006nd,Ichikawa:2004zi,Fukugita:2006rm}.
121:
122: Hence in the concordance analysis the correlation between running
123: and neutrino mass needs to be addressed in a combined study of CMB,
124: LSS and SNIa, where SNIa helps significantly to determine the matter
125: density. We report the results of such a combined analysis in this
126: paper using Markov Chain Monte Carlo method in constraining
127: %Here we consider the
128: %case the three generations of left-handed neutrinos have the same
129: %mass $m_\nu$ and evaluate constraints on $m_\nu$. If one takes
130: the total neutrino mass, $m_\nu = \sum_{i=1}^3 m_{\nu i}
131: =94.4\Omega_\nu h^2$eV.
132: %our constraint applies to more general
133: %cases as well.
134: Here $\Omega_\nu$ is the density parameter of the
135: neutrino and $h$ is the Hubble constant in unit of 100km/s/Mpc.
136:
137: To break possible degeneracy among the cosmological
138: parameters, we make a global fit to the forementioned current data
139: with the publicly available Markov Chain Monte Carlo
140: package \texttt{cosmomc} \cite{Lewis:2002ah,IEMCMC}. Our most general
141: parameter space is:
142: \begin{equation}\label{para}
143: \textbf{p}\equiv(\omega_{b}, \omega_{c}, \Theta_S, \tau, m_{\nu}, n_{s}, \alpha_{s}, \log[10^{10} A_{s}])
144: \end{equation}
145: where $\omega_{b}=\Omega_{b}h^{2}$ and
146: $\omega_{c}=\Omega_{c}h^{2}$ are the physical baryon and cold dark
147: matter densities relative to critical density, $\Theta_S$
148: characterizes the ratio of the sound horizon and angular diameter
149: distance, $\tau$ is the optical depth and $A_{s}$ is defined as
150: the amplitude of initial power spectrum. The pivot scale for
151: $n_{s}$ and $\alpha_{s}$ is chosen at $k=0.05$ Mpc$^{-1}$.
152:
153: Assuming a flat Universe and in terms of the Bayesian
154: analysis, we vary the above 8 parameters and fit the theory to the
155: observational data with the MCMC method. For CMB we have only
156: adopted the WMAP3. The
157: bias factors of LSS have been used as nuisance parameters and hence
158: essentially we have used only the shapes of 2dF and SDSS power
159: spectra.
160: As for the SNIa data, while the WMAP team uses both SNLS
161: and Riess
162: sample simultaneously in their ``All'' dataset, here we adopt only
163: one of them, namely, the Riess "gold" sample rather than combining
164: with SNLS. This is because these two groups use somewhat different
165: methods in their analysis and it would not be appropriate to put
166: them together simply\cite{footnt}.
167:
168: Regarding the first-year WMAP data Bridle et al.\ \cite{Bridle:2003sa}
169: found that the claimed preference of a negative
170: $\alpha_s$ was merely due to the lowest WMAP multipoles.
171: In order to probe the sensitivity of the running to the lower
172: multipoles we analyze
173: the running and neutrino properties using the CMB data
174: with and without the contributions of lower multipoles
175: which suffer from large cosmic variance.
176: Specifically, we truncate naturally at $l=24$ given the current
177: likelihood of
178: WMAP3 \cite{Spergel:2006hy,Page:2006hz,Hinshaw:2006,WMAP3IE}.
179:
180: As a result we find a more stringent constraint on the neutrino mass
181: in the presence of running
182: compared with the analysis with constant $n_s$.
183: We also
184: find that currently the preference of a negative running is
185: fairly
186: independent of the WMAP3 low CMB quadrupoles and hence relatively
187: robust.
188:
189:
190: \begin{table*}
191: TABLE 1. Mean with 1$\sigma$ (2$\sigma$) constrains on the spectral
192: index, the running, and the neutrino mass based on
193: LSS and SNIa with WMAP3(with/without
194: $l<24$ CMB contributions) and with/without introducing a running of
195: the primordial spectral index $\alpha_{s}$ and with/without massive
196: neutrinos. The last column shows the corresponding reduction of
197: $\chi^2$ values compared with the power law $\Lambda$CDM cosmology.
198:
199: \begin{center}
200: \begin{tabular}{|c|ccc|ccc|}
201:
202: \hline
203: &\multicolumn{3}{c|}{Normal WMAP3}&\multicolumn{3}{c|}{$l<24$ dropped}\\
204:
205:
206:
207: &$\nu$&$\alpha_s$&$\nu$+$\alpha_s$ &$\nu$&$\alpha_s$&$\nu$+$\alpha_s$ \\
208:
209:
210: \hline
211:
212: $n_s$ &$0.947^{+0.016}_{-0.016}(^{+0.033}_{-0.032})$
213: &$0.880^{+0.038}_{-0.037}(^{+0.074}_{-0.073})$
214: &$0.899^{+0.040}_{-0.041}(^{+0.077}_{-0.078})$
215: &$0.942^{+0.021}_{-0.022}(^{+0.051}_{-0.039})$
216: &$0.862^{+0.049}_{-0.049}(^{+0.096}_{-0.095})$
217: &$0.899^{+0.058}_{-0.059}(^{+0.110}_{-0.113})$ \\
218:
219:
220: $\alpha_s$ & set to $0$
221: &$-0.051^{+0.025}_{-0.025}(^{+0.051}_{-0.048})$
222: &$-0.037^{+0.028}_{-0.028}(^{+0.053}_{-0.053})$
223: & set to $0$
224: &$-0.072^{+0.043}_{-0.042}(^{+0.083}_{-0.089})$
225: &$-0.045^{+0.052}_{-0.050}(^{+0.098}_{-0.101})$ \\
226:
227:
228: $m_{\nu}$ &$0.460^{+0.113}_{-0.460}(^{+0.437}_{-0.460})$
229: & set to $0$
230: &$0.314^{+0.079}_{-0.314}(^{+0.442}_{-0.314})$
231: &$0.470^{+0.131}_{-0.470}(^{+0.499}_{-0.470})$
232: & set to $0$
233: &$0.378^{+0.099}_{-0.378}(^{+0.523}_{-0.378})$ \\
234:
235:
236:
237: \hline
238: %$\chi^2_{\it L}$ & 11493.3 & 11492.0 & 11491.2 & 5476.3 & 5475.2 & 5475.1 \\
239: $\Delta \chi^2 $ & -2 & $-3.4$ & $-4.1$ & -1 & $-2.1$ & $-2.2$ \\
240:
241: \hline
242:
243: \end{tabular}
244: \end{center}
245: \end{table*}
246:
247:
248: In Table 1 we show the mean 1$\sigma$ (2$\sigma$) constrains on the
249: relevant cosmological parameters combining 2dF, SDSS and Riess
250: "gold" sample with WMAP3. We have addressed the cases with/without
251: $l<24$ CMB contributions, with/without introducing $\alpha_{s}$ and
252: with/without massive neutrinos. The last column shows the
253: corresponding reduction of $\chi^2$ values compared with the power
254: law $\Lambda$CDM cosmology. For normal LSS $+$ SNIa $+$ WMAP in the
255: 7 parameter fittings we get $\alpha_{s} =
256: -0.0512^{+0.0506}_{-0.0480}$ at 2$\sigma$. Our results are
257: considerably less stringent than the "All" combination by WMAP team
258: \cite{WMAP3IE}, as we have not included SNLS and other CMB
259: observations. On the other hand the preference of non-vanishing
260: $\alpha_{s}$ is larger than 2$\sigma$ in both cases. The preference
261: to negative running still remains even if we drop the WMAP3 $l<24$
262: contributions, when we get $\alpha_{s} =
263: -0.0717^{+0.0833}_{-0.0886}$ at 2$\sigma$. This may imply a negative
264: running is indeed preferred nontrivially in the combination of
265: WMAP+LSS+SNIa, even without the presence of WMAP3 small $l$
266: contributions. This can also be understood through the Akaike
267: information criterion (AIC \cite{AIC}), which is defined as defined
268: as
269: \begin{equation}
270: AIC=-2\ln{\mathcal{L}}+2k,
271: \end{equation}
272: where $\mathcal{L}$ is the maximum likelihood, $k$ is the number of
273: parameters of the model and $N$ is the number of datapoints. From
274: Table I we can find the reduction of $\Delta \chi^2 \equiv -2\Delta
275: \ln{\mathcal{L}}$ is larger than 2 in the case of running compared
276: with the simple power law $\Lambda$CDM cosmology, hence we have
277: smaller values of AIC with running, although currently not strong to
278: decisive levels.
279:
280:
281: The preference of a negative running can also be obtained in the
282: two-dimensional posterior contours of $n_s-\alpha_{s}$, as depicted
283: in Fig.~\ref{fig:fig1}. For the 7-parameter case with one additional
284: parameter of $\alpha_{s}$, although the contour without WMAP3 low
285: $l$ contributions is larger than that in the left panel, a constant
286: $n_s$ lies close to the 2$\sigma$ lines in both cases. The enlarged
287: contour without $l<24$ is easily understood due to the $n_s-\tau$
288: degeneracy.
289: %, one might get too optimistic results
290: %on the reionization parameter $\tau$ due to possible foreground
291: %contaminations \cite{Page:2006hz}.
292:
293: The correlation between $m_{\nu}$ and the shape of the primordial
294: spectrum is obvious, as can be seen from Table 1 and Fig.~
295: \ref{fig:fig1}. In the presence of massive neutrinos the error
296: bars on $n_s$ and $\alpha_{s}$ get increased disregard with or
297: without small $l$ CMB contributions. And it is noteworthy in the
298: presence of massive neutrinos, a scale-invariant primordial
299: spectrum is consistent with the observations at $\sim 2 \sigma$ if
300: we drop the small $l$ WMAP3 contributions.
301:
302:
303: \begin{figure}[htbp]
304: \begin{center}
305: \includegraphics[scale=0.55]{fig1.eps}
306: \caption{ Two dimensional posterior constraints on the primordial
307: spectral index versus its running at $k=0.05$ Mpc$^{-1}$, using 2dF,
308: SDSS, SNIa and WMAP3(with/without $l<24$ CMB contributions) and
309: with/without the presence of massive neutrinos. \label{fig:fig1}}
310: \end{center}
311: \end{figure}
312:
313: We find that, while almost all of the remaining parameters get less
314: stringently constrained, the neutrino mass is an exception: a more
315: tightened bound on $m_{\nu}$ is achieved in the presence of a
316: nonzero $\alpha_{s}$ than the case with constant $n_s$, as shown in
317: Table 1 and in the one dimensional constraints as in
318: Fig.~\ref{fig:fig2}.
319: This has shown the fact that running is indeed
320: strongly correlated with neutrino mass, which is mainly due to the
321: physics on LSS.
322: \if
323: During the epoch of structure formation the
324: gravitational instability of the fluctuations plays a crucial role.
325: Massive neutrinos serve to prevent the instabilities on distances
326: smaller than the neutrinos' free streaming scale. On small scales
327: the growth of the fluctuations is suppressed by
328: \cite{Lesgourgues:2006nd}
329: \begin{equation}
330: \left( {\Delta P\over P }\right) \approx
331: -8{\Omega_\nu\over\Omega_m}\approx-0.8 \left( { m_\nu \over 1 e V}
332: \right) \left( {0.1 N_{\nu} \over\Omega_m h^2}\right)\,.
333: \label{eq:detP}
334: \end{equation}
335: And the physics of running on the LSS power spectrum is
336: straightforward on the linear scales: \be P(k) = P_s(k) T^2(k)
337: ,\label{mpkns} \ee where running is present in the sector of the
338: primordial spectrum $P_s(k)$ and massive neutrinos essentially
339: contribute to the matter transfer function $T(k)$.
340: \fi
341:
342: \begin{figure}[htbp]
343: \begin{center}
344: \includegraphics[scale=0.8]{fig2.eps}
345: \caption{ One dimensional posterior constraints on the sum of
346: neutrino masses, using 2dF, SDSS, SNIa and WMAP3(with/without
347: $l<24$ CMB contributions) and with/without introducing a running
348: of the primordial spectral index $\alpha_{s}$. Note due to the
349: non-gaussian distribution of $m_{\nu}$, the LSS $+$ SNIa $+$ WMAP3
350: (black line) seems to indicate a nonzero neutrino mass, but it is
351: not the case, as can be seen in Table 1. \label{fig:fig2}}
352: \end{center}
353: \end{figure}
354:
355: In Fig.~\ref{fig:fig3} we display the two dimensional posterior
356: constraints on the sum of neutrino masses versus matter
357: density in the same case as Fig.~\ref{fig:fig2}. While the allowed
358: parameter space for $\Omega_m$ is significantly enlarged in the presence
359: of running, neutrino mass is constrained stringently in cases with
360: nonzero $\alpha_{s}$. The correlation between $\Omega_m$ and
361: $m_{\nu}$ is rather strong and the accumulation of the observational
362: data, such as SNAP, PLANCK and SDSS will help significantly to break
363: the degeneracy, to detect the features of the primordial spectrum as
364: well as the nature of neutrinos.
365:
366:
367: \begin{figure}[htbp]
368: \begin{center}
369: \includegraphics[scale=0.55]{fig3.eps}
370: \caption{ Two dimensional posterior constraints on the sum of
371: neutrino masses versus matter density, using 2dF, SDSS, SNIa and
372: WMAP3(with/without $l<24$ CMB contributions) and with/without
373: introducing a running of the primordial spectral index
374: $\alpha_{s}$.
375: \label{fig:fig3}}
376: \end{center}
377: \end{figure}
378:
379: It has been claimed that a running of the spectral index will be
380: excluded in the presence of SDSS Lyman $\alpha$ observations
381: \cite{Seljak:2004sj,Hannestad06x,Viel:2006yh,Seljak:2006bg}, the systematics of Lyman $\alpha$
382: data are relatively less constrained
383: \cite{Spergel:2006hy,Lesgourgues:2006nd} and we leave this in a
384: separate investigation to be reported in \cite{Feng:2006ui}, and
385: detailed analysis with other additional possible degeneracies in
386: \cite{toappear2}.
387:
388: For many years neutrinos have played a fundamental role in both
389: physics and astrophysics,
390: and provided venues of new physics such
391: as the parity violation and oscillations with tiny masses.
392: Surely
393: neutrinos will continue to play a crucial role for our understanding
394: of the Universe. While the resulting reduction on neutrino mass in
395: this paper is less than 0.2 eV, such an effect would hopefully help
396: to change our understandings on the ultimate detection of neutrino
397: mass with future cosmological surveys and the difference is already
398: larger than the low limit of neutrino mass from oscillation
399: experiments. On the other hand there are also some mild tensions in
400: the determinations of the background cosmological parameters with
401: current CMB, LSS and SNIa. We may still need some better
402: understandings on each data-set before entering the precision
403: cosmology \cite{Bridle:2003yz} and in cases when all of the
404: observations have similar tendencies in the preference of a negative
405: running one can hopefully get more eminent effects in the probe of
406: neutrino mass. % (Update with future simulations)
407:
408:
409: The distinctive feature probed in the current paper will also open
410: new windows on relevant studies, such as probing neutrino mass with
411: a nonzero running in gravitational lensing surveys, N-body
412: simulations in the presence of running and massive neutrinos.
413:
414:
415: {\bf{Acknowledgments:}} %We thank Roberto D. Peccei for enlightening discussions related to this project.
416: We acknowledge the use of the
417: Legacy Archive for Microwave Background Data Analysis (LAMBDA).
418: Support for LAMBDA is provided by the NASA Office of Space Science.
419: We have performed our numerical analysis on the Shanghai
420: Supercomputer Center(SSC). We used a modified version of
421: CAMB \cite{Lewis:1999bs,IEcamb} which is based on
422: CMBFAST \cite{cmbfast,IEcmbfast}. We thank Steen Hannestad, Antony
423: Lewis, Chris Lidman, Hiranya Peiris and Pengjie Zhang for helpful
424: discussions. The work of J.Y. is supported partially by the JSPS
425: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research No. 16340076 and B.F. is by the
426: JSPS fellowship program. This work is supported in part by National
427: Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 90303004,
428: 10533010 and 19925523 and by Ministry of Science and Technology of
429: China under Grant No. NKBRSF G19990754.
430:
431: \begin{thebibliography}{}
432:
433:
434: % \cite{Spergel:2006hy}
435: \bibitem{Spergel:2006hy}
436: D.~N.~Spergel {\it et al.},
437: ``Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Three Year Results:
438: Implications for Cosmology,''
439: arXiv:astro-ph/0603449.
440: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0603449;%%
441:
442:
443:
444: \bibitem{Page:2006hz} L.~Page {\it et al.},
445: ``Three Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations:
446: Polarization Analysis,''
447: arXiv:astro-ph/0603450.
448: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0603450;%%
449:
450: \bibitem{Hinshaw:2006}
451: G.~Hinshaw {\it et al.},
452: ``Three-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations:
453: Temperature Analysis,''
454: arXiv:astro-ph/0603451.
455: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0603451;%%
456: \bibitem{Jarosik:2006}
457: N.~Jarosik {\it et al.},
458: ``Three-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Beam
459: Profiles, Data Processing, Radiometer Characterization and Systematic Error
460: Limits,''
461: arXiv:astro-ph/0603452.
462: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0603452;%%
463:
464: \bibitem{WMAP3IE}
465: Available at http://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/product/map/current/ .
466:
467:
468:
469: %\cite{Cole:2005sx}
470: \bibitem{Cole:2005sx}
471: S.~Cole {\it et al.} [The 2dFGRS Collaboration],
472: ``The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: Power-spectrum analysis of the final
473: dataset and cosmological implications,''
474: Mon.\ Not.\ Roy.\ Astron.\ Soc.\ {\bf 362} (2005) 505
475: [arXiv:astro-ph/0501174].
476: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0501174;%%
477:
478: %\cite{Tegmark:2003uf}
479: \bibitem{Tegmark:2003uf}
480: M.~Tegmark {\it et al.} [SDSS Collaboration],
481: ``The 3D power spectrum of galaxies from the SDSS,''
482: Astrophys.\ J.\ {\bf 606}, 702 (2004)
483: [arXiv:astro-ph/0310725].
484: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0310725;%%
485:
486: % \cite{Riess:2004nr}
487: \bibitem{Riess:2004nr}
488: A.~G.~Riess {\it et al.} [Supernova Search Team Collaboration],
489: ``Type Ia Supernova Discoveries at z>1 From the Hubble Space Telescope:
490: Evidence for Past Deceleration and Constraints on Dark Energy Evolution,''
491: Astrophys.\ J.\ {\bf 607}, 665 (2004)
492: [arXiv:astro-ph/0402512].
493: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0402512;%%
494:
495:
496: \bibitem{snls}
497: P.~Astier {\it et al.},
498: ``The Supernova Legacy Survey: Measurement of $\Omega_M$, $\Omega_{\Lambda}$ and w
499: from the First Year Data Set,''
500: Astron.\ Astrophys.\ {\bf 447}, 31 (2006)
501: [arXiv:astro-ph/0510447].
502: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0510447;%%
503:
504: \bibitem{Lewis:2002ah}
505: A.~Lewis and S.~Bridle,
506: ``Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: a Monte-Carlo approach,''
507: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 103511 (2002)
508: [arXiv:astro-ph/0205436].
509: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0205436;%%
510:
511: %\cite{Feng:2003nt}
512: \bibitem{Feng:2003nt}
513: B.~Feng, X.~Gong and X.~Wang,
514: ``Assessing the Effects of the Uncertainty in Reheating Energy Scale on
515: Primordial Spectrum and CMB,''
516: Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A {\bf 19}, 2377 (2004)
517: [arXiv:astro-ph/0301111].
518: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0301111;%%
519:
520: \bibitem{wmap1a} C.~L.~Bennett {\it et al.},
521: ``First Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations:
522: Preliminary Maps and Basic Results,''
523: Astrophys.\ J.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 148}, 1 (2003)
524: [arXiv:astro-ph/0302207].
525: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0302207;%%
526:
527:
528: \bibitem{wmap1b} D.~N.~Spergel {\it et al.} [WMAP Collaboration],
529: ``First Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations:
530: Determination of Cosmological Parameters,''
531: Astrophys.\ J.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 148}, 175 (2003)
532: [arXiv:astro-ph/0302209].
533: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0302209;%%
534:
535: \bibitem{wmap1c} H.~V.~Peiris {\it et al.},
536: ``First year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations:
537: Implications for inflation,''
538: Astrophys.\ J.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 148}, 213 (2003)
539: [arXiv:astro-ph/0302225].
540: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0302225;%%
541:
542:
543: %\cite{Slosar:2004fr}
544: \bibitem{Slosar:2004fr}
545: See e.g. A.~Slosar, U.~Seljak and A.~Makarov,
546: ``Exact likelihood evaluations and foreground marginalization in low
547: resolution WMAP data,''
548: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 69}, 123003 (2004)
549: [arXiv:astro-ph/0403073].
550: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0403073;%%
551: %%\cite{Ballesteros:2005eg}
552:
553:
554: %\cite{Feng:2003mk}
555: \bibitem{Feng:2003mk}
556: B.~Feng, M.~z.~Li, R.~J.~Zhang and X.~m.~Zhang,
557: ``An inflation model with large variations in spectral index,''
558: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68}, 103511 (2003)
559: [arXiv:astro-ph/0302479].
560: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0302479;%%
561:
562:
563: %\cite{Kawasaki:2003zv}
564: \bibitem{Kawasaki:2003zv}
565: M.~Kawasaki, M.~Yamaguchi, and J.~Yokoyama, ``Inflation with a
566: running spectral index in supergravity,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 68},
567: 023508 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0304161].
568: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0304161;%%
569:
570: %\cite{Yamaguchi:2003fp}
571: \bibitem{Yamaguchi:2003fp}
572: M.~Yamaguchi and J.~Yokoyama, ``Chaotic hybrid new inflation in
573: supergravity with a running spectral index,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf
574: 68}, 123520 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0307373].
575: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0307373;%%
576:
577: %\cite{Yamaguchi:2004tn}
578: \bibitem{Yamaguchi:2004tn}
579: M.~Yamaguchi and J.~Yokoyama, ``Smooth hybrid inflation in
580: supergravity with a running spectral index and early star
581: formation,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 70}, 023513 (2004)
582: [arXiv:hep-ph/0402282].
583: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0402282;%%
584:
585:
586: %%\cite{Chen:2004nx}
587: \bibitem{Chen:2004nx}
588: C.-Y.~Chen, B.~Feng, X.-L.~Wang, and Z.-Y.~Yang, ``Reconstructing
589: large running-index inflaton potentials", Class.\ Quant.\ Grav.\
590: {\bf 21}, 3223 (2004) arXiv:[astro-ph/0404419].
591: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0404419;%%
592:
593: \bibitem{Ballesteros:2005eg}
594: G.~Ballesteros, J.~A.~Casas and J.~R.~Espinosa, ``Running spectral
595: index as a probe of physics at high scales", JCAP. {\bf 0603}, 001
596: (2006) arXiv:[hep-ph/0601134].
597: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0601134;%%
598:
599:
600:
601: %\cite{Hannestad:2006zg}
602: \bibitem{Hannestad:2006zg}
603: S.~Hannestad,
604: ``Primordial neutrinos,''
605: arXiv:hep-ph/0602058.
606: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0602058;%%
607:
608: %\cite{Lesgourgues:2006nd}
609: \bibitem{Lesgourgues:2006nd}
610: See e.g. J.~Lesgourgues and S.~Pastor,
611: ``Massive neutrinos and cosmology,''
612: arXiv:astro-ph/0603494.
613: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0603494;%%
614:
615: %\cite{Dodelson:1995es}
616: \bibitem{Dodelson:1995es}
617: S.~Dodelson, E.~Gates and A.~Stebbins,
618: ``Cold + Hot Dark Matter and the Cosmic Microwave Background,''
619: Astrophys.\ J.\ {\bf 467}, 10 (1996)
620: [arXiv:astro-ph/9509147].
621: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9509147;%%
622:
623: %\cite{Ichikawa:2004zi}
624: \bibitem{Ichikawa:2004zi}
625: K.~Ichikawa, M.~Fukugita and M.~Kawasaki,
626: ``Constraining neutrino masses by CMB experiments alone,''
627: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 043001 (2005)
628: [arXiv:astro-ph/0409768].
629: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0409768;%%
630:
631: %\cite{Fukugita:2006rm}
632: \bibitem{Fukugita:2006rm}
633: M.~Fukugita, K.~Ichikawa, M.~Kawasaki and O.~Lahav,
634: ``Limit on the neutrino mass from the WMAP three year data,''
635: arXiv:astro-ph/0605362.
636: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0605362;%%
637:
638:
639: \bibitem{IEMCMC}
640: Available from \texttt{http://cosmologist.info}.
641:
642: %\cite{footnt}
643: \bibitem{footnt}
644: Currently the SNLS and Riess "gold" sample are comparable in the
645: determination of cosmological parameters, as shown in Ref.
646: \cite{WMAP3IE}, and each dataset has its own nice features. In the
647: present work we use only the Riess sample.
648:
649:
650: %\cite{Bridle:2003sa}
651: \bibitem{Bridle:2003sa}
652: S.~L.~Bridle, A.~M.~Lewis, J.~Weller and G.~Efstathiou,
653: ``Reconstructing the primordial power spectrum,''
654: Mon.\ Not.\ Roy.\ Astron.\ Soc.\ {\bf 342}, L72 (2003)
655: [arXiv:astro-ph/0302306].
656: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0302306;%%
657:
658:
659:
660: \bibitem{AIC} H. Akaike, ``A new look at the statistical model identification,''
661: IEEE Trans. Auto. Control, 19, 716 (1974).
662:
663:
664: %\cite{Seljak:2004sj}
665: \bibitem{Seljak:2004sj}
666: U.~Seljak {\it et al.},
667: ``SDSS galaxy bias from halo mass-bias relation and its cosmological
668: implications,''
669: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 71}, 043511 (2005)
670: [arXiv:astro-ph/0406594].
671: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0406594;%%
672:
673: %\cite{Hannestad06x}
674: \bibitem{Hannestad06x}
675: A.~Goobar, S.~Hannestad, E.~Mortsell and H.~Tu, ``The neutrino mass
676: bound from WMAP-3, the baryon acoustic peak, the SNLS supernovae and
677: the Lyman-alpha forest,'' arXiv:astro-ph/0602155.
678: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0602155;%%
679:
680:
681: %\cite{Viel:2006yh}
682: \bibitem{Viel:2006yh}
683: M.~Viel, M.~G.~Haehnelt and A.~Lewis,
684: ``The Lyman-alpha forest and WMAP year three,''
685: arXiv:astro-ph/0604310.
686: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0604310;%%
687:
688: %\cite{Seljak:2006bg}
689: \bibitem{Seljak:2006bg}
690: U.~Seljak, A.~Slosar and P.~McDonald,
691: ``Cosmological parameters from combining the Lyman-alpha forest with CMB,
692: galaxy clustering and SN constraints,''
693: arXiv:astro-ph/0604335.
694: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0604335;%%
695:
696:
697: %\bibitem{toappear1}
698: %\cite{Feng:2006ui}
699: \bibitem{Feng:2006ui}
700: B.~Feng, J.~Q.~Xia and J.~Yokoyama,
701: ``Scale dependence of the primordial spectrum from combining the three-year
702: WMAP, Galaxy Clustering, Supernovae, and Lyman-alpha forests,''
703: arXiv:astro-ph/0608365.
704: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0608365;%%
705:
706:
707: \bibitem{toappear2}
708: B. Feng {\it et al.}, at press.
709:
710: %\cite{Bridle:2003yz}
711: \bibitem{Bridle:2003yz}
712: See e.g. S.~L.~Bridle, O.~Lahav, J.~P.~Ostriker and P.~J.~Steinhardt,
713: ``Precision Cosmology? Not Just Yet,''
714: Science {\bf 299} (2003) 1532
715: [arXiv:astro-ph/0303180].
716: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0303180;%%
717:
718:
719: %\cite{Lewis:1999bs}
720: \bibitem{Lewis:1999bs}
721: A.~Lewis, A.~Challinor and A.~Lasenby,
722: ``Efficient Computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models,''
723: Astrophys.\ J.\ {\bf 538}, 473 (2000)
724: [arXiv:astro-ph/9911177].
725: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9911177;%%
726:
727:
728: \bibitem{IEcamb}
729: Available at http://camb.info .
730:
731:
732: \bibitem{cmbfast}
733: U.~Seljak and M.~Zaldarriaga,
734: ``A Line of Sight Approach to Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies,''
735: Astrophys.\ J.\ {\bf 469}, 437 (1996)
736: [arXiv:astro-ph/9603033].
737: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9603033;%%
738:
739: \bibitem{IEcmbfast}
740: Available at http://cmbfast.org/ .
741:
742: \end{thebibliography}{}
743:
744: \end{document}
745: