1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \documentclass{emulateapj}
4:
5: \newcommand{\CII}{[\ion{C}{2}]}
6:
7: \begin{document}
8:
9: \title{A Detection of [\ion{C}{2}] line emission in the $z=4.7$ QSO BR1202-0725}
10: \author{Daisuke Iono\altaffilmark{1,2},
11: Min S. Yun\altaffilmark{3},
12: Martin Elvis\altaffilmark{2},
13: Alison B. Peck\altaffilmark{2},
14: Paul T. P. Ho\altaffilmark{2,4},
15: David J. Wilner\altaffilmark{2},
16: Todd R. Hunter\altaffilmark{2},
17: Satoki Matsushita\altaffilmark{4},
18: Sebastien Muller\altaffilmark{4}
19: }
20: \altaffiltext{1}{National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, 181-8588 Tokyo, Japan; d.iono@nao.ac.jp}
21: \altaffiltext{2}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138}
22: \altaffiltext{3}{Department of Astronomy, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003}
23: \altaffiltext{4}{Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, P.O. Box 23-141, Taipei 106, Taiwan, R.O.C.}
24:
25: \begin{abstract}
26:
27: We present $\sim3''$ resolution imaging of the $z=4.7$ QSO BR1202-0725 at
28: 900~$\micron$ from the Submillimeter Array.
29: The two submillimeter continuum components are clearly resolved from each
30: other, and the positions are consistent with previous lower frequency images.
31: In addition, we detect [\ion{C}{2}] line emission from the northern component.
32: The ratio of [\ion{C}{2}] to far-infrared luminosity is 0.04\% for the
33: northern component, and an upper limit of $< 0.03\%$ is obtained for the
34: southern component. These ratios are similar to
35: the low values found in local ultraluminous galaxies, indicating that the
36: excitation conditions are different from those found in local field galaxies.
37: X-ray emission is detected by {\it Chandra}
38: from the southern component at L$_{0.5-2keV}=3\times10^{45}$~erg~s$^{-1}$,
39: and detected at 99.6\% confidence from the northern component
40: at L$_{0.5-2keV}\sim$3$\times$10$^{44}$erg~s$^{-1}$,
41: %both submillimeter continuum components,
42: supporting the idea that BR1202-0725 is {\em a pair}
43: of interacting galaxies at $z=4.7$ that each harbor an active nucleus.
44:
45: \end{abstract}
46:
47: \keywords{galaxies: formation, galaxies: starburst, cosmology: observations, galaxies: high redshift, submillimeter, galaxies: individual (BR1202-0725)}
48:
49: \section{Introduction}
50:
51: The far infrared (FIR) fine structure lines of abundant species
52: (e.g. [\ion{C}{1}], [\ion{C}{2}], [\ion{O}{1}])
53: are recognized as one of the most
54: important coolants in the warm ISM.
55: In particular, the emission from singly ionized carbon
56: (i.e. [\ion{C}{2}], $\lambda_{rest} = 158 \micron$)
57: is known to trace
58: warm ($\geq 200$ K) and dense ($n_{cr} = 3 \times 10^3$~cm$^{-3}$)
59: photo-dissociation regions \citep[PDRs; ][]{kaufman99},
60: directly identifying the
61: gas surrounding active star forming regions.
62: The [\ion{C}{2}] line is the dominant coolant
63: in the Galactic ISM, accounting for 0.1 -- 1 \% of the
64: FIR luminosity \citep{hollenbach97}.
65: The brightness of the line makes it an attractive tracer of star
66: formation in galaxies, and a relation holds between [\ion{C}{2}] luminosity
67: and the massive star formation rate derived from H$\alpha$ emission
68: for galaxies that have L$_{\rm FIR}$~$< 3 \times 10^{10}$~L$_{\odot}$ \citep{boselli02}.
69: In the FIR luminous galaxies (ULIRGs), the [\ion{C}{2}]-to-FIR flux
70: ratio is an order of magnitude smaller than in normal
71: star forming galaxies \citep{luhman98,luhman03}.
72: The reason for the deficiency in the [\ion{C}{2}] line luminosity is not
73: well understood, but several possible scenarios have been offered
74: \citep{luhman98, malhotra01,pierini03, luhman03}.
75:
76:
77: Despite the large line luminosity expected, detecting [\ion{C}{2}] line
78: emission from luminous high redshift sources using a single-dish
79: submillimeter telescope has proved difficult
80: \citep[e.g.][]{isaak94,vanderwerf98,bollato04,marsden05}.
81: The low [\ion{C}{2}]-to-FIR ratio suggests that the physical properties
82: in high-$z$ sources resemble those of the local ULIRG population
83: \citep[e.g.][]{blain02}.
84: Detection of the \CII\ line in the $z=6.4$ QSO J1148+5251 has been
85: reported recently by \citet[][]{maiolino05}.
86: Here we report a first detection of the [\ion{C}{2}] line
87: emission from the $z=4.7$ hyper-luminous ($\sim 10^{13}$~L$_{\odot}$)
88: QSO BR1202-0725
89: observed using the Submillimeter Array \citep[SMA; ][]{ho04}\footnote{The
90: Submillimeter
91: Array is a joint project between the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
92: and the Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, and is
93: funded by the Smithsonian Institution and the Academia Sinica.}.
94:
95: BR1202-0725 is an optically bright QSO ($M_B = -28.5$)
96: with a $2\farcs3$ Lyman~$\alpha$ extension toward the northwest
97: \citep{hu96, petitjean96, fontana98, ohyama04}.
98: Radio continuum emission was detected at 1.4, 4.9 and 43~GHz
99: \citep{yun00,carilli02}. The emission at 1.4~GHz was
100: resolved into two components; one at the location of the QSO and
101: the other $\sim4''$ northwest. This apparent companion is also
102: seen in millimeter continuum emission \citep{omont96,guilloteau99}.
103: Abundant CO emission (M$_{H_2} \geq 10^{10}$~M$_{\odot}$)
104: was detected toward both the optical
105: QSO and the northwestern companion \citep{omont96,ohta96,
106: guilloteau01,carilli02}. The CO-derived redshifts are
107: $z=4.6947$ and 4.6916 for the QSO and the
108: northwestern companion, respectively \citep{omont96}.
109:
110:
111:
112: We adopt $H_0 = 70$~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$,
113: $\Omega_m$ = 0.3, $\Omega_{\Lambda}$ = 0.7, which gives
114: $D_L = 43.27$~Gpc ($1''$ = 6.5~kpc)
115: for the luminosity distance to BR1202-0725.
116:
117: \section{Observation and Data Reduction}
118:
119: %Observations of BR1202-0725
120: %were obtained on February 22, 2005 using 5 antennas, April 5, 2005 using 6 antennas, March 21, 2006 using 7 antennas, and April 19, 2006 using 8 antennas in the compact configuration of the SMA.
121: %The average system temperature (DSB) was
122: %240~K, 310~K, 300~K, 250~K, for the first, second, third, and the fourth
123: %track respectively. The average phase RMS toward the 9.0~Jy
124: %(in Spring 2005) quasar 3C279 was 5 and 15 degrees, and toward the
125: %9.5~Jy (in Spring 2006) quasar 3C273 was 14 and 6 degrees, respectively.
126: A total of 5 tracks (Table~\ref{log}) were obtained toward BR1202-0725, where
127: the total on-source integration time was 19.6~hours.
128: The SIS receivers were tuned to a redshifted [\ion{C}{2}]
129: frequency of 333.969~GHz ($900~\micron$) (LSB).
130: The SMA correlator had 2~GHz total bandwidth with 0.8~MHz
131: (0.7~km~s$^{-1}$) spectral resolution.
132: The data were calibrated using the IDL based SMA calibration tool MIR.
133: The quasars 3C279 and 3C273 were observed to calibrate the antenna
134: based time dependent gain, and Callisto, 3C279, 3C273, and 1924-292 were used
135: to calibrate the bandpass. The flux scaling is derived assuming
136: Callisto has a total flux density of 15 Jy at 334 GHz, and we estimate a 20\%
137: uncertainty in the derived fluxes.
138:
139:
140: Imaging and analysis of the visibility data were carried out using MIRIAD.
141: %Maximum sensitivity was achieved by adopting natural weighting,
142: %which gave a synthesized beam size of $3\farcs6 \times 3\farcs3$
143: %(P.A. = $77^\circ$).
144: %In addition,
145: The angular resolution achieved by adopting ROBUST = 2
146: was $3\farcs4 \times 2\farcs7$ (P.A. = $-8^\circ$).
147: %in order to resolve the two components in BR1202-0725.
148: The continuum image constructed using the line-free
149: data has an RMS noise of 3.0~mJy.
150: Although the varying S/N across the the SMA bandpass makes
151: it difficult to characterize the overall noise properties,
152: the RMS noise in the [\ion{C}{2}] spectrum calculated using
153: several line-free regions of the data cube is estimated to be 7.5~mJy.
154:
155: \section{Results}
156:
157: Figure~\ref{fig1}~($left$) presents the 900 $\micron$ continuum
158: image of BR1202-0725.
159: The coordinates of the two components are
160: $\alpha$~(J2000) = $12^h 05^m 22.98^s$ and
161: $\delta$~(J2000) = $-7^{\circ} 42' 30\farcs0$ for BR1202N, and
162: $\alpha$~(J2000) = $12^h 05^m 23.12^s$ and
163: $\delta$~(J2000) = $-7^{\circ} 42' 32\farcs5$ for BR1202S
164: with uncertainties of $\pm 0\farcs2$.
165: The peak of the northern component (BR1202N) is coincident with
166: the CO~(2--1) peak \citep{carilli02} within the $0\farcs2$ astrometric
167: accuracy.
168: The peak of the southern component (BR1202S) is displaced to the north
169: from the CO~(2--1) and the radio continuum peaks \citep{carilli02}
170: by $\sim 0\farcs5$. The location of BR1202S is consistent with the optical/NIR QSO reported by \citet{hu96}.
171: The derived flux densities from the line-free region of the spectrum
172: are $S_{900} = 27 \pm 4$~mJy
173: (BR1202N) and $32 \pm 4$~mJy (BR1202S).
174: BR1202S emits $54\pm9\%$ of the total $900\micron$ flux, which is
175: slightly lower than the earlier observations at 1.3~mm in which
176: $65\pm10\%$ of the total flux was found in BR1202S \citep{omont96}.
177:
178: A spectrum at the peak of the $900\micron$ continuum in BR1202N
179: is shown in Figure~\ref{fig1}~(\textit{middle}).
180: A similar spectrum toward BR1202S is also shown in
181: Figure~\ref{fig1}~(\textit{right}).
182: Continuum subtraction for both spectra was performed by fitting
183: a zeroth order baseline in the line-free channels of the visibilities.
184: The BR1202N spectrum shows a 22~mJy peak at $z \sim 4.691$
185: with a line profile that spans the redshift range
186: of $z = 4.687$ -- 4.696. No significant detection is seen in
187: the BR1202S spectrum.
188: The FWHM of the [\ion{C}{2}] line is $240 \pm 50$~km~s$^{-1}$,
189: which is narrower than the CO~(5--4) profile (FWHM = $350\pm 60$~km~s$^{-1}$)
190: obtained by \citet{omont96}.
191: The formal significance of the [\ion{C}{2}] line detection over the
192: entire line-width shown in Figure~\ref{fig1}
193: is $4\sigma$, assuming Gaussian statistics. The true significance of this
194: feature is likely to be higher because noise is non-uniform across the
195: bandpass. The excellent agreement between the [\ion{C}{2}] line
196: profile and the published CO~(5--4) line profile further supports the
197: robustness of our [CII] line detection.
198: %#In order to investigate the exact spatial origin of the [\ion{C}{2}]
199: %#line emission, an image using the emission in the velocity range -300
200: %#to 200 km~s$^{-1}$ was made (Figure~\ref{fig1} ($c$)). The result shows
201: %#that the emission primarily originates near BR1202N,
202: %#with an extension toward BR1202S.
203: %#Averaging line free channels of the same velocity
204: %#width (500~km~s$^{-1}$) results in an image that is consistent
205: %#with Figure~\ref{fig1} ($a$),
206: %#demonstrating the robustness of the [\ion{C}{2}] line detection from BR1202N.
207: By integrating the emission in the velocity range -230 to 130 km~s$^{-1}$,
208: we estimate the [\ion{C}{2}] line flux of
209: $S_{\rm [CII]} = (6.8\pm1.1)$~Jy~km~s$^{-1}$
210: which translates to a [\ion{C}{2}] luminosity of
211: $\rm L_{[CII]} = (4.5\pm0.7) \times 10^{9} L_{\odot}$.
212: Using a FIR luminosity of
213: $\rm L_{FIR} = (1.2\pm0.2) \times 10^{13} L_{\odot}$ (see \S4.2),
214: we obtain $\rm L_{[CII]}/L_{FIR} = (3.8\pm0.9) \times 10^{-4}$~(0.04\%)
215: in BR1202N. In addition, assuming $\Delta v = 500$~km~s$^{-1}$ and
216: $\rm L_{FIR} = 2.6 \times 10^{13} L_{\odot}$ (see \S4.2), we obtain a
217: $3\sigma$ upper limit of $\rm L_{[CII]}/L_{FIR} < 2.8 \times 10^{-4}$~(0.03\%)
218: in BR1202S.
219:
220: \section{Discussion}
221:
222: \subsection{Properties of the [\ion{C}{2}] Line Emission}
223:
224: The exceedingly low $\rm L_{[CII]}/L_{FIR}$ ratios for both BR1202N
225: and BR1202S are
226: consistent with the similarly low ratios found in local
227: ULIRGs where the average was found to be
228: $\rm L_{[CII]}/L_{FIR} = 0.04\%$ \citep{luhman98,luhman03}.
229: This is in stark contrast to the values found in the local
230: galaxies by \citet{malhotra01} in which
231: $\sim 70\%$ of the sources show $\rm L_{[CII]}/L_{FIR} > 0.2\%$, with the
232: majority in the range $0.1 - 1\%$.
233: Past studies have reported
234: $\rm L_{[CII]}/L_{FIR} \sim 0.02\%$ for the $z=6.42$
235: QSO SDSS~J1148+5251 \citep{maiolino05},
236: and $\rm L_{[CII]}/L_{FIR} < 0.4\%$ in a $z=4.926$
237: QSO CL~1358+62 \citep{marsden05}.
238: Our new measurement suggests that the [\ion{C}{2}]-to-FIR ratio
239: (0.04\%) in the high-$z$ hyper-luminous source
240: BR1202-0725 is comparable to local ULIRGs.
241: Table~\ref{ratios} summarizes these results.
242:
243:
244:
245: The integrated [\ion{C}{2}] line intensity is known to be a tracer of
246: star formation activity in normal galaxies.
247: We derive the star formation rate (SFR) of 2900~$\rm M_{\odot}~yr^{-1}$
248: using the calibration of \citet{maiolino05}.
249: This is 1 -- 2 orders of magnitude higher than the
250: SFRs derived from optical recombination lines observed near BR1202N
251: \citep[i.e. 10 -- 230 M$_\odot$~yr$^{-1}$;][]{hu96,petitjean96,
252: ohta00,ohyama04}, but consistent with the SFR derived from the SED fit to
253: the millimeter/submillimeter continuum measurements
254: (i.e. SFR = 2000 $\rm M_{\odot}~yr^{-1}$ in BR1202N; see \S 4.2).
255:
256:
257: Another important diagnostic of the physical properties
258: is the [\ion{C}{2}]-CO flux ratio.
259: Early studies suggest the close spatial and kinematical association
260: between the [\ion{C}{2}] and CO~(1--0) emissions in nearby galaxies,
261: suggesting that this ratio is a good tracer of star formation
262: activity that is independent of the beam
263: filling factor \citep{crawford85,stacey91}.
264: Assuming the luminosity ratio between the CO~(5--4) and CO~(1--0) lines
265: in BR1202N is similar to that of
266: the Cloverleaf \citep{barvainis94,barvainis97}, the CO~(1--0) luminosity is
267: estimated to be L$_{\rm CO(1-0)} \sim 10^{6}$~L$_{\odot}$, yielding
268: L$_{\rm [CII]}$/L$_{\rm CO(1-0)} \sim 4500$.
269: This value is highly uncertain since the CO~(5--4) -- CO~(1--0) ratio
270: may be different in BR1202-0725. Nevertheless,
271: this is a factor of 2.5 larger than the average values of ULIRGs
272: \citep[i.e. L$_{\rm [CII]}$/L$_{\rm CO(1-0)} \sim$ 1700;][]{vanderwerf98},
273: but comparable to the average values of normal galaxies
274: \citep[i.e. L$_{\rm [CII]}$/L$_{\rm CO(1-0)}$ = 4400 -- 6300;][]{crawford85,
275: stacey91}.
276: The higher observed ratio may suggest a factor of few higher
277: G$_0$/n ratio (where G$_0$ and n are the far UV flux and the cloud density
278: respectively) in BR1202N compared to the local ULIRGs
279: \citep[see Figure~9 of][]{kaufman99}.
280:
281:
282: \subsection{Properties of the Continuum Emission}
283:
284: The spatially resolved submillimeter images allow us to
285: investigate the properties of the individual components in BR1202-0725.
286: The radio to FIR SED of BR1202-0725 is shown in Figure~\ref{fig2}, where
287: the individual flux densities are given for BR1202N and BR1202S for the 1.4~GHz
288: \citep{carilli02}, 1.3~mm \citep{omont96} and $900\micron$ observations (see figure caption for the adopted parameters). The SEDs of the two sources
289: are analyzed using the model by \citet{yun02}, yielding
290: L$_{\rm FIR} = 1.2 \times 10^{13}$ and $2.6 \times 10^{13}$~L$_{\odot}$, and
291: SFR = 2000 and 4500 $\rm M_{\odot}~yr^{-1}$
292: for BR1202N and BR1202S respectively.
293: The discrepancy between the SFR derived by us and
294: \citet{yun02}(2300 $\rm M_{\odot}~yr^{-1}$ for the entire BR1202-0725)
295: is due to the difference in the adopted cosmology.
296: Note that while the millimeter/submillimeter continuum flux densities of
297: BR1202N and BR1202S are comparable (\S3), the radio
298: continuum flux density of BR1202N is 3 times larger.
299: This suggests a presence of a highly obscured AGN in BR1202N
300: (see \S4.3), or a strong effect of a
301: highly energetic jet from BR1202S \citep{klamer04}.
302:
303: Assuming a dust absorption coefficient of $\kappa_d = 1.5$~m$^2$~kg$^{-1}$ at $160\micron$ \citep{hildebrand83,draine84},
304: the dust mass of the individual components is estimated to be
305: M$_{\rm d}~(\rm BR1202N) = (5.4 \pm 0.8) \times 10^8$~M$_\odot$ and
306: M$_{\rm d}~(\rm BR1202S)= (9.2 \pm 1.1) \times 10^8$~M$_\odot$.
307: Using the H$_2$ mass derived from the CO~(5-4) emission \citep{omont96},
308: we find M$_{\rm H_2}$/M$_{\rm d} \sim 50 \pm 10$ for both components.
309: This ratio is an order of magnitude lower than the mean value for
310: LIRGs/ULIRGs
311: \citep[M$_{\rm H_2}$/M$_{\rm d} = 540 \pm 290$;][]{sanders91},
312: nearby spiral galaxies\footnote{The CO to H$_2$ conversion factor used by
313: \citet{omont96}, \citet{sanders91} and \citet{devereux90} are all
314: consistent to within 20\%.
315: In addition, the rest frame $160\micron$ emission for BR1202-0725 traces
316: the same warm dust (and hence the same M$_d$)
317: as measured by {\it IRAS} \citep{yun06}.}
318: \citep[M$_{\rm H_2}$/M$_{\rm d} \sim 500$; see Fig. 2b of ][]{devereux90}
319: and a sample of {\it Spitzer} 160 $\micron$ selected galaxies \citep[M$_{\rm H_2}$/M$_{\rm d} = 330$;][]{yun06}.
320: These gas-to-dust ratios are highly uncertain because dust emissivity,
321: temperature, and CO-to-H$_2$ conversion factor are all poorly constrained.
322: If the low ratio for BR1202-0725 is correct, however,
323: it may indicate that the H$_2$ mass is significantly underestimated in
324: BR1202-0725, and/or the warm component of dust dominates
325: the far infrared emission, suggesting that the entire
326: ISM is involved in the starburst activity.
327:
328:
329: \subsection{BR1202-0725: A Colliding Galaxy System at $z=4.7$}
330: Our analysis of previously unpublished archival {\em Chandra} data
331: (ObsID 3025) clearly shows that BR1202S is an X-ray source
332: and gives 26.4 net counts in 9.64~ksec.
333: The derived flux from BR1202S is
334: $f_{0.5-2keV} = 6\times10^{-15}$~erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$ which
335: yields a luminosity of
336: L$_{0.5-2keV}=3\times10^{45}$~erg~s$^{-1}$
337: \citep[assuming $\Gamma$ = 2.0 and Galactic foreground
338: N$_H$ = $3.35\times10^{20}$cm$^{-2}$;][]{stark92}.
339: X-ray emission is also seen within $1''$ of the position of BR1202N.
340: With just 2 counts in a single pixel, this detection seems marginal,
341: but the local background of 0.03 counts/pixel implies that
342: the likelihood of a random occurrence is only 0.04\%.
343: The derived flux from BR1202N is $f_{0.5-2keV} =
344: 4.8^{+6.5}_{-4.3}\times$10$^{-16}$erg~cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$
345: \citep[95\% confidence;][]{regener51}, implying
346: L$_{0.5-2keV}\sim$3$\times$10$^{44}$erg~s$^{-1}$.
347:
348:
349: If the X-ray emission from BR1202N is real, its high X-ray luminosity
350: suggests that BR1202N also hosts a luminous AGN.
351: In addition, our new [\ion{C}{2}] line detection, large dust emission,
352: and the presence of abundant molecular gas suggest that BR1202N
353: is forming stars at a high rate. BR1202S and BR1202N thus
354: form a system of two massive galaxies
355: undergoing an interaction or a merger, separated by a projected
356: distance of $\sim$25~kpc, observed when the universe was only 1.2 Gyrs old.
357: The presence of a highly obscured AGN (and an optically bright QSO)
358: during a massive merger
359: is consistent with the scenario predicted in recent galaxy collision
360: simulations that investigate the evolution of a central
361: black hole \citep[e.g.][]{hopkins05}.
362:
363: A high degree of clustering near massive galaxies is expected in the
364: theoretical models of large scale structure formation \citep[e.g.][]{white78}.
365: This is supported by observations such as the higher surface density of
366: submillimeter sources in the fields surrounding high-$z$ radio
367: galaxies \citep{stevens03}.
368: Although an earlier study by \citet{giallongo98} found little evidence
369: for clustering of galaxies near BR1202-0725
370: with $R' \leq 25$, two massive galaxies in
371: proximity of each other makes BR1202-0725 a particularly interesting
372: test ground for the hierarchical scenarios, soon after the reionization.
373:
374:
375:
376: \section{Summary}
377:
378: We present a $3''$ resolution $900\micron$ continuum image and a
379: detection of the redshifted [\ion{C}{2}] line emission from the $z=4.7$
380: QSO BR~1202-0725 obtained using the SMA.
381: This is one of the first detections of the [\ion{C}{2}] line from a high redshift source.
382: The [\ion{C}{2}] line is associated with
383: BR1202N.
384: The low [\ion{C}{2}]-FIR ratio of $\sim 3.8 \times 10^{-4}$ is similar
385: to local ULIRGs.
386: X-ray emission is clearly detected from BR1202S,
387: and at 99.6\% confidence from BR1202N, suggesting
388: %in both submillimeter continuum sources,
389: that BR1202-0725 is the first example of a pair of AGN hosts at $z \sim 4.7$.
390:
391: The authors thank the anonymous referee for valuable comments, which have
392: improved this work significantly.
393:
394: \begin{thebibliography}{fun}
395: \bibitem[Barvainis et al.(1994)]{barvainis94} Barvainis, R., Tacconi, L., Antonucci, R., Alloin, D., \& Coleman, P. 1994, Nature, 371, 586
396: \bibitem[Barvainis et al.(1997)]{barvainis97} Barvainis, R., Maloney, P., Antonucci, R., \& Alloin, D., 1997, ApJ, 484, 695
397: \bibitem[Blain et al.(2002)]{blain02} Blain, A. W., Smail, I., Ivison, R. J., Kneib, J. -P. \& Frayer, D. T. 2002, PhR, 369, 111
398: \bibitem[Bolatto et al.(2004)]{bollato04} Bolatto, A. D., Di Francesco, J. \& Willott, C. J. 2004, ApJL, 606, L101
399: \bibitem[Boselli et al.(2002)]{boselli02} Boselli, A., Gavazzi, G., Lequeux, J., \& Pierini, D. 2002, A\&A, 385, 454
400: \bibitem[Carilli et al.(2002)]{carilli02} Carilli, C. L. et al. 2002, AJ, 123, 1838
401: \bibitem[Crawford et al.(1985)]{crawford85} Crawford, M. K., Genzel, R., Townes, C. H., \& Watson, D. M. 1985, ApJ, 291, 75
402: \bibitem[Devereux \& Young(1990)]{devereux90} Devereux, N. A. \& Young, J. S. 1990, ApJ, 359, 42
403: \bibitem[Draine \& Lee(1984)]{draine84} Draine, B. T. \& Lee, H. M. 1984, ApJ, 285, 89
404: \bibitem[Fontana et al.(1998)]{fontana98} Fontana, A., D'Odorico, S., Giallongo, E., Cristiani, S., Monnet, G., \& Petitjean, P. 1998, AJ, 115, 1225
405: \bibitem[Giallongo et al.(1998)]{giallongo98} Giallongo, E., D'Odorico, S., Fontana, A., Cristiani, S., Egami, E., Hu, E., \& McMahon, R. G., AJ, 115, 2169
406: \bibitem[Guilloteau et al.(1999)]{guilloteau99} Guilloteau, S., Omont, A., Cox, P., McMahon, R. G. \& Petitjean, P. 1999, A\&A, 349, 363
407: \bibitem[Guilloteau(2001)]{guilloteau01} Guilloteau, S. 2001, in ASP Conf. Ser. 235, Science with the Atacama Large Millimeter Array, ed. A. Wootten(San Francisco:ASP)
408: \bibitem[Hildebrand(1983)]{hildebrand83} Hildebrand, R. H. 1983, QJRAS, 24, 267
409: \bibitem[Ho, Moran \& Lo(2004)]{ho04} Ho, P. T. P., Moran, J. M. \& Lo, Kwok Yung 2004, ApJ, 616, 1
410: \bibitem[Hopkins et al.(2005)]{hopkins05} Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J., Di Matteo, T., Martini, P., Robertson, B., \& Springel, V. 2005, ApJ, 630, 705
411: \bibitem[Hu, McMahon \& Egami(1996)]{hu96} Hu, E. M., McMahon, R. G. \& Egami, E. 1996, ApJL, 459, L53
412: \bibitem[Hollenbach \& Tielens(1997)]{hollenbach97} Hollenbach, D. J. \& Tielens, G. G. M., 1997, ARAA, 35, 179
413: \bibitem[Isaak et al.(1994)]{isaak94} Isaak, K. G., McMahon, R. G., Hills, R. E. \& Withington, S. 1994, MNRAS, 269, L28
414: \bibitem[Kaufman et al.(1999)]{kaufman99} Kaufman, M. J., Wolfire, M. G., Hollenbach, D. J. \& Luhman, M. L., 1999, ApJ, 527, 795
415: \bibitem[Klamer et al.(2004)]{klamer04} Klamer, I. J., Ekers, R. D., Sadler, E. M. \& Hunstead, R. W. 2004, ApJL, 612, L97
416: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(1998)]{luhman98} Luhman, M. L. et al. 1998, ApJL, 504, L11
417: \bibitem[Luhman et al.(2003)]{luhman03} Luhman, M. L. et al. 2003, ApJ, 594, 758\bibitem[Maiolino et al.(2005)]{maiolino05} Maiolino, R., Cox, P., Caselli, P., Beelen, A., Bertoldi, F. et al. 2005, A\&A, 480, L51
418: \bibitem[Marsden et al.(2005)]{marsden05} Marsden, G., Borys, C., Chapman, S. C., Halpern, M. \& Scott, D. 2005, MNRAS, 359, 43
419: \bibitem[Malhotra et al.(2001)]{malhotra01} Malhotra et al. 2001, ApJ, 561, 766
420: \bibitem[Ohyama, Taniguchi \& Shioya(2004)]{ohyama04} Ohyama, Y., Taniguchi, Y. \& Shioya, Y. 2004, AJ, 128, 2704
421: \bibitem[Ohta et al.(1996)]{ohta96} Ohta, K., Yamada, T., Nakanishi, K., Kohno, K., Akiyama, M. \& Kawabe, R. 1996, Nature, 382, 426
422: \bibitem[Ohta et al.(2000)]{ohta00} Ohta, K. et al. 2000, PASJ, 52, 557
423: \bibitem[Omont et al.(1996)]{omont96} Omont, A., Petitjean, P., Guilloteau, S., McMahon, R. G., Solomon, P. M. \& Pecontal, E. 1996, Nature, 382, 428
424: \bibitem[Petitjean et al.(1996)]{petitjean96} Petitjean, P., Pecontal, E., Valls-Gabaud, D. \& Charlot, S. 1996, Nature, 380, 411
425: \bibitem[Pierini, Leech \& V\"olk(2003)]{pierini03} Pierini, D., Leech, K. J., \& V\"olk, H. J. 2003, A\&A, 397, 871
426: \bibitem[Regener(1951)]{regener51} Regener, V. H. 1951, PhRv, 84, 161
427: \bibitem[Sanders, Scoville \& Soifer(1991)]{sanders91} Sanders, D. B., Scoville, N. Z., \& Soifer, B. T. 1991, ApJ, 370, 158
428: \bibitem[Stacey et al.(1991)]{stacey91} Stacey, G. J., Geis, N., Genzel, R., Lugten, J. B., Poglitsch, A., Sternberg, A., \& Townes, C. H. 1991, ApJ, 373,444
429: \bibitem[Stevens et al.(2003)]{stevens03} Stevens, J. A. et al. 2003, Nature, 425, 264
430: \bibitem[Stark et al.(1992)]{stark92} Stark, A. A., Gammie, C. F., Wilson, R. W., Bally, J., Linke, R. A., Heiles, C. \& Hurwitz, M. 1992, ApJS, 79, 77
431: \bibitem[van der Werf(1998)]{vanderwerf98} van der Werf, P. P. 1998, in ASP Conf. Ser. 156, Highly Redshifted Radio Lines, ed. C. L. Carilli, S. J. E. Radford, K. M. Menten, \& G. I. Langston (San Francisco: ASP), 91.
432: \bibitem[White \& Rees(1978)]{white78} White, S. D. M. \& Rees, M. J. 1978, MNRAS, 183, 341
433: \bibitem[Yun et al.(2000)]{yun00} Yun, M. S., Carilli, C. L., Kawabe, R., Tutui, Y., Kohno, K. \& Ohta, K. 2000, ApJ, 528, 171
434: \bibitem[Yun \& Carilli(2002)]{yun02} Yun, M. S., \& Carilli, C. L. 2002, ApJ, 568, 88
435: \bibitem[Yun et al.(2006)]{yun06} Yun, M. S., et al. 2006, in prep.
436: \end{thebibliography}
437:
438: \clearpage
439:
440: \begin{figure}
441: \plotone{f1.eps}
442: \caption{(\textit{Left}) $900\micron$ continuum map of BR1202-0725 made by averaging line free channels in the LSB. The crosses mark the locations of the CO~(2--1) peaks from \citet{carilli02}. The contour levels are -2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11$\sigma$~($1\sigma=3.0$~mJy~beam$^{-1}$).
443: The beam is shown in the lower left corner.
444: The SMA line profile of BR1202N (\textit{middle}) and BR1202S
445: (\textit{right}) obtained at the peak pixels using 120~km~s$^{-1}$ velocity
446: averaging. Velocity of 0~km~s$^{-1}$ corresponds to 334~GHz.
447: The solid lines are schematic representations of the central velocities and linewidts of the CO~(5--4) line observed in BR1202N and BR1202S by \citet{omont96}, where the peaks have been scaled to match the [\ion{C}{2}] line intensity in BR1202N.
448: }
449: \label{fig1}
450: \end{figure}
451:
452: \clearpage
453:
454: \begin{figure}
455: \plotone{f2.eps}
456: \caption{The radio to FIR SED of BR1202-0725. Two values are given when BR1202N and BR1202S are spatially resolved. The solid dark line represents the fit to the SED of the entire BR1202-0725 system, while the SEDs are not unique fits for BR1202N and BR1202S. The parameters used for the
457: SEDs are T$_d$ = 80K, $\alpha = 0.75$,
458: $\beta = 1.75$, $f_{nth} = 6.0$ and SFR = 2000 M$_{\odot}~yr^{-1}$
459: for BR1202N and T$_d$ = 65K, $\alpha = 0.75$,
460: $\beta = 1.50$, $f_{nth} = 2.0$ and SFR = 4500 M$_{\odot}~yr^{-1}$
461: for BR1202S, where $\alpha$, $\beta$, and $f_{nth}$ are the synchrotron spectral index, dust emissivity index, and the normalization factor to account for the non-thermal synchrotron emission \citep[see][for details]{yun02}.
462: }
463: \label{fig2}
464: \end{figure}
465:
466: \clearpage
467:
468: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
469: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
470: \tablewidth{0pt}
471: \tablecaption{Summary of SMA Observations\label{log}}
472: \tablehead{
473: \colhead{Date} & \colhead{N$_{ants}$\tablenotemark{1}} & \colhead{$t_{\rm source}$\tablenotemark{2}} & \colhead{T$_{sys}$\tablenotemark{3}} & \colhead{RMS phase\tablenotemark{4}} }
474: \startdata
475:
476: 02/22/2005 & 5 & 5.3 & 240 & 5 \\
477:
478: 04/05/2005 & 6 & 5.2 & 310 & 15 \\
479:
480: 03/21/2006 & 7 & 1.3 & 300 & 14 \\
481:
482: 04/19/2006 & 8 & 4.5 & 250 & 6 \\
483:
484: 05/11/2006 & 5 & 3.3 & 300 & 11 \\
485:
486: \enddata
487: \tablenotetext{1}{Number of SMA antennas used.}
488: \tablenotetext{2}{On source integration time in hours.}
489: \tablenotetext{3}{The average DSB system temperature in Kelvins.}
490: \tablenotetext{4}{The average RMS phase (in degrees) taken over all baselines for each track. These are calculated toward 3C279 for the first two tracks and 3C273 for the three tracks taken in 2006.}
491: \end{deluxetable}
492:
493: \clearpage
494:
495: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
496: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize}
497: \tablewidth{0pt}
498: \tablecaption{Summary of Luminosity Ratios\label{ratios}}
499: \tablehead{
500: \colhead{Source} & \colhead{$\rm L_{FIR}$ (L$_\odot$)} & \colhead{$\rm L_{[CII]}/L_{FIR}$} & Ref.}
501: \startdata
502:
503: Normal Galaxies & $10^{7}$ -- $10^{11}$ & $0.1 - 1\%$&1 \\
504:
505: ULIRGs & $\sim 10^{12}$ & $0.01 - 0.1\%$ &2 \\
506:
507: High-$z$ Sources \\
508:
509: ~~~BR1202N ($z=4.7$) & $1.2 \times 10^{13}$ & $0.04\%$ & 3\\
510:
511: ~~~BR1202S ($z=4.7$) & $2.6 \times 10^{13}$ & $<0.03\%$ & 3\\
512:
513: ~~~SDSS J1148+5251 ($z=6.4$) & $1.2 \times 10^{13}$ & $0.02\%$ & 4\\
514:
515: ~~~CL~1358+62 ($z=4.9$) & $2.4 \times 10^{12}$ & $< 0.4\%$ & 5\\
516: \enddata
517: \tablerefs{(1) \citet{malhotra01}; (2) \citet{luhman03};
518: (3) this work; (4) \citet{maiolino05}; (5) \citet{marsden05}.}
519: \end{deluxetable}
520:
521: \end{document}
522:
523:
524:
525:
526:
527: