1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
4: %%\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
5: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
6:
7: \renewcommand{\vec}[1]{\mbox{$\bf #1$}}
8: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
9: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
10: \newcommand{\Mdot}{\dot{M}~}
11: \newcommand{\mdot}{\dot{m}~}
12: \newcommand{\kms}{\mbox{ km s$^{-1}$}~}
13: \newcommand{\gcms}{\mbox{ g cm s$^{-1}$}~}
14: \newcommand{\gcm}{\mbox{ g cm$^{-3}$}~}
15: \newcommand{\about}{\mbox{$\sim$}}
16: \newcommand{\cc}{\mbox{ cm$^3$}~}
17: \newcommand{\Mo}{\mbox{M$_{\odot}$}~}
18: \newcommand{\Moy}{\mbox{M$_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$}~}
19: \newcommand{\Lo}{\mbox{$L_{\odot}$}~}
20: \newcommand{\Ro}{\mbox{R$_{\odot}$}}
21: \newcommand{\hii}{H~{\sc ii}~}
22: \newcommand{\Oiii}{O~[{\sc iii}]~}
23: \newcommand{\Heii}{He~{\sc ii}~}
24:
25:
26: \shorttitle{PN Dynamics After the Fast Wind}
27: \shortauthors{Garc\'{\i}a-Segura et al.}
28:
29:
30: \begin{document}
31:
32:
33: \title{The Dynamical Evolution of Planetary Nebulae \\
34: After the Fast Wind}
35:
36:
37: \author{G. Garc\'{\i}a-Segura\altaffilmark{1}, J. A. L\'opez\altaffilmark{1},
38: W. Steffen\altaffilmark{1}, J., Meaburn\altaffilmark{1,2}, and A.
39: Manchado\altaffilmark{3}}
40:
41: \altaffiltext{1}{Instituto de Astronom\'{\i}a, Universidad Nacional
42: Aut\'onoma de M\'exico, Apdo Postal 877, Ensenada 22800, Baja California,
43: Mexico; ggs@astrosen.unam.mx; jal@astrosen.unam.mx; wsteffen@astrosen.unam.mx}
44: \altaffiltext{2}{Jodrell Bank Observatory, University of Manchester,
45: Macclesfield SK11 9DL, UK; jm@ast.man.ac.uk}
46: \altaffiltext{3}{Instituto de Astrof\'{\i}sica de Canarias, C/V\'{\i}a
47: L\'actea, E-38200 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain; amt@iac.es}
48:
49:
50: \begin{abstract}
51:
52: In this paper we explore the dynamics of ionization bounded planetary nebulae
53: after the termination of the fast stellar wind.
54: When the stellar wind becomes negligible, the hot, shocked bubble
55: depressurizes and the thermal pressure of the photoionized region,
56: at the inner edge of the
57: swept-up shell, becomes dominant. At this stage the shell tends to fragment
58: creating clumps with comet-like tails and long,
59: photoionized trails in between, while the photoionized material expands
60: back towards the central stars as a rarefaction wave.
61: Once that the photoionized gas fills the inner cavity, it develops a kinematical pattern
62: of increasing velocity from the center outwards with a typical range of velocities starting
63: from the systemic velocity to $\sim 50 \kms $ at the edges. The Helix nebula is a clear
64: example of a planetary nebula at this late evolutionary stage.
65:
66: \end{abstract}
67:
68:
69:
70: \keywords{Hydrodynamics---Stars: AGB and Post-AGB---Planetary Nebulae:
71: general ---Planetary Nebulae: individual (NGC 7293, NGC 6853, NGC 2867)}
72:
73:
74: \section{Introduction}
75:
76: High spatial resolution imagery in recent years have revealed a number of well developed
77: planetary nebulae that exhibit a fragmented appearance of their shells with clumps and radial
78: spokes, as it is the case of the famous Helix Nebula, NGC 7293
79: (Vorontsov-Velyaminov 1968;
80: Meaburn et al. 1992; O'Dell \& Handron 1996). Similar examples are the Dumbbell nebula, NGC 6853 (Manchado et al.1996; Meaburn et al. 2005a) and NGC 2867 (Corradi et al. 2003). Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities have been some times invoked as the cause of this fragmentation but with limited success (Burkert \& O'Dell 1996). Alternatively, the effects of the ionizing radiation on the nebula have been shown by Capriotti (1973) and also by Garc\'{\i}a-Segura \& Franco (1996) and
81: Garc\'{\i}a-Segura et al.(1999) to be much more relevant in the fragmentation process of the nebular shell.
82:
83: Recently, Meaburn et al. (2005b) have shown that the current kinematics of nebulae such as NGC 7293 cannot be explained by the classic ``two-wind model'' (Kwok 1982). Since NGC 7293 shows
84: emission in \Heii and \Oiii at very low velocities close to the central star, Meaburn et al. (2005b)
85: concluded that only after the fast wind has switched off could this global velocity structure be generated.
86: The absence of a fast stellar wind in NGC 7293 has been confirmed from
87: observations with the IUE satellite (Perinotto 1983; Cerruti-Sola \&
88: Perinotto 1985) that failed to detect P-Cygni profiles from their central
89: stars; likewise in the cases of NGC 6853 and NGC 2867. Furthermore,
90: the lack of extended, soft x-ray emission from NGC 7293 (Guerrero et al.
91: 2001) discards the presence of a "hot bubble" and the shocked, fast wind.
92: In general, Cerruti-Sola \& Perinotto (1985) found that the hotter the
93: central stars are the least likely to have fast stellar winds, a result
94: indicative of the rapid fading of the stellar wind as the central star evolves.
95:
96:
97: In this letter we present numerical calculations which show that the decay
98: of the fast stellar winds produces self-consistently the fragmented structures
99: and kinematics observed in evolved planetary nebulae.
100:
101: \section{Relevant Stellar Parameters}
102:
103: There are several dynamical studies of the evolution of PNs that include
104: the effects of stellar evolution. Recently, Sch\"onberner et al. (2005)
105: have discussed the stellar evolution path for a $0.595$ \Mo post-AGB,
106: following the recommendation of Pauldrach et al.(1988) for
107: the parameters of the central stellar wind. A Reimers' wind (Reimers 1975)
108: is assumed during the short transition region from the AGB to the PN domain.
109: In this model (see Figure 1 in Sch\"onberner et al.2005), the mass loss rate
110: begins with several $10^{-7}$ \Moy for a period of $10^3$ yr, decreasing
111: down to $10^{-8}$ \Moy, to finally reach values of $10^{-10}$ \Moy
112: after $10^4$ yr; meanwhile the wind velocity increases from $10^2$ to
113: $10^4$ \kms. After $10^4$ yr the wind can be considered negligible
114: (turn-around point).
115: As initial condition, this calculation assume $4.3 \times 10^{-5}$ \Moy
116: and $v_{\infty}= 10$ \kms for the AGB wind.
117:
118: Also, Villaver et al. (2002a) have used the paths from
119: Vassiliadis \& Wood (1994) for
120: $0.569$ \Mo, $0.597$ \Mo, $0.633$ \Mo, $0.677$ \Mo, $0.754$ \Mo and
121: $0.9$ \Mo, corresponding to initial values at the ZAMS of 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5,
122: 3.5 and 5 \Mo respectively. The Vassiliadis \& Wood's (1994) models
123: also use the Pauldrach et al.(1988) theoretical results to compute the
124: mass loss rates and wind velocities from the AGB to the PN domain.
125: In these models (Figure 2 in Villaver et al. 2002a), the fast wind is
126: negligible (turn-around point) after $30 \times 10^3$, $ 10 \times 10^3$,
127: $ 5 \times 10^3$, $ 2.5 \times 10^3$, $ 1 \times 10^3$, and
128: $ 0.2 \times 10^3$ years respectively. The second model in Villaver et
129: al. (2002a) is almost identical to the model used in
130: Sch\"onberner et al. (2005).
131: The initial conditions (see Villaver et al. 2002b) corresponding to the end
132: of the AGB winds are taken from Vassiliadis (1992),
133: and are in the range of $4 \times 10^{-6} - 30 \times 10^{-6} $ \Moy,
134: and $11 - 15$ \kms.
135:
136: Mellema (1994) has also used a model for a $0.598$ \Mo post-AGB from
137: Sch\"onberner (1983), with similar stellar parameters as discussed above.
138:
139: Given the range of possible parameters to consider in the stellar
140: evolution tracks, stellar masses, mass loss rates and wind velocities,
141: we have adopted in this study the following representative numbers:
142: For the AGB winds, we have adopted a $v_{\infty}= 10 \kms$,
143: $\Mdot = 10^{-6} \Moy$ (model A) and $\Mdot = 10^{-5} \Moy$ (model B).
144: For the post-AGB wind, $v_{\infty}= 1,000 \kms$ and $\Mdot = 10^{-7} \Moy$.
145: These choices give wind momentum ratios of 10 (model A) and 1 (model B).
146: We also have adopted 1,000 yr for the duration of the fast wind.
147:
148:
149:
150: \section{Simplified Hydrodynamical Simulations}
151:
152:
153: The numerical experiment presented here
154: (model B)(Garc\'{\i}a-Segura et al.2006 discusses model A)
155: includes two phases:
156: in the first phase, a typical two-wind model scenario (Kwok 1982)
157: where a fast wind sweeps up a slow wind is considered.
158: For simplicity, this phase lasts 1,000 yr
159: in the computation, but it could last longer or shorter depending of the
160: particular track of stellar evolution. In the second phase, the fast wind is
161: switched off, and the dynamical evolution is computed for a total of 8,000 yr.
162: In both phases the photoionization is considered following the approach of
163: Garc\'{\i}a-Segura \& Franco 1996 with a central star that emits
164: $10^{45} s^{-1}$ ionizing photons.
165: We have adopted this average value from
166: Villaver et al. (2002a) (see their Figure 4), which is maintained for at least
167: $10^4$ yr.
168: We have not considered in detail the temporal variation of the ionizing
169: photons. However, Villaver's models show that the evolution of the nebulae
170: are optically thick during the first few thousand years of the evolution.
171: In this regime, our simple models provide a reasonable description of
172: the location of the ionization front for the mass-loss rates that we have
173: considered.
174: A simple expanding spherical morphology is adopted for simplicity (i. e., no
175: rotation, magnetic field, or anisotropic mass-loss events).
176:
177: The simulations are performed with the hydrodynamical code ZEUS-3D
178: (version 3.4) (Stone \& Norman 1992; Clarke 1996), and details about the
179: set up can be found in Garc\'{\i}a-Segura et al.(1999), and
180: Garc\'{\i}a-Segura et al.(2005) for the self-expanding grid technique.
181:
182: We perform the two-dimensional simulation in spherical polar
183: coordinates ($r,\theta$), with reflecting boundary conditions at the
184: equator and the polar axis, and rotational symmetry assumed with respect
185: to the latter.
186: Our grid consist of $200 \times 180$
187: equidistant zones in
188: $r$ and $\theta$ respectively, with a radial extent of 0.1 pc (initially),
189: and an angular extent of $90^{\circ}$. The innermost
190: radial zone lies at $r=2.5 \times 10^{-3}\,$pc from the central star.
191:
192: Figures 1 and 2 show mosaics of snapshots of gas densities and photoionized
193: gas densities covering 8,000 yr of the evolution for
194: model B,
195: each one separated
196: by 1,000 yr.
197: The first, top-left panel in Figure 1 shows progressively,
198: starting from the origin of the grid, the fast, free expanding wind region,
199: the terminal or reverse shock, the hot, shocked bubble,
200: the swept-up shell with an outer, forward shock, and the slow wind. This
201: is the classical view of a two-wind model. Vishniac (1983) or thin
202: shell instabilities give the corrugate appearance of the swept-up shell
203: (see Garc\'{\i}a-Segura \& Mac Low 1995 for further details).
204: The rest of the panels show how the hot shocked bubble collapses after
205: $\sim$ 6,000 yr and also show the expansion of the photoionized gas, once that
206: the fast wind is switched off.
207: The fragmentation of the swept-up shell follows the
208: pattern imposed by the Vishniac instability, and its development and
209: growth comes from the ionization-shock front instability (Garc\'{\i}a-Segura
210: \& Franco 1996).
211:
212:
213: Figure 3 is a mosaic with snapshots of the radial velocities counterparts of
214: Figure 1 and 2. The last two panels (bottom-right) show the global kinematics
215: of the ionized gas after the collapse of the hot bubble in which it can be
216: clearly appreciated that the gas close to the central star presents
217: very small velocities, reaching practically inert conditions there,
218: as it is found in the Helix nebula (Meaburn et al.2005b).
219: Notice that these low velocities reach the central star region, and are
220: not only a projection effect along the line of sight, as in models where
221: the low velocity emitting regions are located in the inner edges of the
222: swept-up shells (e. g., Marten \& Sch\"onberner 1991; Perinotto et al. 2004).
223: The gas
224: located at the border of the main nebula, shows larger velocities
225: following the kinematics of a rarefraction wave.
226:
227: The last panel of Figure 3 also shows that the
228: neutral cometary globules immersed in the nebula
229: present smaller velocities than the surrounding photoionized gas
230: that has been accelerated by thermal pressure,
231: while the extended sections of these
232: neutral tails at further distances show larger velocities than the AGB wind
233: due to the acceleration by the ionization-shock front.
234: Model B is not shown in this letter, but it is discussed in
235: Garc\'{\i}a-Segura et al. (2006) where similar results are found.
236:
237:
238: In the simulations, the cometary globules originate in the neutral, swept-up
239: shell of piled up AGB wind, and so, they, or part of them must be
240: excited by shocks. This is consistent with the detection of shock-excited
241: molecular Hydrogen in the Dumbbell nebula (see Manchado et al. 2006).
242: Once that the wind is switched off, the head of the
243: globules are no longer confined in the swept-up shell by the pressure of the
244: wind, and so, they become engulfed in the nebula. This is a novel
245: result that previous hydrodynamical works had not solved (see for example
246: Garc\'{\i}a-Segura et al. 1999).
247: Huggins et al.(1992) observed that the CO cometary globules in
248: the Helix nebula show a
249: smaller expansion velocity than the ionized gas, which is in line
250: with our computations. However, the present numerical simulations are two-dimensional,
251: and the limited resolution does not allow a quantitative analysis of the structures that are formed.
252: Thus, quantitative details about velocities of the globules, number,
253: sizes and masses, as well as
254: the spoke-like pattern and its spatial
255: frequency developed in the simulations are beyond the scope of this letter.
256: However, the qualitative resemblance with cases like the Helix and
257: the Dumbbell nebulae is remarkable and encouraging. Note for example, the
258: cometary globules that develop in Figure 2, bottom-right, with bright
259: photoionized heads,
260: like the ones observed in the Helix
261: (see also Figure 16 in O'Dell et al. 2004), and also the resemblance with
262: the molecular, shock-exited long tails extending further out in the
263: Dumbbell (Manchado et al.2006).
264:
265:
266:
267:
268:
269: In this study, we have switched off the fast wind after the first 1000 years of evolution and followed the subsequent development finding for the first
270: time a consistent
271: representation of the fractured morphology and kinematic pattern often observed in planetary
272: nebulae. The stellar wind is likely not to die-off as abruptly as in our
273: simulations, although
274: massive central stars evolve fast (e.g. see fig 3 in Villaver et al. 2002)
275: and the behavior computed here should be a
276: good approximation
277: for those cases, as in the Helix nebula where the estimated central star
278: mass is 0.93 \Mo (G\'orny et al. 1997).
279: For the case of the evolution of low mass central stars, those are
280: expected to take
281: place in much longer times than the dilution of their surrounding nebulae.
282: If this is the case, there should be a direct correlation between the
283: fragmentation of a planetary nebula with the mass of the central star,
284: and an anticorrelation with the detection of extended soft x-rays.
285:
286: Additional numerical simulations at higher resolution, taking detailed
287: account of the time dependent stellar evolution effects will allow a
288: quantitative analysis of the shell structure as a result of the
289: termination of the fast wind. Such calculations will be the subject of
290: a future paper.
291:
292:
293:
294:
295: \acknowledgments
296: We thank the anonymous referee for his/her valuable comments which
297: improved the manuscript.
298: We thank M. L. Norman and the LCA for the use of ZEUS-3D.
299: The computations were performed at
300: Instituto de Astronom\'{\i}a, Universidad Nacional Aut\'onoma de M\'exico.
301: We gratefully acknowledge financial support from UNAM-DGAPA grants IN108406-2, IN108506-2 and IN112103 as well as CONACYT grant 43121
302:
303:
304: \begin{thebibliography}{}
305:
306: \bibitem[]{195} Capriotti, E. R. 1973, ApJ, 179, 495
307: \bibitem[]{196} Cerruti-Sola, M., \& Perinotto, M. 1985, ApJ, 291, 237
308: \bibitem[]{197} Clarke, D. A. 1996, ApJ, 457, 291
309: \bibitem[]{198} Corradi, R. L. M., Sch\"onberner, D., Steffen, M., \& Perinotto,
310: M. 2003, M.N.R.A.S., 340, 417
311: \bibitem[]{202} Guerrero, M. A., Chu, Y.-H., Gruendl, R. A., Williams, R. M.,
312: \& Kaler, J. B. 2001, ApJ, 553, L55
313: \bibitem[]{204} Huggins, P. J., Bachiller, R., Cox, P., \& Forveille, T.
314: 1992, ApJ, 401, L43
315: \bibitem[]{206} Burkert, A., O'Dell, C. R. 1996, AAS, 189, 9707
316: \bibitem[]{207} Garc\'{\i}a-Segura, G. \& Franco, J. 1996, ApJ, 469, 171
317: \bibitem[]{208} Garc\'{\i}a-Segura, G., Langer, N., R\'o\.zyczka, M.,
318: \& Franco, J. 1999, ApJ, 517, 767
319: \bibitem[]{210} Garc\'{\i}a-Segura, G., L\'opez, J. A., \& Franco, J. 2005,
320: ApJ, 618, 919
321: \bibitem[]{342} Garc\'{\i}a-Segura, G., L\'opez, J. A., Steffen, W., Meaburn, J.,
322: \& Manchado, A. 2006, IAU Symp 234, Planetary Nebulae in our Galaxy and Beyond, in press
323: \bibitem[]{212} Garc\'{\i}a-Segura, G. \& Mac Low, M.-M. 1995, ApJ, 455, 160
324: \bibitem[]{323} G\'orny, S. K., Stasi\'nska, G., Tylenda, R. 1997, A\&A,
325: 318, 256
326: \bibitem[]{213} Kwok, S. 1982, ApJ, 258, 280
327: \bibitem[]{214} Manchado, A., Guerrero, M., Stanghellini, L., \& Serra-Ricart,
328: M. 1996, ``The IAC Morphological Catalog of Northern Galactic
329: Planetary Nebulae'', ed. Instituto de Astrof\'{\i}sica de Canarias
330: \bibitem[]{349} Manchado, A., Villaver, E., Garc\'{\i}a-Segura, G., et al. 2006,
331: IAU Symp 234, Planetary Nebulae in our Galaxy and Beyond, in press
332: \bibitem[]{} Marten, H., Sch\"onberner, D. 1991, A\&A, 248, 590
333: \bibitem[]{217} Meaburn, J., Boumis, P., Christopolou. P.E., Goudis, C.D.,
334: Bryce, M. \& L\'opez, J.A. 2005a, Rev. Mex. Astron. \&
335: Astrophys. 41, 109
336: \bibitem[]{220} Meaburn, J., Boumis, P., L\'opez, J. A., Harman, D. J.,
337: Bryce, M., Redman, M. P., \& Mavromatakis, F. 2005b,
338: M.N.R.A.S., 360, 963
339: \bibitem[]{223} Meaburn, J., Walsh, J. R., Clegg, R. E. S., Walton, N. A.,
340: Taylor, D., \& Berry, D. S. 1992, MNRAS, 255, 177
341: \bibitem[]{359} Mellema, G. 1994, A\&A, 290, 915
342: \bibitem[]{225} O'Dell, C. R., \& Handron, K. D. 1996, AJ, 111, 1630
343: \bibitem[]{226} O'Dell, C. R., McCullough, Peter R., \& Meixner, M 2004,
344: AJ, 128, 2339
345: \bibitem[]{363} Pauldrach, A., Puls, J., Kudritzki, R. P., M\'endez, R. H.,
346: \& Heap, S. H. 1988, A\&A, 207, 123
347: \bibitem[]{228} Perinotto, M. 1983, IAU Symp. 103, (Reidel, Dordrecht), 323
348: \bibitem[]{} Perinotto, M., Sch\"onberner, D., Steffen, M., Calonaci, C.
349: 2004, A\&A, 414, 993
350: \bibitem[]{366} Reimers, D. 1975, in Problems in Stellar Atmospheres and
351: Envelopes, ed. B. Baschek, W. H. Kegel, \& G. Traving (Berlin: Springer), 229
352: \bibitem[]{368} Sch\"onberner, D. 1983, ApJ, 272, 208
353: \bibitem[]{369} Sch\"onberner, D., Jacob, R., Steffen, M., Perinotto, M.,
354: Corradi, R. L. M., \& Acker, A. 2005, A\&A, 431, 963
355: \bibitem[]{230} Stone, J. M. \& Norman, M. L. 1992, ApJS, 80, 753
356: \bibitem[]{373} Villaver, E., Manchado, A., \& Garc\'{\i}a-Segura, G. 2002a,
357: ApJ, 581, 1204
358: \bibitem[]{375} Villaver, E., Garc\'{\i}a-Segura, G., \& Manchado, A. 2002b,
359: ApJ, 571, 880
360: \bibitem[]{231} Vishniac, E. T. 1983, ApJ, 274, 152
361: \bibitem[]{232} Vorontsov-Velyaminov, B. A. 1968, in IAU Symp. No 34,
362: ``Planetary Nebulae'', eds. Osterbrock \& O'Dell, Reidel, Dordrecht, 256
363: \bibitem[]{380} Vassiliadis, E. 1992, Ph.D. thesis, Australian National University
364: \bibitem[]{381} Vassiliadis, E., \& Wood, P. 1994, ApJS, 92, 125
365: \end{thebibliography}
366:
367: \clearpage
368:
369: \begin{figure}
370: \epsscale{.80}
371: %\plotone{f1.ps}
372: \caption{Snapshots of gas densities covering 8,000 yr of the evolution of
373: model B}
374: \end{figure}
375:
376: \clearpage
377:
378: \begin{figure}
379: %\plotone{f2.ps}
380: \caption{Same as Figure 1 but for photoionized gas densities. The white
381: line at $45^{\circ}$ in the last panel correspond to the one-dimensional plot
382: on figure 3}
383: \end{figure}
384:
385: \clearpage
386:
387: \begin{figure}
388: %\plotone{f3.ps}
389: \caption{Same as Figure 1 but for radial velocities. A one-dimensional plot
390: at $45^{\circ}$ is also shown in the last panel at 8,000 yr.}
391: \end{figure}
392:
393:
394: \end{document}
395:
396:
397:
398: