1: %\documentclass[floatfix,aps,prl,twocolumn,showpacs]{revtex4}
2: \documentclass[aps,prl,twocolumn,showpacs]{revtex4}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{amsmath}
5: \usepackage{amssymb}
6: \font\FermiPPTfont=cmssbx10 scaled 1440
7: \font\FermiSmallfont=cmssq8 scaled 1200
8: \def\LANLppthead#1#2{
9: \null
10: \begin{center}\vskip -1.0truein{\hbox to 7.5truein {
11: \hfill
12: \vbox to 1in {\vfill \FermiSmallfont
13: \hbox{#1}
14: \hbox{#2}
15: \vfill}
16: }}\vskip-0.0truein\end{center}}
17: \def\Cv{c_{\rm v}}
18: \def\rs{r_{\rm s}}
19: \def\photon2{\gamma \gamma}
20: \def\Zgamma{\gamma Z^0}
21: \def\dd{{\rm d}}
22: \def\cv{c_{\rm v}}
23: \def\GeV{\ {\rm GeV}}
24: \def\cm{{\rm cm}}
25: \def\s{{\rm s}}
26: \def\sr{{\rm sr}}
27: \def\Aeff{{\cal{A}}_{\rm eff}}
28: \def\LOS{{\rm LOS}}
29: \def\TeV{{\rm TeV}}
30: \def\texp{t_{\rm exp}}
31: \def\Eth{E_{\rm th}}
32: \def\Ngs{N_{\gamma, \rm s}}
33: \def\NB{N_{\rm B}}
34: \def\rs{r_{\rm s}}
35: \def\rtilde{\tilde{r}}
36: \def\rhos{\rho_{\rm s}}
37: \def\apjs{Astrophys.\ J.\ Supp.}
38: \def\apj{Astrophys.\ J.}
39: \def\apjl{Astrophys.\ J.\ Lett.}
40: \def\aap{Astron.\ \& Astrophys.}
41: \def\mnras{Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.}
42: \def\rtilde{{\tilde{r} } }
43: \def\Td{T_d}
44: \def\sigmav{\langle \sigma v \rangle}
45: \def\calD{{\cal D }}
46: \def\Mm{M_{\rm m}}
47: \def\MeV{{\rm MeV}}
48: \def\dmax{ {\cal D}_{\rm max}}
49: \def\Nm{N_{\rm m}}
50: \def\zform{z_{\rm form}}
51: \def\Lm{L_{\rm m}}
52: \def\thetamin{\theta_{\rm min}}
53: \def\psimax{\psi_{\rm max}}
54: \def\Mchi{M_\chi}
55: \def\Ngth{N_{\gamma, \rm th}}
56: \def\Msun{M_\odot}
57: \def\muth{\mu_{\rm th}}
58:
59: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
60:
61: \begin{document}
62:
63: \LANLppthead {LA-UR 06-3781}{astro-ph/0606208}
64:
65: \title{Proper motion of $\gamma$-rays from microhalo sources }
66:
67: \author{Savvas M. Koushiappas}
68: \affiliation{T-6, Theoretical Division,
69: \& ISR-1, ISR Division, MS B227, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los
70: Alamos, NM 87545, USA; smkoush@lanl.gov }
71:
72: \pacs{95.35.+d,98.80.-k, 95.55.Ka, 98.70.Rz, 97.10.Wn}
73:
74: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
75:
76: \begin{abstract}
77: I discuss the prospects of detecting the smallest dark matter bound structures
78: present in the Milky Way by
79: searching for the proper motion of $\gamma$-ray sources in the upcoming GLAST
80: all sky map. I show that for dark matter particle candidates that couple to photons
81: the detection of at least one $\gamma$-ray microhalo source
82: with proper motion places a constraint on the couplings and mass of the dark matter
83: particle. For SUSY dark matter, proper motion detection implies that the mass of the
84: particle is less than 500 GeV and the kinetic decoupling temperature is in the range
85: of [4-100] MeV.
86: \end{abstract}
87:
88: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
89: \maketitle
90:
91: In the $\Lambda$CDM cosmological model, $\sim 26 \%$ of the present-day energy density
92: of the Universe is in the form of dark matter \cite{Spergeletal} which remains an
93: outstanding problem in cosmology and particle physics.
94: Favored Cold dark matter (CDM) particle candidates (see \cite{BHS05} and
95: references therein) are Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs). They are
96: kept in thermal equilibrium through interactions of the form
97: $\chi \chi \leftrightarrow f \bar{f}$, and in kinetic equilibrium through
98: $\chi f \leftrightarrow \chi f$.
99: The temperature at which these particles decouple
100: from the radiation fluid is called the freeze-out temperature, while the
101: temperature at which they
102: decouple from scattering interactions
103: is called the kinetic decoupling temperature ($\Td$)
104: \cite{Schmid:1998mx,HSS01, CKZ02}.
105:
106: In the CDM paradigm,
107: the first collapsed and virialized dark matter structures, {\it microhalos}, are
108: formed at high redshifts\cite{Berezinsky:2003vn,Green:2003un, Green:2005fa}.
109: Their minimum mass is set by the RMS dark matter particle
110: velocities set at kinetic decoupling; scales smaller than the free-streaming
111: scale are smoothed out.
112: For the case of supersymmetric (SUSY) cold dark matter (CDM), this mass scale is
113: $\Mm \approx 10^{-4} M_\odot \,( \Td / 10 \,\MeV )^{-3}$ \cite{HSS01,Berezinsky:2003vn,LZ05}.
114: Recent numerical simulations of the formation of microhalos in the context of SUSY CDM
115: provided hints on their properties, and on their evolution and
116: survival in the hierarchical structure formation scenario \cite{DMS05,DKM06}. Their
117: potential detection using $\gamma$-rays has been studied in Refs.~\cite{Pieri:2005pg,DKM06}.
118: Based on simple analytical studies,
119: it has been argued that the abundance of microhalos in the Milky Way can
120: be severely reduced due to interactions in early rapid merging processes and
121: in stellar and galactic disc interactions \cite{ZSH1,METAL05,Berezinsky:2005py,Green:2006hh}.
122: These arguments are still under debate and need to be resolved through detailed
123: numerical simulation studies.
124:
125: Investigating the existence of microhalos in the Milky Way could be very important for two reasons:
126: 1) A possible detection can provide information about the particle physics properties
127: of the dark matter particle, and 2) a measured abundance in the Milky Way halo contains
128: information on the hierarchical assembly of dark matter halos at very early times, a
129: task that is unattainable by any other method.
130: If a fraction of microhalos survive in the present day Milky Way halo, and the
131: dark matter particle couples to photons (as is the case for SUSY CDM as well as candidates
132: that originate from theories with extra-dimensions),
133: they may appear as $\gamma$-ray
134: sources in the sky with potentially detectable proper motion \cite{METAL05}.
135: A search for proper motion of unidentified $\gamma$-ray sources can provide
136: important information on the physics of the dark matter particle and on the
137: survival rate of microhalos in the Solar neighborhood.
138: In this paper, I present proper motion signals that should be expected in the upcoming
139: GLAST $\gamma$-ray experiment (http://glast.gsfc.nasa.gov) for dark matter particle candidates
140: that couple to photons. I find that for SUSY CDM particles with mass less than $\Mchi \leq
141: 500$ GeV and kinetic decoupling temperature of $\Td \sim [4- 100]\MeV$ there will be at least one
142: detectable microhalo with proper motion if $\sim 20 \%$ of microhalos at the Solar radius survive
143: \cite{Berezinsky:2005py,Green:2006hh}.
144:
145:
146: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
147: {\bf \it Photons from Microhalos:}
148: The number of photons with energy greater than $\Eth$
149: on Earth from a microhalo at distance $\calD$ is
150: \begin{equation}
151: \label{eq:ns}
152: \Ngs(E>\Eth)= \frac{1}{4 \pi}
153: \frac{N_\gamma \sigmav}{\Mchi^2}
154: g[\rho(r)] {\cal A}_{\rm eff} \tau_{\rm exp}.
155: \end{equation}
156: Here,
157: $\sigmav$ is the annihilation cross section
158: of the dark matter particle to photons, $\Mchi$ is the mass of the dark matter particle and
159: $N_\gamma = \int_{\Eth}^{\Mchi} [dN_\gamma / dE] dE$ is the total number of photons
160: emitted above a threshold energy $\Eth$ and $dN_\gamma / dE$ is the
161: spectrum of the emitted photons.
162: The effective area of the detector is ${\cal A}_{\rm eff}$,
163: and $ \tau_{\rm exp}$ is the
164: exposure time.
165: The term $ g[\rho(r)]$ contains all the information about the distribution of dark matter in a
166: microhalo at a distance $\calD$,
167: $ g[\rho(r)] = \calD^{-2}\int \rho^2(r) d^3 r = 2 \pi \int_0^{{\phi_m}}
168: \sin \psi \{ \int \rho^2[r(s,\psi,\calD)] \, ds \} \, d \psi$.
169: The integral is performed along the line of sight, for an angular extent of
170: $\phi_m =\tan^{-1}[ r_s / \calD]$, where $r_s$ is the scale radius.
171: The distribution of mass is $\rho(r)$ and is
172: assumed to be described by an NFW profile \cite{NFW96} (for an NFW profile, $\sim$90\% of
173: the flux comes within the region inside of $r_s$).
174: All microhalos
175: are described by the same value of the quantity $ g[\rho(r)]$ if
176: all are formed at the same
177: redshift, $\zform \approx 70$ \cite{DMS05}.
178: Given a concentration parameter $\cv \approx 1$ \cite{DMS05}, a microhalo of mass $\Mm$ is
179: described by an NFW profile with a characteristic density
180: of $\rho_s \approx 756 \GeV \, \cm^{-3}$ and a scale radius
181: $r_s \approx 3 \times 10^{-3} \, {\rm pc} {\Mm}_{,-6}^{1/3} Z_{70}^{-3}$,
182: where ${\Mm}_{,-6}=\Mm / 10^{-6} \, M_\odot$ and $Z_{70}= [(1+\zform)/71]$
183: For the case of SUSY CDM,
184: the number of photons detected on Earth that originate
185: within a microhalo region defined by the PSF of GLAST
186: can be written as
187: \begin{equation}
188: \label{eq:Ns}
189: \Ngs \approx 50 \left( \frac{ {\Mm}_{,-6}}{\calD^2_{0.05}} \right)
190: \left( \frac{ N_\gamma }{30} \right)
191: \left( \frac{ \sigmav_{-26}}{{\Mchi}_{,40}^2} \right) \, Z_{70}^3 .
192: \end{equation}
193: Here, $\calD_{0.05} = \calD / 0.05 {\rm pc}$, the threshold energy is $\Eth = 3 \GeV$ and
194: the Hubble parameter is taken as $h=0.7$.
195: In this expression,
196: $\sigmav_{-26}= \sigmav / 10^{-26} \cm^3 \s^{-1}$, ${\Mchi}_{,46}= \Mchi / 40 \GeV$,
197: and the photon spectrum is taken from Ref.~\cite{BUB97}.
198: This particular choice of cross section, particle mass and threshold energy
199: represents an optimistic approach to the case of SUSY CDM detected with GLAST \cite{KZW04},
200: because the annihilation cross section can be up to a factor of $10^6$ smaller, while the
201: mass can be as high as numerous TeV.
202: However, for dark matter candidates that arise from stable
203: Kaluza-Klein excitations in models with universal extra dimensions
204: the annihilation cross section to photons can be much higher \cite{BHS05}.
205:
206: In order to detect the $\gamma$-ray signal from
207: microhalos, the source signal must be larger than the
208: threshold number of photons for detection, i.e., $\Ngs \ge \Ngth$, where
209: $\Ngth \approx 6 $ for a GLAST orbit-averaged effective area of $\Aeff \approx 2 \times 10^3 \cm^2$
210: \cite{Ritz} and an exposure time of 2 years.
211: Given a microhalo of mass $\Mm$, the maximum distance from the Sun $\dmax$ at which a
212: microhalo can be detected is obtained by setting Eq.~\ref{eq:ns} equal to $\Ngth$. I define the
213: ``visibility volume'' of a microhalo of mass $\Mm$ to be the volume defined through $\dmax$.
214:
215: Microhalos formed at $\zform \approx 70$
216: will merge to form present day dark matter halos. A fraction
217: of the Milky Way halo mass perhaps remains in the form of microhalos
218: formed at very high redshifts. Simulations show that
219: the subhalo mass function in Milky Way
220: size halos is $ dN/dM \sim M^{-2}$, with about 10\% of the
221: mass of the Milky Way in halos of mass greater than $10^7 \Msun$.
222: Analytical arguments based on approximations for the survival probability
223: of microhalos in an evolving parent halo \cite{Berezinsky:2005py},
224: as well as preliminary numerical
225: work on the mass function of subhalos down to microhalo scales \cite{DKM06}, find
226: the form of the subhalo mass function is preserved down to microhalo scales.
227: Thus, the amount of mass per logarithmic mass interval
228: is a constant, and depends only on the survival probability of microhalos.
229: If approximately 20\% of microhalos survive \cite{Berezinsky:2005py} in the
230: Solar neighborhood (with perhaps a small mass dependence on microhalo
231: mass \cite{Green:2006hh}), then the fraction of the local mass in microhalos
232: is roughly of order 0.2\%.
233: I define the quantity $\xi$ to be the fraction of the dark matter density in
234: the solar neighborhood that is in the form of microhalos, i.e., $\xi=0.002$.
235: If there are $\Nm$ microhalos in a logarithmic interval in $\Mm$,
236: the number of microhalos
237: per radial distance interval from the Sun is $d\Nm/d \calD = 4 \pi \xi \calD ^2 \rho(r_\odot) / \Mm$,
238: and the total number of microhalos per logarithmic mass interval in $\Mm$
239: within a visibility volume is
240: $N_{\rm m} = \int_0^{{\dmax}} [d\Nm/d \calD ] d \calD$.
241: The Sun is located at $r_\odot \approx 8$ kpc from the
242: galactic center, and the local dark matter density is
243: $\rho(r_\odot)= 0.01 \, M_\odot \, {\rm pc}^{-3}$ \cite{HF00}.
244:
245: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
246:
247: {\it Microhalo proper motion}:
248: I assume microhalos obey a Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distribution function set by the
249: virial temperature of the Milky Way halo. On the Earth's frame, the distribution function
250: can be written as $f(v) dv = [v \zeta(v) / \pi ^{1/2} v_e v_0 ] dv$.
251: where, $\zeta(v) = {\rm exp}[(v_1/v_0)^2] - {\rm exp}[(v_2/v_0)^2]$, $v_1=v-v_e$ and $v_2=v+v_e$.
252: Here, $v_0\approx 220$ km s$^{-1}$ is the velocity of the Sun in the
253: frame of the Galaxy, and $v_e=1.12 v_0$ is the speed of the Earth
254: (the very small annual modulation of the Earth's velocity is neglected).
255: A microhalo at a distance $\calD$ from the Sun, and with a velocity with magnitude $v$ at an
256: angle $\theta$ relative to the Earth's frame will exhibit a proper motion of angular
257: displacement $\mu = \tan^{-1}[ \tau v \sin \theta /\calD]$ in a time period $\tau$.
258: Naively, for GLAST, a detection of proper motion
259: requires that the angular displacement must be
260: greater than the point spread function, i.e., $\mu > \mu_0=9$ arcminutes (which is
261: the 68\% PSF for GLAST). However,
262: the PSF of GLAST improves to less than 9 arcminutes at energies greater than few GeV because
263: the sensitivity of the instrument is not background dominated. It is
264: reasonable to assume that a detection of proper motion is defined by the condition
265: $\muth > \mu_0 / \sqrt{\Ngth }\approx 4 \,{\rm arcmin}$.
266: This is a conservative approach, because
267: large number of photon counts (as might be the case for a nearby microhalo)
268: may in fact increase the angular resolution of the detector
269: \cite{BV99}.
270: Furthermore, it is possible that some microhalos are close enough
271: that they will have an angular extent (see Fig.~\ref{fig:figure2}) such that the excess
272: count in adjacent angular bins may be used to even better localize the source, increasing
273: the sensitivity of the detector to proper motion measurements.
274: The number of microhalos in a logarithmic interval in $\Mm$ detected with GLAST
275: with proper motion greater than $\muth$ is obtained by integrating
276: the velocity distribution function with the abundance of microhalos with a velocity
277: vector at an angle greater than $\thetamin(\muth,v,\calD) = \sin^{-1}[ \calD \tan \muth / v \tau]$, as
278: \begin{eqnarray}
279: \Nm (\Mm, \ge \muth) &=& 4 \pi \int_0^{\dmax(\Mm)} \frac{dN_{\rm m}}{d \calD } \\
280: &\times& \left( \int_0^\infty
281: f(v) \cos [\theta_{\rm min}(\muth,v,\calD)] d v \right) \, d \calD. \nonumber
282: \end{eqnarray}
283:
284:
285: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
286: {\it Results}:
287: % Figure 1
288: Fig.~\ref{fig:figure1} shows the number of visible microhalos per logarithmic mass interval
289: and contours of the
290: number of microhalos with detectable proper motion for different microhalo masses and
291: physics of the dark matter particle. The dashed line depicts the best case scenario
292: for SUSY CDM, namely, a neutralino dark matter, with $\Mchi = 46 \GeV$, and
293: $\sigmav = 5 \times 10^{-26} \cm^3 \s^{-1}$. The photon spectrum is
294: taken from Ref.~\cite{BUB97}, and is integrated from $\Eth = 4 \GeV$. The integration
295: time is 2 years. If, for example, the decoupling temperature of the SUSY CDM
296: particle is $\sim 10 \, \MeV$, then microhalos have a mass of $\sim 10^{-4} \, M_\odot$,
297: and if $\sim 0.2\%$ of them survive in the Milky Way halo to the present day,
298: $\sim 20$ will be detected with GLAST, and 8 out of 20 will exhibit a
299: detectable proper motion \footnote{See EPAPS Document No.---- for a similar figure for a
300: detector with $\Aeff = 2\times 10^8 \cm^2$ and a PSF of 6 arcmin, and for a figure which
301: shows the cumulative number of microhalos with proper motion as a function of the cutoff
302: mass in the microhalo mass function in the case of SUSY CDM.
303: This document can be reached through a direct link in the online article's HTML
304: reference section, or via the EPAPS homepage http://www.aip.org/pubservs/epaps.html}.
305:
306: \begin{figure}[t]
307: \resizebox{!}{7.5cm}{\includegraphics{figure1r.ps}}
308: \caption {\small {\it Top}: The dependence of the number of visible microhalos per logarithmic mass interval
309: to the microhalo
310: mass and the properties of the dark matter particle. {\it Solid} lines depict the iso-number
311: contours of microhalos which also exhibit detectable proper motion. The {\it dashed} line shows the
312: best case scenario for SUSY CDM particle. The shaded area shows the region that is
313: already being excluded by EGRET measurements.}
314: \label{fig:figure1}
315: \end{figure}
316: \begin{figure}[t]
317: \resizebox{!}{7.5cm}{\includegraphics{figure2r.ps}}
318: \caption {\small The angular size of microhalos as a function of microhalo mass and distance
319: for the best case scenario of SUSY CDM. The {\it solid} line defines the distance threshold for
320: detection. {\it Dashed} lines depict the
321: iso-number contours of the number of microhalos per logarithmic mass interval within a volume defined by $
322: \calD$.
323: {\it Dot-dashed} lines show the maximum distance at which a microhalo could exhibit proper
324: motion of 1, 3, 6 \& 9 arcmin.
325: The {\it cross-hatched} area corresponds to the
326: region where microhalos have an angular extent that should be detectable by
327: {\it GLAST}. }
328:
329: \label{fig:figure2}
330: \end{figure}
331: \begin{figure}[t]
332: \resizebox{!}{7.5cm}{\includegraphics{figure3r.ps}}
333: \caption {\small The dependence of the number of visible microhalos per logarithmic mass interval
334: on the microhalo mass
335: and redshift of formation. {\it Solid} lines as in figure~\ref{fig:figure1}. The {\it dashed }
336: line depicts the redshift at which microhalos form in numerical simulations \cite{DMS05,METAL05,DKM06}.}
337: \label{fig:figure3}
338: \end{figure}
339: The shape of the contours of microhalos with detectable proper motion can
340: be understood with the help of Fig.~\ref{fig:figure2}. The radius from the Sun at which a microhalo is
341: detected is $\calD \sim \Mm^{1/2}$. However, the radius of the volume that is needed in
342: order to encompass at least one microhalo is $\calD \sim \Mm^{1/3}$ (see e.g. the intersection of
343: the $N(<\calD)=1$ contour and the detectability line in Fig.~\ref{fig:figure2}). Therefore, for
344: small mass microhalos $\Mm \le 10^{-6}\Msun$, the number of microhalos with proper motion
345: is limited by the non-abundance of microhalos within a visibility volume. On the other
346: hand, for high mass microhalos, even though the detectable number can be high,
347: the number of microhalos exhibiting proper
348: motion is limited by the distance at which a microhalo can be placed and still exhibit a
349: detectable proper motion, because $\mu \sim \calD^{-1}$ (see e.g. the intersection
350: of the $\mu = 3'$ and $N(<\calD)=1$ contour in Fig.~\ref{fig:figure2}).
351:
352: For smaller(larger) values of $\xi$, such as the case where microhalos are
353: disrupted more(less) efficiently,
354: the number of visible microhalos and/or ones that exhibit detectable proper
355: motion should be multiplied by a factor of $\xi/0.002$.
356: An interesting outcome of the detection of a large
357: number of microhalos will be the potential measurement of their parallax.
358: Such measurements can be used to estimate the
359: absolute luminosity and thus
360: the measured flux can provide important information about the
361: physics of the dark matter particle and its distribution.
362: This calculation assumes
363: isotropy of the microhalo distribution in the solar neighborhood and thus isotropy in the
364: distribution of detected microhalos.
365: However, the Doppler effect due to the motion of the Earth-Sun system in the
366: Milky Way halo will create a dipolar distribution with an amplitude of order
367: $\Delta \Nm / \Nm \sim 10^{-3}\%$ \cite{Jordi}.
368:
369: In the context of SUSY CDM,
370: the detection of at least 1 microhalo with proper motion has an
371: important implication:
372: the decoupling temperature must be in the range
373: $\Td \sim [4-100] \GeV$, and the mass of the particle must be $\Mchi \le 500 \GeV$.
374: The former is inferred from the crossing of the SUSY $N_\gamma \langle \sigma v
375: \rangle / \Mchi^2$ line with the $\ge 1$ iso-number contour of detectable microhalos
376: with proper motion in Fig.~\ref{fig:figure1}.
377: The latter is inferred from the lowest value of the quantity $N_\gamma \langle \sigma v
378: \rangle / \Mchi^2$ along the same $\ge 1$ iso-number contour in Fig.~\ref{fig:figure1}.
379: These bounds can be
380: understood in the following way: High decoupling temperatures imply small microhalos, which are less luminous;
381: The visibility volume shrinks reducing the number of detectable microhalos
382: ($\Nm \sim \Mm^{-1}\calD^3 \sim \Mm^{1/2}$).
383: On the other hand, low decoupling temperature results in more massive microhalos,
384: in a larger visibility volume. Proper motion is inversely proportional to the distance of the microhalo,
385: $\mu \sim \calD^{-1} \sim \Mm^{-1/2}$, and so more massive microhalos will tend
386: to exhibit smaller proper motions.
387: It will be of interest to deduce the implications of the kinetic decoupling temperature and particle
388: mass
389: constraints to direct searches for dark matter, because the interactions
390: (scalar scattering) that set the kinetic decoupling temperature are the same as the ones that
391: are expected to take place in a direct dark matter detection experiment.
392:
393:
394: % Figure 2
395: The cross-hatched region in Fig.~\ref{fig:figure2} depicts
396: the region where microhalos can potentially be resolved
397: as extended objects (greater than the 9 arcmin PSF of GLAST).
398: If for example microhalos have mass of order $\sim 10^{-3}\Msun$, then there will be $\sim 25$
399: microhalos visible, out of which $\sim 7$ will be resolved as extended objects, and $\sim 2$
400: of them will exhibit a detectable proper motion of greater than $3$ arcmin. This number is a conservative
401: estimate since the excess photon flux from adjacent resolution bins in extended objects could be
402: used to better localize the position of the
403: source\footnote{See EPAPS Document No.---- for examples of the angular profile of photons
404: emitted from extended microhalos.
405: This document can be reached through a direct link in the online article's HTML
406: reference section, or via the EPAPS homepage http://www.aip.org/pubservs/epaps.html}.
407:
408: % Figure 3
409: Fig.~\ref{fig:figure3} shows the number of visible microhalos and contours of the
410: number of microhalos with detectable proper motion for different microhalo masses and
411: formation redshift. Recent simulations suggest that microhalos are formed
412: at $\zform \sim 70$ (depicted as the dashed line in Fig.~\ref{fig:figure2}).
413: The assumption that microhalos form at $\zform \sim 70$
414: should be taken with caution because the redshift of formation depends on 1) the rarity of the
415: over-density from which the microhalos collapse \cite{Green:2005fa,DKM06} and
416: 2) the scale invariance of the primordial power spectrum \cite{Green:2005fa,Bertschinger:2006nq}.
417: Furthermore, simulations of small box-sizes are very sensitive to the redshift at which the simulation is
418: initiated \cite{Heitmann:2006eu}. This redshift must be high enough such that
419: the initial Zel'dovich displacement is a small enough fraction of the mean
420: inter-particle separation. For simulations aiming at the formation of
421: microhalos this criterion implies a starting redshift much
422: higher than what has been assumed in refs.~\cite{DMS05,METAL05,DKM06}. Not fullfiling this
423: requirement delays structure formation on all scales in simulations.
424: Therefore, if a population of microhalos is formed at a higher redshift than what has been
425: assumed in this calculation would imply that
426: the number of visible microhalos and microhalos with detectable proper motion
427: could be higher as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:figure2}.
428:
429:
430: In summary, a detection of the proper motion of $\gamma$-ray sources would be of profound
431: importance.
432: First and foremost, it will be a detection of annihilating dark matter.
433: In addition,
434: it will provide information on the survival rate of microhalos in the Solar neighborhood
435: \cite{DMS05,METAL05,DKM06,ZSH1,Berezinsky:2005py,Green:2006hh}.
436: Furthermore,
437: it will provide an upper bound to the dark matter particle mass, namely, $\Mchi \le 500$ GeV, an
438: area in the parameter space that will be accessible for further studies at the upcoming LHC.
439: Moreover, the kinetic decoupling temperature of the dark matter particle must be in the range
440: $\Td = [4-100]$ MeV, dramatically restricting the current allowed range of values \cite{PSK06}.
441: Therefore, it is essential that a particular analysis for the proper motion of $\gamma$-ray
442: sources is performed by the GLAST team, and that the GLAST lifetime is maximized so as to
443: increase the baseline for proper motion detection.
444:
445: I thank John Beacom for numerous helpful suggestions.
446: I acknowledge useful discussions with Kevork Abazajian,
447: Salman Habib, Katrin Heitmann, Daniel Holz, Gerard Jungman, Louie Strigari,
448: Mike Warren and Andrew Zentner. I thank the
449: Aspen Center for Physics, where part of this work was completed.
450: This work was carried out under the auspices of the NNSA of the U.S. Department of Energy at
451: Los Alamos National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-06NA25396.
452:
453:
454: \bibliography{mu}
455:
456: \end{document}
457: