1: \documentclass{mem0}
2: \usepackage{natbib}\usepackage{txfonts}\usepackage{balance}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage[a4paper]{hyperref}
5: \idline{75}{282}
6: \begin{document}
7: \def\mum{$\mu$m~}
8: \def\lH{$l/H$}
9: \def\Vt{$V_t$}
10: \def\CDC{$^{12}$C/$^{13}$C~}
11: \def\HHO{H$_2$O~}
12: \def\Tef{T$_{\rm eff}$}
13: \newcommand{\ai}{{\em ab initio}}
14:
15: \def\teff{$T\rm_{eff }$}
16: \def\kms{$\mathrm {km s}^{-1}$}
17:
18: \title{The modelling of the spectra and atmospheres of evolved stars
19: }
20:
21: \subtitle{}
22:
23: \author{
24: Yakiv V.Pavlenko\inst{1}
25: }
26:
27: \offprints{Ya. V.Pavlenko}
28:
29:
30: \institute{
31: Main Astronomical Observatory of the National Academy of Sciences,
32: 27 Zabolotnoho, Kyiv-127, 03680 Ukraine
33: \email{yp@mao.kiev.ua}
34: }
35:
36: \authorrunning{Pavlenko}
37:
38:
39: \titlerunning{Model atmospheres and spectra}
40:
41:
42: \abstract{
43:
44: The method and results of the computation of the model atmospheres
45: and spectral energy distributions of chemically peculiar stars, are discussed.
46: The models are computed with a special consideration of the particular
47: problems encountered when computing model atmospheres for
48: M and C-giants, and of hydrogen deficient stars.
49: We present some computed model atmospheres for
50: Sakurai's object, giants of globular clusters, and C-giants.
51: \keywords{Stars: abundances --
52: Stars: atmospheres -- Galaxy: globular clusters --
53: stars: carbon isotopic ratios}
54: }
55: \maketitle{}
56:
57: \section{Introduction}
58:
59: The computations of model atmospheres of and theoretical spectra
60: of stars is an essential part of many modern astrophysical
61: projects. An extended grid of model atmospheres and spectra were
62: computed recently using the most complete sets of opacities (see
63: Kurucz (1993, 1999), Hauschildt et al. (1999). In most of the computations
64: the solar abundances (Anders \& Grevesse 1989)
65: or solar abundances scaled by the metallicity factor [Fe/H]
66: are used. However,
67: the metal abundances in the atmospheres of evolved stars can
68: significantly differ from the solar abundance ratios. The reason for this is
69: because convection and other mixing processes dredge up
70: the products of the nucleosynthesis from the stellar interior.
71: %% Molecular opacities are of importance in the
72: %%atmospheres of C- and M-giants. In the case of coolest stellar atmospheres
73: %%(\Tef $<$ 3000 K)
74: %%we should account absorption of polyatomic species and dust.
75:
76:
77: The atmospheres of the most evolved stars (R CrB, Sakurai's object, etc) present
78: another interesting problem. They are helium and carbon rich, therefore the
79: opacity due to H$^-$ absorption is not as important.
80: The temperature structure of the model atmospheres of these stars
81: is the different from the case of the ``normall'' abundances
82: due to the changes of opacity.
83:
84:
85:
86: \section{Model atmospheres and synthetic spectra}
87:
88: We computed plane-parallel model atmospheres
89: of the evolved stars in LTE, with no energy
90: divergence by SAM12 program (Pavlenko 2003). The
91: program is a modification of ATLAS12 (Kurucz 1999).
92:
93: Chemical equilibrium is computed for the molecular species,
94: by assuming LTE. The nomenclatures of molecules accounted for are
95: different in atmospheres of hydrogen rich and hydrogen poor,
96: carbon-rich and carbon poor stars. We account mainly for the molecules
97: which are the most abundant or most important sources of opacities.
98:
99:
100: SAM12 uses the standard set of continuum opacities from ATLAS12.
101: The adopted
102: opacity sources account for changes in the opacity as
103: a function of temperature and element abundance.
104: We add some opacities sources which are of importance in the atmospheres of
105: carbon-rich, hydrogen-deficient stars:
106:
107: -- The opacities due to
108: C~I, N~I, O~I bound-free absorption over a wide (0.1--8~$\mu$m)
109: wavelength region were
110: computed using the OPACITY PROJECT (Seaton et al.1992) cross sections database
111: (Pavlenko \& Zhukovska 2004).
112:
113: -- The opacity of C$^-$ (Myerscough \& McDowell 1996) also is
114: taken into account
115: (see Pavlenko 1999 for more details).
116:
117: The opacity sampling approach (Sneden et al. 1976) is used to account for
118: atomic and molecular line absorption. The atomic line data are taken
119: from the VALD database (Kupka et al. 1999). Lists of diatomic
120: molecular lines of $^{12}$CN, $^{13}$CN, $^{12}$C$_2$, $^{13}$C$_2$,
121: $^{12}$C$^{13}$C, $^{12}$CO, $^{13}$CO, SiH, and MgH are taken from
122: Kurucz (1993). We account for
123: TiO and VO opacities in the atmospheres of oxygen-rich stars in the
124: framework of JOLA (just-overlapping-line) approximation. In the atmospheres of
125: the carbon-rich stars the absorption by CS lines (Chandra et al. 1994)
126: was accounted for.
127:
128:
129: Bands of polyatomic molecules appear in the spectra of the coolest
130: evolved stars:
131: %%. We account for them using a different method than
132: %%for the computation of model atmospheres of M- and C-giants:
133:
134: a) Water vapour band form strong features in the infrared spectra
135: of cool stars with oxygen-rich atmospheres. We computed \HHO
136: opacities using AMES line lists (Partrige \& Schwenke 1998).
137:
138: b) In the cool atmospheres of C-stars HCN/HNC bands dominate in the infra-red
139: region of the spectrum. We computed the HCN/HNC opacity using
140: detailed line line list (Harris et al. 2002, 2003, 2006).
141:
142: The shape of each molecular or atomic line was determined using
143: the Voigt function $H(a,v)$. Damping constants were taken from
144: line databases or computed using Unsold's (1955) approach.
145:
146: The following molecular electronic bands
147: were accounted for:
148: CaO (C$^1\Sigma$ - X$^1\Sigma$), CS(A$^1\Sigma$ - X$^1\Sigma$),
149: SO (A$^3\Pi$ - X$^3\Sigma$), SiO (E$^1\Sigma$-X$^1\Sigma$),
150: SiO(A$^1\Pi$ - X$^1\Sigma^+$, NO (C$_2 \Pi_r$- X$_2\Pi_r$),
151: NO(B$_2\Pi_r$ -X$_2\Pi_r$),
152: NO(A$^2\Sigma^+$ - X$_2\Pi_r$),
153: MgO(B$^1\Sigma^+$ - X$^1\Sigma^+$),
154: AlO(C$^2\Pi$ -X$^2\Sigma$),
155: AlO(B$^2\Sigma^+$ - X$^2\Sigma^+$),
156: in the framework
157: of the JOLA approach.
158:
159: Convection plays an important role in
160: these atmospheres.
161: We use the mixing length theory of 1D convection modified by
162: Kurucz(1999) in ATLAS12.
163:
164: In the Fig. \ref{_SEDS} we show the computed SEDS for two model atmospheres
165: of the same effective temperature, surface gravity and metallicity,
166: i.e 3000/0.0/0,
167: but with a different C to O ratios.
168: The differences in the opacity nomenclatures are clearly seen.
169:
170: The temperature structure of model atmospheres of the evolved giants show very
171: strong dependence on the adopted abundances and other parameters
172: (Fig. \ref{TT}).
173:
174:
175:
176: \begin{figure*}
177: \includegraphics[width=130mm]{_yp01.eps}
178: \includegraphics[width=130mm]{_yp02.eps}
179: \caption{\label{_SEDS}Spectral energy distributions computed for
180: two giants with \Tef/log g/[Fe/H] = 3000~K/0.0/0 and different C/0
181: = -0.25 (top) and (+0.02) (bottom). }
182: \end{figure*}
183:
184: \begin{figure*}
185: \includegraphics[width=65mm]{_yp03.eps}
186: \includegraphics[width=65mm]{_yp04.eps}
187: \caption{\label{TT}Left: temperature structure of the model
188: atmosphere of giant 5000/0.0 computed with a normal abundance and
189: with a hydrogen deficient abundance, i.e. [H]=0, -2.4 (see section \ref{Sak}). Right: the
190: response of the atmosphere temperature of a C-giant 3000/0.0/0 to the
191: variation of some input parameters.}
192: \end{figure*}
193:
194:
195:
196: Synthetic spectra are calculated with the WITA6 program
197: (Pavlenko 2000),
198: using the same approximations and opacities as SAM12. In the computations we
199: use TiO line list (Plez 1998) instead of JOLA, and the CO (Goorvitch 1994)
200: line list instead of the Kurucz(1993) line list. Naturally, much smaller
201: wavelength steps in the synthetic
202: spectra are adopted ($\Delta \lambda$ = 0.02 and 0.1 in the blue
203: and IR spectral regions, respectively.
204:
205: \section{Fits to observed spectra}
206: \subsection{\label{_vfc}Veiling-free case}
207:
208: To determine the best fit parameters, we compare the observed
209: fluxes $F_{\nu}$ with the computed fluxes
210: following the scheme of Jones et al (2002) and Pavlenko \& Jones (2003). We
211: let
212: $$F_{\nu}^x = \int F^y_{\nu} \times G (x-y)*dy, $$
213: where $r^y_{\nu}$ and $G(x-y)$ are respectively the
214: fluxes computed by WITA6 and the broadening profile. We adopt
215: a gaussian + rotation and/or extension profile for the latter.
216: We then find the minima of the 3D
217: function
218: $$S(f_{\rm s}, f_{\rm h}, f_{\rm g}) =
219: \sum \left ( F_{obs} - F^x \right )^2 , $$
220: where $f_{\rm s}$, $f_{\rm g}$, $f_{\rm g}$ are the
221: wavelength shift, the normalisation factor, and the profile
222: broadening parameter, respectively.
223: The parameters $f_{\rm s}, f_{\rm h}$ and $f_{\rm g}$
224: are determined by the minimisation procedure for every computed
225: spectrum. Then,
226: From the grid of the better solutions for the given
227: abundances and/or other parameters (microrurbulent velocity,
228: effective temperature, isotopic ratios, etc), we choose the
229: best-fitting solution.
230:
231: \subsection{\label{_vc}A case with the dust veiling}
232:
233: For the case of the most evolved stars, some of the flux originates in the
234: optically thin envelope around the star. Third provides a
235: source of veiling the observed spectra: $F_{total} = F_{atmos}+F_{envelope}$.
236: In this case we should minimise $F_{total}-F_{obs}$, whilst
237: considering $F_{envelope}$
238: as an additional parameter (see section \ref {Sak} and Pavlenko et al. 2004
239: for more details).
240:
241:
242: \section{Results}
243:
244:
245: \subsection{C-giants}
246:
247: The {\it ab initio} HCN linelist (Harris et al. 2002, 2003) was
248: used to compute new model atmospheres and synthetic spectra for
249: the carbon stars (Pavlenko 2003). Recently the accuracy of the first {\it
250: ab initio} line list was improved by by using an accurate
251: database of 5200 HCN and HNC rotation-vibration energy levels,
252: determined from existing laboratory data.
253:
254: Model atmospheres and synthetic
255: spectra computed with this new linelist provide better fit to
256: the spectrum of WZ~Cas in which the
257: absorption feature at 3.56 \mum\ is reproduced to a higher degree
258: of accuracy than has previously been possible (see Harris et al,
259: 2006 for more details).
260:
261: Using the new HCN line list, we computed a new grid of carbon rich
262: model atmospheres for a wide range of [Fe/H], C/O, \Tef, log g.
263: They can be used for the express analysis of the new data obtained
264: for C-giants in our Galaxy (Yakovina et al. 2003)
265: and/or other galaxies (Dominguez et al.
266: 2005).
267:
268: \subsection{\CDC in giants of globular clusters}
269:
270: %The behaviour were examined by
271: %comparing observed and synthetic spectra of
272: %stars in globular clusters of different metallicities (
273: Pavlenko, Jones
274: \& Longmore (2003b) investigated
275: changes in the $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C isotopic ratio and the carbon abundances
276: in atmospheres of red giants of in the galactic globular
277: clusters M71, M5, M3 and M13 covering the metallicity range
278: from --0.7 to --1.6 and \Tef = 3500--4900 K. Observational data were
279: obtained with the UKIRT telescope in 1993.
280: Model atmospheres and synthetic spectra of the $\Delta\nu$=2 CO bands
281: around 2.3 $\mu$m
282: were computed for a fixed
283: \Tef and log g, but with different \Vt, C/O, \CDC. We then apply the minimisation
284: procedure (see sect. \ref{_vfc}) to obtain the best solution. An example of the best fit
285: to an observed spectrum of II-46 giant of globular cluster M3 is shown in Fig.
286: \ref{_M}.
287: We find:\\
288: -- lower \CDC for more luminous hotter objects. \\
289: -- relatively low carbon abundances which
290: are not affected by the value of oxygen abundance. \\
291: -- For
292: most giants the determined $^{12}$C/$^{13}$C ratios are consistent with the
293: equilibrium value for the CN cycle. \\
294: -- a larger dispersion of
295: \CDC in giants of M71 of metallicity [M/H]
296: = -0.7 in comparison with other
297: giants of M3, M5, M13 which are more metal deficient (Fig. \ref{_M}).
298:
299: %%%% Figure
300: \begin{figure*}
301: \begin{center}
302: \includegraphics[width=65mm,angle=00]{_yp05.eps}
303: \includegraphics[width=65mm,angle=00]{_yp06.eps}
304: \end{center}
305: \caption[]{\label{_M} Left: fits to observed spectrum of
306: II-46 giant in the globular cluster M3. Right: the found \CDC for
307: giants of globular clusters of different metallicities (Pavlenko et al. 2003b).}
308: \end{figure*}
309:
310:
311:
312: Our results suggest a complete mixing on the
313: ascent of the stars up the red giant branch. This is in
314: contrast to the substantially higher values
315: suggested across this range of parameters by the current
316: generation of theoretical models of stellar evolution
317: (see Pavlenko et al. 2003b for more details).
318:
319:
320:
321:
322:
323: \subsection{\label{Sak}R CrB and V4334 Sgr}
324:
325: It has been firmly established that the two most abundant elements in
326: the atmospheres of the evolved R CrB-like stars are helium and
327: carbon (see Asplund et al 1997).
328: A hydrogen deficient model
329: atmosphere for R CrB was computed by Pavlenko (1999), see
330: www.mao.kiev.ua\-/staff\-/yp/\-Results\-/Mod.rcrb1999.tar.gz.
331:
332: Sakurai's object (V4334 Sgr)
333: provides another extreme case of stellar evolution.
334: The ``novalike object in Sagittarius'', was discovered by Y.~Sakurai
335: on February 20, 1996 (Nakano et al. 1996). Soon after discovery, it was
336: found to be a final He flash object, a rare type of star on
337: the evolutionary track
338: that leads from the central star of a planetary nebulae back to the red giant
339: region. These objects are often referred to as ``born-again giants''.
340: Its progenitor was a
341: faint blue star ($\sim$ 21$\rm ^m$) in the centre of a low surface brightness
342: planetary nebula (Duerbeck \& Benetti 1996).
343: %%Early spectroscopic studies of
344: %%the object found an increasing hydrogen deficit in the atmosphere, and a
345: %%C/O ratio $>$ 1 (Asplund et al. 1997, Kipper \& Klochkova 1997).
346:
347: Model atmosphere and spectra of Sakurai's object on later stages of evolution
348: were investigated
349: by Pavlenko et al. (2000), Pavlenko
350: \& Duerbeck (2002). We show the effective temperature of the
351: pseudo-photosphere of Sakurais object drops monotonically from 5500
352: in July, 1997 down to 5250 K in August, 1998.
353: In March 1997 the first evidence of dust formation was seen (
354: Kimeswenger et al. 1997, Kamath \& Ashok 1999, Kerber et al. 2000).
355: Pavlenko \& Geballe (2002) {\it spectroscopically~}
356: showed the presence of the dust veiling of the infrared
357: part of the Sakurai's spectrum (see Fig. \ref{l6}). Later,
358: Pavlenko et al. (2004) using the procedure decsribed in
359: section \ref{_vc}
360: determined \CDC = 4 $\pm$ 1 in atmosphere
361: of Sakyrai's object from the fit to 2.3 \mum CO bands observed by
362: UKIRT in July, 1997 (see Fig. \ref{l6}) which is consistent with
363: VLTP (the star on very late thermal pulse) interpretation of V 4334
364: Sgr (Herwig 2001).
365:
366: %%%% Figure 6.
367: \begin{figure*}
368: \begin{center}
369: \includegraphics[width=65mm,angle=00]{_yp07.eps}
370: \includegraphics[width=65mm,angle=00]{_yp08.eps}
371: \end{center}
372: \caption[]{\label{l6} Left: fits to observed spectrum of of
373: Sakurai's Object on 1997 July 13. Right: the fit to $^{12}$CO and $^{13}$CO
374: bands. Synthetic spectra were computed for a microturbulent
375: velocity of 6~km/s.}
376: \end{figure*}
377:
378:
379:
380:
381:
382: \section{Conclusions}
383:
384: Due to the high sensitivity of computed model atmospheres and
385: synthetic spectra of evolved stars on the adopted input data, the
386: analysis of their spectra should be done in the framework of the
387: self-consisted approach. Model atmospheres should correspond with
388: the obtained abundances and other physical parameters.
389: Even in the case of the ``normal'' red giants the temperature structure
390: should be computed with the correct abundances.
391: Otherwise, the abundance determination results might
392: be affected by significant errors ($>$ 0.2-0.3 dex, see Pavlenko
393: \& Yakovina 1994 for more details).
394: Generally
395: speaking, existed grids of the model atmospheres can be used as
396: zero-approach tool to be refined in the process of analysis.
397:
398:
399: Despite a substantial efforts to develop more sophisticated model
400: atmosphere, a few problems provide the real challenge for the
401: modern theory of stellar astrophysics:
402:
403: -- atmospheres of the most evolved stars do not exist in
404: hydrostatic equilibrium. In some cases effects of sphericity can
405: be essential.
406:
407: -- Convection in the extended photospheres can be properly described only
408: in the 3D approach.
409:
410:
411: -- The further computation of line lists and other
412: physical parameters (dissociation energies, partition functions,
413: etc) of polyatomic molecules is absolutely essential for cool
414: stellar atmosphere modelling to progress.
415: In particular little, no or only poor data exists for species
416: such as C$_3$, CH$_4$ and C$_2$H$_2$. These species
417: provide substantial opacity in the coolest atmospheres.
418: Even the existing line lists of diatomic molecules,
419: such as CN, C$_2$, CH, are not accurate enough to be used for
420: the high resolution analysis of observed spectra.
421:
422: Naturally, these problems can be solved one at a time. However, it is only possible
423: when paying special
424: attention to theoretical support of current observations.
425:
426:
427: \begin{acknowledgements}
428: I thank SOC \& LOC of the VIII Torino Meeting for the invitation
429: and support of my participation. I am grateful to my colleagues
430: Andrew Longmore (Eddinbough Observatory),
431: Bogdan Kaminsky (MAO),
432: Carlos Abia (University of Granada),
433: Gregory Harris(UCL),
434: Hilmar Duerbeck (Open University),
435: Hugh Jones(UH),
436: Larisa Yakovina (MAO),
437: Nye Evans (Keele University),
438: Thomas Geballe (UKIRT)
439: for the excellent collaboration.
440:
441: Thanks to Greg Harris (UCL) for his help with our expression of the
442: English language.
443:
444: \end{acknowledgements}
445:
446: \bibliographystyle{aa}
447: \begin{thebibliography}{}
448:
449: %%\bibitem[{Boesgaard et al. (1998)}]{boe98}
450: %%Boesgaard, A.\ M., et al. 1998, ApJ, 493, 206
451:
452:
453: %%\bibitem[Cuoco et al.(2003)]{cuoco} Cuoco, A. et al.\ 2003, ArXiv
454: %%Astrophysics e-prints, 7213
455:
456: \bibitem[{Anders \& Grevesse(1989)}]{anders89} Anders, E., Grevesse, N.\ 1989,
457: GeGoAA, 53, 197
458:
459:
460: \bibitem[Asplund et al. (1997)]{asp97} Asplund, M.,
461: Gustafsson, B., Lambert, D.L., Rao, N.K.\
462: 1997, A\&A 321, L17
463:
464: \bibitem[Chandra et al. (1995)]{Chandra}
465: Chandra S., Kegel W. H., Le Roy R. J.,
466: Hertenstein T.\ 1995, AAAS, 114, 175
467:
468: \bibitem[Dominguez et al. (2004)]{Dom}
469: Dominguez, I, Abia, C., Straniero, O., Cristallo S. and Ya.V. Pavlenko.\
470: 2004, A\&A, 422, 1045.
471:
472:
473: \bibitem[Doyle (1968)]{Doyle1968}
474: Doyle, R.O.\ 1968, ApJ, 153, 987.
475:
476: \bibitem[Duerbeck \& Benetti (1996)]{due96}Duerbeck, H.W.,
477: Benetti, S.\ 1996, ApJ, 468, L111
478:
479: \bibitem[Jones et al.(2002)]{jones} Jones, H. R. A., Pavlenko, Ya., Viti, S.,
480: Tennyson, J.\ 2002, MNRAS, 330, 675
481:
482:
483: \bibitem[Hauschildt et al.(1999)]{hauschildt99} Hauschildt, P. H., Allard, F.,
484: Baron, E.\ 1999, ApJ, 512, 377
485:
486: \bibitem[Herwig (2001)]{herwig} Herwig, F.\ 2001, ApJ, 554, L71
487:
488: \bibitem[Goorvitch (1994)]{goorvitch} Goorvitch, D.\ 1994, ApJS, 95, 535
489:
490:
491: \bibitem[Harris et al. (2002)]{linepaper} Harris G. J., Polyansky O. L.,
492: Tennyson J.\ 2002, ApJ, 578, 657
493:
494: \bibitem[Harris et~al. (2003)]{paper1} Harris G. J.,
495: Pavlenko, Ya. V., Jones, H. R. A., Tennyson J.\ 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1107
496:
497: \bibitem[Harris et~al. (2006)]{paper2} Harris G. J., Tennyson J.,
498: Kaminsky B. M., Pavlenko, Ya. V., Jones, H. R. A.\ 2006, MNRAS, 367, 400.
499:
500:
501: \bibitem[Nakano et al. (1996)]{nak96}Nakano, S., Sakurai, Y., et al.\ 1996, IAU Circ. 6322
502:
503: \bibitem[Kamath \& Ashok (1999)]{kam99}Kamath, U.S., Ashok, N.M.\ 1999, MNRAS 302, 512
504:
505:
506: \bibitem[Kerber et al. (2000)]{ker00} Kerber, F., Palsa, R., K\"oppen, J., Bl\"ocker, T.,
507: Rosa, M.R.\ 2000, ESO Messenger, No. 101, 27
508:
509: \bibitem[Kimeswenger et al. (1997)]{kim97} Kimeswenger, S., Gratl, H., Kerber, F., Fouqu\'e, P.,
510: Kohle, S. Steele, S.\ 1997, IAU Circ. 6608
511:
512:
513: \bibitem[Kipper \& Klochkova (1997)]{kip97} Kipper, T.,
514: Klochkova, V.\ 1997, A\&A 324, L65
515:
516: \bibitem[Kupka et al.(1999)]{kupka99} Kupka F., Piskunov, N., Ryabchikova, T.A.,
517: Stempels, H. C., Weiss, W. W.\ 1999, A\&AS, 138, 119
518:
519: \bibitem[Kurucz (1993)]{kurucz93} Kurucz.\ 1993, CD ROM 9, 18.
520: Harvard-Smisthonian Observatory.
521:
522: \bibitem[Kurucz (1999)]{kurucz99}Kurucz, R. L.\ 1999, http://kurucz.harvard.edu
523:
524:
525: \bibitem[Myerscough \& McDowell (1966)]{Myerscough1966}
526: Myerscough, V. P., McDowell, M. R. C.\ 1966, MNRAS, 132, 457.
527:
528: \bibitem[Pavlenko (1999)]{yp1999}
529: Pavlenko Ya.V.\ 1999. Astron. Rept, 43, 94.
530:
531: \bibitem[Pavlenko (2000)]{pav00} Pavlenko, Ya.\ 2000, Astron. Rept., 44, 219
532:
533: \bibitem[Pavlenko \& D\"{u}rbeck(2002)]{phwd}
534: Pavlenko, Ya. V., Duerbeck, H. W.\ 2001a,
535: A\&A, 367, 933.
536:
537: \bibitem[Pavlenko \& D\"{u}rbeck(2002)]{pav-hwd} Pavlenko, Ya. V., D\"{u}rbeck,
538: H. W.\
539: 2001, A\&A, 367, 993
540:
541: \bibitem[Pavlenko \& Geballe(2002)]{pav-trg} Pavlenko, Ya. V., Geballe, T. R.\ 2002,
542: A\&A, 390, 621
543:
544: \bibitem[Pavlenko \& Jones(2002)]{pav-jones} Pavlenko, Ya. V., Jones, H. R. A.\
545: 2002, A\&A, 396, 967
546:
547:
548:
549: \bibitem[Pavlenko \& Zhukovska (2003)]{PZ2003}
550: Pavlenko, Ya,V., Zhukovska, S.\ 2003,
551: KFNT, 19, 28.
552:
553:
554: \bibitem[Pavlenko et al.(2003)]{pavlenko03b}
555: Pavlenko, Ya. V., Jones, H. R. A., Longmore, A. J.\ 2003b,
556: MNRAS, 345, 311.
557:
558: \bibitem[Pavlenko et al.(2003)]{P93} Pavlenko, Ya,V.\ 2003,
559: Astron. Rept., 47, 59.
560:
561:
562: \bibitem[Pavlenko et al. (2004)]{pav04}
563: Pavlenko, Ya.V., Geballe, T.R, Evans, A., Smalley, B., Eyres, S.P.S.,
564: Tyne, V.H., Yakovina, L.A.\ 2004, A\&A, 417, L39.
565:
566:
567: \bibitem[Patridge \& Schwenke (1998)]{_PS1998_} Partrige, H.,
568: Schwenke, D.J.\ 1997,
569: Chem. Phys. 106, 4618.
570:
571: \bibitem[Plez (1889)]{Plez1989_} Plez, B.\ 1998, A\&A, 337, 495.
572:
573:
574: \bibitem[Seaton et al.(1992)]{seaton} Seaton M.J., Zeippen C.J., Tully J.A.,
575: et al.\ 1992, Rev. Mexicana Astron. Astrophys., 23, 107.
576:
577: \bibitem[Sneden et~al.(1976)]{Sneden1976}
578: Sneden, C., Johnson, H. R., Krupp, B. M.\ 1976, ApJ, 204, 218.
579:
580:
581: \bibitem[Unsold (1955)]{Unsold1955} Unsold, A.\ 1955. Physik der
582: Sternatmospharen, springer Verlag, 2-nd ed.
583:
584: \bibitem[Yakovina et al. (2003)]{yak2003}
585: Yakovina, L. A., Pavlenko, Ya. V., Abia, C.\ 2003,
586: Ap\&SS, 288, 279.
587:
588:
589:
590: \end{thebibliography}
591:
592:
593: \end{document}
594: