1: \documentclass{emulateapj}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3: \usepackage{natbib}
4:
5:
6: \newcommand{\degrees}[1]{\ensuremath{#1^\circ}}
7: \newcommand\Eav{{$\left<E\right>$}}
8: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
9:
10: \slugcomment{Accepted by The Astrophysical Journal Letters}
11:
12: \shorttitle{Is PSR B0656+14 a very nearby RRAT source?}
13: \shortauthors{Weltevrede et al.}
14:
15: \begin{document}
16:
17: \title{Is pulsar B0656+14 a very nearby RRAT source?}
18:
19: \author{P. Weltevrede\altaffilmark{1}, B.~W. Stappers\altaffilmark{2,1}, J.~M. Rankin\altaffilmark{3,5} \& G.~A.~E. Wright\altaffilmark{4,5}}
20: \altaffiltext{1}{Astronomical Institute ``Anton Pannekoek'', University of Amsterdam,
21: Kruislaan 403, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands (email: {\tt wltvrede@science.uva.nl})}
22: \altaffiltext{2}{Stichting ASTRON, Postbus 2, 7990 AA Dwingeloo, The Netherlands (email: {\tt stappers@astron.nl})}
23: \altaffiltext{3}{Physics Department, 405 Cook Physical Science building,
24: University of Vermont, Burlington, 05405, USA (email: {\tt Joanna.Rankin@uvm.edu})}
25: \altaffiltext{4}{Astronomy Centre, University of Sussex, Falmer, BN1 9QJ, UK (email: {\tt G.Wright@sussex.ac.uk})}
26: \altaffiltext{5}{Visiting Astronomer, Astronomical Institute ``Anton Pannekoek'', University of Amsterdam}
27:
28: \begin{abstract}
29: The recently discovered RRAT sources are characterized by very bright
30: radio bursts which, while being periodically related, occur
31: infrequently. We find bursts with the same characteristics for the
32: known pulsar B0656+14. These bursts represent pulses from the bright
33: end of an extended smooth pulse-energy distribution and are shown to
34: be unlike giant pulses, giant micropulses or the pulses of normal
35: pulsars. The extreme peak-fluxes of the brightest of these pulses
36: indicates that PSR B0656+14, were it not so near, could only have been
37: discovered as an RRAT source. Longer observations of the RRATs may
38: reveal that they, like PSR B0656+14, emit weaker emission in addition
39: to the bursts.
40: \end{abstract}
41:
42: \keywords{stars: pulsars --- stars: individual (PSR B0656+14) --- radiation mechanism: non-thermal}
43:
44: \section{Introduction}
45:
46: \object{PSR B0656+14} is one of three nearby pulsars in the middle-age range in
47: which pulsed high-energy emission has been detected. These are
48: commonly known as ``The Three Musketeers'' \citep{bt97}, the other two
49: being Geminga and PSR B1055--52. PSR B0656+14 was included in a recent
50: extensive survey of subpulse modulation in pulsars in the northern sky
51: at the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope (WSRT) by
52: \citet{wes06}. In the single pulses analysed for this purpose, the
53: unusual nature of this pulsar's emission was very evident, especially
54: the brief, yet exceptionally powerful bursts of radio emission.
55:
56: These extreme bursts of radio emission of PSR B0656+14 are similar to
57: those detected in the recently discovered population of bursting
58: neutron stars. These Rotating RAdio Transients (RRATs;
59: \citealt{mll+06}) typically emit detectable radio emission for less
60: than one second per day, causing standard periodicity searches to fail
61: in detecting the rotation period. From the greatest common divisor of
62: the time between bursts, a period has been found for ten out of the
63: eleven sources. The periods (between 0.4 and 7 s) suggest these
64: sources may be related to the radio-quiet X-ray populations of neutron
65: stars, such as magnetars \citep{wt06} and isolated neutron stars
66: \citep{hab04}. However, \citet{ptp06} have shown that the estimated
67: formation rate of magnetars is too low. Furthermore the spectrum of
68: the only RRAT for which an X-ray counterpart has so far been detected
69: \citep{rbg+06} seems to be too cool, too thermal and too dim for a
70: magnetar, but is consistent with a cooling middle-aged neutron star
71: like PSR B0656+14
72: \citep{szk+06}. Also the pulse period and the slowdown-rate of PSR
73: B0656+14, as well as the derived surface magnetic field strength and
74: characteristic age, are within the range of measured values for RRATs.
75:
76:
77: \section{Observations}
78: \label{SctObs}
79:
80: The results in this paper are based on an archival and a new
81: observation made using the 305-meter Arecibo telescope on 20 July 2003
82: and 30 April 2005 respectively. Both observations had a
83: centre-frequency of 327 MHz and a bandwidth of 25 MHz. Almost 25,000
84: and 17,000 pulses with a sampling time of 0.5125 and 0.650 ms were
85: recorded using the Wideband Arecibo Pulsar Processor
86: (WAPP\footnote{{\tt http://www.naic.edu/{\tiny{$\!\sim$}}wapp}}) for
87: the 2003 and 2005 observation respectively. The Stokes parameters have
88: been corrected off-line for dispersion, Faraday rotation and various
89: instrumental polarization effects.
90:
91: The data were in some instances affected by Radio Frequency
92: Interference, but this could relatively easily be removed by excluding
93: the pulses with the highest root-mean-square (RMS) of the off-pulse noise
94: (about 1\% of the data in both observations) from further
95: analysis. The results derived from both observations (of which the one
96: from 2005 is relatively clean) are very similar, making us confident
97: in the results.
98:
99: The observations are not flux calibrated, but are sufficiently long to
100: get a pulse profile with high precision. From its shape it follows
101: that the peak-flux of the profile is about 17 times that of the
102: integrated flux-density over the entire pulse phase. The average flux
103: at our observing frequency is estimated to be 7.2 mJy, based on the
104: measurement of the spectral index ($-0.5$) and flux-density by
105: \citet{lylg95} at 408 MHz. Therefore the peak-flux of the profile is
106: approximately 0.12 Jy. The scintillation bandwidth of PSR B0656+14 is
107: much smaller than the observing bandwidth, so no intensity
108: fluctuations appear in the data as a function of time due to
109: interstellar scintillation.
110:
111:
112: \section{The radio bursts of PSR B0656+14}
113:
114:
115:
116: \begin{figure}
117: \epsscale{.99}
118: \plotone{f1.eps}
119: \caption{\label{Enhists}The pulse-energy distribution of
120: the 2005 observation of PSR B0656+14 (solid line) and the off-pulse
121: distribution (dashed line). The brightest pulse is about 116 times
122: stronger than the average, which is outside the plotted energy-range.}
123: \end{figure}
124:
125:
126: To characterize the bright pulses of PSR B0656+14, the pulse-energy
127: distribution is calculated (see Fig. \ref{Enhists}). In this plot the
128: energies are normalized to the average pulse-energy {\Eav}. The
129: brightest measured pulse is 116 {\Eav}, which is exceptional for
130: regular radio pulsars. Based on the energy of these pulses alone, PSR
131: B0656+14 would fit into the class of pulsars that emit so-called giant
132: pulses (e.g. \citealt{cai04}). About 0.3\% of the pulses of PSR
133: B0656+14 are brighter than 10 {\Eav}, which is the working definition
134: of giant pulses. Nevertheless, there are important differences between
135: giant pulses and the bright bursts of PSR B0656+14. The bursts of PSR
136: B0656+14 have timescales that are much longer than the nano-second
137: timescale observed for giant pulses (e.g. \citealt{spb+04,hkwe03}), do
138: not show a power-law energy-distribution, are not confined to a narrow
139: pulse window and are not associated with an X-ray component. This
140: suggests differing emission mechanisms for the classical giant pulses
141: and the bursts of PSR B0656+14. Also the possible correlation between
142: emission of giant pulses and high magnetic field strengths at the
143: light cylinder (around $10^5$ Gauss;
144: \citealt{cst+96}) clearly fails for PSR B0656+14 (766 Gauss).
145: However, giant pulses have been claimed in other (slow) pulsars that
146: also easily fail this test (e.g. \citealt{ke04,kkg+03}) and for
147: millisecond pulsars a high magnetic field strengths at the light
148: cylinder seems to be a poor indicator of the rate of emission of giant
149: pulses \citep{kbmo+06}.
150:
151: \begin{figure}
152: \epsscale{.80}
153: \plotone{f2.eps}
154: \caption{\label{lrced}
155: The dashed line is the average profile of our 2005 observation. The
156: solid line shows the ratio between the peak-flux of the brightest
157: burst at each longitude and the average peak-flux of the profile.
158: }
159: \end{figure}
160:
161: The bursts of PSR B0656+14 are even more extreme when we consider
162: their peak-fluxes (see Fig. \ref{lrced}). The highest measured
163: peak-flux of a burst is 420 times the average peak-flux of the pulsed
164: emission, which is an order of magnitude brighter than the giant
165: micropulses observed for the Vela pulsar \citep{jvkb01} and PSR
166: B1706--44 \citep{jr02}. Giant micropulses are not necessarily extreme
167: in the sense of having a large integrated energy (as required for
168: giant pulses), but their peak-flux densities are very large. Not only
169: are the bursts of PSR B0656+14 much brighter (both in peak-flux and
170: integrated energy) than those found for giant micropulses, they are
171: also not confined in pulse longitude and they do not show a power-law
172: energy-distribution as the giant pulses and micropulses do.
173:
174:
175: \begin{figure*}
176: %\epsscale{.25}
177: %\plotone{f3a.eps}
178: %\epsscale{.39}
179: %\plotone{f3b.ps}
180: %\epsscale{.35}
181: %\plotone{f3c.eps}
182: \begin{center}
183: \resizebox{!}{0.29\hsize}{\includegraphics[angle=0,trim=0 -15 0 0,clip=true]{f3a.eps}}
184: \resizebox{!}{0.29\hsize}{\includegraphics[angle=0,trim=0 -30 0 0,clip=true]{f3b.ps}}
185: \resizebox{!}{0.3\hsize}{\includegraphics[angle=0,trim=0 0 0 0,clip=true]{f3c.eps}} \vspace*{-5mm}
186: \end{center}
187: \caption{\label{megapulse}The bright radio burst detected at the
188: leading edge of the pulse profile in the 2003 observation. {\bf Left:}
189: The burst (solid line) compared with the average pulse profile (dashed
190: line). {\bf Middle:} The same burst, but now with frequency
191: resolution. The data in this plot is not de-dispersed and its
192: dispersion track matches exactly what is expected for the known
193: dispersion measure (DM) of this pulsar (dashed line). {\bf Right: }
194: The longitude-resolved energy-distribution at the longitude of the
195: peak of the strong pulse (solid line) and the off-pulse distribution
196: (dashed line). The peak-fluxes ($F_i$) are normalized to the average
197: peak-flux of the profile ($\left<F_p\right>$).}
198: \end{figure*}
199:
200: At the leading edge of the profile we detected a burst with an
201: integrated pulse-energy of $12.5\left<E\right>$. What makes this pulse
202: so special is that it has a peak-flux that is 2000 times that of the
203: average emission at that pulse longitude (left panel of
204: Fig. \ref{megapulse}). Its dispersion track exactly matches what is
205: expected for this pulsar (middle panel of Fig. \ref{megapulse}),
206: proving that this radio burst is produced by the pulsar. Notice that
207: the effect of interstellar scintillation is also clearly visible
208: (different frequency channels have different intensities) and that the
209: dispersion track is the same for the two pulses in the centre of the
210: profile. This burst demonstrates that the emission mechanism operating
211: in this pulsar is capable of producing intense sporadic bursts of
212: radio emission even at early phases of the profile. There are only two
213: bursts with a peak-flux above the noise level detected at the
214: longitude of the peak of this pulse out of the total of almost 25,000
215: pulses (see right panel of Fig. \ref{megapulse}). This implies either
216: that these two bursts belong to an extremely long tail of the
217: distribution, or that there is no emission at this longitude other
218: than such sporadic bursts.
219:
220: \section{The RRAT connection}
221:
222: It is unclear how the extreme pulses of PSR B0656+14 fit into the zoo
223: of apparently different emission types of radio pulsars. They are
224: brighter than the giant micropulses, and not constrained to a
225: particular pulse longitude and, despite being energetic enough, they
226: are too broad to be characterized as classical giant pulses. However,
227: the observational facts are that PSR B0656+14 occasionally emits
228: extremely bright bursts of radio emission which are short in
229: duration. One cannot help but see the similarities with the RRATs.
230:
231:
232: \begin{table}
233: \caption{\label{LuminositiesTable}Comparison of the peak-flux of
234: the brightest bursts of PSR B0656+14 and those of the RRATs. Here
235: $S_\mathrm{peak}$ is the peak-flux of the brightest detected burst for
236: each source, $D$ the distance and $L_\mathrm{peak}=S_\mathrm{peak}d^2$
237: the peak-luminosity of the brightest detected burst. }
238: \begin{center}
239: \begin{tabular}{lrcc}
240: \hline
241: \hline
242: Name & $S_\mathrm{peak}$ & $D$ & $L_\mathrm{peak}$ \\
243: & mJy & kpc & Jy kpc$^2$ \\
244: \hline
245: B0656+14 & 59000 & 0.288 & 4.1\\
246: J0848--43 & 100 & 5.5 & 3.0\\
247: J1317--5759 & 1100 & 3.2 & 11\\
248: J1443--60 & 280 & 5.5 & 8.5\\
249: J1754--30 & 160 & 2.2 & 0.77\\
250: J1819--1458 & 3600 & 3.6 & 47\\
251: J1826--14 & 600 & 3.3 & 6.5\\
252: J1839--01 & 100 & 6.5 & 4.2\\
253: J1846--02 & 250 & 5.2 & 6.8\\
254: J1848--12 & 450 & 2.4 & 2.6\\
255: J1911+00 & 250 & 3.3 & 2.7\\
256: J1913+1333 & 650 & 5.7 & 21\\
257: \hline
258: \end{tabular}
259: \end{center}
260: \end{table}
261:
262: One important question is whether the luminosities of the bursts of
263: the relatively nearby PSR B0656+14 (288 pc; \citealt{btg+03}) and
264: those of the RRATs are comparable (there is no indication that the
265: spatial distributions of RRATs and PSRs are different;
266: \citealt{mll+06}). The brightest burst we found in the centre of the
267: profile has a peak-flux that is 420 times the average peak-flux. With
268: an average peak-flux of 0.12 Jy (see Sect. \ref{SctObs}), this
269: corresponds to a peak flux of 50 Jy. If one compares luminosities
270: (Table \ref{LuminositiesTable}), one can see that the brightest burst
271: of PSR B0656+14 is as luminous as those of four of the eleven RRATs,
272: and therefore very typical for these sources.
273:
274:
275: It is interesting to compare not only the luminosities of the bursts,
276: but also their peak-flux distributions. Although the slope of the top
277: end of the distribution of PSR B0656+14 is in the range of the giant
278: pulses (between $-2$ and $-3$), it is better described by a lognormal
279: than by a power-law distribution. This again suggests that the bright
280: bursts of PSR B0656+14 are different from the classical giant
281: pulses. The top end of the RRAT distribution with the highest number
282: of detections seems to be harder (with a slope $-1$), but for the
283: other RRATs this is as yet unclear. For instance, the tail of the
284: distribution of PSR B0656+14 seems to be consistent with the
285: distribution of the RRAT with the second highest number of detections.
286:
287: Normal periodicity searches failed to detect the RRATs, which places
288: an upper limit on the average peak-flux density of weak pulses among
289: the detected bursts of about 1:200 \citep{mll+06}. Because the
290: brightest burst of PSR B0656+14 exceeds the underlying peak-flux by a
291: much greater factor, PSR B0656+14 could have been identified as an
292: RRAT, were it not so nearby. Were it located twelve times farther away
293: (thus farther than five of the RRATs), we estimate that only one burst
294: per hour would be detectable (the RRATs have burst rates ranging from
295: one burst every 4 minutes to one every 3 hours). The typical burst
296: duration (about 5 ms) of PSR B0656+14 also matches that of the RRATs
297: (between 2 and 30 ms).
298:
299: \begin{figure*}
300: \epsscale{0.55}
301: \plotone{f4a.ps}
302: \epsscale{0.27}
303: \plotone{f4b.ps}
304: \caption{\label{distribution}{\bf Left:} The power-spectrum of
305: the first 35 minutes of the 2005 observation of PSR B0656+14 with
306: artificially increased noise corresponding to a twelve times larger
307: distance of this pulsar. The dashed lines indicates the rotation
308: frequency of this pulsar. {\bf Right:} The brightest recorded pulse in
309: the same piece of data, again for a twelve times larger distance.}
310: \end{figure*}
311:
312: Were PSR B0656+14 twelve times more distant, the RMS of the noise
313: would increase by a factor 144 relative to the strength of the pulsar
314: signal. When we artificially add gaussian-distributed noise at this
315: level to the observation, we find no sign of the pulsar's (2.6-Hz)
316: rotation frequency in 35-minute segments of the data\footnote{For
317: telescopes with a lower sensitivity than Arecibo (e.g. Parkes) then
318: even if PSR B0656+14 were quite a bit closer it would not reveal it's
319: periodicity in a similarly long observation.} (left panel of
320: Fig. \ref{distribution}) yet the brightest pulse (right panel of
321: Fig. \ref{distribution}) is easily detected ($18\sigma$). Only in the
322: spectrum of the whole 1.8-hour observation --- which is significantly
323: longer than the continuous observations of the Parkes Multibeam Survey
324: --- is the periodicity marginally detectable. This means that a
325: distant PSR B0656+14 could only be found as a RRAT in a survey using
326: Arecibo, unless the pointings were unusually long.
327:
328: \section{Implications and discussion}
329:
330: We have shown that PSR B0656+14 could have been identified as an RRAT,
331: had it been at the typical distance of the known RRATs. We have no way
332: of telling whether its capacity to produce intense bursts of emission
333: right across its profile is related to its age, period, inclination,
334: or even its immediate galactic environment, since this behavior has
335: been found in no other pulsar. The pulse-energy distribution is not a
336: power-law, but is better fitted by a lognormal distribution and such
337: distributions are thought to be common for pulsars
338: (e.g. \citealt{cjd04}).
339:
340: In a study of 32 pulsars, \citet{rit76} found that PSR B0950+08 shows
341: the highest degree of pulse-to-pulse intensity
342: variation. Nevertheless, the brightest pulse found in an extensive
343: study of its field statistics by
344: \citet{cjd04} is approximately 5 {\Eav}. Vela does not show pulses
345: brighter than 10 {\Eav} and only 0.5\% of the pulses are brighter than
346: 3 {\Eav} \citep{jvkb01}. For PSR B0656+14 4\% of the pulses are
347: brighter than 3 {\Eav}. Therefore the emission of PSR B0656+14 appears
348: to be extremely erratic compared with both normal pulsars and pulsars
349: with giant micropulses.
350:
351: One could wonder if more known pulsars show a similar kind of sporadic
352: bright emission. To answer this question one should analyse the pulse
353: energy distribution of a sample of pulsars. A complication would be
354: that longer than typical observations are required to detect the
355: presence of a tail of strong pulses. In a large survey for subpulse
356: modulation by \citet{wes06}, this pulsar was the only pulsar that
357: showed clear evidence for this kind of sporadic emission.
358:
359: Our identification of PSR B0656+14 with RRATs implies that at least
360: some RRATs could be sources which emit pulses continuously, but over
361: an extremely wide range of energies. This is in contrast to a picture
362: (predicted by \citealt{zgd06}) of infrequent powerful pulses with
363: otherwise no emission. Therefore, if it indeed turns out that PSR
364: B0656+14 (despite its relatively short period) is a true prototype for
365: an RRAT, we can expect future studies to demonstrate that
366: RRATs emit much weaker pulses among their occasional bright bursts. We
367: would also predict that their integrated profiles will be found to be
368: far broader than the widths of the individual bursts, and will need
369: many thousands of bursts to stabilize.
370:
371: Hopefully, radio observations of RRATs will soon be able to test these
372: predictions. These, together with the detection of more RRATs and
373: potentially their high-energy counterparts, will shed light on their
374: true nature. The transient nature of these sources makes them
375: difficult to detect. However it is likely that the Galactic population
376: exceeds that of the ``normal'' radio pulsars \citep{mll+06}. Thus
377: surveys with long pointings, such as those planned with LOFAR, or many
378: observations of the same region of sky are required. Surveys at low
379: frequencies will also be more sensitive to nearer RRATs as the greater
380: degree of dispersion will allow them to be more easily distinguished
381: from radio frequency interference.
382:
383:
384:
385:
386: \acknowledgments
387:
388: GAEW and JMR thank the Netherlands Foundation for Scientific Research
389: (NWO) and the Anton Pannekoek Institute, Amsterdam, for their kind
390: hospitality, and GAEW the University of Sussex for a Visiting
391: Fellowship. Portions of this work (for JMR) were carried out with
392: support from US National Science Foundation Grants AST 99-87654 and
393: 00-98685. Arecibo Observatory is operated by Cornell University under
394: contract to the US National Science Foundation. The Westerbork
395: Synthesis Radio Telescope is operated by the ASTRON (Netherlands
396: Foundation for Research in Astronomy) with support from NWO.
397:
398:
399: \begin{thebibliography}{22}
400: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
401:
402: \bibitem[{Becker \& Tr\"{umper}(1997)}]{bt97}
403: Becker, W. \& Tr\"{umper}, J. 1997, A\&A, 326, 682
404:
405: \bibitem[{{Brisken} {et~al.}(2003){Brisken}, {Thorsett}, {Golden}, \&
406: {Goss}}]{btg+03}
407: {Brisken}, W.~F., {Thorsett}, S.~E., {Golden}, A., \& {Goss}, W.~M. 2003, ApJ,
408: 593, L89
409:
410: \bibitem[{{Cairns}(2004)}]{cai04}
411: {Cairns}, I.~H. 2004, ApJ, 610, 948
412:
413: \bibitem[{{Cairns} {et~al.}(2004){Cairns}, {Johnston}, \& {Das}}]{cjd04}
414: {Cairns}, I.~H., {Johnston}, S., \& {Das}, P. 2004, MNRAS, 353, 270
415:
416: \bibitem[{{Cognard} {et~al.}(1996){Cognard}, {Shrauner}, {Taylor}, \& {Thorse
417: tt}}]{cst+96}
418: {Cognard}, I., {Shrauner}, J.~A., {Taylor}, J.~H., \& {Thorse tt}, S.~E. 1996,
419: ApJ, 457, L81
420:
421: \bibitem[{{Haberl}(2004)}]{hab04}
422: {Haberl}, F. 2004, Advances in Space Research, 33, 638
423:
424: \bibitem[{{Hankins} {et~al.}(2003){Hankins}, {Kern}, {Weatherall}, \&
425: {Eilek}}]{hkwe03}
426: {Hankins}, T.~H., {Kern}, J.~S., {Weatherall}, J.~C., \& {Eilek}, J.~A. 2003,
427: Nature, 422, 141
428:
429: \bibitem[{Johnston \& Romani(2002)}]{jr02}
430: Johnston, S. \& Romani, R. 2002, MNRAS, 332, 109
431:
432: \bibitem[{{Johnston} {et~al.}(2001){Johnston}, {van Straten}, {Kramer}, \&
433: {Bailes}}]{jvkb01}
434: {Johnston}, S., {van Straten}, W., {Kramer}, M., \& {Bailes}, M. 2001, ApJ,
435: 549, L101
436:
437: \bibitem[{{Knight} {et~al.}(2006){Knight}, {Bailes}, {Manchester}, {Ord}, \&
438: {Jacoby}}]{kbmo+06}
439: {Knight}, H.~S., {Bailes}, M., {Manchester}, R.~N., {Ord}, S.~M., \& {Jacoby},
440: B.~A. 2006, ApJ, 640, 941
441:
442: \bibitem[{{Kramer} {et~al.}(2003){Kramer}, {Karastergiou}, {Gupta}, {Johnston},
443: {Bhat}, \& {Lyne}}]{kkg+03}
444: {Kramer}, M., {Karastergiou}, A., {Gupta}, Y., {et~al.} 2003, A\&A, 407, 655
445:
446: \bibitem[{{Kuzmin} \& {Ershov}(2004)}]{ke04}
447: {Kuzmin}, A.~D. \& {Ershov}, A.~A. 2004, A\&A, 427, 575
448:
449: \bibitem[{Lorimer {et~al.}(1995)Lorimer, Yates, Lyne, \& Gould}]{lylg95}
450: Lorimer, D.~R., Yates, J.~A., Lyne, A.~G., \& Gould, D.~M. 1995, MNRAS, 273,
451: 411
452: \bibitem[{{McLaughlin} {et~al.}(2006){McLaughlin}, {Lyne}, {Lorimer}, {Kramer},
453: {Faulkner}, {Manchester}, {Cordes}, {Camilo}, {Possenti}, {Stairs}, {Hobbs},
454: {D'Amico}, {Burgay}, \& {O'Brien}}]{mll+06}
455: {McLaughlin}, M.~A., {Lyne}, A.~G., {Lorimer}, D.~R., {et~al.} 2006, Nature,
456: 439, 817
457:
458: \bibitem[{{Popov} {et~al.}(2006){Popov}, {Turolla}, \& {Possenti}}]{ptp06}
459: {Popov}, S.~B., {Turolla}, R., \& {Possenti}, A. 2006, MNRAS, L34+
460:
461: \bibitem[{{Reynolds} {et~al.}(2006){Reynolds}, {Borkowski}, {Gaensler}, {Rea},
462: {McLaughlin}, {Possenti}, {Israel}, {Burgay}, {Camilo}, {Chatterjee},
463: {Kramer}, {Lyne}, \& {Stairs}}]{rbg+06}
464: {Reynolds}, S.~P., {Borkowski}, K.~J., {Gaensler}, B.~M., {et~al.} 2006, ApJ,
465: 639, L71
466:
467: \bibitem[{{Ritchings}(1976)}]{rit76}
468: {Ritchings}, R.~T. 1976, MNRAS, 176, 249
469:
470: \bibitem[{{Shibanov} {et~al.}(2006){Shibanov}, {Zharikov}, {Komarova}, {Kawai},
471: {Urata}, {Koptsevich}, {Sokolov}, {Shibata}, \& {Shibazaki}}]{szk+06}
472: {Shibanov}, Y.~A., {Zharikov}, S.~V., {Komarova}, V.~N., {et~al.} 2006, A\&A,
473: 448, 313
474:
475: \bibitem[{{Soglasnov} {et~al.}(2004){Soglasnov}, {Popov}, {Bartel}, {Cannon},
476: {Novikov}, {Kondratiev}, \& {Altunin}}]{spb+04}
477: {Soglasnov}, V.~A., {Popov}, M.~V., {Bartel}, N., {et~al.} 2004, ApJ, 616, 439
478:
479: \bibitem[{{Weltevrede} {et~al.}(2006){Weltevrede}, {Edwards}, \&
480: {Stappers}}]{wes06}
481: {Weltevrede}, P., {Edwards}, R.~T., \& {Stappers}, B.~W. 2006, A\&A, 445, 243
482:
483: \bibitem[{{Woods} \& {Thompson}(2006)}]{wt06}
484: {Woods}, P.~M. \& {Thompson}, C. 2006, Compact Stellar X-ray Sources (Cambridge
485: University Press), in press; astro-ph/0406133
486:
487: \bibitem[{{Zhang} {et~al.}(2006){Zhang}, {Gil}, \& {Dyks}}]{zgd06}
488: {Zhang}, B., {Gil}, J., \& {Dyks}, J. 2006, ApJL, submitted ({\tt
489: astro-ph/0601063})
490:
491: \end{thebibliography}
492:
493:
494:
495:
496:
497:
498: \end{document}
499:
500:
501: