1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \begin{document}
3: \title{Rotation of Cosmic Voids and Void-Spin Statistics}
4: \author{Jounghun Lee and Daeseong Park}
5: \affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, FPRD, Seoul National University,
6: Seoul 151-747, Korea}
7: \email{jounghun@astro.snu.ac.kr,pds2001@astro.snu.ac.kr}
8: \begin{abstract}
9: We present a theoretical study of void spins and their correlation
10: properties. The concept of the spin angular momentum for an unbound
11: void is introduced to quantify the effect of the tidal field on the
12: distribution of matter that make up the void. Both the analytical and
13: numerical approaches are used for our study.
14: Analytically, we adopt the linear tidal torque model to evaluate
15: the void spin-spin and spin-density correlations, assuming that a void forms
16: in the initial region where the inertia momentum and the tidal shear tensors
17: are maximally uncorrelated with each other. Numerically, we use the Millennium
18: run galaxy catalog to find voids and calculate their spin statistics.
19: The numerical results turn out to be in excellent agreement with the analytic
20: predictions, both of which consistently show that there are strong spatial
21: alignments between the spin axes of neighbor voids and strong
22: anti-alignments between the void spin axes and the directions to the
23: nearest voids. We expect that our work will provide a deeper insight
24: into the origin and properties of voids and the large scale structure.
25: \end{abstract}
26: \keywords{cosmology:theory --- large-scale structure of universe}
27:
28: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
29:
30: \section{INTRODUCTION}
31:
32: Recent galaxy redshift surveys \citep[e.g., 2dFGRs,][]{col-etal01}
33: have allowed us to map the universe on the largest scale ever and
34: study systematically the detailed properties of the cosmic large-scale
35: structures. It is confirmed by these surveys that the galaxies in the
36: universe are not distributed evenly but develop pattern of network
37: connected by filaments and sheets which in turn are separated by
38: immense voids.
39:
40: Voids are defined observationally as large regions with very low galaxy
41: number density and shown to occupy approximately $40\%$ of the cosmic volume
42: \citep{hoy-vog04}. The striking vastness of the observed void volumes
43: inspired a flurry of research on the origin and properties of cosmic voids
44: \citep{ela-pir97,sch-etal01,pee01,mat-whi03,ben-etal03,she-van04,hoy-vog04,
45: roj-etal04,col-etal05,hoy-etal05,got-etal05,sha-etal06}. It is now
46: generally believed that voids are originated from the local minima of
47: the primordial density fluctuations and expand faster than the rest
48: of the universe.
49:
50: The very fact that voids are extremely underdense and expand faster
51: has led many authors to assume somewhat naively that the shapes of voids
52: should be spherical. In fact previous analytical and numerical works on
53: voids are based on this assumption
54: \citep[e.g.,][]{dub-etal93,van-van93,fri-pir01,she-van04}.
55:
56: Very recently, however, \citet{sha-etal06} investigated systematically
57: the shapes of voids by applying the excursion set approach to the
58: density field in N-body simulations and demonstrated that the intrinsic
59: shapes of voids are far from spherical symmetry. They claimed that voids
60: are most vulnerable to external shears due to their low-density, so that
61: their shapes are disturbed to be nonspherical in spite of their faster
62: expansion.
63:
64: Although \citet{sha-etal06} focused on the shapes and morphology of voids,
65: we note here that if the tidal shear plays a significant role in the case of
66: voids, then it should cause not only the shapes of voids to be nonspherical
67: but also voids to acquire the spin angular momentum. Our goal here is to
68: construct an analytic model for the spin angular momentum of voids originated
69: from the tidal shear effect and test the analytic predictions against the
70: data from the recent Millennium run simulation.
71:
72: The organization of this paper is as follows. In $\S 2$, the analytic model
73: for the void spin angular momentum and the void spin correlation properties
74: are presented. In $\S 3$, the Millennium run galaxy catalog is analyzed
75: to determine void spin statistics, and the numerical results are compared
76: with the analytic predictions. In $\S 4$, the achievements and caveats of
77: our works are discussed, and a final conclusion is drawn.
78:
79: \section{THE ANALYTIC MODEL}
80:
81: Let us consider a Lagrangian region in the linear smoothed density
82: field. According to the linear tidal torque theory \citep{dor70,whi84},
83: the spin angular momentum of matter which make up this region,
84: ${\bf J}\equiv (J_{i})$, is proportional to the tensor product as
85: \begin{equation}
86: \label{eqn:ang}
87: J_{i} \propto \epsilon_{ijk}T_{jl}I_{lk},
88: \end{equation}
89: where ${\bf I}\equiv (I_{ij})$ is the inertia tensor of the region, and
90: ${\bf T}\equiv (T_{ij})$ is the local tidal tensor at the center of the mass
91: of the region defined as the second derivative of the perturbation potential
92: : $T_{ij}\equiv \partial_{i}\partial_{j}\Phi$.
93:
94: Strictly speaking, equation (\ref{eqn:ang}) gives a valid first order
95: approximation to the spin angular momentum only when the Lagrangian
96: regions correspond to bound halos. However, to quantify the effect of
97: tidal field on voids, we extend the validity of the linear tidal
98: torque theory to the case of underdense proto-void regions and define
99: the {\it spin angular momentum of a void} by equation (\ref{eqn:ang}).
100:
101: Since a void is an unbound system, its spin angular momentum has a
102: distinct meaning from that of a bound halo although defined in a
103: similar way. Basically, the spin angular momentum of a void is
104: introduced to quantify how a proto-void region reacts to the effect of
105: the local tidal force. The local tidal field will generate non-radial
106: motion of the material in the proto-void region, leading the
107: distribution of matter in the void to deviate from spherical symmetry.
108: The magnitude of the void spin angular momentum quantifies the degree
109: of this deviation, and its direction indicates the direction
110: along which the maximum deviation occurs.
111:
112: It was shown by N-body simulations that in the overdense proto-halo regions
113: the principal axes of ${\bf I}$ are in fact strongly correlated with that of
114: ${\bf T}$ \citep{lee-pen00,por-etal02}. Very recently, \citet{lee06} has
115: shown analytically that the degree of the misalignment between the principal
116: axes of ${\bf I}$ and ${\bf T}$ decreases monotonically with the linear
117: density of the region. In other words, the more underdense a region is,
118: the more misaligned the principal axes of ${\bf I}$ and ${\bf T}$ are.
119:
120: Given these numerical and analytical findings, we propose a new
121: hypothesis that a void forms from the initial underdense region where the
122: principal axes of ${\bf I}$ and ${\bf T}$ are maximally misaligned with
123: each other. This hypothesis combined with equation (\ref{eqn:ang}) leads us
124: to expect that the alignment between the void spin axes and the principal
125: axes of the local tidal tensor should be strongest for the proto-void regions.
126:
127: \citet{lee-pen00} showed that the alignment between the spin axis of a
128: Lagrangian region and the intermediate principal axes of the local tidal
129: tensor can be best quantified by calculating the expectation value of the
130: unit spin given the tidal tensor, and they derived an approximate formula
131: for it. Their original formula is characterized by a correlation parameter,
132: $c$, in the range of $[0,1]$, which was introduced to represent the degree
133: of the alignment \footnote{In the original formula, \citet{lee-pen00} used
134: a rescaled correlation parameter, $a$, which is nothing but $3/5$ times $c$.}
135: between the spin axes and the principal axes of the tidal tensors.
136: The case of maximum alignment corresponds to $c=1$ while no alignment case
137: to $c=0$. For the case of halo spins, they found $c\approx 0.3$ empirically.
138: In accordance of our hypothesis, $c=1$ for void spins.
139:
140: Now, with the value of $c$ set at unity, the formula of \citet{lee-pen00} is
141: rewritten for the case of void spins as
142: \begin{equation}
143: \label{eqn:spincorr}
144: \langle \hat{J}_{i}\hat{J}_{j}\vert\hat{\bf T}\rangle =
145: \left(\frac{1}{3} + \frac{1}{5}\right)\delta_{ij} -
146: \frac{3}{5}\hat{T}_{ik}\hat{T}_{kj},
147: \end{equation}
148: where $\hat{\bf J}\equiv{\bf J}/\vert{\bf J}\vert$ and
149: $\hat{\bf T}\equiv \tilde{\bf T}/\vert\tilde{\bf T}\vert$ with
150: $\tilde{T}_{ij}\equiv T_{ij}-\textrm{Tr}({\bf T})\delta_{ij}/3$.
151: Equation (\ref{eqn:spincorr}) indicates that the spin axes of voids
152: are spatially correlated due to the spatial correlation of the tidal
153: field. The alignments between the spin axes of neighbor void spins can be
154: quantified by the two-point spin-spin correlation function which was
155: introduced by \citet{pen-etal00} for the case of dark halos:
156: \begin{equation}
157: \label{eqn:eta}
158: \eta_{V}(r) = \langle\vert\hat{\bf J}({\bf x})\cdot
159: \hat{\bf J}({\bf x + r})\vert^{2}\rangle - \frac{1}{3}.
160: \end{equation}
161: Here, the constant $1/3$ represents the value of
162: $\langle\vert\hat{\bf J}({\bf x})\cdot\hat{\bf J}({\bf x}+{\bf r})
163: \vert^{2}\rangle$ for the case of no alignment.
164:
165: For the case of a power-law power spectrum, the void spin-spin correlation
166: function, $\eta_{V}(r)$, can be approximated \citep{pen-etal00} as
167: \begin{equation}
168: \label{eqn:spincorrft}
169: \eta_{V}(r) \approx \frac{3}{50}\frac{\xi^{2}_{R_V}(r)}{\xi^{2}_{R_V}(0)}.
170: \end{equation}
171: Here $\xi_{R_V}$ is the correlation function of the linear density
172: field smoothed on a typical Lagrangian scale of voids, defined as
173: \begin{equation}
174: \label{eqn:autocor}
175: \xi_{R_V}(r) \equiv \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\Delta^{2}(k)\frac{\sin kr}{kr}
176: W^{2}(kR_{V})d\ln k,
177: \end{equation}
178: where $\Delta^{2}(k)$ is the dimensionless power spectrum and $W(kR_{V})$
179: is the top-hat spherical filter of scale radius, $R_V$. Since voids and
180: galaxy clusters can be thought of the counterparts which are supposed to
181: form at the local minima and maxima of the initial density field,
182: respectively, we assume the typical Lagrangian scale of voids are same
183: as that of galaxy clusters, setting the value of $R_{V}$ at $8h^{-1}$Mpc.
184: Since the concordance $\Lambda$CDM cosmology is well represented by a
185: power-law power spectrum $\Delta^{2}(k)\propto k$ on the scale of
186: $8h^{-1}$Mpc, one can regard equation (\ref{eqn:eta}) as a valid
187: approximation.
188:
189: It is worth mentioning here that the misalignment between the principal
190: axes of ${\bf T}$ and ${\bf I}$ (i.e., the value of the correlation
191: parameter $c=1$) is characteristic for those underdense regions in the
192: initial density field that will eventually become voids. Although
193: the majority of the initial underdense regions will evolve into voids,
194: some underdense regions could merge into overdense region to collapse
195: rather than to become voids \citep{col-etal05}.
196:
197: \citet{lee-pen01} showed both analytically and numerically that for the
198: case of dark halos the separation vectors between the neighbor halos,
199: ${\bf r}\equiv (r_{i})$, are aligned with the major axes of the tidal tensors.
200: To quantify the degree of this alignment, \citet{lee-pen01} proposed the
201: following formula:
202: \begin{equation}
203: \label{eqn:dencorr}
204: \langle \hat{r}_{i}\hat{r}_{j}\vert\hat{\bf T}\rangle =
205: \frac{1}{3}\delta_{ij} - b\left(\frac{1}{3}\delta_{ij}-
206: \hat{T}_{ik}\hat{T}_{kj}\right),
207: \end{equation}
208: where $\hat{\bf r}\equiv {\bf r}/\vert{\bf r}\vert$ and $b$ is a correlation
209: parameter in the range of $[0,1]$. The negative sign in front of the parameter
210: $b$ indicates that $\hat{\bf r}$ is aligned with the {\it major} principal
211: axis of $\hat{\bf T}$ unlike $\hat{\bf J}$. The value of $b$ was determined
212: empirically to be approximately $0.3$ for the case of halos \citep{lee-pen01}.
213:
214: Similarly, we expect that the separation vectors between the neighbor
215: voids are aligned with the {\it minor} axes of the tidal tensors.
216: Then, equation (\ref{eqn:dencorr}) should be also true for the case of
217: voids. We assume further that $b$ has the same value of $0.3$.
218:
219: Now that the spin axes of voids are aligned with the intermediate axes
220: of the local tidal tensors (eq.[\ref{eqn:spincorr}]) while the separation
221: vectors to the nearest voids are aligned with the minor axes of the local
222: tidal tensors, one can expect that the spin axes of voids should be
223: anti-aligned with the separation vectors to the nearest voids.
224:
225: The expected spin-direction anti-alignment can be quantified by the following
226: correlation function \citep{lee-pen01}:
227: \begin{equation}
228: \label{eqn:omega}
229: \omega_{V}(r) = \langle\vert\hat{\bf J}\cdot\hat{\bf r}\vert^{2}\rangle - 1/3.
230: \end{equation}
231: It was found by \citet{lee-pen01} that for the case of small-scale galactic
232: halos equation (\ref{eqn:dencorrft}) can be approximated as
233: $RR^{\prime}/(R^{2}+R^{\prime 2})$ where $R$ is the typical Lagrangian size
234: of a galactic halo and $R^{\prime}\equiv R+r$. This approximation was made
235: under the assumption that the tidal field does not vary significantly
236: within the Lagrangian distance $r$. For the cases of large-scale voids,
237: however, this assumption may not be valid since within the void separation
238: the tidal field is likely to vary significantly. Taking into account the
239: spatial variance of the tidal field, we find that for the case of voids
240: the spin-direction correlation function is better approximated as
241: \begin{equation}
242: \label{eqn:dencorrft}
243: \omega_{V}(r) \approx
244: -\frac{3}{100}\frac{\xi^{2}_{R_V}(r)}{\xi^{2}_{R_V}(0)}.
245: \end{equation}
246:
247: \section{RESULTS FROM SIMULATIONS}
248:
249: \subsection{\it Identifying Voids}
250:
251: To test the analytic predictions made in $\S 2$, we use the Millennium
252: run galaxy catalog carried out by the Virgo Consortium \citep{spr-etal05}.
253: The catalog consists of total $8964936$ galaxies at redshift $z=0$ in a
254: periodic box of linear size $500h^{-1}$Mpc, with information on various
255: galaxy properties such as position, velocity, mass, magnitude, and
256: star formation rate.
257:
258: Voids are identified in the catalog by the void-finding algorithm described
259: in \citet[][hereafter HV02]{hoy-vog02} which was in fact first suggested by
260: \citet{ela-pir97}. To apply the HV02 algorithm to the Millennium run
261: catalog, we first determine the values of the key parameters, $l$ and $s_{c}$.
262: The two parameters, $l$ and $s_{c}$, represent the distance within
263: which a field galaxy is required not to have any three neighbors and a
264: threshold for the minimum linear size of a void, respectively.
265: For the Millennium run catalog, the key parameter values we obtain are
266: $l=2.44h^{-1}$Mpc and $s_{c}=6h^{-1}$Mpc, respectively. For the
267: detailed description of the procedures to identify voids from the
268: Millennium run catalog, see our companion paper
269: (D. Park \& J. Lee 2006 in preparation).
270:
271: The total $24037$ voids are found from the catalog. The volume $\Gamma_{V}$
272: of each void is measured by means of the Monte-Carlo integration method
273: described in HV02. The effective radius of each void is then determined
274: as $R_{e}\equiv (3\Gamma_{V}/4\pi)^{1/3}$. The mean value of $R_{e}$
275: is obtained to be $\bar{R}_{e}=10.45h^{-1}$Mpc.
276:
277: The density of each void, $\delta_{V}$, is measured by counting the number
278: of void galaxies: $\delta_{V} \equiv (n_{V}-\bar{n}_{g})/\bar{n}_{g}$ where
279: $n_{V}\equiv N_{V}/\Gamma_{V}$ is the number density of void galaxies, and
280: $\bar{n}_{g}$ is the mean number density of the total catalog galaxies.
281: Figure \ref{fig:den} plots the probability distribution of $\delta_{V}$.
282: As can be seen, the voids found in the catalog are extremely underdense
283: with the mean density $\bar{\delta}_{V}=-0.92$.
284:
285: \subsection{\it Measuring the Void Spin Angular Momentum}
286:
287: We first choose only those voids which contain more than $30$ void
288: galaxies. Total number of such voids is found to be $13507$.
289: The specific spin angular momentum, ${\bf j}$, of each selected void is
290: determined as
291: \begin{equation}
292: \label{eqn:angnum}
293: {\bf j} = \frac{1}{M_{V}}\sum_{\alpha}^{N_{V}}m_{\alpha}{\bf r}_{\alpha}
294: \times{\bf v}_{\alpha},
295: \end{equation}
296: where $m_{\alpha}$ and $M_{V}\equiv \sum_{\alpha}^{N_{V}}m_{\alpha}$ are
297: the mass of the $\alpha$-th galaxy and the total mass of all galaxies
298: in each void, respectively. The position and the velocity of the
299: $\alpha$-th void galaxy in the center of mass frame are represented
300: by ${\bf r}_{\alpha}$ and ${\bf v}_{\alpha}$, respectively. We rescale
301: this specific spin angular momentum to be dimensionless as
302: \begin{equation}
303: \label{eqn:tilj}
304: \tilde{j} \equiv \frac{j}{\sqrt{2}M_{V}R_{e}V},
305: \end{equation}
306: with $V^{2}\equiv GM_{V}/R_{e}$, which is analogous to the definition of
307: the halo spin parameter \citep{bul-etal01}. Figure \ref{fig:void}
308: illustrates a few examples of the voids identified from the catalog with
309: the directions of the void spin axes marked as short solid line on the
310: voids.
311:
312: Figure \ref{fig:log} plots the distribution of $\tilde{j}$ for the voids
313: from the catalog as histograms, which shows that $p(\tilde{j})$ has a
314: log-normal shape. We fit the following log-normal formula to the histogram
315: with adjusting the values of $\sigma_{\tilde{j}}$ and $\tilde{j}_{0}$:
316: \begin{equation}
317: \label{eqn:spindis}
318: p(\tilde{j}) = \frac{1}{\tilde{j}\sqrt{2\pi}\sigma_{\tilde{j}}}
319: \exp\left(-\frac{\ln^{2}(\tilde{j}/\tilde{j}_{0})}
320: {2\sigma^{2}_{ \tilde{j}}}\right),
321: \end{equation}
322: The best-fit values of $\sigma_{\tilde{j}}$ and $\tilde{j}_{0}$ are found to
323: be $0.72$ and $0.91$, respectively. As can be seen, the value of $\tilde{j}$
324: spreads over a large range, revealing the strong shear effect on voids.
325:
326: \subsection{\it Determining the Void Spin-Spin and Spin-Density Correlations}
327:
328: We measure the cosine of the relative angle, $\cos\theta$, between the spin
329: axes of each void pair in the catalog, and determine the average of
330: $\cos^{2}\theta$ as a function of the separation distance between the
331: two voids. For this, we also use only those voids which have more than $30$
332: galaxies. The two-point spin-spin correlation function (eq.[\ref{eqn:eta}])
333: is then determined simply by subtracting one third from the average,
334: $\langle\cos^{2}\theta\rangle$.
335:
336: Figure \ref{fig:spincorr} plots the numerical result as solid squares
337: with errors. The errors are calculated as the standard deviation of
338: $\cos^{2}\theta$ for the case of no correlation. The horizontal dotted
339: line corresponds to the case of no alignment. As can be seen, there is a
340: clear signal of alignment up to the distance of $20h^{-1}$Mpc, which is
341: almost an order of magnitude stronger compared with the case of halos.
342:
343: The analytic prediction (eq.[\ref{eqn:spincorrft}]) is also plotted
344: as solid line for comparison. As can be seen, the analytic prediction
345: is in excellent agreement with the numerical result. It is worth emphasizing
346: that the analytic prediction is not a fitting model but derived from first
347: physical principles under the assumption that voids form in the initial
348: regions where the tidal and the inertia tensors are maximally uncorrelated
349: with each other. The good agreement between the numerical result and the
350: analytical prediction supports this idea.
351:
352: In a similar manner, we also determine the void spin-direction correlation
353: function (eq.[\ref{eqn:omega}]). Figure \ref{fig:dencorr} plots the numerical
354: result as solid squares with errors. As can be seen, there is a clear
355: signal of anti-alignment between the void spin axes and the direction
356: toward the nearest neighbor voids, which is also an order of magnitude
357: stronger compared with the case of halos. The analytic prediction
358: (eq.[\ref{eqn:dencorrft}]) is also plotted as solid line for comparison.
359: We find a good agreement between the analytical and the numerical results
360: for the spin-direction correlation, too.
361:
362: \section{DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION}
363:
364: In the light of the work of \citet{sha-etal06} who claimed that
365: the tidal shear must play a strong role in case of voids, we have proposed
366: a scenario that voids are originated from the regions in the initial density
367: field whose inertia tensors are completely uncorrelated with the local
368: tidal tensors. Since the alignment between the principal axes of the
369: inertia and tidal tensors plays a role of reducing the tidal shear effect
370: according to the linear tidal torque theory, the hypothesis implies
371: that voids should have very high spin angular momentum. We define the
372: concept of the spin angular momentum for an unbound void to quantify
373: the effect of the tidal field on the distribution of matter that make
374: up voids.
375:
376: Our analytic model based on the linear tidal torque theory have
377: predicted that there is a strong spatial alignment between the spin
378: axes of neighbor voids and a strong anti-alignment between the spin
379: axes of voids and the directions to the nearest voids.
380:
381: Our predictions have been tested against the Millennium run galaxy catalog
382: where $13507$ large voids with more than $30$ galaxies are identified.
383: We have measured numerically the distribution and correlation functions
384: of void spins, and found that the predictions of our analytic model are in
385: excellent agreement with the numerical results.
386:
387: The success of our work is, however, subject to a couple of caveats.
388: The first caveat comes from our implicit assumption that the matter
389: voids are same as the galaxy voids. In our analytic model, we consider
390: the matter voids. While in the numerical analysis we deal with the galaxy
391: voids. Although the two types of voids are not necessarily same,
392: they should be at least closely correlated with each other.
393:
394: The second caveat lies in the fact that there is no standard way to
395: identify voids. Unlike the case of halo-finding, the use of different
396: algorithms could produce different results for some properties of voids.
397: Especially, the shapes and volumes of voids can differ significantly by the
398: underlying criterion of the void-finding algorithm. If one use an algorithm
399: which regards a void as a spherical region of low density, then all voids
400: found by that algorithm would be spherical.
401: In spite of this ambiguity in finding voids, we expect that our result
402: on the correlation properties of the void spin angular momentum would not
403: change significantly by the different choice of the void finding algorithm,
404: since the correlation properties are basically determined not by the shapes
405: of voids but by the galaxies in voids.
406:
407: Another issue we would like to discuss here is a possibility of
408: testing numerically our key assumption that a void forms in the
409: initial underdense region where the misalignment between the principal
410: axes of the inertia and the tidal tensors becomes maximum. Although
411: \citet{lee06} has already shown analytically that our assumption is
412: true, it would be highly desirable to test it against numerical data from the
413: Millennium run simulation. For this, it would be necessary to find the
414: Lagrangian positions of all the particles that make up each void and
415: to determine the inertia momentum tensor of each Lagrangian proto-void
416: region in the principal axis frame of the initial tidal field. As
417: the initial density field of the Millennium run simulation is not
418: available to the public yet, the numerical test of our assumption is
419: postponed. We hope to report the test result elsewhere in the future.
420:
421: Finally, we conclude that our work on void spins will provide a deeper
422: insight into the origin and properties of the large scale structure in
423: the universe.
424:
425: \acknowledgments
426:
427: We thank the anonymous referee for helpful suggestions.
428: The Millennium Run simulation used in this paper was carried out by the Virgo
429: Supercomputing Consortium at the Computing Center of the Max-Planck Society
430: in Garching. The semi-analytic galaxy catalogue is publicly available at
431: http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/galform/agnpaper. This work is supported by
432: the research grant No. R01-2005-000-10610-0 from the Basic Research Program
433: of the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation.
434:
435:
436: \begin{thebibliography}{100}
437: \bibitem[Benson et al.(2003)]{ben-etal03}
438: Benson, A. J., Hoyle, F., Torres, F., Vogeley, M. S. 2003, \mnras, 340, 160
439: \bibitem[Bullock et al.(2001)]{bul-etal01}
440: Bullock, J. S., Dekel, A., Kolatt, T. S., Kravtsov, A. V., Klypin, A. A.,
441: Porciani, C. \& Primack, J. R. 2001, \apj, 555, 240
442: \bibitem[Colberg et al.(2005)]{col-etal05}
443: Colberg J. M., Sheth R. K., Diaferio A., Gao L., \& Yoshida N. 2005,
444: \mnras, 360, 216
445: \bibitem[Colless et al.(2001)]{col-etal01}
446: Colless et al. 2001, \mnras, 328, 1039
447: \bibitem[Davis et al.(1985)]{dav-etal85}
448: Davis, M., Efstathious, G., Frenk, C. S., \& white, S. D. M., 1985, \apj,
449: 292, 371
450: \bibitem[Doroshkevich(1970)]{dor70}
451: Doroshkevich, A. G. 1970, astrofizika, 6, 581
452: \bibitem[Dubinski et al.(1993)]{dub-etal93}
453: Dubinski, J., da Costa, L. N., Goldwirth, D. S., Lecar, M., \&
454: Piran, T. 1993, \apj, 410, 458
455: \bibitem[El-Ad \& Piran(1997)]{ela-pir97}
456: El-Ad, H., \& Piran, T. 1997, \apj, 491, 421
457: \bibitem[Rriedmann \& Piran(2001)]{fri-pir01}
458: Friedmann, Y., \& Piran, T. 2001, \apj, 548, 1
459: \bibitem[Gottl\"{o}ber et al.(2005)]{got-etal05}
460: Gottl\"{o}ber, S., Lokas, E. L., Klypin, A., \& Hoffman, Y. 2003,
461: \mnras, 344, 715
462: \bibitem[Hoyle et al.(2005)]{hoy-etal05}
463: Hoyle, F., Rojas, R., Vogeley, M. S., \& Brinkmann, J. 2005, \apj,
464: 620, 618
465: \bibitem[Hoyle \& Vogeley(2002)]{hoy-vog02}
466: Hoyle, F., \& Vogeley, M. S. 2002, \apj, 566, 641
467: \bibitem[Hoyle \& Vogeley(2004)]{hoy-vog04}
468: Hoyle, F., \& Vogeley, M. S. 2004, \apj, 607, 751
469: \bibitem[Icke(1984)]{ick84}
470: Icke V. 1984, \mnras, 206, 1
471: \bibitem[Lee \& Pen(2000)]{lee-pen00}
472: Lee, J. \& Pen, U. L. 2000, \apj, 532, L5
473: \bibitem[Lee \& Pen(2001)]{lee-pen01}
474: Lee, J. \& Pen, U. L. 2001, \apj, 555, 106
475: \bibitem[Lee(2006)]{lee06}
476: Lee, J. 2006, \apj, 644, L5
477: \bibitem[Little \& Weinberg(1994)]{lit-wei94}
478: Little B., \& Weinberg D. H. 1994, MNRAS, 267, 605
479: \bibitem[Mathis \& White(2003)]{mat-whi03}
480: Mathis, H., \& White, S. D. M. 2003, \mnras, 337, 1193
481: \bibitem[Patiri et al.(2004)]{pat-etal04}
482: Patiri, S. G., Betancort-Rijo, J. E., \& Prada, F. 2004, preprint
483: (astro-ph/0407513)
484: \bibitem[Peebles(2001)]{pee01}
485: Peebles, P. J. E. 2001, \apj, 557, 495
486: \bibitem[Pen et al.(2000)]{pen-etal00}
487: Pen, U.L., Lee, J., \& Seljak, U. 2000, \apj, 543, L107
488: \bibitem[Plionis et al.(2002)]{pli-etal02}
489: Plionis, M., \& Basilakos, S. 2002, \mnras, 330, 399
490: \bibitem[Porciani et al.(2002)]{por-etal02}
491: Porciani, C., Dekel, A., \& Hoffman, Y. 2002, \mnras, 332, 339
492: \bibitem[Rojas et al.(2004)]{roj-etal04}
493: Rojas, R. R., Vogeley, M. S., Hoyle, F., \& Brinkmann, J. 2004,
494: \apj, 617, 50
495: \bibitem[Rojas et al.(2005)]{roj-etal05}
496: Rojas, R. R., Vogeley, M. S., Hoyle, F., \& Brinkmann, J. 2005,
497: \apj, 624, 571
498: \bibitem[Sahni et al.(1996)]{sah-etal96}
499: Sahni, V., \& Shandarin, S. 1996, MNRAS, 282, 641
500: \bibitem[Schmidt et al.(2001)]{sch-etal01}
501: Schmidt, J. D., Ryden B. S., \& Melott A. L. 2001, \apj, 546, 609
502: \bibitem[Shandarin et al.(2006)]{sha-etal06}
503: Shandarin, S., Feldman, H. A., Heitmann, K., \& Habib, S. 2006,
504: \mnras, 367, 1629
505: \bibitem[Sheth \& van de Weygaert(2004)]{she-van04}
506: Sheth, R. K., \& van de Weygaert, R. 2004, \mnras, 350, 517
507: \bibitem[Springel et al.(2005)]{spr-etal05}
508: Springel, V. et al. 2005, \nat , 435, 629
509: \bibitem[Strauss et al.(2002)]{str-etal02}
510: Strauss, et al. 2002, \apj, 124, 1810
511: \bibitem[White(1984)]{whi84}
512: White, S. D. M. 1984, \apj, 286, 38
513: \bibitem[Van de Weygaert \& Van Kampen(1993)]{van-van93}
514: Van de Weygaert, R., \& Van Kampen, E. 1993, \mnras, 263, 481
515: \end{thebibliography}
516:
517:
518: \clearpage
519: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
520: \begin{figure}
521: \begin{center}
522: \plotone{f1.eps}
523: \caption{Void density distribution measured from the Millennium run galaxy
524: catalog.}
525: \label{fig:den}
526: \end{center}
527: \end{figure}
528: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
529:
530: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
531: \begin{figure}
532: \begin{center}
533: \plotone{f2.eps}
534: \caption{Examples of the voids identified in the Millennium run galaxy
535: catalog. The straight line on each void represents the spin axis.}
536: \label{fig:void}
537: \end{center}
538: \end{figure}
539: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
540:
541: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
542: \begin{figure}
543: \begin{center}
544: \plotone{f3.eps}
545: \caption{Distribution of the rescaled spin angular momentum of voids.
546: The histogram represents the result from the Millennium run simulation while
547: the solid line is the log-normal fit (eq.[\ref{eqn:spindis}]).}
548: \label{fig:log}
549: \end{center}
550: \end{figure}
551: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
552: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
553: \begin{figure}
554: \begin{center}
555: \plotone{f4.eps}
556: \caption{Void spin-spin correlation function (eq.[\ref{eqn:eta}]).
557: The solid squares with errors represent the result from the Millennium
558: run simulation while the solid line is the analytic prediction
559: (eq.[\ref{eqn:spincorrft}]). The horizontal dotted line corresponds to
560: the case of no alignment.}
561: \label{fig:spincorr}
562: \end{center}
563: \end{figure}
564: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
565: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
566: \begin{figure}
567: \begin{center}
568: \plotone{f5.eps}
569: \caption{Void spin-density correlation function (eq.[\ref{eqn:omega}]).
570: The solid squares with errors represent the result from the Millennium run
571: simulation while the solid line is the analytic prediction
572: (eq.[\ref{eqn:dencorrft}]). The horizontal dotted line corresponds to the
573: case of no alignment.}
574: \label{fig:dencorr}
575: \end{center}
576: \end{figure}
577: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
578: \end{document}
579: