1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18:
19: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
20:
21: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
22:
23: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
24:
25: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
26:
27: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
28:
29: %% Sometimes a paper's abstract is too long to fit on the
30: %% title page in preprint2 mode. When that is the case,
31: %% use the longabstract style option.
32:
33: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
34:
35: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
36: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
37: %% the \begin{document} command.
38: %%
39: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
40: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
41: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
42: %% for information.
43:
44: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
45: \newcommand{\myemail}{mikako@optik.mtk.nao.ac.jp}
46:
47: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
48:
49: \slugcomment{}
50:
51: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
52: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
53: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
54: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
55: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
56: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
57:
58: \shorttitle{ The compact circumstellar material around
59: OH~231.8+4.2}
60: \shortauthors{Matsuura et al.}
61:
62: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
63: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
64:
65: \begin{document}
66:
67: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
68: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
69: %% you desire.
70:
71: \title{The compact circumstellar material around
72: OH~231.8+4.2\footnote{
73: Based on observations made with the VLT and
74: the VLTI (Project numbers 065.L-0395, 072.D-0766 and 074.D-0405)} }
75:
76: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
77: %% author and affiliation information.
78: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
79: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
80: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
81: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
82:
83: \author{M.~Matsuura\altaffilmark{2,3,4},
84: O.~Chesneau\altaffilmark{5},
85: A.A.~Zijlstra\altaffilmark{2},
86: W.~Jaffe\altaffilmark{6},
87: L.B.F.M.~Waters\altaffilmark{7,8},
88: J.~Yates\altaffilmark{9},
89: E.~Lagadec\altaffilmark{2},
90: T.~Gledhill\altaffilmark{10},
91: S.~Etoka\altaffilmark{2},
92: and A.M.S.~Richards\altaffilmark{11}
93: }
94: %\affil{Astronomy Department, University of California,
95: % Berkeley, CA 94720}
96:
97: %\author{C. D. Biemesderfer\altaffilmark{4,5}}
98: %\affil{National Optical Astronomy Observatories, Tucson, AZ 85719}
99: %\email{aastex-help@aas.org}
100: %\and
101: %\author{R. J. Hanisch\altaffilmark{5}}
102: %\affil{Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD 21218}
103:
104: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
105: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
106: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
107: %% affiliation.
108:
109: \altaffiltext{2}{School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester,
110: P.O. Box 88, Manchester M60 1QD, UK}
111: \altaffiltext{3}{School of Mathematics and Physics,
112: Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK}
113: \altaffiltext{4}{National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Osawa 2-21-1,
114: Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan}
115: \altaffiltext{5}{Observatoire de la C\^{o}te d'Azur,
116: Avenue Copernic, F-06130, Grasse, France}
117: \altaffiltext{6}{Leiden Observatory, P.B. 9513, Leiden 2300 RA, The Netherlands}
118: \altaffiltext{7}{Astronomical Institute `Anton Pannekoek', University of Amsterdam,
119: Kruislaan 403, 1098 SJ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands}
120: \altaffiltext{8}{Instituut voor Sterrenkunde, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven,
121: Celestijnenlaan 200B, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium}
122: \altaffiltext{9}{University College London, Gower street, London, WC1E 6BT,
123: UK}
124: \altaffiltext{10}{Centre for Astrophysics Research,
125: Science and Technology Research Institute, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane,
126: Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9AB, UK}
127: \altaffiltext{11}{Jodrell Bank Observatory, University of Manchester,
128: Jodrell Bank, Cheshire SK11 9DL, UK}
129:
130: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
131: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
132: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
133: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
134: %% editorial office after submission.
135:
136: \begin{abstract}
137: We have observed the bipolar post-AGB candidate OH 231.8+4.2, using
138: the mid-infrared interferometer MIDI and the infrared camera with the
139: adaptive optics system NACO on the Very Large Telescope. An unresolved
140: core ($<$200~mas in FWHM) is found at the center of the OH\,231.8+4.2
141: in the 3.8~$\mu$m image. This compact source is resolved with the
142: interferometer.
143: We used two 8-meter telescopes with four different
144: baselines, which cover projected baseline lengths from 62 to 47 meters,
145: and projected position angles from 112 to 131 degrees that are almost
146: perpendicular to the bipolar outflow. Fringes from 8 to 9~$\mu$m and
147: from 12 to 13.5~$\mu$m were clearly detected, whilst the strong
148: silicate self-absorption allows only marginal detection of
149: visibilities between 9 and 12~$\mu$m. The fringes from the four
150: baselines consistently show the presence of a compact circumstellar
151: object with an inner radius of 30--40~mas, which is equivalent to
152: 40--50 AU at 1.3~kpc. This clearly shows that the mid-infrared
153: compact source is not the central star (3~AU) but circumstellar
154: material. The measured size of the circumstellar material is
155: consistent with the size of such disks calculated by hydrodynamic
156: models, implying the circumstellar material may have a disk
157: configuration.
158:
159: \end{abstract}
160:
161:
162:
163: \keywords{ stars: AGB -- post-AGB
164: stars: mass loss --
165: (ISM:) dust, extinction
166: ISM: jets and outflows --
167: Infrared: stars --- }
168:
169: %________________________________________________________________
170:
171:
172: \maketitle
173: \section{Introduction}
174: Low and medium mass stars ($\sim$1--8 $M_{\sun}$ on the main
175: sequence) experience an intensive mass-loss phase during the Asymptotic
176: Giant Branch (AGB) phase. Typically, the AGB wind is spherically symmetric.
177: However, during the next evolutionary stages, i.e., the post-AGB
178: phase and the planetary nebula (PN) phase, a high fraction of stars
179: show asymmetric shapes in their circumstellar envelopes, such as
180: elliptical and bipolar. One of the hypotheses about the formation of the
181: bipolar shape invokes a binary disk scenario \citep{Balick02,
182: VanWinckel03}. Part of the material lost during the intensive AGB
183: mass-loss wind is trapped in the binary system, and a circumbinary disk is
184: formed in the plane of the binary orbit.
185: The disk restricts the direction of the low
186: density but high velocity post-AGB and PN wind in the equatorial
187: plane, and focuses the wind towards two poles. The size of the binary
188: disk will be small \citep[less than 100 AU (80~mas for our
189: target);][]{Mastro99}, and so requires interferometric observations to
190: be resolved.
191:
192: \object{OH 231.8+4.2} (IRAS~07399$-$1435; RA 07h42m16.83s Dec
193: $-$14d42m52.1s; hereafter OH~231) is one of the well studied post-AGB
194: candidates. TiO bands are detected from the central region,
195: suggesting the central star exhibits a M9 spectral type \citep{Cohen81}.
196: \citet{SanchezContreras04} claimed
197: the presence of a spectroscopic binary from optical spectra, because in addition to TiO
198: and VO bands from the M-type star, Balmer lines and continuum excess
199: are detected. OH~231 is probably located in the open cluster, M~46
200: \citep{Jura85}, thus the distance is relatively well determined (1.3
201: kpc).
202:
203: The outflow is strongly bipolar, and bubbles and
204: shocked regions are found in the outflow \citep[e.g.][]{Bujarrabal02}.
205: L-, N- and Q-band seeing-limited images show an unresolved core at
206: the center of this object \citep{Kastner92, Jura02}. The infrared
207: color of this compact source is extremely red, and it is believed
208: to be a dusty disk \citep{Jura02}. The velocity structure of
209: SiO masers also suggest the presence of a rotating disk around this
210: compact source \citep{SanchezContreras02}.
211: The OH masers appear to be associated with an expanding torus
212: \citep{Zijlstra01}.
213:
214: In this paper
215: we present both high resolution infrared (IR) images and
216: and mid-IR interferometeric visibilities of the
217: central compact source, so as to resolve the
218: compact source at the center and so as to determine if this source is a disk.
219:
220: \section{ Observations and Analysis}
221:
222: OH\,231 was observed with the MID-infrared Interferometric instrument
223: \citep[MIDI;][]{Leinert03} on the Very Large Telescopes (VLTs) on 2005
224: March 2nd (UT), using the telescopes Melipal and Yepun.
225: The observing log is summarized in Table~\ref{table-log}.
226: From these observing runs, we also obtained acquisition images (single dish)
227: with the adaptive optics (AO) system, spectro-photometric data, and
228: visibilities (correlated fluxes) for each baseline.
229:
230:
231:
232: The data reduction software packages
233: MIA and EWS
234: \citep{Jaffe04, Chesneau05a} were used to reduce the spectra and
235: visibilities. To estimate errors in the visibility data
236: the MIA visibilities were extracted with three
237: different thresholds of noise level, and the difference in the
238: visibilities between these thresholds are counted as errors.
239: The difference between visibilities due to the choice of the calibration
240: data was counted as a systematic error, and added to the errors derived above.
241: The EWS visibilities are slightly higher than the MIA ones but well within
242: error bars.
243:
244: For spectro-photometry, we used \cite{Cohen99}'s templates of HD~139127
245: (K4.5III) for HD~50778 (K4III) and of HD~180711 (G9III) for HD~61935
246: (G9III), and scaled the flux to IRAS 12~$\mu$m measurements. The
247: spectro-photometric error bars were estimated from eight calibrated
248: spectra recorded.
249:
250: We observed OH~231 with the AO system and the
251: infrared camera NACO \citep{Rousset03, Lenzen03} on theVLT
252: on the 2004 March 6th (UT).
253: %The weather was clear.
254: The exposure time was 7.5~min for NB2.12 and 4.8~min (positive image
255: only) for L'-band, respectively. Both filters measure
256: continuum emission. The NB2.12 filter ($\lambda_{\rm c}$=2.122~$\mu$m
257: and $\Delta \lambda$=0.022~$\mu$m) is designed to detect H$_2$ 1--0 S(1)
258: line, however, our spectroscopic observations using ISAAC/VLT show no
259: detection of this line, and the NB2.12 band measured continuum emission,
260: probably scattered light. We used the S27 and L27 cameras (a pixel
261: scale of 27~mas). The central wavelength is 3.80~$\mu$m and the width
262: is 0.62~$\mu$m for L'-band. The wave-front sensor was used in visible
263: light provided by an AO reference star ($V$=14.2~mag) approximately
264: 35\,arcsec away from the central compact object, giving a Strehl
265: ratio of about 30~\% at 2.12~$\mu$m. An ND filter was used for
266: the L'-band observations, which reduces the energy by 1.5--2~\%. The
267: jitterring technique was used to minimize the effect of hot pixels and
268: the sky background was estimated from a medium of jitterred frames
269: with different positions. A chopping technique was used during the L'-band
270: observations with a throw of 10 arcsec to the east and the
271: west.
272:
273: MERLIN Phase-referenced observations of the 1667~MHz OH maser line
274: have been obtained on the 2005 April 25th, using a velocity
275: resolution of 0.7~km\,s$^{-1}$.
276: The observations covered
277: the velocity range,
278: from $v_{\rm LSR}$=$-$20 to +80\,km\,s$^{-1}$.
279: The angular resolution is about 0.2 arcsec. The data were reduced
280: using AIPS. Velocity maps were obtained by calculating moment maps.
281: The systemic velocity is about 35~km\,s$^{-1}$ \citep{Zijlstra01}.
282:
283: \section{Data description and interpretation}
284:
285: Fig.~\ref{Fig-NACO} shows NACO NB2.12 and L'-band images of OH~231.
286: The central region is still obscured in NB2.12 image and the bipolar
287: outflow is brighter. On the other hand, in L'-band the central region
288: is brighter than the outflow. This shows that this central region has
289: a very red color, because this region is obscured by extremely high
290: optical depth and/or because it has a very cold temperature, as
291: suggested by previous infrared observations \citep{Kastner92,
292: Bujarrabal02}.
293:
294: In the NB2.12-band image, the central region consists of patchy clouds (blobs)
295: which were also seen in the near-infrared HST images \citep{Bujarrabal02,
296: Meakin03}.
297: A smooth $\sim
298: 1\times$1~arcsec$^2$ trapezium-shape cloud with a bright central core
299: is found in the L'-band image (Fig.~\ref{Fig-NACO} (c)).
300: This trapezium has
301: an elongation towards the north-west direction. This shape
302: resembles images at 11.7 and 17.9~$\mu$m obtained with the Keck~I
303: \citep{Jura02}.
304:
305: Inside the trapezium cloud in the L'-band image, there is a bright
306: point-like source. The NACO observations were unable to resolve the
307: source,
308: suggesting the source size $<0.20\times 0.17$~arcsec$^2$ (FWHM).
309: This provides a more stringent limit than
310: \citet{Jura02}, who reported an unresolved source with a dimension of
311: $\sim 1\times1$arcsec$^2$ at 11$\mu$m.
312: We also our MIDI single-dish acquisition images at
313: 8.7$\mu$m using the AO system (about 0.25~arcsec resolution) also did not
314: resolve the bright point-like source.
315:
316: Fig.~\ref{Fig-spec} shows mid-infrared spectra of OH~231.8+4.2,
317: obtained with MIDI. This spectrum shows the flux detected from the
318: compact source only.
319: There is a strong
320: silicate absorption from 9--11~$\mu$m, however, the flux is not completely
321: zero and is $\sim$1~Jy. The silicate absorption band is broad for this source.
322: \citet{Gillett76} and IRAS LRS
323: observations show 43 and 30~Jy at 8~$\mu$m, respectively and
324: \citet{Meixner99} reported 25 Jy at 8.8~$\mu$m, while our flux is
325: 9~Jy at 8~$\mu$m. Our spectra are from
326: small core region (about 0.5$\times$0.3~arcsec$^2$), whereas other measurements
327: for this object
328: are from more extended regions, up to 2$\times$5~arcsec$^2$ \citep{Jura02}.
329: Variability at mid-infrared is known for this object \citep{Jura02}
330: but is not the major reason of the flux discrepancy.
331:
332:
333: We detected fringes with MIDI from `the red and point-like source'
334: found in the near- and mid-infrared images.
335: Fig.~\ref{Fig-correlated-flux} shows the correlated flux obtained with
336: MIDI. Correlated flux is clearly recorded below 9~$\mu$m and above
337: 11~$\mu$m, but there is only a marginal detection ($\sim$0.1~mJy) at
338: 9--11~$\mu$m. At the wavelength covering the silicate absorption, the
339: visibilities are small, either because the flux level from this infrared
340: source is too low or because the source is extended at this wavelength
341: range.
342:
343:
344: The visibility data are interpreted in the frame of a smooth Gaussian
345: profile, as described by \citet{Leinert04}. The assumption of a
346: Gaussian profile is appropriate if the object is optically thin
347: or mildly optically thick. Fig.~\ref{Fig-gauss} shows radii for the
348: Gaussian (given in terms of the `half' width of the half maximum; HWHM) required to reproduce the
349: observed visibilities at each wavelength. We clearly see that the
350: structure is resolved on the 30--45 mas scale. At the distance of
351: 1.3~kpc \citep{Jura02}, the radii are about 40--50~AU, as displayed on
352: the right side of the y-axis in Fig.~\ref{Fig-gauss}.
353:
354: The position angles of these four baselines vary by only 15 degrees.
355: The observed differences in the correlated flux between the four
356: baselines as seen in Fig.~\ref{Fig-correlated-flux} are mainly due to
357: the baseline length, rather than any asymmetry in the object. This is
358: confirmed by the absence of a significant dependence of the
359: Gaussian radii on the baseline lengths at each wavelength point
360: (Fig.~\ref{Fig-gauss}). These correlated fluxes are therefore resolving
361: structures on scales of 60--80 mas in FWHM.
362:
363:
364: Fig.~\ref{Fig-NACO} (d) presents the velocity distribution
365: of the 1667~MHz maser emission in m\,s$^{-1}$
366: detected by MERLIN.
367: The OH maser data are overplotted on the ISAAC/VLT L'-band image
368: %(this makes use of the excellent astrometry of the MERLIN and VLT data).
369: It shows a clear velocity gradient along
370: the torus-like maser distribution. Only blue shifted velocities
371: were detected by MERLIN.
372:
373:
374: \section{ Discussion}
375:
376: Our L'-band and N-band images
377: using the AO system find an unresolved compact object in the center
378: with dimension less
379: than 200~mas. This object has a red color and consists of
380: circumstellar material. This circumstellar material is responsible
381: for the fringes detected by mid-infrared interferometer.
382:
383: There are other emission mechanisms which can cause correlated flux in
384: the mid-infrared, such as (1) the central star and (2) the central
385: star + binary companion(s), but we can exclude these possibilities.
386: First, the correlated flux of a single star with a radius 3~AU
387: \citep{SanchezContreras02} at 1.3~kpc (2.3~mas) is almost 100~\% of
388: the total flux (i.e. unresolved) with current baseline lengths. The
389: observed fringes indicate a much larger source size. Using the
390: parameters of the central star from \citet{Jura02} ($T_{\rm
391: eff}=2500$~K, radius of $4.6\times10^{13}$~cm), the flux of the
392: central star is $\sim$6~Jy at 10~$\mu$m, thus the
393: correlated flux should also be $\sim$6~Jy on any baseline. The
394: measured values are inconsistent with the expected correlated flux;
395: the flux drops to 0.1--0.2~Jy for the longest baseline.
396: Thus, the measured visibilities are not from the central star.
397: Second, the silicate absorption is detected in correlated flux,
398: which shows the circumstellar origin of the mid-infrared compact
399: source. Although the presence of a binary companion has been
400: suggested by \citet{SanchezContreras04}, it is unlikely that
401: we measured the orbit of the binary companion around the central star,
402: nor the radius of the binary companion. A sharp angular dependence
403: of visibilities would be expected in the orbit case, which is not
404: detected (Fig.~\ref{Fig-gauss}). The possibility of the binary
405: companion radius is ruled out because the flux
406: would be 1~mJy level at 1.3~kpc if the companion is an A0V star
407: \citep{SanchezContreras04}. Therefore, the MIDI visibilities are due to
408: dusty circumstellar material. The absence of stellar emission in
409: the correlated flux suggests this material is still optically thick at
410: 10~$\mu$m.
411:
412: \citet{Jura02} analyzed the spectral energy distribution of this
413: object and argued that the mid-infrared unresolved source is a disk.
414: \citet{SanchezContreras02} measured the
415: velocity distribution of SiO maser lines. The SiO masers show
416: the presence of a rotating disk, within 4~mas from the star.
417: \citet{Zijlstra01} find that OH velocity structure could be viewed as an
418: expanding torus, with an additional component from a bipolar,
419: ballistic outflow.
420:
421: Our NACO images also suggest the presence of a disk or torus. The
422: central region in the L'-band shows a trapezium shape: this may be
423: interpreted as a flared outflow from a torus or a disk. The trapezium
424: shape is also seen in the NB2.12 image. The small blobs
425: seen in the trapezium cloud of NB2.12 image, is probably due to
426: non-uniform extinction within the flared disk, or an illusion caused by
427: scattered light. The north part of the `trapezium region' is
428: brighter than other regions in NB2.12, possibly because the disk is
429: slightly inclined with the northern part nearer to the earth.
430:
431:
432: The obtained size of the dense circumstellar material is at least
433: 40--50 AU. The optical depth from our preliminary analysis using
434: {\it DUSTY} \citep{Ivezic97} suggests $\tau_{\rm{8\mu m}}$=1.6 and $\tau_{\rm{13~\mu
435: m}}$=2.7, showing the actual inner radius is smaller than the values
436: which we measured. Nevertheless, if the density distribution is
437: $\rho=\rho_0 (r/r_0)^{-\alpha}$ where $\alpha=1$--2, the optical depth
438: increases dramatically for closer inner radii, and the
439: measured size need not be that different from the
440: actual inner radius of the dusty shell or torus. The hydrodynamic
441: model of \citet{Mastro99} shows that an accretion disk with a radius of
442: 40--50 AU can be formed in a binary disk. The co-incidence of the
443: radii from the theory and the observations implies that the circumstellar
444: material is shaped as a disk or torus in this object.
445:
446:
447: On the other hand, \citet{Jura02} assumed a binary companion with an
448: orbit of 3--~5~AU for OH 231, and the inner radius of the disk might be
449: $\sim 1.7$ larger than the companion orbit, which should be 5--9~AU.
450: Our measured inner radius is much larger than \citet{Jura02}'s
451: assumption. This may be because the companion is actually further out
452: than expected because the central star is larger than expected by
453: \citet{Jura02}, or because our mid-infrared measurements observe the
454: radius at which disk has cooled down enough to allow dust to
455: condense out of the gas phase.
456: An alternative
457: solution could be that the disk is gradually expanding and losing
458: momentum, and at the time of the formation, the disk could be much smaller
459: than the current size. In conclusion, we measured the angular size of the
460: circumstellar material in OH~231to be 40--50~AU, and this material is
461: probably in a disk or toroidal configuration. Future MIDI observations with
462: different baseline angles are required to confirm the presence of a
463: disk like structure and to measure its inclination angle.
464:
465:
466: The OH masers are located to the south and east, within the darker lane seen
467: in the L'-band image, and trace the waist of the trapezium, allowing
468: for orientation effects. Only foreground (blue-shifted) OH is seen:
469: the red emission appears to be more extended and is not picked up by
470: the MERLIN interferometer, while the blue emission consist of more
471: compact components.
472: The velocity field shows a clear gradient in the southern part of
473: the maser spots,
474: with $v_{\rm LRS}$=20--30\,km\,s$^{-1}$ on the east and west edge and
475: the bluest component ($v_{\rm LRS}$=10\,km\,s$^{-1}$) in the middle.
476: It is inconsistent with an
477: expanding torus, but is consistent if we observe the blue-shifted rim
478: of a biconical outflow tilted towards us. Thus, the dynamics of the
479: source change from a rotating disk in the very centre, within a few
480: stellar radii, to a conical outflow at $\sim$1000~AU. The stellar
481: position estimated by the
482: the SiO maser tracing an equatorial rotating torus
483: \citep{SanchezContreras02} coincides with the central position of the
484: blue-shifted ($\sim$0--5\,km\,s$^{-1}$) biconical distribution seen in OH.
485:
486:
487: All the components of the binary disk hypothesis \citep{Balick02,
488: VanWinckel03} may therefore be present in OH~231.8+4.2: a rotating SiO maser disk
489: very close to the central star, a compact circumstellar material at $\sim$40--50~AU
490: which may have a disk-like distribution, and a bipolar outflow.
491:
492:
493:
494: \acknowledgements
495: We appreciate the ESO staff for their support.
496: M.M. and E.L. are supported by PPARC, and S.E. by ESO.
497: M.M. acknowledges hospitality at
498: Observatoire de la C\^{o}te d'Azur.
499:
500: \begin{thebibliography}{}
501: \bibliographystyle{aa}
502:
503: \bibitem[Balick \& Frank(2002)]{Balick02}
504: Balick, B., \& Frank, A.,
505: 2002, ARA\&A 40, 439
506:
507: \bibitem[Bujarrabal et al.(2002)]{Bujarrabal02}
508: Bujarrabal, V., Alcolea, J., S\'{a}nchez-Contreras, C., \& Sahai, R.,
509: 2002, A\&A 389, 271, 2002
510:
511: \bibitem[Chesneau et al.(2005)]{Chesneau05a}
512: Chesneau, O., Min, M., Herbst, T., et al., 2005, A\&A 435, 1043
513:
514: \bibitem[Cohen(1981)]{Cohen81}
515: Cohen, M.,
516: 1981, PASP 93, 288
517:
518: \bibitem[Cohen et al.(1985)]{Cohen85}
519: Cohen M., Dopita M.A., Schwartz R.D., \& Tielens A.G.G.M.,
520: 1985, ApJ 287, 702
521:
522: \bibitem[Cohen et al.(1999)]{Cohen99}
523: Cohen, M., Walker R.G., Carter B., Hammersley P., Kidger M., \& Noguchi K.,
524: 1999, AJ 117, 1864
525:
526: \bibitem[Gillett \& Soifer(1976)]{Gillett76}
527: Gillett F.C., \& Soifer B.T., 1976, ApJ 207, 780
528:
529: \bibitem[G\'{o}mez \& Rodr\'{i}guez(2001)]{Gomez01}
530: G\'{o}mez, Y., \& Rodr\'{i}guez, L.F.
531: 2001, ApJ 557, L109
532:
533: \bibitem[Ivezi\'{c} \& Elitzur(1997)]{Ivezic97}
534: Ivezi\'{c}, Z., \& Elitzur, M.,
535: 1997, MNRAS 287, 799
536:
537: \bibitem[Jaffe(2004)]{Jaffe04}
538: Jaffe, W.J.,
539: 2004, SPIE 5491, 715
540:
541: \bibitem[Jura et al.(2002)Jura, Chen, \& Plavchan]{Jura02}
542: Jura, M., Chen, C., \& Plavchan, P.,
543: 2002, ApJ 574, 963
544:
545: \bibitem[Jura et al.(1985)]{Jura85}
546: Jura, M., \& Morris, M., 1985, ApJ, 292, 487
547:
548: \bibitem[Kastner et al.(1992)]{Kastner92}
549: Kastner, J.H., Weintraub, D.A., Zuckerman, B., Becklin, E.E., McLean, I.,
550: \& Gatley, I., 1992, ApJ, 398, 552
551:
552: \bibitem[Leinert et al.(2003)]{Leinert03}
553: Leinert Ch., et al., 2003, Msngr, 112, 13
554:
555: \bibitem[Leinert et al.(2004)]{Leinert04}
556: Leinert Ch., et al., 2004, A\&A 423, 537
557:
558: \bibitem[Lenzen et al.(2003)]{Lenzen03}
559: Lenzen R., et al. 2003, SPIE 4841, 944
560:
561: \bibitem[Mastrodemos \& Morris(1998)]{Mastro98}
562: Mastrodemos N., \& Morris M.,
563: 1998 ApJ 497, 303
564:
565: \bibitem[Mastrodemos \& Morris(1999)]{Mastro99}
566: Mastrodemos N., \& Morris M.,
567: 1999 ApJ 523, 357
568:
569: \bibitem[Meakin et al.(2003)]{Meakin03}
570: Meakin C.A., Bieging J.H., Latter W.B., Hora J.L., \& Tielens A.G.G.M.,
571: 2003 ApJ 585, 482
572:
573: \bibitem[Meixner et al.(1999)]{Meixner99}
574: Meixner M., Ueta T., \& Dayal A.,
575: 1999, ApJS 122, 221
576:
577: \bibitem[Rousset et al.(2003)]{Rousset03}
578: Rousset, G., et al. 2003, SPIE 4839, 140
579:
580: \bibitem[S\'{a}nchez\,Contreras et al.(2002)]{SanchezContreras02}
581: S\'{a}nchez Contreras C.,
582: Desmurs J.F., Bujarrabal J., Alcolea J., \& Colomer F.,
583: 2002, A\&A 385, L1
584:
585: \bibitem[S\'{a}nchez\,Contreras et al.(2004)]{SanchezContreras04}
586: S\'{a}nchez Contreras C., de Paz, G., \& Sahai, R., 2004, ApJ 616, 519
587:
588: \bibitem[Van Winckel(2003)]{VanWinckel03}
589: Van Winckel, H., 2003, ARA\&A, 41, 391
590:
591: \bibitem[Zijlstra et al.(2001)]{Zijlstra01}
592: Zijlstra A.A., et al.,
593: 2001, MNRAS 322, 280
594:
595: \end{thebibliography}
596:
597:
598:
599:
600: %_________________________________________________________________
601: \begin{table}
602: \begin{caption}
603: {Observing log for MIDI. (Size: the theoretical size of the calibration stars.)
604: }\label{table-log}
605: \end{caption}
606: \begin{tabular}{llcccc}\hline\hline
607: OB & UT time & Airmass & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Projected baseline} & size \\
608: & & & Length & PA & \\
609: &&&[meters] & [degrees] & [mas] \\
610: \hline
611: OB1 (OH~231) & 02:04--02:07 & 1.02 & 61.7 & 112.0 \\
612: OB2 (OH~231) & 02:53--02:55 & 1.06 & 58.9 & 116.2 \\
613: OB3 (OH~231) & 03:55--03:57 & 1.19 & 52.8 & 123.8 \\
614: OB4 (OH~231) & 04:38--04:40 & 1.35 & 47.4 & 131.2 \\
615: \hline
616: \multicolumn{2}{l}{Calibrations} \\
617: Cal1 (HD~50778) & 02:29--02:31 & 1.11 & 56.2 & 117.8 & 3.76$\pm$0.04\\
618: Cal2 (HD~61935) & 03:12--03:14 & 1.12 & 56.0 & 116.4 & 2.21$\pm$0.01\\
619: Cal3 (HD~61935) & 04:14--04:16 & 1.30 & 48.3 & 123.8 \\
620: \hline
621: \end{tabular}
622: \end{table}
623: %________________________________________________________________
624:
625:
626:
627: %_________________________________________________________________
628: \begin{figure*}
629: \centering
630: %\resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics*{2_12_fig_col.eps}}
631: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics*{fig1.eps}}
632: \caption{Near infrared adaptive optics images (a, b and c) of OH 231.
633: Lines in image (b) show the approximate baseline position angle of OB1
634: and OB4 for MIDI observations. Insert (c) shows the brightest region of
635: L'-band image in different color scale so as to clearly show the
636: unresolved `central' object inside. North is top and east is
637: left. The color in insert (d) shows the OH-maser velocity map,
638: superposed on the L'-band ISAAC
639: contour image. Note that the scale in (d) is 16$\times$20~arcsec$^2$,
640: which is different from those in
641: (a, b and c). }
642: \label{Fig-NACO}
643: \end{figure*}
644: %_________________________________________________________________
645:
646:
647:
648: %_________________________________________________________________
649: \begin{figure}
650: \centering
651: %\resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics*{spec_total.ps}}
652: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics*{fig2.ps}}
653: \caption{Spectra of OH~231.
654: Bold line shows the total spectrum using OB1--OB4 data together
655: with the error bars.
656: Dotted line shows the spectrum reduced from OB1 (calibrator: HD~50778),
657: and the dash line from OB2, OB3 and OB4 (calibrator: HD~61935).
658: The difference below 8.5~$\mu$m is probably caused by the uncertainty of
659: SiO-band intensities in the spectra of the calibrators.
660: }
661: \label{Fig-spec}
662: \end{figure}
663: %_________________________________________________________________
664:
665:
666:
667: %_________________________________________________________________
668: \begin{figure}
669: \centering
670: %\resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics*{correlated_flux.eps}}
671: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics*{fig3.eps}}
672: \caption{Correlated flux of the mid-infrared `core'.
673: }
674: \label{Fig-correlated-flux}
675: \end{figure}
676: %_________________________________________________________________
677:
678:
679:
680: %_________________________________________________________________
681: \begin{figure}
682: \centering
683: %\resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics*{fwhm.eps}}
684: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}{\includegraphics*{fig4.eps}}
685: \caption{The radius (half of the FWHM of the Gaussian) to reproduce
686: the visibilities.
687: }
688: \label{Fig-gauss}
689: \end{figure}
690: %_________________________________________________________________
691:
692:
693:
694:
695: \end{document}
696:
697:
698: