1: % Lodz: 19.02.06
2: % This is to emulate the later appearance of the paper
3:
4: \documentclass[apj]{emulateapj}
5:
6: %\usepackage{apjfonts}
7:
8: %% The command below calls the preprint style
9: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
10: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
11: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
12: %%
13:
14: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
15:
16: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
17:
18: %\usepackage{footnpag}
19:
20:
21: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
22: %\documentclass{aastex}
23:
24:
25: %\setcounter{page}{1}
26: %
27: \def\Journal#1#2#3#4{{#4}, {#1}, {#2}, #3}
28: % Some useful journal names
29: \def\NCA{Nuovo Cimento}
30: \def\NAT{Nature}
31: \def\AAA{A\&A}
32: \def\ApJ{ApJ}
33: \def\AJ{Astronom. Journal}
34: \def\Aph{Astropart. Phys.}
35: \def\ApJS{ApJSS}
36: \def\ML{Machine Learning}
37: \def\MNRAS{MNRAS}
38: \def\NIM{Nucl. Instrum. Methods}
39: \def\NIMA{Nucl. Instrum. Methods A}
40: \def\NPB{Nucl. Phys. B}
41: \def\PLB{Phys. Lett. B}
42: \def\PRL{Phys. Rev. Lett.}
43: \def\PRD{Phys. Rev. D}
44: \def\ZPC{Z. Phys. C}
45:
46: \begin{document}
47:
48: \title{Discovery of Very High Energy $\gamma$-Rays from Markarian~180 Triggered by an Optical Outburst}
49:
50:
51: % authors 13 July 2006 Format ApJ (rkb)
52: %
53: \author{
54: J.~Albert\altaffilmark{a},
55: E.~Aliu\altaffilmark{b},
56: H.~Anderhub\altaffilmark{c},
57: P.~Antoranz\altaffilmark{d},
58: A.~Armada\altaffilmark{b},
59: M.~Asensio\altaffilmark{d},
60: C.~Baixeras\altaffilmark{e},
61: J.~A.~Barrio\altaffilmark{d},
62: H.~Bartko\altaffilmark{g},
63: D.~Bastieri\altaffilmark{h},
64: J.~Becker\altaffilmark{f},
65: W.~Bednarek\altaffilmark{j},
66: K.~Berger\altaffilmark{a},
67: C.~Bigongiari\altaffilmark{h},
68: A.~Biland\altaffilmark{c},
69: E.~Bisesi\altaffilmark{i},
70: R.~K.~Bock\altaffilmark{g},\altaffilmark{h},
71: P.~Bordas\altaffilmark{u},
72: V.~Bosch-Ramon\altaffilmark{u},
73: T.~Bretz\altaffilmark{a},
74: I.~Britvitch\altaffilmark{c},
75: M.~Camara\altaffilmark{d},
76: E.~Carmona\altaffilmark{g},
77: A.~Chilingarian\altaffilmark{k},
78: S.~Ciprini\altaffilmark{l},
79: J.~A.~Coarasa\altaffilmark{g},
80: S.~Commichau\altaffilmark{c},
81: J.~L.~Contreras\altaffilmark{d},
82: J.~Cortina\altaffilmark{b},
83: V.~Curtef\altaffilmark{f},
84: V.~Danielyan\altaffilmark{k},
85: F.~Dazzi\altaffilmark{h},
86: A.~De Angelis\altaffilmark{i},
87: R.~de~los~Reyes\altaffilmark{d},
88: B.~De Lotto\altaffilmark{i},
89: E.~Domingo-Santamar\'\i a\altaffilmark{b},
90: D.~Dorner\altaffilmark{a},
91: M.~Doro\altaffilmark{h},
92: M.~Errando\altaffilmark{b},
93: M.~Fagiolini\altaffilmark{o},
94: D.~Ferenc\altaffilmark{n},
95: E.~Fern\'andez\altaffilmark{b},
96: R.~Firpo\altaffilmark{b},
97: J.~Flix\altaffilmark{b},
98: M.~V.~Fonseca\altaffilmark{d},
99: L.~Font\altaffilmark{e},
100: M.~Fuchs\altaffilmark{g},
101: N.~Galante\altaffilmark{g},
102: M.~Garczarczyk\altaffilmark{g},
103: M.~Gaug\altaffilmark{h},
104: M.~Giller\altaffilmark{j},
105: F.~Goebel\altaffilmark{g},
106: D.~Hakobyan\altaffilmark{k},
107: M.~Hayashida\altaffilmark{g},
108: T.~Hengstebeck\altaffilmark{m},
109: D.~H\"ohne\altaffilmark{a},
110: J.~Hose\altaffilmark{g},
111: C.~C.~Hsu\altaffilmark{g},
112: P.~Jacon\altaffilmark{j},
113: O.~Kalekin\altaffilmark{m},
114: R.~Kosyra\altaffilmark{g},
115: D.~Kranich\altaffilmark{c,},
116: M.~Laatiaoui\altaffilmark{g},
117: A.~Laille\altaffilmark{n},
118: T.~Lenisa\altaffilmark{i},
119: P.~Liebing\altaffilmark{g},
120: E.~Lindfors\altaffilmark{l,}\altaffilmark{*},
121: S.~Lombardi\altaffilmark{h},
122: F.~Longo\altaffilmark{p},
123: J.~L\'opez\altaffilmark{b},
124: M.~L\'opez\altaffilmark{d},
125: E.~Lorenz\altaffilmark{c,}\altaffilmark{g},
126: P.~Majumdar\altaffilmark{g},
127: G.~Maneva\altaffilmark{q},
128: K.~Mannheim\altaffilmark{a},
129: O.~Mansutti\altaffilmark{i},
130: M.~Mariotti\altaffilmark{h},
131: M.~Mart\'\i nez\altaffilmark{b},
132: D.~Mazin\altaffilmark{g,}\altaffilmark{*},
133: C.~Merck\altaffilmark{g},
134: M.~Meucci\altaffilmark{o},
135: M.~Meyer\altaffilmark{a},
136: J.~M.~Miranda\altaffilmark{d},
137: R.~Mirzoyan\altaffilmark{g},
138: S.~Mizobuchi\altaffilmark{g},
139: A.~Moralejo\altaffilmark{b},
140: K.~Nilsson\altaffilmark{l},
141: J.~Ninkovic\altaffilmark{g},
142: E.~O\~na-Wilhelmi\altaffilmark{b},
143: R.~Ordu\~na\altaffilmark{e},
144: N.~Otte\altaffilmark{g},
145: I.~Oya\altaffilmark{d},
146: D.~Paneque\altaffilmark{g},
147: R.~Paoletti\altaffilmark{o},
148: J.~M.~Paredes\altaffilmark{u},
149: M.~Pasanen\altaffilmark{l},
150: D.~Pascoli\altaffilmark{h},
151: F.~Pauss\altaffilmark{c},
152: R.~Pegna\altaffilmark{o},
153: M.~Persic\altaffilmark{r},
154: L.~Peruzzo\altaffilmark{h},
155: A.~Piccioli\altaffilmark{o},
156: M.~Poller\altaffilmark{a},
157: E.~Prandini\altaffilmark{h},
158: A.~Raymers\altaffilmark{k},
159: W.~Rhode\altaffilmark{f},
160: M.~Rib\'o\altaffilmark{u},
161: J.~Rico\altaffilmark{b},
162: B.~Riegel\altaffilmark{a},
163: M.~Rissi\altaffilmark{c},
164: A.~Robert\altaffilmark{e},
165: S.~R\"ugamer\altaffilmark{a},
166: A.~Saggion\altaffilmark{h},
167: A.~S\'anchez\altaffilmark{e},
168: P.~Sartori\altaffilmark{h},
169: V.~Scalzotto\altaffilmark{h},
170: V.~Scapin\altaffilmark{h},
171: R.~Schmitt\altaffilmark{a},
172: T.~Schweizer\altaffilmark{m},
173: M.~Shayduk\altaffilmark{m},
174: K.~Shinozaki\altaffilmark{g},
175: S.~N.~Shore\altaffilmark{s},
176: N.~Sidro\altaffilmark{b},
177: A.~Sillanp\"a\"a\altaffilmark{l},
178: D.~Sobczynska\altaffilmark{j},
179: A.~Stamerra\altaffilmark{o},
180: L.~S.~Stark\altaffilmark{c},
181: L.~Takalo\altaffilmark{l},
182: P.~Temnikov\altaffilmark{q},
183: D.~Tescaro\altaffilmark{b},
184: M.~Teshima\altaffilmark{g},
185: N.~Tonello\altaffilmark{g},
186: A.~Torres\altaffilmark{e},
187: D.~F.~Torres\altaffilmark{b,}\altaffilmark{t},
188: N.~Turini\altaffilmark{o},
189: H.~Vankov\altaffilmark{q},
190: V.~Vitale\altaffilmark{i},
191: R.~M.~Wagner\altaffilmark{g},
192: T.~Wibig\altaffilmark{j},
193: W.~Wittek\altaffilmark{g},
194: R.~Zanin\altaffilmark{h},
195: J.~Zapatero\altaffilmark{e}
196: }
197: \altaffiltext{a} {Universit\"at W\"urzburg, D-97074 W\"urzburg, Germany}
198: \altaffiltext{b} {Institut de F\'\i sica d'Altes Energies,
199: E-08193 Bellaterra, Spain}
200: \altaffiltext{c} {ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Switzerland}
201: \altaffiltext{d} {Universidad Complutense, E-28040 Madrid, Spain}
202: \altaffiltext{e} {Universitat Aut\`onoma de Barcelona, E-08193 Bellaterra, Spain}
203: \altaffiltext{f} {Universit\"at Dortmund, D-44227 Dortmund, Germany}
204: \altaffiltext{g} {Max-Planck-Institut f\"ur Physik, D-80805 M\"unchen, Germany}
205: \altaffiltext{h} {Universit\`a di Padova and INFN, I-35131 Padova, Italy}
206: \altaffiltext{i} {Universit\`a di Udine, and INFN Trieste, I-33100 Udine, Italy}
207: \altaffiltext{j} {University of \L \'od\'z, PL-90236 Lodz, Poland}
208: \altaffiltext{k} {Yerevan Physics Institute, AM-375036 Yerevan, Armenia}
209: \altaffiltext{l} {Tuorla Observatory, FI-21500 Piikki\"o, Finland}
210: \altaffiltext{m} {Humboldt-Universit\"at zu Berlin, D-12489 Berlin, Germany}
211: \altaffiltext{n} {University of California, Davis, CA-95616-8677, USA}
212: \altaffiltext{o} {Universit\`a di Siena, and INFN Pisa, I-53100 Siena, Italy}
213: \altaffiltext{p} {Universit\`a di Trieste, and INFN Trieste, I-34100 Trieste, Italy}
214: \altaffiltext{q} {Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy, BG-1784 Sofia, Bulgaria}
215: \altaffiltext{r} {INAF and INFN Trieste, I-34131 Trieste, Italy}
216: \altaffiltext{s} {Universit\`a di Pisa, and INFN Pisa, I-56126 Pisa, Italy}
217: \altaffiltext{t} {Institut de Ci\`encies de l'Espai (CSIC-IEEC), E-08193 Bellaterra, Spain}
218: \altaffiltext{u} {Universitat de Barcelona, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain}
219: \altaffiltext{*} {correspondence: elilin@utu.fi, mazin@mppmu.mpg.de}
220:
221:
222: %% abstract %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
223:
224: \begin{abstract}
225:
226: The high-frequency--peaked BL Lacertae object Markarian~180 (Mrk~180) was
227: observed to have an optical outburst in 2006 March, triggering a Target of
228: Opportunity observation with the MAGIC telescope. The source was observed for
229: 12.4 hr, and very high energy $\gamma$-ray emission was detected with a
230: significance of 5.5~$\sigma$. An integral flux above 200~GeV of
231: $(2.3\pm0.7)\times10^{-11}\, \mbox{cm}^{-2}\,\mbox{s}^{-1}$ was measured,
232: corresponding to 11\% of the Crab Nebula flux. A rather soft spectrum with a
233: photon index of $-3.3\pm0.7$ has been determined. No significant flux
234: variation was found.
235:
236:
237: \end{abstract}
238:
239: \keywords{BL Lacertae objects: individual (Markarian 180) --- gamma rays: observations}
240:
241:
242: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
243: % %
244: % %
245: % I N T R O D U C T I O N %
246: % %
247: % %
248: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
249:
250: \section{Introduction}
251:
252:
253: The search for very high energy (VHE, defined as $E\gtrsim 100$~GeV)
254: $\gamma$-ray emission from active galactic nuclei (AGNs) is one of the major
255: goals for ground-based $\gamma$-ray astronomy. New detections open the
256: possibility of a phenomenological study of the physics inside the relativistic
257: jets in AGNs, in particular, to understand both the origin of the VHE
258: $\gamma$-rays as well as the correlations between photons of different energy
259: ranges (from radio to VHE). The number of reported VHE $\gamma$-ray--emitting
260: AGNs has been slowly increasing and is currently 12 (2006 June). Six of
261: them have been seen by MAGIC: Mrk~421 \citep{magic421}, Mrk~501
262: \citep{mazin}, 1ES1959+650 \citep{magic1959}, 1ES2344+514 \citep{mazin},
263: 1ES1218+304 \citep{magic1218}, and PG1553+113 \citep{magic1553}.
264:
265:
266: The known VHE $\gamma$-ray--emitting AGNs are variable in flux in all wave bands.
267: Correlations between X-ray and $\gamma$-ray emission have been found (e.g.,
268: \citet{fossati04}), although the relationship has proven to be rather
269: complicated, with $\gamma$-ray flares also being detected in the absence of
270: X-ray flares \citep{holder,krawczynski} and vice versa \citep{rebillot}. The
271: optical-TeV correlation has yet to be studied, but the optical-GeV correlations
272: seen in 3C~279 \citep{hartman01} suggest that at least in some sources, such
273: correlations exist. Using this as a guideline, the MAGIC collaboration has been
274: performing Target of Opportunity observations whenever alerted that
275: sources were in a high flux state in the optical and/or X-ray band.
276:
277:
278: The AGN Mrk~180 (1ES 1133+704) is a well-known high-frequency--peaked BL Lac
279: (HBL) object at a redshift of $z=0.045$ \citep{falco}. The spectral energy
280: distribution (SED) of HBL objects exhibits a generic two-bump structure: one peak with
281: a maximum in the X-ray band and the other peak located in the GeV-TeV band.
282: The radiation is produced in a highly beamed plasma jet, which is almost
283: aligned with the observer's line of sight. A double-peaked SED is normally
284: attributed to a population of relativistic electrons, where one peak is due to
285: synchrotron emission in the magnetic field of the jet and where the second peak is
286: caused by inverse Compton (IC) scattering of low-energy photons. The low-energy
287: photons can be external to the jet (external Compton scattering; \citet{dermer}) or
288: are produced within the jet via synchrotron radiation (synchrotron
289: self-Compton [SSC] scattering; \citet{maraschi}). Models based on the acceleration of
290: hadrons can also sufficiently describe the observed SEDs and light curves
291: \citep{mannheim91,massaro2}. All of the up to now known AGNs with strong GeV/TeV
292: $\gamma$-emission belong to the HBL object class.
293:
294:
295: In many cases, the second peak of the SED is not observable because of low
296: sensitivity above a few times 100~MeV of satellite-borne detectors and a
297: too high energy threshold of ground-based $\gamma$-ray detectors. In case
298: of Mrk~180, HEGRA \citep{54AGN} and Whipple \citep{horan}
299: observed this object but were only able to derive flux upper limits, and EGRET
300: did not detect the source \citep{fichtel, hartman}.
301:
302: In the optical, Mrk~180 is characterized by a bright host galaxy
303: $R=14.17\pm0.02$ mag and a much fainter (variable) core $R=15.79\pm0.02$ mag
304: \citep{nilsson}. The variations in total optical brightness are therefore
305: small. The source is observed regularly as part of the Tuorla Observatory
306: Blazar monitoring program\footnote{See http://users.utu.fi/kani/1m/.} with the Tuorla 1~m
307: telescope and the KVA 35~cm telescope\footnote{See http://tur3.tur.iac.es/.}. To determine
308: the core flux, we had to subtract the flux of the host galaxy and a nearby star
309: within the $5''$ aperture radius (together R=14.96 mag, or 3.2 mJy; \linebreak
310: Nilsson, private communication).
311:
312: After Mrk~180 had been detected in the X-rays by {\it HEAO-1} \citep{HEAO}, it
313: was observed by various satellites with fluxes ranging from 6.3 to $22\times
314: 10^{-12}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ \citep{donato} at around 1~keV and from $5.0$ to
315: $9.8\times10^{-12}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ in the 2--10~keV band
316: \citep{perlman,donato05}. The source is monitored by the all-sky monitor (ASM)
317: on board the {\it Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer}.
318:
319: In this Letter we present the first detection of VHE $\gamma$-ray
320: emission from Mrk~180.
321:
322:
323:
324: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
325: % %
326: % %
327: % O B S E R V A T I O N AND %
328: % D A T A A N A L Y S I S %
329: % %
330: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
331:
332: \section{Observations and Data Analysis}
333:
334: The MAGIC telescope (Major Atmospheric Gamma Imaging
335: Cherenkov telescope; \citet{magic}) is located on the Canary Island La
336: Palma (2200 m above sea level, 28\fdg45$'$ north, 17\fdg54$'$ west).
337: MAGIC is currently the largest imaging atmospheric Cherenkov telescope
338: with a 17~m--diameter tessellated reflector dish \citep{cortina}. The
339: 3\fdg5 field of view camera comprises 576 photomultipliers (PMTs) with
340: enhanced quantum efficiency. The accessible energy range spans from 50--60 GeV
341: (trigger threshold at small zenith angles) up to tens of TeV. The $\gamma$
342: point-spread function is about 0\fdg1.
343:
344: The observation of Mrk~180 was triggered by a brightening of the source in the
345: optical on 2006 March 23. The alert was given as the core flux increased by
346: 50\% from its quiescent level value as determined from over 3 years of data
347: recording, shown in Fig.~\ref{fig_opt}. During the MAGIC observation, optical
348: follow-up observations were performed with KVA. The simultaneous MAGIC, ASM, and
349: KVA light curve is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig_LC}. Around this time, Mrk 180 was
350: also observed as part of the AGN-monitoring program by the University of
351: Michigan Radio Observatory (UMRAO).
352: %The 4.8 GHz flux density was 0.21$\pm$0.02 Jy and the 14.5 GHz flux density
353: %was 0.22$\pm$0.06 Jy from 2006 Jan 1. - Apr. 13.
354: No evidence of flaring was found between 2006 January and April.
355:
356: \begin{figure}[t]
357: \begin{center}
358: \begin{minipage}[b]{0.45\textwidth}
359: %\includegraphics*[bb=0 0 688 253,width=0.9\textwidth,clip]{f1.eps}
360: \includegraphics*[width=0.9\textwidth,clip]{f1.eps}
361: \caption{\label{fig_opt} {\it R}-band light curve of Mrk~180 extending
362: from 2003 January to the end of 2006 March as measured by the KVA telescope;
363: 5 mJy is equivalent to 14.47 mag.}
364: \end{minipage}
365: \end{center}
366: \end{figure}
367:
368: \begin{figure}[t]
369: \begin{center}
370: \begin{minipage}[b]{0.45\textwidth}
371: %\includegraphics*[bb=0 0 688 495,width=0.9\textwidth,clip]{f2.eps}
372: \includegraphics*[width=0.9\textwidth,clip]{f2.eps}
373: \caption{\label{fig_LC} Light curve of Mrk~180 for
374: MJD = 53815--53825 (March 21--31).
375: {\it Upper panel}: VHE $\gamma$-rays measured by MAGIC above 200~GeV.
376: {\it Middle panel}: ASM count rate.
377: {\it Lower panel}: Optical flux measured by KVA.}
378: \end{minipage}
379: \end{center}
380: \end{figure}
381:
382:
383: Mrk~180 was observed in 2006 during 8 nights (from March 23 to 31), for a total
384: of 12.4 hr, at zenith angles ranging from $39^{\circ}$ to $44^{\circ}$.
385: The observations were performed in the so-called wobble mode \citep{daum}, in
386: which the telescope is pointed alternatively for 20 minutes to two opposite sky
387: positions at 0\fdg4 off the source. Runs with unusual trigger rates due
388: to detector problems or adverse atmospheric conditions were rejected. The
389: total observation time was thus reduced to 11.1 hr.
390:
391: The data were analyzed using the standard analysis and calibration programs for
392: the MAGIC telescope \citep{bretz,rwagner,gaug}. For the $\gamma$/hadron shower
393: separation a multidimensional classification technique based on the Random
394: Forest method was used \citep{breiman,rf}. The cuts for the $\gamma$/hadron
395: separation were trained using a fraction of randomly chosen data to represent
396: the background (hadrons) and were compared to Monte Carlo (MC) $\gamma$ events with
397: the same zenith angle distribution (CORSIKA ver. 6.023;
398: \citet{corsika,majumdar}). The cuts were then chosen such that the overall cut
399: efficiency for MC $\gamma$ events was about 50$\%$. The number of excess
400: events is determined as the difference between the source and background region
401: in the $\theta^{2}$ distributions, with $\theta$ being the angular distance between
402: the source position in the sky and the reconstructed arrival position of the
403: air shower. The latter position is determined for each shower image by means of
404: the so-called DISP method \citep{fomin,lessard,domingo}, using image shape
405: parameters \citep{hillas}. In order to determine the background distribution,
406: three background regions of the same size are chosen symmetrically to the
407: on-source region with respect to the camera center. A final cut of
408: $\theta^2<0.024$ is applied to determine the significance of the signal and the
409: number of excess events. The energy of the $\gamma$-ray candidates was also
410: estimated using the Random Forest technique. The applied cuts were chosen to
411: be looser than the ones in Fig.~\ref{fig_theta2} in order to gain statistics on
412: the $\gamma$-ray candidates. Due to the large zenith angle of the observation,
413: the corresponding energy threshold (defined as the peak in the differential
414: energy distribution of the MC $\gamma$ events) after cuts was about 200~GeV.
415: Effects on the spectrum determination, introduced by the limited energy
416: resolution of the detector, were corrected using the ``unfolding'' methods according to
417: \citet{anykeyev}.
418:
419:
420: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
421: % %
422: % %
423: % R E S U L T S %
424: % %
425: % %
426: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
427:
428: \section{Results}
429:
430: \begin{figure}[t]
431: \begin{center}
432: \begin{minipage}[b]{0.45\textwidth}
433: \includegraphics*[width=1\textwidth,angle=0,clip]{f3.eps}
434: \caption{\label{fig_theta2} The $\theta^2$-distribution for the
435: ON-source data ({\it filled circles}) and normalized OFF-source events
436: ({\it gray histogram}) for Mrk~180.
437: The vertical dotted line indicates the
438: $\theta^2$ cut used to determine excess events. The total excess
439: of 165 events corresponds to a significance of 5.5~$\sigma$.}
440: \end{minipage}
441: \end{center}
442: \end{figure}
443:
444:
445: The distribution of $\theta^2$-values after cuts is shown in
446: Fig.~\ref{fig_theta2}. The signal of 165 events over 605.2 normalized
447: background events corresponds to a 5.5~$\sigma$ excess using equation (17) in
448: \citet{LiMa}. The shape of the excess is consistent with a pointlike source
449: seen by MAGIC.
450:
451: No evidence of flux variability was found. The fit to the nightly integrated
452: flux is consistent with a constant emission ($\chi^{2}=7.1$, 6 degrees of freedom).
453: %(reduced $\chi^{2}=1.2$).
454: Fig.~\ref{fig_LC} shows the VHE light curve together with the ASM daily averages
455: and the {\it R}-band flux data. The X-ray flux of the source is generally below the
456: ASM sensitivity, but on March 25 a 3~$\sigma$ excess was observed, which
457: suggests that the source was also active in X-rays. The optical flux reached
458: its maximum on the night MAGIC started the observations (March 23) and began to
459: decrease afterward.
460:
461: \begin{figure}[t]
462: \begin{center}
463: \begin{minipage}[b]{0.45\textwidth}
464: \includegraphics*[width=1\textwidth,angle=0,clip]{f4.eps}
465: \caption{\label{fig_spectrum} Differential energy spectrum of Mrk~180.
466: {\it Full circles}: Spectrum measured by MAGIC.
467: {\it Open circles}: De-absorbed energy spectrum (see text).
468: The horizontal bars indicate the size of each energy bin.
469: The black line represents a power-law fit to the
470: measured spectrum. The fit parameters are listed in the figure.
471: For comparison, the Crab Nebula energy spectrum as derived from MAGIC
472: data \citep{rwagner} is shown ({\it dotted line}).}
473: \end{minipage}
474: \end{center}
475: \end{figure}
476:
477:
478: The measured energy spectrum of Mrk~180 is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig_spectrum}.
479: Assuming a power-law spectrum, we obtained the following parameterization: \[
480: {\frac{\mathrm{d}N}{\mathrm{d}E}}=(4.5\pm1.8)\times10^{-11}\left({\frac{E}{0.3\,\mathrm{TeV}}}\right)^{-3.3\pm0.7}\,
481: \frac 1 {\mbox{TeV}\,\mbox{cm}^{2}\,\mbox{s}} \] The observed integral flux
482: above 200~GeV is $F(E>200\:\mathrm{GeV})=(2.25\pm0.69)\times10^{-11}
483: \mbox{cm}^{-2}\mbox{s}^{-1}$, which corresponds to $1.27\times10^{-11}\,
484: \mathrm{ergs} \mathrm{cm}^{-2} \mathrm{s}^{-1} $, or 11\% of the Crab Nebula
485: flux measured by MAGIC. The errors are statistical only. We estimate the
486: systematic errors to be around 50\% for the absolute flux level and 0.2 for the
487: spectral index. The large systematic flux error is a consequence of the steep
488: slope. The main error contributions are the uncertainty in the atmospheric
489: transmission, the reflectivity and focusing uncertainty of the mirrors and
490: light catchers in front of the PMTs, and the uncertainty in the effective quantum
491: efficiency of the PMT and in the photoelectron-to-signal conversion. A second
492: independent analysis gave results in very good agreement with the quoted
493: numbers.
494:
495: The VHE $\gamma$-rays from Mrk~180 are partially absorbed by the low-energy
496: photons of the evolving extragalactic background light (EBL; see
497: \citet{nikishov,gould,stecker,HauserDwek}). Given the redshift z=0.045 of
498: Mrk~180, the effect is small for photons with energies below 1 TeV. We calculate
499: the optical depth and the resulting attenuation of the VHE $\gamma$-rays from
500: Mrk~180 using the number density of the evolving EBL provided by the best-fit
501: model of \citet{kneiske}. This state-of-the-art model is consistent with the
502: recently derived upper limits on the EBL inferred from arguments about AGN spectra
503: \citep{hessebl}. The attenuation was determined by the numerical integration of
504: equation (2) from \citet{dwek}. The de-absorbed energy spectrum of Mrk~180 is
505: also shown in Fig.~\ref{fig_spectrum} ({\it open circles}). A fit with a simple
506: power-law to the de-absorbed spectrum reveals a slope with $\alpha=-2.8\pm0.7$.
507:
508:
509:
510: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
511: % %
512: % %
513: % D I S C U S S I O N %
514: % %
515: % %
516: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
517:
518: \section{Discussion and conclusions}
519:
520: In this Letter we have presented the first detection of VHE $\gamma$-ray
521: emission from Mrk~180. The discovery was triggered by an optical flare, but no
522: significant variations in the VHE regime were found. The short observation
523: period and the small signal prevent us from carrying out detailed studies. It is
524: therefore impossible to judge whether the detected VHE flux level represents
525: a flaring or a quiescent state of the AGN.
526:
527: Earlier observations by other experiments have only set upper limits on the VHE
528: $\gamma$-ray emission from Mrk~180. HEGRA observed the source for 9.8 hr,
529: resulting in an upper limit (99\% c.l.) at 1.5~TeV of 12\% of the Crab Nebula
530: flux \citep{54AGN}. Whipple observed Mrk~180 during three observation periods
531: for a total of 26.8 hr, resulting in a flux upper limit at 300~GeV of 10.8\%
532: of the Crab Nebula flux \citep{horan}. Both upper limits are above the flux
533: presented in this Letter.
534:
535: Fig.~\ref{fig_SED} shows the SED of Mrk~180: the radio, optical and X-ray data
536: are from UMRAO, KVA, ASM, and the NED database, and the VHE data are from this analysis and
537: various upper limits. Simultaneous data are noted in black, while historical
538: data are noted in gray. The predicted flux by the phenomenological model of
539: \citet{fossati} ({\it dashed line}) is too high, as already emphasized by
540: the non detection measurements \citep{54AGN,horan}. A more detailed SSC model
541: from \citet{costamante} ({\it solid line}) seems to describe the data more
542: closely.
543:
544: The rather steep slope of the VHE spectrum suggests an IC peak position well
545: below 200~GeV, while the non detection by EGRET gives a lower limit of
546: $\sim1$~GeV for the peak position. This is in agreement with the SSC model of
547: \citet{costamante} suggesting that the IC peak position is at around 10~GeV. The
548: overall IC luminosity, however, is underestimated in this model: the observed
549: integral flux above 300~GeV is a factor 30 larger than predicted. An
550: explanation for this discrepancy could be the model's underlying assumption of
551: a quiescent-state synchrotron spectrum to obtain the IC flux. This could
552: indeed suggest that our measurement was made during a high state.
553:
554: \begin{figure}[t]
555: \begin{center}
556: \begin{minipage}[b]{0.45\textwidth}
557: \includegraphics*[width=0.9\textwidth,angle=0,clip]{f5.eps}
558: \caption{\label{fig_SED} SED of Mrk~180. Simultaneous data
559: (UMRAO, KVA, ASM, and MAGIC) are represented as black circles.
560: The gray circles represent historical data
561: \citep{giommi,perlman}.
562: The arrows denote the upper limits from ASM, EGRET \citep{fichtel}, Whipple,
563: and HEGRA. The solid line is from \citet{costamante} and the dashed
564: line is from \citet{fossati} (see text).}
565: \end{minipage}
566: \end{center}
567: \end{figure}
568:
569: The discovery of VHE emission from Mrk~180 during an optical outburst makes it
570: very tempting to speculate about the connection between optical activity and
571: increased VHE emission. Since Mrk~180 has not been observed prior to the
572: outburst with MAGIC and since the upper limits from other experiments are above the
573: observed flux level, further observations are needed.
574:
575:
576: {\textit{Acknowledgements:}}
577: We would like to thank the IAC for the excellent working conditions at the ORM
578: in La Palma. The support of the German BMBF and MPG, the Italian INFN, the
579: Spanish CICYT, ETH research grant TH~34/04~3, and the Polish MNiI grant
580: 1P03D01028 is gratefully acknowledged. We also thank H. D. and M. F. Aller,
581: at the University of Michigan Radio Observatory, for providing us with the UMRAO data.
582:
583:
584:
585: \begin{thebibliography}{10}
586:
587: \bibitem[Aharonian et~al.(2004)]{54AGN}Aharonian, F. et~al.
588: \newblock \Journal{\AAA}{421}{529}{2004}
589:
590: \bibitem[Aharonian et~al.(2006)]{hessebl}Aharonian, F. et al.
591: \newblock 2006, Nature, 440, 1018
592:
593: \bibitem[Albert et al.(2006a)]{magic1959}Albert, J. et al.
594: \newblock 2006a, ApJ, 639, 761
595:
596: \bibitem[Albert et al.(2006b)]{magic1218}Albert, J. et al.
597: \newblock 2006b, ApJ, 642, L119
598:
599: \bibitem[Albert et al.(2006c)]{magic421}Albert, J. et al.
600: 2006c, ApJ, submitted (astro-ph/0603478)
601:
602: \bibitem[Albert et al.(2006d)]{magic1553}Albert, J. et al.
603: 2006d, ApJL, submitted (astro-ph/0606161)
604:
605:
606: \bibitem[Anykeyev et~al.(1991)]{anykeyev}Anykeyev, V.B. et al.
607: \newblock \Journal{\NIMA}{303}{350}{1991}
608:
609: \bibitem[Bock et~al.(2004)]{rf}Bock, R.K. et al.
610: \newblock \Journal{\NIMA}{516}{511}{2004}
611:
612: \bibitem[Breiman(2001)]{breiman}Breiman, L.
613: \newblock \Journal{\ML}{45}{5}{2001}
614:
615: \bibitem[Bretz(2005)]{bretz}Bretz, T.
616: \newblock {AIP Conf. Proc.}, 2005, 745, 730
617:
618: \bibitem[Cortina et~al.(2005)]{cortina}Cortina, J. et al.
619: \newblock 2005, Proc. 29th ICRC (Pune), 5, 359
620:
621: \bibitem[Costamante $\&$ Ghisellini(2002)]{costamante}Costamante, L. $\&$ Ghisellini, G.
622: \newblock \Journal{\AAA}{384}{56}{2002}
623:
624: \bibitem[Daum et al.(1997)]{daum}Daum, A. et al.
625: \newblock \Journal{\Aph}{8}{1}{1997}
626:
627: \bibitem[Dermer$\&$ Schlickeiser(1993)]{dermer} Dermer, C. D. $\&$ Schlickeiser, R.
628: \newblock \Journal{ApJ}{416}{458}{1993}
629:
630: \bibitem[Domingo-Santamar\'\i a et~al.(2005)]{domingo}Domingo-Santamar\'\i a, E. et al.
631: \newblock 2005, Proc. 29th ICRC (Pune), 5, 363
632:
633: \bibitem[Donato et~al.(2001)]{donato}Donato, D., et al.
634: \newblock \Journal{\AAA}{375}{739}{2001}
635:
636: \bibitem[Donato et~al.(2005)]{donato05}Donato, D., Sambruna, R.M. $\&$ Gliozzi, M.
637: \newblock \Journal{\AAA}{433}{1163}{2005}
638:
639: \bibitem[Dwek \& Krennrich(2005)]{dwek}Dwek, E. $\&$ Krennrich, F.
640: \newblock \Journal{\ApJ}{618}{657}{2005}
641:
642: \bibitem[Falco et~al.(1999)]{falco}Falco, E.F. et al.
643: \newblock 1999, PASP, 111, 438
644:
645: \bibitem[Fichtel et~al.(1994)]{fichtel}Fichtel, C. E., et al.
646: \newblock \Journal{\ApJS}{93}{125}{1994}
647:
648: \bibitem[Fomin et~al.(1994)]{fomin}Fomin, V. P. et al.
649: \newblock \Journal{\Aph}{2}{137}{1994}
650:
651: \bibitem[Fossati et~al.(2000)]{fossati}Fossati, G. et al.
652: \newblock \Journal{\ApJ}{541}{166}{2000}
653:
654: \bibitem[Fossati et al.(2004)]{fossati04}Fossati, G. et al.
655: \newblock \Journal{NewAR}{48}{419}{2004}
656:
657: \bibitem[Gaug et~al.(2005)]{gaug}Gaug, M. et~al.
658: \newblock 2005, Proc. 29th ICRC (Pune), 5, 375
659:
660: \bibitem[Giommi et~al.(2002)]{giommi}Giommi, P. et al.
661: \newblock 2002, Proc. of the Blazar Astrophysics with {\it BeppoSAX} and Other
662: Observatories (Rome), 63
663:
664: \bibitem[Gould \& Schr\'eder(1966)]{gould}Gould, R.J. $\&$ Schr\'eder, G.P.
665: \newblock 1966, Phys. Rev. Lett., 16, 252
666:
667: \bibitem[Hartman et al.(1999)]{hartman}Hartman, R. C. et al.
668: \newblock \Journal{\ApJS}{123}{79}{1999}
669:
670: \bibitem[Hartman et~al.(2001)]{hartman01}Hartman, R. C. et al.
671: \newblock \Journal{\ApJ}{558}{583}{2001}
672:
673: \bibitem[Hauser \& Dwek(2001)]{HauserDwek}Hauser, M.G. $\&$ Dwek, E.
674: \newblock 2001, {ARA\&A}, 39, 249
675:
676: \bibitem[Hillas(1985)]{hillas}Hillas, A. M.
677: \newblock 1985, Proc. 19th ICRC (La Jolla), 3, 445
678:
679: \bibitem[Holder et al.(2003)]{holder}Holder, J. et al.
680: \newblock \Journal{\ApJ}{583}{L9}{2003}
681:
682: \bibitem[Horan et al.(2004)]{horan}Horan, D. et al.
683: \newblock \Journal{\ApJ}{603}{51}{2004}
684:
685: \bibitem[Knapp \& Heck(2004)]{corsika}Knapp, J. \& Heck, D.
686: 2004, EAS Simulation with CORSIKA, \newline
687: http://www-ik.fzk.de/corsika/usersguide/corsika\_tech.html
688:
689: \bibitem[Kneiske et~al.(2004)]{kneiske}Kneiske, T. M. et al.
690: \newblock \Journal{\AAA}{413}{807}{2004}
691:
692: \bibitem[Krawczynski et~al.(2003)]{krawczynski}Krawczynski, H., et al.
693: \newblock 2003, AAS HEAD Meeting, 35, 49.01
694:
695: \bibitem[Lessard et~al.(2001)]{lessard}Lessard, R. W. et al.
696: \newblock \Journal{\Aph}{15}{1}{2001}
697:
698: \bibitem[Lorenz(2004)]{magic}Lorenz, E.
699: \newblock {NewA Rev.}, 2004, 48, 339
700:
701: \bibitem[Li \& Ma(1983)]{LiMa}Li,T.-P., and Ma, Y.-Q.
702: \newblock \Journal{\ApJ}{272}{317}{1983}
703:
704: \bibitem[Majumdar et~al.(2005)]{majumdar}Majumdar, P. et al.
705: \newblock 2005, Proc. 29th ICRC (Pune), 5, 203
706:
707: \bibitem[Mannheim et~al.(1991)]{mannheim91}Mannheim, K., Biermann, P. L., Kruells, W. M.
708: \newblock \Journal{\AAA}{251}{723}{1991}
709:
710: \bibitem[Maraschi et~al.(1992)]{maraschi}Maraschi, L., Ghisellini, G. \& Celotti, A.
711: \newblock \Journal{\ApJ}{397}{L5}{1992}
712:
713: \bibitem[Massaro et~al.(2004)]{massaro2}Massaro, E., et al.
714: \newblock \Journal{\AAA}{422}{103}{2004}
715:
716: \bibitem[Mazin (2006)]{mazin}Mazin, D.
717: 2006, Ap\&SS, in press
718:
719: \bibitem[Mufson \& Hutter(1981)]{HEAO}Mufson, S. L. $\&$ Hutter, D. J.
720: \newblock \Journal{\ApJ}{248}{L61}{1981}
721:
722: \bibitem[Nilsson et al.(2003)]{nilsson}Nilsson, K. et al.
723: \newblock \Journal{\AAA}{400}{95}{2003}
724:
725: \bibitem[Nikishov(1962)]{nikishov}Nikishov, A.I.
726: \newblock 1962, {Soviet Phys.-JETP}, 14, 393
727:
728: \bibitem[Perlman et~al.(2005)]{perlman}Perlman, E. et al.
729: \newblock \Journal{\ApJ}{625}{727}{2005}
730:
731: \bibitem[Rebillot et al.(2003)]{rebillot}Rebillot, P. et al.
732: \newblock 2003, Proc. 28th ICRC (Tsukuba), 5, 2599
733:
734: \bibitem[Stecker et~al.(1992)]{stecker}Stecker, F.W., De Jager, O.C., Salamon, M.H.
735: \newblock \Journal{\ApJ}{390}{L49}{1992}
736:
737: \bibitem[Wagner et~al.(2005)]{rwagner}Wagner, R.M. et al.
738: \newblock 2005, Proc. 29th ICRC (Pune), 4, 163
739:
740:
741: \end{thebibliography}
742:
743:
744: \end{document}
745:
746: