1: \documentclass{emulateapj}

2: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

3: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}

4: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}

5: 

6: % PACKAGES

7: 

8: \usepackage{amsmath}

9: \usepackage{graphicx}

10: \usepackage{rotate}

11: \usepackage{graphics}

12: \usepackage{epsf,psfig}

13: \usepackage[dvips]{color}

14: \usepackage{color}

15: \usepackage{epsfig}

16: \usepackage{amssymb}

17: \usepackage{latexsym}

18: \usepackage{txfonts}

19: 

20: % NEW COMMANDS

21: 

22: \newcommand{\un}[1]{~\hspace{-1pt}\ensuremath{\mathrm{#1}}}

23: \newcommand{\ti}[1]{$^{44}{}${#1}}

24: \newcommand{\ca}[1]{$^{40}{}${#1}}

25: \newcommand{\fe}[1]{$^{56}{}${#1}}

26: 

27: % INSTRUMENTS

28: 

29: \newcommand{\integ}{{\it INTEGRAL}~}

30: \newcommand{\rxte}{{\it RXTE}~}

31: \newcommand{\ibis}{IBIS~}

32: \newcommand{\spi}{SPI~}

33: \newcommand{\isgri}{ISGRI~}

34: \newcommand{\ibisgri}{IBIS/ISGRI~}

35: \newcommand{\xmm}{{\it XMM-Newton}~}

36: \newcommand{\chandra}{{\it Chandra}~}

37: \newcommand{\asca}{{\it ASCA}~}

38: \newcommand{\gro}{{\it CGRO}}

39: \newcommand{\sax}{{\it BeppoSAX}}

40: \newcommand{\simbolx}{{\it SIMBOL-X}~}

41: 

42: % OTHERS

43: 

44: \newcommand{\am}{$^{\prime}$~}

45: \newcommand{\as}{$^{\prime\prime}$~}

46: \newcommand{\gammaray}{$\gamma$-ray~}

47: \newcommand{\gammarays}{$\gamma$-rays~}

48: \newcommand{\xray}{X-ray~}

49: \newcommand{\xrays}{X-rays~}

50: 

51: % DEFINITIONS

52: 

53: \def\k{km s$^{-1}$}

54: \def\ks{km s$^{-1}$~}

55: \def\d{$^\circ$}

56: \def\m{$^\prime$}

57: \def\s{$^{\prime\prime}$}

58: \def\hh{$^{\mathrm h}$}

59: \def\mm{$^{\mathrm m}$}

60: \def\ss{$^{\mathrm s}$}

61: \def\cm3{cm$^{-3}$}

62: \def\pp{$^{\prime\prime}$}

63: \def\msol{M$_\odot$}

64: \def\ha{H$\alpha$}

65: \def\eg{{\it e.g.~}}

66: \def\etal{et~al.~}

67: \def\ie{{\em i.e.~}}

68: 

69: % LAYOUT

70: 

71: %\addtolength{\textheight}{5mm}

72: %\addtolength{\voffset}{-2.5mm}

73: %\addtolength{\textwidth}{4mm}

74: %\addtolength{\hoffset}{-2mm}

75: %\submitted{}

76: %\received{10 May 2006}

77: %\revised{}

78: %\accepted{29 June 2006}

79: %\ccc{}

80: %\cpright{AAS}{2003}

81: 

82: %_________________________________________________________________________________________________

83: 

84: \begin{document}

85: 

86: \title{The signature of \ti{Ti} in Cassiopeia A \\

87:        revealed by IBIS/ISGRI on INTEGRAL}

88: 

89: \slugcomment{Accepted version for ApJL on 29 June 2006}

90: \shorttitle{\ibisgri observations of Cassiopeia~A}

91: \shortauthors{Renaud \etal}

92: 

93: \author{

94:     M. Renaud\altaffilmark{1,2}, J. Vink\altaffilmark{3}, A. Decourchelle\altaffilmark{1,4},

95:     F. Lebrun\altaffilmark{1,2}, P.R. den Hartog\altaffilmark{5}, R. Terrier\altaffilmark{2},

96:     C. Couvreur\altaffilmark{1}, J. Kn\"{o}dlseder\altaffilmark{6}, P. Martin\altaffilmark{6},

97:     N. Prantzos\altaffilmark{7}, A.M. Bykov\altaffilmark{8}, H. Bloemen\altaffilmark{5}

98:     }

99: 

100: \altaffiltext{1}{\scriptsize Service d'Astrophysique,

101: DAPNIA/DSM/CEA, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France; mrenaud@cea.fr}

102: 

103: \altaffiltext{2}{\scriptsize APC-UMR 7164, 11 place M. Berthelot,

104: 75231 Paris, France}

105: 

106: \altaffiltext{3}{\scriptsize Astronomical Institute, Utrecht University,

107: P.O. Box 80000, 3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands}

108: 

109: \altaffiltext{4}{\scriptsize AIM-UMR 7158, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France}

110: 

111: \altaffiltext{5}{\scriptsize SRON Netherlands Institute for Space

112: Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 AC Utrecht, The Netherlands}

113: 

114: \altaffiltext{6}{\scriptsize Centre d'Etude Spatiale des

115: Rayonnements and Universit\'e Paul Sabatier, 31028 Toulouse,

116: France}

117: 

118: \altaffiltext{7}{\scriptsize Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris,

119: 75014 Paris, France}

120: 

121: \altaffiltext{8}{\scriptsize A.F. Ioffe Institute for Physics and

122: Technology, St. Petersburg, Russia, 194021}

123: 

124: \begin{abstract}

125: 

126: We report the detection of both the 67.9 and 78.4\un{keV} \ti{Sc}

127: \gammaray lines in Cassiopeia~A with the \integ \ibisgri

128: instrument. Besides the robustness provided by spectro-imaging

129: observations, the main improvements compared to previous

130: measurements are a clear separation of the two \ti{Sc} lines

131: together with an improved significance of the detection of the

132: hard \xray continuum up to 100\un{keV}. These allow us to refine

133: the determination of the \ti{Ti} yield and to constrain the nature

134: of the nonthermal continuum emission. By combining COMPTEL,

135: \sax/PDS and \isgri measurements, we find a line flux of (2.5

136: $\pm$ 0.3) $\times$ 10$^{-5}$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ leading to a

137: synthesized \ti{Ti} mass of 1.6 $^{+0.6}_{-0.3}$ $\times$

138: 10$^{-4}$ M$_{\odot}$. This high value suggests that Cas~A is

139: peculiar in comparison to other young supernova remnants, from

140: which so far no line emission from \ti{Ti} decay has been

141: unambiguously detected.

142: 

143: \end{abstract}

144: 

145: \keywords{gamma rays: observations --- ISM: individual (Cassiopeia A) ---

146:           nuclear reactions, nucleosynthesis, abundances --- supernova remnants}

147: 

148: %_________________________________________________________________________________________________

149: 

150: \section{Introduction}

151: \label{s:intro}

152: 

153: Cassiopeia~A (hereafter, Cas~A) is the youngest known supernova

154: remnant (SNR) in the Milky Way, located at a distance of

155: 3.4$^{+0.3}_{-0.1}$\un{kpc} \cite{c:reed95}. The estimate of the

156: supernova is A.D.~1671.3$\pm$0.9, based on the proper motion of

157: several ejecta knots \cite{c:thorstensen01}. However, an event

158: observed by Flamsteed (A.D.~1680) could be at the origin of the

159: Cas~A remnant \cite{c:ashworth80,c:stephenson02}. The large

160: collection of data from observations in the radio, infra-red,

161: optical, \xray (see \eg Hwang \etal 2004) up to TeV \gammarays

162: \cite{c:aharonian01} allows us to study its morphology,

163: composition, cosmic-ray acceleration efficiency and secular

164: evolution in details. Young SNRs are thought to be efficient

165: particle accelerators and represent the main galactic production

166: sites of heavy nuclei, some of them being radioactives. Soft

167: \gammaray observations, beyond the thermal \xray emission ($\geq$

168: 10\un{keV}), can therefore provide invaluable information in both

169: of these areas by studying the nonthermal continuum and the

170: \gammaray line emission. Cas~A then appears to be the best case

171: for such investigations.

172: 

173: Few radioactive isotopes are accessible to \gammaray astronomy for

174: probing cosmic nucleosynthesis \cite{c:diehl98}. Amongst them,

175: \ti{Ti} is a key isotope for the investigation of the inner

176: regions of core-collapse SNe and their young remnants. This

177: nucleus is thought to be exclusively created in SNe but with a

178: large variation of yields depending on their type. Recent accurate

179: measurements by several independent groups give a weighted-average

180: \ti{Ti} lifetime of 86.0 $\pm$ 0.5 years

181: \cite{c:ahmad98,c:gorres98,c:norman98,c:wietfeldt99,c:hashimoto01}.

182: The discovery of the 1157\un{keV} \ti{Ca} $\gamma$-ray line

183: emission from the decay chain of \ti{Ti}

184: ($^{44}$Ti$\longrightarrow$$^{44}$Sc$\longrightarrow$$^{44}$Ca)

185: with \gro/COMPTEL \cite{c:iyudin94} was the first direct proof

186: that this short-lived isotope is indeed produced in SNe. This has

187: been strengthened by the \sax/PDS detection of the two blended low

188: energy \ti{Sc} lines at 67.9\un{keV} and 78.4\un{keV}

189: \cite{c:vink01}. By combining both observations, Vink \etal (2001)

190: deduced a \ti{Ti} yield of (1.5$\pm$1.0) $\times$ 10$^{-4}$

191: M$_{\odot}$.

192: 

193: This high value compared to those predicted by "standard" models

194: (\eg Woosley \& Weaver 1995b, WW95; Thielemann, Nomoto, \& Hashimoto 1996,

195: TNH96) as well as improved ones \cite{c:rauscher02,c:limongi03} could be

196: due to several effects. First of all, the explosion of Cas~A seems to

197: have been intrinsically asymmetric since such asymmetries have recently

198: been observed in the ejecta \cite{c:vink04,c:hwang04}, and there are

199: indications that its explosion energy was $\sim$ 2 $\times$ 10$^{51}$

200: erg \cite{c:laming03}, higher than the canonical value of 10$^{51}$

201: erg. The sensitivity of the \ti{Ti} production to the explosion

202: energy and asymmetries may explain the high \ti{Ti} yield compared

203: to explosion models \cite{c:nagataki98}.

204: 

205: It is generally accepted that Cas~A was formed by the explosion of a

206: massive progenitor, from a 16 M$_{\odot}$ single star \cite{c:chevalier03}

207: to a Wolf-Rayet (WR) remnant of a very massive ($<$ 60 M$_{\odot}$)

208: precursor \cite{c:fesen91}. Type Ib explosions, originating from

209: progenitors which have experienced strong mass loss (see Vink

210: 2004, Vink 2005), should on average produce more \ti{Ti} due to

211: the lower fall back of material on the compact stellar remnant

212: \cite{c:wlw95a}. However, there is some debate on the detailed

213: stellar evolution scenario that may have accounted for the low

214: mass of the star prior to the explosion. The amount of oxygen

215: present (1-2 M$_{\odot}$, Vink \etal 1996) suggests a main

216: sequence mass of 20 M$_{\odot}$. This may be too low to form a

217: Type Ib progenitor by mass loss in a WR phase. Moreover, the high

218: surrounding density is better explained if the shock wave is

219: moving through the dense wind of a red supergiant rather than the more

220: tenuous wind of a WR. Therefore, it has been recently suggested that the

221: low mass of the progenitor is the result of a common envelope evolutionary

222: phase in a binary system \cite{c:young06}. The authors demonstrated that

223: such a scenario of a 15-25 M$_{\odot}$ progenitor which lost its

224: hydrogen envelope due to a binary interaction can match the main

225: observational constraints. In any case, the \ti{Ti} production is

226: highly sensitive to details of the explosion as well as nuclear

227: reaction rates. It is of interest to point out that the major

228: \ti{Ti} production reaction \ca{Ca}($\alpha$,$\gamma$)\ti{Ti} has

229: been revised \cite{c:nassar06}, implying an increase of the

230: \ti{Ti} production by a factor of $\sim$ 2.

231: 

232: In addition to the \ti{Sc} \gammaray lines, the hard \xray

233: spectrum is also of interest for its nonthermal continuum emission

234: and because this underlying continuum is critical to properly

235: measure the \ti{Sc} line flux. Nevertheless, its nature is still

236: under debate. The nonthermal hard \xray continuum could be due to

237: either synchrotron radiation of TeV electrons \cite{c:allen97} or

238: nonthermal bremsstrahlung from supra-thermal electrons which have

239: been accelerated by internal shocks (Laming 2001a,b; Vink \&

240: Laming 2003). Both cases predict a gradual steepening at high

241: energies and then, reliable continuum flux measurements beyond the

242: two low energy \ti{Sc} lines ($>$ 80\un{keV}) are necessary, as

243: initiated with \gro/OSSE \cite{c:the96}. Soft \gammaray

244: observations are therefore critical to better understand the

245: nucleosynthesis and the particle acceleration processes in young

246: SNRs such as Cas~A. \ibis \cite{c:ubertini03}, one of the two main

247: coded mask aperture instruments onboard the \integ satellite

248: \cite{c:winkler03}, is best suited to study both the hard \xray

249: continuum and the line emission thanks to its low energy

250: (15\un{keV} -- 1\un{MeV}) camera \isgri \cite{c:lebrun03}.

251: \ibisgri provides spectro-imaging (13\m~FWHM, 6\un{keV} FWHM at

252: 70\un{keV}) over a large field of view (400 deg$^{2}$) in the

253: energy range 15\un{keV}-1\un{MeV} with a milliCrab sensitivity at

254: 70 keV (3 $\sigma$, $\Delta$E/E = 2, 10$^{6}$ s). The large field

255: of view allows for long exposures devoted to the simultaneous

256: observation of several sources. In this letter, we report the

257: results of the spectro-imaging analysis of Cas~A based on \ibisgri

258: observations.

259: 

260: %_________________________________________________________________________________________________

261: 

262: \section{INTEGRAL/IBIS observations and Data Analysis}

263: \label{s:obs}

264: 

265: Since its launch, \integ has performed deep Open Time observations

266: dedicated to the Cassiopeia region, mainly for measuring and

267: constraining the \ti{Ti} production in the Cas~A and Tycho SNRs.

268: Preliminary results on these two young SNRs are reported in Vink

269: \etal (2005) and Renaud \etal (2006), respectively. Moreover, den

270: Hartog \etal (2006) have presented a comprehensive list of the

271: sources detected by \ibisgri above 20\un{keV} in this region. We

272: have performed a detailed analysis of $\sim$ 1800 pointings or

273: science windows (hereafter, scws), each of them lasting typically

274: between 1800 and 3500 s during which the telescopes are pointed at

275: a fixed direction. We have selected pointings at less than

276: 11\d~from Cas~A and removed those for which the Veto and \isgri

277: ($\geq$ 500\un{keV}) counting rates were above 3.5 $\times$

278: 10$^{4}$ and 45 ct.s$^{-1}$, respectively. The total effective

279: time is then $\sim$ 3.2\un{Ms} (over $\sim$ 4.5\un{Ms} of total

280: exposure time).

281: 

282: For \gammaray line studies, the most critical part of the

283: \ibisgri data analysis is the energy correction of detected

284: events. The spectral performance of the \isgri camera depends on

285: the alignment of the pixel gains and offsets. Based on more than

286: two years of observations, a fine in-flight calibration has been

287: done by taking into account several parameters such as the

288: temperature, the accumulated proton irradiation, and the time

289: after the detector switch-on. Moreover, because of the charge loss

290: in the Cadmium Telluride (CdTe) detectors and in their electronics,

291: the \isgri spectral response above $\sim$ 60\un{keV} depends on the pulse

292: rise-time and a second software correction is needed \cite{c:lebrun03}.

293: 

294: \begin{figure}

295: 

296: \includegraphics[scale=0.36, angle=0]{f1.eps}

297: \caption{Position (left) and width (right) of the W K$_{\alpha}$

298: background line.\label{f:isgri_lines}}

299: 

300: \end{figure}

301: 

302: To evaluate the efficiency of all these corrections, we measured

303: the position and the width of the W K$_{\alpha}$ fluorescence

304: background line at 59\un{keV} for each scw. As shown in Figure

305: \ref{f:isgri_lines}, the dispersion of the 59\un{keV} line

306: position over the 3 years of observations is about 0.1\un{keV}.

307: The spectral degradation observed on the right panel of Figure

308: \ref{f:isgri_lines} is due to the irradiation of the detector

309: pixels but is still negligible after 3 years in terms of line

310: sensitivity ($\sim$ 5\%). The deconvolution of coded mask images

311: (shadowgrams) removes completely the background only if it is

312: flat. Background structures in the shadowgram produces large scale

313: structures in the deconvolved image. To avoid them, a background

314: map is first subtracted from the shadowgram. Such correcting

315: background maps were produced by summing a large number of high

316: latitude observations from all directions. In this way, the

317: shadowgrams of the many weak sources are smeared out on the

318: detector. With more than 2\un{Ms} of exposure time, these ensure

319: the best removal of structures in the detector images, mainly

320: around the fluorescence lines located close to the two low energy

321: \ti{Sc} astrophysical lines. We then used the Off-Line Scientific

322: Analysis (OSA) software \cite{c:goldwurm03} version 5.1 in order

323: to obtain sky images and we have constructed mosaic images in 14

324: energy bands (see Figs. \ref{f:isgri_ima} and \ref{f:isgri_spec}).

325: 

326: \begin{figure*}

327: 

328: \includegraphics[scale=0.7, angle=0]{f2.eps}

329: \caption{\ibisgri flux images centered on Cas~A (2.5\d $\times$

330: 2.5\d) in six energy bands. The linear scale is the same for all

331: images, between 10$^{-6}$ and 4.7 $\times$ 10$^{-6}$ cm$^{-2}$

332: s$^{-1}$ keV$^{-1}$. Note that the noise in the images depends on

333: the energy band widths. \label{f:isgri_ima}}

334: 

335: \end{figure*}

336: 

337: %_________________________________________________________________________________________________

338: 

339: \section{Results}

340: \label{s:res}

341: 

342: In order to estimate the source position of the hard \xray

343: continuum, we also analyzed the 18-25\un{keV} energy band which

344: has the best signal to noise ratio (hereafter, S/N) for a steep

345: spectrum such as that of Cas~A. We have fitted the source with a

346: two-dimensional elliptical gaussian with the following parameters:

347: the background level, the position and the value of the maximum,

348: the widths on the two axes, and the rotation angle of the ellipse.

349: We did not find any evidence of a source extent (the two widths

350: are close to 14\m~FWHM). The fitted position of Cas~A is R.A. =

351: 23\hh~23\mm~22.6\ss, decl. = +58\d~49\m~02.1\s~(J2000) with a S/N

352: of $\sim$ 38. According to Gros \etal (2003), the corresponding

353: point source location error (PSLE) radius at the 90\% confidence

354: level is $\sim$ 50\s. Therefore, the full error box is contained

355: within the remnant.

356: 

357: \begin{figure}[htb]

358: 

359: \includegraphics[scale=0.355, angle=0]{f3.eps}

360: \caption{\ibisgri spectrum of Cas~A and the best-fit model as

361: described in the text (solid red line) with the following

362: boundaries: 21, 24, 28, 34, 39.5, 50, 63.5, 65.5, 69.5, 73.5,

363: 75.5, 79.5, 85.5, 109.5 and 201\un{keV}. The count rates and the

364: model have been divided by the effective \isgri area at the center

365: of each channel, in order to obtain approximate flux density

366: units. The upper limit above 110\un{keV} is given at the 3

367: $\sigma$ confidence level. \label{f:isgri_spec}}

368: 

369: \end{figure}

370: 

371: Figure \ref{f:isgri_ima} shows \ibisgri images centered on Cas~A

372: in the six energy bands around the two \ti{Sc} lines that shows

373: that the source brightens at the line energies. For building up

374: the source spectrum, we first measured in each individual sky

375: image the flux and its associated variance at the pixel

376: corresponding to the fitted position in the 18-25\un{keV} energy

377: range. Note that this variance takes into account all

378: uncertainties, in particular those resulting from the background

379: subtraction. We then calculated the weighted mean count rate and

380: corresponding error for each of the 14 energy bands. This spectrum

381: is presented in Figure \ref{f:isgri_spec}, showing the clear

382: detection of the two low energy \ti{Sc} lines. We tested two

383: different models for the continuum emission: the pegged power-law

384: {\tt pegpwrlw} in the 21-120\un{keV} band and the {\tt srcut}

385: \cite{c:reynolds99} model in XSPEC v.11.3. This latter is an

386: approximation of the \xray synchrotron radiation from young SNRs.

387: The \ti{Sc} lines were fitted with two gaussians of equal

388: intensity at fixed positions and with no line broadening.

389: 

390: \begin{deluxetable*}{cccccccc}

391: \tabletypesize{\scriptsize} \tablecaption{Spectral model fits}

392: \tablehead{

393: \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{Total flux in the} & \colhead{} & \colhead{} & \colhead{Roll-off} & \colhead{} \\

394: \colhead{} & \colhead{\ti{Sc} Flux} & \colhead{Power-Law} & \colhead{21-120\un{keV} range} & \colhead{Flux density} & \colhead{} & \colhead{Energy} & \colhead{} \\

395: \colhead{Model} & \colhead{(10$^{-5}$ ph cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$)} &

396: \colhead{Index} & \colhead{(10$^{-12}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$)} &

397: \colhead{at 1\un{GHz} (Jy)} & \colhead{Radio Index} &

398: \colhead{(keV)} & \colhead{$\chi^{2}$/$\nu$} } \startdata

399: Power-Law & 2.2 $\pm$ 0.5 &  3.3 $\pm$ 0.1  & 37.5 $\pm$ 1.5  &      ---        &      ---        &       ---       &  9.5/10  \\

400: SRCUT     & 2.9 $\pm$ 0.5 &      ---        &       ---       &

401: 2720 (fixed)  &   0.77 (fixed)  & 0.97 $\pm$ 0.02 & 18.5/11

402: \enddata

403: \label{t:res_sp}

404: 

405: \end{deluxetable*}

406: 

407: \begin{figure}

408: 

409: \includegraphics[scale=0.185]{f4.eps}

410: \caption{Confidence ellipses for the combination of the \ti{Sc}

411: line flux and the power-law photon index in the 21-120\un{keV}

412: band with \ibisgri (thick lines), and in the 30-100\un{keV} band

413: with \sax/PDS (thin lines, Vink \etal 2001). The vertical arrow

414: corresponds to the \rxte upper limit at 90 \% confidence level on

415: the \ti{Sc} line flux \cite{c:rothschild03} and the horizontal

416: arrow presents the first \rxte and OSSE measurements of the photon

417: index \cite{c:allen97}. \label{f:correl_ima}}

418: 

419: \end{figure}

420: 

421: 

422: The obtained best-fit parameters together with their 1 $\sigma$

423: confidence levels are given in Table \ref{t:res_sp}. The best-fit

424: model is found with a pure power-law continuum spectrum and a

425: \ti{Sc} line flux of (2.2 $\pm$ 0.5) $\times$ 10$^{-5}$ cm$^{-2}$

426: s$^{-1}$ in each line ($\chi^{2}$ = 9.5 for 10 dof) consistent

427: with previous COMPTEL and \sax/PDS measurements. Taken together

428: the \ti{Sc} lines are detected at the 4.5 $\sigma$ confidence

429: level ($\Delta$$\chi^{2}$ = 20) and each is individually detected

430: at 3 $\sigma$ above the continuum emission. Relaxing the

431: constraints on the line positions and width results in fitted

432: line flux (2.3 $\pm$ 0.5 $\times$ 10$^{-5}$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$), positions

433: (67.8 $\pm$ 1.6 and 77.4 $\pm$ 1.4\un{keV}) and width ($<$

434: 1.6\un{keV}) consistent with the expected values and does not

435: improve the fit ($\chi^{2}$ = 9.5 for 7 dof). The 3 $\sigma$ upper

436: limit on the line broadening translates to a non-constraining

437: upper limit of $\sim$ 14,000 km s$^{-1}$ for the expansion velocity.

438: For the {\tt srcut} model, the flux density at 1\un{GHz} and the

439: radio spectral index were fixed to 2720\un{Jy} and 0.77

440: \cite{c:green05}. We find a $\chi^{2}$ of 18.5 for 11 dof.

441: According to the F-test, a power-law is favored over the {\tt

442: srcut} model at 2.5 $\sigma$ (98.8 \%). It would be also the case

443: of any other model that predicts a substantial steepening of the

444: continuum emission above 50\un{keV}. From Table \ref{t:res_sp} it

445: is clear that the estimate of the \ti{Sc} line flux is sensitive

446: to this continuum modeling and we then explored the correlation

447: between the \ti{Sc} line flux and the power-law photon index.

448: Figure \ref{f:correl_ima} presents such a correlation diagram. A 

449: detailed analysis of the nature of the hard \xray continuum, its

450: effect on the \ti{Sc} line flux estimate, and the results obtained

451: with the {\it INTEGRAL}/\spi data will be presented in a forthcoming

452: paper (Vink \etal 2006, in preparation).

453: 

454: %_________________________________________________________________________________________________

455: 

456: \section{Discussion}

457: \label{s:discuss}

458: 

459: The \ibisgri observations confirm the presence of the two low energy

460: \ti{Sc} \gammaray lines in Cas~A. By performing a weighted average of

461: the three independent measurements of COMPTEL, \sax/PDS \cite{c:vink01}

462: and \isgri, we find a line flux of (2.5 $\pm$ 0.3) $\times$ 10$^{-5}$

463: cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$. Taking into account uncertainties on its age \cite{c:thorstensen01},

464: distance \cite{c:reed95} and \ti{Ti} lifetime \cite{c:vink05}, this is

465: translated into an initial synthesized \ti{Ti} mass of

466: (1.6$^{+0.6}_{-0.3}$) $\times$ 10$^{-4}$ M$_{\odot}$. This mass of

467: ejected \ti{Ti} is generally thought to be unusually large (or

468: for few specific cases, marginally consistent) in comparison with

469: spherical explosion models of WW95 and TNH96 \cite{c:timmes96}.

470: Moreover, in the standard frame where \ti{Ti} and \fe{Ni} are

471: co-produced during the first stages of the explosion, Cas~A should

472: have been a very bright, \fe{Ni}-rich SN, in contrast with its non

473: detection or with the Flamsteed's historical record. However, the large

474: \ti{Ti}/\fe{Ni} ratio could be explained by the high degree of

475: asymmetries \cite{c:nagataki98}.The high \ti{Ti} yield thus supports the

476: idea that Cas~A is the result of an asymmetric and/or a relatively more

477: energetic explosion, consistent with other observational evidence

478: \cite{c:vink04,c:hwang04}.

479: 

480: Anyway, the \ti{Ti} production in core-collapse SNe is highly sensitive to

481: the network used to compute nuclear reactions. With the recent revised

482: \ca{Ca}($\alpha$,$\gamma$)\ti{Ti} reaction rate \cite{c:nassar06},

483: theoretical models become more compatible with the \ti{Ti} yield

484: deduced from \ibisgri and previous observations. However, this

485: would make the lack of other Galactic \ti{Ti} sources an even more

486: serious problem: several \gammaray line surveys \cite{c:dupraz97,c:renaud04,c:the06}

487: have highlighted the problem of the "young, missing, and hidden" Galactic SNe,

488: those that should have occurred since Cas~A and are still not detected through the

489: line emission from \ti{Ti} decay. This would strengthen the idea that Cas~A

490: is peculiar \cite{c:young06}. On the other hand, the high \ti{Ti} yield

491: of both Cas~A and SN~1987A \cite{c:fransson01} is more in accordance with

492: the solar \ti{Ca}/\fe{Fe} ratio, whereas this ratio is underpredicted by

493: current spherically symmetric explosive nucleosynthesis models

494: \cite{c:prantzos04,c:young06}.

495: 

496: Besides the robustness provided by these \ibisgri spectro-imaging

497: observations, the main improvements compared to previous

498: observations \cite{c:vink01,c:rothschild03} are the improved

499: spectral resolution and the improved significance of the detection

500: of the hard \xray nonthermal continuum up to 100\un{keV} well

501: fitted by a single power-law. The latter gives more stringent

502: constraints on both the line intensities and the underlying

503: continuum. Therefore, the scenario of a synchrotron radiation by

504: TeV electrons \cite{c:allen97} as modeled by Reynolds \& Keohane

505: (1999) seems not appropriate in the case of Cas~A. On the other

506: hand, the model developed by Laming (2001a,b) implying a

507: nonthermal bremsstrahlung emission of supra-thermal electrons

508: could be an alternative scenario. Based on this firm detection of

509: the \ti{Sc} lines with IBIS/ISGRI, the expected results with SPI,

510: thanks to its fine spectral resolution ($\Delta$E $\sim$ 2\un{keV}

511: FWHM at 1\un{MeV}), should help us for the first time to constrain

512: the kinematics of the innermost layers of the explosion (Vink

513: \etal 2006, in preparation).

514: 

515: %_________________________________________________________________________________________________

516: 

517: \acknowledgements{The present work is based on observations with

518: {\it INTEGRAL}, an ESA project with instruments and science data

519: center (ISDC) funded by ESA members states (especially the PI

520: countries: Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, Spain,

521: Czech Republic and Poland, and with the participation of Russia

522: and the USA). \isgri has been realized and maintained in flight by

523: CEA-Saclay/DAPNIA with the support of CNES.}

524: 

525: \begin{thebibliography}{dummy}

526: 

527: \bibitem[Aharonian \etal 2001]{c:aharonian01} Aharonian, F., \etal 2001, \aap, 370, 112

528: \bibitem[Ahmad \etal 1998]{c:ahmad98} Ahmad, I., \etal 1998, \prl, 80, 2559

529: \bibitem[Allen \etal 1997]{c:allen97} Allen, G.~E., \etal 1997, \apjl , 487, L97

530: \bibitem[Ashworth 1980]{c:ashworth80} Ashworth, W.~B. 1980, J.~Hist.~Astron., 11, 1

531: \bibitem[Chevalier \& Oishi 2003]{c:chevalier03} Chevalier, R.~A., \& Oishi, J. 2003, \apj, 593, 23

532: \bibitem[Den Hartog \etal 2006]{c:denhartog06} den Hartog, P.~R., Hermsen, W., Kuiper, L., Vink, J., in 't Zand, J.~J.~M., \& Collmar, W. 2006, \aap, 451, 587

533: %\bibitem[Den Hartog \etal 2006]{c:denhartog06} den Hartog, P.~R., \etal 2006, \aap, 451, 587

534: \bibitem[Diehl \& Timmes 1998]{c:diehl98} Diehl, R., \& Timmes, F.~X. 1998, \pasp, 110, 637

535: \bibitem[Dupraz \etal 1997]{c:dupraz97} Dupraz, C., \etal 1997, \aap, 324, 683

536: \bibitem[Fransson \& Kozma 2001]{c:fransson01} Fransson, C., \& Kozma, C., 2001, New Astr. Rev., 46, 487

537: \bibitem[Fesen \& Becker 1991]{c:fesen91} Fesen, R.~A., \& Becker, R.~H. 1991, \apj, 371, 621

538: \bibitem[Goldwurm \etal 2003]{c:goldwurm03} Goldwurm, A., \etal 2003, \aap, 411, L223

539: \bibitem[G\"{o}rres \etal 1998]{c:gorres98} G\"{o}rres, J., \etal 1998, \prl, 80, 2554

540: \bibitem[Green 2005]{c:green05} Green, D.A. 2005, astro-ph/0505428

541: \bibitem[Gros \etal 2003]{c:gros03} Gros, A., \etal 2003, \aap, 411, L179

542: \bibitem[Hashimoto \etal 2001]{c:hashimoto01} Hashimoto, T., \etal 2001, Nucl.~Phys.~A, 686, 591

543: \bibitem[Hwang \etal 2004]{c:hwang04} Hwang, U., \etal 2004, \apj, 615, L117

544: \bibitem[Iyudin \etal 1994]{c:iyudin94} Iyudin, A.~F., \etal 1994, \aap, 284, L1

545: \bibitem[Laming 2001a]{c:laming01a} Laming, J.~M. 2001a, \apj, 546, 1149

546: \bibitem[Laming 2001b]{c:laming01b} Laming, J.~M. 2001b, \apj, 563, 828

547: \bibitem[Laming \& Hwang 2003]{c:laming03} Laming, J.~M., \& Hwang, U. 2003, \apj, 597, 347

548: \bibitem[Lebrun \etal 2003]{c:lebrun03} Lebrun, F., \etal 2003, \aap, 411, L141

549: \bibitem[Limongi \& Chieffi 2003]{c:limongi03} Limongi, M., \& Chieffi, A. 2003, \apj, 592, 404

550: \bibitem[Nagataki \etal 1998]{c:nagataki98} Nagataki, S., Hashimoto, M., Sato, K., Yamada, S., \& Mochizuki, Y. 1998, \apj, 492, 45

551: \bibitem[Nassar \etal 2006]{c:nassar06} Nassar, H., \etal 2006, \prl, Volume 96, Issue 4

552: \bibitem[Norman \etal 1998]{c:norman98} Norman, E.~B., \etal 1998, \prc, 57, 2010

553: \bibitem[Prantzos 2004]{c:prantzos04} Prantzos, N. 2004, 5th INTEGRAL Workshop on the INTEGRAL Universe (ESA SP-552), 16-20 February 2004, Munich, Germany

554: %\bibitem[Rauscher \etal 2002]{c:rauscher02} Rauscher, T., Heger, A., Hoffman, R.~D., \& Woosley, S.~E. 2002, \apj, 576, 323

555: \bibitem[Rauscher \etal 2002]{c:rauscher02} Rauscher, T., \etal 2002, \apj, 576, 323

556: \bibitem[Reed \etal 1995]{c:reed95} Reed, J.~E., Hester, J.~J., Fabian, A.~C., \& Winkler, P.~F. 1995, \apj, 440, 706

557: \bibitem[Renaud \etal 2004]{c:renaud04} Renaud, M., Lebrun, F., Ballet, J., Decourchelle, A., Terrier, R., \& Prantzos, N. 2004, 5th INTEGRAL Workshop on the INTEGRAL Universe (ESA SP-552), 16-20 February 2004, Munich, Germany

558: \bibitem[Renaud \etal 2006]{c:renaud06} Renaud, M., Vink, J., Decourchelle, A., Lebrun F., Terrier, R., \& Ballet, J. 2006, AwR V conference, 5-9 September 2005, Clemson, USA

559: \bibitem[Reynolds \& Keohane 1999]{c:reynolds99} Reynolds, S.~P., \& Keohane, J.~W. 1999, \apj, 525, 368

560: \bibitem[Rothschild \& Lingenfelter 2003]{c:rothschild03} Rothschild, R.~E., \& Lingenfelter, R.~E. 2003, \apj, 582, 257

561: \bibitem[Stephenson \& Green 2002]{c:stephenson02} Stephenson, F.~R., \& Green, D.~A. 2002, Historical Supernovae and their Remnants (Oxford: OUP)

562: \bibitem[Timmes \etal 1996]{c:timmes96} Timmes, F.~X., Woosley, S.~E., Hartmann, D.~H., \& Hoffman, R.~D. 1996, \apj, 464, 332

563: \bibitem[The \etal 1996]{c:the96} The, L.-S., \etal 1996, \aaps, 120, 357

564: \bibitem[The \etal 2006]{c:the06} The, L.-S., \etal 2006, \aap, in press, preprint in astro-ph/0601039

565: \bibitem[Thielemann \etal 1996]{c:thielemann96} Thielemann, F.~K., Nomoto, K., \& Hashimoto, M. 1996, \apj, 460, 408

566: \bibitem[Thorstensen \etal 2001]{c:thorstensen01} Thorstensen, J.~R., Fesen, R.~A., \& van den Bergh, S. 2001, \aj, 122, 297

567: \bibitem[Ubertini \etal 2003]{c:ubertini03} Ubertini, P., \etal 2003, \aap, 411, L131

568: \bibitem[Vink \etal 1996]{c:vink96} Vink, J., Kaastra, J.~S., \& Bleeker, J.~A.~M. 1996, \aap, 307, L41

569: \bibitem[Vink \etal 2001]{c:vink01} Vink, J., Laming, J.~M., Kaastra, J.~S., Bleeker, J.~A.~M., Bloemen, H., \& Oberlack, U. 2001, \apj, 560, L79

570: \bibitem[Vink \& Laming 2003]{c:vink03} Vink, J., \& Laming, J.~M. 2003, \apj, 584, 758

571: \bibitem[Vink 2004]{c:vink04} Vink, J. 2004, New Astronomy Review, 48, 61

572: \bibitem[Vink 2005]{c:vink05} Vink, J. 2005, AdSpR, 35, 976

573: \bibitem[Vink 2006]{c:vink06} Vink, J., \etal 2006, in preparation

574: \bibitem[Wietfeldt \etal 1999]{c:wietfeldt99} Wietfeldt, F.~E., Schima, F.~J., Coursey, B.~M., \& Hoppes, D.~D. 1999, \prc, 59, 528

575: \bibitem[Winkler \etal 2003]{c:winkler03} Winkler, C., \etal 2003, \aap, 411, L1

576: \bibitem[Woosley \etal 1995a]{c:wlw95a} Woosley, S.~E., Langer, N., \& Weaver, T.~A. 1995a, \apj, 448, 315

577: \bibitem[Woosley \& Weaver 1995b]{c:ww95b} Woosley, S.~E., \& Weaver, T.~A. 1995b, \apjs, 235, 101

578: \bibitem[Young \etal 2006]{c:young06} Young, P.~A., \etal 2006, \apj, 640, 891

579: 

580: \end{thebibliography}

581: 

582: \end{document}

583: