1: % \documentclass{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
3: \documentclass[preprint]{aastex}
4: \voffset -0.8truein
5: % \documentclass{aastex}
6: \def\simgr{\,\hbox{\hbox{$ > $}\kern -0.8em \lower 1.0ex\hbox{$\sim$}}\,}
7: \def\simle{\,\hbox{\hbox{$ < $}\kern -0.8em \lower 1.0ex\hbox{$\sim$}}\,}
8: \def\mdot{\dot M}
9: \def\te{T_{\rm eff}}
10: \shortauthors{KAPUSTA}
11: \shorttitle{RXS J053234.9+624755}
12: \begin{document}
13: \title{ Orbital Period of the Dwarf Nova RXS J053234.9+624755
14: \footnote{Based on observations obtained at the MDM Observatory, operated by
15: Dartmouth College, Columbia University, Ohio State University, and
16: the University of Michigan.}
17: }
18:
19: \author{Ann B. Kapusta and John R. Thorstensen}
20: \affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy\\
21: 6127 Wilder Laboratory, Dartmouth College\\
22: Hanover, NH 03755-3528;\\
23: ann.kapusta@dartmouth.edu}
24:
25: \begin{abstract}
26:
27: We report spectroscopy of the newly discovered SU Ursae Majoris dwarf nova
28: identified with the x-ray source RXS J053234.9+624755. Radial velocities of
29: the H$\alpha$ emission line in the quiescent state give an orbital period of
30: 0.05620(4) d (80.93 min), which is among the shortest for SU UMa stars with
31: determined periods. We also report UBVI magnitudes of the quiescent dwarf nova
32: and surrounding stars. Using a previous measurement of the superhump period,
33: we find the fractional superhump excess $\epsilon$ to be 0.016(4), which is not
34: atypical of dwarf novae in this period range.
35: \end{abstract}
36:
37: \keywords{stars -- individual (RXS J053234.9+624755); binaries - close;
38: dwarf novae, cataclysmic variables, SU UMa}
39:
40: \section{Introduction}
41:
42: Cataclysmic Variables (CVs) are close binary systems that consist of an
43: accreting white dwarf (the primary) and a secondary component that usually
44: resembles a main-sequence star. \citet{warn} comprehensively reviews CVs.
45: Dwarf novae, or U Geminorum stars, are a subclass of CVs that can be further
46: subclassified based on their outburst behavior. The SU Ursae Majoris stars
47: (referred to as UGSU)
48: form a subclass of dwarf novae that undergo occasional superoutbursts in
49: addition to normal outbursts. Superoutbursts occur less frequently than normal
50: outbursts, but are brighter and last longer. During a superoutburst,
51: characteristic oscillations called ``superhumps'' develop in the light curves.
52: The measured superhump period, $P_{\rm sh}$, is usually a few percent longer
53: than the measured orbital period, $P_{\rm orb}$. Almost all known SU UMa stars
54: have $P_{\rm orb} < 2$ hr. The superhump period excess, $\epsilon =$[($P_{\rm
55: sh}-P_{\rm orb}$/$P_{\rm orb}$], is an important quantity for these stars.
56: \citet{patt01} demonstrated that $\epsilon$ correlates well with the mass ratio
57: $q=M_2/M_1$, which is otherwise difficult to obtain.
58:
59: Another class of dwarf novae are the WZ Sagittae stars (UGWZ), which are
60: extreme examples of the SU UMa-type stars. WZ Sge stars exhibit
61: large-amplitude outbursts ($\geq$ 6 mag) that occur less frequently than the
62: those of the UGSU (\citealt{osaki}). WZ Sge stars do exhibit superhumps in
63: their light curves, but do not appear to have any `normal' outbursts.
64:
65: Here we present observations of the dwarf nova identified with the ROSAT x-ray
66: source RXS J053234.9+624755 (hereafter RX0532+62). The discovery of this star,
67: which lies in Camelopardalis, is described by \citet{poy}. \citet{bernhard}
68: classified it as a U Gem-type dwarf novae with a recurrence time scale of 133
69: days. The relatively frequent outbursts show that this star is not a UGWZ.
70: RX0532+62 underwent a well-observed superoutburst in 2005 March. During this
71: outburst a superhump period, $P_{\rm sh}$, of 0.0571(2) d (82.2 mins) was
72: reported by Tonny Vanmunster (CBA Belgium) \footnote{``Detection of Superhumps
73: in the CV 1RXS J053234.9+624755'' can be found at
74: http:$\rm//users.skynet.be/fa079980/cv\_2005/1RXSJ053234\_2005\_mar\_18.htm$};
75: \citet{poy} independently found a similar, but less accurate, value of $P_{\rm
76: sh}$. We undertook observations of this star to independently determine the
77: orbital period, $P_{\rm orb}$, and allow determination of the superhump period
78: excess, $\epsilon$.
79:
80: \section{Observations}
81:
82: We took spectra using the MDM Observatory 1.3m McGraw-Hill telescope on Kitt
83: Peak during two observing runs in 2005 September and 2006 January. We used the
84: Mark III spectrograph and a thinned $1024^2$ SITe CCD detector, with a 600 line
85: mm$^{-1}$ grism that gave spectra spanning from 4500 \AA\ to 7000
86: \AA\ at 2.3 \AA\ pixel$^{-1}$. In all, 106 spectra of RX0532+62 were
87: taken with typical exposure times of 480 s, along with frequent comparison
88: spectra to maintain the wavelength calibration. At the beginning and end of
89: every photometric night, we observed flux standards to determine an absolute
90: flux calibration. Table 1 gives a journal of observations. The system was
91: in quiescence for all the observations reported here.
92:
93: We also obtained direct images with the MDM 2.4m Hiltner Telescope. A SITe
94: $2048^2$ CCD with an image scale of 0.275 arcsec pixel$^{-1}$ was used, with
95: filters matching the Johnson UBV and Kron-Cousins I passbands. The stars in
96: the field were calibrated using \citet{landolt92} standards. Exposures were
97: obtained while the sky appeared photometric, and the reduced images were
98: processed using the DAOphot program as implemented in IRAF\footnote{The Image
99: Reduction and Analysis Facility software is written and maintained by the IRAF
100: programming group located at the National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO).
101: Software and information can be found at http://iraf.noao.edu.}
102: (\citealt{stetson}). Positions for stars in the field were derived by fitting
103: a plate model to 39 USNO A2.0 stars (\citealt{USNOA2.0}); the fit had an RMS
104: error of 0.37 arcsec. Table 2 shows the celestial positions, magnitudes, and
105: colors of RX0532+62 and the field stars. Figure 1 shows the field around
106: RX0532+62 along with the measured V magnitudes.
107:
108: We reduced the spectra using standard IRAF routines, except for the extraction
109: of one-dimensional spectra from the two-dimensional images. For this, we used
110: an original implementation of the optimal extraction algorithm developed by
111: \citet{horne}; the primary advantage over the IRAF ${\it apsum}$ routine was an
112: improved rejection of bad pixels. The time averaged and flux-calibrated
113: spectrum of RX0532+62 is shown in Figure 2. The spectrum appears typical of
114: dwarf novae, showing strong broad emission lines. The double peaks in the
115: emission lines imply that the orbital inclination is not too far from edge-on.
116: To measure the emission line radial velocities we used the convolution method
117: described by \citet{sy80}. The steep sides of the line profile were measured
118: by convolving the line with a function consisting of positive and negative
119: gaussians displaced by an adjustable separation. The emission lines' widths
120: and strengths were measured in the time-average spectra; the results are given
121: in Table 3.
122:
123: To search for $P_{\rm orb}$ in the radial velocities, we used the
124: ``residualgram'' method as described by \citet{thor96}. Figure 3 shows the
125: result for the 2005 September data. Table 4 gives the parameters of the best
126: sine fits of the form $v(t) = \gamma + K\sin[2\pi(t-T_{o})/P]$, and the rms
127: scatter $\sigma$ around the best fits. Figure 4 shows the velocities folded on
128: the period adopted from the combined (2005 September, 2006 January) data,
129: together with the best-fitting sinusoid. The 2005 September data did not
130: unambiguously determine the correct choice of daily cycle count because of the
131: limited hour angle coverage available early in the observing season. The 2006
132: January data were taken in order to resolve the ambiguity, but for unknown
133: reasons the velocities had greater scatter than the 2005 September data. We
134: also measured velocities of the H$\beta$ emission in an attempt to resolve the
135: daily cycle count. The H$\beta$ velocities corroborated the H$\alpha$
136: measurements, but the period remained ambiguous. However, we know $P_{\rm
137: sh}$, and that the $P_{\rm orb}$ of an SU UMa-type should be a few percent less
138: than $P_{\rm sh}$. This guides our choice of cycle count, which yields
139: 0.05620(4) d for the 2005 September data. The run-to-run cycle count is
140: ambiguous, but periods consistent with all the data are given by $$P_{\rm
141: orb}={130.588 \pm 0.015 \over 2324 \pm 6}{\rm \ \ d},$$
142: where the numerator is the measured
143: interval between blue-to-red crossings of the H$\alpha$ emission velocities
144: determined from our two observing runs, and the denominator is constrained
145: to integer values.
146:
147: \section{Discussion}
148:
149: Combining our $P_{\rm orb}$ with the previously measured $P_{\rm sh}$, we find
150: $\epsilon = 0.016(4)$. \citet{patt03} plot log($\epsilon$) against log($P_{\rm
151: orb}$) for a large number of systems with hydrogen-rich secondaries. On this
152: plot, RX0532+62 lies near the short-period end, where systems appear to be
153: evolving through the period minimum. These occupy a relatively wide range of
154: $\epsilon$ values. RX0532+62 is toward the top of this range, as if it has
155: evolved into the turnaround region relatively recently. \citet{patt01} fits
156: the empirical relation between $\epsilon$ and the mass ratio $q$ as
157: $\epsilon(q)=0.216q$. Using our $\epsilon$ value, we determine $q=0.074(19)$,
158: which is typical for dwarf novae with similar periods\footnote{The uncertainty in
159: $q$ is computed here using only the uncertainty in $\epsilon$; imperfections
160: in the empirical relation are ignored.}. We conclude that
161: RX0532+62 is a typical SU UMa star lying near the minimum period for
162: hydrogen-rich secondary systems.
163:
164: {\it Acknowledgments}: We thank Holly Sheets for taking the 2006 January
165: spectra. The National Science Foundation funded this research
166: through award AST-0307413 and an REU supplement to that award. Travel for Ann
167: Kapusta was made possible by a generous gift from Claudia and Jay Weed.
168:
169:
170: \clearpage
171:
172: \begin{thebibliography}
173:
174: \bibitem[Bernhard et al.(2005)]{bernhard} Bernhard, K., Lloyd, C., berthold, T., Kriebel, W., Renz, W. \ 2005, IBVS, 5620
175:
176: \bibitem[Horne(1986)]{horne} Horne, K.\ 1986, \pasp, 98, 609
177:
178: \bibitem[Landolt(1992)]{landolt92} Landolt, A. U. 1992, AJ, 104, 340
179:
180: \bibitem[Monet et al.(1996)]{USNOA2.0} Monet, D., et al. 1996, USNO-SA2.0, (U. S. Naval Observatory, Washington, DC)
181:
182: \bibitem[Patterson(2001)]{patt01} Patterson, J.\ 2001, \pasp, 113, 736-747
183:
184: \bibitem[Patterson et al.(2003)]{patt03} Patterson, J., et al.\ 2003, \pasp, 115, 1308-1329
185:
186: \bibitem[Poyner \& Shears(2006)]{poy} Poyner, G. \& Shears J. 2006, J.Br. Astron. Association, 116, 1
187:
188: \bibitem[Osaki(1995)]{osaki} Osaki, Yoji \ 1995, PASJ, 47, 47-58
189:
190: \bibitem[Thorstensen et al.(1996)]{thor96} Thorstensen, J. R., Patterson, J., Thomas, G., \& Shambrook, A. 1996, \pasp, 108, 73
191:
192: \bibitem[Stetson(1987)]{stetson} Stetson, P.~B., \ 1987, \pasp, 99, 191
193:
194: \bibitem[Schneider \& Young(1980)]{sy80} Schneider, D., \& Young, P. 1980, \apj, 238, 946
195:
196: \bibitem[Warner(1995)]{warn} Warner, B. 1995, Cataclysmic Variables (Cambridge University Press)
197:
198: \end{thebibliography}
199:
200: \clearpage
201:
202: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
203: \tablewidth{0pt}
204: \tablecolumns{4}
205: \tablecaption{Journal of Observations}
206: \tablehead{
207: \colhead{Dates(UT)} &
208: \colhead{$N$\tablenotemark{a}} &
209: \colhead{HA Start\tablenotemark{b}} &
210: \colhead{HA End\tablenotemark{c}}
211: }
212: \startdata
213: \cutinhead{Spectroscopy (1.3m)}
214: 2005 Sep 13 & 23 & $ -5:01$ & $ -1:32$ \\
215: 2005 Sep 14 & 17 & $ -4:10$ & $ -1:41$ \\
216: 2005 Sep 15 & 13 & $ -3:01$ & $ -1:15$ \\
217: 2005 Sep 16 & 18 & $ -5:07$ & $ -2:38$ \\
218: 2006 Jan 22 & 10 & $ +2:16$ & $ +4:10$ \\
219: 2006 Jan 23 & 25 & $ -2:55$ & $ +0:33$ \\
220: \cutinhead{UBVI Direct Imaging (2.4m)}
221: 2005 Sep 14 & 4 & $-$1:03 & $-$0:59 \\
222: \enddata
223: \tablenotetext{a} {Number of Exposures}
224: \tablenotetext{b} {Hour angle at the midpoint of the first exposure in hours and minutes}
225: \tablenotetext{c} {Hour angle at the midpoint of the exposure in hours and minutes}
226: \end{deluxetable}
227:
228: \clearpage
229:
230: \begin{deluxetable}{llrrrr}
231: %\voffset -0.8truein
232: \tablewidth{0pt}
233: \tablecolumns{6}
234: \tablecaption{Filter Photometry}
235: \tabletypesize{\small}
236: \tablehead{
237: \colhead{$\alpha$\tablenotemark{a}} &
238: \colhead{$\delta$\tablenotemark{a}} &
239: \colhead{$U-B$} &
240: \colhead{$B-V$} &
241: \colhead{$V$} &
242: \colhead{$V-I$} \\
243: }
244:
245: \startdata
246: \cutinhead{Field stars}
247: 5:32:15.52 & +62:46:28.3 & $ 1.24 \pm 0.02 $& $ 1.19 \pm 0.01 $& $ 13.87 \pm 0.00 $& $ 1.21 \pm 0.01 $ \\
248: 5:32:15.99 & +62:47:23.7 & $ 0.24 \pm 0.03 $& $ 0.73 \pm 0.01 $& $ 15.94 \pm 0.01 $& $ 0.84 \pm 0.01 $ \\
249: 5:32:17.30 & +62:47:17.9 & $ 0.62 \pm 0.14 $& $ 0.91 \pm 0.02 $& $ 16.98 \pm 0.01 $& $ 1.04 \pm 0.01 $ \\
250: 5:32:23.84 & +62:49:30.5 & $ 0.38 \pm 0.11 $& $ 0.88 \pm 0.03 $& $ 17.00 \pm 0.02 $& $ 0.94 \pm 0.03 $ \\
251: 5:32:26.39 & +62:48:49.9 & $ 0.84 \pm 0.06 $& $ 1.09 \pm 0.01 $& $ 15.59 \pm 0.01 $& $ 1.18 \pm 0.01 $ \\
252: 5:32:29.45 & +62:46:02.9 & $ 0.21 \pm 0.02 $& $ 0.68 \pm 0.01 $& $ 14.97 \pm 0.00 $& $ 0.78 \pm 0.01 $ \\
253: 5:32:30.82 & +62:49:49.3 & $ 0.45 \pm 0.01 $& $ 0.85 \pm 0.01 $& $ 14.21 \pm 0.00 $& $ 0.86 \pm 0.00 $ \\
254: 5:32:30.96 & +62:50:06.6 & $ 0.17 \pm 0.26 $& $ 0.92 \pm 0.06 $& $ 17.86 \pm 0.02 $& $ 1.04 \pm 0.03 $ \\
255: 5:32:31.46 & +62:47:58.1 & $ 0.20 \pm 0.03 $& $ 0.75 \pm 0.01 $& $ 15.62 \pm 0.01 $& $ 0.84 \pm 0.01 $ \\
256: 5:32:32.18 & +62:49:39.0 & $ 1.42 \pm 0.04 $& $ 1.29 \pm 0.01 $& $ 14.40 \pm 0.00 $& $ 1.29 \pm 0.00 $ \\
257: 5:32:37.91 & +62:49:54.1 & $ 0.27 \pm 0.05 $& $ 0.78 \pm 0.01 $& $ 16.12 \pm 0.01 $& $ 0.85 \pm 0.01 $ \\
258: 5:32:39.68 & +62:46:29.3 & $ 0.40 \pm 0.01 $& $ 0.84 \pm 0.00 $& $ 14.31 \pm 0.00 $& $ 0.94 \pm 0.01 $ \\
259: 5:32:39.69 & +62:50:10.7 & $ 0.44 \pm 0.19 $& $ 0.87 \pm 0.03 $& $ 17.45 \pm 0.01 $& $ 0.98 \pm 0.02 $ \\
260: 5:32:40.04 & +62:47:45.1 & $ 0.89 \pm 0.38 $& $ 1.30 \pm 0.04 $& $ 17.32 \pm 0.01 $& $ 1.34 \pm 0.02 $ \\
261: 5:32:40.46 & +62:46:23.5 & $ 0.96 \pm 0.17 $& $ 0.99 \pm 0.03 $& $ 16.91 \pm 0.01 $& $ 1.06 \pm 0.01 $ \\
262: 5:32:44.65 & +62:45:39.9 & $ 0.39 \pm 0.01 $& $ 0.84 \pm 0.01 $& $ 14.13 \pm 0.01 $& $ 0.87 \pm 0.01 $ \\
263: 5:32:46.49 & +62:45:48.1 & $ 0.17 \pm 0.04 $& $ 0.80 \pm 0.01 $& $ 15.84 \pm 0.01 $& $ 0.84 \pm 0.01 $ \\
264: 5:32:47.28 & +62:47:55.8 & $ 0.67 \pm 0.24 $& $ 0.91 \pm 0.04 $& $ 17.45 \pm 0.01 $& $ 0.97 \pm 0.02 $ \\
265: 5:32:48.62 & +62:47:20.6 & $ 1.46 \pm 0.65 $& $ 1.13 \pm 0.05 $& $ 17.74 \pm 0.02 $& $ 1.21 \pm 0.02 $ \\
266: 5:32:49.35 & +62:47:35.3 & $ 0.15 \pm 0.16 $& $ 0.81 \pm 0.04 $& $ 17.64 \pm 0.01 $& $ 0.95 \pm 0.02 $ \\
267: 5:32:49.44 & +62:48:22.9 & $ 0.21 \pm 0.04 $& $ 0.74 \pm 0.01 $& $ 16.05 \pm 0.01 $& $ 0.80 \pm 0.01 $ \\
268: 5:32:49.82 & +62:48:12.4 & $ 1.12 \pm 0.18 $& $ 1.16 \pm 0.02 $& $ 16.45 \pm 0.01 $& $ 1.22 \pm 0.01 $ \\
269: 5:32:50.98 & +62:46:16.5 & $ 0.10 \pm 0.01 $& $ 0.61 \pm 0.01 $& $ 13.47 \pm 0.01 $& $ 0.63 \pm 0.01 $ \\
270: 5:32:52.02 & +62:46:18.8 & $ 0.19 \pm 0.13 $& $ 0.88 \pm 0.02 $& $ 16.70 \pm 0.01 $& $ 0.94 \pm 0.01 $ \\
271: 5:32:52.04 & +62:49:10.8 & $ 0.46 \pm 0.10 $& $ 0.97 \pm 0.02 $& $ 16.78 \pm 0.01 $& $ 1.02 \pm 0.02 $ \\
272: 5:32:54.02 & +62:48:58.2 & $ 1.28 \pm 0.55 $& $ 1.26 \pm 0.06 $& $ 17.78 \pm 0.02 $& $ 1.42 \pm 0.02 $ \\
273: \cutinhead{Variable star}
274: 5:32:33.88 & +62:47:52.5 & $ -1.19 \pm 0.01 $& $ 0.01 \pm 0.01 $& $ 16.25 \pm 0.01 $& $ 0.65 \pm 0.01 $ \\
275:
276: \enddata
277: \tablenotetext{a}{Coordinates referred to the ICRS(i.e. J2000), and are from a fit to
278: 39 USNO A2.0 stars, with a scatter of 0.37 arcsec. Right ascensions are measured in hours,
279: minutes, and seconds and the declinations are in degrees, minutes, and
280: seconds.}
281: \end{deluxetable}
282:
283:
284: \clearpage
285:
286: \begin{deluxetable}{lrcc}
287: \tablewidth{0pt}
288: \tablecolumns{4}
289: \tablecaption{Emission Features}
290: \tablehead{
291: \colhead{Feature} &
292: \colhead{E.W.\tablenotemark{a}} &
293: \colhead{Flux\tablenotemark{b}} &
294: \colhead{FWHM \tablenotemark{c}} \\
295: &
296: \colhead{(\AA )} &
297: \colhead{} &
298: \colhead{(\AA)} \\
299: }
300:
301: \startdata
302: \cutinhead{RX 0532+62}
303: H$\beta$ & $113$ & $1844$ & 32 \\
304: HeI $\lambda 4921$ & $ 10$ & $162$ & 40 \\
305: HeI $\lambda 5015$ & $ 12$ & $184$ & 37 \\
306: Fe $\lambda 5169$ & $ 9$ & $139$ & 36 \\
307: HeI $\lambda 5876$ & $ 43$ & $524$ & 40 \\
308: H$\alpha$ & $160$ & $2004$ & 35 \\
309: HeI $\lambda 6678$ & $ 20$ & $236$ & 46 \\
310:
311: \enddata
312: \tablenotetext{a}{Emission equivalent widths are counted as positive.}
313: \tablenotetext{b}{Absolute line fluxes in units of 10$^{-16}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$.
314: These are uncertain by a factor of about
315: 2, but relative fluxes of strong lines
316: are estimated accurate to $\sim 10$ per cent.}
317: \tablenotetext{c}{From Gaussian fits.}
318: \end{deluxetable}
319:
320: \clearpage
321:
322: \begin{deluxetable}{lllrrcc}
323: \tablecolumns{7}
324: \tabletypesize{\small}
325: \tablewidth{0pt}
326: \tablecaption{Fit to the Radial Velocities}
327: \tablehead{
328: \colhead{Data Set} &
329: \colhead{$T_0$\tablenotemark{a}} &
330: \colhead{$P$} &
331: \colhead{$K$} &
332: \colhead{$\gamma$} &
333: \colhead{$N$} &
334: \colhead{$\sigma$\tablenotemark{b}} \\
335: \colhead{} &
336: \colhead{} &
337: \colhead{(days)} &
338: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} &
339: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} &
340: \colhead{} &
341: \colhead{(km s$^{-1}$)} \\
342: }
343: \startdata
344: Combined & 53629.9522(15) & [0.0561950]\tablenotemark{c} & 38(6) & $-0(5)$ & 106 & 23 \\
345: 2005 September & 53627.9854(10) & 0.05620(4) & 42(4) & $ 7(3)$ & 71 & 19 \\
346: % January 2006 & 53758.5742(11) & 0.05966(15) & 38(4) & $-10(3)$ & 35 & 23 \\
347: 2006 January & 53758.580(2) & 0.0557(3) & 38(10) & $-9(7)$ & 35 & 23 \\
348: \enddata
349: \tablecomments{Parameters of least-squares sinusoid fits to the radial
350: velocities, of the form $v(t) = \gamma + K \sin(2 \pi(t - T_0)/P$.}
351: \tablenotetext{a}{HJD - 2452000.}
352: \tablenotetext{b}{Root-mean-square residual of the fit.}
353: \tablenotetext{c}{This period is based on an arbitrary choice of cycle count
354: between 2005 September and 2006 January.}
355: \end{deluxetable}
356:
357: \clearpage
358:
359: \begin{figure}
360: \caption{Finding chart with standard magnitudes. The image is approximately 4.5 arc minutes square. The labels are V-Magnitudes of stars in the field.
361: }
362: \end{figure}
363:
364: \clearpage
365:
366: \begin{figure}
367: %\epsscale{0.88}
368: %\plotone{starchart.ps}
369: \plotone{f2.eps}
370: \caption{Mean spectrum of RX0532+62 from 2005 September. The 2006
371: January average appeared nearly identical.
372: }
373: \end{figure}
374:
375: \clearpage
376:
377: \begin{figure}
378: %\epsscale{0.88}
379: %\plotone{starchart.ps}
380: \plotone{f3.eps}
381: \caption{Results of the period search on the H$\alpha$ radial velocities of RX0532+62. The highest peak corresponds to the adopted $P_{\rm orb}$.
382: }
383: \end{figure}
384:
385: \clearpage
386:
387: \begin{figure}
388: %\epsscale{0.88}
389: %\plotone{starchart.ps}
390: \plotone{f4.eps}
391: \caption{Emission-line radial velocities as a function of orbital phase, together with the best-fitting
392: sinusoid. The data and fit are repeated for a second cycle
393: to preserve continuity. The pluses show velocities from
394: 2006 January, and the filled circles are from 2005
395: September. The gross period is determined by the 2005 September data and comparison to the superhump period, but the precise period used here is based on an arbitrary choice of cycle count between the 2005 September and the 2006 January observing runs.
396: }
397: \end{figure}
398:
399: \end{document}
400: