1: \documentstyle[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: \def\plotfiddle#1#2#3#4#5#6#7{\centering \leavevmode
4: \vbox to#2{\rule{0pt}{#2}}
5: \special{psfile=#1 voffset=#7 hoffset=#6 vscale=#5 hscale=#4 angle=#3}}
6:
7: \def\sun{\hbox{$\odot$}}
8: \def\boo{Bo{\"o}tes }
9:
10: \def\etal{{\it et~al.\ }}
11: % \tightenlines
12: % \mathwithsecnums
13: % \received{}
14: % \accepted{}
15: % \journalid{}
16: % \articleid{}{}
17:
18: \lefthead{}
19: \righthead{}
20:
21: \begin{document}
22: \title{RR Lyrae Stars in the \boo dSph}
23:
24: \author{M. H. Siegel}
25: \affil{University of Texas, McDonald Observatory}
26: \authoraddr{1 University Station, C1402, Austin TX, 78712\\
27: e:mail: siegel@astro.as.utexas.edu}
28:
29: \begin{abstract}
30: We present a catalog of 15 RR Lyrae variable stars in the recently discovered \boo dSph
31: galaxy -- the most metal-poor simple stellar population with measured RR Lyrae stars.
32: The pulsational properties of the RR Lyrae conform closely to period-abundance trends extrapolated from
33: more metal-rich populations and we estimate the distance of \boo to be $(m-M)_0=18.96\pm0.12$.
34: The average period (0.69 days), the ratio of type c to type ab
35: pulsators (0.53) and the RRab period shift (-0.07) indicate an Oosterhoff II classification for
36: Bo{\"o}tes, a marked contrast to the other
37: dSph galaxies, which are Oosterhoff intermediate.
38: This supports the contention that the Oosterhoff dichotomy is a continuum --
39: that RR Lyrae properties, to first order, vary smoothly with abundance.
40: The dSph galaxies are not distinct from the Galactic globular clusters, but bridge
41: the Oosterhoff gap. The absence of
42: any anomalous Cepheids in \boo could indicate the lack of an intermediate age population.
43: \end{abstract}
44: \keywords{stars:variables:RR Lyrae -- galaxies: dwarf -- galaxies: individual (Bo{\"o}tes)}
45:
46: \section{Introduction}
47: Belokurov et al. (2006, hereafter B06) have reported the discovery of a new dSph galaxy
48: in the constellation of Bo{\"o}tes.
49: This galaxy, claimed to be faintest known Local Group galaxy, is very sparse and apparently metal-poor,
50: with a color-magnitude diagram consistent with an abundance near
51: $[Fe/H]\sim2.3$. Munoz et al. (2006, hereafter M06) have presented spectra of \boo stars,
52: revealing the dSph to be
53: extremely metal-poor ($[Fe/H]\sim-2.5$) with a high apparent M/L ratio ($\sim130-680$).
54:
55: Studies of variable stars in dSph galaxies (Siegel \& Majewski 2000, hereafter SM00, and references
56: therein) have found rich populations of RR Lyrae variable stars as well as anomalous Cepheids.
57: The variable stars are useful not only for constraining the distance modulus to the dwarfs
58: but for confirming gross properties of the stellar populations. The presence of anomalous
59: Cepheids and RR Lyrae stars indicate intermediate and old stellar populations, respectively, and
60: the pulsational properties of the latter are heavily dependent upon the abundance --
61: and perhaps evolution -- of the horizontal branch (HB) stars. Inversely, the RR Lyrae in dSph
62: galaxies may probe regions of parameter space unoccupied by Galactic RR Lyrae. \boo is a perfect
63: example of this -- it appears to be one of the most metal-poor simple stellar populations near the
64: Galaxy. In this Letter, we present
65: a survey of variable stars in Bo{\"o}tes, identify 15 RR Lyrae variable stars and show
66: that their pulsational properties are consistent with trends extrapolated from more
67: metal-rich populations. We also comment on the impact
68: this study has on the Oosterhoff ``dichotomy''.
69:
70: \section{Observations and Reduction}
71:
72: We observed the \boo dSph with the 0.8-meter telescope at McDonald Observatory on UT
73: April 30 to May 3 2006 and June 23-26 2006. Images were obtained with the Prime Focus Corrector
74: (PFC) in the $B$, Washington $M$, $T_2 (=I)$ and narrow-band $DDO51$ filters. The PFC
75: has a field of view of 46\farcm0 and although this should presumably be large enough to
76: observe the entirety of Bo{\"o}tes, a slight offset in the 0.8-m setting circles displaced
77: our pointing slightly southwest of the dSph center. \boo subtends a large angle
78: on the sky (M06 estimate $r_h\sim$13\farcm) and there is some indication that it
79: extends off the eastern end of our survey field.
80:
81: Data were reduced with the IRAF CCDPROC package. Although the 0.8-m telescope
82: is unguided, the tracking is stable enough -- and the pixel scale coarse enough -- to allow 600s
83: integrations without significant image ellipticity. Only the first two nights of the April run
84: were photometric.
85:
86: The data were photometered using the DAOPHOT and ALLFRAME packages (Stetson 1987, 1994).
87: Despite
88: the coarse pixel scale of the PFC (1\farcs35 per pixel), we derived excellent PSFs with
89: precise photometry down to Bo{\"o}tes' HB. Photometric errors are approximately
90: $\sigma_B=0.08$ at $B=20$ for individual images and $\sigma_B=.01$ at $B=20$ in the combined image
91: created for ALLFRAME.
92:
93: Standard stars were measured using multi-aperture photometry and DAOGROW
94: (Stetson, 1990) to extract total magnitudes. The total magnitudes were then
95: calibrated to the standards of Landolt (1992) and Geisler (1990,1996)
96: using the matrix inversion methods outlined in Siegel et al. (2002). Individual images
97: were calibrated using the iterative technique described in Siegel et al. with apertures
98: corrected to the total magnitudes of the PSF stars as calculated by DAOGROW.
99: The $B$ zero point of the photometric frames showed variation consistent
100: with that of the standard stars (.01 mag).
101:
102: RR Lyrae stars vary in color by 0.2-0.4 mag (Nemec 2004),
103: which could induce offsets in
104: the relative photometry. Although we took four $I$
105: observations from which stellar colors could be measured, this is inadequate
106: for precise epochal colors for each CCD frame. We therefore transformed
107: the photometry of the RR Lyrae
108: stars using the average RR Lyrae $<B>-<I>$ color. Given that the $B-I$ color term
109: is small (-.059 mag), this reduces the color-induced photometric scatter to $<1-2$\%.
110:
111: Accurate stellar positions were estimated from the IRAF task TFINDER and the NOMAD
112: astrometric catalog (Zacharias et al. 2004). The astrometry has a precision of 0\farcs2
113: in each coordinate.
114:
115: \section{Light Curve Fitting}
116:
117: Light curves are based on 58 $B$ images obtained with the PFC. A
118: table of Julian dates and $B$ magnitudes
119: for all our RR Lyrae stars is available electronically through the ApJ.
120:
121: To identify variable stars in our data, we used the variability index produced by
122: DAOMASTER -- the ratio of scatter to observational error. We selected stars with
123: variability greater than 2.75 as potential variables.
124: Twenty stars in our sample showed this level of variability. Figure 1 shows the
125: color-magnitude diagram of \boo with the variable stars marked.
126:
127: Fifteen of
128: the variables are on the \boo HB and all of these are RR Lyrae stars (\S4).
129: The bright star near $B-I\sim1.5$
130: shows 0.1 mag variability with no consistent periodicity on the 1-2 day timescale. Its
131: $M-DDO51$ color is precisely along the field dwarf locus.
132: All three red variables have $M-DDO51$ colors consistent with stars near the tip of
133: the red giant branch (TRGB). One of these has an apparent magnitude ($I=14.7$) near
134: the \boo TRGB ($I=15.2$; Bellazzini et al. 2004). The red stars show variations of 0.1-0.2 mag,
135: but manifested {\it between} the two observing runs, not over either individual
136: run. These may be long-period variables near the TRGB.
137: The remaining bright variable is located
138: just above the \boo HB -- a position normally associated with anomalous Cepheid variables. However,
139: this star shows no periodicity on the scale of 1-2 days, only a 0.2 magnitude difference
140: between the observing runs. It could be a foreground quasar or another long-period variable.
141:
142: The absence of any anomalous Cepheids (AC) could indicate that \boo lacks an intermediate-age population
143: (see Nemec et al. 1988; Mateo et al. 1995). However, \boo may have too few stars
144: to produce AC. Our study of Leo II (SM00) identified only
145: four AC against 148+ RR Lyrae stars.
146:
147: For the RR Lyrae candidates, periods were fit using methods outlined in SM00. We used
148: Stetson's (1996) modified version of the Lafler-Kinman index (1965) to identify potential periods and used
149: a Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm to fit the RR Lyrae templates of Layden (1998) to
150: each trial period. With each star, a clear minimum $\chi^2$ was found\footnote{Star V3 has
151: two $\chi^2$ minima at .32 and .48 days. We did not capture the star during its
152: rise and both periods fit the descent of the light curve -- although with a much larger amplitude
153: for the .48 day fit (both were RRc templates). We selected the 0.32 day fit
154: because the period and amplitude would be more consistent with the other \boo RRc stars as well
155: as those in other dSph galaxies and globular clusters.}. We should expect 1-3 of Bo{\"o}tes'
156: RR Lyrae to demonstrate the Blazhko (1907) effect but our data are not extensive enough to detect
157: second-order variation. None of our stars exhibit double-mode pulsation
158: (Cox et al. 1980; Sandage et al. 1981; Cox et al. 1983; Nemec 1985a).
159:
160: Periods were checked by comparison to the phase dispersion minimization (Stellingwerf 1978)
161: program in IRAF and the STDLC template-fitting program of Layden et al. (1999) and
162: Layden \& Sarajedini (2000). Both fit periods within measurement uncertainties of ours.
163:
164: \section{\boo RR Lyrae Stars}
165:
166: Table I lists ID, coordinates, period, amplitude and Bailey (1902)
167: type (pulsation mode) for the 15 RR Lyrae stars identified in Bo{\"o}tes.
168: We also list intensity-weighted mean
169: magnitudes ($m_B$) calculated by integrating the Layden templates in .02
170: phase increments at the fit amplitude and period. Light curves of all our variables are shown
171: in figure 2.
172:
173: Figure 3 shows the period-amplitude distribution of the RR Lyrae stars in Bo{\"o}tes. We
174: note that they follow a period-amplitude relationship similar to that seen in other
175: globular clusters and dSph galaxies, but offset to longer periods -- a result consistent
176: with a very low abundance for Bo{\"o}tes. The c variables are of nearly constant
177: amplitude but show a hint of the parabola shape predicted by Bono et al. (1997).
178:
179: \subsection{\boo Stellar Populations}
180:
181: Sandage (1993, S93) demonstrated that the pulsational properties of RR Lyrae track
182: the abundance of the parent population. This provides a check on abundance
183: that is independent of photometric zero point, reddening or assumptions about
184: standard candles. \boo would represent the lowest-metallicity population
185: for which these relations have been tested.
186:
187: The most reliable diagnostic of S93 is the average period of the RRab stars, which is
188: updated in Sandage (2006) to:
189:
190: \begin{center}
191: log$<P_{ab}>$ = -0.098 [Fe/H] - 0.416
192: \end{center}
193:
194: The RRab variables in \boo have an average period of $.691\pm.089$ days, consistent
195: with an abundance of [Fe/H]=-2.6 on the Zinn-West (1984) scale.
196:
197: The shortest and longest RRab period depends on the location of the
198: blue and red edges, respectively, of the instability strip. S93 showed that these values
199: also depend on the abundance of the parent population. We use the formula
200: for the the shortest period from Sandage (2006) and for the longest period from S93:
201:
202: \begin{center}
203: log($P_{ab}$) = -0.452 + 0.033 [Fe/H]$^2$
204: \end{center}
205:
206: \begin{center}
207: log($P_{ab}$) = -0.09 [Fe/H] - 0.280
208: \end{center}
209:
210: Our shortest RRab has a period of 0.576 days,
211: consistent with an abundance of [Fe/H]=-2.5 on the Zinn-West scale.
212: Our longest period variable (.859 days) would be consistent with an abundance of
213: [Fe/H]=-2.4
214: on the Butler-Blanco scale (Butler 1975; Blanco 1992), which we correct
215: to a Zinn-West abundance of [Fe/H]=-2.6.
216:
217: Finally, the average RRc period tracks abundance by the S93 equation:
218:
219: \begin{center}
220: log$<P_{c}>$ = -0.119 [Fe/H] - 0.670,
221: \end{center}
222:
223: \noindent which, given the average \boo RRc period of $.364\pm.044$ days, indicates an abundance
224: of [Fe/H]=-2.0. This is more metal-rich than the other measures. We would
225: expect the RRc stars to have an average period of 0.42 days given the S93 formula.
226: If star V3 were to be evaluated at the 0.48 day degeneracy, this would only increase
227: the derived abundance to $[Fe/H]\sim-2.1$. A degeneracy in an RRab star and/or
228: several undiscovered RRc with periods near 0.5 days would be required to move the
229: average period to longer values. The average RRC period is the only measure inconsistent
230: with the measured abundance of Bo{\"o}tes. This may indicate non-linearity in the $[Fe/H]-<P_c>$
231: relation, similar to the slight non-linearity identified in the relationship between
232: abundance and shortest RRab period.
233:
234: It should be noted that \boo subtends a large solid angle -- its variables are distributed
235: across the PFC field with 14/15 on the eastern half. A few RR Lyrae
236: stars may have been missed in our survey.
237: Given the small number of RR Lyrae stars, a missed variable with an extremely long or
238: short period could alter our results, shifting the average period or providing an RRab
239: with a shorter or longer period than the ones we have measured.
240:
241: Nevertheless, our pulsational diagnostics {\it are} consistent with the very low \boo abundance
242: indicated by B06 and
243: M06. This demonstrates that the connection between RR Lyrae pulsation properties and abundance
244: extends to the extremely metal-poor domain. More variable star surveys of the growing number of
245: newly-discovered metal-poor dwarfs in the Local Group would test this assertion.
246:
247: We noted above that the period-amplitude relation of Bo{\"o}tes' RR Lyrae stars is shifted
248: relative to M3. Period shifts are well-established in cluster RR Lyrae
249: (Sandage 1981a; Sandage 1981b; Carney et al. 1992) and are quantitatively defined
250: by comparison to a reference variable star population, M3 being the usual template.
251: SM00 refine the period shift measure to:
252:
253: \begin{center}
254: $\Delta log P = -[0.129 A_{B} + 0.112 + log P]$
255: \end{center}
256:
257: The $\Delta log P$ values of \boo are plotted in Figure 4. The right
258: ordinate has the $\Delta M_{bol}$ scale derived in SM00 by applying assumptions about period shift
259: (notably constant mass) to the fundamental pulsation equation of van Albada \& Baker (1971).
260:
261: The RR Lyrae stars in \boo have a mean period shift of -.07. There is some
262: scatter in the period shifts which may indicate scatter in the fundamental properties
263: of Bo{\"o}tes' RR Lyrae -- either age, abundance or evolution. The period shifts of Bo{\"o}tes' RR Lyrae are
264: consistent with bolometric luminosities several tenths of a magnitude brighter than
265: the RR Lyrae of M3, as expected for a very metal-poor population. We tested this hypothesis
266: by comparing $m_B$ against $\Delta log P$. We found that
267: a linear correlation with a slope of 0.7 mag. This would be consistent with the
268: variable stars of \boo being 0.05 mag brighter than those of M3, a luminosity difference
269: four times smaller than that predicted by the magnitude-abundance relations in the
270: literature (see \S5). This indicates either that the assumption of constant mass in
271: the SM00 derivation is erroneous or that there is too much scatter in the period shift for an
272: {\it internal} check on the $m_B-\Delta log P$ relation.
273:
274: \subsection{\boo and the Oosterhoff Continuum}
275:
276: Oosterhoff (1939) established that Galactic globular clusters can be divided
277: into two categories based on the average RRab period and RRab to RRc ratio
278: (see review in Catelan 2005). The dSph galaxies, LMC and Fornax globular clusters,
279: and M31 have average $<P_{ab}>$ and $\frac{N_{RRc}}{N_{RRab}}$ measures intermediate between
280: OoI and OoII (SM00;
281: Catelan 2005 and references therein), filling the Oosterhoff gap and providing a continuous
282: trend of pulsation properties with abundance (see Figure 6 in SM00).
283: Nevertheless, some studies of RR Lyrae stars continue to differentiate
284: stars based on their Oosterhoff type.
285:
286: It could be argued that the dSph RR Lyrae are different from the globular cluster
287: RR Lyrae by virtue of the second-parameter effect. However, \boo breaks this
288: trend. It is very metal-poor -- the most metal-poor object known to
289: have RR Lyrae stars.
290: The average period of \boo RRab stars (0.69 days) and the ratio of RRc to RRab (0.53) place \boo
291: in the OoII category. The Oosterhoff dichotomy also manifests in period shift -- both
292: cluster and field stars avoid $\Delta log P$ values between
293: -0.01 and -0.05 (Suntzeff et al. 1991, marked in Figure 4). The stars in \boo have OoII period shifts.
294:
295: This means that the dSph galaxies
296: not only fill the Oosterhoff gap in the Peterson diagram, but {\it bridge} the
297: gap, providing a continuum of behavior from OoI to OoII. This reinforces the contention
298: of Renzinini (1983), Castellani (1983) and S93 that the Oosterhoff gap only exists
299: because of blueward shift in the HBs of intermediate-abundance Galactic globular clusters.
300:
301: Of course, as SM00 note, there are many parameters that affect RR Lyrae pulsational
302: properties besides abundance -- notably evolution from the zero-age HB
303: (Lee, Demarque \& Zinn 1990; Lee \& Carney 1999; Demarque et al. 2000). Nevertheless, the presence of \boo in the
304: OoII part of the Peterson diagram shows
305: that the dSph galaxies follow the same abundance-pulsation relations as the globular clusters.
306: It is clear that when {\it all} groups
307: of RR Lyrae stars are considered, metallicity is the ``first parameter" of RR Lyrae
308: pulsational properties. The data require no fundamental difference between OoI and
309: OoII RR Lyrae stars
310: because no dichotomy exists in the observational plane.
311:
312: \section{Distance and $M_V$ of \boo}
313:
314: RR Lyrae stars are excellent standard candles.
315: The average $m_B$ of Bo{\"o}tes' RR Lyrae variables is $B=19.81\pm.05.$\footnote
316: {The RRc variables are .05 mag brighter than the RRab variables.} Sandage (2006) estimates that
317: the typical RR Lyrae at the abundance of \boo have a $(B-V)_0$ color of $0.331\pm.025$. Piersimoni et
318: al. (2002) provide an empirical calibration of RRab color from period, $A_B$ and
319: [Fe/H], from which we calculate $(B-V)_0=.332\pm.03$ for our stars.
320: This places the RR Lyrae locus of \boo at $V=19.48\pm.06$. An analysis of the literature
321: (Fernley et al. 1998; Gratton et al. 2004; Sandage 2006) indicates
322: that stars at $[Fe/H]=-2.5$ should have an absolute magnitude of $M_V=0.35\pm0.10$, resulting
323: in a \boo distance modulus of $(m-M)=19.13\pm0.12$. B06 estimate an $A'_V$ extinction
324: value for \boo of 0.06 mag.
325: We find,
326: from the maps of Schlegel et al. (1998), a reddening of $E_{B-V}=.056; A'_V=0.17$. This produces
327: an absolute distance modulus of $(m-M)_0=18.96\pm.12$ for a distance of $62\pm4$ kpc.
328:
329: Our survey reveals more variable stars in \boo
330: than would be expected from such a low luminosity dwarf ($M_V=-5.8$; B06). By comparison, SM00 detect
331: ten times as many RR Lyrae in Leo II, which is over four magnitudes ($\sim80\times$) brighter than
332: Bo{\"o}tes.
333: Our preliminary examination of Ursa Major, which B06 claim is of similar
334: brightness to Bo{\"o}tes, indicates perhaps one RR Lyrae in the field. In fact, \boo has more RR Lyrae
335: stars within its core radius (12) than Ursa Major has HB stars (9, from figure 1 of Willman et al. 2005).
336: This could indicate that \boo has a high frequency of RR Lyrae stars -- or it could indicate that B06
337: underestimate Bo{\"o}tes' $M_V$. An absolute magnitude of $M_V\sim-7$ would be more consistent with
338: the number of RR Lyrae stars in Bo{\"o}tes.
339:
340: \section{Conclusions}
341:
342: We identify and fit periods
343: to 15 RR Lyrae variable stars in the \boo dSph galaxy. While \boo subtends a large solid angle and may have RR Lyrae outside
344: our survey field, the average, shortest and longest RRab periods are consistent with the very low
345: metallicity derived by B06 and M06.
346: \boo is the most metal-poor object in which RR Lyrae
347: have been identified. The distance modulus
348: of \boo is $(m-M)_0=18.96\pm0.12$.
349:
350: \boo is a canonical OoII object, with long RRab periods, a large fraction of RRc variables and
351: large negative RRab period shifts. In combination with the other dSph galaxies, it bridges the Oosterhoff
352: gap, confirming that the the gap is a selection effect peculiar to the
353: Milky Way and not necessarily a fundamental aspect of RR Lyrae variable stars.
354:
355: \acknowledgements
356:
357: This research was supported by NSF grant AST-0306884. Work on this program was performed at the Aspen
358: Center for Physics.
359:
360: \newpage
361:
362: \begin{references}
363: \reference{B02} Bailey, S. I. 1902, {\it Annals of Harvard College Observatory}, 38, 1
364: \reference{B06} Belokurov, V., et al. 2006, {\it in press, astro-ph/0604355}
365: \reference{2004A&A...424..199B} Bellazzini, M.,
366: Ferraro, F.~R., Sollima, A., Pancino, E., \& Origlia, L.\ 2004, \aap, 424, 199
367: \reference{B92} Blanco, V. 1992, \aj, 104, 734
368: \reference{Blazhko} Blazhko, S. 1907, {\it Astron. Nachr.}, 175, 325
369: \reference{BCSM} Bono, G., Caputo, F., Castellani, V. \& Marconi, M. 1997, \aaps, 121, 327.
370: \reference{B75} Butler, D. 1975, \apj, 200, 68
371: \reference{CJS} Carney, B. W., Storm, J. \& Jones, R. V. 1992, \apj, 386, 663
372: \reference{C83} Castellani, V. 1983, MSAIt, 54, 141
373: \reference{C05} Catelan, M. 2005, in ``Resolved Stellar Populations'', eds. Valls-Gabaud, D. \&
374: Chavez, M. 2005, {\it in press, astro-ph/0507464}
375: \reference{CKH} Cox, A. N., King, D. S. \& Hodson, S. W. 1980, \apj, 236, 219
376: \reference{CHC} Cox, A. N., Hodson, S. W. \& Clancy, S. P. 1983, \apj, 266, 94
377: \reference{DZLY} Demarque, P., Zinn, R., Lee, Y. W. \& Yi, S. 2000, \aj, 119, 1398
378: \reference{1998A&A...330..515F} Fernley, J., Barnes,
379: T.~G., Skillen, I., Hawley, S.~L., Hanley, C.~J., Evans, D.~W., Solano, E.,
380: \& Garrido, R.\ 1998, \aap, 330, 515
381: \reference{G90} Geisler, D. 1990, \pasp, 102, 344
382: \reference{G96} Geisler, D. 1996, \pasp, 111, 480
383: \reference{2004A&A...421..937G} Gratton, R. G.,
384: Bragaglia, A., Clementini, G., Carretta, E., Di Fabrizio, L., Maio, M., \&
385: Taribello, E.\ 2004, \aap, 421, 937
386: \reference{LK} Lafler, J. \& Kinman, T. D. 1965, \apjs, 11, 216
387: \reference{L92} Landolt, A. U. 1992, \aj, 104, 340
388: \reference{L98} Layden, A. C. 1998, \aj, 115, 193
389: \reference{L99} Layden, A. C., Ritter, L. A., Welch, D. L. \& Webb, T. M. A. 1999, \aj, 117, 1313
390: \reference{L00} Layden, A. C. \& Sarajedini, A. 2000, \aj, 119, 1760
391: \reference{LC99b} Lee, J. W. \& Carney, B. W. 1999, \aj, 117, 2868
392: \reference{LDZ} Lee, Y. W., Demarque, P. \& Zinn, R. 1990, \apj, 350, 155
393: \reference{MFK} Mateo, M., Fischer, P. \& Krzeminski, W. 1995, \aj, 110, 2166
394: \reference{M06} Munoz, R. R., et al. 2006, {\it submitted, astro-ph/0606271}
395: \reference{N85a} Nemec, J. M. 1985, \aj, 90, 240
396: \reference{N88} Nemec, J. M., Wehlau, A. \& de Oliveira, C.M. 1988, \aj, 96, 528
397: \reference{N04} Nemec, J. M. 2004, \aj, 127, 2185
398: \reference{Oo} Oosterhoff, P. Th. 1939, {\it Observatory}, 62, 104
399: \reference{2002AJ....124.1528P} Piersimoni, A.~M., Bono, G., \& Ripepi, V.\ 2002, \aj, 124, 1528
400: \reference{R83} Renzini, A. 1983, MSAIt, 54, 335
401: \reference{SKS} Sandage, A., Katem, B. \& Sandage, M. 1981, \apjs, 46, 41
402: \reference{S81a} Sandage, A. 1981a, \apj, 244, L23
403: \reference{S81b} Sandage, A. 1981b, \apj, 248, 161
404: \reference{S93a} Sandage, A. 1993a, \aj, 106, 687 [S93a]
405: \reference{S06} Sandage, A. 2006, \aj, 131, 1750
406: \reference{Sch98} Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P. \& Davis, M. 1998, \apj, 1998, 500, 525
407: \reference{SM00} Siegel, M. H. \& Majewski, S. R. 2000, \aj, 120, 284
408: \reference{SMRT} Siegel, M. H., Majewski, S. R., Reid, I. N. \& Thompson, I. B. 2002, \apj, 578, 151
409: \reference{S78} Stellingwerf, R. F. 1978, \apj, 224, 953
410: \reference{PBS87} Stetson, P. B. 1987, \pasp, 99, 191
411: \reference{PBS90} Stetson, P. B. 1990, \pasp, 102, 932
412: \reference{PBS94} Stetson, P. B. 1994, \pasp, 106, 250
413: \reference{PBS96} Stetson, P. B. 1996, \pasp, 108, 851
414: \reference{S91} Suntzeff, N. B., Kinman, T. D. \& Kraft, R. P. 1991, \apj, 367, 528
415: \reference{VB} van Albada, T.S. \& Baker, N. 1971, \apj, 169, 311
416: \reference{W05} Willman, B. et al., 2005, \apj, 626, L85
417: \reference{NOMAD} Zacharias, N., Monet, D. G., Levine, S. E., Urban, S. E., Gaume, R. \&
418: Wycoff, G. L., 2004, \baas, 205.4815
419: \reference{ZW} Zinn, R. \& West, M. J. 1984, \apjs, 55, 45
420: \end{references}
421:
422: \newpage
423:
424: \begin{center}
425: TABLE II. RR Lyrae Variable Properties\\
426: \begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c|c|c|c} \tableline\tableline
427: Var ID & RA & DEC & Period & $A_{B}$ & $m_{B}$ & Bailey \\
428: & J2000.0 & J2000.0 & (Days) & & & Type \\
429: \tableline
430: V1 & 13:59:29.36 & 14:10:43.6 & .3037714 & 0.628 & 19.78 & c \\
431: V2 & 13:59:51.34 & 14:39:06.1 & .3102270 & 0.667 & 19.73 & c \\
432: V3 & 14:00:26.87 & 14:35:33.3 & .3228953 & 0.638 & 19.79 & c \\
433: V4 & 14:00:08.90 & 14:34:24.3 & .3832322 & 0.584 & 19.82 & c \\
434: V5 & 14:00:21.56 & 14:37:29.0 & .3863158 & 0.566 & 19.75 & c \\
435: V6 & 13:59:45.95 & 14:31:40.8 & .3918305 & 0.607 & 19.86 & c \\
436: V7 & 13:59:49.37 & 14:10:05.6 & .4011623 & 0.742 & 19.76 & c \\
437: V8 & 13:59:59.69 & 14:27:34.1 & .4145401 & 0.489 & 19.79 & c \\
438: V9 & 13:59:47.28 & 14:27:56.4 & .5758855 & 1.279 & 19.84 & ab \\
439: V10 & 14:00:25.76 & 14:33:08.6 & .6279676 & 1.325 & 19.78 & ab \\
440: V11 & 13:58:04.38 & 14:13:19.3 & .6617310 & 1.201 & 19.82 & ab \\
441: V12 & 13:59:56.00 & 14:34:55.1 & .6797488 & 0.544 & 19.90 & ab \\
442: V13 & 13:59:06.36 & 14:19:00.1 & .7061108 & 0.819 & 19.77 & ab \\
443: V14 & 13:59:25.75 & 14:23:45.4 & .7244797 & 0.858 & 19.89 & ab \\
444: V15 & 14:00:11.08 & 14:24:19.7 & .8586484 & 0.481 & 19.83 & ab \\
445: \tableline
446: \end{tabular}
447: \end{center}
448:
449: \newpage
450:
451: \figcaption[f1.eps]{$BI$ color-magnitude diagram of the \boo field. Variable stars
452: are marked with triangles.}
453:
454: \figcaption[f2.eps]{Light curves for the \boo RR Lyrae, sorted by increasing period.
455: Template light curves are overlayed for comparison.}
456:
457: \figcaption[f3.eps]{Period-amplitude distribution of the RR Lyrae stars in Bo{\"o}tes. The dashed
458: line marks the period-amplitude locus of M3, parameterized by SM00.}
459:
460: \figcaption[f4.eps]{The period shift ($\Delta log P$) of Bo{\"o}tes' RR Lyrae stars.
461: The right
462: ordinate shows the corresponding bolometric magnitude shift, under the assumption of constant
463: mass. The dashed lines mark the
464: zone avoided by Galactic field and globular cluster stars. This may be contrasted with a similar diagram
465: for Leo II shown in SM00 and Mateo et al. (1995).}
466:
467: \newpage
468:
469: \begin{figure}
470: \plotone{f1.eps}
471: \end{figure}
472: \begin{figure}
473: \plotone{f2.eps}
474: \end{figure}
475: \begin{figure}
476: \plotone{f3.eps}
477: \end{figure}
478: \begin{figure}
479: \plotone{f4.eps}
480: \end{figure}
481:
482: \end{document}
483: