1: %\documentclass[]{emulateapj}
2: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
3: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
4: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
5:
6: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
7: \newcommand{\myemail}{maxima@phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp}
8:
9: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
10:
11: \shorttitle{Suzaku Observation of BD~+30$^{\circ}$~3639}
12: \shortauthors{Murashima et al.}
13: \begin{document}
14: \title{{\it Suzaku} Reveals Helium-burning Products in the\\
15: X-ray Emitting Planetary Nebula BD~+30$^{\circ}$~3639
16: }
17:
18: \author{M.~Murashima\altaffilmark{1}, M.~Kokubun\altaffilmark{1},
19: K.~Makishima\altaffilmark{1,2}, J.~Kotoku\altaffilmark{3},
20: H.~Murakami\altaffilmark{4}, K.~Matsushita\altaffilmark{5},
21: K.~Hayashida\altaffilmark{6}, K.~Arnaud\altaffilmark{7},
22: K.~Hamaguchi\altaffilmark{7}, and H.~Matsumoto\altaffilmark{8}}
23: \affil{1: Department of Physics, University of Tokyo,
24: 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0011, Japan}
25: \affil{2:The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research,
26: 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan}
27: \affil{3:Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology,
28: O-okayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan}
29: \affil{4:PLAIN Center, ISAS/JAXA,
30: 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan}
31: \affil{5:Department of Physics, Tokyo University of Science,
32: Kagurazaka, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8601, Japan}
33: \affil{6:Department of Space and Earth Science, Osaka University,
34: Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan}
35: \affil{7:Exploration of the Universe Division, Code 660,
36: NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA}
37: \affil{8:Department of Physics, Kyoto University,
38: Kitashirakawa, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan}
39:
40: \begin{abstract}
41: BD~+30$^{\circ}$~3639, the brightest planetary nebula at X-ray energies,
42: was observed with {\it Suzaku}, an X-ray observatory launched on 2005 July 10.
43: Using the X-ray Imaging Spectrometer,
44: the K-lines from C~{\sc VI}, O~{\sc VII}, and O~{\sc VIII} were
45: resolved for the first time,
46: and C/O, N/O, and Ne/O abundance ratios determined.
47: The C/O and Ne/O abundance ratios exceed the solar value
48: by a factor of at least 30 and 5, respectively.
49: These results indicate that the X-rays are emitted mainly by
50: helium shell-burning products.
51: \end{abstract}
52:
53:
54: \keywords{planetary nebulae: general --- planetary nebulae:
55: individual(BD~+30$^{\circ}$~3639), X-ray}
56:
57:
58: \section{Introduction}
59:
60: Intermediate-mass stars,
61: with initial masses $\lesssim 8\ M_{\odot}$,
62: are thought to contribute significantly to the synthesis of C, N, O, and Ne
63: through the CNO cycle and He burning.
64: These nuclear fusion products are ejected through mass loss
65: as the stars evolve from their AGB (asymptotic giant branch) phase
66: into planetary nebulae (PNe).
67: Hence, a PN can be regarded as a messenger bearing
68: information on the nucleosynthesis within these stars.
69: However, the optically-visible material in PNe
70: represents matter accumulated over the PN lifetime,
71: making it difficult to extract information on, for instance,
72: pure He-burning products just by observing the PNe shells.
73:
74: Soft X-rays, detected from several PNe,
75: are thought to originate in hot plasmas
76: produced by shocks in fast stellar winds
77: \citep{kwok1982,volk1985}.
78: These fast winds develop during the
79: later evolutionary stages of the central star,
80: so the X-rays are thought to be emitted by the star's late-phase products.
81: X-ray spectroscopy of PNe will thus allow us
82: to diagnose products of a particular nucleosynthesis phase
83: inside intermediate-mass stars.
84: However, it has been difficult to resolve K-lines from C, N, and O,
85: the major CNO and He-burning products,
86: because the line energies were too low for X-ray CCDs.
87: In addition, these objects are often too X-ray faint for
88: high-resolution spectroscopy using gratings,
89: even when their angular size is small enough.
90:
91: The 5th Japanese X-ray satellite {\it Suzaku}
92: ({\it Astro-E2}; Mitsuda et al. 2004)
93: was developed by a Japan-US collaboration
94: as a successor to {\it ASCA},
95: and was launched successfully on 2005 July 10.
96: Its X-ray Imaging Spectrometer (XIS)
97: comprises four CCD cameras, XIS-0 through XIS-3 \citep{XIS}.
98: Three of the cameras use front-illuminated (FI) CCD chips while
99: XIS-1 utilizes the back-illuminated (BI) technology.
100: Compared to similar instruments on preceding X-ray missions,
101: both the BI and FI chips have better responses
102: to X-rays with energies below $\sim 1$ keV:
103: their FWHM energy resolution at 0.5 keV is
104: $\sim 40$ eV (FI) and $\sim 50$ eV (BI),
105: with insignificant low-energy tails.
106:
107: We observed the PN, BD~+30$^{\circ}$~3639,
108: with {\it Suzaku} in order to resolve the anticipated
109: carbon and oxygen emission lines.
110: Since its detection using {\it ROSAT} \citep{kreysing1992},
111: this object has been known as the X-ray brightest PN,
112: emitting spatially-extended soft X-rays from inside
113: its $\sim 4''$ diameter optical shell \citep{kastner2000}.
114: The X-ray emitting plasma is thought
115: to have highly non-solar abundance ratios,
116: as shown by the strong Ne-K line
117: first detected using {\it ASCA} \citep{arnaud1996},
118: and a broad sub-keV spectral hump,
119: presumably a blend of C, N, and O lines,
120: subsequently detected with {\it Chandra}
121: \citep{kastner2000,maness2003}.
122:
123:
124:
125:
126:
127: \section{Observation}
128: The present observation of BD~+30$^{\circ}$~3639
129: was performed for a net exposure of 34.4 ksec on 2005 September 20,
130: (\dataset [ADS/Sa.SUZAKU#X/100025010] {seq. no. 100025010}),
131: as part of the initial performance verification of {\it Suzaku}.
132: Both the XIS and the Hard X-ray Detector (HXD; \cite{HXD})
133: onboard were operated in their nominal modes.
134: We do not however use the HXD data,
135: since its non-imaging $34' \times 34'$ field of view
136: also contains part of the large supernova remnant,
137: G65.2+5.7, which overlaps with the target PN.
138:
139: The target was clearly detected in all XIS cameras;
140: Figure~\ref{szimage} shows 0.3--0.7 keV images
141: obtained with two of them.
142: We define the source region as a $2'.5$ radius circle centered on the source,
143: which encloses $\sim 90\%$ of signal photons from the PN
144: that is essentially a point source at the angular resolution of the {\it Suzaku} X-ray Telescopes.
145: The background region is defined as
146: a surrounding annulus with an outer radius of $5'$,
147: as indicated in Figure~\ref{szimage}a.
148: After background subtraction, net signal counts are
149: $1116 \pm 46$, $3039 \pm 74$, $1174 \pm 47$, and $1012 \pm 44$
150: from XIS-0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
151: Since the three FI cameras (XIS-0, 2, 3)
152: are essentially identical, we co-add their data, and refer to them as
153: ``XIS-023'' below.
154:
155:
156:
157: \section{Analysis and Results}
158:
159: %%%%% spectrum of source/background regions %%%%%
160: As shown in Figure \ref{x1spec},
161: the on-source XIS-1 spectrum clearly reveals at 0.37 keV
162: the K$_\alpha$ line from hydrogenic carbon (C~{\sc VI}).
163: Its absence in the background spectrum ensures
164: that the line is coming from the PN itself.
165: The spectra also show K$_\alpha$ lines
166: from O~{\sc VII}, O~{\sc VIII}, and Ne~{\sc IX}.
167: Some of these lines are found in the background spectrum as well,
168: but with much reduced intensities;
169: these background lines are thought to come from
170: diffuse Galactic soft X-ray components
171: which may well extend to the present Galactic latitude of $5.^\circ 0$,
172: possibly with additional contribution from G65.2+5.7.
173:
174: At a temperature of $kT \sim 0.3$ keV \citep{arnaud1996,maness2003},
175: the C~{\sc VI} to O~{\sc VII} (the triplet summed)
176: line emissivity ratio of a solar-ratio plasma is $\sim 0.15$.
177: As illustrated in Figure~\ref{x1spec} in green,
178: this ratio will be reduced to $\sim 0.03$ \citep{mioPhD}
179: due to interstellar plus intra-nebular absorption
180: (with the latter probably dominant; \cite{kastner2002}),
181: and the decrease in XIS-1 efficiency toward lower energies.
182: Nevertheless, the XIS-1 spectrum yields comparable numbers of C~{\sc VI}
183: and O~{\sc VII} line photons,
184: suggesting a highly enhanced C/O ratio of the X-ray emitting plasma.
185:
186:
187: %%%%% gain and QE correction %%%%%
188: This early in the mission,
189: the XIS calibration is still being fine-tuned.
190: There are uncertainties in the energy gain,
191: and also in the low-energy efficiency
192: which has decreased since the start of observations.
193: We solved the former by self-calibrating (within $\sim 3\%$) the gains
194: using the emission lines from BD~+30$^{\circ}$~3639 themselves.
195: The latter effect is attributed to excess absorption
196: due to the build-up of contaminant in front of the XIS cameras.
197: We estimated the chemical composition of the excess absorber
198: using a {\it Suzaku} observation of the isolated neutron star RX~J1856.6-3574
199: \citep{mioPhD},
200: which is known to exhibit a blackbody with a temperature of 63 eV,
201: absorbed by a low column of
202: $N_{\rm H} = 0.087 \times 10^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$ \citep{burwitz2003}.
203: To accurately determine the contaminant thickness
204: for XIS-1 and (separately) XIS-023,
205: we included in all analysis a simultaneous fit to the archival
206: (\dataset [ADS/Sa.CXO#obs/00587] {ObsId 587})
207: background-subtracted {\it Chandra} ACIS-S spectrum
208: of the same object.
209:
210:
211: %%%%% vAPEC fitting %%%%%
212: We jointly fit the background-subtracted XIS-1, XIS-023, and
213: {\it Chandra} ACIS-S spectra,
214: using an absorbed single-temperature vAPEC model \citep{APEC}.
215: The abundances (relative to solar; \cite{abundances}) of C, N, O, Ne, and Fe,
216: were left free; that of He fixed to solar; other heavy elements were neglected;
217: $kT$ and the
218: intervening (interstellar plus intra-nebular)
219: hydrogen column density $N_{\rm H}$ were left free.
220: As shown in Figure \ref{combined-fit},
221: the model gives a reasonable joint fit to the three spectra,
222: with $\chi^{2}/\nu= 331/228$.
223: We determined
224: $kT=0.19 \pm 0.01$ keV and
225: $N_{\rm H} = (2.1^{+0.4}_{-0.7}) \times 10^{21}\ {\rm cm}^{-2}$.
226: Figure~\ref{combined-fit} also illustrates the difference
227: in the energy-resolving power between the XIS and ACIS-S.
228:
229: %%%%% Confidence contour (abundance ratios) %%%%%
230: This fitting procedure cannot in reality constrain
231: the absolute (i.e., relative to hydrogen) metal abundances,
232: since the low-energy flux from a plasma with
233: $kT \sim 0.2$ keV is dominated by
234: emission lines from the metals themselves,
235: even when the metallicity is $\sim 1$ solar.
236: Furthermore, the continua, due to hydrogen,
237: (presumably non-solar abundance) helium,
238: and the enhanced metals themselves,
239: cannot be independently determined.
240: Nevertheless, we expect abundance {\it ratios} among metals
241: to be reasonably constrained by the lines
242: which are individually resolved with the XIS.
243: To see this, we produced in Figure~\ref{contour}
244: confidence contours for the C and O abundances
245: using the joint vAPEC fits.
246: Thus, the contours are highly elongated
247: along the proportionality between the two quantities,
248: and the C/O ratio is successfully constrained
249: as $104 >$ C/O $>71$ solar at 90\% confidence
250: with the best estimate at 85.
251: (The range does not change significantly even allowing $N_{\rm H}$ to float.)
252: In the same way, we have obtained $5.5>$N/O
253: $>0.9$ and $7.5>$ Ne/O $>4.7$, with the best fits of 3.2 and 5.8, respectively,
254: and Fe/O$<0.1$, all in solar units.
255: Below, these results are examined for various systematic effects.
256:
257:
258:
259: %%%%% Systematic errors (He/Hbgd, QE-correction,bkgd etc.) %%%%%
260: We have so far assumed the He/H ratio to be solar.
261: However, increasing it to 5, 10, or 20 solar
262: does not affect the relative C/N/O/Ne abundances by more than 5\%.
263: Similarly, the results remain unchanged within $\sim 10$\%
264: when the thickness of the XIS excess absorber
265: is varied by $\pm 20$\% around the best estimates
266: (equivalent to $N_{\rm H} \sim 8 \times 10^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$),
267: or the background spectra are derived from several other regions
268: (e.g., using larger annuli or using limited azimuthal sectors)
269: in the XIS field of view.
270:
271: %%%%% 2-temperature plasma, NEI %%%%%
272: To relax the assumption of isothermality,
273: we refitted the three spectra jointly with a sum of two vAPEC components,
274: which are constrained to share common abundances and the same $N_{\rm H}$.
275: We tentatively fixed the C/O ratio at various trial values,
276: and let the two temperatures vary freely.
277: Even with this extra degree of freedom,
278: acceptable fits were reproduced only
279: when the assumed C/O ratio is in the range 35--120 solar.
280: The two temperatures were typically found
281: at $\sim 0.12$ keV and $\sim 0.22$ keV.
282: Further, the C/O ratio stayed above $\sim 30$
283: even when fitted with a model allowing non-equilibrium
284: ionization conditions.
285:
286: %%% Nh uncertainty
287:
288: The largest systematic effect on our results
289: comes from uncertainty in $N_{\rm H}$,
290: because our best-fit value ($N_{\rm H} \sim 2 \times 10^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$)
291: is twice that estimated from extinction data
292: at longer wavelengths \citep{cahn1992,arnaud1996,kastner2000}.
293: We therefore repeated the joint, single-vAPEC fit to the three spectra,
294: but this time fixing $N_{\rm H}$ at $1 \times 10^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$.
295: Then, $kT$ increased to $\sim 0.23$ keV,
296: and the C/O ratio decreased by a factor of $\sim 3$,
297: while the Ne/O ratio remained nearly unchanged.
298: These new parameters are consistent with the recent
299: {\it Chandra} LETG results on BD~+30$^{\circ}$~3639 \citep{kastner2006}.
300: However, the (non-reduced) $\chi^2$ for the joint fit to
301: the {\it Suzaku} XIS and {\it Chandra} ACIS data increases by $\sim 25$
302: when $N_{\rm H}$ is forced to take the smaller value.
303: This suggests that the X-ray absorption is actually higher
304: than is implied by the extinction data,
305: perhaps because the intra-nebular absorber is metal-enriched.
306:
307:
308: Based on these evaluations,
309: we take as our result the original single-vAPEC solution
310: (i.e., C/O $\sim 85$) with free $N_{\rm H}$,
311: with the reservation that the C/O ratio could be subject to a
312: systematic over-estimation by a factor of $\sim 3$.
313: This factor reflects possible non-isothermality,
314: non-equilibrium ionization conditions,
315: or the uncertainty in $N_{\rm H}$.
316: In any event, the very high carbon over-abundance
317: relative to oxygen is a robust result,
318: confirming the previous suggestions
319: \citep{arnaud1996, kastner2000, maness2003}.
320:
321:
322: \section{Discussion}
323:
324: %%%%% Plasma energetics %%%%%
325:
326: The three spectra analyzed consistently indicate an absorbed
327: 0.2--2.0 keV flux of $6.5 \times 10^{-12}$ erg s$^{-1}$,
328: in agreement with previous measurements \citep{maness2003}.
329: Correction for the absorption by $N_{\rm H}=2 \times 10^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$
330: increases this flux by a factor of $\sim 9$,
331: yielding an absorption-corrected 0.2--2.0 keV luminosity of
332: $\sim 1.4 \times 10^{33}$ ergs s$^{-1}$
333: at a distance of 1.3 kpc \citep{mellema2004}.
334: (If the fit with $N_{\rm H}=1 \times 10^{21}$ cm$^{-2}$ is used,
335: the absorption-corrected quantities become smaller
336: than these by a factor of $\sim 3$.)
337: This is only $\sim 0.1\%$ of the kinetic luminosity,
338: $\sim 1.2 \times 10^{36}$ ergs s$^{-1}$,
339: supplied by the fast stellar wind \citep{mdot}.
340: This, together with the X-ray emitting region
341: just fitting inside the optical shell \citep{kastner2000},
342: supports the interacting wind model \citep{kwok1982,volk1985}
343: as a scenario to explain the X-ray emission from this PN.
344:
345:
346: %%%%% Comparing with IR-opt.-UV abundances %%%%%
347: Observations in the optical and neighboring wavelengths
348: give the nebular abundance ratios of BD~+30$^{\circ}$ 3639
349: as C/O$\sim 3.7$, N/O$\sim 1.8$, and Ne/O $\sim 2.8$
350: in solar units \citep{bernard2003}.
351: Compared with these,
352: our X-ray results imply qualitatively similar,
353: but much more extreme, abundance patterns.
354: This is not surprising,
355: since the X-ray emitting plasma is considered to
356: represent a very limited radial zone of the stellar interior.
357: In fact, assuming, based on the {\it Chandra} image,
358: that the X-ray emitting plasma fills a sphere of radius 0.01 pc ($1''.6$),
359: its mass is estimated as $ \sim 5 \times 10^{-4} \: ~ M_{\odot}$
360: from the observed emission measure of $5.7 \times 10^{55}$ cm$^{-3}$.
361: This can be supplied only in $\sim 70$ yr
362: by the mass loss of $\sim 7 \times 10^{-6}~M_{\odot}$ yr$^{-1}$
363: from the central star \citep{mdot}.
364:
365: %%%%% Interpretation of X-ray abundance ratios %%%%%
366: Which part of the stellar interior provides the X-ray emitting plasma?
367: The most outstanding feature is the extreme carbon enhancement over oxygen,
368: by a factor of $\sim 40$ in the {\it number} ratio,
369: or $\sim 30$ in the {\it mass} ratio.
370: This is a typical value expected from competition
371: between the triple-$\alpha$ and $^{12}$C($\alpha, \gamma$)$^{16}$O
372: reactions during He shell-burning flashes \citep{herwig,suda2004},
373: for an initial mass of $\sim 2~M_{\odot}$.
374: Therefore, we presume that the X-rays come
375: primarily from products of He shell-burning episodes
376: which took place in the AGB phase.
377: The possible factor-of-three uncertainty
378: will not affect this inference significantly,
379: since the theoretical calculations are
380: thought to be uncertain to a similar degree.
381:
382: The observed high Ne/O ratio, in contrast,
383: requires a neon-producing path without $^{16}$O.
384: Presumably $^{14}$N,
385: concentrated through the CNO cycle, burnt as
386: $^{14}$N($\alpha, \gamma$)$^{18}$F($\beta ^+, \nu$)$^{18}$O($\alpha, \gamma$)$^{22}$Ne during the He shell flashes.
387: This produces $^{22}$Ne,
388: which is indistinguishable in X-rays from the more abundant $^{20}$Ne.
389: Finally, the hint of enhanced N/O ratio can be explained
390: if some fraction of the nitrogen from the CNO cycle,
391: stored in the upper He layer,
392: escaped without being caught up in the He shell burning.
393:
394: These considerations lead us
395: to the following scenario for this PN.
396: The hydrogen-rich envelope is likely to have already been expelled.
397: The outer parts of the He layer,
398: composed of radiative and convective zones,
399: are currently being ejected in the form of fast stellar winds
400: with a velocity of $\sim 1000$ km s$^{-1}$.
401: The winds carry the abundant carbon and $^{22}$Ne
402: produced in He shell flashes \citep{herwig},
403: as well as unprocessed nitrogen.
404: These ejecta are shock-heated to emit X-rays.
405:
406: A more quantitative comparison with the optical spectra
407: of the central stars of PNe \citep{leuenhagen}
408: will provide a valuable calibration
409: of the models of stellar evolution and nucleosynthesis.
410: Such work may also allow us to
411: estimate the initial progenitor mass,
412: and to clarify when the fast stellar winds start blowing.
413: In closing, the present {\it Suzaku} observation
414: has provided a valuable opportunity of
415: witnessing the carbon nucleosynthesis inside an evolved star,
416: which is one of the central building blocks of the modern astronomy
417: but has rarely been observed directly.
418:
419: \acknowledgments
420:
421: MM, together with the co-authors,
422: expresses her deepest gratitude to the
423: {\it ASTRO-E/Astro-E2/Suzaku} project members.
424: Authors thank Prof. Masayuki~Fujimoto and Dr. Takuma Suda
425: of Hokkaido University for elucidating discussion.
426: They are also grateful to Dr. Joel Kastner of Rochester Institute of Technology
427: for communicating their latest {\it Chandra} LETG results on BD~+30$^{\circ}$~3639.
428:
429:
430: {\it Facilities:} \facility{Suzaku (XIS)}.
431:
432:
433:
434: \begin{thebibliography}{}
435:
436: \bibitem[Anders \& Gevesse(1989)]{abundances}
437: Anders, E. \& Grevesse, N. 1989,
438: Geochem. Cosmochem. Acta, 53, 197
439:
440: \bibitem[Arnaud et al.(1996)]{arnaud1996}
441: Arnaud, K., Borkowski, K. J., \& Harrington, J. P. 1996,
442: \apjl, 462, 75
443:
444: \bibitem[Bernard-Salas et al.(2003)]{bernard2003}
445: Bernard-Salas, J., Pottasch, S. R., Wesselius, P. R.,
446: \& Feibelman, W. A. 2003,
447: \aap, 406, 165
448:
449: \bibitem[Burwitz et al.(2003)]{burwitz2003}
450: Burwitz, V., Harbel, F., Neuh\"auser, R., Predehl, P.,
451: Tr\"umper, J., \& Zavlin, V. E. 2003,
452: \aap, 399, 1109
453:
454: \bibitem[Cahn et al.(1992)]{cahn1992}
455: Cahn, J., Kaler, J., \& Stanghellini, L. 1992, \aaps, 94, 399
456:
457: \bibitem[de Freitas Pacheco et al.(1993)]{mdot}
458: de Freitas Pacheco, J. A., Costa, R. D. D., de Araujo, F. X., \& Petrini, D. 1993,
459: \mnras, 260, 401
460:
461: \bibitem[Hayashida et al.(2004)]{XIS}
462: Hayashida, K., et al. 2004,
463: SPIE, 5488, 73
464:
465: \bibitem[Herwig(2005)]{herwig}
466: Herwig, F. 2005,
467: \araa, 43, 435
468:
469:
470: \bibitem[Kastner et al.(2000)]{kastner2000}
471: Kastner, J. H., Soker, N., Vrtilek, S. D., \& Dgani, R. 2000,
472: \apjl, 545, 57
473:
474: \bibitem[Kastner et al.(2002)]{kastner2002}
475: Kastner, J. H., Li, J., Vrtilek, S., Gatley, I., Merrill, K. M., \& Soker, N. 2002,
476: \apj, 581, 1225
477:
478: \bibitem[Kastner et al.(2006)]{kastner2006}
479: Kastner, J. H., Yu, Y. S., Houck, H., Behar, E., Nordon, R., \& Soker, N. 2006,
480: Proc. IAU Symp. 234, eds. R. Mendez et al., in press
481:
482: \bibitem[Kawaharada et al.(2004)]{HXD}
483: Kawaharada, M. et al. 2004,
484: SPIE, 5501, 286
485:
486: \bibitem[Kreysing et al.(1992)]{kreysing1992}
487: Kreysing, H. C., Diesch, C., Zweigle, J., Staubert, R.,
488: Grewing, M., \& Hasinger, G. 1992,
489: \aap, 264, 623
490:
491: \bibitem[Kwok(1982)]{kwok1982}
492: Kwok, S. 1982,
493: \apj, 258, 280
494:
495: \bibitem[Leuenhagen \& Hamann(1998)]{leuenhagen}
496: Leuenhagen, U., \& Hamann, W.-R. 1998,
497: \aap, 330, L265
498:
499: \bibitem[Maness et al.(2003)]{maness2003}
500: Maness, H. L., Vrtilek, S. D., Kastner, J. H., \& Soker, N. 2003,
501: \apj, 589, 439
502:
503: \bibitem[Mellema (2004)]{mellema2004}
504: Mellema, G. 2004, \aap, 416, 623
505:
506: \bibitem[Mitsuda et al.(2004)]{AstroE2}
507: Mitsuda, K., Kunieda, H., Inoue, H., \& Kelley, R. 2004,
508: SPIE, 5488, 177
509:
510: \bibitem[Murashima(2006)]{mioPhD}
511: Murashima, M. 2006, PhD Thesis,
512: the University of Tokyo
513:
514: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2001)]{APEC}
515: Smith, R. K., Brickhouse, N. S., Liedahl, D. A., \& Raymond,
516: J. C. 2001, \apj, 556, L91
517:
518: \bibitem[Suda et al.(2004)]{suda2004}
519: Suda, T., Aikawa, M., Machida, M. N., Fujimoto, M. Y., \& Iben, I. J. 2004,
520: \apj, 611, 476
521:
522: \bibitem[Volk \& Kwok.(1985)]{volk1985}
523: Volk, K., \& Kwok, S. 1985,
524: \aap, 153, 79
525:
526: \end{thebibliography}
527:
528: \clearpage
529:
530: \begin{figure}
531: \plotone{f1.eps}
532: \caption{Images of BD~+30$^{\circ}$~3639 in 0.3--0.7 keV,
533: taken with XIS-0 (FI-CCD; left) and XIS-1 (BI-CCD; right).
534: Two circles specify on-source and background
535: data accumulation regions.
536: }
537: \label{szimage}
538: \end{figure}
539:
540: \clearpage
541:
542: \begin{figure}
543: \epsscale{0.9}
544: \plotone{f2.eps}
545: \caption{Spectra obtained with XIS-1 (BI).
546: Red filled circles show the on-source (background inclusive) data,
547: and black open circles the background.
548: The prediction of an absorbed 1-solar abundance model
549: with $kT=0.2$ keV is sketched in green.
550: Positions of major lines are indicated in blue.
551: }
552: \label{x1spec}
553: \end{figure}
554:
555: \clearpage
556:
557: \begin{figure}
558: \epsscale{0.95}
559: \plotone{f3.eps}
560: \caption{Background-subtracted XIS-1 (red), XIS-023 (black),
561: and {\it Chandra} ACIS-S (blue) spectra of BD~+30$^{\circ}$~3639,
562: fitted jointly by an absorbed vAPEC model.
563: The XIS responses take into account the excess absorption.
564: }
565: \label{combined-fit}
566: \end{figure}
567:
568: \clearpage
569:
570: \begin{figure}
571: \epsscale{0.8}
572: \plotone{f4.eps}
573: \caption{Confidence contours for the O and C abundances,
574: derived from the single vAPEC fit of Figure~\ref{combined-fit}.
575: The 69\% (black solid), 90\% (red solid), and 99\% (blue dotted)
576: confidence contours are drawn.
577: The other parameters are left free,
578: except for those described in the figure.
579: }
580: \label{contour}
581: \end{figure}
582:
583: \end{document}
584:
585:
586: