1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3:
4: \shorttitle{[CI] in APM~08279+5255 at z=3.91}
5: \shortauthors{WAGG ET AL.}
6:
7: \slugcomment{Accepted by ApJ, July 11, 2006}
8:
9: \def\etals{{ et al. }\rm}
10: \def\ci{{[CI]~$^3$P$_1 - ^3$P$_0$ }}
11: \def\cup{{[CI]~$^3$P$_2 - ^3$P$_1$ }}
12: \def\water{{H$_2$O~1$_{10} - $1$_{01}$ }}
13:
14: \begin{document}
15:
16: \title{Atomic Carbon in APM~08279+5255 at z=3.91
17: \footnote{Based on observations carried out with the IRAM Plateau de
18: Bure Interferometer. IRAM is supported by INSU/CNRS (France), MPG (Germany)
19: and IGN (Spain).}}
20:
21: \author{
22: J. Wagg,$^{2,3}$ D.J. Wilner,$^{2}$
23: R. Neri,$^{4}$ D. Downes,$^{4}$ and T. Wiklind,$^{5}$
24: }
25:
26: \affil{$^{2}$Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,
27: Cambridge, MA, 02138}
28: \email{jwagg@cfa.harvard.edu}
29:
30: \affil{$^{3}$Instituto Nacional de Astrof\'isica, \'Optica y Electr\'onica
31: (INAOE), Aptdo. Postal 51 y 216, Puebla, Mexico}
32:
33:
34: \affil{$^{4}$Institut de Radio Astronomie Millim\'etrique,
35: St. Martin d'H\`eres, F-38406, France}
36:
37: \affil{$^{5}$ESA Space Telescope Division, STScI,
38: 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA}
39:
40: \begin{abstract}
41: We present a detection of \ci emission in the lensed quasar
42: APM~08279+5255 at z=3.91 using the IRAM Plateau de Bure interferometer.
43: The [CI] line velocity and width are similar to the values of
44: previously detected high-J CO and HCN lines in this source,
45: suggesting that the emission from all of these species arises from
46: the same region. The apparent luminosity of the [CI] line is
47: $L'_{\rm CI} = (3.1 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{10}$~K~km~s$^{-1}$~pc$^2$,
48: which implies a neutral carbon mass,
49: $M_{\rm CI} = (4.4 \pm 0.6)m^{-1} \times10^{7}$~M$_{\odot}$,
50: where $m$ is the lensing magnification factor.
51: The [CI] line luminosity is consistent with the large molecular gas mass
52: inferred from the nuclear CO line luminosity
53: ($\sim$10$^{11} m^{-1}$~M$_{\odot}$).
54: We also present an upper limit on the \water line luminosity in
55: APM~08279+5255 of,
56: $L'_{\rm H_2O} < 1.8 \times 10^{10}$~K~km~s$^{-1}$~pc$^2$ (3-$\sigma$).
57: \end{abstract}
58:
59:
60: \keywords{
61: -- galaxies: active
62: -- galaxies: high-redshift
63: -- quasars: emission lines
64: -- quasars: individual (APM~08279+5255)
65: -- galaxies: ISM
66: }
67:
68: \section{Introduction}
69:
70: The ultraluminous quasar APM~08279+5255 at z=3.91 (Irwin et al.\ 1998)
71: is strongly gravitationally lensed (Ledoux et al.\ 1998; Ibata et al.\ 1999;
72: Egami et al.\ 2000) and appears to be one of the most luminous objects
73: in the Universe, with an apparent infrared luminosity
74: of $\sim$10$^{15}$~L$_{\odot}$ (Lewis et al.\ 1998).
75: Observations over a wide range of wavelengths
76: (e.g., Downes et al.\ 1999;
77: Ellison et al.\ 1999;
78: Gallagher et al.\ 2002;
79: Soifer et al.\ 2004;
80: Wagg et al.\ 2005) have shown that APM08279+5255 contains
81: an active nucleus and likely a starburst component.
82:
83: The combination of extreme intrinsic luminosity and amplification by
84: strong gravitational lensing
85: has allowed APM~08279+5255 to be detected in many rotational lines
86: of CO (J=4-3 and J=9-8 Downes et al.\ 1999, hereafter D99;
87: J=1-0 and J=2-1 Papadopoulos et al.\ 2001; Lewis et al.\ 2002 ),
88: including the unique
89: detection in the high excitation J=11-10 line
90: (A. Weiss et al., in preparation).
91: From high angular resolution observations, D99 suggest that the
92: high-J CO emission arises in a warm, dense circumnuclear disk
93: of sub-kiloparsec size. The detection of both HCN J=5-4
94: and HCO$^+$ J=5-4 line emission support the idea that the molecular
95: gas is dense (Wagg et al.\ 2005; Garcia-Burillo et al.\ 2006)
96:
97: Given the wealth of molecular lines detected in APM~08279+5255,
98: observations of additional diagnostic lines can provide further
99: constraints on the physical conditions in this high-redshift object.
100: One important tracer of the dense neutral gas within a galaxy's
101: interstellar medium is atomic carbon, in particular the \ci line
102: with rest frequency 492.161~GHz (G\'erin \& Phillips 1998, 2000).
103: This line has not been
104: observed widely in local galaxies due to poor atmospheric transmission
105: near this frequency; however, this line is redshifted into better
106: atmospheric windows for objects at redshifts, z~$\ga$~1.
107: The \ci line provides a complimentary probe of the physical conditions
108: of dense, neutral gas, and the [CI]/CO ratio may also provide
109: information on the role of X-rays in the molecular excitation
110: (Maloney et al. 1996).
111: In addition, Papadopoulos et al.\ (2004a, b) argue that this line
112: can provide a measure of the total molecular hydrogen (H$_2$) gas mass,
113: independent of CO line emission.
114:
115: To date, [CI] emission has been detected in four objects at z~$>2$,
116: most of which are thought to be gravitationally lensed.
117: The $^3$P$_1 - ^3$P$_0$
118: line was first detected in H1413+117 at z=2.6 (the ``Cloverleaf'';
119: Barvainis et al.\ 1997), and more recently the higher excitation
120: $^3$P$_2 - ^3$P$_1$ line was also detected in this object (Weiss et al.\ 2003).
121: Other high-redshift objects with \ci line detections include
122: IRAS~F10214 at z=2.3 (and an upper-limit on the \cup line intensity
123: is reported by Papadopoulos 2005), SMM~J14011+0252 at z=2.6
124: (Weiss et al.\ 2005), and PSS~2322+1944 at z=4.1 (Pety et al.\ 2005).
125:
126: Another important species that acts as a major coolant of dense gas
127: is water. In general, H$_2$O lines at local velocites are not accessible
128: from the ground, but they have been observed from space and are ubiquitous
129: in dense molecular cloud cores in the Galaxy
130: (Ashby et al.\ 2000; Snell et al.\ 2000).
131: At high-redshift, a tentative detection of the H$_2$O~2$_{11} - $2$_{02}$
132: line, with rest frequency 752.033~GHz, was reported in IRAS~F10214 at z=2.3
133: (Encrenaz et al.\ 1993; Casoli et al.\ 1994). At more modest redshifts,
134: the fundamental transition of ortho-water, \water has been detected in
135: absorption towards B0218+357 at z=0.685 (Combes \& Wiklind 1997).
136: For APM~08279+5255, the lower excitation \water line with rest frequency
137: 556.936~GHz is redshifted into the 3~millimeter atmospheric window.
138:
139: Here we report a detection of \ci line emission
140: in APM~08279+5255 at z=3.91, and an upper-limit on \water line emission,
141: obtained with the IRAM Plateau de Bure Interferometer (PdBI).
142: Throughout this paper we adopt a $\Lambda$-dominated cosmology:
143: $H_0 = 70$~km~s$^{-1}$~Mpc$^{-1}$, $\Omega_\Lambda = 0.7$, and
144: $\Omega_m = 0.3$ (Spergel et al.\ 2006).
145:
146:
147: \section{Observations}
148:
149: We used the IRAM PdBI to search for the \ci and \water lines in
150: APM~08279+5255, redshifted to the 3-millimeter band, on six dates in
151: 1999 and 2001.
152: All of the observations were made in compact configurations of the four
153: or five available antennas.
154: The receivers were tuned to 100.216 GHz
155: for the [CI] line, and 113.406 GHz for the H$_2$O line.
156: Spectral correlators covered a velocity range of $\sim$1500~km~s$^{-1}$
157: for [CI], and $\sim$1300~km~s$^{-1}$ for H$_2$O.
158: The phase center was offset by $1.25''$
159: from the CO peak position in D99.
160: Baseline lengths ranged from 17 to 81 meters, and the synthesized beam
161: sizes were $7\farcs2 \times 6\farcs0$ (position angle 89$^{o}$) for
162: the [CI] image, and $5\farcs9 \times 4\farcs4$ (position angle 82$^{o}$)
163: for the H$_2$O image. The nearby quasar 0749+540 was used for complex
164: gain calibration.
165: The flux scale was set using standard sources including MWC349, CRL618,
166: 3c345.3 and 0923+392, and should be accurate to better than 20\%.
167: The on-source integration time for the [CI] and H$_2$O images were
168: equivalent to 7.3 hours and 3.1 hours, respectively, with the full
169: six antenna array.
170: The resulting [CI] image has an rms noise of 0.36~mJy~beam$^{-1}$
171: in a 150~km~s$^{-1}$ channel, and the H$_2$O image has a higher rms noise
172: of 0.96~mJy~beam$^{-1}$ in a 130~km~s$^{-1}$ channel, reflecting
173: lower atmospheric transmission near the edge of the 3-millimeter window.
174:
175: \section{Results}
176:
177: Figure~1 shows images of the [CI] line and continuum emission over
178: the full velocity range observed. The line emission is clearly detected
179: in several velocity bins and appears spatially unresolved.
180: The position of peak emission is consistent with that found previously
181: for the dust continuum, CO lines, and HCN line.
182: Figure~2 shows the spectra of the [CI] and H$_2$O lines at this position.
183: There is no evidence for significant H$_2$O line emission.
184: For the [CI] spectrum, we estimate the continuum level at 100.2~GHz using
185: the ``line-free'' channels to be $S_{\rm 100GHz} = 1.18\pm0.18$~mJy.
186: For the H$_2$O spectrum, we estimate the continuum level at 113.4~GHz using
187: all of the channels to be $S_{\rm 113GHz} = 2.43\pm0.48$~mJy.
188: These values are consistent with the 93.9 GHz continuum flux of
189: $1.20\pm0.30$~mJy measured by D99 and a thermal spectrum.
190: A Gaussian fit to the continuum subtracted \ci spectrum yields a
191: peak of $2.20\pm0.51$~mJy,
192: central velocity $v_0 = 117 \pm 28$~km~s$^{-1}$ (z=$3.9130\pm0.0005$), and
193: $\Delta V_{\rm FWHM} = 386 \pm 67$~km~s$^{-1}$.
194: The integrated intensity of the \ci line is $0.93 \pm 0.13$~Jy~km~s$^{-1}$,
195: which implies a line luminosity
196: $L'_{\rm CI} = (3.1 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{10}$~K~km~s$^{-1}$~pc$^2$,
197: following Solomon et al.\ (1992).
198: Table~1 lists the fitted and derived \ci line parameters.
199:
200: We place an upper limit on the \water line emission from the noise around
201: the mean in the spectrum, assuming
202: $\Delta V_{\rm FWHM}$ = 450~km~s$^{-1}$ like the CO, HCN, and [CI] lines.
203: The 3-$\sigma$ upper limit to the integrated intensity is
204: $3\cdot(\Delta V_{\rm FWHM}/\Delta V_{\rm chan})^{1/2}\cdot \sigma_{chan}
205: = 0.70$~Jy~km~s$^{-1}$, which implies an upper limit to the H$_2$O line
206: luminosity $L'_{\rm H_2O} < 1.8 \times 10^{10}$~K~km~s$^{-1}$~pc$^2$.
207:
208: \section{Discussion}
209:
210: \subsection{Emission Region and [CI]/CO Luminosity Ratio}
211:
212:
213: The fitted [CI] line center and width are compatible with previous
214: observations of the HCN J=5-4 and HCO+ J=5-4 lines (Wagg et al.\ 2005;
215: Garcia-Burillo et al.\ 2006), though offset by $\sim120$ km~s$^{-1}$ from
216: the mean redshift determined from the high-J CO lines (D99; Weiss
217: et al. 2006, in preparation). While the line center difference
218: between the [CI] and CO is formally significant at the $\sim$4$\sigma$ level,
219: the true significance is likely lower, since the line profiles from this
220: complex source are almost certainly not described accurately by a single
221: Gaussian. Given this uncertainty, the modest signal-to-noise ratios, and
222: the lack of any resolved velocity structure in the observed line profiles,
223: we simplify our analysis by assuming the [CI] emission region is cospatial
224: with the CO line emission region, such that the conditions derived for a
225: model with a single physical component apply to both species. We stress that
226: even if all of the observed lines do arise from a single physical component,
227: the fitted Gaussian centers and widths of lines with different excitation
228: properties will not necessarily match each other perfectly, given the
229: complexity of the underlying source structure and optical depth effects.
230: Data of higher quality and from more transitions will be required to relax
231: the single component assumption and to justify more sophisticated modeling.
232:
233: The gas in the single component region is warm and dense, and is likely to be
234: a circumnuclear disk of sub-kiloparsec size. The CO emission clearly
235: has been magnified by gravitational lensing, and models suggest a
236: magnification factor in the range 3 to 20 (D99, Lewis et al.\ 2002),
237: or even higher in the models by Egami et al. (2000).
238: The exact magnification factor depends critically on the intrinsic size of
239: the emitting region. If the [CI], CO, and HCN emission are truly co-spatial,
240: however, then the magnification factors are the same, and line luminosity
241: ratios will not suffer any biases due to differential lensing effects.
242:
243: The luminosity ratio between the [CI] and CO lines is a potential
244: diagnostic of the gas excitation and carbon chemistry.
245: To compare the luminosities of [CI] and CO in APM~08279+5255, we use
246: the nuclear component of the CO J=1-0 emission (Lewis et al.\ 2002),
247: which gives $L'_{\rm [CI]} / L'_{\rm CO(1-0)} = 0.23\pm0.06$.
248: This value falls within the range $0.2\pm0.2$ found for local
249: galaxies (G\'erin \& Phillips 2000), and also the range
250: $\sim$~0.15~-~0.32 for the other four high-redshift objects that
251: have been detected in both [CI] and CO emission.
252: This ratio does not appear to have any strong dependence on environment,
253: either in the local galaxy sample, or at high-redshifts.
254: Given the significant uncertainties in the [CI]/CO luminosity ratio
255: for any individual object, it is not possible to place strong constraints
256: on the contribution of X-ray irradiation to the molecular gas excitation.
257:
258:
259: We can estimate the [CI/CO] abundance ratio from the observations,
260: adopting the physical conditions derived from multi-transition
261: CO observations (Wagg et al. 2005; A. Weiss et al. in preparation)
262: and a simple radiative transfer model. Using the
263: \textit{RADEX}\footnote{http://www.strw.leidenuniv.nl/\~{}moldata/radex.html}
264: LVG code (Sch\"{o}ier et al.\ 2005), we find that an abundance ratio,
265: [CI/CO]~$\sim$~0.6, reproduces the observed \ci to CO J=1-0
266: line luminosity ratio.
267: This ratio is similar to that found in the nearby starburst galaxy M82
268: ([CI/CO]~$\sim$~0.5; Schilke et al.\ 1993, White et al.\ 1994).
269:
270: \subsection{Neutral Carbon Mass}
271:
272: The luminosity of the \ci line can be used to derive the neutral carbon mass
273: (Weiss et al.\ 2005), as
274: \begin{equation}
275: M_{[CI]} = 5.706 \times 10^{-4}
276: \frac{Q(T_{ex})}{3}e^{23.6/T_{ex}}L'_{[CI]}~[M_{\odot}],
277: \end{equation}
278: where $Q(T_{ex}) \sim 1 + 3e^{-T_1/T_{ex}} + 5e^{-T_2/T_{ex}}$
279: ($T_1 = 23.6$~K and $T_2 = 62.5$~K are the energies of the $^3$P$_1$
280: and $^3$P$_2$ levels above the ground state) is
281: the partition function.
282: The only high-redshift object for which both the \ci and \cup
283: lines have been measured is the ``Cloverleaf'' quasar, where
284: $T_{ex} = 30$~K (Weiss et al.\ 2003, 2005).
285: Without a measurement of the higher \cup line
286: in APM~08279+5255, the value of $T_{ex}$ is uncertain.
287: However, Weiss et al.\ (2005) show that for $T_{ex} > 20$~K
288: and LTE, the estimated neutral carbon mass is
289: insensitive to the assumed excitation temperature.
290: Adopting a nominal value of $T_{ex} = 80$~K for the \ci line in
291: APM~08279+5255 (from the derived molecular gas and dust temperatures),
292: the neutral carbon mass within the nuclear region of APM~08279+5255
293: is $M_{\rm CI} = (4.4\pm0.6) m^{-1} \times10^{7}$~M$_{\odot}$,
294: where $m$ is the lensing magnification factor.
295: If $T_{ex}$ were $20$~K, then the estimated [CI] mass would be $\sim$30\%
296: lower.
297:
298: \subsection{Molecular Gas Mass}
299:
300: The luminosity in the CO J=1-0 line is the traditional tracer of molecular gas
301: (= H$_2$) mass in the Galaxy and in a variety of extragalactic environments.
302: For nearby ultraluminous infrared galaxies
303: (ULIRGs; Sanders \& Mirabel 1996; Sanders et al.\ 1988), which are believed
304: to be analogues to the currently detectable luminous high-redshift galaxies,
305: the empirical scaling factor between CO J=1-0 luminosity and H$_2$ gas mass
306: is $\sim$1~M$_{\odot}$~(K~km~s$^{-1}$~pc$^2$)$^{-1}$ (Downes \& Solomon 1998).
307: If we apply this factor to the nuclear CO J=1-0 line emission in
308: APM~08279+5255 (Papadopoulos et al.\ 2001; Lewis et al.\ 2002), then
309: the molecular gas mass implied is $\sim 1.5m^{-1} \times10^{11}$~M$_{\odot}$.
310:
311:
312: Following Papadopoulos et al.\ (2004a), the small scatter in the observed
313: [CI]/CO luminosity ratio suggests that \ci emission may provide an independent
314: estimate of molecular gas mass.
315: Papadopoulos et al.\ (2004a) relate the integrated [CI] line intensity,
316: $S_{[CI]}$, to molecular (= H$_2$) gas mass, as
317: \begin{equation}
318: M_{\rm H_2-[CI]} = 1375.8 \frac{D_{l}^2}{1+z}
319: \left( \frac{X_{\rm [CI]}}{10^{-5}} \right )^{-1}
320: \left ( \frac{A_{10}}{10^{-7}s^{-1}} \right )^{-1}
321: Q_{10}^{-1}\frac{S_{\rm [CI]}}{\rm [Jy~km~s^{-1}]}~[M_{\odot}],
322: \end{equation}
323: where $X_{\rm CI}$ is the [CI]-to-H$_2$ abundance ratio
324: (we assume $X_{\rm CI} = 3 \times 10^{-5}$), $A_{10}$ is the Einstein
325: A-coefficient ($A_{10} = 7.93 \times 10^{-8}$~s$^{-1}$), and $Q_{10}$ is
326: the excitation factor which depends on the kinetic temperature, and
327: density of the gas (we adopt $Q_{10} = 0.5$). The cosmology dependence is
328: included through the luminosity distance, $D_l$.
329: Using the observed integrated intensity of the \ci line in APM~08279+5255
330: gives $M_{\rm H_2 - [CI]} = (2.7\pm0.4)m^{-1} \times 10^{11}$~M$_{\odot}$,
331: in good agreement with the molecular gas mass estimated from the CO J=1-0 line.
332:
333: Table~\ref{table2} presents the molecular gas mass estimates derived
334: from [CI] and from CO for the five high-redshift objects where both lines
335: are detected, adjusted to a common cosmology.
336: The \ci line integrated intensities for IRAS~F10214, SMM~J14011+0252,
337: and H1413+117 are taken from Weiss et al.\ (2005), and for
338: PSS~2322+1944 from Pety et al.\ (2005).
339: The CO J=1-0 line has been detected only in APM~08279+5255 and
340: PSS~2322+1944 (Carilli et al.\ 2002). For the other objects, which are
341: not detected in the CO J=1-0 line, we use observations of
342: the CO J=3-2 line (IRAS~F10214; Solomon et al.\ 1992, H1413+117;
343: Weiss et al.\ 2003, SMM~J14011+0252; Downes \& Solomon 2003),
344: which is approximately equal to the luminosity in the CO J=1-0 line
345: at high-redshifts for warm, dense gas (Solomon et al.\ 1992).
346: Though the uncertainties are large, there is very good agreement between
347: the molecular gas mass estimates from the two tracers.
348:
349: \subsection{H$_2$O}
350:
351: We did not detect any significant \water line emission in APM~08279+5255.
352: We can estimate the H$_2$O line luminosity expected for the circumnuclear
353: region for a nominal water abundance, again adopting the previously derived
354: physical conditions for the region.
355: In Galactic molecular clouds, a typical ortho-H$_2$O abundance is
356: $4.5\times10^{-9}$ relative to H$_2$ (Snell et al. 2000; Ashby et al. 2000).
357: For $T_{kin}$ = 80~K, $n_{H_2} \sim 40,000$~cm$^{-3}$, an LVG calculation
358: gives $N({\rm H_2O})/\triangle v =
359: 8.0 \times 10^{12}$~cm$^{-2}$(km~s$^{-1}$)$^{-1}$,
360: $L'_{\rm H_2O} = 1.1 \times 10^{7}$~K~km~s$^{-1}$~pc$^2$,
361: more than two orders of magnitude below the upper limit.
362: In strongly shocked regions, the H$_2$O abundance has been observed to be
363: enhanced by more than an order of magnitude, but even if that were the case,
364: calculations show that the \water line emission would remain well below
365: the achieved detection threshold.
366:
367: \section{Summary}
368:
369: We detected \ci line emission in the ultraluminous quasar
370: APM~08279+5255 at z=3.91. The \ci line width and center are
371: similar to those of previously detected millimeter CO and HCN lines.
372: Estimates of the molecular gas mass based on the \ci line and
373: based on CO lines yield similar results, and there is no
374: evidence for any substantial contribution from a primarily
375: atomic medium. Though the observational uncertainties remain large,
376: this seems to be the case for the five high-redshift sources
377: with reported detections of both CO and [CI] emission lines.
378: The \ci line may be a valuable alternative probe of molecular gas
379: mass in systems lacking high excitation CO line emission,
380: where the molecular medium is more diffuse and cooler
381: ($T_{kin} \la 20$~K,and $n_{H_2} \la 10^4$~cm$^{-3}$;
382: Papadopoulos et al.\ 2004a). The Atacama Large Millimeter Array
383: will greatly expand the number of high-redshift sources accessible
384: in [CI] and CO emission, and will have the capability to spatially
385: resolve the emission to show directly the extent of the gas.
386:
387:
388: \section{Acknowledgments}
389:
390: We thank the IRAM PdBI staff for carrying out these observations.
391: J.W. is grateful to the SAO for support through a predoctoral student
392: fellowship and the Department of Astrophysics at INAOE for a graduate student
393: scholarship. This work is partially supported by CONACYT grant 39953-F.
394: J.W. thanks S\'ebastien Muller for helpful tips on PdBI data reduction,
395: and also Padeli Papadopoulos and Matthew Ashby for discussions about
396: [CI] and H$_2$O excitation and emission at high-redshift. We thank
397: the referee for a thorough reading of the submitted manuscript
398: and helpful suggestions.
399:
400: \begin{references}
401:
402: \reference{ashby00} Ashby, M.~L.~N., et al.\ 2000, ApJ, 539, L115
403:
404: \reference{barvainis97} Barvainis, R., Maloney, P., Antonucci, R.,
405: Alloin, D., 1997, ApJ, 484, 695
406:
407: \reference{carilli02} Carilli C.~L., Cox P., Bertoldi F., Menten K.~M.,
408: Omont A., Djorgovski S.~G., Petric A., Beelen A., Isaak K.~G., McMahon R.~G.
409: 2002, ApJ, 575, 145
410:
411: \reference{1994A&A...287..716C} Casoli F., Gerin M., Encrenaz P.~J.,
412: Combes F., 1994, A\&A, 287, 716
413:
414: \reference{combes_wiklind} Combes, F. \& Wiklind, T. 1997, ApJ 486, L79
415:
416: \reference{downes98} Downes, D. \& Solomon, P.M. 1998, ApJ, 507, 615
417:
418: \reference{1999ApJ...513L...1D} Downes D., Neri R., Wiklind T.,
419: Wilner D.\ J., Shaver P.\ A. 1999, ApJ, 513, L1 (D99)
420:
421: \reference{DS2003} Downes, D. \& Solomon, P.M. 2003, ApJ, 528, 37
422:
423: \reference{egami00} Egami E., Neugebauer G., Soifer B.\ T., Matthews K., Ressler M., Becklin E.\ E., Murphy T.\ W., Dale D.\ A., 2000, ApJ, 535, 561
424:
425:
426: \reference{1999PASP..111..946E} Ellison S.~L., Lewis G.~F., Pettini M., Sargent W.~L.~W., Chaffee F.~H., Foltz C.~B., Rauch M., Irwin M.~J., 1999, PASP, 111, 946
427:
428: \reference{1993A&A...273L..19E} Encrenaz P.~J., Combes F., Casoli F.,
429: Gerin M., Pagani L., Horellou C., Gac C., 1993, A\&A, 273, L19
430:
431: \reference{2002ApJ...567...37G} Gallagher S.~C., Brandt W.~N., Chartas G., Garmire G.~P., 2002, ApJ, 567, 37
432:
433: \reference{2006astro.ph..5656G} Garcia-Burillo S., et al., 2006, astro-ph/0605656
434:
435: \reference{GP98} G\'erin M. \& Phillips T.G. 1998, ApJ, 509, L17
436:
437: \reference{GP00} G\'erin M. \& Phillips, T.G. 2000, ApJ, 537, 644
438:
439:
440: \reference{ibata99} Ibata R.\ A., Lewis G.\ F., Irwin M.\ J., Leh{\'a}r J., Totten E.\ J., 1999, AJ, 118, 1922
441:
442:
443: \reference{irwin98} Irwin M.\ J., Ibata R.\ A., Lewis G.\ F., Totten E.\ J., 1998, ApJ, 505, 529
444:
445: \reference{lewis98} Lewis, G.F., Chapman, S.C., Ibata, R.A., Irwin, M.J., \& Totten, E.J. 1998, ApJ, 505, L1
446:
447: \reference{lewis02} Lewis, G.F., Carilli, C., Papadopoulos, P., Ivison, R.J., 2002, MNRAS, 330, L15
448:
449: \reference{maloney96} Maloney, P.R., Hollenbach, D.J., Tielens, G.G.M.
450: 1996, ApJ, 466, 561
451:
452: \reference{papadopoulos01} Papadopoulos, P., Ivison, R.J., Carilli, C., Lewis., G. 2001, Nature, 409, 58
453:
454:
455: \reference{papadop04a} Papadopoulos, P.P., Thi, W.-F., Viti, S. 2004a,
456: MNRAS, 351, 147
457:
458: \reference{papadop04b} Papadopoulos, P.P. \& Greve, T.R. 2004b, ApJ, 615, L29
459:
460: \reference{papadop05} Papadopoulos P.~P., 2005, ApJ, 623, 763
461:
462: \reference{pety04} Pety J., Beelen A., Cox P., Downes D., Omont A.,
463: Bertoldi F., Carilli C.~L. 2005, A\&A, 428, L21
464:
465:
466:
467: \reference{sanders88} Sanders, D.B., Soifer, B.T., Elias, J.H., Madore, B.F., Matthews, K., Neugebauer, G., \& Scoville, N.Z. 1988, ApJ, 325, 74
468:
469: \reference{sanders96} Sanders, D.B. \& Mirabel, I.F. 1996, ARA\&A, 34, 749
470:
471: \reference{schilke93} Schilke, P., Carlstrom, J.E., Keene, J., Phillips, T.G., 1993, ApJ, 417, L67
472:
473: \reference{radex} Sch\"{o}ier, F.L., van der Tak, F.F.S., van Dishoek, E.F., Black, J.H., 2005, A\&A, 432, 369
474:
475: \reference{snell00} Snell, R.~L., et al.\ 2000, ApJ, 539, L101
476:
477: \reference{2004ApJS..154..151S} Soifer B.~T., et al.\ 2004, ApJS, 154, 151
478:
479: \reference{solomon92b} Solomon, P.M., Downes, D., Radford, S.J.E., 1992, ApJ, 398, L29
480:
481: \reference{2006astro.ph..3449S} Spergel D.~N., et al., 2006, astro-ph/0603449
482:
483: \reference{apmhcn} Wagg J., Wilner D.\ J., Neri R., Downes D.,
484: Wiklind T. 2005, ApJ, 634, L13
485:
486: \reference{2003A&A...409L..41W} Weiss A., Henkel C., Downes, D., Walter F. 2003, A\&A, 409, L41
487:
488: \reference{2005A&A...429L..25W} Weiss A., Downes D., Henkel C., Walter F. 2005, A\&A, 429, L25
489:
490: \reference{white94} White, G.J., Ellison, B., Claude, S., Dent, W.R.F., Matheson, D.N., 1994, A\&A, 284, L23
491:
492:
493: \end{references}
494:
495: \clearpage
496:
497: \begin{deluxetable}{lc}
498: \tablecaption{\ci line parameters for APM~08279+5255.
499: \label{table1}}
500: \tablewidth{0pt}
501: \tablehead{\colhead{} & \colhead{}}
502: \startdata
503: \ci peak: & $2.20\pm0.51$~mJy \\
504: \ci $\Delta V_{\rm FWHM}$: & $386\pm67$~km~s$^{-1}$ \\
505: \ci $v_0$\tablenotemark{a}: & $117\pm28$~km~s$^{-1}$ \\
506: $S_{[CI]}$: & $0.93\pm0.13$~Jy~km~s$^{-1}$ \\
507: $L'_{[CI]}$\tablenotemark{b}: & $3.1\pm0.4 \times 10^{10}$~K~km~s$^{-1}$~pc$^2$ \\
508: \enddata
509: \tablenotetext{a}{velocity with respect to z=3.911, determined from CO
510: lines.}
511: \tablenotetext{b}{The \ci luminosity is not corrected for lensing
512: magnification.}
513: \end{deluxetable}
514:
515: \clearpage
516:
517: \begin{deluxetable}{lccccc}
518: \tablecaption{Masses of neutral carbon and H$_2$ in high-redshift objects.
519: \label{table2}}
520: \tablewidth{0pt}
521: \tablehead{\colhead{Object} & \colhead{$z_{CO}$\tablenotemark{a}} &
522: \colhead{M$_{[CI]}$} &
523: \colhead{M$_{H_2}$(CO)} &
524: \colhead{M$_{H_2}$([CI])} &
525: \colhead{Refs.} \\
526: \colhead{} & \colhead{} &
527: \colhead{[M$_{\odot}$/10$^7$]} &
528: \colhead{[M$_{\odot}$/10$^{10}$]} &
529: \colhead{[M$_{\odot}$/10$^{10}$]} &
530: \colhead{CO,[CI]}
531: }
532: \startdata
533: IRAS F10214 & 2.29 & (2.7$\pm$0.3)$m^{-1}$ & (11.3$\pm$2.5)$m^{-1}$ & (18.8$\pm$2.4)$m^{-1}$ & 1,2 \\
534: H1413+117 & 2.56 & (8.1$\pm$1.2)$m^{-1}$ & (44.3$\pm$0.7)$m^{-1}$ & (55.8$\pm$8.6)$m^{-1}$ & 3,2 \\
535: SMM~J14011+0252 & 2.57 & (3.7$\pm$0.6)$m^{-1}$ & (9.5$\pm$1.0)$m^{-1}$ & (25.9$\pm$4.3)$m^{-1}$ & 4,2 \\
536: \textbf{APM~08279+5255} & 3.91 & (4.4$\pm$0.6)$m^{-1}$ & (13.4$\pm$3.0)$m^{-1}$ & (26.7$\pm$3.7)$m^{-1}$ & 5,6\\
537: PSS 2322+1944 & 4.12 & (3.8$\pm$0.6)$m^{-1}$ & (12.5$\pm$5.3)$m^{-1}$ & (25.2$\pm$3.7)$m^{-1}$ & 7,8 \\
538: \hline
539: \enddata
540: \tablenotetext{a}{Redshift of CO emission.}
541: \tablecomments{$m$ is the gravitational lensing magnification factor \\
542: References -- (1) Solomon et al. 1992; (2) Weiss et al.\ 2005; (3) Weiss et al.\ 2003;
543: (4) Downes \& Solomon 2003; (5) Lewis et al.\ 2002; (6) This paper;
544: (7) Carilli et al.\ 2002; (8) Pety et al.\ 2005
545: }
546: \end{deluxetable}
547:
548: \clearpage
549:
550: \begin{figure}
551: \centering
552: \includegraphics[height=6.0in,angle=270]{f1.eps}
553: \caption{
554: Images of the \ci and 100.2 GHz continuum emission in APM~08279+5255
555: over the full observed velocity range.
556: The contour intervals are -2, 2, 4, 6 and 8$\times\sigma$
557: (0.36~mJy~beam$^{-1}$).
558: The cross marks the position of the CO peak position from D99, which is
559: offset ($1\farcs19$, $-0\farcs36$) from the phase center
560: (08$^h$31$^m$41$^s$.57, 52$^o$45$^m$17$^s$.7). The filled ellipse in the
561: top left panel shows the
562: $7\farcs2 \times 6\farcs0$ PA 89.0$^{\circ}$ synthesized beam.
563: The velocities indicated in the upper right corner in each panel are
564: relative to z=3.911, determined from CO observations.
565: \label{fig:ci_chan}.}
566: \end{figure}
567:
568: \clearpage
569:
570: \begin{figure}
571: \centering
572: \includegraphics[width=5in]{f2a.eps}
573: \includegraphics[width=5in]{f2b.eps}
574: \caption{ Spectra of \ci (\textit{top}) and \water (\textit{bottom}) at
575: the position of peak continuum intensity.
576: Dotted lines show the fitted continuum levels, calculated from the intensity
577: in the channels marked by the hatched regions. The dashed line shows
578: a Gaussian fit to the \ci emission.
579: \label{fig:ci_spec}}
580: \end{figure}
581:
582:
583: \end{document}
584: