1: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \documentclass{emulateapj}
3: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
4: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
5: \newcommand{\mincir}{\raise
6: -2.truept\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{$\sim$}}\raise5.truept\hbox{$<$}\ }}
7: \newcommand{\magcir}{\raise
8: -2.truept\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{$\sim$}}\raise5.truept\hbox{$>$}\ }}
9: \newcommand{\minmag}{\raise
10: -2.truept\hbox{\rlap{\hbox{$<$}}\raise6.truept\hbox{$<$}\ }}
11:
12: %epomenws: \magcir (megalutero peripou iso)
13: % \mincir (mikrotero perpiou iso)
14:
15:
16: \shorttitle{AEGIS: the environment of X-ray sources at $z\approx1$}
17: \shortauthors{Georgakakis et al.}
18:
19: \begin{document}
20:
21: \title{All-wavelength Extended Groth strip International Survey: the
22: environment of X-ray sources at $z\approx1$}
23:
24: \author{
25: A. Georgakakis\altaffilmark{1,2},
26: K. Nandra\altaffilmark{1},
27: E. S. Laird\altaffilmark{3},
28: M. C. Cooper\altaffilmark{4},
29: B. F. Gerke\altaffilmark{5},
30: J. A. Newman\altaffilmark{6},
31: D. J. Croton\altaffilmark{4},
32: %R. Yan\altaffilmark{4},
33: M. Davis\altaffilmark{4,5},
34: S. M. Faber\altaffilmark{7},
35: A. L. Coil\altaffilmark{8}
36: }
37: \altaffiltext{1}{Astrophysics Group, Blackett Laboratory, Imperial
38: College, Prince Consort Rd , London SW7 2BZ, UK}
39:
40: \altaffiltext{2}{Marie-Curie fellow; email: age@imperial.ac.uk}
41:
42: \altaffiltext{3}{UCO/Lick Observatory, University of California, Santa
43: Cruz, CA 95064, USA}
44:
45: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Astronomy, University of California at
46: Berkeley, Mail Code 3411, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA}
47:
48: \altaffiltext{5}{Department of Physics, University of California,
49: Berkeley, Mail Code 7300, CA 94720, USA}
50:
51: \altaffiltext{6}{Hubble fellow; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,
52: 1 Cyclotron Rd, Mail Stop 50-208, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA}
53:
54: \altaffiltext{7}{UCO/Lick Observatory and Department of Astronomy and
55: Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA
56: 95064, USA}
57:
58:
59: \altaffiltext{8}{Hubble fellow; Steward Observatory, University of
60: Arizona, 933 N. Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ 85721-0065, USA}
61:
62:
63: \begin{abstract}
64: We explore the environment of $z \approx 1$ AGN using a sample of 53
65: spectroscopically identified X-ray sources in the All-wavelength
66: Extended Groth strip International Survey. We quantify the
67: local density in the vicinity of an X-ray source by measuring the
68: projected surface density of spectroscopically identified optical
69: galaxies within a radius defined by the 3rd nearest neighbour. Our
70: main result is that X-ray selected AGN at $z \approx 1$ avoid
71: underdense regions at the 99.89\% confidence level. Moreover,
72: although we find that the overall population shares the same (rich)
73: environment with optical galaxies of the similar $U-B$ and $M_B$, there
74: is also tentative evidence (96\%) that AGN with blue colors ($U-B \la
75: 1$) reside in denser environments compared to optical galaxies.
76: We argue that the results above are a consequence of the whereabouts
77: of massive galaxies, capable of hosting supermassive black holes at
78: their centers, with available cold gas reservoirs, the fuel for AGN
79: activity. At $z\approx1$ an increasing fraction of such systems are
80: found in dense regions.
81: \end{abstract}
82:
83: \keywords{Surveys -- galaxies: active -- galaxies: high redshift -- galaxies:
84: structure}
85:
86:
87: \section{Introduction}\label{sec_intro}
88: In recent years there has been increasing evidence that the formation
89: of spheroids and the build-up of supermassive black holes at their
90: centers are strongly interconnected (Ferrarese \& Merritt 2000;
91: Gebhardt et al. 2000; Alexander et al. 2005). Moreover, it is now
92: well established that galaxy properties, such as morphology, color
93: and star-formation, strongly depend on environment (e.g. Butcher \&
94: Oemler 1978; Lewis et al. 2002; Gomez et al. 2003; Hogg et al. 2004),
95: suggesting a close link between local density and the evolution of
96: individual systems. Putting the evidence above together, it is natural
97: to assert that AGN activity, being strongly coupled to galaxy
98: formation and evolution, should also depend on environment.
99:
100: Despite significant observational progress however, the link
101: between local density and AGN remains controversial. For example, at
102: low redshift ($z\approx0.1$) Miller et al. (2003) found no dependence
103: on environment of the fraction of spectroscopically identified AGN in
104: the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; Schneider et. al. 2005). More
105: recent studies, also using SDSS data, suggest that it
106: is only when the AGN population is split into subsamples based on optical
107: classification and/or luminosity, that environmental differences
108: become apparent. For example powerful AGN ($L[{\rm O\,III}] > 10^{7}
109: \, L_{\odot}$) and/or narrow-line Seyferts are found in increasingly
110: {\it less} dense regions at $z \approx 0.1$, while less luminous AGN
111: and/or LINERs show no dependence on local density (e.g. Kauffmann et
112: al. 2004; Wake et al. 2005; Constantin \& Vogeley 2006). The above
113: low-$z$ results however, appear to be in conflict with observations
114: suggesting that at least certain classes of powerful AGN, such as
115: radio galaxies, reside in relatively rich environments (e.g. Zirbel
116: 1997). Additionally, the large scale distribution of
117: optically and X-ray selected AGN at $z\ga 1$ is consistent with
118: correlation lengths in the range $r_0 = 5 - 10 \, h^{-1} \rm \,
119: Mpc$ (e.g. Croom et al. 2005; Basilakos et al. 2004; Gilli et
120: al. 2005; Adelberger \& Steidel 2005). This indicates that AGN have
121: local density distribution similar to early-type systems at $z \approx
122: 1$ ($r_0 \approx \rm 6.6 \,h^{-1}\,Mpc$; Coil et al. 2004b) and that
123: they avoid poor environments at these redshifts (e.g. emission-line
124: galaxies, $r_0 \approx \rm 3.2 \,h^{-1}\,Mpc$; Coil et
125: al. 2004b). Contrary to these results, Coil et al. (2006) show that
126: the clustering amplitude of broad-line QSOs at $0.7<z<1.4$ matches
127: that of blue galaxies rather than early-type systems. This may
128: indicate differences in the methods used to select AGN in these
129: studies.
130:
131:
132: In this paper we directly quantify, for the first time, the environment
133: of X-ray selected AGN at $z \approx 1$ in an attempt to shed light on
134: the AGN/density relation at high redshift and how it compares with
135: low-$z$ results. The testbed for this analysis is the All-wavelength
136: Extended Groth strip International Survey (AEGIS), a unique
137: multiwavelength wide-area (0.5\,deg$^2$) sample, which combines
138: observations from X-ray to radio with moderate resolution optical
139: spectroscopy to $z \approx 1.4$ (Davis et al. 2006). Throughout the
140: paper we adopt $H_{0}=\rm 70\,km\,s^{-1}\,Mpc^{-1}$, $\Omega_{M}=0.3$
141: and $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.7$.
142:
143:
144: \section{The Data}\label{data}
145: The main source of redshift information for the AEGIS is the DEEP2,
146: a spectroscopic survey which aims to explore the galaxy
147: properties and the large-scale structure at $z\approx1$ (Davis et al.
148: 2003). This on-going project uses the DEIMOS spectrograph on the
149: 10\,m Keck II telescope to obtain redshifts for galaxies to
150: $R_{AB}=24.1$\,mag. The spectra are obtained with a moderately
151: high resolution grating ($R \approx 5000$), which provides a
152: velocity accuracy of $\approx 30 \rm \, km \, s^{-1}$ and a
153: wavelength range $\rm 6500-9100\,\AA$. This spectral window
154: allows the identification of the O\,II emission line to $z \approx
155: 1.4$. In this study we use a total of 5864 galaxies with secure
156: redshifts ($>$90\% confidence; quality $Q>2$) in the range
157: $0.6<z<1.4$. In this interval the AEGIS has high spectroscopic
158: sampling rate and is less affected by the survey edges.
159:
160:
161: At X-ray wavelengths the 0.5\,deg$^2$ region of the AEGIS is covered
162: by 8 ACIS-I {\it Chandra} pointings. In the analysis presented in this
163: paper we use data from 4 of the 8 {\it Chandra} fields that will
164: eventually be available for the AEGIS. Details about the X-ray data
165: used here are listed in Table \ref{tab1}. The remaining observations
166: are still being analyzed or lie in regions where the DEEP2
167: spectroscopy is still incomplete and does not allow study of the local
168: density using 3-dimensional information. The X-ray data reduction,
169: source detection and flux estimation are carried out using methods
170: fully described in Nandra et al. (2005). The detected sources are
171: optically and spectroscopically identified using the DEEP2 photometric
172: and redshift catalogues (Coil et al. 2004a; Faber et al. 2006)
173: following the prescriptions presented by Georgakakis et
174: al. (2006). The X-ray sample comprises a total of 814 sources of which
175: 58 in the range $0.6<z<1.4$.
176:
177:
178: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccc}
179: \tablecolumns{5}
180: \tablewidth{0pc}
181: \tablecaption{Log of {\it Chandra} observations used in this paper.\label{tab1}}
182: \tablehead{
183: \colhead{field} & \colhead{Observation} & \colhead{$\alpha$} &
184: \colhead{$\delta$} & \colhead{exposure} \\
185: \colhead{name} & \colhead{ID} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{(J2000)}&
186: \colhead{time (ks)} \\
187: }\startdata
188: GWS & 3305, 4357, 4365 & 14:17:43.60 & +52:28:41.20 & 200 \\
189: EGS3 & 5845, 5846 & 14:21:32.70 & +53:13:27.70 & 98 \\
190: EGS4 & 5847, 5848 & 14:19:23.90 & +52:50:32.69 & 89 \\
191: EGS7 & 6222, 6223 & 14:15:22.50 & +52:08:26.40 & 84 \\
192: \enddata
193: \tablecomments{Columns are: (1) the name of the {\it Chandra}
194: pointing, (2) the sequence number of the observations used at a
195: given pointing, (3) nominal right ascension of satellite pointing,
196: (4) nominal declination, (5) total exposure time of observations
197: used in this paper.}
198: \end{deluxetable}
199:
200:
201: \section{Overdensity estimator}\label{method}
202: We quantify the environment of galaxies following the prescription
203: described by Cooper et al. (2005, 2006). For a given source the
204: DEEP2 redshift information is used to estimate $D_3$, the projected
205: distance on the sky to the 3rd nearest neighbor within a radial velocity
206: slice of $\rm \pm1000\,km\,s^{-1}$ from the central source. This
207: is then converted to projected density using the relation
208: $\Sigma_3= 3 / (\pi \, D_3^2 )$. We attempt to account for edge
209: effects by excluding from the analysis sources with projected distance
210: $<1$\,Mpc from field edges. This reduces the sample size to 4189
211: optical galaxies and 53 X-ray sources. The $\Sigma_3$ estimates are
212: then corrected for the DEEP2 variable spectroscopic incompleteness
213: across the survey region by normalizing with the 2-dimensional
214: completeness map, which accounts for the redshift identification
215: success rate at different sky positions (Cooper et
216: al. 2006). Additionally, DEEP2 is a magnitude limited spectroscopic
217: survey and therefore, $\Sigma_3$ underestimates the true density at
218: higher redshifts. We account for this effect by dividing the measured
219: $\Sigma_3$ at a given $z$ with the median at that redshift (Cooper et
220: al. 2005, 2006). This normalized quantity, $\delta_3$, is a measure
221: of the overdensity in the vicinity of a galaxy relative to the median
222: field density at that redshift.
223:
224: \begin{figure}
225: \epsscale{0.8} \plotone{f1.eps}
226: \caption{
227: Distribution of $\log (1+\delta_3)$ for the X-ray selected AGN (hatched
228: histogram). This is compared with the mean expectation for control
229: samples of optical galaxies (continuous line). The dashed lines
230: represent the $1\sigma$ rms around the mean.
231: }\label{hist_den.fig}
232: \end{figure}
233:
234:
235: \begin{figure*}
236: \epsscale{0.8}\plottwo{f2.eps}{f3.eps}
237: \caption{
238: Mean overdensity estimator $\log (1+\delta_3)$ against $M_B$ (left)
239: and $U-B$ (right). In both plots the mean $\log (1+\delta_3)$ is
240: estimated in different $M_B$ and $U-B$ bins. DEEP2 galaxies and X-ray
241: sources are plotted with open and filled circles respectively. The
242: errorbars correspond to the standard error in each bin. We only plot
243: systems brighter than $M_B=-23$\,mag because more luminous galaxies
244: are affected by small number statistics. For the X-ray sample we only
245: plot bins with more than 4 sources. The X-ray source points in the
246: right panel are offset to the left for clarity.
247: }\label{hist_con_den_color.fig}
248: \end{figure*}
249:
250:
251: \section{Results}\label{results}
252:
253: Fig. \ref{hist_den.fig} presents the distribution of the overdensity
254: estimator for the X-ray sample in comparison with the mean expectation
255: for optically selected galaxies. For the comparison, a total of 200
256: control subsamples are constructed by randomly selecting galaxies
257: from the DEEP2 spectroscopic survey. The mean $1+\delta_3$ distribution
258: for the above 200 subsamples and the $1\sigma$ rms are also shown in
259: Fig. \ref{hist_den.fig}. There is evidence in this plot that X-ray
260: sources avoid underdense environments, $\log (1+\delta_3) \la -0.5$.
261: Indeed, the KS test rejects the null hypothesis probability, $P_{KS}$,
262: that the two distributions (optical and X-ray) are drawn from the same
263: population at the 99.89\% confidence level. Optically luminous systems
264: however, have on average different local environments compared to
265: fainter galaxies (e.g. Cooper et al. 2006). Matching the absolute
266: magnitude distribution of the random subsamples to that of the X-ray
267: sources reduces $P_{KS}$ to 99.4\%. The rest-frame color of galaxies
268: also strongly depends on environment. We therefore repeat the analysis
269: by matching both the $M_B$ and $U-B$ distributions of optical galaxies
270: and X-ray sources. This further reduces $P_{KS}$ to 87\%.
271:
272: The trends above are further explored in
273: Fig. \ref{hist_con_den_color.fig}, plotting the mean
274: $\log(1+\delta_3$) within different $M_B$ and $U-B$ bins for both
275: DEEP2 galaxies and X-ray selected AGN. When estimating averages we
276: account for the Malmquist bias by weighting each galaxy by $\rm
277: 1/Vmax$, the inverse of the maximum volume available to a source
278: within the survey limits (e.g. Cooper et
279: al. 2006). Fig. \ref{hist_con_den_color.fig} shows that firstly,
280: X-ray selected AGN are found, on average, in overdense regions and
281: secondly, they are associated with optically luminous ($M_B \la
282: -21$\,mag) galaxies with $U-B \ga 0.7$, in agreement with previous
283: studies (Dunlop et al. 2003; Colbert et al. 2005; Grogin et al. 2005;
284: Nandra et al. 2006). Interestingly though, the two panels of
285: Fig. \ref{hist_con_den_color.fig} appear to give somewhat different
286: results on the local density of X-ray sources relative to optical
287: galaxies: for a given $M_B$, X-ray sources reside in richer
288: environments compared to optical galaxies at the 99\% significance
289: level, while this is not the case when grouped in $U-B$ color, with the
290: exception of relatively blue AGN ($U-B\approx0.8$).
291: %These trends are
292: %discussed in the next section.
293:
294: \section{Discussion}\label{discussion}
295:
296: In this paper we explore the environment of X-ray selected AGN at
297: $z\approx1$ using data from the AEGIS. The main result from our
298: analysis is that the X-ray population at $z\approx1$ avoids underdense
299: regions at the 99.89\% significance level. To further understand the
300: individual trends of environment with color and absolute magnitude we
301: use the color-magnitude diagram (CMD) of X-ray sources
302: presented by Nandra et al. (2006). From this perspective, the
303: higher mean density of the X-ray sample relative to DEEP2 galaxies at
304: a given $M_B$ is because the optical sample includes sources with
305: very blue colors, known to reside in environments with below average
306: local density (Fig. \ref{hist_con_den_color.fig}; Cooper et
307: al. 2006).
308:
309: Similarly, a given $U-B$ color bin samples optical galaxies with a
310: range of absolute magnitudes, with the less luminous ones residing in
311: underdense environments. The arguments above are consistent with our
312: finding that the overdensity estimator distribution of X-ray sources
313: and optical galaxies differ only at the 87\% level when the two
314: samples are matched in both the $M_B$ and $U-B$. X-ray sources with
315: relatively blue colors however, appear to be genuinely different from
316: the DEEP2 population, albeit at the 96\% level. These systems stand
317: out in Fig. \ref{hist_con_den_color.fig} and this difference persists
318: at a similar significance, if we restrict the optical sample to
319: $M_B<-21$\,mag, i.e. to galaxies with similar brightness to X-ray
320: sources. These AGN occupy the upper bound of the blue cloud in the CMD
321: presented by Nandra et al. (2006). Their blue colors may be due to
322: contamination of the optical continuum by AGN emission. However, out
323: of the 19 X-ray sources in that color bin only 3 have $L_X > 5 \times
324: 10^{43} \rm \, erg \, s^{-1}$ and therefore may be dominated by AGN
325: emission at optical wavebands. Alternatively the above tentative
326: trend with color may suggest that for these systems environment
327: plays a role in the observed activity. A larger X-ray sample is
328: required to further explore this.
329:
330: The SDSS spectroscopic survey currently provides the only direct
331: estimate of the environment of AGN, albeit at much lower redshift,
332: $z\approx0.1$, compared to this study. Kauffmann et al. (2004)
333: using the 1st release of the SDSS found a strong dependence on environment
334: for powerful AGN ($L {\rm [OIII]} > 10^7 L_{\odot}$) at $z<0.1$, in
335: the sense that the most luminous systems are found in the
336: field. Lower luminosity AGN in this study show no dependence on local
337: density. The results above on the environment of low-$z$ AGN are
338: clearly different from those reported here. Kauffmann et
339: al. (2003) also explored the
340: host galaxy properties of powerful AGN in the SDSS. They find that
341: they are associated with massive ($ M \ga 10^{10}\, M_{\odot}$) early
342: type galaxies which are however, distinct from the bulk of the
343: optically selected early-type population, in that they show evidence
344: for on-going or recent star-formation activity. Based on the evidence
345: above Kauffmann et al. (2003) suggest that there are two essential
346: ingredients for strong AGN activity: a massive central black hole and
347: abundant gas supply to fuel it. Only massive early-type galaxies have
348: large enough bulges to host massive black holes. From these early-type
349: galaxies those which show evidence for substantial amounts of young
350: stellar populations have sufficient gas supply to both produce young
351: stars and to feed the central engine. Such galaxies are relatively
352: rare in the present day Universe and are preferentially found in
353: low-density regions. Only in these environments can gas-rich
354: star-forming galaxies survive today (e.g. Kauffman et al. 2004; Gomez
355: et al. 2003; Lewis et al. 2002; Poggianti et al. 2006).
356:
357: At higher redshifts however, there is an increasing fraction of
358: massive galaxies with sufficient cold gas reservoirs that can
359: potentially produce young stars and also fuel luminous AGN. For
360: example, there is accumulating evidence that the number density of
361: luminous blue galaxies, which are rare locally (e.g. Kauffman et
362: al. 2004), substantially increases to $z\approx1$ (Bell et al. 2004;
363: Cooper et al. 2006). These systems have blue colors, most likely
364: because of star-formation, while their luminosities suggest high
365: stellar masses. These galaxies are clearly prime candidates for
366: powerful AGN hosts. Interestingly, these luminous blue galaxies,
367: contrary to their low-$z$ counterparts, are shown to reside in regions
368: of enhanced density (Cooper et al. 2006). As demonstrated in
369: Fig. \ref{hist_con_den_color.fig} our X-ray selected AGN sample is
370: likely to include such systems. Moreover, the bluer X-ray sources in
371: the sample appear to reside in higher density regions compared to
372: optical galaxies on average.
373:
374: The evidence above suggests that our finding for an association
375: between X-ray selected AGN and higher density regions at $z \approx 1$
376: is related to the whereabouts of massive galaxies with available cold
377: gas reservoirs to sustain accretion of material on the central black
378: hole. Observations show that such systems are also found in denser
379: environments at $z\approx1$, contrary to the local Universe.
380:
381: A central question in AGN studies is the triggering mechanism of the
382: observed activity. Recent results suggest that mergers are not the
383: main process for activating a supermassive black hole (Grogin et
384: al. 2005; Pierce et al. 2006). Is it possible then, that the
385: environment plays a role in
386: triggering the AGN activity suggesting a causal link between the two?
387: The enhanced density of the bluer X-ray sources in our sample compared
388: to optical galaxies, if confirmed with larger samples, supports such
389: an association. For example it is plausible that the central black hole
390: becomes active during the infall of the host galaxy to the overdense
391: region, as it experiences the gravitational potential of the structure
392: or frequent interactions with other galaxies in that region. In the
393: framework of hierarchical models massive galaxies, which can
394: potentially host luminous AGN, are more often found in denser
395: regions. At $z \approx 1$, richer environments were substantially more
396: active compared to the local Universe (Bundy et al. 2006), with the
397: higher contrast occurring for intermediate-mass group-like systems
398: with velocity dispersions $\sigma \approx 500-600 \rm \, km \,
399: s^{-1}$ (Poggianti et al. 2006), close to the upper mass limit that is
400: well sampled by the DEEP2 (Gerke et al. 2005). According to Poggianti
401: et al., this enhanced activity is associated with infalling systems
402: many of which are likely to have sufficient mass to harbour a central
403: black hole and cold-gas reservoirs to sustain star-formation activity
404: and possibly also feed the black hole. As these massive galaxies
405: further grow (e.g. by mergers) from high redshift to the
406: present day, the supply of cold gas is cut-off (e.g. Croton et
407: al. 2005; Cooper et al. 2006) leading to quenching of the
408: star-formation and possibly the AGN activity. These massive systems
409: will therefore, appear as red-and-dead at low-$z$.
410:
411:
412: A possible link between AGN triggering and environment, if
413: confirmed, would suggest that the enhanced local density in the
414: vicinity of X-ray sources at $z \approx 1$ is a consequence of the
415: hierarchical evolution of structures in the Universe and its impact on
416: the cold gas reservoirs of individual galaxies. The AEGIS survey
417: provides a unique dataset that can potentially test this scenario. Open
418: questions include: what fraction of the X-ray population is found in
419: optically selected groups (e.g. Gerke et al. 2005)? Are there
420: morphological and/or color gradients with distance from the centre
421: of the group, indicating
422: enhanced activity for infalling members? Are there differences
423: in the color, stellar mass and/or X-ray luminosity between AGN locked
424: in groups and those that are not? Addressing these points requires a
425: larger X-ray sample than that presented here. A full discussion of
426: these issues is therefore referred to a future publication using the
427: full AEGIS X-ray sample.
428: \\
429: \\
430: Financial support has been provided through PPARC and the Marie-Curie
431: Fellowship grant MEIF-CT-2005-025108 (AG) the Leverhulme trust
432: (KN), the Hubble Fellowship grants
433: HF-01165.01-A (JAN) and HF-01182.01-A (ALC), the NSF grants AST00-71198
434: and AST0071048. The W.M. Keck Observatory, a scientific partnership
435: among Caltech, the University of California and NASA. The Observatory
436: was made possible by the generous financial support of the W.M. Keck
437: Foundation. The authors wish to acknowledge the very significant
438: cultural role that the summit of Mauna Kea has within the indigenous
439: Hawaiian community; we are fortunate to be able to conduct
440: observations from this mountain.
441:
442:
443: \begin{thebibliography}{}
444:
445: {\bibitem{1a} Adelberger K. L., Steidel C. C., 2005, ApJ, 627L, 1}
446:
447: {\bibitem{1} Alexander D. M., et al., 2005, Nature, 434, 738}
448:
449: %{\bibitem{1} Akylas A., Georgantopoulos I., Plionis M., 2000, MNRAS,
450: %318, 1036}
451:
452: {\bibitem{2} Basilakos S., Plionis M., Georgakakis A., Georgantopoulos
453: I., 2005, MNRAS, 356, 183}
454:
455: {\bibitem{3} Bell E. F., et al., 2004, ApJ, 608, 752}
456:
457: %{\bibitem{4} Bell E. F. \& de Jong R. S. 2001, ApJ, 550, 212}
458:
459: {\bibitem{3a} Bundy K., et al., 2006, AJ, submitted, astro-ph/0512465}
460:
461: {\bibitem{5} Butcher H., \& Oemler A. Jr., 1978, ApJ, 226, 559}
462:
463: %{\bibitem{6} Butcher H., \& Oemler A. Jr., 1984, ApJ, 285, 426}
464:
465: %{\bibitem{7} Cid Fernandes R., Jr, Heckman T.M., Schmitt H.R., Gonzaez
466: % Delgado R.M., Storchi-Bergmann T., 2001, ApJ, 558, 81}
467:
468: {\bibitem{8} Coil A. L., et al., 2006, ApJ, submitted}
469:
470: {\bibitem{8} Coil A. L., et al., 2004a, ApJ, 617, 765}
471:
472: {\bibitem{8a} Coil A. L., et al., 2004b, ApJ, 609, 525}
473:
474: {\bibitem{8b} Colbert J. W., Teplitz H. I., Yan L., Malkan M. A.,
475: McCarthy P. J., 2005, ApJ, 621, 587}
476:
477:
478: {\bibitem{8c} Constantin A., Vogeley M. S., 2006, ApJ, submitted, astro-ph/0601717}
479:
480:
481: {\bibitem{9} Cooper M. C., Newman J. A., Madgwick D. S., Gerke B. F.,
482: Yan R., Davis M., 2005, ApJ, 634, 833}
483:
484: {\bibitem{10} Cooper M. C., et al., 2006, ApJ, submitted}
485:
486: %{\bibitem{11} Croom S. M., Smith R. J., Boyle B. J., Shanks T., Miller
487: % L., Outram P. J., Loaring N. S., 2004, MNRAS, 349, 1397}
488:
489: {\bibitem{12} Croton D. J., et al., 2005, MNRAS, submitted:
490: astro-ph/0508046}
491:
492: {\bibitem{13} Davis M. et al., 2003, in ``Discoveries and Research
493: Prospects for 6- to 10-m class telescopes II''. Edited by
494: Guhathakurta, Puragra, Proceedings of the SPIE, 2003, vol 4834,
495: p. 161}
496:
497: {\bibitem{13a} Dunlop J. S., et al., 2003, MNRAS, 340, 1095}
498:
499: {\bibitem{14} Davis M., et al., 2006, ApJL, this volume}
500:
501: %{\bibitem{15} Fabian A.C., Barcons X., Almaini O., Iwasawa K., 1998,
502: % MNRAS, 297, L11}
503:
504: {\bibitem{16} Ferrarese L., Merritt D., 2000, ApJ, 539, L9}
505:
506: {\bibitem{17} Gebhardt K., et al., 2000, ApJ, 539, L13}
507:
508:
509: %{\bibitem{18} Georgakakis A., Hopkins A. M., Afonso J., Sullivan M.,
510: % Mobasher B., Cram L. E., 2004, MNRAS, 354, 127}
511:
512: %{\bibitem{19} Georgakakis A. E., Georgantopoulos I. \& Akylas A., 2006,
513: % MNRAS, 366, 171.}
514:
515: {\bibitem{20} Georgakakis A., et al., 2006, MNRAS, submitted}
516:
517: {\bibitem{17a} Gerke B. F., et al., 2005, ApJ, 625, 6}
518:
519: {\bibitem{21} Gilli R., et al., 2005, A\&A, 430, 811}
520:
521: {\bibitem{22} G\'omez P. L., et al., 2003, 584, 210}
522:
523: %{\bibitem{23} Gonz\'alez Delgado R.M., Heckman T., Leitherer C., 2001,
524: % ApJ, 546, 845}
525:
526: {\bibitem{24} Grogin N. A., et al., 2005, ApJ, 627, L97}
527:
528: %{\bibitem{25} Hopkins P. F., et al., 2005, ApJ, 630, 705}
529:
530: {\bibitem{26} Hogg D. W., et al., 2004, ApJ, 601L, 29}
531:
532: {\bibitem{26a} Kauffmann G., et al., 2004,
533: MNRAS, 353, 713}
534:
535: {\bibitem{27} Kauffmann G., et al., 2003, MNRAS, 346, 1055}
536:
537: %{\bibitem{28} Kodama T., \& Bower R. G., 2001, MNRAS, 321, 18}
538:
539: %{\bibitem{29} Koekemoer A. M., et al., 2002, 567, 675}
540:
541: {\bibitem{30} Lewis I., et al., 2002, MNRAS, 334, 673}
542:
543: {\bibitem{31} Miller C. J., Nichol R. C., G\'omez P. L., Hopkins
544: A. M., Bernardi M., 2003, 597, 142}
545:
546: %{\bibitem{32} Mullis C. R., Henry J. P., Gioia I. M., Bohringer H.,
547: % Briel U. G., Voges W., Huchra J. P., 2004, ApJ, 617, 192}
548:
549:
550: {\bibitem{33} Nandra K., et al., 2005, MNRAS, 356, 568}
551:
552: {\bibitem{34} Nandra K., et al., 2006, ApJL, this volume}
553:
554: %{\bibitem{34} Peterson K. C., Gallagher S. C., Hornschemeier A. E., Muno
555: % M. P., Bullard E. C., 2006, AJ, 131, 133}
556:
557: {\bibitem{35a} Pierce C., et al., 2006, ApJL, this volume}
558:
559: {\bibitem{35} Poggianti B. M., et al., 2006, ApJ, in press, astro-ph:
560: 0512391}
561:
562: %{\bibitem{36} Severgnini P. et al., 2003, A\&A, 406, 483}
563:
564: {\bibitem{37} Schneider D., et al., 2005, AJ, 130, 367}
565:
566: {\bibitem{38a} Wake D. A., et al., 2004, ApJ, 610L, 85}
567:
568: {\bibitem{38} Zirbel E. L., 1997, ApJ, 476, 489}
569: \end{thebibliography}
570:
571: \end{document}
572: