1: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass{aastex}
3: \documentclass[10pt,preprint]{aastex}
4: %\documentclass[twocolumn]{emulateapj}
5: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
6:
7:
8: %\slugcomment{Submitted to The Astronomical Journal}
9: \slugcomment{Accepted for publication in The Astronomical Journal}
10:
11: \shorttitle{Spitzer Observations of Var~Her~04}
12:
13: \shortauthors{Ciardi et al.}
14:
15: \begin{document}
16:
17: \title{
18: Spitzer Observations of Var~Her~04:\\
19: Possible Detection of Dust Formation in a Super-Outbursting TOAD}
20:
21: \author{David R. Ciardi}
22: \affil{Michelson Science Center/Caltech\\
23: 770 South Wilson Avenue, M/S 100-22,
24: Pasadena, CA 91125}
25: \email{ciardi@ipac.caltech.edu}
26:
27: \author{Stefanie Wachter, D. W. Hoard}
28: \affil{Spitzer Science Center/Caltech\\
29: 1200 East California Avenue, M/S 220-6, Pasadena, CA 91125}
30:
31: \author{Steve B. Howell}
32: \affil{WIYN Observatory \& NOAO\\
33: P.O. Box 26732, 950 N. Cherry Ave. Tucson, AZ 85719}
34:
35: \and
36:
37: \author{Gerard T. van~Belle}
38: \affil{Michelson Science Center/Caltech\\
39: 770 South Wilson Avenue, M/S 100-22,
40: Pasadena, CA 91125}
41:
42: \begin{abstract}
43:
44: We present four MIPS (24 \micron) and two IRAC (3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8.0 \micron)
45: Spitzer observations of the newly discovered Tremendous Outburst Amplitude
46: Dwarf nova (TOAD) Var~Her~04 during decline from super-outburst. The four MIPS
47: observations span 271 days and the two IRAC observations span 211 days. Along
48: the line-of-sight to Var~Her~04, there is a foreground M-star within 1\arcsec\
49: of the variable; as a result, all of the Spitzer photometry presented in this
50: paper is a blend of the foreground M-star and Var~Her~04. We estimate the
51: quiescent level of the TOAD to be $\Delta V=4-5$ magnitudes below that of the
52: M-star. Based upon the spectral energy distribution and the 2MASS colors, we
53: find the M-star to be an M3.5V dwarf at a distance of 80-130 pc. Based upon its
54: outburst amplitude and quiescent apparent magnitude, we estimate the distance
55: to Var~Her~04 to be $200-400$ pc, suggesting that the line-of-sight foreground
56: star is physically unrelated to the cataclysmic variable. All of the Spitzer
57: photometry is consistent with the photospheric emission of the line-of-sight
58: M3.5V star, except for one 24 \micron\ observation obtained after the variable
59: re-brightened. This 24 \micron\ flux density is 75 $\mu$Jy ($4\sigma$) above
60: the preceding and following MIPS observations. We tentatively suggest that the
61: mid-infrared brightening of 75 $\mu$Jy may be associated with a dust formation
62: event in the super-outburst ejecta. Assuming a dust temperature of $100-400$ K,
63: we have estimated the amount of dust required. We find $10^{-13}-10^{-11}$
64: M$_\odot$ of dust is needed, consistent with amounts of mass ejection in TOADs
65: expected during super-outburst, and possibly making TOADs important
66: contributors to the recycling of the interstellar medium.
67:
68: \end{abstract}
69:
70: \keywords{novae, cataclysmic variables — stars: individual (Var~Her~04)
71: circumstellar material -- infrared}
72:
73: \section{Introduction}
74:
75: Tremendous Outburst Amplitude Dwarf novae (TOADs) consist of a white dwarf
76: primary star and an extremely low-mass main sequence or brown dwarf secondary
77: star \citep[$M \lesssim 0.1\ M_\odot$; e.g.,][]{crd98}. With typical orbital
78: periods of a few hours or less, the secondary star is tidally locked to the
79: white dwarf, and overfills its Roche lobe. Material from the secondary star
80: is transferred via the inner Lagrange point to an accretion disk surrounding
81: the white dwarf. As material builds in the accretion disk, instabilities in
82: the accretion disk give rise to rare ``super-outbursts,'' which, relative to
83: the pre-outburst quiescent luminosity, are a hundred times more luminous than
84: outbursts from normal dwarf novae such as U Gem and SS Cyg
85: \citep[e.g.,][]{harrison04}. These outbursts are not thermo-nuclear, as is
86: the case for classical novae. Rather, viscous heating causes the disk
87: temperature to rise until ionization of hydrogen occurs, causing a pressure
88: wave to propagate inward, pushing material onto the surface of the white
89: dwarf \citep{hsc95}. The release of gravitational energy powers the
90: super-outburst luminosity, with dramatic brightening of 6 or more magnitudes.
91: Super-outbursts for TOADs occur very infrequently -- on timescales of
92: multiple decades.
93:
94: During the super-outburst, TOADs have winds \citep[$>5000$ km/s;][]{howell95}
95: which are strong enough to expel material from the binary system much like
96: classical novae \citep{long03}, and \emph{unlike} other types of dwarf novae
97: which rarely display outflows that exceed (or even approach) escape velocity
98: during outburst (e.g., U Gem, SS Cyg). The outburst declines in TOADs
99: typically last a few hundred days and often show a characteristic $2-3$
100: magnitude dip in the optical near 50 days \citep{richter92}, much like what
101: is seen in the lightcurves of slow novae near 100 days
102: \citep[e.g.,][]{gehrz98, evans03, evans05}. In slow novae, the optical dip
103: can be $8 - 10$ magnitudes deep, and is attributed to the formation of an
104: optically thick dust shell in the ejecta \citep{sar94, evans03, evans05}.
105:
106: In TOADs, the optical dip is suggested to be a dramatic drop in the mass
107: transfer rate from the secondary star on to the outbursting accretion disk,
108: or a cooling wave propagating through the accretion disk, causing a cessation
109: of the outburst. Approximately 10 days later, the dwarf nova re-brightens
110: \citep{patterson02}, attributed to a continuation of the outburst, but at
111: lower luminosity \citep{richter92}. However, the evidence for the exact
112: mechanism is sparse.
113:
114: Given that TOADs have winds strong enough to eject material from the system
115: like classical novae, an alternative explanation of the optical dip might be
116: the formation of dust within the super-outburst ejecta. The V band (0.55
117: $\mu$m) light curve for the 1995 super-outburst of the TOAD AL Comae
118: Berenices has an optical dip that is $2.5-3$ magnitudes deep
119: \citep{howell96}, while the corresponding I band (0.9 $\mu$m) dip is only $2
120: - 2.5$ magnitudes deep \citep{po95} -- consistent with the 0.5 magnitude
121: difference between the dust extinction at 0.55 $\mu$m and 0.9 $\mu$m
122: \citep{mathis90}. However, no infrared observations to detect the formation
123: of dust during super-outburst have been attempted - until now.
124:
125: On 2004 June 16, a previously unknown star in Hercules went into outburst
126: \citep{iau8363, price04}. Photometric observations revealed the presence of
127: superhumps providing a good indication that this was a super-outburst and an
128: estimate for the orbital period. Given the large outburst amplitude and the
129: very short orbital period ($P=81.8$ minutes), Var~Her~04 was identified as a
130: TOAD. For a given TOAD, super-outbursts are rare (timescales of decades); we
131: took advantage of this timely opportunity to observe the outburst with the
132: Spitzer Space Telescope. We obtained two observations with IRAC (3.0, 4.5,
133: 5.6, 8.0 \micron) and four observations with MIPS (24 \micron) to investigate
134: for whether dust is formed in the ejecta of TOAD super-outbursts and, hence,
135: possibly explain the observed dip in the optical light curves of TOADs whose
136: origin is a mystery.
137:
138: \section{Spitzer Observations}
139:
140: Four observations were obtained with the 24 \micron\ channel on the MIPS
141: instrument \citep{rieke04}, and two observations were obtained with all four
142: channels (3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8.0 \micron) with the IRAC instrument
143: \citep{fazio04}. The first three MIPS observations (hereafter, referred to
144: as MIPS-1, MIPS-2, MIPS-3) were each separated by approximately 30 days
145: beginning on 21 Aug 2004, 67 days after the peak of the outburst. The final
146: MIPS observation (MIPS-4) was obtained in May 2005 almost a full year past
147: the outburst peak. The first IRAC observation (IRAC-1) was obtained between
148: between the second and third MIPS observation, and the second IRAC
149: observation (IRAC-1) was obtained near the time of MIPS-4. Table
150: \ref{dates-tab} details the dates and number of days past outburst peak for
151: each of the Spitzer observations.
152:
153: The operational mode of the Spitzer spacecraft is to observe in
154: advance-scheduled instrument campaigns; i.e., a single instrument for a
155: dedicated period of time. As a result, while our requests of monthly spacing
156: between the observations were generally met, we had no control over exactly
157: when those observations were made. Figure \ref{aavso-fig} displays a
158: validated V-band lightcurve obtained from the American Association of
159: Variable Star Observers (AAVSO). The times of the MIPS and IRAC observations
160: are marked to indicate when in the outburst the observations were made. As
161: discussed in \S3.1, along the line-of-sight to Var~Her~04, there is an M-star
162: within 1\arcsec\ of the variable. None of the photometric measurements
163: presented in this paper (including the AAVSO lightcurve) spatially resolve
164: the foreground M-star from Var~Her~04.
165:
166: After decline from the primary outburst, there are two minor re-brightening
167: ($\Delta V \approx 0.5$ mag) events peaking at $t=85$ days and $t\approx 120$
168: days (Fig.~\ref{aavso-fig}). The full amplitude of these two re-brightenings
169: is uncertain as the photometry is dominated by the M-star when Var~Her~04 is
170: faint. The MIPS-1 observation ($t=67$ days) was made just prior to the first
171: re-brightening. The MIPS-2 observation ($t=99$ days) was obtained during
172: decline from the first re-brightening. The IRAC-1 ($t=114$ days) observation
173: was made 11 days prior to the second re-brightening peak, and MIPS-3 ($t=125$
174: days), and the MIPS-3 observation was during decline from the second minor
175: re-brightening. There are no AAVSO validated CCD+V data corresponding to the
176: time of MIPS-3, but interpolation suggests that the lightcurve may have been on
177: a slow decline between $t=125$ and $t=150$ days. The final Spitzer observations
178: (IRAC-2 and MIPS-4) were obtained well after the outburst event had ended, and
179: represent the photometric levels of the foreground M-star (see \S 3.1 below).
180:
181: The IRAC data were processed with the S13.2.0 pipelines. The MIPS-1, MIPS-2,
182: and MIPS-3 data were processed with the S10.5.0 pipelines, and the MIPS-4
183: data were processed with S12.0.2 pipeline. The Basic Calibrated Data (BCD)
184: for each Astronomical Observation Request (AOR) were subsequently mosaiced
185: using MOPEX \citep{mm05} to create one single deep image for each of the IRAC
186: and MIPS visits. The total on-source integration time was 570 seconds for
187: each IRAC observation, consisting of 19 dithered 30 second frames. During
188: each MIPS 24 \micron\ observation, Var~Her~04 was observed for a total of
189: 3000 seconds, consisting of 20 photometry cycles with an exposure time of 10
190: seconds per frame. Source identification and aperture photometry was
191: performed using an IDL version of DAOPHOT. Because the MIPS-4 observation
192: was reduced with a slightly different pipeline sequence, only differential
193: photometry was performed on all of the MIPS frames to allow for direct
194: comparison between the visits.
195:
196: Figure \ref{mips-fig} displays ``cut-outs'' of the MIPS-1, MIPS-2, and MIPS-3
197: images centered on Var~Her~04.\footnote{MIPS-4 appears nearly identical to
198: MIPS-1 and MIPS-3, and is not shown.} In the figure, the arrows mark the
199: position of the Var~Her~04, and the circles indicate the stars used for
200: photometric comparison in the ensemble differential photometry. The
201: equatorial coordinates for each of the comparison stars and the variable are
202: given in Table \ref{coord-tab}. These comparison stars were chosen because
203: they were within a few arcminutes of Var~Her~04, were of comparable
204: brightness to Var~Her~04 at 24 \micron, and were apparently photometrically
205: stable at 24 \micron. The comparison were stars were weighted and combined
206: into an ensemble comparison star \citep[e.g.,][]{everett02} and used to
207: perform standard differential photometry on Var~Her~04.
208:
209: \section{Discussion}
210:
211: \subsection{Distance to Var~Her~04 and the Foreground Star}
212:
213: Var~Her~04, a super-outbursting TOAD, has an orbital period ($P=81.8$ minutes)
214: and a mass ratio ($q=0.072$) very similar to that of WZ Sge \citep{price04}.
215: During its 2001 outburst, WZ Sge had a peak outburst magnitude near $V=8$ mag
216: \citep{patterson02}, while Var~Her~04 had a peak outburst magnitude of $V=12$
217: mag (see Figure \ref{aavso-fig}). TOADs have an average outburst amplitude of
218: $\Delta V \approx 7.5 \pm 0.8$ mag \citep{hsc95}. If we assume that WZ Sge and
219: Var~Her~04 have the same intrinsic outburst amplitude \citep[as most TOADs do;
220: e.g.,][]{howell95}, we can scale the properties of WZ Sge \citep[$d=43.5\pm0.3$
221: pc][]{harrison04} to Var~Her~04. At $\sim 20-40$ times fainter, the implied
222: distance of Var~Her~04 is $\sim 4.5-9.0$ times further away than WZ Sge for an
223: estimated distance of $d\approx200 - 400$ pc.
224:
225: There is a foreground star located $\approx 1\arcsec$ southeast of
226: Var~Her~04. Because of the line-of-sight proximity of the foreground star,
227: all of the photometry presented in this work is an unresolved blend of
228: Var~Her~04 and the foreground star. To understand the contribution of the
229: foreground star to our photometry, we retrieved the near-infrared photometry
230: at the position of the foreground star (2MASS J18392619+2604087) from the
231: Two-Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS; \citealt{skrutskie06}) archive. The 2MASS
232: star has near-infrared magnitudes of $J=13.399 \pm 0.036$, $H=12.853 \pm
233: 0.043$, and $K_{\rm s}=12.542 \pm 0.033$ mag. The quiescent near-infrared
234: brightness for the resolved variable Var~Her~04 is $J\approx17$ mag
235: \citep{price04}. Thus, while the 2MASS magnitudes are an unresolved blend
236: between the foreground star and Var~Her~04, the variable contributes less
237: than 3\% to the total near-infrared brightness, and the magnitudes, as
238: measured by 2MASS, are dominated by the foreground star.
239:
240: We have plotted the 2MASS colors in the $JHK_s$ color-color diagram shown in
241: Figure \ref{2mass-fig}. Because of the divergence of the near-infrared colors
242: of giants and main sequence stars for spectral types later than about K5, the
243: 2MASS photometry allows us to identify unambiguously the foreground star as a
244: main sequence object with spectral type M4$\pm$0.5. The near-infrared colors
245: for the short-orbital-period dwarf nova WZ Sge could not be mistaken for
246: those of a normal, low mass main sequence star (see Figure \ref{2mass-fig}).
247: The near-infrared colors of WZ Sge are quite similar to those reported by
248: \citet{price04} for the resolved quiescent variable (\ref{2mass-fig}).
249:
250: Comparison of the 2MASS J-band magnitude of the foreground star with the
251: absolute magnitudes expected for M3 -- M4 dwarf stars \citep[$M_{\rm
252: J}\approx 7.8 - 8.9$,][]{hawley02}, we find a distance range of $d\approx80 -
253: 130$ pc for the foreground star which is substantially closer than
254: Var~Her~04, and suggests that the foreground star is merely line-of-sight and
255: physically unrelated to Var~Her~04.
256:
257: Scaling the quiescent brightness of WZ Sge \citep[$V=15.5$
258: mag,][]{patterson02}, Var~Her~04 has an expected quiescent brightness of
259: $V\approx 19.5$ mag, suggesting that the $V=16.5$ mag floor in Figure
260: \ref{aavso-fig} (marked by the horizontal dashed line) is {\em not} the
261: quiescent level of Var~Her~04, but rather is the visual magnitude of the
262: foreground M-star.
263:
264: With an expected quiescent value of $V\approx19.5$ mag and an outburst
265: amplitude of $\Delta V\approx 7.5$ mag, Var~Her~04 is similar in brightness to
266: the TOAD AL Comae Berenices \citep[$V\approx20$ mag, $\Delta V\approx 8$ mag;
267: ][]{howell96}. AL Com is at a distance of $\approx$ 250 pc \citep{shm96},
268: consistent with the distance estimated for Var~Her~04 from the peak outburst
269: brightness.
270:
271: \subsection{Mid-Infrared Photometry}
272:
273: The differential lightcurve for the four MIPS observations (Figure
274: \ref{mipsdiff-fig}) clearly shows that at the time of MIPS-2 ($t=99$ days),
275: Var~Her~04 is 75 $\mu$Jy brighter than it is at the time of MIPS-1, MIPS-3,
276: and MIPS-4. The ensemble comparison does not exhibit the same brightness
277: change, and remains within 1$\sigma$ of the ``zero-level.'' The MIPS-2
278: photometric point is $\sim 4\sigma$ away from the zero-level baseline. The
279: brightness level increase in MIPS-2 can be seen by eye in Figure
280: \ref{mips-fig}. MIPS-4 was obtained $t=338$ days after the outburst event
281: and sets the baseline for the M-star flux density at 24 \micron. The
282: agreement of MIPS-1 and MIPS-3 with MIPS-4 implies that the two former
283: observations are primarily of the foreground M-star without a significant
284: contribution from Var~Her~04. Only the 24 \micron\ flux density at MIPS-2 is
285: significantly different.
286:
287: For the two IRAC observations, absolute aperture photometry was performed.
288: The ensemble comparison stars were used to check for changes between the
289: IRAC-1 and IRAC-2 observations, but no significant deviations were detected.
290: As IRAC-2 was obtained long after the outburst event had ended, the agreement
291: between the IRAC-1 and IRAC-2 photometry, separated by over 200 days (see
292: Figure \ref{aavso-fig}), indicates that both IRAC-1 and IRAC-2 are dominated
293: by the foreground M dwarf and contain little (if any) contribution from the
294: Var~Her~04.
295:
296: We scaled an empirical template for the 2MASS and IRAC flux densities of an
297: M3.5V star \citep{patten06} to the 2MASS J-band flux density (Figure
298: \ref{sed-fig}). The resulting reduced chi-square of the M3.5V template fit
299: to the 2MASS-IRAC data is $\chi^2_\nu \approx 1$. M3V and M4V templates were
300: also fitted but resulted in significantly worse chi-squares ($\chi^2_\nu
301: \gtrsim 10$). The goodness of the M3.5V fit for both the 2MASS and the IRAC
302: data indicates that the IRAC data (like the 2MASS) are dominated by the M3.5V
303: star, with little contribution from Var~Her~04.
304:
305: The MIPS 24 \micron\ differential photometric data (Figure
306: \ref{mipsdiff-fig}) were scaled such that the weighted mean of the MIPS-1,
307: -3,and -4 data equaled the M3.5V template extrapolated to 24 \micron. All of
308: the photometry from the four MIPS campaigns and the two IRAC campaigns are
309: reported in Table \ref{fluxes-tab}. In the following section, we discuss the
310: source the 24 \micron\ brightening seen in MIPS-2.
311:
312: \subsection{The 24 \micron\ Brightening}
313:
314: Using Figure \ref{aavso-fig} as a reference, the optical (V) emission begins
315: to rise just again after the MIPS-1 observation ($t=67$ days) and after the
316: initial decline from the primary outburst. The cause of this re-brightening
317: is unknown but may be a continuation of the outburst event. At $t=85$ days,
318: the V emission peaks and begins to decline again with a minimum near $t=105$
319: days. The MIPS-2 observation at $t=99$ days is nearly at this minimum.
320:
321: The MIPS-3 observation ($t=125$ days) was obtained on a day with no validated
322: AAVSO CCD+V data. However, if we assume that the decline rate in V from
323: $t=115$ days to $t=125$ days equals the climb rate in V from $t=105$ days to
324: $t=115$ days, then the V magnitude at the time of MIPS-3 equals the V magnitude
325: at the time of MIPS-2. In fact, we expect the V-band decline rate to be {\em
326: slower} than the V-band climb rate \citep[e.g., AL Com][]{howell96}. Thus, the
327: V-band brightness at the time of MIPS-3 is likely {\em brighter} than the
328: V-band brightness at the time of MIPS-2. We note here that the true rates of
329: rise and decline and the true depths of the minima are diluted by the presence
330: of the unresolved foreground M-star.
331:
332: The 24 \micron\ emission associated with MIPS-3 is less than the 24 \micron\
333: emission at MIPS-2, even though the V magnitudes at the time of MIPS-3 is
334: (likely) brighter than or equal to V magnitude at the time of MIPS-2. Further,
335: the 24 \micron\ emission at MIPS-3 equals the 24 \micron\ emission associated
336: with MIPS-1 and MIPS-4, suggesting that the 24 \micron\ emission observed at
337: MIPS-1, -3, and -4 are dominated by the foreground M-star. Thus, the 24
338: \micron\ increase observed at $t=99$ days (MIPS-2) occurs, {\em not} because
339: Var~Her~04 simply has gotten brighter, but rather there is an additional
340: emission source associated with Var~Her~04.
341:
342: It is conceivable that the foreground M-star could have undergone a flare event
343: exactly at the time of the MIPS-2 observation. However, as flare events
344: generally last a few hours or less \citep[e.g.,][]{rockenfeller06}, the MIPS-2
345: visit would have to coincide exactly with the flare. Additionally, we
346: inspected the first and second halves of the MIPS-2 data cube to search for
347: variability within the MIPS-2 observation, as might be expected if the M-star
348: had undergone a flare event. We found the photometry of Var~Her~04 for the
349: split data to agree within $1-2\ \mu$Jy indicating there is no significant
350: change in brightness during the MIPS-2 observation. Consequently, we attribute
351: the 24 \micron\ brightening solely to the variable Var~Her~04.
352:
353: We hypothesize that Var~Her~04 may have undergone a dust formation event (near
354: $t=85$ days) during the optical re-brightening event, in a manner very similar
355: to what occurs in slow-novae dust formation events \citep[e.g.,][]{evans05}.
356: Var~Her~04, after a steady decline since peak outburst. Var~Her~04 begins to
357: re-brighten ($t=65$ days). Although the exact rate and level of the decline
358: and full re-brightening is lost in the confusion of the foreground star),
359: typical re-brightening in TOADs is $\Delta V \approx 2-3$ magnitudes
360: \citep[e.g., WZ Sge \& AL Com:][]{richter92, khp96}.
361:
362: In our hypothesis, the re-brightening event at $t=65$ days may be sufficient to
363: allow dust production to occur (at $t=85$ days), and the amount of dust
364: produced is sufficient to obscure the optical emission from Var~Her~04, causing
365: the V magnitude to drop. At $t=105$ days, the dust is at its densest and the
366: optical emission is at a minimum. The exact level of this dip is lost in the
367: glare of the foreground M-star. It is at this conjuncture that the infrared
368: emission from the dust is at its peak brightness (MIPS-2).
369:
370: The dust shell continues to expand. As the dust dissipates, the optical
371: emission from Var~Her~04 is unveiled and the V-band lightcurve re-brightens.
372: As the dust dissipates, the 24 \micron\ emission declines (MIPS-3) and
373: returns to the pre-event level (MIPS-1) which also equals the final quiescent
374: level (MIPS-4). If this proposed scenario is correct, the dust forms and
375: dissipates in approximately $\Delta t=50$ days ($t\approx 70$ days to
376: $t\approx 120$ days).
377:
378: Without a contemporaneous flux density at a longer wavelength (e.g., 70
379: \micron), we cannot constrain the dust temperature $T_d$. We can assume,
380: however, a reasonable set of dust temperatures (50, 100, 200, and 400 K). In
381: Figure \ref{sed-fig}, we display the composite spectral energy distribution
382: with the 50, 100, 200, and 400 K blackbody curves overlayed (recall that the
383: 2MASS and Spitzer photometry does not spatially resolve the foreground star
384: from Var~Her~04). The 50, 100, 200, and 400 K blackbody curves predict 70
385: \micron\ flux densities in outburst of 10, 0.2, 0.03, and 0.02 mJy,
386: respectively.
387:
388: Without a 70 \micron\ (or longer) flux density, we cannot differentiate
389: between dust temperatures, but we can estimate the amount of dust required to
390: produce the 75 $\mu$Jy brightening at 24\micron\ for each of these dust
391: temperatures via
392: \begin{equation}
393: M_d = \frac{(16/3)\pi a \rho D^2}{Q_\nu B_\nu(T_d)}F_\nu
394: \end{equation}
395: where $F_\nu$ is the observed flux density at frequency $\nu$, $Q_\nu$ is the
396: grain emissivity at frequency $\nu$, $a$ is the grain radius, $\rho$ is the
397: grain mass density, $D$ is the distance to Var~Her~04, and $B_\nu$ is the
398: Planck function at dust temperature $T_d$. Assuming $a=0.5$ \micron, $\rho = 1$
399: g cm$^{-3}$, $Q_\nu = 0.1(\lambda/\micron)^{-\alpha}$, and $\alpha=0.45$
400: \citep[e.g.,][]{mkv06}, we estimate dust masses of $10^{-8},\ 10^{-11},\
401: 10^{-12}\ {\rm and,}\ 10^{-13}$ M$_\odot$ for dust temperatures of 50, 100,
402: 200, and 400 K, respectively.
403:
404: For an outburst amplitude of $\Delta V = 7.5$ mag, a typical TOAD accretes
405: approximately $10^{-10}-10^{-9}$ M$_\odot$ on to the white dwarf surface during
406: a super-outburst \citep{osaki96, cannizzo01}. For a re-brightening event of
407: $\Delta V = 2-3$ mag, the expected amount of material ejected just from this
408: event may be $50-100$ times less. Even if all of this material is ejected from
409: the white dwarf surface, {\em and} all of that material forms dust, there is
410: not enough mass to explain the 24 \micron\ emission if the dust temperature is
411: less than $\sim 100$ K. However, if a few percent of this material is ejected
412: from the white dwarf surface and condenses into dust grains outside the
413: sublimation radius, the derived dust masses for dust temperatures of $100 -
414: 400$ K are consistent with the anticipated accretion amounts during a
415: super-outburst event.
416:
417: Theory predicts that there are 10$^4$ - 10$^5$ TOADs throughout the Galaxy
418: \citep[e.g.,][]{hns01}. If each TOAD outbursts, on average, once every 10
419: years, then there may be 10$^3$ - 10$^4$ outbursts per year throughout the
420: Galaxy. If each outburst produces $10^{-13} - 10^{-11}$ M$_\odot$ of dust,
421: this corresponds to $10^{-10} - 10^{-8}$ M$_\odot$ of dust injected into the
422: interstellar medium per year. On average there is one classical nova per
423: year in the Galaxy, and each classical nova ejects $10^{-9} - 10^{-6}$
424: M$_\odot$ of dust into the interstellar medium \citep{gehrz98}, perhaps
425: making the total population of TOADs as important as classical novae in the
426: recycling of the interstellar medium.
427:
428: \section{Summary}
429:
430: We have obtained Spitzer MIPS and IRAC observations of the newly discovered
431: Tremendous Outburst Amplitude Dwarf nova (TOAD) Var~Her~04 in decline from
432: super-outburst. Four MIPS observations at 24 \micron\ were made spanning 271
433: days. In addition, two sets of IRAC observations (all four bands) spanning
434: 211 days were also made. All of the Spitzer photometry is consistent with the
435: photospheric emission of a line-of-sight (but physically unrelated) M3.5V
436: star, except for one 24 \micron\ observation obtained after the variable
437: re-brightened. We tentatively suggest that the mid-infrared brightening of
438: 75 $\mu$Jy may be associated with a dust formation event. We estimate that
439: the amount of dust required to produce such a brightening at 24 \micron\ is
440: only $10^{-13}-10^{-11}$ M$_\odot$, consistent with the amount of material
441: expected in super-outburst ejecta. Given the total population of TOADs in the
442: Galaxy, TOADs may be as important as classical novae in terms of their
443: production of dust. A dedicated observing program to study TOADs (that are
444: not spatially confused with foreground stars) in super-outburst is needed to
445: understand more clearly the ejecta processes, and the contribution of TOADs
446: to the recycling of the interstellar medium.
447:
448:
449: \acknowledgments
450:
451: The authors would like to thank the Director of the Spitzer Science Center
452: for granting our observing request through the Director's Discretionary Time.
453: This work has been supported, in part, by NASA through the Spitzer Science
454: Center and the Michelson Science Center at Caltech. A special thank you to
455: Steve Schurr for his enthusiasm and red pen.
456:
457: We acknowledge with thanks the variable star observations from the AAVSO
458: International Database contributed by observers worldwide and used in this
459: research. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science
460: Archive, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California
461: Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and
462: Space Administration. This publication makes use of data products from the
463: Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of
464: Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California
465: Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space
466: Administration and the National Science Foundation.
467:
468: \begin{thebibliography}{500}
469:
470: \bibitem[Cannizzo(2001)]{cannizzo01} Cannizzo, J.~K.\ 2001, \apjl, 561, L175
471:
472: \bibitem[Ciardi et al.(1998)]{crd98} Ciardi, D. R. et al. 1998, \apj, 504,
473: 450
474:
475: \bibitem[Evans(2003)]{evans03} Evans, A. 2003, \apss, 275, 131
476:
477: \bibitem[Evans et al.(2005)]{evans05} Evans, A., et al. 2005,
478: \mnras, 360, 1483
479:
480: \bibitem[Everett et al.(2002)]{everett02} Everett, M. E. 2002, \pasp, 114, 656
481:
482: \bibitem[Fazio et al.(2004)]{fazio04} Fazio, G.~G., et al.\
483: 2004, \apjs, 154, 10
484:
485: \bibitem[Gehrz et al.(1998)]{gehrz98} Gehrz, R.~D., et al. 1998, \pasp, 110, 3
486:
487: \bibitem[Harrison et al. (2004)]{harrison04} Harrison, T. et al. 2004, \aj,
488: 127, 460
489:
490: \bibitem[Hawley et al.(2002)]{hawley02}
491: Hawley, S.~L., et al.\ 2002, \aj, 123, 3409
492:
493: \bibitem[Howell, Szkody, \& Cannizzo(1995)]{hsc95} Howell, S. B., Szkody, P.,
494: \& Cannizzo, J. K. 1995, \apj, 439, 337
495:
496: \bibitem[Howell et al.(1995)]{howell95} Howell, S. B. et al. 1995, \apj, 453, 454
497:
498: \bibitem[Howell et al.(1996)]{howell96} Howell, S. B. et al. 1996, \aj, 111, 2367
499:
500: \bibitem[Howell et al.(2001)]{hns01} Howell, S.~B., Nelson,
501: L.~A., \& Rappaport, S.\ 2001, \apj, 550, 897
502:
503: \bibitem[IAUC \# (8363)]{iau8363} IAU Circular \#8363
504:
505: \bibitem[Kuulkers, Howell, \& van Paradijs(1996)]{khp96} Kuulkers, E., Howell,
506: S. B., \& van Paradijs, J. 1996, \apjl, L87
507:
508: \bibitem[Long et al.(2003)]{long03} Long, K. S. et al. 2003, \apj, 591, 1172
509:
510: \bibitem[Makovoz \& Marleau(2005)]{mm05} Makovoz, D., \&
511: Marleau, F.~R.\ 2005, \pasp, 117, 1113
512:
513: \bibitem[Mathis(1990)]{mathis90} Mathis, J. 1990, \araa, 28, 37
514:
515: \bibitem[Muthumariappan, Kwok, \& Volk(2006)]{mkv06} Muthumariappan, C.,
516: Kwok, S., \& Volk, K. 2006, \apj, 640, 353
517:
518: \bibitem[Osaki(1996)]{osaki96} Osaki, Y.\ 1996, \pasp, 108, 39
519:
520: \bibitem[Patten et al.(2006)]{patten06} Patten, B., et al.\ 2006, \apj,
521: in press (astro-ph/0606432)
522:
523: \bibitem[Patterson et al.(2002)]{patterson02} Patterson, J. et al. 2002, \pasp,
524: 114, 721
525:
526: \bibitem[Price et al.(2004)]{price04} Price, A., et al.\ 2004,
527: \pasp, 116, 1117
528:
529: \bibitem[Pych \& Olech(1995)]{po95} Pych, W. \& Olech, A. 1995, Acta Astronomica,
530: 45, 385
531:
532: \bibitem[Richter(1992)]{richter92} Richter, G. A. 1992, RvMA, 5, 26
533:
534: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2004)]{rieke04} Rieke, G.~H., et al.\
535: 2004, \apjs, 154, 25
536:
537: \bibitem[Rockenfeller et al.(2006)]{rockenfeller06} Rockenfeller, B. et al.
538: 2006, \mnras, 367, 407
539:
540: \bibitem[Skrutskie et al.(2006)]{skrutskie06}
541: Skrutskie, M.~F., et al.\ 2006, \aj, 131, 1163
542:
543: \bibitem[Smith, Aitken, \& Roche(1994)]{sar94} Smith, C. H., Aitken, D. K.,
544: \& Roche, P. F. 1994, \mnras, 267, 225
545:
546: \bibitem[Sproats, Howell, \& Mason(1996)]{shm96} Sproats, L.~N., Howell,
547: S.~B., \& Mason, K.~O.\ 1996, \mnras, 282, 1211
548:
549: \end{thebibliography}
550:
551:
552: %**********
553: % Table 1
554: %**********
555: \begin{deluxetable}{cccc}
556: \tablecolumns{4}
557: \tablewidth{0pc}
558: \tablecaption{Dates of Spitzer Observations \label{dates-tab} }
559:
560: \tablehead{ \colhead{Observation} & \colhead{UT Date} & \colhead{Days Past
561: Outburst} & \colhead{AOR Key}} \startdata
562: %
563: MIPS-1 & 21 Aug 2004 & 67 & 12000000\\
564: MIPS-2 & 22 Sep 2004 & 99 & 12000768\\
565: IRAC-1 & 07 Oct 2004 & 114 & 12001024\\
566: MIPS-3 & 18 Oct 2004 & 125 & 12001280\\
567: IRAC-2 & 06 May 2005 & 325 & 13533696\\
568: MIPS-4 & 19 May 2005 & 338 & 13533440\\
569: \enddata
570:
571: \end{deluxetable}
572:
573: %**********
574: % Table 2
575: %**********
576: \begin{deluxetable}{ccc}
577: \tablecolumns{4} \tablewidth{0pc}
578: \tablecaption{Coordinates \label{coord-tab}
579: }
580:
581: \tablehead{ \colhead{Star} & \colhead{R.A. (J2000)} & \colhead{Dec.
582: (J2000)}\\
583:
584: \colhead{} & \colhead{[hh:mm:ss]} & \colhead{[dd:mm:ss]} } \startdata
585: %
586: Var~Her~04 & 18:39:26 & 26:04:08\\
587: Comparison-1 & 18:39:20 & 26:03:39\\
588: Comparison-2 & 18:39:24 & 26:03:32\\
589: Comparison-3 & 18:39:26 & 26:03:29\\
590: Comparison-4 & 18:39:28 & 26:05:07\\
591: \enddata
592:
593: \end{deluxetable}
594:
595:
596: %**********
597: % Table 3
598: %**********
599: \begin{deluxetable}{lcc}
600: \tablecolumns{4} \tablewidth{0pc} \tablecaption{Flux
601: Densities\tablenotemark{a} \label{fluxes-tab} }
602:
603: \tablehead{ \colhead{Bandpass} & \colhead{Flux Density} &
604: \colhead{Observation}\\
605:
606: \colhead{[$\mu$m]} & \colhead{[mJy]} & \colhead{ID}
607: } \startdata
608: %
609: 1.235 (0.162) & $7.12\pm0.34$ & 2MASS J\\
610: 1.662 (0.251) & $7.59\pm0.42$ & 2MASS H\\
611: 2.159 (0.262) & $6.42\pm0.28$ & 2MASS K$_s$\\
612: 3.550 (0.75) & $3.19\pm0.07$ & IRAC-1\\
613: & $3.22\pm0.10$ & IRAC-2\\
614: 4.493 (1.015) & $2.46\pm0.06$ & IRAC-1\\
615: & $2.29\pm0.09$ & IRAC-2\\
616: 5.731 (1.425) & $1.57\pm0.13$ & IRAC-1\\
617: & $1.56\pm0.18$ & IRAC-2\\
618: 7.872 (2.905) & $0.94\pm0.06$ & IRAC-1\\
619: & $0.83\pm0.08$ & IRAC-2\\
620: 23.7 (4.7) & $0.15\pm0.02$ & $\langle$MIPS-1,3,4$\rangle$\tablenotemark{b}\\
621: & $0.23\pm0.02$ & MIPS-2\\
622:
623:
624: \enddata
625: \tablenotetext{a}{Unresolved Photometry of Var~Her~04 and Foreground
626: Line-of-Sight M-star.} \tablenotetext{b}{Mean of differential photometry from
627: MIPS-1, MIPS3 and MIPS-4 scaled to the M3.5V template.}
628:
629: \end{deluxetable}
630:
631: \clearpage
632: \begin{figure}[ht]
633:
634: \includegraphics[angle=90,scale=0.7,keepaspectratio=true]{f1.eps}
635:
636: \figcaption{CCD visual magnitude lightcurve for Var~Her~04. Data are from
637: the AAVSO and contain only CCD+V-filter validated observations. Data have
638: been re-binned in 1-day wide bins. Error bars represent dispersion of the
639: observations within that bin. The mean ``quiescent'' magnitude of V=16.5
640: mag, as determined from the points at $t > 250$ days, is marked by the
641: horizontal dashed line. This is {\em not} the quiescent level of the
642: outbursting Var~Her~04, but is the visual magnitude of the unrelated,
643: line-of-sight foreground M-star. The times of the four
644: MIPS and two IRAC observations are marked by the vertical lines.
645: \label{aavso-fig} }
646:
647: \end{figure}
648: \clearpage
649:
650: \begin{figure}[ht]
651:
652: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=0.7,keepaspectratio=true]{f2.eps}
653:
654: \figcaption{24 \micron\ ``cut-out'' images for the MIPS-1, MIPS-2, and MIPS-3
655: observations. The images, oriented in equatorial coordinates with north up
656: and east to the left, span $210\arcsec \times 110\arcsec$ with a pixel
657: scale of $2.45\arcsec\ {\rm pixel}^{-1}$. The arrow highlights the position
658: of Var~Her~04, emphasizing the appearance of the CV in MIPS-2, and its
659: absence in MIPS-1 and MIPS-3. MIPS-4, not shown, appears identical to
660: MIPS-3. The circled stars are the four stars used for comparison in the
661: ensemble differential photometry. \label{mips-fig} }
662:
663: \end{figure}
664: \clearpage
665:
666: \begin{figure}[ht]
667:
668: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=0.7,keepaspectratio=true]{f3.eps}
669:
670: \figcaption{2MASS color-color diagram for dwarf and giant stars. The dwarf
671: stars occupy the lower branch and separate from the giant stars at a
672: spectral type of M0. The 2MASS color photometry of the foreground star is
673: marked by the filled circle. The 2MASS color of the TOAD WZ Sge (in
674: quiescence) is marked by the filled square. The position of Var~Her~04 (in
675: quiescence) is also marked (open square), showing that it has similar
676: colors to WZ Sge. Note that the JHK photometry for the quiescent
677: Var~Her~04 is from \citet{price04} and is not in the native 2MASS
678: magnitudes. Diamonds mark the fiducial spectral types. \label{2mass-fig} }
679:
680: \end{figure}
681:
682: \clearpage
683:
684: \begin{figure}[ht]
685:
686: \includegraphics[angle=90,scale=0.7,keepaspectratio=true]{f4.eps}
687:
688: \figcaption{Differential 24 \micron\ photometry from the MIPS observations. The
689: mean of the ensemble stars has been set to zero, as marked by
690: the horizontal dashed line. For the CV, the mean level of the 24 \micron\
691: flux densities (for MIPS-1, MIPS-3, and MIPS-4) has been set to zero after
692: subtraction of the ensemble flux densities. \label{mipsdiff-fig} }
693:
694: \end{figure}
695: \clearpage
696:
697: \begin{figure}[ht]
698:
699: \includegraphics[angle=90,scale=0.7,keepaspectratio=true]{f5.eps}
700:
701: \figcaption{Spectral energy distribution for the unresolved photometry of
702: the CV and the line-of-sight foreground M-dwarf. An M3.5V dwarf template,
703: scaled to the 2MASS J-band photometric point, is shown in black. The
704: ``high-state'' MIPS-2 data point is also shown, with four different
705: blackbody curves forced to fit the MIPS-2 data point.\label{sed-fig} }
706:
707: \end{figure}
708:
709:
710: \end{document}
711: