1: % Astron. Nachrichten, instructions for authors coding with LaTeX2e. V2004.1
2:
3: \documentclass{an}
4: \usepackage{graphicx}
5: \usepackage{times}
6: \usepackage{fancyhdr}
7: \sloppy
8: \pagestyle{fancy}
9:
10: \def\hr{\hbox{$^{\rm h}$}} % Hours
11: \def\fhr{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\rm h}$}} % Fractions of hours
12: \def\deg{\hbox{$^\circ$}} % Degree
13: \def\fdeg{\hbox{$.\!\!^\circ$}} % Fractions of degrees
14: \def\sec{\hbox{$^{\rm s}$}} % Seconds
15: \def\fsec{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\rm s}$}} % Fractions of seconds
16: \def\arcm{\hbox{$^\prime$}} % Arcminutes
17: \def\farcm{\hbox{$.\mkern-4mu^\prime$}} % Fractions of arcminutes
18: \def\arcs{\hbox{$^{\prime\prime}$}} % Arcseconds
19: \def\farcs{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\prime\prime}$}} % Fractions of arcseconds
20: \def\day{\hbox{$^{\rm d}$}} % Days
21: \def\fday{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\rm d}$}} % Fractions of days
22: \def\per{\hbox{$^{\rm p}$}} % Period
23: \def\fper{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\rm p}$}} % Fractions of period
24: \def\mm{\hbox{$^{\rm m}$}} % Magnitude or minute
25: \def\fmm{\hbox{$.\!\!^{\rm m}$}} % Fractions of magnitudes
26:
27: \begin{document}
28:
29: \title{Optical observations of Be/X-ray transient system KS 1947+300}
30:
31: \author{ \"U. K{\i}z{\i}lo\u{g}lu, A. Baykal, N. K{\i}z{\i}lo\u{g}lu}
32: \institute{Physics Dept., Middle East Technical University, Ankara 06531, Turkey. }
33:
34: \date{Received; accepted; published online}
35:
36: \abstract{ROTSE-IIId
37: observations of the Be/X-ray transient system KS 1947+300 obtained between
38: September 2004 and December 2005 make it possible to study
39: the correlation between optical and X-ray activity. The optical outburst of
40: 0.1 mag was accompanied by an increase in X-ray flux in 2004 observations.
41: Strong correlation between the optical and X-ray light curves
42: suggests that neutron star directly accretes from the outflowing material
43: of Be star. The nearly zero time lag between X-ray and optical light curves
44: suggests a heating of the disk of Be star by X-rays.
45: No optical brightening and X-ray enhancement was seen in 2005
46: observations. There is no indication of the orbital modulation in the
47: optical light curve.
48: \keywords{stars: individual (KS1947+300) - stars: Be - stars: circumstallar
49: matter - stars: pulsars:
50: individual (GRO J1948+32) }}
51:
52: \correspondence{nil@astroa.physics.metu.edu.tr}
53:
54: \maketitle
55:
56: \section{Introduction}
57: The transient X-ray source KS 1947+300 was discovered in 1989 through observations of the GC 2023+338
58: field (Borozdin et al. 1990). After its discovery Grankin et al.
59: (1991) and Goranskij et al. (1991) identified an optical counterpart which shows
60: H$\alpha$ emission line in its spectrum. Negueruela et al. (2003) derived a
61: spectral type B0Ve for the optical companion and a distance of $\sim$ 10 kpc.
62: Considering
63: this distance, the peak X-ray luminosity during the 2000-01 outburst was
64: $\sim 2\,10^{37}$ erg/s (typical for Be/X-ray transients during the
65: Type II outburst).
66: The equivalent width of
67: H$\alpha$ line remained almost the same during their one year
68: observation period.
69: They mentioned that the occurrence of several weaker X-ray outbursts has not been
70: reflected in any change in the intensity of H$\alpha$ line.
71: They explained this fact with a low inclination angle of the system.
72: Galloway et al. (2004), analyzing their observations obtained with the
73: instruments aboard RXTE (the ASM, PCA, HEXTE), found that neutron star revolves in a nearly circular
74: orbit (e = 0.033) with orbital period 40.415 d and projected
75: semimajor axis 137\,lt-s, based on the modulations of neutron star's pulse period
76: of $18.7\,\mathrm{s}$ (Chakrabarty et al. 1995) during the 2000-01 outburst.
77: They reported an increase in neutron star period indicating that the angular
78: momentum was effectively transferred from the accreted material
79: on to the neutron star which required an extended disk.
80: They did not find eclipses in their data.
81: Tsygankov$\&$Lutovinov (2005) estimated the magnetic field strength
82: of the pulsar as $2.5\,10^{13}$ G and distance to the binary
83: as $9.5\pm1.1$ kpc. This system occupies the region of
84: Be/X systems in the P$_{spin}$- P$_{orb}$ diagram (Reig et al.
85: 2004).
86:
87: \section{Observations and Results}
88:
89: Our CCD observations were obtained between MJD 53255 (September 7, 2004)
90: and MJD
91: 53718 (December 14, 2005) using 45 cm ROTSE-IIId robotic telescope located at
92: Bak{\i}rl{\i}tepe, Turkey.
93: It operates without filters and has a wide passband which peaks at
94: 550 nm (Akerlof et al., 2003).
95: ROTSE magnitudes were calculated by comparing all the field stars to
96: USNO 2.0 R-band catalog.
97: About 1000 CCD frames which have an exposure time of 5\,s
98: were analyzed following the procedure
99: described in K{\i}z{\i}lo\u{g}lu et al. (2005) and Baykal et al. (2005).
100: This system has right ascension and declination of
101: %$19^{h} 49^{m} 30^{s}.5$ and $+30^{o} 12^{'} 24^{"}$, respectively.
102: $19\hr 49\mm 30\fsec5$ and $+30\deg 12\arcm 24\arcs$, respectively.
103: \begin{figure*}
104: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}
105: {\includegraphics[angle=-90,scale=2]{ks1947_lc1_1.ps}}
106: \caption{Upper panel shows ROTSE-IIId daily average light curve
107: of KS1949+300 for Sep - Dec 2004 period
108: and middle panel represents X-ray light curve taken with RXTE/ASM
109: (daily average of 1.5-12.0 keV energy band) for the same period.
110: Lower panel is the hardness ratio of RXTE/ASM 3.0-5.0 KeV band
111: to 5.0-12.0 KeV band.}
112: \label{figlabel}
113: \end{figure*}
114: \begin{figure*}
115: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}
116: {\includegraphics[angle=-90]{ks1947_lc2.ps}}
117: \caption{ The same as Fig. 1 but for Jul - Dec 2005 interval.}
118: \label{figlabel}
119: \end{figure*}
120:
121: Figures 1 and 2 show the long time optical observations of
122: Be/X-ray transient system KS 1947+300 for the first time.
123: Fig. 1 shows the optical outburst like behavior of this system
124: for the data obtained in 2004. Fig. 2 shows the optical data for the year
125: 2005. On the same figures the X-ray light curves in ASM Unit c/s
126: (daily average of
127: 1.5- 12 keV energy band) of this system which was detected with the All-Sky-Monitor
128: (ASM) aboard RXTE are plotted. An increase of 0.1 mag in optical magnitude
129: is seen in Fig. 1 accompanied by an increase in X-ray flux. Both curves show
130: a similar trend. A change in the measured magnitude of Be star is
131: reflected in the change in X-ray flux.
132: This similarity between optical and X-ray light curves is not seen clearly when
133: only the low energy band of ASM data (1.5-3.0 keV) was considered.
134: During optical and X-ray excess the hardness ratio of the higher energy bands
135: (3.0-5.0 and 5.0-12.0 keV) did not show any notable change.
136: In 2005, both light curves are seen nearly constant during the
137: optical observation period.
138: There is no significant magnitude change in the optical
139: light curve and likewise no enhancement in the X-ray light curve.
140:
141: A classical correlation analysis (Oppenheim and Schaffer 1975) was used to
142: test for correlated/time-lagged changes in X-ray and optical light curves.
143: The classical correlation function is defined as
144:
145: \[
146: CF(\tau) = {<[a(t) - \bar a][b(t + \tau) - \bar b]> \over \sigma_{a}\sigma_{b} }
147: \]
148:
149: where $<...>$ is the expectation value of the two time series lagged with
150: respect to each other. $\sigma_{a}$ and $\sigma_{b}$ are the standard
151: deviations of each time series. The time series and the CF are properly
152: normalized such that at $\tau = 0$ the autocorrelation of a single
153: time series is unity.
154: Fig.3 is plot of the cross-correlation between optical and X-ray
155: light curves.
156: A very strong correlation exists between the optical
157: and X-ray light curves for the 2004 data.
158: The correlation which is centered on a nearly zero time-lag,
159: starts $\sim 20$ days before and lasts $\sim 35$ days. Correlated X/optical
160: data suggests that neutron star directly accretes from the outflowing
161: material of Be star.
162: The 2005 data indicates that both optical and X-ray time series are not
163: correlated for all time-lags.
164: \begin{figure}
165: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}
166: {\includegraphics[angle=-90]{ks_corr.ps}}
167: \caption{Cross correlation of the ROTSE-IIId and ASM light
168: curves for Sep - Dec 2004 (upper panel) and
169: Jul - Dec 2005 observations (lower panel)}
170: \label{figlabel}
171: \end{figure}
172:
173: In Fig.4 we present timing analysis for the ROTSE-IIId light curve.
174: Barycentric corrections were made to the time series by using JPL DE200
175: ephemerides prior to the timing analysis. The power spectrum build from all
176: ROTSE-IIId data (Sep 2004 - Dec 2005) by using Scargle method (Scargle 1982)
177: did not show any pronounced frequency. The power at the frequency 1 d$^{-1}$ is
178: the effect of nightly observations as expected. We could not find
179: any indication of the orbital period modulation of KS1947+300.
180: However there seems to be a red noise behavior for the frequencies lower than
181: 0.07 d$^{-1}$. The slope of the red noise spectrum is $\sim \nu^{-1.6}$,
182: where $\nu$ is the frequency in d$^{-1}$.
183:
184: Middle panel in the Fig. 4 is the power spectrum calculated for the 2004
185: ROTSE-IIId data. It is the same time interval that a correlation between X-ray
186: and optical light curves is seen. Again no apparent modulation can be
187: recognized. Although orbital modulation is not expected in such a short
188: observation span, other short time scale modulations are also absent.
189: No significant period is detected.
190: An indication of a red noise feature seen in 2004 - 2005 data is also present
191: for the frequencies lower than $\sim 0.07$ d$^{-1}$.
192: The power spectrum for the 2005 observations shown in the lower panel of
193: Fig. 4 also does not show any specific periodic behavior. The red noise
194: feature is absent.
195:
196: \begin{figure}
197: \resizebox{\hsize}{!}
198: {\includegraphics[angle=-90]{ks_pow.ps}}
199: \caption{ The power spectrum of the ROTSE-IIId light curve by using Scargle
200: method. Upper panel is for all time series starting from Sep 2004 to Dec 2005.
201: Middle and lower panels are for the 2004 and 2005 data, respectively.}
202: \label{figlabel}
203: \end{figure}
204:
205:
206: \section{Discussion}
207:
208: Start time of our observations (MJD 53255) corresponds to the orbital phase
209: of 0.42 which is calculated using T$_{\pi/2}$ = 51985.31 MJD
210: from Galloway et al. (2004) (T$_{\pi/2}$ is the epoch at which the mean
211: longitude is $\pi$/2 ). Maximum of brightness occurs at $\sim$ 0.25
212: orbital phase. Magnitude change lasts about 70-80 d.
213: The brightening and fading phases have similar time durations.
214: If the magnitude change is attributed
215: to the disk around Be star then the disk is lost in about 70-80 d.
216: Hanuschik et al. (1993), in their study of H$\alpha$ outburst of
217: $\mu$ Cen, propose that the outburst is caused by the ejection of
218: photospheric matter into bound orbits forming a short lived (less than
219: 100 d) quasi stable Keplerian disk. They did not find close relation
220: between H$\alpha$ emission activity and photometric data.
221: Negueruela et al. (2003) observed almost no change in the strength of the
222: H$\alpha$ line (equivalent width:$\sim$ 15 A) during their
223: one year observation period which begins one month after the 2000-01
224: X-ray outburst. They argued that if Be star disk was lost then the
225: strength of H$\alpha$ line should fade away.
226: It seems that the long period of X-ray activity in 2000-01 period and
227: likewise remaining relatively constant the strength of H$\alpha$ line
228: oppose to the possibility of a short lived disk during this period.
229: It is less likely to have short lived disk in this system.
230:
231: The circular orbital velocity of X-ray component is 74 km/s according to
232: the orbital parameters given by Galloway et al (2004).
233: Using the orbital parameters of KS 1947+300,
234: Galloway et al., (2004) estimated the mass function
235: as f$_{x}$= 1.71 M$_\odot$. For a neutron star of mass
236: 1.4 M$_\odot$, the mass of optical component is 3.4 M$_\odot$ when
237: the inclination angle i=90$^{o}$.
238: Since we did not see eclipses either from RXTE/ASM or ROTSE observations,
239: we assumed that inclination angles should be less than
240: 85$^{o}$.
241: If we assume masses of 15 and 20 M$_\odot$ for the optical component
242: the inclination angles are found as 28$^{o}$ and 26$^{o}$, respectively.
243: The corresponding Roche Lobe radii are 73 and 83 R$_\odot$ which
244: are much larger than the expected radius of B0V star. It is difficult
245: to explain the X-ray outburst of this system by mass transfer from Be star
246: through the inner Lagrangian point of Roche Lobe.
247: In the truncated viscous disk model
248: (Okazaki$\&$Negueruela 2001) the tidal torques on neutron star truncates
249: the disk effectively in systems with low eccentricity therefore
250: preventing the development of an extended and steady disk.
251: It is difficult to explain the behavior of Be disk in this system
252: with the viscous disk model.
253:
254: The maximum X-ray luminosity obtained from ASM data (Fig.1)
255: during our 2004 observation period
256: is $\sim$ $5\,10^{36}$ erg/s which is calculated using the definition
257: in Galloway et al. (2004)
258: (1 count/s $\sim$$3.6\,10^{-10}$ erg/s/cm$^{2}$ in
259: the energy range 1.5-12 keV). This luminosity is typical for
260: TypeI outburst but its duration is longer than the typical
261: value for TypeI outburst.
262: The derived accretion rate on to the neutron star is calculated as
263: $\sim$ $4\,10^{-10}$ M$_\odot$/yr.
264: It is known that
265: the mass loss rate derived is in the order of $10^{-8}$ M$_\odot$/yr
266: for Be stars (Waters et al. 1987, Clark et al. 1999).
267: Clark et al. (1999) find a mass loss rate of 1.5-9$\,10^{-8}$ M$_\odot$/yr
268: for the Be/X-ray binary A0535+26.
269: Hanuschik et al. (1993) calculated the typical mass transfer rate during the
270: H$\alpha$ outburst of $\mu$ Cen (B2IV-Ve star) which lasted a few days
271: as $\sim$ $4\,10^{-9}$ M$_\odot$/yr. Such equatorial mass loss rates
272: from Be star can produce the observed X-ray luminosity for KS 1947+300.
273:
274: The increase in optical luminosity of the system is calculated $\sim$
275: $10^{36}$ erg/s using the value of M$_{v}$ =-4.2 (Vacca et al. 1996).
276: This increase can be explained as a heating of Be star
277: equatorial disk by X-rays.
278: The nearly zero time lag between X-ray and optical light curves suggests
279: this result. The X-ray emission from the neutron star is absorbed in
280: the stellar wind and equatorial disk of the Be star and reprocessed into
281: the optical wavelengths (Kriss et al. 1983, Mendelson and Mazeh, 1991).
282:
283: \acknowledgements
284:
285: This study was supported by TUG (Turkish National Observatory), TUB\.ITAK.
286: We acknowledge support from The Scientific and Technological Research Council
287: of Turkey through project 106T040.
288: ROTSE is a collaboration of Lawrence Livermore National Lab,
289: Los Alamos National Lab, and the University of Michigan (http://www.rotse.net).
290:
291: \begin{thebibliography}{}
292: \bibitem{} Akerlof, C.W., Kehoe, R.L., McKay, T.A., Rykoff, E.S., Smith, D.A., et al.:
293: 2003, PASP~, 115, 132
294: \bibitem{} Baykal, A., K{\i}z{\i}lo\u{g}lu, U., K{\i}z{\i}lo\u{g}lu, N.: 2005,
295: IBVS, No:5615
296: \bibitem{} Borozdin, K., Gilfanov, M., Sunyaev, R., Churazov, E., et al.:
297: 1990, PAZh., 16, 804
298: \bibitem{} Chakrabarty, D., Towsian, K., Lars, B., Thomas, A.P.: 1995, ApJ~, 446, 826
299: \bibitem{} Clark, J.S., Lyuty, V.M., Zaitseva, G.V., Larionov, V.M.,
300: Larionova, L.M., et al.: 1999, MNRAS~, 302, 167
301: \bibitem{} Galloway, D.K., Morgan, E.H., Levine, A.M.: 2004, ApJ~, 613, 1164
302: \bibitem{} Grankin, K.N., Shevchenko, V.S., Yakubov, S.D.: 1991, PAZh., 17, 991
303: \bibitem{} Goranskij, V.P., Esipov, V.F., Lyutyi, V.M., Shugarov, S.Y.:
304: 1991, SvAL~, 17, 399
305: \bibitem{} Hanuschik, F.W., Dach, S.J., Baudzus, M., Thimm, G.: 1993, A\&A~, 274, 356
306: \bibitem{} Mendelson, H., Mazeh, T.: 1991, MNRAS~, 250, 373
307: \bibitem{} K{\i}z{\i}lo\u{g}lu, U., K{\i}z{\i}lo\u{g}lu, N., Baykal, A.: 2005,
308: AJ~, 130, 2766
309: \bibitem{} Kriss, G.A., Cominsky, L.R., Remillard, R.A., William, G.,
310: Thorstensen, J.R.: 1983, ApJ~, 266, 806
311: \bibitem{} Nequeruela, I., Israel, G.L., Morco, A., Norton, A.J., Speziali, R.:
312: 2003, A\&A~, 397, 739
313: \bibitem{} Okazaki, A.T., Nequeruela, I.: 2001, A\&A~, 377, 161
314: \bibitem{} Oppenheim, A. V., and Schaffer, R. W.: 1975, Digital Signal
315: Processing (Prentice Hall: New Jersey).
316: \bibitem{} Reig, P., Nequeruela, I., Fabregat, J., et al.: 2004, A\&A~, 421, 673
317: \bibitem{} Scargle, J.D., 1982, ApJ~, 263, 835
318: \bibitem{} Tsygankov, S.S., Lutovinov, A.A.: 2005, AstL~, 31, 88
319: \bibitem{} Vacca, W.D., Garmany, C.D., Shull, J.M.: 1996, ApJ~, 460, 914
320: \bibitem{} Waters, L.B.F.M., Cote, J., Lamers, H.J.G.L.M.: 1987, A\&A~,
321: 185, 206
322:
323: \end{thebibliography}
324:
325: \end{document}
326: