1: %%
2: %% beginning of file 'ms.tex'
3: %%
4: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
5: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
6: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
7: %\documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
8: \usepackage{amssymb}
9: \newcommand{\myemail}{hayato@crab.riken.jp}
10: %\shorttitle{}
11: \shortauthors{Hayato et al.}
12:
13: \begin{document}
14:
15: \title{Discovery of a Compact X-ray Source \\
16: in the LMC Supernova Remnant N23 with {\it Chandra}}
17: \author{Asami Hayato\altaffilmark{1,2}, Aya Bamba\altaffilmark{2},
18: Toru Tamagawa\altaffilmark{2,1}, and Kiyoshi Kawabata\altaffilmark{1}}
19: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics, Faculty of Science,
20: Tokyo University of Science, 1-3, Kagurazaka, Shinjyuku-ku,
21: Tokyo 162-8601, Japan; \myemail}
22: \altaffiltext{2}{RIKEN (Institute of Physical and Chemical Research), 2-1,
23: Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan}
24:
25: \begin{abstract}
26:
27: An X-ray compact source was discovered with {\it Chandra} in a
28: supernova remnant (SNR) N23, located in the Large Magellanic
29: Cloud. The compact source (CXOU J050552.3$-$680141) is seen in only
30: the hard band ($>$ 2 keV) image of N23, while the soft band image ($<$
31: 2 keV) shows diffuse emission of the SNR, with an extent of
32: $\sim 60 \arcsec \times 80\arcsec$. The compact source is located at
33: almost the center of N23, and there is no identifiable object for the
34: source from previous observations at any other wavelength. The source
35: spectrum is best explained by a power-law model with a photon index of
36: $\Gamma$ = 2.2 $^{+0.5}_{-0.3}$ and an absorption-corrected luminosity
37: of $L_{x}$ = 1.0 $\times$ 10$^{34}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ in the 0.5--10 keV
38: band for a distance of 50 kpc. Neither pulsation nor time variability
39: of the source was detected with this observation with a time
40: resolution of 3.2 sec. These results correspond with those of
41: \citet{hughes06}, who carried out analysis independently around the
42: same time as our work.
43:
44: Based on information from the best-fit power-law model, we suggest
45: that the source emission is most likely from a rotation-powered pulsar
46: and/or a pulsar wind nebula. It is generally inferred that the
47: progenitor of N23 is a core-collapsed massive star.
48:
49: \end{abstract}
50: %keywords
51: \keywords{ISM: supernova remnants --- X-rays: individual (N23, CXOU J050552.3$-$680141)}
52:
53: \section{Introduction}
54:
55: The Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) quite well meet the requirements of
56: a systematic study of supernova remnants (SNRs), in view of the facts
57: concerning the known distance (50 kpc; Feast 1999) and the small
58: absorption because it is the nearest face-on galaxy to us. Over 30
59: SNRs have been discovered in the LMC so far, and categorized
60: \citep{williams99,hughes98}. Besides, due to the limited spatial
61: resolution of previous observations, it is reported that only six of
62: pulsar/SNR associations in the LMC, PSR B0540$-$69 in N158A
63: \citep{gotthelf00}, PSR J0537$-$6910 in N157B \citep{marshall98}, a
64: pulsar in N206 \citep{klinger02}, SGR 0526$-$66 in N49
65: \citep{kulkarni03,rothschild94}, XMMU J053559.3$-$673509 in DEM L241
66: \citep{bamba06}, and a pulsar wind nebula (PWN) in SNR B0453$-$68.5
67: \citep{gaensler03a}. A PWN is a synchrotron emission from
68: high pressure plasma swept by the pulsar's relativistic wind. Even
69: though all of PWNe are powered by a pulsar, there is a case of a PWN
70: without detection of a pulsar \citep{gaensler03a}. The pulsar/SNR or
71: PWN/SNR associations provide meaningful information, such as the age
72: of the systems, and the type of remnants.
73:
74: The SNR N23 (0506$-$68.0) is one of the SNRs in the LMC that
75: \citet{milne80} identified as an SNR with radio observations at 5 and
76: 14.7 GHz for the first time. It is classified by its morphology as
77: being a middle-aged ($\sim$3000 year) and an irregular-shaped SNR in
78: \citet{hughes98}. SNR N23 has not been well studied, so
79: there is still no absolute solution for its explosion type (a
80: core-collapse or a Ia). \citet{cohen88} insisted the possibility
81: that N23 is a remnant from a massive star SN, since a CO
82: cloud with high-density OB stars was observed within $\sim$30 pc of
83: N23. On the other hand, \citet{banas97} suggested that the remnant
84: does not have any association with others according to their own
85: observations with better spatial resolutions than that of the Cohen
86: survey.
87:
88: We present the results of an X-ray observation of N23 with {\it
89: Chandra} in this paper. The observation details are summarized in
90: $\S$2, and the analysis results in $\S$3. Using those results, we
91: discuss the source discovered at the center of the remnant in $\S$4,
92: and $\S$5 is a summary of this paper. \citet{hughes06} reported the
93: same results based on their independent analysis.
94:
95: \section{Observation Details}
96:
97: An observation of SNR N23 was performed with the {\it Chandra}
98: \citep{weisskopf02} ACIS-S detector \citep{garmire00} on December 29, 2002
99: (observation ID = 2762). The operation was in a timed exposure very
100: faint mode, and it provided a time resolution of 3.24 sec. Data
101: reduction was done using {\it Chandra} Interactive Analysis of
102: Observation (CIAO) version 3.1 and CALDB version 2.28. From the Level
103: 1 processed events that {\it Chandra} X-Ray Center gives, {\it
104: Advanced Satellite for Cosmology and Astrophysics} ({\it ASCA}) grades
105: of 0, 2, 3, 4, and 6 were selected. After that, the data was filtered
106: for good time intervals and, consequently, the total usable exposure
107: time was 37 ksec.
108: \section{Results}
109:
110: \subsection{Image Analysis}
111: \label{sec:imgana}
112:
113: Figure~\ref{fig:img} shows ACIS X-ray images in the (a) 0.5--2.0 keV
114: and (b) 2.0--8.0 keV bands. It demonstrates that the diffuse emission
115: extend $\sim 60 \arcsec \times 80 \arcsec$ (15 pc $\times$ 19 pc for a
116: distance of 50 kpc) in the soft X-ray band. The eastern part of the
117: SNR is quite bright, whereas the northern and western parts are
118: not. The lack of uniformity of the morphology might be due to a
119: molecular cloud sitting southeast of N23 \citep{banas97,math85}.
120:
121: In the hard X-ray image, a compact source (CXOU J050552.3$-$680141) is
122: found in the SNR, although diffuse emission is not. It was detected by
123: the {\tt wavdetect} command in CIAO with a significance of 11 $\sigma$
124: in the 2.0$-$8.0 keV band. The contour of 3 $\sigma$ detection has an
125: elliptical shape (1\farcs5 $\times$ 1\farcs3), and is slightly larger
126: than the point spread function size at the source position of ACIS;
127: however, it cannot be concluded that the source significantly extends,
128: since there are non-uniform and complicated diffuse emissions over the
129: source. Its location was identified as R.A.= 05$^{\rm h}05^{\rm
130: m}$52\fs3, decl.=$-$68\arcdeg01\arcmin41\farcs2 (J2000) with an
131: uncertainty of less than a pixel size (0.5 arcsec). No counterpart
132: object in this position has been found with the SIMBAD data base; in
133: addition, there is no report about the compact source in either
134: optical \citep{math85} or radio \citep{dickel98,banas97} band
135: observations. An optical and a radio limits are magnitude $>$ 17 and
136: $<$ $\sim$2mJy respectively \citep{hughes06,dickel98}. We concentrate
137: our discussion on this compact object in this paper, and call it
138: ``Source'' hereinafter.
139:
140: \subsection{Spectral Analysis}
141: \label{sec:specana}
142:
143: We obtained the spectrum of Source with photons in the elliptical
144: region at Source, described in $\S$\ref{sec:imgana} (Figure
145: \ref{fig:img} (a)). There were 285 and 37 events in the region in the
146: 0.5--2.0 keV and 2.0--8.0 keV bands, respectively, and the corresponding
147: count rates were 4.4 and 0.57 counts sec$^{-1}$ arcmin$^{-2}$ with an
148: exposure time of 37 ksec.
149:
150: Because the background of Source surely consists of the thermal emission of
151: SNR itself, we tested three backgrounds: the first was a circle
152: that included the whole SNR (Bgd 1), the second was a circle from an
153: extraneous region (Bgd 2), and the third was a circle that had
154: almost the same surface brightness as the surrounding region of Source
155: (Bgd 3), as shown in Figure \ref{fig:img} (a).
156:
157: We fitted three spectra with an absorbed power-law function, blackbody
158: model, and plasma (Mekal) model
159: \citep{mewe85,mewe86,kaastra92,liedahl95}, assuming that photons are
160: absorbed in Galaxy ($N{_{\rm H}}^{\rm gal}$) and the LMC ($N{_{\rm
161: H}}^{\rm LMC}$). The calculation of absorption columns was done using
162: cross sections obtained by \citet{morrison83} for $N{_{\rm H}}^{\rm gal}$
163: and \citet{baluc92} for $N{_{\rm H}}^{\rm LMC}$, under the assumption
164: that the abundances are 1 solar for $N{_{\rm H}}^{\rm gal}$
165: \citep{anders89} and 0.3 solar for $N{_{\rm H}}^{\rm LMC}$
166: \citep{russ92,hughes98}. We froze $N{_{\rm H}}^{\rm gal}$ to 5.6 $\times
167: 10^{20} {\rm cm}^{-2}$ \citep{dickey90}, while we left $N{_{\rm
168: H}}^{\rm LMC}$ a free parameter. Table \ref{tbl:fit_results} gives the
169: results of the fittings. Even though we tested three models with three
170: different background regions, it did not matter for the results of the
171: absorption-corrected flux, $\sim10^{-14}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s
172: $^{-1}$. However, only the power-law fitting of the spectrum with the
173: Bgd 1 gave an acceptable reduced $\chi^2$. Figure \ref{fig:spec}
174: represents the best-fit power-law model and data with Bgd 1.
175:
176: \subsection{Timing Analysis}
177:
178: Coherent pulsations of Source were searched. Selected photons are from
179: the region of Source (see $\S$\ref{sec:specana}) and in the 2.0--8.0
180: keV band. The arrival times of photons were corrected with the
181: {\tt axbary} command in CIAO. Figure~\ref{fig:powspec} gives a
182: power-density spectrum of Source made based on a fast Fourier
183: transform (FFT) algorithm. Even the highest peak dose not protrude
184: significantly from the white noise; thus, we consider that no
185: significant pulsation was detected. Note that the time resolution of
186: ACIS is only 3.24 sec in this observation.
187:
188: We also searched for the time variability of Source. We made a light
189: curve of the entire observation time, as demonstrated in
190: Figure~\ref{fig:lc}. A statistical analysis with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov
191: test shows 53\% for the probability of its constancy. As a result, we
192: have concluded that Source has no significant time variability.
193:
194: \section{Discussion}
195:
196: Although a physical association between Source and the SNR N23 is
197: strongly supported by the fact that the Source location is almost at
198: the center of the SNR, our fitting results of the $N{_{\rm H}}^{\rm
199: LMC}$ do not determine whether Source is in LMC or not due to the
200: error. We thus verified the case that Source is (1) an object in
201: Galaxy, (2) the object in LMC is unrelated with SNR, (3) a background
202: active galactic nucleus (AGN), (4) the stellar remnant of N23.
203:
204: \subsection{If Source is in Galaxy}
205:
206: If Source is in Galaxy, possible candidates are an active RS CVn
207: binary ($L_x$=29$-$32), a Cataclysmic Variables (CV; $L_x$=30$-$33), a
208: Young Stellar Object (YSO; $L_x$=29$-$31), or a Low Mass X-ray Binary
209: (LMXB; $L_x=$30$-$39), because their luminosities are consistent with the
210: Source luminosity, assuming that Source is in Galaxy.
211:
212: Since plasma models with any of three backgrounds did not provide an
213: acceptable reduced $\chi^2$, we concluded that Source is unlikely to
214: be a RS CVn, a CV, or a YSO, which are well explained by plasma
215: models. The emission from a LMXB can explained by a power-law model,
216: but the photon index is typically 1--2 \citep{muno03}, which is harder
217: than the best-fit power-law model of Source.
218:
219: As a result, we can say that Source would not be a
220: considerable object in the case that Source is in Galaxy.
221:
222: \subsection{Source possibility of being a HMXB in the LMC}
223:
224: If Source is in the LMC and unrelated with the SNR, it could be a
225: HMXB. The luminosity of HMXB (log$ L_x$ = 33--38; Muno et al. 2003)
226: corresponds to the luminosity of Source, if Source is in the LMC. The
227: observed spectrum of a HMXB is explained with a photon index of
228: 0.5--2.5 \citep{muno03}, which is also the same as the best-fit
229: power-law of Source. However, the HMXB should be observed with the
230: companion star in the optical band, and the expected optical limit of
231: the companion star in the LMC is magnitude 16. The work by
232: \citet{hughes06} using the data of the MACHO Project indicates that the
233: optical limit in the Source region is $>$ 17. We can thus reject the
234: possibility of being a HMXB in LMC.
235:
236: \subsection{Source possibility of being an AGN}
237:
238: The spectrum of an AGN has a photon index of $\sim$1--3
239: \citep{beckmann06}, and the photon index of Source is in between.
240: We calculated the expected number of AGNs in the back of N23 using a
241: log{\it N}$-$log{\it S} function measured by the {\it ROSAT} deep
242: survey in the Lockman Hole \citep{hasinger98}. As a result, 24 AGNs,
243: the flux of which is equal or higher than Source, are spread per
244: square degree in the sky. Then, because the possibility of the AGN
245: coincidence in the SNR region (elliptical; $\sim 60\arcsec \times
246: 80\arcsec$) is only 0.8\%, we can hardly find an AGN in the back of
247: N23.
248:
249: \subsection{Source as a stellar remnant of SNR N23}
250:
251: It is highly possible that Source associates with the SNR due to its
252: location. The existence of an associating stellar remnant suggests
253: that N23 is outcome of gravitational core-collapse of a massive star.
254:
255: The possible candidates for Source as a stellar remnant of N23 would
256: be a neutron star, a compact central object (CCO), an isolated pulsar,
257: or a PWN.
258:
259: The emission by a neutron star can be explained by a blackbody model
260: with $kT$ = 0.15--0.25 keV \citep{page96,page98}, but the blackbody
261: model was not able to represent the Source radiation with any
262: backgrounds. Thus, Source is hardly said to be a usual neutron star.
263:
264: CCOs have recently been discovered in several SNRs, like the central
265: source in Cassiopeia A \citep{chakrabarty01} or in Puppis A
266: \citep{zavlin99}. CCOs' spectra can be fitted with either a blackbody
267: or a power-law model, but the blackbody temperatures of CCOs are
268: excessively high ($kT$ = $\sim$0.3--0.6 keV; Chakrabarty et al. 2001,
269: Kaspi \& Roberts 2004) to consider that they are the usual neutron
270: stars; also, the photon indices of power-law fitting is too soft
271: ($\Gamma$ = $\sim$2.6--4.1; Kaspi \& Roberts 2004) to be pulsars. The
272: luminosity of CCOs is log{\it L}$_x$ = 31--35 ergs s$^{-1}$, as shown
273: by the triangle symbols in Figure~\ref{fig:pi_lum}. Even though the
274: Source luminosity is consistent with those of CCOs, Source could not
275: be acceptably fitted with a blackbody model, and the photon index of a
276: power-law model is harder than the typical photon index of CCOs. Thus,
277: we consider that Source in N23 seems not to be a CCO.
278:
279: A pulsar typically has the power-law spectrum with a photon index of
280: $\Gamma$ = $\sim$0.6--1.9 \citep{gotthelf00}, which is harder than the
281: best-fit photon index of Source. Meanwhile, for a PWN, we would
282: observe a softer photon index, generically, $\Gamma$ = $\sim$1.1--2.3
283: \citep{cheng04}. The luminosity of the PWN is log$ L_x$ = 29--37,
284: which is brighter than that of only the pulsar \citep{cheng04}. This
285: is indicated in Figure~\ref{fig:pi_lum} by circle symbols. Due to the
286: spectrum agreement, Source likely included the emission from a PWN. In
287: this case, Source would be a rotation-powered pulsar plus a PWN, or a
288: PWN powered by an unseen pulsar. For any conclusion, the pulsation
289: searches with the better time resolution are required.
290:
291: There is no counterpart of Source in the ATCA radio observation (1380,
292: 2387, 4790, and 8640 MHz \citep{dickel98}), and the flux limit was
293: estimated as $\sim$2 mJy in any of four frequencies. Source is quite
294: similar to the radio-quiet PWN around PSR B1509$-$58, which flux in
295: the X-ray band is factor of 2 lagrer than Source and the radio flux
296: limit is $\sim$1.3 mJy \citep{gaensler02,gaensler99}. Therefore, the
297: radio limit is consistent with our conclusion that Source is a
298: radio-quiet PWN.
299:
300: \section{Summary}
301:
302: A detailed analysis of the compact source at the center of SNR N23 in
303: the LMC with {\it Chandra} has been presented. N23 has $\sim 60
304: \arcsec \times 80 \arcsec$ diffuse emission in the $<$ 2 keV band, and an
305: almost point-like compact source in the $>$ 2 keV band. This source
306: (CXOU J050552.3$-$680141) has no counterpart at any other
307: wavelength. The spectrum of the source can be fitted to a power-law
308: function with $\Gamma$ = 2.2 $^{+0.5}_{-0.3}$, and a luminosity of 1.0
309: $\times$ 10$^{34}$ ergs s$^{-1}$ in the 0.5--10 keV band for a
310: distance of 50 kpc. Neither significant pulsation nor time variability
311: was detected with the time resolution of 3.2 sec observation. The
312: results of the fittings indicate that the source might well be a
313: rotation-powered pulsar and/or a pulsar wind nebula (PWN) associating
314: with the SNR. It implies that the progenitor of the remnant is likely
315: to be a massive star.
316:
317: \acknowledgments
318: We gratefully acknowledge the {\it Chandra} team for making available
319: its public data used herein. We thank R. Yamazaki, K. Mori, T. Mihara,
320: M. Nakajima, N. Isobe and K. Makishima for their fruitful
321: discussions. This research made use of the SIMBAD data base, obtained
322: by CDS, Strasbourg, France. This work is supported in part by the
323: Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) of the Ministry of Education,
324: Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (No.17740183).
325:
326: \begin{thebibliography}{}
327: \bibitem[Anders \& Grevesse(1989)]{anders89} Anders, E., \& Grevesse, N.,
328: Geochimia et Cosmochimica Acta, 53, 197
329: \bibitem[Balucinska-Church \& McCammon(1992)]{baluc92} Balucinska-Church, M.,
330: \& McCammon, D. 1992, \apj, 400, 699
331: \bibitem[Bamba et al.(2006)]{bamba06} Bamba, A., Ueno, M., Nakajima, H.,
332: Mori, K., \& Koyama, K. 2006, \aap, 450, 585
333: \bibitem[Banas et al.(1997)]{banas97} Banas, K. R., Hughes, J. P.,
334: Bronfman, L., \& Nyman, L. 1997, \apj, 480, 607
335: \bibitem[Beckmann et al.(2006)]{beckmann06} Beckmann, V., Gehrels, N.,
336: \& Shrader, C. R. 2006, \apj, 638, 642
337: \bibitem[Caraveo et al.(2003)]{caraveo03} Caraveo, P. A., Bignami, G. F.,
338: DeLuca, A., Mereghetti, S., Pellizzoni, A., Mignani, R.,
339: Tur, A., \& Becker, W. 2003, Science, 301, 1345
340: \bibitem[Chakrabaty et al.(2001)]{chakrabarty01} Chakrabarty, D.,
341: Pivovaroff, M. J., Hernquist, L. E., Heyl, J. S., \& Narayan, R.
342: 2001, \apj, 548, 800
343: \bibitem[Cheng et al.(2004)]{cheng04} Cheng, K. S., Taam, R. E.,
344: \& Wang, W. 2004, \apj, 617, 480
345: \bibitem[Cohen et al.(1988)]{cohen88} Cohen, R. S., Dame, T. M., Montani, J.,
346: Rubio, M., \& Thaddeus, P. 1988, \apjl, 331, L95
347: \bibitem[Dickel \& Milne(1998)]{dickel98} Dickel, J. R., \& Milne, D. K. 1998,
348: \apj, 115, 1057
349: \bibitem[Dickey \& Lockman(1990)]{dickey90} Dickey, J. M.,
350: \& Lockman, F. J. 1990, \araa, 28, 215
351: \bibitem[Finley et al.(1998)]{finley98} Finley, J. P., Srinvasan, R., Saito, Y.,
352: Hirayama, M., Kamae, T., \& Yoshida, K. 1998, \apj, 493, 884
353: \bibitem[Frail and Scharringhausen(1997)]{frail97} Frail, D. A. \&
354: Scharringhausen, B. R. 1997, \apj, 480, 364
355: \bibitem[Gaensler et al.(2002)]{gaensler02} Gaensler, B. M., Arons, J.,
356: Kaspi. V. M., Pivovaroff, M. J., Kawai. N., \& Tamura, K. 2002, \apj,
357: 569, 878
358: \bibitem[Gaensler et al.(1999)]{gaensler99} Gaensler, B. M., Brazier, K. T. S.,
359: Manchester, R. N., Johnston, S., \& Green, A. J. 1999, MNRAS, 305, 724
360: \bibitem[Gaensler et al.(2003a)]{gaensler03a} Gaensler, B. M., Hendrick, S. P.,
361: Reynolds, S. P., \& Borkowski, K. J. 2003a, \apjl, 594, L111
362: \bibitem[Gaensler et al.(2003b)]{gaensler03b} Gaensler, B. M., Schulz, N. S.,
363: Kaspi, V. M., Baganoff, W. E. 2003b, \apj, 588, 411
364: \bibitem[Gaensler et al.(2000)]{gaensler00} Gaensler, B. M., Stappers, B. W.,
365: Frail, D. A., Moffett, D. A., Johnston, S., \& Chatterjee, S. 2000, MNRAS,
366: 318, 58
367: \bibitem[Gaensler et al.(2004)]{gaensler04} Gaensler, B. M., Swaluw, E. V. D.,
368: Camilo, F., Kaspi, V. M., Baganoff, F. K., Yusef-Zadeh, F., \&
369: Manchester, R. N. 2004, \apj, 616, 383
370: \bibitem[Garmire et al.(2000)]{garmire00} Garmire, G., Feigelson, E. D.,
371: Broos, P., Hillenbrand, L. A., Pravdo, S. H., Townsley, L.,
372: \& Tsuboi, Y. 2000, \aj, 120, 1426
373: \bibitem[Gotthelf \& Kaspi(1998)]{gotthelf98} Gotthelf, E. V., \&
374: Kaspi, V. M. 1998, \apjl, 497, L29
375: \bibitem[Gotthelf et al.(1999)]{gotthelf99} Gotthelf, E. V., Petre, R.,
376: \& Vasisht, G. 1999, \apjl, 514, L107
377: \bibitem[Gottelf \& Vasisht(1997)]{gotthelf97} Gotthelf, E. V., \& Vasisht, V.
378: 1997, \apjl, 486, L133
379: \bibitem[Gotthelf \& Wang(2000)]{gotthelf00} Gotthelf, E. V., \& Wang, D. 2000,
380: \apjl, 532, L117
381: \bibitem[Halpern et al.(2001)]{halpern01} Halpern, J. P., Camilo, F.,
382: Gotthelf, E. V, Helfand, D. J., Kramer, M., Lyne, A. G.,
383: Leighly, K. M., \& Eracleous, M. 2001, \apjl, 552, L125
384: \bibitem[Hasinger et al.(1998)]{hasinger98} Hasinger, G., Burg, R.,
385: Giacconi, R., Schmidt, M., Tr$\ddot{\rm u}$mper, J., \&
386: Zamorani, G. 1998, \aap, 329, 482
387: \bibitem[Hessels et al.(2004)]{hessels04} Hessels, J. W. T., Roberts, M. S. E.,
388: Ranson, S. M., Kaspi, V. M., Romani, R. W., Ng, C-Y, Freire, P. C. C., \&
389: Gaensler, B. M. 2004, \apj, 612, 389
390: \bibitem[Hughes et al.(1998)]{hughes98} Hughes, J. P., Hayashi, I.,
391: \& Koyama, K. 1998, \apj, 505, 732
392: \bibitem[Hughes et al.(2001)]{hughes01} Hughes, J. P., Slane, P. O.,
393: Burrows, D. N., Garmire, G., Nousekm J. A., Olbert, C. M.,
394: \& Keohane, J. W. 2001, \apjl, 559, L153
395: \bibitem[Hughes et al.(2006)]{hughes06} Hughes, J. P., Rafelski, M.,
396: Warren, J. S., Rakowski, C., Slane, P., Burrows, D., \&
397: Nousek, J. 2006, \apjl, 645, L117
398: \bibitem[Kaaret(2001)]{kaaret01} Kaaret, P., Marshall, H. L., Alodcroft, T. L.,
399: Graessle, D. E., Karovska, M., Murray, S. S., Rots, A. H.,
400: Schulz, N. S., \& Seward, F. D. 2001, \apj, 546, 1159
401: \bibitem[Kaastra(1992)]{kaastra92} Kaastra, J. S., 1992,
402: An X-ray Spectral Code for Optically Thin Plasmas
403: (Internal SRON-Leiden Report, updated version 2.0)
404: \bibitem[Kaspi et al.(2001)]{kaspi01} Kaspi, V. M., Gotthelf, E. V.,
405: Gaensler, B. M., \& Lyutikov, M. 2001, \apjl, 562, L163
406: \bibitem[Klinger et al.(2002)]{klinger02} Klinger, R. J., Dickel, J. R.,
407: \& Fields, B. D. 2002, \apj, 124, 2135
408: \bibitem[Kulkarni et al.(2003)]{kulkarni03} Kulukarni, S. R.,
409: Kaplan, D. L., Marshall, H. L., Frail, D. A., Murakami, T., \&
410: Yonetoku, D. 2003, \apj, 585, 948
411: \bibitem[Liedahl et al.(1995)]{liedahl95} Lideahl, D. A.,
412: Osterheld, A. L., \& Goldstein, W. M. 1995, \apjl, 438, 115
413: \bibitem[Lu et al.(2002)]{lu02} Lu, F. J., Wang, Q. D., Aschenbach, B.,
414: Durouchoux, P., \& Song, L. M. 2002, \apjl, 568, L49
415: \bibitem[Milne et al.(1980)]{milne80} Milne, D. K., Caswell, L.,
416: \& Haynes, R. F. 1980, \mnras, 191, 469
417: \bibitem[Mathewson et al.(1985)]{math85} Mathewson, D. S., Ford, V. L.,
418: Tuohy, I. R., Mills, B. Y., Turtle, A. J., \& Helfand, D. J. 1985,
419: \apjs, 58, 197
420: \bibitem[Marshall et al.(1998)]{marshall98} Marshall, F. E., Gotthelf, E. V.,
421: Zhang, W., Middleditch, J., \& Wang, Q. D. 1998, \apj, 499, L179
422: \bibitem[Mereghetti et al.(1996)]{mereghetti96} Mereghetti, S.,
423: Bignami, G. F., \& Caraveo, P. A. 1996, \apj, 464, 842
424: \bibitem[Mereghetti et al.(2002)]{mereghetti02} Mereghetti, S., Tiengo, A.,
425: \& Israel, G. L. 2002, \apj, 569, 275
426: \bibitem[Mewe et al.(1985)]{mewe85} Mewe, R., Gronenschild, E. H. B. M., \&
427: van den Oord, G. H. J. 1985, \aaps, 62, 97
428: \bibitem[Mewe et al.(1986)]{mewe86} Mewe, R., Lemen, J. R., \&
429: van den Oord, G. H. J. 1986, \aaps, 65, 511
430: \bibitem[Morrison \& McCammon(1983)]{morrison83} Morrison, D. S.,
431: \& McCommon, D. 1983, \apj, 270, 119
432: \bibitem[Muno et al.(2003)]{muno03} Muno, M. P., Baganoff, F. K.,
433: Baytz, M. W., Brandt, W. N., Broos, P. S., Feigelson, E. D.,
434: Garmire, G. P., Morris, M. R., Ricker, G. R., \&
435: Townsley L. K. 2003, \apj, 589, 225
436: \bibitem[Murray et al.(2002)]{murray02} Murray, S. S., Slane, P. O.,
437: Seward, F. D., \& Ransom, S. M. 2002, \apj, 568, 226
438: \bibitem[Page(1998)]{page98} Page, D. 1998,
439: in The many Faces of Neutron Stars, ed.
440: R. Buccheri, J. van Paradijs, \& M. A. Alpar
441: (Dordrecht:Kluwer), 539
442: \bibitem[Page and Sarmiento(1996)]{page96} Page, D., \& Sarmiento, A. 1996,
443: \apj, 473, 1067
444: \bibitem[Pavlov et al.(2001)]{pavlov01} Pavlov, G. G., Sanwal, D.,
445: Kiziltan, B., \& Garmire, G. P. 2001, \apjl, 559, L131
446: \bibitem[Petre et al.(1996)]{petre96} Petre, R., Becker, C. M., \&
447: Winkler, P. F. 1996, \apjl, 465, L43
448: \bibitem[Petre et al.(2002)]{petre02} Petre, R., Kuntz, K. D., \&
449: Shelton, R. L. 2002, \apj, 579, 404
450: \bibitem[Roberts et al.(2003)]{roberts03} Roberts, M. S. E.,
451: Tam, C. R., Kaspi, V. M., \& Lyutikov, M. 2003 \apj, 588, 992
452: \bibitem[Rothschild et al.(1994)]{rothschild94} Rothschild, R. E.,
453: Kulkarni, S. R., \& Lingenfelter, R. E. 1994, \nat, 368, 432
454: \bibitem[Russell \& Dopita(1992)]{russ92} Russell, S. C.,
455: \& Dopita, M. A. 1992, \apj, 384, 508, \nat, 368, 432
456: \bibitem[Safi-Harb et al.(1995)]{safi95} Safi-Harb, S.,
457: $\ddot{\rm O}$gelman, H., \& Finley, J. P. 1995, \apj, 439, 772
458: \bibitem[Stappers et al.(2003)]{stappers03} Stappers, B.W., Gaensler, B. M.,
459: Kaspi, V. M., van der Klis, M., \& Lewin, H. W. G. 2003, Sience,
460: 299, 1372
461: \bibitem[Torii et al.(2000)]{torii00} Torii, K., Slane, P. O., Kinigasa, K.,
462: Hashimotodani, K., \& Tsunemi, H. 2000, PASJ, 52, 875
463: \bibitem[Wang and Gotthelf(1998)]{wang98} Wang, Q. D., \& Gotthelf E. V.
464: 1998 \apj, 494, 134
465: \bibitem[Weisskopf et al.(2002)]{weisskopf02} Weisskopf, M. C., Brinkman, B.,
466: Canizares, C., Garmire, G., Murray, S., \& Van Speybroeck, L. P.
467: 2002, \pasp, 114, 1
468: \bibitem[Williams et al.(1999)]{williams99} Willams, R. M., Chu, Y. H.,
469: Dickel, J. R., Petre, R., Smith, R. C., \& Tavarez, M. 1999,
470: \apjs, 123, 467
471: \bibitem[Zavlin et al.(1999)]{zavlin99} Zavlin, V. E., Tr$\ddot{\rm u}$mper,
472: J., \& Pavlov, G. G. 1999, \apj, 525, 959
473: \end{thebibliography}
474: \clearpage
475:
476: \begin{figure}
477: \plottwo{f1a.ps}{f1b.ps}
478: \caption{{\it Chandra} ACIS X-ray images of SNR N23 in the
479: (a) 0.5--2.0 keV and (b) 2.0--8.0 keV bands in a logarithmic scale.
480: The source and background regions are shown in the panel (a).
481: The coordinates are in J2000. \label{fig:img}}
482: \end{figure}
483:
484: \begin{figure}
485: \plotone{f2.ps}
486: \caption{The background (Bgd 1) subtracted spectrum of the source (crosses)
487: with the best fit model, the power-law function (solid line).
488: Residuals are shown in the bottom panel.
489: \label{fig:spec}}
490: \end{figure}
491:
492: \begin{figure}
493: \plotone{f3.ps}
494: \caption{The power spectrum of Source in the 2.0--8.0 keV band.
495: \label{fig:powspec}}
496: \end{figure}
497:
498: \begin{figure}
499: \plotone{f4.ps}
500: \caption{The X-ray light curve of Source in the 2.0--8.0 keV band, binned with 1000 s.
501: The background is not subtracted.\label{fig:lc}}
502: \end{figure}
503:
504:
505: \begin{figure}
506: \begin{center}
507: \plotone{f5.eps}
508: \caption{Relationships of photon indices and luminosities of Source
509: (a solid line with a diamond), PWNe (doted lines with circles), and
510: CCOs (dashed lines with triangles). Referred PWNe are in SNR
511: G18.0-0.7 (assumed distance D = 4 kpc; \citet{gaensler03b}),
512: in N157B (D = 50 kpc; \citet{marshall98,wang98}),
513: PSR B0540$-$69 (D = 50 kpc; \citet{kaaret01}),
514: in G11.2-0.3 (D = 5.0 kpc; \citet{roberts03}),
515: Crab (D = 2.0 kpc; \citet{petre02}),
516: Vela (D = 0.3 kpc; \citet{pavlov01}),
517: Geminga (D = 0.16 kpc; \citet{caraveo03}),
518: PSR J2229$+$6114 (D = 3.0 kpc; \citet{halpern01}),
519: PSR 1105$-$6107 (D = 7 kpc; \citet{gotthelf98}),
520: PSR 1706$-$44 (D = 2.5 kpc; \citet{finley98}),
521: PSR B1757$-$24 (D = 5 kpc; \citet{kaspi01}),
522: in 3C58 (D = 2.6 kpc; \citet{murray02,torii00}),
523: PSR B1957$+$20 (D = 1.5 kpc; \citet{stappers03}),
524: PSR J2021$+$3651 (D = 10 kpc; \citet{hessels04}),
525: PSR J1747$-$2958 (D = 5 kpc; \citet{gaensler04}),
526: in SNR G292.0$+$1.8 (D = 4.8 kpc; \citet{hughes01}),
527: in W44 (D = 2.02 kpc; \citet{petre02}),
528: PSR J1930$+$1852 (D = 5 kpc; \citet{lu02}),
529: PSR B0458$-$685 (D = 50 kpc; \citet{gaensler04}),
530: and PSR B1509$-$58 (D = 5.2 kpc; \citet{gaensler02}).
531: The PWNe list of \citet{cheng04} are used.
532: CCOs are in Cas A (D = 3.4 kpc; \citet{mereghetti02}),
533: in G226.2$-$1.2 (D = 0.4 kpc; \citet{pavlov01}),
534: in G296.5$+$10.0 (D = 1.5 kpc; \citet{mereghetti96}),
535: in RCW 103 (D = 3.3 kpc; \citet{gotthelf99}),
536: and in Kes 73 (D = 7.0 kpc; \citet{gotthelf97}).
537: Error bars indicate 90\% confidence.
538: \label{fig:pi_lum}}
539: \end{center}
540: \end{figure}
541:
542: \clearpage
543: \begin{table}
544: \caption{Best-fit parameters for Source\tablenotemark{a}\label{tbl:fit_results}}
545: \begin{tabular}{lccccc}
546: \tableline\tableline
547: Power-law\tablenotemark{b} & $\Gamma$ & & ${N_{\rm H}}^{\rm LMC}$\tablenotemark{c} & Flux\tablenotemark{d} & $\chi^2$/d.o.f.\\
548: & & & [$10^{20}\rm{cm}^{-2}$] & [ergs cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$] & \\
549: \tableline
550: with Bgd 1 & 2.2 (1.9--2.7) & & $<$0.32 & 3.5 $\times10^{-14}$& 18.4/16\\
551: with Bgd 2 & 3.7 (3.0--4.8) & & 0.4 (0.1--0.9) & 7.0 $\times10^{-14}$ & 37.9/16\\
552: with Bgd 3 & 2.4 (1.9--2.7) & & $<$39.2 & 3.7 $\times10^{-14}$& 20.5/16\\
553: \tableline\tableline
554: Blackbody\tablenotemark{b} & $kT$ & & ${N_{\rm H}}^{\rm LMC}$\tablenotemark{c} & Flux\tablenotemark{d} & $\chi^2$/d.o.f.\\
555: & [keV] & & [$10^{20}\rm{cm}^{-2}$] & [ergs cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$] & \\
556: \tableline
557: with Bgd 1 & 0.26 (0.22--0.32) & & $<$0.2 & 2.0 $\times10^{-14}$& 34.7/16\\
558: with Bgd 2 & 0.20 (0.18--0.22) & & $<$0.2 & 3.3 $\times10^{-14}$& 47.7/16 \\
559: with Bgd 3 & 0.27 (0.24--0.29) & & $<$0.4 & 2.0 $\times10^{-14}$& 36.7/16 \\
560: \tableline\tableline
561: Plasma\tablenotemark{b} & $kT$ & Abundance & ${N_{\rm H}}^{\rm LMC}$\tablenotemark{c} & Flux\tablenotemark{d} & $\chi^2$/d.o.f.\\
562: & [keV] & & [$10^{20}\rm{cm}^{-2}$] & [ergs cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$] & \\
563: \tableline
564: with Bgd 1 & 1.63 (1.11--4.84) & $<$1.0 & $<$0.2 & 2.6 $\times10^{-14}$& 22.2/15\\
565: with Bgd 2 & 0.65 (0.50--0.80) & $<$0.052 & $<$5.2 & 3.6 $\times10^{-14}$& 35.1/15\\
566: with Bgd 3 & 1.63 (0.83--2.60) & $<$0.3 & $<$0.2 & 2.7 $\times10^{-14}$ & 24.2/15\\
567: \tableline
568: \end{tabular}
569: \tablenotetext{a}{Values in parentheses are 90\% parameters confidence regions.}\\
570: \tablenotetext{b}{The assumed ${N_{\rm H}}^{\rm gal}$ was 5.6 $\times$ 10$^{20}$ cm$^{-2}$
571: \citep{dickey90}.}\\
572: \tablenotetext{c}{In the 0.5--10~keV band. Corrected for absorption.}\\
573: \tablenotetext{d}{0.3 solar abundance are used.}\\
574: \end{table}
575: \end{document}
576:
577: %%
578: %% End of file `ms.tex'.
579: %%
580:
581:
582:
583:
584:
585: