1: \section{Qualitative evolution}\label{sec-analysis}

2: 

3: In what follows we present a qualitative account of common elements in the dynamical evolution of typical cluster mergers.  A series of stages which mergers generically progress through will be identified and the evolution of the system's physical and observable properties described.  In the process, several classes of transient structures will be introduced.  This discussion is kept brief and is intended to provide a context for the discussion of the observability of substructure and relaxation which follows in Sections \ref{analysis-disturbed} and \ref{analysis-relaxation}$^\ddagger$\renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}\footnotetext[3]{Readers are invited to peruse relevant digital movies detailing the evolution of various system properties over the course of the simulations at \URL}\renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\arabic{footnote}}.  For those seeking a more detailed description, a specific discussion of each class of transient structure can be found afterwards in Section \ref{analysis-transients}.  All quoted times are measured from $t_o$, the moment at which the secondary system traverses $R_{200}$ of the primary.

4: 

5: \subsection{Evolutionary stages}\label{analysis-generic}

6: 

7: All of the simulations we have studied proceed through a similar evolutionary sequence involving five distinct stages: a pre-interaction phase, first core-core interaction, apocentric passage, secondary core accretion, and relaxation.  Several important times during this progression which we shall refer to throughout our analysis are listed in Table \ref{table-times}. 

8: 

9: Initially, our systems are constructed to possess small core radii ($r_c \sim 50$\kpc, measured from $\beta$-model fits), low central entropies ($S=10$\keVcmsq\ at $10$\kpc) and strong central positive temperature gradients.  The low-density outer atmosphere of each system becomes distorted during pre-interaction through tidal forces and compression, adiabatically raising the temperature of material between and producing a short-lived bridge in surface brightness joining them.  As the cores continue to accelerate upon approach, a pair of shock fronts materialise and are driven towards each core, heating and compressing them briefly.  The effects of this interaction reaches its maximum strength at \tclosest$=0.5-0.8$\Gyr\ when the cores reach their closest approach.  The system's temperature and luminosity increase sharply for $\sim 400$\Myrs\ at this point.  Cooling of gas to a cold ($T<2.5\times10^4$\K) state or to stars is subsequently quenched for $2-3$\Gyrs\ in most cases but is merely suppressed in the off-axis 10:1 interactions.  Meanwhile, the primary system's projected central positive temperature gradient is strongly reduced and its core radius increased.  A detailed analysis of these phenomena is presented in the second and third papers of this series \citep[][in preparation]{P06b,P06c} in which the effects of mergers on the global properties of merging systems and the structure and appearance of compact cool cores will be studied.

10: 

11: In every case (including the head-on collisions) some part of the secondary's cool core survives its first encounter with the primary core, forming a single clump and large cool stream of stripped material in off-axis cases and strings of one or more clumps in head-on cases.

12: 

13: At $t_{apo}=1.2-2.5$\Gyrs\ the disturbed secondary core reaches a maximum separation of $1.2$-$1.7$\Mpc\ from the primary core.  The surviving portion then returns for another encounter with the primary, reaching a second pericenter at \taccrete$=2.2-4.8$\Gyrs.  In Table \ref{table-times} we see that the time elapsed until either of these stages generally correlates with the mass ratio and impact parameter of the interaction, presumably due to the declining efficiency of dynamical friction.  Second pericentric passage marks the beginning of an extended period of several \Gyrs\ during which material dispersed from the secondary core accumulates onto the core of the primary system.  Although a small portion of the secondary core can survive the resulting disruption and experience tertiary encounters with the primary, there are no realistically observable traces of it following \taccrete\ in any of the cases we have studied$^7$\footnotetext[7]{Higher impact parameters than probed by our simulations, although atypical, could result in longer lived distinct secondary cores.}.  For this reason, our systems are considered to be evolving as a single merger remnant from \taccrete\ onwards.

14: 

15: In a study of the orbital parameters of cluster substructure in a cosmological context (including gas but not cooling), \citet{Tormenetal04} similarly find that the gaseous component of secondary systems becomes disrupted shortly after second pericentric passage.  They also present simple analytic models for predicting the time and distance of first pericentric and apocentric passages.  Our simulations compare well to their model predictions, supporting the consistency of our initial conditions with the orbital properties of substructure in cosmological simulations.

16: 

17: Following the accretion of the secondary core, the resulting remnant proceeds through a period of relaxation.  It appears undisturbed under reasonable observational circumstances in simulated \Chandra\ observations by \trelax$=4.4-7.8$\Gyrs\ but past this time, continues to evolve until the end of our simulations:  recovery of the core's central temperature decrement is still proceeding \citep[see][for more details]{P06c} as well as accretion of both dark matter and gas dispersed beyond the $R_{200}$ radius during the merger.  The system sustains a virialised state within $R_{500}$ after $t_{virial}$ and hydrostatic equilibrium at $R_{500}$ after $t_{hydro}$ (see Section \ref{analysis-relaxation}).

18: 

19: Following \tclosest, short-lived structures in the system's distribution of X-ray surface brightness, SZ signature, temperature and entropy arise.  In Figs. \ref{fig-1to1_Sigmagas} to \ref{fig-10to1_entropy} we present projected gas surface density/X-ray brightness, temperature/SZ and entropy maps of each of our simulations near several of the times discussed above.  In what follows we shall use these figures to present the progression of these structures (both physical and observable) as they arise and dissolve.  

20: 

21: {\bf Readers may find it useful to refer to movies of our simulations$^\ddagger$ while reading the following subsections.}

22: 

23: 

24: \subsection{Evolution of head-on mergers}\label{analysis-head_on}

25: 

26: Our head-on mergers evolve in a distinctly different way from our off-axis mergers, with even their qualitative evolutions exhibiting strong dependences on the mass ratio of the systems.  We thus isolate the account of their evolution from that of the off-axis cases.

27: 

28: \subsubsection{Physical state}

29: 

30: In our equal mass head-on merger, two near-planar shocks are produced shortly before \tclosest\ and are driven into and through each core (in good agreement with RS01).  They subsequently exit the system as two symmetric hemispherical fronts.  Due to the confining geometry of this situation, material initially in the cores of the merging systems remains in relatively high density structures during the impact.  From \tclosest\ to approximately \tapo, much of this material occupies an expanding disk oriented normal to the axis of the merging systems' motion and a filament of dense clumps strung between the remnants of the two cores, both of which are clearly visible in Fig. \ref{fig-1to1_Sigmagas}.  In Figs. \ref{fig-1to1_Tsl} and \ref{fig-1to1_entropy} we see that this material is cold ($T\sim 1.0$\keV) and has low entropy ($S\sim 10$\keVcmsq).  At approximately \taccrete\ it reaccretes to the remnant core having radiated most of the thermal energy generated by the impact.  As a result, the system's core returns to a state of cooling twice as efficient at converting the hot ICM into stars and condensed gas ($T<2.5\times10^5$K) as the primary prior to the merger.  Although equal mass head-on mergers are predicted to be rare in CDM models of structure formation$^{8}$\footnotetext[8]{However, they are not without observational precedence; RXCJ0532.9-3701 \citep{Finoguenovetal05} has boxy isophotes and a cloverleaf morphology in entropy, much like our relaxing equal mass head-on merger}, this supports the findings of \citet{Motl04} who find that mergers can act as a means of constructing actively cooling cores.  We will study this in more detail in \citet{P06c}.

31: 

32: Comparing Fig. \ref{fig-1to1_Sigmagas} to Fig. \ref{fig-3to1_Sigmagas} we can see that reducing the mass of the secondary to a third of the primary's dramatically changes even the qualitative behaviour of a head-on collision.  Although two shocks are still produced, the one leading the secondary's motion is much more significant to the system's evolution.  As Figs. \ref{fig-3to1_Tsl} and \ref{fig-3to1_entropy} show, the bow-shaped geometry of this shock (again, in good agreement with RS01) displaces the material of the primary core forward and laterally.  The result is a conical shell of cool ($T\sim 3$\keV) moderate-entropy ($S\sim 150$\keVcmsq) gas, entrained by the remainder of the secondary core at its apex.  This structure surrounds a bubble of hot ($T\sim10$\keV) high-entropy ($S\sim550$\keVcmsq) gas.  These figures also illustrate how the low pressure region created in the wake of the secondary's motion is quickly and convectively filled by this displaced material.  Material displaced most laterally reaccretes first, flowing in through the back of the secondary's wake.  Material initially displaced more forwardly is dragged in behind afterwards.  Upon returning to the core, this material experiences additional shocking, resulting for example in the high temperature ($T\sim 9.5$\keV) region seen to the left of the core shortly after \taccrete\ in Fig. \ref{fig-3to1_Tsl}.

33: 

34: In the 10:1 case, the secondary core penetrates the primary core and deposits nearly all the kinetic energy of its gaseous component into the core of the primary.  The result is a large ($\sim 500$\kpc) bubble with an expanding shell of cool ($T\sim 3.5$\keV) low-entropy ($S\sim 70$\keVcmsq) material filled with hot ($T\sim 7$\keV) moderate-entropy ($S\sim 180$\keVcmsq) gas.  In Fig. \ref{fig-10to1_Tsl} the initial formation of the bubble after \tclosest\ is illustrated.  This bubble lasts for $\sim 1.5$\Gyrs\ and is carried forward to a radius of $\sim 750$\kpc\ by the momentum of the collision. Its final extent can be seen in Figs. \ref{fig-10to1_Tsl} and \ref{fig-10to1_entropy}.  Shortly before \tapo\ it stops moving and expanding, collapses into a low entropy stream and accretes back to the core by \taccrete.

35: 

36: \subsubsection{Observable state}

37: 

38: Following the procedure detailed in Section \ref{numerics-observations} we have produced simulated \Chandra\ observations and overlaid their contours onto the projected gas surface density maps presented in Figs. \ref{fig-1to1_Sigmagas}, \ref{fig-3to1_Sigmagas} and \ref{fig-10to1_Sigmagas}.  This allows us to determine which distributed features have sufficiently high surface brightnesses to be detected under reasonable observational circumstances.  We have also generated SZ maps and overlaid their contours on the temperature maps presented in Figs. \ref{fig-1to1_Tsl}, \ref{fig-3to1_Tsl} and \ref{fig-10to1_Tsl}.  Since these maps do not include the effects of instrumentation, we cannot comment in detail on the detectability of low surface brightness features through SZ observations.  We place our faintest contours at a level of $\log{y}=-5.5$ \citep[$\delta T=-17\mu K$ at 30GHz,][]{McCarthyetal03} to approximate the depth to which the next generation of SZ imaging instruments will reach \citep[\eg $-10\mu K$ for SZA at 30GHz,][]{Knoxetal04}.  The resulting SZ limit is a good match to the system extent realistically observable by \Chandra.

39: 

40: In the 1:1 case, we can see in Figs. \ref{fig-1to1_Sigmagas} and \ref{fig-1to1_Tsl} that both the expanding disk and filament of disturbed core material created in the impact and discussed above are reasonably observable through X-ray observations.  Comparing these figures we can see that the remnant's X-ray isophotes are extremely boxy while the SZ contours are significantly more regular and much less elliptical (this is a trend that we observe in all of our simulations).  Complicated temperature and entropy variations are seen throughout the duration of the merger, with small $\sim100$\kpc\ scale variations ($\Delta T/T\sim 15\%$) remaining at \trelax.

41: 

42: In the 3:1 head-on case, Figs. \ref{fig-3to1_Sigmagas} and \ref{fig-3to1_Tsl} illustrate that the extended features generated in this merger following \tclosest\ are similarly observable as in the 1:1 case.  However, we can see that at \taccrete\ there are large extended low surface brightness features that escape detection by \Chandra.  Complicated temperature and entropy variations, distinctly different from those observed in the 1:1 case, emerge after \taccrete\ and persist until the end of the simulation.  The temperature fluctuations present at \trelax\ are more significant ($\Delta T/T\sim 20\%$) and spatially irregular than in the 1:1 case. 

43: 

44: Lastly, Figs. \ref{fig-10to1_Sigmagas} and \ref{fig-10to1_Tsl} illustrate the observability of extended structures formed in our 10:1 head-on merger.  We can see from these that the large expanding bubble formed from the collision is not detectable when it reaches its largest extent at \tapo.  Furthermore, the system looks quite regular in both X-ray and SZ at \taccrete, although small but significant irregularities in the central X-ray isophotes persist for $\sim 2$\Gyrs\ afterwards.  Temperature and entropy fluctuations are present throughout the merger with the bubble formed from the core material dominating the temperature and entropy distributions after \tclosest.  Significant fluctuations in temperature ($\Delta T/T\sim 20\%$) are present at \trelax, with little change occurring between \taccrete\ and \trelax.

45: 

46: \subsection{Evolution of off-axis mergers}\label{analysis-off-axis}

47: 

48: In all of the off-axis simulations we have studied, several distinct classes of transient structure are formed when the secondary (and sometimes primary) system's core becomes disturbed.  Interestingly, the qualitative evolution of these structures is remarkably independent of impact parameter and mass ratio over the ranges we have studied.  Furthermore, their properties are consistent with those of ``cold fronts'' observed in many \Chandra\ and \XMM\ observations \citep{Markevitchetal00}.  Cold fronts are contact discontinuities between regions of bright, dense, cold gas and faint, hot, rarefied gas.  These regions are observed to be in near pressure equilibrium with the surrounding ICM and the jumps in temperature across their interface imply mildly sonic or sub-sonic velocities.

49: 

50: Several authors have studied simulations of merging clusters illustrating that the ram pressure disruption of cold low entropy cores during mergers can account for these features \citep{Bialeketal02,Heinzetal03,Mathisetal05}.  Once removed from the dark matter potential confining it, stripped gas lags behind its dark matter and galactic components, adiabatically expanding and cooling until it establishes pressure equilibrium within the resulting merger remnant.

51: 

52: Our simulations confirm these results.  In what follows we will give a qualitative account of our off-axis mergers' evolution through a series of transient structures and discuss their observable properties.  We shall find that there are many points when several classes of structure resembling cold fronts can be created.  Additional details can be found in Section \ref{analysis-transients} where each of these classes will be studied in detail and new mechanisms involved in the production and evolution of cold fronts will be presented.

53: 

54: \subsubsection{Physical state}

55: 

56: In all of our 1:1 and 3:1 off-axis mergers, ram pressure stripping causes both the primary and secondary cores to develop ``comet-like'' head/tail morphologies in gas surface density, X-ray surface brightness, temperature and entropy during their first pericentric passage.  In the 10:1 cases, this is true only for the secondary core.  In all cases, this morphology starts $\sim 100$\Myrs\ before \tclosest\ and ends shortly before \tapo\ with a typical duration of $\sim0.5$\Gyrs.

57: 

58: Upon reaching apocentric passage, several extended structures in the system's distribution of temperature, entropy and gas density have evolved.  In Figs. \ref{fig-1to1_Sigmagas} and \ref{fig-3to1_Sigmagas} we see that a bridge connecting the surviving portions of the primary and secondary cores has formed in the 1:1 and 3:1 cases (see Section \ref{analysis-bridges}).  Several long and roughly radial outwardly moving plumes of cool ($T\sim3$\keV) low-entropy ($S\sim60$\keVcmsq) material have also formed (see Section \ref{analysis-plumes}).  These features are not obvious in the system's gas density or surface brightness maps, but are evident in the temperature and entropy maps presented in Figs. \ref{fig-1to1_Tsl}, \ref{fig-1to1_entropy}, \ref{fig-3to1_Tsl} and \ref{fig-3to1_entropy}.  All of these structures are essentially absent in our off-axis 10:1 mergers.

59: 

60: \begin{figure*}

61: \begin{minipage}{175mm}

62: \begin{center}

63: \leavevmode \epsfysize=10cm \epsfbox{fig10.ps}

64: \caption{Displacement of the centre of mass of gas within the central $150$\kpc~from its dark matter centre of mass (smoother, lower-amplitude red curve) and the mass-averaged velocity of the same material in the direction of that displacement (the more erratic blue curve) for the late stages of each of our simulations.  Vertical dashed lines correspond to \taccrete\ and \trelax.  The increased activity between these two timescales is primarily the result of the gas core being disturbed by the secondary's gas core during the second and typical the final pericentric passage, and by the ensuing cold stream.  Values across the top indicate the transverse velocity at $t_o$ depicted by each column while text on the right indicates the mass ratio depicted by each row$^\dagger$.}

65: \label{fig-rv_t}

66: \end{center}

67: \end{minipage}

68: \end{figure*}

69: 

70: Following \tapo, material displaced as plumes from the primary and secondary cores stops expanding away from the system and begins returning towards the remnant core.  At \taccrete, the secondary core returns for its second (and last) pericentric passage of the system.  After this, plume material begins accreting to the remnant core as collimated high velocity ($\sim 1000$\kms) streams of material (see Section \ref{analysis-streams}).  At this point, evidence of a secondary core has been destroyed and these features are not associated with an apparent merging system.  Stream material is generally shock heated as it accretes to the remnant core.  These streams occur even in our 10:1 cases and are visible in the temperature and entropy maps presented in Figs. \ref{fig-1to1_Tsl}, \ref{fig-1to1_entropy}, \ref{fig-3to1_Tsl}, \ref{fig-3to1_entropy}, \ref{fig-10to1_Tsl} and \ref{fig-10to1_entropy} as narrow and radially oriented cold low entropy structures following \taccrete.  When they accrete directly to the remnant core, these streams lead to multiple discontinuities, or ``edges'' in the system's central surface brightness distribution (see Section \ref{analysis-edges}).

71: 

72: \subsubsection{Observable state}

73: 

74: Elongated and curved disturbed cores have been observed in several systems (\eg A85, A1758, and A2256) and are frequently attributed to the disruption of accreting systems due to ram pressure stripping.  We observe this for only a short duration ($\lesssim 0.5$\Gyr) following \tclosest\ in all of our off-axis mergers.  Prior to \tclosest, this morphology does not manifest.  At \tapo, longer lived elongated tails are created but the ejection mechanism is not ram pressure stripping (see Section \ref{analysis-plumes}).

75: 

76: In Fig. \ref{fig-1to1_Sigmagas} we see that the bridge formed after \tclosest\ in our off-axis 1:1 mergers remains visible in our simulated \Chandra\ observations until destroyed at \taccrete.  The material forming this structure is not stripped from the central core but from the region just outside the initial cooling radius.  Hence, it is of intermediate entropy ($300-500$\keVcmsq) and temperature ($\sim 6.5$\keV).  No strong pressure gradients arise across it, as shown in the SZ maps in Fig. \ref{fig-1to1_Tsl}.

77: 

78: The bridges formed in our off-axis 3:1 mergers remain detectable for only $1.0$\Gyr\ following \tclosest, or roughly until \tapo.  As in the 1:1 cases, the entropy of the bridge material is of intermediate entropy ($200-400$\keVcmsq) and temperature ($\sim 4.5$\keV) and exhibits no strong pressure gradients.

79: 

80: In Figs. \ref{fig-1to1_Sigmagas} and \ref{fig-3to1_Sigmagas} we also see that the plumes generated from the disturbance of the primary and secondary cores are observable in the 1:1 cases but only marginally so in the 3:1 cases.  Figure \ref{fig-10to1_Sigmagas} shows that in the 10:1 cases, although the system appears disturbed after \tclosest, no extended features exist with sufficient surface brightness to be detected.

81: 

82: At \taccrete, very significant temperature fluctuations ($\Delta T/T\sim 20\%$) are present in all cases and persist until well after \trelax.  Because the accreting streams retain angular momentum from the merger and do not readily mix with the remnant, they produce spiral structures in the remnant's temperature and entropy distribution which are visible in our temperature and entropy maps at \trelax.

83: 

84: Because the SZ signature is proportional to gas density ($\rho_g$) rather than the $\rho_g^2$ dependence of the X-ray surface brightness, extended low density features tend to be washed-out in the SZ maps.  Despite this, we can see that our SZ maps indicate that the bridges formed in the 1:1 and 3:1 mergers remain above our nominal SZ threshold.  At \trelax~, when accreting streams leave the X-ray surface brightness elongated in these cases, the SZ maps look significantly more regular with only the 1:1 $v_t/V_c=0.15$ case looking comparably disturbed to its X-ray surface brightness. 

85: 

86: \subsection{Core oscillations}\label{analysis-oscillations}

87: 

88: In several of the cases we have studied, we find that the central ($r\lesssim0.5R_{500}$) ICM of our merger remnants oscillate with respect to their dark matter distributions. In the discussion of the evolution of disturbed morphology and relaxation which follows, there will be several instances when these oscillations will be relevant.  Such oscillations have been discussed by several authors in attempts to account for ``edges'' observed in the central surface brightness of some clusters (see Section \ref{analysis-edges} for more details and references).

89: 

90: In Fig. \ref{fig-rv_t} we present the displacement of the centre of mass of the densest central $150$\kpc\ of our remnant gaseous cores relative to the centre of mass of the densest central $150$\kpc\ of dark matter.  To differentiate oscillating modes from the influence of substructure passing through the core in this calculation, we also present the mass averaged velocity of the gas in the direction of this displacement's vector.  Displacement due to coherent oscillations will be accompanied by positive velocities until peak displacement when the velocity turns around and becomes negative, returning to zero when the displacement does.  The displacement of the core due to the arrival of substructure is revealed by increases in the displacement at times of small or negative radial velocity.  There are several instances of significant core oscillations following \taccrete\ stimulated by the second pericentric passage of the secondary core.  They generally last until \trelax.

91: 

92: We have performed this calculation for material within $50$\kpc\ as well.  On these scales we observe no oscillations larger than the softening length ($10$\kpc) at times when oscillations are present on $150$\kpc\ scales.  Hence, gas in the central regions of our remnant cores (where cooling is most rapidly taking place) remains tightly coupled to the dark matter potential with the surrounding material constituting the oscillation seen on $150$\kpc\ scales.  It has been hypothesised that energy from bulk oscillations in the potential of the core due to displacements of the gas from the dark matter could act as a source of heating for compact cool cores \citep{Markevitchetal01}.  Our analysis suggests that although oscillations may occur on $150$\kpc\ scales, the actively cooling gas on $50$\kpc\ scales can remain strongly coupled to the dark matter.  In such cases, oscillations in the potential may not be affecting cooling.  Further study is required to determine if this is the case for oscillations stimulated through close encounters by secondary systems with mass ratios of only a few percent, such as those studied by \citet{TittleyandHenriksen04}.

93: 

94: All of these calculations determine the motion of the gaseous core relative to the dark matter core.  We have checked to see how the dark matter core is itself moving within its halo.  For our 1:1 cases, we find that on both $150$ and $50$\kpc\ scales the dark matter cores remain stationary relative to the centre of mass of the system following \taccrete.  However, the dark matter cores of our 3:1 and 10:1 mergers experience significant motions about the system's centre of mass until well after \trelax.  The oscillations we observe between the gas and dark matter on $150$\kpc\ scales are thus a result of the dark matter core orbiting the centre of mass of the system.  As the gravitationally dominant dark matter core moves, the gaseous component is dragged behind it but with a lag due to the extra pressure it experiences.  The result is an oscillation between the two components as the dark matter core moves in its orbit.  On $50$\kpc\ scales, baryonic material dominates the potential of most of the gas and the dark matter can follow it since it is not subject to pressure.  As a result, oscillations between the gas and dark matter do not occur on these scales.

95: 

96: Following \taccrete, the gaseous and dark matter cores of our 1:1 merger remnants rapidly become concentric by \trelax.  A few displacements of the core position with respect to the dark matter are apparent but these are generally accompanied by negative radial velocities indicating that they are a product of the accretion of substructure onto the core.

97: 

98: The cores of our 3:1 merger remnants all experience bulk oscillations between their gaseous and dark matter components following \taccrete.  In the head-on and $v_t/V_c=0.15$ cases, the amplitude of these motions are $100$\kpc\ and $150$\kpc\ respectively with velocities reaching $400$\kms.  These motions last for $\sim 1$\Gyr\ and end immediately before \trelax.  In the $v_t/V_c=0.4$ case, a series of 4 core oscillations occur beginning at \taccrete\ with amplitudes as large as $50$\kpc\ and velocities of $175-250$\kms.  They are of much shorter duration ($\sim 0.5$\Gyr) and are finished by \trelax.

99: 

100: Some part of the dark matter cores of the secondary systems in our 10:1 mergers remain intact in near circular orbits within $50$\kpc\ of the remnant's centre until the end of our simulations.  This is not surprising since the sinking timescale due to dynamical friction is the longest.

101: As a result, we measure small amplitude ($<20$\kpc) oscillations in our 10:1 merger remnants.  These motions are most coherent in the head-on case and involve bulk velocities of $<100$\kms.

102: 

103: \section{Evolution of disturbed morphology}\label{analysis-disturbed}

104: 

105: \begin{figure*}

106: \begin{minipage}{175mm}

107: \begin{center}

108: \leavevmode \epsfysize=10cm \epsfbox{fig11.ps}

109: \caption{Evolution of the centroid variance  computed from the X-ray surface brightness maps in the $x$ (line of sight) and $z$ (orthogonal) projections (thin red lines and thick blue lines respectively).  Horizontal dashed lines indicate the range of centroid shifts observed by \citet{OHaraetal05} while vertical dotted lines indicate (from left to right) $t_o$, \tclosest~, \taccrete\ and \trelax.  Centroids are computed within $1.2$\Mpc\ (roughly the initial $R_{500}$ of the primary).  The centroid statistic traces the qualitative evolution of the merging system very well.  The statistic takes on its maximum values when the system is in its most disturbed state and typically, it falls off between 

110: $t_{accrete}$ and $t_{relax}$ as the system recovers.   Over the course of the merger, the statistic spans the entire range of values found by \citet{OHaraetal05} in an analysis of 45 clusters$^\dagger$.}

111: \label{fig-wx_t}

112: \end{center}

113: \end{minipage}

114: \end{figure*}

115: 

116: With the general evolution of merging systems accounted for, we now discuss the timescales by which evidence of the merger event disappears.  Determination of the degree to which a cluster is disturbed has generally taken three approaches in observational studies: visual inspection, measurement of displacements of the X-ray peak from the X-ray or mass centroid of the system, and power-ratio analyses of the system's X-ray surface brightness.  In this section we shall apply each of these approaches in turn to establish when our simulated merger remnants would return to apparently undisturbed states.  In the section which follows, we shall compare these timescales to more formal and physical measures of the system's dynamical state.

117: 

118: \subsection{Simulated observations}\label{analysis-observations}

119: 

120: In evaluating the effectiveness of quantitative measures of our remnants' dynamical state, we shall use as a fiducial the time when our systems appear relaxed under reasonable observational circumstances.  We determine this time by visual judgement of our simulated \Chandra\ observations and of the uniformity of their isophotes; a process we facilitate by generating unsharp masked images with smoothing kernel sizes of $1.5$'' and $15$'' \citep{Chatzikosetal06}.  This is all done in projections normal to the plane of the orbit.  Substructure is likely most identifiable in this projection and thus, this measure represents a conservative upper limit on the time when the system would look disturbed.  We have studied how our results change if evaluation is performed in $x$-projections and find that the systems tend to look undisturbed as much as $2$\Gyrs\ earlier.

121: 

122: Generally speaking, evidence of substructure disappears first from the simulated images, then from the unsharp masked images and finally in the structure of the X-ray isophotes.  The delay between the dissolving of substructure in the images and the regularisation of their isophotes can take several \Gyrs\ and varies significantly from case to case.  Since the isophotes are the most sensitive measure, the system will be said to appear relaxed at \trelax\ when all isophotes brighter than $6\times$ the background level (\ie all but the faintest in Fig. \ref{fig-1to1_Sigmagas}, \ref{fig-3to1_Sigmagas} and \ref{fig-10to1_Sigmagas}) appear regular by visual inspection.  These times are tabulated in Table \ref{table-times}.  

123: 

124: In one case (1:1 head-on), minor complications arose during this procedure.  Although the simulated observations appear regular and relaxed by $t\sim 3.8$\Gyrs, their isophotes remain significantly boxy until $t\sim 4.4$\Gyrs.  Some evidence of this boxy morphology lingers until the end of the simulation making a clear determination of \trelax\ difficult.

125: 

126: \subsection{Centroid shifts}\label{analysis-centroids}

127: 

128: The apparent displacement of a system's core from the centre of the system has been used as a measure of dynamical disequilibrium by several authors and has been implemented in several different ways.  For instance, \citet{Mohretal93} quantify X-ray centroid shifts ($w_x$) using the offset of a system's X-ray surface brightness peak from its surface brightness centroid (integrated within a projected radius $r_p$).  They argue that systems for which $w_x$ is dependent on $r_p$ are dynamically young.  For a sample of 46 \textit{Einstein} observed clusters, they obtain an average value $\langle w_x \rangle=62$\kpc\ with $71$\% of systems having $w_x>0$ at a $3\sigma$ or greater significance.  These results generally conform with more recent results of \citet{Kolokotronisetal01} who find $\langle w_x \rangle=83$\kpc\ for a sample of 22 ROSAT observed systems.

129: 

130: We have chosen to quantify the centroid variance of our systems using the method employed by \citet{OHaraetal05}.  This approach determines the offset between the X-ray peak and centroid as a function of $r_p\lesssim R_{500}$ and assigns to $w_x$ the RMS of the resulting profile.  We determine this profile by computing the centroid within a circular aperture of size $r_p=R_{500}$ and then reducing its size by $5\%$ until it reaches $r_p\leq0.05R_{500}$.  We have experimented with various details of this procedure and find that it is essential to exclude the bright central core if the statistic is to detect subtle distortions.

131: Hence, we excise the central $r_p=30$\kpc\ when computing centroids (but retain it when we compute the position of the peak).

132: 

133: In Fig. \ref{fig-wx_t} we plot the time dependence of $w_x$ measured in this way for each of our simulations in $x$ and $z$-projections.  The evolution of this quantity in $y$-projections is very similar to its evolution in the $z$-projection and is omitted to clarify the plot.  We also indicate the range of typical values observed by \citet{OHaraetal05} in their study of 45 ROSAT observed clusters ($w_x=0.008R_{500}$ to $0.07R_{500}$, with 5 extreme points excluded) as well as the times of several important stages in each system's evolution.  

134: 

135: As a product of our idealised initial conditions, all of our systems start with values of $w_x$ less than the lower bound of the observations.  In off-axis cases, it immediately begins to increase in $x$-projections as the cores slowly move apart in projection.  This effect grows more significant with increasing $v_t/V_c$ as we would expect.  In $z$-projections, no increase occurs until $\sim t_o$ when the body of the  secondary enters the $R_{500}\sim1.2$\Mpc\ aperture used for our calculations.  

136: In the off-axis cases, the statistic for the $x$ and $z$-projections are virtually indistinguishable following \tclosest.  In the head-on cases, the signal is much lower when the merger proceeds along the line of sight.  Typically, the statistic drops sharply when the primary and the secondary are close together, as in the line-of-sight/head-on case and more generally at $t_{closest}$ and $t_{accrete}$.  This is due to the fact that the centroid shift in all the apertures is nearly the same.  In detecting disturbances, the centroid variance method depends on the displacement varying as the aperture is reduced and successively more distant surface brightness fluctuations are excluded from consideration.

137: 

138: \begin{figure*}

139: \begin{minipage}{175mm}

140: \begin{center}

141: \leavevmode \epsfysize=10cm \epsfbox{fig12.ps}

142: \caption{Time evolution of the displacement between the X-ray peak and the centroid of the projected mass maps in the $x$ (line of sight) and $z$ (orthogonal) projections (thin red lines and thick blue lines respectively).  Horizontal dashed lines indicate the mean and maximum centroid shifts measured by \citet{Smithetal05} (normalised by $R_{500}$ of our system) while vertical dotted lines indicate (from left to right) $t_o$, \tclosest~, \taccrete\ and \trelax.  In the case of massive (1:1) mergers, the  statistic behaves like $w_x$ and tracks the morphological evolution of the system over the course of the merger.   For moderate and minor mergers, the statistic remains high well past $t_{relax}$ although the system is close to being virialised for $t > t_{relax}$.  This signal is entirely due to low-mass remnant dark matter substructure that keeps jiggling the mass centroid$^\dagger$.}

143: \label{fig-Dr_t}

144: \end{center}

145: \end{minipage}

146: \end{figure*}

147: 

148: Our 1:1 mergers evolve to values of $w_x$ much larger than those observed for a duration of $\sim 4$\Gyrs.  During this time, the system is a distinct binary and is not representative of any of the systems present in the \citet{OHaraetal05} catalogue.  Following \taccrete, $w_x$ declines rapidly and reaches a roughly constant level near the minimum observed value $\sim 1$\Gyr\ before \trelax.  In our $v_t/V_c=0.4$ case, there is a subsequent rise at late times due to a late accretion of material.  It is likely that the strength of this rise would not be as significant in a system hosting realistic substructure where the effect of late accreting material from multiple mergers would tend to cancel their individual effects.  For this reason, we will consider the system to have relaxed according to this measure $\sim 1$\Gyr\ prior to \trelax\ in this case but acknowledge that more study is required to understand clearly the role long lasting substructure has on $w_x$ in realistic environments.

149: 

150: In the 3:1 cases we see a similar rise after $t_o$ to values greater than the maximum observed but lasting for a much shorter duration ($\sim 2$\Gyrs).  Following \taccrete, $w_x$ oscillates erratically amongst the highest values observed by \citet{OHaraetal05}.  It slowly declines to the minimum observed value by the end of the simulations in the head-on and $v_t/V_c=0.4$ cases but remains high in the $v_t/V_c=0.15$ case.  The cause of this slowed or absent decline in $w_x$ following \taccrete\ is a sustained shift of the centroid in the central $0.5R_{500}$.  This is due to oscillations in the remnant's central dark matter distribution.

151: 

152: Lastly, our 10:1 cases are disturbed to high levels of $w_x$ for $\sim4$\Gyrs\ following $t_o$ and for $\sim1$\Gyr\ following \taccrete\ in the $v_t/V_c=0.4$ case (due to the reduced disruption of the core).  They oscillate just above the minimum observed value otherwise.

153: 

154: Thus, our systems appear exceptionally disturbed to our centroid variance measure for $\sim4$\Gyrs\ between \tclosest\ and \taccrete\ when they generally appear as two distinct clusters.  Immediately following \taccrete\ for our major/moderate (1:1 and 3:1) mergers and $\sim2$\Gyrs\ after \tclosest\ for our 10:1 mergers (when the systems appear as single remnants), our simulations all exhibit values of $w_x$ similar to the maximum observed by \citet{OHaraetal05} (with the natural exception of the head-on cases in $x$-projections).  In 3:1 cases, $w_x$ remains high until well past \trelax.  Our equal mass and 10:1 mergers quickly relax to levels comparable to the minimum values observed by \citet{OHaraetal05}.  Referring to Table \ref{table-times} we can see that for a cluster observed at $z=0.1$, most 10:1 mergers occurring before $z\sim0.5$ will have evolved past \taccrete\ and will thus yield $w_x\sim0.01R_{500}$.  This fact combined with the expectation that most clusters should have experienced such an event naturally explains the observed minimum of this statistic.

155: 

156: We have also computed this statistic for SZ maps ($w_{SZ}$) of our systems.  We find that the evolution of $w_{SZ}$ is nearly identical to that of $w_x$, with both producing very similar maximum shifts and periods during which $w_x$ is significantly higher than $0.1R_{500}$.

157: 

158: Another approach to measuring centroid shifts has been implemented by \citet{Smithetal05} who measure the shift between the peak in the X-ray surface brightness and the centre of projected mass of the system ($\Delta r$), as determined from weak lensing maps.  For a sample of 10 clusters, they find $\langle \Delta r \rangle=55$\kpc\ ($\sim0.045R_{500}$ for our systems ) with $70$\% of their systems having $\Delta r>0$ at a $3\sigma$ or greater significance.  In Fig. \ref{fig-Dr_t} we present the evolution of this statistic for our simulations.  Again, we plot only $x$ and $z$-projections due to the similarity of results in $y$ and $z$-projections.

159: 

160: Examining Fig. \ref{fig-Dr_t} we see that for the 1:1 mergers, this statistic drops precipitously after \taccrete\ (similarly to $w_x$) and sustains similar values after \trelax.  For the 3:1 mergers however, there is a long lived late time shift in $z$-projections which does not reach maximum amplitude until \trelax\ and does not reduce to $\Delta r\sim0.01R_{500}$ until shortly before the end of our simulations.  A similar but even longer lived shift persists in our 10:1 mergers which fail to sustain $\Delta r\lesssim 0.01R_{500}$ for more than $0.5$\Gyrs\ in any projection for any case.  These sustained shifts are due to central dark matter oscillations (see Section \ref{analysis-oscillations}).

161: 

162: Given the relatively high frequency of 10:1 mergers and the long duration of their impact on $\Delta r$, we expect that few systems should exhibit $\Delta r<0.045R_{500}$ (the mean value for our 10:1 $v_t/V_c=0.15$ merger after \trelax) and therefore, it is surprising that \citet{Smithetal05} find any systems consistent with $\Delta r=0$.  However, if projection effects are considered, it may be that some or all of the $3$ systems to which they assign relaxed morphologies using this statistic are being seen with their X-ray peak merely in projection against their centre of mass.  Alternatively, long lived substructure from multiple past minor mergers may compete against each other in their influence on the centre of mass, reducing its overall offset from the X-ray peak.  Further study of this statistic and its efficacy as an indicator of disturbed systems in a full cosmological context is clearly necessary.

163: 

164: \subsection{Power ratio morphology}

165: 

166: The use of surface brightness moment decomposition for quantifying the degree to which systems appear relaxed was first introduced by \citet{BuoteTsaiI} and has since been utilised in several observational \citep{BuoteTsaiII,Jeltemaetal05} and theoretical studies \citep{Thomasetal98,OHaraetal05}.  This method uses power ratios ($P_m/P_0$) computed from moments of the system's surface brightness distribution; $\Sigma(x)$, where $x'=(R,\phi)$ is in polar coordinates.  Following the procedure of \citet[][J05 hereafter]{Jeltemaetal05}, we have applied this procedure to our simulations computing power ratios from

167: 

168: \begin{center}

169: \begin{align}\label{eqn-power_ratios}

170: P_0(R)&=\left[a_o\ln\left(R\right)\right]^2\\

171: P_m(R)&=\frac{1}{2m^2R^{2m}}\left(a_m^2+b_m^2\right)

172: \end{align}

173: \end{center}

174: 

175: \noindent where $a_m$ and $b_m$ are moments of the distribution given by

176: 

177: \begin{center}

178: \begin{align}\label{eqn-moments}

179: a_m(R)&=\int_{R'\le R} \Sigma(x')(R')^m\cos m\phi'\,d^2x'\\

180: b_m(R)&=\int_{R'\le R} \Sigma(x')(R')^m\sin m\phi'\,d^2x'

181: \end{align}

182: \end{center}

183: 

184: \noindent These statistics are usually normalised by $P_0$ (\ie expressed as $P_m/P_0$), a measure of the total luminosity of the system.

185: 

186: We have studied the effects of removing the central cores of our simulated clusters when computing these statistics.  We find this to be particularly necessary when the system is only subtly disturbed.  At such times, the contribution of any persisting structure in $\Sigma(x)$ to Eqns. 4 and 5 becomes overwhelmed by the bright and centrally concentrated cores of the merging systems.  When we exclude the central cores from our calculations of $P_m$ we find a significant increase in amplitude and scatter.  For the discussion which follows, we have computed power ratios with the central $30\kpc\sim0.025R_{500}$ excised.  We have confirmed that there is little effect on our conclusions if this radius is reduced to $15$\kpc\ or increased to $50$\kpc.

187: 

188: \begin{figure*}%[t]

189: \begin{minipage}{175mm}

190: \begin{center}

191: \leavevmode \epsfysize=10cm \epsfbox{fig13.ps}

192: \caption{The time evolution of the X-ray surface brightness power ratios computed within a $0.5$\Mpc\ aperture in the $z$-projection, the

193: projection in which the merger-induced disturbances are the most apparent.  Dotted horizontal lines depict the median noise levels for the 

194: observational sample analysed by \citet{Jeltemaetal05} for (in descending order) $P_2/P_0$, $P_3/P_0$ and $P_4/P_0$.  Dash-dotted black, thick

195: red and blue lines correspond to $P_2/P_0$, $P_3/P_0$ and $P_4/P_0$ respectively.  Vertical dotted lines represent (from left to right) $t_o$,

196: \tclosest, \taccrete\ and \trelax.  The power ratios can easily pick out the very short-duration highly disturbed states but for the most part

197: the amplitudes tend to be comparable to or less than the median noise levels for the J05 sample of clusters$^\dagger$.  See also Fig. \ref{fig-P4_P3}.}

198: \label{fig-PN_t}

199: \end{center}

200: \end{minipage}

201: \end{figure*}

202: 

203: In Fig. \ref{fig-PN_t} we plot the time evolution of $P_2/P_0$, $P_3/P_0$ and $P_4/P_0$ in a $0.5$\Mpc\ $z$-projected aperture for each of our

204: mergers.  \citet{BuoteTsaiI} find that model systems with power ratios identically equal to zero can be assigned significant values (a few 

205: times $10^{-7}$ for $P_3/P_0$ for instance) when realistic noise is added to simulated X-ray images.  Based on their analysis of an observed 

206: sample of clusters, J05 found that median noise contributions resulted in values for $P_2/P_0$, $P_3/P_0$ and $P_4/P_0$ of $7.5\times10^{-8}$, 

207: $1.9\times10^{-8}$, and $9.4\times10^{-9}$ respectively.   We indicate these levels in the plot.  The plot illustrates that in the absence of 

208: noise, the values of the power ratios for the mergers are typically well below the median noise levels, except when the systems are in their 

209: most disturbed state.  In practise, the values assigned to a relatively relaxed-looking cluster will be highly dependent on the quality of the 

210: individual observation.  In fact, the lowest values of $P_N/P_0$ quoted by J05 are a factor of $\sim 10$ below the median noise levels.  

211: In what follows we shall loosely refer to the median noise levels reported by J05 as the ``observable levels'' of each 

212: statistic.  We will treat these levels as a reasonable fiducial when determining the point at which our systems would be judged as undisturbed 

213: by this approach.  

214: 

215: %We also indicate on this plot the lowest observed values reported by J05 ($1.82\times10^{-7}$, $5.1\times10^{-10}$, and $6.03\times10^{-11}$ for $P_2/P_0$, $P_3/P_0$ and $P_4/P_0$ respectively). We see immediately from this plot that our simulations spend large amounts of time at values which lie below these minimum values.  This is not a surprise given our idealised initial conditions and the lack of instrumental noise in our measurements.

216: 

217: The evolution of $P_3/P_0$ and $P_4/P_0$ is very similar; the latter behaves more or less like a scaled version of the former.  In the approach

218: to the first pericentric passage at \tclosest, both power ratios experience a brief sharp spike which exceeds observable levels in all cases, though just barely in the 3:1 and 10:1 mergers.

219: This is followed by a climb to a plateau or a broad peak, during which time the signal remains at or below the observable levels except in the 1:1 case, and a fall-off at $\sim t_{accrete}\pm 1$\Gyr.  The amplitudes of the initial spike and of the plateau/broad peak are correlated with the secondary's mass, with the most massive merger generating the greatest signal.   There does not appear to be any clearly discernible correlations with impact parameter.  Once the signal falls below observable levels after the second drop, it remains so for the duration of the simulation under all conditions.

220: 

221: The evolution of $P_2/P_0$ is  different from that of $P_3/P_0$ and $P_4/P_0$.  Like the latter two, the signal briefly spikes above the noise level at \tclosest~but rapidly drops below. It exceeds the noise level again at \taccrete~for $\lesssim 2$\Gyr~and then generally only for the mergers with mass ratios greater than 3:1.  (At 3:1, the second spike just exceeds the observable level).

222: Afterwards, it stabilises at values far below observable levels, changing very little after \trelax.  For the major/moderate (1:1 and 3:1) mergers,  $P_2/P_0$ settles at $\sim10^{-8}$ while our 10:1 mergers, the power ratio hovers at values of about $\sim10^{-9}$.

223: 

224: In their study of the redshift evolution of power-ratios, J05 find that between $z=0.5-0.9$ (their high-$z$ sample) and $z<0.5$ (their low-$z$ sample), the $P_3/P_0$ and $P_4/P_0$ ratios show statistically significant declines while the $P_2/P_0$ ratio shows no significant change.  Furthermore, observed values of $P_2/P_0$ are confined to a range more narrow than $P_3/P_0$ or $P_4/P_0$.  Our simulations reproduce these trends but with a much lower normalisation.  Further study is required to understand if this discrepancy is a product of noise effects or our idealised initial conditions and lack of cosmological substructure.  Since $P_2/P_0$ is the power ratio most sensitive to the large scale ellipticity of the system, it would be interesting to determine if more realistic triaxial initial conditions would produce a similar narrow range of near constant final $P_2/P_0$ but with a higher normalisation comparable to that observed.  As it stands, our results suggest that the power ratios are most sensitive to gross disturbances such as those that arise early in the merging process.

225: 

226: 

227: \begin{figure*}

228: \begin{minipage}{175mm}

229: \begin{center}

230: \leavevmode \epsfysize=10cm \epsfbox{fig14.ps}

231: \caption{Plot of $P_4/P_0$ vs. $P_3/P_0$ for our simulations measured at different time snapshots over the course of the merger, within an aperture of $0.5$\Mpc.  

232: The data of \citet{Jeltemaetal05} is plotted in blue with our simulations plotted as red triangles, green squares and black circles for $x$, $y$

233: and $z$ projections respectively.  This combination of power ratios yields a signal above the median noise level of J05 sample (shown as

234: horizontal and vertical lines) only when system is caught in the short-lived highly disturbed state.   It is most sensitive to disturbances induced by highly off-axis mergers and least sensitive to line-of-sight mergers$^\dagger$.}

235: \label{fig-P4_P3}

236: \end{center}

237: \end{minipage}

238: \end{figure*}

239: 

240: %\begin{figure*}

241: %\begin{minipage}{175mm}

242: %\begin{center}

243: %\leavevmode \epsfysize=10cm \epsfbox{P4_P3_Sigmax_R500.ps}

244: %\caption{Same as Fig. \ref{fig-P4_P3} but integrated within an aperture of $1.2$\Mpc\ ($\sim R_{500}$).}\label{fig-P4_P3_R500}

245: %\end{center}

246: %\end{minipage}

247: %\end{figure*}

248: %\begin{figure*}

249: %\begin{minipage}{175mm}

250: %\begin{center}

251: %\leavevmode \epsfysize=10cm \epsfbox{P4_P3_Mass.ps}

252: %\caption{Power ratio plots of $P_4/P_0$ vs. $P_3/P_0$ for our simulations measured for mass maps within an aperture of $0.5$\Mpc.  The data of \citet{Jeltemaetal05} for X-ray power ratios is plotted as a fiducial in blue with our simulations plotted as red triangles, green squares and black circles for $x$, $y$ and $z$ projections respectively.}\label{fig-P4_P3_Mass}

253: %\end{center}

254: %\end{minipage}

255: %\end{figure*}

256: %\begin{figure*}

257: %\begin{minipage}{175mm}

258: %\begin{center}

259: %\leavevmode \epsfysize=10cm \epsfbox{P4_P3_SZ.ps}

260: %\caption{Same as Fig. \ref{fig-P4_P3_Mass} but computed from SZ maps.}\label{fig-P4_P3_SZ}

261: %\end{center}

262: %\end{minipage}

263: %\end{figure*}

264: 

265: Correlations between different power ratios have generally been used to identify disturbed systems and to study the evolution of cluster substructure.  Here, we focus our attention on the $P_4/P_0$-$P_3/P_0$ plane.  In Fig. \ref{fig-P4_P3}, %and \ref{fig-P4_P3_R500} 

266: we present a comparison in this plane between the observations of J05 and our simulations computed within apertures of $0.5$\Mpc. %and $R_{500}\sim 1.2$\Mpc.  

267: Results computed in $x$, $y$ and $z$-projections are presented with red triangles, green squares and black circles respectively.  In Fig. \ref{fig-P4_P3}, we can see that the observed trends in 

268: normalisation, maximum amplitude and scatter are well reproduced, though our measurements cluster at values of $P_3/P_0$ and $P_4/P_0$ well below the observations.  These two power ratios return values 

269: above the observable levels only during the highly disturbed phases of the merger, and  during the initial stages of the off-axis mergers.

270: 

271: We have also examined the distribution of points in the $P_4/P_0$-$P_3/P_0$ plane, where the power ratios are computed within a larger aperture of radius $R_{500}\sim 1.2$\Mpc.  With the exception of some reduction in the scatter, the results are very similar to those presented in Fig. \ref{fig-P4_P3}

272: 

273: % Comparing this plot to Fig. \ref{fig-P4_P3_R500}  we can see that increasing the aperture decreases the peak amplitudes reached and decreases the scatter in the relation.  It also brings the results of the three projections into closer agreement, in part because a more consistent fraction of the secondary system can be included in all projections with a larger aperture. 

274: 

275: Finally, we also applied the power ratio analysis to total projected mass and SZ maps to examine the efficacy of this approach to measuring substructure through weak lensing and microwave observations.  

276: %In Figs. \ref{fig-P4_P3_Mass} and \ref{fig-P4_P3_SZ} we plot the results with the X-ray based observations of J05 plotted for reference.  

277: The results were indistinguishable from the X-ray results, with amplitudes of the $P_3/P_0$ and $P_4/P_0$ for the projected mass maps being lower.

278: 

279: \subsection{Comparison of disturbed morphology measures}

280: 

281: We have examined several methods of determining the dynamical state of galaxy clusters.  In Figs. \ref{fig-wx_t}, \ref{fig-Dr_t} and \ref{fig-PN_t} we present the time evolution of $w_x$, $\Delta r$ and $P_m/P_0$.  In each case we indicate the moment when the isophotes of our simulated $50$\ks\ $z=0.1$ \Chandra\ observations appear undisturbed as a fiducial reference for the sensitivity of each approach.

282: 

283: We find that while the centroid shift and power ratio approaches are both capable of identifying highly disturbed systems or systems with significant, well-defined substructures, the $w_x$ is more sensitive to subtler disturbances and its time evolution tracks the visual appearance as well as the dynamical state of the merging system quite well.  The amplitude of the power ratios is relatively low when the system is not highly perturbed (for example, the analysis barely registers 10:1 mergers) and appears to be  highly susceptible to noise in the X-ray images.  More study is required to understand in exactly what way realistic noise affects the sensitivity of the $P_m/P_0$ statistics.  

284: 

285: Our experiments with the $\Delta r$ statistic introduced by \citet{Smithetal05} suggest that it is very sensitive to long lived substructures and oscillating modes in the dark matter haloes of merger remnants.  The statistic yields a signal even when dynamically the system is within 2\% of being relaxed

286: as defined by our virial indicator (see Section \ref{analysis-relaxation} and Fig.~\ref{fig-Vg_t}).

287: However, it is likely that our idealised mergers are exaggerating this sensitivity.  More study with cosmological simulations which include a proper account of halo substructure should be conducted to determine exactly how effective $\Delta r$ is relative to centroid shift and power ratio measures.

288: 

289: In summary, for clusters at $z=0.1$, the eye is remarkably adept at identifying disturbed morphologies in deep \Chandra\ images but quantitatively, we find that the centroid variance, $w_x$, is the most effective measure of a system's dynamical state.  

290: 

291: \section{Relaxation}\label{analysis-relaxation}

292: 

293: Is a system which appears undisturbed actually in a relaxed state?  This is commonly assumed to be the case in studies which have selected compact cool core systems with regular and symmetric isophotes to represent equilibrium systems.  However, all clusters are a product of mergers and even though their dynamical timescales are short ($\sim1.5$\Gyr\ at $R_{200}$), the timescales by which bound substructures become disrupted and dissolve into the accreting halo can be much longer, as illustrated in the preceding sections.

294: As a result, a merger remnant can take significant lengths of time to reach a proper equilibrium state, perhaps even longer than the typical interval separating merger events.

295: 

296: In practical terms, the point at which a system appears undisturbed depends on the state of the system's baryonic component whose signatures of disturbance can be diluted by observational limitations.  Furthermore, the gaseous component is subject to disruptive gas dynamical forces which do not act on the dynamically dominant dark matter component, perhaps erasing evidence of substructure faster than it loses dynamical relevance.  Hence, it is natural to suspect a discrepancy between when a system appears relaxed and when it is formally so.

297: 

298: In this section we will quantify the relaxation of our merger remnants by studying their recovery towards a virialised and hydrostatic state of equilibrium.  We shall compare the timescales by which they do this to the point at which the system would look relaxed under typical observational circumstances.  We shall find that our systems typically achieve a virialised state approximately when they appear relaxed but continue to exhibit deviations from hydrostatic equilibrium at the level of $10-20$\% until the end of our simulations.

299: 

300: \begin{figure*}

301: \begin{minipage}{175mm}

302: \begin{center}

303: \leavevmode \epsfysize=10cm \epsfbox{fig15.ps}

304: \caption{Time evolution of the virial parameter computed over a volume of radius $R_{500}$ (thick red) and $R_{200}$ (blue) for the gaseous component of our simulations.  The evolution of the {\it gas} virial parameters for these two volumes is very similar.  The horizontal dashed lines indicate our $2$\% virialisation criteria.  The vertical dotted lines indicate \taccrete\ and \trelax\ for each case. If we define the system to be relaxed when the virial parameter drops to and remains at $\left| V \right| < 0.02$, then the gas component typically relaxes halfway between \taccrete and \trelax$^\dagger$.}

305: \label{fig-Vg_t}

306: \end{center}

307: \end{minipage}

308: \end{figure*}

309: 

310: \subsection{Virialisation}

311: 

312: To study the virialisation of our systems we employ the scalar virial theorem \citep[see][for good reviews]{Collins78,Spitzer78,BandT} which states that

313: \begin{center}

314: \begin{equation}\label{eqn-scalar_virial}

315: \frac{1}{2}\frac{d^2I}{dt^2}=2T+W+S

316: \end{equation}

317: \end{center}

318: 

319: \noindent where $T=K+U$ is the sum of the system's kinetic ($K$) and thermal ($U$) energies,

320: $W=\sum_{i=1}^{N} \vec{F_{i}} \cdot \vec{r_{i}}$ is the `virial', and 

321: $I$ is the system's moment of inertia, all computed within a specified volume.  The term denoted by $S=S_g+S_d$ is a surface pressure term integrated over the bounding surface of the volume, with contributions $S_g$ and $S_d$ due to the gaseous and collisionless (dark matter and stellar) components given by

322: \begin{center}

323: \begin{align}\label{eqn-surface_gas}

324: S_g&=-\oint P r\,dA\\

325: S_d&=-\oint \rho_d \sigma_d^2 \,dA

326: \end{align}

327: \end{center}

328: 

329: \begin{figure*}

330: \begin{minipage}{175mm}

331: \begin{center}

332: \leavevmode \epsfysize=10cm \epsfbox{fig16.ps}

333: \caption{Same as Fig. \ref{fig-Vg_t} but depicting the virialisation of the dark matter component of our simulations. The dark matter component typically relaxes slightly later than the gas component and the oscillations in $V$ damp out more slowly.  Also, the central regions of the systems relax faster than the full cluster$^\dagger$.}

334: \label{fig-Vd_t}

335: \end{center}

336: \end{minipage}

337: \end{figure*}

338: 

339: \noindent where $P=nkT$ is the pressure of the gas with a number density $n$ and temperature $T$ and $\sigma_d$ and $\rho_d$ denote the velocity dispersion normal to the surface and mass density of the collisionless component.

340: 

341: %The term denoted by $W$ in Eqn. \ref{eqn-scalar_virial} is 'the virial' of the system given by

342: %\begin{center}

343: %\begin{equation}\label{eqn-virial}

344: %W=\sum_{i=1}^{N} \vec{F_{i}} \cdot \vec{r_{i}}

345: %\end{equation}

346: %\end{center}

347: 

348: %\noindent where $F_i$ is the net gravitational force acting on the $i$th particle at a radius of $r_i$ with the sum acting over the $N$ particles within the bounding volume.  Averaged in an interval over which the system is periodic (or instantaneously for a static system), 

349: 

350: Averaged over an interval in which the system is periodic (or instantaneously for a steady state system), the left side of Eqn. \ref{eqn-scalar_virial} vanishes.  Furthermore, when integrated over the entirety of an isolated system, $S$ becomes zero and Eqn. \ref{eqn-scalar_virial} takes its popular form 

351: \begin{center}

352: \begin{equation}\label{eqn-virial_common}

353: 2T+W=0.

354: \end{equation}

355: \end{center}

356: 

357: %\begin{figure}

358: %\begin{center}

359: %\leavevmode \epsfysize=8cm \epsfbox{E_r.ps}

360: %\caption{Kinetic energy ($T$, in red), virial ($-W$, in black), and surface term ($-S$, in black) for both gas (long dashed lines) and all matter (solid lines) in an isolated $10^{15}$ $M_\odot$ system as a function of the bounding radius $r$.  Vertical dotted lines indicate $R_{cool}$, $R_{500}$, $R_{200}$ and $R_{100}$ from left to right respectively.  The black short-dashed line plots $W'=0.5\sum_{i=1}^{N}m_i\phi_i$ to illustrate the difference between the virial ($W$) and the gravitational binding energy ($W'$) within $r$.}\label{fig-virial_energies}

361: %\end{center}

362: %\end{figure}

363: 

364: It is commonly taken for granted that $W$ represents the gravitational binding energy of the system but it must be emphasised that this is strictly true only when computed over the totality of an isolated system.  In general, $W$ is not equivalent to the gravitational binding energy within $r$.  

365: %To illustrate this discrepancy, we present in figure \ref{fig-virial_energies} the dependence of the terms contributing to Eqn. \ref{eqn-scalar_virial} on the radius of a spherical bounding surface for an isolated system.  The solid black line indicates $W$ computed according to Eqn. \ref{eqn-virial} while the black dashed line indicates $W'=0.5\sum_{i=1}^{N}m_i \phi_i$ where $\phi_i$ is the potential experienced by the $i$th member of $N$ particles within the bounding radius, $r$.  At $150$\kpc\ the discrepancy between $W$ and $W'$ is an order of magnitude while at the edge of the system, the two results converge.  With long-dashed lines we also plot $T_g$, $W_g$ and $S_g$ to illustrate the minimal contribution of the gaseous component to Eqn. \ref{eqn-scalar_virial}.

366: 

367: 

368: In Figs. \ref{fig-Vg_t} and \ref{fig-Vd_t} we present the temporal dependence of the virial disequilibrium parameter \citep{Ricker98} for the gaseous and dark matter components of our evolving merger remnants following \taccrete\ (when the system can be considered to be a single remnant).  

369: (Although the baryonic component's contribution to the virial parameter of the total system is negligible, it is interesting to see if the observable gaseous component virialises on the same timescales as the dark matter component.)  This virial parameter is defined as follows:

370: \begin{center}

371: \begin{equation}\label{eqn-virial_parameter}

372: V= 1+\frac{2\bar{T}}{\bar{W}+\bar{S}}

373: \end{equation}

374: \end{center}

375: 

376: \noindent where $\bar{T}$, $\bar{W}$ and $\bar{S}$ are time averages computed to account for the fact that the canonical form of the virial theorem presented in Eqn. \ref{eqn-virial_common} holds only when the quantities in Eqn. \ref{eqn-scalar_virial} are averaged over an interval in which the system is periodic.  This is done using a dynamical time $t_{dyn}=\sqrt{3 \pi / 16 G \Delta \rho_c}$ (where $\Delta$ is the over density being considered) for quantities involving the collisionless component and the local isothermal sound crossing time $t_{sc}=r\sqrt{\mu m_p/kT}$ for quantities involving the gaseous component.  Although the system may not be strictly periodic over these timescales, we have confirmed that the term involving $I$ in Eqn. \ref{eqn-scalar_virial} contributes negligibly during the period we present in figures \ref{fig-Vg_t} and \ref{fig-Vd_t}.  Following RS01, we select the moment of virialisation to be when the system sustains a value of $\left| V \right| < 0.02$.

377: 

378: Overall, we find that the virial parameters for the gas and the dark matter track each other's general trends although the oscillations in the gas virial parameter tend to be of slightly lower amplitude and damp more quickly.  As a result, the gas component typically relaxes (\ie the gas virial parameter drops to and remains at $\left| V \right| < 0.02$) earlier than the dark matter component. There is not much difference in the relaxation time of gas within $R_{500}$ and $R_{200}$.  On the other hand, the dark matter distribution within $R_{500}$ relaxes earlier than the full cluster.

379: 

380: In more detail, our 1:1 mergers all virialise by \trelax.  The gaseous component generally virialises $\sim 0.5$ \Gyrs\ before the dark matter component which virialises almost exactly at \trelax\ in all cases.  Thus, the system is virialised approximately $4.5$-$5.5$\Gyr\ (or $3$-$4$ dynamical times) after the secondary initially crosses $R_{200}$ of the primary \citep[in good agreement the findings of previous studies, \eg~][]{Roettigeretal97}.  The virialisation of our 3:1 mergers proceeds similarly to our 1:1 mergers for the dark matter. 

381: In the 10:1 case, the gaseous component within $R_{500}$ achieve virialisation at or well before our 1:1 and 3:1 mergers: immediately after \taccrete\ in the off-axis cases and well before in the head-on case.  Within $R_{200}$, however, our 10:1 gaseous components reach virialisation much later ($\sim 2$\Gyrs) than our 1:1 and 3:1 cases.  The dark matter behaves similarly.  Within $R_{500}$ the system is virialised at or before \trelax~while within $R_{200}$, the system never reaches our virialisation criteria.  In these cases, the system sustains a state where $V_d$ oscillates with an amplitude of $\sim 5$\% until the end of our simulations.  The retarded onset or absence of virialisation within $R_{200}$ for our 10:1 mergers is a result of late infall of material dispersed beyond $R_{200}$ during the merger.

382: 

383: \begin{figure*}

384: \begin{minipage}{175mm}

385: \begin{center}

386: \leavevmode \epsfysize=10cm \epsfbox{fig17.ps}

387: \caption{Hydrostatic disequilibrium parameter measured at $R_{500}$ (thick red) and $R_{200}$ (blue).  The horizontal dashed lines indicate $15$\% equilibrium (the criteria used for $t_{hydro}$ in Table \ref{table-times}).  The vertical dotted lines indicate \taccrete\ and \trelax\ for each case$^\dagger$.}\label{fig-HE_t}

388: \end{center}

389: \end{minipage}

390: \end{figure*}

391: 

392: 

393: \subsection{Hydrostatic equilibrium}

394: 

395: Another independent measure of the equilibrium status of our merger remnants is the dynamical criterion of hydrostatic equilibrium.  For a pressure supported medium in a gravitational potential, hydrostatic equilibrium implies

396: \begin{center}

397: \begin{equation}\label{eqn-hydrostatic_equilibrium}

398: \rho^{-1}\frac{dP}{dr}=\frac{G M(<r)}{r^2}

399: \end{equation}

400: \end{center}

401: 

402: Given that X-ray derived mass determinations of clusters assume that this condition holds, its validity following mergers is of significant importance.  Recent studies have found evidence suggesting that clusters for which hydrostatic equilibrium can be accurately assumed are rare but no consideration has yet been given to whether systems can fail to be in hydrostatic equilibrium while appearing undisturbed.  In Fig. \ref{fig-HE_t} we plot the evolving hydrostatic disequilibrium parameter of our merger remnants following \taccrete\ given by

403: \begin{center}

404: \begin{equation}\label{eqn-H_parameter}

405: H=1+\frac{\rho^{-1}\frac{dP}{dr}}{r^{-2} G M(<r)}

406: \end{equation}

407: \end{center}

408: 

409: The evolution of hydrostatic disequilibrium for our systems all follow the same qualitative pattern.  Shortly before \taccrete, at both $R_{500}$ and $R_{200}$, they experience significant positive excursions in $H$ as the secondary core accretes to the remnant core.  Following this, $H$ is seen to oscillate with damped amplitude in each case with the oscillations at $R_{200}$ lagging in phase behind those at $R_{500}$ by $\sim 0.5$\Gyrs.  The phase of these oscillations is generally such that at $R_{200}$, a period of positive $H$ lasting $\sim 2$\Gyrs with an amplitude of $10-20$\%, occurs at or shortly after \taccrete.  At $R_{500}$, slightly lower amplitude (typically $\sim 10-20$\%) and less coherent oscillations persist until the end of our simulations.

410: 

411: Regular disruptions of hydrostatic equilibrium such as those depicted in Fig. \ref{fig-HE_t} could translate into discrepancies in X-ray mass measurements obtained from methods which assume the validity of Eqn. \ref{eqn-hydrostatic_equilibrium}.  We shall examine this issue in more detail in \citet{P06b} where we will discuss the effects of mergers on global cluster observables and scaling relations.

412: 

413: \subsection{Comparison of apparent and formal states of relaxation}

414: 

415: In Section \ref{analysis-disturbed} we found that our merger remnants generally appear relaxed through centroid (our preferred method) and power ratio measures once the isophotes of our simulated $z=0.1$ \Chandra\ observations appear undisturbed at \trelax.

416: 

417: In Table \ref{table-times} we list the times at which our systems are formally virialised ($t_{virial}$; measured for the dark matter) or in hydrostatic equilibrium ($t_{hydro}$; taken to be when the system sustains $\left| H\right| <0.15$) at $R_{500}$.  Our systems are generally virialised (both the gas and dark matter) within $R_{500}$ at or near \trelax\ while late accretion of material renders the system somewhat less virialised ($5$\% versus our $2$\% virialisation criterion) at $R_{200}$ in our 10:1 mergers at \trelax.  We also list the redshifts at which the secondary would have to cross $R_{200}$ of the primary in order to be seen in each phase at redshifts of $z=0.1$ and $z=0.5$.  We can see from this how unlikely virialised or hydrostatic clusters should be at $z=0.5$.

418: 

419: We thus find that our merger remnants are generally virialised at or shortly ($\lesssim 2$\Gyrs) after appearing relaxed to visual inspection.  However, even at this time merger remnants are adiabatically oscillating, exchanging energy between thermal and kinetic components.  They are in hydrostatic equilibrium only at the $10$-$20$\% level at this time and sustain this level of hydrostatic disequilibrium with little change after appearing relaxed.

420: 

421: \section{Transient Structures}\label{analysis-transients}

422: 

423: Our simulations reveal that the phenomena generally referred to as ``cold fronts'' consist of several classes of transient structure formed by the disruption of compact cool cores in off-axis mergers.  Previous theoretical studies of cold-front production have focused primarily on the disruption of the secondary's core but our analysis reveals that both cores can be involved.  Several other transient phenomena such as core surface brightness discontinuities and oscillations are naturally formed in the process as well.  In this section we shall discuss in more detail the processes driving the formation of these structures, noting where possible the occurrence of each in presently published observations of cluster mergers.

424: 

425: \subsection{Bridges}\label{analysis-bridges}

426: 

427: At two points during a cluster merger, luminous bridges connecting the interacting systems can be formed.  In the first, the outer atmospheres of the merging clusters become compressed on the incident side of the collision during preinteraction.  The resulting increase in gas density and temperature between the systems leads to enhanced surface brightness between the two systems and the formation of a luminous bridge.  This effect is short-lived ($\sim 0.5$\Gyrs\ in the 1:1 cases, less in others) but has been observed in several systems including A399/401 \citep{Sakelliouetal04} and A1750 \citep{Belsoleetal05}.

428: 

429: \begin{figure*}%[t]

430: \begin{minipage}{175mm}

431: \begin{center}

432: \leavevmode \epsfysize=8cm \epsfbox{fig18.ps}

433: \caption{The left panel of four plots shows entropy maps for our 3:1 $v_t/V_c=0.15$ simulation illustrating the ejection of two distinct

434: ``plumes'' (labelled A and B) of low entropy material from the primary core in response to the pericentric passage of the secondary.   The 

435: first is triggered by the shocks that precede the secondary, and the second by negative pressure gradients in the wake behind the secondary.

436: The right panel of plots illustrates the ejection of a plume (labelled C) from the secondary at apocentre in the same simulation.  The plumes

437: eventually evolve into streams and most of the ejected low entropy material flows along the streams into the primary core.  

438: Each frame above  is $1.5$\Mpc\ on a side and is a $z$-projection of a $0.5$\Mpc\ thick slice$^\dagger$.}

439: \label{fig-3to1_plumes}

440: \end{center}

441: \end{minipage}

442: \end{figure*} 

443: 

444: As discussed in Section \ref{analysis-off-axis}, material stripped by ram pressure from the interacting clusters becomes dispersed, forming comet-like tails which trail their surviving cores following \tclosest.  Due to the density gradients of the systems they are passing through and the scaling of ram pressure with the density of the flowing material, this process is more efficient on the side of each core incident to the collision.  As a result, overlapping enhancements of stripped material form behind each core, producing a luminous bridge which joins the two systems.

445: 

446: Following \tclosest,  material from these regions moving in the plane of the orbit is driven together.  It becomes particularly concentrated in a curved planar feature oriented normal to the plane of the orbit.  As a result, the surface brightness of this bridge is most bright and concentrated in $z$-projections.  In $x$-projections it is not discernible and in $y$-projections it is significantly wider and more diffuse.  The cores of both clusters appear disturbed at these times, distinguishing this process from the one acting during preinteraction.

447: 

448: The dependence of the brightness and shape of the bridge could be used as a useful cue when interpreting the orientations of observed merging systems.  In A1758 \citep{DavidKempner04} for instance we see an excellent example of a system apparently exhibiting a post-interaction bridge.  The two merging systems in this case (A1758N and A1758S) both have disturbed cores and there is an obvious bridge connecting them.  The width of the bridge is more than $1.2$\Mpc\ suggesting that the system may be significantly inclined to the plane of the sky.  Other systems exhibiting similar morphologies include A1644 \citep{Reiprichetal04}, A754 \citep{Henryetal04} and A115 \citep{GutierrezKrawczynski05}.

449: 

450: \subsection{Plumes}\label{analysis-plumes}

451: 

452: In Section \ref{analysis-off-axis} we noted that in all of the off-axis cases we have studied, outwardly propagating collimated plumes of primary and secondary core material are produced between \tclosest\ and \tapo.  Several mechanisms are involved in the production of these structures, a few of which have been discussed previously in the literature.  \citet{Mathisetal05} provide a good summary of theoretical research involving the disruption of cold cores.  Their work supports the claims of \citet{Heinzetal03} who illustrate the important influence of ram pressure stripping during the disruption of merging cluster cores.  However, they emphasise that other processes are likely essential to the formation of cold fronts.  

453: 

454: Our study confirms and expands upon this claim.  Although ram pressure is certainly important for the disruption of both clusters, it is primarily only responsible for the stripping of material roughly beyond $R_{2500}\sim 500$\kpc\ (moderately high entropy material).  It does not lead to the prominent low entropy radial plumes produced in our simulations.  In our simulated \Chandra\ images, the period during which ram pressure stripped material is bright enough to produce an observable ``comet-like'' surface brightness feature is brief ($\sim 0.5$\Gyrs) and occurs only at or shortly after \tclosest.  A disturbed merging system spends most of its time at or near apocentric passage.  In our simulations, material stripped by ram pressure has dispersed and is no longer apparent in surface brightness by that point.  Bright features of displaced core material are produced primarily by other mechanisms during this longer lived phase.

455: 

456: In Fig. \ref{fig-3to1_plumes} we illustrate the production of three low entropy plumes generated from the cores of the primary (Fig. \ref{fig-3to1_plumes}a) and secondary (Fig. \ref{fig-3to1_plumes}b) with a series of entropy maps covering the evolution of our 3:1 $v_t/V_c=0.15$ simulation during first pericentric passage (Fig. \ref{fig-3to1_plumes}a) and apocentric passage (Fig. \ref{fig-3to1_plumes}b).  In these figures, the secondary enters from the bottom left and passes underneath and near to the core of the primary.

457: 

458: In Fig. \ref{fig-3to1_plumes}a we see that two plume-like structures (labelled ``A'' and ``B'') are produced from the primary core.  The one labelled ``A'' is produced on the side roughly opposite from the point of closest contact with the secondary core at \tclosest.  This feature is generated from material which has become confined in a narrow structure by the convergence of the shock as it passes the primary core.  This behaviour is produced by refraction of the shock due to the decline in the primary core's sound speed into the centre.

459: 

460: The other two plumes (``B'' and 'C' in Fig. \ref{fig-3to1_plumes}) are produced through distinctly different means.  In the off-axis simulations we have studied, short-lived but strong negative radial pressure gradients can be generated near the cores of the interacting clusters, leading to the ejection of low entropy material into the outer regions of the merger remnant.  Since these gradients are often very localised, the ejection tends to be highly directional leading to the formation of large outwardly flowing collimated plumes.  Since the process is adiabatic, the ejected material retains its low entropy and eventually reaccretes to the core of the remnant.  This occurs as low entropy streams of high velocity material over an extended period lasting well after \taccrete\ (see Section \ref{analysis-streams}).

461: 

462: Two mechanisms generally conspire to make this happen: the sudden release of compressive forces due to changes in the relative radial motion of the systems and the presence of low pressure regions in the direction toward which material is dispersed as a result.  After pericentric passage, the primary's core is rapidly compressed and the wake of the secondary's motion creates a large low pressure region on the incident side of the collision.  Low entropy material from the primary's core becomes ejected back along the secondary's path as a result, forming plume ``B''' which reaches a radius of $\sim 800$\kpc\ in this case.  

463: 

464: The secondary core is subject to these mechanisms at \tapo\ when it turns around and returns to the primary core.  The decline of ram pressure at that time results in the release of compressive forces and the strong negative pressure gradient of the primary at such radii provides a low pressure region for the secondary core's material to disperse towards.  These mechanisms are assisted by a gravitational ``sling-shot'' effect resulting from the lag of the secondary's gas core behind its dark matter halo, as noted by \citet{Bialeketal02}.  This lag is due to the additional pressure experienced by the gas but not the dark matter.  The net result of these processes is the displacement of a significant portion of the surviving secondary core's material outwards to its tidal radius.  This material is then efficiently stripped away by tidal effects forming plume 'C' depicted in Fig. \ref{fig-3to1_plumes}b.  As a result, the plume formed from the secondary after apocentric passage assumes the morphology of a trailing tidal tail \citep{ToomreToomre72}.  More specifically, it has a shape which is curved in the same sense (from tail to core) as the orbit (see Fig. \ref{fig-3to1_plumes}b).  As the system passes apocentre, this structure precesses until it is oriented radially with the primary core.  Plumes ejected from primary cores at \tclosest\ are confined by the pressure gradients of the secondary's wake and do not share this shape nor evolution.

465: 

466: The symmetry of our 1:1 off-axis mergers means that all of the processes discussed above act on both cores equally to create a pair of symmetric plumes.  They connect at \taccrete\ forming an ``integral'' shaped structure.  Its curvature is much more pronounced in the $v_t/V_c=0.4$ case.  Comparing Figs. \ref{fig-1to1_entropy} to \ref{fig-3to1_entropy}, we can see that the plumes formed from the secondary cores are quite similar between the 1:1 and 3:1 cases.  However, in the 3:1 cases the plumes formed from the primary core reach much smaller radii.

467: 

468: The compressive forces generated in our 10:1 simulations are far less significant than in the 1:1 or 3:1 cases resulting in a much less significant plume of primary core material following \tclosest.  Furthermore, the resulting pressure gradients are far less localised and result in a broader and less collimated displacement of material.  By \tapo, all of the material of the secondary beyond $300$\kpc\ has been completely stripped and dispersed into the outer regions of the system.  Part of the core survives until \taccrete\ though, generating a small but undetectable plume after \tapo.

469: 

470: Several examples of observed systems exhibiting these morphologies exist including A1758 \citep{DavidKempner04} and A2744 \citep{KempnerDavid04}.  These systems possess disturbed accreting cores with curved shapes.  In both cases, the authors suggest that they are products of ram pressure stripping but this interpretation is not consistent with our simulations in either case: their large projected separations from their primary cores and their shape suggest they have ejected plumes similar to plume 'C'.  A1758N appears to have passed in front of A1758S from east to west, transited apocentric passage and is ejecting a plume of material as it returns back toward A1758S.  The A1758N plume is curved in the sense expected from such an orbit.  A plume from the core of A1758S is apparent but lacks the same curved appearance.  This may mean that A1758S is the more massive of the systems and has a plume such as plume ``B'' depicted in Fig. \ref{fig-3to1_plumes}a, or that projection effects are distorting its appearance.

471: 

472: A more secure example of a plume being ejected from a massive primary system such as plume ``B'' can be seen in A1644 \citep{Reiprichetal04}.  As noted above, this system has a significant bridge joining the interacting systems.  It appears to be at or near apocentric passage and the bridge's lack of curvature, the absence of curved plumes and the thickness of the bridge suggest that the system's orbit is highly inclined.  Although the temperature map is cut-off near the main system to the south west, there is a strong suggestion of an elongated cold region similar to plume ``B'' seen in a $y$-projection.   As we would expect from such an orientation, this feature is nearly collinear with the bridge.  

473: 

474: Another good example of a system which appears to have had a plume of primary core material ejected by a merger is A2744.  \citet{KempnerDavid04} suggest that this system is a 4:1 merger and should compare well to our 3:1 off-axis cases.  We conclude from the structure of the bridge joining the interacting systems and the shape of the secondary's plume that this system is near apocentric passage and significantly inclined.  The left-handed orientation of the secondary plume's curvature suggests that it has passed behind the primary in a north western direction and is now travelling towards us near apocentric passage.  Consistent with this interpretation we find a cold region to the south east of the primary, where the secondary would have entered the system, ejecting a plume from the primary's core.

475: 

476: \subsection{Induced core rotation}\label{analysis-rotation}

477: 

478: Due to the initial gas density gradients of the systems, the ram pressure acting on the cores as they pass each other is differential in off-axis cases.  This induces torques on the gaseous components of each system causing them to rotate.  Generally, the result is two co-rotating cores lasting from \tclosest\ to the second pericentric passage at \taccrete\ when the coherence of this motion is disturbed.  Remarkably, the release of the pressure gradients which lead to plume ``B'' in Fig. \ref{fig-3to1_plumes}a applies enough torque on the primary core in our 3:1 $v_t/V_c=0.15$ case to cause the core to counter-rotate.  This is the only instance in which we witness such counter rotation and more exploration of orbital and mass ratio parameter space is needed to understand how often this occurs.

479: 

480: As a result of its induced rotation prior to apocentric passage, our secondary cores have prograde rotations when they eject the material which form the tidal tail plumes discussed above.  This enhances the efficiency of the process.

481: 

482: \subsection{Streams}\label{analysis-streams}

483: 

484: \begin{figure}

485: \begin{center}

486: \leavevmode \epsfysize=8cm \epsfbox{fig19.ps}

487: \caption{Different time snapshots of the radial velocity maps (mass weighted) for the gaseous component in the 3:1 $v_t/V_c=0.15$ simulation

488: showing the collision of a high velocity stream (labelled B) with the remnant core.  In this specific case, the  primary and the secondary cores

489: merged at \taccrete$=2.5$\Gyrs.  Stream B consists of low entropy material that was originally part of the secondary core but shorn off during

490: the course of the merger.  Also shown is a stream feature (labelled A) that is not readily apparent in the surface brightness map but which

491: corresponds to a stream associated with returning material originally ejected from the primary core during the creation of plume `A' (see

492: Fig. \ref{fig-3to1_plumes}a).

493: Each frame here is $3.0$\Mpc\ on a side and is a $z$-projection of a $0.5$\Mpc\ thick slice$^\dagger$.}

494: \label{fig-3to1_vr_stream}

495: \end{center}

496: \end{figure}

497: 

498: The plumes of material removed from the cores of merging clusters discussed in Section \ref{analysis-plumes} collect into large collimated structures.  Because of the reduced entropy of this material, its buoyancy is low and it ultimately accretes onto the remnant core after the remainder of the secondary core does so at \taccrete.  As a result, long lived ($\sim 2$\Gyr) high velocity ($v \sim 1000$\kms) structures form in the cores of the remnant before the system relaxes.  We distinguish these structures from plumes because they are inwardly propagating high velocity structures of low (generally undetectable) surface brightness and are not associated with an apparent merging core (the secondary having been accreted and its observable presence destroyed at \taccrete).

499: 

500: In Fig. \ref{fig-3to1_vr_stream} we present a series of radial velocity maps for our 3:1 $v_t/V_c=0.15$ simulation illustrating the interaction of two low entropy streams (labelled ``A'' and ``B'') with the remnant core.  The secondary core accretes from the top right at \taccrete$=2.5$\Gyrs\ in this case and the stream formed from its disruption (labelled ``B'') follows it from the same direction.  Another inwardly radial (but unapparent in surface brightness) feature (labelled ``A'') can be seen on the opposite side of the system in these frames.  It is a long lasting stream formed from plume ``A'' identified in Fig. \ref{fig-3to1_plumes}a.

501: 

502: Large scale bulk motions with velocities similar to these streams were observed in the cores of merger remnants in the cosmological AMR simulations of \citet{Motl04}.  These authors raise concerns that such motions preclude the existence of actively cooling cores.  In our simulations, high velocity structures in the core remain highly collimated and completely disrupt cooling of the core in only one case (3:1 $v_t/V_c=0.15$).  Even in this extreme case, cooling resumes on rapid ($\sim 300$\Myrs) timescales once the stream finishes its accretion.  This takes $\sim2$\Gyrs.  In all other 1:1 and 3:1 off-axis cases we have studied, the high velocity streams possess enough angular momentum when they accrete to miss the region of active cooling.  In the 10:1 cases, the stream does not significantly disrupt cooling even when it does interact directly with the remnant core.  In \citet{P06c} we will examine in more detail the effect these streams can have on the final structure of a merger remnant.

503: 

504: The low entropy streams formed in the 1:1 off-axis cases are highly collimated and accrete quickly soon after \taccrete.  In all cases, some portion of the streams are visible until \taccrete\ when their appearance becomes disrupted by the second interaction of the cores.  In the $v_t/V_c=0.4$ case, the accreting streams form a large low entropy spiral which evolves into a ring roughly $1$\Mpc\ in diameter by \trelax\ (see Fig. \ref{fig-1to1_Tsl}).  This structure then slowly dissolves, disappearing $\sim2$\Gyrs\ after forming.

505: 

506: The secondary cores in our 3:1 mergers become more significantly disrupted after \tclosest\ than in the 1:1 cases.  As a result, material stripped from the secondary core becomes dispersed over a larger volume.  Furthermore, it accretes slightly later than \taccrete\ and over a longer period.  The streams are barely observable in our simulated \Chandra\ observations for only a $\sim 300$\Myrs\ following \taccrete.

507: 

508: Streams such as these have low surface brightness and are best observed in the temperature structure of clusters.  They should manifest as cold fronts oriented radially to the primary core with no obvious secondary core being present.  There are several examples of observed systems like this.  In A576 for instance, \citet{KempnerDavid04b} note a ``finger'' of cool gas which extends to the northwest of the system from its core.  In A2255 \citep{Sakelliouetal06} there is a distinct cool region to the southeast of the cluster core which is not associated with an obvious peak in X-ray brightness.  Finally, in A2034 \citep{Kempneretal03} there is a large diffuse tail of relatively cool gas extending towards the south of the cluster centre with no obvious X-ray peak associated with it.

509: 

510: \subsection{Edges}\label{analysis-edges}

511: 

512: The enhanced spatial resolution of \Chandra\ has revealed that the central regions of several clusters exhibit ``edges'' in their surface brightness as a result of large and localised gas density gradients.  Among these are RXJ1720.1+2638 \citep{Mazzottaetal01}, A496 \citep{DupkeWhite03} and A1795 \citep{Markevitchetal01}.  Systems with several of these features have also been found including A576 \citep{KempnerDavid04b} which has at least $2$ within $50$\kpc\ and ZW3146 \citep{Formanetal02} which has $3$ at $r\sim20$, $45$ \& $170$\kpc.  Attempts to account for these features have generally invoked bulk motions of cold core material with respect to its surrounding ICM.  Explored mechanisms capable of driving such motions include the activity of jets from central AGN \citep{Fabianetal05} or gravitationally induced motions due to small passing substructure \citep{Markevitchetal01,TittleyandHenriksen04}.

513: 

514: Occasionally when the streams discussed in Section \ref{analysis-streams} accrete to the centre of the remnant, an interface forms between it and the stationary core.  Significant and abrupt jumps in density, temperature and pressure can result accompanied by a jump in surface brightness reminiscent of observed edges.

515: 

516: In Fig. \ref{fig-3to1_edge} we show the evolution of two such edges following \taccrete\ for our 3:1 $v_t/V_c=0.15$ simulation.  As the secondary core accretes to the primary core in this case, it does so on the top right side.  This leads to an expanding edge (labelled ``A'') which starts at a radius of $120$\kpc\ and disappears $0.3$\Gyrs\ later at a radius of $210$\kpc.  The stream which follows the accreting secondary core gets deflected towards the bottom of the core by this structure, forming a more significant edge (labelled ``B'') at a radius of $40$\kpc\ which lasts for $0.5$\Gyr.

517: 

518: \begin{figure}

519: \begin{center}

520: \leavevmode \epsfysize=8cm \epsfbox{fig20.ps}

521: \caption{Surface brightness maps of our 3:1 $v_t/V_c=0.15$ simulation showing the formation of $2$ ``edges'' associated with the accretion of the

522: secondary (labelled A) and the stream of low entropy material that follows the secondary (labelled B).  The first ``edge'' is weak feature that

523: moves outward in radius and disappears soon after \taccrete.  The second ``edge'' is more well-defined and remains stationary during the

524: accretion of the stream material, a process that can last for $\sim 0.5$\Gyrs.  We do not see any examples of ``edges'' produced by core

525: oscillations, nor do we find evidence for significant core oscillations in our simulations.

526: Each frame shown is a $z$-projection $0.5$\Mpc\ on a side$^\dagger$.}

527: \label{fig-3to1_edge}

528: \end{center}

529: \end{figure}

530: 

531: In Section \ref{analysis-streams} we noted several systems which show evidence of streams of radially collimated material.  In two of these, A576 and A2034, there are obvious edge features present.  In the case of A576, these edges are aligned properly with the orientation of the stream to be a produced by it.  In the case of A2034, the edges are apparently on the opposite side from the stream.  In our simulations, multiple streams are typically produced by a single merger.  It may be that an unseen stream (possibly produced by the same event which generated the observed stream) is responsible for the observed edge in this case.  It may also be that the observed stream is passing in front of or behind the core before making contact with it.

532: 

533: No obvious edges are produced in our simulations by core oscillations.  Edges produced through the accretion of streams are distinct, long lived ($\sim 500$\Myrs) and can yield multiple edges (such as those seen in A576) simultaneously.  The last of these properties is difficult to account for through core oscillations but naturally explained as a product of accreting streams.

534: 

535: % LocalWords:  normalised utilised Eqns analysed stabilises normalisation shorn

536: % LocalWords:  haloes Virialisation virialisation emphasised virialises

537: % LocalWords:  virialise apocentre emphasise localised Formanetal

538: