1: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
3: %%\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
4: \documentclass{emulateapj}
5:
6: %\newcommand{\lmc}{LMC}
7: %\newcommand{\smc}{SMC}
8:
9:
10: \shorttitle{Eclipsing binaries in the MACHO database}
11: \shortauthors{Derekas et al.}
12:
13:
14: \begin{document}
15:
16:
17: \title{Ellipsoidal Variability and Long Secondary Periods in MACHO Red Giant
18: Stars}
19:
20:
21: \author{A. Derekas\altaffilmark{1}, L. L. Kiss\altaffilmark{1},
22: T. R. Bedding\altaffilmark{1}, H. Kjeldsen\altaffilmark{2},
23: P. Lah\altaffilmark{3}, Gy. M.
24: Szab\'o\altaffilmark{4,5}}
25: \altaffiltext{1}{School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia;
26: E-mail: derekas@physics.usyd.edu.au}
27: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Aarhus,
28: DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark}
29: \altaffiltext{3}{Research School of Astronomy \& Astrophysics, Australian
30: National University, Canberra, Australia}
31: \altaffiltext{4}{Department of Experimental Physics, University of Szeged,
32: D\'om t\'er 9. Szeged 6720, Hungary}
33: \altaffiltext{5}{Magyary Zolt\'an Postdoctoral Research Fellow}
34:
35: \begin{abstract}
36:
37:
38: We present a period-luminosity-amplitude analysis of 5899 red giant and binary
39: stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud, using publicly available observations of
40: the MACHO project. For each star, we determined new periods, which were
41: double-checked in order to exclude aliases and false periods. The
42: period-luminosity relations confirm the existence of a short-period,
43: small-amplitude P--L sequence at periods shortward of Seq. A. We point out
44: that the widely accepted sequence of eclipsing binaries between Seqs. C and D,
45: known as Seq. E, does not exist. The correct position for Seq. E is at periods
46: a factor of two greater, and the few stars genuinely lying between Seq. C and
47: D are under-luminous Mira variables, presumably enshrouded in dust. The true
48: Seq. E overlaps with the sequence of Long Secondary Periods (Seq. D) and their
49: P--L relation is well described by a simple model assuming Roche geometry. The
50: amplitudes of LSPs have properties that are different from both the pulsations
51: and the ellipsoidal variations, but they are more similar to the former than
52: the latter, arguing for pulsation rather than binarity as the origin of the LSP
53: phenomenon.
54:
55: \end{abstract}
56:
57:
58: \keywords{binaries: eclipsing --- galaxies: individual (Large Magellanic Cloud)
59: --- stars: AGB and post-AGB --- stars: oscillations --- stars: statistics ---
60: stars: variables: other}
61:
62:
63:
64: \section{Introduction}
65:
66: The multiplicity of red giant period-luminosity (P--L) relations has been a
67: major discovery on the road to interpreting complex light variations of these
68: stars. Following the two seminal papers by \citet{woo99} and \citet{woo00}, a
69: picture has emerged that can be summarized as follows: large-amplitude Mira
70: stars pulsate in the fundamental mode, whereas smaller-amplitude semiregulars
71: are often multimode pulsators, in which various overtone modes can be excited
72: \citep[see also][]{bed98}. Besides the pulsating P--L sequences (Seq. A, B and
73: C, as labeled by \citet{woo99}), two other sequences were suggested: Seq. E
74: with red giants in eclipsing binaries and Seq. D with stars that have long
75: secondary periods (LSPs). The latter pose a great mystery and the nature of
76: their slow variations is still not understood, with several different
77: mechanisms proposed \citep{oli03,woo04}.
78:
79: The basic picture of multiple P--L relations has been confirmed by many
80: independent studies, mostly based on $K$-band magnitudes. It has emerged that
81: the original five sequences have further details, including a break at the tip
82: of the Red Giant Branch (RGB), which is due to the existence of distinct RGB
83: pulsators that are mixed with the more evolved AGB variables
84: \citep[e.g.][]{ita02,kis03,kis04,ita04a,ita04b,sos04a,fra05}. Almost all
85: authors have accepted the existence of the distinct sequences of red giant
86: binaries (Seq. E) and LSP stars (Seq. D). The only exception was
87: \citet{sos04b}, who showed that Seqs. E and D seem to merge at a specific
88: luminosity (as measured by the Wesenheit index) and suggested that this may
89: imply the binary origin of LSPs.
90:
91: Here we report on a combined analysis of MACHO observations of eclipsing
92: binaries and red giants in the Large Magellanic Cloud, which shed new light on
93: these stars and on the LSP phenomenon.
94:
95: \section{Data analysis and results}
96:
97: Our results are based on two sets of publicly available almost eight-year long
98: MACHO light curves. A detailed description of the MACHO project can be found in
99: \citet{coo95}. Some of the data are offered for download through the MACHO
100: website (http://wwwmacho.mcmaster.ca), where one can choose specific samples
101: based on an automated classification of variability type. Using the Web
102: interface, we individually downloaded all light curves classified as eclipsing
103: binaries (6833 stars) and as red giant variables (classified as Wood A, B, C
104: and D classes; 2868 stars).
105:
106: In the case of the eclipsing binaries, it became obvious very quickly that the
107: classification was not perfect, and a large fraction of stars turned out to be
108: Cepheids, RR Lyrae stars or long-period variables. We also found that the
109: catalogued periods were incorrect for a significant number of stars. We
110: therefore reclassified all 6833 stars and re-determined their periods, using
111: the following procedure (more details will be given elsewhere).
112:
113: Periods were first estimated using the Phase Dispersion Minimization method
114: \citep{ste78}. We then checked all the folded light curves by eye and refined
115: the periods with the String--Length method \citep{laf65,cla02}, which is more
116: reliable than PDM when the light curve contains long flat sections and very
117: narrow minima, as is the case for many eclipsing binaries. Also, in many cases
118: PDM gave harmonics or subharmonics of the true period, which was only
119: recognized through the visual inspection of every phase diagram. We also
120: examined the color variations to identify and exclude pulsating stars with
121: sinusoidal light curves. After this analysis, 3031 stars remained as genuine
122: eclipsing or ellipsoidal variables.
123:
124: Next, we classified the binary sample using Fourier decomposition of their
125: phase diagrams. \citet{ruc93} showed that light curves of W UMa systems
126: (contact binaries) can be quantitatively described using only two coefficients,
127: ${\rm a_{2}}$ and ${\rm a_{4}}$, of the cosine decomposition ${\rm \sum a_{i}
128: \cos (2\pi i \varphi)}$. \citet{poj02} tested the behavior of semi-detached and
129: detached systems in the ${\rm a_{2} - a_{4}}$ plane by decomposing theoretical
130: light curves into Fourier coefficients. We found that only stars with ``W
131: UMa-like'' light curve shape composed the sequence (which is plotted in Fig.\
132: \ref{pl}), while detached and semi-detached systems are spread everywhere in
133: the P--L plane.
134:
135: Our second set of light curves were those of the 2868 publicly available MACHO
136: red giant variables. Since they often show multiply periodic light variations,
137: we determined periods with iterative sine wave fitting. As a measure of
138: significance, we also estimated the $S/N$ ratio of the peaks in the Fourier
139: spectra. Since the noise in the Fourier spectrum increased toward lower
140: frequencies, different values of the $S/N$ were used when determining whether a
141: peak was real for different period-luminosity relations ($S/N$ cutoff was set
142: to 3 for Seq. A$^\prime$, 4 for Seq. A, 6 for Seqs. B, C and 10 for Seq. D). We
143: omitted periods close to 1 yr, because many light curves show variations with
144: this period that are not real. As a result, a total of 4315 significant
145: frequencies were identified for the 2868 stars.
146:
147: We studied these two samples in the P--L plane. In order to reduce the effects
148: of interstellar extinction and allow a direct comparison with previous results
149: in the literature, we plotted the period--$K$ magnitude relation. We obtained
150: near infrared magnitudes by cross-correlation with the 2MASS All-Sky Point
151: Source Catalog (http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu), with a search radius of
152: 3$^{\prime\prime}$. The resulting P--L diagram is shown in the left panel of
153: Fig.\ \ref{pl}.
154:
155: \begin{figure*}
156: \epsscale{1}
157: \plottwo{f1a.eps}{f1b.eps}
158: \caption[]{\label{pl}Period-Luminosity relations for red giant pulsators (black
159: dots) before (left panel) and after (right panel) period correction of stars on
160: Seq. E; 310 ellipsoidal and contact eclipsing binaries (red pluses)
161: are shown with the correct periods in both plots.
162: The solid lines in the right panel show model calculations using evolutionary
163: tracks and assuming Roche-geometry (see text).}
164: \end{figure*}
165:
166:
167: To our surprise, the P--L relation of the binary sample did not follow Seq. E,
168: as we had expected. Instead, they overlapped with Seq. D, which at first sight
169: appears to give strong evidence for the binary origin of Seq. D and prompted us
170: to investigate the issue in more detail.
171:
172:
173: \section{Discussion}
174:
175:
176: The combined P--L plot in Fig.\ \ref{pl} shows the well-known complex structure
177: of distinct sequences. Besides sequences A, B, C, D and E, we also detect the
178: existence of the faintly visible new short-period P--L sequence (Seq.
179: A$^\prime$) on the left-hand side boundary of the diagram (labeled as a$_{4}$
180: and b$_{4}$ in \citet{sos04a} and $P_4$ in \citet{kis06}). The eclipsing stars
181: (pluses) seem to merge with Seq. D rather than forming Seq. E as adopted in the
182: literature \citep{woo99,woo00,kis03,kis04,ita04a,ita04b,nod04,fra05}.
183:
184: To clarify this issue, we re-checked periods for: (i) stars on Seq. E in Fig. 1
185: of \citet{woo00}, for which the identifiers and basic data were kindly provided
186: by Peter Wood; (ii) stars on Seq. E in our Fig.\ \ref{pl} (black dots). In both
187: cases, it turned out that for most of the objects, the given periods were half
188: of the true ones, as one might expect from a Fourier analysis of eclipsing
189: binary light curves. We have carefully double-checked all individual light
190: curves on Seq. E and D and corrected the periods (see Fig.\ \ref{example}). The
191: final P--L plot is shown in the right panel of Fig.\ \ref{pl}.
192:
193: As a result of the period correction, the sequence between C and D, which is
194: known as Seq. E in the literature, has completely disappeared. A few stars
195: remain in the gap but practically none of them are eclipsing binaries. The
196: majority turn out to be Mira stars that are very red ($J-K>2$ mag) and are
197: presumably carbon-rich Miras that are dimmed by circumstellar dust clouds
198: (bottom panel of Fig.\ \ref{example}). We propose to retain the label E for the
199: sequence of ellipsoidal variables in its corrected position (right panel of
200: Fig.\ \ref{pl}).
201:
202: \begin{figure}
203: \epsscale{0.9}
204: \plotone{f2.eps}
205: \caption[]{\label{example}
206: Example of phase diagrams before (left panels) and after (right panel) period
207: correction. The first and the second star from the top show eclipsing binary
208: and ellipsoidal variable light curve, while the third star has a typical LSP
209: variation. The bottom panel shows the light curve of a Mira star that lies in
210: the gap between Seqs. C and D and which faded $\sim$2 mags during 8 years of
211: MACHO observations.}
212: \end{figure}
213:
214:
215: In the literature, only \citet{sos04b} plotted the eclipsing binary sequence at
216: the correct (doubled) period. However, they did not discuss this issue and one
217: can still find more recent studies where Seq. E was shown at the wrong period.
218: \citet{sos04b} have, however, shown that Roche geometry gives a good fit to the
219: OGLE ellipsoidal variables. We have also checked this on the MACHO sample. We
220: calculated the theoretical orbital periods of systems at mass ratios of 1,
221: where the components fill their Roche lobes. For this, we used evolutionary
222: models of \citet{cas03} and applied equations of Section 4 in \citet{sos04b}.
223: (Note, however, that the definition of $f(q)$ in their Eq. 1 actually gave
224: $f(q)^{-1}$ as the filling factor.) For the calculations we took the
225: evolutionary tracks of the 0.85 ${\rm M}_{\odot}$ and 2.5 ${\rm M}_{\odot}$
226: models, since theses masses represent the mass limits of stars that evolve
227: through the RGB and AGB. The $K$ magnitudes of the models were determined from
228: $T_{\rm eff}$ vs. $(V-K)$ calibrations, combined from \citet{hou00} and
229: \citet{kuc06}.
230:
231: In the right panel of Fig.\ \ref{pl} we show these two limits (the shorter
232: period line belongs to the higher mass). For any other mass ratios, the orbital
233: periods shift towards smaller values. This simple approach with Roche geometry
234: describes remarkably well the observed period-luminosity relation of
235: ellipsoidal variables in the MACHO sample, in agreement with the study of
236: \citet{sos04b}. However, the OGLE sample contains a larger fraction of
237: ellipsoidals and most of them have longer periods than are predicted by the
238: models. Those stars do not entirely fill the Roche lobe \citep{sos04b}. It is
239: also worth mentioning that the low fraction of ellipsoidal/eclipsing RGB stars
240: in the MACHO data (1.5\%) was used by \citet[]{woo04} as an argument against
241: the binary origin of LSPs. However, the OGLE statistics clearly showed that
242: there are at least 10 times more such RGB stars, and so that argument is no
243: longer valid.
244:
245: Since the lower mass model fits Seq. D quite well, the question arises: how
246: similar are the ellipsoidal and LSP variables? To assess this, we examined the
247: amplitudes of these stars. \citet{sos04b} mentioned that amplitudes of LSPs are
248: positively correlated with the brightness of the star. Compared to OGLE data,
249: the MACHO observations have the advantage of giving information on the color
250: variations. We examined the amplitudes in the MACHO blue and red bands of the
251: binary and LSP stars, and also included Seq. C stars, which allow a comparison
252: with stars that we know to be pulsating.
253:
254:
255: The amplitudes were measured by fitting smooth spline functions to the phased
256: light curves. The resulting blue peak-to-peak amplitudes are shown as a
257: function of $K$ magnitude in Fig.\ \ref{amlu}, where several features are
258: apparent. Firstly, the amplitudes of ellipsoidal variables (circles in the
259: upper panel) do not show any correlation with luminosity, as expected for
260: variation caused by the geometry of a binary system. Secondly, the amplitudes
261: of LSP variables (crosses in the upper panel) increase with luminosity, with
262: their distribution forming a striking triangular envelope (the correlation
263: coefficient is $r\sim0.51$). It is also very interesting that the points below
264: the well-defined upper envelope seem to show a flat distribution. Whatever the
265: cause of the LSP phenomenon, there appears to be a maximum possible amplitude
266: at each luminosity, with an apparently uniform distribution of amplitudes
267: beneath this maximum value.
268:
269: \begin{figure}
270: \epsscale{0.9}
271: \plotone{f3.eps}
272: \caption[]{\label{amlu} Luminosity-amplitude relation of stars on Seq. C, D
273: and E. {\it Top panel:} Black crosses show the luminosity-amplitude relation
274: for Seq. D stars, while turquoise circles the same for Seq. E stars, which
275: contain ellipsoidal variables. The difference of the two sequence is very
276: clear, e.g. amplitudes of Seq. D stars show moderately positive correlation
277: with the luminosity. {\it Bottom panel:} Luminosity-amplitude relation for
278: Seq. C stars, which are fundamental mode pulsators. This relation is
279: significantly different from those of Seqs. D and E stars.}
280: \end{figure}
281:
282:
283: In comparison, stars on the pulsating P--L sequence C (lower panel in Fig.\
284: \ref{amlu}), show a very different distribution. To quantify the difference
285: between the amplitude-luminosity distribution of Seqs. C and D, we performed
286: the multivariate $\varepsilon$-test of \citet{sze04}, applied for two
287: dimensions. In this test we measure the effects of random permutations of the
288: initial distributions via changes in the ``information energy'' of the two
289: distributions. In our case, 1000 random permutations showed that the difference
290: between the C and D samples is highly significant. Therefore, we conclude that
291: the physical mechanism causing the LSP phenomenon must be different from both
292: the ellipsoidal variations of Seq. E and the radial fundamental-mode
293: pulsations of Seq. C. Note, however, that for Seqs. A and B, there is a similar
294: positive correlation between amplitude and luminosity (see the upper three
295: panels in figs. 4 in \citet{kis03} and \citet{kis04}) than for Seq. D.
296:
297: \begin{figure}
298: \epsscale{0.9}
299: \plotone{f4.eps}
300: \caption[]{\label{pamp} Blue-to-red amplitude ratios as function of period for
301: stars on Seqs. B (grey triangles), C (orange pluses), D (black crosses) and E
302: (purple circles). Grey triangles show those short period pulsations of Seq. D
303: stars, which fall to Seq. B. The two clearly pulsating sequences, Seqs. B and
304: C are the continuation of each other. Ellipsoidal variables (Seq. E) have
305: lower amplitude ratio than pulsating stars. Amplitude ratios of Seq. D stars
306: are more similar to those of pulsating stars.}
307: \end{figure}
308:
309:
310: At the same time, comparing blue and red amplitudes for individual stars
311: revealed further interesting information. In Fig.\ \ref{pamp} we plot the
312: blue-to-red amplitude ratios as function of period for Seqs. B, C, D and E
313: stars. For the pulsating objects the median of the ratio is 1.40, indicating
314: strong color, thus temperature, changes during the pulsations. For
315: ellipsoidal/eclipsing binaries, the median ratio is 1.13, while the LSPs have a
316: median ratio of 1.29, being more similar to the pulsating stars \citep[see
317: also][]{hub03}. This behavior agrees with the findings of \citet{woo04}
318: who, based on color-amplitude variations of single objects, argued for the
319: pulsational origin of LSPs. The overall statistics of more than 700 LSP
320: variables favors this argument over the binary hypothesis, also agreeing with
321: \citet{hin02}, who concluded that the long-period velocity changes in their
322: observed stars probably result from some kind of pulsation.
323:
324:
325: \section{Summary}
326:
327: The main results of this paper can be summarized as follows:
328:
329: \begin{list}{$\cdot$}{}
330: {\parskip=-6pt
331:
332: \item the period-luminosity relations of $\sim$6000 stars based
333: on MACHO data confirm the existence of the short-period, small-amplitude P--L
334: sequence at shortward of Seq. A, which belongs to a higher-overtone pulsation
335: mode. We label this Seq. A$^{\prime}$.
336:
337: \item the widely accepted sequence of eclipsing binaries between C and D, known as
338: Seq. E, does not exist. The correct position for Seq. E, which comprises contact
339: binaries and ellipsoidal variables, is at periods a factor of two greater. The true
340: Seq. E overlaps with the LSPs (Seq. D), which appears to suggest a binary origin
341: for the LSP phenomenon (but see the last point).
342:
343: \item of the few stars that genuinely lie between Seq. C and D, most are
344: under-luminous Mira variables, presumably enshrouded in dust.
345:
346: \item we confirmed that ellipsoidal variables have a similar P--L relation to
347: LSP stars. Their P--L relation is well described by a simple model assuming
348: Roche geometry.
349:
350: \item the amplitudes of LSPs have properties that are different from both the
351: pulsations and the ellipsoidal variations, but they are more similar to the
352: former than the latter, arguing for pulsation rather than binarity as the
353: origin of the LSP phenomenon.
354:
355: }
356: \end{list}
357:
358:
359: \acknowledgments
360:
361:
362: AD is supported by an Australian Postgraduate Research Award. LLK is supported by a
363: University of Sydney Postdoctoral Research Fellowship. GyMSz was supported by the
364: Magyary Zolt\'an Higher Educational Public Foundation. This paper utilizes public
365: domain data obtained by the MACHO Project, jointly funded by the US Department of
366: Energy through the University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
367: under contract No. W-7405-Eng-48, by the National Science Foundation through the
368: Center for Particle Astrophysics of the University of California under cooperative
369: agreement AST-8809616, and by the Mount Stromlo and Siding Spring Observatory, part
370: of the Australian National University.
371:
372:
373:
374: \begin{thebibliography}{}
375: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
376: \expandafter\ifx\csname url\endcsname\relax
377: \def\url#1{{\tt #1}}\fi
378:
379: \bibitem[Bedding \& Zijlstra(1998)]{bed98}
380: Bedding, T. R., Zijlstra, A. A., 1998, \apj, 506, 47
381:
382: \bibitem[Castellani et al.(2003)]{cas03}
383: Castellani, V., Degl'Innocenti, S., Marconi, M., Prada Moroni, P. G., \&
384: Sestito, P., 2003, \aap, 404, 645
385:
386: \bibitem[Clarke(2002)]{cla02}
387: Clarke, D., 2002, \aap, 386, 763
388:
389: \bibitem[Cook(1995)]{coo95}
390: Cook, K. H., Alcock, C., Allsman, H. A., et al. 1995, ASP Conf. Ser., 83, 221
391:
392: \bibitem[Fraser et al.(2005)]{fra05}
393: Fraser, O. J., Hawley, S. L., Cook, K. H., \& Keller, S. C., 2005, \aj, 129,
394: 768
395:
396: \bibitem[Hinkle et al.(2002)]{hin02}
397: Hinkle, K. H., Lebzelter, T., Joyce, R. R., \& Fekel, F. C., 2002, \aj, 123,
398: 1002
399:
400: \bibitem[Houdashelt et al.(2000)]{hou00}
401: Houdashelt, M. L., Bell, R. A., Sweigart, A. V., \& Wing, R. F., 2000, \aj,
402: 119, 1424
403:
404: \bibitem[Huber et al.(2003)]{hub03}
405: Huber, J. P., Bedding, T. R., O'Toole, S. J., 2003, aahd.conf., 421
406:
407: \bibitem[Ita et al.(2002)]{ita02}
408: Ita, Y., et al., 2002, \mnras, 337, L31
409:
410: \bibitem[Ita et al.(2004a)]{ita04a}
411: Ita, Y., et al., 2004a, \mnras, 347, 720
412:
413: \bibitem[Ita et al.(2004b)]{ita04b}
414: Ita, Y., et al., 2004b, \mnras, 353, 705
415:
416: \bibitem[Kiss \& Bedding(2003)]{kis03}
417: Kiss, L. L., \& Bedding, T. R., 2003, \mnras, 343, L79
418:
419: \bibitem[Kiss \& Bedding(2004)]{kis04}
420: Kiss, L. L., \& Bedding, T. R., 2004, \mnras, 347, L83
421:
422: \bibitem[Kiss \& Lah(2006)]{kis06}
423: Kiss, L. L., \& Lah, P., 2006, Mem. S. A. It., 77, 303
424:
425: \bibitem[Ku\v{c}inskas et al.(2006)]{kuc06}
426: Ku\v{c}inskas, A., et al., 2006, \aap, 452, 1021
427:
428: \bibitem[Lafler \& Kinman(1965)]{laf65}
429: Lafler, J., \& Kinman, T. D., 1965, \apjs, 11, 216
430:
431: \bibitem[Noda et al.(2004)]{nod04}
432: Noda, S., et al., 2004, \mnras, 348, 1120
433:
434: \bibitem[Olivier \& Wood(2003)]{oli03}
435: Olivier, E. A., \& Wood, P. R., 2003, \apj, 584, 1035
436:
437: \bibitem[Pojma\'nski(2002)]{poj02}
438: Pojma\'nski, G., 2002, Acta Astron., 52, 397
439:
440: \bibitem[Rucinski(1993)]{ruc93}
441: Rucinski, S. M., 1993, \pasp, 105, 1433
442:
443: \bibitem[Soszy{\'n}ski et al.(2004a)]{sos04a}
444: Soszy{\'n}ski, I., et al., 2004a, Acta Astron., 54, 129
445:
446: \bibitem[Soszy{\'n}ski et al.(2004b)]{sos04b}
447: Soszy{\'n}ski, I., et al., 2004b, Acta Astron., 54, 347
448:
449: \bibitem[Stellingwerf(1978)]{ste78}
450: Stellingwerf, R. F., 1978, \apj, 224, 953
451:
452: \bibitem[Sz\'ekely \& Rizzo(2004)]{sze04}
453: Sz\'ekely G.J., \& Rizzo M.L., 2004, InterStat, 2004 November, 5
454:
455: \bibitem[Wood et al.(1999)]{woo99}
456: Wood, P. R., et al., 1999, IAUS, 191, 151
457:
458: \bibitem[Wood(2000)]{woo00}
459: Wood, P. R., 2000, PASA, 17, 18
460:
461: \bibitem[Wood et al.(2004)]{woo04}
462: Wood, P. R., Olivier, E. A., \& Kawaler, S. D., 2004, \apj, 604, 800
463:
464:
465: \end{thebibliography}
466:
467:
468:
469:
470: \clearpage
471:
472: \end{document}
473:
474: