1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass{emulateapj}
3:
4: \widowpenalty 10000
5: \clubpenalty 10000
6:
7: %\received{}
8: %\accepted{}
9: %\journalid{}{}
10: %\articleid{}{}
11:
12: \newcommand{\ts}{\thinspace}
13: \newcommand{\simless}{\mathbin{\lower 3pt\hbox
14: {$\rlap{\raise 5pt\hbox{$\char'074$}}\mathchar"7218$}}}
15: \newcommand{\simgreat}{\mathbin{\lower 3pt\hbox
16: {$\rlap{\raise 5pt\hbox{$\char'076$}}\mathchar"7218$}}}
17:
18: \newcommand{\about} {$\sim$\ts}
19: \newcommand{\aboutless}{$\simless$\ts}
20: \newcommand{\aboutmore}{$\simgreat$\ts}
21: \newcommand{\msun}{\ts M$_\odot$}
22: \newcommand{\etal}{et~al.}
23: \newcommand{\IRAS}{{\it IRAS}}
24: \newcommand{\Hipparcos}{{\it Hipparcos}}
25: \newcommand{\Spitzer}{{\it Spitzer}}
26:
27: \begin{document}
28:
29: \title{Evidence for Mass-dependent Circumstellar Disk Evolution\\
30: in the 5 Myr-old Upper Scorpius OB Association}
31:
32: \author{John M. Carpenter\altaffilmark{1}}
33: \author{Eric E. Mamajek\altaffilmark{2}}
34: \author{Lynne A. Hillenbrand\altaffilmark{1}}
35: \author{Michael R. Meyer\altaffilmark{3}}
36:
37: \altaffiltext{1}{California Institute of Technology, Department of Astronomy, MC 105-24, Pasadena, CA 91125}
38: \altaffiltext{2}{Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St.,
39: MS-42, Cambridge, MA 02138}
40: \altaffiltext{3}{Steward Observatory, The University of Arizona,
41: 933 North Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ 85721}
42:
43: \begin{abstract}
44:
45: We present 4.5, 8, and 16\micron\ photometry from the {\it Spitzer Space
46: Telescope} for 204 stars in the Upper Scorpius OB Association. The data are
47: used to investigate the frequency and properties of circumstellar disks around
48: stars with masses between \about 0.1 and 20\msun\ at an age of \about 5~Myr.
49: We identify 35 stars that have emission at 8\micron\ or 16\micron\ in excess
50: of the stellar photosphere. The lower mass stars (\about 0.1-1.2\msun) appear
51: surrounded by primordial optically thick disks based on the excess emission
52: characteristics. Stars more massive than \about 1.8\msun\ have lower
53: fractional excess luminosities suggesting that the inner \about 10~AU of the
54: disk has been largely depleted of primordial material. None of the G and F
55: stars (\about 1.2-1.8\msun) in our sample have an infrared excess at
56: wavelengths $\le$16\micron. These results indicate that the mechanisms for
57: dispersing
58: primordial optically thick disks operate less efficiently on average for low
59: mass stars, and that longer time scales are available for the buildup of
60: planetary systems in the terrestrial zone for stars with masses
61: \aboutless 1\msun.
62:
63: \end{abstract}
64:
65: \keywords{open clusters and associations: individual(Upper Scorpius OB1) ---
66: planetary systems:protoplanetary disks ---
67: stars:pre-main sequence}
68:
69: \section{Introduction}
70:
71: Most young (\about 1\,Myr) stars embedded within molecular clouds are
72: surrounded by circumstellar accretion disks \citep{Strom89} that are potential
73: sites of planet formation. The ubiquity of disks extends to all masses from
74: as high as 10\msun\ down through brown dwarfs, and in all environments from
75: isolated stars in Taurus to dense clusters in Orion \citep{Lada00,Bouy06}.
76:
77: By an age of 10\,Myr, the primordial disks so ubiquitous around
78: young stars change dramatically. The inner disk (\aboutless 1\,AU) dissipates
79: in $>$90\% of stars \citep{Mamajek04}, accretion rates drop by an
80: order of magnitude \citep{Muzerolle00}, and the mass contained in
81: small dust grains declines by at least a factor of four
82: \citep{Liu04,Carpenter05}. Results from the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}
83: \citep{Werner04} demonstrate an even more
84: striking degree of evolution, as dust within a \about 1\,AU orbital radius is
85: found in only a few percent of \about 10\,Myr stars
86: \citep{Silverstone06}. MIPS\,24\micron\ surveys have detected dust in
87: 7--48\% of 10--30\,Myr stars \citep{Young04,Rieke05,Chen05}, but with
88: fractional dust luminosities orders of magnitude below that found in younger
89: sources. Together these observations have established that circumstellar disks
90: are at an advanced evolutionary stage by an age of \about 10\,Myr.
91:
92: Key to understanding the formation of planetary systems is examining the
93: evolution of circumstellar disks after the main accretion phase has
94: terminated. To measure the properties of disks during this epoch for stellar
95: masses ranging from 0.1 to 20\msun, we have conducted a photometric survey of
96: 205 stars with spectral types between M5 and B0 in the 5 Myr-old Upper
97: Scorpius OB association using the IRAC, IRS, and MIPS
98: instruments on \Spitzer. This Letter presents analysis of the IRAC and
99: IRS photometry to probe for terrestrial-zone material across the stellar mass
100: spectrum at a constant age.
101:
102: \section{Sample Selection}
103: \label{sample}
104:
105: The parent sample for this program was selected from previous membership
106: studies of the Upper Sco OB association. We compiled members identified based
107: on (a) \Hipparcos\, astrometry \citep[B, A, F, and G stars;][]{deZeeuw99},
108: (b) optical color--magnitude diagrams and spectroscopic verification of
109: lithium \citep[G, K, and M stars;][]{Preibisch99,Preibisch02}, and (c) x--ray
110: sources subsequently verified as lithium-rich, pre-main-sequence stars
111: \citep[G, K, \& M stars;][]{Walter94,Martin98,Preibisch98,Kunkel99,Kohler00}.
112: Since these studies identified Upper Sco members based on stellar properties
113: (proper motion, strong lithium, x--ray emission) rather then those linked to
114: circumstellar material (e.g. H$\alpha$ emission, near-infrared excess), we
115: believe that our sample is not biased for or against the presence of a
116: circumstellar disk.
117:
118: The parent sample was cross--matched with the \Hipparcos\, \citep{Perryman97},
119: Tycho--2 \citep{Hog00}, and UCAC2 \citep{Zacharias04} proper motion catalogs
120: where possible. Using the \citet{Madsen02} kinematic model for Upper~Sco, we
121: computed the probability that a given star has a proper motion consistent with
122: membership in the association \citep[see e.g.][]{Mamajek02}. Any star that
123: deviated more than 2$\sigma$ from the proper motion model was removed, as was
124: any star with an inferred cluster parallax distance more than 45\,pc from the
125: mean Upper Sco distance \citep[where the line-of-sight depth of the
126: association is $\sim$30\,pc; ][]{Preibisch99}. We also removed stars located
127: in projection against the $\rho$~Oph molecular cloud, which is
128: near Upper~Sco and contains stars with ages of \aboutless 1\,Myr. These
129: criteria yielded 341 Upper Sco members with spectral type M5 and earlier.
130:
131: The aim was to populate five quasi-logarithmically-spaced mass bins with
132: 50 stars each. In paring the list, we (a) removed stars
133: requiring $>20$~cycles with MIPS to detect the photosphere at 24\micron,
134: (b) dropped sources where a nearby star compromised the 2MASS photometry,
135: (c) removed stars with the highest 70\micron\ background levels, and
136: (d) avoided sources observed by other \Spitzer\ programs.
137: The final source list consists of 205 stars\footnote{One source, HIP~80112, was
138: observed only with MIPS and is not further discussed.}:
139: 48 stars with masses between 0.1 and 0.2\msun\ (corresponding to spectral
140: types of \about M3-M5), 50 between 0.2 and 0.4\msun\ (M0.5-M3),
141: 42 between 0.4 and 1.8\msun\ (F0-M0.5),
142: 50 between 1.8 and 3.0\msun\ (B5-F0), and 15 more massive
143: than 3\msun\ (earlier than B5).
144: The final source list does not constitute
145: a complete sample of stars, but should be a representative population
146: of Upper Sco.
147:
148: \citet{Preibisch99} estimated an age of 5 Myr for a x-ray-selected sample
149: of stars in Upper Sco as inferred from \citet{DM94} pre-main sequence
150: evolutionary tracks after allowing for
151: binaries. This age is consistent with the nuclear \citep[5-6~Myr;][]{deGeus89}
152: and dynamical \citep[4.5~Myr;][]{Blaauw91} age of the high mass stars.
153: Moreover, \citet{Preibisch99} find that the intrinsic age spread within the
154: association is less than 2 Myr. We therefore adopt an age of 5~Myr for Upper
155: Sco, but recognize that the age is uncertain by at least 1-2 Myr depending on
156: the choice of model evolutionary tracks.
157:
158: \section{Observations and Data Reduction}
159: \label{obs}
160:
161: IRAC \citep[4.5\micron\ and 8\micron,][]{Fazio04} observations for 204 stars
162: and IRS peak-up-imaging \citep[PUI; 16\micron,][]{Houck04} data for 195 stars
163: were obtained with the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}. IRS PUI observations
164: were not attempted for nine B-stars since the detector would have saturated on
165: the stellar photosphere. Exposure times ranged from 0.02 to 12 seconds for
166: IRAC and from 6 to 30 seconds for IRS PUI depending on the stellar brightness
167: estimated from 2MASS photometry. At least nine dither positions were obtained
168: per band, and the number was increased as needed to achieve a minimum signal
169: to noise ratio on the stellar photosphere of 50 for IRAC and 20 for IRS PUI.
170:
171: Data analysis was performed on the Basic Calibrated Data images
172: produced by the S14 pipeline for IRAC and S13 for IRS PUI. Photometry
173: was measured on individual frames using a modified version of IDLPHOT. For
174: IRAC, we adopted an aperture radius of 3 pixels (1 pixel = 1.22\arcsec) and
175: a sky annulus between 10 and 20 pixels. For IRS PUI, we used an aperture
176: radius of 2 pixels (1 pixel = 1.8\arcsec) and a sky annulus between 5 and 8
177: pixels. A multiplicative aperture correction of 1.110, 1.200, and 1.316 was
178: applied to the IRAC 4.5\micron, IRAC 8\micron, and IRS 16\micron\ flux densities
179: to place the photometry on the calibration scale described in the IRAC and IRS
180: data handbooks. Photometric corrections at the few percent level were
181: applied to the IRAC data to account for distortion and variations in the
182: effective bandpass across the detector \citep{Reach05}.
183: Internal photometric uncertainties were computed as standard deviation of the
184: mean of measurements made on individual frames. We adopted a minimum
185: uncertainty of 1.22, 0.66, and 0.58\% for 4.5\micron, 8\micron, and
186: 16\micron\ respectively based on repeatability achieved for bright stars.
187:
188: We incorporate into the analysis 14 solar-type stars in Upper Sco from the FEPS
189: \Spitzer\ Legacy Program \citep{Meyer06} that were selected for that study
190: based on criteria similar to those stated in \S\ref{sample}. We exclude
191: the FEPS source HD~143006 since this star was recognized as a Upper Sco
192: member based on an \IRAS\ excess \citep{Odenwald86} and thus would bias the
193: sample. The FEPS IRAC data were processed using the above procedures.
194: FEPS did not obtain IRS PUI observations.
195:
196: Table~\ref{tbl:phot} lists the sources, spectral types, \Spitzer\
197: fluxes, and internal uncertainties for the 218 stars analyzed here. The
198: uncertainties do not include calibration uncertainties of 2\% for
199: IRAC \citep{Reach05} and 6\% for IRS PUI as quoted in the IRS data handbook
200: \footnote{The calibration factors adopted here are 0.1388 and 0.2021
201: MJy/sr per DN/s for IRAC 4.5\micron\ and 8\micron\ and
202: 0.01375 MJy/sr per $e^{-1}$/sec for IRS 16\micron\ PUI.}. Five sources are
203: flagged in Table~\ref{tbl:phot} where the curve of growth at 16\micron\
204: deviates from a point source by more than 4\% for the adopted aperture radius,
205: indicating that the flux measurement may include contributions from a second
206: source.
207:
208: \section{Sources with Infrared Excesses}
209:
210: Color-color diagrams for the Upper Sco sources are presented in
211: Figure~\ref{fig:ccd}. The top panel shows the 8\micron\ to 4.5\micron\ flux
212: ratio ($\equiv R_8$) as a function of the $J-H$ color, and the bottom panel
213: shows the 16\micron\ to 4.5\micron\ flux ratio ($\equiv R_{16}$). In both
214: panels, most sources lie along a tight locus that is assumed to represent
215: emission dominated by reddened stellar photospheres. However, several
216: sources have large values of $R_8$ or $R_{16}$ diagnostic of 8\micron\ or
217: 16\micron\ emission in excess of the photosphere.
218:
219: Since the scatter in the observed colors is likely dominated by factors not
220: easily quantified on a star-by-star basis, we determined empirically a
221: threshold to identify sources with intrinsic infrared excesses. A linear
222: relation was fitted between log~$R_{16}$ and $J-H$. Any outliers more distant
223: than four times the RMS of the fit residuals were removed, and the fit was
224: repeated until no additional outliers were identified. A similar fit was
225: performed between log~$R_8$ and $J-H$ after removing all $R_{16}$ outliers.
226:
227: The RMS residuals from the final linear fit were 1.9\% and 5.7\% for
228: $R_8$ and $R_{16}$ respectively. A source was identified with an infrared
229: excess if $R_8$ or $R_{16}$ exceeded the fitted relation by both four
230: times the RMS of the fit residuals and four times the internal uncertainty
231: in the flux ratio. We further required that a large value of $R_8$ or
232: $R_{16}$ does not result from extinction as determined from $B$,
233: $V$ and 2MASS photometry, spectral types, and the \citet{Mathis90}
234: extinction law.
235:
236: Excesses were inferred toward 35 sources as indicated in Table~\ref{tbl:phot}:
237: 29 at 8\micron\ and 33 at 16\micron.
238: The 16\micron\ excess sources include $[$PBB2002$]$\,USco\,J161420.2$-$190648,
239: which saturated the IRS detector. HIP\,78207 and
240: $[$PZ99$]$\,J161411.0$-$230536 have 8\micron\ excesses but were not observed
241: at 16\micron. An IRS spectrum of the latter source shows a clear excess at
242: this wavelength \citep{Carpenter07}, and HIP\,78207 exhibits \IRAS\ excesses
243: at 12\micron\ and 25\micron\ \citep{Oudmaijer92}.
244:
245: \section{Discussion}
246:
247: The excess properties of the Upper Sco sources are not uniform across spectral
248: type as demonstrated in Figure~\ref{fig:ccd}. The 8\micron\ excess fraction
249: for K+M stars (24/127) is higher than for B+A stars (5/61) at
250: the 92\% confidence level and higher than for F+G stars (0/30) at 99.2\%
251: confidence as determined from the two-tailed Fisher's Exact Test. At 16\micron,
252: the K+M excess fraction (23/121) is similar to that for B+A stars (10/52), but
253: higher than for F+G stars (0/22) at 97.5\% confidence.
254:
255: More telling differences between early and late spectral types are observed
256: in the magnitude of the excesses. Nine B+A stars have a $R_{16}$ color
257: excess less than twice the stellar photosphere, while all K+M sources exceed
258: this limit with excesses up to 27 times the photospheric level. Similarly, at
259: 8\micron, all but two B+A excess sources have a $R_8$ excess less than 10\% of
260: the photosphere, while 23 of the 24 K+M excess sources have larger color
261: excesses.
262:
263: In Figure~\ref{fig:sed}, we assess the evolutionary state of the circumstellar
264: disks in Upper Sco by comparing normalized, dereddened spectral energy
265: distributions (SEDs) for stars in Upper Sco with a sample of well
266: known T Tauri \citep{Hartmann05} and Herbig Ae/Be \citep{Hillenbrand92} stars
267: that have tabulated photometry. The Taurus and Herbig Ae/Be objects are
268: expected to represent young stars surrounded by primordial, optically thick,
269: circumstellar accretion disks.
270:
271: As shown in Figure~\ref{fig:sed}, the SEDs for B and A stars in Upper Sco
272: differ substantially from most Herbig Ae/Be stars. Herbig Ae/Be stars typically
273: have excesses at wavelengths as short as 2\micron\ and have fractional
274: excess luminosities that are 10-100 times the photosphere at
275: 10-20\micron. By comparison, only one B or A star in Upper Sco has a $K$-band
276: excess (HIP~78207), and the fractional excess luminosity at 16\micron\ is
277: typically less than twice the photosphere.
278:
279: Surprisingly, none of the F and G stars in our Upper Sco sample exhibit a
280: detectable excess. While \citet{Chen05} identified a 24\micron\ excess
281: around one of five F+G stars in Upper Sco, and the G6\,V star HD~143006 is
282: surrounded by an optically thick disk \citep{Sylvester96}, overall infrared
283: excesses at wavelengths $\le$ 16\micron\ are relatively rare for this spectral
284: type range at the age of Upper~Sco.
285:
286: The results for the B, A, F, and G stars imply that the reservoir of small
287: dust grains in a primordial, optically thick, inner disk have been largely
288: depleted by an age of 5~Myr for \about 1-20\msun\ stars. The inner-disk
289: radius inferred by the weak (or lack-of) excess emission at 16\micron\ is
290: \about 4-10~AU for 6000-10,000~K photospheres assuming optically thin,
291: blackbody dust emission \citep{Jura03}.
292: These results are consistent with the low fraction of accreting B and A stars
293: found in the 4~Myr-old Trumpler~37 cluster \citep{Sicilia06} and the 5~Myr-old
294: Orion OBIb association \citep{Hernandez06}. However, \citet{Hernandez06}
295: found that 7 of 11 F-stars in Orion~OBIb contain 24\micron\ excesses
296: consistent with a debris disk, suggesting that the excess fraction for F
297: and G-stars in Upper Sco may increase once our longer
298: wavelength observations are obtained.
299:
300: In contrast to the massive stars, the K and M stars in Upper Sco with
301: infrared excesses have characteristics similar to optically thick primordial
302: disks. As discussed above and demonstrated in Figure~\ref{fig:sed},
303: the K+M stars have larger fractional excesses than the B+A stars, and the
304: magnitude of the excesses overlaps with that observed toward Class~II stars in
305: Taurus. A further connection between the disks in Upper Sco and Taurus is
306: found by considering evidence for disk accretion as traced by H$\alpha$
307: emission. Of the 100 stars in our sample with measured H$\alpha$ line
308: strengths (see references in \S\ref{sample}), nine have H$\alpha$ equivalent
309: widths consistent with accretion according to the criteria recommended by
310: \citet{White03}. Eight of these nine sources have an infrared excess
311: and are therefore likely surrounded by accretion disks. We note however that
312: the H$\alpha$ equivalent widths for 14 K+M stars with excesses are consistent
313: with active chromospheres. These similarities suggest that many of the K+M
314: stars in Upper Sco remain surrounded by optically thick disks. Assuming
315: optically thick blackbody emission, the 4.5\micron\ and 8\micron\ excesses
316: may imply the presence of dust at radii as small as \about 0.05~AU
317: \citep{Jura03}.
318:
319: Differences in the excess characteristics between the \about 1-2 Myr-old
320: Taurus and 5~Myr Upper Sco populations are notable since they may reflect
321: temporal evolution in the disk properties. While the magnitude of the excesses
322: overlaps between the two samples, the excesses are larger on average for Taurus
323: as seen in Figure~\ref{fig:sed}. Furthermore, about half of the stars in
324: Taurus exhibit a $K$-band excess \citep{Strom89} compared to only two (1.5\%)
325: K+M stars in Upper Sco ($[$PBB2002$]$~USco~J161420.2$-$190648 and
326: $[$PZ99$]$~J160421.7$-$213028). Similarly, while 68\% of the stars in Taurus
327: exhibit a 3.6\micron\ excess \citep{Haisch01}, only $19^{+5}_{-4}$\% of K+M
328: stars in Upper Sco have a 8\micron\ excess. Therefore, not only are there
329: fewer sources with disks in Upper Sco, but the disks that remain lack
330: the hot dust found in younger stars. \citet{Sicilia06} found similar
331: tendencies for the low mass population in Trumpler~37 compared to Taurus. They
332: attribute these differences to grain growth or dust settling in the inner
333: disk, although further observations and modeling are needed to explore
334: the relevance of these ideas to stars in Upper Sco.
335:
336: To summarize, 19\% of K0-M5 stars in Upper Sco possess infrared excesses
337: similar to Class~II sources in Taurus, indicating primordial disks last around
338: an appreciable number of 0.1-1\msun\ stars for at least 5~Myr. By contrast,
339: only \aboutless 1\% of the more massive stars in Upper Sco contain such disks
340: within an orbital radius of \about 4-10~AU. Similar results have been reported
341: for the 4~Myr-old Trumpler~37 cluster \citep{Sicilia06}, and the 2-3~Myr-old
342: IC~348 cluster may also contain a higher fraction of disks around
343: later type stars \citep{Lada06}. Our observations of Upper Sco extend these
344: conclusions to the full range of stellar masses down to the hydrogen burning
345: limit at an age of \about 5~Myr. These results establish that warm dust in
346: the terrestrial zone persist for longer times around stars with masses
347: \aboutless 1\msun.
348:
349: \acknowledgements
350:
351: JMC would like to thank the Spitzer Science Center staff for
352: patiently answering numerous questions regarding Spitzer data. EEM is
353: supported by a Clay Postdoctoral Fellowship through the Smithsonian
354: Astrophysical Observatory. MRM acknowledges support by NASA through the NASA
355: Astrobiology Institute under cooperative agreement CAN-02-OSS-02 issued
356: through the Office of Space Science. This work is based on observations made
357: with the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope}, which is operated by
358: JPL/Caltech under a contract with NASA. Support for this work was provided by
359: NASA through an award issued by JPL/Caltech.
360: This research made use of the
361: SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France. This paper made use of
362: data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of
363: the U. Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/Caltech,
364: funded by NASA and the NSF.
365:
366: \begin{thebibliography}{}
367:
368: \bibitem[Blaauw(1991)]{Blaauw91} Blaauw, A. 1991, in The Physics of Star
369: Formation and Early Stellar Evolution, C. J. Lada \& N. D. Kylafis,
370: (Dordrecht:Kluwer), 125
371:
372: \bibitem[Bouy \etal(2006)]{Bouy06} Bouy, H., He\'elama, N., Mart\'in, E. L.,
373: Barrado y Navascu\'es, D., Sterzik, M., \& Pantin, E. 2006, \aap, in press
374:
375: \bibitem[Carpenter \etal(2007)]{Carpenter07} Carpenter, J.~M., \etal~2007,
376: in preparation
377:
378: \bibitem[Carpenter et al.(2005)]{Carpenter05} Carpenter, J.~M., Wolf,
379: S., Schreyer, K., Launhardt, R., \& Henning, T.\ 2005, \aj, 129, 1049
380:
381: \bibitem[Chen et al.(2005)]{Chen05} Chen, C.~H., Jura, M., Gordon,
382: K.~D., \& Blaylock, M.\ 2005, \apj, 623, 493
383:
384: \bibitem[de Geus \etal(1989)]{deGeus89} de Geus, E. J., de Zeeuw, P. T., \&
385: Lub, J. 1989, \aap, 216, 44
386:
387: \bibitem[Fazio \etal(2004)]{Fazio04} Fazio, G., Hora, J. L, Allen, L. E.,
388: \etal~2004, \apjs, 154, 10
389:
390: \bibitem[D'Antona \& Mazzitelli(1994)]{DM94} D'Antona, F., \& Mazzitelli, I.
391: 1994, \apjs, 90, 467
392:
393: \bibitem[Haisch et al.(2001)]{Haisch01} Haisch, K.~E., Jr., Lada,
394: E.~A., \& Lada, C.~J.\ 2001, \apjl, 553, L153
395:
396: \bibitem[Hartmann et al.(2005)]{Hartmann05} Hartmann, L., Megeath,
397: S.~T., Allen, L., Luhman, K., Calvet, N., D'Alessio, P.,
398: Franco-Hernandez, R., \& Fazio, G.\ 2005, \apj, 629, 881
399:
400: \bibitem[Hern\'andez \etal(2006)]{Hernandez06} Hern{\'a}ndez, J.,
401: Brice{\~n}o, C., Calvet, N., Hartmann, L., Muzerolle, J.,
402: \& Quintero, A. 2006, astro-ph/0607562
403:
404: \bibitem[Hillenbrand \etal(1992)]{Hillenbrand92} Hillenbrand, L. A.,
405: Strom, S. E., Vrba, F. J., \& Keene, J. 1992, \apj, 397, 613
406:
407: \bibitem[H{\o}g et al.(2000)]{Hog00} H{\o}g, E., et al.\ 2000, \aap,
408: 355, L27
409:
410: \bibitem[Houck \etal(2004)]{Houck04} Houck, J., Roellig, T., van Cleve, J.,
411: \etal~2004, \apjs, 154, 18
412:
413: \bibitem[Houk(1982)]{Houk82} Houk, N. 1982, in Michigan Spectral Survey
414: Volume 3 (Ann Arbor: Dept. Astron., Univ. Mich.)
415:
416: \bibitem[Houk \& Smith-Moore(1988)]{Houk88} Houk, N., \& Smith-Moore, M.
417: 1988, in Michigan Spectral Survey Volume 4 (Ann Arbor: Dept. Astron.,
418: Univ. Mich.)
419:
420: \bibitem[Jura(2003)]{Jura03} Jura, M. 2003, \apjl, 584, L91
421:
422: \bibitem[K\"ohler \etal(2000)]{Kohler00} K\"ohler, Kunkel, M.,
423: Leinert, C., \& Zinnecker, H. 2000, \aap, 356, 541
424:
425: \bibitem[Kunkel(1999)]{Kunkel99} Kunkel M., 1999, Ph.D. Thesis,
426: Julius--Maximilians--Universit\"at W\"urzburg
427:
428: \bibitem[Lada \etal(2000)]{Lada00} Lada, C. J., Muench, A. A., Haisch, K. E.,
429: Lada, E. A., Alves, J. F., Tollestrup, E. V., \& Willner, S. P. 2000,
430: \aj, 120, 3162
431:
432: \bibitem[Lada et al.(2006)]{Lada06} Lada, C.~J., et al.\ 2006, \aj,
433: 131, 1574
434:
435: \bibitem[Liu et al.(2004)]{Liu04} Liu, M.~C., Matthews, B.~C.,
436: Williams, J.~P., \& Kalas, P.~G.\ 2004, \apj, 608, 526
437:
438: \bibitem[Madsen(2002)]{Madsen02} Madsen, S., Dravins, D., \& Lindegren, L.
439: 2002, \aap, 381, 446
440:
441: \bibitem[Mamajek \etal(2002)]{Mamajek02} Mamajek, E. E., Meyer, M. R.,
442: \& Liebert, J. 2002, \aj, 124, 1670
443:
444: \bibitem[Mamajek et al.(2004)]{Mamajek04} Mamajek, E.~E., Meyer,
445: M.~R., Hinz, P.~M., Hoffmann, W.~F., Cohen, M., \& Hora,
446: J.~L.\ 2004, \apj, 612, 496
447:
448: \bibitem[Mart\'in(1998)]{Martin98} Mart\'in, E. L. 1998, \aj, 115, 351
449:
450: \bibitem[Mathis(1990)]{Mathis90} Mathis, J.~S.\ 1990, \araa, 28, 37
451:
452: \bibitem[Meyer et al.(2006)]{Meyer06} Meyer, M.~R., et al.\ 2006, PASP,
453: submitted
454:
455: \bibitem[Muzerolle et al.(2000)]{Muzerolle00} Muzerolle, J., Calvet,
456: N., Brice\~no, C., Hartmann, L.. \& Hillenbrand, L. \ 2000, \apjl, 535, L47
457:
458: \bibitem[Odenwald(1986)]{Odenwald86} Odenwald, S. F. 1986, \apj, 307, 711
459:
460: \bibitem[Oudmaijer \etal(1992)]{Oudmaijer92} Oudmaijer, R. D., van der Veen,
461: W. E. C. J., Waters, L. B. F. M., Trams, N. R., Wailkens, C.,
462: Engelsman, E. 1992, \aaps, 96, 625
463:
464: \bibitem[Perryman \& ESA(1997)]{Perryman97} Perryman, M.~A.~C., \& ESA
465: 1997, The \Hipparcos\, and Tycho catalogues.~ESA SP Series Vol. 1200
466:
467: \bibitem[Preibisch \etal(2002)]{Preibisch02} Preibisch, T., Brown,
468: A. G. A., Bridges, T., Guenther, E., \& Zinnecker, H. 2002, \aj, 124,
469: 404
470:
471: \bibitem[Preibisch \etal(2001)]{Preibisch01} Preibisch, T., Guenther,
472: E., \& Zinnecker, H. 2001, \aj, 121, 1040
473:
474: \bibitem[Preibisch \& Zinnecker(1999)]{Preibisch99} Preibisch, T., \&
475: Zinnecker, H. 1999, \aj, 117, 2381
476:
477: \bibitem[Preibisch \etal(1998)]{Preibisch98} Preibisch, T., Guenther, E.,
478: Zinnecker, H., Sterzik, M., Frink, S., \& Roeser, S. 1998, \aap,
479: 333, 619
480:
481: \bibitem[Reach \etal(2005)]{Reach05} Reach, W. T., Megeath, S. T., Cohen, M.,
482: \etal~2005, \pasp, 117, 978
483:
484: \bibitem[Rieke et al.(2005)]{Rieke05} Rieke, G.~H., et al.\ 2005,
485: \apj, 620, 1010
486:
487: \bibitem[Sicilia-Aguilar \etal(2006)]{Sicilia06} Sicilia-Aguilar, A.,
488: \etal~2006, \apj, 638, 897
489:
490: \bibitem[Silverstone et al.(2006)]{Silverstone06} Silverstone, M.~D.,
491: et al.\ 2006, \apj, 639, 1138
492:
493: \bibitem[Strom et al.(1989)]{Strom89} Strom, K.~M., Strom, S.~E.,
494: Edwards, S., Cabrit, S., \& Skrutskie, M.~F.\ 1989, \aj, 97, 1451
495:
496: \bibitem[Sylvester \etal(1996)]{Sylvester96} Sylvester, R. J., Skinner, C. J.,
497: Barlow, M. J., \& Mannings, V. 1996, \mnras, 279, 915
498:
499: \bibitem[Walter \etal(1994)]{Walter94} Walter, F. M., Vrba, F. J.,
500: Mathieu, R. D., Brown, A., \& Myers, P. C. 1994, AJ, 107, 692
501:
502: \bibitem[Werner \etal(2004)]{Werner04} Werner, M., Roellig, T., Low. F.,
503: \etal~2004, \apjs, 154, 1
504:
505: \bibitem[White \& Basri(2003)]{White03} White, R., \& Basri, G.
506: 2003, \apj 582, 1109
507:
508: \bibitem[Young et al.(2004)]{Young04} Young, E.~T., et al.\ 2004,
509: \apjs, 154, 428
510:
511: \bibitem[Zacharias et al.(2004)]{Zacharias04} Zacharias, N., Urban,
512: S.~E., Zacharias, M.~I., Wycoff, G.~L., Hall, D.~M., Monet, D.~G.,
513: \& Rafferty, T.~J.\ 2004, \aj, 127, 3043
514:
515: \bibitem[de Zeeuw et al.(1999)]{deZeeuw99} de Zeeuw, P.~T.,
516: Hoogerwerf, R., de Bruijne, J.~H.~J., Brown, A.~G.~A., \&
517: Blaauw, A.\ 1999, \aj, 117, 354
518:
519: \end{thebibliography}
520:
521:
522: \begin{figure}
523: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=0.7]{f1.ps}
524: \caption{
525: \label{fig:ccd} Color-color diagrams showing $J-H$ along the abscissa,
526: tracing the stellar photosphere, and the 8\micron\ to 4.5\micron\ flux
527: ratio (top panel) and 16\micron\ to 4.5\micron\ flux ratio (bottom) along
528: the ordinate, diagnostic of circumstellar disks. Dashed lines indicate the
529: thresholds adopted to identify sources with infrared excesses, corresponding
530: to a color excess above the photosphere of 8\% (top panel) and 25\% (bottom).
531: Black circles represent sources identified with a 8\micron\ or 16\micron\
532: excess, and gray circles are sources without a detectable excess.
533: The open circle circle represents ScoPMS~17 for which the 16\micron\
534: excess is questionable based on possible source confusion (see
535: Table~\ref{tbl:phot}).
536: The internal uncertainties in the \Spitzer\ flux ratios are all
537: smaller than the symbol size, and the median $J-H$ uncertainty is
538: 0.036~mag. The source $[$PBB2002$]$ USco J161420.2$-$190648, which has
539: an excess at both 8\micron\ and 16\micron, is offscale on these plots.
540: The reddening vector from \citet{Mathis90} is indicated.
541: }
542: \end{figure}
543:
544: \begin{figure}
545: \includegraphics[angle=0,scale=0.7]{f2.ps}
546: \caption{
547: \label{fig:sed} Dereddened spectral energy distributions for B+A (top), F+G,
548: K, and M (bottom) stars. Gray circles represent Upper Sco sources
549: that do not have a detectable excess at wavelengths $\le$ 16\micron,
550: and open circles are sources with an excess in one or more bands.
551: Plus-symbols represent Herbig Ae/Be stars (B, A, and F spectral types) and
552: Class~II sources in Taurus (G, K, and M spectral types) listed in
553: \citet{Hillenbrand92} and \citet{Hartmann05}. The SEDs have been normalized
554: to $J$-band, and a random offset has been added to the wavelengths to
555: illustrate the distribution of points.
556: }
557: \end{figure}
558:
559: \input{tab1}
560:
561: \end{document}
562: