1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
4:
5: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
6:
7: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
8:
9: %\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
10:
11: %% \documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
12:
13: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
14: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
15: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
16: %% for information.
17:
18: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
19: \newcommand{\myemail}{skywalker@galaxy.far.far.away}
20:
21:
22: \begin{document}
23:
24: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
25: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
26: %% you desire.
27:
28: \title{Substructure in Tidal Streams; Tributaries in the Anticenter Ring}
29:
30: \author{C. J. Grillmair}
31: \affil{Spitzer Science Center, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125}
32: \email{carl@ipac.caltech.edu}
33:
34: \begin{abstract}
35:
36: We report on the detection in Sloan Digital Sky Survey data of at
37: least three, roughly parallel components in a $65\arcdeg$-long,
38: stellar stream complex previously identified with the Anticenter or
39: Monoceros Ring. The three-stream complex varies in width from
40: $4\arcdeg$ to $6\arcdeg$ along its length and appears to be made up of
41: two or more narrow substreams as well as a broader, diffuse
42: component. The width and complexity of the stream indicate that the
43: progenitor was likely a dwarf galaxy of significant size and mass. The
44: stream is 8.9 kpc distant and is oriented almost perpendicularly to
45: our line of sight. The visible portion of the stream does not pass
46: near any known dwarf galaxies and a preliminary orbit does not point
47: to any viable progenitor candidates. Orbits for the narrower
48: substreams can be modeled with velocity offsets from the broad
49: component of $\approx 8$ km s$^{-1}$. We suggest that the broad
50: component is likely to be the remains of a dwarf galaxy, while the
51: narrower streams constitute the remnants of dynamically distinct
52: components which may have included a native population of globular
53: clusters. While the color of the main sequence turn-off is not unlike
54: that for the Monoceros Ring, neither the visible stream nor any
55: reasonable projection of its orbit passes through Monoceros or Canis
56: Major, and we conclude that this stream is probably unrelated to the
57: overdensities found in these regions.
58:
59:
60: \end{abstract}
61:
62: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
63: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
64: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
65: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
66:
67: \keywords{Galaxy: Structure --- Galaxy: Halo}
68:
69: \section{Introduction}
70:
71: The value of large scale digital sky surveys to studies of Galactic
72: structure and the Local Group has become abundantly clear in recent
73: years, and particularly in the last few months. In addition to the
74: large scale features attributed to past galaxy accretion events
75: \citep{yann03,maje2003,roch04}, Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data
76: were used to detect the remarkably strong tidal tails of Palomar 5
77: \citep{oden2001,rock2002, oden2003, grill2006b}, NGC 5466
78: \citep{belo2006a, grill2006a}, and streams due to extant or extinct
79: globular clusters \citep{grill2006c} and dwarf galaxies
80: \citep{belo2006b, grill2006d}. \citet{will2005}, \citet{zuck2006}, and
81: \citet{belo2006c} recently used SDSS data to discover several new dwarf
82: satellites of the Milky Way.
83:
84: In this paper we continue our analysis of the SDSS database to search
85: for extended structures in the Galactic halo. We briefly describe our
86: analysis in Section \ref{analysis}. We discuss the structure of a
87: stream complex, attributed to the Monoceros Ring by \citet{belo2006b}
88: in Section \ref{discussion}, estimate distances in Section
89: \ref{distance}, and put constraints on the orbit in Section
90: \ref{orbit}.
91:
92: \section{Data Analysis \label{analysis}}
93:
94: Data comprising $ugriz$ photometry for stars in the region $108\arcdeg
95: < \alpha < 162\arcdeg$ and $-4\arcdeg < \delta < 68\arcdeg$ were
96: extracted from Data Release 5 of the SDSS using the SDSS CasJobs query
97: system. The data were analyzed using the matched filter technique
98: employed by \citet{grill2006a}, \citet{grill2006b},
99: \citet{grill2006c}, \citet{grill2006d} and described in detail by
100: \citet{rock2002}. This technique is made necessary by the fact that,
101: over the magnitude range and over the region of sky we are
102: considering, the foreground disk stars outnumber the more distant
103: stars in the Galactic halo by some three orders of magnitude. Applied in
104: the color-magnitude domain, the matched filter is a means by which we
105: can optimally differentiate between two populations.
106:
107: We used the SDSS photometry to create a color-magnitude density or
108: Hess diagram for both stars of interest and for the foreground
109: population. Dividing the former by the latter, we generated an array
110: of relative weights which we used as an optimal color-magnitude
111: filter. We generated the search filter using the color-magnitude
112: distribution of stars in M 13. Owing to M 13's proximity, we have a
113: better measure of its luminosity function and the effects of SDSS
114: completeness than we do for other objects in the DR5 field. We used
115: all stars with $15 < g < 22.5$. We dereddended the SDSS photometry as
116: a function of position on the sky using the DIRBE/IRAS dust maps of
117: \citet{schleg98}. A single Hess diagram for field stars was
118: generated using $1.2 \times 10^7$ stars spread over $\sim 2200$
119: deg$^2$ of DR5. We applied the M 13 filter to the entire survey area,
120: and the resulting weighted star counts were summed by location on the
121: sky to produce a two dimensional probability map.
122:
123: In Figure 1 we show the final filtered star count distribution, using
124: a filter matched to the $g, g - i$ color magnitude distribution of
125: stars in M 13 but shifted faintwards by 0.3 mags. An exponential
126: surface function has been subtracted from the image to remove the
127: rapid rise in the number of disk stars at low Galactic latitudes, and
128: a 4th-order polynomial surface has been used to remove remaining large
129: scale gradients. The final image has been binned to a pixel size of
130: $0.08\arcdeg$ and smoothed using a Gaussian kernel with $\sigma =
131: 0.2\arcdeg$.
132:
133: \section{Discussion \label{discussion}}
134:
135: Apparent in Figure 1 is a broad and complex stream running from north
136: to south across the field. Portions of this stream are visible in
137: \citet{newberg02} and \citet{belo2006b}. The narrow, curved stream
138: running towards the northeast is part of the 63$\arcdeg$-long globular
139: cluster stream found by \citet{grill2006c}, hereafter referred to as
140: GD-1. The broad, east-west stream just above the main gap in the data
141: is the Sagittarius stream discussed by \citet{belo2006b}, though
142: somewhat muted by our filtering due to its greater distance. The
143: stream complex of interest extends from (R.A., decl.) =
144: ($126.4\arcdeg, -0.7\arcdeg$) to (R.A., decl.) = ($133.9\arcdeg,
145: 64.2\arcdeg$), and runs in a $65\arcdeg$, nearly great circle path
146: from Ursa Major in the north to Hydra in the south. The stream is
147: truncated at both the southern and northern ends by the limits of the
148: available data. We note that there is also an apparent concentration
149: of stars at (R.A., decl.) = ($134\arcdeg, 3.4\arcdeg$), surrounded by
150: faint, banded substructure roughly parallel to that of the main
151: western stream.
152:
153: From the reddening map of \citet{schleg98}, the maximum values of
154: $E(B-V)$ are $\approx 0.2$ (near the northern tip), with typical
155: values near 0.03 along the remainder of the stream. There are
156: diminutions here and there in the stream that could be attributed to
157: regions of higher reddening, but there are no long features with a
158: north-south orientation which could be held to account for either the
159: appearance of the stream as a whole, or for the different components
160: within it.
161:
162: Sampling at several representative points, the main stream complex
163: appears to be about $5\arcdeg$ wide on average. This is significantly
164: broader than the globular cluster streams found by \citet{oden2003,
165: grill2006a, grill2006b} and \citet{grill2006c}. $5\arcdeg$ corresponds
166: to about 800 pc at our estimated distance to the stream (see below),
167: which is much larger than the tidal diameters of globular clusters.
168: We conclude that the progenitor was considerably more extended than a
169: globular cluster and was most likely a dwarf galaxy.
170:
171: The stream is clearly not just a broad swath of stars. Rather, it
172: appears to be made up of a $\sim 2\arcdeg$ wide broad component
173: running roughly along the center of the stream complex, and at least
174: two narrower, $1\arcdeg$-wide streams to the east and west of the
175: broad component. The fine structure in the stream complex is
176: illustrated in Figure 2, where we have made several east-west slices
177: across the complex at various declinations. Comparing Figures 1 and 2,
178: there are indications of additional structure within the broad
179: component, and still other, more tenuous parallel streams to the east
180: and west of the three major components.
181:
182: Integrating the background subtracted, weighted star counts along the
183: stream over a width of $\approx 5\arcdeg$ we find that the total
184: number of stars in the discernible stream down to $g = 22.5$ is $9200
185: \pm 1500$. The mean surface density of stars in the southern portion
186: of the stream ($-1\arcdeg < \delta < 14\arcdeg$) is about 67 stars
187: deg$^{-2}$, which is roughly twice the 32 stars deg$^{-2}$ (corrected
188: for $cos(\delta)$) found in the northern section ($39\arcdeg < \delta
189: < 52\arcdeg$). The highest local surface densities exceed 200 stars
190: deg$^{-2}$. If we assume a globular cluster-like luminosity function
191: in the stream, then we can use the color transformation equations of
192: \citet{smith2002}, the deep M 4 luminosity function of
193: \citet{richer2002}, and the mass-luminosity relation of
194: \citet{baraffe97} to extrapolate to fainter magnitudes. Integrating
195: over $3 < M_V < 17$, we estimate a total number of stars in the
196: visible portion of the stream of $33,000 \pm 5400$, a total luminosity
197: of $5500 \pm 900 L_\odot$, and a total estimated mass of $9300 \pm
198: 1500 M_\odot$.
199:
200:
201: \subsection{Color-Magnitude Distribution and Distance to the Stream \label{distance}}
202:
203:
204: In Figure 3 we show $g, g - i$ color-magnitude distributions for the
205: stream stars, extracted by generating a Hess diagrams of stars lying
206: along $2\arcdeg$-wide regions covering the western and eastern halves
207: of the stream complex and subtracting a similar field star
208: distribution sampled over $\approx 500$ deg$^2$ to the east and west
209: of the stream complex. Despite the somewhat limited statistics, a
210: clear signature of the turn-off and main sequence is evident in the
211: stream population. Moreover, the turn-off regions of the
212: distributions match the dereddened, shifted main sequence locus of M
213: 13 fairly well. The turn-offs in the eastern and western halves of the
214: complex lie at dereddened $g - i = 0.27$ and $0.3$, respectively. A
215: similar diagram in $g - r$ yields dereddened turn-off colors of $g - r
216: = 0.23$ and 0.25, respectively, with the difference most likely a due
217: to $\sim 0.02$ mag measurement uncertainty. These estimates lie
218: between values of 0.26 and 0.22 measured by \citet{newberg02} for the
219: Monoceros Ring and the Sagittarius stream, respectively. They are also
220: much bluer than \citet{newberg02}'s estimate of dereddened $g - r =
221: 0.40$ for thick disk stars. Based solely on turn-off color, we can
222: therefore rule out association of the stream complex with thick
223: disk stars. However, within the uncertainties, the turn-off colors are
224: consistent with those of either the Monoceros Ring or the Sagittarius
225: stream.
226:
227:
228: Varying the magnitude shift applied to M 13's main sequence locus from
229: -1.0 to +3.0 mag, we measured the foreground-subtracted, mean surface
230: density of stream stars in the regions $-1\arcdeg < \delta <
231: 9\arcdeg$, $17\arcdeg < \delta < 39\arcdeg$, and $39\arcdeg < \delta <
232: 63\arcdeg$. To avoid potential problems related to a difference in
233: age between M 13 and the stream stars, we used only the portion of the
234: filter with $19.5 < g < 22.5$, where the bright cutoff is 0.8 mag
235: below M 13's main sequence turn-off. Though this reduces the stream
236: contrast somewhat, it provides sufficient integrated signal-to-noise
237: to enable main sequence fitting.
238:
239: Fitting Gaussians to the mean surface densities as a function of
240: magnitude shift (e.g. \citet{grill2006c}, we find that the highest
241: contrasts occur for shifts of +0.31, +0.29, and +0.37 mag for the
242: eastern half of the stream complex over the declination ranges given
243: above, respectively. For the western half, we find that the filter
244: response peaks at shifts of +0.34, +0.25, and +0.38 mag, respectively.
245: The magnitude shifts for the two halves are highly consistent with one
246: another, and we conclude that there is no significant distance offset
247: from one side of the complex to the other. Adopting a distance to M 13
248: of 7.7 kpc \citep{harris96} we find an average heliocentric distance
249: of $d = 8.9 \pm 0.2$ kpc. The stream is roughly perpendicular to our
250: line of sight and slightly curved about the Galactic center as
251: expected. Our distance estimate is in excellent agreement with the
252: $\approx 9$ kpc found by \citet{ibata03} in their WFS-0801 field,
253: which is situated on the western edge of the stream complex at $\alpha
254: = 120.5, \delta = 40.3$.
255:
256:
257: \subsection{Constraints on the Orbit \label{orbit}}
258:
259: The visible portion of the stream complex spans the Galactic
260: anticenter direction and, projecting a great circle path, is inclined
261: by $35\arcdeg$ to the Galactic plane. Though we are currently limited
262: by a lack of velocity information, for a given model of the Galactic
263: potential the progenitor's orbit is actually fairly well constrained
264: by the observed distance and orientation of the stream. Using the
265: Galactic model of \citet{allen91} (which includes a disk, bulge, and
266: spherical halo, and which \citet{grill2006a, grill2006b} and
267: \citet{grill2006c} found to work reasonably well for NGC 5466, Pal 5,
268: and GD-1), we use a least squares method to fit both the orientation
269: on the sky and the distance measurements in Section \ref{distance}. In
270: addition to a number of normal points lying along the central
271: component of the stream, we chose as a velocity fiducial point a
272: position at the northern end of the stream at (R.A., decl) =
273: (125.463\arcdeg, 51.492\arcdeg).
274:
275: If we allow the proper motions to be free ranging and uninteresting
276: parameters, the model which best fits the data predicts $v_{LSR} = -18
277: \pm 10$ km s$^{-1}$ at the fiducial point, where the uncertainty
278: corresponds to the 95\% confidence interval. A projection of this
279: orbit is labeled C in Figure 4. We note that the uncertainty is
280: primarily determined by the large lever arm over which it has been
281: possible to measure relative distances. The 95\% range in
282: $v_{LSR}$ in turn predicts a range in perigalactic and apogalactic
283: radii of $6.6 < R_p < 6.9$ kpc and $16.8 < R_a < 17.3$ kpc. Of course,
284: these ranges do not take into account uncertainties in the absolute
285: distance of the stream (which depends on the uncertainty in M 13's
286: distance) or of the validity of \citet{allen91}'s Galactic model.
287:
288: Given the very similar distances estimated for the eastern and western
289: portions of the stream, it is highly unlikely that the complex could
290: be a superposition of multiple wraps around the Galaxy. The two
291: narrower streams (E and W in Figure 4) can be reasonably well modeled
292: by 0.18 $mas$ yr$^{-1}$ offsets in east-west proper motion. At the
293: distance of the stream complex this amounts to $\approx 8$ km
294: s$^{-1}$. The entire stream complex is therefore likely to be the
295: remains of a dwarf galaxy which contained distinct components spanning
296: a range of binding energies. The narrower streams might, for example,
297: be the remnants of the parent galaxy's globular cluster
298: population. Piecing together the original structure and evolution of
299: the stream's progenitor will require detailed N-body modeling.
300:
301: Integrating orbits for parameter sets spanning the range above, we
302: find that, with the exception of the Sagittarius dE, there are no
303: known dwarf galaxies within $5\arcdeg$ of the projected orbit. The
304: Sagittarius dE lies $3.1\arcdeg$ from the projection of the best-fit
305: orbit, but the orbital planes of the the Sagittarius dE and the new
306: stream are clearly distinct (Figure 4); we attribute this apparent
307: proximity to the expected confluence of orbit projections in the
308: direction of the Galactic center and not to any physical association
309: between them.
310:
311: The orientation of the stream on the sky puts fairly strict limits on
312: the plane of the orbit. The visible portion of the stream passes
313: through Lynx, Cancer, and Hydra. We find no reasonable combination of
314: parameters that would place the southern projection of the stream in
315: either Monoceros or Canis Major. Nor does the visible extent of the
316: stream complex fit either the prograde or retrograde models of the
317: Monoceros stream computed by \citet{penarrubia05}. Thus, even while
318: the turn-off colors appear to be similar, we conclude on orbital grounds
319: that this stream complex is unlikely to be related to either the
320: Monoceros stream or the Canis Major overdensity.
321:
322:
323:
324: \acknowledgments
325:
326:
327: Funding for the creation and distribution of the SDSS Archive has been
328: provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating
329: Institutions, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the
330: National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, the
331: Japanese Monbukagakusho, and the Max Planck Society.
332:
333:
334:
335: {\it Facilities:} \facility{Sloan}.
336:
337:
338: \begin{thebibliography}{}
339:
340: \bibitem[Allen \& Santillan (1991)]{allen91} Allen, C., \& Santillan,
341: A. 1991, {\it Rev. Mex. Astron. Astrofis.}, 22, 255
342:
343: \bibitem[Belokurov et al. (2006a)]{belo2006a} Belokurov, V., Evans, N. W.,
344: Irwin, M. J., Hewett, P. C., \& Wilkinson, M. I. 2005, \apjl, 637, L29
345:
346: \bibitem[Belokurov et al. (2006b)]{belo2006b} Belokurov, V. et al. 2006,
347: \apjl, 642, 137
348:
349: \bibitem[Belokurov et al. (2006c)]{belo2006c} Belokurov, V. et al. 2006,
350: \apjl, 647, L111
351:
352: \bibitem[Grillmair (2006)]{grill2006d} Grillmair, C. J. 2006, \apjl,
353: 645, 37
354:
355: \bibitem[Grillmair \& Johnson (2006)]{grill2006a} Grillmair, C. J., \&
356: Johnson, R. 2006, \apjl, 639, L17
357:
358: \bibitem[Grillmair \& Dionatos (2006a)]{grill2006b} Grillmair,
359: C. J. \& Dionatos, O. 2006b, \apjl, 641, L37
360:
361: \bibitem[Grillmair \& Dionatos (2006b)]{grill2006c} Grillmair, C. J., \&
362: Dionatos, O. 2006, \apjl, 643, 17
363:
364: \bibitem[Harris (1996)]{harris96} Harris, W. E. 1996, \aj, 112, 1487
365:
366: \bibitem[Ibata et al. (2003)]{ibata03} Ibata, R. A., Irwin, M. J.,
367: Lewis, G. F., Ferguson, A. M. N., \& Tanvir, N. 2003, \mnras, 340, 21
368:
369: \bibitem[Majewski et al. (2003)]{maje2003} Majewski, S. R., Skrutskie,
370: M. F., Weinberg, M. D., \& Ostheimer, J. C. 2003, \apj, 599, 1082
371:
372: \bibitem[Newberg et al. (2002)]{newberg02} Newberg, H. J. et al. 2002,
373: \apj, 569, 245
374:
375: \bibitem[Odenkirchen et al. (2001)]{oden2001} Odenkirchen, M., Grebel,
376: E. K., Rockosi, C. M., Dehnen, W., Ibata, R., Rix, H., Solte, A.,
377: Wolf, C., Anderson, J. E. Jr., Bahcall, N. A, Brinkmann, J., Csabai,
378: I., Hennessy, G., Hindsley, R. B., Ivezic, Z., Lupton, R., Munn,
379: J. A., Pier, J. R., Stoughton, C., York, D. G. 2001, \apjl, 548, 1650
380:
381: \bibitem[Odenkirchen et al. (2003)]{oden2003} Odenkirchen, M., Grebel,
382: E. K., Dehnen, W., Rix, H., Yanny, B., Newberg, H., Rockosi, C. M.,
383: Martinez-Delgado, D., Brinkmann, J., Pier, J. R. 2003, \aj, 126, 2385
384:
385: \bibitem[Penarrubia et al. (2005)]{penarrubia05} Penarrubia, J.,
386: Martinez-Delgado, D., Rix, H. W., Gomez-Flechoso, M. A., Munn, J.,
387: Newberg, H., Bell, E. F., Yanny, B., Zucker, D., \& Grebel,
388: E. K. 2005, \apj, 626, 128
389:
390: \bibitem[Richer et al. (2002)]{richer2002} Richer, H. B. et al. 2002,
391: \apjl, 574, L151
392:
393: \bibitem[Rocha-Pinto et al. (2004)]{roch04} Rocha-Pinto, H. J.,
394: Majewski, S. R., Skrutskie, M. F., Crane, J. D., Patterson,
395: R. J. 2004, \apj, 615, 732
396:
397: \bibitem[Rockosi et al. (2002)]{rock2002} Rockosi, C. M., Odenkirchen,
398: M., Grebel, E. K., Dehnen, W., Cudworth, K. M., Gunn, J. E., York,
399: D. G., Brinkmann, J., Hennessy, G. S., \& Ivezic, Z. 2002, \aj, 124,
400: 349
401:
402: \bibitem[Schlegel, Finkbeiner, \& Davis (1998)]{schleg98} Schlegel,
403: D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., \& Davis, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525
404:
405: \bibitem[Smith et al. (2002)]{smith2002} Smith, J. A. et al. 2002, \aj, 123,
406: 2121
407:
408: \bibitem[Willman et al. (2005)]{will2005} Willman, B. et al. 2005,
409: \aj, 129, 2692
410:
411: \bibitem[Yanny et al. (2003)]{yann03} Yanny, B. et al. 2003, \apj,
412: 588, 824
413:
414: \bibitem[Zucker et al. (2006)]{zuck2006} Zucker, D. B. 2006, \apjl, submitted.
415:
416: \end{thebibliography}
417:
418:
419: \clearpage
420:
421: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
422: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
423: %% To embed the sample graphics in
424: %% the file, uncomment the \plotone, \plottwo, and
425: %% \includegraphics commands
426: %%
427: %% If you need a layout that cannot be achieved with \plotone or
428: %% \plottwo, you can invoke the graphicx package directly with the
429: %% \includegraphics command or use \plotfiddle. For more information,
430: %% please see the tutorial on "Using Electronic Art with AASTeX" in the
431: %% documentation section at the AASTeX Web site,
432: %% http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AAS/AASTeX.
433: %%
434: %% The examples below also include sample markup for submission of
435: %% supplemental electronic materials. As always, be sure to check
436: %% the instructions to authors for the journal you are submitting to
437: %% for specific submissions guidelines as they vary from
438: %% journal to journal.
439:
440: %% This example uses \plotone to include an EPS file scaled to
441: %% 80% of its natural size with \epsscale. Its caption
442: %% has been written to indicate that additional figure parts will be
443: %% available in the electronic journal.
444:
445: \begin{figure}
446: \epsscale{0.6}
447: \plotone{f1.eps}
448: \caption{Smoothed, summed weight image of the SDSS field after
449: subtraction of both an exponential and a 4th-order polynomial surface
450: fit. Darker areas indicate higher surface densities. The weight image
451: has been smoothed with a Gaussian kernel with $\sigma =
452: 0.2\arcdeg$. The solid gray areas are either data missing from DR5, or
453: clusters or bright stars which have been masked out prior to
454: analysis. The stream complex runs from (R.A., decl) = ($126.4\arcdeg,
455: -0.7\arcdeg$) to approximately (R.A., decl.) = ($133.9\arcdeg,
456: 64.2\arcdeg$). The feature at (R.A., decl.) = ($143\arcdeg,
457: 30\arcdeg$) is a portion of the cold stellar stream discovered by
458: \citet{grill2006c}. \label{fig1}}
459: \end{figure}
460:
461: \begin{figure}
462: \epsscale{0.7}
463: \plotone{f2.eps}
464: \caption{Profiles across the stream complex at constant declination,
465: after smoothing the weighted star counts with a Gaussian kernel with
466: $\sigma = 0.25\arcdeg$ and summing over $2.4\arcdeg$-wide bands in
467: declination. E, C, and W indicate the Eastern, Central, and Western
468: components. EBS denotes the Easter Banded Structure alluded to in the
469: text. The profiles have been offset vertically for clarity. Note
470: indications of still other streams, both within the central stream and
471: to the east and west of the complex.}
472: \end{figure}
473:
474:
475:
476: \begin{figure}
477: \epsscale{0.6}
478: \plotone{f3.eps}
479: \caption{The dereddened, background subtracted, color-magnitude
480: distribution of stream stars. The left-hand panel shows the C-M
481: distribution of stars in the western portion of the stream complex,
482: while the right-hand panel shows the distribution of stars in a
483: $2\arcdeg$-wide strip on the eastern side of the complex. The main
484: sequence and the turn-off are clearly distinguishable. The solid line
485: shows the dereddened locus of giant branch and main sequence stars as
486: measured in DR5 for M 13, shifted faintwards by 0.3 mags.}
487: \end{figure}
488:
489: \begin{figure}
490: \epsscale{0.6}
491: \plotone{f4.eps}
492: \caption{Contour plot of Figure 1, showing projections of the best
493: fitting orbits to each of the eastern, central, and western stream
494: components. GD-1 is the globular cluster stream found by
495: \citet{grill2006c}, and other designations are as in Figure 2.}
496: \end{figure}
497:
498:
499:
500:
501: \end{document}
502:
503: %%
504:
505: