1: \documentclass[12pt, preprint]{aastex}
2: %% \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
3: \newcommand{\ms}{\mbox{m s$^{-1}~$}}
4: \newcommand{\msy}{\mbox{m s$^{-1}$ yr$^{-1}~$}}
5: \newcommand{\kms}{\mbox{km s$^{-1}~$}}
6: \newcommand{\msun}{M$_{\odot}$}
7: \newcommand{\rsun}{R$_{\odot}$}
8: \newcommand{\mjup}{M$_{\rm JUP}$}
9: \newcommand{\mearth}{M$_{\rm EARTH }$}
10: \newcommand{\msat}{M$_{\rm SAT}$}
11: \newcommand{\rjup}{R$_{\rm JUP}~$}
12: \newcommand{\msini}{$M \sin i~$}
13: \newcommand{\teff}{\mbox{$T_{\rm eff}$}}
14: \newcommand{\teq}{\mbox{$T_{\rm eq}$}}
15: \newcommand{\tint}{\mbox{$T_{\rm int}$}}
16: \newcommand{\etal}{\mbox{\rm et al.~}}
17: \newcommand{\logg}{\mbox{$\log g$}}
18: \newcommand{\fe}{\mbox{[Fe/H]}}
19: \newcommand{\sini}{$sin i~$}
20: \newcommand{\vsini}{V$sin i~$}
21: \newcommand{\ab}{$\sim$}
22: \newcommand{\lessim}{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}}
23: \newcommand{\Mv}{M$_{\rm v}~$}
24: \newcommand{\simgt}{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}}
25: \newcommand{\simlt}{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}}
26:
27: \received{}
28: \accepted{}
29:
30: \slugcomment{Submitted to PASP; Revised July 25, 2006}
31:
32: \shortauthors{Bozorgnia \etal}
33: \shorttitle{Search for an Atmosphere in HD149026}
34: \begin{document}
35:
36:
37: \title{Search for an Atmospheric Signature\\
38: of the Transiting Exoplanet HD 149026b\altaffilmark{1}}
39: \author{Nassim Bozorgnia\altaffilmark{2},
40: Jonathan J. Fortney\altaffilmark{3,4,5}
41: Debra A. Fischer\altaffilmark{2},
42: Chris McCarthy\altaffilmark{2},
43: Geoffrey W. Marcy\altaffilmark{2,6}}
44:
45: \altaffiltext{1}{Based on observations obtained at the
46: W. M. Keck Observatory, which is operated by the University of
47: California
48: and the California Institute of Technology. Keck time has been
49: granted by NASA.}
50: \altaffiltext{2}{Department of Physics \& Astronomy, San Francisco State
51: University, San Francisco, CA 94132; fischer@stars.sfsu.edu}
52: \altaffiltext{3}{Space Science and Astrobiology Division, NASA Ames
53: Research
54: Center, MS 245-3, Moffett Field, CA 94035; jfortney@arc.nasa.gov}
55: \altaffiltext{4}{Spitzer Fellow}
56: \altaffiltext{5}{SETI Institute, 515 North Whisman Road, Mountain
57: View, CA 94043}
58: \altaffiltext{6}{Department of Astronomy, University of California,
59: Berkeley, CA USA 94720}
60:
61: \begin{abstract}
62:
63: HD149026b is a short-period, Saturn-mass planet that transits a metal-
64: rich
65: star. The planet radius, determined by photometry, is remarkably small
66: compared to other known transiting planets,
67: with a heavy element core that apparently comprises $\sim 70$\% of
68: the total
69: planet mass. Time series spectra were obtained at Keck before and
70: during transit in order to model the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect.
71: Here, we make use of these observations to carry out a differential
72: comparison of spectra obtained in and out-of-transit
73: to search for signatures of neutral atomic lithium and potassium from
74: the planet atmosphere. No signal was detected at the 2\% level; we
75: therefore place upper limits on the column density of these atoms.
76:
77: %We acknowledge support from NASA, grant number NNG056G164G to DF.
78:
79: \end{abstract}
80:
81: \keywords{planetary systems --- stars: individual (HD 149026) ---
82: transit effects}
83:
84:
85: \section{Introduction}
86:
87: Extrasolar planets that transit their host stars offer a
88: unique opportunity to search for constituents in the planet atmosphere.
89: As stellar flux passes through the planet atmosphere, additional
90: absorption features will be imprinted on the (otherwise pure) stellar
91: spectrum (Seager \& Sasselov 2000, Brown 2001, Hubbard \etal 2001).
92: This offers a possibility
93: for detection of atmospheric transmission features
94: when working differentially with in-transit and out-of-transit spectra.
95: We have used this fact to search for additional absorption in alkali lines
96: from the atmosphere of HD 149026b during transit.
97:
98:
99: Transiting planets that reside close
100: to their host stars are strongly irradiated and have atmospheres
101: with temperatures (but not gravities) similar to those of late type
102: L dwarfs. In the cool atmosphere of sub-stellar objects
103: like brown dwarfs and giant exoplanets, the more refractory metals
104: condense and rain out-of-the atmosphere leaving the less refractory
105: alkali metals in atomic form (Burrows \& Sharp 1999; Lodders 1999).
106: Thus, the strongest absorption features are expected for alkali
107: metals such as sodium and potassium
108: (Seager \& Sasselov 2000, Sudarsky, Burrows \& Pinto 2000).
109:
110: Since the discovery of HD 209458b
111: (Charbonneau et al. 2000; Henry et al. 2000),
112: this star has been the subject of many ground-based and
113: space-based studies. HD 209458 is a bright star with
114: $V=7.65$, permitting spectroscopy with high resolution and high S/N.
115: The transiting planet has an anomalously large radius of 1.3 \rjup,
116: making
117: it an excellent candidate to search for atmospheric signatures. In
118: contrast,
119: searching for atmospheric features in other transiting exoplanets
120: may be more difficult, because the planet to star radius is generally
121: smaller and the host stars have a lower intrinsic brightness.
122: However, if
123: other exoplanets have tenuous, but extended atmospheres, then it may be
124: possible to identify atmospheric features from the planet.
125:
126: The most successful searches for exoplanet atmospheres have been carried
127: out from space where telluric contamination is avoided and
128: higher S/N has enabled more sensitive searches. Based on
129: observations with the \emph{Hubble Space Telescope} (HST),
130: Charbonneau \etal (2002) detected absorption from the sodium resonance
131: doublet at 5893 \AA\ in the dense lower atmosphere of HD 209458b, and
132: Vidal-Madjar \etal (2003) detected an escaping, trailing extended
133: exosphere of hydrogen. In contrast, it is more challenging
134: to search for exoplanet atmospheres with ground-based telescopes.
135: Bundy \& Marcy (2000) carried out a differential analysis of spectra
136: for HD 209458 obtained in and
137: out-of-transit at the Lick and Keck Observatories. They also studied
138: the
139: spectra of 51 Peg, which is not a transiting planet. Because of
140: contamination from ${\rm H_2O}$ and ${\rm O_2}$ features, they were only
141: able to place weak upper limits on Na I and K I line depth variations.
142: Deming et al. (2005) searched for carbon monoxide
143: absorption features in the transmission spectrum of HD 209458b
144: at $\sim2.3$ $\micron$ using NIRSPEC on Keck II telescope. Their
145: analysis
146: required 1077 high-resolution spectra to achieve
147: comparable sensitivity to the HST sodium observations.
148: No changes in the CO features in and out-of-transit were measured,
149: implying the presence of high clouds in the planet atmosphere.
150:
151:
152:
153: \section{HD 149026: A Star with a Transiting Planet}
154:
155: HD 149026 is a metal-rich G0 IV subgiant with V=8.15 and an absolute
156: visual
157: magnitude, $M_V=3.66$. The planet's mass is similar to Saturn in our
158: solar
159: system with a radius of $0.725$ \rjup (Sato \etal 2005)
160: determined from the observed photometric transit depth.
161: Interior models discussed by Sato \etal (2005) imply a
162: planet core of about 70 Earth masses. HD 149026b orbits with a
163: semimajor axis of only $a=0.045$ AU, and Sato et al. (2005) report an
164: effective temperature in the planet atmosphere of 1540 K.
165:
166:
167: \subsection{Expected Atmospheric Features}
168:
169: The equilibrium temperature of an exoplanet atmosphere at the substellar
170: point is a function of the effective stellar temperature, $T_*$, the
171: stellar radius,
172: $R_*$, and the planet-star separation, $a$. These factors are modulated
173: by the planet Bond albedo, $A_B$, and by a geometrical factor, $f$.
174: If a thermal gradient is established from heating on the tidally
175: locked day
176: side of the planet, then a wind will circulate energy to the night side
177: of the planet. Depending on the efficiency of this process, $f$ is 1 for
178: isotropic emission from both sides of the planet, and $f$ scales to 2
179: for emission from the day side only.
180: %
181: \begin{equation}
182: T_{eq}=T_*(R_*/2a)^{1/2}[f(1-A_B)]^{1/4}
183: \end{equation}
184: %
185: Adopting $T_*$ and $R_*$ from Sato \etal (2005), and assuming
186: isotropic emission and a Bond albedo, $A_B = 0.3$, we calculate
187: $T_{eq}=1593$ K.
188:
189: Fortney \etal (2006) define the planet effective temperature as:
190:
191: %
192: \begin{equation}
193: T_{eff}^{4}=T_{eq}^{4}+T_{int}^{4}
194: \end{equation}
195: %
196:
197: \noindent
198: where \teq is the equilibrium temperature of the planet in the presence of stellar radiation,
199: and \tint is the effective intrinsic temperature of the planet in isolation.
200: These authors note that for strongly
201: irradiated planets, the intrinsic isolation temperature is negligible.
202: They consider atmospheric models for HD 149026b with
203: a range of metallicities: [M/H] = 0., 0.5, 1.0.
204: For a cloud-free model with [M/H]=0.5 and assuming isotropic
205: radiation, Fortney \etal (2006) derive an effective
206: temperature for the planet atmosphere of 1734 K, implying $A_B < 0.1
207: $. If radiation is
208: not isotropic, but radiates from the day side only (2$\pi$ steradians),
209: this same atmospheric model yields \teff $ = 2148$ K, and TiO and VO
210: features appear at low pressures (Fortney \etal 2006).
211:
212: The temperature of HD 149026b is therefore likely to be similar to
213: the temperature of L/T dwarfs (Kirkpatrick 2005).
214: The brown dwarf spectral sequence is a temperature
215: sequence over part of the range, except from mid-/late-L to mid-T
216: where the
217: behavior of clouds become a dominant effect (Kirkpatrick 2005).
218: The effective temperature estimates for HD 149026b ranging from \teff=
219: $1540 -2148$ K
220: correspond to the brown dwarf spectral type range from early-L to mid-T.
221:
222:
223: Based on the effective temperature range of the planet, observable
224: spectral features in the atmosphere can be predicted. The spectra
225: of L dwarfs, T dwarfs and irradiated giant planets have
226: dominant absorption lines from neutral alkali metals like Na I, K I,
227: Rb I, Cs I and Li I. Early L-type dwarfs
228: have prominent molecular lines, TiO and VO bands,
229: hydride bands FeH, CaH, and CrH in their atmospheres.
230: By mid to late L-types, the hydrides and the ground state neutral
231: lines of Na I and K I have grown in strength and are the dominant
232: absorbers, while the TiO and VO have weakened.
233: Another important feature in the spectra of late L-type
234: and mid T-type brown dwarfs is H${_2}$O; the neutral alkali
235: lines are still strong, and the hydrides are less prominent. In
236: late T-type brown dwarfs, the two major lines of Na I and K I have grown
237: very wide (Kirkpatrick 2005). Because the rainout of condensates
238: clear the atmosphere of most of its metals, the less
239: refractory neutral alkali metals become important in the
240: atmospheres of strongly irradiated, close-in ($\sim0.05$ AU)
241: exoplanets with \teff\ from 800 to
242: 2000 K (Burrows \& Volobuyev 2002; Sudarsky \etal 2003).
243: Sodium and potassium can be particularly important both in
244: brown dwarfs and in the hotter ($\geq\ 1400$ K) of the giant
245: exoplanet classes. Other alkali metals such as lithium should
246: also be present in giant exoplanets, but with lower
247: abundances (Sudarsky et al. 2003).
248: Fortney et al. (2006) find that model atmospheres of
249: HD 149026b with [M/H]=0.5 should show strong absorption by Na and K
250: in the optical spectra. As the \emph{majority} of the planet's mass
251: must be made up of metals, the metallicity of the atmosphere of HD
252: 149026b could be quite high.
253:
254: %In the present search, several atomic lines of the alkali
255: %metals in the wavelength range of 6500-8000 \AA\ are studied,
256: %none of which exhibited variations beyond a 3$\sigma$ level.
257: %We carried out a careful study on the the K line at 7698 \AA\ and
258: %the Li I doublet at 6708 \AA, and discovered no significant
259: %features during transit in those two lines (Fig. 3 and Fig. 5).
260: %Out of transit, both the K line and the Li I doublet exhibit
261: %uncertainties of only $\sim$1.4\% and $\sim$0.4\%.
262: %The part of the spectrum containing the sodium line was
263: %contaminated by iodine lines and we were not able to look
264: %for deviations due to Na.
265:
266:
267: \subsection{Observations}
268:
269: A total of 30 spectra of HD 149026 were obtained at the Keck
270: telescope, using
271: the HIRES echelle spectrometer (Vogt et al. 1994). Eighteen of
272: these spectra were obtained while the planet was transiting the host
273: star.
274: The spectra have a resolution, $R\sim$55000, and span a wavelength
275: range of 3500-8000 \AA\ with typical signal-to-noise ratio of 250.
276: All of these observations were obtained in order to derive velocity
277: information about the star and to model the Rossiter-McLaughlin
278: effect (Wolf \etal 2006). The Rossiter-McLaughlin effect
279: is an apparent deviation in the radial velocity from the Keplerian orbit.
280: This occurs when an extrasolar planet transits across the face of its
281: host star, first obscuring the approaching limb of the
282: rotating star and then the receding limb of the star. The resulting
283: line profile variations at the blue and red edges of the spectral
284: lines is spuriously interpreted as a Doppler shift in our analysis.
285:
286: In order to carry out Doppler analysis,
287: an iodine cell is positioned in front of the spectrometer slit
288: to imprint narrow reference iodine lines. These iodine lines
289: span the wavelength range
290: 4800-6200 \AA\, and have a depth of about 20\%. The iodine lines are
291: used to measure wavelength shifts (velocities) and to derive
292: the instrumental point spread function; however, they
293: interfere with our ability to measure small changes in line
294: absorption strengths. Unfortunately the Na I doublet is contaminated
295: by the
296: presence of iodine and could not be included in our analysis.
297:
298: Redward of 6000 \AA, telluric lines begin to appear in the
299: stellar spectrum. Differences in barycentric velocities at the times
300: of observations
301: create significant shifts in the stellar spectrum relative to
302: the telluric features. Telluric lines that shift in and out of the
303: spectral lines in our analysis are problematic because they will
304: introduce a spurious signal. To avoid this problem, we
305: cross-correlated a telluric spectrum with each stellar spectrum and
306: masked the regions of the spectra containing telluric lines.
307: For those cases where the telluric lines fall
308: on a stellar line, we masked out the entire spectral line to avoid
309: introducing large errors. Doppler shifts arising from dynamical orbital
310: motion correspond to subpixel shifts and can be ignored.
311:
312:
313: \section{Analysis}
314:
315: Our goal was to search for constituents of the illuminated planet
316: atmosphere during transit.
317: In order to carry out the strongest possible analysis, we worked
318: differentially, comparing spectra obtained during transit with
319: those obtained out-of-transit. As a first step, we identified
320: the in-transit and out-of-transit spectra by phase-folding the
321: radial velocity (RV) data with a period of
322: $P=2.875965 +0.000085 -0.000135$ days. This value was calculated
323: by taking the mean of the values provided by Charbonneau et al. (2005),
324: and Wolf et al. (2006) which agree with each other within the
325: stated uncertainties. The time at the center of transit,
326: $T_c (HJD)=2453527.87455+0.00085-0.00091$, was adopted from
327: Charbonneau et al. (2005).
328:
329: Figure 1 represents an update to the phased radial velocity data
330: for HD 149026 presented in Sato et al. (2005).
331: The Keplerian fit is overplotted on the RV data. Fifteen RV
332: measurements
333: made at Keck during transit are shown as open diamonds in the plot.
334: These
335: points were removed when fitting the Keplerian model, because they
336: exhibit the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect and deviate from Keplerian
337: velocities. We froze the period at $P=2.87596$ days to make this fit,
338: and the RMS RV scatter to the fit is 3.07 \ms consistent with our
339: velocity
340: precision. The dashed lines in
341: the plot show the 215 minute transit window.
342:
343: We constructed a high signal-to-noise, continuum normalized template for
344: HD 149026 by averaging all 12 nontransit spectra.
345: Each individual spectrum (both in and out-of-transit)
346: was normalized and cross-correlated with the template
347: spectrum. As a first step, we divided each spectrum by the template,
348: and
349: searched the full
350: wavelength range of 6500-8000 \AA\ by eye for any residuals relative to
351: the template spectrum. We examined 9 spectral orders this way
352: and found no significant changes in the spectrum greater than a few
353: percent. Because of contamination from telluric and iodine
354: lines we were not able to make use of other spectral orders.
355:
356:
357: We then carried out a more robust analysis by searching individual lines
358: such as potassium and lithium in detail.
359: We considered a wavelength bin centered on the K line at 7698 \AA. The
360: template spectrum is overplotted on an in-transit spectrum in Figure 2.
361: The difference of the two spectra (offset from zero) and
362: the line core bin for the K line are also shown in the same figure.
363: We calculated the percent deviation at each pixel by taking
364: the difference between each spectrum and the template spectrum, and
365: dividing
366: by the template spectrum.
367: In order to average over photon noise, we binned the percent
368: difference in
369: wavelength, choosing bins with widths comparable to the sizes of the
370: absorption line cores (8 pixels or 10.4 \kms). The percent
371: deviations are
372: plotted with respect to orbital phase in Figure 3.
373:
374: The individual spectra have signal-to-noise better than 250, so we
375: expect the photon noise to be about 0.4\% in the continuum but larger
376: in cores of the spectral lines. In addition to photon noise, there
377: are systematic errors that arise from imperfect continuum normalization, from
378: the uncertainties in vertically registering the individual spectra against
379: the template, from spectrum-to-spectrum variations in weak telluric
380: lines and perhaps from trace iodine features.
381:
382: To assess our uncertainties, we computed the standard deviation of
383: the percent differences for 12 {\em out-of-transit} spectra in the
384: wavelength bins of interest. Since the out-of-transit spectra should
385: not be contaminated by the planet atmospheres,
386: this represents the typical uncertainties, including Poisson errors and
387: systematic errors. The
388: dashed lines in Figure 3 show the limits where the variations
389: would have exceeded three times the intrinsic fluctuations measured in
390: the out-of-transit spectra.
391:
392: A Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S)
393: test was applied to the in-transit and out-of-transit residuals
394: and suggests that both sets of spectra were drawn from
395: the same parent population. The probability that the two samples were
396: drawn from different populations is only 0.36\%, implying that there
397: is no evidence for an excess of potassium in the irradiated planet
398: atmosphere.
399:
400:
401: The same analysis was applied to the Li I resonance doublet at
402: 6707.82 \AA.
403: Figure 4 shows a comparison of the template and an in-transit
404: spectrum; the 10.4 \kms bin used for the lithium line is also plotted
405: in the same figure.
406: The percent deviations for Li are shown in Figure 5, and the dashed
407: lines show the limit of 3 times the intrinsic fluctuations measured in
408: the out-of-transit spectra. Again,
409: the K-S test shows that the in-transit spectra are statistically
410: indistinguishable from the out-of-transit spectra; no excess lithium
411: absorption is seen during transit.
412:
413:
414: We also scrutinized observations taken near ingress and egress times,
415: for evidence of a leading or trailing atmosphere that could enhance
416: absorption when the planet is not actually transiting.
417: To investigate this possibility, we modified our original analysis of
418: the potassium and lithium lines. In this analysis we constructed a
419: template spectrum from only five out-of-transit spectra
420: which were clearly not near the ingress and egress points.
421: Then we repeated the analysis described above for the K and Li lines.
422: Figure 6 shows the percent deviations for individual observations of
423: the K
424: line relative to the new template and plotted against orbital phase.
425: Figure 7 shows the percent deviations for the Li I line as a function of
426: orbital phase. The dashed horizontal lines again show boundaries
427: that represent three times the RMS scatter in the 5 non-transiting
428: spectra.
429: The nontransit observations near ingress or egress are shown as
430: boundary nontransit points (open triangles) in the plot.
431: Again, the K-S test shows that the line depths do not vary significantly
432: whether the observation was obtained in-transit, near ingress or
433: egress, or
434: out-of-transit. Therefore, we see no line enhancement that suggest a
435: leading
436: or trailing exosphere with a large optical depth.
437:
438:
439: \section{Detectability Simulations}
440:
441: To determine the increase in optical depth in the planet atmosphere that
442: would be needed to produce a detectable signal, we generated synthetic
443: spectra with injected planetary signals of different strengths. We
444: scaled
445: the K line and the Li line in 1\% steps for each of our {\em in-transit}
446: spectra. For each of these pseudo optical depth scaling factors, we
447: applied the two-sided K-S test to find the probability that the
448: simulated
449: transit data
450: were drawn from the same distribution as our out-of-transit template.
451: For our analysis, we used the template constructed from five
452: observations that were not close to ingress or egress.
453: The pseudo optical depth scaling factors for the K line and the
454: resulting K-S statistic,
455: as well as the detection probabilities are listed in Table 1.
456: Small values of the K-S statistic show that the cumulative distribution
457: function of our scaled up in-transit spectra is significantly different
458: from the out-of-transit template, and therefore yield a high probability
459: detection. Alternatively, the detection probability is one minus the
460: K-S statistic. A signal with 1.03 pseudo optical depth scaling factor
461: would have been detected at the 95.16\% confidence level.
462:
463: Figure 8 shows a comparison of in-transit data with a 1.02 pseudo
464: optical
465: depth scaling for the K line. This synthetic data set represents a
466: transit by a planet which imprints a
467: spectral signature 2\% stronger than the signal already present in the
468: stellar spectrum. The top figure shows
469: an overplot of the template and synthetic spectra. We
470: subtracted the template from the synthetic spectrum and offset the
471: differences from zero for visibility on the same scale.
472: The bottom plot in Figure 8 shows the percent deviations
473: for the out-of-transit and synthetically
474: enhanced in-transit data, relative to the template.
475: The K-S test compares these two populations (out-of-transit data
476: and synthetic in-transit data) to calculate the detection probability
477: listed in Table 1.
478:
479: Figure 9 shows the synthetic signal corresponding to a 1.05
480: pseudo optical depth scaling factor for the K line.
481: As with Figure 8, the simulated change of 5\% in the transit
482: spectra is overplotted on the template in the top plot.
483: Figure 9 (bottom plot) shows the percent difference
484: in the 10.4 \kms bin.
485: A K-S test finds a detection probability of 98.8\% for this case.
486: Finally, Figure 10 shows the fake injected signal for a pseudo
487: optical depth
488: factor of 1.08 at the place of the K line. Clearly, an enhancement in
489: line depth of 8\% could even be discovered by simple inspection.
490:
491: We carried out a similar scaling for the Li line at the
492: 10.4 \kms bin at 6707.8 \AA\, and simulated a line with deeper strength.
493: Table 2 shows different values of the pseudo optical depth scaling
494: factor, their corresponding K-S significance level, and the
495: confidence level for detecting the signal.
496: A pseudo optical depth scaling factor of 1.02 results in a 84\%
497: confidence level for detecting lithium, and for a 1.08 scaling
498: factor, the confidence level for detecting the signal is 98.8\%.
499:
500:
501: \section{Discussion}
502: The detection of absorption features in the lower atmosphere of a
503: transiting giant planet requires outstanding precision. Charbonneau
504: \etal (2002), who detected neutral atomic sodium, and Deming \etal
505: (2005), who placed upper limits on CO absorption, obtained a
506: precision 100 times better for HD209458 than we have in our study.
507: They were looking for 0.02\% effects. These studies made use of the
508: \emph{Hubble Space Telescope} and over 1000 ground-based spectra,
509: respectively. However, The detection of species in an extended
510: exosphere need not necessarily require this same precision, because
511: the atmosphere's cross-sectional area is significantly larger (Vidal-
512: Madjar \etal 2003).
513:
514: If one thinks of our 2\% precision as the smallest cross-sectional
515: atmospheric area that we could observe, this corresponds to 2.1 $R_
516: {\rm J}$ on top of the opaque-at-all-wavelengths 0.725 $R_{\rm J}$
517: planet. This large distance makes it immediately clear that we would
518: only be sensitive to species in a large extended exosphere, such as
519: that observed by Vidal-Madjar \etal (2003). Therefore, only if K and
520: Li had a large enough column abundance to remain optically thick past
521: 2.1 $R_{\rm J}$ would these atoms have been detected.
522:
523: Furthermore, these species must remain neutral and atomic, such that
524: they would absorb stellar flux at our specified wavelengths. While
525: these species are likely neutral in the lower atmosphere around $P
526: \gtrsim$1 mbar, where Charbonneau \etal (2002) detected Na in HD
527: 209458b, all exospheric models for highly irradiated giant planets
528: predict temperatures on the order of 10$^4$ K (Lammer \etal 2003,
529: Yelle 2004, Tian \etal 2005). Based on calculations by Yelle (2004)
530: for an HD 2094358b-like planet at 0.04 AU, 2.1 $R_{\rm J}$ likely
531: corresponds to $P \sim 10^{-10}$ bar and $T \sim 2 \times 10^4$ K.
532: This high temperature makes it likely that Li and K will be ionized.
533: Examining K specifically, Lodders \& Fegley (2006) review the
534: chemistry of alkalis in substellar atmospheres and plot a curve where
535: K I and K II have an equal abundance. This curve has only weak
536: pressure dependence. At the lowest pressure considered, 1 mbar, K I
537: and K II are equal in abundance at a temperature of 1900 K. Our
538: exospheric temperatures are likely 5-10 times hotter, meaning K II is
539: strongly preferred. Photodissociation is also likely important and
540: will further reduce the abundances of Li I and K I. Fortney \etal
541: (2003) examined ionization of Na in the atmosphere of HD 209458b and
542: found that photoionization of this species on the planet's limb could
543: proceed to pressures as high as $\sim$ 1 mbar. The atoms Li and K
544: have even lower ionization potentials. Due to the high temperatures
545: and strong photoionizing flux, it appears unlikely that neutral
546: atomic Li and K will be found in significant abundance in the
547: extended atmosphere of HD 149026b. This is consistent with the
548: observations of Charbonneau \etal (2002), who observed Na I in the
549: lower atmosphere, but not the exosphere, of HD 209458b.
550:
551: R.~S.~Freedman has kindly provided us with absorption cross-sections
552: as a function of wavelength for K and Li across our observation
553: bands. These are $\sim 4 \times 10^{-13}$ cm$^2$ for Li and $\sim 1
554: \times 10^{-13}$ cm$^2$ for K. Since we find that the exosphere has
555: an optical depth $\lessim 1$ at 2.1 $R_{\rm J}$, this corresponds to
556: column densities for these atoms in their neutral atomic ground
557: state, of $\lesssim 2 \times 10^{12}$ cm$^{-2}$for Li, and $\lessim 9
558: \times 10^{12}$ cm$^{-2}$ for K, at this radius.
559:
560:
561: A more sensitive search from
562: space-based telescopes could result in a detection of the planetary
563: atmosphere. Ionized alkali species would have noble gas electron
564: configurations and would not
565: have prominent absorption features even for space based observations. We
566: advocate a search for H Lyman $\alpha$ from space to give a first
567: estimate of the extent of an exosphere in HD 149026b. At the same time, since
568: there is a
569: clear link between heavy element mass and atmospheric metallicity in the
570: giant planets in our own solar system, the atmosphere and exosphere of
571: HD 149026b could be richer in metals than HD 209458b. The next elements
572: to search for would probably be C, N, and O species.
573:
574:
575: We gratefully acknowledge the dedication and support of the Keck
576: Observatory staff,
577: in particular Grant Hill for support with HIRES. We thank Paul
578: Butler and
579: Steve Vogt for contributing the observed spectra. We thank Richard
580: Freedman for providing us with opacity data. Thanks to Jessica
581: Lovering for reduction of the CCD images to 1-D spectra. We thank
582: the NOAO
583: and NASA Telescope
584: assignment committees for generous allocations of telescope time.
585: Data presented herein were obtained at the W. M. Keck Observatory
586: from telescope time allocated to the National
587: Aeronautics and Space Administration through the agency's scientific
588: partnership with the California Institute of Technology and the
589: University of
590: California. The Observatory was made possible by the generous financial
591: support of the W. M. Keck Foundation. We thank the Michaelson Science
592: Center for travel
593: support and support through the KDPA program. DAF is a Cottrell
594: Science Scholar
595: of Research Corporation. We acknowledge support from NASA grant (to
596: DAF); a NASA Postdoctoral Program Fellowship (to JJF);
597: NASA grant NCC5-511; NASA grant NAG5-75005 (to GWM).
598:
599:
600:
601: \clearpage
602:
603:
604: \begin{thebibliography}
605:
606: \bibitem[Brown (2001)]{brown01} Brown, T. M. 2001, \apj, 553, 1006
607:
608: \bibitem[Bundy \& Marcy (2000)]{bm00}
609: Bundy, K. A., \& Marcy, G. W. 2000, PASP, 112, 1421
610:
611: \bibitem[Burrows \& Sharp (1999)]{bs99}
612: Burrows, A., \& Sharp, C. M. 1999, \apj, 512, 843
613:
614: \bibitem[Burrows \& Volobuyev (2002)]{bv02}
615: Burrows, A., \& Volobuyev, M. 2002, \apj, 583, 985
616:
617: \bibitem[Butler et al. (1998)]{but98} Butler R. P., Marcy, G. W.,
618: Vogt, S. S., \& Apps, K., 1998, PASP, 110, 1389
619:
620: \bibitem[Charbonneau et al. (2002)]{char01}
621: Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Noyes, R. W., \& Gilliland, R. L.
622: 2002, \apj, 586, 377
623:
624: \bibitem[Charbonneau et al. (2005)]{char05}
625: Charbonneau, D., Winn, J. N., Latham, D. W., Bakos,
626: G., Falco, E. E., Holman, M. J., Noyes, R. W., \& Cs\'ak, B.
627: 2005, \apj, in press
628:
629: \bibitem[Deming \& Brown (2005)]{db05}
630: Deming, D., Brown, T. M., Charbonneau, D., Harrington, J., \&
631: Richardson,
632: L. J. 2005, \apj, 622, 1149
633:
634: \bibitem[Deming et al. (2005)]{dem05}
635: Deming, D., Seager, S., Richardson,
636: L. J., \& Harrington, J. 2005, Nature, 434, 740
637:
638: \bibitem[Fischer et al. (2004)]{fisch04}
639: Fischer, D. A., Laughlin, G., Butler, P., Marcy, G.,
640: Johnson, J., Henry, G., Valenti, J., Vogt, S., Ammons, M.,
641: Robinson, S., Spear, G., Strader, J., Driscoll, P., Fuller, A.,
642: Johnson, T., Manrao, E., McCarthy, C., Munoz, M.,
643: Tah, K. L., Wright, J., Ida, S., Sato, B., Toyota, E.,
644: \& Minniti, D. 2004, \apj, 620, 481
645:
646: \bibitem[Fischer et al. (2006)]{fisch06}
647: Fischer, D. A., Laughlin, G., Marcy, G. W., Butler, R. P.,
648: Vogt, S. S., Johnson, J. A.,
649: Henry, G. W., McCarthy, C., Ammons, M., Robinson, S.,
650: Strader, J., Valenti, J. A., McCullough, P. R.,
651: Charbonneau, D., Haislip, J., Knutson, H. A.,
652: Reichart, D. E., McGee, P., Monard, B., Wright, J. T.,
653: Ida, S., Sato, B., \& Minniti, D. 2006, \apj, 637, 1094
654:
655: \bibitem[Fortney (2005)]{fort05}
656: Fortney, J. J. 2005, \mnras, 364, 649
657:
658: \bibitem[Fortney (2003)]{fort03} Fortney, J. J., Sudarsky, D.,
659: Hubeny, I., Cooper, C. S., Hubbard, W. B., Burrows, A., \& Lunine, J.
660: I. 2003, \apj, 589, 615
661:
662: \bibitem[Fortney et al. (2006)]{fortn06}
663: Fortney, J. J., Saumon, D., Marley, M. S., Lodders, K., \&
664: Freedman, R. S. 2005, \apj, 642, 495
665:
666: \bibitem[Henry et al. (2000)]{henry00}
667: Henry, G. W., Marcy, G. W., Butler, R. P., \&
668: Vogt, S. S. 2000, \apj, 529, L41
669:
670: \bibitem[Hubbard (2001)]{hubb01} Hubbard, W. B., Fortney, J. J.,
671: Lunine, J. I., Burrows, A., Sudarsky, D., \& Pinto, P. 2001, \apj,
672: 560, 413
673:
674: \bibitem[Johnson (2006)]{john06} Johnson, et al. 2006, in press
675:
676: \bibitem[Kirkpatrick (2005)]{kirk05} Kirkpatrick, J. D. 2005, ARA
677: \&A, 43, 195
678:
679: \bibitem[Lammer (2003)]{lamm03} Lammer, H., Selsis, F., Ribas, I.,
680: Guinan, E. F., Bauer, S. J., \& Weiss, W. W. 2003, \apj, 598, L121
681:
682: \bibitem[Lodders (1999)]{lod99} Lodders, K. 1999, \apj, 519, 793
683:
684: \bibitem[Lodders and Fegley (2006)]{lod06} Lodders, K., Fegley, B.,
685: Astrophysics Update v. 2, in press, astro-ph/0601381
686:
687: \bibitem[Sato et al.(2005)]{sat05} Sato, B., Fischer, D. A., Henry,
688: G. W., Laughlin, G., Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W.,
689: Vogt, S. S., Bodenheimer, P., Ida, S., Toyota, E., Wolf, A.,
690: Valenti, J. A., Boyd, L. J., Johnson, J. A., Wright, J. T.,
691: Ammons, M., Robinson, S., Strader, J., McCarthy, C.,
692: Tah, K. L., \& Minniti, D. 2005, \apj, 633, 465
693:
694: \bibitem[Seager \& Sasselov(2000)]{ss00}
695: Seager, S., \& Sasselov, D. D. 2000, \apj, 537, 916
696:
697: \bibitem[Sudarsky et al. (2003)]{sud03} Sudarsky, D.,
698: Burrows, A., \& Hubeny, I. 2003, \apj, 588, 1121
699:
700: \bibitem[Sudarsky et al. (2000)]{sud00} Sudarsky, D.,
701: Burrows, A., \& Pinto, P. 2000, \apj, 538, 885
702:
703: \bibitem[Tian et al.(2005)]{tian05} Tian, F., Toon, O. B., Pavlov, A.
704: A., \& De Sterck, H. 2005, \apj, 621, 1049
705:
706: \bibitem[Vidal-Madjar et al.(2003)]{vm03}
707: Vidal-Madjar, A., Lecavelier des Etangs, A., D\'esert, J. M.,
708: Ballester, G. E., Ferlet, R, H\'ebrard, G., Mayor, M. 2003, \nat,
709: 422, 143
710:
711: \bibitem[Vogt(1994)]{vogt94} Vogt, S. S., et al. 1994, Proc.SPIE,
712: 2198, 362
713:
714: \bibitem[Wolf(2006)]{wolf06} Wolf, A., et al. 2006, in press
715:
716: \bibitem[Yelle(2004)]{yelle04} Yelle, R. V. 2004, Icarus, 170, 167
717:
718: \end{thebibliography}
719:
720: \clearpage
721:
722:
723: \begin{figure}
724: \begin{center}
725: \leavevmode
726: \scalebox{1}{\includegraphics{f1.eps}}
727: \end{center}
728: \caption{Updated phased radial velocities for HD 149026. The velocities
729: measured at Keck during transit are shown as open diamonds in the plot.
730: These measurements
731: exhibit the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect and were removed when fitting
732: a Keplerian model.\label{fig1}}
733: \end{figure}
734:
735: \clearpage
736:
737:
738:
739: \begin{figure}
740: %\centering
741: \begin{center}
742: \leavevmode
743: \scalebox{0.75}{\includegraphics{f2.eps}}
744: \end{center}
745: \caption{The template nontransit spectrum for the K line overplotted
746: on a
747: transit spectrum. The difference of the two (offset from zero) and the
748: 10.4 \kms wavelength bin (dashed lines) are also shown in
749: this plot.\label{fig2}}
750: \end{figure}
751:
752: \clearpage
753:
754:
755: \begin{figure}
756: %\centering
757: \begin{center}
758: %\leavevmode
759: \scalebox{1}{\includegraphics{f3.eps}}
760: \end{center}
761: \caption{Deviations of the K line. The percent deviation is averaged
762: over
763: the 10.4 \kms bin. This percent deviation was calculated by taking the
764: difference between each spectrum and the template nontransit spectrum
765: (which was constructed by averaging 12 nontransit spectra) and
766: dividing by
767: the value of the template spectrum. The dashed lines indicate the
768: 3$\sigma$ detection limits, where $\sigma$ is the RMS scatter in the
769: out-of-transit spectra.\label{fig3}}
770: \end{figure}
771:
772: \clearpage
773:
774:
775: \begin{figure}
776: %\centering
777: \begin{center}
778: %\leavevmode
779: \scalebox{0.75}{\includegraphics{f4.eps}}
780: \end{center}
781: \caption{The template nontransit spectrum for the Li line overplotted
782: on a
783: transit spectrum. The difference of the two (offset from zero) and the
784: 10.4 \kms wavelength bin (dashed lines) are also shown in this
785: plot.\label{fig4}}
786: \end{figure}
787:
788: \clearpage
789:
790:
791: \begin{figure}
792: %\centering
793: \begin{center}
794: %\leavevmode
795: \scalebox{1}{\includegraphics{f5.eps}}
796: \end{center}
797: \caption{Deviations of the Li line. The percent deviation is averaged
798: over the 10.4 \kms bin. This percent deviation is calculated by
799: taking the
800: difference between each spectrum and the template nontransit spectrum
801: (which is constructed by averaging 12 nontransit spectra) and
802: dividing by
803: the value of the template spectrum. The 3$\sigma$ detection limits are
804: plotted as dashed lines.\label{fig5}}
805: \end{figure}
806:
807: \clearpage
808:
809:
810: \begin{figure}
811: \begin{center}
812: \scalebox{1}{\includegraphics{f6.eps}}
813: \end{center}
814: \caption{Deviations of the K line. These deviations were computed
815: using a template spectrum
816: that was constructed from 5 nontransit spectra. The triangles show
817: the boundary nontransit observations which were close to the ingress
818: and were not used in the template nontransit spectrum.\label{fig6}}
819: \end{figure}
820: \clearpage
821:
822: \begin{figure}
823: \begin{center}
824: \scalebox{1}{\includegraphics{f7.eps}}
825: \end{center}
826: \caption{Deviations of the Li line. These deviations were computed
827: using a template
828: spectrum that was constructed from 5 nontransit spectra. The
829: triangles show
830: the boundary nontransit observations which were close to the ingress
831: and were not used in the template nontransit spectrum.\label{fig7}}
832: \end{figure}
833:
834: \clearpage
835:
836:
837:
838:
839:
840: \begin{figure}
841: \centering
842: \scalebox{0.6}{\includegraphics{f8a.eps}}
843: \scalebox{0.6}{\includegraphics{f8b.eps}}
844: \caption{Synthetic data. A 2\% signal is introduced at 7698 \AA.
845: (a) The synthetic transit spectrum overplotted on
846: the template nontransit spectrum. The difference (offset from zero)
847: is also plotted. (b) The percent deviations
848: for such a signal. There is an 84\%\ confidence level to detect such a
849: signal.\label{fig8}}
850: \end{figure}
851:
852: \clearpage
853:
854:
855: \begin{figure}
856: \centering
857: \scalebox{0.6}{\includegraphics{f9a.eps}}
858: \scalebox{0.6}{\includegraphics{f9b.eps}}
859: \caption{Synthetic data. A 5\% signal is introduced at 7698 \AA.
860: (a) The synthetic transit spectrum overplotted on
861: the template nontransit spectrum. The difference (offset from zero)
862: is also plotted. (b) The percent deviations
863: for such a signal. There is a 98.8 \%\ confidence level to detect such
864: a signal.\label{fig9}}
865: \end{figure}
866:
867: \clearpage
868:
869:
870: \begin{figure}
871: \centering
872: \scalebox{0.6}{\includegraphics{f10a.eps}}
873: \scalebox{0.6}{\includegraphics{f10b.eps}}
874: \caption{Synthetic data. An 8\% signal is introduced at 7698 \AA.
875: (a) The difference (offset from zero) of the synthetic transit
876: spectrum and the template nontransit spectrum. (b) The percent
877: deviations
878: for such a signal. Such a signal would clearly be detected.\label
879: {fig10}}
880: \end{figure}
881:
882: \clearpage
883:
884: \include{tab1.tex}
885: \include{tab2.tex}
886:
887:
888:
889:
890: \end{document}
891:
892:
893:
894:
895: