1: 

2: \def\etal{{\frenchspacing\it et al.}}

3: \def\ie{{\frenchspacing\it i.e.}}

4: \def\eg{{\frenchspacing\it e.g.}}

5: \def\etc{{\frenchspacing\it etc.}}

6: \def\rms{{\frenchspacing r.m.s.}}

7: \def\ith{i^{\rm th}}

8: 

9: %%%% EQUATION STUFF: %%%%

10: \def\beq#1{\begin{equation}\label{#1}}

11: \def\eeq{\end{equation}}

12: \def\beqa#1{\begin{eqnarray}\label{#1}}

13: \def\eeqa{\end{eqnarray}}

14: \def\eq#1{equation~(\ref{#1})}

15: \def\Eq#1{Equation~(\ref{#1})}

16: \def\eqn#1{~(\ref{#1})}

17: 

18: %%%% FIGURE STUFF: %%%%

19: \def\fig#1{Figure~\ref{#1}}

20: \def\Fig#1{Figure~\ref{#1}}

21: 

22: \def\bfk{\mbox{\bf k}}

23: \def\bfr{\mbox{\bf r}}

24: \def\bfe{\mbox{\bf e}}

25: \def\bfd{\mbox{\bf d}}

26: \def\bfx{\mbox{\bf x}}

27: \def\bfp{\mbox{\bf p}}

28: \def\bfq{\mbox{\bf q}}

29: \def\ztwodf{z_{\rm 2df}}

30: \def\etal{{\frenchspacing\it et al.}}

31: 

32: \def\expec#1{\langle#1\rangle}

33: 

34: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}

35: 

36: 

37: %\documentclass{article}

38: %\usepackage{emulateapj5,pstricks,apjfonts}

39: \usepackage{emulateapj5}

40: 

41: %\usepackage{emulateapj5,pstricks}

42: \usepackage{graphicx}

43: \usepackage{epsfig}

44: 

45: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}

46: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}

47: \newcommand{\ba}{\begin{eqnarray}}

48: \newcommand{\ea}{\end{eqnarray}}

49: \newcommand{\Om}{\Omega_m}

50: 

51: \shorttitle{Photometric Redshift Estimator for SNe Ia}

52: \shortauthors{Wang}

53: 

54: %\def\baselinestretch{2}

55: \begin{document}

56: 

57: 

58: \title{A Model-Independent Photometric Redshift Estimator 

59: for Type Ia Supernovae}

60: \author{Yun~Wang$^{1}$}

61: \altaffiltext{1}{Homer L. Dodge Department of Physics \& Astronomy, 

62: 			Univ. of Oklahoma,

63:                  440 W Brooks St., Norman, OK 73019;

64:                  email: wang@nhn.ou.edu}

65: 

66: \begin{abstract}

67: 

68: The use of type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) as cosmological standard candles

69: is fundamental in modern observational cosmology.

70: In this letter, we derive a simple empirical photometric redshift estimator 

71: for SNe Ia using a training set of SNe Ia with multiband ($griz$) light-curves

72: and spectroscopic redshifts obtained by the Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS).

73: This estimator is analytical and model-independent; it does not use spectral 

74: templates. We use all the available SNe Ia from SNLS with near maximum

75: photometry in $griz$ (a total of 40 SNe Ia) to train and test our 

76: photometric redshift estimator.

77: The difference between the estimated redshifts $z_{phot}$ and the 

78: spectroscopic redshifts $z_{spec}$, $(z_{phot}-z_{spec})/(1+z_{spec})$, 

79: has rms dispersions of 0.031 for 20 SNe Ia used in the training set, 

80: and 0.050 for 20 SNe Ia not used in the training set. 

81: The dispersion is of the same order of magnitude as the flux uncertainties 

82: at peak brightness for the SNe Ia. There are no outlyers.

83: 

84: This photometric redshift estimator should significantly enhance the

85: ability of observers to accurately target high redshift SNe Ia for spectroscopy

86: in ongoing surveys. It will also dramatically boost the cosmological impact 

87: of very large future supernova surveys, such as those planned for 

88: Advanced Liquid-mirror Probe for Astrophysics, Cosmology and Asteroids (ALPACA),

89: and the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST).

90: 

91: 

92: 

93: \end{abstract}

94: 

95: %\end{document}

96: 

97: \keywords{distance scale -- methods: data analysis -- supernovae: general}

98: 

99: 

100: \section{Introduction}

101: 

102: The use of type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) as cosmological standard candles

103: \citep{Phillips93,Riess95,Wang03}

104: is fundamental in modern observational cosmology. Obtaining the spectroscopic

105: redshifts of SNe Ia is the most costly aspect of supernova surveys.

106: 

107: The use of broadband photometry in multiple filters to estimate redshifts

108: of galaxies has become well established \citep{Weymann99}. 

109: There are two different approaches

110: in estimating photometric redshifts of galaxies.

111: In the empirical fitting method \citep{Connolly95,Wang98},

112: a training set of galaxies with measured spectroscopic redshifts

113: are used to derive analytical formulae relating the redshift to

114: colors and magnitudes.

115: In the template fitting technique (see for example,

116: \cite{Puschell82,Lanzetta96,Mobasher96,Sawicki97}),

117: the observed colors are compared with the predictions of a set of

118: galaxy SED templates.   

119: 

120: The multiband photometry of SNe has been used to select SNe Ia

121: candidates \citep{Dahlen02,Riess04,Johnson06}. \cite{Strolger04}

122: used the template fitting method to estimate the photometric redshift

123: of SN host galaxies.

124: 

125: \cite{Cohen00} carried out a blind test of the predictions of 

126: \cite{Wang98} for galaxies in the Hubble Deep Field North (HDF), 

127: and demonstrated that this technique is capable of reaching

128: a precision of $\sigma[(z_{phot}-z_{spec})/(1+z_{spec})]=0.05$ for the 

129: majority of galaxies with $z<1.3$.

130: In this paper, we modify and further develop the technique

131: of \cite{Wang98}, to derive a simple and model-independent

132: empirical photometric redshift estimator for SNe Ia.

133: This work is made possible by the Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS)

134: First Year Data Release \citep{Astier06}.

135: 

136: We present our method in Sec.2, and the results in Sec.3.

137: Sec.4 contains a simple guide to the use of our photometric

138: redshift estimator. We discuss and summarize in Sec.5.

139: 

140: \section{The Method}

141: 

142: We derive the empirical photometric redshift estimator

143: for SNe Ia by using observables that reflect the properties

144: of SNe Ia as calibrated standard candles.

145: 

146: If SNe Ia were perfect standard candles,

147: the most important observable in estimating their

148: redshifts is the peak brightness. Since the SNLS has the 

149: best sampled light-curves in the $i$ band, we use the $i$

150: band maximum flux. We use the fluxes in $grz$ at the epoch 

151: of $i$ maximum flux to make an effective K-correction

152: to the $i$ flux. Our first estimate of redshift is given by

153: \be

154: z_{phot}^{0} = c_1 + c_2 g_f +c_3 r_f + c_4 i_f + c_5 z_f +c_6 i_f^2

155: \label{eq:z0}

156: \ee

157: where $g_f=2.5\log(f_g)$, $r_f=2.5\log(f_r)$, $i_f=2.5\log(f_i)$,

158: and $z_f=2.5\log(f_z)$, with $f_g$, $f_r$, $f_i$, $f_z$ are fluxes

159: in ADU counts in $griz$ at the epoch of $i$ maximum flux.

160: 

161: Next, we calibrate each SN Ia in its estimated restframe. 

162: We define

163: \be

164: \Delta i_{15}= 2.5 \log(f_i^{15d}/f_i),

165: \label{eq:del_i15}

166: \ee

167: where $f_i^{15d}$ is the $i$ band flux at 15 days after

168: the $i$ flux maximum in the estimated restframe, corresponding

169: to the epoch of $\Delta t^{15d}=15*(1+z_{phot}^{0})$ days after the

170: epoch of $i$ flux maximum.	    

171: 

172: We now arrive at the final photometric redshift estimator

173: \be

174: z_{phot} = c_1 + c_2 g_f +c_3 r_f + c_4 i_f + c_5 z_f +c_6 i_f^2   

175: 		+c_7 \Delta i_{15}

176: \label{eq:z_a}

177: \ee

178: 

179: The coefficients $c_i$ (i=1,2,...,7) are found by using

180: a training set of SNe Ia with $griz$ light-curves and

181: measured spectroscopic redshifts. We use the jackknife 

182: technique \citep{Lupton93} to estimate the bias-corrected

183: mean and the covariance matrix of $c_i$.

184: 

185: 

186: \section{Results}

187: 

188: The Supernova Legacy Survey (SNLS) First Year Data Release 

189: \citep{Astier06} consists of the photometry and redshifts 

190: of 71 SNe Ia. Of these, only 40 have $griz$ light-curves

191: with $gz$ photometry covering the epoch of the maximum

192: flux in the $i$ band. For each of these SN Ia, we fit the

193: fluxes in the $i$ band light-curve to an asymmetrically stretched

194: Gaussian introduced by \cite{Wang99}:

195: \be

196: f=f_0\,\exp\left\{-\left[ \frac{t-t_{peak}}{w (t-t_{start})^q}

197: \right]^2 \right\}.

198: \label{eq:LC fit}

199: \ee

200: All the SNe Ia we used are well fitted by this form in the

201: regions of interest (not too close to the tails).

202: This yields a smooth light curve without spurious features.

203: The $i$ band maximum flux and its corresponding epoch are

204: given by $f_0$ ($f_i=f_0$) and $t_{peak}$ respectively.

205: The fluxes in $grz$ at the same epoch ($t_{peak}$), $f_g$, $f_r$, $f_z$ 

206: are obtained from the $grz$ light-curves using linear interpolation. 

207: We assume a floor of $f_g=200$ (about the size of

208: the flux errors) for SNe Ia with $f_g <0$.

209: Eq.(\ref{eq:z0}) is then used to obtain a first estimate

210: of the SN redshifts, which allows an estimate of $\Delta t^{15d}$.

211: Eq.(\ref{eq:LC fit}) then gives $f_i^{15d}$ needed for

212: Eq.(\ref{eq:del_i15}). Eq.(\ref{eq:z_a}) gives the 

213: final result for the estimated redshifts of the SNe Ia.

214: 

215: Fig.1 shows the photometric redshifts estimated using

216: the estimator derived in this paper, compared to the

217: measured spectroscopic redshifts.

218: The upper panel shows the results for using all 40 SNe Ia

219: in deriving the coefficients in Eq.(\ref{eq:z_a}).

220: The rms dispersion in $(z_{phot}-z_{spec})/(1+z_{spec})$

221: is 0.036. Note that there are no outlyers.

222: This demonstrates the tight correlation between

223: the $griz$ fluxes and $\Delta i_{15}$ with redshifts.

224: The lower panel shows the results for using only the set 

225: containing the most recently discovered 20 SNe Ia in

226: deriving the coefficients in Eq.(\ref{eq:z_a}).

227: These coefficients are then used to predict the redshifts

228: of the other 20 SNe Ia.

229: The rms dispersion in $(z_{phot}-z_{spec})/(1+z_{spec})$

230: is 0.031 for the 20 SNe Ia used in the training set, 

231: and 0.050 for 20 SNe Ia not used in the training set.

232: 

233: To avoid biases that arise from hand picking the SNe Ia

234: used in the training set, we have kept the 40 SNe Ia from SNLS

235: in the order of their discovery, then split them evenly in

236: the middle into two subsets, and used these as the training

237: set and testing set respectively for our photometric 

238: redshift estimator.

239: 

240: Note that the lowest redshift SN Ia in the SNLS $griz$ 

241: sample is at $z=0.263$. Thus this photometric

242: redshift estimator is not calibrated for SNe Ia

243: at $z<0.263$. It will be straightforward to modify

244: and extend this estimator to lower redshifts, as larger 

245: uniform samples of SNe Ia covering

246: a greater range of redshifts become available. 

247: 

248: Peculiar or highly extincted SNe Ia can sometimes

249: be mistaken as high redshift SNe Ia.

250: Table 1 lists 5 peculiar and 2 highly extincted SNe Ia

251: (all are nearby).

252: It demonstrates that the photometric redshift estimator presented

253: here generally yields accurate or negative estimated 

254: redshifts for peculiar and highly extincted SNe Ia.

255: Thus it will not lead to contamination of the high $z$

256: sample by nearby peculiar and highly extincted SNe Ia.

257: \begin{table*}[htb]

258: \caption{Behavior of the photometric redshift estimator

259: for peculiar and highly extincted SNe Ia.}

260: \begin{center}

261: \begin{tabular}{rrrr}

262: \hline

263: SN name & $z_{photo}$ & characteristic & reference \\

264: \hline

265:  SN2005hk & -0.14 & peculiar & \cite{Phillips06b} \\

266:  SN2002cx & -0.12 & peculiar & \cite{Li03}\\

267:  SN1999ac &  -0.1 & peculiar & \cite{Phillips06a}\\

268:  SN1999by &  0.00  & peculiar & \cite{Garnavich04}\\

269:  SN1997br &  -0.01 & peculiar & \cite{Li99}\\

270:  SN2006X  & -0.01 & highly extincted & \cite{Krisciunas06}\\

271:  SN1997cy & -0.12 &  highly extincted & \cite{Germany00}\\

272:  \hline		

273: \end{tabular}

274: %\tablecomments{}

275: \end{center}

276: \end{table*}

277: 

278: 

279: 

280: \section{A Recipe for Using the Photometric Redshift Estimator}

281: 

282: We now give a practical guide to the use of our photometric

283: redshift estimator, Eq.(\ref{eq:z_a}). The coefficients $c_i$ have been

284: derived using 20 SNe Ia, and tested using another 20 SNe Ia

285: [see Fig.1(b)]. The bias-corrected mean and standard deviations of 

286: $c_i$, computed using the jackknife technique, are given by

287: \ba

288:     c_1 &= & 6.122 \pm 2.006 \nonumber\\

289:     c_2 &= & -0.06545 \pm 0.04548 \nonumber\\

290:     c_3 &= & -0.03268 \pm 0.08201 \nonumber\\

291:     c_4 &= & -0.8225 \pm 0.4513 \nonumber\\

292:     c_5 &= & -0.06292 \pm 0.08601 \nonumber\\

293:     c_6 &= &  0.03979 \pm 0.02104 \nonumber\\

294:     c_7 &= &   0.04552 \pm 0.04335

295:     \label{eq:c_i}

296: \ea

297: We give the covariance matrix of $c_i$ in Table 2.

298: 

299: \begin{table*}[htb]

300: \caption{The covariance matrix of $c_i$.}

301: \begin{center}

302: \begin{tabular}{rrrrrrr}

303: \hline\hline

304:   0.4022E+01 & 0.3364E-02 & 0.6515E-01 &-0.8817E+00 & 0.2031E-01 & 0.3988E-01 & 0.3912E-01\\

305:   0.3364E-02 & 0.2068E-02 & 0.3714E-03 & 0.2112E-02 &-0.2602E-02 &-0.2421E-03 & 0.9723E-03\\

306:   0.6515E-01 & 0.3714E-03 & 0.6726E-02 &-0.1750E-01 & 0.1978E-03 & 0.4210E-03 & 0.1924E-03\\

307:  -0.8817E+00 & 0.2112E-02 &-0.1750E-01 & 0.2037E+00 &-0.1203E-01 &-0.9101E-02 &-0.5894E-02\\

308:   0.2031E-01 &-0.2602E-02 & 0.1978E-03 &-0.1203E-01 & 0.7398E-02 & 0.5995E-03 &-0.1549E-02\\

309:   0.3988E-01 &-0.2421E-03 & 0.4210E-03 &-0.9101E-02 & 0.5995E-03 & 0.4429E-03 & 0.2314E-03\\

310:   0.3912E-01 & 0.9723E-03 & 0.1924E-03 &-0.5894E-02 &-0.1549E-02 & 0.2314E-03 & 0.1879E-02\\

311: \hline

312:  \hline		

313: \end{tabular}

314: %\tablecomments{}

315: \end{center}

316: \end{table*}

317: 

318: Here are the steps one should follow in using our photometric redshift estimator:

319: (1) Estimate the flux and epoch of the $i$ band maximum, $f_i$ and $t_{peak}$.

320: (2) Estimate the fluxes in $grz$ at the same epoch, $f_g$, $f_r$, and $f_z$.

321: (3) Use Eq.(\ref{eq:z_a}) with $c_i$ (i=1,2,...,6) given in Eq.(\ref{eq:c_i})

322: and $c_7=0$ to obtain a first estimate of $z_{phot}^0$.

323: (4) Use $z_{phot}^0$ to estimate $\Delta t^{15d}=15*(1+z_{phot}^{0})$.

324: (5) Estimate the $i$ band flux at $\Delta t^{15d}$ days after $t_{peak}$, $f_i^{15d}$,

325: and compute $\Delta i_{15}= 2.5 \log(f_i^{15d}/f_i)$.

326: (6) Use Eq.(\ref{eq:z_a}) with $c_i$ (i=1,2,...,7) given in Eq.(\ref{eq:c_i})

327: to obtain $z_{phot}$.

328: (7) Use the covariance matrix of $c_i$ given in Table 1 to 

329: compute the standard deviation of $z_{phot}$.

330: 

331: Note that the SNLS zeropoints should be used to convert 

332: $g_f$, $r_f$, $i_f$, $z_f$ in Eqs.(\ref{eq:z0}) and (\ref{eq:z_a}) 

333: into magnitudes \citep{Astier06}, and the appropriate conversions

334: should be made if the available photometry is in $BVRI$ instead 

335: of $griz$ \citep{Fuku96}.

336: 

337:  

338:  

339: \section{Discussion and Summary}

340: 

341: We have derived a model-independent photometric redshift estimator, 

342: Eqs.(\ref{eq:z_a}) \& (\ref{eq:c_i}), for SNe Ia that uses only 

343: multiband photometry near maximum light, 

344: and a training set of SNe Ia

345: with multiband photometry and measured spectroscopic redshifts.

346: This estimator is simple and analytical, thus is very easy to

347: implement (see Sec.4).  

348: 

349: The test of our photometric redshift estimator using SNe Ia not 

350: used in the training set demonstrates that this estimator is robust, 

351: and with an accuracy that is of the same order of

352: magnitude as the photometric errors (see Fig.1(b)).

353: The large uncertainties in the coefficients $c_i$ used in 

354: our photometric redshift estimator (see Eq.(\ref{eq:c_i})

355: are indicative of the relatively small sample (20 SNe Ia) used for

356: the training set, as well as photometric errors.

357: Eq.(\ref{eq:c_i}) also shows that the most key constraints

358: on redshift comes from the $g$ and $i$ band photometry.

359: 

360: As the quality of data improves, we expect that our photometric

361: redshift estimator can be further improved to provide more

362: accurate redshift estimates. 

363: This photometric redshift estimator can be easily modified

364: and trained to apply to SNe Ia photometry in any choices

365: of multiple bands.

366: 

367: The measurement of spectroscopic redshifts of SNe is the most

368: costly and constraining aspect of a supernova survey.

369: Our results will allow observers to estimate the redshifts

370: rather accurately based on near maximum 

371: light multiband photometry only (after obtaining spectroscopic redshifts

372: for a modest training set), thus greatly increase the efficiency

373: of supernova spectroscopy of high redshift candidates.

374: 

375: In order to model the systematic uncertainties of SNe Ia

376: as standard candles, it is critical to obtain a very large

377: number of SNe. Future supernova surveys can easily obtain 

378: the multiband photometry of a huge number of supernovae

379: \citep{Wang00,JEDI}, for example, using the

380: Advanced Liquid-mirror Probe for Astrophysics, Cosmology and 

381: Asteroids (ALPACA) \footnote{http://www.astro.ubc.ca/LMT/alpaca/}, 

382: and the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) \footnote{http://www.lsst.org/}.

383: It will not be practical to obtain spectroscopic redshifts

384: for all the SNe Ia found by such surveys. 

385: With the dense sampling and accurate multiband photometry expected 

386: for future supernova surveys, it will be possible to refine

387: our photometric redshift estimator to the accuracies suitable

388: for cosmology \citep{Huterer04}.

389: This will dramatically boost the cosmological impact 

390: of very large future supernova surveys.

391: 

392: 

393: 

394: \bigskip

395: 

396: {\bf Acknowledgements}

397: I am grateful to the SNLS team for releasing their data,

398: including multi-band light-curves in flux units, and

399: to Kevin Krisciunas for providing me with unpublished

400: photometry on SN2006X.

401: This work is supported in part by NSF CAREER grant AST-0094335. 

402: 

403: 

404: 

405: \begin{thebibliography}{}

406: 

407: \bibitem[Astier et al.(2006)]{Astier06}

408: Astier,  P., et al. 2006, A \& A 447, 31-48 (2006) 

409: 

410: \bibitem[Cohen et al.(2000)]{Cohen00}

411: Cohen, J. G., et al. 2000,  ApJ, 538, 29

412: 

413: \bibitem[Connolly et al.(1995)]{Connolly95}

414: Connolly, A. J., et al., 1995, AJ, 110, 2655

415: 

416: \bibitem[Dahlén \& Goobar(2002)]{Dahlen02}

417: Dahlén, T.; Goobar, A. 2002, PASP, 114, 284

418: 

419: \bibitem[Fukugita et al.(1996)]{Fuku96}

420: Fukugita, M., et al. 1996, AJ, 111, 1748

421: 

422: \bibitem[Garnavich et al.(2004)]{Garnavich04}

423: Garnavich, P.M., et al. 2004, ApJ, 613, 1120

424: 

425: \bibitem[Germany et al.(2000)]{Germany00}

426: Germany, L.M., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 320

427: 

428: \bibitem[Huterer et al.(2004)]{Huterer04}

429: Huterer, D., et al. 2004, ApJ, 615, 595

430: 

431: \bibitem[Johnson \& Crotts(2006)]{Johnson06}

432: Johnson, B. D.; Crotts, A. P. S. 2006, AJ, 132, 756

433:   

434: \bibitem[Lanzetta, Yahil, \& Fernandez-Soto(1996)]{Lanzetta96}

435: Lanzetta, K. M.; Yahil, A.; Fernandez-Soto, A. 1996, Nature, 381, 759

436: 

437: \bibitem[Li et al.(1999)]{Li99}

438: Li, W., et al. 1999, AJ, 117, 2709

439: 

440: \bibitem[Li et al.(2003)]{Li03}

441: Li, W., et al. 2003, PASP, 115, 453

442: 

443: 

444: \bibitem[Lupton(1993)]{Lupton93}

445: Lupton, R., 1993, ``Statistics in Theory and Practice'',

446: Princeton University Press

447: 

448: \bibitem[Krisciunas(2006)]{Krisciunas06}

449: Krisciunas, K., 

450: http://www.nd.edu/~kkrisciu/sn2006X.html

451: 

452: \bibitem[Mobasher et al.(1996)]{Mobasher96}

453: Mobasher, B., et al. 1996, MNRAS, 282, L7

454: 

455: \bibitem[Phillips(1993)]{Phillips93}

456: Phillips, M.M. 1993, ApJ, 413, L105 

457: 

458: \bibitem[Phillips et al.(2006a)]{Phillips06a}

459: Phillips, M.M., et al. 2006a, astro-ph/0601684, AJ, in press

460: 

461: \bibitem[Phillips et al.(2006b)]{Phillips06b}

462: Phillips, M.M., et al. 2006b, astro-ph/0611295

463: 

464: \bibitem[Puschell, Owen, \& Laing(1982)]{Puschell82}

465: Puschell, J. J.; Owen, F. N.; Laing, R. A. 1982, ApJ, 257, L57

466: 

467: \bibitem[Riess, Press, \& Kirshner(1995)]{Riess95}

468: Riess, A.G., Press, W.H., and Kirshner, R.P. 1995, ApJ, 438, L17 

469: 

470: \bibitem[Riess et al.~(2004)]{Riess04}

471: Riess, A. G., et al. 2004, ApJ, 607, 665

472: 

473: \bibitem[Sawicki, Lin, \& Yee(1997)]{Sawicki97}

474: Sawicki, M. J.; Lin, H.; Yee, H. K. C., 1997, AJ, 113, 1

475: 

476: \bibitem[Strolger et al.(2004)]{Strolger04}

477: Strolger, L., et al. 2004, ApJ, 613, 200

478:  

479: \bibitem[Wang et al.(2003)]{Wang03}

480: Wang, L. et al., 2003, ApJ, 590, 944 

481: 

482: \bibitem[Wang(1999)]{Wang99}

483: Wang, Y. 1999, ApJ, 525, 651 

484: 

485: % SN pencil beam paper (astro-ph/9806185)

486: \bibitem[Wang(2000)]{Wang00}

487: Wang, Y. 2000, ApJ 531, 676 

488: 

489: \bibitem[Wang, Bahcall, \& Turner(1998)]{Wang98}

490: Wang, Y.; Bahcall, N.; Turner, E. L., 1998, AJ, 116, 2081

491: 

492: \bibitem[Wang et al.(2004)]{JEDI}

493: Wang, Y., et al. 2004 (the JEDI Collaboration), 

494: BAAS, v36, n5, 1560. See also http://jedi.nhn.ou.edu/.

495: 

496: 

497: \bibitem[Weymann et al.(1999)]{Weymann99}

498: Weymann, R.J.; Storrie-Lombardi, L.J.; Sawicki, M.;

499: Brunner, R.J. 1999., Editors, 

500: ``Photometric Redshifts and High Redshift Galaxies'',

501: ASP Conference Series, Vol 191

502: 

503: 

504: 

505: \end{thebibliography}

506: 

507: 

508: %\end{document}

509: \clearpage

510: \setcounter{figure}{0}

511: 

512: \begin{figure}

513: \centering

514: \includegraphics[width=14cm]{f1.eps}

515: \caption{The photometric redshifts estimated using

516: the estimator in Eq.(\ref{eq:z_a}), compared to the

517: measured spectroscopic redshifts.

518: (a) The results for using all 40 SNe Ia

519: in deriving the coefficients in Eq.(\ref{eq:z_a}).

520: (b) The results for using only the set 

521: containing the most recently discovered 20 SNe Ia in

522: deriving the coefficients in Eq.(\ref{eq:z_a}).

523: These coefficients are then used to predict the redshifts

524: of the other 20 SNe Ia.

525: }

526: \label{fig1}

527: \end{figure}

528: 

529: 

530: 

531: \end{document}

532: