1: \documentclass[twocolumn,amsmath,amssymb,prl]{revtex4}

2: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files

3: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point

4: \usepackage{bm}% bold math

5: 

6: \newcommand{\hii}{${\rm HII\ }$}

7: \newcommand{\heii}{${\rm HeII\ }$}

8: \newcommand{\la}{\lesssim}

9: \newcommand{\ga}{\gtrsim}

10: 

11: 

12: \def\etal{{\frenchspacing\it et al.}}

13: \def\bxh{{\bar x_H}}

14: 

15: %Bibliography

16: \def\apj{ApJ}

17: \def\apjs{ApJS}

18: \def\apjl{ApJ Lett.}

19: \def\mnras{MNRAS}

20: \def\prd{Phys. Rev. D}

21: \def\aj{AJ}

22: \def\physrep{Phys. Rep.}

23: \def\araa{ARA\& A}

24: \def\aap{A\& A}

25: \def\pasj{Pub. Astron. Soc. Japan}

26: 

27: \def\beq{\begin{equation}}

28: \def\eeq{\end{equation}}

29: 

30: 

31: 

32: \begin{document}

33: \input{epsf}

34: 

35: \title{Eavesdropping on Radio Broadcasts from Galactic Civilizations with

36: Upcoming Observatories for Redshifted 21cm Radiation}

37: 

38: \author{Abraham Loeb \& Matias Zaldarriaga}

39: \affiliation{Astronomy Department, Harvard University, 60 Garden Street,

40: Cambridge, MA 02138}

41: 

42: \begin{abstract}

43: 

44: The question of whether intelligent life exists elsewhere is one of the

45: fundamental unknowns about our Universe.  Over the past decade $\gtrsim

46: 200$ extra-solar planets have been discovered, providing new urgency for

47: addressing this question in these or other planetary systems.

48: Independently of this perspective, new radio observatories for cosmology

49: are currently being constructed with the goal of detecting 21cm emission

50: from cosmic hydrogen in the redshift range $6\lesssim z\lesssim 15$. The

51: radio frequency band covered by these experiments overlaps with the range

52: of frequencies used for telecommunication on Earth, a regime that was never

53: explored with high sensitivity before.  For example, the Low-Frequency

54: Demonstrator (LFD) of the Mileura Wide-Field Array (MWA), will cover in 8

55: kHz bins the entire frequency range of 80--300 MHz, which is perfectly

56: matched to the band over which our civilization emits most of its radio

57: power.  We show that this and other low-frequency observatories

58: (culminating with the Square Kilometer Array [SKA]) will be able to detect

59: radio broadcast leakage from an Earth-like civilization out to a distance

60: of $\sim 10^{1-2.7}$pc, within a spherical volume containing

61: $10^{(3-8)}\times (\Omega_b/4\pi)^\alpha$ stars, where $\alpha=1$ (or 1.5)

62: for a radar beam of solid angle $\Omega_b$ that remains steady (or sweeps)

63: across the sky. Such a radio signal will show-up as a series of narrow

64: spectral lines that do not coincide with known atomic or molecular

65: lines. The high spectral resolution attainable with the upcoming

66: observatories will allow to monitor the periodic Doppler shift of the

67: broadcasted lines over the planet's orbital period around the parent star.

68: Determination of the parent star mass through observations of its spectrum

69: could then be used to infer the inclination, semi-major axis and

70: eccentricity of the planet's orbit. This, in turn, will allow to estimate

71: the temperature on the planet's surface and to assess whether it can

72: support liquid water or life as we know it.

73: 

74: \end{abstract}

75: 

76: %\paragraph*{Keywords:} CMBR experiments

77: 

78: 

79: %\date{\today}

80: \maketitle

81: 

82: \section{I. Introduction}

83: 

84: Over the past decade, more than 200 new planets outside the solar system

85: were discovered \cite{Marcy}. Because the majority of these planets were

86: detected through precise radial velocity measurements, most of the known

87: extra-solar planets have a mass comparable to that of Jupiter and a tight

88: orbit around a star within a hundred parsec from the sun.  Habitable

89: conditions for life may exist on moons around these giant planets or in

90: other planetary systems that better resemble the solar system.  Given the

91: high detection rate of new planets, the question of whether intelligent

92: life exists elsewhere in the Galaxy is particularly timely.

93: 

94: The search for extra-terrestrial intelligence (SETI) has a long history

95: \cite{Wilson}.  In 1960, a targeted search of two nearby sun-like stars

96: used the 25-meter radio telescope of NRAO \cite{seven}. This project OZMA

97: \cite{eight} was followed by other initiatives using radio telescopes

98: \cite{nine} and some SETI programs continue today (http://www.seti.org/).

99: NASA's program {\it The High Resolution Microwave Search} (HRMS) included

100: both a targeted search at individual stars as well as an all sky survey,

101: but was cancelled by Congress in the early 1990s \cite{ten}.  Funding for

102: SETI initiatives today originates from non-profit organizations such as the

103: Planetary Society \cite{eleven} and the SETI Institute \cite{twelve}. The

104: SETI Institute has revived the targeted search component of HRMS through

105: project PHOENIX. The SERENDIP program at UC Berkeley, as well as the joint

106: venture between the SETI Institute and UC Berkeley involving the

107: construction of the {\it Allen Telescope Array}

108: (http://astron.berkeley.edu/ral/ata/), perform SETI work on radio

109: telescopes that are also used for astronomical studies.

110: 

111: Most of the radio emission from our civilization on Earth originates in the

112: frequency range of 50--400MHz. Table I summarizes the main sources of radio

113: emission, including telecommunication and military radars.  The bandwidth

114: of the signals is narrow, with a fractional frequency width of

115: $(\delta\nu/\nu)_{\rm int} \sim 10^{-9}$ for TV and FM stations and

116: $10^{-5}$ for the military radars.  From a distance, the broadcasted power as

117: a function of frequency would appear as narrow spectral lines.

118: 

119: For practical purposes, the traditional SETI searches focused on high radio

120: frequencies that do not match the frequency range over which our

121: civilization is most luminous (see Table I).  Coincidentally, a new

122: generation of radio observatories is being constructed around the globe

123: with the primary goal of probing the redshifted 21cm (1420 MHz) emission

124: from neutral hydrogen before it was ionized by the first galaxies. As these

125: observatories focus on the redshift range of $z=6$--15, they cover the

126: frequency range of 80--300 MHz. This frequency range happens to coincide

127: with the band over which our civilization is most luminous.

128: Coincidentally, these sensitive new instruments could be suited for SETI

129: work in this frequency band. The goal of this paper is to characterize and

130: motivate the use of these new observatories for SETI studies.  SETI work

131: requires frequency resolution which happens to coincide with the design for

132: one of these forthcoming observatories, the {Mileura Wide-Field Array}

133: (MWA).  We therefore use this experiment as a benchmark example to

134: illustrate our main conclusions.

135: 

136: \section{II. 21 cm Cosmology}

137: 

138: \subsection{II.1 Background}

139:  

140: %The re-ionization history of cosmic hydrogen, left over from the big bang,

141: %provides crucial fossil evidence for when the first stars and black holes

142: %formed in the infant universe.  According to the popular cosmological model

143: %of cold dark matter, dwarf galaxies started to become abundant when the

144: %universe was only hundreds of millions of years old \cite{Loeb}.

145: %Fluctuations in the 21cm brightness from cosmic hydrogen at redshifts

146: %between 6-30 were sourced by the primordial density perturbations created

147: %during the epoch of inflation shortly after big bang, as well as by the UV

148: %radiation from galaxies \cite{FBO}. When the universe was a few hundreds of

149: %millions of years old, the hydrogen distribution had been punched with

150: %holes similarly to a swiss cheese.  These holes were created by the UV

151: %radiation from the first galaxies and black holes, which ionized the cosmic

152: %hydrogen in their vicinity.

153: 

154: The targeted cosmic fluctuations in the 21 cm brightness temperature are

155: small, around 10--20 mK, depending on redshift and angular scale.

156: Detection of these fluctuations is particularly challenging since the sky

157: brightness temperature at the same wavelength is four orders of magnitude

158: higher \cite{Loeb,FBO}. The faintness of the signal will drive the design

159: of instruments to have large collecting areas. During the cosmic epoch of

160: reionization, when the universe is partially ionized, the 21 cm signal has

161: a ``swiss cheese" topology created by the bubbles of ionized hydrogen

162: (which are invisible at 21cm) surrounded by regions in which hydrogen is

163: neutral and can thus be observed \cite{Loeb}. The characteristic bubble

164: size grows during reionization and eventually reaches the large scale of

165: tens of comoving Mpc at the end of reionization, depending on the detailed

166: characteristics of the sources of radiation and the distribution of the gas

167: \cite{WL,FZH,Zahn,Shapiro,furl-21cmsim,sok01,sh03a}. Getting a good measure

168: of the size distribution of these bubbles and other statistical properties

169: of the fluctuations will require mapping tens to hundreds of square degrees

170: (necessary in order to probe many large bubbles at the end of reionization)

171: with at least arcminute resolution (in order to capture the many small

172: bubbles present at the beginning of reionization).  The removal of the

173: strong synchrotron foreground will be achieved by subtracting the sky maps

174: at slightly different frequencies \cite{FBO}. For the cosmological signal,

175: this is equivalent to slicing the hydrogen distribution at different

176: redshifts and hence one should see a different map of its bubble structure,

177: while the synchrotron foreground remains nearly the same.

178: 

179: Given that 21cm cosmology is a new well-funded frontier \cite{Loeb,FBO}, a

180: promising strategy for SETI would be to piggyback on the radio

181: observatories under construction. Next we summarize the characteristics of

182: MWA and other forthcoming experiments and consider their sensitivity for

183: SETI work.

184: 

185: 

186: \subsection{II.2 Upcoming Low-Frequency Observatories}

187: 

188: Several observational groups around the globe are constructing

189: low-frequency arrays that will be capable of mapping the three-dimensional

190: distribution of cosmic hydrogen in the infant universe. These arrays are

191: aiming to detect the long-wavelength (redshifted 21cm) radio emission from

192: hydrogen atoms, and map the three-dimensional distribution of cosmic

193: hydrogen by making measurements over a wide range of frequencies.

194: 

195: 

196: The Low-Frequency Demonstrator (LFD) of the Mileura Wide-Field Array (MWA;

197: see http://web.haystack.mit.edu/arrays/MWA/ for details) is currently under

198: construction, with completion expected in early 2008. The MWA-LFD will

199: cover the frequency range of 80--300MHz in 8kHz bins and include 500

200: dipole-based antenna tiles. Each 4m$\times$4m tile will contain 16 dipole

201: antennas.  Altogether the total collecting area will be 8000 m$^2$ at 150

202: MHz. The tiles will be scattered across a 1.5 km region, providing an

203: angular resolution of a few arcminutes. MWA will be located in a

204: radio-quiet site in Western Australia, called Mileura.  Other experiments

205: whose goal is to detect 21cm fluctuations from the epoch of reionization at

206: $z\sim 6-12$ include the Low-Frequency Array ({\it LOFAR}; {\it

207: http://www.lofar.org}), the Primeval Structure Telescope ({\it PAST}; {\it

208: http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0502029}),

209: %PAPER (www.ursi.org/Proceedings/ProcGA05/pdf/J03a.3(01631).pdf), 

210: and in the more distant future expansions of MWA-LFD with the ultimate

211: observatory being the Square Kilometer Array ({\it SKA}; {\it

212: http://www.skatelescope.org}). 

213: 

214: %Detection of the cosmological signal is challenging. Low-frequency

215: %foreground from radio broadcasting on Earth has to be eliminated by various

216: %filtering techniques. In addition, relativistic electrons within the

217: %Milky-Way galaxy produce synchrotron radio emission as they gyrate around

218: %the Galactic magnetic field. This produces a radio foreground that is at

219: %least a factor of $\sim 10^4$ larger than the expected signal from the

220: %epoch of reionization.  However, by shifting slightly in observed

221: %wavelength one is slicing the hydrogen distribution at different redshifts

222: %and hence one is seeing a different map of its bubble structure, while the

223: %synchrotron foreground remains nearly the same. Theoretical calculations

224: %suggest that it would be possible to extract the cosmic signal by

225: %effectively subtracting the radio images of the sky at slightly different

226: %wavelengths \cite{FBO}.

227: 

228: \section{III. Signal Detectability for SETI}

229: 

230: It is difficult to gauge the likelihood of success for the SETI endeavor

231: \cite{Marko}.  As a result, ambitious and thus expensive projects whose

232: sole purpose is SETI are unlikely to be funded. It is thus particularly

233: fruitful to understand the synergies and complementarities of other

234: scientific projects with various types of SETI searches.

235: 

236: To motivate the potential of this approach we first summarize the expected

237: sensitivity of MWA-LFD and other experiments. To assess what such detection

238: levels could mean for SETI we use the current radio emission by our

239: civilization as an example and also compare with other past and future SETI

240: studies.

241: 

242: It is important to note that high-redshift 21 cm surveys will operate at

243: different frequencies than past and current SETI searches, making them

244: complementary. They will also have very different observing strategies and

245: so they will explore a different part of the signal parameter space.

246: 

247: 

248: \subsection{III.1 Possible Signals: Our Civilization as an Example}

249: 

250: Forecasting how the signals from another civilization might look like is

251: not an easy proposition. It is clear from the start that although one might

252: be able to come up with educated guesses it is very possible that if we

253: ever detect such a signal it will look different from our initial guesses.

254: 

255: For example, one might argue that the characteristics of the signal might

256: be very different if the signal we receive was broadcasted intentionally by

257: another civilization to announce its presence, a ``beacon" of sorts, or

258: just the leakage of signals that the extra-terrestrials produce for their

259: own communication either within their own planet or between

260: spacecrafts \footnote{Note that aside from planet-based broadcasting, there

261: is a possibility of discovering communication stations that were

262: distributed throughout the Galaxy by another civilization which by itself

263: resides far away (G. Laughlin, private communication).}.

264: 

265: Whether we look for a beacon or unintentional leakage, the signal we are

266: after must posses some characteristic that will enable us to distinguish it

267: from naturally produced signals. Examples of such characteristics might be

268: peculiar time variability and very narrow frequency structure centered on a

269: frequency where there are no atomic or molecular lines.

270: 

271: A good starting point when considering ``leakage"-type signals is the

272: signal from our own civilization. A summary of the strongest emission

273: component from the Earth is given in Table \ref{earth} (adopted from

274: Ref. \cite{sullivan}). The strongest sources of emission in terms of their

275: power are military radars \footnote{Table I indicates that it would be

276: easier to detect militant civilizations than their peaceful analogs. If

277: this extrapolation from our own experience is to be believed, then we

278: should make any effort to limit communication with the brightest

279: civilizations in a survey.} ($[\delta\nu/\nu]_{\rm int}\sim 10^{-5}$),

280: followed by TV stations and FM radio stations ($[\delta\nu/\nu]_{\rm int}

281: \sim 10^{-9}$). In terms of power per Hz, the strongest signal originates

282: from TV stations.  These two signals are emitted in a fairly isotropic

283: way. If our civilization was using a telescope to beam those signals as a

284: beacon or perhaps to communicate with a distant spacecraft, then the

285: effective emitted power could have been much larger. Of course in that case

286: only a correspondingly smaller fraction of distant observers would detect

287: the signal at any given time. It is possible then that the signal we are

288: after, would be much stronger than our own emission but with a small duty

289: cycle.

290: 

291: It is important to keep in mind that various physical processes would

292: broaden the bandwidth or modulate the frequency of the emitted radio

293: signal. In particular the motion of the planet around its parent star and

294: the spin of the planet, both introduce shifts. The shifts are

295: especially important for long integration times with narrow bandwidths. For

296: the case of the Earth, the spin velocity $v_{\rm spin}$ would introduce a

297: shift of order,

298: \begin{eqnarray}

299: \left({\delta \nu \over \nu}\right)_{\rm spin}& =& {v_{\rm spin} \over c}

300: \approx 1.5 \times \ 10^{-6} ; \\ \delta \nu_{\rm spin} & \approx & 0.15\

301: {\rm kHz} \times \left( {\nu \over 100 \ {\rm MHz}}\right);

302: \end{eqnarray}

303: over the course of a day.  The envelope of this variability will be

304: modulated by the orbital velocity $v_{\rm orb}$ around the sun over the

305: course of a year with,

306: \begin{eqnarray}

307: \left({\delta \nu \over \nu}\right)_{\rm orb}& =& {v_{\rm orb} \over c}

308: \approx 10^{-4} ; \\ \delta \nu_{\rm orb} & \approx & 10\ {\rm kHz} \times

309: \left( {\nu \over 100 \ {\rm MHz}}\right).

310: \end{eqnarray}

311: The significance of these frequency drifts will depend on the duration of

312: the observations which could be very long, of order months, in the context

313: of 21 cm experiments.

314: 

315: If the transmitters are not distributed uniformly on the surface of the

316: planet, the planet's spin will also introduce a modulation in the intensity

317: of the signal. Of course if the signal originates from a beacon then it

318: might be significantly beamed or pulsed. The modulations of both intensity

319: and frequency could eventually become clues that the emission originates

320: from another civilization or at least from a planet around a star.

321: 

322: In summary, the generic property of the expected signals are that they are

323: narrow in frequency and that they might have interesting time variability

324: as a result of both the orbital motion of the planet and its rotation

325: around its axis, in addition to the variability introduced at the

326: transmission.

327: 

328: Other observing techniques should be used to follow-up on any radio

329: detection of planets in an attempt to check whether it could host life as

330: we know it. The {\it habitable zone} is the range of orbital radii over

331: which liquid water may exist on a rocky planet, so that life as we know it

332: could develop there based on a similar network of chemical reactions to the

333: one that existed on the early Earth. Obviously, the habitable zone

334: straggles the distance of 1AU for a sun-like star, but its location changes

335: for other stellar types \cite{Lopez,Forget}. The first extensive discussion

336: on habitability was provided by Kasting et al. \cite{Kasting,Kasting2}.

337: Existing observational techniques could find planets in the habitable zone

338: in the future \cite{Charb}. Proposed space missions, such as the

339: Terrestrial Planet Finder

340: (http://tpf.jpl.nasa.gov/earthlike/earth-like.html) and Darwin

341: (http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/area/index.cfm?fareaid=28), focus on

342: searches for signatures of life on extrasolar planets.  

343: 

344: So far, no extrasolar planet was found to reside within the habitable zone

345: of its parent star (but see the indirect constraints in Refs.

346: \cite{Jones,Raymond}). Obviously, all planets which will be found to reside

347: in the habitable zone should be searched with great sensitivity for radio

348: signals, and vice versa.  The different search methods are complementary

349: and one should use all probes at our disposal to constrain the physical

350: conditions on such planets and determine whether they might support

351: life. This obviously includes spectroscopy of the parent star, which would

352: yield its distance, spectral type, as well as the location of its habitable

353: zone.

354: 

355: 

356: \subsection{III.2 Experiment Characteristics}

357: 

358: The 21 cm signal from high-redshift hydrogen is faint, leading to

359: brightness temperature fluctuations of the order of $20$ mK on top of a sky

360: brightness of $\sim 200$ K dominated by Galactic synchrotron radiation

361: \cite{FBO}.  The HII regions responsible for a large part of the signal

362: subtend tens of arcminutes on the sky \cite{WL}, and so large fields of

363: view will be required to eliminate uncertainties due to cosmic variance.

364: The MWA-LFD and other future surveys will be designed to have large

365: collecting areas to be able to detect the weak 21cm signal, with fields of

366: view that cover many square degrees on the sky. Observing the 21 cm signal

367: will also require integrating on those fields for long periods of time.

368: Finally the technique that will be used to distinguish the high-redshift 21

369: cm signal from various astrophysical foregrounds and radio frequency

370: interference involves mapping the signal with high frequency resolution.

371: 

372: As a result, {\it future experiments will have extremely good sensitivity

373: and could thus place strong limits on potential SETI signals}. The

374: extensive time coverage would allow the study of signals which might only

375: be transmitted in our direction for a small fraction of the time.

376: 

377: The point source sensitivity of an interferometer composed of antennae of

378: individual area $A_a$ and $N_b$ baselines that observes for a time $t_o$

379: with a bandwidth $\Delta \nu$ is, \beq F_{\rm PSS} = C {2 k T_{sys} \over

380: A_a \sqrt{\Delta\nu t_o N_b}},

381: \label{sens}

382: \eeq where $C$ is a constant of order unity that depends on the spatial

383: distribution of baselines. The system temperature, $T_{sys}$, is dominated

384: by the synchrotron emission from our Galaxy and is thus frequency dependent

385: and variable across the sky. 

386: 

387: For the MWA-LFD, the point source sensitivity at $200$ MHz is\footnote{The

388: value of $F_{\rm PSS}$ for other frequencies can be found at

389: http://web.haystack.mit.edu/arrays/MWA/LFD .}, \beq F_{\rm PSS} = 0.4 \

390: {\rm mJy} \ \left({\Delta \nu \over 8 \ {\rm kHz}}{ t_o \over {\rm

391: month}}\right)^{-1/2}, \eeq where the current design aims at

392: $\Delta\nu=8$kHz.  For a given distance to the source $d$, this formula can

393: be turned into the minimum power required of the transmitter for MWA to see

394: it,

395: \begin{eqnarray} P_{\rm min} &=& 3.5 \times 10^{12} {\rm W} \nonumber \\

396: & \times &

397: \left({d \over 100 {\rm pc}}\right)^2 \times \left({\Delta \nu \over 8 \

398: {\rm kHz}}\right)^{1/2} \times \left({t_o \over {\rm month}}\right)^{-1/2}.

399: \label{pm}

400: \end{eqnarray}

401: Here it is assumed that the intrinsic bandwidth of the signal

402: $\delta\nu_{\rm int}$ is much smaller than $\Delta \nu$. In this regime one

403: gains by making $\Delta \nu$ smaller.

404: 

405: Note that {\it the power level in equation (\ref{pm}) is only an order of

406: magnitude larger than the present-day military radar emission from the

407: Earth (Table I) even for a source which is 100 pc away}. It is plausible

408: that the actual emission from other civilizations would be stronger. It is

409: also possible that the emission would be beamed or pulsed so that it would

410: be visible to us for only a small fraction of the time. The required

411: minimum power scales as $d^2$. Thus a duty cycle of

412: $10^{-2}$ requires a source to be merely 10 times closer for the same

413: emitted peak power.  One way to increase the sensitivity is to reduce the

414: bandwidth of the observations down to $(\delta \nu)_{\rm int}$ below which

415: there is no additional gain.

416: 

417: Figure \ref{distance} shows the power required for a transmitter (assuming

418: isotropic emission) to be detectable by MWA-LFD as a function of distance

419: to the source. The three solid lines show results for an hour, a day or a

420: month of integration on a field. For a month of integration time, the Earth

421: radio signal could be detected out to a distance of $\sim 23$ pc interior

422: to which there are $\sim 10^{3-4}$ stars over the whole sky (the field of

423: view of MWA is about a percent of the sky). However, only a fraction

424: $(\Omega_b/4\pi)^\alpha$ of the military radars may be beamed in our

425: direction, where $\alpha=1$ (or 1.5) for a radar beam of solid angle

426: $\Omega_b$ that remains steady (or sweeps) across the sky. We also plot the

427: expected one-month sensitivity of LOFAR, MWA 5000 (a future extension of

428: MWA with ten times its collecting area) and the SKA -- which would be able

429: to detect the Earth out to a distance of 0.2 kpc. We note that the use of

430: the SKA in the broader context of the exploration of life was discussed in

431: Ref.  \cite{Lazio}.

432: 

433: Another figure of merit that can be used to compare MWA with other previous

434: and future SETI searches is the flux, in ${\rm W~m^{-2}}$, that must be

435: arriving on Earth for a source to be detectable, \beq f_{\rm PSS} = 3

436: \times 10^{-26} {\rm W}\ {\rm m}^{-2} \times \left({\Delta \nu \over 8\

437: {\rm kHz}}\right)^{1/2} \times \left({t_o \over {\rm month}}\right)^{-1/2}.

438: \eeq

439: 

440: \begin{figure} [ht]

441: \centerline{\epsfxsize=3.4in \epsfbox{fig.ps}}

442: \caption{The minimum detectable radio power $P_{\rm min}$ for various

443: high-redshift 21 cm surveys and observing times as a function of the

444: distance to the source. We assume for simplicity that the source emits

445: isotropically and steadily. For the MWA we adopt a bandwidth of

446: $\Delta\nu=8$ kHz and observing times of 1 hour, 1 day and one month (solid

447: lines from top to bottom). We assumed the same bandwidth for LOFAR, for a

448: future extension of MWA with ten times its collecting area (called MWA

449: 5000) and for the SKA.  In those cases we only plot the sensitivity for a

450: one month integration. The dashed line delineates the power per solid

451: angle, $P_\Omega$, along the beam of military radars [Ballistic Missile

452: Early Warning Systems ({\it BMEWS})] from our civilization.}

453: \label{distance}

454: \end{figure}

455: 

456: The promise of future 21 cm surveys is evident from Figure

457: \ref{distance}. As the collecting area increases, the arrays will probe

458: larger distances.

459: 

460: 

461: \subsection{III.3 Comparison with Other SETI Probes}

462: 

463: Next we compare the sensitivity of MWA with other SETI probes in the radio

464: frequency range \cite{tarter}. A very important difference between MWA and

465: previous probes involves its sensitivity to lower frequencies. Most radio

466: SETI programs have searched above 1 GHz and around the unredshifted 21 cm

467: line at 1.42 GHz. There were several reasons to focus on this frequency

468: range. First, the sky brightness temperature is smaller above 1 GHz as the

469: synchrotron emission from relativistic electrons in our galaxy becomes

470: sub-dominant relative to the Cosmic Microwave Background. Second, when

471: looking for a ``beacon" type signal it could be argued that other

472: civilizations might center their transmitters around the 1.42 GHz line with

473: the hope of reaching astronomers using that line for astronomical

474: observations. It is difficult to gauge whether such an argument carries

475: much weight.

476: 

477: Of course, our own radio broadcasting is far greater at lower frequencies,

478: so at least for the purpose of ``eavesdropping" on another civilization,

479: lower frequencies might be more interesting. The fact that our civilization

480: makes much use of the lower frequency spectrum presents severe technical

481: difficulties for SETI programs trying to operate in this frequency range as

482: they have to filter-out our own radio-frequency interference (RFI). Thus,

483: 21cm cosmology is a case in which an unrelated science driver will open a

484: new and potentially {\it more suitable} window for SETI programs. The

485: interest in high-redshift 21 cm surveys means that there will be

486: significant efforts to control RFI by, for example, placing the

487: observatories in remote locations with the lowest RFI record (such as

488: China, Australia, Africa, or even the moon), as well as developing new

489: filtering techniques for RFI and ionospheric noise. Obviously SETI programs

490: could benefit significantly from these technological developments.

491: 

492: A good summary of previous and planned SETI programs can be found in

493: Ref. \cite{tarter}. Here we will only comment on some of the most sensitive

494: of those programs and focus our attention only on radio band examples. In

495: doing so, we would like to demonstrate that SETI work with the MWA-LFD and

496: other 21 cm surveys could have very competitive sensitivities.

497: 

498: The SETI programs carried out at Arecibo and the Parkes telescope in

499: Australia achieved the best sensitivities with their very large collecting

500: areas. For example, the Phoenix project carried out by the SETI institute

501: reached a flux limit of $10^{-26}~{\rm W~m^{-2}}$ by searching the nearest

502: 600 stars at frequencies in the range 1.2--3 GHz with a frequency

503: resolution of 1 Hz. The SERENDIP IV project out of UC Berkeley also uses

504: Arecibo to monitor the sky visible from Arecibo up to a flux of $5 \times

505: 10^{-24}~{\rm W~m^{-2}}$. It covers the sky every three years and looks for

506: recurring signals. It explores the frequency range $1.420\pm 0.05$ GHz with

507: a 0.6 Hz bandwidth. A companion SERENDIP search with similar

508: characteristics operates from the Parkes telescope.

509: 

510: The collecting area of Arecibo is approximately $7\times 10^4$ m$^2$,

511: roughly ten times that of MWA-LFD. By working at higher frequencies where

512: the sky is less bright, the sensitivity of previous surveys was

513: enhanced. The MWA-LFD with its deep observations of certain fields will be

514: competitive or even better than those previous surveys at least for steady

515: signals.  Production of detailed images from the epoch of reionization will

516: require an increase in collecting area of future arrays by a factor of

517: 10--100. Arrays of dipoles such as the MWA-LFD, have a much larger field of

518: view, around 400 square degrees at 200 MHz, while a telescope like Arecibo

519: has a field of view of less that a tenth of a square degree.  The long

520: observing times required for high-redshift 21 cm observations also open a

521: new regime for SETI observations.

522: 

523: The next generation of SETI work will be carried out by the Allen Telescope

524: Array (ATA), a joint venture of the SETI Institute and UC Berkeley. The

525: will include about three hundred and fifty 6 m dishes. The plan is to

526: survey of order $10^5$ stars three times in the frequency range of $1-10$

527: GHz over a period of 10 years.  This instrument has a collecting area

528: similar to that of the MWA-LFD but a smaller field of view.  It is

529: complementary to what could be done with proposed 21 cm arrays over a

530: different range of frequencies. Again, the higher frequencies lead to a

531: smaller sky temperature and thus to a better raw sensitivity in terms of

532: $P_{\rm min}$.  But the larger collecting area of future extensions of the

533: MWA-LFD will partially compensate for their larger system temperature.  The

534: observing strategy of high-redshift 21 cm surveys, namely deep integration

535: on selected fields, is also very different from the ATA survey. It will

536: open a window to search for other types of signals, such as those that

537: could be intense but with a short duty cycle, perhaps appearing for a short

538: time once every rotation period of the planet.

539: 

540: It is very important to stress that all these different SETI projects have

541: fairly different characteristics in terms of frequency coverage, time spent

542: observing any given source, or bandwidth of the observation. Given our

543: ignorance about the characteristics of the extra-terrestrial signal, it is

544: certainly worth using all these different instruments for the search.  In

545: this context, it is clear that the redshifted 21 cm observatories could

546: attain unique sensitivities that were never realized before.

547: 

548: 

549: \section{IV. Discussion}

550: 

551: Figure 1 indicates that integration times of months to years on upcoming

552: low-frequency observatories will provide an unprecedented sensitivity to

553: radio broadcasts from an Earth-like civilization at Galactic distances of

554: 0.01--0.5 kpc, within a spherical volume containing $10^{(3-8)}\times

555: (\Omega_b/4\pi)^\alpha$ stars, where $\alpha=1$ (or 1.5) for a radar beam

556: of solid angle $\Omega_b$ that remains steady (or sweeps) across the sky.

557: The challenge to detect redshifted 21cm radiation from the infant Universe

558: will open a new opportunity for eavesdropping on the leakage of signals

559: from Galactic civilizations in the same band of radio frequencies that our

560: civilization uses for communication. Such an opportunity never existed

561: before.

562: 

563: SETI work requires an optimized algorithm and software for extracting the

564: artificial signal out of the data stream of upcoming observatories aiming

565: to detect the cosmological 21cm brightness fluctuations. If not searched

566: for, the desired SETI signal may be lost.  Processing of the data will be

567: done by filtering-out unwanted foregrounds. In particular, the

568: radio-communication signal from a faint Earth-like source can be separated

569: from the frequency structure of the redshifted 21cm fluctuations through

570: its time dependence.

571: 

572: The desired radio signal would appear as a series of spectral lines whose

573: frequencies would be Doppler shifting continuously on both the spin period

574: of the brodcasting planet (a day for the Earth) as well as its orbital

575: period around the parent star (a year for the Earth). The planet-star

576: system resembles a spectroscopic binary in which one of the objects (the

577: planet) is a test particle in the gravitational field of a companion object

578: (the star) whose mass can be inferred from its emission spectrum through

579: follow-up observations with optical-infrared telescopes.  Under these

580: conditions, measurements of the planet's Doppler effect over a full orbit

581: would determine the inclination, eccentricity and semi-major axis of the

582: planet's motion around the star \footnote{The observed period and projected

583: velocity can be used to infer the inclination if the mass of the star is

584: known; see S. Shapiro \& S.A. Teukolsky, Black Holes, White Dwarfs, and

585: Neutron Stars: The Physics of Compact Objects, Wiley-New York (1983),

586: p. 254. The orbital period, projected velocity, and inclination, can then

587: be used to derive the semi-major axis, from which the eccentricity can be

588: deduced based on the period. The results can be tested for consistency by

589: observing the centroid shift of the radio image as a function of time, as

590: this would provide an independent measure of the distance and hence the

591: luminosity of the star.}.  The inferred orbital parameters can then be used

592: to estimate the temperature on the surface of the planet and to assess

593: whether it is likely to support liquid water or life as we know it.

594: 

595: The optimization of the detection algorithm could also lead to changes in

596: hardware or observing strategy with the goal of improving the prospects for

597: the detection of a SETI signal.  Although MWA-LFD provided the benchmark

598: example in this paper, our conclusions extend to other experiments such as

599: LOFAR, PAST, or the SKA.  In parallel to developing the detection and

600: analysis filter for these experiments, it would be prudent to compile an

601: extended catalog of all nearby stars with known planets where low-frequency

602: radio emission might be detectable.  This work will extend previous

603: analysis \cite{Turnbull} to include additional stars where planets were

604: found recently, as well as to span larger distances than those probed by

605: other SETI experiments.

606: 

607: 

608: \bigskip

609: \paragraph*{Acknowledgments}

610: 

611: We acknowledge support from the FQXi grant \#RFP1-06-22 and Harvard

612: university funds for A.L.; M.~Z.~is supported by the Packard and Sloan

613: foundations, NSF AST-0506556 and NASA NNG05GG84G. We thank the anonymous

614: referee for useful comments.

615: 

616: \begin{references}

617: 

618: \bibitem{Marcy} G. Marcy, R. P. Butler, D.  Fischer, S. Vogt, J. T. Wright,

619: C. G. Tinney, C.~G., \& H. R. A. Jones, Progress of Theoretical Physics

620: Supplement, {\bf 158}, 24 (2005); see also

621: http://www.ifa.hawaii.edu/UHNAI/ppv.htm

622:  

623: \bibitem{Wilson} T. L. Wilson, Nature, {\bf 409}, 1110 (2001).

624: 

625: \bibitem{seven} F. D. Drake, in ``Current Aspects of Exobiology'',

626: eds. G. Mamikunian \& M. H. Briggs, pp. 323-345, Pergamon Press, New-York

627: (1965).

628: 

629: \bibitem{eight} L. F. Baum, ``The Wizard of Oz'', Bobbs-Merrill, New-York

630: (1990).

631: 

632: \bibitem{nine} J. Tarter, in ``The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence'', eds. K. I. Kellerman \& G. A. Seilstad, pp. 79-98,

633: National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Greenbank (1986).

634: 

635: \bibitem{ten} J. Tarter, \& M. Klein, in ``Progress in the Search for

636: Extraterrestrial Life, ed. G. S. Shostak, ASP Conf. Ser. {\bf 74}, 419-422,

637: The Astronomical Society of the Pacific (1995)

638: 

639: \bibitem{eleven} T. McDonough, in ``Progress in the Search for

640: Extraterrestrial Life, ed. G. S. Shostak, ASP Conf. Ser. {\bf 74}, 419-422,

641: The Astronomical Society of the Pacific (1995).

642: 

643: \bibitem{twelve} T. Pierson, in ``Progress in the Search for

644: Extraterrestrial Life, ed. G. S. Shostak, ASP Conf. Ser. {\bf 74}, 443-444,

645: The Astronomical Society of the Pacific (1995).

646: 

647: \bibitem{Marko} M. Horvat, Int. Journal of Astrobiology, {\bf 5}, 143

648: (2006).

649: 

650: \bibitem{Lazio} T. J. W. Lazio, J. C. Tarter, \& D. J. Wilner, New

651: Astronomy Reviews, {\bf 48}, 985 (2004).

652: 

653: \bibitem{tarter}

654: J. Tarter,

655: %``The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI),''

656: Annu, Rev. Astron. Astrophys., {\bf 39}, 511 (2001).

657: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0311514;%%

658: 

659: \bibitem{sullivan}

660: W. T. Sullivan III, S. Brown, C. Wetherill,  

661: %``Eavesdropping: The radio Signature of the Earth,''

662: Science, {\bf 199}, 377 (1978).

663: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0405528;%%

664: 

665: \bibitem{Lopez} B. Lopez, J. Schneider, \& W. C. Danchi, Astrophys. J.,

666: {\bf 627}, 974 (2005).

667: 

668: \bibitem{Forget} F. Forget, Earth Moon and Planets, {\bf 81}, 59 (2000).

669: 

670: \bibitem{Kasting} J. F. Kasting, D. W. Whitmire, \& R. T. Reynolds,

671: Icarus {\bf 101}, 108, (1993).

672: 

673: \bibitem{Kasting2} J. F. Kasting, \& D. Catling, Ann. Rev. Astr.  \&

674: Astrophys., {\bf 41}, 429 (2003).

675: 

676: \bibitem{Charb} D. Charbonneau, T. M. Brown, A. Burrows, \& G.  Laughlin,

677: to appear in Protostars and Planets V, (2006), preprint astro-ph/0603376

678: 

679: \bibitem{Jones} B. W. Jones, P. N. Sleep, \& D. R. Underwood,

680: Astrophys. J. {\bf 649}, 1010 (2006).

681: 

682: \bibitem{Raymond} S. N. Raymond, Astrophys. J. Lett.,

683: {\bf 643}, L131 (2006).

684: 

685: \bibitem{Loeb} A. Loeb, ``First Light'', to be published by Springer-Verlag

686: (2006); preprint astro-ph/0603360.

687: 

688: \bibitem{FBO} S. Furlanetto, S. P. Oh, \& F. Briggs, Phys. Rep., in press

689: (2006); preprint astro-ph/0608032.

690: 

691: \bibitem{WL} J. S. B. Wyithe, \& A. Loeb, Nature, {\bf 432}, 194 (2004).

692: 

693: \bibitem{FZH} S. R. Furlanetto, M. Zaldarriaga, \& L. Hernquist,

694: Astrophys. J., {\bf 613}, 1 (2004).

695: 

696: \bibitem{Zahn} O. Zahn, et al. Astrophys. J., submitted (2006); preprint

697: astro-ph/0604177

698: 

699: \bibitem{Shapiro} G. Mellema, I. T. Illiev, U.-L. Pen, \& P. R. Shapiro,

700: Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc., in press (2006); preprint astro-ph/0603518

701: 

702: \bibitem{furl-21cmsim} S.~Furlanetto, A.~Sokasian and L.~Hernquist, Mon.\

703: Not.\ Roy.\ Astron.\ Soc.\, {\bf 347}, 187 (2004).

704: 

705: \bibitem{sok01} A. {Sokasian}, T. {Abel}, \& L. {Hernquist}, NewA, {\bf

706: 6}, 359 (2001).

707: 

708: \bibitem{sh03a}

709: V. {Springel}, \& L. {Hernquist}, \mnras, {\bf 339}, 289; 312 (2003).

710: 

711: \bibitem{Turnbull} M. C. Turnbull, \& J. C. 

712: Tarter, Astrophys. J. Suppl., {\bf 145}, 181; {\bf 149}, 423 (2003).

713: 

714: 

715: \end{references} 

716: 

717: \bigskip

718: \bigskip

719: \bigskip

720: \bigskip

721: \bigskip

722: \bigskip

723: \bigskip

724: \bigskip

725: \bigskip

726: \bigskip

727: \bigskip

728: \bigskip

729: 

730: \begin{table}[htdp]

731: \caption{Characteristics of the largest components of radio emission from

732: the Earth (adopted from \cite{sullivan} and public web sites on {\it

733: BMEWS}). The power per solid angle $P_\Omega$ along the beam of military

734: radars ({\it BMEWS}) is larger by two orders of magnitude than the total

735: power entry in the table.}

736: \begin{center}

737: \begin{tabular}{||c|c|c|c|c|c|c||}

738: \hline\hline

739: Service & Freq.  & Transmitters & Max. Power  &  Bandwidth  & Power & Power/Hz\\ 

740:  & (MHz) &(No.) & per Tr. (W) & (Hz) & (W) & (W/Hz) \\ \hline

741:  & & & & & & \\

742: Military & $\sim 400$ & 10 & $2 \times 10^{8}$ & $10^{3}$ & $2 \times 10^{9}$ & $2 \times 10^6$\\

743: TV & 40-850 & 2000 & $5 \times 10^{5}$ & 0.1 & $10^{9}$ & $10^{10}$\\

744: FM & 88-108 & 9000 & $4 \times 10^{3}$ & 0.1 & $4 \times 10^{7}$ & $4 \times 10^{8}$  \\

745: \hline \hline

746: \end{tabular}

747: \end{center}

748: \label{earth} 

749: \end{table}%

750: 

751: \end{document}

752: 

753: 

754: