1: % iaus2esa.tex -- sample pages for Proceedings IAU Symposium document class
2: % (based on v1.0 cca2esam.tex)
3: % v1.04 released 17 May 2004 by TechBooks
4: % small changes and additions made by KAvdH/IAU 4 June 2004
5: % Copyright (2004) International Astronomical Union
6:
7: \NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}
8:
9: \documentclass{iaus238}
10: \usepackage{graphicx}
11:
12: \newcommand{\myemph}[1]{\emph{#1},}
13: %\usepackage{pagefram}
14: %\pageframefalse
15:
16: \title[Black holes and magnetic fields] %% give here short title %%
17: {Black holes and magnetic fields}
18:
19: \author[J.~Bi\v c\'ak, V. Karas \& T.~Ledvinka] %% give here short author list %%
20: {Ji\v r\'\i \ Bi\v c\'ak,$^1$ Vladim\'\i r Karas$^2$ \and Tom\'a\v s\ Ledvinka$^1$}
21:
22: \affiliation{
23: $^1$Institute of Theoretical Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, V~Hole\v{s}ovi\v{c}k\'ach~2, CZ-18000~Prague, Czech Republic\\[\affilskip]
24: $^2$Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences, Bo\v{c}n\'{\i}~II, CZ-14131~Prague, Czech Republic\\[\affilskip]
25: email: bicak@mbox.troja.mff.cuni.cz, vladimir.karas@cuni.cz, ledvinka@mbox.troja.mff.cuni.cz}
26:
27: \pubyear{2007}
28: \volume{238} %% insert here IAU Symposium No.
29: %\pagerange{001--999}
30: \date{}
31: \setcounter{page}{139}
32: \jname{Black Holes: from Stars to Galaxies -- across the Range of Masses}
33: \editors{V. Karas \& G. Matt, eds.}
34: \begin{document}
35:
36: \maketitle
37:
38: \begin{abstract}
39: Stationary axisymmetric magnetic fields are expelled from outer horizons
40: of black holes as they become extremal. Extreme black holes exhibit
41: Meissner effect also within exact Einstein--Maxwell theory and in string
42: theories in higher dimensions. Since maximally rotating black holes are
43: expected to be astrophysically most important, the expulsion of the
44: magnetic flux from their horizons represents a potential threat to an
45: electromagnetic mechanism launching the jets at the account of
46: black-hole rotation.
47: \keywords{Black hole physics -- magnetic fields -- galaxies: jets}
48: %% add here a maximum of 10 keywords, to be taken form the file <Keywords.txt>
49: \end{abstract}
50:
51: \firstsection % if your document starts with a section,
52: % remove some space above using this command.
53: \section{Introduction}
54: The exact mechanism of formation of highly relativistic jets from
55: galactic nuclei and microquasars remains unknown. Four ways by which a
56: black hole or its accretion disk could power two opposite jets are
57: indicated in figure~1 (taken from the \emph{Czech} edition of Kip
58: Thorne's popular book to indicate how, as compared with the last 1967
59: IAU meeting in Prague, black holes domesticated even in central Europe):
60: (a)~wind from the disk may blow a bubble in a spinning gas cloud and
61: hot gas makes the orifices through which jets are shot out; (b)~the
62: surface of the puffed rotating disk forms funnels which collimate the
63: wind; (c)~magnetic field lines anchored in the disk are spinning due to
64: disk's rotation and push plasma to form jets; (d)~magnetic lines
65: threading through the hole are forced to spin by the ``rotating
66: geometry'' and push plasma outwards along the rotation axis.
67:
68: \begin{figure}[ht]
69: %\begin{center}
70: \includegraphics[width=0.78\textwidth]{abcdbw.eps}
71: %\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth,bb=21 187 324 340,clip=true]{abcdbw.eps}
72: %\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth,bb=21 21 324 164,clip=true]{abcdbw.eps}
73: %\end{center}
74: \hfill
75: \parbox[b]{0.21\textwidth}{\caption{Four mechanisms of jet formation
76: (drawing from ``\v{C}ern\'e d\'{\i}ry a zborcen\'y \v{c}as'', the Czech
77: edition of ``Black Holes and Time Warps'', by K.~S.
78: Thorne 2004).\newline\newline}\label{fig:fromthorne}}
79: \end{figure}
80:
81: The last way, the Blandford--Znajek mechanism, is considered to be the
82: most relevant. The field brought into the innermost region and onto the
83: black hole from the outside has clean field structure while the field
84: in/around the disk is expected to be quite chaotic (Thorne {\etal} 1986).
85: The estimated power radiated out from the ``load'' regions farther away
86: from the hole is
87: \begin{equation}
88: \Delta L_{\rm max} \simeq
89: \left[ 10^{45} {\rm erg\over sec}\right]
90: \left[a\over M \right]^2
91: \left[M\over 10^{9}M_\odot \right]^2
92: \left[B_n\over 10^4 G \right]^2.
93: \end{equation}
94: Here $a\,\equiv\,J/M$ is the hole's angular momentum per unit mass
95: (velocity of light $c=1$, gravitational constant $G=1$), $B_n$ is the
96: normal magnetic field at the horizon. Hence, the highest power is
97: achieved when the hole is ``extreme'', i.e., rotating with maximal
98: angular momentum or approaching the $a=M$ limit, and $B_n$ determining
99: the magnetic flux across the horizon as high as possible.
100:
101: \begin{figure}[ht]
102: \begin{center}
103: \includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth,bb=142 520 342 720,clip=true]{Kerr0500.eps}
104: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
105: \includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth,bb=142 520 342 720,clip=true]{Kerr1000.eps}
106: \end{center}
107: \caption{Field lines of the test magnetic field uniform at infinity
108: and aligned with hole's rotation axis. Two cases with $a=0.5M$ (left)
109: and $a=M$ (right) are shown.}\label{fig:mgfields}
110: %\end{figure}
111: ~\\
112: %\begin{figure}[h]
113: \begin{center}
114: \includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth,bb=142 230 490 577,clip=true]{mg3.eps}
115: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
116: \includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth,bb=142 230 490 577,clip=true]{mg4.eps}
117: \end{center}
118: \caption{Field lines of the electric field induced by the ``rotating
119: geometry" of Kerr black hole in asymptotically uniform test magnetic
120: field. $a=0.95 M$ (left), and $a=M$ (right). }\label{fig:elfields}
121: \end{figure}
122:
123: \section{Meissner effect}
124: The main purpose of this contribution is to point out that these two
125: aspects go one against the other: black holes approaching extremal
126: states exhibit a ``Meissner effect'' -- they expel external vacuum
127: stationary (electro)magnetic fields.
128:
129: To see this effect in the simplest situation, consider the magnetic
130: test field $B_0$ which is uniform at infinity and aligned with hole's
131: rotation axis. Solution of Maxwell's equations on the background
132: geometry of a rotating (Kerr) black hole with boundary condition of
133: uniformity at infinity and finiteness at the horizon yields the field
134: components; from these the lines of force are defined as lines tangent
135: to the Lorentz force experienced by test magnetic/electric charges at
136: rest with respect to locally non-rotating frames (preferred by the Kerr
137: background field). The field lines are plotted in figure~2 for $a=0.5M$
138: and in extreme case $a=M$. Notice that only weak expulsion occurs in the
139: former case. There is a simple analytic formula for the flux across the
140: hemisphere of the horizon: $\Phi=B_0 \pi r_+^2 (1-a^4/r_+^4)$, where
141: $r_+=M+(M^2-a^2)^{1/2}$
142: (King \etal\ 1975; Bi\v{c}\'ak \& Jani\v{s} 1985).
143:
144: As a consequence of the coupling of magnetic field to frame-dragging
145: effects of the Kerr geometry the electric field of a quadrupolar nature
146: arises. Its field lines are shown in figure~3. Again the flux expulsion
147: takes place. While even with $a=0.95M$ it is still not very distinct,
148: the expulsion becomes complete in the extreme case.
149:
150: \begin{figure}[ht]
151: \begin{center}
152: \includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth]{LA900.ps}
153: ~~~~~~~~~~~~
154: \includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth]{LA995.ps}
155: \end{center}
156: \caption{Field lines of the magnetic field of a current loop in the
157: equatorial plane of Kerr black hole located at $r=1.5~r_+$. Two cases
158: with $a=0.9 M$ (left) and $a=0.995 M$ (right) are shown.
159: }\label{fig:currentloop} %\end{figure} ~\\ %\begin{figure}[h]
160: \begin{center}
161: \includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth]{63a.eps}
162: ~~~~~~~~~~~~
163: \includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth]{70a.eps}
164: \end{center}
165: \caption{Field lines of the magnetic dipole placed far away from
166: the extreme Reissner--Nordstr\"{o}m black hole ($e=M$, left panel),
167: and close to the hole (right panel). }\label{fig:butterfly}
168: \end{figure}
169:
170: One can demonstrate that total flux expansion takes place for all
171: axisymmetric stationary fields around a rotating black hole
172: (Bi\v{c}\'ak \& Jani\v{s} 1985; Bi\v{c}\'ak \& Ledvinka 2000). In
173: figure~4 the field lines of a current loop in the equatorial plane
174: are shown.
175:
176: The Meissner-type effect arises also for charged (Reissner--Nordstr\"om)
177: black holes. Although extremely charged black holes ($e^2=M^2$) are
178: probably not important astrophysically they may be significant in
179: fundamental physics (as very special supersymmetric BPS states mass of
180: which does not get any quantum corrections). Since electromagnetic
181: perturbations are in general coupled to gravitational perturbations, the
182: resulting formalism is involved. Nevertheless, one may construct
183: explicit solutions, at least in stationary cases. From these the
184: magnetic field lines follow as in the Kerr case. The magnetic field
185: lines of a dipole far away from the hole look like in a flat space
186: (Fig.~5a), however, when the dipole is close to the horizon, the
187: expulsion in the extreme case is evident (Fig.~5b). Due to the coupling
188: of perturbations closed field lines appear without any electric current
189: inside; see \cite{BiDvo} for details.
190:
191: There exist exact models (exact solutions of the Einstein--Maxwell
192: equations) representing in general rotating, charged black holes
193: immersed in an axisymmetric magnetic field. The expulsion takes place
194: also within this exact framework -- see \cite{BiKa}, \cite{KaVo},
195: \cite{KaBu}.
196:
197: Very recently the Meissner effect was demonstrated for extremal
198: black-hole solutions in higher dimensions in string theory and
199: Kaluza--Klein theory. The question of the flux expulsion from the
200: horizons of extreme black holes in more general frameworks is not yet
201: understood properly. The authors of \cite{CEG} ``believe this to be a
202: generic phenomenon for black holes in theories with more complicated
203: field content, although a precise specification of the dynamical
204: situations where this effect is present seems to be out of reach.''
205:
206: The flux expulsion does \textit{not} occur for the fields which are not
207: axisymmetric. In figure~6 the field lines are constructed for fields
208: asymptotically uniform and perpendicular to the axis of an extreme Kerr
209: black hole. There is an angle $\delta_{\rm max}\sim-63^\circ$ for which
210: the flux of $B_1$ component across a hemisphere is maximal, $ \Phi_{\rm
211: max}\sim 2.25B_1\pi r^2_+$. This is the effect of the rotating geometry
212: (for detailed description, see Bi\v{c}\'ak \& Jani\v{s} 1985;
213: Dov\v{c}iak {\etal} 2000). In these ``misaligned'' situations, there is an
214: angular momentum flux to infinity, so such conditions are not
215: stationary.
216:
217: Naturally, the shape of magnetic and electric field lines depends on the
218: choice of observers, however, the whole discussion can be cast
219: in equivalent and invariant form by employing surfaces of constant flux
220: in which field lines reside. In this way, figure~7 demonstrates that
221: the cross-section of the black hole for the capture of non-aligned
222: magnetic fields indeed does not vanish as the hole rotation aproaches
223: the extreme value.
224:
225: \begin{figure}[ht]
226: \begin{center}
227: \includegraphics[height=.33\textwidth]{coorda.eps}~~~\hfil
228: \includegraphics[height=.33\textwidth]{mg5.eps}~~~\hfil
229: \includegraphics[height=.33\textwidth]{mg6.eps}
230: \end{center}
231: \caption{Lines of the magnetic field which is asymptotically uniform
232: and perpendicular to the rotation axis. The equatorial plane is shown as
233: viewed from top, i.e.\ along the rotation axis, (a)~in the frame of zero
234: angular momentum observers orbiting at constant radius; (b)~in the frame
235: of freely falling observers. In the panel (b), two regions of
236: ingoing/outgoing lines are distinguished by different levels of shading
237: of the horizon (the hole rotates counter-clockwise,
238: $a=M$).}\label{fig:nonaligned}
239: \end{figure}
240:
241: \begin{figure}[th]
242: \begin{center}
243: \includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{horifc13.eps}
244: \end{center}
245: \caption{The cross-sectional area for the capture of magnetic field lines
246: (asymptotically uniform magnetic field perpendicular to the rotation axis).
247: The three curves correspond to different values of the black-hole
248: angular momentum: $a=0$ (the black hole cross-section is a perfect circle
249: and its projection coincides with the black-hole horizon of radius $2M$,
250: indicated here by shading), $a=0.95M$, and $a=M$ (the most deformed
251: shape refers to the maximally rotating case). Non-vanishing cross-sectional
252: area for the extreme case demonstrates that the Meissner-type expulsion of the
253: magnetic field does not operate on non-axisymmetric fields.
254: The hole's rotation axis is vertical and the magnetic field lines are
255: pointing ``towards us'' (see
256: Dov\v{c}iak \etal\ 2000 for details).}\label{fig:nonaligned2}
257: \end{figure}
258:
259: \section{Recent progress, open problems}
260:
261: Can these important properties of electromagnetic fields in neighborhood
262: of black holes be relevant in astrophysical conditions? Recently
263: remarkable progress in axisymmetric simulations of rotating black holes
264: surrounded by magnetized plasma based on general-relativistic MHD has
265: been achieved by various authors, in particular by C.~Gammie,
266: S.~Komissarov, J.~McKinney, J.~Krolik, D.~Uzdensky, H.~Kim, A.~Aliev and
267: others (see the E-print archive for references). Such simulations could
268: bring an answer although some new analytic insight may also be required.
269: For example, \cite{McKinney} remark ``we see no sign of expulsion of
270: flux from the horizon... It is possible that we have not gone close
271: enough to $a/M=1$.'' They have $a/M=0.938$ and, indeed, in view of
272: simplest (though just vacuum) situations illustrated in figures 2 and 3
273: this value may still be far from $1$ to see the effect.
274:
275: An interesting issue arises in connection with the ``black-hole
276: membrane paradigm'' of Thorne {\etal} (1986). For an extreme black hole
277: the proper distance from any $r>r_+$ to the horizon is logarithmically
278: infinite, so one might tend to explain the vanishing of magnetic flux by
279: this fact. However, although the flux across a ``stretched horizon'' (at
280: a finite distance) is non-vanishing even in the extreme case, it depends
281: on where the stretched horizon is located. It turns out, (see section 4
282: of \cite{BiLe}) that for any $\epsilon>0$ one can find such a stretched
283: horizon that the flux is less then $\epsilon$. This suggests the
284: following question: does the power in the Blandford--Znajek model arise
285: from regions with ``relatively large $\sqrt{-g_{00}}$'' in near extreme
286: cases?
287:
288: Another potential obstacle for Blandford--Znajek mechanism to operate
289: efficiently is a low value of magnetic field brought onto the black hole
290: from an accretion disk in realistic situations. Most recently \cite{RGB}
291: obtained an encouraging result on trapping of magnetic flux by the
292: plunge region of a black hole accretion disk. Their analysis is so far
293: limited to slowly rotating black holes; it does not use general
294: relativity; and it depends crucially on the chosen boundary conditions.
295: It is not clear of how large is the disk region from which flux can be
296: dragged inwards.
297:
298: The main open issue can be stated simply: ``Do extremely rotating black
299: holes produce relativistic jets?'' A compelling answer may be out of
300: reach for some time yet.
301:
302: \begin{acknowledgments}
303: We acknowledge the continued support from the Czech Science Foundation
304: (ref.\ 202/06/0041), as well as the Centre for Theoretical Astrophysics
305: and the Research Program of the Czech Ministery of Education.
306: \end{acknowledgments}
307:
308: \vspace*{-1em}
309:
310: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
311: \bibitem[Bi\v c\'ak \& Dvo\v r\'ak (1980)]{BiDvo}
312: {Bi\v{c}\'ak J., Dvo\v{r}\'ak L.} 1980,
313: \myemph{Stationary electromagnetic fields around black holes III. General solutions and the fields
314: of current loops near the Reissner--Nordstr\"om black hole}
315: {Phys. Rev. D}, {22,} {2933}
316:
317: \bibitem[Bi\v c\'ak \& Jani\v s (1985)]{BiJa}
318: {Bi\v{c}\'ak J., Jani\v{s} V.} 1985,
319: \myemph{Magnetic fluxes across black holes}
320: {MNRAS}, {212,} {899}
321:
322: \bibitem[Bi\v c\'ak \& Karas (1989)]{BiKa}
323: {Bi\v c\'ak J., Karas V.} 1989,
324: \myemph{The influence of black holes on uniform magnetic fields}
325: in Proc. of the 5th Marcel Grossman Meeting on General Relativity, eds. D.~G. Blair \& M.~J. Buckingham, (World Scientific: Singapore), p.~1199
326:
327: \bibitem[Bi\v c\'ak \& Ledvinka 2000]{BiLe}
328: {Bi\v{c}\'ak J., Ledvinka T.} 2000,
329: \myemph{Electromagnetic fields around black holes and Meissner effect}
330: {Nuovo Cim.}, {B115,} {739} (gr-qc/0012006)
331:
332: \bibitem[Chamblin, Emparan \& Gibbons (1998)]{CEG}
333: {Chamblin A., Emparan R., Gibbons G. W.} 1998,
334: \myemph{Superconducting p-branes and extremal black holes}
335: {Phys. Rev. D}, {58,} {084009} (hep-th/9806017)
336:
337: \bibitem[Dov\v ciak {\etal} (2000)]{Dovciak}
338: {Dov\v ciak M., Karas V., Lanza A.} 2000,
339: \myemph{Magnetic fields around black holes}
340: {European Journal of Physics}, {21,} 303 (astro-ph/0005216)
341:
342: \bibitem[Karas \& Bud\'inov\'a (2000)]{KaBu}
343: {Karas V., Bud\'{\i}nov\'a Z.} 2000,
344: \emph{Magnetic fluxes across black holes in a strong magnetic field regime}
345: {Physica Scripta}, {61,} 25 (astro-ph/0005216)
346:
347: \bibitem[Karas \& Vokrouhlick\'y (1991)]{KaVo}
348: {Karas V., Vokrouhlick\'y D.} 1991,
349: \myemph{On interpretation of the magnetized Kerr-Newman black hole}
350: {J. Math. Phys.}, {32,} 714
351:
352: \bibitem[King \etal\ (1975)]{KLK75}
353: King A.~R., Lasota J.~P., Kundt~W. 1975,
354: \myemph{Black holes and magnetic fields}
355: {Phys.\ Rev.\ D}, {12,} 3037
356:
357: \bibitem[McKinney \& Gammie (2004)] {McKinney}
358: {McKinney J. C., Gammie C. F.} 2004,
359: \myemph{A measurement of the electromagnetic luminosity of Kerr black hole}
360: ApJ, {611,} {977} (astro-ph/0404512)
361:
362: \bibitem[Reynolds, Garofalo \& Begelman (2006)] {RGB}
363: {Reynolds C. S., Garofalo D., Begelman M. C.} 2006,
364: \myemph{Trapping of magnetic flux by the plunge region for a black hole accretion disk}
365: ApJ, 651, 1023 (astro-ph/0607381)
366:
367: \bibitem[Thorne (2004)]{Legacy}
368: {Thorne K. S.} 2004,
369: \myemph{\v{C}ern\'e d\'{\i}ry a zborcen\'y \v{c}as: Pozoruhodn\'a d\v{e}dictv\'{\i}
370: Einsteinova g\'enia} the Czech edition of
371: \myemph{Black Holes and Time Warps: Einstein's Outrageous Legacy}
372: translation by J.~Langer {\etal} (Mlad\'a Fronta: Prague)
373:
374: \bibitem[Thorne, Price \& MacDonald (1986)]{Membrane}
375: {Thorne K. S., Price R. M., MacDonald D. A.} 1986,
376: \emph{Black Holes: the Membrane Paradigm} {(Yale Univ. Press: New Haven)}
377:
378: \end{thebibliography}
379:
380: %\discuss{Andrew King}{Comment: A misaligned magnetic field tries to reach
381: %axisymmetric configuration. It is interesting to notice that the
382: %timescale for that is comparable to the Blandford-Znajek timescale.}
383:
384: %\discuss{Ji\v{r}\'{\i} Bi\v{c}\'ak}{Yes indeed, the tendency to align the magnetic
385: %field with the black hole rotation axis is natural here, since in a misaligned
386: %case there is the angular momentum flux out of the system. Of course, even
387: %in case of the misaligned geometry the magnetic field component parallel to the
388: %axis becomes expelled out of the extreme Kerr black hole.}
389: %\cleardoublepage
390: \end{document}
391:
392: