1:
2: Oct. 17, 2006
3: Dear Dr. Sneden
4:
5: Thank you for your email dated Sep. 22 and for sending me the referee's report
6: on the paper submitted to the ApJ Letters, "Detection of a New Galactic Old Stellar System at 150 kpc"
7: by T. Sakamoto and T. Hasegawa (#21044).
8:
9: We found the referee's comments very helpful and have revised the manuscript accordingly.
10: We describe below our response to each of his/her comments and
11: outline the revisions we have made.
12:
13: We are sending herewith the revised manuscript and three EPS figures to the ApJ Web Peer Review System.???
14:
15: We hope that the revised paper is now suitable for publication in ApJ Letters.
16:
17: Yours sincerely,
18:
19: Tsuyoshi Sakamoto
20: National Astronomical Observatory
21: Okayama Astrophysical Observatory
22: Asakuchi, Okayama 719-0232
23: Japan
24: phone:+81-865-44-2155
25: fax:+81-865-44-2360
26: email: sakamtty@cc.nao.ac.jp
27:
28: %=============================================================================%
29:
30: We are very grateful to the referee for his/her useful comments and suggestions
31: that help us to revise many points in the manuscript.
32: We have taken into account all of his/her comments in the revisions of the manuscript.
33:
34: We describe below our response to each of his/her commets and outline the revisions we have made.
35:
36: 1. On the title
37: The referee indicates that a phrase "new Galactic old stellar system" sounds a bit strange.
38: According to the comment, we change the title into a new title
39: "Discovery of a Faint old stellar system at 150 kpc".
40: We also change "a new Galactic old stellar system" into "a faint old stellar system"
41: in Abstract and Conclusion, correspondingly.
42: In addition, we also change the subsection of Section 2 into "Discovery of a faint stellar system".
43:
44: 2. On Abstract
45: Following the referee's comments, we add the uncertainties of the half-light radius and distance.
46: We also add "and" between "photometric" and "dynamical" in last sentence of Abstract.
47:
48: 3. On the expression in the second paragraph of Introduction
49: We add "may" in the last sentence "......dwarf galaxies have still been missed."
50:
51: 4. On M31 dwarf galaxies with small angular sizes
52: We agree to referee's suggestion that the description of
53: M31 satellite reported by Zucker et al. is added into that of MW satellites
54: because it emphasizes the existence of missing dwarf galaxies having
55: small angular sizes .
56:
57: We change the the last sentence of the second paragraph of Introduction
58: into "However, Galactic dwarf galaxies with physical sizes of $\lesssim$ 100pc at 200 kpc
59: and M31 dwarf galaxies (Zucker et al. 2004) have an angular size of a few arcmin,
60: and then their dwarf galaxies may have still been missed."
61:
62: 5. On the description "the outer edge" in the last sentence of Introduction
63: Following the referee's comment, we change the phrase into "the outskirts of the Galactic halo".
64:
65: 6.On adding the paper of Girardi et al. (2004)
66: We refer this paper when we fit Padova isochrones to the color-magnitude diagram of SDSS J1257+3419.
67:
68: 7.On the last sentence of the third paragraph in Section 2.
69: In this part, our expression was unclear, in particular for contamination.
70: To make clear, as the referee indicates, we change into
71: "These checks were carried out in order to assess the contribution of
72: dwarf star contamination (see preceding paragraph).
73:
74: 8. On specifying the range of the metallicities and horizontal branch morphological types
75: for template globular clusters in Section 2.2
76: In the first paragraph, we specify the ranges of the values of [Fe/H] and the horizontal-branch ratio.
77:
78: 9.On limits on the value of [Fe/H]
79: In addition to its value which obtained from the analysis of RGB's curvature,
80: we also limit on the value of [Fe/H] from the horizontal-branch ratio.
81: We estimate the horizontal-branch ratio of SDSS J1257+3419.
82: Based on the [Fe/H] vs. horizontal-branch ratio for Galactic globular clusters (Zinn 1993),
83: we suggest that SDSS J1257+3419 has metal-poor nature ([Fe/H]<-1.5).
84: Thus, the value of [Fe/H] for SDSS J1257+3419 is less than -1.5 and as low as -2.0 or -2.25.
85: We add the description of the above discussion to the last part of the first paragraph of Section 2.2.
86:
87: 10. On the description of star formation history in Section 3
88:
89: In order to make clear the discussion of the star formation history of SDSS J1257+3419,
90: we separate the sentences to describe the star formation history
91: and move to last paragraph.
92: Following the referee's suggestion, we add the discussion of the intermediate-age stars
93: in its last sentence of the last paragraph.
94: