1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: %\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
3: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
4: \newcommand{\myemail}{sakamtty@cc.nao.ac.jp}
5:
6: \slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
7:
8: \shorttitle{Discovery of an Old Stellar System}
9: \shortauthors{Sakamoto \& Hasegawa}
10: %\shortauthors{}
11:
12: \begin{document}
13:
14: \title{Discovery of a Faint Old Stellar System at 150 kpc
15: %\footnote{
16: %After we submited this independent work to ApJL,
17: %Belokurov et al. also reported in astroph that they discovered
18: %the same object as reported in this paper (astroph/0608448).}
19: }
20:
21: \author{Sakamoto, T.}
22: \affil{Okayama Astrophysical Observatory, National Astronomical Observatory
23: of Japan, Asakuchi, Okayama 719-0232, Japan}
24: \email{sakamtty@cc.nao.ac.jp}
25: \and
26: \author{Hasegawa, T.}
27: \affil{Gunma Astronomical Observatory, Agatsuma, Gunma 377-0702, Japan}
28: \email{hasegawa@astron.pref.gunma.jp}
29:
30: \begin{abstract}
31: We report the detection of a faint old stellar system at
32: $(\alpha,\delta)=(194.29^\circ,~34.32^\circ)$ (SDSS J1257+3419),
33: based on the spatial distribution of
34: bright red-giant branch stars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data
35: Release 4.
36: SDSS J1257+3419 has a half-light radius of $38\pm 12$ pc and
37: an absolute integrated $V$-magnitude of $M_V=-4.8^{+1.4}_{-1.0}$ mag
38: at a heliocentric distance of $150\pm 15$ kpc.
39: A comparison between SDSS J1257+3419 and known Galactic halo objects
40: %(i.e., globular clusters and dwarf galaxies)
41: suggests that
42: SDSS J1257+3419 is either (a) a faint and small dwarf galaxy or
43: (b) a faint and widely extended globular cluster.
44: %In order to address the problem, it is important to
45: %detemine the photometric and structural properties
46: %from a large sample of stars down to the main sequence
47: %and to detemine the mass distribution from their kinematical information.
48: In the former case, SDSS J1257+3419 could represent an entity of
49: a postulated subhalo of the Milky Way.
50: Further photometric and dynamical study of this stellar system is vital to
51: discriminate these possibilities.
52: \end{abstract}
53:
54: \keywords{Galaxy: dwarf galaxy --- Galaxy: globular cluster}
55:
56: \section{Introduction}
57:
58: The currently favored scenarios of hierarchical
59: galaxy formation in a cold dark-matter (CDM) universe advocate
60: that a larger galaxy was formed via a successive merging and accretion events
61: of smaller galaxies like dwarf galaxies.
62: However, recent high-resolution numerical simulations based on CDM models have
63: revealed that the properties of CDM-based galaxies disagree with their
64: properties observed
65: on a scale smaller than $\sim1$ Mpc (e.g., Navarro \& Steinmetz 2000).
66: One of the most serious discrepancies is the missing satellite-galaxy problem:
67: a considerably larger number of
68: dark-matter clumps with the size of dwarf galaxy, or subhalos,
69: are predicted to be distributed in the Galaxy-sized dark halo
70: than the observed dwarf galaxies in the Galaxy,
71: particularly, at the low-mass end (Klypin et al. 1999; Moore et al. 1999).
72: This is partly due to the serious imcompleteness in the detection of
73: Galactic dwarf galaxies.
74: Alternatively, no stars may be formed in large numbers of low-mass
75: subhalos because star formation is efficiently suppressed by
76: the photoionoization from the first stars and active galactic nucleus
77: (Bullock, Kravtsov, \& Wenberg 2000).
78: Thus, the search for low-mass dwarf galaxies and the determination
79: of their stellar content is indispensable on
80: addressing the missing satellite-galaxy problem.
81:
82: Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) is an ongoing deep spectroscopic and
83: multicolor photometric survey.
84: Previous dwarf-galaxy searches based on the SDSS database
85: mainly focused on the Galactic
86: dwarf galaxies with angular sizes of $\sim 10'$,
87: where fluctuations on scales smaller than a few arcmin were smoothed and
88: missed (Willman et al. 2002, 2005a; Zucker et al. 2006).
89: %However, some of the low-mass Galactic dwarf galaxies (e.g., Sculptor)
90: %have a size of $\lesssim$100 pc, corresponding to a few arcmin at
91: %the Galactocentric distance of 200 kpc, and thus
92: %distant and small dwarf galaxies may have still been missed in the Galaxy
93: %and M31 (Zucker et al.????).
94: However, Galactic
95: dwarf galaxies with physical sizes of $\lesssim$ 100 pc at 200 kpc
96: and M31 dwarf galaxies (Zucker et al. 2004) have
97: an angular size of a few arcmin, and then their dwarf galaxies
98: may have still been missed.
99:
100:
101: Bright red-giant branch (RGB) stars are expected to be an effective probe to
102: search for distant stellar systems because they have a high intrinsic
103: luminosity.
104: In this paper, we search for stellar systems with sizes of a few arcmin
105: on the basis of the spatial distribution of the RGB stars in the
106: SDSS Data Release 4 (DR4),
107: and we report the detection of
108: a faint old stellar system near the outskirt of the Galactic halo.
109: %In section 2, we describe the search method of a stellar system with
110: %with a size of a few arcmin
111: %and estimate the photometric and structual properties of the detected stellar
112: %system.
113: %In section 3, we compare the stellar system with known Galactic objects,
114: %and we summarize in section 4.
115: %\object[M1]{Crab nebula}!
116:
117: \section{Method and Results}
118:
119: \subsection{Discovery of a faint stellar system}
120: DR4 provided us with deep imaging data that covered 6670 square degrees
121: using five broadband filters ($u, g, r, i$, and $z$,
122: Abazajian et al. 2004).
123: In the database, the objects with $r<21.5$ mag are confidently
124: divided into stars and galaxies
125: on the basis of their light profiles (Ivezic et al. 2000).
126:
127: We constructed a color-selected sample of
128: bright RGB stars from the stars with $r<21.5$ mag in the DR4 database
129: such that they satisfy the following color conditions:
130: $0.09+1.57(r-i)<g-r<0.59+1.57(r-i)$ and $0.4<g-r<1.2$ mag,
131: where the colors are corrected for reddening due to Galactic
132: extinction (Schlegel, Finkbeiner, \& Davis 1998).
133: If the stars are giants, the selection
134: corresponds to the stars with effective tempartures in the range of
135: $3750<T_{eff}({\rm K})<5000$ and with metallicities
136: in the range of $-5.0<{\rm [Fe/H]}<+1.0$, as shown in Lenz et al. (1998).
137: Note that the sample still includes dwarf stars with almost similar colors
138: in Sloan's photometric system (Lenz et al. 1998).
139:
140: The bright RGB stars were counted using a $5'\times 5'$ cell over the entire
141: field covered by the DR4 database,
142: and then we searched for the spatial overdensities that were
143: 5 $\sigma$ and 10 stars above the mean background density.
144: The overdensities in the widely extended bright galaxies and their
145: neighborhood were excluded, for the purpose of avoiding a serious
146: incompleteness in the detection of stars in the galaxies
147: (Mandelbaum et al. 2005).
148: We verified the presence of RGB and horizontal branch (HB) in overdensities
149: in the color-magnitude diagram (CMD),
150: which are the characterstic features of old stellar systems.
151: These checks were carried out in order to assess the contribution of dwarf
152: star contamination (see preceding paragraph).
153: %This is because our sample of RGB stars partly includes
154: %dwarf stars as described above.
155:
156: An unknown spatial overdensity is detected in a field centered
157: at $(\alpha,\delta)=(194^\circ.29,34^\circ.32)$ in addtion to
158: known Galactic objects (i.e., dwarf galaxies, globular clusters,
159: and an open cluster).
160: Figure 1(a) shows the spatial distribution of DR4's
161: stars around this overdensity,
162: and they are symmetrically concentrated within $2'.5$.
163: In Figure 1(e), the CMD of the overdensity within a circle with a radius of
164: $2'.5$ has a clear RGB at $0.4<g-r<0.8$ mag, $18.8<r\lesssim 23.0$ mag,
165: and a clear HB within $-0.35<g-r<-0.05$ mag, $21.5<r<22.0$ mag.
166: This is in contrast to the CMD of the same-sized control field
167: at a distance of $1^\circ$ from the center of the overdensity in Figure 1(d).
168: We allocate the stars in a region enclosed within
169: $-10(g-r)+25.7<r<-10(g-r)+29.0$ and $18.8<r<23.0$ mag
170: for RGB stars
171: and within $-0.35<g-r<-0.05$ mag and $21.5<r<22.0$ mag for HB stars.
172: Both RGB and HB stars are strongly concentrated in Figures 1(b) and (c)
173: and their densities in a $5'\times 5'$ field centered at the overdensity
174: are $5\sigma$ and $9\sigma$
175: above the mean background stellar density, respectively.
176: Since these stars belong to old stellar populations,
177: the overdensity is definitely a stellar system dominated by old stars
178: (hereafter, SDSS J1257+3419).
179:
180: \subsection{Basic parameters of SDSS J1257+3419}
181: We estimate the basic parameters of SDSS J1257+3419, such as its
182: distance, metallicity, structural parameters, and total absolute magnitude.
183: First we estimate its distance and metallicity by referring to
184: the ridge lines of the RGB and HB stars in Galactic globular clusters.
185: In order to produce the templates of the ridge lines,
186: we perform photometry with Gunn filters
187: for a sample of six globular clusters using the 65-cm telescope
188: at the Gunma Astronomical Observatory.
189: The clusters, M5, M12, M15, M53, M56, and M92, are selected to include
190: a wide range of spectroscopically-measured metallicities ([Fe/H]=$-1.48\sim
191: -2.29$) and of HB morphological-types (the HB ratio$=0.31\sim 0.98$,
192: which denotes the ratio of the difference in the number of
193: blue and red HB stars to all HB stars.
194: Seeing condition was $1''.5\sim2''.5$ in $r$.
195: Very small color-term coefficients and stable airmass dependence
196: on the photometric calibration suggest a good recovery
197: of the CMD of the program clusters;
198: the distance moduli which are measured
199: by fitting Padova isochrones (Girardi et al.
200: 2004) to the RGB, are confirmed to be
201: as accurate as 0.05 $-$ 0.1 mag with the published values.
202: Figure 1(f) shows the CMD of SDSS J1257+3419 and
203: the three representative ridge lines of the globular clusters.
204: The fit of the ridge lines to the HB places SDSS J1257+3419
205: at a distance modulus of $(m-M)_{0} =20.7 \pm 0.1 $,
206: corresponding to 150 kpc with a 10\% accuracy.
207: We limit on the metallicity on the basis of the RGB and HB morphology.
208: The curvature of the RGB suggests
209: that metallicity of SDSS J1257+3419 can be infered
210: coarsely within 0.5 dex for very old single stellar population:
211: its metallicity is lower than that of the metal-rich entity
212: M5 ([Fe/H] = $-1.25$), and it is as low as that of the
213: globular clusters M92 ([Fe/H] = $-2.25$);
214: fits to the CMD with a slightly metal-rich entity
215: M53 ([Fe/H]=$-2.0$) is still acceptable.
216: The HB ratio for SDSS J1257+3419 is 0.86,
217: where blue and red HB stars are assumed to have $g'-r'<0.0$ mag
218: and $g'-r'>0.0$ mag, respectively.
219: Based on [Fe/H] vs. the HB ratio for Galactic globular clusters (Zinn 1993),
220: we suggest that SDSS J1257+3419 has a
221: metal-poor nature ([Fe/H]$\lesssim -1.5$).
222: Note that the ratio estimate is weak due to small number
223: statistics and the failure to exclude field stars.
224: Thus, the value of [Fe/H] for SDSS J1257+3419 is less than $-1.5$ and
225: could be as low as $-2.0$ or $-2.25$.
226:
227:
228: Next, we estimate the structural properties of SDSS J1257+3419.
229: We derive its centroid from the density-weighted
230: first moment of the distribution,
231: and estimate the average ellipticity by using the three density-weighted second
232: moments (Stobie 1980).
233: For tracers of the radial profile, we adopt the stars with
234: $g-r<0.8$ and $r<23$ mag, which effectively reduce the
235: foreground stars at each radius.
236: Figure 2 shows the radial profile of the stars, where
237: the average densities with elliptical annuli are plotted
238: after subtracting a constant background level ($0.45 {~\rm arcmin^{-2}}$).
239: An exponential law with a half-light radius of $r_h=38$ pc approximately
240: represents the radial profile;
241: the radius little depends on the binning size of the profile.
242:
243: Finally, we roughly estimate an absolute integrated magnitude in the $V$-band,
244: $M_V$, using two different methods.
245: This is because photometric data on faint RGB and bright main-sequence stars
246: and kinematical data for membership identification are not available.
247: We first estimate its lower bound by summing the luminosities of the
248: RGB stars and HB stars within $r_h$ and then by doubling the summed luminosity
249: (e.g., Willman et al. 2005b).
250: The lower bound is estimated as $M_V=-3.4$ mag,
251: assuming that the distance is 150 kpc.
252: We note that this value may be underestimated because of the highly
253: distributed nature of bright RGB stars beyond the half-light radius
254: in the stellar system.
255: We second estimate a rough value of $M_V$ from the number of cluster RGB stars
256: that are brighter than the HB stars by applying
257: a loosely defined relation between the number of such RGB stars in the
258: globular clusters and its $M_V$.
259: The relation is constructed by performing
260: a weighted least-squares fitting procedure
261: (weights being inversely proportional to the poisson noise of the number of
262: the stars)
263: for the number of the observed RGB stars of
264: 4 globular clusters (M5, M12, M52, and M92), which are expected to
265: have small numbers of contamination and of missing RGB stars,
266: and their values of $M_V$ corrected for the field of view (Harris 1996).
267: We find the most likely value of $M_V=-4.8$ mag and
268: the upper bound of $M_V=-5.8$ mag, which is $1\sigma$ above it.
269:
270: The estimated basic parameters are listed in Table 1.
271:
272:
273: \section{Discussion}
274: We discuss whether SDSS J1257+3419 is a subhalo.
275: Although the direct way of the discrimination is
276: the comparison between the total and stellar mass distributions,
277: the kinematical information to determine the total mass distribution
278: is not available.
279: Previous works suggested that the Galactic globular clusters (GCs)
280: and dwarf galaxies (DGs) are
281: dominated by stars and dark matter, respectively.
282: We thus set limits on the existence of the dark matter in SDSS J1257+3419,
283: by comparing it with GCs and DGs in some photometric and structural properties.
284:
285: The DGs are relatively well separated from the GCs
286: in the $r_h$-$M_V$ plot shown in Figure 3.\footnote{We plot the
287: compilation data of Harris (1996) and Willman et al. (2005b) for the GCs
288: and that of Mateo (1998), Willman et al. (2005a), Zucker et al. 2006),
289: and Belokurov et al. (2006) for the DGs.}
290: The half-light radius of SDSS J1257+3419 is
291: larger than the GCs and to be smaller than the DGs.
292: SDSS J1257+3419 also has a luminosity comparable to the
293: faintest GCs and DGs.
294: Thus, SDSS J1257+3419 is located near the boundary between the
295: dwarf galaxies and globular clusters:
296: it could be a faint, small dwarf galaxy,
297: or a faint, extended globular cluster.
298:
299: It should be noted that
300: another stellar system having such intermediate properties---SDSS J1049+5103---
301: has been recently detected (Willman et al. 2005).
302: The follow-up observations showed
303: that SDSS J1049+5103 is a stellar system with multiple stellar tails at
304: a distance of $\sim40$ kpc
305: and that its large spatial extent relative to low-luminosity globular
306: clusters may be formed as a result of tidal interaction with the Galaxy
307: during their orbital motions (Willman et al. 2006).
308: SDSS J1257+3419 is more luminous and more distant than SDSS J1049+5103
309: ($M_V=-2.5$ mag),
310: and the mass-loss in the former system due to Galactic tides
311: might not be sufficiently high to explain its large spatial extent.
312: In order to determine whether it is a dwarf galaxy or a globular cluster,
313: it is vital to determine the photometric and structural properties
314: from a large sample of stars down to the turnoff of the main sequence
315: and to determine the mass distribution from their kinematical information.
316:
317: Further we discuss the properties of SDSS J1257+3419.
318: If SDSS J1257+3419 is Galactic DG,
319: it is the fifth furthest one.
320: %Combined with the fact that the shape of SDSS J1257+3419 is almost spherical,
321: %Galactic tides might give only small effects on its internal
322: %spatial structure during the orbital motions.
323: Thus, it is a good tracer of the mass determination of
324: the Galaxy (Sakamoto et al. 2003).
325:
326: If SDSS J1257+3419 is a GC, it is the furthest one.
327: It might not be gravitationally bound to the Milky Way,
328: but to the Local Group.
329: Its shape is almost spherical, and it might have a simple dynamical evolution
330: due to weak Galactic tides.
331: Thus, it might be a good entity to understand the evolution of an isolated GC.
332:
333: We set limits on the star formation history.
334: The known Galactic dSphs exhibit a wide variety of star formation histories
335: ranging from galaxies that are entirely dominated by very old populations to
336: dwarf galaxies with considerable fractions of intermediate-age stars
337: (Mateo 1998; Grebel \& Gallagher 2004).
338: Assuming no star within $22<r<23$ mag and $g-r<0.4$ mag (see Figure 1(e)),
339: we find that no star formation occured at least during the last four Gyr.
340: %The faintest dwarf galaxies tend to be the ones in which only old populations
341: %are found. Another indication of a sizable fraction of intermediate-age stars
342: %in SDSS J1257+3419 is the absence of ared clump in color-magnitude diagram.
343: The absence of a red clump in the CMD strengthen that no sizable fraction of intermediate-age stars are populated in the SDSS J1257+3419.
344:
345: %To set stronger limits on SDSS J1257+3419,
346: %it is necessary to determine
347: %an absolute integrated magnitude, kinematical structure, metallicity,
348: %and star formation history,
349: %on the basis of a large sample of stars up to the turnoff point of the
350: %main sequence.
351: %Also, it is important to identify membership by the radial velocity
352: %and metallicity
353:
354: \section{Conclusion}
355: We detect a faint old stellar system (SDSS J1257+3419)
356: with a half-light radius of 38 pc
357: at a heliocentric distance of $150\pm 15$ kpc on the basis of the spatial
358: distribution of bright RGB stars in SDSS-DR4.
359: The rough absolute integrated $V$-magnitude is $-4.8^{+1.4}_{-1.0}$ mag.
360: When we compared the half-light radius and absolute integrated magnitude with
361: those of the
362: known Galactic objects (i.e., dwarf galaxies and globular clusters),
363: we find that SDSS J1257+3419 is either a faint and small dwarf galaxy or
364: a faint and widely extended globular cluster.
365:
366: \acknowledgments
367: TS would like to thank
368: Okayama Prefecture and the National Institute of Information
369: and Communications Technology for their support on high-speed network
370: connection (Okayama Information Highway and Japan Gigabit Network) for
371: data transfer and analysis.
372: TH thanks Y. Kondo and Y. Negishi for their assistance in ridge line
373: measurements in this study.
374:
375: Funding for the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, the Japanese Monbukagakusho, and the Max Planck Society. The SDSS Web site is http://www.sdss.org/.
376: The SDSS is managed by the Astrophysical Research Consortium (ARC) for the Participating Institutions. The Participating Institutions are The University of Chicago, Fermilab, the Institute for Advanced Study, the Japan Participation Group, The Johns Hopkins University, the Korean Scientist Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, the Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA), the Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA), New Mexico State University, University of Pittsburgh, University of Portsmouth, Princeton University, the United States Naval Observatory, and the University of Washington.
377:
378: \begin{thebibliography}{}
379: \bibitem []{}Abazajian, K., et al. 2004, \aj, 128, 502
380: \bibitem []{}Belokurov, V., et al., astroph/0604355
381: \bibitem []{}Bullock, J. S., Kravtsov, A. V., \& Weinberg, D. H. 2000, \apj, 539, 517
382: %\bibitem []{}Font, A. S., Johnston, K. V., Bullock, J. S., \& Robertson, B. 2006, \apj, 638, 585
383: \bibitem []{}Girardi, I., Grebel, E. K., Odenkirchen, M. ,\& Chiosi, C. 2004, \aap, 422, 205
384: \bibitem []{}Grebel, E. K. ,\& Gallagher J. S. III 2004, \apj, 610, L89
385: \bibitem []{}Harris, W. E. 1996, \aj, 112, 1487
386: \bibitem []{}Ivezic, Z., et al., 2000, \aj, 120, 963
387: \bibitem []{}Klypin, A., Kravtsov, A. V., Valenzuela, O., \& Prada, F. 1999, \apj, 522, 82
388: \bibitem []{}Lenz, D. D., Newberg, H. J., Rosner, R., Richards, G. T., \& Stoughton, C. 1998, \apjs, 119, 121
389: \bibitem []{}Mandelbaum, R., et al. 2005, \mnras, 361, 1287
390: \bibitem []{}Mateo, M. 1998, \araa, 36, 435
391: \bibitem []{}Moore, B., Ghigna, S., Governato, F., Lake, G., Quinn, T., Stadel, J., \& Tozzi, P. 1999, \apj, 524, L19
392: \bibitem []{}Navarro, J. F., \& Steinmetz, M. 2000, \apj, 538, 477
393: \bibitem []{}Sakamoto, T., Chiba, M., \& Beers, T. C. 2003, \aap, 397, 899
394: \bibitem []{}Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner D. P., \& Davis, M. 1998, \apj, 500, 525
395: \bibitem []{}Stobie, R. S. 1980, JBIS, 33, 323
396: \bibitem []{}Willman, B., Dalcanton, J., Ivezic, Z., Jackson, T., Lupton, R., \& Brinkmann, J. 2002, \aj, 123, 848
397: \bibitem []{}Willman, B., et al. 2005a, \apj, 626, L85
398: \bibitem []{}Willman, B., et al. 2005b, \aj, 129, 2692
399: \bibitem []{}Willman, B., et al. 2006, astroph/0603486
400: \bibitem []{}Zinn, R. 1993, ASP Conf. series, 48, 38
401: \bibitem []{}Zucker, D. B. et al. 2004, \apj, 612, L121
402: \bibitem []{}Zucker, D. B. et al. 2006a, \apj, 643, L103
403: %\bibitem []{}Zucker, D. B. et al. 2006b, astroph/0606633
404:
405: \end{thebibliography}
406:
407: \clearpage
408:
409: \begin{figure*}
410: \epsscale{1.0}
411: \plotone{fig1.eps}
412: \caption{Spatial distribution and CMD for SDSS J1257+3419.
413: Upper panels show the spatial distribution around
414: SDSS J1257+3419 for (a) all the stars, (b) RGB stars,
415: and (c) HB stars.
416: Lower panels show the CMD in
417: a $2'.5$-radius circle centered on SDSS J1257+3419 (panels e and f)
418: and in the same-sized control field at a distance of $1^\circ$ from its center
419: (panel d).
420: The curves in panel f denote the ridge lines of three globular clusters.
421: }
422: \label{fig1}
423: \end{figure*}
424:
425:
426: \clearpage
427: \begin{figure}
428: \epsscale{.80}
429: \plotone{fig2.eps}
430: \caption{Radial profile of SDSS J1257+3419 for the stars with $g-r<0.8$ mag
431: and $r<23$ mag.
432: The surface number densities, $\Sigma$, denote
433: the average densities within the elliptical annuli
434: after subtracting a constant background level ($0.45 {~\rm arcmin^{-2}}$).
435: The solid curve denote the best-fitting exponential
436: law with a half-light radius
437: of $0.86'$.}
438: \label{fig2}
439: \end{figure}
440:
441: \begin{figure}
442: \epsscale{0.80}
443: \plotone{fig3.eps}
444: \caption{Plot of half-light radius, $r_h$, and
445: absolute integrated $V$-magnitude, $M_V$,
446: for SDSS J1257+3419 (filled circle), SDSS J1049+5103 (open circle),
447: Galactic globular clusters (filled triangles), and
448: dwarf galaxies (open triangles).}
449: \label{fig2}
450: \end{figure}
451:
452: %\clearpage
453:
454: \begin{table}
455: \begin{center}
456: \caption{Basic parameters of SDSS J1257+3419}
457: \begin{tabular}{ll}
458: \tableline\tableline
459: Parameter&Value\\
460: \tableline
461: Coordinates (J2000)&$(12^h57^m09.6^s$, $+34^\circ 19'12'')$\\
462: Galactic coordinates&$(113.59^\circ,82.70^\circ)$\\
463: Ellipticity&0.10\\
464: $A_V$&0.00 mag\\
465: %$r_h$&$0.86'\pm 0.26'$\\
466: $(m-M)_0$&$20.7\pm 0.1$ mag\\
467: Heliocentric distance&$150\pm 15$ kpc\\
468: $r_h$&$38 \pm 12$ pc\\
469: %$M_{tot,V}$(lower bound)&$-3.4$ mag\\
470: $M_{tot,V}$&$-4.8^{+1.4}_{-1.0}$ mag\\
471: \tableline
472: \end{tabular}
473: \end{center}
474: \end{table}
475:
476: \end{document}
477:
478:
479:
480:
481:
482:
483: