1: %% --------------------------------------------------------
2: %% \documentclass[twocolumn,runningheads]{svjour2}
3: \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
4: %\documentclass[twocolumn,runningheads,natbib]{svjour2}
5: %\usepackage{graphicx}
6: %% don't use \def but \newcommand{}{}
7: %\journalname{Astrophysics and Space Science}
8: \begin{document}
9: %% --------------------------------------------------------
10: \title{10 Years of {\em{RXTE}} Monitoring of Anomalous X-ray Pulsar
11: 4U~0142+61: Long-Term Variability}
12: %% \subtitle{}
13: %\titlerunning{10 Years of {\em{RXTE}} Monitoring of AXP 4U~0142+61}
14: %% --------------------------------------------------------
15: \author{Rim~Dib\altaffilmark{1}, Victoria~M.~Kaspi\altaffilmark{1}, and
16: Fotis~P.~Gavriil\altaffilmark{2}}
17: %% \authorrunning{Short form of author list} % if too long for running head
18: \altaffiltext{1}{Department of Physics, McGill University,
19: Montreal, QC H3A~2T8}
20: \altaffiltext{2}{X-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight
21: Center,Greenbelt, MD 20771}
22: %% --------------------------------------------------------
23: %\date{Received: date / Accepted: date}
24: %% The correct dates will be entered by the editor
25: %\maketitle
26: %% --------------------------------------------------------
27: \begin{abstract}
28: %% --------------------------------------------------------
29: We report on 10 yr of monitoring of the 8.7-s Anomalous X-ray Pulsar
30: 4U~0142+61 using the {\emph{Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer (RXTE)}}. This
31: pulsar exhibited stable rotation from 2000 until February 2006: the RMS
32: phase residual for a spin-down model which includes $\nu$, $\dot{\nu}$, and
33: $\ddot{\nu}$ is 2.3\%. We report a possible phase-coherent timing solution
34: valid over a 10-yr span extending back to March~1996. A glitch may have
35: occured between 1998 and 2000, but it is not required by the existing data.
36: We also report that the source's pulse profile has been evolving in the past
37: 6 years, such that the dip of emission between its two peaks has been
38: getting shallower since 2000, almost as if the profile is recovering to its
39: pre-2000 morphology, in which there was no clear distinction between the
40: peaks. These profile variations are seen in the 2$-$4~keV band but not in
41: 6$-$8~keV. Finally, we present the pulsed flux time series of the source in
42: 2$-$10~keV. There is evidence of a slow but steady increase in the source's
43: pulsed flux since 2000. The pulsed flux variability and the narrow-band
44: pulse profile changes present interesting challenges to aspects of the
45: magnetar model.
46: %%
47: \end{abstract}
48: %% --------------------------------------------------------
49: %% report the discovery of a slow but steady increase in the pulsar's pulsed
50: %% flux since 2000, such that it has risen by 47$\pm$4\% over the past 5.5
51: %% years in the 2.5$-$9~keV band. Simultaneously, its pulse profile has been
52: %% evolving, such that the dip of emission between its two peaks has been
53: %% getting shallower since 2000, as if it is recovering to its pre-2000
54: %% morphology, in which there was no clear distinction between the peaks. Both
55: %% the flux and pulse profile variations are restricted to the soft end of the
56: %% band such that we observe no variations in either above 6 keV.
57: %% --------------------------------------------------------
58: \keywords{pulsars: individual(4U~0142+61) --- stars: neutron ---
59: X-rays: stars ---}
60: %% \PACS{First \and Second \and More}
61: %% --------------------------------------------------------
62: %\end{abstract}
63: %% --------------------------------------------------------
64: \section{Introduction}
65: \label{intro}
66: %% --------------------------------------------------------
67: \subsection{Anomalous X-ray Pulsars (AXPs)}
68: \label{intro1}
69: %% --------------------------------------------------------
70: The existence of magnetars -- young, isolated neutron stars powered by the
71: decay of an ultrahigh magnetic field -- is now well supported by several
72: lines of evidence~\citep{Ref1}. There are at least two flavors of magnetars:
73: SGRs and AXPs. They both exhibit: X-ray pulsations with a luminosity of
74: 10$^{34-36}$~erg~s$^{-1}$, periods ranging from 5-12~s, period derivatives
75: of 10$^{-13}$$-$10$^{-11}$, and surface dipolar magnetic fields of 0.6$-$7
76: $\times$ 10$^{14}$~G. In the magnetar model, the pulsed X-rays are the
77: result of a combination of surface thermal emission and resonant scattering
78: in the magnetosphere~\citep{Ref2}. For more on AXPs and SGRs, see reviews by
79: V.~Kaspi and S.~Mereghetti (this volume).
80: %% --------------------------------------------------------
81: \subsection{AXP~4U~0142+61}
82: \label{intro2}
83: %% --------------------------------------------------------
84: 4U~0142+61 is an 8.7-s AXP. It has $\dot{P}$~$\cong$~0.2~$\times~10^{-11}$,
85: implying a surface dipole magnetic field of
86: 1.3~$\times~10^{14}$~G\footnote{Magnetic fields here are calculated via $B
87: \equiv 3.2 \times 10^{19} \sqrt{P \dot{P}}$~G, where $P$ is the spin period
88: in seconds and $\dot{P}$ is the period derivative.}. It is known to pulsate
89: in the optical band~\citep{Ref3,Ref4}, and has been detected in the
90: near-IR~\citep{Ref5}, in the far-IR~\citep{Ref6}, and in hard
91: X-rays~\citep{Ref7,Ref8}. It has a soft X-ray spectrum well fitted by a
92: combination of a blackbody and a power law (see, for example,
93: \citealt{Ref9}). AXP~4U~0142+61 rotates with high stability~\citep{Ref10}.
94: However, \cite{Ref11} reported a timing glitch in 1999 on the basis of an
95: {\em{ASCA}} observation in which the value of the frequency is marginally
96: discrepant with that predicted by the ephemeris reported by~\cite{Ref10}.
97: %%
98:
99: %%
100: Here we report on continued {\em{RXTE}} monitoring observations of this
101: source. Our observations are described in Section~\ref{obs}. Our timing,
102: pulsed morphology, and pulsed flux analysis are presented, respectively, in
103: Sections~\ref{timing}, \ref{pulseprofile}, and~\ref{pulsedflux}.
104: %% --------------------------------------------------------
105: \section{Observations}
106: \label{obs}
107: %% --------------------------------------------------------
108: We used 136 {\em{RXTE/PCA}} observations of various lengths in our analysis:
109: {\em{a)}} 4 very closely spaced {\em{RXTE}} Cycle 1 observations, {\em{b)}}
110: 14 short Cycle 2 observations spanning a period of a year, {\em{c)}} 1 Cycle
111: 3 observation (followed by a 2-yr gap with no observations), {\em{d)}} 118
112: observations taken regularly from 2000 to 2006 as part of a long-term
113: monitoring program spanning {\em{RXTE}} Cycles 5 to 10.
114: %%
115:
116: %%
117: For each observation, photon arrival times were barycentered and binned with
118: 31.25-ms time resolution.
119: %% --------------------------------------------------------
120: \section{Phase-coherent Timing}
121: \label{timing}
122: %% --------------------------------------------------------
123: \begin{deluxetable}{lccc}
124: \tabletypesize{\small}
125: \tablewidth{385.0pt}
126: \tablecaption
127: {
128: Spin Parameters for 4U~0142+61\tablenotemark{a}
129: \label{table1}
130: }
131: \tablehead
132: {
133: &
134: \colhead{Pre-Gap Ephemeris\tablenotemark{b}} &
135: \colhead{Post-Gap Ephemeris} &
136: \colhead{Overall Ephemeris} \\
137: \colhead{Parameter} &
138: \colhead{Spanning} &
139: \colhead{Spanning} &
140: \colhead{Spanning} \\
141: &
142: \colhead{Cycles 1 to 3} &
143: \colhead{Cycles 5 to 10} &
144: \colhead{All Cycles}
145: }
146: \startdata
147: MJD range & 50170.693$-$50893.288 & 51610.636$-$53787.372 &
148: 50170.693$-$53787.372 \\
149: TOAs & 19 & 118 & 137 \\
150: $\nu$ (Hz) & 0.115096869(3) & 0.1150969337(3) &0.1150969304(2) \\
151: $\dot{\nu}$ (10$^{-14}$ Hz s$^{-1}$) & $-$2.659(3) & $-$2.6935(9) &
152: $-$2.6514(7) \\
153: $\ddot{\nu}$ (10$^{-23}$ Hz s$^{-2}$) & --- & 0.417(10) & $-$1.7(2) \\
154: $d^{3}\nu/dt^{3}$ (10$^{-31}$ Hz s$^{-3}$) & --- & --- & 3.62(12) \\
155: $d^{4}\nu/dt^{4}$ (10$^{-39}$ Hz s$^{-4}$) & --- & --- & 8.7(3) \\
156: $d^{5}\nu/dt^{5}$ (10$^{-46}$ Hz s$^{-5}$) & --- & --- & $-$5.01(13) \\
157: $d^{6}\nu/dt^{6}$ (10$^{-54}$ Hz s$^{-6}$) & --- & --- & 6.6(4) \\
158: Epoch (MJD) & 51704.000025 & 51704.000025 & 51704.000000 \\
159: RMS residual & 0.019 & 0.023 & 0.019 \\
160: \enddata
161: \end{deluxetable}
162: %% --------------------------------------------------------
163: %% \tablenotetext{a} { Numbers in parantheses are TEMPO-reported 1$\sigma$
164: %% uncertainties. }
165: %% \tablenotetext{b} { The pre-gap ephemeris reported here is
166: %% slightly different from that reported in Gavriil~$\&$~Kaspi~2002 because
167: %% here we take into account the Cycles~1 and~3 observations.
168: %% Note that both ephemerides return the same number of pulsar rotation
169: %% cycles between the first and the last pre-gap observations. }
170: %% --------------------------------------------------------
171: \begin{figure}
172: \centering
173: \includegraphics[scale=.30]{figure1.ps}
174: \caption{Arrival time residuals for 4U~0142+61 for the post-gap period,
175: using the post-gap ephemeris given in Table~\ref{table1}.
176: The residuals have RMS~2.3\% of the pulse period.}
177: \label{figure1}
178: \end{figure}
179: %% --------------------------------------------------------
180: \begin{figure}
181: \centering
182: \includegraphics[scale=.30]{figure2.ps}
183: \caption{Arrival time residuals for 4U~0142+61 for all Cycles using the
184: post-gap ephemeris.}
185: \label{figure2}
186: \end{figure}
187: %% --------------------------------------------------------
188: \begin{figure}
189: \centering
190: \includegraphics[scale=.30]{figure3.ps}
191: \caption{Arrival time residuals for all Cycles using the overall ephemeris
192: (see Table 1). The residuals have RMS~1.9\% of the pulse period.}
193: \label{figure3}
194: \end{figure}
195: %% --------------------------------------------------------
196: %% \subsection{Analysis}
197: %% \label{timinganalysis}
198: %% --------------------------------------------------------
199: Each binned time series was folded at the pulse period. Resulting pulse
200: profiles were cross-correlated with a high S/N template. This returned an
201: average pulse time of arrival (TOA) for each observation corresponding to a
202: fixed pulse phase. The pulse phase at any time can be expressed as a Taylor
203: expansion polynomial. The TOAs were fitted to the polynomial using the
204: pulsar timing software package
205: TEMPO\footnote{http://pulsar.princeton.edu/tempo.}.
206: %% --------------------------------------------------------
207:
208: %% --------------------------------------------------------
209: %% \subsection{Results}
210: %% \label{timingresults}
211: %% --------------------------------------------------------
212: We report a phase-coherent timing solution that spans the post-gap
213: ({\emph{i.e.}} after 2000) 6-yr period up until February 2006 (MJD~53787)
214: including all data in {\emph{RXTE}} Cycles 5$-$10. The parameters of our
215: best-fit spin-down model are shown in Table~\ref{table1}. The phase
216: residuals are shown in Figure~\ref{figure1}. The best-fit post-gap
217: ephemeris does not, however, fit the pre-gap TOAs well. Figure~\ref{figure2}
218: shows a clear systematic deviation in the pre-gap residuals obtained after
219: subtracting the post-gap ephemeris. This could indicate that a glitch
220: occured at some time during the gap. However, by using 6 frequency
221: derivatives, we found a possible ephemeris that fits the entire Cycle~1 to
222: Cycle~10 range (see Table~\ref{table1}, Figure~\ref{figure3}).
223: %% --------------------------------------------------------
224:
225: %% --------------------------------------------------------
226: %% \subsection{Discussion}
227: %% \label{timingdiscussion}
228: %% --------------------------------------------------------
229: The existence of our overall ephemeris cannot rule out the possibility of
230: the glitch having occured in 1999~\citep{Ref11}: if a fully recovered glitch
231: with a short relaxation time occured in the {\emph{RXTE/PCA}} observing gap
232: between Cycles 3 and 5, only a random phase jump would be observed. To
233: investigate this, we added an arbitrary but constant time jump to all the
234: post-gap TOAs. We were still able to find a new ephemeris that connected the
235: TOAs through the two-year gap. This indicates that our overall ephemeris is
236: not unique. Hence, we cannot rule out the possibility of a phase jump
237: between Cycles~3 and~5, and therefore a glitch in 1999 cannot be ruled out.
238: However, it is also not required by the data. Indeed, the frequency of the
239: discrepant {\em{ASCA}} observation reported by~\cite{Ref11} is consistent
240: with the frequency predicted by the overall ephemeris shown in Table~1 to
241: within 2$\sigma$.
242: %% --------------------------------------------------------
243: \section{Pulse Profile Changes}
244: \label{pulseprofile}
245: %% --------------------------------------------------------
246: \begin{figure}
247: \centering
248: \includegraphics[scale=.61]{figure4.ps}
249: \caption{Average pulse profiles in all RXTE Cycles in 2$-$10, 2$-$4, and
250: 6$-$8~keV. In a given band, the different profile qualities are due to different
251: net exposure times. The Cycle number is shown in the top right corner of
252: each plot.}
253: \label{figure4}
254: \end{figure}
255: %% --------------------------------------------------------
256: \begin{figure}
257: \centering
258: \includegraphics[scale=.54]{figure5.ps}
259: \caption{Ratios of the Fourier amplitudes of the pulse profiles in all
260: three energy bands as a function of {\emph{RXTE}} Cycle. Top: ratio of the 2nd
261: amplitude (A2) to that of the fundamental (A1). Middle:(A3/A1). Bottom:
262: (A4/A1).}
263: \label{figure5}
264: \end{figure}
265: %% --------------------------------------------------------
266: %% \subsection{Analysis}
267: %% \label{profileanalysis}
268: %% --------------------------------------------------------
269: To search for pulse profile changes, the phase-aligned profiles were
270: averaged for each {\emph{RXTE}} Cycle. This was done in three energy bands.
271: The average profiles in all bands are presented in Figure~\ref{figure4}. The
272: ratios of the Fourier amplitudes of the pulse profiles in all bands as a
273: function of {\emph{RXTE}} Cycle are presented in Figure~\ref{figure5}.
274: %% --------------------------------------------------------
275:
276: %% --------------------------------------------------------
277: %% \subsection{Results and Discussion}
278: %% \label{profileresults}
279: %% --------------------------------------------------------
280: In Figure~\ref{figure4}, the pulse profile changes are clear: for 2$-$10 and
281: 2$-$4~keV, in Cycles~1 and~2, the smaller peak is not well defined. After
282: the two-year gap, in Cycle~5, the dip between the peaks is much more
283: pronounced. The peaks start to merge back in subsequent Cycles almost as if
284: the profile is recovering to its original morphology. In 6$-$8~keV, the
285: smaller peak is not as obvious, indicating that it has a softer spectrum
286: relative to the larger peak.
287: %%
288:
289: %%
290: Given the spectrum of the source (see~\citealt{Ref9}), which is fitted to a
291: two-component model consisting of power law and thermal emission,
292: %% The spectrum of the source is fitted to a two-component model including
293: %% both a power law and (a) thermal emission component \cite{}. The
294: the 2$-$4~keV band includes both thermal and power-law photons while the
295: 6$-$8~keV band contains negligibly few thermal photons. In
296: Figure~\ref{figure5}, the fact that the ratio of the harmonics is dropping
297: only in 2$-$4~keV suggests that only the thermal component of the spectrum
298: is evolving.
299: %% --------------------------------------------------------
300: \section{Pulsed Flux}
301: \label{pulsedflux}
302: %% --------------------------------------------------------
303: \begin{figure}
304: \centering
305: \includegraphics[scale=.30]{figure6.ps}
306: \caption{Pulsed flux time series for 4U~0142+61 in the 2$-$10~keV band.
307: %% Observations shorter than 2.5~ks were combined.
308: %% Observations longer than 8~ks were broken into smaller segments.
309: }
310: \label{figure6}
311: \end{figure}
312: %% --------------------------------------------------------
313: %% \subsection{Analysis}
314: %% \label{fluxdanalysis}
315: %% --------------------------------------------------------
316: For each observation, the pulsed flux, F$_{rms}$ (in counts/s/PCU), was
317: calculated by taking the square root of the average of the squares of the
318: deviations from the mean number of counts in the pulse profile. We omitted
319: PCU~0 from this analysis because of the uncertainties in its response due to
320: the loss of the propane layer.
321: %% --------------------------------------------------------
322:
323: %% --------------------------------------------------------
324: %% \subsection{Results}
325: %% \label{fluxresults}
326: %% --------------------------------------------------------
327: The pulsed flux series for 4U~0142+61 shows a slow but steady increase since
328: 2000 in 2$-$10~keV (see Fig.~\ref{figure6}). There are hints that the change
329: is also present in 2$-$4~keV and not in 6$-$8~keV but our statistics do not
330: let us confirm this. We verified there are no comparable trends in the
331: long-term light curves of the other AXPs observed as part of this monitoring
332: program.
333: %% --------------------------------------------------------
334:
335: %% --------------------------------------------------------
336: %% \subsection{Discussion}
337: %% \label{fluxdiscussion}
338: %% --------------------------------------------------------
339: From~\cite{Ref2}, increases in the twist angle of the field lines in the
340: magnetosphere can cause luminosity increases as well as pulse profile
341: changes. It is tempting to also attribute the increase in the pulsed flux of
342: this source to an increase in the twist angle. However, \cite{Ref2} also
343: predict that an increase in the twist angle is accompanied by an increase in
344: the spin down rate, which is not what we are currently observing: in the
345: post-gap ephemeris presented in table~1, $\ddot{\nu}$ is positive,
346: %% which means that $\dot{\nu}$ is becoming less negative,
347: %% i.e. the spin down rate is {\emph{de}}creasing.
348: i.e. the magnitude of the spin down rate is {\emph{de}}creasing.
349: Thus, another explanation is needed.
350: %% --------------------------------------------------------
351:
352: %% --------------------------------------------------------
353: %% news
354: %% --------------------------------------------------------
355: Finally, it is interesting to note that in April~2006, after the last
356: {\emph{RXTE}} Cycle included in this analysis, the pulsar appears to have
357: entered an extended active phase: a single burst accompanied by a pulse
358: profile change was detected from the pulsar on April~06~\citep{Ref12}. A series
359: of four bursts was later detected on June~25~\citep{Ref13}. This interesting turn
360: of events is presently under careful study.
361: %% --------------------------------------------------------
362: \begin{acknowledgements}
363: %% --------------------------------------------------------
364: This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research
365: Council (NSERC) PGSD scholarship to RD. FPG holds a National Research
366: Council Research Associateship Award at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
367: Additional support was provided by NSERC Discovery Grant Pgpin 228738-03
368: NSERC Steacie Supplement Smfsu 268264-03, FQRNT, CIAR, and CFI. VMK is a
369: Canada Research Chair.
370: %% --------------------------------------------------------
371: \end{acknowledgements}
372: %% --------------------------------------------------------
373: \begin{thebibliography}{3}
374: %% --------------------------------------------------------
375: %% ONE AUTHOR
376: %% \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Author}{2003}]{refbla}
377: %% Author A.B. A\&A, {\bf 403}, L19 (2003)
378: %% QUOTE: \cite{refbla} to produce ``... Author (2003)...'';
379: %% QUOTE: \citep{refbla} to produce ``... (Author 2003)...''
380: %% QUOTE: \citealt{refbla} to produce ``... Author 2003...''.
381: %% TWO AUTHORS
382: %% \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Author1 \& Author2}{1999}]{a1a21999}
383: %% Author1 A.B. \& Author2 C.D. ApJ, {\bf 423}, 249 (2004)
384: %% QUOTE: \cite{a1a21999} will give ``... Author1 & Author2 (1999)...''
385: %% QUOTE: same goes for \citep and \citealt
386: %% THREE AUTHORS (Rim guessing)
387: %% \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Author1, Author2 \& Author3}{2004}]{refblaaa}
388: %% Author1 A.B., Author2 C.D. \& Author3 C.D. ApJ, {\bf 423}, 249 (2004)
389: %% QUOTE: \cite{refblaaa} will give ``... Author1, Author2 & Author3 (1999)...''
390: %% MORE AUTHORS
391: %% \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Author1 et al.}{2006}]{a1etal2006}
392: %% Author1 A.B., Author2 A.B, Author3 A.B et al. MNRAS, {\bf 366}, 249 (2006)
393: %% QUOTE: \cite{a1etal{2006} will give ``... Author1 et al. (2006)...''
394: %% QUOTE: same for \citep and \citealt
395: %% --------------------------------------------------------
396: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Den~Hartog et al.}{2006}]{Ref7}
397: Den~Hartog,~P.~R., Hermsen,~W., Kuiper,~L. et al.
398: A\&A, {\bf 451}, 587 (2006).
399: %
400: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Dib et al.}{2006}]{Ref13}
401: Dib,~R., Kaspi,~V., Gavriil,~F., et al.
402: The Astronomer's Telegram, {\bf 845}, 1-+ (2006).
403: %
404: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Dhillon et al.}{2005}]{Ref4}
405: Dhillon,~V.~S., Marsh,~T.~R., Hulleman,~F. et al.
406: MNRAS, {\bf 363}, 609 (2005).
407: %
408: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Gavriil \& Kaspi}{2002}]{Ref10}
409: Gavriil,~F.~P. \& Kaspi,~V.~M.
410: ApJ, {\bf 567}, 1067 (2002).
411: %
412: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Hulleman, van~Kerkwijk \& Kulkarni}{2004}]{Ref5}
413: Hulleman,~F., van~Kerkwijk,~M.~H., \& Kulkarni,~S.~R.
414: A\&A, {\bf 416}, 1037 (2004).
415: %
416: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kaspi, Dib \& Gavriil}{2006}]{Ref12}
417: Kaspi,~V., Dib,~R., \& Gavriil,~F.
418: The Astronomer's Telegram, {\bf 794}, 1-+ (2006).
419: %
420: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kern \& Martin}{2002}]{Ref3}
421: Kern,~B. \& Martin,~M.
422: Nature, {\bf 417}, 527 (2002).
423: %
424: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Kuiper et al.}{2006}]{Ref8}
425: Kuiper,~L., Hermsen,~W., Den~Hartog,~P.~R., et al.
426: ApJ, accepted, (2006).
427: %
428: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Morii, Kawai \& Shibazaki}{2005}]{Ref11}
429: Morii,~M., Kawai,~N., \& Shibazaki,~N.
430: ApJ, {\bf 622}, 544 (2005).
431: %
432: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Thompson, Lyutikov \& Kulkarni}{2002}]{Ref2}
433: Thompson,~C., Lyutikov,~M., \& Kulkarni,~S.~R.
434: ApJ, {\bf 574}, 332 (2002).
435: %
436: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Wang, Chakrabarty \& Kaplan}{2006}]{Ref6}
437: Wang,~Z., Chakrabarty,~D., \& Kaplan,~D.~L.
438: Nature, {\bf 440}, 722 (2006).
439: %
440: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{White et al.}{1996}]{Ref9}
441: White,~N.~E., Angelini,~L., Ebisawa,~K. et al.
442: ApJ~Letters, {\bf 463}, L83+ (1996).
443: %
444: \bibitem[\protect\citeauthoryear{Woods \& Thompson}{2006}]{Ref1}
445: Woods,~P.~M. \& Thompson,~C.
446: astro-ph/0406133.
447: To appear in Compact Stellar X-ray Sources,
448: eds.~W.~H.~G.~Lewin and M.~van~der~Klis.
449: %% --------------------------------------------------------
450: \end{thebibliography}
451: %% --------------------------------------------------------
452: \end{document}
453: %% --------------------------------------------------------
454: %% \bibliographystyle{spmpsci} % FOR BIBTEX USERS
455: %% \bibliography{} % name your BibTeX data base
456: %% --------------------------------------------------------
457: %% \begin{thebibliography}{3}
458: %% and use \bibitem to create references. Consult the Instructions
459: %% for authors for reference list style.
460: %% --------------------------------------------------------
461: %% FORMAT FOR ARTICLES.
462: %% \bibitem{Ref1}
463: %% Author, I.: Article title. Journal Title-Abbreviated {\bf Vol}, pp--pp
464: %% (year)
465: %% FORMAT FOR BOOKS.
466: %% \bibitem{Ref2}
467: %% Author, I., Smith, J.: Book Title. Publisher, Place (year)
468: %% FORMAT FOR PROCEEDINGS.
469: %% \bibitem{Ref3}
470: %% Author, I., Smith, J.: Paper title. In: Editor, A. (ed.) Proceedings
471: %% Title, Location, Date, pages. Publisher, Place (year)
472: %% \end{thebibliography}
473: %% --------------------------------------------------------
474: %% EXAMPLE CITE: and \cite{Ref1}
475: %% EXAMPLE OF REFERENCING: (see Sect.~\ref{sec:1}).
476: %% EXAMPLE PARAGRAPHG: \paragraph{Paragraph headings} Use paragraph headings.
477: %% EXAMPLE EQUATION:
478: %% \begin{equation}
479: %% a^2+b^2=c^2
480: %% \end{equation}
481: %% --------------------------------------------------------
482: %%%%%%\begin{figure} % 1 column fogs
483: %%%%%%\centering
484: %% Use the relevant command to insert your figure file.
485: %% For example, with the graphicx package use
486: %%%%%% \includegraphics{example.eps}
487: %%%%%%\caption{Please write your figure caption here}
488: %%%%%%\label{fig:1}
489: %%%%%%\end{figure}
490: %% --------------------------------------------------------
491: %%%%%%\begin{figure*} % 2 column figs
492: %%%%%%\centering
493: %% Use the relevant command to insert your figure file.
494: %% For example, with the graphicx package use
495: %%%%%% \includegraphics[width=0.75\textwidth]{example.eps}
496: %%%%%%\caption{Please write your figure caption here}
497: %%%%%%\label{fig:2}
498: %%%%%%\end{figure*}
499: %% --------------------------------------------------------
500: %%%%%%\begin{table}[t]
501: %%%%%%\caption{Please write your table caption here}
502: %%%%%%\centering
503: %%%%%%\label{tab:1}
504: %%%%%%\begin{tabular}{lll} % For LaTeX tables use
505: %%%%%%\hline\noalign{\smallskip}
506: %%%%%%first & second & third \\[3pt]
507: %%%%%%\tableheadseprule\noalign{\smallskip}
508: %%%%%%number & number & number \\
509: %%%%%%number & number & number \\
510: %%%%%%\noalign{\smallskip}\hline
511: %%%%%%\end{tabular}
512: %%%%%%\end{table}
513: %% --------------------------------------------------------
514: