1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%EM_APJ VERSION%%%%%%%%%%%%%10/25/06%%%%%%%%%%
2: %% Beginning of file 'ic405_sptz.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2006 Jan 02, to be submitted to ApJ, Summer 2006
5: %% NOTE: modified from home, via WinSCP, 06/25/06
6: %% Converted to ms.tex 07/07/06
7: %% REviewed following rox comments, to srm, 07/19/06
8: %% SRM comments rec'd 08/01/06 (changes made, newest version prepared, 08/04/06)
9: %% FINAL SRM AND REL COMMENTS: started work on 08/27/06
10: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
11: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
12:
13: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
14: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
15: %% any data that comes before this command.
16:
17: %% The command below calls the preprint style
18: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
19: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
20: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
21: \documentclass{emulateapj}
22: \topmargin=+0.0in
23: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
24:
25: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
26:
27: % \documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
28:
29: %% preprint2 produces a double-column, single-spaced document:
30:
31: % \documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
32: % \usepackage{graphics}
33: \usepackage{epsfig}
34: \usepackage{natbib}
35: \bibliographystyle{apj}
36:
37: %% If you want to create your own macros, you can do so
38: %% using \newcommand. Your macros should appear before
39: %% the \begin{document} command.
40: %%
41: %% If you are submitting to a journal that translates manuscripts
42: %% into SGML, you need to follow certain guidelines when preparing
43: %% your macros. See the AASTeX v5.x Author Guide
44: %% for information.
45:
46: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
47: \newcommand{\myemail}{france@pha.jhu.edu}
48:
49: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
50:
51: %\slugcomment{DRAFT, 07/01/20006 - kf}
52: \slugcomment{To appear in the Astrophysical Journal}
53:
54:
55: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
56: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
57: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
58: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
59: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters. Running heads
60: %% will not print in the manuscript style.
61:
62: \shorttitle{A $Spitzer$ Study of IC 405}
63: \shortauthors{France et al.}
64:
65: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
66: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
67:
68: \begin{document}
69:
70: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
71: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
72: %% you desire.
73:
74: \title{A Cometary Bow Shock and Mid-Infrared Emission Variations
75: Revealed in $Spitzer$ Observations of HD 34078 and IC 405\altaffilmark{1}}
76:
77: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
78: %% author and affiliation information.
79: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
80: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
81: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
82: %% As in the title, you can use \\ to force line breaks.
83:
84: \author{Kevin France\altaffilmark{2}, Stephan R. McCandliss, and Roxana E. Lupu}
85: \affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University,\\
86: 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218}
87: %\author{Kevin France, Stephan R. McCandliss, and Roxana E. Lupu}
88: %\affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University,
89: % Baltimore, MD 21218}
90:
91: %\author{S. R. McCandliss\altaffilmark{2}}
92: %\affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University,
93: % Baltimore, MD 21218}
94:
95: %\and
96:
97: %\author{P. D. Feldman\altaffilmark{1}}
98: %\affil{Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University,
99: % Baltimore, MD 21218}
100:
101: %% Notice that each of these authors has alternate affiliations, which
102: %% are identified by the \altaffilmark after each name. Specify alternate
103: %% affiliation information with \altaffiltext, with one command per each
104: %% affiliation.
105:
106: %%%These are for extra affiliations at the bottom of page
107: \altaffiltext{1}{Based in part on observations made with the the $Spitzer$~$Space$~$Telescope$,
108: which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
109: under a contract with NASA.}
110: %CTIO is operated by AURA, Inc.\ under contract to the National Science
111: %Foundation.}
112:
113: \altaffiltext{2}{Current Address: Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Toronto,
114: 60 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3H8}
115:
116: \received{2006 August 31}
117: \revised{2006 October 18}
118: \accepted{2006 October 27}
119:
120: %\ccc{}
121: %\cpright{AAS}{}
122:
123:
124: %% Mark off your abstract in the ``abstract'' environment. In the manuscript
125: %% style, abstract will output a Received/Accepted line after the
126: %% title and affiliation information. No date will appear since the author
127: %% does not have this information. The dates will be filled in by the
128: %% editorial office after submission.
129:
130: \begin{abstract}
131: We present new infrared observations of the emission/reflection nebula
132: IC 405 obtained with the $Spitzer$~$Space$~$Telescope$. Infrared
133: images in the four IRAC bands (3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8.0 $\mu$m) and
134: two MIPS bands (24 and 70 $\mu$m) are complemented by %low and high-dispersion
135: IRS spectroscopy (5~--~30 $\mu$m) of two nebular filaments.
136: %and longer wavelength (24 and 70 $\mu$m) imaging and photometry from MIPS.
137: The IRAC (8.0 $\mu$m) and MIPS imaging shows evidence of a bow shock associated
138: with the runaway O9.5V star, HD 34078, created by the interaction between the star and nebular material.
139: The ratio of emission at 24 to 70 $\mu$m is higher
140: in the immediate vicinity of HD 34078 than in the outer filaments, providing
141: evidence for elevated dust temperatures (T$_{d}$~$\gtrsim$~90 K) in the shock region.
142: The nebular imaging reveals that the morphology is
143: band dependent, with varying contributions
144: from aromatic emission features, H$_{2}$, and dust emission.
145: Nebular spectroscopy is used to quantify these contributions,
146: showing several aromatic emission bands between 6~--~14 $\mu$m,
147: the S(5), S(3), S(2), and S(1) pure rotational emission lines of
148: H$_{2}$, and atomic %FINE STRUCTURE (\ion{O}{1}?) lines.
149: fine structure lines of Ne, S, and Ar.
150: The low-dispersion spectra provide constraints on the ionization
151: state of the large molecules responsible for the aromatic infrared features.
152: %and are compared with the H$_{2}$ .
153: H$_{2}$ rotational temperatures of the two bright nebular filaments
154: are determined from the observed line strengths.
155: An average T(H$_{2}$)~$\sim$~400 K is inferred, with evidence for additional
156: non-uniform excitation by UV photons in the intense radiation field
157: %of the illuminating O9 star, HD 34078. The photo-excitation
158: of HD 34078. The photoexcitation
159: hypothesis is supported by direct measurement of the far-UV
160: H$_{2}$ fluorescence spectrum, obtained with $FUSE$.
161: %Finally, the IRAC and MIPS imaging shows evidence of a bow shock associated
162: %with HD 34078, created by the interaction between the star and nebular material.
163: %This bow shock morphology is more pronounced in 24$\mu$m MIPS observations
164: %made near the star.
165: %The ratio of emission at 24 to 70 $\mu$m is higher
166: %in the immediate vicinity of HD 34078 than in the outer filaments, providing
167: %evidence for elevated dust temperatures (T$_{d}$~$\gtrsim$~90 K) in the shock region.
168: %The spectroscopy show emission
169: %from the rotational lines of molecular hydrogen as well as dust emission
170: %features attributed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and silicates.
171: %The H$_{2}$/PAH ratios derived from these observations are markedly higher
172: %than in previously studied gaseous nebulae (e.g. NGC 2023, NGC 7023, and
173: %IC 63).
174: %We suggest that this enhanced ratio is caused by the illuminating
175: %star, HD 34078, a runaway O star newly illuminating the nebular gas
176: %and dust. The dust has either been destroyed by the intense ultraviolet
177: %radiation field of HD 34078 or has not been processed by the radiation
178: %long enough to produce the characteristic PAH spectra seen in other
179: %objects. Consequently, we attribute $\sim$~50\% of the flux seen in the
180: %IRAC images to emission from H$_{2}$ in four nebular filaments of interest.
181: %Ultraviolet fluorescence is considered to be the dominant excitation
182: %mechanism based on spectroscopy obtained with $FUSE$.
183: \end{abstract}
184:
185: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
186: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
187: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
188: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
189:
190: \keywords{dust~---~ISM:~molecules~---~ISM:~individual~(IC 405)~---
191: ~reflection nebulae~---~Infrared: ISM}
192:
193:
194:
195: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%START OF THE PAPER%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
196: \section{Introduction}
197:
198: %%%SPITZER IC 405 OBJECT INTRODUCTION
199: IC 405 is an emission/reflection nebula in Auriga~\citep{herbig58,herbig99}.
200: It is illuminated by the O9.5V star HD 34078 (AE Aur, V~=~6.0),
201: a high proper motion ($\approx$ 40 mas/yr; Blaauw \& Morgan 1954)
202: runaway star ejected from the Orion star-forming region in a binary-binary
203: interaction approximately 2.5 million years ago~\citep{bagnuolo01}.
204: The star and the optical nebula are roughly cospatial at
205: present~\citep{herbig58,france04,boisse05}, at a distance of 450~pc.
206: The sightline to HD 34078 is considerably reddened ($E(B~-~V)$~=~0.53;
207: Cardelli et al. 1989)~\nocite{ccm}, however, the extended nebular regions
208: appear to be free of foreground attenuation~\citep{france04}.
209:
210: The large transverse velocity of the star indicates that it has only
211: recently encountered the nebular material with which it now interacts.
212: The present geometric configuration has made the HD 34078 sightline
213: a target for studies of interstellar absorption line variation.
214: \citet{herbig99} combines fifty years of atomic and molecular line
215: observations in the violet-blue ($\lambda$3400~--~4900 \AA) to set an upper limit on the length scale
216: of substructure in the ISM of 1450 AU. More recently, variations
217: in the column density of interstellar CH and CN (10~--~20~\%) have been
218: observed on this sightline, setting a smaller upper limit on the
219: substructure size ($\leq$ 200 AU) towards HD 34078~\citep{rollinde03}. A
220: similar study~\citep{boisse05} using $Far$ $Ultraviolet$
221: $Spectroscopic$ $Explorer$ ($FUSE$) observations has set an upper limit
222: on the molecular hydrogen (H$_{2}$) column variation of $\leq$~5\%,
223: constraining the scale to a few tens of AU. They also find evidence
224: for interaction between HD 34078 and the surrounding nebula. Detections
225: of excited molecular hydrogen absorption lines (measurements up to
226: $v$~=~0, $J$~=~11 and tentative detections up to the $v$~=~2 level) are
227: evidence for fluorescent pumping by the local stellar UV field~\citep{boisse05}.
228: Additional observations of the interaction between the UV radiation
229: field of HD 34078 and the nebular gas and dust are presented by~\citet{france04}.
230: They present a spectroscopic study of far-UV dust scattering and
231: fluorescent H$_{2}$ emission lines in the nebula.
232:
233: Evidence for interaction between the star and nebular dust grains has also been
234: detected by $IRAS$~\citep{vanburen95}. The high proper motion of HD 34078 makes it a
235: candidate host for a bow shock. As a massive star moves supersonically through an
236: ambient interstellar medium, stellar radiation pressure and/or strong stellar winds can produce a
237: comet-shaped, compact \ion{H}{2} region surrounded by shocked molecular
238: gas~\citep{vanburen88,vanburen90}. A 60 $\mu$m excess observed in
239: $IRAS$ maps~\citep{vanburen95,noriega97} identifies IC 405 as a potential bow shock region.
240:
241: In this paper, we present the first direct imaging of the bow shock around HD 34078
242: with the $Spitzer$ $Space$ $Telescope$-IRAC and MIPS. We also use MIPS
243: data to study the nebular dust emission, characterize the spectroscopic properties
244: of aromatic emission features (AEFs) and H$_{2}$
245: using nebular observations made with the $Spitzer$-IRS,
246: and put these new observations in context with existing studies of IC 405.
247: \S1.1 provides background information
248: on the diagnostic properties of AEFs, H$_{2}$, and
249: dust in diffuse nebulae. In \S2, we describe
250: the new $Spitzer$ data, and introduce supporting
251: far-UV spectroscopy from $FUSE$. An analysis of the
252: infrared (IR) imaging and spectroscopy is given in \S3.
253: In \S4, we discuss the structure of the bow shock region,
254: present determinations of the H$_{2}$ rotational and dust temperatures,
255: and analyze spatial variations in AEF carrier ionization
256: across the nebular filaments.
257: %we present a discussion of the line profiles and ratios of AEFs
258: %and their implications for the physical state of the PAHs and
259: %H$_{2}$ in IC 405. We compare mid/far-IR images and photometry
260: %(8, 24, and 70~$\mu$m) with analytic bow shock models in \S5,
261: %deriving basic physical parameters of the shock region.
262: Our findings and a summary of the observations are presented in \S5.
263:
264: \begin{figure*}
265: %\begin{center}
266: \hspace{+0.0in}
267: %\epsfig{figure=f0.eps,width=4.0in,angle=0}
268: \includegraphics[width=4.0in]{f1a.eps}
269: \hspace{-0.3in}
270: %\epsfig{figure=f1.eps,width=4.0in,angle=0}
271: \includegraphics[width=4.0in]{f1b.eps}
272: \caption{\label{irac405}
273: $Left$: Optical image of IC 405 from~\citet{france04}.
274: $Right$: Post-BCD 8.0~$\mu$m IRAC images of IC 405,
275: scaled to highlight the rich nebular structure.
276: The origin is the position of the illuminating, runaway O9.5 star, HD 34078.
277: The main nebular regions studied in this work are labeled
278: A and B. White overlays represent far-UV
279: spectrograph apertures (the squares are the
280: $FUSE$ LWRS slit and the rectangles represent a rocket-borne spectrograph; France et al. 2004).
281: %Spectroscopy
282: %from $FUSE$ Pos3 and Pos4 (square boxes) provide supporting information
283: %for our IRS observations of Filaments A and B, while the
284: %rocket spectrograph (rectangles) has been used to show that the
285: %nebula suffers negligible foreground attenuation.
286: At the cores of the bright filaments, discrete features
287: contribute $\leq$ 40\% of the nebular emission at 8 $\mu$m.
288: %Contributions from the 8.6 $\mu$m AEF, H$_{2}$, and atomic emission
289: %are less than 10\%.
290: }
291: %\end{center}
292: \end{figure*}
293:
294: \subsection{AEFs, H$_{2}$, and Dust Emission in Photodissociation Regions}
295: %Emission from Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) has been found
296: %Aromatic emission features (AEFs) have been found
297: AEFs have been found
298: to be ubiquitous in the mid-IR spectra (3~--~20~$\mu$m) of reflection
299: nebulae and \ion{H}{2} regions (see van Dishoeck 2004 for a recent review).
300: \nocite{vand04,werner04,peeters04}
301: AEFs are seen as broad bands in the
302: $ISO$-SWS/$ISO$-CAM-CVF and $Spitzer$-IRS wavelength
303: ranges, with lines complexes centered on 3.3, 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, 11.2, and
304: 12.7~$\mu$m. These features are usually attributed to a superposition
305: of C~--~C and C~--~H vibrational modes in a distribution of polycyclic aromatic
306: hydrocarbons (PAHs)
307: consisting of tens to hundreds of C-atoms~\citep{schutte93,vand04}.
308: However, discrepancies between astronomical emission features and laboratory PAH spectra
309: exist, preventing a conclusive identification of the exact carrier of the AEFs
310: (Gordon et al. 2006 and references therein).~\nocite{gordon06}
311: The carrier population that gives rise to the observed mid-IR bands (also
312: called Aromatic Infrared Bands; Verstraete et al.,
313: 2001)\nocite{verstraete01} spans a range of
314: sizes and ionization states. The size distribution is thought
315: to be regulated by the hardness of the illuminating radiation
316: field~\citep{verstraete01} while the aromatic molecule ionization balance is
317: controlled by the strength of the ultraviolet (UV) radiation field
318: and the electron density~\citep{bakes01,bregman05}. The relative strengths and
319: spectral profiles of the major AEFs reflect the physical state
320: of the carrier population in a given environment.
321:
322: %%%NGC 7023 Spitzer blurb for 'other nebulae' discussion section-05/2006
323: %Analyses of the $Spitzer$ spectrum of NGC 7023,
324: %shown in Figure 2, is given by~\cite{werner04}
325: %and~\cite{peeters04}. \cite{werner04} find the strength
326: %of the PAH emission features to vary with position within the nebula and
327: %detect strong PAH emission in a filament that is bright in the near-IR
328: %vibrational lines of H$_{2}$~\citep{takami00}. They also detect new
329: %unidentified mid-IR emission features at 6.7, 10.1, 15.8, 17.4, and
330: %19.0~$\mu$m that may be attributed to a combination of
331: %C--H out-of-plane bending modes and C--C--C bending modes~\citep{werner04}.
332: %\cite{peeters04}, comparing the 15~--~21 $\mu$m spectra obtained
333: %by $Spitzer$ with observations made by $ISO$ show that the PAH
334: %emission varies from object to object. They attribute these spectral
335: %changes to variations in the PAH population.
336:
337: Variations in the spectral features of the AEFs can be used to quantify
338: the response of the carrier molecules to
339: different radiation and density environments~\citep{bakes01}.
340: These variations can be studied by comparing a sample of nebulae %with a range of dust distributions and stellar radiation fields
341: ~\citep{verstraete01}, at different locations within a single object~\citep{verstraete96,hony01},
342: or in the diffuse interstellar medium~\citep{boulanger00}.
343: The C~--~H emission features at
344: 3.3 and 11.2~$\mu$m are found to be well correlated over a range of
345: physical conditions, however the relative strengths of the C~--~H and
346: C~--~C features are observed to vary with environment~\citep{hony01,vand04}.
347: The ratio of a C~--~C to a C~--~H feature (6.2/11.2 $\mu$m for example)
348: reflects the ionization state as C~--~C band strengths are
349: stronger in ionized aromatic carriers while C~--~H bands
350: display the opposite behavior~\citep{uchida00}.
351: The increase in the 6.2 $\mu$m C~--~C feature
352: (and more generally, the 6.2, 7.7, and 8.6 ~$\mu$m bands) is due to the dipole moment
353: %results from the creation of an oscillating dipole,
354: produced by a change in charge distribution during ionization~\citep{peeters02}.
355: %Another diagnostic feature of the AEFs
356: %is the central wavelength of the 7.7~$\mu$m band. The peak of this
357: %feature can be used to constrain the age of the PAH carriers and the
358: %degree of UV processing they have undergone.
359: The carriers of the AEFs fall in the middle of the
360: molecular mass distribution in reflection nebulae and \ion{H}{2}
361: regions (which we will group under the broad heading of
362: photodissociation regions; PDRs).
363:
364: \begin{figure}
365: \begin{center}
366: \hspace{+0.0in}
367: %\epsfig{figure=f2.eps,width=7.5in,angle=0}
368: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=7.5in]{f2.eps}
369: \caption{\label{mips24} Post-BCD 24 $\mu$m map of IC 405.
370: The region near HD 34078 (0,0) shows the wake-like morphology, suggesting the
371: presence of a bow shock as the star traverses the ambient nebular material.
372: The bow shock region at 8 and 24 $\mu$m can be seen enlarged
373: %with a scaling favorable to observing the shock structure
374: in Figures 4 and 5. The overlays on Filament A and B represent the
375: IRS-SL scan regions, with the ON/OFF convention used in Figures 10 and 12
376: indicated. (The IRS-SL scans are shown in more detail in Figures 8 and 9.)}
377: \end{center}
378: \end{figure}
379:
380: %H2 AND BIG GRAINS
381: H$_{2}$, residing at the lower
382: limit of this distribution, makes up the majority of the
383: molecular mass in these objects~\citep{pdrs,shaw05}. H$_{2}$
384: is seen to emit from far-UV to the mid-IR wavelengths,
385: excited by both UV photons (i.e. - fluorescence) and thermal processes, such as collisions and shocks.
386: Detection of the UV emission lines of H$_{2}$ is one clear indication of
387: photoexcitation. H$_{2}$ dissociates in environments with temperatures
388: corresponding to the excited electronic levels that give rise to the UV lines~\citep{shull82}.
389: The emission nebula IC 63 is the prototypical object for PDR studies of fluorescent H$_{2}$.
390: The far-UV spectrum has been well-studied~\citep{witt89,hurwitz98,france05a},
391: confirming stellar continuum photons as the excitation source of the observed emission.
392: Far-UV H$_{2}$ emission lines in IC 405 have been observed~\citep{france04},
393: and these observations will be discussed below.
394:
395: Near-IR observations of the rovibrational emission lines of H$_{2}$ can also be used to constrain
396: the molecular excitation mechanism. Collisional processes can populate the lowest
397: excited vibrational states of the molecule ($v$~=~1 and 2), but the fluorescent
398: cascade associated with the electronic excitation of H$_{2}$ by UV photons is the only
399: mechanism (ignoring excitation by non-thermal electrons)
400: available to populate higher vibrational states ($v$~$>$~2) as the molecules
401: dissociate at kinetic temperatures proportional to these higher vibrational levels~\citep{shull82}.
402: %Hence, the detection of highly vibrationally excited lines (in absorption or emission)
403: %is indicative of fluorescent excitation.
404: Ratios of these excited vibrational states can be compared with model predictions
405: to determine the excitation mechanism~\citep{black87}.
406: Near-IR line ratios indicate UV excitation in IC 63~\citep{luhman97},
407: the bright reflection nebulae NGC 2023 and NGC
408: 7023~\citep{martini99,takami00}, and on larger scales in molecular clouds~\citep{luhman96}.
409: %Collisions are thought to play a larger part in the rovibrational excitation
410: %of H$_{2}$ in regions with high densities ($n_{H}$~$>$ 10${5}$ cm$^{-3}$,
411: %Kristensen et al. 2003) and/or where shocks play a significant role (
412: Collisions contribute to the rovibrational excitation of H$_{2}$ in
413: dense molecular clouds~\citep{kristensen03} and regions where shocks play
414: an important role, such as planetary nebulae~\citep{kastner96,lupu06}.
415: The pure rotational emission lines of H$_{2}$, %, accessible by $ISO$, $Spitzer$, and ground based instruments
416: accessible only in the mid-IR,
417: give diagnostic information about the molecular gas temperature in PDRs.
418: Ratios of these lines have been used to derive temperatures in
419: star-forming regions~\citep{rosenthal00,allers05}, PDRs~\citep{thi99,habart04},
420: and external galaxies~\citep{valentijn99,armus04}.
421:
422: \begin{figure}
423: \begin{center}
424: \hspace{+0.0in}
425: %\epsfig{figure=f3.eps,width=7.5in,angle=0}
426: \includegraphics[width=7.5in]{f3.eps}
427: \caption{\label{mips70} Post-BCD 70 $\mu$m scan of IC 405.
428: The position of HD 34078 is at the origin. The Filament A$^{**}$ region is the strongest
429: feature in the 70 $\mu$m data. }
430: \end{center}
431: \end{figure}
432:
433: Dust grains populate the upper end of the molecular mass distribution in PDRs.
434: Grains are observed through their thermal emission in the mid/far-IR (Schnee et al. 2005 and
435: references therein) and in the attenuation and scattering of ultraviolet
436: and visible photons~\citep{ccm,witt93,burgh02,draine03}.~\nocite{schnee05}
437: $IRAS$ observations of PDRs find that grain emission is spatially correlated with
438: near-IR H$_{2}$ emission~\citep{luhman96}. \citet{jansen94,jansen95}
439: present observations of IC 63, where dust emission is coincident with the region of
440: peak H$_{2}$ emission (at UV and IR wavelengths) as well as CO and other molecules.
441: This correlation would be expected as dust grains are thought to be the
442: primary site of H$_{2}$ formation in the interstellar medium~\citep{cazaux02,cazaux04}.
443: Additionally, photoelectric emission from small grains is an important
444: source of heating in PDRs~\citep{abel05}.
445: \citet{habart04} provide observational evidence for a correlation between AEFs and
446: H$_{2}$, which they propose is related to H$_{2}$ formation on PAHs. % in these regions.
447: With the wealth of observational evidence that these molecules are
448: interrelated in PDRs, it follows naturally to study this group as a whole.
449:
450:
451: %%%8.6 um blurb for discussion section-05/2006
452: %There is debate about the ability of small aromatic molecules
453: %to survive in intense UV radiation fields~\citep{verstraete01,vanD04}.
454: %\citet{verstraete01} have found that the molecules have a larger minimum
455: %size when exposed to a harder radiation field.
456: %The modeling results are uncertain, but it appears that this is seen as a decrease in the
457: %relative strength of the 8.6~$\mu$m feature, presumably due to photodestruction
458: %or ionization of the carrier.
459:
460: In this work, we further address %these issues
461: the physical conditions of the AEF carriers and their relationship
462: with H$_{2}$ and dust grains by presenting new
463: observations of the emission/reflection nebula IC 405 made with $Spitzer$.
464: We use a combination of imaging and
465: spectroscopy to constrain the variation in aromatic carrier properties with
466: changing radiation and dust environment through the nebula.
467: %This work does not aim to determine the exact species responsible for
468: %the AEFs, and neither endorses nor opposes a particular model (PAHs, for example).
469: Our aim is to present new IR observational characteristics
470: of large molecules, dust grains, and H$_{2}$ in the unique PDR environment
471: of IC 405, for comparison with previous far-UV observations.
472:
473: %Mid-IR spectroscopy of several nebular positions reveal variation
474: %in the relative line strengths of the AEFs as well as the
475: %strength of the AEFs relative to the pure rotational emission lines
476: %of H$_{2}$. The spectroscopic results
477: %aid in the interpretation of multi-band imaging at several infrared
478: %wavelengths. Observations of IC 405 provide a new environmental
479: %configuration in which to study these molecules, and offer an %a rare
480: %opportunity to directly compare the properties of %dust and
481: %H$_{2}$ at IR and far-UV wavelengths.
482:
483:
484: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
485: \section{Observations}
486:
487: \subsection{$Spitzer$}
488: $Spitzer$ observations of IC 405 (Program ID 20434)
489: were made at positions coincident with the UV
490: data presented in~\citet{france04}, where H$_{2}$ fluorescence
491: was observed above the level of dust scattered light
492: ($FUSE$ Pos3: RA~=~5$^{h}$16$^{m}$30.21$^{s}$,
493: $\delta$~=~+34$^{\circ}$24$^{'}$56.4$^{''}$ and $FUSE$ Pos4:
494: RA~=~5$^{h}$16$^{m}$18.64$^{s}$,
495: $\delta$~=~+34$^{\circ}$32$^{'}$25.2$^{''}$, J2000; see also \S2.2).
496: The Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) observed the nebula in mapping mode on 2005 September
497: 23, with an exposure time of 12 seconds per frame,
498: for a total integration time approximately 825 seconds. Details of the
499: IRAC instrument can be found in~\citet{irac04}.
500: %A list of the IRAC observing programs is included with 8~$\mu$m nebular photometry in Table~2.
501: The IRAC pointings covered the northern nebula in
502: all four bands (r16033792), with the 4.5/8.0~$\mu$m channel acquiring
503: data of HD 34078 and the associated bow shock (r16033280, Figure~1).
504: The images were reduced with the data processing pipeline (S14.0.0)
505: provided by the $Spitzer$~$Science$~$Center$ (SSC).
506: Analysis was performed on the post-Basic Calibrated Data
507: (BCD) products.
508:
509: \begin{figure}
510: \begin{center}
511: \hspace{+0.0in}
512: %\epsfig{figure=f4.eps,width=4.50in,angle=0}
513: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f4.ps}
514: \caption{\label{irac8bow} IRAC 8.0 $\mu$m blow up of the bow shock region,
515: scaled to illustrate the shock structure. The shock subregions are
516: labeled Shock-East (S$_{E}$), Shock-Center (S$_{C}$), and Shock-West (S$_{W}$).
517: Photometry of the subregions is given in
518: Table 1.
519: }
520: \end{center}
521: \end{figure}
522:
523: \begin{figure}
524: \begin{center}
525: \hspace{+0.0in}
526: %\epsfig{figure=f5.eps,width=5.0in,angle=0}
527: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f5.ps}
528: \caption{\label{mips24bow} MIPS 24 $\mu$m blow up of the shock region,
529: scaled to illustrate the shock structure. The stellar position is at the origin.
530: The inner 10~--~25\arcsec\ near HD 34078 in the direction of stellar motion
531: (North, +$y$) is saturated at 24 $\mu$m, indicative of the high temperature of the
532: grains in the shock region. The dashed lines indicate the location and direction of
533: the spatial profiles presented in Figure 7.
534: 24 $\mu$m photometry of the shock region is given in Table 1
535: }
536: \end{center}
537: \end{figure}
538:
539: \begin{figure}
540: \begin{center}
541: \hspace{+0.0in}
542: %\epsfig{figure=f6.eps,width=6.0in,angle=0}
543: \includegraphics[width=3.5in]{f6.ps}
544: \caption{\label{irac45} IRAC 4.5 $\mu$m image of the
545: HD 34078 region with a logarithmic intensity scale to
546: enhance the nebular emission. The ``cirrus'' features described
547: in \S3.1 are identified. The 4.5 $\mu$m band shows these
548: structures at a higher contrast than the shell structure
549: seen in Figure 1.
550: %Filament A$^{**}$ is visible in the northwest corner of the image.
551: }
552: \end{center}
553: \end{figure}
554:
555: %%%BOW SHOCK PHOTOMETRY TABLE
556: \begin{deluxetable*}{ccccccc}
557: \tabletypesize{\small}
558: \tablecaption{Mid and far-IR photometry of bow shock region. \label{sptzbow}}
559: \tablewidth{0pt}
560: \tablehead{
561: \colhead{Position} & \colhead{RA (2000)\tablenotemark{a}} &
562: \colhead{$\delta$ (2000)} & \colhead{F$_{8}$} & \colhead{F$_{24}$} &
563: \colhead{F$_{70}$} & \colhead{T$_{d}$\tablenotemark{b}} \\
564: %\colhead{Brightness at 1060 \AA\tablenotemark{a}} \\
565: & \colhead{( $^{\mathrm h}$\, $^{\mathrm m}$\, $^{\mathrm s} )$} &
566: \colhead{(\arcdeg\, \arcmin\, \arcsec )} & \colhead{(Jy)} &
567: \colhead{(Jy)} & \colhead{(Jy)} & \colhead{(K)} \\
568: }
569: %\tableline
570: \startdata
571: S$_{E}$ & 05 16 20.98 & +34 18 52 & 0.508 $\pm$ 0.083 & 3.435 $\pm$ 0.229 & 1.945 $\pm$ 0.169 & 83.93 $\pm$ 2.06 \\
572: S$_{C}$ & 05 16 18.42 & +34 18 58 & 0.805 $\pm$ 0.103 & 4.286 $\pm$ 0.255 & 1.904 $\pm$ 0.167 & 88.76 $\pm$ 2.24 \\
573: S$_{W}$ & 05 16 16.83 & +34 18 48 & 0.675 $\pm$ 0.094 & 3.347 $\pm$ 0.225 & 1.805 $\pm$ 0.162 & 84.85 $\pm$ 2.16\\\\
574: \enddata
575:
576: \tablenotetext{a}{Shock pointings were defined from analysis of the
577: 24 $\mu$m MIPS data obtained near HD 34078.}
578: \tablenotetext{b}{Dust temperatures were derived from the ratio of
579: 24 to 70 $\mu$m flux density, F$_{24}$/F$_{70}$. This temperature should be considered
580: a lower limit due to the saturation of the 24 $\mu$m map. }
581: %at the long wavelength end, M. England, private communication~\ref{fuse_sum}.
582: %This note generated with the deluxetable environment}
583:
584: \end{deluxetable*}
585:
586:
587: Using the mapping mode on the Infrared
588: Spectrograph (IRS, Houck et al. 2004)\nocite{irs04}, we obtained
589: spectra clustered around previous $FUSE$ observations Pos3 (r16033024) and Pos4 (r16033536).
590: IRS programs were carried out on
591: 2006 March 17 and 19 with a total exposure time of $\sim$~9600 seconds.
592: Data at all IRS wavelengths were acquired %in mapping mode
593: through both the
594: high and low-resolution apertures (SL, SH, LL, and LH). The spatial
595: coverage of the low-resolution aperture scan allows us to correlate
596: %spectroscopy of several nebular filaments with imaging and photometry,
597: spectral variations with nebular morphology,
598: hence this work will focus on an analysis of the
599: low-resolution (Short-Low, 5~--~15$\mu$m; % and Long-Low, 14~--~35$\mu$m;
600: $R$~=~60~--~130) data. Short-High and Long-Low spectroscopic
601: data were used as supporting observations.
602: The post-BCD (pipeline version S13.2.0) reduced one-dimensional spectra were tagged according
603: to the central aperture position for registration with the associated
604: filaments observed in the imaging. As the ``on-filament'' nebular
605: positions filled most of the Short-Low aperture, analyzing the full-slit extraction
606: at all pointings yielded information about both the spectral characteristics and the
607: slit-filling fraction.
608:
609: We also obtained mosaic maps of IC 405 in the three bands of the
610: Multiband Imaging Photometer for $Spitzer$ (MIPS). A description of the MIPS
611: instrument is given in~\citet{mips04}. The data (r16032768)
612: were obtained on 2006 February 28.
613: The post-BCD scan maps (S13.2.0) at 24 and 70 $\mu$m (Figures 2 and 3) were used to perform photometry of several
614: nebular filaments %( Tables 3 and 4)
615: and complement the
616: imaging at shorter wavelengths.
617: The 24 and 70 $\mu$m maps are of high quality, but we note the
618: inner 10~--~25\arcsec\ of the bow shock region near HD 34078
619: is likely saturated on the 24 $\mu$m Si:As array.
620: The 160 $\mu$m map contains gaps that
621: make measuring long-wavelength photometry very challenging, we will focus on
622: the shorter wavelength MIPS channels here. The 24 and 70 $\mu$m scans covers roughly
623: 8\arcmin~$\times$~54\arcmin\ and 5\arcmin~$\times$~52\arcmin, respectively,
624: both centered on $FUSE$ Pos4.
625:
626:
627: \subsection{$FUSE$}
628: IC 405 was observed by $FUSE$ on 2003 March 11~--~13 as part of the
629: D127 guest observer program~\citep{france04}. Spectroscopy was
630: obtained in the $FUSE$ far-UV bandpass (905~--~1187 \AA) through
631: the low-resolution (30\arcsec~$\times$~30\arcsec;
632: $\Delta\lambda\approx$ 0.33\AA) aperture (Moos et al. 2000).~\nocite{moos00}
633: The data acquired at positions Pos3 and Pos4 show H$_{2}$ emission
634: lines and were used to guide the $Spitzer$ observations
635: presented in this work. We use the LiF2a (1087~--~1179\AA)
636: channel to measure the strength of the strongest far-UV band of
637: continuum pumped H$_{2}$ fluorescence, $\lambda\sim$~1100\AA,
638: for comparison with the pure rotational emission lines in the IRS bandpass (\S4.2).
639: The $FUSE$ data were obtained in time-tagged mode
640: and reduced with the CalFUSE pipeline, version 2.2.3, with errors
641: determined from the associated count rate plots. Both
642: positions were observed for roughly 12.5 ksec.
643:
644: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
645: \section{Analysis and Results: Imaging and Spectroscopy}
646: The 8.0 $\mu$m IRAC images showed the best combination of
647: S/N ($\sim$6~--~38 for the faintest to the brightest nebular features),
648: spatial resolution ($\lesssim$2\arcsec; Fazio et al. 2004),
649: and nebular structure with a field-of-view that
650: covered all of the subregions of interest. A
651: composite of the 8.0 $\mu$m images is shown in Figure~1. These data provided
652: a reference frame for all of the image and spectroscopic analysis described below.
653: %An inspection of the 8.0 $\mu$m images show rich
654: %substructure not seen in optical images of IC 405. The wake-like feature
655: %suggestive of a shock caused by the intrusion of HD 34078 will be discussed in
656: %greater detail in \S3.1.1.
657: The overall morphology of the 8.0 $\mu$m
658: images shows the brightest structures seen in the three-color optical
659: image\footnote{T.A. Rector, http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap011204.html; also
660: presented in Figure 1 of France et al. (2004).}, displayed in Figure 1 for comparison with the IRAC data.
661: The ``shell'' structure seen to the East/Northeast of HD 34078 with a
662: radius of $\sim$~400\arcsec\ observed in DSS images and in Plate IV of
663: \citet{herbig58} is observed at 8.0 $\mu$m.
664:
665: %%%IRAC 8um observation table
666: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
667: \tabletypesize{\small}
668: \tablecaption{8~$\mu$m IRAC photometry of nebular filaments. \label{sptz8fil}}
669: \tablewidth{0pt}
670: \tablehead{
671: \colhead{Position} & \colhead{Program} & \colhead{RA (2000)} &
672: \colhead{$\delta$ (2000)} & \colhead{Flux\tablenotemark{a}} \\
673: %\colhead{Brightness at 1060 \AA\tablenotemark{a}} \\
674: & & \colhead{( $^{\mathrm h}$\, $^{\mathrm m}$\, $^{\mathrm s} )$} &
675: \colhead{(\arcdeg\, \arcmin\, \arcsec )} & \colhead{(Jy)} \\ %& \colhead{}
676: }
677: %\tableline
678: \startdata
679: A & r16033280 & 05 16 30.97 & +34 25 04 & 0.466 $\pm$ 0.079 \\
680: A$^{*}$ & r16033280 & 05 16 19.84 & +34 25 18 & 0.385 $\pm$ 0.072 \\
681: A$^{**}$ & r16033280 & 05 16 15.53 & +34 23 57 & 0.573 $\pm$ 0.088 \\
682: B & r16033792 & 05 16 16.88 & +34 32 21 & 0.543 $\pm$ 0.085 \\
683: \\
684: \enddata
685:
686: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
687: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
688: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
689:
690: \tablenotetext{a}{The 8.0 $\mu$m images contain contributions from
691: AEFs, H$_{2}$, and [\ion{Ar}{2}]. The 7.7 AEF contributes between
692: 30~--~40\% of the 8.0 $\mu$m band flux in the region of peak filament
693: brightness.}
694: %at the long wavelength end, M. England, private communication~\ref{fuse_sum}.
695: %This note generated with the deluxetable environment}
696:
697: \end{deluxetable}
698:
699:
700:
701: Two bright nebular regions were chosen for analysis in this work, based on
702: previous ultraviolet studies.
703: Filaments A and B were part of the~\citet{france04} far-UV study of IC 405.
704: Data acquired at these positions showed a combination of fluorescent H$_{2}$ emission and
705: dust-scattered starlight. These observations provided %the first astronomical detection of
706: detection of continuum pumped H$_{2}$ emission where the
707: rotational substructure was spectroscopically resolved at wavelengths shortward of Ly$\alpha$.
708: Filament A is broken up into three subregions: the
709: main A knot with existing UV spectroscopy; $\sim$175\arcsec\ to the west,
710: Filament A$^{*}$ is a clumpy feature located at the end of the
711: Filament A structure; and Filament A$^{**}$ to the southwest was the brightest
712: feature in the 70 $\mu$m data (these nebular features are labeled in Figure~1).
713: The brightest features in the optical image are related to the regions
714: containing Filaments A and B at infrared wavelengths. Filaments A and
715: B are also the dominant features in the 6300~--~6750~\AA\ photographic
716: images presented in Herbig (1958; Plate III), where line emission from
717: H$\alpha$, [\ion{N}{2}], and [\ion{S}{2}] is the primary source of the nebular
718: brightness.\nocite{herbig58}
719:
720: The following subsections are divided into imaging and
721: spectroscopic results. The imaging is presented first,
722: starting near HD 34078 and moving out into the northern filaments.
723: An analysis of the IRS spectroscopy follows, we determine the
724: relative contribution of the nebular species to the IRAC images and observe
725: position-dependent line strengths.
726: We note that the IRAC band overlap regions and spectroscopic programs were
727: centered on Filaments A and B, thus six-band imaging and
728: spectroscopy do not exist for all IC 405 subregions.
729: A brief comparison between the imaging and spectroscopy of the different regions
730: is given in \S3.3.
731: %The imaging, photometry, and spectroscopy are discussed where applicable.
732:
733: \subsection{Imaging: IRAC and MIPS}
734:
735: $Bow$ $Shock$ - The wake feature seen clearly in the 8.0 $\mu$m IRAC (Figure 4) and
736: 24 $\mu$m MIPS (Figure 5) images is thought to be enhanced dust emission
737: produced by the interaction of HD 34078 with the ambient nebular medium~\citep{vanburen88}.
738: The bullet-tip interaction region is seen most
739: clearly in the 24 $\mu$m images (despite the saturation of the brightest
740: ridge), and three positions were chosen for analysis. Moving from
741: left to right on the image blow-ups, they are labeled Shock-East (S$_{E}$),
742: Shock-Center (S$_{C}$), and Shock-West (S$_{W}$).
743: The 8.0 $\mu$m data show an emission arc of diameter $\sim$~75\arcsec\
744: with an enhancement of factors of $>$~5 (in units of MJy sr$^{-1}$)
745: relative to the interfilament medium.
746: The emission arc has a brightness peak 10~--~20\arcsec\ to the northeast
747: of the stellar coordinates. The 24 $\mu$m
748: image shows a similar 75\arcsec\ arc, with higher contrast emission in the outer
749: edges of the arc. The 24 $\mu$m data also suggest a
750: connection between the shocked material and the cirrus features
751: discussed below. The 24 $\mu$m flux density transitions from the cometary arc into the cirrus features to the east of the star more smoothly than at 8 $\mu$m.
752: %lacking the
753: %factor of $\sim$3 flux dip between the shock and cirrus regions observed at 4.5 $\mu$m.
754: Both the 8 and 24 $\mu$m images show a clear spatial offset between the
755: position of HD 34078 and the peak of the infrared emission.
756: The 4.5 $\mu$m IRAC image is dominated by the saturated core of HD 34078 (Figure 6),
757: but asymmetries in the PSF suggest that an enhancement exists
758: in the direction of stellar motion.
759: An arc is detected in the 70 $\mu$m MIPS observations, which can be
760: seen faintly in Figure~3.
761:
762: \begin{figure}
763: \begin{center}
764: \hspace{+0.0in}
765: %\epsfig{figure=f7.eps,width=5.0in,angle=90}
766: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=3.5in]{f7.eps}
767: \caption{\label{mipscuts} Spatial profiles of the 24 and 70 $\mu$m MIPS scans
768: of the southern region of IC 405. The 24 $\mu$m data have been convolved to
769: a resolution of $\approx$~18\arcsec\ for comparison with the 70 $\mu$m map.
770: The direction and magnitude of the stellar motion through IC 405 is indicated.
771: The 24 $\mu$m profiles outline the shock region while the 70 $\mu$m cuts show
772: a weaker peak near the stellar position and a maximum near the Filament A$^{**}$
773: region.}
774: \end{center}
775: \end{figure}
776:
777: %Hard to say whether 8.0 are hot grains or PAHS as not much PAH emission
778: %in the 4.5 band to constrain things and we did not obtain spec. of the
779:
780: %%%MIPS 24um observation table
781: \begin{deluxetable}{lcccc}
782: \tabletypesize{\small}
783: \tablecaption{24~$\mu$m MIPS photometry of nebular filaments. \label{sptz24fil}}
784: \tablewidth{0pt}
785: \tablehead{
786: \colhead{Position} & \colhead{Program} & \colhead{RA (2000)} &
787: \colhead{$\delta$ (2000)} & \colhead{Flux\tablenotemark{a}} \\
788: %\colhead{Brightness at 1060 \AA\tablenotemark{a}} \\
789: & & \colhead{( $^{\mathrm h}$\, $^{\mathrm m}$\, $^{\mathrm s} )$} &
790: \colhead{(\arcdeg\, \arcmin\, \arcsec )} & \colhead{(Jy)} \\ %& \colhead{}
791: }
792: %\tableline
793: \startdata
794: A & r16032768 & 05 16 30.99 & +34 25 03 & 1.045 $\pm$ 0.126 \\
795: A$^{*}$ & r16032768 & 05 16 19.70 & +34 25 18 & 0.984 $\pm$ 0.123 \\
796: A$^{**}$ & r16032768 & 05 16 15.52 & +34 23 58 & 1.175 $\pm$ 0.134 \\
797: B & r16032768 & 05 16 18.17 & +34 32 27 & 0.892 $\pm$ 0.117 \\
798: \\
799: \enddata
800:
801: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
802: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
803: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
804:
805: \tablenotetext{a}{IRS Long-Low spectra were analyzed to assess the emission line
806: contribution to the 24 $\mu$m band flux. Discrete lines were found to contribute
807: less than 8\% of emission in the 21.5~--~26.2 $\mu$m bandpass.}
808: %at the long wavelength end, M. England, private communication~\ref{fuse_sum}.
809: %This note generated with the deluxetable environment}
810:
811: \end{deluxetable}
812:
813: %$Spatial$~$Profiles$~$and$~$Photometry$ -
814: We measured the variation in dust profile across the interaction region by
815: taking spatial cuts through the 24 and 70 $\mu$m MIPS
816: data, intersecting the S$_{E}$, S$_{C}$, and S$_{W}$ positions.
817: In order to make a fair comparison, the 24 $\mu$m data were
818: convolved to a resolution of 18\arcsec\ and rebinned to the
819: dimensions of the 70 $\mu$m scan. The images were then
820: aligned with a $\sim$~3\arcdeg\ rotation to account for
821: spacecraft roll orientation and registered
822: with their WCS data using a combination of image analysis tools (custom IDL
823: codes as well as ds9 from the Chandra X-Ray Center
824: and the SSC data retrieval program Leopard).
825: %IDL, $Leopard$, and ds9.
826: We found that the registration was accurate to roughly 2\arcsec\ in
827: $x$ ($\sim$~RA) and 10\arcsec\ in $y$ ($\sim$~Dec).
828: These profiles are shown in Figure 7 running from south to north
829: (left to right on the figure), intersecting the S$_{E}$, S$_{C}$, and
830: S$_{W}$ coordinates listed in Table 1. S$_{E}$, S$_{C}$, and
831: S$_{W}$ are labeled in Figures 4 and 5, with dashed lines representing the
832: cuts in Figure 5.
833: The 24 $\mu$m profiles
834: show the dominance of the bow shock, again noting that the
835: peak brightness regions (10~--~25\arcsec\ from HD 34078) are likely saturated.
836: The position of HD 34078 is indicated with the dotted line at 0
837: and the direction of stellar motion through the nebula is labeled in the
838: center panel.
839: The S$_{E}$ profile shows the largest breadth due to
840: its association with the cirrus-like structures.
841: The 70 $\mu$m profiles show an enhancement at the shocked region,
842: but rise to a maximum at the intersection of the nebular arm
843: containing Filament A$^{**}$ ($y$~$\approx$~400\arcsec,
844: marked with the dashed line in Figure 7). The second peak in the 70 $\mu$m S$_{E}$
845: and S$_{C}$ profiles near 520\arcsec\ are associated
846: with the intersection of Filament A$^{*}$. We also observe
847: an additional peak %a second maximum
848: at the intersection of the Filament B arm, but we do not show
849: a comparison as the image registration was of poorer quality.
850:
851: \begin{figure*}
852: \begin{center}
853: \hspace{+0.0in}
854: %\epsfig{figure=f8.eps,width=5.0in,angle=90}
855: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=6.5in]{f8.ps}
856: \caption{
857: \label{6ircomp_01} Six-color imaging of the Filament A, A$^{*}$, and
858: A$^{**}$ regions. Data from the four IRAC bands and two MIPS bands are shown
859: at their original resolution, with intensity scales intended to display the nebular structure.
860: The black regions on the 3.6 and 70 $\mu$m
861: images were not observed. The overlays shown on the 8.0 $\mu$m image
862: represent the IRS-SL aperture scan direction and the ON/OFF convention used in this work.
863: This spectroscopy indicates that the AEFs make an
864: important contribution to the nebular emission at positions of peak
865: filament brightness.
866: }
867: \end{center}
868: \end{figure*}
869:
870: Flux ratio (F$_{24}$/F$_{70}$) profiles were made using these
871: extractions. These profiles were interpolated onto
872: a common spatial grid ($\approx$~4.7\arcsec/pixel) before comparison. The registration
873: in $y$ was the primary source of uncertainty for these comparisons.
874: These ratios were used to derive the dust temperature profile
875: in the shocked region, discussed in \S4.1.1. Photometry
876: of the S$_{E}$, S$_{C}$, and S$_{W}$ regions was performed on the
877: 8, 24, and 70 $\mu$m images following the procedure described below.
878: The photometric values for the shock regions are listed in Table 1.
879:
880:
881: $The$ $HD$ $34078$ $Region$~--~The largest difference between the 8.0 $\mu$m and optical images
882: of IC 405 are the cirrus-like sheets of emission that are seen to the
883: northeast of HD 34078 ($\Delta~x$~=~-250~--~0\arcsec,
884: $\Delta~y$~=~0~--~300\arcsec\ in Figures 1, 4, 5, and 6). This cirrus structure
885: extends along filaments roughly from HD 34078 into the region containing
886: Filament A$^{**}$. It may be possible to observe this substructure in the optical
887: with high spatial resolution and a narrow field of view,
888: imaging the nebula without strong contamination from the central star
889: (i.e. - $HST$-ACS).
890:
891: These cirrus sheets are the strongest features in the 4.5 $\mu$m IRAC
892: images of this region (Figure 6). The region of patchy emission (-330\arcsec,-75\arcsec)
893: seen at 8.0 $\mu$m is observed with a lower
894: relative strength at 4.5 $\mu$m. MIPS 24 $\mu$m imaging of this region
895: finds similar relative intensities as those seen at 4.5 $\mu$m, strong
896: cirrus sheets to the northeast of the star, with much lower relative
897: intensity features coincident with the patchy 8.0 $\mu$m
898: and ``shell'' structure. This
899: suggests that there is a common dust component responsible for the
900: cirrus emission seen at 4.5, 8.0, and 24 $\mu$m, while there is an
901: additional component contributing to the 8.0 $\mu$m flux in the
902: ``shell'' region. This additional 8.0 $\mu$m component is most likely
903: a combination of an increased contribution from the 7.7 and 8.6 $\mu$m
904: AEFs. One of the results of the IRS scans of the bright filaments,
905: discussed below, is that the percentage contribution of AEFs to the
906: total flux in a given imaging band increases in the
907: brightest knots. We propose that the regions showing an enhanced
908: brightness in the 8.0 $\mu$m IRAC band relative
909: to the dust emission at 4.5 and 24 $\mu$m are favorable for survival
910: of the AEF carriers.
911:
912:
913: $Filament$ $A$ - Filaments A$^{*}$ and A$^{**}$ were covered by all four IRAC imaging fields and the
914: MIPS scans at both 24 and 70 $\mu$m. A portion of Filament A was
915: lost at the edge of the 70 $\mu$m map, but covered in all other
916: bands (Figure 8). The 3.6 $\mu$m images of this region display a peak along the star-facing edge of the
917: clouds containing the filaments. The filaments are seen at 4.5 $\mu$m,
918: though faint compared to the cirrus features seen near the star at
919: this wavelength. The 4.5 $\mu$m images were the weakest (in units
920: of MJy sr$^{-1}$) in our filamentary imaging.
921: We found the 4.5, 5.8, and 8.0 $\mu$m bands to be
922: tracing the same spatial regions, with the 5.8 and 8.0 bands
923: enhanced relative to the 4.5 $\mu$m. Again, this is attributed to additional
924: flux from AEFs in the 5.8 and 8.0 $\mu$m bands.
925:
926: The 24 and 70 $\mu$m MIPS images of Filament A show consistency with the
927: 8.0 $\mu$m reference image. The
928: 24 $\mu$m map shows an additional flare structure pointing from Filament
929: A$^{**}$ to the northwest (RA~=~05$^{h}$16$^{m}$14.49$^{s}$,
930: $\delta$~=~+34$^{\circ}$24\arcmin47.0\arcsec, J2000).
931: This feature is also seen weakly at 4.5 $\mu$m.
932:
933: \begin{figure*}
934: \begin{center}
935: \hspace{+0.0in}
936: %\epsfig{figure=f8.eps,width=5.0in,angle=90}
937: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=6.0in]{f9.ps}
938: \caption{
939: \label{6ircomp_02} Six-color imaging of the Filament B
940: region. Data from the four IRAC bands and two MIPS bands are shown
941: at their original resolution. The images are qualitatively similar,
942: but quantitative analysis shows that the South (HD 34078-facing)
943: edge of filament is more extended at 24 $\mu$m, suggesting that
944: the carriers of the AEFs are being destroyed in the tenuous interfilament
945: medium. The 24 $\mu$m map also shows a ``Plume'' to the
946: north and a ``Binary'' feature to the northeast of the main Filament B emission,
947: not seen as distinctly in other bands. Again, the overlays shown on the 8.0 $\mu$m image
948: represent the IRS-SL aperture scan direction and the ON/OFF convention.
949: }
950: \end{center}
951: \end{figure*}
952:
953: %$Photometry$ - Nebular photometry (at 8, 24, and 70 $\mu$m) of the four filaments
954: Nebular photometry (at 8, 24, and 70 $\mu$m) of Filaments A and B
955: was performed and the flux densities are presented in Tables 2, 3, and 4.
956: To ensure a fair comparison, the spatial resolution of the
957: 8.0 $\mu$m IRAC image and the 24 $\mu$m MIPS scan were degraded.
958: A two-dimensional Gaussian kernel was convolved with the data
959: to produce 8 and 24 $\mu$m images with an effective resolution of
960: about 18\arcsec, comparable to that of the 70 $\mu$m map~\citep{mips04}.
961: The convolved images were integrated over a discrete
962: number of pixels and multiplied by the solid angle subtended by each pixel,
963: 3.4~$\times$~10$^{-11}$ sr pixel$^{-1}$ at 8 $\mu$m,
964: 1.5~$\times$~10$^{-10}$ sr pixel$^{-1}$ at 24 $\mu$m, and
965: 5.8~$\times$~10$^{-10}$ sr pixel$^{-1}$ at 70 $\mu$m.
966:
967: We chose the photometric extraction regions based on the sizes of the
968: filaments in the 8.0 $\mu$m data. We found that the
969: central cores of all four filament positions could be contained
970: in a box of roughly 20\arcsec~$\times$~20\arcsec.
971: %;Mismatches in aperture sizes should not affect the analysis.
972: A 20 pixel square %(24\arcsec$^{2}$) extraction region was
973: used at 8 $\mu$m, a 10 pixel square was used in the 24 $\mu$m band, %(25.5\arcsec$^{2}$),
974: and a 5 pixel square extraction %(25\arcsec$^{2}$)
975: was used for the 70 $\mu$m MIPS data.
976: These extraction regions are of the same order as the projected size of the
977: $FUSE$ LWRS aperture (30\arcsec~$\times$~30\arcsec) used at Filaments A and B (Figure 1).
978: %As noted above, on the filaments the discrete band component to the
979: %8.0 $\mu$m flux could be as high as 30~--~40\%. The discrete contribution to the 8.0 $\mu$m
980: %band flux density varies across the photometric extraction region (Figure 5), thus
981: %the overall line emission contribution cannot be conclusively determined, and the
982: %quoted values should be taken as an upper limit to the continuum emission in this band.
983: %DOUBLE CHECK THAT THE 70 $\mu$m PIXEL SIZE IS $NOT$ 9.84).
984: The photometric measurements were used to constrain the
985: nebular dust temperature in IC 405, as discussed in \S4.1 and \S4.2.
986:
987: %%%MIPS 70um observation table
988: \begin{deluxetable*}{lcccc}
989: \tabletypesize{\small}
990: \tablecaption{70~$\mu$m MIPS photometry of nebular filaments. \label{sptz70fil}}
991: \tablewidth{0pt}
992: \tablehead{
993: \colhead{Position} & \colhead{Program} & \colhead{RA (2000)} &
994: \colhead{$\delta$ (2000)} & \colhead{Flux} \\
995: %\colhead{Brightness at 1060 \AA\tablenotemark{a}} \\
996: & & \colhead{( $^{\mathrm h}$\, $^{\mathrm m}$\, $^{\mathrm s} )$} &
997: \colhead{(\arcdeg\, \arcmin\, \arcsec )} & \colhead{(Jy)} \\ %& \colhead{}
998: }
999: %\tableline
1000: \startdata
1001: A & partially off scan map & -- & -- & -- \\
1002: A$^{*}$ & r16032768 & 05 16 19.66 & +34 25 20 & 2.562 $\pm$ 0.193 \\
1003: A$^{**}$ & r16032768 & 05 16 15.64 & +34 23 50 & 3.141 $\pm$ 0.214 \\
1004: B & r16032768 & 05 16 17.74 & +34 32 32 & 2.356 $\pm$ 0.186 \\
1005: \\
1006: \enddata
1007:
1008: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
1009: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
1010: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
1011:
1012: %\tablenotetext{a}{Calculated from LiF 2a, calibration in LiF 1b incorrect
1013: %at the long wavelength end, M. England, private communication~\ref{fuse_sum}.
1014: %This note generated with the deluxetable environment}
1015:
1016: \end{deluxetable*}
1017:
1018:
1019: $Filament$ $B$ - The Filament B region is located $\approx$~1000\arcsec\ north of HD 34078,
1020: a part of what \citet{herbig58} labels the ``E nebulosity''. This is
1021: a position where $FUSE$ detected fluorescent emission from H$_{2}$ as
1022: the most prominent spectral feature from Ly$\beta$ to
1023: 1190~\AA~\citep{france04}. Filament B was covered in all six imaging
1024: bands used in this work as well as with spectroscopic
1025: scans. %%%High-dispersion spectra of the filament center were also obtained.
1026: Unlike the southern filaments described above, all four IRAC bands
1027: appear to be tracing the same material in the Filament B region.
1028: They show the same northeast-to-southwest elongated filamentary structure
1029: with a peanut-shaped central concentration. This peanut-shaped
1030: central structure, shown in all six IR imaging bands in Figure 9,
1031: is the center of Filament B (RA~=~05$^{h}$16$^{m}$16.88$^{s}$,
1032: $\delta$~=~+34$^{\circ}$32\arcmin21.0\arcsec, J2000).
1033:
1034: The MIPS scans at 24 and 70 $\mu$m follow the structure seen in the
1035: IRAC bands, with a few noteworthy exceptions. The MIPS data
1036: show that the southern edge of the region occurs closer to the star at 24 $\mu$m
1037: than at the IRAC wavelengths. The 24 $\mu$m brightness increases
1038: gradually (B$_{24}$ 47~--~61 MJy sr$^{-1}$) over a $\sim$~30\arcsec\
1039: transition region onto Filament B, while the 8.0 $\mu$m brightness
1040: rises more abruptly at the edge of the filament, increasing in brightness
1041: by more than a factor of two (B$_{8}$ 18~--~40 MJy sr$^{-1}$) over
1042: a 15\arcsec\ interface region. Destruction of small grains and the
1043: carrier of the 7.7 $\mu$m AEF in the more tenuous environment
1044: south of Filament B could produce this effect. We may be seeing the
1045: erosion of this cloud in progress, the strong UV field of HD 34078
1046: photoevaporating the carbonaceous grains and weakly shielded molecules.
1047: This idea could be tested by searching for the remnants of these species
1048: ([\ion{C}{2}]~$\lambda$158 $\mu$m for example; van Dishoeck 2004)
1049: %-DOUBLE CHECK THE SANITY OF THIS/OTHER REMNANT SPECIES PREDICTIONS?
1050: %REFERENCES FOR SUCH A PROCESS?)
1051: with future far-IR spectroscopic instrumentation,
1052: such as $Herschel$-PACS~\citep{pacs04}.
1053:
1054: The 24 $\mu$m MIPS data also reveal a plume of material to the
1055: north-northwest of the main knot of Filament B
1056: (RA~=~05$^{h}$16$^{m}$16.74$^{s}$,
1057: $\delta$~=~+34$^{\circ}$33\arcmin09.5\arcsec, J2000). The IRAC images show
1058: hints of emission at this location, but only at 24 $\mu$m is the contrast
1059: high enough to identify this plume as a separate feature. It is worth
1060: noting that this plume seems to be ``in the shadow''
1061: of Filament B, analogous to the position of the flare filament
1062: seen in the shadow of Filament A$^{**}$ at 24 $\mu$m. The other
1063: notable feature seen in the MIPS imaging is the binary structure seen to the
1064: northeast of Filament B at 24 $\mu$m
1065: (RA~=~05$^{h}$16$^{m}$21.75$^{s}$,
1066: $\delta$~=~+34$^{\circ}$32\arcmin41.9\arcsec, J2000).
1067: The two components of this feature are not spatially resolved at 70 $\mu$m.
1068: The ``Plume'' and ``Binary'' features are labeled on Figure 8.
1069: %The binarity of this
1070: %feature is unresolved at 70 $\mu$m, but a second brightness peak is clearly visible
1071: %at this location
1072: %(DO WE DARE CALL IT A PROTOSTAR? A REDSHIFT 20 LY-A EMITTER? :).
1073:
1074: Integrated flux densities for Filament B were measured from the
1075: IRAC 8.0, MIPS 24, and MIPS 70 $\mu$m images.
1076: The values are listed in Tables 2, 3, and 4. We find the
1077: 24/70 $\mu$m ratio to be essentially identical in Filaments A$^{*}$, A$^{**}$, and B
1078: (0.379~$\pm$~0.005), indicative of similar dust temperatures in the three regions (\S4.2).
1079:
1080: \begin{figure}
1081: \begin{center}
1082: \hspace{+0.0in}
1083: %\epsfig{figure=f9.eps,width=5.5in,angle=90}
1084: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=3.75in]{f10.eps}
1085: \vspace{+0.15in}
1086: \caption{
1087: \label{p4irs_01} Filament A line strengths measured with the Short-Low
1088: module on the IRS, as a function of position. The coordinates
1089: correspond to the 8.0 $\mu$m reference image, Figure 1.
1090: The map goes from
1091: East (-245\arcsec, on the core of the filament) to West
1092: ($>$ -220\arcsec, off of the peak of the 8.0 $\mu$m filament emission).
1093: %The dotted lines are integer multiples
1094: %of the minimum line strength, intended to illustrate the change in relative
1095: %strength of a given line.
1096: %The [\ion{Ne}{2}] line is the
1097: %strongest spectral feature in several of the Filament A and Filament
1098: %B Short-High observations.}
1099: }
1100: \end{center}
1101: \end{figure}
1102:
1103: \subsection{Spectroscopy: IRS}
1104:
1105:
1106: $Filament$ $A$ - The IRS scan maps of Filament A have been used
1107: to measure the variations in emission characteristics from dense
1108: knots to tenuous nebular material.
1109: The spatial and spectral coverage of the Short-Low (5~--~15 $\mu$m)
1110: module is best suited to studying the change in
1111: AEF signature while scanning across the region of interest in full-slitwidth
1112: steps. Filament A was mapped from east to west,
1113: with the eastern portion of the map being located on the brightest parts
1114: of Filament A, while the western portion was off the brightest Filament A
1115: emission (Figure 10).
1116:
1117: \begin{figure}
1118: \begin{center}
1119: \hspace{+0.0in}
1120: %\epsfig{figure=f10.eps,width=5.0in,angle=90}
1121: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=3.5in]{f11.eps}
1122: \caption{
1123: \label{p3irs} IRS spectra of the ON-filament and
1124: OFF-filament regions near Filament A. The OFF-Filament
1125: was scaled up to the ON-filament flux level in the 10 $\mu$m region.
1126: The ON-filament (top panel, blue) spectrum shows the 7.7 and 11.2 AEFs,
1127: H$_{2}$, and the 11~--~14 $\mu$m ``plateau'' to be enhanced compared to the
1128: OFF-filament (top panel, red) pointing.
1129: The bottom panel shows the difference of the ON and OFF-filament
1130: spectra to illustrate the differences.}
1131: \end{center}
1132: \end{figure}
1133:
1134: All observed emission lines follow the same generic trend: They are brightest near the
1135: peak of the 8.0 $\mu$m reference image, and their intensity
1136: falls off with distance from the peak (Figure 10).
1137: The AEFs at 6.2, 8.6, and 11.2 were detected clearly at all Filament A
1138: pointings. Band substructure in the 6.2 $\mu$m feature is discussed in \S4.4.
1139: Line strengths were measured by integrating the spectra over the
1140: wavelengths of interest (in the case of the 7.7 $\mu$m band, the
1141: 1$^{st}$ and 2$^{nd}$ orders were joined before measurement). The continuum contribution was removed
1142: by subtracting %an integrated portion of the spectrum adjacent to the line.
1143: a linear fit to the continuum over the wavelengths spanned by the line.
1144: The 7.7 $\mu$m AEF was seen to be the most variable spectral feature,
1145: ranging from marginally detectable off the filament to a wide ($\Delta\lambda~\sim$~1~$\mu$m) band
1146: at the peak of the filament brightness.
1147: %Unfortunately, when it was
1148: %present, the 7.7 $\mu$m feature straddled the 1$^{st}$, 2$^{nd}$, and 3$^{rd}$ IRS
1149: %orders. %We did not feel that reliable systematic line strengths could be
1150: %The 7.7 $\mu$m line strength could not be measured in the same
1151: %manner as the other features when both the line and continuum subtraction measurement
1152: %came from different orders and detector segments, thus we only describe
1153: %this qualitative analysis of the 7.7 $\mu$m AEF.
1154: %Error measurements were not included in the one-dimensional
1155: %extractions of these Short-Low observations, and several approaches were
1156: %attempted to account for the error in these measurements.
1157: %Wavelength regions used for subtracting the continuum from the measured line strengths
1158: %often lay on the wing of an AEF, this caused the background region to vary
1159: %over the extracted wavelength region in some cases.
1160: %This complicated a systematic error analysis plan.
1161: For all IRS-SL spectral lines, we conservatively assumed a 20\%
1162: flux error on each measurement (line and continuum) which resulted to total line
1163: strength uncertainties of a few to approximately 30\%.
1164: % We are currently developing a more rigorous error analysis system which
1165: % will be implemented in the data analysis of our $Spitzer/FUSE$ PDR
1166: %survey, in preparation.
1167: %Errors in line
1168: %strength measurements for the rest of the lines studied was conservatively
1169: %assumed to be 20\%. %NOTE HOW Co-ADDING LINE+CONT, ERR sometimes was less.
1170: %The assumption of 20\% flux error independent of the signal strength in a
1171: % given line is responsible for the somewhat counterintuitive error bars shown
1172: % in Figures 5 and 8. We do not feel that an underestimate of the error on the
1173: % fainter, off-filament line strength will affect the analysis.
1174:
1175: Figure 11 shows examples of the low-dispersion spectra acquired at Filament A,
1176: showing several aromatic and H$_{2}$ emission lines.
1177: The spectra obtained on the peak of the 8 $\mu$m emission also
1178: show a broad ``plateau'' feature from 11~--~14 $\mu$m that is not
1179: seen in the spectra obtained off the filament.
1180: This plateau was first seen by $IRAS$~\citep{cohen85}, and $Spitzer$
1181: detected a similar 10.5~--~14.5 $\mu$m
1182: feature in NGC 7023, however in that nebula the individual features wash out into
1183: a broad $\Delta\lambda$~$\approx$~2 $\mu$m feature farther from the
1184: central star~\citep{werner04b}.
1185: A similar effect with distance from the illuminating star was seen by
1186: \citet{cesarsky00} in the reflection nebula Ced 201.
1187: In the case of IC 405 however, the entire spectroscopic scan of Filament A is
1188: roughly equidistant from HD 34078, thus we are most likely not observing an evolution
1189: with radiation field. %%%It seems clear from the imaging that
1190: The imaging indicates that the spectra sample less dense regions as the scan moves off
1191: the filament. This result would be consistent with the 11~--~14 $\mu$m plateau
1192: being controlled by density\footnote{We note that while IR flux density
1193: images are representative of the underlying
1194: density structure, the IRAC flux density does not strictly reflect the
1195: nebular density~\citep{heitsch06}.}.
1196: %%%%%MJy/sr <-> cm$^{2 or 3}$ conversion uncertainty statement - kf - 07/19/06%%%%%
1197: %%%%% PUT into a footnote per discussions with SRM - 08/27/06 %%%%
1198: %We note that while IR flux density images are representative of the underlying
1199: %density structure, the IRAC flux density does not strictly reflect the
1200: %nebular density~\citep{heitsch06}. Keeping this qualification in mind,
1201:
1202: \begin{figure}
1203: \begin{center}
1204: \hspace{+0.0in}
1205: %\epsfig{figure=f11.eps,width=5.5in,angle=90}
1206: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=3.75in]{f12.eps}
1207: \vspace{+0.15in}
1208: \caption{
1209: \label{p4irs_02} Filament B line strengths measured with the Short-Low
1210: module on the IRS, as a function of position. The coordinates
1211: correspond to the 8.0 $\mu$m reference image, Figure 1. The map goes from
1212: East (-105\arcsec, off of the filament) to West
1213: ($>$ -70\arcsec, near the peak of the 8.0 $\mu$m filament emission).
1214: }
1215: \end{center}
1216: \end{figure}
1217:
1218: Mid-IR spectra of the Orion Bar~\citep{bregman89} indicate that
1219: the molecules responsible for the 11~--~13 $\mu$m plateau are independent of
1220: the carriers of the narrower AEFs.
1221: %We also do not observe the individual features
1222: %washing out as the plateau strengthens.
1223: In IC 405, the AEFs, as well as the lines of
1224: H$_{2}$ and 12.8 $\mu$m AEF+[\ion{Ne}{2}] (described below), show an
1225: increase in peak flux with the plateau strength. Figure~11
1226: illustrates the changes in these features. The top panel shows a comparison
1227: between spectra observed at the peak of the filament brightness
1228: and spectra observed off the filament. The ``off'' spectrum is scaled
1229: to the 10.0~--~10.5 $\mu$m region of the ``on'' spectrum.
1230: The difference of the two is plotted in the lower panel. The
1231: relative strengths of the 7.7 $\mu$m feature, the H$_{2}$ lines, and the
1232: 11.2 and 12.8 $\mu$m features are all enhanced with the 11~--~14 $\mu$m
1233: plateau.
1234: %The 12.7 $\mu$m AEF cannot be clearly identified in these data.
1235: %AEF 11.3 AT 11.08 ON THE FILAMENT? MEASUREMENT ERROR?
1236:
1237: Several atomic emission lines produced in ionized gas were
1238: observed in the Short-High observations clustered on the brightest region
1239: of Filament A, but we only report on the species that appear in
1240: more than 15 of the 25 pointings. These spectra show strong [\ion{Ne}{2}] $\lambda$12.81 $\mu$m
1241: at all positions. In the low dispersion spectra of Filament A, the
1242: average central wavelength of the 12.8 $\mu$m feature is observed at
1243: $\langle\lambda_{obs}\rangle$~=~12.817~$\pm$~0.005 $\mu$m, consistent with the
1244: observed emission coming from ionized neon as opposed to the 12.7 $\mu$m AEF.
1245: In addition to [\ion{Ne}{2}],
1246: %\ion{O}{1} $\lambda$13.14 and [\ion{S}{3}]
1247: %$\lambda$18.71 $\mu$m were seen in most of the high dispersion data.
1248: [\ion{S}{3}] $\lambda$18.71 $\mu$m is detected in most of the high dispersion data.
1249: We note that it is interesting to find these
1250: energetic ions (ionization potentials are $>$ 21 eV for \ion{Ne}{2} and \ion{S}{3}) spatially aligned with the emission
1251: lines of H$_{2}$, described below. One might naively expect that
1252: the molecules would be destroyed in a region with highly excited ions, yet they
1253: are observed within the same 4.7\arcsec~$\times$~11.3\arcsec\
1254: (IRS Short-High aperture) region. This may suggest that
1255: the H$_{2}$ in IC 405 resides in dense globular reservoirs, as in planetary
1256: nebulae~\citep{huggins02,speck03,lupu06,hora06}. Narrow band
1257: near-IR imaging in the rovibrational emission lines of H$_{2}$ ($\lambda$~$\sim$~2 $\mu$m)
1258: would be useful in testing this suggestion. Finally, we detect emission lines
1259: at 12.94 and 13.14 $\mu$m in the majority of the Short-High spectra at a signal to noise ratio
1260: comparable to the H$_{2}$ lines discussed below. % and displayed in Figure 14.
1261: The 12.94 $\mu$m line remains unidentified, but we tentatively identify the 13.14 $\mu$m feature
1262: as the \ion{O}{1} $\lambda\lambda$13.139~--~13.157~$\mu$m multiplet.
1263: Hot pixels in the Short-High module do not appear to be the source of the unidentified
1264: lines, however, the 13.14 $\mu$m line does appear as a single pixel in some of the pointings.
1265: Given the possibility of hot pixel contamination and the fact that
1266: the excitation process for the neutral oxygen line is unclear,
1267: we do not feel that this is a conclusive detection.
1268:
1269: The pure rotational emission lines of H$_{2}$ are seen at the
1270: on-filament pointings. The (0~--~0) S(5), S(3), and S(2) lines are
1271: %seen in the spectra of the eastern 20\arcsec\ of Filament A
1272: strongest in the core of Filament A, becoming weaker
1273: in all directions outside of the brightest 20\arcsec.
1274: The S(4) line was only weakly observed in one pointing.
1275: %Outside of the brightest 20\arcsec\ of the filament, the H$_{2}$
1276: %emission declines (both along the filament and on both the star
1277: %and anti-star sides).
1278: %%%(i.e.-the line measurement algorithm began to measure negative line strengths), providing
1279: %providing information on the ability of H$_{2}$ to survive outside of the
1280: %dense clumps seen in PDRs.
1281: The S(5) line of H$_{2}$ is likely blended with [\ion{Ar}{2}], as we measure a line center that
1282: lies between the rest wavelengths for the molecular and atomic lines,
1283: $\lambda_{obs}$~=~6.946~$\pm$~0.010, where as $\lambda_{S(5)}$~=~6.91 and
1284: $\lambda_{[ArII]}$~=~6.99 $\mu$m. The continuum subtraction for the
1285: S(3) and S(2) lines is somewhat uncertain due to the variability of
1286: the AEFs on whose wings they reside. Due to concerns about what
1287: effects this may have on the determination of the
1288: H$_{2}$ rotational temperature (T(H$_{2}$)), we also used observations
1289: of the brightest filamentary regions with the Short-High IRS module
1290: to make clean measurements of the H$_{2}$ (0~--~0) S(2) $\lambda$12.28
1291: and S(1) $\lambda$17.03 $\mu$m lines when they are
1292: seen at high S/N. The determination of T(H$_{2}$) is discussed in \S4.2.
1293:
1294: %TALK ABOUT LINE PERCENTAGES HERE!%
1295: The contributions from the 6.2, 7.7, and 8.6 $\mu$m AEFs to the
1296: 5.8 and 8.0 $\mu$m IRAC bands were measured in Filament A.
1297: Line strengths were determined as described above, and compared to the total spectroscopic flux measured
1298: in the IRS data over the 5.8 and 8.0 $\mu$m IRAC imaging windows~\citep{irac04,werner04}.
1299: We found that the 6.2 $\mu$m feature was responsible for $\sim$ 33~--~57\%
1300: of the emission in the 5.8 $\mu$m IRAC band, with a peak in the AEF
1301: contribution coincident with the peak in 5.8 $\mu$m brightness.
1302: The relative contributions from H$_{2}$ S(5)+[\ion{Ar}{2}]
1303: ($\lambda$~$\approx$~6.95~$\mu$m), and the
1304: 7.7 and 8.6 $\mu$m AEFs were measured in the IRAC 8.0 $\mu$m bandpass.
1305: The H$_{2}$ S(5)+[\ion{Ar}{2}] was negligible off the filament and
1306: rose to a maximum of 3\% at the peak 8.0 $\mu$m brightness. The
1307: 8.6 $\mu$m AEF contributes 1.0~--~1.5 \% at all positions, while the
1308: 7.7 $\mu$m AEF showed a strong increase on the
1309: filament. At the western end of the IRS scan (the ''OFF'' filament
1310: position) the 7.7 $\mu$m feature contributes about 8\% of the
1311: flux in the 8.0 $\mu$m image, increasing to 34\% at the peak of the 8.0 $\mu$m
1312: brightness. Following this argument and noting the brightness
1313: of the 3.6 $\mu$m images relative to 4.5 $\mu$m, we consider it
1314: likely that a substantial fraction of the 3.6 $\mu$m brightness
1315: is due to emission from the 3.3 $\mu$m AEF, although we note that
1316: the scattered starlight component increases at shorter wavelengths as well.
1317:
1318: \begin{figure}
1319: \begin{center}
1320: \hspace{+0.0in}
1321: %\epsfig{figure=f12.eps,width=5.0in,angle=90}
1322: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=3.5in]{f13.eps}
1323: \caption{
1324: \label{p4irs_03} IRS spectra of Filament B. The blue spectrum in the
1325: top panel was acquired on the peak of the 8.0 $\mu$m emission, while the red
1326: spectrum was acquired off of the brightest region of the filament.
1327: The OFF-filament spectrum was scaled to the ON-filament flux between 10~--~10.5 $\mu$m.
1328: The difference of the two spectra is plotted in the lower panel. The strengths of the pure rotational H$_{2}$
1329: lines and the 11~--~14 $\mu$m plateau are observed to be less variable than at Filament A (Figure 11).
1330: }
1331: %In addition to the AEFs and H$_{2}$ emission lines
1332: %present in the spectrum, we note that the AEF+[\ion{Ne}{2}] $\lambda$12.8
1333: %$\mu$m line is anomalously strong. }
1334: \end{center}
1335: \end{figure}
1336:
1337:
1338: $Filament$ $B$ - The dust, H$_{2}$, and atomic lines observed in the
1339: Short-Low spectra of Filament B follow two behaviors. The 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, and
1340: 11.2 AEFs show a roughly linear increase in brightness as the scan
1341: moves onto the filament, while H$_{2}$ S(5)+[\ion{Ar}{2}], H$_{2}$
1342: S(3) and S(2), and AEF+[\ion{Ne}{2}] $\lambda$12.8 $\mu$m show a rise
1343: in strength then flatten out across the filament. This is shown in
1344: Figure 12. Examples of the spectra obtained at Filament B are shown in Figure 13.
1345: The 11~--~14 $\mu$m plateau is also observed at the filament position,
1346: although with less variability than at Filament A.
1347: %%%as well as the AEF lines at 7.7, 8.6 and 11.3 $\mu$m.
1348: %%%H$_{2}$ S(3) and S(2) are present as well as the 12.8 $\mu$m AEF/[\ion{Ne}{2}] blend.
1349: The Short-High spectra were again used to cleanly measure the
1350: S(2) and S(1) lines near the peak of the Filament B brightness.
1351: As in Filament A, we detect [\ion{Ne}{2}]~$\lambda$12.81 and [\ion{S}{3}] $\lambda$18.71 $\mu$m at the
1352: majority of the pointings. The $\lambda$12.94 and $\lambda$13.14 $\mu$m features are observed as well.
1353:
1354: Following the procedure outlined for Filament A, we measured the
1355: contribution of line emission to the 5.8 and 8.0 $\mu$m images. The
1356: 6.2 $\mu$m AEF is an appreciable fraction of the 5.8 $\mu$m IRAC band
1357: brightness, ranging from 40\% at the eastern end of the scan map
1358: (OFF filament) to 46\% at the peak of the Filament B. The
1359: H$_{2}$ S(5)+[\ion{Ar}{2}] blend makes up 2.8\% of the
1360: nebular flux off the filament, dropping to 1.5\% on the
1361: center of the filament. This is opposite the behavior seen at Filament A,
1362: where the relative H$_{2}$+[\ion{Ar}{2}] contribution increased
1363: with filament brightness. The 7.7 and 8.6 $\mu$m AEFs
1364: relative contribution to the 8.0 $\mu$m image increases substantially
1365: with position. Both lines contribute roughly
1366: 2.5 times more to the ON filament positions than they do in the more
1367: diffuse nebular pointings. The 7.7 $\mu$m AEF rises from 13 to 35\%
1368: while the 8.6 $\mu$m feature increases from 2 to 5\%.
1369:
1370: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% REFORMATTED FIL A & B TABLE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1371: %%%%%06/17/06 - \rotate works, but table is still too long, I will try
1372: %%%%%%%%%%reformatting vertically....
1373: %\clearpage
1374: %%%All band/line strength A, Ak, B, C table
1375: \begin{deluxetable*}{l|lcc}
1376: \tabletypesize{\small}
1377: %\rotate %%%trying to force the long table sideways, kf-06/17/06
1378: \tablecaption{Filament A and B molecular line strength and dust brightnesses. \label{sptzlines_vert}}
1379: \tablewidth{0pt}
1380: \tablehead{
1381: & \colhead{$Spitzer$} & \colhead{Filament A} & \colhead{Filament B} \\
1382: & \colhead{$FUSE$} & \colhead{Pos3} & \colhead{Pos4}
1383: }
1384: %\tableline
1385: \startdata
1386: %$Spitzer$ Filament & A & B \\
1387: %\tableline
1388: %\tableline
1389: % & $FUSE$ Pointing & Pos3 & Pos4 \\
1390: Species & & & \\
1391: %& & & \\
1392: H$_{2}$ & $\langle$(0~--~0) S(3) Brightness$\rangle$\tablenotemark{a} & 2.84 $\pm$ 0.62 & 2.14 $\pm$ 0.25 \\
1393: & $\langle$(0~--~0) S(2) Brightness$\rangle$ & 1.22 $\pm$ 0.23 & 1.08 $\pm$ 0.12 \\
1394: & UV Brightness\tablenotemark{b} & 2.00 $\pm$ 0.60 & 0.40 $\pm$ 0.16 \\
1395: & T(H$_{2}$) (K)\tablenotemark{c} & 418$^{+108}_{-73}$ & 387$^{+46}_{-39}$ \\
1396: & & \\
1397: AEFs & $\langle$6.2 $\mu$m Brightness$\rangle$ & 8.73 $\pm$ 2.23 & 10.13 $\pm$ 3.39 \\
1398: & $\langle$7.7 $\mu$m Brightness$\rangle$ & 8.52 $\pm$ 2.31 & 9.39 $\pm$ 3.89 \\
1399: & $\langle$8.6 $\mu$m Brightness$\rangle$ & 1.69 $\pm$ 0.66 & 3.30 $\pm$ 1.03 \\
1400: & $\langle$11.2 $\mu$m Brightness$\rangle$ & 5.05 $\pm$ 2.79 & 10.58 $\pm$ 3.16 \\
1401: & & \\
1402: Blends & $\langle$H$_{2}$ + [\ion{Ar}{2}] 6.95 $\mu$m Brightness$\rangle$ & 1.23 $\pm$ 0.50 & 1.29 $\pm$ 0.28 \\
1403: & $\langle$AEF + [\ion{Ne}{2}] 12.8 $\mu$m Brightness$\rangle$ & 4.04 $\pm$ 0.77 & 7.35 $\pm$ 1.15 \\
1404: & & \\
1405: Dust & F$_{24}$ (Jy) & 1.045 $\pm$ 0.126 & 0.892 $\pm$ 0.117 \\
1406: & F$_{70}$ (Jy) & -- & 2.356 $\pm$ 0.186 \\
1407: \enddata
1408: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
1409: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
1410: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
1411: \tablenotetext{a}{H$_{2}$ brightnesses are averages over six ON filament
1412: pointings at each postion. AEF and Blend brightnesses are averages over all IRS-SL pointings
1413: at each filament. They are in units of (x 10$^{-5}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ sr$^{-1}$).}
1414: \tablenotetext{b}{Measured over the $\sim$ 1100~\AA\ line complex (1097.7~--~1108.0~\AA).}
1415: \tablenotetext{c}{Measured from the ($I(S(3))/I(S(2))$) ratio.
1416: Filament A shows evidence for temperature fluctuations to T(H$_{2}$)~$\sim$~700 K (see \S4.2).}
1417: %at the long wavelength end, M. England, private communication~\ref{fuse_sum}.
1418: %This note generated with the deluxetable environment}
1419: \end{deluxetable*}
1420:
1421:
1422: \subsection{Regional Comparison}
1423:
1424: We can compare the general characteristics of Filament B to those
1425: of Filament A (Table 5). The H$_{2}$ rotational emission lines
1426: are brighter in Filament A,
1427: %[[[as would be expected due to the filaments
1428: %proximity to HD 34078]]RETHINK THIS]. [NEED A COLLISIONAL HEATING
1429: %METHOD THAT GETS ENERGY FROM THE STAR'S UV PHOTONS]
1430: which could indicate a higher H$_{2}$ density in Filament A or
1431: possibly a higher photoelectric grain heating rate
1432: due to the relative proximity of HD 34078~\citep{pdrs,abel05}.
1433: Similarly, we observe 24 $\mu$m emission,
1434: presumably emission from grains, to be brighter in Filament A.
1435: Again, we would expect the grain population nearer the illuminating
1436: star to display an enhanced brightness. %have an elevated temperature.
1437: However, the AEFs show the opposite behavior, they are seen
1438: to be anti-correlated with the strength of the far-UV radiation field.
1439: The 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, and 11.2 $\mu$m AEFs all have a
1440: position averaged brightness higher in Filament B. The 8.0 $\mu$m
1441: photometric measurements are higher in Filament B, consistent
1442: with a considerable contribution from a brighter 7.7 $\mu$m feature.
1443: As the AEF carriers and small ($a~\lesssim$~30 \AA) grains are thought to be
1444: heated stochastically by the absorption of a
1445: single UV photon~\citep{draine01}, one might expect the AEF flux to be higher
1446: near HD 34078. We suggest that
1447: the opposite behavior may be caused by increased photodestruction of the
1448: AEF carriers in the more intense UV radiation field at Filament A.
1449: %The large column density of hydrogen, relative to the aromatics,
1450: %may place the H$_{2}$ in a self-shielding regime (molecular fraction $>$ 0.01;
1451: %Savage et al. 1977) while the AEF carriers
1452: %are more easily dissociated by the UV radiation field of HD 34078.~\nocite{savage77}
1453: The large column density of hydrogen, relative to the aromatics,
1454: may place the H$_{2}$ in a self-shielding regime
1455: %(molecular fraction $>$ 0.01; Savage et al. 1977)
1456: while the AEF carriers are more easily dissociated by the UV radiation field of HD 34078. %~\nocite{savage77}
1457: An analogous situation is seen in UV illuminated PDRs where
1458: H$_{2}$ is observed while the lower column density, unshielded, CO is destroyed~\citep{luhman96,luhman97}.
1459: %The lower relative column densities of the aromatic molecules, relative
1460: %to H$_{2}$, may not
1461: %The evidence for photodestruction is not conclusive, this issue
1462: %will be addressed more thoroughly in a future work.
1463:
1464: \begin{figure}
1465: \begin{center}
1466: \hspace{+0.0in}
1467: %\epsfig{figure=f13.eps,width=4.5in,angle=90}
1468: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=3.25in]{f14.eps}
1469: \caption{\label{tempcuts} Dust temperature profiles of the southern portion of IC 405, from
1470: HD 34078 (at the origin) to Filament A$^{**}$. The error ranges are plotted as dotted lines.
1471: The temperature profiles are created by taking
1472: the ratio of spatial extractions from the 24 and 70 $\mu$m MIPS scans. The dust temperature
1473: is seen to rise sharply at the location of the bow shock, 10~--~25\arcsec\ north of HD 34078.
1474: The minimum dust temperature of $\sim$~60 K is observed at the position of Filament A$^{**}$. This
1475: temperature is characteristic of the dense filaments in IC 405.}
1476: \end{center}
1477: \end{figure}
1478:
1479:
1480: IRS mapping observations of the shock region were not
1481: part of the P20434 program, but predictions about the spectral
1482: characteristics of the region can be made. H$_{2}$ (0~--~0) S(3) $\lambda$9.66 $\mu$m,
1483: (1~--~0) S(1) $\lambda$2.12 $\mu$m, and [\ion{O}{1}] $\lambda$63 $\mu$m should
1484: be readily observable in this region~\citep{vanburen90}. \citet{draine83}
1485: make predictions about cooling through additional rotational lines of H$_{2}$, as
1486: well as CO, OH, H$_{2}$O, and [\ion{C}{1}].
1487: %but we note that proprietary IRS staring observations of HD 34078 exist in the
1488: %$Spitzer$ archive, and these spectra will be analyzed in a future work.
1489:
1490:
1491:
1492: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1493: \section{Discussion}
1494:
1495: \subsection{Cometary Bow Shock Associated with HD 34078}
1496: Far-IR bow shocks are found around roughly 30\% of galactic O and B
1497: runaway stars~\citep{vanburen95,noriega97}. These stars are
1498: ejected from the their formation site by interactions, primarily with either a supernova
1499: binary companion or members of the cluster in which they were formed~\citep{huthoff02}.
1500: When one of these high space velocity ($\geq$~30 km s$^{-1}$) stars
1501: encounters even moderately dense interstellar material, a bow shock is formed
1502: by ram pressure confinement of the OB stellar wind as it moves through the ambient medium~\citep{vanburen88,noriega97}.
1503: UV radiation from the star heats the shocked gas and dust,
1504: producing excess far-IR emission in these shock regions, which has been observed by $IRAS$.
1505:
1506: HD 34078 was a bow shock candidate in the $IRAS$ survey of~\citet{vanburen95}, showing an
1507: excess brightness at 60 $\mu$m, but no shock morphology could be detected. A higher
1508: spatial resolution (1\arcmin) follow up to this survey~\citep{noriega97} did not resolve
1509: the shock. It is only the imaging capabilities of $Spitzer$
1510: ($\leq$~6\arcsec\ at $\lambda~\leq$~24 $\mu$m)
1511: that allow us to unambiguously identify the HD 34078 bow shock.
1512: Figures 4 and 5 show the stellar region at 8 and 24 $\mu$m, identifying the
1513: three shock regions of interest, as described in \S3.1. Inspection of the
1514: images makes clear the ``cometary'' morphology~\citep{vanburen90}, though the
1515: $\sim$~75\arcsec\ diameter arc is more extended than traditional ultracompact \ion{H}{2}
1516: regions that are interpreted as bow shocks~\citep{maclow91}.
1517:
1518: \subsubsection{Temperature Structure}
1519: The dust in the bow shock region should be heated by the UV radiation field of HD 34078, and we
1520: use spatial extractions of the 24 and 70 $\mu$m MIPS maps to confirm this prediction. The
1521: F$_{24}$/F$_{70}$ ratio cuts have been converted into dust temperature profiles as a function
1522: of position following the modified black body prescription described in \S4.2.
1523: The dust temperature
1524: profiles for the S$_{E}$, S$_{C}$, and S$_{W}$ regions are shown in Figure 14. These cuts extend from roughly
1525: 100\arcsec\ south of HD 34078 to 550\arcsec\ north of the star, intersecting the
1526: Filament A$^{**}$ region. We observe the $\sim$~60 K filament temperature derived below for Filament A$^{**}$, and
1527: see the rise in dust temperature near HD 34078, increasing sharply in the inner 100\arcsec\ to a
1528: peak that is coincident with the location of the cometary morphology on the images. The peak dust
1529: %temperatures for the shock regions are T$_{d,peak}^{S_{E}}$~=~82.50$^{+1.82}_{-1.92}$,
1530: %T$_{d,peak}^{S_{C}}$~=~92.31$^{+2.31}_{-2.42}$, and T$_{d,peak}^{S_{W}}$~=~91.17$^{+2.40}_{-2.53}$, respectively.
1531: temperatures for the shock regions are T$_{d,peak}^{S_{E}}$~=~82.5$\pm$1.9,
1532: T$_{d,peak}^{S_{C}}$~=~92.3$\pm$2.4, and T$_{d,peak}^{S_{W}}$~=~91.2$\pm$2.5, respectively.
1533: These peak temperatures are lower limits as the 24 $\mu$m MIPS data were saturated along
1534: a portion of the bright bow shock ridge. The dust temperatures derived from the photometric
1535: measurements (given in Table 1) of the shock region average over the peak 24 $\mu$m brightness and the surrounding emission.
1536: %slightly lowering the inferred temperature.
1537: %These temperatures are T$_{d}^{S_{E}}$~=~83.93~$\pm$~2.06, T$_{d}^{S_{C}}$~=~88.76~$\pm$~2.24, and
1538: %T$_{d}^{S_{W}}$~=~84.85~$\pm$~2.16 K (Table 1).
1539:
1540: \begin{figure}
1541: \begin{center}
1542: \hspace{+0.0in}
1543: %\epsfig{figure=f14.eps,width=5.0in,angle=90}
1544: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=3.5in]{f15.eps}
1545: \caption{\label{irsshp3p4comp} Short-High spectra of the H$_{2}$ (0~--~0)
1546: S(2) and S(1) pure rotational emission lines at 12.28 and 17.03 $\mu$m.
1547: An offset of 0.4 Jy was added to the Filament B spectra for this figure.
1548: Ratios of the measured line strengths ($I(S(2))/I(S(1))$) are used to
1549: derive the H$_{2}$ rotational temperature, T(H$_{2}$).
1550: The $I(S(2))/I(S(1))$ temperature in Filament B agrees with that
1551: derived from Short-Low measurement of the $I(S(3))/I(S(2))$ temperature
1552: (T$^{B}$(H$_{2}$)~$\approx$~400 K). However, the Short-High
1553: observations of Filament A show evidence for non-uniform excitation corresponding
1554: to a temperature of roughly 700 K.
1555: }
1556: \end{center}
1557: \end{figure}
1558:
1559:
1560: The dust temperatures we derive are factors of 2~--~3 higher
1561: than seen in the original $IRAS$ bow-shock survey~\citep{vanburen88}.
1562: The high temperature of the HD 34078 shock can be related to the high velocity of the star
1563: and the high spatial resolution of these observations.
1564: The $\sim$100 km s$^{-1}$ velocity of HD 34078 is outside the
1565: range of velocities considered by~\citet{vanburen95}. HD 34078 has
1566: the largest one-dimensional proper motion (within the errors) of these shock
1567: candidates ($pm_{y}$ in Table 2 of van Buren et al. 1995).
1568: %[STATEMENT ABOUT BEAM (=TEMPERATURE) DILUTION AT IRAS SPATIAL RESOLUTION?]
1569: The high spatial resolution provided by $Spitzer$-MIPS allows
1570: us to spatially resolve the hottest shock regions. The larger $IRAS$ beam (5\arcmin\ for
1571: van Buren et al 1995; and 1\arcmin\ for Noriega-Crespo et al. 1997) sampled
1572: the entire shock region, diluting the warmer inner regions with cooler dust
1573: on the exterior of the shock. Averaged over 5\arcmin\
1574: around HD 34078 (-90~--~210\arcsec\ of Figure 14), the
1575: temperature derived for S$_{C}$ decreases to 76 K.
1576:
1577: \subsubsection{Bow Shock Density: H$_{2}$ Excitation and UV Dust Extinction}
1578: The morphological and thermal evidence places the HD 34078/IC 405 interface
1579: in the cometary bow shock family, and we can use the analytic models of
1580: van Buren \& McCray (1988) and van Buren et al. (1990) to explore other topics related to the
1581: IC 405 system.~\nocite{vanburen88,vanburen90}
1582: %The nebular density can be derived
1583: %by combining the $Spitzer$ observations presented here with parameters from the literature.
1584: % here we aim to determine the nebular density.
1585: An estimate of the nebular density enables us to calculate the column density and
1586: UV optical depth associated with the bow shock and explore the implications for existing studies.
1587:
1588: The distance from the star to the shock region can be calculated from Equation (2)
1589: of (van Buren et al. 1990; see also van Buren \& McCray 1988), assuming an
1590: existing knowledge of the nebular density. Alternatively,
1591: we can measure the star-shock distance directly from the IRAC and MIPS observations,
1592: and solve for the density. Let $l$ be the measured %angular
1593: distance from the star to the shock structure in the direction of motion,
1594: $\approx$15\arcsec\ on the 8.0 $\mu$m IRAC image. At the assumed distance of 450 pc, this corresponds
1595: to a separation of 1.77~$\times$~10$^{15}$ cm. Rewriting equation (2) of~\citet{vanburen90},
1596: the density ($n_{H}$~=~2$n_{H_{2}}$~+~$n_{HI}$~+~$n_{HII}$) in the region of IC 405
1597: through which HD 34078 is currently moving is given by
1598: \begin{equation}
1599: n_{H}~=~(3.03~\times~10^{38})~\dot{m}_{*,-6}~v_{w,8}~\mu_{H}^{-1}~v_{*,6}^{-2}~l^{-2}~~cm^{-3}
1600: %\quad \text{cm^{-3}}
1601: \end{equation}
1602: %where $\dot{m_{*,-6}}$ is the stellar wind mass loss rate in units of
1603: %$\times$~10$^{-6}$~M$_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$,
1604: where $\dot{m}$$_{*,-6}$ is the stellar wind mass loss rate in units of
1605: $\times$~10$^{-6}$~M$_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$,
1606: $v_{w,8}$ is the terminal velocity of the stellar wind in units of $\times$~10$^{8}$ cm s$^{-1}$,
1607: $v_{*,6}$ is the stellar velocity in units of $\times$~10$^{6}$ cm s$^{-1}$, and $\mu_{H}$
1608: is the dimensionless mass per H-nucleus. We take $\mu_{H}$ to be 1 and assume
1609: a stellar velocity of $\sim$~100 km s$^{-1}$~\citep{blaauw54,boisse05}.
1610: The stellar mass loss rate (log($\dot{m}$$_{*}$)~=~-9.5) and terminal wind velocity
1611: (800 km s$^{-1}$) are taken from~\citet{martins05}.
1612: Following this procedure, we calculate a nebular density of $n_{H}$~=~244 cm$^{-3}$.
1613:
1614: %This density can be used to find the column density of the swept-up material by slightly
1615: Rewriting Equation (7) of~\citet{vanburen90}, the column density of the swept-up material is given by
1616: \begin{equation}
1617: N~=~(1.95~\times~10^{19})~\dot{m}_{*,-6}^{1/2}~v_{w,8}^{1/2}~\mu_{H}^{-1/2}~v_{*,6}^{-1}~n_{H}^{1/2}~~cm^{-2}
1618: %\quad\text{cm^{-2}}
1619: \end{equation}
1620: with the parameters defined as before. This calculation yields a column density
1621: of material piled-up by the intrusion of HD 34078, $N$~=~4.8~$\times$~10$^{17}$~cm$^{-2}$.
1622: This value is very similar to the H$_{2}$ column density found by~\citet{boisse05}
1623: for the %vibrationally
1624: hot absorption component along the HD 34078 line of sight.
1625: They find $N(H_{2},J \geq 5)$~=~3.3~$\times$~10$^{17}$ cm$^{-2}$, comparable to their
1626: model prediction of 2.4~$\times$~10$^{17}$ cm$^{-2}$. Our derived column density
1627: of the bow shock region supports the hypothesis that the high-lying states of
1628: H$_{2}$ observed on the HD 34078 sightline are produced in a hot layer near the star,
1629: swept-up by the passage of HD 34078, and excited by stellar UV photons.
1630:
1631: The sightline to HD 34078 is seen to be highly reddened compared
1632: with other regions of IC 405~\citep{france04}. This is inferred from the blue rise of the
1633: ratio of nebular surface brightness to stellar flux (S/F$_{*}$) at far-UV
1634: wavelengths (900~--~1400 \AA). The $Spitzer$ data allow us to determine if this
1635: enhanced reddening can be attributed to the material associated with the shock region.
1636: Equation (6) of~\citet{vanburen88} gives the UV optical depth ($\tau_{UV}$)
1637: of the swept-up dust. Assuming that the majority of the dust survives the interaction
1638: with HD 34078 and that the swept-up material has a velocity of a few km s$^{-1}$,
1639: $\tau_{UV}$ is of the order 0.01. This relatively small value of $\tau_{UV}$ is
1640: insufficient to explain the observed S/F$_{*}$ in IC 405. In other words, the
1641: dust responsible for the differential extinction towards IC 405 is not associated
1642: with the bow shock. It is more likely that this dust is located in the
1643: translucent cloud along the HD 34078 sightline.
1644: This cloud is observed to produce the majority of the cold ($J$~=~0, 1; T(H$_{2}$)~=~77 K)
1645: H$_{2}$ absorption~\citep{boisse05}, and we conclude that this cloud is also responsible
1646: for the majority of the extinction towards HD 34078.
1647:
1648: \begin{figure}[b]
1649: \begin{center}
1650: \hspace{+0.0in}
1651: \vspace{+0.4in}
1652: %\epsfig{figure=f15.eps,width=6.5in,angle=0}
1653: \includegraphics[width=3.25in]{f16.eps}
1654: \caption{\label{fusep3p4comp}\vspace{+0.0in} $FUSE$ observations of Filaments A
1655: (above) and B (below). H$_{2}$ fluorescence is observed at each position
1656: imposed on the dust scattered continuum of HD 34078,
1657: providing direct evidence for a population of photo-excited nebular gas.
1658: A synthetic spectrum of H$_{2}$ emission,
1659: scaled to the flux level of the data, is overplotted.
1660: Lyman band H$_{2}$ (labeled 0~--~0 and 1~--~0) and photospheric absorption lines are also observed.
1661: %These features are primarily absorption out of the $J$~=~0 and 1 levels of the (0~--~0)
1662: %and (1~--~0) vibrational bands.
1663: %This data provides
1664: %direct evidence for a population of photo-excited H$_{2}$ in IC 405.
1665: %This component can lead to the IR line ratios that deviate from a thermal distribution.
1666: }
1667: \end{center}
1668: \end{figure}
1669:
1670: \subsection{H$_{2}$ and Dust Temperatures in Filaments A and B}
1671: Observationally, little attention has been paid to IC 405 %is not as well-characterized %compared to other bright
1672: in comparison with other bright PDRs (NGC 2023, NGC 7023, IC 63, and the Orion Bar).
1673: Here we establish the dust and H$_{2}$ rotational temperatures of the outer filaments.
1674:
1675: $H_{2}$ -- Rotational temperatures can be measured from
1676: H$_{2}$ emission line ratios in the IRS bandpass~\citep{rosenthal00,allers05}.
1677: This temperature directly probes the bulk of the
1678: molecular mass in PDRs and has been a widely used diagnostic since
1679: a large number of mid-IR observations were made available by
1680: $ISO$ (see references in the review by van Dishoeck 2004 and \S1.1).~\nocite{thi99,habart04}
1681: We have used the IRS Short-Low measurements of the position averaged H$_{2}$
1682: S(3) and S(2) emission line strengths and Short-High observations of the central
1683: cores of Filaments A and B to determine T(H$_{2}$)
1684: for these regions. Only the brightest six Short-Low pointings corresponding
1685: to the ON position in Figures 10 and 12 were considered.
1686: %The H$_{2}$ S(3) and S(2) lines of Filaments A and B are described in
1687: %Sections 3.2 and 3.3 and shown in Figures 6 and 9, respectively.
1688: The use of the Short-High
1689: module allows us to separate the (0~--~0) S(2) $\lambda$12.28 $\mu$m
1690: and S(1) $\lambda$17.03 $\mu$m lines from nearby spectral features.
1691: The S(2) and S(1) line strengths were measured from the two cleanest
1692: (defined as a combination of line S/N and a low, featureless background)
1693: Short-High observations at each filament. The S(2) and S(1) spectra from Filaments A and B
1694: are shown in Figure 15.
1695:
1696: T(H$_{2}$) was determined by combining the measured line ratios,
1697: $I(S(2))/I(S(1))$ and $I(S(3))/I(S(2))$, with energy levels and transition
1698: probabilities from the literature. This temperature determination assumes that the pure rotational lines are optically thin and thermally populated, with an equilibrium ortho-to-para H$_{2}$ ratio of 3. Internal and foreground
1699: attenuation is also assumed to be negligible,
1700: which is supported by the finding that the reddening towards the nebula is
1701: essentially zero at far-UV wavelengths~\citep{france04}.
1702:
1703: The energy levels from~\citet{mandy93} give $\Delta E_{21}/k$~=~667 K,
1704: and the Einstein-$A$ radiative transition probabilities are
1705: $A_{S(2)}$~=~2.76~$\times$~10$^{-9}$ s$^{-1}$ and
1706: $A_{S(1)}$~=~4.76~$\times$~10$^{-10}$ s$^{-1}$~\citep{avals98}. The ratio
1707: of level degeneracies, $g_{S(2)}/g_{S(1)}$, is 9$/$21.
1708: Using these parameters, we obtain rotational temperatures of
1709: T$^{A}_{21}$(H$_{2}$)~=~692~$\pm$~55 K and T$^{B}_{21}$(H$_{2}$)~=~381~$\pm$~28 K
1710: for Filaments A and B, respectively.
1711: These temperatures are higher than one would expect for a cold
1712: interstellar cloud, but are similar to recent PDR observations that find
1713: typical H$_{2}$ rotational temperatures
1714: in the range of a few hundred degrees K~\citep{thi99,habart04,allers05}.
1715:
1716: Noting the added uncertainties in the continuum levels discussed above,
1717: we also calculated the H$_{2}$ rotational temperature using position
1718: averaged strengths of the S(3) and S(2) lines observed in the low-dispersion
1719: spectra. Including the values for $A_{S(3)}$, $\Delta E_{32}/k$, from the references
1720: given above with $g_{S(3)}$, we found T$^{A}_{32}$(H$_{2}$)~=~418$^{+108}_{-73}$~K and
1721: T$^{B}_{32}$(H$_{2}$)~=~387$^{+46}_{-39}$~K. The agreement at Filament B
1722: is remarkable (381 vs. 387), but the Filament A temperatures differ
1723: by almost 300 K.
1724:
1725: We interpret variations seen at Filament A as differing relative populations in adjacent rotational states,
1726: indicative of the influence of non-thermal excitation by far-UV photons.
1727: %on the measured line ratios.
1728: The distribution of excited robvibrational states produced in the fluorescent cascade
1729: differs from a thermal distribution, and this is reflected in the observed
1730: emission line ratios~\citep{black87}.
1731: %on smaller spatial scales probed by the Short-High aperture, possibly indicating a clumpy medium.
1732: If the filament structure is clumpy, the narrower field-of-view of the Short-High
1733: aperture (as opposed to the position averaged Short-Low data used to determine
1734: T$_{32}$(H$_{2}$)) could be dominated by a knot with a larger non-thermal emission fraction.
1735: Two tests of the Short-Low data have been performed to explore this possibility.
1736: We have used the individual H$_{2}$ S(3) and S(2) line strengths to look at
1737: T$_{32}$ as a function of position. This shows that the derived H$_{2}$ rotational
1738: temperature displays excursions to greater than 700 K, albeit at the lower signal to noise positions
1739: not considered in the average line strengths used to determine T$_{32}$ above.
1740: Secondly, we looked at temperature variations along the Short-Low slit at a pointing that
1741: spatially overlapped the Short-High spectra used. We measured a higher temperature
1742: (T$^{A}_{32}$(H$_{2}$)~$\gtrsim$~520 K) along the star-facing edge of Filament A,
1743: coincident with the Short-High positions, suggesting that the line ratios used to determine
1744: the H$_{2}$ rotational temperature may be altered by UV photons in this region.
1745:
1746:
1747: %Hydrogen molecules under the influence of a strong UV radiation field will be excited into
1748: %higher lying electronic energy levels.
1749: %(predominantly $B$$^{1}\Sigma^{+}_{u}$~and~$C$$^{1}\Pi_{u}$), and
1750: %The transition back to the ground electronic state produces a characteristic
1751: %ultraviolet spectrum and leaves the molecules in excited rovibrational
1752: %levels.
1753: %Decay out of these levels is relatively slow, but the transition
1754: %back to the ground vibrational level alters the rovibrational emission line ratios~\citep{black87}.
1755:
1756: The majority of rovibrational emission lines that would indicate
1757: fluorescent pumping fall at wavelengths shorter than the $Spitzer$-IRS
1758: bandpass, thus IRS spectroscopy alone may not be sufficient
1759: to constrain the excitation mechanism of nebular H$_{2}$.
1760: In IC 405 however, direct evidence for non-thermal (fluorescent) excitation of H$_{2}$ has
1761: been presented by~\citet{france04}. $FUSE$ observations
1762: clearly revealed the far-UV spectrum of fluorescent molecular hydrogen at
1763: Filaments A and B. These spectra are shown in Figure 16.
1764: Filament A is shown in the top panel, where the emission
1765: from H$_{2}$ is seen imposed upon dust-scattered light from
1766: HD 34078. We note that the fluorescent lines at Pos3 display
1767: a broadening in excess of the instrumental width, as has been seen in the
1768: H$_{2}$ emission spectra of other
1769: PDRs~\citep{france05a}. %\footnote{The cause of this broadening is being investigated in $FUSE$ spectra
1770: %of NGC 2023 and NGC 7023 and will be presented in a future work.}~\citep{france05a,france05b}.
1771: %A synthetic fluorescence spectrum is overplotted on the data.
1772: HD 34078 is clearly identified as the excitation source by
1773: the highly excited photospheric features of \ion{P}{5} and \ion{Si}{4}
1774: seen in the scattered light.
1775: As has been shown for fluorescent H$_{2}$ emission near the
1776: Trapezium~\citep{france05b}, a star with such photospheric ions~\citep{pellerin02}
1777: is the most likely to have the requisite far-UV flux ($\lambda$~$\lesssim$~1110~\AA) to
1778: produce observable UV fluorescence. The $FUSE$ spectrum of Filament B
1779: is shown in the bottom panel, overplotted with a synthetic H$_{2}$
1780: spectrum~\citep{france04}. It is interesting
1781: to note that the synthetic spectrum was created with a rotational temperature of 400 K,
1782: only attempting to find qualitative agreement with the data.
1783: The fluorescent H$_{2}$ was integrated over
1784: the strongest far-UV line complex (1097.7~--~1108.0~\AA) after subtracting the
1785: contribution from dust scattered light. Integrated surface brightnesses are
1786: quoted in Table 5.
1787:
1788: Fluorescent excitation by HD 34078 can also be observed in
1789: the highly excited H$_{2}$ absorption lines on the HD 34078 sightline~\citep{boisse05}.
1790: As non-thermal emission clearly plays a role in IC 405, we propose that the
1791: average rotational temperatures of the filaments is $\sim$~400 K, while
1792: %%%la la la - connect the dots - la la la%%%
1793: UV-pumping has produced non-uniform excitation. The result of this
1794: excitation has been to alter the observed line ratios at the Short-High
1795: pointings used in Filament A, leading to the observed temperature deviation.
1796: %non-uniform excitation of H$_{2}$ in Filament A,
1797: %where the mid-IR line ratios (and hence the determination of T(H$_{2}$)) deviate from
1798: %their equilibrium values.
1799:
1800: %The fluorescent emission strength in Filament A is $\sim$~5 times greater
1801: %than in Filament B, a direct result of the higher incident UV flux
1802: %from HD 34078. We suggest that the influence of UV-pumping has created
1803: %non-uniform heating of H$_{2}$ in Filament A, regions where the mid-IR line
1804: %ratios (and hence the determination of T(H$_{2}$)) deviate from
1805: %their equilibrium values. The mean T(H$_{2}$) is
1806: %determined by the average of multiple IRS low-dispersion spectra covering
1807: %the filaments, while the temperature derived from the high-dispersion
1808: %%%($I(S(2))/I(S(1))$)
1809: %measurements is more susceptible to filament
1810: %substructure. Thus, we conclude that the average H$_{2}$ rotational temperature
1811: %of both Filaments A and B is approximately 295 K.
1812: %Non-uniform heating in Filament A due the increased influence of UV
1813: %photons, can lead to nebular subregions with T(H$_{2}$)~$\sim$~700 K.
1814:
1815: $Dust$~--~Thermal dust temperature (T$_{d}$) can be determined
1816: from mid and far-IR photometry, made widely available
1817: by $IRAS$~\citep{sodroski87,schnee05}. Measurements of T$_{d}$
1818: fit two or more IR data points, assuming emission from the dust cloud is described
1819: by a modified black-body curve. The black-body function
1820: is typically modified by a power-law emissivity function that
1821: is representative of the grain composition.
1822:
1823: We have used the 24 and 70 $\mu$m MIPS observations of IC 405
1824: to derive the dust temperature in the three filaments where the
1825: scans overlap (A$^{*}$, A$^{**}$, and B), as well as across the
1826: bow shock region (\S4.1.1).
1827: The contribution of discrete spectral features to the photometric
1828: flux in these bands has been considered. The weak
1829: spectral features in IRS Long-Low (20~--~30~$\mu$m)
1830: observations contribute less than $\sim$~8\%
1831: of the 24 $\mu$m band flux at all pointings. The contribution
1832: of line emission to the 70 $\mu$m brightness is more difficult to
1833: constrain without the aid of spectroscopy. We note that [\ion{O}{1}]
1834: $\lambda$63~$\mu$m lies at the edge of the MIPS 70 $\mu$m filter.
1835: [\ion{O}{1}] may be strong in IC 405~\citep{vand04}, but
1836: without direct measurement of the nebular SED at these wavelengths, we do not
1837: attempt to correct for emission lines.
1838:
1839: The observed F$_{24}$/F$_{70}$ photometric
1840: ratio, computed from Tables 3 and 4, was fit using
1841: a modified black body spectrum, with a dust
1842: emissivity proportional to $\nu^{2}$. The choice for the
1843: dust emissivity law was determined by the theoretical
1844: dust absorption opacity wavelength dependence 2.92$\times$10$^{5}$
1845: ($\lambda$/$\mu$m)$^{-2}$, valid in the 20~$\mu$m$\leq \lambda \leq$700~$\mu$m
1846: range for the average diffuse ISM~\citep{li01}.
1847: %determined that a color correction is significantly smaller than
1848: The spectral slope in the 24 and 70 $\mu$m filter
1849: bandpasses does not make a significant contribution to the resulting brightness ratios,
1850: the %color
1851: correction being significantly smaller than our measurement errors for T$_{d}$~$\geq$~40 K.
1852:
1853: %The temperature profiles corresponding to the three cuts across the
1854: %shock shown in Figure~18 have been derived from the F24/F70
1855: %ratio using a modified black body spectrum, with a dust
1856: %emissivity proportional to $\nu^{2}$. The choice for the
1857: %dust emissivity law was determined by the theoretical
1858: %dust absorption opacity wavelength dependence 2.92$\times$10$^{5}$
1859: %($\lambda$/$\mu$m)$^{-2}$, valid in the 20~$\mu$m$\leq \lambda \leq$700~$\mu$m
1860: %range for the average diffuse ISM~\citep{li01}.
1861: %The slope of the
1862: %continuum in the 24 and 70 $\mu$m filter bandpass does not make a
1863: %significant contribution to the resulting brightness ratios.
1864: %The contribution of other spectral features to the 24$\mu$m band
1865: %specific intensity
1866:
1867: The F$_{24}$/F$_{70}$ ratios were nearly identical in the three
1868: filaments, 0.379 (\S3.1), and the inferred dust temperatures reflect this.
1869: The mean temperature for the nebular dust in IC 405 is 63 K.
1870: Individually, the observed filament dust temperatures are
1871: %T$_{d}^{A^{*}}$~=~62.82~$\pm$~1.49, T$_{d}^{A^{**}}$~=~62.55~$\pm$~1.35, and
1872: %T$_{d}^{B}$~=~62.67~$\pm$~1.56 K.
1873: T$_{d}^{A^{*}}$~=~62.8~$\pm$~1.5, T$_{d}^{A^{**}}$~=~62.6~$\pm$~1.4, and
1874: T$_{d}^{B}$~=~62.7~$\pm$~1.6 K.
1875: These grain temperatures are roughly a factor of 3.5 higher than
1876: those found for molecular clouds in Perseus, Ophiucus, and Serpens
1877: ($\langle$T$_{d}$$\rangle$~=~17 K; Schnee et al. 2005), suggesting that
1878: the grains have processed the UV photons from HD 34078.~\nocite{schnee05}
1879: Our derived temperature for the IC 405 filaments is similar
1880: to the lower limit of the dust temperature (55 K) in the Orion Bar PDR~\citep{lis98}.
1881: What may be surprising about the IC 405
1882: dust measurements is the similarity of the temperature at
1883: Filaments A$^{*}$ and A$^{**}$ (roughly equidistant from HD 34078) with that
1884: of Filament B. Single photon heating effects should be important for grains with
1885: $\lesssim$ 1000 carbon atoms in the intense radiation field of HD 34078~\citep{draine01}.
1886: This may be the cause of the constant temperature distribution in the nebular filaments.
1887: %%%%%%%%%BELOW discussion onthe similarity of the dust temps
1888: %%%%%%%%%removed per the referee's report - 09/29/06
1889: %What may be surprising about the IC 405
1890: %dust measurements is the similarity of the temperature at
1891: %Filaments A$^{*}$ and A$^{**}$ (roughly equidistant from HD 34078) with that
1892: %of Filament B. One would expect the thermal dust
1893: %temperature to follow the $d^{-2}$ drop in stellar flux.
1894: %We conclude that due to the recent introduction of HD 34078 to the
1895: %nebula, the grains in IC 405 have not had sufficient time to
1896: %reach equilibrium with the nebular radiation field.
1897: %%%%%HEATING BY INDIVIDUAL PHOTONS SEEMS TO DOMINATE-DRAINE01
1898: %Heating of the grains by individual photons~\citep{draine01},
1899: %leads to a constant ``temperature'' distribution in the nebular filaments.
1900:
1901: \begin{figure}
1902: \begin{center}
1903: \hspace{+0.0in}
1904: %\epsfig{figure=f16.eps,width=5.0in,angle=90}
1905: \includegraphics[angle=90,width=3.5in]{f17.eps}
1906: \caption{
1907: \label{rat_62_112} IRS measurements of the ratio of 6.2 and
1908: 11.2 $\mu$m line strengths in Filaments A and B.
1909: %The 6.2 $\mu$m feature
1910: %is thought to arise from an ionized carrier, while neutral aromatic molecules
1911: %are thought to produce the 11.2 $\mu$m feature.
1912: Their ratio is an
1913: indication of the ionization state of the aromatics in these regions. The relative ionization
1914: fraction increases off the core of Filament A, but is seen to be constant
1915: at Filament B. $Note:$ The Filament B data is displayed ON (-50\arcsec) to OFF (-105\arcsec)
1916: for comparison with Filament A in this plot.
1917: %The overlaid Gaussians are used to define the line center (LAME)
1918: }
1919: \end{center}
1920: \end{figure}
1921:
1922: \subsection{Ionization and Molecular Environment}
1923: There is general consensus that the AEFs are produced by a superposition of
1924: vibrational modes of large carbonaceous molecules~\citep{verstraete01,peeters02}.
1925: Laboratory and theoretical studies have shown that
1926: the typical interstellar aromatic emission spectrum is composed of a combination
1927: of neutral and ionized carriers with a distribution of sizes
1928: (see the review by van Dishoeck, 2004, and references therein).
1929: These studies have shown that cations (positively charged ions)
1930: have enhanced 6~--~10 $\mu$m features arising from stronger C~--~C
1931: stretching modes. Neutral molecules have stronger C~--~H bands,
1932: producing the majority of the aromatic emission at 3.3
1933: and 10~--~14 $\mu$m~\citep{hony01,bregman05}.
1934: %The relative degree of ionization
1935: %can be determined by comparing the strength of the
1936: %lines produced by neutral molecules and ions.
1937: The ratio of 6.2/11.2 $\mu$m emission bands can be indicators
1938: of ionization~\citep{uchida00,bakes01} and molecular structure~\citep{chan01,hony01}.
1939:
1940: IRS scans of the two filaments in IC 405
1941: allow us to study the change in ionization state with environment.
1942: Assuming that Filaments A and B are located at roughly the same heliocentric distance
1943: as HD 34078, we can constrain the relative radiation fields at the two positions.
1944: Variations in the spectral properties along Filaments A and B
1945: can be correlated with change in filament structure/density $and$ changing radiation field.
1946: Previous studies have primarily focused on the variations of AEFs
1947: with radiation field strength~\citep{verstraete96,peeters02,werner04b}.
1948: Our results for molecular ionization fraction as a function of position are
1949: shown in Figure 17. The scan moves off the filament to the right,
1950: the position coordinates have been calculated to correspond to the
1951: images presented in this work.
1952: %(note that the Filament B coordinates
1953: %have been reversed for this comparison).
1954: The 6.2/11.2 ratio is displayed as squares for Filament A and triangles
1955: for Filament B. We observed an increase in ionization fraction
1956: as the scan moves from the central knot to the diffuse
1957: nebula at Filament A, going from roughly 1.4 to 3.3.
1958: This can be understood as an increase in the contribution
1959: from ionized carriers in less dense regions at a constant
1960: radiation field~\citep{bakes01}.
1961: %%%%%%%%%%Corrected per the referee report - 09/29/06
1962: %This can be understood
1963: %if we assume that the density of aromatic molecules is traced by the
1964: %8.0 $\mu$m IRAC band (\S3.1). The drop in density causes the
1965: %the molecules to be less shielded, resulting in a higher degree of ionization.
1966:
1967: \begin{figure}
1968: \begin{center}
1969: \hspace{+0.0in}
1970: \vspace{+0.05in}
1971: %\epsfig{figure=f17.eps,width=6.5in,angle=0}
1972: \includegraphics[width=2.75in,angle=90]{f18.eps}
1973: \caption{
1974: \label{h2pahrat} The ionization measure of the AEF carriers (6.2/11.2 $\mu$m)
1975: as a function of strength of the molecular hydrogen emission at 9.66 $\mu$m.
1976: %This plot shows that H$_{2}$ emission in Filament A is suppressed in
1977: %higher ionization environments, perhaps due to photodissociation in the lower density, higher
1978: %UV radiation field off the core of Filament A.
1979: The correlation observed at Filament A suggests that ionization of the aromatics
1980: increases in lower density environments at given radiation field~\citep{bakes01}.
1981: No trend is observed at Filament B.}
1982: \end{center}
1983: \end{figure}
1984:
1985: The ionization fraction is seen to be constant with position in Filament B.
1986: The baseline 6.2/11.2 $\mu$m ratio is lower in Filament B than in
1987: Filament A ($\sim$ 0.9 vs 1.4), suggesting that the overall
1988: ionization fraction is smaller in Filament B. Filament B
1989: is roughly twice the angular distance from HD 34078
1990: and consequently receives about a quarter of the UV flux present at
1991: Filament A, consistent with the $FUSE$ observations presented in \S4.2.
1992: While the ionization fraction declines with diminishing UV flux,
1993: there might not be a one-to-one relationship.
1994: This conclusion is derived in connection to the assertion made in
1995: \S3.3 that Filament A shows indirect evidence for enhanced AEF carrier
1996: destruction relative to Filament B. Using the Filament B region as a baseline,
1997: our observations are consistent with the photodestruction of the aromatic molecules
1998: responsible for the AEFs being a multi-step process where dissociation is preceded
1999: by ionization. Additional observations of PDRs are available in the
2000: $Spitzer$ and $ISO$ archives, and we will explore similarities with IC 405
2001: in future work.
2002: %, and it depends strongly on the incident radiation field.
2003: %our observations suggest that we are observing this process
2004: %occurring in the higher radiation field environment of Filament A. We note that
2005: %the comparison with Filament B is essential to this interpretation, this baseline region
2006: %under the influence of a markedly weaker radiation field highlights the observed properties of Filament A.
2007: %%%the above was reworded by roxana, 07/11/06-kf
2008: %the observations %of Filament A alone would not be significant if they could not be compared to
2009: %a baseline cloud where difference in the strength of the radiation field
2010:
2011:
2012: The AEF ionization measure can also be
2013: correlated with the environment in which H$_{2}$ emission is produced.
2014: A comparison of the H$_{2}$ emission strength and AEF ionization is shown
2015: in Figure 18. The S(3) rotational line was used as representative of
2016: H$_{2}$ emission because of its brightness and separation from
2017: other lines. We observe the AEF ionization fraction to increase
2018: as the molecular hydrogen line strength decreases in Filament A.
2019: %%%the below was corrected by the referee - 09/29/06
2020: Assuming that H$_{2}$ is representative of density,
2021: these results also indicate that the AEF carrier population is
2022: more ionized in more tenuous regions at a given UV radiation field~\citep{bakes01}.
2023: Combining this result with the spatial dependence of the molecular
2024: ionization described above confirm that in strongly illuminated PDRs,
2025: the 6.2/11.2 $\mu$m ratio is a good diagnostic of the local ionization conditions.
2026: This result is consistent with the \citet{bakes01} prediction for regions
2027: with a ratio of ionizing radiation field to electron density ($G_{o}$/$n_{e}$) of
2028: $\sim$~10$^{4}$ cm$^{3}$. No correlation is observed at Filament B.
2029: %These data do not exclude the possibility that the the H2 is being
2030: %photodissociated where the AEFs are more ionized.
2031: %As both the H$_{2}$ S(3) strength and AEF ionization are
2032: %essentially constant in Filament B, we do not observe a correlation.
2033: %In the higher
2034: %ionization regions, H$_{2}$ will experience less shielding,
2035: %becoming more susceptible to dissociation.
2036: %[MAKE SURE THIS STTEMENT IS NOT IN CONFLICT WITH WHAT I SAID IN THE FIL A VS B COMAPRISON IN SECTION 3.3]
2037: %H$_{2}$ dissociates through a two-step process
2038: %following electronic excitation~\citep{stecher67} in the presence
2039: %of far-UV photons. Hydrogen molecules will thus be more readily destroyed
2040: %outside of the dense cores of the filaments.
2041: %%%Note on agreement with Sec 3.3 rm'd per SRMs comments-08/28/06
2042: %We note that this observation is not in conflict with the discussion presented in \S3.3.
2043: %Here we compare H$_{2}$ line strength and ionization fraction at different points
2044: %in Filament A, while in \S3.3, we compared the average properties of Filaments A and B.
2045: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%confused blurb below%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2046: %In addition to %increased dissociation, we are observing less emitting H$_{2}$ column %density
2047:
2048: \subsection{Substructure in the 6.2 $\mu$m Feature -- Evidence for PANHs?}
2049: In addition to providing information about the ionization state,
2050: %of the AEF
2051: the 6.2 $\mu$m feature can be a diagnostic of the AEF carrier structure.
2052: \citet{peeters02} have performed a survey of the 6.2 $\mu$m feature
2053: in a variety of astronomical objects, and have determined empirical
2054: subclasses for this band. Lines with peak wavelengths
2055: near 6.22 $\mu$m form Class A, while lines peaking between 6.24 and 6.3
2056: $\mu$m make up Classes B and C. Most \ion{H}{2} regions,
2057: reflection nebulae, and non-isolated Herbig Ae/Be stars belong to
2058: Class A, while isolated Herbig Ae/Be stars and most planetary
2059: nebulae belong to Class B. They find red-peaked ($\lambda_{o}$ $\sim$~6.3 $\mu$m) lines to be composed
2060: of ``pure'' PAHs, while blue-peaked ($\lambda_{o}$ $\sim$~6.2 $\mu$m) lines have N-atoms
2061: substituted at inner lattice sites.
2062:
2063: \begin{figure}
2064: \begin{center}
2065: \hspace{+0.0in}
2066: %\epsfig{figure=f18.eps,width=6.0in,angle=90}
2067: \includegraphics[angle=90,scale=.7]{f19.eps}
2068: \caption{
2069: \label{redcomp62} IRS Short-Low observations of the
2070: 6.2 $\mu$m AEF in Filament A. The spectra have been normalized to the peak of
2071: the on-filament 6.2 $\mu$m band and offset by factors of 0.5 for this display.
2072: The data show a variation in the 6.2 $\mu$m profile from the core of the filament (ON, top) to the
2073: edges (OFF, bottom). The spectra maintain a Class A 6.2 $\mu$m
2074: peak~\citep{peeters02}, but develop red substructure away from the
2075: core of the filament. Three Gaussians are fitted to the spectra showing the
2076: main peak (blue), the second peak seen at 6.33 $\mu$m (green), and the
2077: broad 6.5 $\mu$m ``hump'' (red). The 6.5 $\mu$m Gaussian on the
2078: second OFF spectrum (offset~=~+0.5) was fit over a slightly expanded wavelength
2079: range to show the feature more clearly.
2080: %We propose that we are seeing a
2081: %decrease in nitrogenation and/or aromatic molecular size during the
2082: %transition to the lower density/higher UV radiation field of the
2083: %interfilament region. }
2084: }
2085: \end{center}
2086: \end{figure}
2087:
2088: \citet{hudgins05} carry the nitrogenation hypothesis further,
2089: determining the necessary site for N-substitution in order to reproduce the
2090: observed 6.2 $\mu$m wavelength and ruling out increasing molecular size
2091: alone as the explanation for the observed line profiles.
2092: They find that nitrogen substitution is required to
2093: reproduced the observed profiles, labeling this PAH subclass
2094: polycyclic aromatic nitrogen heterocycles (PANHs). They conclude that
2095: PAHs or PANHs with N-substitution on the edges of the molecule
2096: produce the emission at $\lambda$~$\geq$~6.3 $\mu$m, while PANHs with
2097: the N-atom substituted in the interior of the molecule are responsible for
2098: the Class A spectra observed by \citet{peeters02}.
2099:
2100: With this observational and theoretical evidence in mind, we
2101: report a tentative detection of band substructure to the
2102: red of the main 6.2 $\mu$m peak at Filament A. Filament A
2103: spectra are shown in Figure 19 from 5.8~--~7.2 $\mu$m.
2104: The spectra are
2105: dominated by a main Class A feature at $\lambda_{max}$~=~6.210~$\pm$~0.007
2106: $\mu$m . At the peak filament brightness position,
2107: we observe an enhanced red wing to the main feature. This wing develops a
2108: distinct second peak at 6.33 $\mu$m as the overall 6.2 band decreases in
2109: strength away from the central core of the filament. An additional
2110: red ``hump'' appears further to the red ($\lambda~\sim$~6.50 $\mu$m)
2111: becoming stronger with increasing distance from the peak filament brightness position.
2112: Three Gaussians are shown overplotted on the data in Figure 18
2113: representing each component. The H$_{2}$+[\ion{Ar}{2}] blend is
2114: seen near 6.95 $\mu$m.
2115:
2116: The red features are qualitatively similar to the
2117: coronene cation (C$_{24}$H$_{12}^{+}$)
2118: %%%(-DOUBLE CHECK Hudgins 05!)
2119: spectra shown in Figure 3 of \citet{hudgins05}.
2120: %%%this stupid, apologetic sentence cut per SRM - 08/28/06
2121: %A determination of the carrier of the red features seen in IC 405-Filament A is
2122: %beyond the scope of this work, but it is interesting to note the similarities.
2123: %%%original sentence about interface region below - rewrite based on SRM suggestion
2124: %Given that the substructure is most pronounced
2125: %in the same region where ionization fraction is seen to increase, one
2126: %interpretation is that processing by UV photons is altering the
2127: %PAH population in the interface between the dense filament and the
2128: %more tenuous nebular regions.
2129: The substructure is most pronounced in the same region where
2130: the ionization fraction is seen to increase. One interpretation is that
2131: processing by UV photons is altering the PAH population in the interface
2132: between the dense filament and the more tenuous nebular regions.
2133: We only see red substructure in one Filament B spectrum.
2134: Filament B is generally observed to have an
2135: unmodified Class A 6.2 $\mu$m band, $\lambda_{max}$~=~6.219~
2136: $\pm$~0.004 $\mu$m. We note that a 6.35 $\mu$m feature
2137: was reported as a red shoulder of the 6.2 $\mu$m band in $ISO$
2138: observations of M17--SW~\citep{verstraete96}, interpreted as
2139: large PAHs under the influence of a strong UV radiation field.
2140: However, \citet{peeters02} report no detection of a 6.35 $\mu$m feature.
2141:
2142:
2143:
2144:
2145: %\subsection{Radiation Pressure Dominated Bow Shock Around HD 34078}
2146:
2147:
2148: \section{Summary}
2149:
2150: We have presented new $Spitzer$ observation of IC 405,
2151: an emission/reflection nebula in Auriga illuminated by the
2152: runaway O9.5 star HD 34078.
2153: We have used IRS spectroscopy to assess the morphological differences seen in
2154: four band (3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8.0 $\mu$m) imaging obtained with IRAC.
2155: The combination of the IRAC data with 24 and 70 $\mu$m MIPS maps
2156: of the nebula reveal wavelength dependent morphology in several
2157: subregions. We attribute these differences to variations
2158: in the relative strengths of AEFs and emission from grains.
2159: In addition to the AEFs, the spectroscopy revealed emission from the
2160: pure rotational lines of H$_{2}$ and atomic fine structure lines.
2161: The emission bands/lines were observed to vary
2162: in both absolute and relative strength as a function of position
2163: at two bright nebular filaments.
2164:
2165: Dust temperatures in three nebular filaments were derived from 24 and 70 $\mu$m
2166: photometry. The dust temperature was a constant 63 K, independent of the distance
2167: from the illuminating star.
2168: %We interpret this as evidence for a grain population
2169: %that is not in equilibrium with the radiation field of HD 34078, possibly
2170: %due to the recent entrance of the star into the cloud.
2171: A similar temperature analysis
2172: performed on spatial profiles of the 24 and 70 $\mu$m data obtained near HD 34078
2173: show elevated dust temperatures ($\gtrsim$~90 K) in a bow shock ahead of the star,
2174: in the direction of stellar motion. The bow shock scenario is
2175: supported by the cometary morphological structure seen in the 8.0 and
2176: 24 $\mu$m images of the stellar region. We use this data to support the
2177: two-component model for the HD 34078 sightline. The excited H$_{2}$
2178: is thought to be associated with the shock region, while the majority of the cold H$_{2}$ absorption
2179: and dust extinction occurs in an intervening translucent cloud.
2180:
2181: The measured AEF line strength were found to be anti-correlated with the intensity
2182: of the far-UV radiation field in the nebula, possibly due to increased
2183: destruction of the aromatics. The spectroscopic data also were
2184: used to constrain the relative ionization state of the AEF carrier
2185: molecules. The ionization state was seen to increase with decreasing
2186: density in one filament.
2187: This ionization fraction was seen to be anticorrelated with the H$_{2}$ emission
2188: line strength, consistent with enhanced AEF carrier ionization
2189: with decreasing density at a given UV radiation field.
2190: %indicating that H$_{2}$ dissociation is enhanced in lower
2191: %density, higher ionization regions.
2192: Evidence was presented for substructure in the 6.2 $\mu$m
2193: AEF, suggestive of changing carrier size and/or composition as a function of
2194: nebular environment. Line ratios were used to
2195: derive the H$_{2}$ rotational temperature in two filaments, indicating an
2196: average rotational temperature of roughly 400 K, with evidence for additional
2197: non-uniform excitation in the filament nearer to the illuminating star. These measurements
2198: were complemented by observations of the far-UV H$_{2}$
2199: fluorescence spectrum, providing direct evidence for excitation by UV photons.
2200: %Combining UV and IR data sets will advance future studies of the
2201: %detailed properties of H$_{2}$ in photodissociation regions.
2202:
2203: As new imaging and spectroscopic observations of PDRs become available in the
2204: $Spitzer$ archive, opportunities for comparative studies with existing
2205: UV data are made possible. Combining the UV and mid-IR observations
2206: with near-IR observations of the rovibrational emission lines of H$_{2}$,
2207: an accounting of the energy redistribution
2208: following electronic excitation can be carried out in order to
2209: test models of H$_{2}$ fluorescence. A panchromatic H$_{2}$ spectrum
2210: could be produced in a variety of PDRs, from pure reflection nebulae (NGC 2023) to star-forming
2211: regions (Orion Bar) to \ion{H}{2} regions with harder radiation fields (planetary nebulae
2212: such as M 27). These data would allow models that span a wide range in
2213: excitation temperature, density, and radiation field to be compared with observation.
2214: H$_{2}$ observations can be compared to the AEF and dust properties in these regions
2215: in order to explore the relationship between molecular-phase PDR diagnostics and
2216: local environmental characteristics.
2217: % enabling studies exploring the dependence of PDR
2218: % of how the molecular phases of PDRs depend on the local environmental characteristics.
2219:
2220: \acknowledgments
2221: It is a pleasure to acknowledge B-G Andersson for several
2222: discussions about the infrared properties of dust grains.
2223: We thank an anonymous referee, whose comments greatly improved the
2224: quality of this paper.
2225: This work is based in part on observations made with the $Spitzer$
2226: $Space$ $Telescope$, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of
2227: Technology under a contract with NASA. Support for this work was
2228: provided by JPL grant JPL1276492 to The Johns Hopkins University.
2229: The $FUSE$ data were obtained under the
2230: Guest Investigator Program of the NASA-CNES-CSA $FUSE$ mission, operated
2231: by The Johns Hopkins University.
2232:
2233: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%BIBLIOGRAPHY%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2234:
2235: \begin{thebibliography}{77}
2236: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
2237:
2238: \bibitem[{{Abel} {et~al.}(2005){Abel}, {Ferland}, {Shaw}, \& {van
2239: Hoof}}]{abel05}
2240: {Abel}, N.~P., {Ferland}, G.~J., {Shaw}, G., \& {van Hoof}, P.~A.~M. 2005,
2241: \apjs, 161, 65
2242:
2243: \bibitem[{{Allers} {et~al.}(2005){Allers}, {Jaffe}, {Lacy}, {Draine}, \&
2244: {Richter}}]{allers05}
2245: {Allers}, K.~N., {Jaffe}, D.~T., {Lacy}, J.~H., {Draine}, B.~T., \& {Richter},
2246: M.~J. 2005, \apj, 630, 368
2247:
2248: \bibitem[{{Armus} {et~al.}(2004){Armus}, {Charmandaris}, {Spoon}, {Houck},
2249: {Soifer}, {Brandl}, {Appleton}, {Teplitz}, {Higdon}, {Weedman}, {Devost},
2250: {Morris}, {Uchida}, {van Cleve}, {Barry}, {Sloan}, {Grillmair}, {Burgdorf},
2251: {Fajardo-Acosta}, {Ingalls}, {Higdon}, {Hao}, {Bernard-Salas}, {Herter},
2252: {Troeltzsch}, {Unruh}, \& {Winghart}}]{armus04}
2253: {Armus}, L., {Charmandaris}, V., {Spoon}, H.~W.~W., {Houck}, J.~R., {Soifer},
2254: B.~T., {Brandl}, B.~R., {Appleton}, P.~N., {Teplitz}, H.~I., {Higdon},
2255: S.~J.~U., {Weedman}, D.~W., {Devost}, D., {Morris}, P.~W., {Uchida}, K.~I.,
2256: {van Cleve}, J., {Barry}, D.~J., {Sloan}, G.~C., {Grillmair}, C.~J.,
2257: {Burgdorf}, M.~J., {Fajardo-Acosta}, S.~B., {Ingalls}, J.~G., {Higdon}, J.,
2258: {Hao}, L., {Bernard-Salas}, J., {Herter}, T., {Troeltzsch}, J., {Unruh}, B.,
2259: \& {Winghart}, M. 2004, \apjs, 154, 178
2260:
2261: \bibitem[{{Bagnuolo} {et~al.}(2001){Bagnuolo}, {Riddle}, {Gies}, \&
2262: {Barry}}]{bagnuolo01}
2263: {Bagnuolo}, Jr., W.~G., {Riddle}, R.~L., {Gies}, D.~R., \& {Barry}, D.~J. 2001,
2264: \apj, 554, 362
2265:
2266: \bibitem[{{Bakes} {et~al.}(2001){Bakes}, {Tielens}, \&
2267: {Bauschlicher}}]{bakes01}
2268: {Bakes}, E.~L.~O., {Tielens}, A.~G.~G.~M., \& {Bauschlicher}, Jr., C.~W. 2001,
2269: \apj, 556, 501
2270:
2271: \bibitem[{{Blaauw} \& {Morgan}(1954)}]{blaauw54}
2272: {Blaauw}, A. \& {Morgan}, W.~W. 1954, \apj, 119, 625
2273:
2274: \bibitem[{{Black} \& {van Dishoeck}(1987)}]{black87}
2275: {Black}, J.~H. \& {van Dishoeck}, E.~F. 1987, \apj, 322, 412
2276:
2277: \bibitem[{{Boiss{\'e}} {et~al.}(2005){Boiss{\'e}}, {Le Petit}, {Rollinde},
2278: {Roueff}, {Pineau des For{\^e}ts}, {Andersson}, {Gry}, \&
2279: {Felenbok}}]{boisse05}
2280: {Boiss{\'e}}, P., {Le Petit}, F., {Rollinde}, E., {Roueff}, E., {Pineau des
2281: For{\^e}ts}, G., {Andersson}, B.-G., {Gry}, C., \& {Felenbok}, P. 2005, \aap,
2282: 429, 509
2283:
2284: \bibitem[{{Boulanger} {et~al.}(2000){Boulanger}, {Abergel}, {Cesarsky},
2285: {Bernard}, {Miville Desch{\^e}nes}, {Verstraete}, \& {Reach}}]{boulanger00}
2286: {Boulanger}, F., {Abergel}, A., {Cesarsky}, D., {Bernard}, J.~P., {Miville
2287: Desch{\^e}nes}, M.~A., {Verstraete}, L., \& {Reach}, W.~T. 2000, in ESA
2288: SP-455: ISO Beyond Point Sources: Studies of Extended Infrared Emission, ed.
2289: R.~J. {Laureijs}, K.~{Leech}, \& M.~F. {Kessler}, 91--+
2290:
2291: \bibitem[{{Bregman} \& {Temi}(2005)}]{bregman05}
2292: {Bregman}, J. \& {Temi}, P. 2005, \apj, 621, 831
2293:
2294: \bibitem[{{Bregman} {et~al.}(1989){Bregman}, {Allamandola}, {Witteborn},
2295: {Tielens}, \& {Geballe}}]{bregman89}
2296: {Bregman}, J.~D., {Allamandola}, L.~J., {Witteborn}, F.~C., {Tielens},
2297: A.~G.~G.~M., \& {Geballe}, T.~R. 1989, \apj, 344, 791
2298:
2299: \bibitem[{{Burgh} {et~al.}(2002){Burgh}, {McCandliss}, \& {Feldman}}]{burgh02}
2300: {Burgh}, E.~B., {McCandliss}, S.~R., \& {Feldman}, P.~D. 2002, ApJ, 575, 240
2301:
2302: \bibitem[{{Cardelli} {et~al.}(1989){Cardelli}, {Clayton}, \& {Mathis}}]{ccm}
2303: {Cardelli}, J.~A., {Clayton}, G.~C., \& {Mathis}, J.~S. 1989, \apj, 345, 245
2304:
2305: \bibitem[{{Cazaux} \& {Tielens}(2002)}]{cazaux02}
2306: {Cazaux}, S. \& {Tielens}, A.~G.~G.~M. 2002, \apjl, 575, L29
2307:
2308: \bibitem[{{Cazaux} \& {Tielens}(2004)}]{cazaux04}
2309: ---. 2004, \apj, 604, 222
2310:
2311: \bibitem[{{Cesarsky} {et~al.}(2000){Cesarsky}, {Lequeux}, {Ryter}, \&
2312: {G{\'e}rin}}]{cesarsky00}
2313: {Cesarsky}, D., {Lequeux}, J., {Ryter}, C., \& {G{\'e}rin}, M. 2000, \aap, 354,
2314: L87
2315:
2316: \bibitem[{{Chan} {et~al.}(2001){Chan}, {Roellig}, {Onaka}, {Mizutani},
2317: {Okumura}, {Yamamura}, {Tanab{\'e}}, {Shibai}, {Nakagawa}, \&
2318: {Okuda}}]{chan01}
2319: {Chan}, K.-W., {Roellig}, T.~L., {Onaka}, T., {Mizutani}, M., {Okumura}, K.,
2320: {Yamamura}, I., {Tanab{\'e}}, T., {Shibai}, H., {Nakagawa}, T., \& {Okuda},
2321: H. 2001, \apj, 546, 273
2322:
2323: \bibitem[{{Cohen} {et~al.}(1985){Cohen}, {Tielens}, \& {Allamandola}}]{cohen85}
2324: {Cohen}, M., {Tielens}, A.~G.~G.~M., \& {Allamandola}, L.~J. 1985, \apjl, 299,
2325: L93
2326:
2327: \bibitem[{{Draine}(2003)}]{draine03}
2328: {Draine}, B.~T. 2003, \apj, 598, 1017
2329:
2330: \bibitem[{{Draine} \& {Li}(2001)}]{draine01}
2331: {Draine}, B.~T. \& {Li}, A. 2001, \apj, 551, 807
2332:
2333: \bibitem[{{Draine} {et~al.}(1983){Draine}, {Roberge}, \& {Dalgarno}}]{draine83}
2334: {Draine}, B.~T., {Roberge}, W.~G., \& {Dalgarno}, A. 1983, \apj, 264, 485
2335:
2336: \bibitem[{{Fazio} {et~al.}(2004){Fazio}, {Hora}, {Allen}, {Ashby}, {Barmby},
2337: {Deutsch}, {Huang}, {Kleiner}, {Marengo}, {Megeath}, {Melnick}, {Pahre},
2338: {Patten}, {Polizotti}, {Smith}, {Taylor}, {Wang}, {Willner}, {Hoffmann},
2339: {Pipher}, {Forrest}, {McMurty}, {McCreight}, {McKelvey}, {McMurray}, {Koch},
2340: {Moseley}, {Arendt}, {Mentzell}, {Marx}, {Losch}, {Mayman}, {Eichhorn},
2341: {Krebs}, {Jhabvala}, {Gezari}, {Fixsen}, {Flores}, {Shakoorzadeh}, {Jungo},
2342: {Hakun}, {Workman}, {Karpati}, {Kichak}, {Whitley}, {Mann}, {Tollestrup},
2343: {Eisenhardt}, {Stern}, {Gorjian}, {Bhattacharya}, {Carey}, {Nelson},
2344: {Glaccum}, {Lacy}, {Lowrance}, {Laine}, {Reach}, {Stauffer}, {Surace},
2345: {Wilson}, {Wright}, {Hoffman}, {Domingo}, \& {Cohen}}]{irac04}
2346: {Fazio}, G.~G., {Hora}, J.~L., {Allen}, L.~E., {Ashby}, M.~L.~N., {Barmby}, P.,
2347: {Deutsch}, L.~K., {Huang}, J.-S., {Kleiner}, S., {Marengo}, M., {Megeath},
2348: S.~T., {Melnick}, G.~J., {Pahre}, M.~A., {Patten}, B.~M., {Polizotti}, J.,
2349: {Smith}, H.~A., {Taylor}, R.~S., {Wang}, Z., {Willner}, S.~P., {Hoffmann},
2350: W.~F., {Pipher}, J.~L., {Forrest}, W.~J., {McMurty}, C.~W., {McCreight},
2351: C.~R., {McKelvey}, M.~E., {McMurray}, R.~E., {Koch}, D.~G., {Moseley}, S.~H.,
2352: {Arendt}, R.~G., {Mentzell}, J.~E., {Marx}, C.~T., {Losch}, P., {Mayman}, P.,
2353: {Eichhorn}, W., {Krebs}, D., {Jhabvala}, M., {Gezari}, D.~Y., {Fixsen},
2354: D.~J., {Flores}, J., {Shakoorzadeh}, K., {Jungo}, R., {Hakun}, C., {Workman},
2355: L., {Karpati}, G., {Kichak}, R., {Whitley}, R., {Mann}, S., {Tollestrup},
2356: E.~V., {Eisenhardt}, P., {Stern}, D., {Gorjian}, V., {Bhattacharya}, B.,
2357: {Carey}, S., {Nelson}, B.~O., {Glaccum}, W.~J., {Lacy}, M., {Lowrance},
2358: P.~J., {Laine}, S., {Reach}, W.~T., {Stauffer}, J.~A., {Surace}, J.~A.,
2359: {Wilson}, G., {Wright}, E.~L., {Hoffman}, A., {Domingo}, G., \& {Cohen}, M.
2360: 2004, \apjs, 154, 10
2361:
2362: \bibitem[{{France} {et~al.}(2005){France}, {Andersson}, {McCandliss}, \&
2363: {Feldman}}]{france05a}
2364: {France}, K., {Andersson}, B.-G., {McCandliss}, S.~R., \& {Feldman}, P.~D.
2365: 2005, \apj, 628, 750
2366:
2367: \bibitem[{{France} \& {McCandliss}(2005)}]{france05b}
2368: {France}, K. \& {McCandliss}, S.~R. 2005, \apjl, 629, L97
2369:
2370: \bibitem[{{France} {et~al.}(2004){France}, {McCandliss}, {Burgh}, \&
2371: {Feldman}}]{france04}
2372: {France}, K., {McCandliss}, S.~R., {Burgh}, E.~B., \& {Feldman}, P.~D. 2004,
2373: \apj, 616, 257
2374:
2375: \bibitem[{{Gordon} {et~al.}(2006){Gordon}, {Englebracht}, {Smith}, {Rieke}, \&
2376: {Misselt}}]{gordon06}
2377: {Gordon}, K., {Englebracht}, C., {Smith}, J., {Rieke}, G., \& {Misselt}, K.
2378: 2006, astro-ph, 0605544
2379:
2380: \bibitem[{{Habart} {et~al.}(2004){Habart}, {Boulanger}, {Verstraete},
2381: {Walmsley}, \& {Pineau des For{\^e}ts}}]{habart04}
2382: {Habart}, E., {Boulanger}, F., {Verstraete}, L., {Walmsley}, C.~M., \& {Pineau
2383: des For{\^e}ts}, G. 2004, \aap, 414, 531
2384:
2385: \bibitem[{{Heitsch} {et~al.}(2006){Heitsch}, {Whittney}, {Indebtown}, {Meade},
2386: {Babler}, \& {Churchwell}}]{heitsch06}
2387: {Heitsch}, R., {Whittney}, B.~A., {Indebtown}, R., {Meade}, M.~R., {Babler},
2388: B.~L., \& {Churchwell}, E. 2006, \apj, astroph0607318
2389:
2390: \bibitem[{{Herbig}(1958)}]{herbig58}
2391: {Herbig}, G.~H. 1958, \pasp, 70, 468
2392:
2393: \bibitem[{{Herbig}(1999)}]{herbig99}
2394: ---. 1999, \pasp, 111, 809
2395:
2396: \bibitem[{{Hollenbach} \& {Tielens}(1997)}]{pdrs}
2397: {Hollenbach}, D. \& {Tielens}, A. 1997, Annual Reviews of Astronomy and
2398: Astrophysics, 35, 179
2399:
2400: \bibitem[{{Hony} {et~al.}(2001){Hony}, {Van Kerckhoven}, {Peeters}, {Tielens},
2401: {Hudgins}, \& {Allamandola}}]{hony01}
2402: {Hony}, S., {Van Kerckhoven}, C., {Peeters}, E., {Tielens}, A.~G.~G.~M.,
2403: {Hudgins}, D.~M., \& {Allamandola}, L.~J. 2001, \aap, 370, 1030
2404:
2405: \bibitem[{{Hora} {et~al.}(2006){Hora}, {Latter}, {Smith}, \&
2406: {Marengo}}]{hora06}
2407: {Hora}, J., {Latter}, W.~B., {Smith}, H., \& {Marengo}, M. 2006, \apj,
2408: astroph0607541
2409:
2410: \bibitem[{{Houck} {et~al.}(2004){Houck}, {Roellig}, {van Cleve}, {Forrest},
2411: {Herter}, {Lawrence}, {Matthews}, {Reitsema}, {Soifer}, {Watson}, {Weedman},
2412: {Huisjen}, {Troeltzsch}, {Barry}, {Bernard-Salas}, {Blacken}, {Brandl},
2413: {Charmandaris}, {Devost}, {Gull}, {Hall}, {Henderson}, {Higdon}, {Pirger},
2414: {Schoenwald}, {Sloan}, {Uchida}, {Appleton}, {Armus}, {Burgdorf},
2415: {Fajardo-Acosta}, {Grillmair}, {Ingalls}, {Morris}, \& {Teplitz}}]{irs04}
2416: {Houck}, J.~R., {Roellig}, T.~L., {van Cleve}, J., {Forrest}, W.~J., {Herter},
2417: T., {Lawrence}, C.~R., {Matthews}, K., {Reitsema}, H.~J., {Soifer}, B.~T.,
2418: {Watson}, D.~M., {Weedman}, D., {Huisjen}, M., {Troeltzsch}, J., {Barry},
2419: D.~J., {Bernard-Salas}, J., {Blacken}, C.~E., {Brandl}, B.~R.,
2420: {Charmandaris}, V., {Devost}, D., {Gull}, G.~E., {Hall}, P., {Henderson},
2421: C.~P., {Higdon}, S.~J.~U., {Pirger}, B.~E., {Schoenwald}, J., {Sloan}, G.~C.,
2422: {Uchida}, K.~I., {Appleton}, P.~N., {Armus}, L., {Burgdorf}, M.~J.,
2423: {Fajardo-Acosta}, S.~B., {Grillmair}, C.~J., {Ingalls}, J.~G., {Morris},
2424: P.~W., \& {Teplitz}, H.~I. 2004, \apjs, 154, 18
2425:
2426: \bibitem[{{Hudgins} {et~al.}(2005){Hudgins}, {Bauschlicher}, \&
2427: {Allamandola}}]{hudgins05}
2428: {Hudgins}, D.~M., {Bauschlicher}, Jr., C.~W., \& {Allamandola}, L.~J. 2005,
2429: \apj, 632, 316
2430:
2431: \bibitem[{{Huggins} {et~al.}(2002){Huggins}, {Forveille}, {Bachiller}, {Cox},
2432: {Ageorges}, \& {Walsh}}]{huggins02}
2433: {Huggins}, P.~J., {Forveille}, T., {Bachiller}, R., {Cox}, P., {Ageorges}, N.,
2434: \& {Walsh}, J.~R. 2002, \apjl, 573, L55
2435:
2436: \bibitem[{{Hurwitz}(1998)}]{hurwitz98}
2437: {Hurwitz}, M. 1998, \apjl, 500, L67+
2438:
2439: \bibitem[{{Huthoff} \& {Kaper}(2002)}]{huthoff02}
2440: {Huthoff}, F. \& {Kaper}, L. 2002, \aap, 383, 999
2441:
2442: \bibitem[{{Jansen} {et~al.}(1994){Jansen}, {van Dishoeck}, \&
2443: {Black}}]{jansen94}
2444: {Jansen}, D.~J., {van Dishoeck}, E.~F., \& {Black}, J.~H. 1994, \aap, 282, 605
2445:
2446: \bibitem[{{Jansen} {et~al.}(1995){Jansen}, {van Dishoeck}, {Black}, {Spaans},
2447: \& {Sosin}}]{jansen95}
2448: {Jansen}, D.~J., {van Dishoeck}, E.~F., {Black}, J.~H., {Spaans}, M., \&
2449: {Sosin}, C. 1995, \aap, 302, 223
2450:
2451: \bibitem[{{Kastner} {et~al.}(1996){Kastner}, {Weintraub}, {Gatley}, {Merrill},
2452: \& {Probst}}]{kastner96}
2453: {Kastner}, J.~H., {Weintraub}, D.~A., {Gatley}, I., {Merrill}, K.~M., \&
2454: {Probst}, R.~G. 1996, \apj, 462, 777
2455:
2456: \bibitem[{{Kristensen} {et~al.}(2003){Kristensen}, {Gustafsson}, {Field},
2457: {Callejo}, {Lemaire}, {Vannier}, \& {Pineau des For{\^e}ts}}]{kristensen03}
2458: {Kristensen}, L.~E., {Gustafsson}, M., {Field}, D., {Callejo}, G., {Lemaire},
2459: J.~L., {Vannier}, L., \& {Pineau des For{\^e}ts}, G. 2003, \aap, 412, 727
2460:
2461: \bibitem[{{Li} \& {Draine}(2001)}]{li01}
2462: {Li}, A. \& {Draine}, B.~T. 2001, \apj, 554, 778
2463:
2464: \bibitem[{{Lis} {et~al.}(1998){Lis}, {Serabyn}, {Keene}, {Dowell}, {Benford},
2465: {Phillips}, {Hunter}, \& {Wang}}]{lis98}
2466: {Lis}, D.~C., {Serabyn}, E., {Keene}, J., {Dowell}, C.~D., {Benford}, D.~J.,
2467: {Phillips}, T.~G., {Hunter}, T.~R., \& {Wang}, N. 1998, \apj, 509, 299
2468:
2469: \bibitem[{{Luhman} \& {Jaffe}(1996)}]{luhman96}
2470: {Luhman}, M.~L. \& {Jaffe}, D.~T. 1996, \apj, 463, 191
2471:
2472: \bibitem[{{Luhman} {et~al.}(1997){Luhman}, {Luhman}, {Benedict}, {Jaffe}, \&
2473: {Fischer}}]{luhman97}
2474: {Luhman}, M.~L., {Luhman}, K.~L., {Benedict}, T., {Jaffe}, D.~T., \& {Fischer},
2475: J. 1997, \apjl, 480, L133+
2476:
2477: \bibitem[{{Lupu} {et~al.}(2006){Lupu}, {France}, \& {McCandliss}}]{lupu06}
2478: {Lupu}, R.~E., {France}, K., \& {McCandliss}, S.~R. 2006, \apj, 644, 981
2479:
2480: \bibitem[{{Mac Low} {et~al.}(1991){Mac Low}, {van Buren}, {Wood}, \&
2481: {Churchwell}}]{maclow91}
2482: {Mac Low}, M.-M., {van Buren}, D., {Wood}, D.~O.~S., \& {Churchwell}, E. 1991,
2483: \apj, 369, 395
2484:
2485: \bibitem[{{Mandy} \& {Martin}(1993)}]{mandy93}
2486: {Mandy}, M.~E. \& {Martin}, P.~G. 1993, \apjs, 86, 199
2487:
2488: \bibitem[{{Martini} {et~al.}(1999){Martini}, {Sellgren}, \&
2489: {DePoy}}]{martini99}
2490: {Martini}, P., {Sellgren}, K., \& {DePoy}, D.~L. 1999, \apj, 526, 772
2491:
2492: \bibitem[{{Martins} {et~al.}(2005){Martins}, {Schaerer}, {Hillier},
2493: {Meynadier}, {Heydari-Malayeri}, \& {Walborn}}]{martins05}
2494: {Martins}, F., {Schaerer}, D., {Hillier}, D.~J., {Meynadier}, F.,
2495: {Heydari-Malayeri}, M., \& {Walborn}, N.~R. 2005, \aap, 441, 735
2496:
2497: \bibitem[{{Moos}(2000)}]{moos00}
2498: {Moos}, H.~W. e.~a. 2000, \apjl, 538, L1
2499:
2500: \bibitem[{{Noriega-Crespo} {et~al.}(1997){Noriega-Crespo}, {van Buren}, \&
2501: {Dgani}}]{noriega97}
2502: {Noriega-Crespo}, A., {van Buren}, D., \& {Dgani}, R. 1997, \aj, 113, 780
2503:
2504: \bibitem[{{Peeters} {et~al.}(2002){Peeters}, {Hony}, {Van Kerckhoven},
2505: {Tielens}, {Allamandola}, {Hudgins}, \& {Bauschlicher}}]{peeters02}
2506: {Peeters}, E., {Hony}, S., {Van Kerckhoven}, C., {Tielens}, A.~G.~G.~M.,
2507: {Allamandola}, L.~J., {Hudgins}, D.~M., \& {Bauschlicher}, C.~W. 2002, \aap,
2508: 390, 1089
2509:
2510: \bibitem[{{Peeters} {et~al.}(2004){Peeters}, {Mattioda}, {Hudgins}, \&
2511: {Allamandola}}]{peeters04}
2512: {Peeters}, E., {Mattioda}, A.~L., {Hudgins}, D.~M., \& {Allamandola}, L.~J.
2513: 2004, \apjl, 617, L65
2514:
2515: \bibitem[{{Pellerin} {et~al.}(2002){Pellerin}, {Fullerton}, {Robert}, {Howk},
2516: {Hutchings}, {Walborn}, {Bianchi}, {Crowther}, \& {Sonneborn}}]{pellerin02}
2517: {Pellerin}, A., {Fullerton}, A.~W., {Robert}, C., {Howk}, J.~C., {Hutchings},
2518: J.~B., {Walborn}, N.~R., {Bianchi}, L., {Crowther}, P.~A., \& {Sonneborn}, G.
2519: 2002, \apjs, 143, 159
2520:
2521: \bibitem[{{Poglitsch} {et~al.}(2004){Poglitsch}, {Waelkens}, {Bauer}, {Cepa},
2522: {Henning}, {van Hoof}, {Katterloher}, {Kerschbaum}, {Lemke}, {Renotte},
2523: {Rodriguez}, {Royer}, \& {Saraceno}}]{pacs04}
2524: {Poglitsch}, A., {Waelkens}, C., {Bauer}, O.~H., {Cepa}, J., {Henning}, T.~F.,
2525: {van Hoof}, C., {Katterloher}, R., {Kerschbaum}, F., {Lemke}, D., {Renotte},
2526: E., {Rodriguez}, L., {Royer}, P., \& {Saraceno}, P. 2004, in Microwave and
2527: Terahertz Photonics. Edited by Stohr, Andreas; Jager, Dieter; Iezekiel,
2528: Stavros. Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 5487, pp. 425-436 (2004)., ed. J.~C.
2529: {Mather}, 425--436
2530:
2531: \bibitem[{{Rieke} {et~al.}(2004){Rieke}, {Young}, {Engelbracht}, {Kelly},
2532: {Low}, {Haller}, {Beeman}, {Gordon}, {Stansberry}, {Misselt}, {Cadien},
2533: {Morrison}, {Rivlis}, {Latter}, {Noriega-Crespo}, {Padgett}, {Stapelfeldt},
2534: {Hines}, {Egami}, {Muzerolle}, {Alonso-Herrero}, {Blaylock}, {Dole}, {Hinz},
2535: {Le Floc'h}, {Papovich}, {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, {Smith}, {Su}, {Bennett},
2536: {Frayer}, {Henderson}, {Lu}, {Masci}, {Pesenson}, {Rebull}, {Rho}, {Keene},
2537: {Stolovy}, {Wachter}, {Wheaton}, {Werner}, \& {Richards}}]{mips04}
2538: {Rieke}, G.~H., {Young}, E.~T., {Engelbracht}, C.~W., {Kelly}, D.~M., {Low},
2539: F.~J., {Haller}, E.~E., {Beeman}, J.~W., {Gordon}, K.~D., {Stansberry},
2540: J.~A., {Misselt}, K.~A., {Cadien}, J., {Morrison}, J.~E., {Rivlis}, G.,
2541: {Latter}, W.~B., {Noriega-Crespo}, A., {Padgett}, D.~L., {Stapelfeldt},
2542: K.~R., {Hines}, D.~C., {Egami}, E., {Muzerolle}, J., {Alonso-Herrero}, A.,
2543: {Blaylock}, M., {Dole}, H., {Hinz}, J.~L., {Le Floc'h}, E., {Papovich}, C.,
2544: {P{\'e}rez-Gonz{\'a}lez}, P.~G., {Smith}, P.~S., {Su}, K.~Y.~L., {Bennett},
2545: L., {Frayer}, D.~T., {Henderson}, D., {Lu}, N., {Masci}, F., {Pesenson}, M.,
2546: {Rebull}, L., {Rho}, J., {Keene}, J., {Stolovy}, S., {Wachter}, S.,
2547: {Wheaton}, W., {Werner}, M.~W., \& {Richards}, P.~L. 2004, \apjs, 154, 25
2548:
2549: \bibitem[{{Rollinde} {et~al.}(2003){Rollinde}, {Boiss{\' e}}, {Federman}, \&
2550: {Pan}}]{rollinde03}
2551: {Rollinde}, E., {Boiss{\' e}}, P., {Federman}, S.~R., \& {Pan}, K. 2003, \aap,
2552: 401, 215
2553:
2554: \bibitem[{{Rosenthal} {et~al.}(2000){Rosenthal}, {Bertoldi}, \&
2555: {Drapatz}}]{rosenthal00}
2556: {Rosenthal}, D., {Bertoldi}, F., \& {Drapatz}, S. 2000, \aap, 356, 705
2557:
2558: \bibitem[{{Schnee} {et~al.}(2005){Schnee}, {Ridge}, {Goodman}, \&
2559: {Li}}]{schnee05}
2560: {Schnee}, S.~L., {Ridge}, N.~A., {Goodman}, A.~A., \& {Li}, J.~G. 2005, \apj,
2561: 634, 442
2562:
2563: \bibitem[{{Schutte} {et~al.}(1993){Schutte}, {Tielens}, \&
2564: {Allamandola}}]{schutte93}
2565: {Schutte}, W.~A., {Tielens}, A.~G.~G.~M., \& {Allamandola}, L.~J. 1993, \apj,
2566: 415, 397
2567:
2568: \bibitem[{{Shaw} {et~al.}(2005){Shaw}, {Ferland}, {Abel}, {Stancil}, \& {van
2569: Hoof}}]{shaw05}
2570: {Shaw}, G., {Ferland}, G.~J., {Abel}, N.~P., {Stancil}, P.~C., \& {van Hoof},
2571: P.~A.~M. 2005, \apj, 624, 794
2572:
2573: \bibitem[{{Shull} \& {Beckwith}(1982)}]{shull82}
2574: {Shull}, M. \& {Beckwith}, S. 1982, Annual Reviews of Astronomy and
2575: Astrophysics, 30, 163
2576:
2577: \bibitem[{{Sodroski} {et~al.}(1987){Sodroski}, {Dwek}, {Hauser}, \&
2578: {Kerr}}]{sodroski87}
2579: {Sodroski}, T.~J., {Dwek}, E., {Hauser}, M.~G., \& {Kerr}, F.~J. 1987, \apj,
2580: 322, 101
2581:
2582: \bibitem[{{Speck} {et~al.}(2003){Speck}, {Meixner}, {Jacoby}, \&
2583: {Knezek}}]{speck03}
2584: {Speck}, A.~K., {Meixner}, M., {Jacoby}, G.~H., \& {Knezek}, P.~M. 2003, \pasp,
2585: 115, 170
2586:
2587: \bibitem[{{Stecher} \& {Williams}(1967)}]{stecher67}
2588: {Stecher}, T.~P. \& {Williams}, D.~A. 1967, \apjl, 149, L29+
2589:
2590: \bibitem[{{Takami} {et~al.}(2000){Takami}, {Usuda}, {Sugai}, {Kawabata},
2591: {Suto}, \& {Tanaka}}]{takami00}
2592: {Takami}, M., {Usuda}, T., {Sugai}, H., {Kawabata}, H., {Suto}, H., \&
2593: {Tanaka}, M. 2000, \apj, 529, 268
2594:
2595: \bibitem[{{Thi} {et~al.}(1999){Thi}, {van Dishoeck}, {Black}, {Jansen},
2596: {Evans}, \& {Jaffe}}]{thi99}
2597: {Thi}, W.~F., {van Dishoeck}, E.~F., {Black}, J.~H., {Jansen}, D.~J., {Evans},
2598: N.~J., \& {Jaffe}, D.~T. 1999, in ESA SP-427: The Universe as Seen by ISO,
2599: ed. P.~{Cox} \& M.~{Kessler}, 529--+
2600:
2601: \bibitem[{{Uchida} {et~al.}(2000){Uchida}, {Sellgren}, {Werner}, \&
2602: {Houdashelt}}]{uchida00}
2603: {Uchida}, K.~I., {Sellgren}, K., {Werner}, M.~W., \& {Houdashelt}, M.~L. 2000,
2604: \apj, 530, 817
2605:
2606: \bibitem[{{Valentijn} \& {van der Werf}(1999)}]{valentijn99}
2607: {Valentijn}, E.~A. \& {van der Werf}, P.~P. 1999, \apjl, 522, L29
2608:
2609: \bibitem[{{van Buren} {et~al.}(1990){van Buren}, {Mac Low}, {Wood}, \&
2610: {Churchwell}}]{vanburen90}
2611: {van Buren}, D., {Mac Low}, M.-M., {Wood}, D.~O.~S., \& {Churchwell}, E. 1990,
2612: \apj, 353, 570
2613:
2614: \bibitem[{{van Buren} \& {McCray}(1988)}]{vanburen88}
2615: {van Buren}, D. \& {McCray}, R. 1988, \apjl, 329, L93
2616:
2617: \bibitem[{{van Buren} {et~al.}(1995){van Buren}, {Noriega-Crespo}, \&
2618: {Dgani}}]{vanburen95}
2619: {van Buren}, D., {Noriega-Crespo}, A., \& {Dgani}, R. 1995, \aj, 110, 2914
2620:
2621: \bibitem[{{van Dishoeck}(2004)}]{vand04}
2622: {van Dishoeck}, E.~F. 2004, \araa, 42, 119
2623:
2624: \bibitem[{{Verstraete} {et~al.}(2001){Verstraete}, {Pech}, {Moutou},
2625: {Sellgren}, {Wright}, {Giard}, {L{\'e}ger}, {Timmermann}, \&
2626: {Drapatz}}]{verstraete01}
2627: {Verstraete}, L., {Pech}, C., {Moutou}, C., {Sellgren}, K., {Wright}, C.~M.,
2628: {Giard}, M., {L{\'e}ger}, A., {Timmermann}, R., \& {Drapatz}, S. 2001, \aap,
2629: 372, 981
2630:
2631: \bibitem[{{Verstraete} {et~al.}(1996){Verstraete}, {Puget}, {Falgarone},
2632: {Drapatz}, {Wright}, \& {Timmermann}}]{verstraete96}
2633: {Verstraete}, L., {Puget}, J.~L., {Falgarone}, E., {Drapatz}, S., {Wright},
2634: C.~M., \& {Timmermann}, R. 1996, \aap, 315, L337
2635:
2636: \bibitem[{{Werner} {et~al.}(2004{\natexlab{a}}){Werner}, {Roellig}, {Low},
2637: {Rieke}, {Rieke}, {Hoffmann}, {Young}, {Houck}, {Brandl}, {Fazio}, {Hora},
2638: {Gehrz}, {Helou}, {Soifer}, {Stauffer}, {Keene}, {Eisenhardt}, {Gallagher},
2639: {Gautier}, {Irace}, {Lawrence}, {Simmons}, {Van Cleve}, {Jura}, {Wright}, \&
2640: {Cruikshank}}]{werner04}
2641: {Werner}, M.~W., {Roellig}, T.~L., {Low}, F.~J., {Rieke}, G.~H., {Rieke}, M.,
2642: {Hoffmann}, W.~F., {Young}, E., {Houck}, J.~R., {Brandl}, B., {Fazio}, G.~G.,
2643: {Hora}, J.~L., {Gehrz}, R.~D., {Helou}, G., {Soifer}, B.~T., {Stauffer}, J.,
2644: {Keene}, J., {Eisenhardt}, P., {Gallagher}, D., {Gautier}, T.~N., {Irace},
2645: W., {Lawrence}, C.~R., {Simmons}, L., {Van Cleve}, J.~E., {Jura}, M.,
2646: {Wright}, E.~L., \& {Cruikshank}, D.~P. 2004{\natexlab{a}}, \apjs, 154, 1
2647:
2648: \bibitem[{{Werner} {et~al.}(2004{\natexlab{b}}){Werner}, {Uchida}, {Sellgren},
2649: {Marengo}, {Gordon}, {Morris}, {Houck}, \& {Stansberry}}]{werner04b}
2650: {Werner}, M.~W., {Uchida}, K.~I., {Sellgren}, K., {Marengo}, M., {Gordon},
2651: K.~D., {Morris}, P.~W., {Houck}, J.~R., \& {Stansberry}, J.~A.
2652: 2004{\natexlab{b}}, \apjs, 154, 309
2653:
2654: \bibitem[{{Witt} {et~al.}(1993){Witt}, {Petersohn}, {Holberg}, {Murthy},
2655: {Dring}, \& {Henry}}]{witt93}
2656: {Witt}, A.~N., {Petersohn}, J.~K., {Holberg}, J.~B., {Murthy}, J., {Dring}, A.,
2657: \& {Henry}, R.~C. 1993, ApJ, 410, 714
2658:
2659: \bibitem[{{Witt} {et~al.}(1989){Witt}, {Stecher}, {Boroson}, \&
2660: {Bohlin}}]{witt89}
2661: {Witt}, A.~N., {Stecher}, T.~P., {Boroson}, T.~A., \& {Bohlin}, R.~C. 1989,
2662: \apjl, 336, L21
2663:
2664: \bibitem[{{Wolniewicz} {et~al.}(1998){Wolniewicz}, {Simbotin}, \&
2665: {Dalgarno}}]{avals98}
2666: {Wolniewicz}, L., {Simbotin}, I., \& {Dalgarno}, A. 1998, \apjs, 115, 293
2667:
2668: \end{thebibliography}
2669:
2670: \end{document}
2671: %%%GENERIC TABLE WRITE-IN - for Peter's HIFI desire for a pointing list - 10/30/06
2672: \begin{deluxetable*}{ccccccccc}
2673: \tabletypesize{\small}
2674: \tablecaption{Warm \& Dense ISM Pointing Table.\tablenotemark{a}}
2675: \tablewidth{0pt}
2676: \tablehead{
2677: \colhead{Target} & \colhead{RA (2000)\tablenotemark{b}} & \colhead{$\delta$ (2000)} &
2678: \colhead{$l$} & \colhead{b} &
2679: \colhead{HIFI Time} & \colhead{PACS Time} & \colhead{$\chi$} & \colhead{$n_{H}$} \\
2680: %\colhead{Brightness at 1060 \AA\tablenotemark{a}} \\
2681: & \colhead{( $^{\mathrm h}$\, $^{\mathrm m}$\, $^{\mathrm s} )$} & \colhead{(\arcdeg\, \arcmin\, \arcsec )} &
2682: \colhead{(\arcdeg)} & \colhead{(\arcdeg)} & \colhead{(h)} & \colhead{(h)} & \colhead{(Draine)} & \colhead{(cm$^{-3}$)} \\
2683: }
2684: %\tableline
2685: \startdata
2686: NGC 3603 & 11 15 09.1 & -61 16 17 & 291.63 & -0.53 & 7.4 & 1.7 & 10$^{6}$ & 3$\times$10$^{3}$--10$^{4}$ \\
2687: Mon R2 & 06 07 46.6 & -06 22 59 & 213.70 & -12.60 & 10.5 & 3.2 & 10$^{5}$ & 10$^{5}$--10${6}$ \\
2688: S 106\tablenotemark{c} & 05 16 20.98 & +34 18 52 & 100.00 & -12.05 & 10.0 & 1.2 & 6$\times$10$^{4}$ & 10$^{4}$--10$^{5}$ \\
2689: Carinae & 10 44 19.0 & -59 53 21 & 287.61 & -0.85 & 9.5 & 3.9 & 10$^{4}$ -- 10$^{5}$ & 10$^{4}$--10$^{6}$ \\
2690: Cep B & 22 75 07.1 & +62 37 34 & XXX.XX & -YY.YY & 6.0 & 1.5 & 3500 & 6$\times$10$^{4}$ \\
2691: NGC 7023 & 21 01 36.9 & +68 09 48 & 104.06 & +14.19 & 5.5 & 0.6 & 1500 & 5$\times$10$^{4}$--10$^{6}$ \\
2692: IC 63 & 00 59 01.4 & +60 53 18 & 123.85 & -1.97 & 4.8 & 0.3 & 650 & 4$\times$10$^{4}$ \\
2693: $\rho$ Oph & 16 25 57 & -24 20 48 & 353.04 & +17.03 & 5.5 & 3.2 & 400 & 2--4$\times$10$^{4}$ \\
2694: Ced 201 & 22 13 27 & +70 15 15 & 110.72 & +11.37 & 3.8 & 0.2 & 200 & 5$\times$10$^{3}$--2$\times$10$^{4}$ \\
2695: Rosette & 06 35 & +04 12 & 207.32 & -1.73 & 6.5 & 4.4 & 140 & 3$\times$10$^{2}$--2$\times$10$^{4}$ \\
2696: S 140 & 22 19 00.3 & +63 04 10 & 106.63 & +5.13 & 10.1 & 1.2 & 100 & 5$\times$10$^{5}$--10$^{6}$ \\
2697: Horsehead & 05 40 59.0 & -02 27 30 & 106.96 & -16.78 & 7.5 & 3.2 & 60 & 10$^{4}$--10$^{5}$ \\
2698: \tableline
2699: IC 443 & 06 18 02.7 & +22 39 36 & 189.09 & +3.23 & 22.0 & 4.5 & -- & 10$^{3}$--10$^{4}$ \\
2700: 3C 391 & 18 49 22.4 & -00 55 21 & 31.88 & +0.04 & 3.6 & 4.1 & -- & -- \\
2701: W 28 & 18 01 & -23 11 & 6.71 & -0.05 & 3.6 & 2.0 & -- & -- \\
2702: W 44 & 18 56 06 & +01 18 & 34.62 & -0.45 & 3.6 & 2.0 & -- & -- \\
2703: \tableline
2704: Barnard 68 & 17 22 38.2 & -23 49 34 & 1.52 & +7.09 & 3.4 & 1.0 & 1 & 5$\times$10$^{4}$ \\
2705: \enddata
2706:
2707: \tablenotetext{a}{ 2006 October 30 -- kf }
2708: \tablenotetext{b}{All values taken from $Simbad$ except, S106, which was converted from Schneider et al. (2003).}
2709: \tablenotetext{c}{J1950}
2710:
2711: \end{deluxetable*}
2712:
2713:
2714:
2715: %%%%%Creating tables for IC405-Spitzer paper on XP (yikes), the plan is
2716: %%%%% to have 8,24,and 70um individual filament detail tables, one where
2717: %%%%% we bring all 3 together with a the FUSE numbers, one bow shock
2718: %%%%% photometry table, one table summing up the IRS observations, and
2719: %%%%% one table that lists all the IRS measurables (h2_temp, PAH lines, ratios...)
2720:
2721: %% Text for table notes should follow after the \enddata but before
2722: %% the \end{deluxetable}. Make sure there is at least one \tablenotemark
2723: %% in the table for each \tablenotetext.
2724:
2725: %% Use the figure environment and \plotone or \plottwo to include
2726: %% figures and captions in your electronic submission.
2727:
2728: %% The following command ends your manuscript. LaTeX will ignore any text
2729: %% that appears after it.
2730: \end{document}
2731:
2732:
2733:
2734:
2735:
2736:
2737:
2738:
2739:
2740: