1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2: \begin{document}
3:
4: \title{On the Progenitor of Supernova 1987A}
5:
6: \author{M. Parthasarathy\altaffilmark{1}, David Branch, E. Baron, and
7: David J. Jeffery} \affil{Homer L. Dodge Department of Physics and
8: Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019}
9:
10: \altaffiltext{1}{Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Koramangala,
11: Bangalore - 560034, India}
12:
13: \begin{abstract}
14:
15: A previously unpublished ultralow--dispersion spectrum of Sanduleak
16: -69~202, the stellar progenitor of SN~1987A, is presented and the
17: uncertain presupernova evolution of Sanduleak -69~202 is discussed.
18:
19: \end{abstract}
20:
21: \keywords{Supernovae: individual (SN 1987A) --- techniques:
22: ultralow--dispersion spectra --- Large Magellanic Cloud ---
23: supergiants --- stars: Sanduleak -69~202}
24:
25: \section{INTRODUCTION}
26:
27: Supernova 1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), the
28: observationally brightest supernova since Kepler's supernova of 1604,
29: was observed in all wavelength regions and its neutrino burst was
30: detected. Its aftermath may be observed as long as there are
31: astronomers on Earth. SN~1987A was classified as a Type~II supernova
32: (SN~II) in view of the strong hydrogen lines in its optical spectrum,
33: but because it was the explosion of a blue supergiant (BSG) rather
34: than a red one (RSG), it was an atypical SN~II: its light curve did
35: not reach maximum until three months after core collapse and at
36: maximum it was only about 10~percent as luminous as most SNe~II. For
37: reviews of SN~1987A see Arnett et~al. (1989) and McCray (1993).
38: Vainu Bappu Observatory, Kavalur, India
39: also participated in the observations of
40: SN~1987A (Ashoka et al. 1987, Anupama et al. 1988).
41:
42:
43: SN~1987A provided the first good opportunity to directly investigate a
44: supernova progenitor star. The progenitor of SN~1987A was Sanduleak
45: -69~202 (Sk~-69~202), a twelfth magnitude star classified as OB by
46: Sanduleak (1970) from an objective prism survey of the LMC.
47: Unfortunately, the observational record of Sk~-69~202 is limited,
48: partly because no spectral peculiarities or variability called
49: attention to Sk~-69~202 during the decades prior to its demise.
50:
51: Only serendipitous or survey data exist for Sk~-69~202. Isserstedt
52: (1975) obtained UBV photoelectric photometry between 1971 and 1973: $V
53: = 12.24, B-V = +0.04$, and $U-B = -0.65$, characteristic of spectral
54: type B3~I. Walborn et~al. (1987) analyzed eight CTIO 4--m
55: prime--focus plates obtained between 1974 and 1983 that covered the
56: wavelength range from blue to near--IR. Sk~-69~202 appeared to be
57: normal, and no near--IR excess (no hot dust) was detected. Also, there
58: was little or no light variability between 1974 and 1983 (Walborn
59: et~al. 1987) and between 1970 and 1981 (Blanco et~al. 1987). Plotkin
60: \& Clayton (2004) examined a large number of Harvard blue patrol
61: plates obtained from 1896 to 1954 and found no variability at the 0.3
62: magnitude level.
63:
64: In 1972 and 1973 Rousseau et al. (1978) obtained ESO astrograph
65: objective--prism spectra of 110~\AA~mm$^{-1}$ dispersion at
66: H${\gamma}$ on Kodak IIa--O plates; the wavelength coverage was
67: limited, from 3850 to 4150~\AA. They classified Sk~-69~202 as B3~I.
68: Walborn et~al. (1989) analyzed and critically discussed these spectra
69: (as well as one ESO Schmidt objective prism spectrum of
70: 460~\AA~mm$^{-1}$ dispersion at H${\gamma}$). They compared the
71: spectrum of Sk~-69~202 with the spectra of six other LMC supergiants
72: observed in the same way. The spectral type of Sk~-69~202 was
73: constrained to be within the range B0.7 to B3, with B3 favored.
74:
75: In view of the limited amount of observational data on Sk~-69~202, all
76: of it should be made available. We report on an ultralow--dispersion
77: objective--prism spectrum of Sk~-69~202 and the surrounding region
78: that was obtained in January 1974. Formally, this spectrum extends the
79: wavelength coverage of Sk~-69~202 to 6600~\AA, although only at
80: ultralow--dispersion.
81:
82: \section{ULTRALOW--DISPERSION SPECTRUM OF Sk~-69~202}
83:
84: Morgan et~al. (1954) showed that faint OB stars and very red stars
85: could be easily detected on 103a--F plates using objective prisms that
86: give ultralow dispersion of 30,000~\AA~mm$^{-1}$. Subsequent work by
87: Schulte (1956a,b) identified several reddened OB stars of the
88: Cygnus~OB2 (VI~Cygni) association from 10,000~\AA~ mm$^{-1}$
89: objective--prism spectra. This technique requires construction of
90: prisms of very small angle (Bidelman 1972). The ultralow--dispersion
91: technique was developed at the Vainu Bappu Observatory (VBO), Kavalur,
92: India and was successfully applied to detect red and blue stars (Bappu
93: \& Parthasarathy 1977; Parthasarathy 1978). Bappu, Parthasarathy, \&
94: Scaria (1977, 1978, 1985) used this method to detect very red stars in
95: selected regions of the LMC, and Parthasarathy \& Jain (1995) applied
96: it to detect cool and reddened stars in Cyg~OB2.
97:
98: The instrument (Bappu \& Parthasarathy 1977) used was an F/2 slitless
99: spectrograph with a three--degree quartz prism and a Schmidt camera at
100: the Cassegrain focus of the 1--m Ritchey--Chretien reflector at
101: VBO. The field of view was 40 arcminutes in diameter. Spectra
102: covering the wavelength range 3500 to 6600~\AA\ were obtained on Kodak
103: 103a-E emulsion. The dispersion was 10,000~\AA~mm$^{-1}$. The spectra
104: were unwidened and were about 250 microns in length along the
105: dispersion (Bappu \& Parthasarathy 1977; Parthasarathy \& Jain
106: 1995). With this setup ultralow--dispersion spectra of all stars
107: within a 40 minutes of arc field could be recorded in one exposure.
108:
109: Ultralow--dispersion spectra of B, A, F, G, K, and M stars are shown
110: in Figure~1. The main criterion for classification is the shape of the
111: image. From Figure~1 it is clear that one can easily distinguish
112: between OB stars and very red stars. The discontinuity in the spectrum
113: is due to the dip in the sensitivity of the 103a--E emulsion in the
114: green, which serves as a wavelength reference to distinguish the blue
115: part of the spectrum from the red. For example notice the difference
116: in the spectra of the B star and the K and M stars. Observations of
117: several selected regions of the LMC obtained between 1974 and 1976 and
118: the detection of red stars in the LMC can be found in Bappu
119: et~al. (1977, 1978, 1985). The region of the LMC observed in 1974 in
120: which Sk~-69~202 is present is shown in Figure~2. This region also
121: includes the nearby Sk~-69~203, a B0.7~I star with $V = 12.29, B-V =
122: +0.01, U-B = -0.85$ (Isserstedt 1975; Rousseau et~al. 1978; Walborn
123: et~al. 1989), quite similar to Sk~-69~202 and possibly associated with
124: it.
125:
126: The ultralow--dispersion spectrum of Sk~-69~202 shows that it was a B
127: star in 1974. Comparison of densities in different sections of the
128: images of Sk~-69~202 and Sk~-69~203 indicates that the magnitude and
129: colors of Sk~-69~202 were similar to that of Sk~-69~203, in agreement
130: with the UBV photometry and spectral classification.
131:
132: \section{PRESUPERNOVA EVOLUTION OF Sk~-69~202}
133:
134: All data discussed above indicate that from 1971 to 1983 Sk~-69~202
135: showed the characteristics of a normal B3~I star, with no evidence for
136: variability, no Balmer--line emission, and no noticeable reddening or
137: near--IR excess. (Walborn et~al. 1989). From the spectra presented by
138: Walborn et~al. we estimate that the rotational velocity may not be
139: more than 100 km s$^{-1}$. Sk~-69~202 was a normal B3~I supergiant
140: shortly before exploding.
141:
142: SN~1987A has three circumstellar rings that are part of a complex
143: system of gas that appears to have been ejected by the progenitor some
144: 20,000 years before Sk~-69~202 exploded (Burrows et al. 1995; Sugerman
145: et~al. 2005 and many references therein). The inner, equatorial ring
146: is expanding at 10~km~s$^{-1}$; its true shape is a nearly circular
147: ring of radius~0.67 ly, inclined at 43 degrees to our line of sight.
148: Analysis of the emission--line spectrum of the inner ring (Fransson
149: et~al. 2005) indicates that it is nitrogen-rich, with N/(C+O) about 10
150: times greater than the solar ratio (or perhaps somewhat smaller than
151: this; Zhekov et~al. 2006). The enhanced N abundance is thought to be
152: due to conversion of C and O to N by the CNO cycle in Sk~-69~202
153: before the ring material was expelled. The outer loops have physical
154: radii 1.5~ly and lie on planes approximately parallel to the plane of
155: the inner ring but displaced by about 1.3~ly on either side. The outer
156: loops have radial velocities consistent with the interpretation that
157: they were expelled at or near the time of the inner ring material.
158:
159: The presupernova evolution of Sk~-69~202 and the origin of the triple
160: ring system remain uncertain. According to the evolutionary models of
161: massive stars the progenitors of most SNe II are expected to be RSGs.
162: The prevailing opinion is that SN~1987A did become an RSG, during
163: which time it may have expelled the material of the rings in the form
164: of a slow wind, and then returned to the blue. Within the current
165: uncertainties of stellar evolution it is possible to make assumptions
166: that cause models of single stars to return to the blue, but it is not
167: clear that these assumptions are natural (Woosley et~al. 2002). It is
168: supposed that the fast wind of the second BSG phase then interacted
169: with the slow wind of the RSG phase to produce the present ring system
170: (e.g., Lundqvist \& Fransson 1996; Sugarman et~al. 2005). However, to
171: end up with a ring system rather than a more spherical shell, the RSG
172: wind must have been for some reason equatorially enhanced, and if
173: Sk~-69~202 had been an RSG one might expect some evidence for
174: circumstellar gas and dust, emission lines, and variability in the
175: presupernova data obtained between 1971 and 1983.
176:
177: Opposed to the single--star scenario above is that Sk~-69~202 may have
178: been the product of the merger of an RSG and a less massive companion
179: star (Hillebrandt \& Meyer 1989; Podsiadlowski \& Ivanova 2003). Such
180: a merger can result in a BSG and perhaps a complex circumstellar
181: system. However, the scenario is complicated. Morris \&
182: Podsiadlowski (2006) find that the mass ejection would be primarily at
183: mid--latitudes rather than in the equatorial plane. They suggest that
184: the mid--latitude ejection provided the material of the outer rings,
185: and that the equatorial ejection of the inner ring material occurred
186: {\sl after} the merger in a rotation--enforced outflow during the
187: contraction toward the blue. Another possible difficulty with the
188: merger model is that it requires fine tuning to get the merger to
189: happen just 20,000 years before the supernova, which would make
190: SN~1987A an uncommon event (Woosley et~al. 2002). Also, if Sk~-69~202
191: was a merger product, rapid rotation of a few hundred km s$^{-1}$ is
192: expected. As mentioned above, the spectra of Sk~-69~202 showed no
193: evidence for rapid rotation.
194:
195: Is it possible that Sk~-69~202 never was an RSG? Pastorello
196: et~al. (2005) presented spectroscopic and photometric observations of
197: the peculiar Type~II SN~1998A. They showed that in many respects the
198: light curves and spectra resembled those of SN~1987A, indicating that
199: the progenitor of SN~1998A also was a BSG. In spite of the strong
200: observational selection against the discovery of subluminous events,
201: Pastorello et~al. cited the existence of several other SNe~II with
202: (fragmentary) light curves possibly similar in shape to SN~1987A and
203: SN~1998A, which suggests that explosions of BSGs are not too uncommon.
204: This would be inconsistent with explanations that require fine tuning.
205: Instead, there may be some regular channel for producing
206: SN~1987A--like events. From stellar evolution calculations H\"oflich
207: et~al. (2001) found that models having somewhat lower metallicity or
208: higher main---sequence mass than SN~1987A explode as BSGs without
209: becoming RSGs, but the quantitative results depend on various
210: assumptions. A problem for this scenario for SN~1987A, though, is
211: that if Sk~-69~202 never was an RSG, then there may be no good
212: explanation for the low--velocity circumstellar material, although
213: McCray \& Lin (1994) suggested that the inner ring is the inner rim of
214: a disk of gas left over from the formation of Sk~-69~202. It is
215: interesting that Sher~25, an apparently normal B1.5~Iab supergiant in
216: or near the Galactic open cluster NGC~3603, has a system of rings
217: reminiscent of SN~1987A (Brandner et~al. 1997). Like other B~type
218: supergiants, Sher~25 has photospheric CNO abundances that indicate
219: strong processing via the CNO cycle (Crowther et~al. 2007).
220:
221: The history of Sk~-69~202 continues to be a mystery. Future
222: observations of the interaction between the high--velocity ejecta of
223: SN~1987A and the circumstellar matter, especially in X--rays (Zhekov
224: et~al. 2006), may provide vital clues to the past.
225:
226: We are grateful to Arlin Crotts and Dick McCray for instructive
227: comments. This work has been supported by NSF grant AST-0506028 and
228: NASA grant NNG04GD368.
229:
230:
231: \begin{thebibliography}{}
232:
233: \bibitem[Anupama et~al. (1988)]{anu88} Anupama, G.C., et~al., 1988, Vistas in Astronomy 31, 261
234:
235: \bibitem[Arnett et~al. (1989)]{arn89} Arnett, W. D., Bahcall, J. N.,
236: Kirshner, R. P., \& Woosley, S. E. 1989, \araa, 27, 629
237:
238: \bibitem[Ashoka et~al. (1987)]{ash87} Ashoka, B.N., et~al., 1987, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 8, 195
239:
240: \bibitem[Bappu \& Parthasarathy(1977)]{bap77} Bappu, M. K. V., \&
241: Parthasarathy, M. 1977, \ Kodaikanal Obs. Bull. 2, 1
242:
243: \bibitem[Bappu et~al. (1977)]{bap77} Bappu, M. K. V., Parthasarathy, M.,
244: \& Scaria, K. K. 1977, \ Kodaikanal Obs. Bull. 2, 85
245:
246: \bibitem[Bappu et~al. (1978)]{bap78} Bappu, M. K. V., Parthasarathy, M.,
247: \& Scaria, K. K. 1978, \ Kodaikanal Obs. Bull. 2, 184
248:
249: \bibitem[Bappu et~al. (1985)]{bap85} Bappu, M. K. V., Parthasarathy, M.,
250: \& Scaria,K. K. 1985, \ Kodaikanal Obs. Bull. 5, 1
251:
252: \bibitem[Bidelman (1972)]{bid72} Bidelman, W. P. 1972, in The role of
253: Schmidt Telescopes in Astronomy ed. U. Haug (Hamburg, ESO, SRC) p.53
254:
255: \bibitem[Blanco et~al. (1987)]{bla87} Blanco V. M., et~al. 1987, \apj,
256: 320, 589
257:
258: \bibitem[Brandner et~al. (1997)]{bra97} Brandner, W., Chu, Y.-H.,
259: Eissenhauer, F.,Grebel, E. K., \& Points, S. D. 1997, \apj, 489, L153
260:
261: \bibitem[Burrows et~al. (1995)]{bur95} Burrows, C. J., et~al. 1995,
262: \apj, 452, 680
263:
264: \bibitem[Crowther et~al. (2006)]{cro06} Crowther, P. A., Lennon, D. J.,
265: Walborn, N., \& Smartt, S. J., 2006, in Mass Loss from Stars and the
266: Evolution of Stellar Clusters, ed. A. J. Koter, L. J. Smith, \&
267: R. Waters (San Francisco: ASP), in press
268:
269: \bibitem[Fransson et~al. (2005)]{fra05} Fransson, C., et~al. 2005,
270: \apj, 622, 991
271:
272: \bibitem[Hillebrandt \& Meyer (1989)]{hil89} Hillebrandt, W., \&
273: Meyer, F. 1989, \aap, 219, L3
274:
275: \bibitem[Hoflich et~al. (2001)]{hof01} H\"oflich, P., et~al. 2001, \
276: RevMexAA, 10, 157
277:
278: \bibitem[Isserstedt (1975)]{iss75} Isserstedt, J. 1975, \aap, Suppl. 19, 259
279:
280: \bibitem[Lundqvist \& Fransson, C. (1996)]{lun96} Lundqvist, P., \&
281: Fransson, C. 1996, \apj, 464, 924
282:
283: \bibitem[McCray (1993)]{mcc93} McCray, R. 1993, \araa, 31, 175
284:
285: \bibitem[McCray \& Lin (1994)]{mcc94} McCray, R., \& Lin,
286: D. N. C. 1994, Nature, 369, 378
287:
288: \bibitem[Morgan et~al. (1954)]{mor54} Morgan, W. W., Meinel, A. B., \&
289: Johnson, H. M. 1954, \apj, 120, 506
290:
291: \bibitem[Morris \& Podsiadlowski (2005)]{mor05} Morris, T., \&
292: Podsiadlowski, P. 2006, \mnras, 365, 2
293:
294: \bibitem[Parthasarathy (1978)]{par78} Parthasarathy, M. 1978, IAU
295: Symposium 80, 25, (D.Reidel)
296:
297: \bibitem[Parthasarathy \& Jain (1995)]{par95} Parthasarathy, M., \&
298: Jain, S. K. 1995, \aap, Suppl. 111, 407
299:
300: \bibitem[Pastorello et~al. (2005)]{pas05} Pastorello, A., et al. 2005,
301: \mnras, 360, 950
302:
303: \bibitem[Plotkin \& Clayton (2004)]{plo04} Plotkin,R. M., \& Clayton,
304: G. C. 2004, JAAVSO, 32, 89
305:
306: \bibitem[Podsiadlowski \& Ivanova (2003)]{pod03} Podsiadlowski, P., \&
307: Ivanova, N. 2003, in From Twilight to Highlight : The Physics of
308: Supernovae, ed. W. Hillebrandt \& B. Leibundgut (Berlin: ESO
309: Astrophysics Symposia, Springer-Verlag), p.~13
310:
311: \bibitem[Rousseau et~al. (1978)]{rou78} Rousseau, J., Martin, N.,
312: Prevot, L., Rebeirot, E., Robin, A., \& Brunet,~J.~P. 1978, \aap,
313: Suppl. 31, 243
314:
315: \bibitem[Sanduleak (1970)]{san70} Sanduleak, N. 1970, Cerro Tololo
316: Inter-American Obs. Contr. No. 89
317:
318: \bibitem[Schulte (1956a)]{sch56a} Schulte, D. H. 1956a, \apj, 123, 250
319:
320: \bibitem[Schulte (1956b)]{sch56b} Schulte, D. H. 1956b, \apj, 124, 530
321:
322: \bibitem[Sugerman et~al. (2005)]{sug05} Sugerman, B. E. K., et~al. 2005,
323: \apj, 627, 888
324:
325: \bibitem[Walborn et~al. (1987)]{wal87} Walborn, N. R., Lasker, B. M.,
326: Laidler, V. G., \& Chu, Y.--H. 1987, \apj, 321, L41
327:
328: \bibitem[Walborn, N.R., et~al. (1989)]{wal89} Walborn, N. R., Prevot,
329: M. L., Prevot, L., Wamsteker, W., Gonzalez, R., Gilmozzi, R., \&
330: Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1989, \aap, 219, 229
331:
332: \bibitem[Woosley et~al. (2002)]{woo02} Woosley, S. E., Heger, T.A ., \&
333: Weaver, T. 2002, \ Rev.Mod. Phys. 74, 1015
334:
335: \bibitem[Zhekov et~al. (2006)]{zhe06} Zhekov, S. A., McCray, R.,
336: Borkowski, K. J., Burrows, D. N., \& Park, S. 2006, \apj, 645, 293
337:
338: \end{thebibliography}
339:
340: %Arnett, W.D., Bahcall, J.N., Kirshner, R.P., \& Woosley,~S.E. 1989,
341: %ARAA, 27, 629
342: %
343: %Blanco, V.M., et al. 1987, ApJ, 320, 589
344: %
345: %Brandner, W., Chu, Y.--H., Eissenhauer, F., Grebel, E.K., \&
346: %Points,~S.D. 1997, ApJ, 489, L153
347: %
348: %Crowther, P.A., Lennon, D.J., Walborn, N. ., \& Smartt,~S.J. 2006, in
349: %Mass Loss from Stars and the Evolution of Stellar Clusters,
350: %ed. A.J. Koter, L.J. Smith, \& R. Waters (San Francisco: ASP), in
351: %press
352: %
353: %Lundqvist, P. \& Fransson, C. 1996, ApJ, 464, 924
354: %
355: %McCray, R., \& Lin, D.N.C. 1994, Nature, 369, 378
356: %
357: %Morris, T., \& Podsiadlowski, P. 2005, MNRAS, in press
358: %
359: %Plotkin, R.M., \& Clayton, G.C. 2004, JAAVSO, 32, 2004
360: %
361: %Sanduleak, N. 1970, Cerro Tololo Inter--American Obs. Contr. No.~89
362: %
363: %Zhekov, S.A., McCray, R., Borkowski, K.J., Burrows,~D.N., \&
364: %Park,~S. 2006, ApJ, 645, 293
365:
366: \clearpage
367:
368: \begin{figure}
369: %\includegraphics[width=.8\textwidth,angle=270]{f1.eps}
370: \begin{center}
371: \includegraphics[height=.8\textwidth]{f1eb.eps}
372: \end{center}
373: \caption{The ultralow--dispersion (10,000~\AA~mm$^{-1}$)
374: spectra of stars of various spectral types. Wavelength increases to
375: the right. The discontinuity in the spectrum is due to the dip in the
376: sensitivity of the 103a--E emulsion in the green.
377: }
378: \end{figure}
379:
380: \begin{figure}
381: \begin{center}
382: \includegraphics[width=.8\textwidth]{f2eb.eps}
383: \end{center}
384: \caption{
385: The region of the LMC that contains Sk -69 202
386: (lower arrow), the progenitor of SN~1987A, and Sk -69 203 (upper
387: arrow). Numbered stars are red stars identified by Bappu
388: et~al. (1977). Spectra were recorded on 103a-E emulsion and cover the
389: wavelength range 3500 to 6500~\AA. Wavelength increases downward.
390: The 1950 coordinates of the field center are R.A. 05 36.5 and Dec. -69
391: 10. North is at the top and east is toward the left.
392: }
393: \end{figure}
394:
395: \end{document}
396: