1: \documentclass{emulateapj_mo}
2: \usepackage{lscape}
3: %%\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
4: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
5: %%\documentclass[preprint2]{aastex}
6: %%\documentclass[preprint2,longabstract]{aastex}
7:
8: %%\newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
9: \newcommand{\myemail}{inada@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp}
10:
11: \shorttitle{SDSS J1029+2623: 22 arcsecond lensed QSO}
12: \shortauthors{Inada et al.}
13:
14: \begin{document}
15:
16: \title{SDSS J1029+2623: A Gravitationally Lensed Quasar with an Image
17: Separation of 22.5 Arcseconds${}^1$}
18:
19: \author{
20: Naohisa Inada\altaffilmark{2,3},
21: Masamune Oguri\altaffilmark{4,5},
22: Tomoki Morokuma\altaffilmark{2},
23: Mamoru Doi\altaffilmark{2},
24: Naoki Yasuda\altaffilmark{6},
25: Robert H. Becker\altaffilmark{7,8},
26: Gordon T. Richards\altaffilmark{9,10},
27: Christopher S. Kochanek\altaffilmark{11},
28: Issha Kayo\altaffilmark{12},
29: Kohki Konishi\altaffilmark{6},
30: Hiroyuki Utsunomiya\altaffilmark{2},
31: Min-Su Shin\altaffilmark{5},
32: Michael A. Strauss\altaffilmark{5},
33: Erin S. Sheldon\altaffilmark{13},
34: Donald G. York\altaffilmark{14,15},
35: Joseph F. Hennawi\altaffilmark{16},
36: Donald P. Schneider\altaffilmark{17},
37: Xinyu Dai\altaffilmark{11},
38: and
39: Masataka Fukugita\altaffilmark{6}
40: }
41: \altaffiltext{1}{Based in part on data collected at Subaru Telescope,
42: which is operated by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan.}
43: \altaffiltext{2}{Institute of Astronomy, Faculty of Science, University
44: of Tokyo, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-0015, Japan.}
45: \altaffiltext{3}{Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
46: Research Fellow.}
47: \altaffiltext{4}{Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and
48: Cosmology, Stanford University, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, CA
49: 94025.}
50: \altaffiltext{5}{Princeton University Observatory, Peyton Hall,
51: Princeton, NJ 08544.}
52: \altaffiltext{6}{Institute for Cosmic Ray Resarch, University of Tokyo,
53: 5-1-5 Kashiwa, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8582, Japan.}
54: \altaffiltext{7}{IGPP-LLNL, L-413, 7000 East Avenue, Livermore, CA 94550.}
55: \altaffiltext{8}{Department of Physics, University of California at
56: Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616.}
57: \altaffiltext{9}{Department of Physics, Drexel University, 3141
58: Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104.}
59: \altaffiltext{10}{Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles St.,
60: Baltimore, MD 21218.}
61: \altaffiltext{11}{Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University,
62: Columbus, OH 43210.}
63: \altaffiltext{12}{Department of Physics and Astrophysics, Nagoya
64: University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8062, Japan.}
65: \altaffiltext{13}{Center for Cosmology and Particle Physics,
66: Department of Physics, New York University, 4 Washington Place, New
67: York, NY 10003. }
68: \altaffiltext{14}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The
69: University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637.}
70: \altaffiltext{15}{Enrico Fermi Institute, The University of Chicago,
71: 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637.}
72: \altaffiltext{16}{Department of Astronomy, University of California at
73: Berkeley, 601 Campbell Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-3411.}
74: \altaffiltext{17}{Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The
75: Pennsylvania State University, 525 Davey Laboratory, University
76: Park, PA 16802.}
77:
78: \setcounter{footnote}{17}
79:
80: \begin{abstract}
81: We report the discovery of a cluster-scale lensed quasar,
82: SDSS J1029+2623, selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. The lens
83: system exhibits two lensed images of a quasar at ${z_s}=2.197$. The
84: image separation of $22\farcs5$ makes it the largest separation lensed
85: quasar discovered to date. The similarity of the optical spectra and
86: the radio loudnesses of the two components support the
87: lensing hypothesis. Images of the field show a cluster of galaxies at
88: ${z_l}\sim 0.55$ that is responsible for the large image
89: separation. The lensed images and the cluster light center are not
90: collinear, which implies that the lensing cluster has a complex
91: structure.
92: \end{abstract}
93:
94: \keywords{gravitational lensing ---
95: quasars: individual (SDSS~102913.94+262317.9) ---
96: galaxies: clusters: general}
97:
98: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
99: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
100: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
101: \section{Introduction}\label{sec:intro}
102: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
103: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
104: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
105:
106: The discovery of SDSS J1004+4112 with an image separation of
107: $14\farcs6$, the first example of a quasar multiply imaged by a massive
108: cluster of galaxies, opened a new window for understanding our
109: universe \citep{inada03,oguri04a,sharon05}.
110: Although there are many examples of galaxies (arcs) lensed by
111: clusters,
112: large-separation lensed quasars have several advantages over arcs
113: as a cosmological probe.
114: First, the simpler (point-like) structure of quasars and
115: their well-understood redshift distribution should make the
116: large-separation lensed quasars much cleaner probes of cosmology and
117: structure formation models \citep[e.g.,][]{oguri04b,hennawi06}, while
118: the statistics of arcs remain contentious \citep{bartelmann03}.
119: Second, the time-variability of quasars allows the measurement of
120: time delays among the multiple lensed images, thereby breaking
121: the mass-sheet degeneracy of lens models given a priori knowledge
122: of the Hubble constant \citep[e.g.,][]{kochanek02}.
123: This was explored in detail for SDSS J1004+4112
124: \citep[e.g.,][]{oguri04a,williams04,kawano06,fohlmeister06}.
125: Our current problem is that the small number of known systems
126: limits their use in statistical analyses, however,
127: current and future large lens surveys will discover
128: many large-separation lensed quasars \citep{wambsganss03}.
129:
130: In this {\it Letter},
131: we report the discovery of the second large-separation lensed quasar,
132: SDSS J1029+2623, a quasar at $z_s=2.197$ doubly imaged by a massive galaxy
133: cluster at $z_l{\sim}0.55$.
134: It was discovered in the course of the Sloan Digital
135: Sky Survey Quasar Lens Search \citep[SQLS;][]{oguri06}, which is a
136: survey of strongly lensed quasars in
137: the Sloan Digital Sky Survey \citep[SDSS;][]{york00}.
138: The image separation of $22\farcs5$ makes it
139: the largest separation lens among the $\sim 100$ lensed quasars known
140: so far \citep{kochanek06}.
141:
142: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
143: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
144: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
145: \section{Candidate Selection and Subaru observations}\label{sec:sdss}
146: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
147: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
148: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
149:
150: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
151: \begin{figure*}
152: \epsscale{.32}
153: \plotone{f1a.eps}
154: \plotone{f1b.eps}
155: \plotone{f1c.ps}
156: \caption{{\it Left}: The $gri$ composite SDSS image of SDSS J1029+2623
157: (1\farcs3 seeing). The quasar images (blue stellar objects) are indicated
158: by A and B. G1 and G2 (red extended objects) are likely to be member
159: galaxies of a lensing cluster at $z{\sim}0.55$.
160: The inset shows an expanded view of component B: An object $\sim 2''$
161: Southeast of component B has quite different color from those of the
162: quasar components.
163: {\it Middle}: The FOCAS $i$-band image (1\farcs8 seeing).
164: {\it Right}: Locations of galaxies ($i<22.5$) identified in the
165: FOCAS images are plotted with filled circles. Larger circles mean
166: brighter galaxies. Galaxies that survive the color cut of
167: $R-i=0.7{\pm}0.3$ are shown by darker circles. Filled triangles are
168: the locations of the two quasar images. In all the panels,
169: North is up and East is left.
170: \label{fig:img}}
171: \end{figure*}
172: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
173:
174: From the SDSS-II Sloan Legacy Survey data, we discovered the
175: lens candidate SDSS J1029+2623
176: using the algorithm described in \citet{oguri06}.
177: It consists of a quasar whose redshift was spectroscopically
178: measured by the SDSS to be $z=2.198$ (hereafter referred to as A)
179: and a stellar object (hereafter B) with almost
180: the same color as component A (see Table \ref{tab:info}).
181: Components A and B are separated by $22\farcs5$.
182: There are no other point sources in the field with similar
183: colors that would be candidates for additional quasar images.
184: In addition to the
185: similar colors, the $gri$ composite SDSS image shown in the left panel of
186: Figure \ref{fig:img} exhibits a concentration of red galaxies centered on
187: two bright galaxies (named G1 and G2), which implies the existence
188: of a high-redshift cluster of galaxies. Indeed, the photometric
189: redshifts of G1 and G2 are both $\sim$0.55 from their SDSS colors
190: \citep{csabai03}. The properties of components A, B, G1, and G2
191: are summarized in Table \ref{tab:info}.
192: We note that the details of the SDSS are described in a series
193: of technical papers: \citet{gunn06} for the dedicated wide-field
194: ($3^{\circ}$ field of view) 2.5-m telescope;
195: \citet{fukugita96}, \citet{gunn98}, \citet{lupton99}, \citet{hogg01},
196: \citet{lupton01}, \citet{smith02}, \citet{pier03}, \citet{ivezic04},
197: and \citet{tucker06} for the photometric survey;
198: \citet{richards02} for the spectroscopic target selection algorithm
199: of quasars; and \citet{blanton03} for the tiling algorithm of
200: the spectroscopic survey. Most of the SDSS data are already publicly
201: available \citep{stoughton02,abazajian03,abazajian04,abazajian05,adelman06}.
202:
203: We obtained 600~sec spectra of components A and B with the Faint
204: Object Camera And Spectrograph \citep[FOCAS;][]{kashikawa02} at the
205: Subaru 8.2-meter telescope on 2006 June 28. The observation was
206: conducted in the 3$\times$1 on-chip binning mode, using the 300B grism,
207: the SY47 filter and a $0\farcs8$-width slit aligned along components A and B.
208: The spectral resolution, wavelength coverage, and spatial scale
209: of the CCD detector were $\hbox{R}\sim500$, from 4700{\,\AA} to
210: 9400{\,\AA}, and $0\farcs311$ pixel$^{-1}$, respectively.
211: Although the seeing was poor ($\sim$1\farcs8), the $22\farcs5$ separation
212: makes it easy to extract the spectra of the two components using
213: standard IRAF\footnote{
214: IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories,
215: which are operated by the Association of Universities for Research
216: in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National
217: Science Foundation.}
218: tasks.
219: The spectra are shown in the upper panel of Figure \ref{fig:spec}.
220: It is clear that both components are quasars at the same
221: redshift, $z=2.197$ (see Table \ref{tab:info}). Moreover, the
222: spectral shapes are similar; both components have similar
223: broad absorption line features at the same wavelength in the \ion{C}{4}
224: emission lines, similar profiles for the \ion{Fe}{3} emission lines,
225: and similar characteristic shapes of the red wings of the \ion{Mg}{2}
226: emission lines. In addition, the spectral flux ratio plotted in the
227: lower panel of Figure \ref{fig:spec} is constant (${\sim}1.2$)
228: over the full range of the observed wavelengths. The similarity of the
229: spectra supports the idea that the two components are
230: lensed images of a single quasar.
231:
232: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
233: \begin{figure}
234: %\epsscale{.8}
235: %\rotate
236: \includegraphics[scale=0.35,angle=270]{f2.eps}
237: \caption{Spectra of components A ({\sl black} solid line,
238: shifted upwards by a constant of 10 flux density units)
239: and B ({\sl gray} solid line) taken with the FOCAS on the
240: Subaru telescope. The signal to noise ratio
241: (in the 6000{\,\AA} -- 8000{\,\AA} continuum) is about 25.0 per pixel.
242: The dotted lines indicate the positions of the
243: quasar \ion{C}{4}, \ion{C}{3]}, \ion{Fe}{3}, and \ion{Mg}{2}
244: emission lines redshifted to $z=2.197$. The feature at 7600{\,\AA}
245: is atmospheric. The inset shows an expanded view of the \ion{C}{4}
246: emission lines. The vertical dot-dashed line in the inset shows the
247: central position of the broad absorption lines.
248: In the bottom panel, the black solid
249: line shows the spectral flux ratio between A and B, and the dark
250: gray solid line shows the 1$\sigma$ error of the spectral flux
251: ratio, which is derived from the noise per pixel in each
252: spectrum. The ratio is confirmed to be constant (${\sim}1.2$) within
253: the $2.3{\sigma}$ error, over the entire range of observed
254: wavelengths.
255: \label{fig:spec}}
256: \end{figure}
257: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
258:
259: We also obtained 120~sec $R$- and 120~sec $i$-band images
260: ($\sim$1\farcs8 seeing)
261: with FOCAS. On-chip $2\times2$ binning yielded images with a
262: pixel scale of 0\farcs207 pixel$^{-1}$. The $i$-band image is
263: shown in the middle panel of Figure \ref{fig:img}. From the FOCAS images,
264: we found that galaxy G1 is likely to be a superposition of two
265: early-type galaxies; however, we treated them as a single object since
266: the poor seeing prevents us from separating them. We used SExtractor
267: \citep{bertin96} for the photometry (MAG\_AUTO) calibrated by the SDSS
268: magnitudes of the nearby stars\footnote{
269: We used the transformation
270: formulae described in Table 7 of \citet{smith02} to calculate $R$
271: magnitudes of the nearby stars from the SDSS $gr$ magnitudes.}.
272: All galaxies (classified by the combination of the SExtractor
273: CLASS\_STAR parameter and visual inspection) with $i<22.5$ are
274: plotted as filled circles in the right panel of Figure
275: \ref{fig:img}. Among them, we selected galaxies with colors of
276: $R-i=0.7{\pm}0.3$ as possible cluster members, because G1 and G2 have
277: $R-i$ colors of 0.6 and 0.8, respectively. The $R-i$ color of 0.7 is
278: consistent with the red-sequence color of a galaxy cluster at
279: $z{\sim}0.55$ \citep[e.g.,][]{goto03}. The selected galaxies are
280: plotted as dark filled circles in the right panel of Figure
281: \ref{fig:img}. As expected, clustering of galaxies
282: near G1 and G2 is much more pronounced after the color cut,
283: suggesting the existence of a cluster of galaxies at
284: $z\sim0.55$.
285:
286: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
287: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
288: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
289: \section{Discussion and Conclusion}\label{sec:subaru}
290: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
291: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
292: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
293:
294: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
295: \begin{figure}
296: \epsscale{.85}
297: \plotone{f3.eps}
298: \caption{Constraints on the center of the potential of the lensing cluster
299: from mass modeling. Solid lines indicate 1, 2, and $3\sigma$
300: likelihood regions for the center based on an SIE model for the cluster
301: potential (see text for details).
302: The quasar images (A and B) and bright member galaxies
303: (G1 and G2) are marked by filled triangles and crosses, respectively.
304: If we model the system using a SIE+external shear with the potential
305: center fixed to galaxy G1, the best-fitting model has an Einstein radius
306: of $15\farcs0$ (corresponding to the velocity dispersion of
307: $\sim$900 km sec$^{-1}$), an ellipticity of 0.25 with its direction
308: of $88^\circ$ (East of North), and a shear of 0.09 with its direction
309: of $28^\circ$, although it does not reproduce the observables exactly.
310: \label{fig:model}}
311: \end{figure}
312: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
313:
314: An interesting thing about this lens system is that the quasar
315: images and the light center of the lensing cluster appear not to be
316: collinear (see Figure \ref{fig:img}).
317: Brightest cluster galaxies are sometimes significantly offset from the
318: center of a cluster mass \citep[e.g.,][]{lin04}, so the lack of
319: collinearity does not necessarily argue against the lensing hypothesis.
320: Nevertheless, it is of great interest to understand the impact of this
321: offset for lens models. To explore this, we use standard mass
322: modeling techniques as implemented in the public {\it lensmodel}
323: software \citep{keeton01}. Since the small number of observational
324: constraints limits detailed investigations of the mass distribution,
325: we adopt the simplest model used for modeling studies, a singular
326: isothermal ellipsoid (SIE). We fit the quasar positions
327: and fluxes
328: assuming a position error of $0\farcs5$ and a flux error of 20\%;
329: we adopt errors larger than the actual measurement errors in order to
330: account for perturbations from massive galaxies in the cluster.
331: In addition we include a mild prior on the ellipticity, $e=0.3\pm0.2$,
332: to exclude models with a highly elongated cluster. With this model,
333: we derive the allowed range for the center position of the lensing
334: cluster potential, as shown in Figure \ref{fig:model}.
335: The offset of at least $\sim 30$~kpc between the preferred model
336: positions and galaxies G1 and G2 suggests either that the actual mass
337: distribution of the lensing cluster is more complex than this
338: simple model or that there is a genuine offset that might be confirmed
339: in X-ray observations.
340:
341: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
342: \begin{figure}
343: \epsscale{.9}
344: \plotone{f4.eps}
345: \caption{The 6 cm VLA radio map of SDSS J1029+2623 field.
346: North is up and East is left.
347: The observation was made during the transition between the B and
348: CnB arrays, leading to the strongly elongated beam (shown in the
349: lower left inset). The red small dots
350: represent the optical position of components A, B, G1, and G2.
351: The small blue dot Northwest of G2 marks the ROSAT X-ray source position
352: while the surrounding blue dashed circle indicates the uncertainties in
353: the position.
354: \label{fig:vla}}
355: \end{figure}
356: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
357:
358: While the similarity of the optical spectra and the existence of the
359: lensing galaxy cluster
360: make the lensing interpretation solid, we can further test the lensing
361: hypothesis using archival data at other wavelengths.
362: In the FIRST radio survey \citep{becker95}, there are two radio
363: sources in the field: Galaxy G2, with a peak flux of 4.20 mJy/beam,
364: is the strongest source, component B, with a peak flux of 1.01 mJy/beam,
365: is detected just at the flux limit, and component A is not detected.
366: Although the difference
367: could be explained by quasar variability combined with the time
368: delay between the lensed images, it might argue a binary interpretation
369: for the quasars.
370: In order to clarify the interpretation of the FIRST radio data,
371: we obtained a 1 hour 6 cm Very Large Array (VLA) radio map of the system
372: on 23 September 2006.
373: Figure \ref{fig:vla} shows the primary beam corrected VLA 6 cm map;
374: both quasar components have more than
375: 5$\sigma$ detections (0.237$\pm$0.045 mJy/beam for A and
376: 0.325$\pm$0.045 mJy/beam for B). There are some offsets
377: (but within 5$\sigma$, see Table \ref{tab:info}) between the
378: SDSS positions and the VLA positions of the quasar components.
379: However both components are extended in the VLA data and
380: better quality data will be necessary to clarify the offsets.
381: The radio loudnesses of the images, defined relative to the SDSS
382: $i$-band fluxes, are 1.8 and 2.5 for images A and B, respectively.
383: The radio flux ratio (A/B)
384: of 0.73 is mildly inconsistent with the optical flux ratio
385: of 1.2, however, allowing for variability both between the epochs
386: of the two observations and the multi-year time delay of
387: the two images, finding two quasars with such similar radio loudnesses
388: further supports the lensing hypothesis given the enormous range of
389: radio loudnesses observed for quasars \citep{ivezic02}.
390:
391: The system was also detected as 1RXS J102912.0+262338 by the ROSAT
392: All-Sky Survey \citep{voges99} with a count rate of
393: $0.040 \pm 0.016$ counts s${}^{-1}$.
394: This corresponds to an 0.1-2.4~keV flux of approximately
395: $(4\pm 1)\times 10^{-13}$ ergs cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$, and
396: it is flagged as an extended source, albeit at low significance.
397: The X-ray position
398: could be consistent with the position of G2 given the
399: $10\farcs0$ uncertainties in the X-ray data (Figure \ref{fig:vla}).
400: Assuming the X-ray signals arise from the lensing cluster ($z{\sim}0.55$),
401: the X-ray luminosity is approximately $3 \times 10^{44} h^{-2}$ ergs s${}^{-1}$
402: (for a cosmological model with $\Omega_M=0.3$ and $\Omega_\Lambda=0.7$)
403: and corresponds to a velocity dispersion of approximately
404: $\sigma \simeq 1000$~km s$^{-1}$ that is slightly larger than
405: the velocity scale of $\sigma \simeq 900$~km s$^{-1}$ needed
406: to produce the 22\farcs5 image separation. Thus the
407: X-ray luminosity is a little too high, suggesting that the
408: AGN in galaxy G2 is an X-ray source as well as a radio source,
409: even though it shows no signs of AGN activity in its broad band
410: optical colors.
411:
412: In summary, the best interpretation of the two quasar components
413: in the SDSS J1029+2623 system is that a quasar at ${z_s}=2.197$ is doubly
414: imaged by a cluster of galaxies at ${z_l}\sim 0.55$.
415: The evidence for strong lensing comes from
416: the remarkable similarity of the spectral shapes
417: and the similar radio loudnesses of the two quasars, and
418: the existence of the lensing cluster with the presence of an
419: extended X-ray source which is capable of producing the observed
420: image separation. However, simple mass models require a center of the
421: cluster potential offset from the positions of the bright galaxies or
422: the ROSAT X-ray emission. Such an offset with respect to the bright galaxies
423: was also found for the SDSS1004+4112 system \citep{oguri04a},
424: and the X-ray position may be dominated by the AGN in galaxy G2.
425: Thus, further follow-up observations, such as deep and
426: high-resolution X-ray imaging and
427: optical spectroscopy of member galaxies are needed
428: to identify the cluster potential center.
429:
430: \acknowledgments
431:
432: This work was supported in part by Department of Energy contract
433: DE-AC02-76SF00515.
434: A portion of this work
435: was also performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy,
436: National Nuclear Security Administration by the University of
437: California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract
438: No. W-7405-Eng-48.
439: The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National
440: Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated
441: Universities, Inc. This work made use of the Very Large Array at the
442: NRAO, and we thank NRAO for a rapid response time award.
443:
444: Funding for the SDSS and SDSS-II has been provided by the
445: Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions,
446: the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy,
447: the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Japanese
448: Monbukagakusho, the Max Planck Society, and the Higher Education
449: Funding Council for England. The SDSS Web Site is http://www.sdss.org/.
450:
451: The SDSS is managed by the Astrophysical Research Consortium for
452: the Participating Institutions. The Participating Institutions
453: are the American Museum of Natural History, Astrophysical Institute
454: Potsdam, University of Basel, Cambridge University, Case Western
455: Reserve University, University of Chicago, Drexel University,
456: Fermilab, the Institute for Advanced Study, the Japan Participation
457: Group, Johns Hopkins University, the Joint Institute for Nuclear
458: Astrophysics, the Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and
459: Cosmology, the Korean Scientist Group, the Chinese Academy of
460: Sciences (LAMOST), Los Alamos National Laboratory, the Max-Planck-Institute
461: for Astronomy (MPIA), the Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA),
462: New Mexico State University, Ohio State University, University of
463: Pittsburgh, University of Portsmouth, Princeton University, the
464: United States Naval Observatory, and the University of Washington.
465:
466: \begin{thebibliography}{}
467:
468: \bibitem[Abazajian et al.(2003)]{abazajian03}
469: Abazajian, K., et al. 2003, \aj, 126, 2081
470:
471: \bibitem[Abazajian et al.(2004)]{abazajian04}
472: Abazajian, K., et al. 2004, \aj, 128, 502
473:
474: \bibitem[Abazajian et al.(2005)]{abazajian05}
475: Abazajian, K., et al. 2005, \aj, 129, 1755
476:
477: \bibitem[Adelman-McCarthy et al.(2006)]{adelman06}
478: Adelman-McCarthy, J.~K., et al. 2006,
479: \apjs, 162, 38
480:
481: \bibitem[Bartelmann et al.(2003)]{bartelmann03}
482: Bartelmann, M., Meneghetti, M., Perrotta, F., Baccigalupi, C.,
483: \& Moscardini, L. 2003, A\&A, 409, 449
484:
485: \bibitem[Becker et al.(1995)]{becker95}
486: Becker, R. H., White, R. L., \& Helfand, D. J. 1995, \apj, 450, 559
487:
488: \bibitem[Bertin \& Arnouts(1996)]{bertin96}
489: Bertin, E. \& Arnouts, S. 1996, A\&AS, 117, 393
490:
491: \bibitem[Blanton et al.(2003)]{blanton03}
492: Blanton, M. R., Lin, H., Lupton, R. H., Maley, F. M., Young, N.,
493: Zehavi, I., \& Loveday, J. 2003, \aj, 125, 2276
494:
495: \bibitem[Csabai et al.(2003)]{csabai03}
496: Csabai, I., et al. 2003, \aj, 125, 580
497:
498: \bibitem[Fohlmeister et al.(2006)]{fohlmeister06}
499: Fohlmeister, J., et al.\ 2006, \apj, submitted (astro-ph/0607513)
500:
501: \bibitem[Fukugita et al.(1996)]{fukugita96}
502: Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., Doi, M.,
503: Shimasaku, K., \& Schneider, D. P. 1996, \aj, 111, 1748
504:
505: \bibitem[Goto et al.(2003)]{goto03}
506: Goto, T., et al. 2003, \aj, 123, 1807
507:
508: \bibitem[Gunn et al.(1998)]{gunn98}
509: Gunn, J. E., et al. 1998, \aj, 116, 3040
510:
511: \bibitem[Gunn et al.(2006)]{gunn06}
512: Gunn, J. E., et al. 2005, \aj, 131, 2332
513:
514: \bibitem[Hennawi et al.(2006)]{hennawi06}
515: Hennawi, J.~F., Dalal, N., \& Bode, P. 2006, \apj, in press (astro-ph/0506175)
516:
517: \bibitem[Hogg et al.(2001)]{hogg01}
518: Hogg, D. W., Finkbeiner, D. P., Schlegel, D. J.,
519: \& Gunn, J. E.\ 2001, \aj, 122, 2129
520:
521: \bibitem[Inada et al.(2003)]{inada03}
522: Inada, N., et al. 2003, \nat, 426, 810
523:
524: \bibitem[Ivezi\'{c} et al.(2002)]{ivezic02}
525: Ivezi\'{c}, \v{Z}., et al. 2002, \aj, 124, 2364
526:
527: \bibitem[Ivezi\'{c} et al.(2004)]{ivezic04}
528: Ivezi\'{c}, \v{Z}., et al. 2004, AN, 325, 583
529:
530: \bibitem[Kashikawa et al.(2002)]{kashikawa02}
531: Kashikawa, N., et al.\ 2002, \pasj, 54, 819
532:
533: \bibitem[Kawano \& Oguri(2006)]{kawano06}
534: Kawano, Y., \& Oguri, M.\ 2006, \pasj, 58, 271
535:
536: \bibitem[Keeton(2001)]{keeton01}
537: Keeton, C.~R.\ 2001, preprint (astro-ph/0102340)
538:
539: \bibitem[Kochanek(2002)]{kochanek02}
540: Kochanek, C. S. 2002, \apj, 578, 25
541:
542: \bibitem[Kochanek(2006)]{kochanek06}
543: Kochanek, C. S. 2006, in: Kochanek, C. S., Schneider,
544: P., Wambsganss, J., Part 2 of Gravitational Lensing:
545: Strong, Weak \& Micro, Proceedings of the 33rd Saas-Fee Advanced Course,
546: G. Meylan, P. Jetzer \& P. North, (eds.), Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 91
547:
548: \bibitem[Lin \& Mohr(2004)]{lin04}
549: Lin, Y.-T., \& Mohr, J.~J.\ 2004, \apj, 617, 879
550:
551: \bibitem[Lupton et al.(1999)]{lupton99}
552: Lupton, R. H., Gunn, J. E., \& Szalay, A. S. 1999, \aj, 118, 1406
553:
554: \bibitem[Lupton et al.(2001)]{lupton01}
555: Lupton, R., Gunn, J. E., Ivezi\'c, Z., Knapp, G. R.,
556: Kent, S., \& Yasuda, N. 2001, in ASP Conf. Ser. 238,
557: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems X,
558: ed. F. R. Harnden, Jr., F. A. Primini, and H. E. Payne
559: (San Francisco: Astr. Soc. Pac.), p. 269
560:
561: \bibitem[Oguri et al.(2004)]{oguri04a}
562: Oguri, M., et al. 2004, \apj, 605, 78
563:
564: \bibitem[Oguri \& Keeton(2004)]{oguri04b}
565: Oguri, M., \& Keeton, C.~R. 2004, \apj, 610, 663
566:
567: \bibitem[Oguri et al.(2006)]{oguri06}
568: Oguri, M., et al. 2006, \aj, 132, 999
569:
570: \bibitem[Pier et al.(2003)]{pier03}
571: Pier, J. R., Munn, J. A., Hindsley, R. B., Hennessy, G. S.,
572: Kent, S. M., Lupton, R. H., \& Ivezi\'{c}, \'{Z}. 2003,
573: \aj, 125, 1559
574:
575: \bibitem[Richards et al.(2002)]{richards02}
576: Richards, G. T., et al. 2002, \aj, 123, 2945
577:
578: \bibitem[Sharon et al.(2005)]{sharon05}
579: Sharon, K., et al. 2006, \apj, 629, L73
580:
581: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2002)]{smith02}
582: Smith, J. A., et al. 2002, \aj, 123, 2121
583:
584: \bibitem[Stoughton et al.(2002)]{stoughton02}
585: Stoughton, C., et al. 2002, \aj, 123, 485
586:
587: \bibitem[Tucker et al.(2006)]{tucker06}
588: Tucker, D. L., et al. 2006, AN, in press (astro-ph/0608575)
589:
590: \bibitem[Voges et al.(1999)]{voges99}
591: Voges, W., et al.\ 1999, \aap, 349, 389
592:
593: \bibitem[Wambsganss(2003)]{wambsganss03}
594: Wambsganss, J. 2003, \nat, 426, 781
595:
596: \bibitem[Williams \& Saha(2004)]{williams04}
597: Williams, L.~L.~R., \& Saha, P.\ 2004, \aj, 128, 2631
598:
599: \bibitem[York et al.(2000)]{york00}
600: York, D. G., et al. 2000, \aj, 120, 1579
601:
602: \end{thebibliography}
603:
604: \clearpage
605: \begin{landscape}
606: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
607: \begin{deluxetable}{ccccccccccc}
608: %\tabletypesize{\footnotesize}
609: %\rotate
610: \tablecaption{Properties of SDSS J1029+2623\label{tab:info}}
611: \tablewidth{0pt}
612: \tablehead{
613: \colhead{Component} & \colhead{R.A.(SDSS)} &
614: \colhead{Decl.(SDSS)} & \colhead{R.A.(VLA)} &
615: \colhead{Decl.(VLA)} & \colhead{$i$} &
616: \colhead{$u-g$} & \colhead{$g-r$}
617: & \colhead{$r-i$} & \colhead{$i-z$}
618: & \colhead{Redshift\tablenotemark{a}}
619: }
620: \startdata
621: A & 10:29:13.94 & +26:23:17.9 & 10:29:14.05\tablenotemark{b} & +26:23:17.4\tablenotemark{b} & 18.59$\pm$0.01 & 0.72$\pm$0.04 & 0.18$\pm$0.01 & 0.19$\pm$0.01 & 0.32$\pm$0.03 & 2.1966$\pm$0.0003 \\
622: B & 10:29:14.24 & +26:23:40.1 & 10:29:14.31\tablenotemark{b} & +26:23:39.3\tablenotemark{b} & 18.61$\pm$0.01 & 0.67$\pm$0.04 & 0.14$\pm$0.01 & 0.20$\pm$0.01 & $-0.10$$\pm$0.04 & 2.1969$\pm$0.0003 \\
623: G1 & 10:29:13.35 & +26:23:32.8 & \nodata\phn & \nodata\phn & 19.01$\pm$0.04 & 0.71$\pm$0.90 & 1.93$\pm$0.17 & 1.05$\pm$0.06 & 0.75$\pm$0.09 & 0.56$\pm$0.03 \\
624: G2 & 10:29:12.48 & +26:23:32.0 & 10:29:12.49 & +26:23:31.9 & 18.77$\pm$0.03 & 1.63$\pm$1.72 & 1.87$\pm$0.15 & 1.06$\pm$0.05 & 0.48$\pm$0.08 & 0.53$\pm$0.06 \\
625: \enddata
626: \tablecomments{Data are from the SDSS except for the celestial coordinates in the
627: VLA data and the spectroscopic
628: redshifts. Magnitudes refer model magnitudes without Galactic
629: extinction corrections, measured on 13 December 2004.
630: All celestial coordinates are given in J2000.}
631: \tablenotetext{a}{Spectroscopic redshifts (derived from \ion{Mg}{2}
632: emission lines in the FOCAS spectra) for A and B, and photometric
633: redshifts for G1 and G2 \citep{csabai03}.}
634: \tablenotetext{b}{VLA position errors for A and B are both about 0\farcs5
635: per coordinate.}
636: \end{deluxetable}
637: \clearpage
638: \end{landscape}
639: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
640:
641: \end{document}
642:
643: %%
644: %% End of file `sample.tex'.
645: