1: %%
2: %% Beginning of file 'sample.tex'
3: %%
4: %% Modified 2005 December 5
5: %%
6: %% This is a sample manuscript marked up using the
7: %% AASTeX v5.x LaTeX 2e macros.
8:
9: %% The first piece of markup in an AASTeX v5.x document
10: %% is the \documentclass command. LaTeX will ignore
11: %% any data that comes before this command.
12:
13: %% The command below calls the preprint style
14: %% which will produce a one-column, single-spaced document.
15: %% Examples of commands for other substyles follow. Use
16: %% whichever is most appropriate for your purposes.
17: %%
18:
19: % for referee
20: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
21:
22: %% manuscript produces a one-column, double-spaced document:
23: %%\documentclass[manuscript]{aastex}
24:
25: %% Two-column
26: \documentclass[manuscript]{emulateapj}
27: %\usepackage{natbib}
28: \def\nh{$N_{H}$}
29: \def\eg{{\it e.g.}}
30: \def\etal{et al. }
31: \def\ie{{\em i.e.}}
32: \def\ergcms{\,\text{erg}\,\text{cm}$^{-2}$\,\text{s}$^{-1}$}
33: \def\chis{{$\chi^2_{\nu}$}}
34: \def\chiss{{$\chi^2$}}
35: \def\ergs{\,erg\,s$^{-1}$}
36: \def\ergcms{\,erg\,cm$^{-2}$\,s$^{-1}$ }
37: \def\diskbb{{\sc diskbb}}
38: \def\isis{{\sc ISIS}}
39: \newcommand{\integral}{\textsl{INTEGRAL}}
40: \newcommand{\vdag}{(v)^\dagger}
41: \newcommand{\myemail}{ada@iasf-milano.inaf.it}
42: \newcommand{\chandra}{{\it \mbox{Chandra}}}
43: \newcommand{\swift}{{\it \mbox{Swift}}}
44: \newcommand{\suzaku}{{\it \mbox{Suzaku}}}
45: \newcommand{\rxte}{{\it \mbox{RXTE}}}
46: \newcommand{\mysou}{{\objectname{IGR~J17497$-$2821}}}
47:
48:
49: %%
50:
51: %% You can insert a short comment on the title page using the command below.
52:
53: %\slugcomment{Not to appear in Nonlearned J., 45.}
54:
55: %% If you wish, you may supply running head information, although
56: %% this information may be modified by the editorial offices.
57: %% The left head contains a list of authors,
58: %% usually a maximum of three (otherwise use et al.). The right
59: %% head is a modified title of up to roughly 44 characters.
60: %% Running heads will not print in the manuscript style.
61:
62: \shorttitle{Hunting the nature of \mysou~with X-ray and NIR observations}
63: \shortauthors{Paizis, Nowak, Chaty et al. 2007}
64:
65: %% This is the end of the preamble. Indicate the beginning of the
66: %% paper itself with \begin{document}.
67:
68: \begin{document}
69:
70: %% LaTeX will automatically break titles if they run longer than
71: %% one line. However, you may use \\ to force a line break if
72: %% you desire.
73:
74: \title{Hunting the nature of \mysou~with X-ray and NIR observations}
75:
76: %% Use \author, \affil, and the \and command to format
77: %% author and affiliation information.
78: %% Note that \email has replaced the old \authoremail command
79: %% from AASTeX v4.0. You can use \email to mark an email address
80: %% anywhere in the paper, not just in the front matter.
81: %% As in the title, use \\ to force line breaks.
82:
83: \author{A. Paizis\altaffilmark{1}} % tra par graffa la nota all'affiliazione alternativa, se esiste
84: \email{ada@iasf-milano.inaf.it}
85: \author{M. A. Nowak\altaffilmark{2}}
86: \author{S. Chaty\altaffilmark{3}}
87: \author{J. Rodriguez\altaffilmark{3}}
88: \author{T.~J.-L. Courvoisier\altaffilmark{4,}\altaffilmark{5}}
89: \author{M. Del Santo\altaffilmark{6}}
90: \author{K. Ebisawa\altaffilmark{7}}
91: \author{R. Farinelli\altaffilmark{8}}
92: \author{P. Ubertini\altaffilmark{6}}
93: \author{J. Wilms\altaffilmark{9}}
94: \altaffiltext{1}{IASF Milano - INAF, Via Bassini 15, 20133 Milano, Italy}
95: \altaffiltext{2}{Center for Space Research, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA, mnowak@space.mit.edu}
96: \altaffiltext{3}{AIM - Astrophysique Interactions Multi-\'echelles (UMR 7158 CEA/CNRS/Universit\'e Paris 7 Denis Diderot)
97: CEA Saclay, DSM/DAPNIA/Service d'Astrophysique, FR-91 191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France, chaty@cea.fr, rodrigue@discovery.saclay.cea.fr}
98: \altaffiltext{4}{\textit{INTEGRAL} Science Data Centre, Chemin d'Ecogia 16, 1290 Versoix, Switzerland, Thierry.Courvoisier@obs.unige.ch}
99: \altaffiltext{5}{Observatoire de Gen\`eve, 51 chemin des Mailletes, 1290 Sauverny, Switzerland}
100: \altaffiltext{6}{IASF Roma - INAF, Via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133 Roma, Italy, melania.delsanto@iasf-roma.inaf.it, pietro.ubertini@iasf-roma.inaf.it}
101: \altaffiltext{7}{ISAS 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8510, Japan, ebisawa@astro.isas.jaxa.jp}
102: \altaffiltext{8}{Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit\`{a} di Ferrara, Via Saragat 1, I--44100 Ferrara, Italy, farinel@fe.infn.it }
103: \altaffiltext{9}{Dr. Karl Remeis-Sternwarte, Astronomisches Institut, Universit\"at Erlangen-N\"urnberg, Sternwartstr. 7, 96049 Bamberg, Germany, wilms@astro.uni-tuebingen.de}
104:
105:
106: \begin{abstract}
107:
108: We report on a \chandra~grating observation of the recently discovered hard X-ray transient
109: \mbox{IGR~J17497$-$2821}.
110: The observation took place about two weeks after the source discovery at a flux level of about 20\,mCrab in the 0.8-8\,keV range.
111: We extracted the most precise X-ray position
112: of \mysou, $\alpha_{J2000}$=17$^{h}$ 49$^{m}$ 38$^{s}$.037,
113: \mbox{$\delta_{J2000}$= -28$^{\circ}$ 21$^{\prime}$ 17$^{\prime \prime}$.37}
114: (90\% uncertainty of 0$^{\prime\prime}$.6). We also report on optical and near infra-red photometric follow-up
115: observations based on this position.
116: With the multi-wavelength information at hand, we discuss
117: the possible nature of the source proposing that \mysou~is a low-mass X-ray binary, most likely hosting a black hole,
118: with a red giant K-type companion.
119:
120: \end{abstract}
121:
122: %% Keywords should appear after the \end{abstract} command. The uncommented
123: %% example has been keyed in ApJ style. See the instructions to authors
124: %% for the journal to which you are submitting your paper to determine
125: %% what keyword punctuation is appropriate.
126: %%\keywords{globular clusters: general --- globular clusters: individual(NGC 6397,
127: %%NGC 6624, NGC 7078, Terzan 8}
128:
129: \keywords{X-rays: binaries -- binaries: close -- stars: individual: IGR~J17497$-$2821}
130:
131: \section{Introduction}
132: On 2006 September 17 a new hard-X ray transient, \mysou~\citep{soldi06},
133: was discovered by the IBIS telescope \citep{ubertini03} on-board
134: \mbox{{\it INTEGRAL}} \citep{winkler03}.
135: The source was first detected at a flux of about 25 mCrab in the 20--40\,keV range and
136: further observations \citep{shaw06,kuulkers06} indicated that \mbox{IGR~J17497$-$2821} was brightening with a
137: 3--200\,keV \integral~spectrum well fitted by an absorbed power-law with $\Gamma$=1.93$\pm$0.05.
138: Two days later, a \swift~observation was performed
139: and a \swift/XRT position at $\alpha_{J2000}$=17$^{h}$ 49$^{m}$ 38$^{s}$.1,
140: $\delta_{J2000}$= -28$^{\circ}$ 21$^{\prime}$ 16$^{\prime \prime}$.9
141: with uncertainty of 5${^{\prime \prime}}$.3 radius (90\% containment)
142: was reported \citep{kennea06}. The XRT spectrum was well fitted using
143: an absorbed power-law with
144: \nh=(4.8 $\pm$ 0.3)$\times$10$^{22}$ cm$^{-2}$ and $\Gamma=1.6~\pm~0.1$.
145: The source was also detected by \emph{RXTE}/PCA
146: \citep{markwardt06}
147: and \emph{Suzaku} \citep{itoh06}.
148: In the quest to understand the nature of this new transient,
149: archival optical and follow-up Near Infra-Red (NIR) observations were reported \citep[][respectively]{laycock06,chaty06a,chaty06b}.
150: Nevertheless, the location of the source near the Galactic center
151: made it very difficult to assess a unique optical-NIR identification and a sub-arcsec
152: accuracy of the X-ray source was clearly needed \citep{paizis06b,torres06}.
153: In this letter we present a \chandra~grating observation of \mysou~together
154: with optical-NIR observations\footnote{The optical and NIR observations were obtained as part of
155: the European Southern Observatory (ESO) Target of Opportunity program 078.D-0268 (PI S. Chaty).}
156: based on the X-ray position (sub-arcsec accuracy) obtained with our \chandra~data.
157:
158: \section{Observations and data analysis}
159:
160: \subsection{\chandra~data}
161:
162: We observed \mysou~for 19\,ksec with \chandra~on 2006 October 1 from
163: 17:42 UT until 23:42 UT (MJD 54010).
164: The High Energy Transmission Grating Spectrometer, HETGS \citep{canizares00}, was used.
165: It has two sets of gratings, the High Energy Grating, HEG 0.8--10\,keV,
166: and Medium Energy Grating, MEG 0.4--8.0\,keV.
167: We reduced the data in a standard manner, using the CIAO version 3.3 software
168: package and \chandra~CALDB version 3.2.3. The spectra were analyzed with
169: the \isis~analysis system, version 1.3.0 \citep{houck02}.
170: We obtained the X-ray position of the source using the \emph{findzero.sl}
171: routine\footnote{http://space.mit.edu/CXC/analysis/findzo/index.html}, strongly
172: recommended by the \chandra~grating team in case of bright sources for which the zeroth-order (un-dispersed) position is
173: piled-up (about 47\% pile-up in the present case).
174: We extracted
175: the first order dispersed spectra ($m=\pm1$ for HEG and MEG, for a total of four spectra) and to
176: increase the signal-to-noise ratio, we merged the two HEG ($m=\pm1$) and MEG ($m=\pm1$) spectra into two
177: final combined spectra.
178: We binned the data to obtain a minimum of 16 counts per bin for
179: both HEG and MEG (0.8--8\,keV), as well as a minimum number of 16 channels per
180: bin for HEG and 8 for MEG.
181:
182: \begin{figure*}
183: \includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{f1bis.eps}
184: \caption{\emph{Left panel:} X-ray intensity history of the 2006 outburst
185: of IGR~J17497$-$2821 provided by the {\it \mbox{Swift}}/BAT team (15--50\,keV data). The time of our follow-up observations is shown:
186: solid line arrow for \chandra, dotted for NIR and dashed for optical observations. \emph{Middle panel:} unfolded
187: \chandra~ spectrum with best fit model ({\sc phabs(diskbb+po+gaussian)}, Table~1) superimposed. Residuals between the model and the data in units of 1$\sigma$
188: are shown. \emph{Right panel: zoom in the Si~XIII absorption line region (3$\sigma$, MEG and HEG combined)}. \label{fig:spectrum}}
189: \end{figure*}
190:
191:
192: \begin{figure*}
193: \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{f2a.eps}
194: \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{f2b.eps}
195: \caption{\emph{Left panel}: $Z$-band image of the field of view of IGR~J17497$-$2821.
196: \emph{Right panel}: $K_{s}$-band image of the field of view of IGR~J17497$-$2821.
197: In both images we over-plot the
198: \swift/XRT 90\% error circle, 5$^{\prime \prime}$.3 radius \citep{kennea06},
199: and the \chandra~90\% error circle, 0$^{\prime \prime}$.6 radius (this paper).
200: North is up, East is to the left, and the length of the arrow represents
201: 5$^{\prime \prime}$. \label{fig:coun}}
202: \end{figure*}
203:
204: \subsection{Optical and NIR data}
205: We also obtained optical photometry in $U$ ($357.08$\,nm), $B$ ($421.20$\,nm),
206: $V$ ($544.17$\,nm), $R$ ($641.58$\,nm), $I$ ($794.96$\,nm) and $Z$
207: ($840.90$\,nm) bands of the field of view (FoV) of \mbox{IGR~J17497$-$2821} with the
208: imager SUSI2, installed on the 3.5\,m New Technology Telescope (NTT) of
209: La Silla observatory (ESO, Chile). The observations were performed
210: on 2006 October 3 between 00:01 UT and 00:12 UT and
211: 2006 October 7 between 23:55 UT and 8 00:06 UT. We used
212: the large field imaging of SUSI2's detector with 0$^{\prime \prime}$.166 pixel$^{-1}$
213: image scale and 5$^{\prime}$.5$\times$5$^{\prime}$.5 FoV. The images
214: were binned by a factor 2, and the integration time was of 60\,s
215: for each exposure.
216: Photometry was preformed relative to the standard star Mark-A of \cite{landolt92}.
217:
218: We also obtained NIR photometry in $J$ ($1.247\,\mu$m), $H$ ($1.653\,\mu$m)
219: and $K_{s}$ ($2.162\,\mu$m) bands of the field around \mysou~with the
220: spectro-imager SofI, installed on the NTT. The
221: observations were performed in two epochs, the first between 2006 October
222: 1, 23:48 UT, and October 2, 00:11 UT, and the second between
223: October 3, 23:45 UT, and October 4, 00:09 UT. We used the large
224: field imaging of SofI's detector with 0$^{\prime \prime}$.288 pixel$^{-1}$ image scale and
225: a 4$^{\prime}$.94$\times$4$^{\prime}$.94 FoV.
226: To accurately determine the sky brightness, the observations consisted of nine
227: slightly (30$^{\prime \prime}$) dithered frames of 10\,sec each per filter, for a total
228: exposure of 90\,sec in each filter.
229: Photometry was preformed relative to the standard stars sj9181 and sj9183
230: of \cite{persson98}.
231:
232:
233: We used the Image Reduction and Analysis Facility (\rm{IRAF}) suite to
234: perform data reduction, carrying out standard procedures of optical
235: and NIR image reduction. Aperture photometry in the crowded field of \mysou~was performed with the
236: \rm{daophot} package of the \rm{IRAF} suite. This package
237: allows one to build a synthetic Point Spread Function (PSF) using bright
238: and isolated stars in the field of view, and then to scale and
239: subtract this PSF from all the stars. With an iterative PSF subtraction
240: it is possible to reveal fainter objects which are
241: hidden in the glare of brighter ones, such as blended objects.
242: \begin{table*}
243: \tiny
244: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccc}
245: \hline
246: \hline
247: {\nh} &{$\Gamma$} & {kT$_{in}$ } & {R$_{in}$} &{Line\_en} &{Line\_width}&{Line\_eq-width}& {Flux$_{0.8-8\,keV}$}&\chis (d.o.f.)\\
248: {($\times10^{22}$\,cm$^{-2}$)} & & {(keV)} & {(km, at 8kpc)} & {(keV)}&{(keV)}& {(eV)} &{(\ergcms)}& \\
249: \hline
250: \hline
251: {4.4$\pm$0.1} & {$1.23\pm0.05$} & - & -& - &- &-& {2.95$\times10^{-10}$}& {1.17 (335)} \\
252: \hline
253: {5.6$\pm$0.4} &{1.5$\pm$0.1} & {0.19$\pm$0.02} & {$280{+118 \atop -114}$/$\sqrt(cos\theta)$} &
254: {6.4 $\pm$0.1} & {$<$0.22}& {$45.4{+0.1 \atop -32.1}$}&{2.90$\times10^{-10}$}&{1.05 (330)}\\
255: \hline
256: \end{tabular}
257: \label{fit}
258: \caption{Summary of the spectral fit parameters (0.8--8\,keV). }
259: \end{table*}
260:
261:
262: \begin{table}
263: \tiny
264: \begin{centering}
265: \begin{tabular}{ccccc}
266: \hline
267: \hline
268: Candidate & mag$_{J}$ & mag$_{H}$ &mag$_{Ks}$ & mag$_{V}$ \\
269: \hline
270: \hline
271: \emph{1a} & 20.6$\pm$0.2 &17.5$\pm$0.2 & 14.7$\pm$0.1 & \\
272: \emph{1b} & - & - & 16.1$\pm$0.3 & \\
273: \hline
274: Blend \emph{1a}+\emph{1b} & - & - & - & $>$23\\
275: \hline
276: \label{mag}
277: \end{tabular}
278: \end{centering}
279: \caption{Summary of the optical and NIR results. }
280: \end{table}
281:
282:
283: \section{Results}
284: A hard X-ray intensity history of the 2006 outburst of \mysou~seen by \swift/BAT is presented in
285: Fig.~\ref{fig:spectrum}, left panel. The time of our \chandra,
286: optical and NIR observations are shown by the indicated arrows.
287:
288:
289: \subsection{X-ray position and grating spectrum}
290: We extracted the X-ray position of \mbox{IGR~J17497$-$2821} from the zeroth-order image
291: obtaining $\alpha_{J2000}$=17$^{h}$ 49$^{m}$ 38$^{s}$.037,
292: \mbox{$\delta_{J2000}$= -28$^{\circ}$ 21$^{\prime}$ 17$^{\prime \prime}$.37}.
293: Given the brightness of the source, the statistical error is smaller than the
294: absolute position accuracy of \chandra, 0$^{\prime \prime}$.6 at 90\%
295: uncertainty\footnote{http://cxc.harvard.edu/cal/ASPECT/celmon/}. Therefore we attribute to the position
296: found a 90\% uncertainty of 0$^{\prime \prime}$.6.
297: This position, compatible with the \swift/XRT one \citep{kennea06},
298: was immediately announced to the community by \cite{paizis06b}.
299: The first order HEG and MEG spectra of \mysou~are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:spectrum}, middle
300: panel.
301: An absorbed power-law with column density
302: \nh=(4.4$\pm$0.1)$\times$$10^{22}$\,cm$^{-2}$ ({\sc phabs} model)
303: and photon index $\Gamma=1.23\pm0.05$ fits the data
304: with a reduced \chis=1.17 for 335 d.o.f in the 0.8--8\,keV band (Table~1).
305: The absorbed flux is about 3$\times$$10^{-10}$\ergcms~in the 0.8--8\,keV range ($\sim$20mCrab) with no discrete features evident in the spectrum, aside
306: from the ISM absorption edges associated with Si and S.
307: The most significant feature in the \emph{combined residuals} is a hint of
308: He-like Si absorption line at 1.867\,keV
309: (Si~XIII, 3$\sigma$ level, Fig.~\ref{fig:spectrum}, right
310: pane), likely associated to the ISM in its hot-diffuse phase. If confirmed, this is the first
311: detection of Si in the hot ISM \citep{wang05}.
312: The power-law slope of $\sim$1.2 is harder
313: than the measurements currently available from the other missions \citep[$\Gamma=1.6$,][]{kennea06,itoh06,rodriguez06b,walter07}.
314: The source is rather
315: constant during our observation and instrumental issues such as a high pile-up
316: are very unlikely (pile-up fraction in the HETGS arms
317: of about 2\%).
318: Most likely, the heavy absorption of the system leaves a \chandra~effective
319: energy range that is very narrow (1.5-8\,keV), and we are systematically
320: underestimating both the spectral slope and the absorption column density.
321: The power-law model alone does not seem to be the best fit model for the \chandra~grating spectra
322: and adding a thermal
323: component (\diskbb) to the power-law
324: results in a much better fit (probability of $\sim$10$^{-7}$ that the improvement was purely due to chance).
325: Table~1 shows
326: the spectral parameters we obtain with the new model to which we added also a marginally detected
327: 6.4 keV iron line ($\Delta$\chiss=9 for the three additional line parameters).
328:
329:
330:
331:
332:
333:
334: \subsection{Astrometry}
335: We computed the astrometry of the $Z$ and $K_{s}$ band images of \mysou,
336: respectively taken on 2006 October 8, 00:05 UT, and
337: 2006 October 2, 00:10 UT. The optical astrometry has been computed
338: with all USNO stars located in the field,
339: while the
340: NIR astrometry used all 2MASS stars located in the field.
341: The rms error on the astrometry is respectively of 0$^{\prime \prime}$.35
342: for the optical image and 0$^{\prime \prime}$.32 for the NIR one.
343: The field of view of \mysou~in the optical ($Z$ band)
344: and in the NIR ($K_{s}$ band) are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:coun}, left and right
345: panel respectively.
346: We over-plot the \swift/XRT 90\% error circle, 5$^{\prime \prime}$.3
347: radius \citep{kennea06}, and the \chandra~90\% error circle,
348: 0$^{\prime \prime}$.6 radius (this paper).
349: The inspection of the $Z$ image (Fig.~\ref{fig:coun}, left) shows that there is no visible
350: counterpart inside the \chandra~90\% error circle.
351: In the $K_{s}$ band image (Fig.~\ref{fig:coun}, right), inside the \swift/XRT error circle,
352: there are three 2MASS sources (2MASS~17493780--2821181, 2MASS~17493774--2821173 and
353: 2MASS~17493798--2821120, respectively labeled 2M1,
354: 2M2 and 2M3) and some additional sources which have been labeled
355: according to \cite{chaty06b}. Source \#1 is in fact a blended source \citep{torres06}.
356: We call \emph{1b} the new source
357: compatible with our \chandra~position (0$^{\prime \prime}$.1 away) and \emph{1a} the other one of the blend (0$^{\prime \prime}$.612 away).
358:
359:
360: \subsection{Photometry}
361: The iterative cleaning process described in Section 2.2 allowed us
362: to extract magnitudes even for the blended objects shown in
363: Fig.~\ref{fig:coun}, right panel.
364: The obtained instrumental magnitudes were transformed into apparent magnitudes
365: with the standard method described in \cite{massey92}.
366: There is no object detected inside the \chandra~error circle in the optical
367: images up to a magnitude of V$\sim$23.
368: Concerning the NIR, we took the images of the first epoch
369: (2006 October 1--2) since
370: for the images of the second epoch the conditions were not photometric,
371: and the objects \emph{1a} and \emph{1b} could not be de-blended.
372: In the $J$ and $H$ images the candidate \emph{1b} is not visible, therefore in
373: Table~2 we give the apparent magnitudes of the Candidate \emph{1a} in $J$
374: and $H$, and the apparent magnitudes of both candidates \emph{1a} and \emph{1b}
375: in $K_{s}$.
376: The $K_{s}$ magnitude of candidate \emph{1b} is consistent with the $K_{s}$ magnitude
377: of 15.9$\pm$0.2 reported by \cite{torres06} during observations
378: performed ten days earlier. The source seems to be quite constant in the NIR, similarly to what reported by \cite{chaty06c}.
379: There are no archival optical-NIR images of the field at the resolution needed
380: and \mysou~will be visible again by the NTT at ESO starting on March 2007.
381: Follow-up observations are important to detect any variations
382: from candidates \emph{1a} and \emph{1b}, since even if candidate \emph{1b} is the best
383: candidate based on its proximity to the \chandra~position,
384: only NIR variations correlated with the X-ray flux might
385: establish which is the real \mbox{counterpart}.
386:
387: \section{Discussion}
388: \mysou~is placed in the direction of the
389: Galactic center, (\emph{l},\emph{b})=(0$^{\circ}$.9,$-$0$^{\circ}$.4), and
390: we observe a column density of about 5$\times$$10^{22}$\,cm$^{-2}$ that is higher than the
391: Galactic average value expected in the source direction, $\sim$1.5$\times$$10^{22}$\,cm$^{-2}$ \citep{dickey90}.
392: This can imply that there is an additional contribution from within the system. Nevertheless,
393: the value obtained with the radio maps by \cite{dickey90} does not resolve the small scale non-uniformity of \nh~and
394: does not include the possible contribution of molecular hydrogen,
395: probably underestimating the true value.
396: Given the location in the sky and the high interstellar
397: absorption, the source is most likely at the distance of the Galactic center or beyond.
398: For our best fit model, assuming a distance of 8\,kpc, we obtain an (un-absorbed) 1--20\,keV source luminosity that is typical of X-ray binaries,
399: $\sim$ $10^{37}$\ergs, similarly to what reported by \cite{rodriguez06b}. The nature of the companion, {\it i.e.} Low Mass X-ray Binary (LMXB) versus
400: High Mass X-ray Binary (HMXB) and of the compact object, {\it i.e.} Black Hole (BH) versus Neutron Star (NS) is still a matter of
401: debate.
402: The general X-ray properties seem to suggest that the source is a (transient) LMXB and
403: the X-ray spectrum we obtain is compatible with a LMXB in the so-called low-hard state (LHS).
404:
405: Using the relation between \nh~and interstellar extinction A$_{V}$ \citep{predehl95}
406: and the ratio A$_{K}$/A$_{V}$=0.112 \citep{rieke85}, our observed column density range (4.3--6$\times$$10^{22}$\,cm$^{-2}$,
407: to allow for both fitting models in Table~1)
408: corresponds to a $K$ band extinction in the range of A$_{K}$=2.7--3.7 magnitudes. This leads to an absolute $K$ magnitude
409: range of $-$1.1$>$M$_{K}$$>$$-$2.2 (assumed
410: distance of 8\,kpc and observed $K$ magnitude of mag$_{K}$=16.1, see Table~2). This value \citep[see Fig.~1 in][]{chaty02}
411: suggests a B-type companion
412: in the case of a main sequence star, therefore a HMXB, or
413: a K-type companion in the case of a red giant,
414: therefore a LMXB or, more precisely, the fourth known "symbiotic" LMXB \citep[][]{mattana06,
415: masetti06}.
416: We note that in the LMXB frame (favored by the X-ray properties of the source), one
417: could envisage a scenario where the companion star is a stellar type K
418: \emph{main sequence} star (dimmer than the red giant K-type option) at 8\,kpc that is rendered brighter
419: by the accretion disk contribution (NIR emission from reprocessed X-rays).
420: To obtain a main sequence K-type star
421: from a red giant K-type star at a fixed distance we need a shift of about 6 magnitudes in M$_{K}$ \citep{chaty02}, gap that should
422: be covered by the disk emission alone.
423: Such an increase has been seen in other sources, due
424: to the disk contribution, but they were in the high-soft
425: state and not, as in the present case, in a low-hard state with a cold disc
426: for which a 3 magnitude increase would be expected.
427: Conversely, in the absence of NIR disk emission,
428: the option of a main sequence star located
429: much closer than 8\,kpc is also unlikely. In fact, the needed 6 magnitude shift
430: would place the source as close as $\sim$0.4\,kpc leading to a
431: 1--20\,keV source luminosity during our \chandra~observation of about $10^{34}$\ergs, unusually low for
432: a LMXB in outburst.
433:
434: The synergy of the NIR and soft X-ray observations presented here seem to suggest that
435: \mysou~is a LMXB with a red giant K-type companion. The
436: B-type companion in a HMXB system (even if not favored by the X-ray properties)
437: or the LMXB main sequence possibility (with proper interplay of distance and accretion disk contribution)
438: cannot be ruled out since the source is too faint for a spectral analysis that would lead to much stronger
439: constraints than the magnitude estimates presented here.
440:
441: Regarding the nature of the compact object we note that up to now no pulsations or type-I X-ray bursts,
442: that would point to presence of NS in the system,
443: have been detected \citep{markwardt06,rodriguez06b}.
444: % so no conclusive signature is
445: %currently available to infer the nature of the compact object.
446: Our results
447: are consistent with a cold (0.2\,keV) disk
448: around a BH
449: of \eg~10 solar masses at a distance of 8\,kpc and also the power-law slope
450: ($\Gamma\sim$1.5)
451: is typical of a BH in the low-hard state \citep{belloni04}. However, based on our \chandra~grating spectrum alone,
452: we cannot rule out the NS LMXB in the LHS scenario, even if this seems rather unlikely given that \mysou~has been detected up to $\sim$300\,keV
453: \citep{itoh06}, rather hard for a NS LMXBs. Indeed, also \cite{rodriguez06b} and \cite{walter07} using different
454: diagnostics than ours, favor a BH as the primary. We note that \cite{walter07} propose a counterpart that
455: lies outside our \chandra~error box (0$^{\prime \prime}$.98 away). Although this identification seems unlikely,
456: further investigation is needed to locate the true counterpart. Our identification, if confirmed,
457: makes \mysou~the first symbiotic (K-type \emph{giant} companion) LMXB hosting a BH.
458:
459:
460:
461:
462: \acknowledgments
463:
464: AP thanks S. Soldi, N. Mowlavi, S. Shaw and E. Kuulkers for updates on the {\it INTEGRAL} monitoring of the source.
465: AP and MN thank Tom Aldcroft for useful discussion on the \chandra~absolute astrometry.
466: AP, MDS and PU akcnowledge the Italian Space Agency financial and programmatic support via contract I/023/05/0.
467:
468: \begin{thebibliography}{}
469:
470: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Belloni}}{2004}]{belloni04}
471: {Belloni}, T., 2004, Nuclear Physics B Proc. Suppl., 132, 337
472:
473: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Canizares} et~al.}{2000}]{canizares00}
474: {Canizares}, C.~R., et~al., 2000, \apjl, 539, L41
475:
476: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Chaty} et~al.}{2006c}]{chaty06c}
477: {Chaty}, S., {Hatano}, H., {Matsuoka}, Y., \& {Nagata}, T., 2006c, The
478: Astronomer's Telegram, 936, 1
479:
480: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Chaty} et~al.}{2006b}]{chaty06b}
481: {Chaty}, S., {Hatano}, H., {Matsuoka}, Y., \& {Nagata}, T., 2006b, The
482: Astronomer's Telegram, 906, 1
483:
484: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Chaty} et~al.}{2006a}]{chaty06a}
485: {Chaty}, S., {Matsuoka}, Y., {Nagata}, T., \& {Ueda}, Y., 2006a, The
486: Astronomer's Telegram, 897, 1
487:
488: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Chaty} et~al.}{2002}]{chaty02}
489: {Chaty}, S., {Mirabel}, I.~F., {Goldoni}, P., {Mereghetti}, S., {Duc}, P.-A.,
490: {Mart{\'{\i}}}, J., \& {Mignani}, R.~P., 2002, \mnras, 331, 1065
491:
492: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Dickey} \& {Lockman}}{1990}]{dickey90}
493: {Dickey}, J.~M., \& {Lockman}, F.~J., 1990, \araa, 28, 215
494:
495: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Houck}}{2002}]{houck02}
496: {Houck}, J.~C., 2002,
497: \newblock in High Resolution X-ray Spectroscopy with XMM-Newton and Chandra
498:
499: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Itoh} et~al.}{2006}]{itoh06}
500: {Itoh}, T., et~al., 2006, The Astronomer's Telegram, 914, 1
501:
502: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Kennea} et~al.}{2006}]{kennea06}
503: {Kennea}, J.~A., {Burrows}, D.~N., {Nousek}, J., \& {Gehrels}, N., 2006, The
504: Astronomer's Telegram, 900, 1
505:
506: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Kuulkers} et~al.}{2006}]{kuulkers06}
507: {Kuulkers}, E., et~al., 2006, The Astronomer's Telegram, 888, 1
508:
509: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Landolt}}{1992}]{landolt92}
510: {Landolt}, A.~U., 1992, \aj, 104, 340
511:
512: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Laycock} et~al.}{2006}]{laycock06}
513: {Laycock}, S., {Zhao}, P., {Berg}, M.~V.~D., {Grindlay}, J., \& {Hong.}, J.,
514: 2006, The Astronomer's Telegram, 895, 1
515:
516: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Markwardt} \& {Swank}}{2006}]{markwardt06}
517: {Markwardt}, C.~B., \& {Swank}, J.~H., 2006, The Astronomer's Telegram, 891, 1
518:
519: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Massey} \& {Davis}}{1992}]{massey92}
520: {Massey}, P., \& {Davis}, L.~E., 1992, \emph{A User's Guide to Stellar CCD
521: Photometry with IRAF}
522:
523: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Masetti} et~al.}{2006}]{masetti06}
524: {Masetti}, N.,{Orlandini}, M., {Palazzi}, E., {Amati}, L., and {Frontera} F. 2006, \aap, 453, 295
525:
526: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Mattana} et~al.}{2006}]{mattana06}
527: {Mattana}, F., {Gotz}, D., {Falanga}, M., {Senziani}, F., {De Luca}, A., {Esposito},
528: P., and {Caraveo} P.~A. 2006, \aap, 460, L1
529:
530: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Paizis} et~al.}{2006}]{paizis06b}
531: {Paizis}, A., {Nowak}, M.~A., {Rodriguez}, J., {Wilms}, J., {Courvoisier},
532: T.~J.-L., {Del Santo}, M., {Ubertini}, P., \& {Ebisawa}, K., 2006, The
533: Astronomer's Telegram, 907, 1
534:
535: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Persson} et~al.}{1998}]{persson98}
536: {Persson}, S.~E., {Murphy}, D.~C., {Krzeminski}, W., {Roth}, M., \& {Rieke},
537: M.~J., 1998, \aj, 116, 2475
538:
539: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Predehl} \& {Schmitt}}{1995}]{predehl95}
540: {Predehl}, P., \& {Schmitt}, J.~H.~M.~M., 1995, \aap, 293, 889
541:
542: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Rieke} \& {Lebofsky}}{1985}]{rieke85}
543: {Rieke}, G.~H., \& {Lebofsky}, M.~J., 1985, \apj, 288, 618
544:
545: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Rodriguez} et~al.}{2007}]{rodriguez06b}
546: {Rodriguez}, J., {Cadolle-Bel}, M., {Tomsick}, J.~A., {Corbel}, S.,
547: {Procksopp}, C., {Paizis}, A., {Shaw}, S., \& {Bodaghee}, A., 2007,
548: ApJ in press (astro-ph/0611341)
549:
550: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Shaw} et~al.}{2006}]{shaw06}
551: {Shaw}, S., et~al., 2006, The Astronomer's Telegram, 886, 1
552:
553: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Soldi} et~al.}{2006}]{soldi06}
554: {Soldi}, S., et~al., 2006, The Astronomer's Telegram, 885, 1
555:
556: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Torres} et~al.}{2006}]{torres06}
557: {Torres}, M.~A.~P., {Steeghs}, D., {Jonker}, P.~G., {Burns}, C.~R., \&
558: {Freedman}, W.~L., 2006, The Astronomer's Telegram, 909, 1
559:
560: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Ubertini} et~al.}{2003}]{ubertini03}
561: {Ubertini}, P., et~al., 2003, \aap, 411, L131
562:
563: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Wang} et~al.}{2005}]{wang05}
564: {Wang}, Q.~D., et~al., 2005, \apj, 635, 386
565:
566: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Walter} et~al.}{2007}]{walter07}
567: {Walter}, R., et~al., 2007, \aap, 461, L17
568:
569: \bibitem[\protect\astroncite{{Winkler} et~al.}{2003}]{winkler03}
570: {Winkler}, C., et~al., 2003, \aap, 411, L1
571:
572: \end{thebibliography}
573:
574:
575: \end{document}
576:
577:
578: