1: \documentstyle[emulateapj,psfig,apjfonts]{article}
2: \submitted{Received 2006 August 4; Accepted: 2006 November 16}
3: %\documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
4: \input{psfig.sty}
5:
6:
7: \def\gs{\mathrel{\raise0.35ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle >$}\kern-0.6em
8: \lower0.40ex\hbox{{$\scriptstyle \sim$}}}}
9: \def\ls{\mathrel{\raise0.35ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle <$}\kern-0.6em
10: \lower0.40ex\hbox{{$\scriptstyle \sim$}}}}
11:
12: \newenvironment{inlinefigure}{%
13: \def\@captype{figure}%
14: \noindent\begin{minipage}{0.999\linewidth}\small}
15: {\end{minipage}\smallskip}
16: \makeatother
17:
18: \lefthead{Smail et al.}
19: \righthead{The ``Cosmic Eye''}
20:
21: %\addtolength{\topmargin}{0.5in}
22:
23: \begin{document}
24:
25: \title{A very bright, highly magnified Lyman-break galaxy at $z=3.07$.}
26:
27:
28: \author{
29: Ian Smail,\altaffilmark{1} A.\,M.\ Swinbank,\altaffilmark{1}
30: J.\ Richard,\altaffilmark{2} H.\ Ebeling,\altaffilmark{3}
31: J.-P.\ Kneib,\altaffilmark{4} A.\,C.\ Edge,\altaffilmark{1}
32: D.\ Stark,\altaffilmark{2} R.\,S.\ Ellis,\altaffilmark{2}
33: S.\ Dye,\altaffilmark{5}
34: G.\,P.\ Smith\altaffilmark{6} \& C.\ Mullis.\altaffilmark{7}
35: }
36:
37: \altaffiltext{1}{Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham University, South Road,
38: Durham, DH1 3LE, UK}
39: \altaffiltext{2}{California Institute of
40: Technology, Department of Astronomy, MC 105-24, Pasadena, CA 91125}
41: \altaffiltext{3}{Institute for Astronomy, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822}
42: \altaffiltext{4}{Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille, Traverse du
43: Siphon -- B.P.8 13376, Marseille Cedex 12, France}
44: \altaffiltext{5}{Cardiff University, School of Physics \& Astronomy, Queens Buildings,
45: The Parade, Cardiff, CF24 3AA, U.K.}
46: \altaffiltext{6}{School of Physics and Astronomy, University of
47: Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, U.K.}
48: \altaffiltext{7}{Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, 918
49: Dennison, 500 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1042}
50:
51: \setcounter{footnote}{5}
52:
53: \begin{abstract}
54: We report the discovery using {\it Hubble Space Telescope} imaging and
55: Keck spectroscopy of a very bright, highly magnified ($\sim 30\times$)
56: Lyman Break Galaxy (LBG) at $z=3.07$ in the field of the massive
57: $z=0.33$ cluster MACS\,J2135.2$-$0102. The system comprises two
58: high-surface brightness arcs with a maximum extent of $3''$, bracketing
59: a central object which we identify as a massive early-type galaxy at
60: $z=0.73$. We construct a lens model which reproduces
61: the main features of the system using a combination of a galaxy-scale
62: lens and the foreground cluster. We show that the morphological,
63: spectral and photometric properties of the arcs are consistent with
64: them arising from the lensing of a single $\sim L_V^\ast$ LBG. The most
65: important feature of this system is that the lensing magnification
66: results in an apparent magnitude of $r=20.3$, making this one of the
67: brightest LBGs known. Such a high magnification provides the
68: opportunity of obtaining very high signal to noise (and potentially
69: spatially resolved) spectroscopy of a high redshift galaxy to study its
70: physical properties. We present initial imaging and spectroscopy
71: demonstrating the basic properties of the system and discuss the
72: opportunities for future observations.
73: \end{abstract}
74:
75: \keywords{cosmology: observations --- galaxies: individual (LBG\,J213512.73$-$010143) ---
76: galaxies: evolution --- galaxies: formation}
77: %\newpage
78:
79: %
80: %
81: %
82: \section{Introduction}
83:
84: Some of the most compelling science drivers from the extragalactic
85: research field for the construction of Extremely Large Telescopes (ELT)
86: involve investigating the internal dynamics of the gas and stars, and
87: the chemical abundances of these components, in faint high-redshift
88: galaxies (Hook 2005). This requires a combination of high
89: spatial-resolution and high signal-to-noise spectroscopy which only the
90: largest telescopes can provide. These observations will yield
91: insights into the physical properties of star-formation in
92: the early Universe. Yet some of these scientific questions can be
93: tackled with the current generation of 10-m-class telescopes, when
94: aided by the natural magnification provided by a gravitational lens.
95: Such lens-aided studies are already providing some of our most
96: sensitive views of the distant Universe, with lensing surveys for faint
97: sources out to the highest redshifts (Kneib et al.\ 2004b) and across a
98: range of wavebands (e.g.\ Ellis et
99: al.\ 2001; Smail et al.\ 2002; Metcalfe et al.\ 2003; Santos et al.\
100: 2004; Kneib et al.\ 2004a).
101:
102: In terms of our understanding of the internal properties of high
103: redshift galaxies, the studies of the gravitationally lensed Lyman
104: break galaxy (LBG) cB58 by Pettini et al.\ (2000, 2002) have
105: demonstrated that high-signal-to-noise spectra of typical LBGs can be
106: obtained with 10-m telescopes, if they are highly magnified as a result
107: of being serendipitously positioned behind a suitable foreground
108: gravitational lens. cB58 has an apparent magnitude of $r=20.4$ and
109: represents a $\sim (30\pm 10) \times$ magnified image of an $L^\ast$
110: LBG at $z=2.72$. The studies of this object have yielded a wealth of
111: information on the metallicity and energetics of the interstellar
112: medium in a young star-forming galaxy (Pettini et al.\ 2002).
113: The only drawback with these studies is the difficulty in
114: drawing wide-ranging conclusions from a single object, and hence the
115: urgent need to find other examples of similarly highly magnified
116: galaxies. To this end, several deep imaging surveys of clusters have
117: been undertaken to search for highly magnified LBGs using $U$- and
118: $B$-band dropout selection (e.g.\ Smail, Edge \& Ellis 1998; Stern et
119: al.\ 2004). The difficulty for these surveys is the presence of large
120: numbers of red galaxies in the clusters, whose spectral properties are
121: sufficiently similar to the target population to be a significant
122: source of contamination and so far they have not yet yielded any highly
123: magnified, high-redshift galaxies as bright as cB58. Similarly,
124: attempts to use the wide area coverage of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
125: (SDSS) to identify rare intrinsically bright or highly magnified LBGs
126: (Bentz et al.\ 2004), have until recently only uncovered an unusual
127: class of AGN with weak restframe UV emission lines (Ivison et al.\
128: 2005). However, Allam et al.\ (2007) have just announced the discovery
129: of a bright lensed LBG using data from SDSS.
130:
131: In this letter we present the discovery of a $z=3.07$ galaxy,
132: LBG\,J213512.73$-$010143, which appears as two highly-magnified arcs
133: with an apparent magnitude of $r=20.3$, making it slightly brighter
134: than cB58. We assume a cosmology with $\Omega_m=0.27$,
135: $\Omega_\Lambda=0.73$ and $H_o=71$\,km\,s$^{-1}$\,Mpc$^{-1}$, giving
136: angular scales of 4.7, 7.3 and 7.8\,kpc arcsec$^{-1}$ at $z=0.33$,
137: $z=0.73$ and $z=3.08$ respectively. All quoted magnitudes are
138: AB.
139:
140:
141: %
142: %
143: %
144: \section{Observations and Reduction}
145:
146:
147:
148: \subsection{{\it HST} Imaging}
149:
150: We obtained a 1.2-ks {\it Hubble Space Telescope (HST)} ACS F606W image
151: of MACS\,J2135.2$-$0102 on 2006 May 8th, as part of our Snapshot
152: program (GO\# 10491, PI: H.\ Ebeling). This program targets
153: high-luminosity X-ray clusters to both identify bright lensed galaxies
154: and constrain the cluster mass distributions. MACS\,J2135.2$-$0102 is
155: a high-luminosity X-ray cluster at $z=0.325$ cataloged by Ebeling, Edge
156: \& Henry (2001). The ACS exposure comprised three 400\,s exposures
157: dithered with a LINE pattern and a 3$''$ spacing. The data were
158: reduced using {\sc multidrizzle} v2.7 to
159: provide an image with 0.05$''$ sampling and good cosmetic properties.
160:
161: %
162: % FIGURE 1
163: %
164: %\begin{figure*}[tbh]
165: \centerline{\psfig{file=f1.eps,width=3.5in,angle=90}}
166: %\caption{\small
167: \noindent{\small\addtolength{\lineskip}{-2pt}
168: {\sc Fig.~1.}---
169: An {\it HST} ACS F606W image of
170: LBG\,J213512.73$-$010143 showing the twin arcs (labeled as North, N,
171: and South, S) around a compact source, G1. Arc N has several bright
172: knots with a symmetric appearance, along with a low-surface brightness
173: extension to the west which has a different radius of curvature. Arc S
174: has a bright knot at each end, connected by low-surface brightness
175: emission. The two arcs are not concentric and we mark their centers of
176: curvature by ``X''. The pairs of dotted lines indicate the alignment
177: of the spectroscopic slits in our Keck LRIS observations. The inset to
178: the upper-left displays the same field at a higher contrast, while the
179: inset at the lower-left shows a true color SDSS $gri$ image of the
180: source and we indicate the direction to the cluster center.
181:
182: }
183: %\end{figure*}
184:
185:
186: A visual inspection of the {\it HST} image by
187: two of us (ACE/AMS) identified an unusual object at 21\,35\,12.730
188: $-$01\,01\,42.9 $\pm 0.5''$ (J2000), lying approximately 75$''$ due
189: north of the brightest cluster galaxy (21\,35\,12.08 $-$01\,02\,58,
190: J2000). In the {\it HST} ACS image,
191: Fig.~1, the object appears as two non-concentric arcs, enclosing a
192: central compact object and is reminiscent of a ``Cosmic Eye''. We
193: denote the northern and southern arcs as N and S respectively and the
194: central source as G1. Interestingly, the centers of curvature of N and
195: S do not coincide, lying WSW and NE of G1 respectively (Fig.~1). The
196: radii of curvature are 1.0$''$ for N, which is nearly perfectly
197: circular, and 1.5$''$ for S, which is more flattened. The faint, western
198: extension of N has a radius of curvature of 1.3$''$.
199:
200: A search of the SDSS DR4 shows that this object is well-detected with a
201: total magnitude of $r=20.27$, consistent with the {\it HST} measurement
202: of $R_{606}=20.54\pm 0.02$ for the light from both arcs, and
203: $R_{606}=21.06\pm 0.05$, $R_{606}=21.60\pm 0.10$ and $R_{606}=22.34\pm
204: 0.15$ for N, S and G1 respectively. The arcs are unresolved across
205: their width, with apparent FWHM of $\sim 0.15''$ along their whole
206: lengths: 2.2$''$ for N and 2.8$''$ for S, yielding axial ratios of
207: $>15$ and $>19$ respectively. In contrast, G1 has a FWHM of $\sim
208: 0.25''$ with an ellipticity of $\epsilon \sim 0.3$ at a P.A.\ of
209: 105\,deg.\ (i.e.\ aligned along the major axis of the arcs).
210:
211:
212: \setcounter{figure}{1}
213:
214: %
215: % FIGURE 2
216: %
217: \begin{figure*}[tbh]
218: \centerline{\psfig{file=f2.eps,width=6.0in,angle=0}}
219: \caption{\small The combined Keck LRIS spectrum of the two arcs (top)
220: as well as the spectra for the individual arcs, N and S (center). We
221: mark the positions of the absorption features we identify in the
222: spectra, both the strong lines arising from the ISM in the galaxy and
223: the weaker photospheric features (marked with dotted lines). The top
224: axis gives the restframe wavelength scale at the systemic redshift of
225: the source. For comparison we show the composite spectrum of LBGs with
226: Ly$\alpha$ absorption from Shapley et al.\ (2003), note the broad
227: similarity in the main spectral features -- apart from the stronger
228: damping wings of the Ly$\alpha$ line in the lensed LBG. We also show
229: in the inset the NIRSPEC spectrum of the eastern component of S,
230: identifying the H$\beta$ and [O{\sc iii}]4959,5007 lines which yield a
231: systemic redshift for the source of $z=3.0743$. The flux scale of the
232: inset is the same as the main figure.
233: }
234: \end{figure*}
235:
236: \subsection{Keck Spectroscopy and Imaging}
237:
238: The morphology of this source is strongly suggestive of gravitational
239: lensing, with G1 identified as the primary lens. In addition, the SDSS
240: $griz$ colors are blue ($(g-r)=1.20$, $(r-i)=0.53$ and $(i-z)=0.29$)
241: but with a red $(u-g)=2.30$ color indicating a spectral break
242: short-ward of the $g$-band and hence a probable high redshift, $z\sim
243: 3$--4. As such we observed the system as a high priority
244: with the LRIS spectrograph on the Keck I telescope on the night of 2006
245: June 30 in good transparency and $\ls 1.0''$ seeing. The system was
246: observed at two position angles (P.A.\ of 55 and 120 degs, see Fig.~1)
247: to cover both arcs and G1. We employed the 600\,l/mm grism in the blue
248: arm, blazed at 4000\AA, and the 400\,l/mm grating in the red arm,
249: blazed at 8500\AA, giving wavelength coverage from the atmospheric
250: cutoff out to $\sim 9000$\AA. The total integration at each P.A.\ was
251: 3.6\,ks. The spectra were reduced with standard {\sc iraf} and {\sc
252: idl} routines to yield fluxed, wavelength-calibrated spectra. We show
253: the individual spectra for each arc and the total combined spectrum in
254: Fig.~2. A spectrum was also extracted for G1.
255:
256: In addition, we obtained a 2.4-ks exposure with NIRSPEC on Keck II on
257: the night of 2006 July 24. This observation, taken at P.A.\ of 55
258: deg., covered the entire $K$-band window and detected continuum and a
259: series of narrow emission lines from the eastern component of S (see
260: the inset in Fig.~2). Finally, we obtained a $K'$-band image of the
261: system with the NIRC near-infrared imager on Keck I on the night of
262: 2006 July 4. The total exposure time was 1.14\,ks as 19 individual
263: 60-s exposures in 0.5$''$ seeing. The image detects and resolves both
264: arcs and the central galaxy, G1.
265:
266: %
267: %
268: %
269: \section{Analysis and Discussion}
270:
271: \subsection{Source Properties}
272:
273: The LRIS spectra (Fig.~2) show that the two arcs have blue continua
274: with a series of strong absorption features and spectral breaks which
275: unambiguously identify the source redshift at $z\sim 3.074$.
276: As Fig.~2 shows, the absorption features in the combined spectrum are
277: similar to those in the subset of the LBG population which exhibit
278: Ly$\alpha$ in absorption (Shapley et al.\ 2003). In particular, we see
279: strong absorption from species in the interstellar medium (ISM) of the
280: galaxy, as well as broad, blueshifted absorption in the C{\sc iv}\,1550
281: and O{\sc i}\,1302 lines, both of which are observed in typical LBGs.
282: One distinctive difference is that the Ly$\alpha$ absorption line in
283: the arcs is stronger than in typical LBGs and indicates a significant
284: H{\sc i} column density of $\log($N(H{\sc i}$)) \sim 21.7$ ($\sim 7$
285: times higher than cB58, Pettini et al.\ 2000). We qualitatively
286: compare the spectrum with the predictions from the {\sc Starburst99} model
287: (Leitherer et al.\ 1999, 2002) and the {\it IUE} spectra of O/B stars
288: in de Mello et al.\ (2000). The strength of the C{\sc iv}\,1550
289: absorption, the lack of an associated red emission wing and the
290: relative weakness of the Si{\sc iv}\,1400 absorption suggest that the
291: luminosity weighted stellar population in the arcs is dominated by
292: early B-type supergiants, indicating either a $\sim 10$\,Myr-old burst
293: of star formation or on-going activity over a similar or slightly
294: longer period, but with a stellar IMF deficient in O-type stars.
295:
296: Analysis of the spectra for the individual subcomponents of the arcs
297: shows no evidence for velocity offsets between the internal components
298: of N and S, as expected if they are both multiply imaged. We derive
299: redshifts, from fits to individual photospheric absorption lines (O{\sc
300: iv}\,1343.4, Si{\sc iii}\,1417.2, C{\sc iii}\,1427.8 and S\,{\sc
301: v}\,1501.8), for S of $z=3.0747\pm0.0005$ and for N of $z=
302: 3.0744\pm0.0003$ (all errors are bootstrap estimates). We caution that
303: these features are individually weak, but they suggest that there is no
304: significant velocity offset between the two arcs ($\ls
305: 50$\,km\,s$^{-1}$). However, a comparison of the spectra of the two
306: arcs does show some marked differences: the profiles of the Ly$\alpha$,
307: Ly$\beta$ and the stronger ISM lines differ between N and S, and the
308: continuum appears redder in S, indicating that N and S are images of
309: different sources, either two galaxies, or more likely two regions
310: within a single galaxy (consistent with the lens reconstruction).
311:
312: We also measure the redshifts of the strong ISM lines in the two arcs
313: obtaining $z=3.0727\pm 0.0004$ and $z=3.0726\pm 0.0003$ for single
314: Gaussian fits to the lines in S and N respectively, using Si{\sc
315: ii}\,1260.4, O{\sc i}\,1302.2 C{\sc ii}\,1334.5, Si{\sc iv}\,1402.8,
316: Si{\sc ii}\,1526.7 and Al{\sc ii}\,1670.8. Looking at the stronger ISM
317: lines in the composite spectrum in more detail shows that they comprise
318: at least three separate components: a weak one at $z=3.0666\pm 0.0007$
319: and two stronger ones at $z=3.0715\pm 0.0010$ and $z=3.0752\pm 0.008$.
320: The reddest component has a redshift consistent with the photospheric
321: and nebular emission line estimates (see below) suggesting it arises in
322: gas at the systemic redshift of the system. For the bluer ISM lines,
323: we derive blueshifts of $-200\pm 70$\,km\,s$^{-1}$ for the stronger
324: line and $-570\pm 60$\,km\,s$^{-1}$ for the weaker. These are
325: consistent with outflows of material from the galaxy in the form of a
326: wind and the velocities are comparable to those seen in typical LBGs by
327: Steidel et al.\ (2007). Turning to the continuum emission we measure a
328: restframe UV spectral slope for the composite spectrum between
329: 1200--2000\AA\ of $\beta=-1.6\pm 0.1$ which implies A$_{1600}\sim 1.7$
330: or $E(B-V)\sim 0.4$ (Calzetti et al.\ 2000). We also see a sharp
331: decline in flux as we move blue-ward of Ly$\beta$, with little
332: detectable emission shortward of 930\AA\ in the
333: restframe.
334:
335: In the near-infrared spectrum available for the eastern component of S
336: we see three narrow emission lines corresponding to H$\beta$, [O{\sc
337: iii}]\,4959 and [O{\sc iii}]5007, with unresolved restframe FWHM of
338: $\ls 220$\,km\,s$^{-1}$ (corrected for the instrumental resolution).
339: These features indicate a redshift for the emission line
340: gas in the system of $z=3.0743\pm 0.0001$ which we adopt as the
341: systemic redshift for the galaxy.
342:
343: Finally, the LRIS spectrum of G1 shows a strong continuum break around
344: 6900\AA\ and several features which we identify
345: as Ca H\&K, G-band and [O{\sc ii}]\,3727 at
346: $z=0.7268\pm0.0007$. The [O{\sc ii}]\,3727 line has an equivalent
347: width of just 7.5\AA, indicating modest star formation activity. Thus
348: the likely lens appears to be an early type spiral behind the cluster,
349: and from the width of the G-band and Ca H\&K lines in the spectrum we
350: estimate a central velocity dispersion of $\sim 230\pm
351: 30$\,km\,s$^{-1}$. In addition to this galaxy, we also serendipitously
352: detect a further two galaxies which show [O{\sc ii}]\,3727 at $z\sim
353: 0.73$ indicating the presence of a structure at this redshift.
354:
355: Turning to the broadband imaging, we compare the morphology of the arcs
356: as seen in the NIRC $K'$-band image to the {\it HST} ACS F606W image.
357: This shows no evidence for strong color variations within or between
358: the two arcs, although the difference in resolution in the two bands
359: and the presence of the lens makes this comparison difficult. In
360: addition, we see no evidence for a second lens in the system -- with
361: the position of G1 agreeing well between the optical and near-infrared
362: images. We find that the arcs dominate the integrated light from the
363: system from the $g$- to $K$-bands: measuring $K'=18.9\pm 0.1$ and
364: $(R_{606}-K') \sim 1.7$ for the combined arcs and $K'=19.7\pm 0.1$ and
365: $(R_{606}-K') \sim 2.8$ for G1. The color of G1 matches that of an
366: early type spiral or S0 at $z=0.73$, while the $K'$-band magnitude
367: yields $M_K\sim -23.9 + 5\log(h)$, indicating it is a $\sim L_K^\ast$
368: galaxy (consistent with its measured velocity dispersion and the
369: Faber-Jackson relation).
370:
371:
372: %
373: %
374: %
375: \subsection{Lensing Model}
376:
377: To interpret the
378: properties of this system in more detail we have developed a lens model
379: for the system using the semi-linear inversion method of Warren \& Dye
380: (2003). The lens model includes not only a mass component for G1, but also a
381: significant external shear from the mass distribution in the foreground
382: cluster at $z=0.33$, which is essential to reproduce the non-concentric
383: configuration of the two arcs. The best-fit parameters for the
384: galaxy-scale mass component are in good agreement with the observed
385: light distribution and velocity dispersion of G1 -- the mass is
386: centered on G1 with an ellipticity of $\epsilon = 0.31\pm 0.01$ at a
387: P.A.\ of $103\pm 2$\,deg and a velocity dispersion $\sigma =230\pm
388: 5$\,km\,s$^{-1}$. The cluster contributes an additional shear of
389: $\gamma=0.15$ along a direction tangential to the cluster center, which
390: produces the offset in the centers of curvature of N and S. This lens
391: model suggests a combined magnification for the arcs of $28\pm 3$. The
392: model forms the arcs N/S from lensing of a single, extended
393: background source with a scale size of $\sim 1$\,kpc. However, to
394: reproduce the faint western extension of N we require a second
395: background source, offset from the primary source by $\sim 0.3''$ ($\sim
396: 2$\,kpc). The proximity of these two sources means that they likely represent
397: two star forming knots within a single galaxy. In this regard, we note
398: that if the galaxy wasn't lensed, it would appear as a single elongated
399: source even in deep ACS imaging. A more detailed description of the
400: mass model for the lensing galaxy is given in Dye et al.\ (2007).
401:
402: \subsection{Intrinsic Properties}
403:
404: Having determined the magnification of the system we can estimate the
405: intrinsic luminosity of the background galaxy. Firstly we note
406: that the characteristic apparent magnitude of $z\sim 3$ LBGs from
407: Shapley et al.\ (2001) is $K^\ast = 22.52\pm 0.25$. Hence the combined
408: $K'$-band magnitude of the arcs N/S corresponds to an apparent
409: luminosity of $28 L^\ast_V$! Correcting for the lensing magnification
410: of $\sim 28\pm 3$, the arcs' intrinsic apparent magnitude translates to
411: $K\sim 22.6\pm 0.2$, consistent with $L_V^\ast$ for the $z=3$ LBG
412: population (c.f.\ Allam et al.\ 2007). Similarly, comparing the colors
413: of the arcs, $(R_{606}-K')\sim 1.6$, with typical $z\sim 3$ LBGs from
414: Shapley et al.\ (2001), which have $(R-K)\sim 1.0\pm 0.6$, we find that
415: the arcs are slightly redder than the typical LBG but are within the
416: 1-$\sigma$ scatter for the population.
417:
418: Finally, to estimate the star formation rate in the galaxy we use the
419: $R$-band continuum magnitudes of the arcs to determine a restframe
420: 1500\AA\ luminosity of $L_{1500}\sim
421: 4.6\times10^{30}$\,ergs\,s$^{-1}$\,Hz$^{-1}$, which translates into a
422: star formation rate of 640\,M$_\odot$\,yr$^{-1}$, adopting a Salpeter
423: IMF with an upper-mass cut-off of 100\,M$_\odot$ (Kennicutt 1998) and
424: without any correction for reddening or magnification. Correcting for
425: the estimated magnification and UV reddening we derive an intrinsic
426: star formation rate of $\sim 100$\,M$_\odot$\,yr$^{-1}$.
427:
428:
429: %
430: %
431: %
432: \section{Conclusions}
433:
434: We report the discovery of a LBG at $z=3.0743$ which is seen as a pair
435: of arcs with an apparent magnitude of $r=20.3$, equivalent to
436: $28L^\ast_V$. This very bright apparent magnitude results from
437: gravitational lensing by a galaxy at $z=0.73$ and a cluster
438: at $z=0.33$ which provide a combined magnification of $28\pm 3\times$.
439: Correcting for this magnification we show that LBG\,J213512.73$-$010143
440: (the ``Cosmic Eye'') is a compact $\sim L^\ast_V$ LBG with moderate
441: dust reddening, $E(B-V)\sim 0.4$, and a star formation rate of $\sim
442: 100$\,M$_\odot$\,yr$^{-1}$. We illustrate the wide range of spectral
443: features which can be identified in a modest signal-to-noise,
444: moderate-resolution spectrum of the galaxy and look forward to future
445: observations at higher signal-to-noise and resolution. The importance
446: of this system is the opportunity it provides to obtain restframe UV,
447: mid-infrared and millimeter wavebands observations of a typical $z\sim
448: 3$ LBG at the resolution and signal-to-noise which will only become
449: available for unlensed examples with the commissioning of ELTs, the
450: {\it James Webb Space Telescope (JWST)} or the Atacama Large Millimeter
451: Array (ALMA) respectively. Such observations will provide unique
452: information on the elemental abundances, star formation, gas mass and
453: dynamics of this young galaxy, facilitating a range of studies
454: including the calibration of the various indicators proposed to trace
455: the metallicity of gas in distant galaxies. This system can thus act
456: as a path-finder for the science which will be done with ELTs, JWST and
457: ALMA when they are completed.
458:
459:
460: %
461: %
462: %
463: \acknowledgments
464: We thank Max Pettini for help and useful discussions and an anonymous
465: referee for constructive comments which improved this work. IRS and
466: GPS acknowledge support from the Royal Society, AMS acknowledges
467: support from PPARC.
468:
469: %
470: %
471: %
472: \begin{thebibliography}{}
473:
474: \bibitem[]{} Allam, S.S., Tucker, D.L., Lin, H., Diehl, H.T., Annis,
475: J., Buckley-Greer, E., Frieman, J.A., 2007, ApJL, submitted (astroph/0611138)
476:
477: \bibitem[]{} Bentz, M.C., Osmer, P.S., Weinberg, D.H., 2004, ApJ, 600, L19
478:
479: \bibitem[]{} Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R.C., Kinney, A.,
480: Koornneef, J., Storchi-Bergmann, T., 2000, ApJ, 533, 682
481:
482: \bibitem[]{} Campusano, L.E., Pell\'o, R., Kneib, J.-P., Le Borgne,
483: J.-F., Fort, B.,
484: Ellis, R.S., Mellier, Y., Smail, I., 2001, A\&A, 378, 394
485:
486: \bibitem[]{} Dye, S., et al., 2007, in prep.
487:
488: \bibitem[]{} Ellis, R.S., Santos, M.R., Kneib, J.-P., Kuijken, K.,
489: 2001, ApJ, 560, L119
490:
491: \bibitem[]{} Ebeling, H., Edge, A.C., Henry, J.P., 2001, ApJ, 553, 668
492:
493: \bibitem[]{} Hook, I. M. (Ed.), 2005, "The Science Case for the
494: European Extremely Large Telescope: The next step in mankind's quest for the Universe"
495:
496: \bibitem[]{} Ivison, R.J.,Smail, I., Bentz, M., Stevens, J.A.,
497: Menendez-Delmestre, K., Chapman, S.C., Blain, A.W., 2005, MNRAS, 362,
498: 535
499:
500: \bibitem[]{} Kennicutt, R.C., 1998, ARAA, 36, 189.
501:
502: \bibitem[]{} Kneib, J-P., van der Werf, P., Kraiberg Knudsen, K.,
503: Smail, I., Blain, A.W., Frayer, D., Barnard, V., Ivison, R., 2004a,
504: MNRAS, 349, 1211
505:
506: \bibitem[]{} Kneib, J-P., Ellis, R.S., Santos, M.R., Richard, J., 2004b,
507: ApJ, 607, 697
508:
509: \bibitem[]{} Leitherer, C., et al., 1999, ApJS, 123, 3.
510:
511: \bibitem[]{} Metcalfe, L., Kneib, J.-P., McBreen, B., Altieri, B.,
512: Biviano, A., Delaney, M., Elbaz, D., Kessler, M.F., et al., 2003, A\&A,
513: 407, 791
514:
515: \bibitem[]{} de Mello, D.F., Leitherer, C., Heckman, T.M., 2000,
516: ApJ, 530, 251.
517:
518: \bibitem[]{} Pettini, M., Steidel, C.C., Adelberger, K.L., Dickinson,
519: M., Giavalisco, M., 2000, ApJ, 532, 96
520:
521: \bibitem[]{} Pettini, M., Rix, S., Steidel, C.C., Adelberger, K.L., Hunt, M.P.,
522: Shapley, A.E., 2002, ApJ, 569, 742
523:
524: \bibitem[]{} Santos, M.R., Ellis, R.S., Kneib, J.-P., Richard, J.,
525: Kuijken, K., 2004, ApJ, 606, 683
526:
527: \bibitem[]{} Smail, I., Edge, A.C., Ellis, R.S., 1998, PASA, 15, 267
528:
529: \bibitem[]{} Smail, I., Ivison, R.J., Blain, A.W., Kneib, J.-P., 2002,
530: MNRAS, 331, 495
531:
532: \bibitem[]{} Shapley, A.E., Steidel, C.C., Adelberger, K.L., Dickinson,
533: M., Giavalisco, M., Pettini, M., 2001, ApJ, 562, 95
534:
535: \bibitem[]{} Shapley, A.E., Steidel, C.C., Pettini, M.,
536: Adelberger, K.L., 2003, ApJ, 588, 65
537:
538: \bibitem[]{} Steidel, C.C., et al., 2007, in prep.
539:
540: \bibitem[]{} Stern, D., van Dokkum, P.G., Nugent, P., Sands, D.J.,
541: Ellis, R.S., Sullivan, M., Bloom, J.S., Frail, D.A., Kneib, J.P.,
542: Koopmans, L.V.E., Treu, T., 2004, ApJ, 612, 690
543:
544: \bibitem[]{} Warren, S., Dye, S., 2003, ApJ, 590, 673
545:
546: \end{thebibliography}
547:
548:
549: \end{document}
550:
551:
552: