1: \documentclass[12pt,preprint]{aastex}
2:
3: %\usepackage{natbib}
4: %\shorttitle{}
5:
6: \shortauthors{Stanford et al.}
7: \newcommand{\wcen}{$\omega$ Cen}
8: \newcommand{\feh}{[Fe/H]}
9: \newcommand{\cah}{[Ca/H]}
10: \newcommand{\eq}{$\approx$}
11:
12: \begin{document}
13:
14: \title{A Sr-Rich Star on the Main Sequence of Omega Centauri}
15:
16: \author{Laura M. Stanford, G. S. Da
17: Costa and John E. Norris}
18: \affil{Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Australian
19: National University, Weston, ACT, 2611, Australia}
20: \email{stanford, gdc, jen@mso.anu.edu.au}
21: \and
22:
23: \author{Russell D. Cannon} \affil{Anglo-Australian
24: Observatory, P.O. Box 296, Epping, NSW, 2121, Australia}
25: \email{rdc@aao.gov.au}
26:
27:
28:
29: \begin{abstract}
30: Abundance ratios relative to iron for carbon, nitrogen, strontium and
31: barium are presented for a metal-rich main sequence star
32: \mbox{([Fe/H]=--0.74}) in the globular cluster $\omega$ Centauri.
33: This star, designated 2015448, shows depleted carbon and solar
34: nitrogen, but more interestingly, shows an enhanced abundance ratio of
35: strontium \mbox{[Sr/Fe]\eq1.6~dex}, while the barium abundance ratio
36: is \mbox{[Ba/Fe]$\leq$0.6~dex}. At this metallicity one usually sees
37: strontium and barium abundance ratios that are roughly equal.
38: Possible formation scenarios of this peculiar object are considered.
39: \end{abstract}
40:
41: \keywords{globular clusters: general ---
42: globular clusters: individual ($\omega$ Centauri)}
43:
44: \section{Introduction}
45:
46: The largest globular cluster associated with our Galaxy, $\omega$
47: Centauri, shows substantial ranges in abundance of all elements that
48: are studied (e.g. \citealt{nd95a, scl95, smi00, pan02}). The iron
49: abundance ranges from \mbox{\feh$\approx$--2.0} up to
50: \mbox{\feh\eq--0.4}. A peak at \feh=--1.7 exists which accounts for
51: approximately 70\% of the population, and there is a long tail to
52: higher metallicities \citep{nfm96, sk96, lee99, pan00, sta06a}.
53:
54:
55: Studies of individual elements have also shown a range in their
56: abundances within the cluster members. Carbon, nitrogen and oxygen
57: show large scatters in their abundance ratios for a given
58: \feh~\citep{per80, bw93, nd95a}. The $\alpha$ elements (Mg, Si, Ca
59: and Ti) show a constant value of \mbox{[$\alpha$/Fe]{\eq}0.3} below
60: \mbox{[Fe/H]$<$--1.0} \citep{bw93, scl95, nd95a, smi00} but decrease
61: to \mbox{[$\alpha$/Fe]=0.0} at higher metallicities
62: \mbox{(\feh$>$--1.0)} \citep{pan02}. The constancy with iron at lower
63: abundances indicates they are produced by the same source, most likely
64: supernovae Type II. At the higher metallicities, the [$\alpha$/Fe]
65: decreases, consistent with supernovae Type Ia contributions.
66:
67:
68: Sodium and aluminium abundance ratios are correlated, and both are
69: anticorrelated with [O/Fe] \citep{bw93, nd95a, nd95b, smi00}.
70: \citet{smi00} also report [Al/Fe] being anticorrelated with [Mg/Fe].
71: [Cu/Fe] has been found to be constant for \mbox{[Fe/H]$<$--0.8}
72: \citep{smi00, cun02}, but \citet{pan02} reported a trend of increasing
73: [Cu/Fe] as the metallicity increased from \mbox{\feh=--1.2} to~--0.5.
74: Studies of the iron peak elements (Cr, Ni, Ti) and metals (Sc, V) have
75: shown that there is no trend with respect to iron (up to
76: \mbox{\feh\eq--0.8)}, consistent with primordial enrichment from Type
77: II supernovae. The heavy neutron capture elements have been shown by
78: \citet{nd95a} and \citet{scl95} to increase sharply as a function of
79: iron abundance. These results are in contrast to normal globular
80: clusters, and suggest that the stellar winds from AGB stars (sources
81: of s-process elements) were involved with the enrichment of {\wcen}.
82:
83:
84: The cluster also has several members that are of distinct classes,
85: such as CH stars, Ba stars, S stars \citep{le83} and stars with strong
86: CO \citep{per80} to name a few. Here we present another object that
87: has unusual abundance ratios, the formation of which is difficult to
88: explain.
89:
90:
91: We have obtained observations of a sample of main sequence and turnoff
92: (MSTO) stars within the cluster for several purposes. Firstly, the
93: possibility of an age-metallicity relation within the cluster's member
94: stars was investigated \citep{sta06a}. We found an age range of
95: \mbox{2--4} Gyrs exists between the most metal-poor and metal-rich
96: populations within the cluster, similar to that found by other studies
97: \citep{hil04, rey04, sol05}. Positions, photometry, metallicities and
98: ages of the stars in the catalogue can be found in the electronic
99: version of \citet{sta06a}. The second goal was to determine abundance
100: ratios of several elements --- carbon, nitrogen, strontium and barium
101: as functions of [Fe/H] \citep{sta06b}. In that analysis a metal-rich
102: main sequence (MS) member, 2015448, was found that exhibited unusual
103: s-process abundance ratios. The purpose of this Letter is to detail
104: the abundance analysis for star 2015448, and to propose possible
105: formation scenarios. \S \ref{OR_sect} briefly describes the
106: observation and reduction process for our sample of main sequence and
107: turnoff members. The stellar parameters and analysis are detailed in
108: \S \ref{SPA_sect}, while \S \ref{D_sect} discusses the possible
109: formation scenarios for this object.
110:
111:
112: \section{Observations} \label{OR_sect}
113:
114: The observations and reduction of our data are described in detail in
115: \citet{sta06a} to which we refer the reader. Briefly, photometry for
116: the cluster was obtained in the V and B bands, and samples were chosen
117: within an annulus \mbox{15'---25'} from the cluster center. Two
118: regions were defined near the MSTO, shown in Figure \ref{cmd}, and
119: spectra were obtained for objects within these CMD regions using the
120: Two Degree Field Spectrograph (2dF) on the Anglo-Australian Telescope
121: \citep{lew02}. Figure \ref{cmd} shows the color-magnitude diagram of
122: all objects with no membership information as small dots, the sample
123: of 420 radial velocity members as large dots, and the object that is
124: the topic of this Letter as a large star. This object, 2015448, has
125: $V=18.22$, and $B-V=0.69$. This star immediately stood out in a
126: visual inspection of the spectra, due to the anomalously strong Sr
127: lines, seen in a Figure \ref{spec}. Its position is
128: \mbox{RA=13$^h$24$^m$49.10$^s$} and
129: \mbox{Dec=--47$\degr$40$'$34.7$''$} (J2000). With a radial velocity
130: of \mbox{228$\pm$11~kms$^{-1}$}, star 2015448 is likely to be a member of
131: the cluster as {\wcen} has a radial velocity of
132: \mbox{232$\pm$0.7~kms$^{-1}$} \citep{din99}
133:
134:
135: The observations were carried out in half hour exposures, and, as
136: several such exposures were needed to obtain the required
137: signal-to-noise of $\sim$30 for each star, there are several
138: individual observations for star 2015448. Also, this object was observed
139: in observing sessions in 1998, 1999 and 2002, in different fibres and
140: spectrographs. This gives an independent check on the relative
141: strengths of the Sr and Ba features. It was found that the two Sr
142: features were present in all observations, while Ba was not clearly
143: detected in any of our spectra.
144:
145: A spectroscopic abundance analysis of the full sample is detailed in
146: \citet{sta06b}. Abundances relative to iron of C, N and Sr were
147: determined using spectrum synthesis techniques. The CH feature at
148: $\sim$4300{\AA} was used to determine the [C/Fe] abundance for each
149: star. This [C/Fe] was then adopted when the CN feature at 3883{\AA}
150: was analyzed to find [N/Fe]. The Sr abundance ratio was determined
151: using the two Sr lines at 4077.71{\AA} and 4215.52{\AA}. When
152: possible, [Ba/Fe] was also determined from the feature at
153: 4554.03{\AA}.
154:
155:
156: \section{Stellar Parameters and Analysis} \label{SPA_sect}
157:
158: The process for calculating metallicities is described in detail in
159: \citet{sta06a}. The Sr-rich star has a metallicity of
160: \mbox{[Fe/H]=--0.74$\pm$0.23~dex}, determined solely from the
161: Auto-Correlation Function method, and an age of
162: \mbox{14.5$\pm$2.2~Gyrs}. This age is consistent with the mean age of
163: the bulk of the stars in the cluster. The ages for the individual
164: stars in the sample were calculated by fitting an isochrone to each
165: object using the magnitude, color, metallicity and [$\alpha$/Fe]
166: abundance (Y$^2$, \citet{yi01}, Green Table). This also enabled an
167: individual temperature and gravity to be assigned to each star. A
168: temperature of 5820 (K), and \mbox{log$g$=4.2~(cgs)} were adopted for
169: this object. A reddening \mbox{$E(B-V)$=0.11} \citep{lub02} and
170: distance modulus \mbox{(m--M)$_{V}$=14.10} were assumed. Although the
171: star's color is redder than the bulk of the population in the cluster,
172: it is also more metal-rich than that population. The hydrogen line
173: strengths in the observed spectrum are consistent with those expected
174: on the basis of the star's color.
175:
176: Synthetic spectra were obtained using the stellar models of Kurucz
177: (1993), atomic line lists of Bell (2000, private communication) and
178: molecular line lists of Kurucz. The spectrum synthesis code was
179: developed by \citet{cn78}. More details of this process are given in
180: \citet{sta06b}.
181:
182:
183:
184: \subsection{Abundance Ratios} \label{A_sect}
185:
186: Figure \ref{spec1} shows the synthetic spectrum fits to the CH, CN, Sr
187: and Ba features. The G band at $\sim$4300{\AA} was analyzed first,
188: and gave a C abundance of \mbox{[C/Fe]=--0.5$\pm$0.3~dex}. This
189: feature loses its sensitivity for abundances less than
190: \mbox{[C/Fe]=--0.5}, shown by the close proximity of the
191: \mbox{[C/Fe]=--0.8} and --0.5~dex synthetic lines. As we have no
192: information on O, which affects the C abundance obtained from the CH
193: feature, a value of \mbox{[O/Fe]=0.18~dex} was assumed. This star was
194: assumed to have a \mbox{[C/Fe]=--0.5}, which was then used when
195: determining [N/Fe]. Synthesis of the CN feature at $\sim$3883{\AA} led
196: to a N abundance ratio of \mbox{[N/Fe]$<$0.5~dex}. A range of N
197: abundance ratios are shown in the synthetic spectra, enabling an upper
198: limit on to be placed on the N abundance ratio. The CN feature in
199: Figure \ref{spec1} shows that abundance ratios of \mbox{[N/Fe]=1.5}
200: and 1.0 are too high. However, this feature loses its sensitivity as
201: smaller N abundance ratios are considered and only an upper limit can
202: be determined.
203:
204:
205:
206: The Sr and Ba lines were analyzed together. There were two Sr lines
207: used, Sr {\sc} II at 4077.71{\AA} and Sr {\sc II} at 4215.52{\AA}.
208: The Ba {\sc II} 4554.03{\AA} line was used to constrain the Ba
209: abundance ratio. The two Sr lines are in agreement and yield
210: \mbox{[Sr/Fe]=1.6$\pm$0.1~dex}. It can be seen clearly that a solar
211: Sr abundance ratio does not fit the observed spectrum. The CN
212: bandhead at $\sim$4216{\AA} can affect the abundance ratio obtained
213: for the Sr 4215{\AA} feature. However with an assumed solar N
214: abundance ratio, there is little effect to the Sr line. While the N
215: abundance ratio could be as high as \mbox{[N/Fe]=0.5~dex}, spectrum
216: synthesis calculations show this does not affect on the Sr 4215{\AA}
217: line significantly, and does not alter the abundance ratio obtained.
218: Using the same enhancement for Ba that was found for Sr, one finds the
219: predicted strength to be too high to fit the observed Ba line. The
220: sensitivity of the Ba feature is low up until abundance ratios of
221: \mbox{[Ba/Fe]=0.6~dex}, and an upper limit can be placed at this
222: value.
223:
224:
225: \subsection{Errors} \label{E_sect}
226:
227: The stellar parameters temperature, gravity and metallicity, for
228: star 2015448 were varied individually by their uncertainties to give an
229: estimate of the error in our determined abundance ratios. These were
230: then added in quadrature. The error in temperature comes from
231: $\Delta(B-V)$ and the reddening, equating to $\pm$100K uncertainty in
232: temperature. This propagated to errors of $\pm$0.2~dex in C and
233: $\pm$0.1~dex in Sr. Gravity was changed by $\pm$0.2~dex, and did not
234: lead to any significant errors in the final abundance ratios. The
235: uncertainty in metallicity propagated to errors in abundance ratios
236: for \mbox{$\Delta$C$\pm$0.2~dex} and \mbox{$\Delta$Sr$\pm$0.1~dex}.
237: The CN feature used to determine N, adopting the previously determined
238: C abundance ratio for 2015448, did not show any change with the above
239: changes in temperature, gravity, metallicity, or the determined error
240: in the C abundance ratio, due to the low sensitivity of this feature.
241: To determine the effect of the assumed oxygen abundance,
242: \mbox{[O/Fe]=0.0} and +0.3 were used and the CH feature reanalyzed.
243: It was found to have no noticeable effect on the [C/Fe] abundance
244: determined.
245:
246:
247: \section{Discussion} \label{D_sect}
248:
249: This peculiar star in {\wcen} shows \mbox{[C/Fe]=--0.5},
250: \mbox{[N/Fe]$<$0.5}, enhanced \mbox{[Sr/Fe]=1.6}, and
251: \mbox{[Ba/Fe]$<$0.6}. The formation process that created it was
252: unusual as there are no similar objects yet found within the cluster.
253: We do find MS objects with high Sr, but these also have similar
254: enhancements in Ba. This star was one out of 420 stars studied on the
255: main sequence turnoff. Given that it is a metal-rich star, and we
256: only found 25 such objects, a more extensive search of other areas of
257: the center of the cluster may prove fruitful in determining if there
258: are more of these objects. On the RGB, at a metallicity of
259: \mbox{\feh=--0.8}, most stars have \mbox{[Ba/Fe]\eq+0.6}
260: \citep{nd95a}, which is consistent with the upper limit found for
261: star 2015448. \citet{nd95a} did not observe Sr, and a direct comparison
262: cannot be made. However, they did investigate other light s-process
263: elements such as Y and Zr. Both of these elements have abundance
264: ratios equal to or less than 0.6, and no stars on the RGB exhibit
265: s-process abundances as high as is found here for [Sr/Fe].
266:
267: There are at least two possibilities that lead to the formation of
268: this star. Firstly, it may have been in a binary system with a
269: companion that underwent unusual s-process enrichment and transfered
270: mass to the star we see today. At present we have no evidence that
271: this star is in a binary system: the individual velocities from the
272: 1998, 1999 and 2002 observations are consistent to within the
273: measurement errors of \mbox{$\sim$10kms$^{-1}$}. A second possibility
274: is that the Sr-rich star formed out of already enriched material.
275:
276: AGB stars of low and intermediate mass dredge up $^{12}$C to the
277: surface via helium shell thermal pulses. In general, if the star is
278: more massive than $\sim$3M$_{\odot}$, the $^{12}$C is processed to
279: $^{14}$N via the CN cycle \citep{vdm02}. The main s-process is
280: thought to occur within the $^{13}$C pocket where the neutron source
281: is the \mbox{$^{13}$C($\alpha$,n)$^{16}$O} reaction
282: (e.g. \citealt{lk01}). To generate the abundance ratio seen here it
283: would seem necessary that the s-processing occurs only for the light
284: s-process elements, perhaps up to the peak at Zr, rather than
285: progressing through to heavy s-process elements which include Ba.
286: This was may be due to the neutron density not being high enough, as
287: higher neutron densities, assuming all other parameters being equal,
288: will produce larger amounts of heavier nuclei such as Ba or La,
289: relative to the lighter ones \citep{smi05}.
290:
291: Another source of s-processing, known as the weak s-process, occurs in
292: massive stars \citep{phn90}. The \mbox{$^{22}$Ne($\alpha$,n)$^{25}$Mg}
293: reaction is the source of the neutrons. Most of the neutrons produced
294: from this reaction are captured by the light elements, and only a
295: small fraction are captured by the $^{56}$Fe seed nucleus, a process
296: known as ``self-poisoning''. This is the reason for the limited
297: efficiency of the \mbox{$^{22}$Ne($\alpha$,n)$^{25}$Mg} source for
298: s-process. It allows for the production of only light s-process nuclei
299: with mass numbers \mbox{65$<$A$<$90} and Sr, with a mass number of 87,
300: falls into this range. Ba, on the other hand with mass number 137,
301: does not and little of this element is produced by this process
302: \citep{phn90}. It is unclear whether massive stars could also produce
303: the necessary C and N abundance pattern found here, or whether star
304: 2015448 contains other elemental abundance patterns that may have
305: originated from these objects.
306:
307:
308: The r-process occurs in an environment that is rich in neutrons, and
309: the mean time between successive neutron captures in very short
310: compared with the time to undergo $\beta$-decay. This scenario as the
311: enrichment source also requires the presence of SNe products such as
312: calcium and iron, or to have the Sr enriched material transferred but
313: not any SNe products.
314:
315: Using the abundance yields for the r and (main) s-process (occurring
316: in low-to-intermediate mass AGB stars) from \citet{cam82}, and
317: normalizing to [Sr/Fe] one finds a difference greater than one dex
318: between predicted and observed abundances for Ba. For the main
319: s-process, the predicted abundance is \mbox{[Ba/Fe]=1.68}, while the
320: r-process predicts \mbox{[Ba/Fe]=1.84}. Both of these values are
321: obviously too large, confirming the unusual nature of the source of
322: the abundance patterns found in star 2015448. However, it should be
323: noted that AGB star yields do not explain the abundance anomalies of
324: Na, Mg, Al, and O found in other stars of {\wcen} or globular clusters
325: (see e.g. \citealt{fen04}). This may be due to the inadequacy of the
326: models used to calculate yields for these objects.
327:
328: From weak s-process yields in massive stars \citep{phn90}, using an
329: initial metallicity of \mbox{Z/Z$_{\odot}$=10$^{-1}$} and mass of
330: 16M$_{\odot}$, \mbox{[Sr/Fe]\eq1.8} and \mbox{[Ba/Fe]\eq0.7}, in good
331: agreement with the Sr abundance and upper limit of the Ba one obtained
332: here. This indicates the weak s-process is the more favorable option
333: for the source of enrichment in star 2015448.
334:
335:
336: This star is also highly unusual when compared to observations of
337: field stars. Studies of n-capture elements in samples of field stars
338: for a range of metallicities show a spread in abundance ratios of Sr
339: and Ba at low metallicities \mbox{([Fe/H]$<$-2.0)}, with most stars
340: having [Sr/Fe] or [Ba/Fe] $\leq$0.0~\citep{mcw98, bur00, hon04}. At
341: higher metallicities, the abundances are within $\sim$0.5 of the solar
342: abundance.
343:
344: A cool field giant, U Aquarii, has enhanced [Sr/Fe] and [Y/Fe]
345: abundances, and low [Ba/Fe] \citep{bln79}. This star is a faint R CrB
346: type variable star and shows no CH features, but strong $^{12}$C$_{2}$
347: bands. \citet{bln79} concluded that U Aqr is a hydrogen deficient
348: carbon star with enhanced abundances of the light s-process elements
349: Sr and Y (by a factor of $\sim$100) and little or no Ba. It is now a
350: He-C core of an evolved star of $\sim$1M$\odot$ that ejected its H
351: rich envelope at the He core flash. \citet{bln79} postulated that a
352: single neutron exposure occurred at the flash resulting in a brief
353: neutron irradiation producing only the light s-process elements. A
354: similar giant, known as Sakurai's Object \citep{asp97} shows similarly
355: enhanced C and light s-process elements, and is H deficient. These
356: types of stars may be responsible for the abundance pattern found in
357: star 2015448. However, a significant difference is the C-rich nature of
358: the giants compared with the carbon depleted nature of star 2015448.
359:
360: Our results provide a challenging puzzle to determine the source of
361: the abundance patterns found for this star. That said, the resolution
362: of our data is inadequate to address this question. Higher resolution
363: spectra with high S/N are needed to analyze as many elements as
364: possible, in particular the s-process ones, to be able to obtain an
365: accurate history for the evolution of star 2015448.
366:
367:
368:
369: \begin{thebibliography}{}
370: \bibitem[Asplund et al.(1997)]{asp97}
371: Asplund, M., Gustafsson, B., Lambert, D. L., \& Kameswara Rao, N. 1997, A\&A, 321, L17
372: \bibitem[Beers et al.(1999)]{bee99} Beers, T. C., Rossi, S., Norris,
373: J. E., Ryan, S. G., \& Shefler, T. 1999, \aj, 117, 981
374: \bibitem[Bond, Luck \& Newman(1979)]{bln79}
375: Bond, H. E., Luck, R. E., \& Newman, M. J. 1979, \apj, 233, 205
376: \bibitem[Brown \& Wallerstein(1993)]{bw93}
377: Brown, J. A., \& Wallerstein, G. 1993, \aj, 106, 133
378: \bibitem[Burris et al.(2000)]{bur00}
379: Burris, D. L., Pilachowski, C. A., Armandroff, T. E., Sneden, C., Cowan, J. J., Roe, H. 2000, \apj, 544, 302
380: \bibitem[Cameron(1982)]{cam82}
381: Cameron, A. G. W. 1982, \apss, 82 123
382: \bibitem[Cottrell \& Norris(1978)]{cn78}
383: Cottrell, P. \& Norris, J. 1978, \apj, 221, 893
384: \bibitem[Cunha et al.(2002)]{cun02}
385: Cunha, K., Smith, V. V., Suntzeff, N. B., Norris, J. E., Da Costa, G. S., \& Plez, B. 2002, \aj, 124, 379
386: \bibitem[Dinescu~et~al.(1999)]{din99}
387: Dinescu, D I., van Altena, W F., Girard, T M., \& López, C E. 1999a, \aj, 117, 277
388: \bibitem[Fenner et al.(2004)]{fen04}
389: Fenner, Y., Campbell, S. W., Karakas, A. I., Lattanzio, J. C., Gibson, B. C. 2004, \mnras, 353, 789
390: \bibitem[Hilker~et~al.(2004)]{hil04}
391: Hilker, M., Kayser, A., Richtler, T., \& Willemsen, P. 2004, \aap, 442, L9
392: \bibitem[Honda et al.(2004)]{hon04}
393: Honda, S., Aoki, W., Kajino, T., Ando, H., Beers, T. C., Izumiura, H.,. Sadakane, K., \& Takada-Hidai, M. 2004, \apj, 607, 474
394: \bibitem[Lattanzio \& Karakas(2001)]{lk01}
395: Lattanzio, J. C., \& Karakas, A. I. 2001, Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana, 72, 255
396: \bibitem[Lee et al.(1999)]{lee99}
397: Lee, Y.-W., Joo, J.-M., Sohn, Y.-J., Rey, S.-C., Lee, H.-C., Walker, A. R. 1999, Nature, 402, 55
398: \bibitem[Lewis et al.(2002)]{lew02}
399: Lewis et al., 2002, \mnras, 333, 279
400: \bibitem[Lloyd Evans(1977)]{le83}
401: Lloyd Evans, T. 1983, \mnras, 204, 975
402: \bibitem[Lub(2001)]{lub02}
403: Lub, J., 2002, in van Leeuwen, F., Hughes, J. D., \& Piotto, G. 2002, eds, ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 265, A Unique Window into Astrophysics. (Astron. Soc. Pac.: San Francisco), p. 95
404: \bibitem[McWilliam (1998)]{mcw98}
405: McWilliam, A. 1998, \aj, 115, 1640
406: \bibitem[Norris \& Da Costa(1995a)]{nd95a}
407: Norris, J. E., \& Da Costa, G. S. 1995, ApJ, 447, 680
408: \bibitem[Norris \& Da Costa(1995b)]{nd95b}
409: Norris, J. E., \& Da Costa, G. S. 1995, \apj, 441, L81
410: \bibitem[Norris, Freeman \& Mighell(1996)]{nfm96}
411: Norris, J. E., Freeman, K. C., \& Mighell, K. J. 1996, ApJ, 462, 241
412: \bibitem[Pancino et al.(2000)]{pan00}
413: Pancino, E., Ferraro, F. R., Bellazzini, M., Piotto, G., \& Zoccali, M. 2000, ApJ, 534, 83
414: \bibitem[Pancino et al.(2002)]{pan02}
415: Pancino, E., Pasquini, L., Hill, V., Ferraro, F. R., Bellazzini, M. 2002, \apj, 568, L101
416: \bibitem[Persson et al.(1980)]{per80}
417: Persson, S. E., Frogel, J. A., Cohen, J. G., Aaronson, M., \& Matthews, K. 1980, \apj, 235, 452
418: \bibitem[Prantzos, Hashimoto \& Nomoto(1990)]{phn90}
419: Prantzos, N., Hashimoto, M., \& Nomoto, K. 1990, A\&A, 234, 211
420: \bibitem[Raiteri et al.(1993)]{rai93}
421: Raiteri, C. M., Gallino, R., Busson, M., Neuberger, D., \& Kappeler, F. 1993, \apj, 419, 207
422: \bibitem[Rey~et~al.(2004)]{rey04}
423: Rey, S.-C., Lee, Y.-W., Ree, C. H., Joo, M.-J., \& Sohn, Y.-J. 2004, \aj, 127, 958
424: \bibitem[Sollima~et~al.(2005)]{sol05}
425: Sollima, A., Pancino, E., Ferraro, F. R., Bellazzini, M., Straniero, O., Pasquini, L. 2005, \apj, 634, 332
426: \bibitem[Smith(2005)]{smi05}
427: Smith, V. V. 2005, in Barnes, T. G. \& Bash, F. N., eds, ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 336, Cosmic Abundances as Records of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis in honor of David L. Lambert. (Astron. Soc. Pac.: San Francisco), 165
428: \bibitem[Smith et al.(1995)]{scl95}
429: Smith, V. V., Cunha, K., \& Lambert, D. 1995, AJ, 110, 2827
430: \bibitem[Smith et al.(2000)]{smi00}
431: Smith, V. V., Suntzeff, N., Cunha, K., Gallino, R., Busso, M., Lambert, D., \& Straniero, O. 2000, AJ, 119, 1239
432: \bibitem[Stanford et al.(2006a)]{sta06a}
433: Stanford, L. M., Da Costa, G. S., Norris, J. E., \& Cannon, R. D. 2006a, \apj, 647, 1075
434: \bibitem[Stanford et al.(2006b)]{sta06b}
435: Stanford, L. M., Da Costa, G. S., Norris, J. E., \& Cannon, R. D. 2006b, in preparation
436: \bibitem[Sunztzeff \& Kraft(1996)]{sk96}
437: Suntzeff, N. B., \& Kraft, R. P. 1996, \aj, 111, 1913
438: \bibitem[Truran et al.(2002)]{tru02}
439: Truran, J. W., Cowan, J. J., Pilachowski, C. A., \& Sneden, C. 2002, PASA, 113, 1293
440: \bibitem[Ventura et al.(2002)]{vdm02}
441: Ventura, P., D'Antona, F., \& Mazzitelli, I. 2002, A\&A, 393, 215
442: \bibitem[Wanajo et al.(2003)]{wti03}
443: Wanajo, S., Tamamura, M., \& Itoh, N. 2003, \apj, 593,968
444: \bibitem[Woosley \& Hoffman(1992)]{wh92}
445: Woosley, S. E., \& Hoffman, R. D. 1992, \apj, 395, 202
446: \bibitem[Yi et al.(2001)]{yi01}
447: Yi, S., Demarque, P., Kim, Y.-C., Lee, Y.-W., Ree, C.-H., Lejeune, T., \& Barnes, S. 2001, \apj, 136, 417
448: \end{thebibliography}
449:
450: \clearpage
451:
452: \begin{figure}
453: \includegraphics[scale=.60,angle=0]{f1.ps}
454: \caption{CMD of
455: $\omega$ Cen sample showing the photometry for the cluster (small
456: dots), photometry for radial velocity members (large dots) and the
457: object with unusual abundance ratios --- 2015448 (large star). The
458: boxes represent the two regions that were observed in 1998 and 1999,
459: and 2002. \label{cmd}}
460: \end{figure}
461:
462: \clearpage
463:
464: \begin{figure}
465: \includegraphics[scale=.85,angle=0]{f2.ps}
466: \caption{Combined observed spectra of the star 2015448.
467: \label{spec}}
468: \end{figure}
469:
470: \clearpage
471:
472: \begin{figure}
473: \includegraphics[scale=.70,angle=0]{f3.ps}
474: \caption{Observed
475: spectrum (dark line) of the star 2015448 and synthetic spectra (light
476: lines) in the region of the CH $\sim$4300{\AA}, CN $\sim$3883{\AA}
477: bands, and Sr {\sc II} 4077{\AA}, Sr {\sc II} 4215{\AA} and Ba {\sc
478: II} 4554 {\AA} lines.
479: \label{spec1}}
480: \end{figure}
481:
482: \end{document}
483:
484: